Next Article in Journal
Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Children—Tips and Pitfalls
Next Article in Special Issue
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) Infection-Associated Anemia in the Asir Region, Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Analysis of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Oral Samples from Intubated Patients in Intensive Care Unit
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolomics: A New Era in the Diagnosis or Prognosis of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive In Silico Characterization of the Coding and Non-Coding SNPs in Human Dectin-1 Gene with the Potential of High-Risk Pathogenicity Associated with Fungal Infections

by
Hakeemah H. Al-nakhle
1,† and
Aiah M. Khateb
1,2,*,†
1
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Collage of Applied Medical Science, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia
2
Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(10), 1785; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101785
Submission received: 8 April 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published: 18 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Analysis of Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
The human C-type lectin domain family 7 member A (CLEC7A) gene encodes a Dectin-1 protein that recognizes beta-1,3-linked and beta-1,6-linked glucans, which form the cell walls of pathogenic bacteria and fungi. It plays a role in immunity against fungal infections through pathogen recognition and immune signaling. This study aimed to explore the impact of nsSNPs in the human CLEC7A gene through computational tools (MAPP, PhD-SNP, PolyPhen-1, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, SNAP, and PredictSNP) to identify the most deleterious and damaging nsSNPs. Further, their effect on protein stability was checked along with conservation and solvent accessibility analysis by I-Mutant 2.0, ConSurf, and Project HOPE and post-translational modification analysis using MusiteDEEP. Out of the 28 nsSNPs that were found to be deleterious, 25 nsSNPs affected protein stability. Some SNPs were finalized for structural analysis with Missense 3D. Seven nsSNPs affected protein stability. Results from this study predicted that C54R, L64P, C120G, C120S, S135C, W141R, W141S, C148G, L155P, L155V, I158M, I158T, D159G, D159R, I167T, W180R, L183F, W192R, G197E, G197V, C220S, C233Y, I240T, E242G, and Y3D were the most structurally and functionally significant nsSNPs in the human CLEC7A gene. No nsSNPs were found in the predicted sites for post-translational modifications. In the 5′ untranslated region, two SNPs, rs536465890 and rs527258220, showed possible miRNA target sites and DNA binding sites. The present study identified structurally and functionally significant nsSNPs in the CLEC7A gene. These nsSNPs may potentially be used for further evaluation as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

1. Introduction

Human Dectin-1 is a type II membrane protein expressed in many myeloid cells, including macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils, and gamma delta T cells from the lymphoid lineage [1,2,3,4]. It plays an essential role in pathogen recognition and signaling in innate immunity [5,6]. Recently, Dectin-1 was found to increase immunological tolerance by binding to the conserved core domain of annexins (annexins A1, A4, and A13) produced on apoptotic cells [6]. It has a cytosolic portion containing an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif termed ITAM, an extracellular lectin domain, and a transmembrane domain. It has 10 isoforms listed in the UniProt database [7]. It contains a signaling motif known as hemITAM in its intracellular cytoplasmic tail [7], and two conserved amino acids (Trp 221 and His 223) are critical for ligand-Dectin-1 receptor interactions since they contribute to the binding sites and functions of the receptor [7]. The CLEC7A isoform 1 consists of 247 amino acids and serves as a pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) that recognizes β-1,3-linked and β-1,6-linked glucans, which form the cell walls of pathogenic bacteria and fungi [8]. Dectin-1 lacks Ca2+-binding sites in its CRD as it does not require Ca2+ for ligand recognition [9]. However, β-glucan Ca2+ binding sites have shown that bound calcium ions (Ca2+) are needed to stabilize the domain structure [10]. Dectin-1 binds specifically to β-glucan receptors, requiring at least 10- or 11-mer chain length in Dectin-1’s lectin domain [11]. Increasing β-glucan chain length correlates with increasing secondary structure formation, thus increasing the interaction as the helical structures fit into the ligand-binding site of the Dectin-1 lectin domain [12]. Dectin-1 only recognizes the middle part of the β-glucan chain, not the reducing/non-reducing ends [12]. In fungal recognition, on macrophages and DCs, Dectin-1 accomplishes two tasks: it internalizes β-glucan-containing particles and sends signals into the nucleus [12].
Single point mutations (SNPs), including synonymous (sSNPs) and non-synonymous (nsSNP) SNPs, have been shown to contribute to the pathophysiology of fungal infection. In a family with mucocutaneous fungal infections, a recessive mutation that changed an amino acid in Dectin-1 (Y238X) was discovered. Leading to the prematurely terminated translation of the Dectin-1 receptor’s tyrosine residue [13]. Even if fungal killing and phagocytosis happen regularly, this mutation has been linked to susceptibility to fungal infections [14]. The final 9 amino acids of the CRD are deleted due to a nonsense mutation brought about by a single nucleotide alteration in this gene. Upon fungal infection or challenge with β-glucan, the mutation exhibits the expected loss of function and decreased cytokine response—changes in the translation termination at the tyrosine residue of the Dectin-1 receptor. The mutations in CLEC7A (SNPs rs3901533, rs7309123, and rs16910527) have been associated with fungal infection susceptibility, and Dectin-1 genetic variation plays a crucial role in fungal infection. Meta-analysis results suggest that CLEC7A SNPs may affect profound fungal infection susceptibility. In contrast, polymorphisms in rs16910526 are unlikely to have a significant effect.
Further investigations are warranted to verify and extend the present results and design novel immunotherapeutic strategies to optimize or replace conventional antifungal treatments. Previous studies used nsSNPs as computational tools to understand the molecular mechanisms of various diseases [15]. These tools are crucial in developing personalized medicine based on genomic variation and structural and functional analysis of nsSNPs. The impact of nsSNPs on the Dectin-1 protein on fungal disease pathogenesis was not fully understood. This study aimed to identify potential coding and non-coding SNPs that may affect Dectin-1 protein function, utilizing various computational approaches and bioinformatics tools.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Retrieval of Dectin-1 nsSNPs

SNPs of the Dectin-1 gene were retrieved from the dbSNP database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp (accessed on 7 April 2023)). Primarily, 975,620 SNPs were found, but after applying the missense, pathogenic, and frequency filters, 2068 SNPs were retrieved. The 247 nsSNPs in the coding region were selected for further analysis as the change in codon results in different amino acids. To analyze the non-coding region SNPs, the ENSEMBL database was used to collect the dataset for the Dectin-1 protein. An overview of the methodological approaches is summarized in Figure 1.

2.2. Prediction of Functional Effects of Pathogenicity of nsSNPs

PredictSNP, which combines six software tools, was used to precisely analyze and predict the pathogenicity of Dectin-1 nsSNPs and find the highly risky and deleterious SNPs that can significantly alter the structure or function of Dectin-1 protein. The software includes MAPP, PhD-SNP, PolyPhen-1, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, and SNAP. As a result of combining the six best-performing tools into a consensus classifier, PredictSNP, prediction performance improved significantly. At the same time, all mutation results were returned, confirming that consensus prediction offers a more reliable and accurate alternative to individual tool predictions [16].

2.3. Determining nsSNPs on the Domains of Dectin-1

InterPro software was used to locate the site of nsSNPs on the conserved domains of Dectin-1 [17] (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ (accessed on 7 April 2023)), which can identify motifs and domains of a protein. Consequently, the software was able to determine the functional characterization of a protein using the database consisting of protein families, domains, and functional sites [18].

2.4. Analyzing Protein Evolutionary Conservation

The ConSurf server identifies the evolutionary conservation of the amino acids in the protein sequence and analyzes the phylogenetic relationships between homologous sequences [19,20,21]. The conserved nsSNPs of Dectin-1 were considered for further analysis.

2.5. Analyzing the Effect of the nsSNPs on Protein Stability

To identify the effect of the damaging nsSNPs on the structure and stability of the Dectin-1 protein, I-Mutant 2.0 was used [22] (https://folding.biofold.org/i-mutant/i-mutant2.0.html (accessed on 7 April 2023)). I-Mutant 2.0 is another SVM-based tool that measures the change in free energy (Delta Delta G) and predicts whether it is increasing or decreasing. A Delta Delta G (DDG) (kcal/mole) value of 0 indicates a decrease in protein stability, whereas a DDG (kcal/mole) value > 0 indicates an increase in protein stability. This program predicts the stability of a protein after mutation. A protein stability test was then run on the pathogenic SNPs. Substantially deleterious nsSNPs are those that reduce protein stability.

2.6. Prediction of the Structural Effect of High-Risk nsSNPs on Human Dectin-1 Protein

Project HOPE was used to analyze the predicted effect of the nsSNPs or point mutations on the structure of the Dectin-1 protein. It is a web server that identifies the structural effects of point mutations in a protein sequence [23]. We used NP_922938.1 (the NCBI Reference Sequence Code of CLEC7A) and the 25 SNPs individually as the input. Missense 3D [24] confirmed the results’ stringency and accuracy. Missense 3D predicts the effect of an amino acid substitution on protein structure. This study evaluated structural features used by the Missense3D web server, including disulfide bond breakage and buried H-bond breakage.

2.7. Prediction of the Post-Translational Site’s Modification

MusiteDeep is an online tool for visualizing PTM sites in protein sequences (https://www.musite.net/ (accessed on 7 April 2023)). MusiteDeep determines post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, acetyl-lysine, methylation, pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, palmitoylation, and hydroxylation [25]. The input query for MusiteDeep was the FASTA format of the Dectin-1 protein sequence.

2.8. Analysis of 5′ and 3′ UTR Non-Coding SNPs

The ENSEMBL database was used to investigate non-coding regions [26]. We filtered out SNPs from the 5′ and 3′ regions, and a minor allelic frequency (MAF) value of ≤0.001 was selected. Regulome DB was used to relate SNPs to regulatory elements of the human genome [27]. It also provides chip data, chromatin states, motif information, and ranking based on DNA binding, if available. The PolymiRTS database was utilized to predict if there is DNA variation in miRNA target sites in the 3′ UTR region [28]. The results are presented in four classes: D, O, C, and N, along with context and conservation scores, miR IDs, and target miR sites for miRs.

2.9. Determining CLEC7A Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network Analysis

Protein-protein interactions are essential for regulating and executing a protein’s biological functions. STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) predicts the top ten proteins interacting with the query gene by predicting their interactions with the CLEC7A protein (https://string-db.org (accessed on 7 April 2023)). The STRING algorithm predicts the interaction partners of a protein based on gene fusion, co-expression, function, and experimental data. Each interacting protein is scored from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates the lowest interaction and 1 indicates the highest interaction [29]. The CLEC7A FASTA protein sequence was submitted as input. All predicted interactions associated with confidence scores are included in the output.

2.10. Functional and Pathway Enrichment Analysis Using STRING

The functional analysis involved annotating and enriching proteins in the network based on their functional properties. The most common enrichment analysis is based on gene ontology (GO) terms (i.e., biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components) and pathways. In order to interpret the physical function of a network, functional analysis is necessary. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using STRING [29].

3. Results

3.1. Retrieving nsSNPs of Dectin-1

Dectin-1 SNPs were retrieved using the NCBI dbSNP database. It comprised 3904 SNPs, of which 216 were missense (nsSNP), 758 non-coding transcripts, 247 codings, 93 synonymous, 3858 intronic, 1 inframe insertion, and 2 inframe deletions—regarding clinically significant, 1 pathogenic, 6 benign, and 8 likely benign. For our current study, we only selected nsSNPs in the coding and non-coding regions (3UTR and 5UTR) for further analyses.

3.2. Prediction of Pathogenicity of nsSNPs

Results from predictSNP software were compared to predict the pathogenicity of Dectin-1 nsSNPs precisely and label the highly risky deleterious SNPs that can significantly alter the structure or function. Out of 247 nsSNPs, 27 were predicted to be deleterious SNPs in all computational algorithms (Table 1).

3.3. Identification of the Domains of Dectin-1

Using the InterPro tool, four functional domains of Dectin-1 were predicted. The domains were the non-cytoplasmic domain (1–44), TMhelix domain (43–65), transmembrane (45–70), and cytoplasmic domain (71–274) (Figure 2 and Figure S1).

3.4. Structural Analysis

3.4.1. Determination of Protein Structural Stability (I-Mutant 2.0 Analysis)

We introduced the 28 nsSNPs into the Dectin-1 protein using the I-Mutant 2.0 tool. The outcome revealed that 25 out of 28 deleterious nsSNPs decreased stability (Table 2). The DDG value was calculated from the mutated protein’s unfolding Gibbs free energy value minus the wild type’s unfolding Gibbs free energy value (Kcal/mol). DDG/DDG was positive for D13Y, S22F, and S117F and negative for the remaining nsSNPs run by this tool.

3.4.2. Evolutionary Conservation Analysis

The ConSurf web server [19,20] determined the evolutionary conservancy of amino acid residues in the native Dectin-1. Of the 25 high-risk nsSNPs of the Dectin-1 protein, we found that C120G, C120S, W141R, W141S, D159G, D159R, G197E, G197V, D13Y, and E242G are exposed and functional according to the neural-network algorithm. Whereas, C220S, C233Y, I240T, L183F, I158M, I158T, and C148G residues are buried and structural (Figure 3 and Figure S1).

3.4.3. Project HOPE Results for Comparing Wild-Type and Mutant Amino Acid Properties

Project HOPE evaluated the differences in wild-type and mutant amino acids in terms of size, charge, hydrophobicity value, and possible interactions that mutated residues might induce. All 25 nsSNPs have a deleterious effect on protein structure (Table S2). Dectin-1 protein amino acid residues were altered in size, charge, and hydrophobicity at their respective positions. Amino acid residue sizes were changed from large to small, and the charge was observed to be lost or gained. The loss of hydrogen bonds caused by nsSNPs also increased or decreased hydrophobicity in the protein. As a result of these changes, the protein cannot fold correctly.

3.4.4. Missense 3D Results

Missense 3D predicted that 7 out of 25 nsSNPs have structural damage for the Dectin-1 protein. C120S, C148G, C233Y, and C220S have disulfide breakage; W141R has buried H-bond breakage; W141S has buried hydrophilic introduced; buried charge introduced; L155P has buried pro introduced; buried H-bond breakage; and W180R has buried hydrophilic introduced; buried charge introduced (Table 3).

3.5. Analysis of 5′ and 3′ UTR Non-Coding SNPs

After setting the MAF filter to more than or equal to 0.001, 27 SNPs in the 3UTR and 2 SNPs in the 5UTR were found in the Ensemble database. The gene variants of Dectin-1 with transcript ID ENST00000304084.8 (Table 4. In Regulome DB, only the SNPs with a ranking < 4 were considered, and two SNPs, rs536465890 and rs527258220, were chosen for 5UTR. No SNPs were found for 3UTR. The rankings, along with the probability score, are given in Table 4.

3.6. PolymiRTS Analysis

SNPs in the PolymiRTS database were classified into four functional groups: (1) D describes the disruption of a conserved miRNA site; (2) n describes the disruption of a non-conserved miRNA site; (3) C denotes the creation of a new miRNA site; and (4) O denotes the absence of a determination of an ancestral allele. The results show that all of the miRNA target sites for miRNA predicted to be disrupted by SNPs in Dectin-1 were obtained from CLASH experimental data (n). No nsSNPs were obtained when filtered, considering the functional classes of C and D and conservation scores of 10 (Table S3).

3.7. Protein-Protein Interactions Analysis and Functional Enrichments Analysis

A STRING interaction analysis revealed that the CLEC7A gene is involved in many molecular and biological processes. The CLEC7A has high-confidence interactions with predicted functional partners, including spleen-associated tyrosine kinase (SYK), which mediates signal transduction downstream of a variety of transmembrane receptors, including classical immunoreceptors like the B-cell receptor; Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), which cooperates with LY96 to mediate the innate immune response to bacterial lipoproteins and other microbial cell wall components; Galectin-3; Galactose-specific lectin (LGALS3), which binds IgE; and Fc gamma receptor IIb (FCGR2B), aggregated immunoglobulins gamma. It is involved in various effector and regulatory functions, such as phagocytosis of immune complexes and modulation of antibody production by B-cells. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) cooperates with LY96 and CD14 to mediate the innate immune response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9 (CARD9) is an adapter protein that plays a crucial role in the innate immune response to several intracellular pathogens, such as C. albicans and L. monocytogenes. Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (SRC), a non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase that is activated following the engagement of many different classes of cellular receptors, including immune response receptors; 1-phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate phosphodiesterase gamma-2 (PLCG2), which is a crucial enzyme in transmembrane signaling; C2 domain containing phospholipases; leukocyte antigen CD37 (CD37); and Galectin 9 (LGALS9), which stimulates bactericidal activity in infected macrophages by causing macrophage activation. All interactions are shown in Figure 4. Functional enrichments of the Dectin-1 network, including KEGG and GO, demonstrate that the Dectin-1 protein is involved in multiple immune signaling pathways [29] (Table S4).

4. Discussion

SNPs are considered among the most significant risk factors associated with many diseases. The presence of SNPs within the protein-coding and non-coding regions can adversely affect the function and conformation of the protein. This study aimed to determine which of the most damaging nsSNP variants may affect the functionality of Dectin-1. To our knowledge, no comprehensive in silico analysis has been performed to predict deleterious nsSNPs in coding and non-coding regions. In 2017, only three mutations of the 91 nsSNPs reported were predicted to be responsible for altering the protein structure of Dectin-1. The three mutations predicted were I223S (rs16910527), I158T 306 (rs138005591), and D159G (rs758623997) [30]. This study also detected the same mutations among other high-risk mutations using two additional in-silico algorithms (PolyPhen-1 and PredictSNP), two structural servers (I-Mutant3.0 and Project Hope), protein-protein interactions analysis, and functional and pathway enrichment analysis using STRING. Raman et al. proposed the consideration of the three non-synonymous SNPs in the Dectin-1 gene as a risk assessment against fungal infections.
Effectively distinguishing between harmful and tolerated nsSNP types involves successive filtering using several disease-associated bioinformatics tools. Six functional tools (MAPP, PhD-SNP, PolyPhen-1, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, and SNAP) and two structural servers (I-Mutant3.0 and Project Hope) were applied to determine whether the identified nsSNPs were harmful or benign. Among the 247 nsSNPs found in the SNPs from the NCBI database, 25 nsSNPs with distinct mutations (C54R, L64P, C120G, C120S, S135C, W141R, W141S, C148G, L155P, L155V, I158M, I158T, D159G, D159R, I167T, W180R, L183F, W192R, G197E, G197V, C220S, C233Y, I240T, E242G, and Y3D) were identified as likely to be harmful, deleterious, or disease-causing, based on the outcomes of 8 software tools. Other previously reported FSNPs included Y238X, which has been implicated in increasing the risk of Candida species colonization in the gastrointestinal tract of immunosuppressed patients without increasing the risk of candidemia. In diabetic populations, FSNPs (C/G SNP at position -44) are protective in secreting antifungal peptides by epithelial b-defensins.
InterPro software was used to determine the location of these nsSNPs on different domains of Dectin-1. It revealed 28 nsSNPs in three protein domains, of which two were positioned in the non-cytoplasmic domain. Nine nsSNPs were located in the TMhelix/transmembrane domain, and the rest (16 nsSNPs) were present in the cytoplasmic domain containing the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-like sequence (ITAM-like). This ITAM mediates a ligand-induced signaling response’s activation by interacting with the SKY protein and producing various immune modulators, suggesting the presence of any of the nsSNPs could disrupt the immune signaling pathways.
According to the ConSurf server, the evolutionary model of macromolecules is interpreted to demonstrate the importance of highly conserved regions in the function and conformation of macromolecules. Furthermore, the functional regions of proteins are often conserved and associated with various functions, including catalysis, interaction, and binding [27,28]. Our analysis of the ConSurf web server found 26 highly deleterious nsSNPs located in highly conserved regions. Thus, increasing the risk of inactivating Dectin-1 and reducing antifungal effects. This suggests that these variants may alter the function and conformation of the protein. The conformational changes of the Dectin-1 protein during biomolecular interactions are vital for executing its function. In addition, nsSNPs can lead to aberrant conformations, which may inactivate their antifungal properties [31]. Hence, it is crucial to determine the effect of deleterious nsSNPs in Dectin-1 and their association with various diseases.
The stability of proteins is vital to their structural and functional activity [32]. The I-Mutant results showed that 25 nsSNPs decreased the stability of the protein. There are several consequences of changes in protein stability, including misfolding, degradation, or aberrant conglomeration of proteins [33].
There is a high risk of pathology when mutations occur in or near some special amino acids that contribute to functional and spatial conformation. A missense mutation results in amino acid substitutions, resulting in changes in amino acid size, charge, and hydrophobicity, which may disrupt the folding and interaction of proteins. The analysis from HOPE indicates that mutations lead to either loss of interactions or structural changes, particularly in transmembrane domains. In addition, introducing or losing charge or hydrophobicity would result in repulsion, misfolding, or loss of interactions. The Hope project results demonstrated that all 25 nsSNPs have a deleterious effect on the Dectin-1 structure and consequently contribute to the loss of its function and anti-fungal or microbial properties. Furthermore, the Missense 3D tool predicted the consequences of the 28 structural nsSNPs and showed that only seven nsSNPs deleteriously affect the structural conformation of the Dectin-1 protein.
Biological processes and disease development depend on the regulation of PTMs. Among the most harmful nsSNPs are those that alter PTM sites and are associated with the disease. We found none of the PTM sites we identified were affected by our nsSNPs using MusiteDeep software.
miRNA binds to mRNA and inhibits mRNA translation through mRNA degradation to regulate protein production. A 3UTR nsSNP in the gene can modify or disrupt mRNA target sites, altering miRNA-mRNA interactions and possibly leading to abnormal gene expression [34]. In this regard, non-coding SNPs can interfere with normal gene expression and protein synthesis regulation. According to the PolymiRTS database, the D and C classes with high conservation and negative context scores have the highest functionally probable effects. Class D refers to disrupting a conserved site, while class C refers to creating a new site [28]. PolymiRTS analysis showed that no non-coding SNPs could alter the miRNA binding sites in the 3UTR of Dectin-1. In Regulome DB, only the SNPs with a ranking < 4 were considered. No nsSNPs were found for 3UTR. The rankings, along with the probability score, are given. According to Regulome DB, among the non-coding SNPs, rs536465890 and rs527258220 showed the best results for 5UTR.
From the STRING protein-protein interaction analysis, Dectin-1 was predicted to have strong interactions with SYK, TLR2, LGALS3, FCGR2B, TLR4, CARD9, SRC, PLCG2, LGALS9, and CD37. The STRING interaction result was further validated by using KEGG pathways for Dectin-1. Interestingly, the same set of proteins was involved in an immune signaling pathway. STRING analysis demonstrated that SYK, TLR4, CARD9, and TLR2 are involved in vulvovaginal candidiasis and infectious disease pathways. Therefore, any of the identified nsSNPs may change the Dectin-1 protein’s function.
Studies have shown that a stop codon polymorphism causes inadequate Dectin-1 receptor activity, possibly enhancing vulnerability to invasive aspergillosis (IA) [35]. Cunha et al. and Sainz et al.’s analysis of bone marrow transplant patients and donors discovered that the Dectin-1 receptor variant is a risk factor for IA in high-risk patients. Both groups had an associated degree of significance (OR = 4.91, 95% CI = 1.52–15.9, p = 0.05). Sainz et al. further demonstrated an increase in the proportion of these polymorphism-carrying galactomannan-positive patients. Chai et al. and Smith et al. also confirmed the relationship between variation in the gene encoding Dectin-1 and IA. Recently, it has been discovered that several polymorphisms in genes that encode innate immunity-related proteins enhance susceptibility to Aspergillus infections [31]. The likelihood that a patient has more than one polymorphism and hence has a high vulnerability to developing IA is essential. Chai et al. indicated a strong correlation between the emergence of IA and genetic variations. Although Dectin-1 is one of the main phagocytic receptors in macrophages for fungal infections, other SNPs in other genes have also been reported to affect human-fungal recognition and interaction. These genes include mannose-binding lectin (MBL) 2, toll-like receptors (TLRs 1, 2, 3, 4), CARD9 caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 9, IL-4, and b-Defensin-1 [36].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we have identified several novel nsSNPs in the Dectin-1 gene that may be considered risk targets against fungal infections. The frequency of such mutations in local populations can be determined in the future through epidemiological research, as can whether these mutations are associated with fungal infections. This study could aid in identifying populations more susceptible to developing fungal infections by identifying genetic variations associated with IA or Candidiasis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diagnostics13101785/s1, Figure S1: Domain identification of Dectin-1 protein using InterPRO server; Table S1: Evolutionary conservancy of amino acids in Dectin-1 analyzed by Consurf; Table S2: Structural effect of 25 nsSNPs over Dectin-1 protein using Project Hope. Table S3: miRNA binding site prediction of non-coding SNPs in Dectin-1 protein through PolymiRTS. Table S4: Functional enrichments analysis of Dectin-1 network.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis, H.H.A.-n. and A.M.K.; investigation, H.H.A.-n.; resources, A.M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.H.A.-n. and A.M.K.; writing—review and editing, A.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taibah University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research grant number RC-442/10 awarded to A.M.K.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data is provided in the Supplementary Materials. All data base links are shared in the Section 2.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Taibah University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research, for funding this project no. (RC-442/100).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Kaur, M. The role of dectin-1 in health and disease. Immunobiology 2021, 226, 152071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pyz, E.; Marshall, A.S.J.; Gordon, S.; Brown, G.D. C-type lectin-like receptors on myeloid cells. Ann. Med. 2006, 38, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brown, G.D.; Willment, J.A.; Whitehead, L. C-type lectins in immunity and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taylor, P.R.; Brown, G.D.; Reid, D.M.; Willment, J.A.; Martinez-Pomares, L.; Gordon, S.; Wong, S.Y.C. The beta-glucan receptor, dectin-1, is predominantly expressed on the surface of cells of the monocyte/macrophage and neutrophil lineages. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 3876–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mata-Martínez, P.; Bergón-Gutiérrez, M.; Del Fresno, C. Dectin-1 Signaling Update: New Perspectives for Trained Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 812148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bode, K.; Bujupi, F.; Link, C.; Hein, T.; Zimmermann, S.; Peiris, D.; Jaquet, V.; Lepenies, B.; Weyd, H.; Krammer, P.H. Dectin-1 Binding to Annexins on Apoptotic Cells Induces Peripheral Immune Tolerance via NADPH Oxidase-2. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 4435–4446.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Willment, J.A.; Gordon, S.; Brown, G.D. Characterization of the human beta-glucan receptor and its alternatively spliced isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 43818–43823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Grünebach, F.; Weck, M.M.; Reichert, J.; Brossart, P. Molecular and functional characterization of human Dectin-1. Exp. Hematol. 2002, 30, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, S.; Huo, J.; Lee, K.-G.; Kurosaki, T.; Lam, K.-P. Phospholipase Cgamma2 is critical for Dectin-1-mediated Ca2+ flux and cytokine production in dendritic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 7038–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adams, E.L.; Rice, P.J.; Graves, B.; Ensley, H.E.; Yu, H.; Brown, G.D.; Gordon, S.; Monteiro, M.A.; Papp-Szabo, E.; Lowman, D.W.; et al. Differential High-Affinity Interaction of Dectin-1 with Natural or Synthetic Glucans Is Dependent upon Primary Structure and Is Influenced by Polymer Chain Length and Side-Chain Branching. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 325, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palma, A.S.; Feizi, T.; Zhang, Y.; Stoll, M.S.; Lawson, A.M.; Díaz-Rodríguez, E.; Campanero-Rhodes, M.A.; Costa, J.; Gordon, S.; Brown, G.D.; et al. Ligands for the beta-glucan receptor, Dectin-1, assigned using “designer” microarrays of oligosaccharide probes (neoglycolipids) generated from glucan polysaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 5771–5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hanashima, S.; Ikeda, A.; Tanaka, H.; Adachi, Y.; Ohno, N.; Takahashi, T.; Yamaguchi, Y. NMR study of short β(1-3)-glucans provides insights into the structure and interaction with Dectin-1. Glycoconj. J. 2014, 31, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cunha, C.; Di Ianni, M.; Bozza, S.; Giovannini, G.; Zagarella, S.; Zelante, T.; D’Angelo, C.; Pierini, A.; Pitzurra, L.; Falzetti, F.; et al. Dectin-1 Y238X polymorphism associates with susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis in hematopoietic transplantation through impairment of both recipient- and donor-dependent mechanisms of antifungal immunity. Blood 2010, 116, 5394–5402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. del Pilar Jiménez-A, M.; Viriyakosol, S.; Walls, L.; Datta, S.K.; Kirkland, T.; Heinsbroek, S.E.M.; Brown, G.; Fierer, J. Susceptibility to Coccidioides species in C57BL/6 mice is associated with expression of a truncated splice variant of Dectin-1 (Clec7a). Genes Immun. 2008, 9, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, A.; Purohit, R. Computational screening and molecular dynamics simulation of disease associated nsSNPs in CENP-E. Mutat. Res. 2012, 738–739, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bendl, J.; Stourac, J.; Salanda, O.; Pavelka, A.; Wieben, E.D.; Zendulka, J.; Brezovsky, J.; Damborsky, J. PredictSNP: Robust and Accurate Consensus Classifier for Prediction of Disease-Related Mutations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hunter, S.; Jones, P.; Mitchell, A.; Apweiler, R.; Attwood, T.K.; Bateman, A.; Bernard, T.; Binns, D.; Bork, P.; Burge, S.; et al. InterPro in 2011: New developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D306–D312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Apweiler, R.; Attwood, T.K.; Bairoch, A.; Bateman, A.; Birney, E.; Biswas, M.; Bucher, P.; Cerutti, L.; Corpet, F.; Croning, M.D.; et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ashkenazy, H.; Abadi, S.; Martz, E.; Chay, O.; Mayrose, I.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2016: An improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W344–W350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ashkenazy, H.; Erez, E.; Martz, E.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W529–W533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berezin, C.; Glaser, F.; Rosenberg, J.; Paz, I.; Pupko, T.; Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSeq: The identification of functionally and structurally important residues in protein sequences. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1322–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Capriotti, E.; Fariselli, P.; Casadio, R. I-Mutant2.0: Predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W306–W310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Venselaar, H.; te Beek, T.A.H.; Kuipers, R.K.P.; Hekkelman, M.L.; Vriend, G. Protein structure analysis of mutations causing inheritable diseases. An e-Science approach with life scientist friendly interfaces. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ittisoponpisan, S.; Islam, S.A.; Khanna, T.; Alhuzimi, E.; David, A.; Sternberg, M.J.E. Can Predicted Protein 3D Structures Provide Reliable Insights into whether Missense Variants Are Disease Associated? J. Mol. Biol. 2019, 431, 2197–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, D.; Liu, D.; Yuchi, J.; He, F.; Jiang, Y.; Cai, S.; Li, J.; Xu, D. MusiteDeep: A deep-learning based webserver for protein post-translational modification site prediction and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, W140–W146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hunt, S.E.; McLaren, W.; Gil, L.; Thormann, A.; Schuilenburg, H.; Sheppard, D.; Parton, A.; Armean, I.M.; Trevanion, S.J.; Flicek, P.; et al. Ensembl variation resources. Database 2018, 2018, bay119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boyle, A.P.; Hong, E.L.; Hariharan, M.; Cheng, Y.; Schaub, M.A.; Kasowski, M.; Karczewski, K.J.; Park, J.; Hitz, B.C.; Weng, S.; et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 1790–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhattacharya, A.; Ziebarth, J.D.; Cui, Y. PolymiRTS Database 3.0: Linking polymorphisms in microRNAs and their target sites with human diseases and biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D86–D91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thakur, R.; Shankar, J. Comprehensive in-silico Analysis of High-risk Non-synonymous SNPs in Dectin-1 Gene of Human and their Impact on Protein Structure. Curr. Pharm. Person. Med. 2017, 15, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karplus, M.; Kuriyan, J. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 6679–6685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Deller, M.C.; Kong, L.; Rupp, B. Protein stability: A crystallographer’s perspective. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2016, 72, 72–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Witham, S.; Takano, K.; Schwartz, C.; Alexov, E. A missense mutation in CLIC2 associated with intellectual disability is predicted by in silico modeling to affect protein stability and dynamics. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2011, 79, 2444–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moszynska, A.; Gebert, M.; Collawn, J.F.; Bartoszewski, R. Snps in microrna target sites and their potential role in human disease. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cunha, D.d.O.; Leão-Cordeiro, J.A.B.; de Paula, H.d.S.C.; Ataides, F.S.; Saddi, V.A.; Vilanova-Costa, C.A.S.T.; Silva, A.M.T.C. Association between polymorphisms in the genes encoding toll-like receptors and dectin-1 and susceptibility to invasive aspergillosis: A systematic review. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2018, 51, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pana, Z.-D.; Farmaki, E.; Roilides, E. Host genetics and opportunistic fungal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1254–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overview of in silico analysis used in this study.
Figure 1. An overview of in silico analysis used in this study.
Diagnostics 13 01785 g001
Figure 2. Domain identification of Dectin-1 protein using InterPRO server and the position of nsSNPs in each domain. The Dectin-1 protein (1–274 aa), non-cytoplasmic domain (1–44 aa), TMhelixs domain (43–65 aa), transmembrane (45–70 aa), and cytoplasmic domain (71–274 aa).
Figure 2. Domain identification of Dectin-1 protein using InterPRO server and the position of nsSNPs in each domain. The Dectin-1 protein (1–274 aa), non-cytoplasmic domain (1–44 aa), TMhelixs domain (43–65 aa), transmembrane (45–70 aa), and cytoplasmic domain (71–274 aa).
Diagnostics 13 01785 g002
Figure 3. Evolutionary conservancy of amino acids in Dectin-1 analyzed by Consurf.
Figure 3. Evolutionary conservancy of amino acids in Dectin-1 analyzed by Consurf.
Diagnostics 13 01785 g003
Figure 4. Protein interaction network of CLEC7A protein.
Figure 4. Protein interaction network of CLEC7A protein.
Diagnostics 13 01785 g004
Table 1. High-risk nsSNPs identified by seven in silico programs.
Table 1. High-risk nsSNPs identified by seven in silico programs.
SNP IdAA ChangePredictSNP, MAPP, PhD-SNP, SIFT, SNAPPolyphen1, Polyphen2
rs756166982D13YDeleteriousDamaging
rs759032825S22FDeleteriousDamaging
rs775715931C54RDeleteriousDamaging
rs781427660L64PDeleteriousDamaging
rs112345533S117FDeleteriousDamaging
rs1013923644C120GDeleteriousDamaging
rs1156591610C120SDeleteriousDamaging
rs1422790966S135CDeleteriousDamaging
rs761503556W141RDeleteriousDamaging
rs369482852W141SDeleteriousDamaging
rs746386372C148GDeleteriousDamaging
rs1256594278L155PDeleteriousDamaging
rs747442135L155VDeleteriousDamaging
rs1346068120I158MDeleteriousDamaging
rs138005591I158TDeleteriousDamaging
rs758623997D159GDeleteriousDamaging
rs1302972586D159RDeleteriousDamaging
rs1262393046I167TDeleteriousDamaging
rs1221428821W180RDeleteriousDamaging
rs140318683L183FDeleteriousDamaging
rs1307651895W192RDeleteriousDamaging
rs1255198388G197EDeleteriousDamaging
rs1255198388G197VDeleteriousDamaging
rs1267664350C220SDeleteriousDamaging
rs141153031C233YDeleteriousDamaging
rs1219119993I240TDeleteriousDamaging
rs1458236572E242GDeleteriousDamaging
Table 2. Effect of nsSNPs on protein stability predicted by I-MUTANT 2.0.
Table 2. Effect of nsSNPs on protein stability predicted by I-MUTANT 2.0.
SNP IdAA ChangeProtein DomainsPositionI-MutantRIDDG-Free Energy Change Value (kcal/mol)
rs562749381Y3Dnon-cytoplasmic domain3Decrease6−1.08
rs756166982D13Y13Increase50.07
rs759032825S22F22Increase40.27
rs775715931C54RTMhelixs domain/transmembrane domain54Decrease2−0.21
rs781427660L64P64Decrease7−1.52
rs112345533S117Fcytoplasmic domain117Increase20.1
rs1013923644C120G120Decrease8−1.38
rs1156591610C120S120Decrease7−0.87
rs1422790966S135C135Decrease6−0.82
rs761503556W141R141Decrease8−1.02
rs369482852W141S141Decrease9−1.56
rs746386372C148G148Decrease7−1.02
rs1256594278L155P155Decrease1−1.34
rs747442135L155V155Decrease6−1.31
rs1346068120I158M158Decrease6−1.48
rs138005591I158T158Decrease7−2.15
rs758623997D159G159Decrease7−1.5
rs1302972586D159R159Decrease4−0.59
rs1262393046I167T167Decrease9−2.4
rs1221428821W180R180Decrease8−1.15
rs140318683L183F183Decrease5−1.03
rs1307651895W192R192Decrease7−1
rs1255198388G197E197Decrease3−0.42
rs1255198388G197V197Decrease5−0.35
rs1267664350C220S220Decrease8−0.93
rs141153031C233Y233Decrease3−0.43
rs1219119993I240T240Decrease9−2.06
rs1458236572E242G242Decrease7−1.21
Table 3. Missense 3D analysis of the structural impact of seven missense nsSNPs in Dectin-1 protein highlighted in gray. The other residues were not determined in our study.
Table 3. Missense 3D analysis of the structural impact of seven missense nsSNPs in Dectin-1 protein highlighted in gray. The other residues were not determined in our study.
Uniprot PositionPDB/Model PositionResidue Wild-TypeResidue MutantMissense3D PredictionStructural Damage Predicted
120120CYSSERDamagingDisulphide breakage
133133LEUPRODamagingSecondary structure altered; Disallowed phi/psi
141141TRPSERDamagingBuried H-bond breakage
141141TRPARGDamagingBuried hydrophilic introduced; Buried charge introduced
148148CYSGLYDamagingDisulphide breakage
155155LEUPRODamagingBuried Pro introduced; Buried H-bond breakage
157157LYSARGDamagingBuried/exposed switch
163163GLULYSDamagingBuried/exposed switch
180180TRPARGDamagingBuried hydrophilic introduced; Buried charge introduced
184184SERPHEDamagingBuried H-bond breakage
185185ARGGLNDamagingBuried charge replaced; Buried salt bridge breakage
185185ARGCYSDamagingBuried charge replaced; Buried salt bridge breakage
185185ARGHISDamagingBuried H-bond breakage; Buried salt bridge breakage
188188THRPRODamagingDisallowed phi/psi
191191PROSERDamagingSecondary structure altered
191191PROLEUDamagingSecondary structure altered
216216PROTHRDamagingSecondary structure altered
220220CYSSERDamagingDisulphide breakage
233233CYSTYRDamagingDisulphide breakage
238238TYRHISDamagingBuried/exposed switch
239239SERASNDamagingBuried H-bond breakage
Table 4. Regulome DB data for non-coding SNPs of Dectin-1 3UTR and 5UTR.
Table 4. Regulome DB data for non-coding SNPs of Dectin-1 3UTR and 5UTR.
Dectin-1Chromosome LocationdbSNP IDsRankScore
3UTRchr12:10269383..10269384rs56870624060.16346
chr12:10269395..10269396rs53125783660.1131
chr12:10269470..10269471rs55339270060
chr12:10269472..10269473rs56687043070.18412
chr12:10269515..10269516rs18256200170.18412
chr12:10269552..10269553rs55530237960.29006
chr12:10269556..10269557rs57547950460.08083
chr12:10269718..10269719rs18528237070.18412
chr12:10269727..10269728rs57716942760.4855
chr12:10269916..10269917rs54238412950.39056
chr12:10269919..10269920rs56218786350
chr12:10270059..10270060rs143144453,
rs535611004
60.182
chr12:10270088..10270089rs55758977170.18412
chr12:10270148..10270149rs18754496760.16346
chr12:10270339..10270340rs57366193270.18412
chr12:10270414..10270415rs56260849270.18412
chr12:10270458..10270459rs19327997670.18412
chr12:10270704..10270705rs56032580350.13454
chr12:10270713..10270714rs52938492450
chr12:10270739..10270740rs56901873560.80633
chr12:10270770..10270771rs53761292060.41186
chr12:10270969..10270970rs57622728260.17931
chr12:10270980..10270981rs56470374060.40391
chr12:10271102..10271103rs14115303150.13454
5UTRchr12:10282801..10282802rs5364658902b0.64862
chr12:10282827..10282828rs5272582202b0.67017
chr12:10282834..10282835rs14336740740.60906
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-nakhle, H.H.; Khateb, A.M. Comprehensive In Silico Characterization of the Coding and Non-Coding SNPs in Human Dectin-1 Gene with the Potential of High-Risk Pathogenicity Associated with Fungal Infections. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101785

AMA Style

Al-nakhle HH, Khateb AM. Comprehensive In Silico Characterization of the Coding and Non-Coding SNPs in Human Dectin-1 Gene with the Potential of High-Risk Pathogenicity Associated with Fungal Infections. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(10):1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101785

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-nakhle, Hakeemah H., and Aiah M. Khateb. 2023. "Comprehensive In Silico Characterization of the Coding and Non-Coding SNPs in Human Dectin-1 Gene with the Potential of High-Risk Pathogenicity Associated with Fungal Infections" Diagnostics 13, no. 10: 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101785

APA Style

Al-nakhle, H. H., & Khateb, A. M. (2023). Comprehensive In Silico Characterization of the Coding and Non-Coding SNPs in Human Dectin-1 Gene with the Potential of High-Risk Pathogenicity Associated with Fungal Infections. Diagnostics, 13(10), 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101785

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop