Next Article in Journal
Clinical Effect of the C-Reactive Protein to Serum Albumin Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil
Next Article in Special Issue
Extended Complex Temporomandibular Joint Reconstructions Exploiting Virtual Surgical Planning, Navigation Assistance, and Custom-Made Prosthesis: A Comprehensive Protocol and Workflow
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Initial Troponin I and Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels as Biomarkers for Predicting Delayed Neuropsychiatric Sequelae in Patients with CO Poisoning: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Anatomical Preformed Titanium Implants and Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Implants in the Primary Reconstruction of Isolated Orbital Fractures—A Retrospective Study
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

Usage of Object Matching Algorithms Combined with Mixed Reality for Enhanced Decision Making in Orbital Reconstruction—A Technical Note

J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(6), 922; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060922
by Max Wilkat, Nadia Karnatz *, Felix Schrader, Lara Schorn, Julian Lommen, Aida Parviz, Henriette Louise Möllmann and Majeed Rana
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(6), 922; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060922
Submission received: 28 April 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computer Assisted Maxillo-Facial Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have read with interest the paper "Usage of object matching algorithms combined with mixed reality for enhanced decision making in orbital reconstruction – a technical note".
It is a technical note on the use of mixed reality for decision making and patient communication  in orbital fracture reconstruction. 
The technical approach is very 
sophisticated and the paper is very clear to the reader, tough concise.
Considering the extended use of expensive technologies, I suggest that a consideration is given in the Discussion to the need of prospective studies on the clinical benefit of the different technologies proposed (i.e. PSI vs prefabricated meshes). 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper has great clinical significant. 

Minor 

1) Please change " PSIs (Page1 Line42)" to "Patient specific implants (PSIs)"

2) In discussion, please add not only the education for patients but also the content of education for students.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The article is written accurately and has innovation.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop