Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Metal Criticality for Low-Carbon Power Generation Technologies in Japan
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Graphite Cuboids
Previous Article in Journal
Trace Element and Stable Isotope Geochemistry of Lwamondo and Zebediela Kaolins, Limpopo Province, South Africa: Implication for Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carbonaceous Materials in the Longmenshan Fault Belt Zone: 3. Records of Seismic Slip from the Trench and Implications for Faulting Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Carbon Sources and the Graphitization of Carbonaceous Matter in Precambrian Rocks of the Keivy Terrane (Kola Peninsula, Russia)

1
Geological Institute, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 14, Fersmana Street, 184209 Apatity, Russia
2
Institute of Earth Sciences, Saint-Petersburg State University, 7/9, Universitetskaya Emb., 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
3
Institute for the History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, 18, Dvortsovaya Emb., 191186 St.-Petersburg, Russia
4
Resource Center for Geo-Environmental Research and Modeling (GEOMODEL), Saint-Petersburg State University, 1, Ulyanovskaya Street, 198504 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2019, 9(2), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020094
Submission received: 15 December 2018 / Revised: 28 January 2019 / Accepted: 3 February 2019 / Published: 8 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineralogy of Natural Graphite)

Abstract

:
The Precambrian rocks of the Keivy Terrane reveal five types of carbonaceous matter (CM): Fine-grained, flaky, nest, vein, and spherulitic. These types differ in their distribution character, carbon isotope composition, and graphitization temperatures calculated by the Raman spectra of carbonaceous material (RSCM) geothermometry. Supracrustal rocks of the Keivy Terrane contain extremely isotopically light (δ13CPDB = –43 ± 3‰) carbon. Presumably, its source was a methane–aqueous fluid. According to temperature calculations, this carbon matter and the host strata underwent at least two stages of metamorphism in the west of the Keivy Terrane and one stage in the east. The CM isotope signatures of several samples of kyanite schists (δ13CPDB = –33 ± 5‰) are close to those of oils and oil source rocks, and they indicate an additional carbon reservoir. Thus, in the Keivy territory, an oil-and-gas bearing basin has existed. Heavy carbon (δ13CPDB = −8 ± 3‰) precipitated from an aqueous CO2-rich fluid is derived from either the lower crust or the mantle. This fluid probably migrated from the Keivy alkaline granites into the surrounding rocks previously enriched with “methanogenic” carbon.

1. Introduction

The Keivy Terrane of the Archean Kola Province, located in the northeast of the Baltic Shield, is a unique object for studying carbonaceous matter (CM). Different morphologies of CM are present in variable quantities in gneisses, amphibolites, quartzites, and schists of the Keivy and Tundra series [1]. The aluminous metapelites of the Keivy series (predominantly kyanite schists) are rich in carbon (0.1–2.3 wt % on average) [1,2,3]. These rocks are exposed over a wide area (Figure 1) of about 200 km in length and from several hundred meters to 10–14 km in width in the central part of the Keivy Terrane, as well as several smaller bands and lenses in its eastern and southern parts [3]. The rocks are considered to have originated from sediments that accumulated in a shallow water basin in a stable tectonic setting [1,2]. Keivy series schists are metamorphosed unequally. According to References [4,5,6], most of the stratum was metamorphosed under amphibolite facies conditions at T = 450–560 °C and P = 4–5.3 kbar. In the central part of the Keivy Terrane (mostly in kyanite schists), metamorphism increased either to T = 550–600 °C and P = 6–6.5 kbar [5], or to T = 540–620 °C and P = 5.2–6 kbar [7]. In the east, temperatures were reduced to T < 500 °C (epidote–amphibolite facies, the pressure is not specified) [4,6]. Within the zone of influence of the alkaline granites (the western part of the Terrane), metamorphism proceeded under the conditions of kyanite–sillimanite subfacies of amphibolite facies at T = 550–650 °C and P < 4 kbar [4]. Thermodynamic constructions suggest several stages of metamorphism [5], but their numbers, ages, and correspondence to geodynamic events vary between authors [6]. The age of the metapelites is also debatable. Some authors believe that they are Archean [3,6,8,9,10], while others state that they are Paleoproterozoic [11,12]. However, reliable dating of these rocks has not been performed. In this article, we discuss previous and new data on CM, which abounds in the Keivy metapelites as scattered fine particles and larger intergranular flakes.
We present the first data on CM from alkaline granites of the Keivy Terrane. The Keivy alkaline granite complex has an age of 2.67–2.65 Ga [14,15,16] and it occupies an area of more than 2500 km2 [17]. Due to the poor exposure of the contact zones, the relationship to the surrounding rocks is not clear. This gives rise to contradictory interpretations. Some authors suggested a metasomatic or rheomorphic genesis of granites ([11] and references therein). Others describe the intrusion of granitic magma either into formations of the same tectonomagmatic system [18] or into previously metamorphosed rocks [3,17]. These rocks are the world’s oldest rare-metal anorogenic granites [15,16,19]. In the contact zones between the alkaline granites and the metamorphic rocks, as well as in the internal part of the granitic intrusions, pegmatites and quartzolites are common. Following [20,21], the term “quartzolite” is used for a pegmatitic or hydrothermal rock that is primarily composed of quartz (> 60 vol %). The available geochronological estimates imply the possibility of the diachronous formation of pegmatites and quartzolites: The first formation stage was syngenetic to granites [16,20,22], and the second one occurred 1.6–1.7 Ga ago during the regressive stage of the Svecofennian metamorphic event [21,23]. The formation temperature of these rocks is about 400 °C [5]. The CM studied forms spherulites in quartzolite veins and lenses in the inner part of the Keivy alkaline granite complex.
Additionally, we studied large clusters of CM from the sillimanite schists, preserved in the west of the Keivy Terrane, about 100 m from the granites. The spatial proximity of the latter, as well as the structural and geochemical peculiarities of the sillimanite schists, allows for their formation to be related to the metamorphic–metasomatic processing of metapelites ([2,3] and references therein). CM forms nests from 5 to 10 cm in diameter, and veins from 0.2 to 2 cm in thickness in these rocks, which was explained to be a result of the assimilation and recrystallization of the initial metapelitic CM under the contact influence of granites [2,3].
Different CM morphologies occur in metamorphic rocks, magmatic rocks and metasomatic rocks, throughout the vast territory of the Keivy Terrane [1,2,3]. This makes the carbonaceous matter a witness of various geological events that occurred during the Precambrian era within the Keivy Terrane. CM morphology, the nature of its distribution, and its relationships with associated minerals play a highly informative role in the study of its precursors, and of the conditions for the transformation of host rocks during various metamorphic–metasomatic processes. This is due to the low CM mobility in rocks, and the peculiarity of its internal structure, which sensitively reflects peak crystallization conditions, remaining irreversible in the course of further retrograde transformations [2,24,25,26]. Geothermometry based on the Raman spectra of carbonaceous material (RSCM) was invented for different types of rocks [26,27,28,29]. This technique has been successfully used to estimate the peak temperatures of both regional and contact metamorphism [30,31,32,33,34,35]. According to Reference [36], it works even in the case of polymetamorphic complexes. Since the 13C/12C ratios of the main carbon reservoirs are contrasting [37,38,39], the carbon isotope characteristics of CM also provide valuable information on the nature of carbon in rocks.
In this paper, we report data from the Keivy Terrane CM, obtained by petrographic and mineralogical investigations, Raman spectroscopy, and carbon isotope analysis. Our study aims to characterize the main sources of carbon in the Keivy rocks, as well as to clarify controversial issues on the evolution of the Keivy Terrane, using CM as an indicator of peak thermal events. The results of this study are valuable, both for the understanding of the regional geology of the Kola Peninsula, and for a deeper understanding of crustal processes of the Precambrian period.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

We investigated three rock species comprising all of the CM morphotypes currently known in the Keivy Terrane. To obtain the characteristics of the CM, we selected samples from five formations (Figure 1) that were geographically distant from each other: (1) CM-bearing quartzolites from the Keivy alkaline granite complex; (2) sillimanite schists near the contact with this massif; and (3) kyanite schists from three different areas (the Tyapshmanyuk, Shuururta, and Igiurta areas).
CM-bearing quartzolites (Figure 2a) were selected from a lens with an area of 10 × 20 m in the Rova locality in the western part of the Keivy alkaline granite complex. They represent a massive, coarse-grained rock of milky-white color, primarily composed of quartz (more than 90 vol %). Minor minerals were astrophyllite, arfvedsonite, and riebeckite, and accessory phases were titanite, pyrochlore, galena, and cassiterite. Sixteen samples of this rock were analyzed.
Sillimanite schists (Figure 2b) crop out only in the west of the Keivy Terrane. We selected them from the Makzabak area, where they formed narrow strips and lenses (up to 20 × 300 m) in the enclosing mica and mica–garnet schists, at about 100 m from the contact to the alkaline granites. The major and secondary minerals of the sillimanite schists are (in varying amounts) sillimanite, staurolite, kyanite (locally), muscovite, margarite, quartz, chloritoid, CM, ilmenite, Nb-rutile, and apatite. Monazite, corundum, zircon, xenotime, and fergusonite occurred sporadically. The sheet silicates are often substituted by berthierine. Sillimanite schists are structurally highly heterogeneous; therefore, we selected 25 samples.
Kyanite schists were selected with eight samples from the Tyapshmanyuk mountain (Figure 2c) and 23 samples from Shuururta mountain (Figure 2d) of the central Keivy region, as well as 12 samples from the Igiurta mountain (Figure 2e) of the eastern Keivy region. These schists vary in sizes, orientations, and proportions of minerals; however, in general, the set of rock-forming minerals was constant. The main minerals are kyanite and quartz, and the minor ones are muscovite, plagioclase, staurolite, and CM.

2.2. Analytical Methods

Mineralogical and petrographic investigations of thin sections and polished thin sections in transmitted and reflected light were carried out by using an Axioplan 2 Imaging optical microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The morphology and structure of the CM-spherulites from quartzolites were additionally inspected by using contrasting backscattered electron (BSE) images obtained with a Hitachi S-3400N scanning electron microscope (the "Geomodel" RC SPbSU, St. Petersburg, Russia).
Carbon isotope analyses were conducted on an IRMC Delta V (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) mass spectrometer at the Institute for the History of Material Culture of RAS (St. Petersburg). The samples were mechanically divided into pieces, each maximally enriched with one of the CM morphologies. Crushed samples of about 2 g in weight were subjected to chemical treatment with hydrochloric acid, with the addition of ammonium fluoride to dissolve the carbonate and silicate components. The extraction of the substance into the inlet system was initiated by combustion, i.e., transferring carbon to the CO2 state. The instrumental error in determining the carbon isotopic composition did not exceed ± 0.05% (95% confidence interval). To validate the data and to exclude the instrument error, representative samples of each rock type from each object were additionally analyzed by using the Finnigan MAT Delta instrument in a dual inlet mode at the Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russia). The procedure of the carbon isotope analysis applied in the present study was analogous to that described in Reference [40].
In order to conduct interlaboratory verification, the collection of Raman spectra was carried out in two laboratories. Part of the data was obtained at the Institute of Geology of the KSC RAS with a Nicolet Almega XP (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) dispersive spectrometer equipped with an Olympus BX41 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for navigation, using 50× and 100× objectives. An exciting He-Ne laser with a wavelength of 532 nm was used; the exposure time ranged from 4 to 30 s, and the number of repetitions was 2–30. Another part of the data was obtained at the “Geomodel” RC of the SPbSU Scientific Park (St. Petersburg) with a HORIBA Jobin-Yvon LabRam HR800 laser Raman spectrometer (Horiba, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an Olympus confocal microscope (100× objective lens, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The Raman scattering signal was excited by an Ar+ laser (514.5 nm) with an acquisition time of 4–10 s, and with 10–15 repetitions. In both laboratories, the calibration was performed by using the Raman line of silicon at 521 cm–1. The limit of the spectral resolution was about 2 cm–1. The final laser power did not exceed 3 mW.
Polishing can damage the CM structure [41,42], and researchers often study CM beneath the surface of transparent adjacent grains [26,42,43]. Not all types of the studied СM were available for this method. The last polishing steps with an abrasive size less than 1 μm have the greatest impact on the CM structure [42,44]. In this study, uncoated samples polished by a monocrystalline diamond slurry with a grain size of 3 μm were used. The duration of polishing did not exceed 5 min. However, some influence of polishing on the CM structure could reduce the actual values of the graphitization temperatures. Where possible, the polarized laser beam was set to be perpendicular to the mean CM c-axis, which maximizes the Raman signal. The spectra of the neighboring mineral phases were also collected.

2.3. Raman Spectra Processing

Spectral decomposition (Figure 3) and the determination of the peak position, band area (A), peak width (FWHM), and band intensity (I) were performed using the PeakFit 4.12 software (Systat Software GmbH, Erkrath, Germany). Peaks were approximated by the Voigt function. The decomposition was based on the presence of peaks in the spectrum of natural CM, with up to 8–9 peaks [26,27,41]. According to this concept, in the first-order region (1100–1800 cm–1), graphite with a perfect crystal structure exhibits only one sharp peak at ~1580 cm–1 (the so-called “G band”), corresponding to planar vibrations of carbon atoms in the structure. In the spectrum of less ordered CM with defects in graphene layers, additional first-order peaks appear at ~1350 cm–1 and ~1620 cm–1 (the D1 and D2 bands, respectively). In some cases, low-intensity bands that are especially wide in a poorly ordered amorphous matter, are also observed at about 1400–1500 cm–1 (D3) and 1100–1200 cm–1 (D4). As the degree of crystallinity increases, the relative intensities and areas of the D-peaks decrease, and the weak lines disappear [43]. An indicator of the CM ordering degree is the La value (the in-plane crystallite size), which is calculated through the relative intensity ratio of the D1 and G bands [41,45]. The intensity-based R1 = ID1/IG ratio and area-based R2 = AD1 ⁄(AG + AD1 + AD2) ratio are also used as sensitive parameters to describe the structural order of CM [26,29]. Peaks from the second-order region (2200–3400 cm–1) located near 2400, 2700, 2900, and 3300 cm–1 are regarded as overtones or combination scattering [43].
The graphitization temperature of CM was assessed by an RSCM geothermometer, calibrated (1) for a 514.5 nm laser for regional metamorphism [26], and those calibrated for a 532-nm laser [27] (2) for contact and (3) for regional metamorphism. The first RSCM geothermometer has an absolute precision of ±50 °C, while in the last two calibrations, it is of ±30 °C. The calculations of temperatures by the first geothermometer are closest to the average values of the three indicated thermometers. The second geothermometer yielded 5–10 °C higher, and the third geothermometer yielded 10–15 °C lower temperatures. Hereafter, the results of only the calculations by the first geothermometer are presented. This geothermometer is valid for the temperature range of 330–650 °C [26].

3. Results

3.1. Morphology of Carbonaceous Matter

Five morphological types of CM were found (in order of prevalence): Dispersed fine particles (hereafter fine-grained CM), flakes, irregular aggregates (hereafter “nests” or “nest CM”), veins, and spherulites (Figure 2 and Figure 4).
The fine-grained carbonaceous (CM-1) is presented in all studied schists (Figure 4a,b). This form reached the highest concentrations in kyanite schists, coloring them gray to black (see Figure 2c–e). It is quite evenly dispersed in the rock matrix as tiny particles ranging in size from fractions of microns to three microns, and it was included in rock-forming silicates. Notably, the fine- and medium-grained areas of the schists tend to be enriched with CM-1 more than large silicate crystals.
Metapelites contain flaky carbonaceous matter (CM-2) in variable quantities, from a few microns to 0.05 mm in length, localized in the interstitial space, within schistosity, and/or along grain cracks (Figure 4c,d). In the kyanite schists, large kyanite paramorphoses are light, almost devoid of CM inclusions, and contain flaky CM along their edges, cracks, and interstities (see Figure 2c and Figure 4c). The kyanite schists of the Igiurta mountain (east of the Keivy Terrane) does not contain this CM morphology, while CM-1 was ubiquitous therein.
Sillimanite schists contain four CM morphologies: In addition to CM-1 and CM-2, nest (CM-3) and vein (CM-4) varieties. CM-1 and CM-2 are sporadically present in staurolite grains and sillimanite fibrolites only. CM in these rocks has a dominantly “nest” morphology of up to 10 cm in width, distributed extremely unevenly. The nests are composed of aggregates of mid-sized sinuous flakes (CM-3) (Figure 4e).
Vein carbonaceous matter (CM-4) occurs exclusively in sillimanite schists. The thickness of the veins ranges from a few millimeters to 2 cm. They are composed of curved planks of CM, interspersed with rutile and ilmenite. Notably, CM-4 veins crosscut the main minerals in the rock, including staurolite (Figure 4f,g).
CM-5 from quartzolites located inside the alkaline granite massif occurrs exclusively as spherulites ranging in size from fractions of a millimeter to 5 mm. These spherulites are uneven, composed of dense aggregates, often zonal (Figure 4h), and distributed chaotically in the rock. Sometimes, intergrowths of several spherulites were observed. Spherulitic CM morphology has not been previously described in any rocks of the Keivy Terrane, although it is known in various geological objects [46,47,48,49].

3.2. Stable Carbon Isotope Data

The investigated CM exhibited significant differences in carbon isotope composition (Table 1).
Isotope data of an inseparable mixture of fine-grained CM-1 and flaky CM-2 for kyanite schists of the Tyapshmanyuk mountain are homogeneous with δ13CPDB = −43.4‰ to −44.8‰. CM-1 from the Igiurta mountain shows an isotopic composition close to that of the CM from Tyapshmanyuk mountain, although it is more variable (from –41.3‰ to −46.8‰). For one sample, heavier values were obtained (–35.8 ± 2.5‰). Carbon isotope data for kyanite schists from Shuururta mountain, where CM-1 and CM-2 morphologies were found, are divided into two sets. Three analyses (from two samples) yielded a δ13CPDB value of –42.7 ± 2.5‰. In the other 20 analyses, values vary from –27.3‰ to –38.3‰, with the most values in a range of ±2.5‰ from a median of –33.2‰. Sillimanite schists of the Makzabak area contain several CM types. The range of δ13CPDB variations for the nest CM-3 (possibly contaminated by CM-4) is –14.2‰ to –22.6‰, with more than half of the analyses falling into the interval –17.4 ± 0.4‰. The carbon of the CM-4 veins is significantly heavier, with δ13CPDB values of −10.1 to −10.7‰. Spherulites from the Rova quartzolites contain the heaviest carbon, with δ13CPDB values of −5.6‰ to −9.1‰.

3.3. RSCM Temperature Estimates

The Raman spectra of all investigated CM types except for spherulites yield R2 ratio values of <0.40 (Table 2). This, according to Reference [50], indicates that the fine-grained CM-1, flaky CM-2, nest CM-3, and vein CM-4 correspond to graphite. The spherulitic CM-5 corresponds to semi-graphite.
The peak-temperature ranges for the fine-grained CM-1 from the kyanite schists are (Figure 5):
  • From 470 to 520 °C, with a mean value of 500 °C, for the samples of Tyapshmanyuk mountain;
  • From 390 to 530 °C, with a mean value of 480°C, for the Shuururta mountain samples;
  • From 390 to 520 °C, with a mean value of 480 °C, for the samples from the Igiurta mountain.
Raman spectra of flaky CM-2 indicate a higher structural order, and, consequently, the calculated temperature range is 540–560 °C for the Tyapshmanyuk mountain samples, and 540–590 °C for the Shuururta mountain samples.
The nest CM-3 from the sillimanite schists is characterized by a chaotic arrangement of CM grains. In this regard, the orientation of the laser beam perpendicular to the c-axis was hampered. The calculated temperatures range from 430 to 520 °C, with a mean value of 470 °C.
In the spectrum of the vein CM-4, the narrowest G peak was observed, and the disorder bands are very weak or completely absent. Its structure is the most well-ordered compared to the other morphologies [41]. The calculated peak temperatures are about 540–640 °C, with a mean value of 580 °C close to the upper limit of applicability of the geothermometer [26].
The lowest temperatures were obtained for spherulites. Notably, the zoning seen on the BSE photo is controlled by the variability in the ordering degree of the carbonaceous matter, which is reflected in their Raman spectra. The number of zones in the spherulites varied depending on their size. On average, the calculated temperature range for the CM-5 spherulites is about 410–500 °C, with a mean value of 450 °C. The temperatures calculated for CM-5 (and, possibly, CM-4) are suppositive (most likely minimal), since the crystallinity degrees of vein and magmatic CM are not clearly correlated with temperature [41,52,53].
To assess the RSCM results, it is necessary to evaluate the polishing effect on the obtained RS data. In Reference [51], it was shown that polishing increases the R1 ratio. On the contrary, G-band width at half-maximum (FWHMG) parameter is polishing resistant and is related with the R1 value by the linear function of FWHMG = 14 + 35R1 [51]. The measured R1 values of each of the eight groups of CM from the Keivy Terrane (see Table 2) vary widely (R1 in Table 2), which indicates the effect of polishing. The FWHMG values within these groups are almost identical (FWHMG in Table 2). This confirms the insensitivity of this parameter to polishing. We selected the Raman spectra of those samples in which CM was least affected by polishing. Those spectra have minimal R1 values (R1* in Table 2). An additional selection controller is the proximity of the individual FWHMG values (FWHMG* in Table 2) calculated by using R1* to the average FWHMG values of the sampling. Comparison of temperatures T* with average sampling temperatures (T) made it possible to evaluate deviations in estimates of peak temperatures. In CM-1, in CM-2, and in CM-3, the difference between T* and T is not large (20–40 °C), and the FWHMG and FWHMG * are close. The results obtained are systematically lowered. The error is within the absolute precision of the geothermometer used [26]. Thus, the determined values correspond to the lower limit of the true peak temperatures. Notably, T* values are close to T measurements made by using the (3) geothermometer [27]. For CM-4 and CM-5, the differences between T* and T are higher, and the FWHMG and FWHMG* differ noticeably. Thus, the true peak temperatures of CM-4 and CM-5 should be considered to be higher, which is consistent with [53].
Statistical processing of the obtained peak temperatures is required for the reliable discrimination of the graphitization conditions. Based on the asymmetry of the "box-and-whiskers" and the length of the “whiskers” (Figure 5), we can assume a multiplicity of outliers, and the absence of a normal distribution of peak temperatures for most of the CM types. Therefore, robust nonparametric statistics (the median test, the Kruskal–Wallis test, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and the Mann–Whitney U test) were used [54,55,56,57]. All tests were performed for the p = 0.05 confidence interval.
A comparison of the CM-1 and CM-2 peak temperatures from three kyanite schist localities shows that CM-1 and CM-2 do not belong to a single data sample, as they have different medians and distributions. Statistical tests for CM-2 from different areas reveal a high probability of their belonging to a single data sample, with a general median of 560 °C (in different tests, p vary from 0.6 to 0.8). Statistically, vein CM-4 from sillimanite schists can also be part of this data sample (p from 0.2 to 0.4). Similarly, CM-1 from different localities of kyanite schists are parts of a single data sample, with a general median of 500 °C (p from 0.8 to 1.0). The nest CM-3 from sillimanite schists can also be considered to be part of this data sample (p from 0.3 to 0.4). Only CM-3 is statistically close to spherulitic CM-5 from quartzolites. The median of the combined CM-3 + CM-5 data sample is 450 °C. However, the probability that these two CM types belong to a single data sample is close to the selected significance level (p from 0.1 to 0.2).

4. Discussion

In rocks of the Keivy Terrane, five CM types, with different morphologies, structural positions, crystallization temperatures, and carbon isotope signatures are present. The largest amounts of carbon in the Keivy Terrane are formed as fine-grained (CM-1) and flaky (CM-2) matter. In the mid-1970s, the first carbon isotope data for CM from kyanite schists from Shuururta mountain (about 35‰) were published [1]. Based on this, all carbon in the Keivy Terrane was henceforth considered as a product of the metamorphism of sedimentary biogenic matter. An extremely isotopically light carbon (δ13CPDB from –42‰ to –47‰) was detected in high-Al metamorphic schists and metasomatic kyanite rocks from shear zones of the Keivy Terrane (Vorgel’urta and Manyuk areas) [58].
Light CM (δ13CPDB = –43.5 ± 3.3‰) is a characteristic for all kyanite schists of the study area. Rocks traced in a zone of about 200 km in length have this isotopic signature. Following [58], the source of carbon depleted in the 13C could be an aqueous-methane fluid from sedimentary rocks with organic compounds. This is consistent with the data on fluid inclusions in kyanite rocks, which contain CO2 and solutions of calcium and sodium chlorides, methane and “heavier” hydrocarbons [58]. Abiogenic methane from the Fennoscandian, Canadian, and African Shields has similar isotope characteristics [59,60,61,62]. However, according to Reference [63], “as the thermal stress on carbon complexes increases, more 12C–13C bonds are broken and the gas becomes isotopically heavier”. Methane, a precursor of CM, should have been isotopically lighter [39]. Such signatures are then beyond the limits of variations in the isotopic composition of abiogenic methane ([64] and references therein).
Our investigation confirms the existence of CM with an isotopic composition of δ13CPDB –32.8 ± 5.5‰, along with extremely isotopically light CM (δ13CPDB = –43.5 ± 3.3‰) in kyanite schists of the Shuururta mountain. Moreover, one probe from the Igiurta mountain yielded heavier (δ13CPDB –35.8 ± 2.5‰) values. This indicates the probability of carbon assimilation from an additional reservoir that was more highly enriched in the 13C isotope. Similar isotopic signatures are seen in oils and oil source rocks [39,65,66]. In this light, the recent discovery of forms externally resembling nanobacteria in the schist samples from Shuururta mountain is of interest [67]. It is possible that these organisms contributed to the carbon isotope signatures of some parts of metasedimentary strata in this area. However, taking into account rather large variations in the isotopic composition of the abiogenic gas [59], this CM could also be of abiogenic origin. Nevertheless, the coexistence of isotopic signatures resembling those of natural gases and oils allows us to assume the existence of a Precambrian oil-and-gas-bearing basin within a considerable area of the Keivy Terrane. This hypothesis is supported by recent geodynamic reconstructions, according to which the Keivy Terrane ("domain") could have been a “median massif” during the Neoarchean period, which is often characterized by the presence of hydrocarbon deposits [68].
The isotopically heavy (δ13CPDB = –7.4 ± 1.8‰) carbon of the CM-5 spherulites from the intragranite quartzolites of the Keivy alkaline granite complex could be derived either by CO2 assimilation from lower-crustal fluids or from CO2-rich mantle fluids [37,69]. A similar carbon isotopic composition (δ13CPDB = –10.4 ± 0.3‰) was found in vein CM-4. This indicates the kinship of the CM-4 and CM-5 precursors. Previously, mantle-derived CM was not detected in the Keivy Terrane. One of the important results of our study is the discovery of at least three isotopically contrasting carbon sources.
According to the isotope data, the carbon of CM-3 is intermediate between “methanogenic” and “mantle” (δ13CPDB = –18.4 ± 4.5‰). This is possibly a product of fluid remobilization of extremely light carbon that was dynamically enriched in 13C isotope during its migration. The second scenario is that carbon precipitated from a multicomponent mixture of CH4-rich and CO2-rich fluids from the above sources. Alternatively, these isotope characteristics could be the result of mixing between the isotopically light and heavy forms of carbon matter [70,71].
The results of RSCM thermometry demonstrate statistically significant differences in the peak temperatures of CM-1 and CM-2. Graphitization is a progressive, irreversible transformation [24,25,41]. Therefore, the coexisting CM-1 and CM-2 in kyanite schists, and CM-3 and CM-4 in sillimanite schists with different graphitization temperatures are indicators of polymetamorphic events. This is in good agreement with the conclusions on the multi-stage regional metamorphism of supracrustal formations of the Keivy Terrane [5,6] The described coexistence is possible only if the second event was lower in temperature. Otherwise, the graphitization temperatures would be the same for both CM types, and they would correspond to the maximum thermal effect [25].
Thus, the earliest metamorphic event recorded in the CM of the kyanite schists was the peak metamorphism (about 550 °C). The obtained values are close to the termobarometrical estimates of the kyanite schist formation [4,7]. CM-4 peak temperatures from sillimanite schists are statistically similar to those of CM-2 flakes. This suggests graphitization by a single event. The carbon isotope signatures of CM-4 and its morphology indicate fluid transportation of a parental compound of C (probably, СO2) from the endogenous (granitic) source. The fluid nature of vein CM-4 does not permit the unequivocal acceptance of its thermometric estimates (> 580 °C) [41,52]. However, they are close to the estimates for metamorphic conditions of sillimanite schists (550–650 °C) [5]. Structural relationships of the vein CM-4 with sillimanite, staurolite, and muscovite (namely, its crosscutting of the indicated minerals) suggest that CM-4 was generated later than the minerals of metamorphic association of host rocks. Hence, supracrustal rocks of the Keivy Terrane underwent metamorphism either prior to the intrusion of a granitic melt (“zero metamorphic event”), or contemporaneously with this intrusion (2.67–2.65 Ga). The latter assumption supports the idea of the formation of sillimanite schists under the thermal influence of alkaline granite intrusions [3].
The CM-2 and CM-4 peak temperatures are the same. Apparently, an early event involved the regional heating of the rocks of the Keivy Terrane during the large-scale granitic intrusion in the Archean. The maximum thermal exposure was manifested around the contacts of the granitic massifs, which is fixed at the peak temperatures of CM-4.
No signs of the peak temperature effect were found in kyanite schists of the Igiurta mountain. This suggests a decrease in the intensity of the first (hot) metamorphic event from the northwest to the east of the Keivy Terrane, which confirms the previous thermobarometric estimates [4,5].
The second (regressive) event induced the graphitization of CM-1 in kyanite schists and CM-3 in sillimanite schists. Its peak temperatures are about 500 °C, and the impact is traced throughout the Keivy Terrane.
Considering the obtained temperature estimates, the CM-5 spherulites may have crystallized at the final formation stage of the granite massif. This is consistent with quartzolite formation temperature estimates [5], and the idea that the host quartzolites are the end-members of the granitic magma fractionation formed by residual fluid-saturated Si-rich melts [20,22]. The graphitization temperatures of spherulites (about 450 °C) slightly exceeded those that were obtained by classical thermobarogeochemical methods for quartzolites (about 400 °C) [5]. Possibly, this is caused by the influence of the regressive (“cold”) regional metamorphism.

5. Conclusions

  • The extremely light (δ13CPDB = –40.2‰ to −46.8‰) carbonaceous matter characterizes the rocks from the northwest to the east of the Keivy Terrane.
  • In the kyanite schists of the Shuururta mountain and the Igiurta mountain, along with extremely isotopically light CM, that with a carbon isotope composition of about –33‰ δ13CPDB is widespread. This denotes the existence of an additional carbon reservoir.
  • Within the Keivy Terrane, CM with isotopically heavy carbon (δ13CPDB = −5.6‰ to −10.7‰) occurs both in quartzolites from alkaline granites, and in the sillimanite, schists surrounding the latter.
  • CM graphitization in kyanite schists most likely occurred in two stages of regional metamorphism, the peak event and the regressive event, respectively. Peak temperatures of the CM graphitized are maximal in sillimanite schists surrounding alkaline granites in the northwest of the Keivy Terrane (> 580 °C). Those in the kyanite schists from the central part of the Terrane are lower (~ 550 °C). In CM from the east of the Keivy Terrane, no evidence of this peak metamorphic event was found. The mineral associations of the sillimanite and kyanite rocks, corresponding to amphibolite facies, reflect this early hot event. The obtained data suggest a relationship between this event and the regional heating induced by the intrusion of alkaline granite magmas in the Archaean period.
The second metamorphic event affected all supracrustal rocks of the Keivy Terrane. It proceeded at temperatures of about 500 °C. The traces of this event were recorded in the mineral associations and CM of kyanite schists of the eastern part of the Keivy Terrane, metamorphosed under epidote–amphibolite facies conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.F. and E.K.; Investigation, E.F., O.L. and V.B; Data curation, K.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, E.F.; Validation, E.K. and K.L; Visualization, E.K.; Funding acquisition, E.F.; Writing-Review and Editing, E.F. and E.K.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant number 18-35-00068, and carried out in the Geological Institute KSC RAS under the state order number 0231-2015-0007.

Acknowledgments

Thorough reviews by two anonymous reviewers significantly improved the manuscript. Special thanks are due to our colleagues from the GI KSC RAS, Yu.N. Neradovskiy and I.A. Gorbunov for the provided samples, as well as to the research group of G.Yu. Ivanyuk for the provided study materials and invaluable help with fieldwork. We are grateful to V.N. Reutsky (SB RAS, Novosibirsk) for isotope analyzes of a part of the samples. Scientific discussions with V.P. Petrov are appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sidorenko, S.A.; Sidorenko, A.V. Organic Matter in the Precambrian Sedimentary-Metamorphic Rocks; Nauka: Moskow, Russia, 1975. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Melezhik, V.A.; Basalayev, A.A.; Predovskiy, A.A.; Balabonin, N.L.; Bolotov, V.I.; Pavlova, M.A.; Gavrilenko, B.V.; Abzalov, M.Z. Carbon Deposits of the Early Stages of the Earth’s Development (Geochemistry and Accumulation Conditions on the Baltic Shield); Zhukov, R.A., Ed.; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1988. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Bel’kov, I.V. Kyanite Schists of the Keivy Suite; Tochilin, M.S., Ed.; Academy of Sciences USSR: Leningrad, Russia, 1963. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  4. Petrov, V.P.; Belyaev, O.A.; Voloshina, Z.M.; Bogdanova, M.N.; Ivliyev, A.I. Metamorphism of Early Precambrian Supracrustal Complexes; Zagorodniy, V.G., Ed.; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1986. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Petrov, V.P.; Belyaev, O.A.; Voloshina, Z.M.; Balagansky, V.V.; Glazunkov, A.N.; Pozhilenko, V.I. Endogenous Metamorphic Regimes of the Early Precambrian (Northeastern Part of the Baltic Shield); Mitrofanov, F.P., Ed.; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1990. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Early Precambrian of the Baltic Shield; Glebovitskii, V.A. (Ed.) Nauka: St.-Petersburg, Russia, 2005. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Pindyurina, E.O.; Kol’tsov, A.B. Schists of Keiv metamorphic complex (Kola Peninsula): Mineral paragenesis and formation conditions. Vestn. Spbsu 2015, 7, 38–58, (In Russian with English Abs.). [Google Scholar]
  8. Pushkarev, Y.D. Megacycles in the Evolution of the Crust–Mantle System; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1990. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Radchenko, A.T.; Balaganskiy, V.V.; Basalaev, A.A.; Vinogradov, A.N.; Golionko, G.B.; Petrov, V.P.; Pozhilenko, V.I.; Radchenko, M.K. Precambrian Tectonics of the Northeastern Part of the Baltic Shield (Explanatory Note for the 1:500,000 Geological Map); Mitrofanov, F.P., Ed.; Nauka: St.-Petersburg, Russia, 1992. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Bushmin, S.A.; Glebovitskii, V.A.; Presnyakov, S.L.; Savva, E.V.; Shcheglova, T.P. New data on the age (SHRIMP II) of protolith and paleoproterozoic transformations of the Archean Keivy terrain (Kola Peninsula). Dokl. Earth Sci. 2011, 438, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mints, M.V. 3. Neoarchean intracontinental areas of sedimentation, magmatism, and high-temperature metamorphism (hot regions) in eastern Fennoscandia. In East European Craton: Early Precambrian History and 3D Models of Deep Crustal Structure; Mints, M.V., Konilov, A.N., Philippova, I.B., Zlobin, V.L., Babayants, P.S., Belousova, E.A., Blokh, Y.I., Bogina, M.M., Bush, W.A., Dokukin, P.A., et al., Eds.; Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 2015; Volume 510, ISBN 9780813725109. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fallick, A.E.; Hanski, E.J.; Kump, L.R.; Medvedev, P.V.; Melezhik, V.A.; Prave, A.R.; Svetov, S.A. The Palaeoproterozoic of Fennoscandia as context for the Fennoscandian Arctic Russia—Drilling Early Earth Project. In The Early Palaeoproterozoic of Fennoscandia: Geological and Tectonic Settings // Reading the Archive of Earth’s Oxygenation; Melezhik, V.A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 33–38. ISBN 9783540885573. [Google Scholar]
  13. Balaganskiy, V.V.; Basalayev, A.A.; Belyaev, O.A.; Pozhilenko, V.I.; Radchenko, A.T.; Radchenko, M.K. The 1:500,000 Geological Map of the Kola Region (Northeastern Baltic Shield); Mitrofanov, F.P., Ed.; GI KSC RAS: Apatity, Russia, 1996. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitrofanov, F.P.; Zozulya, D.R.; Bayanova, T.B.; Levkovich, N.V. The world’s oldest anorogenic alkali granitic magmatism in the Keivy structure on the Baltic Shield. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2000, 374, 238–241. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zozulya, D.R.; Bayanova, T.B.; Eby, G.N. Geology and Age of the Late Archean Keivy Alkaline Province, Northeastern Baltic Shield. J. Geol. 2005, 113, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vetrin, V.R.; Rodionov, N.V. Geology and geochronology of neoarchean anorogenic magmatism of the Keivy structure, Kola Peninsula. Petrology 2009, 17, 537–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Batieva, I.D. Petrology of Alkaline Granites in Kola Peninsula; Nauka: Leningrad, Russia, 1976. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  18. Balagansky, V.V.; Myskova, T.A.; Skublov, S.G. On the age of felsic metavolcanites of the Archaean Lebyazhka sequence, Kola region, Baltic Shield. In Proceedings of the Geology and Geochronology of the Rock-Forming and Ore Processes in Crystalline Shields, Apatity, Russia, 8–12 July 2013; Mitrofanov, F.P., Bayanova, T.B., Eds.; K&M Publishing House: Apatity, Russia, 2013; pp. 17–20. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  19. Bagiński, B.; Zozulya, D.; MacDonald, R.; Kartashov, P.M.; Dzierżanowski, P. Low-temperature hydrothermal alteration of a rare-metal rich quartz–epidote metasomatite from the El’ozero deposit, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Eur. J. Mineral. 2016, 28, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyalina, L.M.; Zozulya, D.R.; Savchenko, Y.E.; Tarasov, M.P.; Selivanova, E.A.; Tarasova, E. Fluorbritholite-(Y) and yttrialite-(Y) from silexites of the Keivy alkali granites, Kola Peninsula. Geol. Ore Depos. 2014, 56, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Macdonald, R.; Bagiński, B.; Zozulya, D. Differing responses of zircon, chevkinite-(Ce), monazite-(Ce) and fergusonite-(Y) to hydrothermal alteration: Evidence from the Keivy alkaline province, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Mineral. Petrol. 2017, 111, 523–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bel’kov, I.V.; Batieva, I.D.; Vinogradova, G.V.; Vinogradov, A.N. Mineralization and Fluid Regime in the Contact Zones of Alkali Granite Intrusions; Petrov, V.P., Ed.; Academy of Sciences USSR: Apatity, Russia, 1988. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  23. Bayanova, T.B. Age of Reference Geological Complexes of the Kola Peninsula and Duration of the Magmatic Processes; Nauka: St.-Petersburg, Russia, 2004. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Grew, E.S. Carbonaceous Material in Some Metamorphic Rocks of New England and Other Areas. J. Geol. 1974, 82, 50–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Buseck, P.R.; Beyssac, O. From Organic Matter to Graphite: Graphitization. Elements 2014, 10, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Beyssac, O.; Goffé, B.; Chopin, C.; Rouzaud, J.N. Raman spectra of carbonaceous material in metasediments: A new geothermometer. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2002, 20, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aoya, M.; Kouketsu, Y.; Endo, S.; Shimizu, H.; Mizukami, T.; Nakamura, D.; Wallis, S. Extending the applicability of the Raman carbonaceous-material geothermometer using data from contact metamorphic rocks. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2010, 28, 895–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lahfid, A.; Beyssac, O.; Deville, E.; Negro, F.; Chopin, C.; Goffé, B. Evolution of the Raman spectrum of carbonaceous material in low-grade metasediments of the Glarus Alps (Switzerland). Terra Nova 2010, 22, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rahl, J.; Anderson, K.; Brandon, M.; Fassoulas, C. Raman spectroscopic carbonaceous material thermometry of low-grade metamorphic rocks: Calibration and application to tectonic exhumation in Crete, Greece. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2005, 240, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Negro, F.; Beyssac, O.; Goffé, B.; Saddiqi, O.; Bouybaouene, M.L. Thermal structure of the Alboran Domain in the Rif (northern Morocco) and the Western Betics (southern Spain). Constraints from Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous material. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2006, 24, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wyhlidal, S.; Tropper, P.; Thöny, W.F.; Kaindl, R. Minor element- and carbonaceous material thermometry of high-grade metapelites from the Sauwald Zone, Southern Bohemian Massif (Upper Austria). Mineral. Petrol. 2009, 97, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Robert, A.; Pubellier, M.; de Sigoyer, J.; Vergne, J.; Lahfid, A.; Cattin, R.; Findling, N.; Zhu, J. Structural and thermal characters of the Longmen Shan (Sichuan, China). Tectonophysics 2010, 491, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hilchie, L.J.; Jamieson, R.A. Graphite thermometry in a low-pressure contact aureole, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Lithos 2014, 208–209, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Long, S.P.; Gordon, S.M.; Young, J.P.; Soignard, E. Temperature and strain gradients through Lesser Himalayan rocks and across the Main Central thrust, south central Bhutan: Implications for transport-parallel stretching and inverted metamorphism. Tectonics 2016, 35, 1863–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Safonov, O.G.; Reutsky, V.N.; Varlamov, D.A.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Golunova, M.A.; Shcherbakov, V.D.; van Reenen, D.D.; Smit, A.C.; Butvina, V.G. Composition and source of fluids in high-temperature graphite-bearing granitoids associated with granulites: Examples from the Southern Marginal Zone, Limpopo Complex, South Africa. Gondwana Res. 2018, 60, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Delchini, S.; Lahfid, A.; Plunder, A.; Michard, A. Applicability of the RSCM geothermometry approach in a complex tectono-metamorphic context: The Jebilet massif case study (Variscan Belt, Morocco). Lithos 2016, 256–257, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luque, F.J.; Pasteris, J.D.; Wopenka, B.; Rodas, M.; Barrenechea, J.F. Natural fluid-deposited graphite: Mineralogical characteristics and mechanisms of formation. Am. J. Sci. 1998, 298, 471–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Galvez, M.E.; Beyssac, O.; Martinez, I.; Benzerara, K.; Chaduteau, C.; Malvoisin, B.; Malavieille, J. Graphite formation by carbonate reduction during subduction. Nat. Geosci. 2013, 6, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Galimov, E.M. Isotope organic geochemistry. Org. Geochem. 2006, 37, 1200–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Reutsky, V.N.; Borzdov, Y.M.; Palyanov, Y.N. Effect of diamond growth rate on carbon isotope fractionation in Fe–Ni–C system. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2012, 21, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wopenka, B.; Pasteris, J.D. Structural characterization of kerogens to granulite-facies graphite: Applicability of Raman microprobe spectroscopy. Am. Mineral. 1993, 78, 533–557. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pasteris, J.D. In Situ Analysis in Geological Thin-Sections by Laser Raman Microprobe Spectroscopy: A Cautionary Note. Appl. Spectrosc. 1989, 43, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Beyssac, O.; Goffé, B.; Petitet, J.-P.; Froigneux, E.; Moreau, M.; Rouzaud, J.-N. On the characterization of disordered and heterogeneous carbonaceous materials by Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2003, 59, 2267–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lünsdorf, N.K. Raman spectroscopy of dispersed vitrinite—Methodical aspects and correlation with reflectance. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 153, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tuinstra, F.; Koenig, J.L. Raman Spectrum of Graphite. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1126–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jaszczak, J.A.; Robinson, G.W.; Dimovski, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Naturally occurring graphite cones. Carbon 2003, 41, 2085–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duke, E.F.; Rumble, D. Textural and isotopic variations in graphite from plutonic rocks, South-Central New Hampshire. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1986, 93, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barrenechea, J.F.; Luque, F.J.; Millward, D.; Ortega, L.; Beyssac, O.; Rodas, M. Graphite morphologies from the Borrowdale deposit (NW England, UK): Raman and SIMS data. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2009, 158, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Doroshkevich, A.G.; Wall, F.; Ripp, G.S. Magmatic graphite in dolomite carbonatite at Pogranichnoe, North Transbaikalia, Russia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 2007, 153, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rantitsch, G.; Lämmerer, W.; Fisslthaler, E.; Mitsche, S.; Kaltenböck, H. On the discrimination of semi-graphite and graphite by Raman spectroscopy. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 159, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ammar, M.R.; Rouzaud, J.-N. How to obtain a reliable structural characterization of polished graphitized carbons by Raman microspectroscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012, 43, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Luque, F.J.; Huizenga, J.-M.; Crespo-Feo, E.; Wada, H.; Ortega, L.; Barrenechea, J.F. Vein graphite deposits: Geological settings, origin, and economic significance. Miner. Depos. 2014, 49, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Crespo, E.; Luque, F.J.; Barrenechea, J.F.; Rodas, M. Influence of grinding on graphite crystallinity from experimental and natural data: Implications for graphite thermometry and sample preparation. Mineral. Mag. 2006, 70, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheskin, D. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 2003; ISBN 978-1-58488-440-8. [Google Scholar]
  55. Gibbons, J.; Chakraborti, S. Nonparametric Statistical Inference. Fourth Edition, Revised and Expanded; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2003; ISBN 0-8247-4052-1. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hollander, M.; Wolfe, D.A. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Second Edition; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1999; ISBN 0-471-19045-4. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sprent, P.; Smeeton, N.C.; Smeeton, N.C. Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Fourth Edition; Chapman and Hall/CRC: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 9781439894019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bushmin, S.A.; Glebovitskii, V.A.; Prasolov, E.M.; Lokhov, K.I.; Vapnik, E.A.; Savva, E.V.; Shcheglova, T.P. Origin and composition of fluid responsible for metasomatic processes in shear zones of the Bolshie Keivy tectonic nappe, baltic shield: Carbon isotope composition of graphite. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2011, 438, 701–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sherwood Lollar, B.; Westgate, T.D.; Ward, J.A.; Slater, G.F.; Lacrampe-Couloume, G. Abiogenic formation of alkanes in the Earth’s crust as a minor source for global hydrocarbon reservoirs. Nature 2002, 416, 522–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lollar, B.S.; Lacrampe-Couloume, G.; Voglesonger, K.; Onstott, T.C.; Pratt, L.M.; Slater, G.F. Isotopic signatures of CH4 and higher hydrocarbon gases from Precambrian Shield sites: A model for abiogenic polymerization of hydrocarbons. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2008, 72, 4778–4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sherwood Lollar, B.; Frape, S.K.; Weise, S.M.; Fritz, P.; Macko, S.A.; Welhan, J.A. Abiogenic methanogenesis in crystalline rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 5087–5097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sherwood, B.; Fritz, P.; Frape, S.K.; Macko, S.A.; Weise, S.M.; Welhan, J.A. Methane occurrences in the Canadian Shield. Chem. Geol. 1988, 71, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stahl, W. Carbon isotope fractionations in natural gases. Nature 1974, 251, 134–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ni, Y.; Dai, J. Geochemical characteristics of abiogenic alkane gases. Pet. Sci. 2009, 6, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cai, C.; Zhang, C.; Worden, R.H.; Wang, T.; Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Huang, S.; Zhang, B. Application of sulfur and carbon isotopes to oil–source rock correlation: A case study from the Tazhong area, Tarim Basin, China. Org. Geochem. 2015, 83–84, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shen, P.; Xu, Y.C. A study of carbon isotopes from oils. Chin. Sci. Bull. 1998, 43, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Astafieva, M.M.; Balaganskii, V.V. Keivy Paraschists (Archean–Early Proterozoic): Nanobacteria and Life. Stratigr. Geol. Correl. 2018, 26, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kozlov, N.E.; Sorokhtin, N.O.; Martynov, E.V. Geodynamic Evolution and Metallogeny of Archaean Structural and Compositional Complexes in the Northwestern Russian Arctic. Minerals 2018, 8, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Luque, F.J.; Crespo-Feo, E.; Barrenechea, J.F.; Ortega, L. Carbon isotopes of graphite: Implications on fluid history. Geosci. Front. 2012, 3, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Santosh, M.; Wada, H. A Carbon Isotope Study of Graphites from the Kerala Khondalite Belt, Southern India: Evidence for CO2 Infiltration in Granulites. J. Geol. 1993, 101, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Baiju, K.R.; Nambiar, C.G.; Jadhav, G.N.; Kagi, H.; Satish-Kumar, M. Low-density CO2-rich fluid inclusions from charnockites of southwestern Madurai Granulite Block, southern India; implications on graphite mineralization. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 36, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological scheme of the Keivy Terrane compiled on the basis of the 1:500,000 Geological Map of the Kola Region (simplified after Reference [13]), showing sampling locations (letters in blue circles): (a)—Makzabak (sillimanite schists); (b)—Rova (quartzolites); (c)—Tyapshmanyuk (kyanite schists); (d)—Shuururta (kyanite schists); (e)—Igiurta (kyanite schists). Legend: 1—mafic and ultramafic rocks, PR1; 2—Keivy alkaline granite complex, AR2; 3—gabbroids, AR2; 4—granitoids of normal alkalinity (undivided), AR2; 5—Keivy series aluminous schists, AR2; 6—Tundra series rocks (acidic, medium, basic metavolcanics, mica parashists), AR2; 7—gneisses and amphibolites of Kola series (basement complex), AR; 8—faults. The green line delineates the boundaries of the Keivy Terrane. The inset shows the position of the Keivy Terrane within the Kola Peninsula.
Figure 1. Geological scheme of the Keivy Terrane compiled on the basis of the 1:500,000 Geological Map of the Kola Region (simplified after Reference [13]), showing sampling locations (letters in blue circles): (a)—Makzabak (sillimanite schists); (b)—Rova (quartzolites); (c)—Tyapshmanyuk (kyanite schists); (d)—Shuururta (kyanite schists); (e)—Igiurta (kyanite schists). Legend: 1—mafic and ultramafic rocks, PR1; 2—Keivy alkaline granite complex, AR2; 3—gabbroids, AR2; 4—granitoids of normal alkalinity (undivided), AR2; 5—Keivy series aluminous schists, AR2; 6—Tundra series rocks (acidic, medium, basic metavolcanics, mica parashists), AR2; 7—gneisses and amphibolites of Kola series (basement complex), AR; 8—faults. The green line delineates the boundaries of the Keivy Terrane. The inset shows the position of the Keivy Terrane within the Kola Peninsula.
Minerals 09 00094 g001
Figure 2. Studied carbonaceous matter (CM)-bearing rocks: (a) Quartzolite from the Keivy alkaline granite complex (the Rova area), (b) sillimanite schist, selected near the contact with this complex (the Makzabak area), and kyanite schists from (c) the Tyapshmanyuk, (d) the Shuururta and (e) the Igiurta areas.
Figure 2. Studied carbonaceous matter (CM)-bearing rocks: (a) Quartzolite from the Keivy alkaline granite complex (the Rova area), (b) sillimanite schist, selected near the contact with this complex (the Makzabak area), and kyanite schists from (c) the Tyapshmanyuk, (d) the Shuururta and (e) the Igiurta areas.
Minerals 09 00094 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic decomposition diagram of CM Raman spectrum in the first-order region (1100–1800 cm–1) and (bf) characteristic spectra (in the same region) of different CM morphologies from the studied rocks of the Keivy Terrane.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic decomposition diagram of CM Raman spectrum in the first-order region (1100–1800 cm–1) and (bf) characteristic spectra (in the same region) of different CM morphologies from the studied rocks of the Keivy Terrane.
Minerals 09 00094 g003
Figure 4. CM morphologies and their position in the studied rocks from the Keivy Terrane: (a) Section of a sample of kyanite schist with CM-bearing matrix and (b) morphology of fine-grained CM-1 therein; (c) interstitial distribution of flaky CM-2 in kyanite-muscovite segregations and (d) morphology of CM-2; (e) nest of CM-3; (f) muscovite-staurolite part of the sillimanite schist veined with CM-4 and (g) the morphology of the latter; (h) zoning in spherulitic CM-5. Images: (h) is a backscattered electron (BSE) photomicrograph; (a,c,f) are transmitted light photomicrographs (top—one polarizer, bottom—two polarizers); (b,d,e,g) are reflected light photomicrographs. Abbreviations: CM – carbonaceous matter (the numbers correspond to the morphologies, see explanations in the text); Ms—muscovite; Ky—kyanite; Qz—quartz; and St—staurolite.
Figure 4. CM morphologies and their position in the studied rocks from the Keivy Terrane: (a) Section of a sample of kyanite schist with CM-bearing matrix and (b) morphology of fine-grained CM-1 therein; (c) interstitial distribution of flaky CM-2 in kyanite-muscovite segregations and (d) morphology of CM-2; (e) nest of CM-3; (f) muscovite-staurolite part of the sillimanite schist veined with CM-4 and (g) the morphology of the latter; (h) zoning in spherulitic CM-5. Images: (h) is a backscattered electron (BSE) photomicrograph; (a,c,f) are transmitted light photomicrographs (top—one polarizer, bottom—two polarizers); (b,d,e,g) are reflected light photomicrographs. Abbreviations: CM – carbonaceous matter (the numbers correspond to the morphologies, see explanations in the text); Ms—muscovite; Ky—kyanite; Qz—quartz; and St—staurolite.
Minerals 09 00094 g004
Figure 5. Variations in carbon isotope compositions (δ13CPDB) and crystallization temperatures (T °C) of CM morphotypes (signed) from the rocks of the studied objects. Top marks the possible sources of carbon. To the right of the frame, the thermal mode of events during which CM crystallized is shown (the rationale for this data interpretation is discussed in Section 4). For the Shuururta and Tyapshmanyuk rocks, CM-1 and CM-2 were not amenable to separation, therefore the isotope characteristics of mixtures are displayed.
Figure 5. Variations in carbon isotope compositions (δ13CPDB) and crystallization temperatures (T °C) of CM morphotypes (signed) from the rocks of the studied objects. Top marks the possible sources of carbon. To the right of the frame, the thermal mode of events during which CM crystallized is shown (the rationale for this data interpretation is discussed in Section 4). For the Shuururta and Tyapshmanyuk rocks, CM-1 and CM-2 were not amenable to separation, therefore the isotope characteristics of mixtures are displayed.
Minerals 09 00094 g005
Table 1. Carbon isotope composition of CM from the Keivy Terrane.
Table 1. Carbon isotope composition of CM from the Keivy Terrane.
SampleLocalityLong. (N)Lat.
(E)
Host
Rock 1
CM Typen2δ13CPDB, ‰
K-162Igiurta67.3665839.02185KyCM-12−33.3…−38.2
K-163Igiurta67.3679439.02407KyCM-14−41.3…−45.8
K-164Igiurta67.3693339.02696KyCM-13−41.4…−45.9
K-165Igiurta67.3716639.03104KyCM-13−45.2…−46.8
Igiurta, kyanite schists, only CM-1, n = 12: Median −44.7‰, mean −43.1‰, SD 4.0‰
249-10Tyapshmanyuk 367.7221237.43463KyCM-1 + CM-24−43.4…−44.5
250-10Tyapshmanyuk 367.7208437.43778KyCM-1 + CM-24−43.7…−44.8
Tyapshmanyuk, kyanite schists, CM-1 + СM-2 mix, n = 8: Median −44.2‰, mean −44.2‰, SD 0.5‰
K-197Shuururta67.5835438.21614KyCM-1 + CM-22−29.1…−36.1
K-200Shuururta67.5836238.22089KyCM-1 + CM-22−41.3…−45.1
K-201Shuururta67.5842038.22161KyCM-1 + CM-24−27.3…−33.1
K-202Shuururta67.5853438.22317KyCM-1 + CM-23−30.1…−33.4
K-203Shuururta67.5863438.22675KyCM-1 + CM-22−35.2…−35.7
K-216Shuururta67.5937938.28372KyCM-1 + CM-23−30.9…−38.3
G2-14-2Shuururta67.5308638.09548KyCM-1 + CM-21−37.7
G3-17-1Shuururta67.5848738.22785KyCM-1 + CM-21−32.6
G3-17-2Shuururta67.5848738.22785KyCM-1 + CM-21−33.2
G3-18-1Shuururta67.5494338.27469KyCM-1 + CM-21−40.2
G3-21-1Shuururta67.5529638.29061KyCM-1 + CM-21−37.8
G4-30-1Shuururta67.5674038.08735KyCM-1 + CM-21−33.2
G4-31-1Shuururta67.5693438.06529KyCM-1 + CM-21−34.5
Shuururta, kyanite schists, CM-1 + СM-2 mix, n = 23: Median −33.4‰, mean −34.3‰, SD 4.4‰
F13028Makzabak67.8409536.17565SillCM-3 + CM-420−14.2…−22.6
Makzabak, sillimanite schists, CM-3 + СM-4 mix, n = 20: Median −17.4‰, mean −18.3‰, SD 1.7‰
F13028Makzabak67.8409536.17565SillCM-42−10.1…−10.7
Makzabak, sillimanite schists, only СM-4, n = 2: Median −10.4‰, mean −10.4‰, SD 0.4‰
F12026Rova67.8383836.54107QzCM-59−5.6…−9.1
Rova, quartzolites, СM-5, n = 9: Median −7.5‰, mean −7.4‰, SD 1.9‰
1 Hereafter: Ky—kyanite schists, Sill—sillimanite schists, Qz—quartzolites; 2 n—the number of analyses; 3 Coordinates of the samples from the Tyapshmanyuk area are taken from the map.
Table 2. Summary of Raman spectra of carbonaceous material (RSCM) peak temperature determinations from CM-bearing rocks of the Keivy Terrane.
Table 2. Summary of Raman spectra of carbonaceous material (RSCM) peak temperature determinations from CM-bearing rocks of the Keivy Terrane.
LocalityHost
Rock
CM TypenFWHMG
(SD)
R1
(SD)
R2
(SD)
T
(SD)
T*
[R1*]
FWHMG*
Calc.
IgiurtaKy CM-11818.6
(1.1)
0.30
(0.17)
0.36
(0.09)
480
(42)
522
[0.15]
19.3
TyapshmanyukKyCM-11022.3
(1.5)
0.29
(0.04)
0.32
(0.03)
501
(14)
510
[0.24]
22.5
TyapshmanyukKyCM-2620.7
(0.6)
0.18
(0.03)
0.21
(0.01)
549
(5)
552
[0.16]
19.5
ShuururtaKyCM-1618.7
(2.0)
0.34
(0.23)
0.36
(0.12)
482
(51)
525
[0.17]
20.0
ShuururtaKyCM-2817.1
(0.7)
0.12
(0.03)
0.19
(0.03)
557
(15)
564
[0.10]
16.8
MakzabakSillCM-31523.0
(1.2)
0.44
(0.16)
0.38
(0.07)
472
(32)
496
[0.23]
21.9
MakzabakSillCM-4720.3
(1.8)
0.10
(0.07)
0.13
(0.09)
582
(42)
636
[0.01]
14.1
RovaQzCM-56819.2
(1.7)
0.43
(0.08)
0.42
(0.04)
454
(18)
499
[0.25]
22.6
Note: R1, R2, and peak temperature values calculated using the calibration of [26]; SD—standard deviation; n—the number of analyses; FWHMG—G band width at half-maximum; T*—peak temperature for the sample with R1*, where R1* (in square brackets) is the minimum R1 value for the corresponding sampling; FWHMG* calc.—the value of G band width at half-maximum, calculated by the formula FWHMG = 14 + 35R1 [51] for R1*.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fomina, E.; Kozlov, E.; Lokhov, K.; Lokhova, O.; Bocharov, V. Carbon Sources and the Graphitization of Carbonaceous Matter in Precambrian Rocks of the Keivy Terrane (Kola Peninsula, Russia). Minerals 2019, 9, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020094

AMA Style

Fomina E, Kozlov E, Lokhov K, Lokhova O, Bocharov V. Carbon Sources and the Graphitization of Carbonaceous Matter in Precambrian Rocks of the Keivy Terrane (Kola Peninsula, Russia). Minerals. 2019; 9(2):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fomina, Ekaterina, Evgeniy Kozlov, Kirill Lokhov, Olga Lokhova, and Vladimir Bocharov. 2019. "Carbon Sources and the Graphitization of Carbonaceous Matter in Precambrian Rocks of the Keivy Terrane (Kola Peninsula, Russia)" Minerals 9, no. 2: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020094

APA Style

Fomina, E., Kozlov, E., Lokhov, K., Lokhova, O., & Bocharov, V. (2019). Carbon Sources and the Graphitization of Carbonaceous Matter in Precambrian Rocks of the Keivy Terrane (Kola Peninsula, Russia). Minerals, 9(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9020094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop