Next Article in Journal
Microscopic Diffusion Characteristics of Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonates on the Surface of Anthracite: The Influence of Different Attachment Sites of Benzene Ring in the Backbone
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Adsorption Characteristics of Sulfonate Gemini Surfactant on Lignite Surface
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Imaging Study of the Pore Structure of the Cobourg Limestone—A Potential Nuclear Waste Host Rock in Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) Ion Adsorption Conditions on Pliocene Clays from Post-Mining Waste
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Use of Limestones Built of Carbonate Phases with Increased Mg Content in Processes of Flue Gas Desulfurization

Minerals 2021, 11(10), 1044; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101044
by Katarzyna Jadwiga Stanienda-Pilecki
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Minerals 2021, 11(10), 1044; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101044
Submission received: 10 September 2021 / Revised: 19 September 2021 / Accepted: 22 September 2021 / Published: 26 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Sorbents, Volume II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper may be published without change. All things that I mentioned in the first review are corrected accordingly.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Once more thank You very much for the Review and for accepting the corrections  I have done in my paper. I also would like to thank You very much for the permission for my article to be published  without change.

Reviewer 2 Report

Practically all of my recommendations have been taken into account by the author. Author presented some important additions to the work and I accept it. Especially inclusion of thermal analysis results is very important. There are however necessary some adjustments in these new parts of the work:

  • lines 58-61 - syntax of sentence is to be corrected
  • line 70 - is: connect, should be: connected
  • line 75 - is: I am going, sholuld be: Author aims
  • line 77 - I propose to remove this last sentence
  • lines 519-520 - syntax of sentence is to be corrected

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank You very much for the Review and and for accepting the corrections I have done in my paper.

According to the last remarks:

  • lines 58-61 - syntax of sentence is to be corrected

I have corrected the syntax of sentence of lines 58-61.

  • line 70 - is: connect, should be: connected

I corrected this error.

  • line 75 - is: I am going, sholuld be: Author aims

I corrected this error.

  • line 77 - I propose to remove this last sentence

I have removed the last sentence.

  • lines 519-520 - syntax of sentence is to be corrected

I have corrected the syntax of sentence of lines 519-520. However, I was not sure that the error of the syntax of sentence did not concern also the sentence of lines 516-518. I also corrected the syntax of this sentence.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop