Next Article in Journal
Comparative Studies of Perianal Structures in Myrmecophilous Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae)
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of Conventional and Organic Insecticides against Scaphoideus titanus: Field and Semi-Field Trials
Previous Article in Journal
On the Origin of Neo-Sex Chromosomes in the Neotropical Dragonflies Rhionaeschna bonariensis and R. planaltica (Aeshnidae, Odonata)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Detection of Pentastiridius leporinus, the Main Vector of the Syndrome ‘Basses Richesses’ in Sugar Beet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense

1
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vector Insects, College of Life Sciences, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
2
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Engineering Research Center of Biocontrol, Ministry of Education Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China
4
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2022, 13(12), 1161; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121161
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insect Vectors of Plant Diseases)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Rickettsia is a maternally transmitted endosymbiotic bacterium that infects most insect species. In the current study, we investigated the biological and physiological effects of Rickettsia infection on whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Our results revealed that infection with Rickettsia increased the fertility, survivorship, and shortened the nymphal developmental duration of whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Rickettsia infected B. tabaci had significantly higher glycogen, soluble sugar and trehalose contents than those of Rickettsia negative B. tabaci individuals. When exposed to the entomopathogenic fungus Akanthomyces attenuatus and the insecticides imidacloprid and spirotetramat, Rickettsia infested B. tabaci had lower mortality rates and higher semi-lethal concentrations (LC50). The parasitism by Encarsia formosa was also reduced by Rickettsia infection.

Abstract

Endosymbionts play an essential role in the biology, physiology and immunity of insects. Many insects, including the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, are infected with the facultative endosymbiont Rickettsia. However, the mutualism between Rickettsia and its whitefly host remains unclear. This study investigated the biological and physiological benefits of Rickettsia infection to B. tabaci. Results revealed that infection of Rickettsia increased the fertility, the survival rate from nymph to adult and the number of female whiteflies. In addition, this facilitation caused a significant reduction in nymphal developmental duration but did not affect percentage rate of egg hatching. Rickettsia infected B. tabaci had significantly higher glycogen, soluble sugar and trehalose contents than Rickettsia negative B. tabaci individuals. Rickettsia also improved the immunity of its whitefly hosts. Rickettsia infested B. tabaci had lower mortality rates and higher semi-lethal concentrations (LC50) when exposed to the fungus Akanthomyces attenuatus and the insecticides imidacloprid and spirotetramat. The percentage of parasitism by Encarsia formosa was also reduced by Rickettsia infection. Overall, Rickettsia infection benefits B. tabaci by improving the nutritional composition of its host, and also protects B. tabaci by enhancing its resistance towards insecticides (imidacloprid and spirotetramat), entomopathogenic fungi (A. attenuatus) and its main parasitoid (E. formosa); all of which could significantly impact on current management strategies.

1. Introduction

Endosymbiotic bacteria are prevalent within invertebrates. Some of them supply diet limited nutrients to their insect hosts [1,2], some can alter their host’s tolerance to extreme environmental stress [3,4], while others are reproduction manipulators [5]. Insects form a substantial part of many ecological networks and often close associations with maternally inherited, intracellular bacteria. Insect facultative symbionts are often reproduction manipulators and the diversity by which intracellular bacteria manipulate their host reproduction is considerable and ranges from parthenogenesis, male-killing, cytoplasmic incompatibility to the functional feminization [6,7,8]. It is important to explore both the advantages and disadvantages of a symbiotic relationship between insects and symbionts, since some relationships could aid in the management of insect pests, while others may facilitate the host and significantly reduce the effectiveness of a given pest management strategy.
Whitefly Bemisia tabaci is a destructive pest containing more than 40 cryptic species including two invasive populations, the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1, formerly B biotype) and the Mediterranean (MED, formerly Q biotype) [9,10]. Apart from direct feeding, it causes serious crop losses worldwide by indirectly transmitting viruses [11]. In China, B. tabaci MEAM1 and MED are well distributed across 31 Provinces and have caused significant economic losses since the mid-1990s and early 2000s, respectively. Whitefly is the major pest of many glasshouse vegetables, ornamentals and field crops in China [12,13]. Various characteristics of the whitefly including rapid reproduction, production of wax powder and rapid development of chemical resistance have led to great challenges in their control and management [14].
Regarding the endosymbionts of B. tabaci, in addition to the primary symbiont Portiera, several genera of facultative symbionts, such as Arsenophonus, Cardinium, Hamiltonella, Hemipteriphilus, Rickettsia and Wolbachia have been recorded within various cryptic species of the B. tabaci complex [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Previous studies have shown that, Rickettsia is abundant in many insects including whitefly pests in nature with stable and high frequencies of infection [21,22,23,24]. It can manipulate host reproduction by causing male-killing in some ladybird beetles or parthenogenesis in eulophid wasps [25,26,27]. In B. tabaci, it can modify the adaptability of its whitefly hosts to their environment, such as enhancement in stress resistance to temperature [28], and altering the survival rate, fecundity and offspring of the whiteflies [29]. However, the effects of Rickettsia infection may vary between different B. tabaci cryptic species, or even within the same cryptic species but from different geographical populations. Some studies have revealed the impact of infection of Rickettsia on nutrition changes of B. tabaci [30]. However, very few reports come from a multicomponent systems interaction viewpoint; taking Rickettsia associated defense against fungi, parasitoids and insecticides into one study [31,32,33,34]. This lack of information limits our knowledge concerning the Rickettsia-whitefly interaction and the development of subsequent management strategies.
This study firstly investigated the impact of Rickettsia on the biology of its whitefly host B. tabaci MEAM1, characterizing how the Rickettsia infection affects the biology of its host by altering its nutrition. Secondly, this study assessed the contribution of Rickettsia infection to the immunity of B. tabaci against entomopathogenic fungi, insecticides and parasitism. The study aimed to reveal the specific undescribed interactions of Rickettsia and B. tabaci and give further insight and understanding in the continual development of management strategies against B. tabaci.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plants

Cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L. var. Lumianyan no. 32) were used in the current study to rear B. tabaci populations. Cotton seeds were sown in plastic pots (12 cm diameter × 15 cm height) containing a soil–sand mixture (10% sand, 5% clay and 85% peat). Plants were reared in a glasshouse (26 ± 1 °C, 16:8 h L:D photoperiod) in a pest- and pesticide-free environment and watered as required. Plants were used for experiments at their 6–8 expanded leaf stage.

2.2. Insects

Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species, were initially collected from eggplant (Solanum melongena) grown at the training farm of South China Agricultural University (SCAU) in Guangzhou, China in 2016. Populations were then reared on cotton plants under standard laboratory conditions at 26 ± 1 °C, 60% relative humidity (RH) and a photoperiod of 16:8 h (L:D). Mitochondrial CO1 gene sequencing was used to check and maintain the purity of the B. tabaci populations [35]. Two B. tabaci MEAM1 populations, Rickettsia positive (R+ MEAM1) and Rickettsia negative (R MEAM1) were set up and maintained according to the methods of Liu et al. [36]. In brief, population screening was conducted for single-pair purification using cotton as the host plant. Random whiteflies, newly emerged and not yet mated, were selected in order to identify their sex (female and male) under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss SteREO Discovery, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Following this, one pair of whiteflies were released into a leaf cage which was attached onto a clean cotton leaf to allow egg laying for 6 days. After this, the parent adult whiteflies were recaptured from the cage and examined for the presence of Rickettsia using the Rickettsia-specific primers (16S rRNA, gltA and Pgt) [18,37]. The above steps were repeated to purify the population of B. tabaci MEAM1 until the B. tabaci MEAM1 glasshouse population was numerous enough for experimental trials. To ensure the purity of each population, approximately 100 adult whiteflies were selected and checked for the presence/absence of Rickettsia respectively every month.
The parasitoid Encarsia formosa was first collected from parasitized B. tabaci nymphs on tomato plants at Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences in 2008. Subsequent offspring were reared on cotton plants infested by Rickettsia positive B. tabaci in a separate glasshouse.

2.3. Entomopathogenic Fungus and Insecticides

Akanthomyces attenuatus (previously Lecanicillium attenuatus) SCAUDCL53 strain (NCBI accession No. MH558279) was provided by the Engineering Research Center of Biocontrol, Ministry of Education in SCAU, which was initially collected from Fujian Province in 2016. The A. attenuatus was inoculated on a Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes and sealed with parafilm. Plates were incubated for eight days under the conditions outlined by Khan et al. [38]. Following sporulation, the spores were scraped into a sterilized dry conical bottle containing 50 mL 0.05% Tween-80 and thoroughly shaken via a magnetic stirrer. The conidial suspension was filtered and poured into a new, sterilized dry conical flask. A hemocytometer (Neubauer) was used to determine the concentration of the stock solution which was diluted into five concentrations ranging from 1 × 108, 1 × 107, 1 × 106, 1 × 105 and 1 × 104 conidia/mL.
The two insecticides, imidacloprid (95% WP, Anhui Huaxing Chemical Co., Ltd., Maanshan, China) and spirotetramat (97% WP, Hebei Weiyuan Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, China) were used to assess the effect of Rickettsia infection on the chemical resistance of B. tabaci MEAM1.

2.4. Effect of Rickettsia on Development and Reproduction of Bemisia tabaci

Healthy and fully expanded cotton leaves were marked on the cotton plants and covered with leaf cages (diameter: 7 cm; height: 7 cm). Five pairs of Rickettsia positive (R+) and Rickettsia negative (R) B. tabaci adults (2–4 days old) were separately released into a leaf cage to allow egg-laying for five days. After five days, the number of eggs produced by the mating pairs were counted under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss SteREO Discovery). This experiment investigating fecundity was repeated in nine parallel replications for both R+ and R whiteflies.
In addition, 20–30 pairs of R+ and R B. tabaci adults (2–4 days old) were separately released into a leaf cage to allow egg-laying for 24 h. After 24 h the adult whiteflies were removed. The development and survival of the B. tabaci nymphs were then observed every 24 h. Following the emergence of adult whiteflies, sex identification was made under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss SteREO Discovery, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The treatments were repeated in three parallel replications.

2.5. Effect of Rickettsia on the Nutritional Changes of Bemisia Tabaci

The nutritional contents of B. tabaci were determined by using 100 pairs of R+ and R B. tabaci adults respectively. A total of ten cotton leaves were caged to introduce whiteflies of each Rickettsia status for oviposition for 24 h. After the subsequent emergence of R+ and R whitefly adults (2 h old), specimens were collected in an Eppendorf tube, weighed 10 mg per sample and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen samples were then ground and homogenized in PBS (pH 7.4). This crude homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min and stored at −80 °C for further experimentation.
The protein contents of R+ and R B. tabaci adults were measured according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer Beyotime Biotechnology. The absorbance was read in a Microplate Spectrophotometer (XMark™, BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA). Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) was used to determine Cu+ at a wavelength of 562 nm [39].
The anthrone method was used to estimate the soluble sugar and glycogen content as outlined by Halhoul and Kleinberg [40] and trehalose as outlined by Ferreira et al. [41] at 630 nm wavelength by using a microplate analyzer. The same supernatant was used for all the experiments.

2.6. Effect of Rickettsia on the Defense of Bemisia tabaci against Akanthomyces attenuatus

A total of ten healthy cotton plants were taken, and three fully expanded cotton leaves were selected from each plant and covered with individual leaf cages. There were forty pairs of R+ and R B. tabaci adults that were separately released into a leaf cage of different plants, respectively. After 48 h of egg-laying, the whiteflies were removed. Emerged nymphs were reared up to the 4th instar on the respective leaf. A total of one hundred nymphs were randomly selected per instar, with excess nymphs removed from the leaves via a fine camel hairbrush. Leaves with whitefly nymphs were plucked from the plants and immersed in the conidia suspension with concentrations mentioned above for 15s and then allowed to air-dry at room temperature as outlined in Cuthbertson et al. [42]. Leaves dipped in 0.05%Tween-80 were used as controls. Following this, the leaves were placed in Petri dishes containing 1% water agar medium, covered with a thin plastic layer with small puncture holes for aeration. All the treatment and control experiments were repeated in three parallel replications. All the Petri dishes were placed in separate climate chambers (PQX-250, Jintan Experimental Instrument Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, China) to avoid contamination at identical temperature (26.0 ± 1 °C), relative humidity (70–85%) and photoperiod (14:10 (L:D)); the light intensity was maintained at approximately 3000 Lux. Survival data were collected daily over the following seven days.

2.7. Effect of Rickettsia on the Defense of Bemisia Tabaci against the Parasitoid

As outlined above, three healthy and expanded cotton leaves were selected from one cotton plant and covered with leaf cages. Fifty pairs of R+ and R B. tabaci adults were separately released into the leaf cages. Following egg-laying for 24 h, the whiteflies were removed. Approximately 160 nymphs were randomly selected per instar, with excess nymphs removed using a fine camel hairbrush. Eight females of E. formosa (5 days old) were introduced into the leaf cage for 24 h before being removed. All the treatments were repeated five times. The parasitism rate, developmental duration, and emergence rate (%) of E. formosa were subsequently recorded.

2.8. Effect of Rickettsia on the Resistance of Bemisia tabaci to Insecticides

For the toxicity assay, seven geometrically progressive concentrations ranging from 3.125 mg/L, 6.25 mg/L, 12.5 mg/L, 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L of imidacloprid and spirotetramat were diluted in water. The dip impregnation method was used to determine the toxicity of imidacloprid and spirotetramat to second instar nymphs of R+ and R B. tabaci. When the nymphs developed to second instar, 100 nymphs on one leaf were randomly selected and plucked from the plant, immersed entirely in the different pesticide concentrations of imidacloprid and spirotetramat for 10s, then dried at room temperature, again following method of Cuthbertson et al. [42]. For controls, individual leaves were dipped in ddH2O. Treated leaves were again placed in Petri dishes as outlined above. The data for survival of R+ and R B. tabaci nymphs were collected daily over the following five days.
The residual method was used to determine the toxicity of imidacloprid and spirotetramat to R+ and R B. tabaci adults. Plants and B. tabaci adults were obtained as outlined above. In a 20 mL tube, 0.5 mL of each concentration of imidacloprid and spirotetramat were added separately; the tubes were then physically shaken well to apply the pesticide to the wall of the tube evenly. Following 1 min of shaking, the remaining pesticide was discarded, and the tubes air-dried. Again, tubes washed in ddH2O were used as controls. A total of fifteen pairs of R+ and R B. tabaci adults were then placed into each tube, respectively, for 30 min before being released into the new leaf cages. All the treatment and control experiments were repeated in three parallel replications. Whitefly mortality was recorded after six hours.

2.9. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by using SAS software (v.8.01). Data were tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilks test) and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test) before using parametric tests. Egg hatch ability, the mortality rate of whitefly, the parasitism rate and the emergence rate of parasitoids among different treatments were arcsine transformed wherever the data did not conform to a normal distribution. The biological data, nutrition contents and parasitism were compared among treatments using a t-test. The cumulative corrected mortality rate (%) of whiteflies caused by the entomopathogenic fungus and insecticides respectively were compared among treatments using two-way ANOVA. Tukey’s post-hoc test assessed the mean difference between and among the treatments at p < 0.05. Significant differences between treatments were estimated at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 significance levels. Graphical work was done via GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Rickettsia on Development and Reproduction of Bemisia tabaci

Our results showed that both the fecundity and egg hatching rate of R+ B. tabaci are higher than that of R B. tabaci, with the difference in fecundity being significant (t16 = 12.31, p = 0.0001, t4 = 0.79, p = 0.47; Figure 1a,b). The developmental period of R+ B. tabaci F1 generation was also significantly shorter than that of R B. tabaci individuals (t4 = 2.88, p = 0.045; Figure 1c), but their survivorship from egg to adult was higher than the R- individuals (t4 = 3.12, p = 0.03; Figure 1d). In addition, the percentage of females in the R+ F1 generation was significantly higher than that of R F1 generation (t4 = 4.794, p = 0.0087; Figure 1e), and the average longevity of R+ F1 female adults was significantly longer than that of R F1 female adults (t4 = 4.585, p = 0.01; Figure 1f). Therefore, we can conclude that Rickettsia plays a positive role in terms of the fecundity, the number of females and survival rate in the B. tabaci MEAM1 population.

3.2. Effect of Rickettsia on the Nutritional Components of Bemisia tabaci

The presence of Rickettsia had clear effects on the nutritional components of B. tabaci. The contents of glycogen (t4 = 2.89, p = 0.04), soluble sugar (t4 = 4.10, p = 0.015) and trehalose (t4 = 3.48, p = 0.025) were all significantly elevated in the R+ B. tabaci compared to that of R individuals (Figure 2a–c). However, there was no significant change between the protein concentrations of R+ and R B. tabaci populations (t4 = 0.05, p = 0.96) (Figure 2d).

3.3. Effect of Rickettsia Persistence on Bemisia tabaci Defense against Akanthomyces attenuatus

The bioassay results showed that the A. attenuatus SCAUDCL53 isolate has high pathogenicity to all instar nymphs of R+ and R B. tabaci (Figure 3). At five days after infection, compared with healthy 3rd instar nymphs (Figure 3a-1), the fungus-infected 3rd instar nymphs (Figure 3a-2) were wrapped in white mycelium and had a change in body color. Comparing healthy 2d old pupae (Figure 3b-1), the fungus-infected 2d old pupae (Figure 3b-2) were again wrapped in white mycelium. Here, the body became dried out and again a color change was evident. When comparing healthy newly emerged adults (Figure 3c-1), the fungus-infected newly emerged adults (Figure 3c-2) showed symptoms such as being wrapped in white mycelium, changes in body color, unresponsiveness and in several cases the body became dried up. The mortality rate increased with the increase in conidial suspension concentration; highest mortality rate was at a concentration of 1 × 108 conidia/mL. Overall, the mortality rate of R+ B. tabaci was distinctly lower than that of R B. tabaci (Figure 4). No matter the age of the whitefly treated, the conidial suspension concentration and Rickettsia all significantly affected the mortality of the whitefly (Table S1).
Bioassay results revealed, when infecting the MEAM1 nymphs, a higher semi-lethal concentration (LC50) is required for R+ B. tabaci than R B. tabaci to get 50% mortality. This indicates that the Rickettsia negative MEAM1 nymphs were more susceptible to A. attenuatus infection (Table 1).

3.4. Effect of Rickettsia Infection on Parasitism Rate of Encarsia formosa

Rickettsia infection distinctly increased the defense ability of B. tabaci against parastization from the endoparasitoid E. formosa. The average parasitism rate of E. formosa in R+ B. tabaci reduced approximately 26% compared to those in R B. tabaci (t8 = 2.50, p = 0.037; Figure 5a). Also, the generational developmental duration of E. formosa progeny in R+ B. tabaci nymphs was about 6.56% shorter than those in R B. tabaci nymphs (t8 = 3.38, p = 0.0097; Figure 5b). However, there was no significant effect on the emergence rate of E. formosa progeny that developed in the R+ and R B. tabaci nymphs (t8 = 0.88, p = 0.40; Figure 5c).

3.5. Effect of Rickettsia Infection on Insecticide Resistance of Bemisia tabaci

With an increase in imidacloprid concentrations, B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults’ mortality significantly increased. Also, the mortality of R+ B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults were both lower than those of R B. tabaci second instar nymphs (Figure 6a) and adults (Figure 6b). The semi-lethal concentrations (LC50) of imidacloprid to R+ B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults were higher than those of R B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults (Table 2). In addition, the bioassay results showed that when second instar whitefly nymphs were treated with imidacloprid, the concentration of imidacloprid significantly affected the mortality of the whitefly; but there was no association with the infection status of Rickettsia. However, when the whitefly adults were treated, both the concentration of imidacloprid and Rickettsia infection status significantly affected the mortality of the whitefly (Table S2).
Different results were observed when spirotetramat was used against R+ and R B. tabaci second instar nymphs (Figure 6c) and adults (Figure 6d). The semi-lethal concentrations (LC50) of spirotetramat to R+ B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults were higher than those of R B. tabaci second instar nymphs and adults (Table 2). When second instar whitefly nymphs were treated with spirotetramat, both the concentration of spirotetramat and Rickettsia infection status significantly affected the mortality of the whitefly; significant interactions were observed. However, when whitefly adults were treated the concentration of spirotetramat significantly affected the mortality of the whitefly, but there was no association with the Rickettsia infection status (Table S2). In general, all the bioassay data indicated that Rickettsia infection enhanced the whitefly host’s resistance to insecticides.

4. Discussion

Insect bacterial endosymbionts affect insect hosts’ biological, physiological and ecological traits, including their adaptation to temperature stress, immunity and resistance ability against entomopathogenic fungi and natural enemies; endosymbionts may also affect the development, survival and reproductive pattern of their insect hosts [28,43,44,45]. Although Rickettsia species have been verified in their function as primary nutritional symbionts and reproductive manipulators [37,46], their role in the vast majority of hosts is unknown. The Rickettsia in B. tabaci MEAM1 is in the well-defined bellii clade [36,47], which has also shown to positively influence various fitness measures of B. tabaci, including the induction of a higher reproduction rate and a female-biased sex ratio [22,48]. In this study, we demonstrated the role of Rickettsia focusing on its resistance ability against entomopathogenic fungi, a natural enemy and several chemical pesticides.
It has been confirmed that Rickettsia can impact whiteflies in multiple ways including reproduction, development and survivorship [49]. For example, infected Rickettsia whiteflies produce more offspring that survive to adulthood at greater rates and develop more quickly compared with uninfected whiteflies [22]. Similarly, Chiel et al. [29] and Shi et al. [45] reported that infection of Rickettsia significantly shortened the developmental period of their B. tabaci hosts. Our results revealed that R+ B. tabaci have higher fecundity, survival rate, number of females and higher longevity than the R- B. tabaci, while there were shorter developmental periods for R+ B. tabaci. All our results in the current study further confirmed the above findings.
Endosymbionts are also known as male-killers or to be female-biased (convert non-transmitting male hosts into transmitting females through feminization of genetic males and parthenogenesis induction) [50], among which, Rickettsia has been revealed to manipulate host reproduction, either by killing male offspring as embryos (male-killing) or by inducing parthenogenesis [26]. Our results also showed that R+ B. tabaci produced more female offspring than the R population. It has been reported that, Rickettsia can raise the fitness of infected female indirectly by manipulating host reproduction, either by killing male offspring as embryos (male-killing) or by inducing parthenogenesis. The result of nucleotide sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene in Hagimori et al. [51] indicated that the parasitoid Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) is infected with a Rickettsia bacterium, which appears to be causative of the thelytokous parthenogenesis (in which mothers produce only female offspring from unfertilized eggs). This is the first finding of parthenogenesis-induction by Rickettsia among insects. Moreover, Neochrysocharis formosa (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) males infected with Rickettsia produced by antibiotic treatment exhibited the same courtship behaviors as the arrhenotokous males, but at a lower rate, and did not produce fertilized progeny [52].
Endosymbionts have been reported to affect the nutritional contents of insect hosts [53]. For instance, the breakdown of glycogen generates glucose, which enters the glycolytic pathway being converted into pyruvate. This process leads to ATP generation and provides energy for insect activities [54]. It has been reported that the function of soluble sugar is to offer energy for the hosts’ muscles when an insect is walking or escaping [55,56]. Thus, alteration in soluble sugar content may cause a significant change in the normal functioning of the organism. Trehalose is an important disaccharide in all biological forms and provides energy for growth, metamorphosis, stress recovery, chitin synthesis, and insect flight [57]. From the elevated level of glycogen, soluble sugar and trehalose, we hypothesized that Rickettsia infestation also affects the physiology of B. tabaci. Endosymbionts can promote insect fitness by contributing to nutrition [58], they play a prominent role in insect nutritional ecology by aiding in digestion of food or providing nutrients that are limited or lacking in the diet [59,60]. Lv et al. [61] reported that Buchnera aphidicola helps the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum to overcome the nutritional deficiency of a plant-based diet. In our study, due to increased egg-laying, B. tabaci produces more energy reserves to support reproduction and other daily metabolic activities.
Endosymbionts also play an important role in the enhancement or detraction of the defense system of the pest host against different management strategies, for example, insecticides [62], entomopathogenic fungi [63] and biological control parasitoids [42,64]. Our results showed that Rickettsia enhanced resistance of B. tabaci to imidacloprid, spirotetramat, it has been found that insecticide resistance was increased in hosts infected with some symbionts, but we speculate that the enhancement or decrease of insecticide resistance may depend on the endosymbiont-insecticide association, for example, Rickettsia increased the resistance of whiteflies to acetamiprid and spiromesifen, but not diafenthiuron [65]; Rickettsia coexisting with another symbiont, Arsenophonus, was shown to confer insecticide resistance to acetamiprid in B. tabaci, but did not affect susceptibility to diafenthiuron [62]. In addition, Pan et al. [66] reported that the thiamethoxam-susceptible population of B. tabaci harbored more Portiera and Hamiltonella than the thiamethoxam-resistant population, whereas the thiamethoxam-resistant population of B. tabaci harbored more Rickettsia than the thiamethoxam-susceptible population.
We reached a consensus currently that non-chemical control measures became the alternative and best choice for the management of insect pests, due to increasing resistance to chemical pesticides [67]. Some studies indicated several facultative endosymbionts of the pea aphid have been implicated in increasing their host resistance to pathogenic fungi [43,68,69,70]. Panteleev et al. [63] revealed that females of Drosophila melanogaster infected with Wolbachia were more resistant to the fungus Beauveria bassiana (an insect pathogen) than uninfected females; infected females also exhibited changes in oviposition substrate preference. Hendry et al. [32] also reported that Rickettsia infected B. tabaci exhibited a decreased mortality rate due to the entomopathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas syringae compared to Rickettsia negative B. tabaci. Our results revealed that R+ B. tabaci individuals showed a significant mortality reduction when A. attenuates was applied, and to each specific stage of B. tabaci, a higher concentration was necessary to manage R+ individuals compared to the R individuals. Endosymbionts also protect their host against parasitoids. The endosymbiont Buchnera aphidicola protects Acyrthosiphon pisum against the hymenopteran parasitoid Aphidius ervi by causing high mortality in developing parasitoid larvae [43]. Regiella insecticola was also reported to protect its aphid hosts against the parasitoids Aphidius colmani and Aphidius asychis [71,72]. Hamiltonella did not reduce the susceptibility of aphid to two species of parasitoids (A. ervi and Ephedrus plagiator) and did not affect the fitness of wasps that successfully completed development, but it may reduce the risk of parasitism in its aphid hosts by making them less attractive to searching parasitoids [73]. All these studies along with our findings indicate that, although differing in symbiont species, endosymbionts may share the same functional contribution to their insect hosts.
In conclusion, results from this study and those of previous studies suggest that Rickettsia infestation benefits B. tabaci by aiding in enhanced reproduction, higher survival and faster development by improving its host’s nutritional composition. Rickettsia infection improved its host’s fitness by enhancing its resistance towards insecticides (imidacloprid and spirotetramat), entomopathogenic fungus (A. attenuatus) and parasitoid (E. formosa). This study is useful in understanding the role of endosymbionts within an insect host. Endosymbionts can affect the fitness of their host and they play important roles in protecting their host from environmental stress, such as natural enemies and toxins. However, there are still several unanswered questions that need to be addressed: (1) bacterial endosymbionts are common in insects, so potentially symbiont-mediated protection exists in many insect species, thus, how common is this phenomenon in nature and is this effect the same in different insects? (2) Endosymbionts can enhance their resistance towards insecticides, entomopathogenic fungi and parasitoids, but the breadth of mechanisms that underlie how the symbionts provide protection is still largely unknown. (3) How should we adjust subsequent pest control strategies in response to these characteristics of symbiotic bacteria? All these aspects should be further investigated in the future, to support development of novel strategies of pest biological control.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects13121161/s1, Table S1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the effects of different concentrations of Akanthomyces attenuatus and Rickettsia infection on the mortality of whitefly; Table S2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the effects of different concentrations of insecticide and Rickettsia infection on the mortality of whitefly.

Author Contributions

Z.-Y.F., Y.L., N.S.M. and B.-L.Q. conceived and designed the experiments. Z.-Y.F., Y.L., M.M.K., Z.-Q.H., Q.W. and X.-Y.C. performed the experiments. Z.-Y.F., Y.L. and M.O. analyzed the data. Z.-Y.F., Y.L. and B.-L.Q. contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. Z.-Y.F., Y.L., N.S.M. and B.-L.Q. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1401201) and the National High-Level Talent Special Support Plan (2020) to Bao-Li Qiu.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Andrew GS Cuthbertson (UK) for his critical review on the earlier version of this manuscript; thank Xiaochen Zhang for her assistance in producing the photographs outlining fungus infection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Douglas, A.E. The microbial dimension in insect nutritional ecology. Funct. Ecol. 2009, 23, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gündüz, E.A.; Douglas, A.E. Symbiotic bacteria enable insect to use a nutritionally inadequate diet. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Enders, L.S.; Miller, N.J. Stress-induced changes in abundance differ among obligate and facultative endosymbionts of the soybean aphid. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, B.; Leonard, S.P.; Li, Y.; Moran, N.A. Obligate bacterial endosymbionts limit thermal tolerance of insect host species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24712–24718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lv, N.; Peng, J.; Chen, X.-Y.; Guo, C.-F.; Sang, W.; Wang, X.-M.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Qiu, B.-L. Antagonistic interaction between male-killing and cytoplasmic incompatibility induced by Cardinium and Wolbachia in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Insect Sci. 2021, 28, 330–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hornett, E.A.; Engelstädter, J.; Hurst, G.D.D. Hidden cytoplasmic incompatibility alters the dynamics of male-killer/host interactions. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cass, B.N.; Himler, A.G.; Bondy, E.C.; Bergen, J.E.; Fung, S.K.; Kelly, S.E.; Hunter, M.S. Conditional fitness benefits of the Rickettsia bacterial symbiont in an insect pest. Oecologia 2016, 180, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gillespie, J.J.; Driscoll, T.P.; Verhoeve, V.I.; Rahman, M.S.; Macaluso, K.R.; Azad, A.F. A tangled web: Origins of reproductive parasitism. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 2292–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Qin, L.; Pan, L.-L.; Liu, S.-S. Further insight into reproductive incompatibility between putative cryptic species of the Bemisia tabaci whitefly complex. Insect Sci. 2016, 23, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khatun, M.F.; Jahan, S.M.H.; Lee, S.; Lee, K.Y. Genetic diversity and geographic distribution of the Bemisia tabaci species complex in Bangladesh. Acta Trop. 2018, 187, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, X.B.; Chen, G.; Pan, H.P.; Xie, W.; Wu, Q.J.; Wang, S.L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.G.; Zhang, Y.J. Plants pre-infested with viruliferous MED/Q cryptic species promotes subsequent Bemisia tabaci infestation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chu, D.; Wan, F.H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Brown, J.K. Change in the biotype composition of Bemisia tabaci in Shandong province of China from 2005 to 2008. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1028–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, S.J.; Xue, X.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Ren, S.X.; Du, Y.Z.; Wu, J.H.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Qiu, B.L. Host plants and natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Perring, T.M.; Stansly, P.A.; Liu, T.X.; Smith, H.A.; Andreason, S.A. Chapter 4—Whiteflies: Biology, ecology, and management. In Sustainable Management of Arthropod Pests of Tomato; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 73–110. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nirgianaki, A.; Banks, G.K.; Frohlich, D.R.; Veneti, Z.; Braig, H.R.; Miller, T.A.; Bedford, I.D.; Markham, P.G.; Savakis, C.; Bourtzis, K. Wolbachia infections of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Curr. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Weeks, A.R.; Velten, R.; Stouthamer, R. Incidence of a new sex–ratio–distorting endosymbiotic bacterium among arthropods. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zchori-Fein, E.; Perlman, S.J. Distribution of the bacterial symbiont Cardinium in arthropods. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 2009–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gottlieb, Y.; Ghanim, M.; Chiel, E.; Gerling, D.; Portnoy, V.; Steinberg, S.; Tzuri, G.; Horowitz, A.R.; Belausov, E.; Mozes-Daube, N.; et al. Identification and localization of a Rickettsia sp. in Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl. Environ. Microb. 2006, 72, 3646–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bing, X.L.; Yang, J.; Zchori-Fein, E.; Wang, X.W.; Liu, S.S. Characterization of a newly discovered symbiont of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Appl. Environ. Microb. 2013, 79, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Su, Q.; Oliver, K.M.; Pan, H.; Jiao, X.; Liu, B.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Xu, B.; White, J.A. Facultative symbiont Hamiltonella confers benefits to Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), an invasive agricultural pest worldwide. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chiel, E.; Gottlieb, Y.; Zchori-Fein, E.; Mozes, D.N.; Katzir, N.; Inbar, M.; Ghanim, M. Biotype-dependent secondary symbiont communities in sympatric populations of Bemisia tabaci. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2007, 97, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Himler, A.G.; Adachi, H.T.; Bergen, J.E.; Kozuch, A.; Kelly, S.E.; Tabashnik, B.E.; Chiel, E.; Duckworth, V.E.; Dennehy, T.J.; Zchori-Fein, E. Rapid spread of a bacterial symbiont in an invasive whitefly is driven by fitness benefits and female bias. Science 2011, 332, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gillespie, J.J.; Driscoll, T.P.; Verhoeve, V.I.; Utsuki, T.; Husseneder, C.; Chouljenko, V.N.; Azad, A.F.; Macaluso, K.R. Genomic diversification in strains of Rickettsia felis isolated from different arthropods. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 7, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, P.Q.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; An, X.; Chen, X.S.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Qiu, B.L.; Sang, W. Infection dynamics of endosymbionts reveal three novel localization patterns of Rickettsia during the development of whitefly Bemisia tabaci. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2018, 94, fiy165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lawson, E.T.; Mousseau, T.A.; Klaper, R.; Hunter, M.D.; Werren, J.H. Rickettsia associated with male-killing in a buprestid beetle. Heredity 2001, 86, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Weinert, L.A.; Werren, J.H.; Aebi, A.; Stone, G.N.; Jiggins, F.M. Evolution and diversity of Rickettsia bacteria. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nugnes, F.; Gebiola, M.; Monti, M.M.; Gualtieri, L.; Giorgini, M.; Wang, J.; Bernardo, U. Genetic diversity of the invasive gall wasp Leptocybe invasa (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and of its Rickettsia endosymbiont, and associated sex-ratio differences. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Brumin, M.; Kontsedalov, S.; Ghanim, M. Rickettsia influences thermotolerance in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci B biotype. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chiel, E.; Inbar, M.; Mozes-Daube, N.; White, J.A.; Hunter, M.S.; Zchori-Fein, E. Assessments of fitness effects by the facultative symbiont Rickettsia in the sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Su, Q.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Liu, B.; Fang, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, Y. The endosymbiont Hamiltonella increases the growth rate of its host Bemisia tabaci during periods of nutritional stress. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mahadav, A.; Gerling, D.; Gottlieb, Y.; Czosnek, H.; Ghanim, M. Parasitization by the wasp Eretmocerus mundus induces transcription of genes related to immune response and symbiotic bacteria proliferation in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hendry, T.A.; Hunter, M.S.; Baltrus, D.A. The facultative symbiont Rickettsia protects an invasive whitefly against entomopathogenic Pseudomonas syringae strains. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2014, 80, 7161–7168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, X.D.; Guo, H.F. Importance of endosymbionts Wolbachia and Rickettsia in insect resistance development. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2019, 33, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dangelo, R.A.C.; Michereff-Filho, M.; Inoue-Nagata, A.K.; da Silva, P.S.; Chediak, M.; Guedes, R.N.C. Area-wide insecticide resistance and endosymbiont incidence in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 (B biotype): A Neotropical context. Ecotoxicology 2021, 30, 1056–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kanakala, S.; Ghanim, M. Global genetic diversity and geographical distribution of Bemisia tabaci and its bacterial endosymbionts. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, Y.; Fan, Z.Y.; An, X.; Shi, P.Q.; Ahmed, M.Z.; Qiu, B.L. A single-pair method to screen Rickettsia-infected and uninfected whitefly Bemisia tabaci populations. J. Microbiol. Methods 2020, 168, 105797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Caspi-Fluger, A.; Inbar, M.; Mozes-Daube, N.; Katzir, N.; Portnoy, V.; Belausov, E.; Hunter, M.S.; Zchori-Fein, E. Horizontal transmission of the insect symbiont Rickettsia is plant-mediated. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 279, 1791–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Khan, M.M.; Fan, Z.Y.; O’Neill Rothenberg, D.; Peng, J.; Hafeez, M.; Chen, X.Y.; Pan, H.P.; Wu, J.H.; Qiu, B.L. Phototoxicity of ultraviolet-A against the whitefly Bemisia tabaci and its compatibility with an entomopathogenic fungus and whitefly parasitoid. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 2060288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, P.K.; Krohn, R.I.; Hermanson, G.T.; Mallia, A.K.; Gartner, F.H.; Provenzano, M.D.; Fujimoto, E.K.; Goeke, N.M.; Olson, B.J.; Klenk, D.C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 150, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Halhoul, M.N.; Kleinberg, I. Differential determination of glucose and fructose, and glucose- and fructose-yielding substances with anthrone. Anal. Biochem. 1972, 50, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferreira, J.C.; Paschoalin, V.M.F.; Panek, A.D.; Trugo, L.C. Comparison of three different methods for trehalose determination in yeast extracts. Food Chem. 1997, 60, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Blackburn, L.F.; Northing, P.; Luo, W.; Cannon, R.J.C.; Walters, K.F.A. Leaf dipping as an environmental screening measure to test chemical efficacy against Bemisia tabaci on poinsettia plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 6, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Oliver, K.M.; Russell, J.A.; Moran, N.A.; Hunter, M.S. Facultative bacterial symbionts in aphids confer resistance to parasitic wasps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 1803–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Engelstädter, J.; Telschow, A. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and host population structure. Heredity 2009, 103, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Shi, P.Q.; Chen, X.Y.; Chen, X.S.; Lv, N.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, B.L. Rickettsia increases its infection and spread in whitefly populations by manipulating the defense patterns of the host plant. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2021, 97, fiab032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Perotti, M.A.; Clarke, H.K.; Turner, B.D.; Braig, H.R.; Perotti, B.M.A.; Clarke, H.K.; Turner, B.D.; Braig, H.R. Rickettsia as obligate and mycetomic. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2372–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Davison, H.R.; Pilgrim, J.; Wybouw, N.; Parker, J.; Pirro, S.; Hunter-Barnett, S.; Campbell, P.M.; Blow, F.; Darby, A.C.; Hurst, G.D.D.; et al. Genomic diversity across the Rickettsia and ‘Candidatus Megaira’ genera and proposal of genus status for the Torix group. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bockoven, A.A.; Bondy, E.C.; Flores, M.J.; Kelly, S.E.; Ravenscraft, A.M.; Hunter, M.S. What goes up might come down: The spectacular spread of an endosymbiont is followed by its decline a decade later. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 79, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Giorgini, M.; Bernardo, U.; Monti, M.M.; Nappo, A.G.; Gebiola, M. Rickettsia symbionts cause parthenogenetic reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Appl. Environ. Microb. 2010, 76, 2589–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cordaux, R.; Bouchon, D.; Grève, P. The impact of endosymbionts on the evolution of host sex-determination mechanisms. Trends Genet. 2011, 27, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hagimori, T.; Abe, Y.; Miura, K. The first finding of a Rickettsia bacterium associated with parthenogenesis induction among insects. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adachi-Hagimori, T.; Miura, K. Limited mating ability of a wasp strain with Rickettsia-induced thelytoky. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2020, 113, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, X.; Ling, X.; Guo, H.; Zhu-Salzman, K.; Ge, F.; Sun, Y. Serratia symbiotica enhances fatty acid metabolism of pea aphid to promote host development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fraga, A.; Ribeiro, L.; Lobato, M.; Santos, V.; Silva, J.R.; Gomes, H.; da Cunha Moraes, J.L.; de Souza Menezes, J.; de Oliveira, C.J.L.; Campos, E. Glycogen and glucose metabolism are essential for early embryonic development of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Hansford, R.G.; Johnson, R.N. The nature and control of the tricarboxylate cycle in beetle flight muscle. Biochem. J. 1975, 148, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Li, C.; Sun, Q.; Gou, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.-J.; Liu, C. Long-term effect of elevated CO2 on the development and nutrition contents of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 688220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shukla, E.; Thorat, L.J.; Nath, B.B.; Gaikwad, S.M. Insect trehalase: Physiological significance and potential applications. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Douglas, A.E. Multiorganismal insects: Diversity and function of resident microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015, 60, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Feldhaar, H. Bacterial symbionts as mediators of ecologically important traits of insect hosts. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 36, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Niu, H.; Guo, H. Win by quantity: A striking Rickettsia-bias symbiont community revealed by seasonal tracking in the whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 81, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lv, N.; Wang, L.; Sang, W.; Liu, C.Z.; Qiu, B.L. Effects of endosymbiont disruption on the nutritional dynamics of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insects 2018, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ghanim, M.; Kontsedalov, S. Susceptibility to insecticides in the Q biotype of Bemisia tabaci is correlated with bacterial symbiont densities. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Panteleev, D.Y.; Goryacheva, I.I.; Andrianov, B.V.; Reznik, N.L.; Lazebny, O.E.; Kulikov, A.M. The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia enhances the nonspecific resistance to insect pathogens and alters behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Russ. J. Genet. 2007, 43, 1066–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Oliver, K.M.; Noge, K.; Huang, E.M.; Campos, J.M.; Becerra, J.X.; Hunter, M.S. Parasitic wasp responses to symbiont-based defense in aphids. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kontsedalov, S.; Zchori-Fein, E.; Chiel, E.; Gottlieb, Y.; Inbar, M.; Ghanim, M. The presence of Rickettsia is associated with increased susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) to insecticides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2008, 64, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pan, H.P.; Chu, D.; Liu, B.M.; Xie, W.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Q.J.; Xu, B.Y.; Zhang, Y.J. Relative amount of symbionts in insect hosts changes with host-plant adaptation and insecticide resistance. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, X.; Xu, J.; Sun, T.; Ali, S. Synthesis of Cordyceps fumosorosea-biochar nanoparticles and their effects on growth and survival of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 630220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Scarborough, C.L.; Ferrari, J.; Godfray, H.C.J. Aphid protected from pathogen by endosymbiont. Science 2005, 310, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guay, J.-F.; Boudreault, S.; Michaud, D.; Cloutier, C. Impact of environmental stress on aphid clonal resistance to parasitoids: Role of Hamiltonella defensa bacterial symbiosis in association with a new facultative symbiont of the pea aphid. J. Insect Physiol. 2009, 55, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Łukasik, P.; van Asch, M.; Guo, H.; Ferrari, J.; Charles, J. Godfray, H. Unrelated facultative endosymbionts protect aphids against a fungal pathogen. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vorburger, C.; Gehrer, L.; Rodriguez, P. A strain of the bacterial symbiont Regiella insecticola protects aphids against parasitoids. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Luo, C.; Luo, K.; Meng, L.; Wan, B.; Zhao, H.; Hu, Z. Ecological impact of a secondary bacterial symbiont on the clones of Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Łukasik, P.; Dawid, M.A.; Ferrari, J.; Godfray, H.C.J. The diversity and fitness effects of infection with facultative endosymbionts in the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae. Oecologia 2013, 173, 985–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The effect of Rickettsia infection on the fecundity (a), hatching rate (b), developmental du-ration (c), survival rate from egg to adult (d), sex ratio (% female) (e) and longevity (f) of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population; R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were compared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars *, **, **** signify differences were significantly different at 0.05, 0.01 and 0.0001 levels respectively, ns signifies differences were not significant.
Figure 1. The effect of Rickettsia infection on the fecundity (a), hatching rate (b), developmental du-ration (c), survival rate from egg to adult (d), sex ratio (% female) (e) and longevity (f) of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population; R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were compared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars *, **, **** signify differences were significantly different at 0.05, 0.01 and 0.0001 levels respectively, ns signifies differences were not significant.
Insects 13 01161 g001
Figure 2. The effect of Rickettsia infection on the glycogen content (a), soluble sugar content (b), trehalose content (c) and protein content (d) of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were compared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars * signify differences were significantly different at 0.05 level respectively, ns signifies differences were not significant.
Figure 2. The effect of Rickettsia infection on the glycogen content (a), soluble sugar content (b), trehalose content (c) and protein content (d) of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were compared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars * signify differences were significantly different at 0.05 level respectively, ns signifies differences were not significant.
Insects 13 01161 g002
Figure 3. The infection phenotype of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 nymphs treated with Akanthomyces at-tenuatus (1 × 108 conidia/mL). Panels (a-1,a-2) were healthy 3rd nymphs and the fungus-infected 3rd nymphs, (b-1,b-2) were healthy 2d age pupae and the fungus-infected 2d age pupae, (c-1,c-2) were healthy newly emerged adults and the fungus-infected newly emerged adults of Rickettsia negative B. tabaci on the 5th day after infection.
Figure 3. The infection phenotype of Bemisia tabaci MEAM1 nymphs treated with Akanthomyces at-tenuatus (1 × 108 conidia/mL). Panels (a-1,a-2) were healthy 3rd nymphs and the fungus-infected 3rd nymphs, (b-1,b-2) were healthy 2d age pupae and the fungus-infected 2d age pupae, (c-1,c-2) were healthy newly emerged adults and the fungus-infected newly emerged adults of Rickettsia negative B. tabaci on the 5th day after infection.
Insects 13 01161 g003
Figure 4. The effect of Akanthomyces attenuatus SCAUDCL53 on the mortality rate of the first instar (a), second instar (b), third instar (c) and fourth instar (d) nymphs of Rickettsia positive (R+) and Rickettsia negative (R) B. tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species.
Figure 4. The effect of Akanthomyces attenuatus SCAUDCL53 on the mortality rate of the first instar (a), second instar (b), third instar (c) and fourth instar (d) nymphs of Rickettsia positive (R+) and Rickettsia negative (R) B. tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species.
Insects 13 01161 g004
Figure 5. The effects of Rickettsia infection in B. tabaci MEAM1 on the parasitism of Encarsia formosa. (a) parasitism rate, (b) developmental duration of E. formosa F1 larvae, (c) emergence rate of E. for-mosa F1 adults. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were com-pared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars *, ** indicate that differences were significantly different at 0.05 and 0.01 levels respectively, ns indicate that differences were not significant.
Figure 5. The effects of Rickettsia infection in B. tabaci MEAM1 on the parasitism of Encarsia formosa. (a) parasitism rate, (b) developmental duration of E. formosa F1 larvae, (c) emergence rate of E. for-mosa F1 adults. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Data were com-pared among treatments using t-test, and stars over the bars *, ** indicate that differences were significantly different at 0.05 and 0.01 levels respectively, ns indicate that differences were not significant.
Insects 13 01161 g005
Figure 6. The effects of imidacloprid and spirotetramat on the mortality of second instar nymphs (a,c), adults (b,d) of Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative B. tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Control treatment (CK) was ddH2O.
Figure 6. The effects of imidacloprid and spirotetramat on the mortality of second instar nymphs (a,c), adults (b,d) of Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative B. tabaci MEAM1 cryptic species. R+: Rickettsia positive population, R: Rickettsia negative population. Control treatment (CK) was ddH2O.
Insects 13 01161 g006
Table 1. Virulence of Akanthomyces attenuatum SCAUDCL53 against different Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative developmental stages of B. tabaci.
Table 1. Virulence of Akanthomyces attenuatum SCAUDCL53 against different Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative developmental stages of B. tabaci.
InstarRickettsia +/−LC50
(95% CI Conidia/mL)
Regression
Virulence Model
χ2p
1stR1.52 × 106 (5.77 × 105 − 4.30 × 106)Y = 0.273x − 1.6874.180.24
R+6.18 × 107 (1.93 × 107 − 3.87 × 108)Y = 0.297x − 2.3172.640.45
2ndR3.19 × 106 (1.80 × 106 − 6.0 × 106)Y = 0.488x − 3.1724.800.19
R+1.28 × 107 (5.62 × 106 − 3.80 × 107)Y = 0.357x − 2.546.190.10
3rdR1.56 × 107 (2.37 × 106 − 1.29 × 109)Y = 0.350x − 2.526.600.09
R+2.23 × 109 (1.65 × 108 − 1.36 × 1012)Y = 0.188x − 1.7540.500.92
4thR1.82 × 108 (4.65 × 107 − 1.79 × 109)Y = 0.294x − 2.4265.420.14
R+4.93 × 1011 (3.41 × 109 − 8.07 × 1019)Y = 0.151x − 1.7681.4040.70
Table 2. Toxicity of imidacloprid and spirotetramat against different developmental stages of Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative B. tabaci.
Table 2. Toxicity of imidacloprid and spirotetramat against different developmental stages of Rickettsia positive and Rickettsia negative B. tabaci.
PesticideInstarRickettsia +/LC50 (95% CI) mg/LRegression
Virulence Model
χ2p
ImidaclopridAdultR88.28 (65.14 − 132.22)Y = 0.87x − 1.702.220.70
R+106.32 (83.28 − 144.95)Y = 1.20x − 2.431.820.77
2nd nymphR34.89 (25.20 − 53.33)Y = 0.76x − 1.173.380.50
R+44.28 (31.79 − 69.72)Y = 0.79x − 1.302.050.73
SpirotetramatAdultR97.97 (75.97 − 132.55)Y = 1.15x − 2.282.030.73
R+120.14 (57.00 − 1336)Y = 0.71x − 1.470.830.66
2nd nymphR13.24 (10.68 − 16.19)Y = 1.24x − 1.392.690.61
R+24.83 (19.46 − 32.56)Y = 1.00x − 1.390.550.97
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, Z.-Y.; Liu, Y.; He, Z.-Q.; Wen, Q.; Chen, X.-Y.; Khan, M.M.; Osman, M.; Mandour, N.S.; Qiu, B.-L. Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense. Insects 2022, 13, 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121161

AMA Style

Fan Z-Y, Liu Y, He Z-Q, Wen Q, Chen X-Y, Khan MM, Osman M, Mandour NS, Qiu B-L. Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense. Insects. 2022; 13(12):1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Ze-Yun, Yuan Liu, Zi-Qi He, Qin Wen, Xin-Yi Chen, Muhammad Musa Khan, Mohamed Osman, Nasser Said Mandour, and Bao-Li Qiu. 2022. "Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense" Insects 13, no. 12: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121161

APA Style

Fan, Z. -Y., Liu, Y., He, Z. -Q., Wen, Q., Chen, X. -Y., Khan, M. M., Osman, M., Mandour, N. S., & Qiu, B. -L. (2022). Rickettsia Infection Benefits Its Whitefly Hosts by Manipulating Their Nutrition and Defense. Insects, 13(12), 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13121161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop