Next Article in Journal
Assessing Consciousness through Neurofeedback and Neuromodulation: Possibilities and Challenges
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Silver Nitrate Spray for Skin Wound Care in Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Our Experience in 4 Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Bioinspired Polymers: Transformative Applications in Biomedicine and Regenerative Medicine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/life13081674
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for Long-Term Clinical Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis: Hypotheses and Perspectives

by
Dong-Ho Nahm
Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Republic of Korea
Life 2023, 13(8), 1674; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081674
Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 28 July 2023 / Accepted: 30 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dermatology: Inflammatory Disorders and Future Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing inflammatory skin disorder characterized by itching and eczematous lesions. It is often associated with a personal or familial history of allergic diseases. Allergic inflammation induced by immunoglobulin E and T-helper type 2 (Th2) cell responses to common environmental agents has been suggested to play an essential role in AD pathogenesis. The standard therapies for AD, including topical or systemic agents, focus on controlling skin inflammation. Recently developed monoclonal antibody to interleukin-4 receptor alpha or Janus kinase inhibitors can provide significant clinical improvements in patients with AD by inhibiting Th2 cell-mediated skin inflammation. However, the clinical efficacy of the Th2 cell-targeted therapy is transient and incomplete in patients with AD. Patients with AD are seeking a permanent cure. Therefore, the development of novel immunomodulatory strategies that can improve a long-term clinical outcome and provide a long-term treatment-free clinical remission of AD (disease-modifying therapy) is needed. Regulatory T (Treg) cells play a critical role in the maintenance of immune tolerance and suppress the development of autoimmune and allergic diseases. This review provides three working hypotheses and perspectives for the treatment of AD by Treg cell activation. (1) A decreased number or function of Treg cells is a critical event that causes the activation of Th2 cells, leading to the development and maintenance of AD. (2) Activation of Treg cells is an effective therapeutic approach for AD. (3) Many different immunomodulatory strategies activating Treg cells can provide a long-term clinical improvement of AD by induction of immune tolerance. The Treg cell-targeted immunomodulatory therapies for AD include allergen immunotherapy, microbiota, vitamin D, polyvalent human immunoglobulin G, monoclonal antibodies to the surface antigens of T cell or antigen-presenting cell, and adoptive transfer of autologous Treg cells or genetically engineered Treg cells expanded in vitro.

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing inflammatory skin disorder characterized by itching and eczematous lesions. It is often associated with a personal or familial history of allergic diseases [1,2,3]. Hypersensitivity reaction (allergic reaction) to environmental agents has been suggested as a pathogenetic mechanism responsible for the development and maintenance of chronic skin inflammation in patients with AD [3]. However, the precise pathogenetic mechanism underlying AD remains unclear. The standard therapies for AD, including topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors, focus on controlling skin inflammation [1,2,3]. A significant number of patients with AD can be further improved by systemic immunomodulatory agents including corticosteroids, cyclosporine, or methotrexate. However, there are toxicity risks associated with prolonged use of these compounds [3]. Monoclonal antibody to interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha and Janus kinase inhibitors suppressing T-helper type 2 (Th2) cell-mediated inflammation can provide significant clinical improvement in patients with moderate-to-severe AD [4,5,6,7]. These findings demonstrate that hypersensitivity reactions mediated by Th2 cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of AD [4,5,6,7]. These results also demonstrate that AD is a systemic immune disease, and that systemic immunomodulation is an efficient strategy for the treatment of AD. However, the Th2-targeted therapy could not modulate upstream immune dysfunction causing Th2 cell activation and could not provide a long-term clinical improvement (LTCI) of AD. Thus, further development of novel therapeutic modalities for AD that can improve a long-term clinical outcome and provide a long-term treatment-free clinical remission of AD (disease-modifying therapy) is required. Studies in patients with AD and AD mouse models have shown that immune dysfunction caused by a decreased number and/or function of regulatory T (Treg) cells is critical for Th2 cell activation and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated inflammation [8,9]. Therefore, an immunomodulatory strategy that activates Treg cells is an ideal therapeutic approach to induce immune tolerance and achieve an LTCI of AD. This review provides hypotheses and perspectives on immunomodulatory strategies that activate Treg cells to achieve an LTCI of AD by induction of immune tolerance through antigen-dependent and/or antigen-independent stimulations.

2. Unmet Needs of Patients with AD

Patients with AD are seeking a permanent cure. This fact is supported by the persistence of various complementary and alternative therapies for AD [10], as well as multiple internet and social media contents created by patients with AD who want to share their personal experiences on successful AD self-management. However, physicians are explaining to patients suffering from AD that there is still no cure for AD and that it should be managed by continuous medical treatments [3]. This significant mismatch between patient’s needs and current medical therapies for AD necessitates further development of novel immunomodulatory strategies to achieve an LTCI of AD.

3. Hypothesis on the Pathogenesis of AD

AD is a multifactorial disorder caused by multiple pathogenic elements, including genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, immune dysfunction, hypersensitivity reaction, chronic skin inflammation, and skin barrier defect [2,3]. Unfortunately, the precise interactions among the multiple pathogenic elements involved in the development and maintenance of AD are not fully understood. Epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests that an impairment of immune tolerance state caused by decreased number and/or function of Treg cells resulting from the exposure to various environmental toxicants is responsible for a rapidly increased prevalence of allergic diseases in the industrialized world [3,11,12,13,14]. In this hypothetical pathogenesis model for AD, a human subject with a genetic predisposition for the development of AD is exposed to environmental toxicants (such as air pollution, volatile organic chemicals, phthalates, and bisphenol A) through the respiratory mucosa, gastrointestinal mucosa, or skin. The exposure to environmental toxicants decreases the number and/or function of Treg cells and impairs immune homeostasis (loss of immune tolerance state) in the subject. The toxicant-induced decreased number and/or function of Treg cells induces hypersensitivity in the human subject through the activation of Th2 cells and the development of an IgE response to common environmental agents. Exposure to sensitized allergens and/or chemical irritants induces a hypersensitivity reaction and chronic inflammation of the skin, which induces and maintains the clinical manifestations of AD (pruritus, dryness, and eczema) (Figure 1).
Based on the above hypothesis on AD pathogenesis, a decreased number and/or function of Treg cells suppressing IgE and Th2 cells plays a critical role in AD pathogenesis. Therefore, immunomodulatory strategies that activate Treg cells may be a useful therapeutic approach for inducing an LTCI or long-term treatment-free clinical remission of AD (disease-modifying therapy) by induction of immune tolerance (recovery of immune homeostasis).

4. Previous Reports on the Long-Term Clinical Improvement of AD

Previous reports have suggested that an LTCI of AD can be achieved through three methods. First, a marked change in the living environment, also known as climatotherapy (relocation of a patient to a different region with a beneficial climate such as a foreign country with favorable weather and clean air), has been reported to induce an LTCI of AD [15,16]. However, the LTCI induced by a marked change in the living environment usually disappears shortly after the patient returns to their previous environment, indicating that change in environmental factors alone cannot normalize the disordered immune system of patients with AD [15,16]. Second, allergen immunotherapy induces an LTCI in some patients with AD [17,18]. Multiple clinical studies have reported an LTCI of AD after allergen immunotherapy [17,18,19,20]. Third, up to 70% of children with AD experience a natural LTCI of AD before puberty [21]. Induction of immune tolerance (recovery of immune homeostasis) is the most probable mechanism of an LTCI observed in children with AD [3], although scientific studies could not directly demonstrate this hypothesis. Mimicking the immunological mechanism responsible for the natural LTCI of AD in children (induction of immune tolerance) may be an ideal therapeutic approach for achieving an LTCI of AD [3].

5. Five Questions and Three Hypotheses on the Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Strategies to Achieve a Long-Term Clinical Improvement of AD

The present author developed five key questions on the immune mechanisms that induce natural LTCI in children with AD and the LTCI observed after allergen immunotherapy in patients with AD (Table 1). Additionally, the present author proposes three working hypotheses and perspectives on immunomodulatory strategies to achieve an LTCI of AD (Table 2). These hypotheses and perspectives suggest that various immunomodulatory strategies activating Treg cells can induce an immune tolerance and achieve an LTCI in patients with AD.

6. Mechanism of Immune Tolerance and Rationale of Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for AD

Immune tolerance has been historically defined as a state of unresponsiveness of the immune system to self-antigens and foreign antigens (e.g., proteins and allergens) [22,23]. Prior exposure to a specific antigen has been suggested to induce immune tolerance to the antigen [22,23]. Immune tolerance is crucial for normal physiology, and defects in immune tolerance can lead to autoimmune and allergic diseases [24,25]. However, the present author prefers the term “immune homeostasis” because it is more scientifically appropriate than “immune tolerance” for several reasons. First, “immune tolerance” can be misinterpreted as having no immune response to self or foreign antigens. A well-controlled immune response (immune homeostasis) can maintain a harmoniously controlled immune response in contrast to an exaggerated immune response that can be harmful to the host. A low-grade, well-controlled autoimmune response to a self-antigen is physiological, and this response helps to remove denatured or altered self-antigens [26]. Well-controlled immune responses to microbial organisms also protect the body from severe infections (septicemia and viremia) or hyperactivation of the immune system. Hyperactivation of the immune system induced by viral infection causes uncontrolled systemic inflammation, cytokine release (cytokine storm), multi-organ failure, and death in the coronavirus disease 2019 [27]. Treg cells are a functionally defined subpopulation of T cells that modulate the immune system and play a critical role in immune homeostasis (a well-controlled immune response to self-antigens and foreign antigens), thereby preventing the development of autoimmune diseases, allergic diseases, and allograft rejection [28,29]. Animal experiments have suggested that decreased number and/or function (deficiency or dysfunction) of Treg cells serves as a key immune abnormality responsible for the development of autoimmune and allergic diseases [30].
Treg cells are classified as natural Treg cells (nTreg cells) and induced Treg cells (iTreg cells) [31]. nTreg cells express forkhead box P3 (Foxp3), CD4, and CD25 markers [32,33,34]. nTreg cells mediate “central immune tolerance” by deleting autoreactive lymphocyte clones before they develop into fully immunocompetent cells during lymphocyte development in the thymus [35]. Peripheral immune tolerance is mediated by iTreg cells and develops after T cells mature and enter the peripheral tissues and lymph nodes [36]. In peripheral immune tolerance, the immune response to a certain antigen can also be decreased by repeated antigenic exposure or by antigenic exposure in tolerogenic conditions [36]. iTreg cells arise extra-thymically from conventional (or naïve) CD4+ helper T cells in the presence of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), retinoic acid, and T cell receptor (TCR)-mediated antigen presentation by antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells (DCs) or macrophages) in the peripheral tissue or nearby lymphoid tissue [31]. Among the iTreg cells, the IL-10-producing CD4+ Treg cells without Foxp3 expression (type 1 Treg cells: Tr1 cells) play a key role in allergen tolerance and can be induced by allergen immunotherapy in humans [37,38,39,40]. Previous studies have indicated that allergen-specific Tr1 cells are the predominant type of T cell response to allergens in healthy individuals and prevent unwanted hypersensitivity reactions to environmental antigens, such as house dust mites, pollen, and food [41,42]. There are significant differences in the proportions of three different allergen-specific T cell subtypes (T-helper type 1: Th1, Th2, and Tr1 cells) in peripheral blood between healthy non-allergic human subjects and allergic individuals [42]. The imbalance in the ratio of allergen-specific Th1, Th2, and Tr1 cells appears to be critical in the development of allergic diseases, and recovery of balance among allergen-specific Th1, Th2, and Tr1 cells may provide remission of allergic diseases, including AD [42]. Therefore, immunomodulatory approaches activating Tr1 cells with antigen-specific and/or antigen-nonspecific stimulations could induce an LTCI of AD by inducing immune homeostasis (immune tolerance state).
The presence of inborn errors of immunity (IEI) caused by genetic mutations that affect the immune system is important scientific evidence supporting the hypothesis that immune dysfunction resulting from a decreased number and/or function of Treg cells is critical in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases, including AD [30,43]. IEI are clinically expressed as increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity, allergy, bone marrow failure, and/or malignancy [44]. In human subjects, mutations of the Foxp3 gene (a master control gene of Treg cells) resulting in absent or dysfunctional Treg cells are responsible for immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome, which is clinically characterized by neonatal autoimmune enteropathy, diabetes and thyroiditis, food allergies, and skin eczema [43,45]. AD is a frequent clinical manifestation observed in IPEX syndrome [43,45]. Another example is Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) [46,47]. WAS is a rare X-linked recessive disease characterized by eczema, thrombocytopenia, immune deficiency, and bloody diarrhea [43]. WAS is caused by the genetic defects producing defective proteins (WAS proteins) that have a central role in actin polymerization and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Both nTreg cells and iTreg cells are defective in WAS [46]. In the WAS, the eczematous eruption is indistinguishable from AD when diagnostic criteria for AD are used and clears dramatically after a successful transplantation of bone marrow (hematopoietic stem cells) from a healthy donor [47]. This evidence from IEI demonstrates that Treg cell dysfunction is critically involved in the pathogenesis of the AD [30,43].

7. Immunomodulatory Strategies Activating Regulatory T Cells for AD: In Vivo Activation

The Treg cell-targeted immunomodulatory therapies for AD include allergen immunotherapy, microbiota, vitamin D, polyvalent human immunoglobulin G (IgG), monoclonal antibodies to the surface antigens of T cell or antigen-presenting cell, and adoptive transfer of autologous Treg cells or genetically engineered Treg cells expanded in vitro (Table 3).

7.1. Allergen Immunotherapy (Activation of Allergen-Specific Tr1 Cells)

Allergen immunotherapy is a therapeutic approach that repeatedly administers a high dose of sensitized allergens to patients with allergic diseases either through subcutaneous injection or sublingual absorption to induce allergen-specific immune tolerance [48]. Based on a meta-analysis of multiple randomized clinical trials, allergen immunotherapy has been shown to be clinically beneficial in patients with AD sensitized to inhalant allergens such as house dust mites [49,50]. Allergen immunotherapy decreases allergic reactions (Th2 cell activation and IgE-mediated reaction) and induces clinical improvement in patients with allergic diseases through the activation of allergen-specific Treg cells [37,38,39,40]. Tr1 cells induced in the peripheral tissue and lymph nodes after repeated administration of a high dose of an allergen play a key role in the development of allergen-specific immune tolerance and clinical improvement of allergic diseases [37,38,39,40]. The allergen-specific Tr1 cells induced by allergen immunotherapy downregulate allergic inflammation by releasing IL-10 and TGF-β, which suppress the proliferation of allergen-specific Th2 cells and allergen-specific IgE production by B cell and promote the production of protective allergen-specific IgG antibodies [51]. Allergen immunotherapy increases the number of allergen-specific Tr1 cells [52]. However, it is unclear how Tr1 cells are induced during allergen immunotherapy [53]. A recent single-cell analysis study using allergen-specific T cell clones obtained from patients with allergic rhinitis suggested that allergen-specific Treg cells differentiate from allergen-specific Th2 cells during sublingual immunotherapy [54].
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 randomized, controlled trials, including 1957 patients, on allergen immunotherapy for AD showed that subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy to aeroallergens, particularly house dust mites, can significantly reduce AD severity and improve the quality of life [50]. However, this review also reported an increased risk of adverse events with subcutaneous immunotherapy compared to sublingual immunotherapy [50]. It took months (median five months) for allergen immunotherapy to provide clinical improvement in patients with AD sensitized to aeroallergens, and the probability of a marked reduction in the clinical severity of AD (50% or more from the baseline) was observed in 40% of the patients who received allergen immunotherapy and 26% of those who did not receive allergen immunotherapy [50]. In 1960, Tuft reported that subcutaneous immunotherapy using inhaled allergens in 101 patients with AD provided a favorable clinical response in 77.2% of the patients [20]. Here, clinical exacerbation of AD was observed in 5.0% (5/101 patients) of patients within 12 to 48 h after subcutaneous immunotherapy (“delayed adverse reaction”), and four of the five patients discontinued the allergen immunotherapy [20]. The risk of systemic adverse effects (anaphylaxis and delayed exacerbation of AD), relatively low success rate (<50%), and late-onset clinical efficacy (several months) are three major reasons that preclude the clinical application of allergen immunotherapy for the treatment of AD in real clinical practice.

7.2. Microbial Therapy

Probiotics, which are non-invasive, non-pathogenic bacteria with known health-promoting effects, are primarily found in fermented foods [55,56]. Intake of an adequate quantity of probiotics can be helpful for the homeostasis of the gut and immune system [57]. Probiotics can prevent AD in mice and humans [58,59,60]. Lactobacillus supplementation activates Treg cells in mouse models of allergy [61,62]. In recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses, probiotic strains composed of a mixture of multiple bacterial strains, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, were shown to provide significant clinical improvements in both pediatric and adult patients with AD [63,64] and reduce the risk of developing AD when administered to pregnant women, infants, or both [65]. However, there is controversy about the clinical efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of AD because there also have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses showing limited effectiveness of probiotics in the treatment of AD [66,67]. Further clinical trials are needed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of probiotics in the treatment of AD.
Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients (mainly carbohydrates and fibers) that promote the growth of healthy gut microflora by creating a nutrient-rich intestinal environment in which “good bacteria” may thrive. These beneficial bacteria in the large intestine, mainly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, selectively ferment carbohydrates and fibers [68]. This process increases the number of commensal bacteria and the amount of acidic fermentation products, such as lactate and unbranched short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs, mainly acetate, butyrate, and propionate). Prebiotics can indirectly influence the immune system in patients with AD by supporting the growth of probiotics that produce SCFAs [69]. SCFAs exert anti-inflammatory effects in the intestine by acting on intestinal epithelial cells and facilitating the generation of iTreg cells [69]. A randomized, controlled trial which included 29 infants with AD reported significant clinical improvement after treatment with prebiotics (kestose) for 12 weeks [70]. Due to the lack of well-controlled, randomized clinical trials on prebiotics for AD, further investigations are needed [71]. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the process of transferring fecal bacteria and other microbes from a healthy individual into another individual to restore the gut microbiota of a diseased individual. FMT increases the secretion of IL-10 from CD4+ T cells in mice [72]. FMT also reduced the clinical severity of AD and restored the Th1/Th2 ratio in an AD mouse model [73]. In an uncontrolled pilot clinical trial, FMT performed four times for six weeks (from week 4 to week 10) induced significant clinical improvement (decrease in clinical severity score of AD by more than 75% from the baseline) at week 18 in six (66.7%) out of nine adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD that had not been improved by prior topical and systemic therapies [74].

7.3. Vitamin D

Vitamin D increases the number and function of Treg cells [75,76,77]. DCs treated with active vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol, also called calcitriol) become “tolerogenic” for the T cells, and calcitriol treatment induces the expression of the inhibitory cell-surface molecule programmed death ligand-1 on DCs and induces the differentiation of Treg cells from naïve T cells [78]. Calcitriol also acts directly on human CD4+ T cells, promoting the development of an IL-10-secreting CD4+ Treg cell population [79,80,81]. In BALB/c mice, dietary vitamin D3 supplementation significantly inhibited dinitrofluorobenzene-induced ear swelling and increased the number and suppressive activity of Treg cells in draining lymph nodes [82]. A recent systematic review of randomized, clinical trials on oral supplementation of vitamin D showed a significant clinical benefit in patients with AD [83].

7.4. Polyvalent Human IgG from Multiple Healthy Blood Donors

Intravenous administration of polyvalent human IgG, purified from the plasma pool of multiple healthy voluntary blood donors, has primarily been used to treat patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases associated with decreased immunoglobulin production [84]. Owing to its immunomodulatory effects, this therapy has also been used for the treatment of various autoimmune and allergic diseases [85,86]. In vitro incubation of polyvalent human IgG with purified CD4+CD25high T cells increased the expression of intracellular IL-10, suggesting direct activation of Treg cells by polyvalent human IgG [87]. Intravenous administration of heterologous polyvalent human IgG induced a significant expansion of nTreg cells (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) in patients with autoimmune diseases, including immune thrombocytopenia and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis [88,89]. Therefore, Treg cell activation seems to be one of the major mechanisms responsible for the immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects of polyvalent IgG [87,90,91]. However, clinical trials investigating the clinical efficacy of high-dose intravenous polyvalent IgG therapy in adult patients with severe AD did not show a significant clinical benefit [92]. The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of high-dose intravenous polyvalent human IgG therapy for AD has not been completely evaluated yet. In contrast, subcutaneous administration of a mixture of histamine and polyvalent IgG (“Histaglobin”) significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled study [93]. Intramuscular administration of placenta-derived polyvalent IgG (“Allergobulin”) also significantly reduced the clinical severity of AD in a randomized, double-blind, controlled study [94]. The reason for the discrepancy in the clinical efficacy of polyvalent human IgG therapies for AD according to the routes of administrations (intravenous compared to subcutaneous or intramuscular) should be further evaluated in future studies.

7.5. Intramuscular Administration of Autologous Polyvalent IgG

“Jerne’s idiotypic network theory” (Jerne, 1974) proposes that antigen-binding sites (idiotypes) of autologous immunoglobulins are sufficiently immunogenic to induce antibody responses (anti-idiotype antibodies) in the same host [95,96]. Induction of an anti-idiotypic immune response has been suggested as one of the major mechanisms responsible for the development of immune tolerance (immune homeostasis) [97]. Physiological idiotype-anti-idiotype antibody responses maintain immune homeostasis by controlling excessive immune responses to self or foreign antigens [96,97,98]. Stimulation of anti-idiotypic immunomodulation has been suggested as a promising therapeutic approach for allergic diseases [99]. However, there is scarce evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of anti-idiotypic immunomodulatory therapy in human subjects with allergic diseases. The present author hypothesized that intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG could induce an anti-idiotypic immunomodulatory effect and clinical improvement in patients with allergic diseases [100,101,102,103,104,105]. To prove this concept, the clinical efficacy, safety, and immunomodulatory effects of intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 51 adolescent and adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD [104]. In this study, eight weekly intramuscular administrations of 50 mg autologous total IgG for seven weeks significantly decreased the clinical severity of AD and increased serum levels of IL-10 and interferon (IFN)-γ at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 compared to the baseline without serious adverse events [104]. These results showed that intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG could provide clinical improvement and systemic immunomodulatory effects in patients with AD. To further evaluate the mechanism of immunomodulation induced by intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG, changes in peripheral blood T cells were analyzed before and after administration in 13 healthy human subjects [105]. Intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG significantly increased the percentage of IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells and the percentage of IFN-γ-producing CD3+ T cells in healthy human subjects. These results suggest that intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG activates Tr1 cells in healthy human subjects [105]. Interestingly, long-term clinical improvements and decreases in serum total IgE concentrations lasting for more than 36 weeks were observed in two of three patients with severe AD who were followed up for more than two years after eight intramuscular administrations of 50 mg autologous total IgG for four weeks [102].
Major limitations of previous studies on the clinical efficacy and immunomodulatory efficacy of intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG in patients with AD and healthy human subjects include the lack of knowledge on the detailed molecular mechanism of Treg cell activation induced by intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG. An in vitro study showed that pooled IgG purified from AD patients induced significantly higher productions of IL-10 and IL-17 from cultured thymic CD4+ T cells than pooled purified IgG from healthy blood donors (polyvalent IgG for intravenous administration) [106]. Other in vitro experiments showed that pooled IgG purified from AD patients induced significantly higher productions of IFN-γ and IL-22 from cultured thymic gamma-delta T cells compared to pooled purified IgG from healthy blood donors [107]. These experimental results suggest that polyvalent IgG from AD patients might more efficiently activate Treg cells than polyvalent IgG from healthy blood donors by direct interactions between idiotypes of IgG and T cells without the help of antigen-presenting cells (“hook without bait theory”) as previously proposed [108]. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate detailed immunological mechanisms producing a therapeutic efficacy of intramuscular administration of autologous total IgG in patients with AD.

7.6. Monoclonal Antibodies to Antigens on the Surface of T Cells or Antigen-Presenting Cells

OX40 (CD 134) is expressed only in activated T cells, and its ligand OX40 ligand (OX40L, CD252) is expressed only on activated antigen-presenting cells [109]. OX40L binds to OX40 on T cells and prevents activated T cells from dying, subsequently increasing cytokine production. OX40 plays a critical role in the maintenance of an immune response beyond the first few days, enhances the survival of activated T cells, and plays a crucial role in both Th1- and Th2-mediated reactions in vivo [110]. OX40 and OX40L are only induced after antigen or TCR stimulation, and the OX40–OX40L interaction is a key regulator of T cell responses [111]. OX40 signaling can promote effector T cell proliferation and inhibit Treg cell function [109]. OX40 has been suggested as a potential immunotherapeutic target for cancer, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases [109]. Blocking the OX40–OX40L interaction and OX40 signaling enhanced Treg cell proliferation under in vitro conditions; this approach has been suggested as a novel strategy to increase Treg cells and suppress autoimmunity [112]. An agonist anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody induced Treg cell expansion in a mouse experimental model [113]. In a non-human primate graft versus host disease model using the transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells, concurrent blockade of OX40L with monoclonal antibody (KY1005) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) with sirolimus increased Treg cells in the blood and prevented graft rejection [114]. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b clinical study, an anti-OX40 antibody (rocatinlimab) provided significant clinical improvement in patients with moderate-to-severe AD [115]. Interestingly, a significant proportion of patients who achieved marked clinical improvement (achieving at least a 75% reduction in the clinical severity score of AD from the baseline) after anti-OX40 antibody therapy for 36 weeks experienced prolonged clinical improvement for more than 20 weeks after discontinuation of the therapy [115]. Further clinical studies on the possibility of inducing an LTCI of AD by anti-OX40 antibody therapy are needed.

7.7. Other Chemical Candidates for Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Therapy of AD

There are several other chemicals (small molecules) that have been shown to activate Treg cells, but their immunomodulatory effects and clinical efficacy in patients with AD have not been evaluated yet.

7.7.1. Sirolimus

Sirolimus (also known as rapamycin) is a macrolide compound with immunosuppressant activity that has been used to prevent organ transplant rejection [116]. It is an inhibitor of the mTOR and inhibits the activation of T and B cells by reducing their sensitivity to IL-2 [117]. Human Treg cells expand efficiently in the presence of sirolimus under experimental cell culture conditions [118]. Sirolimus also provided major clinical improvements and expansion of peripheral blood Treg cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [119]. Topical application of sirolimus ointment reduced the clinical severity of eczema in an AD mouse model [120].

7.7.2. Metformin

Metformin is a first-line therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes [121]. It activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, which inhibits mTOR complex1, controlling the activation and differentiation of T and B cells, thereby producing immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects [121]. Oral administration of metformin improved autoimmune arthritis in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis [122]. In the collagen-induced arthritis mouse model and in vitro experiments, metformin treatment decreased Th17 cell differentiation and enhanced Treg cell differentiation [122,123]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving continuous methotrexate therapy were further treated with additional metformin (1000 mg/day) or placebo [124]. After 12 weeks of treatment, metformin-treated patients showed better clinical outcomes and higher remission rates than placebo-treated patients [124]. Oral administration of metformin provided a significant attenuation of skin inflammation in the AD mouse model [125].

7.7.3. Butyrate

Butyrate is one of the SCFAs found in animal fat and plant oils, bovine milk, breast milk, butter, parmesan cheese, body odor, vomit, and as a product of anaerobic fermentation in the colon [126,127,128]. Highly fermentable fiber residues (e.g., resistant starch, oat bran, pectin, and guar) are transformed by colonic bacteria into SCFAs including butyrate [128,129]. Butyrate produced in the colon plays a key role in maintaining immune homeostasis both locally (in the gut) and systemically (via circulating butyrate) [130]. Butyrate promotes the differentiation of Treg cells [130,131] and is the most potent promoter of intestinal Treg cells among the various SCFAs [131]. In patients with ulcerative colitis, an enema with butyrate decreased inflammation and bleeding [132]. In an AD mouse model, oral intake of sodium butyrate alone or in combination with probiotics increased serum levels of IL-10 and mitigated AD symptoms [133].

7.8. Adoptive Cell Therapy with Ex Vivo Expanded Regulatory T Cells

Recent technical developments have enabled adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with ex vivo expanded Treg cells. ACT with Treg cells can be achieved using three methods: polyclonal Treg cells without antigen stimulation, antigen-stimulated and expanded Treg cells, and Treg cells with a genetically engineered chimeric antigen receptor. Adoptive transfer of Treg cells has been proposed to treat T cell-mediated immune diseases including organ transplant rejection, autoimmune diseases, and allergic diseases [134,135]. However, human clinical studies using the adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded Treg cells for AD or other allergic diseases have not been conducted. Future studies on the clinical efficacy and immunomodulatory effects of the adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded Treg cells in patients with AD or animal models of AD are needed.

7.8.1. Autologous Polyclonal Regulatory T Cells

Treg cells can be isolated from the peripheral blood of human subjects and cultured in vitro to expand [136]. In a human clinical trial involving 12 patients with type 1 diabetes (autoimmune diabetes), intravenous infusion of autologous nTreg cells (CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ T cells purified from patients’ peripheral blood and expanded in vitro using beads coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies, IL-2, and autologous serum) resulted in a significant decrease in the requirement of exogenous insulin (in 8 of 12 patients) compared to the untreated control group (in 2 of 10 patients) without significant adverse events [137]. In a human clinical trial for kidney transplantation, adoptive cell transfer of autologous Treg cells by intravenous infusion was effective and well-tolerated [138]. In a phase I/IIa clinical trial investigating Treg cell therapy in kidney transplantation, patients engrafted with autologous Treg cells had similar rejection rates compared to the control group receiving the standard immunosuppression with basiliximab (anti-CD25) but displayed reduced infection rates [138]. In another human trial for patients with kidney transplantation, a single-dose intravenous infusion of autologous nTreg cells was performed seven days after kidney transplantation in 11 patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation [139]. Stepwise tapering of triple immunosuppression (prednisolone, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus) to low dose tacrolimus monotherapy was attempted until week 48. Stable monotherapy immunosuppression (without prednisolone) was achieved in eight of 11 (73%) patients that received nTreg cells, while the control group remained on standard dual or triple drug immunosuppression (with continuous prednisolone) (p = 0.002). Both the nTreg cell treatment and control groups had 100% three-year allograft survival and similar clinical and safety profiles [139]. In future clinical or preclinical studies on AD, it will be possible to conduct a study in which autologous nTreg cells derived from the peripheral blood of patients with AD are expanded in vitro and subsequently re-injected into the same patients.

7.8.2. Autologous Antigen-Stimulated Regulatory T Cells

Theoretically, an ACT with an antigen-specific approach might be more efficient with higher specificity than polyclonal Treg cells without antigen stimulation [140]. Treg cells obtained from kidney allograft recipients can be stimulated by antigen-presenting cells from the kidney graft donor to generate autologous Treg cells reactive to donor alloantigens [141]. Antigen-specific Tr1 cells can be enriched in cultured CD4+ T cells that were stimulated with allogeneic IL-10-producing DCs generated from CD14+ monocytes (from the kidney donor) in the presence of IL-10 [142]. These allospecific Tr1 cells showed specific immune suppression to donor antigens (alloantigens) in vitro and maintained a tolerogenic gene expression profile in vivo [142]. However, human clinical studies in kidney transplantation with intravenous administration of donor alloantigen-stimulated autologous Treg cells resulted in significant rejection risk following immunosuppressive drug weaning [143]. Further developments are needed before antigen-specific Treg cell therapy can be applied clinically. In future clinical or preclinical studies of AD, autologous Treg cells derived from patients with AD sensitized to allergens can be cultured and expanded with allergens (e.g., house dust mite allergens or cat allergens) in vitro and re-infused into patients with AD.

7.8.3. Genetically Engineered Regulatory T Cells

Genetic modification of polyclonal Treg cells to express chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) can be used to recognize a specific antigen, thereby providing antigen-specific Treg cells [144]. The advantage of genetically engineered Treg cell therapy is the reduction in side effects due to non-specific immune suppression by Treg cells [145]. Treg cells can be isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy and allergic donors, cultured with IL-2 for polyclonal Treg expansion, and then transformed into genetically engineered Treg cells by transduction with retroviruses, lentiviruses, or adenovirus to express CAR. Following Good Manufacturing Practice regulations, expanded cells can be infused into patients [146]. CAR is a single protein complex consisting of a single chain antibody fragment that recognizes the antigen in the outer part, a hinge, and an inner part with CD3ζ and CD28/4-1BB domains.
The use of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells bearing antigen-specific CAR, designed to redirect T cells from cancer patients to antigen-expressing tumor cells, is the main ACT strategy for cancer therapy [146,147]. The first CAR-T cell therapy approved by the Food and Drug Administration is tisagenlecleucel (CTL019; trade name Kymriah). Tisagenlecleucel is a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T cell immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma and B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia [148]. CAR-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies has been primarily designed to recognize the CD19 antigen on the surface of B cells, including normal lymphocytes and leukemic cells. CD19 was chosen as a target for immunotherapy because it is uniformly expressed in B cell leukemia/lymphomas and healthy B cells but not in other normal tissues [149]. The production of tisagenlecleucel involves reprogramming the patient’s own T cells with a transgene encoding CAR to identify and eliminate CD19-expressing cells. Upon binding to CD19-expressing cells, the CAR transmits a signal that promotes T cell expansion [150]. The major advantage of CAR-T cells is their ability to be human leukocyte antigen-independent. Obviating the need for antigen presentation in human leukocyte antigen makes this technology more accessible and universal [151]. CAR-engineered T cell therapy is becoming the most promising approach in cancer treatment, involving reprogramming of the patient’s own T cells with a CAR-encoding transgene to identify and eliminate cancer-specific surface antigen-expressing cells. However, the adverse effects of CD8+ cytotoxic CAR-T cells are severe and are characterized by over-activation of the immune system, including cytokine release syndrome, encephalopathy syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, tumor lysis syndrome, B cell aplasia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [152,153,154]. Major trials have indicated that the incidence rate of cytokine release syndrome was 77% in patients treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia [155] and 57–93% in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients [156,157].
Recently, the CAR approach was evaluated in an ovalbumin (OVA) allergy mouse model. In this study, the CAR Treg cell was composed of OVA linked with the transmembrane and signal transduction domains, CD28-CD3ζ [158]. This CAR Treg cell therapy decreased the anaphylactic reaction induced by intraperitoneal OVA injection in the mouse model [158]. Under cell culture conditions, Treg cells transduced with Bet v 1-specific TCR suppressed allergen-specific effector T cell proliferation and cytokine production [159].

7.8.4. Limitations of Adoptive Cell Therapy with Regulatory T Cells

Human Treg cells display phenotypic plasticity and can be changed into effector T cells (Th1, Th2, or Th17 cells) in an inflammatory environment, and the effector cells produce pathogenic cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17 [160,161]. The instability of Treg cells is a crucial limiting factor for the successful development of ACT with Treg cells in immune diseases [162,163,164,165]. The isolation of low-frequency Treg cells from autologous peripheral blood cells is complex and expensive [166]. Currently, ACT with Treg cells has important limitations in its cost, clinical efficacy, and safety. Further technical improvements are needed to achieve a successful clinical application of ACT with Treg cells in AD.

8. Combinations of Different Modalities Activating Regulatory T Cells

Theoretically, combinations of currently available methods that can activate Treg cells (allergen immunotherapy, microbiota, vitamin D, polyvalent human IgG, and small molecular chemicals) may maximize the clinical improvement of patients with AD. High dose vitamin D3 enhanced the clinical efficacy and immunomodulatory effects of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in a grass pollen-driven mouse model of asthma [167]. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial including children with allergic rhinitis, vitamin D supplementation combined with grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy was more effective in reducing nasal and asthma symptoms than grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy alone [168]. In patients with allergic rhinitis and vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation in the build-up phase of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy with house dust mite extract significantly decreased the symptom–medication score of allergic rhinitis compared to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy alone [169]. In a previous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, repeated intradermal injections of immune complexes made of house dust mite antigens and autologous antibodies to house dust mite antigens produced significant clinical improvement in patients with AD [170]. These examples suggest that various combinations of different modalities activating Treg cells can improve a long-term clinical outcome of AD (Figure 2).

9. Conclusions

Immune dysfunction resulting from a decreased number and/or function of Treg cells is critical in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases, including AD. Treg cell activation could be a common immune mechanism responsible for the LTCI observed in patients with AD after allergen immunotherapy and the natural clinical remission observed in children with AD. Therefore, an immunomodulatory strategy that activates Treg cells could be an ideal therapeutic approach to achieve an LTCI of AD. The present author proposes a hypothesis that many different immunomodulatory strategies inducing a sufficient long-term activation of Treg cells can improve the long-term clinical outcome and provide a long-term treatment-free clinical remission of AD by induction of immune tolerance (Figure 3). Further studies on the clinical efficacy of various Treg cell-targeted immunomodulatory therapies should be conducted to improve the long-term clinical outcome in patients with AD.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07045762).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wollenberg, A.; Christen-Zach, S.; Taieb, A.; Paul, C.; Thyssen, J.P.; de Bruin-Weller, M.; Vestergaard, C.; Seneschal, J.; Werfel, T.; Cork, M.J.; et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2020 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, 2717–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ratchataswan, T.; Banzon, T.M.; Thyssen, J.P.; Weidinger, S.; Guttman-Yassky, E.; Phipatanakul, W. Biologics for Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: Current Status and Future Prospect. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2021, 9, 1053–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nahm, D.H. Personalized Immunomodulatory Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis: An Allergist’s View. Ann. Dermatol. 2015, 27, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, F.P.; Tang, X.J.; Wei, C.Q.; Xu, L.R.; Mao, H.; Luo, F.M. Dupilumab treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2018, 90, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Simpson, E.L.; Bieber, T.; Guttman-Yassky, E.; Beck, L.A.; Blauvelt, A.; Cork, M.J.; Silverberg, J.I.; Deleuran, M.; Kataoka, Y.; Lacour, J.P.; et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2335–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, C.; Sun, X.; Zhao, K.; Meng, F.; Li, L.; Mu, Z.; Han, X. Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dermatology 2022, 238, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guttman-Yassky, E.; Teixeira, H.D.; Simpson, E.L.; Papp, K.A.; Pangan, A.L.; Blauvelt, A.; Thaci, D.; Chu, C.Y.; Hong, H.C.; Katoh, N.; et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): Results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet 2021, 397, 2151–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Verhagen, J.; Akdis, M.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C.; Schmid-Grendelmeier, P.; Hijnen, D.; Knol, E.F.; Behrendt, H.; Blaser, K.; Akdis, C.A. Absence of T-regulatory cell expression and function in atopic dermatitis skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 117, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fyhrquist, N.; Lehtimaki, S.; Lahl, K.; Savinko, T.; Lappetelainen, A.M.; Sparwasser, T.; Wolff, H.; Lauerma, A.; Alenius, H. Foxp3+ cells control Th2 responses in a murine model of atopic dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1672–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vieira, B.L.; Lim, N.R.; Lohman, M.E.; Lio, P.A. Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Evidence-Based Review. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2016, 17, 557–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Genuis, S.J. Sensitivity-related illness: The escalating pandemic of allergy, food intolerance and chemical sensitivity. Sci. Total Env. 2010, 408, 6047–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.S.; Park, M.R.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, E.H.; Cho, J.B.; Kim, J.; Han, Y.; Jung, K.; Cheong, H.K. Relationship between indoor air pollutant levels and residential environment in children with atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2014, 6, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahn, K. The role of air pollutants in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 993–999; discussion 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, E.H.; Jeon, B.H.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.M.; Han, Y.; Ahn, K.; Cheong, H.K. Exposure to phthalates and bisphenol A are associated with atopic dermatitis symptoms in children: A time-series analysis. Environ. Health 2017, 16, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Byremo, G.; Rod, G.; Carlsen, K.H. Effect of climatic change in children with atopic eczema. Allergy 2006, 61, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vahavihu, K.; Ylianttila, L.; Salmelin, R.; Lamberg-Allardt, C.; Viljakainen, H.; Tuohimaa, P.; Reunala, T.; Snellman, E. Heliotherapy improves vitamin D balance and atopic dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, J.; Lee, H.; Noh, S.; Bae, B.G.; Shin, J.U.; Park, C.O.; Lee, K.H. Retrospective Analysis on the Effects of House Dust Mite Specific Immunotherapy for More Than 3 Years in Atopic Dermatitis. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chait, I.; Allkins, V. Remission of life-long atopic dermatitis after hyposensitisation to house dust mite. Practitioner 1985, 229, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Leroy, B.P.; Lachapelle, J.-M.; Somville, M.; Jacquemin, M.; Saint-Remy, J. Injection of allergen-antibody complexes is an effective treatment of atopic dermatitis. Dermatology 1991, 182, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tuft, L. Studies in atopic dermatitis. V. Problems in inhalant hyposensitization and results of treatment. J. Allergy 1960, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hua, T.C.; Hwang, C.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Chu, S.Y.; Chen, C.C.; Lee, D.D.; Chang, Y.T.; Wang, W.J.; Liu, H.N. The natural course of early-onset atopic dermatitis in Taiwan: A population-based cohort study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2014, 170, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sykes, M. Immune tolerance: Mechanisms and application in clinical transplantation. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 262, 288–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sakaguchi, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nomura, T.; Ono, M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008, 133, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sharkey, P.; Thomas, R. Immune tolerance therapies for autoimmune diseases: Shifting the goalpost to cure. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2022, 65, 102242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A. Therapeutic manipulation of immune tolerance in allergic disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 645–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ray, S.K.; Putterman, C.; Diamond, B. Pathogenic autoantibodies are routinely generated during the response to foreign antigen: A paradigm for autoimmune disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 2019–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mohamed Khosroshahi, L.; Rezaei, N. Dysregulation of the immune response in coronavirus disease 2019. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’Garra, A.; Vieira, P. Regulatory T cells and mechanisms of immune system control. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 801–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miyara, M.; Sakaguchi, S. Natural regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of suppression. Trends Mol. Med. 2007, 13, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Miyara, M.; Wing, K.; Sakaguchi, S. Therapeutic approaches to allergy and autoimmunity based on FoxP3+ regulatory T-cell activation and expansion. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, 749–755; quiz 756–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schmitt, E.G.; Williams, C.B. Generation and function of induced regulatory T cells. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sakaguchi, S.; Mikami, N.; Wing, J.B.; Tanaka, A.; Ichiyama, K.; Ohkura, N. Regulatory T Cells and Human Disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 38, 541–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ferreira, L.M.R.; Muller, Y.D.; Bluestone, J.A.; Tang, Q. Next-generation regulatory T cell therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019, 18, 749–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Fontenot, J.D.; Gavin, M.A.; Rudensky, A.Y. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Riemann, M.; Andreas, N.; Fedoseeva, M.; Meier, E.; Weih, D.; Freytag, H.; Schmidt-Ullrich, R.; Klein, U.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Weih, F. Central immune tolerance depends on crosstalk between the classical and alternative NF-κB pathways in medullary thymic epithelial cells. J. Autoimmun. 2017, 81, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xing, Y.; Hogquist, K.A. T-cell tolerance: Central and peripheral. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a006957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M.; Blesken, T.; Wymann, D.; Alkan, S.S.; Muller, U.; Blaser, K. Epitope-specific T cell tolerance to phospholipase A2 in bee venom immunotherapy and recovery by IL-2 and IL-15 in vitro. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 1676–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Akdis, C.A.; Blesken, T.; Akdis, M.; Wuthrich, B.; Blaser, K. Role of interleukin 10 in specific immunotherapy. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Francis, J.N.; Till, S.J.; Durham, S.R. Induction of IL-10+CD4+CD25+ T cells by grass pollen immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jutel, M.; Akdis, M.; Budak, F.; Aebischer-Casaulta, C.; Wrzyszcz, M.; Blaser, K.; Akdis, C.A. IL-10 and TGF-beta cooperate in the regulatory T cell response to mucosal allergens in normal immunity and specific immunotherapy. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Akdis, M. Healthy immune response to allergens: T regulatory cells and more. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akdis, M.; Verhagen, J.; Taylor, A.; Karamloo, F.; Karagiannidis, C.; Crameri, R.; Thunberg, S.; Deniz, G.; Valenta, R.; Fiebig, H. Immune responses in healthy and allergic individuals are characterized by a fine balance between allergen-specific T regulatory 1 and T helper 2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 1567–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaseghi-Shanjani, M.; Smith, K.L.; Sara, R.J.; Modi, B.P.; Branch, A.; Sharma, M.; Lu, H.Y.; James, E.L.; Hildebrand, K.J.; Biggs, C.M.; et al. Inborn errors of immunity manifesting as atopic disorders. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 148, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tangye, S.G.; Al-Herz, W.; Bousfiha, A.; Cunningham-Rundles, C.; Franco, J.L.; Holland, S.M.; Klein, C.; Morio, T.; Oksenhendler, E.; Picard, C.; et al. Human Inborn Errors of Immunity: 2022 Update on the Classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J. Clin. Immunol. 2022, 42, 1473–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Halabi-Tawil, M.; Ruemmele, F.M.; Fraitag, S.; Rieux-Laucat, F.; Neven, B.; Brousse, N.; De Prost, Y.; Fischer, A.; Goulet, O.; Bodemer, C. Cutaneous manifestations of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009, 160, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Adriani, M.; Jones, K.; Kirby, M.; Anderson, S.; Silvin, C.; Wincowitch, S.; Candotti, F. Defects of Regulatory T Cell function In The Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome. (49.25). J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 49.25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saurat, J.H. Eczema in primary immune-deficiencies. Clues to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis with special reference to the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Acta Derm. -Venereol. Suppl. 1985, 114, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bousquet, J.; Lockey, R.; Malling, H.J. Allergen immunotherapy: Therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases. A WHO position paper. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1998, 102, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bae, J.M.; Choi, Y.Y.; Park, C.O.; Chung, K.Y.; Lee, K.H. Efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yepes-Nunez, J.J.; Guyatt, G.H.; Gomez-Escobar, L.G.; Perez-Herrera, L.C.; Chu, A.W.L.; Ceccaci, R.; Acosta-Madiedo, A.S.; Wen, A.; Moreno-Lopez, S.; MacDonald, M.; et al. Allergen immunotherapy for atopic dermatitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023, 151, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Akdis, C.A.; Akdis, M. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy and immune tolerance to allergens. World Allergy Organ. J. 2015, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kucuksezer, U.C.; Ozdemir, C.; Cevhertas, L.; Ogulur, I.; Akdis, M.; Akdis, C.A. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy and allergen tolerance. Allergol. Int. 2020, 69, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Roncarolo, M.G.; Gregori, S.; Bacchetta, R.; Battaglia, M.; Gagliani, N. The Biology of T Regulatory Type 1 Cells and Their Therapeutic Application in Immune-Mediated Diseases. Immunity 2018, 49, 1004–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Iinuma, T.; Kiuchi, M.; Hirahara, K.; Kurita, J.; Kokubo, K.; Yagyu, H.; Yoneda, R.; Arai, T.; Sonobe, Y.; Fukuyo, M.; et al. Single-cell immunoprofiling after immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis reveals functional suppression of pathogenic T(H)2 cells and clonal conversion. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 150, 850–860.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mercenier, A.; Pavan, S.; Pot, B. Probiotics as biotherapeutic agents: Present knowledge and future prospects. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rather, I.A.; Bajpai, V.K.; Kumar, S.; Lim, J.; Paek, W.K.; Park, Y.H. Probiotics and Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Reid, G.; Sanders, M.E.; Gaskins, H.R.; Gibson, G.R.; Mercenier, A.; Rastall, R.; Roberfroid, M.; Rowland, I.; Cherbut, C.; Klaenhammer, T.R. New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2003, 37, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Isolauri, E.; Arvola, T.; Sutas, Y.; Moilanen, E.; Salminen, S. Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2000, 30, 1604–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Isolauri, E. Probiotics in human disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 1142S–1146S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cuello-Garcia, C.A.; Brozek, J.L.; Fiocchi, A.; Pawankar, R.; Yepes-Nunez, J.J.; Terracciano, L.; Gandhi, S.; Agarwal, A.; Zhang, Y.; Schunemann, H.J. Probiotics for the prevention of allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Yu, J.; Jeong, S.K.; Hong, S.J. Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus on allergic march model by suppressing Th2, Th17, and TSLP responses via CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 153, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Weiss, S.T. Bacterial components plus vitamin D: The ultimate solution to the asthma (autoimmune disease) epidemic? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 1128–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Tan-Lim, C.S.C.; Esteban-Ipac, N.A.R.; Mantaring, J.B.V., 3rd; Chan Shih Yen, E.; Recto, M.S.T.; Sison, O.T.; Alejandria, M.M. Comparative effectiveness of probiotic strains for the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 32, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Guo, J.; Cao, Z.; Shen, M. The efficacy of probiotics supplementation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2022, 33, 2800–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tan-Lim, C.S.C.; Esteban-Ipac, N.A.R.; Recto, M.S.T.; Castor, M.A.R.; Casis-Hao, R.J.; Nano, A.L.M. Comparative effectiveness of probiotic strains on the prevention of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2021, 32, 1255–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Boyle, R.J.; Bath-Hextall, F.J.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Murrell, D.F.; Tang, M.L. Probiotics for the treatment of eczema: A systematic review. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Makrgeorgou, A.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Bath-Hextall, F.J.; Murrell, D.F.; Tang, M.L.; Roberts, A.; Boyle, R.J. Probiotics for treating eczema. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 11, CD006135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gibson, G.R.; Probert, H.M.; Loo, J.V.; Rastall, R.A.; Roberfroid, M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2004, 17, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Pujari, R.; Banerjee, G. Impact of prebiotics on immune response: From the bench to the clinic. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2021, 99, 255–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shibata, R.; Kimura, M.; Takahashi, H.; Mikami, K.; Aiba, Y.; Takeda, H.; Koga, Y. Clinical effects of kestose, a prebiotic oligosaccharide, on the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39, 1397–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ahn, K. The Effect of Prebiotics on Atopic Dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2023, 15, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Burrello, C.; Garavaglia, F.; Cribiù, F.M.; Ercoli, G.; Lopez, G.; Troisi, J.; Colucci, A.; Guglietta, S.; Carloni, S.; Guglielmetti, S. Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation controls intestinal inflammation through IL10 secretion by immune cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Kim, J.-H.; Kim, K.; Kim, W. Gut microbiota restoration through fecal microbiota transplantation: A new atopic dermatitis therapy. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mashiah, J.; Karady, T.; Fliss-Isakov, N.; Sprecher, E.; Slodownik, D.; Artzi, O.; Samuelov, L.; Ellenbogen, E.; Godneva, A.; Segal, E.; et al. Clinical efficacy of fecal microbial transplantation treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2022, 10, e570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Fisher, S.A.; Rahimzadeh, M.; Brierley, C.; Gration, B.; Doree, C.; Kimber, C.E.; Plaza Cajide, A.; Lamikanra, A.A.; Roberts, D.J. The role of vitamin D in increasing circulating T regulatory cell numbers and modulating T regulatory cell phenotypes in patients with inflammatory disease or in healthy volunteers: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Sidbury, R.; Sullivan, A.F.; Thadhani, R.I.; Camargo, C.A., Jr. Randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation for winter-related atopic dermatitis in Boston: A pilot study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 159, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Lee, S.A.; Hong, S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.H.; Yum, H.Y. Correlation between serum vitamin D level and the severity of atopic dermatitis associated with food sensitization. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2013, 5, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Unger, W.W.; Laban, S.; Kleijwegt, F.S.; van der Slik, A.R.; Roep, B.O. Induction of Treg by monocyte-derived DC modulated by vitamin D3 or dexamethasone: Differential role for PD-L1. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 3147–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Barrat, F.J.; Cua, D.J.; Boonstra, A.; Richards, D.F.; Crain, C.; Savelkoul, H.F.; de Waal-Malefyt, R.; Coffman, R.L.; Hawrylowicz, C.M.; O’Garra, A. In vitro generation of interleukin 10–producing regulatory CD4+ T cells is induced by immunosuppressive drugs and inhibited by T helper type 1 (Th1)–and Th2-inducing cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Urry, Z.; Xystrakis, E.; Richards, D.F.; McDonald, J.; Sattar, Z.; Cousins, D.J.; Corrigan, C.J.; Hickman, E.; Brown, Z.; Hawrylowicz, C.M. Ligation of TLR9 induced on human IL-10-secreting Tregs by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 abrogates regulatory function. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Dimeloe, S.; Nanzer, A.; Ryanna, K.; Hawrylowicz, C. Regulatory T cells, inflammation and the allergic response-The role of glucocorticoids and Vitamin D. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 120, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gorman, S.; Geldenhuys, S.; Judge, M.; Weeden, C.E.; Waithman, J.; Hart, P.H. Dietary Vitamin D Increases Percentages and Function of Regulatory T Cells in the Skin-Draining Lymph Nodes and Suppresses Dermal Inflammation. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 1426503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Li, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, G.; Tian, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Z. Vitamin D Supplementation and Allergic Diseases during Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Buckley, R.H.; Schiff, R.I. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 325, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kazatchkine, M.D.; Kaveri, S.V. Immunomodulation of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with intravenous immune globulin. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gelfand, E.W. Intravenous immune globulin in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2015–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kessel, A.; Ammuri, H.; Peri, R.; Pavlotzky, E.R.; Blank, M.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Toubi, E. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy affects T regulatory cells by increasing their suppressive function. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 5571–5575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, S.C.; Yang, K.D.; Lin, C.Y.; Huang, A.Y.; Hsiao, C.C.; Lin, M.T.; Tsai, Y.G. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy enhances suppressive regulatory T cells and decreases innate lymphoid cells in children with immune thrombocytopenia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2020, 67, e28075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tsurikisawa, N.; Saito, H.; Oshikata, C.; Tsuburai, T.; Akiyama, K. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment increases regulatory T cells in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. J. Rheumatol. 2012, 39, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Maddur, M.S.; Kaveri, S.V.; Bayry, J. Circulating normal IgG as stimulator of regulatory T cells: Lessons from intravenous immunoglobulin. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ephrem, A.; Chamat, S.; Miquel, C.; Fisson, S.; Mouthon, L.; Caligiuri, G.; Delignat, S.; Elluru, S.; Bayry, J.; Lacroix-Desmazes, S.; et al. Expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by intravenous immunoglobulin: A critical factor in controlling experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Blood 2008, 111, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Perez, E.E.; Orange, J.S.; Bonilla, F.; Chinen, J.; Chinn, I.K.; Dorsey, M.; El-Gamal, Y.; Harville, T.O.; Hossny, E.; Mazer, B.; et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, S1–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Clinical Research Group for Histaglobin. Double blind controlled study on the efficacy of histaglobin on chronic urticaria and eczematous dermatitis (in Japanese). Nishinipponifuka 1980, 42, 470–477. [Google Scholar]
  94. Pons-Guiraud, A. Value of Allerglobulin in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and young adults. A double-blind randomized study. Rev. Med. Interne 1986, 7, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jerne, N.K. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann. Immunol. 1974, 125C, 373–389. [Google Scholar]
  96. Lopez-Requena, A.; Mateo De Acosta, C.; Vazquez, A.M.; Perez, R. Immunogenicity of autologous immunoglobulins: Principles and practices. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 3076–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shoenfeld, Y. The idiotypic network in autoimmunity: Antibodies that bind antibodies that bind antibodies. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 17–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schulz, R.; Werner, B.; Behn, U. Self-tolerance in a minimal model of the idiotypic network. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wallmann, J.; Pali-Scholl, I.; Jensen-Jarolim, E. Anti-ids in allergy: Timeliness of a classic concept. World Allergy Organ. J. 2010, 3, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Nahm, D.H.; Cho, S.M.; Kim, M.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Jeon, S.Y. Autologous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with severe recalcitrant atopic dermatitis: A preliminary report. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2014, 6, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Nahm, D.H.; Kim, M.E.; Cho, S.M. Effects of Intramuscular Injection of Autologous Immunoglobulin on Clinical Severity and Serum IgE Concentration in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatology 2015, 231, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nahm, D.H.; Ahn, A.; Kim, M.E.; Cho, S.M.; Park, M.J. Autologous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Patients With Severe Recalcitrant Atopic Dermatitis: Long-Term Changes of Clinical Severity and Laboratory Parameters. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2016, 8, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cho, S.M.; Kim, M.E.; Kwon, B.; Nahm, D.H. Immunomodulatory effects induced by intramuscular administration of autologous total immunoglobulin G in patients with atopic dermatitis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 52, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Nahm, D.H.; Ye, Y.M.; Shin, Y.S.; Park, H.S.; Kim, M.E.; Kwon, B.; Cho, S.M.; Han, J. Efficacy, Safety, and Immunomodulatory Effect of the Intramuscular Administration of Autologous Total Immunoglobulin G for Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2020, 12, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kwon, B.; Yang, S.J.; Cho, S.M.; Kim, M.E.; Nahm, D.H. Intramuscular administration of autologous total immunoglobulin G induces immunomodulatory effects on T cells in healthy human subjects: An open-labeled prospective single-arm trial. Medicine 2022, 101, e29486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sgnotto, F.D.R.; de Oliveira, M.G.; Lira, A.A.L.; Inoue, A.H.S.; Titz, T.O.; Orfali, R.L.; Bento-de-Souza, L.; Sato, M.N.; Aoki, V.; Duarte, A.J.S.; et al. IgG from atopic dermatitis patients induces IL-17 and IL-10 production in infant intrathymic TCD4 and TCD8 cells. Int. J. Dermatol. 2018, 57, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fagundes, B.O.; de Sousa, T.R.; Nascimento, A.; Fernandes, L.A.; Sgnotto, F.D.R.; Orfali, R.L.; Aoki, V.; Duarte, A.; Sanabani, S.S.; Victor, J.R. IgG from Adult Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Patients Induces Nonatopic Neonatal Thymic Gamma-Delta T Cells (gammadeltaT) to Acquire IL-22/IL-17 Secretion Profile with Skin-Homing Properties and Epigenetic Implications Mediated by miRNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Victor, J.R. Do different IgG repertoires play a role in B- and T-cell functional modulation during ontogeny? The “hooks without bait” theory. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2020, 98, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Croft, M.; So, T.; Duan, W.; Soroosh, P. The significance of OX40 and OX40L to T-cell biology and immune disease. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 229, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Redmond, W.L.; Ruby, C.E.; Weinberg, A.D. The role of OX40-mediated co-stimulation in T-cell activation and survival. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 29, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Ishii, N.; Takahashi, T.; Soroosh, P.; Sugamura, K. OX40-OX40 ligand interaction in T-cell-mediated immunity and immunopathology. Adv. Immunol. 2010, 105, 63–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kumar, P.; Marinelarena, A.; Raghunathan, D.; Ragothaman, V.K.; Saini, S.; Bhattacharya, P.; Fan, J.; Epstein, A.L.; Maker, A.V.; Prabhakar, B.S. Critical role of OX40 signaling in the TCR-independent phase of human and murine thymic Treg generation. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 138–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Ruby, C.E.; Yates, M.A.; Hirschhorn-Cymerman, D.; Chlebeck, P.; Wolchok, J.D.; Houghton, A.N.; Offner, H.; Weinberg, A.D. Cutting Edge: OX40 agonists can drive regulatory T cell expansion if the cytokine milieu is right. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 4853–4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Tkachev, V.; Furlan, S.N.; Watkins, B.; Hunt, D.J.; Zheng, H.B.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Betz, K.; Brown, M.; Schell, J.B.; Zeleski, K.; et al. Combined OX40L and mTOR blockade controls effector T cell activation while preserving T(reg) reconstitution after transplant. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaan3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Guttman-Yassky, E.; Simpson, E.L.; Reich, K.; Kabashima, K.; Igawa, K.; Suzuki, T.; Mano, H.; Matsui, T.; Esfandiari, E.; Furue, M. An anti-OX40 antibody to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b study. Lancet 2023, 401, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kahan, B.D. Sirolimus: A comprehensive review. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2001, 2, 1903–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, D.; Eisen, H.J. Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2022, 272, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Strauss, L.; Czystowska, M.; Szajnik, M.; Mandapathil, M.; Whiteside, T.L. Differential responses of human regulatory T cells (Treg) and effector T cells to rapamycin. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Lai, Z.W.; Kelly, R.; Winans, T.; Marchena, I.; Shadakshari, A.; Yu, J.; Dawood, M.; Garcia, R.; Tily, H.; Francis, L.; et al. Sirolimus in patients with clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus resistant to, or intolerant of, conventional medications: A single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yang, F.; Tanaka, M.; Wataya-Kaneda, M.; Yang, L.; Nakamura, A.; Matsumoto, S.; Attia, M.; Murota, H.; Katayama, I. Topical application of rapamycin ointment ameliorates Dermatophagoides farina body extract-induced atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga mice. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kim, J.W.; Choe, J.Y.; Park, S.H. Metformin and its therapeutic applications in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2022, 37, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Son, H.J.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, E.K.; Park, M.J.; Kim, K.W.; Park, S.H.; Cho, M.L. Metformin attenuates experimental autoimmune arthritis through reciprocal regulation of Th17/Treg balance and osteoclastogenesis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 973986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Nyambuya, T.M.; Dludla, P.V.; Mxinwa, V.; Mokgalaboni, K.; Ngcobo, S.R.; Tiano, L.; Nkambule, B.B. The impact of metformin and aspirin on T-cell mediated inflammation: A systematic review of in vitro and in vivo findings. Life Sci. 2020, 255, 117854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Abdallah, M.S.; Alarfaj, S.J.; Saif, D.S.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Elsokary, M.A.; Elsawah, H.K.; Abdelsattar Zaki, S.; Wahsh, E.A.; Abo Mansour, H.E.; Mosalam, E.M. The AMPK modulator metformin as adjunct to methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 95, 107575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pei, X.; Ling, Y.; Zhu, K.; Chen, W.; Gu, M. Metformin Attenuates Atopic Dermatitis by Inhibiting CD40 Expression in CD11c+DC via the mTOR Pathway. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2017, 9, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jiang, L.; Fu, H.; Yang, H.K.; Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Yang, S.T. Butyric acid: Applications and recent advances in its bioproduction. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 2101–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. McNabney, S.M.; Henagan, T.M. Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon and Peripheral Tissues: A Focus on Butyrate, Colon Cancer, Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Lupton, J.R. Microbial degradation products influence colon cancer risk: The butyrate controversy. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Kasubuchi, M.; Hasegawa, S.; Hiramatsu, T.; Ichimura, A.; Kimura, I. Dietary gut microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, and host metabolic regulation. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2839–2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Hoeppli, R.E.; Wu, D.; Cook, L.; Levings, M.K. The environment of regulatory T cell biology: Cytokines, metabolites, and the microbiome. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Scheppach, W.; Sommer, H.; Kirchner, T.; Paganelli, G.M.; Bartram, P.; Christl, S.; Richter, F.; Dusel, G.; Kasper, H. Effect of butyrate enemas on the colonic mucosa in distal ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1992, 103, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kim, J.A.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, I.S.; Yu, D.Y.; Kim, S.C.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.S.; Yun, C.H.; Choi, I.S.; Cho, K.K. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Mixture of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Sodium Butyrate in Atopic Dermatitis Murine Model. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Roth-Walter, F.; Adcock, I.M.; Benito-Villalvilla, C.; Bianchini, R.; Bjermer, L.; Boyman, O.; Caramori, G.; Cari, L.; Fan Chung, K.; Diamant, Z. Immune modulation via T regulatory cell enhancement: Disease-modifying therapies for autoimmunity and their potential for chronic allergic and inflammatory diseases—An EAACI position paper of the Task Force on Immunopharmacology (TIPCO). Allergy 2021, 76, 90–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Matsuda, M.; Terada, T.; Kitatani, K.; Kawata, R.; Nabe, T. Roles of type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells in allergen-specific immunotherapy. Front. Allergy 2022, 3, 981126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Bellinghausen, I.; Khatri, R.; Saloga, J. Current Strategies to Modulate Regulatory T Cell Activity in Allergic Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 912529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Marek-Trzonkowska, N.; Mysliwiec, M.; Dobyszuk, A.; Grabowska, M.; Derkowska, I.; Juscinska, J.; Owczuk, R.; Szadkowska, A.; Witkowski, P.; Mlynarski, W.; et al. Therapy of type 1 diabetes with CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127-regulatory T cells prolongs survival of pancreatic islets—Results of one year follow-up. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 153, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sawitzki, B.; Harden, P.N.; Reinke, P.; Moreau, A.; Hutchinson, J.A.; Game, D.S.; Tang, Q.; Guinan, E.C.; Battaglia, M.; Burlingham, W.J.; et al. Regulatory cell therapy in kidney transplantation (The ONE Study): A harmonised design and analysis of seven non-randomised, single-arm, phase 1/2A trials. Lancet 2020, 395, 1627–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Roemhild, A.; Otto, N.M.; Moll, G.; Abou-El-Enein, M.; Kaiser, D.; Bold, G.; Schachtner, T.; Choi, M.; Oellinger, R.; Landwehr-Kenzel, S.; et al. Regulatory T cells for minimising immune suppression in kidney transplantation: Phase I/IIa clinical trial. BMJ 2020, 371, m3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hu, M.; Rogers, N.M.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.Y.; Wang, Y.M.; Shaw, K.; O’Connell, P.J.; Alexander, S.I. Antigen Specific Regulatory T Cells in Kidney Transplantation and Other Tolerance Settings. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 717594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Leventhal, J.; LeFever, A.; Skaro, A.; Gallon, L.; Mathew, J.; Stare, D.; Konieczna, I.; He, J.; Johnson, G. Interim Results of a Phase 1 Trial of Treg Adoptive Cell Transfer (TRACT) in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am. J. Transpl. 2015, 15, 3031. [Google Scholar]
  142. Mfarrej, B.; Tresoldi, E.; Stabilini, A.; Paganelli, A.; Caldara, R.; Secchi, A.; Battaglia, M. Generation of donor-specific Tr1 cells to be used after kidney transplantation and definition of the timing of their in vivo infusion in the presence of immunosuppression. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Koyama, I.; Bashuda, H.; Uchida, K.; Seino, K.I.; Habu, S.; Nakajima, I.; Fuchinoue, S.; Okumura, K.; Teraoka, S. A Clinical Trial With Adoptive Transfer of Ex Vivo-induced, Donor-specific Immune-regulatory Cells in Kidney Transplantation-A Second Report. Transplantation 2020, 104, 2415–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. MacDonald, K.N.; Salim, K.; Levings, M.K. Manufacturing next-generation regulatory T-cell therapies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 78, 102822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Foster, M.C.; Savoldo, B.; Lau, W.; Rubinos, C.; Grover, N.; Armistead, P.; Coghill, J.; Hagan, R.S.; Morrison, K.; Buchanan, F.B.; et al. Utility of a safety switch to abrogate CD19.CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity. Blood 2021, 137, 3306–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Filley, A.C.; Henriquez, M.; Dey, M. CART Immunotherapy: Development, Success, and Translation to Malignant Gliomas and Other Solid Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Gauthier, J.; Yakoub-Agha, I. Chimeric antigen-receptor T-cell therapy for hematological malignancies and solid tumors: Clinical data to date, current limitations and perspectives. Curr. Res. Transl. Med. 2017, 65, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Prasad, V. Tisagenlecleucel—The first approved CAR-T-cell therapy: Implications for payers and policy makers. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Hammer, O. CD19 as an attractive target for antibody-based therapy. MAbs 2012, 4, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Dai, H.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X.; Han, W. Chimeric Antigen Receptors Modified T-Cells for Cancer Therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2016, 108, djv439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Vairy, S.; Garcia, J.L.; Teira, P.; Bittencourt, H. CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel): CAR-T therapy for relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 3885–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Madduri, D.; Dhodapkar, M.V.; Lonial, S.; Jagannath, S.; Cho, H.J. SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: T-Cell-Directed Immune Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells and Bispecific T-Cell-Engaging Agents. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. June, C.H.; Sadelain, M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Raje, N.; Berdeja, J.; Lin, Y.; Siegel, D.; Jagannath, S.; Madduri, D.; Liedtke, M.; Rosenblatt, J.; Maus, M.V.; Turka, A.; et al. Anti-BCMA CAR T-Cell Therapy bb2121 in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1726–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Maude, S.L.; Laetsch, T.W.; Buechner, J.; Rives, S.; Boyer, M.; Bittencourt, H.; Bader, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Stefanski, H.E.; Myers, G.D.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Schuster, S.J.; Svoboda, J.; Chong, E.A.; Nasta, S.D.; Mato, A.R.; Anak, O.; Brogdon, J.L.; Pruteanu-Malinici, I.; Bhoj, V.; Landsburg, D.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Refractory B-Cell Lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2545–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Abdeladhim, M.; Zhang, A.H.; Kropp, L.E.; Lindrose, A.R.; Venkatesha, S.H.; Mitre, E.; Scott, D.W. Engineered ovalbumin-expressing regulatory T cells protect against anaphylaxis in ovalbumin-sensitized mice. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 207, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Schmetterer, K.G.; Haiderer, D.; Leb-Reichl, V.M.; Neunkirchner, A.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; Kung, H.J.; Schuch, K.; Steinberger, P.; Bohle, B.; Pickl, W.F. Bet v 1-specific T-cell receptor/forkhead box protein 3 transgenic T cells suppress Bet v 1-specific T-cell effector function in an activation-dependent manner. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 238–245, 245.e1–e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Voo, K.S.; Wang, Y.H.; Santori, F.R.; Boggiano, C.; Wang, Y.H.; Arima, K.; Bover, L.; Hanabuchi, S.; Khalili, J.; Marinova, E.; et al. Identification of IL-17-producing FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4793–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. McClymont, S.A.; Putnam, A.L.; Lee, M.R.; Esensten, J.H.; Liu, W.; Hulme, M.A.; Hoffmuller, U.; Baron, U.; Olek, S.; Bluestone, J.A.; et al. Plasticity of human regulatory T cells in healthy subjects and patients with type 1 diabetes. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3918–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Hwang, S.M.; Sharma, G.; Verma, R.; Byun, S.; Rudra, D.; Im, S.H. Inflammation-induced Id2 promotes plasticity in regulatory T cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Hoffmann, P.; Boeld, T.J.; Eder, R.; Huehn, J.; Floess, S.; Wieczorek, G.; Olek, S.; Dietmaier, W.; Andreesen, R.; Edinger, M. Loss of FOXP3 expression in natural human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells upon repetitive in vitro stimulation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009, 39, 1088–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Hua, J.; Inomata, T.; Chen, Y.; Foulsham, W.; Stevenson, W.; Shiang, T.; Bluestone, J.A.; Dana, R. Pathological conversion of regulatory T cells is associated with loss of allotolerance. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Safari, F.; Farajnia, S.; Arya, M.; Zarredar, H.; Nasrolahi, A. CRISPR and personalized Treg therapy: New insights into the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2018, 40, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tang, Q.; Bluestone, J.A. Regulatory T-cell therapy in transplantation: Moving to the clinic. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a015552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hesse, L.; van Ieperen, N.; Petersen, A.H.; Elberink, J.; van Oosterhout, A.J.M.; Nawijn, M.C. High dose vitamin D(3) empowers effects of subcutaneous immunotherapy in a grass pollen-driven mouse model of asthma. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Jerzynska, J.; Stelmach, W.; Rychlik, B.; Lechanska, J.; Podlecka, D.; Stelmach, I. The clinical effect of vitamin D supplementation combined with grass-specific sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2016, 37, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Chiewchalermsri, C.; Sangkanjanavanich, S.; Pradubpongsa, P.; Mitthamsiri, W.; Jaisupa, N.; Jindarat, S.; Buranapraditkun, S.; Jacquet, A.; Sangasapaviliya, A.; Boonpiyathad, T. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in the Build-up Phase of House Dust Mite-Specific Immunotherapy. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2023, 15, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Leroy, B.P.; Boden, G.; Lachapelle, J.M.; Jacquemin, M.G.; Saint-Remy, J.M. A novel therapy for atopic dermatitis with allergen-antibody complexes: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1993, 28, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 13 01674 g001
Figure 1. Hypothetical pathogenesis model for atopic dermatitis. Th2 cells, T-helper type 2 cells; IgE, immunoglobulin E.
Figure 1. Hypothetical pathogenesis model for atopic dermatitis. Th2 cells, T-helper type 2 cells; IgE, immunoglobulin E.
Life 13 01674 g001
Life 13 01674 g002
Figure 2. Regulatory T cell-targeted immunomodulatory strategies to achieve a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by monotherapy or combination therapy.
Figure 2. Regulatory T cell-targeted immunomodulatory strategies to achieve a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by monotherapy or combination therapy.
Life 13 01674 g002
Life 13 01674 g003
Figure 3. Regulatory T cell-targeted immunomodulatory therapies to achieve long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by induction of immune tolerance. The present author proposes a hypothesis that many different immunomodulatory strategies inducing a sufficient long-term activation of regulatory T cells can improve long-term clinical outcomes and provide a long-term treatment-free clinical remission of atopic dermatitis by induction of immune tolerance. * Activation of regulatory T cells means an increase in number and/or function of regulatory T cells.
Figure 3. Regulatory T cell-targeted immunomodulatory therapies to achieve long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by induction of immune tolerance. The present author proposes a hypothesis that many different immunomodulatory strategies inducing a sufficient long-term activation of regulatory T cells can improve long-term clinical outcomes and provide a long-term treatment-free clinical remission of atopic dermatitis by induction of immune tolerance. * Activation of regulatory T cells means an increase in number and/or function of regulatory T cells.
Life 13 01674 g003
Table 1. Five questions on the immune mechanism responsible for a long-term clinical improvement observed in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Table 1. Five questions on the immune mechanism responsible for a long-term clinical improvement observed in patients with atopic dermatitis.
  • What is the mechanism of natural induction of a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis in children?
  • Is the induction of immune tolerance responsible for a natural long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis in children?
  • Is the activation of type 1 regulatory T cells a key mechanism inducing a natural long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis?
  • Is the activation of type 1 regulatory T cells a common mechanism inducing a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by allergen immunotherapy and a natural long-term clinical improvement in children with atopic dermatitis?
  • Can various kinds of immunomodulatory strategies activating regulatory T cells provide a long-term clinical improvement in patients with atopic dermatitis?
Table 2. Three hypotheses and perspectives to achieve a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by regulatory T cell activations.
Table 2. Three hypotheses and perspectives to achieve a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by regulatory T cell activations.
  • A decreased number or function of regulatory T cells is a critical event that causes the activation of Th2 cells, leading to the development and maintenance of atopic dermatitis.
  • Activation of regulatory T cells * is an effective therapeutic approach to achieve a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis.
  • Many different immunomodulatory strategies activating regulatory T cells can provide a long-term clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis by induction of immune tolerance.
* Activation of regulatory T cells means an increase in the number and/or function of regulatory T cells. Th2 cells, T-helper type 2 cells.
Table 3. Immunomodulatory strategies activating regulatory T cells for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Table 3. Immunomodulatory strategies activating regulatory T cells for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.
Strategies with proven clinical efficacy by at least one randomized clinical trial
(1)
Allergen immunotherapy
(2)
Microbial therapy (probiotics)
(3)
Vitamin D
(4)
Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of polyvalent human IgG from multiple healthy blood donors
(5)
Intramuscular injection of autologous total IgG
(6)
Monoclonal antibody to antigen on the surface of T cells (anti-OX40 antibody)
Strategies without proven clinical efficacy in patients with atopic dermatitis by a clinical trial
(1)
Sirolimus (also called rapamycin)
(2)
Metformin
(3)
Butyrate
(4)
Adoptive cell therapy with ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells
IgG, immunoglobulin G.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nahm, D.-H. Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for Long-Term Clinical Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis: Hypotheses and Perspectives. Life 2023, 13, 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081674

AMA Style

Nahm D-H. Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for Long-Term Clinical Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis: Hypotheses and Perspectives. Life. 2023; 13(8):1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nahm, Dong-Ho. 2023. "Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for Long-Term Clinical Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis: Hypotheses and Perspectives" Life 13, no. 8: 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081674

APA Style

Nahm, D. -H. (2023). Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapy for Long-Term Clinical Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis: Hypotheses and Perspectives. Life, 13(8), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop