Next Article in Journal
A Rapid PCR-Free Next-Generation Sequencing Method for the Detection of Copy Number Variations in Prenatal Samples
Next Article in Special Issue
HBV/HDV Co-Infection: Epidemiological and Clinical Changes, Recent Knowledge and Future Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomics of Dry Versus Reanimated Antarctic Lichen-Dominated Endolithic Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chilblain-Like Lesions during COVID-19 Pandemic: The State of the Art
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Aging Bowel Dysfunction and Elderly Vulnerability towards COVID-19 Infection

by
Aaron Lerner
1,*,† and
Mark F. McCarty
2,†
1
The Zabludowicz Center, for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 5262000, Israel
2
Catalytic Longevity, San Diego, CA 92109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Equally contributed to the manuscript.
Life 2021, 11(2), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020097
Submission received: 9 December 2020 / Revised: 20 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 / Published: 28 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Challenges in Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, primarily a respiratory tract virus, also affects the enteric organs. The most affected sector of the community are the retirement and nursing home elderly residents. Along their life the senescent gastrointestinal functions are deteriorating and failing to fully execute their digestive, absorptive, mucosal barriers, and immune protective duties. Adding the decreased motility, increased intestinal permeability, dysbiosis, morbid chronic disease background, the consumed polypharmacy enteric adverse effects to the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 host receptor along the intestinal tracts put the basis for the current hypothesis. It is hypothesized that the disadvantages and failures of the aging enteric tract contribute to the elderly morbidity and mortality during the current new coronavirus pandemic. In a more optimistic look, several nutraceuticals can prevent or restore the dysfunctional intestinal barrier functions, mainly in the elderly and potentially in those who are SARS-CoV-2 infected.

1. Introduction

The actual coronavirus pandemic is an outbreak of the novel acute infectious respiratory disease that started at the end of 2019 in the mega-metropolis of Wuhan, a Chinese province of Hubei. The local outbreak started in China on January 2020, spread epidemically and became, quite quickly, a pandemic. The outbreak is caused by a new coronavirus, named SARS-CoV-2. This virus is also known as a novel coronavirus that induces the COVID-19 disease [1].
As for today, most of the scientific publications concluded that this SARS-CoV-2 virus has a zoonotic origin, as are most of the human viral epidemics, however, animal 0 reservoir is not yet identified [2]. The coronaviruses are an extensive zoonotic viral family, spread worldwide and span numerous animals: bats, piglets, pigs, felines (cats), horses, camels, and swine [3,4,5,6,7]. The actual theory is that we are dealing with a new mutation or a recombinant chimera inside the coronavirus [1]. It is a very contagious, aggressive disease with high disability, morbidity, and mortality. Currently, the Chinese epidemy is contained in contrast to the USA, where, as for the end of November 2020, there are more than 14,300,000 affected and around 280,000 deaths. While the upper respiratory airways and the lungs are the main target of the virus, it appears that the heart, vessels, liver, kidneys, and the intestine are affected as well [8,9]. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is not resilient to the virus. In fact, enteric symptoms are prevalent, ranging between 8% and 49% of patients, the major ones are diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pains [8,9,10,11,12,13]. SARS-CoV-2 cohabitates the gut and is excreted in patients’ stools [12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Colonic biopsy samples positivity has been consistently documented and multiple publications argue for potential fecal–oral transmission of the disease [13,18,23,24,25,26]. One of the interesting aspects of the disease is its differential age targeting and distribution and potential infectivity. It is clear that the elderly patients are prone to be infected and have more morbid and lethal disease, compared to children [27]. Available epidemiological observations hints to the fact that COVID-19 seems to be uncommon in children [28,29]. On the contrary to children, the prognosis, morbidity, and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infected elderly is significantly higher than young and middle-age patients [30]. Notably, patients aged 60 years and over have a significantly higher mortality rate (5.3%) than that of patients below 60 years (1.4%) [30,31]. Multiple publications expand on respiratory and lung vulnerability during the ageing process, however, the senescent GI tract performances that face the new coronavirus are scarcely reported. The present review summarizes the age dependent changes and decline of the gut functions in the elderly. The hypothesis is that the elderly enteric dysfunction put them in a higher risk for COVID-19 severe disease and compromised outcome.

2. Gut Dysfunctions in the Elderly

2.1. Digestive and Absorptive Dysfunction

The digestion and absorption of food is a multi-processed mechanism which is dependent on endogenous secretion of enzymes, exogenous microbial metabolic availability, GI motility, entero-endocrine hormonal activity, and the enteric nervous system control and regulation. During the ageing period, many physiological functions are declining including GI performances. Salivation, olfactory, gustatory, and visual food perceptions, oral and dental health, digestion and absorption and lactose intolerance, diminished appetite and water and food consumption are few of them [32,33]. Those are some of the reasons of malnutrition in older people above the age of 65 years. Their compromised nutritional status is one of the most relevant conditions that negatively affects elderly health and even can predict their preterm death [34]. Chewing activity, enteral hormone that regulates appetite, and endogenous digestive enzyme capacity deteriorate along the third stage of life. Salivary, gastric, duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and colonic enzymatic performances are reduced. On the mucosal part, the corresponding specific absorptive receptors, pathways, apical and trans-enterocytic and enter-enterocytic absorptive mechanisms are also suboptimal or reduced [32,33,34]. There is a reduced digestion of sugars, proteins, and fats. The corresponding specific enzymes, namely, the saccharidases, numerous proteases, and various lipases quantities and digestive capacities decline during ageing [33]. Bile acids pH buffering, fat emulsifying, ileal reabsorption, and the microbiome digestive capacities are as well, gradually decreasing with age [32,33,34]. On top of the above the decrease in the surface area of the small intestine following the ageing degeneration of the villi may lead to blunted absorption of food components [35].

2.2. Failure of Mucosal Barriers and Immune Dysfunction

The largest immune system resides in the enteric mucosa, facing uncountable foreign factors, exogenous antigens, toxins, allergens, carcinogens, microbes, viruses, parasites, and other detrimental environmental factors. The largest number of lymphocytes reside in the GI mucosa, represented by the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). A recent study gives us an overview of candidates from genes and pathways regulated in aging and age-related diseases. Using gene expression databases, the authors identified 44 markers in seven categories (inflammation, mitochondria and apoptosis, calcium homeostasis, fibrosis, neuromuscular junction and neurons, cytoskeleton and hormones, and other) with potential and priority as frailty biomarkers related to aging and age-related diseases [36]. The following markers strongly related to cellular senescence, many involved in GI functions, were IL-6, CXCL10, sVCAM/sICAM, regucalcin, calreticulin, TGFβ, PAI-1, HMGB1, α klotho, FGF23, IGF-1, and miRNAs panel. Those senescent markers need to be experimentally explored in animal models and in the human elderly GI organs for validation and assessing their prognostic, diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic potentials.
The following mucosal barriers are weakened during senescence:
Alpha and β defensins, antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides involved in host defense and in immunomodulation, expressed in alimentary track, particularly in Paneth cells and epithelial cells [33,36]. Mucus layers, which covers the epithelium is a prime barrier that keeps dysbiota and pathobiota in the luminal bay. In Helicobacter pylori positive elderly, the thickness of the mucus layer is reduced [37] and the adhesive ability of bifidobacteria to attach to the mucosa of elderly is declined [38].
As for the frailty and dysfunction of the human senescent mucosal immune systems, various immune functions are failing to execute their pivotal protective function. The local immunosenescence is expressed by reduced secretion of specific immunoglobulin A [39], mature M cells density in the Peyer’s patches of aged mice is decreased [40], tolerance to naïve antigens is declined [41], Peyer’s M enterocyte transcytosis of luminal antigens is weakened [40], dendritic cells density and functionality is decreased, thus, compromising presentation of processed antigens to the mature T and B lymphocytes [42]. All those integrated mucosal immune responses against pathogens, generated in the GALT, decline along the ageing process [33,35,43,44].
Facing the thinner mucosal layer, the reduced immunocompetent cells volume and the surge in proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1b, IL-6, TNFα), it can be summarized that the physical and chemical barriers, the reactive and innate mucosal immunity are compromised in the aged gut mucosa [33,43,44,45].

2.3. Decreased Microbiome/Dysbiome Ratio

The studies on microbiome/dysbiome ratio and microbial composition and diversity are complicated since the enteric microbiome is influenced by lifestyle, age, nutrition, drugs, associated chronic diseases, community versus long-term residential care dwellers, and many other environmental factors. Those parameters impose scientific burden and bias when interpreting the results. The impact of aging on the enteric microbiome is not an exception and explains the variability in the results [46,47,48,49]. Most studies reinforce the decreased stability and increased diversity of the intestinal microbiota during aging. Some reported bifidobacteria, a putatively protective lactic acid producing bacteria, and anaerobes, to be under-represented in the flora of advance age [47,50]. Some observe increased [47,48,50] and some decreased [48,49] diversity, but the studied elderly are extensively different and are not comparable. Enhanced colonization of pathobionts, like Staphylococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Enterococcaceae, paralleled by a decline in beneficial bacteria such as short-chain fatty acid-producing microbes [51], were reported [49]. Some suggest that the reduction in the putatively protective bifidobacterial and the reduced production of short chain fatty acids increase disease risk in elderly people [52]. The questions of cause, consequence, or coevolution, are, as yet, unresolved [48], as is in other GI chronic conditions like celiac [53] or Crohn’s diseases [54]. Hopefully, future identification of specific proteinome or metabolome or metabolic mechanisms that are driven by the gut bacteria in the aging intestine will clarify those questions [55].

2.4. Decreased Motility

The motility and segmental transit times during aging were extensively reviewed, but the conclusions are quite controversial [33,35,56]. Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, several trends can be outlined. Symptomatically, the elderly is suffering from higher threshold for tastes, swallowing difficulties, nausea, dysphagia, heart burning due to gastro-esophageal reflux disease, constipation, and fecal incontinence. The etiology of constipation can be due directly to advance age; however, a plethora of other factors can contribute. Low fiber and fluid intake, side effects of drugs, associated morbid diseases, and reduced physical activity, are some of them. Interesting are the observations of age-dependent degenerative neural mechanisms in the myenteric plexus of the GI nervous system that can impact not only motility but also appetite, food intake, digestion, absorption, local and central gut performance regulation [33,35,56,57].

2.5. Increased Intestinal Permeability

Intestinal permeability is tightly regulated and evolutionary conserved, in order to keep foreign antigens inside the enteric lumen [58,59,60]. Compromised tight junction functional integrity resulting in increased enteric permeability was documented in elderly people [33,35,45,61,62,63]. Adding the failure of mucosal barriers and immune dysfunction, the dysbalanced microbiota to the digestive and absorptive abnormalities of the senescent human gut further potentiate the enhanced gut permeability.

2.6. Increased Chronic Diseases That Induce Gut Dysfunction

The list of associated chronic diseases that contribute to the COVID-19 morbidity and mortality is extending. Hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, cancer, immune dysfunction states, and heavy smoking, are on the list [64,65]. Those conditions are prevalent in >65 years old people and being a male put them at a greater risk. It should be stressed that all those associated conditions affect GI functions and performances and are adding to the GI vulnerability of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

2.7. Increased Nutritional Deficiencies

Balanced personal diet and sufficient caloric intake are crucial for good health status, during the aging period since aging and sickness share paths. Due to many reasons cited above, the nutritional status of the elderly put them at risk for nutritional deficiencies. It is not only the prevalent aging associated malnutrition; hence, specific nutritional factors’ deficiencies were described. Iron, B12, B1, B6, folate, vitamin D, zinc, and selenium are the most important ones [66,67]. It goes without saying that those deficiencies and the associated malnutrition, impair normal elderly GI functions and enhance age-dependent peripheral organs pathologies, mainly in the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, peripheral and central nervous, immune and skin systems [33,68].

2.8. Increased Drug Consumption with Gastrointestinal Side Effects

Along aging, drug consumption increases and puts the elderly at risk for adverse drug reactions. The GI tract side effects are one of the most often reported [69]. NSAIDs and/or aspirin and antibiotics are on the top of the list with their upper and lower bowels’ complications. On the other hand, the frequently prescribed polypharmacy brings further morbidity to those vulnerable aged patients [70]. Many advanced age GI symptoms and diseases are pharmacologically treated. Gastro-esophageal reflux, gastroparesis, constipation, diarrhea, peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, irritable bowel syndrome, IBD, chronic renal and liver disease, osteopenia/osteoporosis, and the above cited nutritional deficiencies, are on this list. All those facts further jeopardize the elderly GI functional integrity. Table 1 summarizes the various aspects of the GI dysfunctions during the aging period of life.

3. The Aging-Gut–SARS-CoV-2 Interrelationship

Since December 2019, a newly identified coronavirus is spreading worldwide, affecting almost all the countries on the globe. As of December 2020, there are around 64,000,000 infected and 1,500,000 deaths. It originated from Wuhan, in Hubei province in China but concentrated in several hot spots like USA, Italy, Spain, Iran, India, and Russia. The SARS-CoV-2 targets advanced age people, many of them with associated chronic diseases, residing in home-care centers [27,28,29,30,64,65]. In Israel for example, out of 1710 deaths, 619 came from nursing homes for the elderly. Normally, they represent 1% of the general population, however, their COVID-19 death rate approaches 36%. No doubt that the respiratory tract and the lungs are the most affected organs, but screening the literature, coming earlier from China and latter from other affected countries, the GI tract is also targeted by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. As mentioned above, multiple observations and facts argue for the gut being a target organ. GI symptoms [8,9,10,11,12,13], dwelling in the gut lumen and excreted in stool [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], induced GI pathology, the entire digestive tract is affected [13,15,71], stools as a way of diagnosis [20], potential fecal–oral transmission [13,18,23,24,25,26] and the observation that diarrhea is associated with prolonged symptoms and substantial viral carriage of the virus [16], strengthen the tight relation between the SARS-CoV-2 and the human intestinal tract. More so, the new coronavirus host cell receptor is angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). This receptor exists on the esophageal lining epithelium, on the small bowel enterocytes and the large bowel colonocytes [23,72]. Adding all the above SARS-CoV-2–gut interrelationships to the fact that the most vulnerable people are the elderly with their dysfunctional GI tract, it is hypothesized that the gastrointestinal functional senescence and frailty contribute substantially to COVID-19 elderly affected mortality. The digestive and absorptive dysfunction [32,33,34] leading to malnutrition [33] and nutritional deficiencies [33,34,66,67,68], failure of mucosal barriers and relative immune dysfunction [39,40,41,42,43,44], compromised motility [33,35,56,57], and enhanced permeability [33,35,45,61,62,63], on the background of high chronic disease rate [64,65] and polypharmacy adverse effects [69,70], all impair intestinal functions. The fact that elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from stool takes longer than from the nose and throat represents a red warning [16]. It seems that the fecal–oral transmission is under investigated and might play a major role in the nursing and retirement homes of the GI vulnerable elderly. Nevertheless, the human-to-human transmission within families is occurring; in China the SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in patients’ feces by PCR analysis [73].
Finally, the respiratory tract is the primary target organ of the COVID-19 disease and the main mortal factor, but, the disadvantages and failures of the aging enteric tract might contribute to their morbidity and mortality during the current pandemic. In this regard, Table 2 summarizes the GI dysfunctions that are associated with or induced by the COVID-19 agent. Comparing Table 1 to Table 2, one can see the similarity between the GI dysfunctions that are attributed to the aging process and those associated with SARC-Cov-2 infections. Interestingly, in both, digestion, absorption, mucosal barriers and immune dysfunctions, macrobiomic homeostasis, motility and gut permeability, and nutritional health are compromised [74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. More so, COVID-19–gut–aging relationships are further strengthened by the following observations. 1. The GI dysfunctions and the intestinal symptoms of the elderly might increase the severity and duration of COVID-19 infection [81]. 2. ACE2 expression is increased during aging [82,83], thus potentiating the elderly’s vulnerability to infection. 3. Many older people have comorbidities and associated chronic diseases, including cardiac, renal diseases, and hypertension, thus chronically consuming angiotensin 1 receptor blockers. Recently, this drug-induced over expression of ACE2 was suggested for the elderly subjects’ enhanced susceptibility to severe COVID-19 [84]. Taken together, the senescent gut cross talks with the SARS-Cov-2 virus are suggested to increase the susceptibility of the elderly to COVID-19 disease. Unfortunately, efficacious pharmacological therapy for intestinal barrier dysfunction during aging is lacking; hence, strategies for nutraceutical support of barrier function are of significant interest.

4. Potential Nutraceutical Support of Intestinal Barrier Function

Intestinal enterocytes are linked by apical tight junctions that are highly conserved during eukaryotes evolution including humankind. Their pivotal function is to limit the paracellular absorption of foreign proteins/peptides, bacterial components and toxins, various allergens and carcinogens, thus preventing acute and chronic diseases. In addition, they serve to prevent massive fluid and electrolyte losses and ensuing metabolic abnormalities. Perturbated homeostatic function of this barrier can increase risk for infections, systemic and hepatic inflammation, food allergies, cancers, and neurodegenerative and autoimmune disorders [58,59,60]. Taking into consideration the gastrointestinal dysfunctions in the elderly and those associated with SARS-Cov-2 infection described above (table 1+2) and the present hypothesis relaying SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility to the senescent gastrointestinal tract, a major question arises: can nutraceuticals prevent or reverse enteric dysfunction in the elderly? Nutraceuticals are nonpharmaceutical alternatives to drugs which may exert physiological benefits. Any product derived from natural food sources that can provide health benefits in addition to the basic nutritional support provided by foods, can be defined as a nutraceutical. In this regard, several of those nutraceuticals have the potential to support effective intestinal barrier function in the elderly.
Various mechanisms and pathways support the formation, maintenance, and functions of the enter-enterocyte’s tight junction zipper-like complex. Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is produced in response to various signals by special neuroendocrine L cells in the intestinal mucosa [85]. This peptide acts locally on subepithelial fibroblasts to stimulate their secretion of insulin-like receptor I (IGF-I), which in turn acts to boost PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 signaling in enterocytes. This exerts an anabolic effect, promoting proliferation and suppressing apoptosis of enterocytes, but also supporting the formation and maintenance of tight junctions [85,86,87]. Notably, the PI3K/Akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway triggered by IGF-I activity on enterocytes has been shown to upregulate mRNA and protein levels of a range of proteins required for tight junction formation and function, including occludin, claudins, and ZO-1 [88]. Hence, nutraceuticals which promote GLP-2 secretion from L cells can support intestinal barrier function; these include effective pre/probiotics, glycine, and glutamine [89,90,91,92,93]. Moreover, diets rich in soluble fiber or resistant starch, by inducing bacterial production of short-chain fatty acids that act as secretagogues for L cells, can likewise support intestinal barrier function [51,88,89,90,91,94].
The favorable impact of AMPK activation on enteric barrier functions is well documented. It is mediated, at least in part, by increased expression of caudal type homeobox 2 (Cdx2), a master transcription factor driving differentiation of gut enterocytes [95]. Hence, pharmaceutical or nutraceutical AMPK activators, such as metformin, berberine, and the short chain fatty acids produced by healthy microflora, can be beneficial to intestinal barrier function. The nutraceutical berberine, a compound found in various Chinese medicinal herbs, is widely employed for diabetes management in China [96,97]. Likely as a consequence of its ability to stimulate AMPK activity, berberine is reported to have favorable effects on the intestinal barrier and tight junction maintenance [96,97,98].
Another factor favorable to the intestinal barrier is the beta-isoform of the estrogen receptor (ERβ); agonists for ERβ aid barrier function, in part, by inducing increased expression of occluding [99]. Fortuitously, when feasible levels of soy products are ingested, the plasma levels of unbound, unconjugated genistein and S-equol that result are sufficient to achieve significant activation of ERbeta, with minimal impact on ERα activity (which is why soy does not induce feminizing effects or increase risk for estrogen-dependent cancers) [100,101,102].
Inflammation of intestinal enterocytes, associated with oxidative stress, is more common during aging [35]. Oxidant stress impedes tight junction formation via activation of the MAP kinases, JNK, p38, and ERK1/2, which oppose the assembly of tight junctions. Appropriate antioxidants have the potential to suppress activation of these kinases by inhibiting oxidant production, promoting catabolism of hydrogen peroxide, or reversing the sulfhydryl-oxidizing effects of hydrogen peroxide on signaling proteins—and hence, have potential for supporting enteric barrier function in the context of inflammation. Antioxidants which may be useful in this regard include phycocyanobilin (a biliverdin metabolite which functions as a prominent light-harvesting chromophore in cyanobacteria such as spirulina, and which can inhibit certain isoforms of NADPH oxidase); phase 2 inducer nutraceuticals such as lipoic or ferulic acids; N-acetylcysteine, a source of the L-cysteine that is rate-limiting for synthesis of the prominent intracellular antioxidant glutathione [103,104,105,106,107,108]. Table 3 summarizes the various nutraceuticals, the mediators involved, and their impact on tight junction performance. Those considerations suggest that rationally designed functional foods or complex supplementation programs may have clinical potential for supporting and restoring healthful intestinal barrier function during aging.

5. Conclusions

The most affected sector in the current COVID-19 pandemic is the nursing and retirement homes elderly. Most of the clinical and scientific interests has been referred to the respiratory tract, but the digestive ways are also affected. Along human life, gut performances are weakened, and GI dysfunctions develop to the detriment of the elders. SARS-CoV-2 gut receptors close to the viral enteric presence, enteric pathology, and viral stool excretion, on top of the elderly local vulnerability is the basis for the present hypothesis of gastrointestinal functional senescence contribution to the COVID-19 elderly affected mortality. In this regard, several nutraceuticals can prevent or restore intestinal barrier dysfunctions by supporting tight junction functional integrity.

Author Contributions

The two authors contributed in conceiving, discussion, and writing of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

None of the authors have conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

Angiotensin converting enzyme 2—ACE2; gastrointestinal—GI; glucagon-like peptide-2—GLP-2; caudal type homeobox 2—Cdx2; estrogen receptor-beta—Erβ; insulin-like receptor I—IGF-I.

References

  1. COVID-19 Pandemic. Edited on 3 December 2020. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic (accessed on 18 January 2021).
  2. Andersen, K.G.; Rambaut, A.; Lipkin, W.I.; Holmes, E.C.; Garry, R.F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Papatsiros, V.G.; Stylianaki, I.; Papakonstantinou, G.; Papaioannou, N.; Christodoulopoulos, G. Case Report of Transmissible Gastroenteritis Coronavirus Infection Associated with Small Intestine and Brain Lesions in Piglets. Viral Immunol. 2019, 32, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tasker, S. Diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis: Update on evidence supporting available tests. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2018, 20, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Pusterla, N.; Vin, R.; Leutenegger, C.M.; Mittel, L.D.; Divers, T.J. Enteric coronavirus infection in adult horses. Vet. J. 2018, 231, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhou, P.; Fan, H.; Lan, T.; Yang, X.L.; Shi, W.F.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Xie, Q.-M.; Mani, S.; et al. Fatal swine acute diarrhoea syndrome caused by an HKU2-related coronavirus of bat origin. Nature 2018, 556, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Abdel-Moneim, A.S.; Abdelwhab, E.M. Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Animal Hosts. Pathogens 2020, 9, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, X.H.; Li, T.Y.; He, Z.C.; Ping, Y.F.; Liu, H.W.; Yu, S.C.; Mou, H.M.; Wang, L.H.; Zhang, H.R.; Fu, W.J.; et al. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2020, 49, E009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, J.; Li, C.; Zhao, G.; Chu, H.; Wang, D.; Yan, H.H.; Poon, V.K.-M.; Wen, L.; Wong, B.H.-Y.; Zhao, X.; et al. Human intestinal tract serves as an alternative infection route for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, eaao4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jin, X.; Lian, J.S.; Hu, J.H.; Gao, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, Y.M.; Hao, S.-R.; Jia, H.-Y.; Cai, H.; Zhang, X.-L.; et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut 2020, 69, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Xu, X.W.; Wu, X.X.; Jiang, X.G.; Xu, K.J.; Ying, L.J.; Ma, C.L.; Li, S.B.; Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, S.; Gao, H.N.; et al. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: Retrospective case series. BMJ 2020, 368, m606. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang, D.; Ma, J.; Guan, J.; Wang, M.; Song, Y.; Tian, D.; Li, P. Manifestations of digestive system in hospitalized patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A single-center, descriptive study. Chin. J. Dig. 2020, 40, E005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tian, Y.; Rong, L.; Nian, W.; He, Y. Review article: Gastrointestinal features in COVID 19 and the possibility of faecal transmission. Aliment. Pharmacol Ther. 2020, 51, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, W.; Xu, Y.; Gao, R.; Lu, R.; Han, K.; Wu, G.; Tan, W. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. JAMA 2020, 323, 1843–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Han, M.; Zou, J.B.; Li, H.; Wei, X.Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, H.Z.; Wang, P.S.; Qiu, Q.; Wang, L.L.; Chen, Y.K.; et al. Fecal Nucleic Acid Test as a Complementary Standard for Cured COVID-19 Patients. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2020, 33, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wei, X.S.; Wang, X.; Niu, Y.R.; Ye, L.L.; Peng, W.B.; Wang, Z.H.; Yang, W.-B.; Yang, B.-H.; Zhang, J.-C.; Ma, W.-L.; et al. Diarrhea is associated with prolonged symptoms and viral carriage in COVID-19. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 18, 1753–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kam, K.Q.; Yung, C.F.; Cui, L.; Lin, R.T.P.; Mak, T.M.; Maiwald, M.; Li, J.; Chong, C.Y.; Nadua, K.; Tan, N.W.H.; et al. A Well Infant with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with High Viral Load. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 847–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wong, S.H.; Lui, R.N.; Sung, J.J. Covid-19 and the digestive system. J. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020, 35, 744–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.; Li, G.; Dai, X.; Liu, G.; Li, G.; Jie, Y. Three cases of novel coronavirus pneumonia with viral nucleic acids still positive in stool after throat swab detection turned negative. Chin. J. Dig. 2020, 40, E002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Xue, Y. Fecal specimen diagnosis 2019 novel coronavirus- infected pneumonia. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jiang, X.; Luo, M.; Zou, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, C.; Qiu, J. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected case with viral detection positive in stool but negative in nasopharyngeal samples lasts for 42 days. J. Med. Virol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ozma, M.A.; Maroufi, P.; Ehsaneh Khodadadi, E.; Köse, S.U.; Esposito, I.; Ganbarov, K.; Dao, S.; Esposito, S.; Dal, T.; Zeinalzadeh, E.; et al. Clinical manifestation, diagnosis, prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) during the outbreak period. Le Infezioni Medicina 2020, 2, 153–165. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, H.; Kang, Z.; Gong, H.; Xu, D.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Cui, X.; Xiao, J.; Meng, T.; Zhou, W.; et al. The digestive system is a potential route of 2019-nCov infection: A bioinformatics analysis based on single-cell transcriptomes. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gu, J.; Han, B.; Wang, J. COVID-19: Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Potential Fecal-Oral Transmission. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1518–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hindson, J. COVID-19: Faecal-oral transmission? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McDermott, C.V.; Alicic, R.Z.; Harden, N.; Cox, E.J.; Scanlan, J.M. Put a lid on it: Are faecal bio-aerosols a route of transmission for SARS-CoV-2? J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 105, 397–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, P.-I.; Hu, Y.-L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Huang, Y.-C.; Hsuehe, P.-R. Are children less susceptible to COVID-19. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 371–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, K.; Chen, Y.; Lin, R.; Han, K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J. Infect. 2020, 80, e14–e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, Y.; Gayle, A.A.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Rocklöv, J. The reproductive number of COVID−19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, taaa021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gariballa, S.E.; Sinclair, A.J. Nutrition, ageing and ill health. Br. J. Nutr. 1998, 80, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Rémond, D.; Danit, R.; Shahar, D.R.; Gille, D.; Pinto, P.; Kachal, J.; Peyron, M.-A.; Dos Santos, C.N.; Walther, B.; Bordoni, A.; et al. Understanding the gastrointestinal tract of the elderly to develop dietary solutions that prevent malnutrition. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 13858–13898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Soderstrom, L.; Rosenblad, A.; Adolfsson, E.T.; Saletti, A.; Bergkvist, L. Nutritional status predicts preterm death in older people: A prospective cohort study. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Soenen, S.; Rayner, C.K.; Jones, K.L.; Horowitz, M. The ageing gastrointestinal tract. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2016, 19, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cardoso, A.L.; Fernandes, A.; Aguilar-Pimentel, J.A.; de Angelis, M.H.; Guedes, J.R.; Brito, M.A.; Ortolano, S.; Pani, G.; Athanasopoulou, S.; Gonos, E.S.; et al. Towards frailty biomarkers: Candidates from genes and pathways regulated in aging and age-related diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 47, 214–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Newton, J.L.; Jordan, N.; Pearson, J.; Williams, G.V.; Allen, A.; James, O.F. The adherent gastric antral and duodenal mucus gel layer thins with advancing age in subjects infected with Helicobacter pylori. Gerontology 2000, 46, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. He, F.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Isolauri, E.; Hosoda, M.; Benno, Y.; Salminen, S. Differences in composition and mucosal adhesion of bifidobacteria isolated from healthy adults and healthy seniors. Curr. Microbiol. 2001, 43, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mabbott, N.A.; Kobayashi, A.; Sehgal, A.; Bradford, B.M.; Pattison, M.; Donaldson, D.S. Aging and the mucosal immune system in the intestine. Biogerontology 2015, 16, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kobayashi, A.; Donaldson, D.S.; Erridge, C.; Kanaya, T.; Williams, I.R.; Ohno, H.; Mahajan, A.; Mabbott, N.A. The functional maturation of M cells is dramatically reduced in the Peyer’s patches of aged mice. Mucosal Immunol. 2013, 6, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santiago, A.F.; Alves, A.C.; Oliveira, R.P.; Fernandes, R.M.; PaulaSilva, J.; Assis, F.A.; Carvalho, C.R.; Weiner, H.L.; Faria, A.M.C. Aging correlates with reduction in regulatory-type cytokines and T cells in the gut mucosa. Immunobiology 2011, 216, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kato, H.; Fujihashi, K.; Kato, R.; Dohi, T.; Fujihashi, K.; Hagiwara, Y.; Kataoka, K.; Kobayashi, R.; McGhee, J.R. Lack of oral tolerance in aging is due to sequential loss of Peyer’s patch cell interactions. Int. Immunol. 2003, 15, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Man, A.L.; Gicheva, N.; Nicoletti, C. The impact of ageing on the intestinal epithelial barrier and immune system. Cell Immunol. 2014, 289, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Montecino-Rodriguez, E.; Beata Berent-Mao, B.; Dorshkind, K. Causes, consequences, and reversal of immune system aging. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Man, A.L.; Bertelli, E.; Rentini, S.; Mari Regoli, M.; Briars, G.; Marini, M.; Watson, A.J.M.; Nicoletti, C. Age-associated modifications of intestinal permeability and innate immunity in human small intestine. Clin. Sci. 2015, 129, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Woodmansey, E.J. Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tiihonen, K.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Rautonen, N. Human intestinal microbiota and healthy ageing. Ageing Res. Rev. 2010, 9, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. O’Toole, P.W.; Jeffery, I.B. Microbiome-health interactions in older people. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kim, B.-S.; Choi, W.C.; Shin, H.; Jin, S.-P.; Bae, J.-S.; Han, M.; Seo, E.Y.; Jongsik Chun, J.; Chung, J.H. Comparison of the Gut Microbiota of Centenarians in Longevity Villages of South Korea with Those of Other Age Groups. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Saunier, K.; Doré, J. Gastrointestinal tract and the elderly: Functional foods, gut microflora and healthy ageing. Dig. Liver Dis. 2002, 34 (Suppl. 2), S19–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lerner, A.; Jeremias, P.; Matthias, T. Nutrients, Bugs and Us: The Short-chain Fatty Acids Story in Celiac Disease. Internat J. Celiac Dis. 2016, 4, 92–94. [Google Scholar]
  52. Hopkins, M.J.; Sharp, R.; Macfarlane, G.T. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 2001, 48, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cenit, M.C.; Olivares, M.; Codoñer-Franch, P.; Sanz, Y. Intestinal Microbiota and Celiac Disease: Cause, Consequence or Co-Evolution? Nutrients 2015, 7, 6900–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Khan, I.; Ullah, N.; Zha, L.; Bai, Y.; Khan, A.; Zhao, T.; Che, T.; Zhang, C. Alteration of Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Cause or Consequence? IBD Treatment Targeting the Gut Microbiome. Pathogens 2019, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Saraswati, S.; Sitaraman, R. Aging and the human gut microbiota—From correlation to causality. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 764. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Rayner, C.K.; Horowitz, M. Physiology of the ageing gut. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2013, 16, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dumic, I.; Nordin, T.; Jecmenica, M.; Lalosevic, M.S.; Milosavljevic, T.; Milovanovic, T. Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders in Older Age. Canadian J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 2019, 6757524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lerner, A.; Neidhöfer, S.; Matthias, T. The gut microbiome feelings of the brain: Perspective for Non-Microbiologists. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lerner, A.; Matthias, T. Changes in intestinal tight junction permeability associated with industrial food additives explain the rising incidence of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2015, 14, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lerner, A.; Matthias, T. GUT-the Trojan horse in remote organs’ autoimmunity. J. Clin. Cell. Immunol. 2016, 7, 401. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tran, L.; Meerveld, B.G.-V. Age-Associated Remodeling of the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2013, 68, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Thevaranjan, N.; Puchta, A.; Schulz, C.; Naidoo, A.; Szamosi, J.C.; Verschoor, C.P.; Loukov, D.; Schenck, L.P.; Jury, J.; Foley, K.P.; et al. Age-Associated Microbial Dysbiosis Promotes Intestinal Permeability, Systemic Inflammation, and Macrophage Dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wilms, E.; Daisy, M.A.E.; Jonkers, D.M.A.E.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Montserrat Elizalde, M.; Tischmann, L.; Paul de Vos, P.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Troost, F.J. The Impact of Pectin Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier Function in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Hu, L.; Chen, S.; Fu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Long, H.; Ren, H.W.; Wang, J.M.; Li, H.; Xu, Q.B.; Yu, W.X.; et al. Risk Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in 323 COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2089–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nikpouraghdam, M.; Jalali Farahani, A.; Alishiri, G.; Heydari, S.; Ebrahimnia, M.; Samadinia, H.; Sepandi, M.; Jafari, N.J.; Izadi, M.; Qazvini, A.; et al. Epidemiological characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in IRAN: A single center study. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Emiroglu, C.; Görpelioglu, S.; Aypak, C. The Relationship between Nutritional Status, Anemia and Other Vitamin Deficiencies in the Elderly Receiving Home Care. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2019, 23, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Seiler, W.O. Clinical pictures of malnutrition in ill elderly subjects. Nutrition 2001, 17, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sharma, P.; Gillies, N.; Pundir, S.; Pileggi, C.A.; Markworth, J.F.; Thorstensen, E.B.; Cameron-Smith, D.; Milan, A.M. Comparison of the Acute Postprandial Circulating B-Vitamin and Vitamer Responses to Single Breakfast Meals in Young and Older Individuals: Preliminary Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sostres, C.; Gargallo, C.; Lanas, A. Drug-related damage of the ageing gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2009, 23, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, M.; Dam, A.; Green, J. Common GI Drug Interactions in the Elderly. Curr. Treat. Options Gastroenterol. 2014, 12, 292–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Q.; Wang, R.; Qu, G. Macroscopic autopsy findings in a patient with COVID-19. J. Forensic Med. 2020, 36, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, H.; Li, H.B.; Lyu, J.R.; Lei, X.M.; Li, W.; Wu, G.; Lyu, J.; Dai, Z.M. Specific ACE2 Expression in Small Intestinal Enterocytes may Cause Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Injury after 2019-nCoV Infection. Int J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wu, P.; Hao, X.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Wong, J.Y.; Leung, K.S.M.; Wu, J.T.; Cowling, B.J.; Leung, G.M. Real-time tentative assessment of the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus infections in Wuhan, China, as at 22 January 2020. Eur. Surveill. 2020, 25, 2000044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chunxiang, M.a.; Yingzi, C.; Hu, X. COVID-19 and the Digestive System. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Name, J.J.; Souza, A.C.R.; Vasconcelos, A.R.; Prado, P.S.; Pereira, C.P.M. Zinc, Vitamin D and Vitamin C: Perspectives for COVID-19 With a Focus on Physical Tissue Barrier Integrity. Front Nutr. 2020, 7, 606398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Salimi, S.; Hamlyn, J.M. COVID-19 and Crosstalk with the Hallmarks of Aging. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020, 75, e34–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Villapol, S. Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with COVID-19: Impact on the gut microbiome. Transl. Res. 2020, 226, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Deffner, F.; Scharr, M.; Klingenstein, S.; Klingenstein, M.; Milazzo, A.; Scherer, S.; Wagner, A.; Hirt, B.; Mack, A.F.; Neckel, P.H. Histological Evidence for the Enteric Nervous System and the Choroid Plexus as Alternative Routes of Neuroinvasion by SARS-CoV2. Front. Neuroanat. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cardinale, V.; Capurso, G.; Ianiro, G.; Gasbarrini, A.; Arcidiacono, P.G.; Alvarod, D. Intestinal permeability changes with bacterial translocation as key events modulating systemic host immune response to SARS-CoV-2: A working hypothesis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2020, 52, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Silva, D.F.O.; Lima, S.C.V.C.; Sena-Evangelista, K.C.M.; Marchioni, D.M.; Cobucci, R.N.; Barbosa de Andrade, F. Nutritional Risk Screening Tools for Older Adults with COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pan, L.; Mu, M.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Yan, J.; Li, P.; Hu, B.; Wang, J.; Hu, C.; et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with digestive symptoms in Hubei, China: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bourgonje, A.R.; Abdulle, A.; Timens, W.; Hillebrands, J.-L.; Navis, G.J.; Gordijn, S.J.; Bolling, M.C.; Dijkstra, G.; Voors, A.A.; Osterhaus, A.D.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Pathol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Datta, P.K.; Liu, F.; Fischer, T.; Rappaport, J.; Qin, X. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and research gaps: Understanding SARS-CoV-2 interaction with the ACE2 receptor and implications for therapy. Theranostics 2020, 10, 7448–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Peron, J.P.S.; NakayaII, H. Susceptibility of the Elderly to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: ACE-2 Overexpression, Shedding, and Antibody dependent Enhancement (ADE). Clinics 2020, 75, e1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Brubaker, P.L. Glucagon-like Peptide-2 and the Regulation of Intestinal Growth and Function. Compr. Physiol. 2018, 8, 1185–1210. [Google Scholar]
  86. Dong, C.X.; Zhao, W.; Solomon, C.; Rowland, K.J.; Ackerley, C.; Robine, S.; Holzenberger, M.; Gonska, T.; Brubaker, P.L. The intestinal epithelial insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor links glucagon-like peptide-2 action to gut barrier function. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Markovic, M.A.; Srikrishnaraj, A.; Tsang, D.; Brubaker, P.L. Requirement for the intestinal epithelial insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in the intestinal responses to glucagon-like peptide-2 and dietary fat. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 6628–6640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Yan, H.; Ajuwon, K.M. Butyrate modifies intestinal barrier function in IPEC-J2 cells through a selective upregulation of tight junction proteins and activation of the Akt signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sun, X.; Yang, Q.; Rogers, C.J.; Du, M.; Zhu, M.J. AMPK improves gut epithelial differentiation and barrier function via regulating Cdx2 expression. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Looijer-van, L.M.; Hotte, N.; Dieleman, L.A.; Albert, E.; Mulder, C.; Madsen, K.L. Estrogen receptor-Î2 signaling modulates epithelial barrier function. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011, 300, G621–G626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yadav, H.; Lee, J.H.; Lloyd, J.; Walter, P.; Rane, S.G. Beneficial metabolic effects of a probiotic via butyrate-induced GLP-1 hormone secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 25088–25097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tolhurst, G.; Heffron, H.; Lam, Y.S.; Parker, H.E.; Habib, A.M.; Diakogiannaki, E.; Cameron, J.; Grosse, J.; Reimann, F.; Gribble, F.M. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 2012, 61, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. De, P.V.; Hamer, H.M.; Windey, K.; Verbeke, K. The impact of pre- and/or probiotics on human colonic metabolism: Does it affect human health? Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  94. McCarty, M.F.; O’Keefe, J.H.; DiNicolantonio, J.J. Dietary Glycine Is Rate-Limiting for Glutathione Synthesis and May Have Broad Potential for Health Protection. Ochsner J. 2018, 18, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Kim, M.H.; Kim, H. The Roles of Glutamine in the Intestine and Its Implication in Intestinal Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Ríos-Covián, D.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Margolles, A.; Gueimonde, M.; de Los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Salazar, N. Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids and their Link with Diet and Human Health. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Turner, N.; Li, J.Y.; Gosby, A.; To, S.W.C.; Cheng, Z.; Miyoshi, H.; Taketo, M.M.; Cooney, G.J.; Edward, W.; Kraegen, E.W.; et al. Berberine and its more biologically available derivative, dihydroberberine, inhibit mitochondrial respiratory complex I: A mechanism for the action of berberine to activate AMP-activated protein kinase and improve insulin action. Diabetes 2008, 57, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. He, Y.; Yuan, X.; Zuo, H.; Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Feng, A. Berberine induces ZIP14 expression and modulates zinc redistribution to protect intestinal mucosal barrier during polymicrobial sepsis. Life Sci. 2019, 233, 116697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hou, Q.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Wen, Y.; Han, Q.; Liu, F. Berberine improves intestinal epithelial tight junctions by upregulating A20 expression in IBS-D mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 118, 109206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Braniste, V.; Leveque, M.; Buisson-Brenac, C.; Bueno, L.; Fioramonti, J.; Houdeau, E. Oestradiol decreases colonic permeability through oestrogen receptor beta-mediated up-regulation of occludin and junctional adhesion molecule-A in epithelial cells. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 3317–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. McCarty, M.F. Isoflavones made simple—Genistein’s agonist activity for the beta-type estrogen receptor mediates their health benefits. Med. Hypotheses 2006, 66, 1093–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Al-Nakkash, L.; Kubinski, A. Soy Isoflavones and Gastrointestinal Health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2020, 9, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yu, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Xiong, W.; Tang, Y.; Lin, L. Spirulina platensis alleviates chronic inflammation with modulation of gut microbiota and intestinal permeability in rats fed a high-fat diet. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 8603–8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. He, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, X.; Song, J.; Wang, N.; Liu, Q. Ferulic acid protects against heat stress-induced intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in IEC-6 cells via the PI3K/Akt-mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Int. J. Hyperthermia 2019, 35, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. He, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, N.; Liu, Q. Ferulic Acid Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Barrier Dysfunction via MicroRNA-200c-3p-Mediated Activation of PI3K/AKT Pathway in Caco-2 Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Koriyama, Y.; Nakayama, Y.; Matsugo, S.; Kato, S. Protective effect of lipoic acid against oxidative stress is mediated by Keap1/Nrf2-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction in the RGC-5 cellline. Brain Res. 2013, 1499, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Lee, S.I.; Kang, K.S. N-acetylcysteine modulates lipopolysaccharide-induced intestinal dysfunction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. McCarty, M.F.; Lerner, A. Perspective: Prospects for Nutraceutical Support of Intestinal Barrier Function. Adv. Nutr. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. A summary of the gastrointestinal dysfunctions in the elderly.
Table 1. A summary of the gastrointestinal dysfunctions in the elderly.
Category of Gastrointestinal DysfunctionIncrease/DecreaseReference
Digestive[32,33,34]
Absorptive[32,33,34,35]
Mucosal barriers[33,36,37,38]
Immune[39,40,41,42,43,44]
Microbiome/dysbiome ratio[46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
Motility[33,35,56,57]
Permeability[33,35,45,61,62,63]
Associated chronic diseases[64,65]
Nutritional deficiencies[33,66,67,68]
Drug consumption with gastrointestinal side effects[69,70]
Table 2. Intestinal dysfunctions in COVID-19 infections.
Table 2. Intestinal dysfunctions in COVID-19 infections.
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in COVID-19Increase/DecreaseReference
Digestive[74]
Absorptive[74]
Mucosal barriers[75]
Immune functions[76]
Microbiome/dysbiome ratio[77]
Motility↓↑[78]
Permeability[79]
Nutritional deficiencies[80]
Table 3. A summary of various nutraceuticals, the mediators involved, and their impact on tight junction’s performance.
Table 3. A summary of various nutraceuticals, the mediators involved, and their impact on tight junction’s performance.
NutraceuticalsIntermediatesTight Junctions’ PerformanceReferences
Prebiotics/probioticsGlycine, glutamine, butyrate, glucagon-like peptide-2, insulin-like growth factor-I, PI3K/Akt/mTORC1Improved[51,77,78,79,80,83]
Prebiotics/probioticsButyrate, AMPKImproved[51,77,78,79,80,83]
BerberineAMPKImproved[85,86,87]
Soy isoflavoneER-betaImproved[88,89,90,91]
N-acetylcysteineNADPH oxidase, JNK, p38, ERK1/2Suppressed[96]
Nrf2NADPH oxidase, JNK, p38, ERK1/2, HO-1Suppressed[92,93,94,95]
HO-1NADPH oxidase, JNK, p38, ERK1/2Suppressed[92,93,94,95]
PhycocyanobilinNADPH oxidase, JNK, p38, ERK1/2Suppressed[92]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lerner, A.; McCarty, M.F. The Aging Bowel Dysfunction and Elderly Vulnerability towards COVID-19 Infection. Life 2021, 11, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020097

AMA Style

Lerner A, McCarty MF. The Aging Bowel Dysfunction and Elderly Vulnerability towards COVID-19 Infection. Life. 2021; 11(2):97. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lerner, Aaron, and Mark F. McCarty. 2021. "The Aging Bowel Dysfunction and Elderly Vulnerability towards COVID-19 Infection" Life 11, no. 2: 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020097

APA Style

Lerner, A., & McCarty, M. F. (2021). The Aging Bowel Dysfunction and Elderly Vulnerability towards COVID-19 Infection. Life, 11(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop