Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Initial-Final Mass Relation from Carbon Stars in Open Clusters
Previous Article in Journal
LAMOST Spectroscopy and Gaia Photo-Astrometry for an Interstellar Extinction Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs

Institut d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 226, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2024, 12(5), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12050066
Submission received: 11 September 2024 / Revised: 9 October 2024 / Accepted: 11 October 2024 / Published: 18 October 2024

Abstract

:
Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars can experience proton ingestion events (PIEs), leading to a rich nucleosynthesis. During a PIE, the intermediate neutron capture process (i-process) develops, leading to the production of trans-iron elements. It is also suggested that lithium is produced during these events. We investigate the production of lithium and trans-iron elements in AGB stars experiencing a PIE with 1 < M ini / M < 3 and 3 < [ Fe / H ] < 0 . We find that lithium is produced in all PIE models with surface abundances 3 < A(Li) < 5 . The surface enrichment and overall AGB lithium yield increases with decreasing stellar mass. The lithium enrichment is accompanied by a production of 13C with 3 < 12 C/13C < 9 at the surface just after the PIE. AGB stars experiencing PIE may be related to J-type carbon stars whose main features are excesses of lithium and13C. In addition to Li and 13C, heavy elements (e.g., Sr, Ba, Eu, Pb) are significantly produced in low-metallicity stars up to [Fe/H] 1 . The yields of our models are publicly available. Additionally, of interest to the Li nucleosynthesis, we provide an updated fitting formula for the 7Be( e , ν e )7Li electron capture rate.

1. Introduction

The asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase corresponds to the life end of ∼1–8 M stars (see, e.g., [1] for a review). This stage is characterized by recurrent convective thermal pulses (TPs) that develop in the H-He intershell region. When fully developed, the top of the convective pulse nearly reaches the bottom of the H-burning shell. In some cases, protons can be ingested in the TP, leading to a proton ingestion event (PIE, e.g., [2,3]). When a PIE arises, H atoms are transported downwards in the pulse and burnt on the flight via the 12C( p , γ )13N reaction with 13N decaying to 13C in about 10 min. The 13C( α , n ) reaction also operating at the bottom of the TP, where T 250 MK, leads to neutron densities as high as a few 10 15 cm−3, leading to the so-called intermediate neutron capture process (i-process, first coined by [4,5]) and to the production of trans-iron elements (e.g., [6,7]). In addition to AGB stars, PIEs (and thus i-process nucleosynthesis) can develop in accreting white dwarfs [8,9,10], low-metallicity massive stars [11,12,13,14], during the core helium flash of low-metallicity low-mass stars [15,16,17,18] and in post-AGB stars experiencing a late thermal pulse [19,20].
During PIEs, some 3He is also engulfed in the TP and burnt via 3He( α , γ )7Be. The freshly produced 7Be is quickly transported by convection to colder regions where 7Li is produced by 7Be( e , ν e )7Li before being destroyed by 7Li( p , α )4He. This 7Li production channel is known as the Cameron–Fowler Beryllium transport mechanism [21] and has been shown to operate in low-mass low-metallicity AGB stars experiencing PIEs [3].
In this paper, we investigate the production of lithium and heavy elements (and 13C) in AGB stars experiencing PIEs over a wide range of masses and metallicities.

2. Computation of AGB Stellar Models

2.1. Initial Conditions and Nuclear Network

The AGB models considered in this work are those computed in Refs. [22,23]. Models have initial masses 1 < M ini / M < 3 and metallicities1  3 < [Fe/H] < 0 using the solar mixture of [24]. We highlight below some relevant computational aspects and refer the reader to the aforementioned works for additional details. The models were computed with the stellar evolution code STAREVOL [25,26,27]. During a PIE, a network of 1160 nuclei is used, comprising 2123 nuclear reactions (n-, p-, α -captures and α -decays), weak (electron captures, β -decays), and electromagnetic interactions of relevance to follow neutron capture processes up to neutron densities of 10 17 cm−3. The nuclear network is coupled to the diffusion equation for the transport of chemical species since, during a PIE, the nuclear burning and convective transport timescales become similar. The nominal rate for the electron capture reaction 7Be( e , ν e )7Li is from [28] with a threshold value of τ 1 / 2 = 53 days below T < 10 6 K. The models presented here were computed with this rate. However, we tested the impact of adopting the theoretical rate of [29] (also tested in [30] to evaluate the impact on the solar neutrino fluxes) and found very little difference in the Li production during the PIE. We provide a new fitting formula to the temperature- and density-dependent rate of [29] in Appendix A.

2.2. Overshoot Mixing

PIEs have been shown to develop (even without extra mixing) during the early AGB phase of stars with M ini < 2.5 M and [Fe/H] < 2 [3,6,7,22,23,31,32,33,34,35,36], considering overshooting above the convective TP facilitates PIEs [23]. Depending on the strength of overshoot (which is poorly constrained), PIEs can develop up to M ini = 4 M and [Fe/H] = 0 ([23,37]). In some of the models considered here, overshooting above the TP is included following the exponential law introduced in [27]. For these models, the depth of the mixing beyond the Schwarzschild boundary is controlled by the parameter f top (cf. Sect. 2 in [23] ), the value of which is set to f top = 0.02 , 0.04 or 0.10 . Setting f top = 0.10 triggers a PIE in all our models except at solar metallicity ([Fe/H] = 0 ). However, a 2 M model at [Fe/H] = 0 with f top = 0.12 can develop a PIE.

3. Results

3.1. Lithium Production in a 1  M [Fe/H]  = 2.5 AGB Model

Lithium is a fragile element that is destroyed by proton captures when the temperature exceeds 2.5 MK. On the one hand, Li is burnt during the pre-main sequence phase, and its abundance further diluted during the first dredge-up event. In our 1 M [Fe/H] = 2.5 AGB model, the surface Li abundance2 drops to about 1 after the first dredge up (Figure 1, at log ( t fin t ) 8 ). The A(Li) value further decreases to 0.5 during the early AGB phase, when the convective envelope reaches deep layers (at log ( t fin t ) 6 ). During the PIE (shown in Figure 2 top panel), the average3 stellar 7Be and 7Li mass fraction dramatically increase (Figure 2 bottom panel), reaching A(Li) values after the PIE up to 4.8 (Figure 1).
We describe below in detail the lithium production in this model. The abundance profiles just before the PIE are shown in Figure 3a. In the outer layers, the mass fraction of 3He is about 10 3 . Some 7Be is present in the top of the H burning shell at M r 0.55 M because of the operation of the 3He( α , γ )7Be reaction. As the PIE develops, protons and 3He are engulfed in the convective pulse (Figure 3b) and 7Be is further produced. After about 2 yr, the mass fraction of 7Be in the pulse has increased to 10 6 (Figure 3c). Some 7Li (in red) starts to be synthesized by 7Be( e , ν e )7Li. As the convective pulse grows and engulfs more 3He, the average 7Be mass fraction in the star increases (bottom panel of Figure 2). Electron captures on 7Be progressively raise the overall abundance of 7Li in the star (red solid line in the bottom panel of Figure 2). From model 90,500, no more 7Be is synthesized despite the fact that the growing pulse is engulfing 3He (see the plateau in the bottom panel of Figure 2) because the temperature in the pulse is too low to activate 3He( α , γ )7Be. After 8.5 yr (Figure 3d), the pulse is about to merge with the envelope, and 7Li has been significantly synthesized. After the merging, 7Be and 7Li quickly reach the surface (Figure 3e) where the abundance of A(Li) raises from 0.46 to 4.8 (Figure 2, bottom panel). After a few decades, the 7Be in the envelope has been fully transformed into 7Li (Figure 3f).

3.2. PIE Lithium Production as a Function of Mass and Metallicity

All our PIE models experience a similar lithium evolution as described in Section 3.1 (with an exception for 3 M models as discussed later): dilution during the first and second dredge ups and then production during the PIE. At the beginning of the AGB phase, the surface A(Li) ranges from 2.2 to 0.9 (Figure 4, symbols in the lower rectangle) and reaches values of 2.6 < A(Li) < 5.3 after the PIE (symbols in the upper rectangle). This Li production is sensitive to (1) the amount of 3He in the envelope right before the PIE, (2) the PIE characteristics (especially the thermodynamic conditions) and (3) the size of the convective pulse compared to the envelope. These three aspects are discussed below in more detail.
(1)
3He is massively synthesized in low mass stars during core H-burning and [38] showed a positive correlation between the main sequence duration, i.e., the initial stellar mass and the production of 3He. Following the first dredge up that brings 3He to the surface, the following evolutionary stages weakly affect its abundance, provided extra mixing mechanisms like thermohaline or rotation are not included (e.g., [39,40,41,42,43]). Given the higher 3He abundance in the lower mass stars at the time of the PIE (Figure 5), we would expect a higher production of Li in these lower mass models. As a numerical test, we increased and decreased the 3He mass fraction by a factor of 10 in the envelope of a 1 M at [Fe/H] = 2.5 right before the PIE. The resulting surface A(Li) after the PIE is accordingly impacted by a factor of ∼10 (black arrows in Figure 4).
(2)
As the PIE proceeds, the layers of the pulse expand and the temperature decreases. The production of 7Be (through 3He( α , γ )7Be) thus depends on how long a sufficiently high temperature is maintained in the convective pulse. This is determined by the pulse characteristics which vary with initial mass, metallicity and, in a given model, from pulse to pulse. During a PIE, our high-mass AGB models maintain a large temperature longer at the bottom of the pulse before the merging of the pulse with the envelope. This tends to favor the production of 7Li in higher mass stars.
(3)
Finally, with increasing initial mass, the extent of the pulse decreases while the mass of the envelope increases. For example, in our 1, 2 and 3 M models at [Fe/H] = 2 , the ratio of the envelope to pulse mass is 4 , 40 and 200, respectively. The lithium is thus more diluted in the more massive envelope of higher mass stars, which results in smaller Li surface enrichments.
To summarize, (1) and (3) tend to favor higher Li enrichment in lower mass stars, while (2) leads to higher Li enrichment in higher mass stars. All together, these effects lead to higher Li enrichment in lower mass stars (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Right after the PIE, 3 A(Li) 5 at the surface (Figure 4) with a rather clear dependence on the initial mass. After the PIE, 1 M models quickly lose their (Li-rich) envelope without experiencing any further thermal pulse. In contrast, the AGB phase resumes in more massive models. Lithium in the envelope is however left unchanged until the end of the AGB except in the 3 M models, where it is partly burnt due to the high temperature ( T > 2.5 MK) at the bottom of the convective envelope. As a consequence, the Li abundances A(Li), corresponding to our AGB model yields4 (Figure 6), are similar to the surface Li abundance after the PIE, except for the 3 M models where lithium is partially destroyed in the envelope, so that the ejected material becomes Li-poor. We note that the surface A(Li) values of the three PIE AGB models computed in [3] (small symbols in Figure 4) are in agreement with our models.

3.3. Production of 13C

During the first dredge up, the ashes of H burning and among them 13C are transported to the stellar surface. In standard models, this leads to a decrease in the surface 12C/13C ratio from 89 (solar value) to ∼15–30 (e.g., [44]). Without extra-mixing processes induced by, e.g., rotation, the 12C/13C ratio in low-mass stars is not expected to change significantly until the early AGB. Subsequently, recurrent third dredge-ups will inject 12C-rich pulse material into the envelope and the ratio will increase. In our standard solar metallicity 2 M model that does not experience a PIE, 12C/13C drops to 26 after the first dredge up and progressively rises during the AGB phase to reach a final value of 81. Including in this model strong overshooting above the pulse triggers a PIE, during which 13C is synthesized by 12C( p , γ )13N( β + )13C. The 13C isotope is later dredged up to the surface when the pulse merges with the envelope, decreasing the 12C/13C ratio from 26 to 9. Considering all our models, the surface 12C/13C ratio decreases from 15–31 just before the PIE to 3–9 just after (Figure 7), i.e., close to the CNO equilibrium value of about 4. The models of [3] at [Fe/H] = 2.7 predict a similar low surface 12C/13C ratio right after the PIE (small symbols in Figure 7). We note that in AGB stars with M ini 1.5 M , additional pulses and 3DUPs develop after the PIE [22,23], potentially increasing the 12C/13C ratio ([37]).

3.4. Heavy Element Production with the i-Process

The production of heavy elements by the i-process in PIE was extensively discussed in, e.g., [6,7,22,23,50,51]. We discuss here a few aspects related to the models presented in [22,23] and refer to these works for more details.
The maximal neutron density during the PIE shows no clear dependencies on initial mass and metallicity. It varies between 6.8 × 10 13 cm−3 and 2.2 × 10 15 cm−3. At [Fe/H] 0.5 , the production of heavy elements is very small (Figure 8): the amount of seed (mainly 56Fe) increases with metallicity, leading to smaller neutron-to-seed ratios. This prevents a significant production of heavy elements at high metallicities. The production of Sr is maximal at 2 < [Fe/H] < 1 (Figure 8, top left panel). At [Fe/H] < 2 , the neutron-to-seed ratio is high enough for (some) Sr to be processed in heavier elements (especially Pb). The production of Ba and Eu shows a clear drop between [Fe/H] 1.5 and 1 . They are consistently produced below [Fe/H] = 1.5 , especially by the 1 and 2 M models. The Pb yields increase with decreasing metallicity due to the higher neutron-to-seed ratio. Often, at a given metallicity, higher mass stars show smaller surface enrichments (Figure 8) as a consequence of larger dilution factors. Finally, as for lithium (cf. Section 3.2), overshooting can impact the yields. A strong overshooting can, for instance, trigger a PIE in an earlier TP, hence leading to different physical conditions and ultimately to a (generally slightly) different nucleosynthesis (e.g., the two black points at [Fe/H] = 2.5 , Figure 8).

4. Conclusions

AGB stars can experience a proton ingestion event during the early AGB phase. This mechanism leads to the intermediate neutron capture process, which significantly produces heavy elements up to [Fe/H] 1 . The production is particularly high in our M ini 1–2 M AGB models. PIEs also synthesize significant 7Li, coming from the chain 3He( α , γ )7Be( e , ν e )7Li. In our models, spanning the mass range 1 < M ini / M < 3 and metallicity range 3 < [Fe/H] < 0 , a surface enrichment of 3 < A(Li) < 5 is noticed just after the PIE. This lithium enrichment comes with an enrichment in 13C (also synthesized during the PIE), leading to surface 12C/13C ratios of 3 to 9 depending on the model. AGB models with M ini 1.5 M experience further thermal pulses and third dredge-up episodes after the PIE. This destroys some lithium in 3 M models and tends to increase (slightly) the surface 12C/13C ratio. Additional mixing mechanisms like thermohaline or rotation (not considered here) may change the picture. Interestingly, there exists a class of carbon stars called J-type, whose origin is still debated (e.g., [52]) and whose main characteristics are the presence of lithium and 13C. As recently shown in [37], most of the properties of J-type stars can be reproduced by AGB models experiencing a PIE, in particular their 12C/13C ratio (blue stars in Figure 7). Interestingly, some post-AGB sources also have very low 12C/13C ratios (blue shaded area in Figure 7 and [49,53]). They might be the descendants of C-rich stars that left the AGB phase shortly after a PIE. Further investigations are required to determine if this scenario is viable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.; methodology, A.C.; software, L.S. and S.G.; validation, L.S., S.G. and S.M.; formal analysis, A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; writing—review and editing, L.S., S.G. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European Union (ChECTEC-INFRA, project no. 101008324).

Data Availability Statement

The chemical yields of the models presented in this work are publicly available at http://www.astro.ulb.ac.be/~siess/StellarModels/PIE (accessed on 14 October 2024).

Acknowledgments

A.C. is a F.R.S-FNRS fellow. L.S. and S.G. are F.R.S-FNRS research associates. The authors are members of BLU-ULB, the interfaculty research group focusing on space research at ULB - Université libre de Bruxelles.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Analytical Fit to the 7Be + e7Li + νe Decay Rate

The electron-capture rate of 7Be strongly depends on the density and temperature. We fitted the theoretical rate λ of [29] starting from the tabulated form given in Ref. [30]. The rate is a function of ρ / μ e , the density divided by the electron mean molecular weight ( 4.1 < log 10 ( ρ / μ e ) < 3 ), and temperature ( 10 4 < T ( K ) < 10 9 ). We adopted the fitting formula
log 10 ( λ ) = a 0 ( exp ( ( x a 1 ) / a 2 ) + a 3 ) a 4 + a 5
with x = log 10 ( T ) and where the coefficients a k , k = 1 , 5 are polynomial functions of y = log 10 ( ρ / μ e )
a k = i = 0 n k b k , i y i
where n k is the polynom order ( n 0 = 4 , n 1 = 3 , n 2 = 4 , n 3 = 1 , n 4 = 4 , n 5 = 2 ) and the parameters b k , i are given in Table A1. The results are shown in Figure A1. We checked that for all ρ / μ e (only eight values are shown in Figure A1), the deviation between the tabulated rate and the fit is less than 25%.
Table A1. Fit parameters of the 7Be( e , ν e )7Li decay rate.
Table A1. Fit parameters of the 7Be( e , ν e )7Li decay rate.
b k , 0 b k , 1 b k , 2 b k , 3 b k , 4
k = 0 2.501 9.756 × 10 1 1.937 × 10 2 1.262 × 10 2 2.041 × 10 3
k = 1 6.027 2.897 × 10 1 6.012 × 10 2 6.633 × 10 3
k = 2 1.808 × 10 1 4.836 × 10 2 8.658 × 10 4 3.794 × 10 3 5.807 × 10 4
k = 3 9.491 × 10 1 2.574 × 10 2
k = 4 2.308 × 10 1 6.432 × 10 2 9.362 × 10 3 2.524 × 10 4 1.669 × 10 4
k = 5 9.343 1.011 4.900 × 10 3
Figure A1. Top panel: 7Be( e , ν e )7Li rate for various ρ / μ e values. Dashed lines correspond to the tabulated rate of [29,30] and solid lines show our fits according to Equation (A1). Bottom panel: deviation between the fit and the tabulated rate in %.
Figure A1. Top panel: 7Be( e , ν e )7Li rate for various ρ / μ e values. Dashed lines correspond to the tabulated rate of [29,30] and solid lines show our fits according to Equation (A1). Bottom panel: deviation between the fit and the tabulated rate in %.
Galaxies 12 00066 g0a1

Notes

1
[X/Y] = log 10 ( N X / N Y ) log 10 ( N X / N Y ) with N X and N Y the numbers of atoms of elements X and Y in the considered model (or observed star) and in the Sun.
2
A(Li) = log 10 ( N Li / N H ) + 12 , where N Li and N H refer to the numbers of atoms of lithium and hydrogen, respectively.
3
At a given time, the average stellar mass fraction of species i is given by X i ¯ = ( 1 / M tot ) 0 M tot X i ( M r ) d m with M tot the stellar mass and X i ( M r ) the mass fraction of chemical species i at mass coordinate M r .
4
The yield Y i of a nucleus i is computed according to the relation Y i = 0 τ star M ˙ ( t ) X i , s ( t ) d t where τ star is the total lifetime of the model star, and X i , s ( t ) and M ˙ ( t ) are the surface mass fraction of the nucleus, i , and the mass-loss rate at time, t, respectively. The A(Li) value in the yields can then be computed as A(Li) = log 10 ( N Li / N H ) + 12 = log 10 [ ( Y 6 Li / 6 + Y 7 Li / 7 ) / Y 1 H ] + 12 .

References

  1. Karakas, A.I.; Lattanzio, J.C. The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2014, 31, e030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujimoto, M.Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Iben, I., Jr. The Origin of Extremely Metal-poor Carbon Stars and the Search for Population III. Astrophys. J. 2000, 529, L25–L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iwamoto, N.; Kajino, T.; Mathews, G.J.; Fujimoto, M.Y.; Aoki, W. Flash-Driven Convective Mixing in Low-Mass, Metal-deficient Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars: A New Paradigm for Lithium Enrichment and a Possible s-Process. Astrophys. J. 2004, 602, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Starrfield, S.; Truran, J.W.; Sparks, W.M. Novae, supernovae, and neutron sources. Astrophys. J. 1975, 198, L113–L117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cowan, J.J.; Rose, W.K. Production of C-14 and neutrons in red giants. Astrophys. J. 1977, 212, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cristallo, S.; Piersanti, L.; Straniero, O.; Gallino, R.; Domínguez, I.; Käppeler, F. Asymptotic-Giant-Branch Models at Very Low Metallicity. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2009, 26, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choplin, A.; Siess, L.; Goriely, S. The intermediate neutron capture process. I. Development of the i-process in low-metallicity low-mass AGB stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 648, A119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Denissenkov, P.A.; Herwig, F.; Battino, U.; Ritter, C.; Pignatari, M.; Jones, S.; Paxton, B. I-process Nucleosynthesis and Mass Retention Efficiency in He-shell Flash Evolution of Rapidly Accreting White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 2017, 834, L10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Denissenkov, P.A.; Herwig, F.; Woodward, P.; Andrassy, R.; Pignatari, M.; Jones, S. The i-process yields of rapidly accreting white dwarfs from multicycle He-shell flash stellar evolution models with mixing parametrizations from 3D hydrodynamics simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 488, 4258–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piersanti, L.; Yungelson, L.R.; Cristallo, S.; Tornambé, A. He-accreting WD: Nucleosynthesis in the extreme binary system (1.02 + 0.30) M. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 484, 950–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pignatari, M.; Zinner, E.; Hoppe, P.; Jordan, C.J.; Gibson, B.K.; Trappitsch, R.; Herwig, F.; Fryer, C.; Hirschi, R.; Timmes, F.X. Carbon-rich Presolar Grains from Massive Stars: Subsolar 12C/13C and 14N/15N Ratios and the Mystery of 15N. Astrophys. J. 2015, 808, L43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banerjee, P.; Qian, Y.Z.; Heger, A. New Neutron-capture Site in Massive Pop III and Pop II Stars as a Source for Heavy Elements in the Early Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 2018, 865, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Clarkson, O.; Herwig, F.; Pignatari, M. Pop III i-process nucleosynthesis and the elemental abundances of SMSS J0313-6708 and the most iron-poor stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 474, L37–L41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Clarkson, O.; Herwig, F. Convective H-He Interactions in Massive Population III Stellar Evolution Models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 500, 2685–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujimoto, M.Y.; Iben, I., Jr.; Hollowell, D. Helium Flashes and Hydrogen Mixing in Low-Mass Population III Stars. Astrophys. J. 1990, 349, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schlattl, H.; Cassisi, S.; Salaris, M.; Weiss, A. On the Helium Flash in Low-Mass Population III Red Giant Stars. Astrophys. J. 2001, 559, 1082–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campbell, S.W.; Lugaro, M.; Karakas, A.I. Evolution and nucleosynthesis of extremely metal-poor and metal-free low- and intermediate-mass stars. II. s-process nucleosynthesis during the core He flash. Astron. Astrophys. 2010, 522, L6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cruz, M.A.; Serenelli, A.; Weiss, A. S-process in extremely metal-poor, low-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 559, A4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Herwig, F. The Evolutionary Timescale of Sakurai’s Object: A Test of Convection Theory? Astrophys. J. 2001, 554, L71–L74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Herwig, F.; Pignatari, M.; Woodward, P.R.; Porter, D.H.; Rockefeller, G.; Fryer, C.L.; Bennett, M.; Hirschi, R. Convective-reactive Proton-12C Combustion in Sakurai’s Object (V4334 Sagittarii) and Implications for the Evolution and Yields from the First Generations of Stars. Astrophys. J. 2011, 727, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cameron, A.G.W.; Fowler, W.A. Lithium and the s-PROCESS in Red-Giant Stars. Astrophys. J. 1971, 164, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choplin, A.; Siess, L.; Goriely, S. The intermediate neutron capture process. III. The i-process in AGB stars of different masses and metallicities without overshoot. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 667, A155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choplin, A.; Siess, L.; Goriely, S.; Martinet, S. The intermediate neutron capture process. V. The i-process in AGB stars with overshoot. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 684, A206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Asplund, M.; Grevesse, N.; Sauval, A.J.; Scott, P. The Chemical Composition of the Sun. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2009, 47, 481–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Siess, L.; Dufour, E.; Forestini, M. An internet server for pre-main sequence tracks of low- and intermediate-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2000, 358, 593–599. [Google Scholar]
  26. Siess, L. Evolution of massive AGB stars. I. Carbon burning phase. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 448, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goriely, S.; Siess, L. Sensitivity of the s-process nucleosynthesis in AGB stars to the overshoot model. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 609, A29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Caughlan, G.R.; Fowler, W.A. Thermonuclear Reaction Rates V. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 1988, 40, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Simonucci, S.; Taioli, S.; Palmerini, S.; Busso, M. Theoretical Estimates of Stellar e- Captures. I. The Half-life of 7Be in Evolved Stars. Astrophys. J. 2013, 764, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vescovi, D.; Piersanti, L.; Cristallo, S.; Busso, M.; Vissani, F.; Palmerini, S.; Simonucci, S.; Taioli, S. Effects of a revised 7Be e-capture rate on solar neutrino fluxes. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 623, A126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campbell, S.W.; Lattanzio, J.C. Evolution and nucleosynthesis of extremely metal-poor and metal-free low- and intermediate-mass stars. I. Stellar yield tables and the CEMPs. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 490, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cristallo, S.; Karinkuzhi, D.; Goswami, A.; Piersanti, L.; Gobrecht, D. Constraints of the Physics of Low-mass AGB Stars from CH and CEMP Stars. Astrophys. J. 2016, 833, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lau, H.H.B.; Stancliffe, R.J.; Tout, C.A. The evolution of low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch stars and the formation of carbon-enhanced metal-poor stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 396, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Suda, T.; Fujimoto, M.Y. Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars with [Fe/H] <= −2.5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 405, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gil-Pons, P.; Doherty, C.L.; Campbell, S.W.; Gutiérrez, J. Nucleosynthetic yields of intermediate-mass primordial to extremely metal-poor stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 668, A100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Remple, B.A.; Battich, T.; Weiss, A. The impact of overshoot on the i-process in AGB stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 687, A260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choplin, A.; Siess, L.; Goriely, S. Proton ingestion in AGB stars as a possible explanation for J-type stars and AB2 grains. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, in press. Available online: https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2410.10300 (accessed on 3 October 2024).
  38. Rood, R.T.; Steigman, G.; Tinsley, B.M. Stellar production as a source of 3He in the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 1976, 207, L57–L60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Charbonnel, C. A Consistent Explanation for 12C/ 13C, 7Li and 3He Anomalies in Red Giant Stars. Astrophys. J. 1995, 453, L41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Charbonnel, C.; Zahn, J.P. Thermohaline mixing: A physical mechanism governing the photospheric composition of low-mass giants. Astron. Astrophys. 2007, 467, L15–L18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eggleton, P.P.; Dearborn, D.S.P.; Lattanzio, J.C. Compulsory Deep Mixing of 3He and CNO Isotopes in the Envelopes of Low-Mass Red Giants. Astrophys. J. 2008, 677, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lagarde, N.; Charbonnel, C.; Decressin, T.; Hagelberg, J. Thermohaline instability and rotation-induced mixing. II. Yields of 3He for low- and intermediate-mass stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 536, A28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lagarde, N.; Decressin, T.; Charbonnel, C.; Eggenberger, P.; Ekström, S.; Palacios, A. Thermohaline instability and rotation-induced mixing. III. Grid of stellar models and asymptotic asteroseismic quantities from the pre-main sequence up to the AGB for low- and intermediate-mass stars of various metallicities. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 543, A108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Charbonnel, C. Clues for non-standard mixing on the red giant branch from C-12/C-13 and C-12/N-14 ratios in evolved stars. Astron. Astrophys. 1994, 282, 811–820. [Google Scholar]
  45. Abia, C.; Isern, J. 12C/13C ratios and Li abundances in C stars: Evidence for deep mixing? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1997, 289, L11–L15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abia, C.; Isern, J. The Chemical Composition of Carbon Stars. II. The J-Type Stars. Astrophys. J. 2000, 536, 438–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hedrosa, R.P.; Abia, C.; Busso, M.; Cristallo, S.; Domínguez, I.; Palmerini, S.; Plez, B.; Straniero, O. Nitrogen Isotopes in Asymptotic Giant Branch Carbon Stars and Presolar SiC Grains: A Challenge for Stellar Nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 2013, 768, L11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abia, C.; Hedrosa, R.P.; Domínguez, I.; Straniero, O. The puzzle of the CNO isotope ratios in asymptotic giant branch carbon stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 599, A39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ziurys, L.M.; Schmidt, D.R.; Woolf, N.J. Carbon Isotope Ratios in Planetary Nebulae: The Unexpected Enhancement of 13C. Astrophys. J. 2020, 900, L31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Choplin, A.; Goriely, S.; Siess, L. Synthesis of thorium and uranium in asymptotic giant branch stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 667, L13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martinet, S.; Choplin, A.; Goriely, S.; Siess, L. The intermediate neutron capture process. IV. Impact of nuclear model and parameter uncertainties. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 684, A8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Abia, C.; de Laverny, P.; Cristallo, S.; Kordopatis, G.; Straniero, O. Properties of carbon stars in the solar neighbourhood based on Gaia DR2 astrometry. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 633, A135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schmidt, D.R.; Woolf, N.J.; Zega, T.J.; Ziurys, L.M. Extreme 13C,15N and 17O isotopic enrichment in the young planetary nebula K4-47. Nature 2018, 564, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface evolution of Li abundance in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star model. The different colors represent the different evolutionary stages (HB for core hydrogen burning, HeB for core helium burning). The circle denotes the occurrence of a proton ingestion event (PIE).
Figure 1. Surface evolution of Li abundance in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star model. The different colors represent the different evolutionary stages (HB for core hydrogen burning, HeB for core helium burning). The circle denotes the occurrence of a proton ingestion event (PIE).
Galaxies 12 00066 g001
Figure 2. Top: Kippenhahn diagram showing the PIE in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 AGB model. Convective regions are shaded gray. The thermal pulse has already developed at point a (0 yr). The dotted green and blue lines trace the mass coordinate where the nuclear energy production by hydrogen and helium burning is maximum, respectively. The dashed green and blue lines delineate the hydrogen and helium-burning zones (where the nuclear energy production by H and He burning exceeds 10 erg g−1 s−1). The red areas show the extent of the overshoot zones. The letters at the bottom correspond to the abundance profiles shown in Figure 3. The numbers indicate the time in years since the first model (90,098). Bottom: evolution of the average 7Li (solid red) and 7Be (solid blue) stellar mass fractions (cf. text for details). The red dashed line shows the surface 7Li mass fraction (and corresponding abundance A(Li)).
Figure 2. Top: Kippenhahn diagram showing the PIE in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 AGB model. Convective regions are shaded gray. The thermal pulse has already developed at point a (0 yr). The dotted green and blue lines trace the mass coordinate where the nuclear energy production by hydrogen and helium burning is maximum, respectively. The dashed green and blue lines delineate the hydrogen and helium-burning zones (where the nuclear energy production by H and He burning exceeds 10 erg g−1 s−1). The red areas show the extent of the overshoot zones. The letters at the bottom correspond to the abundance profiles shown in Figure 3. The numbers indicate the time in years since the first model (90,098). Bottom: evolution of the average 7Li (solid red) and 7Be (solid blue) stellar mass fractions (cf. text for details). The red dashed line shows the surface 7Li mass fraction (and corresponding abundance A(Li)).
Galaxies 12 00066 g002
Figure 3. Abundance profiles in the inner layers of a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 AGB model at t = 0 yr (a), t = 0.6 yr (b), t = 2.1 yr (c), t = 8.5 yr (d), t = 9.2 yr (e) and t = 276 yr (f). The different panels correspond to the letters indicated in Figure 2 top panel. The time since the first model (top left) is indicated. The gray area show the convective zones (corresponding to the the gray zones of Figure 2.
Figure 3. Abundance profiles in the inner layers of a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 AGB model at t = 0 yr (a), t = 0.6 yr (b), t = 2.1 yr (c), t = 8.5 yr (d), t = 9.2 yr (e) and t = 276 yr (f). The different panels correspond to the letters indicated in Figure 2 top panel. The time since the first model (top left) is indicated. The gray area show the convective zones (corresponding to the the gray zones of Figure 2.
Galaxies 12 00066 g003
Figure 4. Surface Li abundance just before (lower rectangle) and just after the PIE (upper rectangle) in AGB models of various masses and metallicities. Different colors correspond to different initial masses. In the upper rectangle, empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2). The small upward (downward) black arrow shows how the surface A(Li) is impacted in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 model if considering 10 times more (less) 3He in the envelope just before the PIE. The three smaller symbols at [Fe/H] = 2.7 correspond to the surface A(Li) of the 1, 1.5 and 2 M models just after the PIE, computed by [3].
Figure 4. Surface Li abundance just before (lower rectangle) and just after the PIE (upper rectangle) in AGB models of various masses and metallicities. Different colors correspond to different initial masses. In the upper rectangle, empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2). The small upward (downward) black arrow shows how the surface A(Li) is impacted in a 1 M , [Fe/H] = 2.5 model if considering 10 times more (less) 3He in the envelope just before the PIE. The three smaller symbols at [Fe/H] = 2.7 correspond to the surface A(Li) of the 1, 1.5 and 2 M models just after the PIE, computed by [3].
Galaxies 12 00066 g004
Figure 5. 3He abundance profile in our 1, 2 and 3 M AGB models just before the PIE.
Figure 5. 3He abundance profile in our 1, 2 and 3 M AGB models just before the PIE.
Galaxies 12 00066 g005
Figure 6. A(Li) in the yields of our 1 3 M AGB models experiencing a PIE. Different colors correspond to different initial masses. Empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2).
Figure 6. A(Li) in the yields of our 1 3 M AGB models experiencing a PIE. Different colors correspond to different initial masses. Empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2).
Galaxies 12 00066 g006
Figure 7. Surface 12C/13C ratios just before (upper rectangle) and just after the PIE (lower rectangle) in AGB models of various masses and metallicities. Different colors correspond to different initial masses (as in Figure 4 and Figure 6). In the lower rectangle, empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have the same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2). The three smaller symbols at [Fe/H] = 2.7 show the surface 12C/13C ratio of the 1, 1.5 and 2 M models of [3], just after the PIE. The blue stars represent J-type stars [45,46,47,48] and the blue shaded area show the range of 12C/13C ratios in a sample of post-AGB sources (Table 2 in [49]).
Figure 7. Surface 12C/13C ratios just before (upper rectangle) and just after the PIE (lower rectangle) in AGB models of various masses and metallicities. Different colors correspond to different initial masses (as in Figure 4 and Figure 6). In the lower rectangle, empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot. Some overshoot models have the same mass and metallicities but were computed with different f top values (cf. Section 2.2). The three smaller symbols at [Fe/H] = 2.7 show the surface 12C/13C ratio of the 1, 1.5 and 2 M models of [3], just after the PIE. The blue stars represent J-type stars [45,46,47,48] and the blue shaded area show the range of 12C/13C ratios in a sample of post-AGB sources (Table 2 in [49]).
Galaxies 12 00066 g007
Figure 8. [Sr/Fe], [Ba/Fe], [Eu/Fe] and [Pb/Fe] ratios as a function of metallicity in the yields of our AGB models that experienced a PIE. Different colors correspond to different initial masses (as in Figure 4, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot.
Figure 8. [Sr/Fe], [Ba/Fe], [Eu/Fe] and [Pb/Fe] ratios as a function of metallicity in the yields of our AGB models that experienced a PIE. Different colors correspond to different initial masses (as in Figure 4, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Empty (filled) symbols correspond to models computed without (with) overshoot.
Galaxies 12 00066 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choplin, A.; Siess, L.; Goriely, S.; Martinet, S. Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs. Galaxies 2024, 12, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12050066

AMA Style

Choplin A, Siess L, Goriely S, Martinet S. Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs. Galaxies. 2024; 12(5):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12050066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choplin, Arthur, Lionel Siess, Stephane Goriely, and Sebastien Martinet. 2024. "Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs" Galaxies 12, no. 5: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12050066

APA Style

Choplin, A., Siess, L., Goriely, S., & Martinet, S. (2024). Production of Lithium and Heavy Elements in AGB Stars Experiencing PIEs. Galaxies, 12(5), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies12050066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop