Next Article in Journal
Paternity Analyses for the Planning of SIT Projects against the Red Palm Weevil
Previous Article in Journal
The Male Reproductive System of the Kissing Bug, Rhodnius prolixus Stål, 1859 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae): Arrangements of the Muscles and the Myoactivity of the Selected Neuropeptides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 14
Issue 4
10.3390/insects14040325
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera, Reduviidae) from Residual Foci in the States of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Using Geometric Morphology

by
Solange Peixoto
1,
Tiago Belintani
2,3,
Dayse Rocha
1,
Felipe Fontes
4,
Natália Frota
4 and
Cleber Galvão
1,*
1
Laboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos, IOC, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21041-250, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Monteiro Lobato, Campinas 13083-859, São Paulo, Brazil
3
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Araraquara 14800-903, São Paulo, Brazil
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Ambiente, Universidade Tiradentes, Aracaju 49032-490, Sergipe, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(4), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040325
Submission received: 22 October 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 28 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Systematics, Phylogeny and Evolution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Foci of Triatoma infestans were found in the states of Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia, Brazil. The objective of the present work is to evaluate the morphometric differences between populations of residual and wild focus of T. infestans through head geometric morphometry. It is possible to show significant morphometric differences between the studied populations. Furthermore, it is possible to establish a morphometric relationship between these populations and to list hypotheses about the distribution and maintenance of residual foci of T. infestans in Brazil.

Abstract

Triatoma infestans is one of the main vectors of Chagas disease in Latin America. Although the species is under control in most Latin countries, it is still necessary to maintain epidemiological surveillance. The present study aims to characterize T. infestans populations from residual foci in Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, comparing them with natural populations in Argentina and Bolivia. For this, we adopt the geometric morphometry of the heads. It is possible to report the morphometric variety of the studied populations. In addition, we show that the size of the heads contributes to the differentiation between populations, while the shape has less power to discriminate groups. Furthermore, we show that some natural populations have morphometric proximity to residual populations, suggesting a relationship between these triatomines. Our data do not support the origin of residual populations but demonstrate the importance of new studies with other techniques to understand the dynamics of distribution and reintroduction of these vectors in Brazilian territory.

1. Introduction

The subfamily Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) is made up of hematophagous insects, and all the described species are potential vectors of the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas, 1909), the etiological agent of Chagas disease (CD) or American trypanosomiasis (WHO) [1].
Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834), started to occupy the domestic niche in the Bolivian Inter-Andean valleys as long ago as the Precambrian period [2]. In the 20th century, T. infestans occupied three distinct areas of dispersal, one isolated by the Andes mountain range (Chile), and the other two separated by regions where climatic conditions were adverse for the species. One of these is made up of the countries Argentina, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay, and the other is made up of the southern regions of Brazil (Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, and Santa Catarina), the southeast region (Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo), and the northeast region (Minas Gerais and Pernambuco) [3].
The Andes Mountains and the climatic conditions of the Andean regions form natural barriers that hampered the process of active dispersion of T. infestans [4]. These factors corroborate with the hypothesis of passive dispersion caused through human actions. In the south-central region of Brazil, the dispersion of T. infestans occurred after housing expansion in the region. It is probable that the area of continuous dispersion from Bolivia to southern Brazil facilitated the entry of T. infestans into Rio Grande do Sul and later São Paulo and Minas Gerais [4]. The intense traffic of mules and donkeys during the gold and coffee cycle in the 18th century between these regions facilitated the process of dispersion in the Brazilian territory [4].
The first hypothesis for the dispersion of T. infestans was the Andean hypothesis, which suggests the Bolivian plateau as the place of origin of the dispersion [5,6,7]. However, the description of the presence of wild T. infestans in the Bolivian and Argentina Gran Chaco [8,9] led Piccinali et al. (2009, 2011) [10,11] to propose the Argentina Gran Chaco as the center of origin and dispersion of T. infestans.
Systematic actions for the chemical control of T. infestans populations, established in Brazil in 1975, implemented by the CD Control Program (PCDCh), through the Southern Cone Countries Initiative, and launched in 1991 [6,12,13], led Brazil to obtain certification of interruption of CD transmission in 2006 through the near-elimination of its main domiciled vector, T. infestans, granted by the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). Despite the significant impact in relation to vector, transfusion, and congenital transmissions [8,9,11], the risk of CD transmission persists because of the existence of autochthonous species, some of them at risk, such as Triatoma rubrovaria (Blanchard, 1843) and Panstrongylus lutzi (Berg, 1879). Despite the certification obtained by Brazil in 2006, residual foci of T. infestans, a synanthropic species and the main vector of Chagas disease for many years, were recently found in Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia, leading to the hypotheses that resistance to the insecticide used is associated with intrinsic characteristics of the vector, lack of adequate training in insecticide formulation, and migration of specimens from nearby locations [14]. Based on these factors, the current study aimed to comparatively analyze, through geometric morphometry, the residual foci of T. infestans in Rio Grande do Sul and Bahia with specimens from Argentina and Bolivia, aiming to characterize the populations of T. infestans of these states with the populations from Argentina and Bolivia.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Specimens and Identification

Triatomines from the following regions were used: Argentina/Cordoba Argentina/Santa Fé; Bolivia/Cochabamba; Bahia (BA)/Brazil; and Rio Grande do Sul (RS)/Brazil (Figure 1). The specimens from the foci used in the study come from the northwest region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul and the municipality of Tremedal, state of BA, Brazil. For the development of the work, specimens and populations of T. infestans kept in the Triatomine insectary of the National and International Laboratory of Reference in Taxonomy of Triatomines of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute—Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil were used. The insects from the residual foci of Tremedal, Bahia (BA 2010) came from the Public Health Entomology Laboratory—Faculdade de Saúde Pública—USP (Table 1). These colonies were identified in this study as TI24, TI25, TI26, TI27, TI28, TI131, TI156, TI165, and TI169. The specimens were identified from descriptions and identification keys [15]. Table 1 provides information about the populations studied.

2.2. Sampling

A total of 245 heads of male specimens of T. infestans were used in the study. The quantity of each population was distributed as follows: TI24 (n = 27); TI 25 (n = 28); TI 26 (n = 30); TI27 (n = 26); TI28 (n = 34); TI131 (n = 30); TI156 (n = 18); TI165 (n = 23); and TI169 (n = 29).

2.3. Obtention of Images and Landmarks

Geometric morphometry (GM) was used to evaluate variations in the shape and size of the heads of adult males from T. infestans populations. The methodological procedure was the same for all analyses presented in this study. The heads were photographed and digitized using a Leica DMC2900 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) with a 3.1 megapixel digital camera (Leica Microsystems) and LAS software (Leica Application Suite United States). The images followed the same settings, aiming to standardize the capture [15].
Eight reference points were selected for the generated matrix (Figure 2). The landmarks were selected as in Oliveira et al. (2017) [16], collected and processed with the TPS package utilities: TPSdig 2.3.2 and TPSutil 1.81 [17,18]. The reference landmarks of all populations were collected three times, seeking to minimize collector effects [17,18]. The order of introduction of the anatomical landmarks were the same for all specimens, as this is a requirement to establish homology of structures. Raw coordinates are used for generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) in MorphoJ [19]). GPA is a statistical analysis method that is performed to delete all information related to size, position, and orientation [17,18]. Subsequently, the generated matrix is projected onto a Euclidean space to generate a set of scores: partial warps [20]. An average setting, known as a “consensus”, is calculated and allows the average variation between the raw data to be determined [20]. All additional statistics were performed using Procrustes residues to analyze differences in size and shape.

2.4. Size and Shape Variables

A factorial map was generated using MorphoJ 1.07a [18] by the general patterns of morphological variation in the multidimensional data obtained with principal component analysis (PCA) using the Procrustes covariance matrix. Coordinates were obtained after the GPA of the original reference coordinates. Procrustes ANOVA [18] was adopted to assess shape variations using MorphoJ 1.07a [18] and to infer differences between groups [20]. To determine the size variables, the isometric estimator defined as centroid size (CS) was used [21]. The CS is derived from raw coordinate data [22] generated in MorphoJ 1.07a [18]. Mahalanobis distances between pairs of populations were calculated for shape measurements and their significance was assessed using a nonparametric permutation-based test (10,000 replicates, Table 2) in MorphoJ 1.07a [18]. Furthermore, a dendrogram was constructed with Mahalanobis distance data, using PAST v.3.25 [23].

2.5. Evaluation of Variations between Groups

To determine the relationships between populations (nine regions and three countries), canonical variable analysis (CVA) was performed, using MorphoJ 1.07a [18]. Multivariate statistics were performed using Procrustes coordinates [24]. The CVA was performed associated with a resampling method (10,000 repetitions). A factor map of the first and second canonical factors was generated in MorphoJ 1.07a [18].

3. Results

From the collection of nine morphometric landmarks from 245 images and the heads of adult males of the T. infestans species, it was possible to demonstrate the morphological relationships of the residual foci in Brazil with the populations of Argentina and Bolivia.

3.1. Analysis of Size and Shape Variables between Populations of Nine Localities

The size variables estimated through the CS show different size means between the studied populations (Figure 3). All recovered averages were significant (p < 0.001).
The populations of T. infestans from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, TI124, TI27, TI28, and TI131, are larger than TI156. Likewise, the two populations of Argentina, TI25 and TI26, show differences in CS, with TI25 being higher. The population of Santa Rosa, Rio Grande do Sul (TI156) and Argentina (TI26) show approximate values. The population from Cordoba, Bolivia has a different metric from the other populations, as well as TI169 from Bahia, Brazil. The size relationship can be described as: TI24 > TI27 > TI25 > TI131 > TI165 > TI26 > TI168 > TI28 > TI156 (Figure 3).
The Mahalanobis distance is a useful distance estimator for determining similarity between samples. Our results allow us to estimate the distances between populations evaluated pairwise (Table 2). The Argentine populations TI25 and TI26 present relatively approximate values, showing proximity between these populations. The population of Rio Grande do Sul, TI24, in relation to the other populations, is close to the Argentine populations (p ˂ 0.001). Unlike other Brazilian populations, Bahia and Rio Grande Sul differ significantly from the Argentine specimens and show a relative proximity to TI65 from Argentina. In summary, the populations that present the most discrepant Mahalanobis distance metric are the two Argentinean populations.
The dendrogram retrieved from the Mahalanobis distance data and the Procrustes distance data clearly illustrates the results (Figure 4). The Procrustes distance is a useful method for comparing shape, and, in this study, we built a similarity dendrogram through the retrieved data. Both dendrograms clearly show the close relationship between populations. Populations TI24, TI25, and TI126 form a clade (Figure 4). Populations from Bahia (TI169), Rio Grande do Sul (TI28), and TI165 from Bolivia form a second clade. Populations TI27, TI131, and TI156 from Rio Grande do Sul do not constitute a clade; however, they are closer to the second clade (TI169, TI128, and TI165).

3.2. Principal Component Analysis between Populations of Nine Localities

Principal component analysis (PCA), which is defined as an exploratory analysis based on the averages of each population, was able to identify morphological patterns among populations of T. infestans (Figure 5).
Principal components explain 100% of the shape variables. The PCA of T. infestans populations from different localities showed the following variables: the first principal component (PC1) accounted for 42.39% of the variations, the second component explained 24.14%, and together they accounted for 66.53% of T. infestans form variables. The disposition of the ellipses in the space of the Cartesian plane shows an overlapping of the ellipses indicating few differences between the studied forms (heads). Even with similar shapes, head length has greater power of discrimination among the studied specimens.

3.3. Canonical Variance Analysis between Populations of 9 Localities

The CVA was used to discriminate groups across datasets. The first component (CV1) was responsible for 55.47% of the shape variations and the second component explained 23.04% of the variation; together they accounted for 78.51% of shape variables in T. infestans populations from different localities (Figure 6). The space of the Cartesian plane groups the populations TI24 and TI25. The Bolivian population (TI165) is separated from the other study species that appear overlapping, showing little potential for discrimination (Figure 6).

4. Analysis of Size and Shape Variables between Populations of Different Regions

To better understand the morphometric diversity of T. infestans, we evaluated the populations by grouping them into four groups distributed in Argentina and Bolivia, and two populations from Brazil, Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, respectively. The objective was to characterize the morphometric patterns of geographically close populations.

4.1. Centroid Size between Populations of Different Regions

The CS averages obtained from the GPA show the size variables between populations from different regions. The highest averages of size were T. infestans from Bolivia. Populations of T. infestans from Argentina and Rio Grande do Sul show approximate values, while T. infestans from Bahia shows the lowest average. The size relationship can be described as: T. infestans Bolivia > T. infestans Argentina (Córdoba/Santa Fe) > T. infestans Rio Grande do Sul > T. infestans Bahia. The size variation is illustrated by the box plot (Figure 7). In summary, differences in centroid size (CS) between the different populations of Argentina, Bolivia, and Brazil were possible (Figure 7).
Mahalanobis distance values retrieved from show morphometric dissimilarity in size between male heads (Table 3). All values are statistically supported (<0.001). The values show that the populations of the Argentine group are more distant, with less difference with the Rio Grande do Sul group, Brazil. Bolivia’s population is far from all populations. The population of Bahia, Brazil, according to the sampled data, is different from the other Brazilian population (Table 3).
Using data from Mahanalobis distances and Procrustes distances, we recovered two similarity dendrograms (Figure 8). The dendrograms retrieved with different data (Mahalanobis and Procrustes) show a similar topology. The dendrograms enable clear visualization of the distances between the study populations. Again, as in the previous results, the population of Argentina is relatively close to the populations of southern Brazil. In contrast, the populations of Bahia, Brazil, and Bolivia are also close.

4.2. Principal Component Analysis between Populations of Different Regions

Principal component analysis (PCA) describes shape and size variables in a Cartesian plane (Figure 9). The first principal component (PC1) was responsible for 63.44% of the variations, and the second component explains 23.58%; together they accounted for 87.02% of shape variables in T. infestans populations from different regions (Figure 9). The disposition of the ellipses in the space of the Cartesian plane shows relative proximity of form in the heads of the populations of the studied regions; however, the population of Bolivia and Bahia presented greater capacity of differentiation in the x-axis. The populations of Argentina and Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) maintained the approximate midpoint overlap (Figure 9).

4.3. Canonical Variance Analysis between Populations of Different Regions

The CVA was able to group the populations through the estimated multivariate correlation of the head of T. infestans populations. The analysis of canonical variables explained 100% of the shape variables. The first component (CV1) was responsible for 48.82% of the variations, and the second component (CV2) explained 33.6%; together they were responsible for 82.41% of the shape variations in T. infestans populations of different regions. The disposition of the ellipses in the space of the Cartesian plane shows a similarity of shape in the heads of the populations. The populations of Bolivia and Bahia (Brazil) maintain approximate midpoint overlap (Figure 10). In contrast, Argentina and Rio Grande do Sul also overlap in the space of the Cartesian axes (Figure 10).

5. Discussion

Despite the positive impact obtained from the reduction in T. infestans populations through vector control, this species still has epidemiological importance because of its ability to adapt to domestic and peridomiciliary environments [6,25]. However, for unknown reasons, T. infestans is still found in residual foci in the states of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil [26]. These episodic findings raise questions about the existence and persistence of residual foci in these regions, so our study sought to evaluate the morphometric relationship of T. infestans populations from residual foci and natural environments by geometric head morphometry.
Our results show that different ecotypic populations of T. infestans, and from different geographical sites, present significant morphometric differences, demonstrated through head geometric morphometry. We also show that macro-geographic patterns are better discriminated than micro-geographic patterns by geometric morphometry. The multivariate method has been shown to be useful in phylogenetic, systematic, or biogeographical studies with Triatominae [18,27,28,29,30,31].
Passive transport by humans is one of the main hypotheses to explain the distribution of T. infestans in South America [5]. In this way, it is possible that maintenance of residual foci of species such as T. infestans or R. prolixus in Brazil can be sustained by the passive transport of specimens from focal regions, where the wild environment or the lack of control keeps populations close to or in contact with human dwellings [5,6]. Our data demonstrate that Brazilian populations from Bahia and Cochabamba, Bolivia show few morphological differences. Similarly, populations from southern Brazil show greater morphometric proximity to populations from Argentina. The proximity of the border between the southern region of Brazil and Argentina is related to dispersion through the Argentinean Gran Chaco, as suggested by Piccinali et al. (2011) [10,11] and Waleckx et al. (2011) [9]. Even if our data do not support the hypothesis, the proximity between populations is demonstrated in this study.
In Brazil, so far, passive transport of T. infestans specimens has not been observed, as described in southern Chile [32], only the presence of residual foci in Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul. However, Brazil is Bolivia’s main economic market, as Bolivia exports 42% of its products to Brazil and, not unlike Argentina, has an active economic relationship with Brazil [33,34]. The results presented are not enough to trace the origins of the Brazilian residual populations, but all dynamics of the distribution of triatomines in the Americas support the need for investigations with other methods, such as phylogeographic studies, as in Campos-Soto [33], where the origin of insular species of Mepraia was described through phylogeographic studies that used molecular phylogenies, a molecular clock, and biogeography.
The Brazilian triatomine fauna is distributed by natural and artificial environments, the latter mainly associated with the transmission of Chagas to humans [35]. According to Forattini [5], maintenance of triatomines in artificial environments is mainly the result of anthropic action in natural environments. In addition to direct human actions on natural environments, secondary factors such as climate change can also significantly interfere with the radiation of insect vectors to new environments [36,37].
Triatomines are insects whose morphology is easily modeled by the environment. Rapid morphological changes in response to ecological factors can make specific identification difficult, as similar genetics but with marked morphological differences are common. [16] The T. brasiliensis complex is an interesting model to illustrate how morphology can obscure knowledge of the group’s species [16]. The T. brasiliensis species has a morphology shaped by ecotypic and environmental variations, as described in Kamimura [29]. Our studies support the phenotypic plasticity of T. infestans and show that geometric morphometry is useful to characterize morphological variation.
In this study, we used the PCA to characterize the variation in shape. The results show little variation in the shape of the heads, and length is the factor with the greatest potential for discrimination between populations of T. infestans. The CVA grouping method is consistent with the result of the PCA, showing little potential for discrimination between the studied populations. These methods are suitable for intra and interspecific studies [18,29]. However, the analyses of the CS and the Mahalanobis and Procrustes distances were useful to discriminate between the specimens, showing phenotypic variability of T. infestans.
Triatomines are excellent models to study phenotypic plasticity, as they are capable of rapidly modifying morphology in response to new habitats. Phenotypic plasticity is evident in triatomines. Our study shows, through head geometric morphometry, the morphometric variations in different populations of T. infestans. In addition to showing the phenotypic relationship between natural and residual populations of T. infestans, we point out the importance of new studies to confirm the relationships and origins between morphometrically close populations, as these data are important to elucidate the distribution dynamics of triatomines, as well as for collaborating in entomological control and surveillance.

Author Contributions

S.P., wrote the article, conceptualization, methodology, editing; T.B., general review of the article, methodology, software; C.G., general review of the article and writing; D.R., general review; F.F., contribution to the making of maps and review; N.F., contribution to the making of maps and review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received support from CAPES Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The database used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We offer our deepest thanks to Funasa-MS field agents in Rio Grande do Sul, who provided technical support for the field work. We thank the Technicians of the National and International Laboratory of Reference in Taxonomy of Triatomines of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute—Fiocruz for the essential assistance for the development of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis). 2020 Disponível. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/chagas-disease#tab=tab_1 (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  2. Usinger, R.L.; Wygodzinsky, P.; Ryckman, R.E. The biosystematics of triatominae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1966, 11, 309–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aragão, M.B.; Dias, E. Aspectos climáticos da doença de Chagas. I. Considerações sôbre a distribuição geográfica do Triatoma infestans. Rev. Bras. Malar. D. Trop. 1956, 8, 633–644. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aragão, M.B. Sôbre a dispersão de Triatoma infestans. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 1971, 5, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Forattini, O.P. Biogeografia, origem e distribuição da domiciliação de triatomíneos no Brasil. Rev. Saúde Pública 2006, 40, 964–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schofield, C.J. Biosystematics and evolution of the Triatominae. Cad. Saúde Pública 2000, 16 (Suppl. 2), 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dujardin, J.P.; Chavez, T.; Moreno, M.; Machane, M.; Noireau, F.; Schofield, C.J. Comparison of isoenzyme electrophoresis and morphometric analysis for phylogenetic reconstruction of the Rhodniini (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). J. Med. Entomol. 1999, 36, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Noireau, F. Wild Triatoma infestans, a potential threat that needs to be monitored. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2009, 104, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Waleckx, E.; Salas, R.; Huamán, N.; Buitrago, R.; Bosseno, M.F.; Aliaga, C.; Barnabé, C.; Rodriguez, R.; Zoveda, F.; Monje, M.; et al. New insights on the Chagas disease main vector Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae, Triatominae) brought by the genetic analysis of Bolivian sylvatic populations. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 1045–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Piccinali, R.V.; Marcet, P.L.; Noireau, F.; Kitron, U.; Gürtler, R.E.; Dotson, E.M. Molecular Population Genetics and Phylogeography of the Chagas Disease Vector Triatoma infestans in South America. J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Piccinali, R.V.; Marcet, P.L.; Ceballos, L.A.; Kitron, U.; Gürtler, R.E.; Dotson, E.M. Genetic variability, phylogenetic relationships and gene flow in Triatoma infestans dark morphs from the Argentinean Chaco. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2011, 11, 895–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Dias, J.C. Southern Cone Initiative for the elimination of domestic populations of Triatoma infestans and the interruption of transfusional Chagas disease. Historical aspects, present situation, and perspectives. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2007, 102 (Suppl. S1), 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Silveira, A.C.; Dias, J.C. O controle da transmissão vetorial. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011, 44 (Suppl. S2), 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bedin, C.; Wilhelm, T.; Villela, M.M.; da Silva, G.C.C.; Riffel, A.P.K.; Sackis, P.; de Mello, F. Residual foci of Triatoma infestans infestation: Surveillance and control in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2001–2018. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2021, 54, e0530-2020:2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lent, H.; Wygodzinsky, P. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) and their significance as vectors of Chagas disease. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 1979, 163, 123–520. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1282 (accessed on 6 March 2022).
  16. Oliveira, J.; Marcet, P.L.; Takiya, D.M.; Mendonça, V.J.; Belintani, T.; Bargues, M.D.; Mateo, L.; Chagas, V.; Folly-Ramos, E.; Cordeiro-Estrela, P.; et al. Combined phylogenetic and morphometric information to delimit and unify the Triatoma brasiliensis species complex and the Brasiliensis subcomplex. Acta Trop. 2017, 170, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Monteiro, L.R.; Reis, S.F. Princípios de Morfometria Geométrica; Holos: Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 1999; p. 189. Available online: https://www.holoseditora.com.br/produto/principios-de-morfometria-geometrica (accessed on 12 September 2022).
  18. Belintani, T.; de Paiva, V.F.; de Oliveira, J.; da Rosa, J.A. New in morphometry: Geometric morphometry of the external female genitalia of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Acta Trop. 2022, 229, 106383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bookstein, F.L. (Ed.) Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology; Statistics in Medicine; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991; Volume 12, pp. 714–715. Available online: https://www.abebooks.co.uk/9780521585989/Morphometric-Tools-Landmark-Data-Geometry-0521585988/plp?cm_sp=plped-_-1-_-isbn (accessed on 3 November 2021).
  21. Klingenberg, C.P.; Leamy, L.J.; Routman, E.J.; Cheverud, J.M. Genetic Architecture of Mandible Shape in Mice: Effects of Quantitative Trait Loci Analyzed by Geometric Morphometrics. Genetics 2001, 157, 785–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Belintani, T.; Oliveira, J.; Pinotti, H.; Silva, L.A.; Alevi, K.C.C.; Galvao, C.; da Rosa, J.A. Phylogenetic and phenotypic relationships of the Triatoma sordida subcomplex (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Acta Trop. 2020, 212, 105679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D.A.T.; Ryan, P.D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 9. Available online: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm (accessed on 24 October 2022).
  24. Klingenberg, C.P.; Monteiro, L.R. Distances and directions in multidimensional shape spaces: Implications for morphometric applications. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Dias, J.C.P.; Schofield, C.J. The evolution of Chagas disease (American Trypanosomiasis) control after 90 years since Carlos Chagas discovery. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1999, 94, 103–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Araújo, R.F.; Mendonça, V.J.; Da Rosa, J.A.; De Matos, J.F.M.; Lima, S.C.R.; Figueiredo, M.A.D.A. Description of a newly discovered Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) Foci in Ibipeba, State of Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gurgel-Gonçalves, R.; Ferreira, J.B.C.; Rosa, A.F.; Bar, M.E.; Galvão, C. Geometric morphometrics and ecological niche modelling for delimitation of near-sibling triatomine species. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2011, 25, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jaramillo, O.N.; Castillo, D.; Wolff, E.M. Geometric morphometric differences between Panstrongylus geniculatus from field and laboratory. Mem. Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kamimura, E.H.; Viana, M.C.; Lilioso, M.; Fontes, F.H.M.; Pires-Silva, D.; Valença-Barbosa, C.; Carbajal-De-La-Fuente, A.L.; Folly-Ramos, E.; Solferin, V.N.; Thyssen, P.J.; et al. Drivers of molecular and morphometric variation in Triatoma brasiliensis (Hemiptera: Triatominae): The resolution of geometric morphometrics for populational structuring on a microgeographical scale. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stevens, L.; Dorn, P.L. Population genetics of Triatominae. In American Trypanosomiasis Chagas Disease: One Hundred Years of Research, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 169–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sobre los registros aislados de Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) en el sur de Chile. Arq. Entomolóxicos 2016, 15, 121–124. Available online: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6500415 (accessed on 2 December 2022).
  32. SECEM (Sistema de Estadísticas de Comercio Exterior del MERCOSUR). Available online: https://estadisticas.mercosur.int/ (accessed on 26 November 2022).
  33. Campos-Soto, R.; Díaz-Campusano, G.; Rives-Blanchard, N.; Cianferoni, F.; Torres-Pérez, F. Biogeographic origin and phylogenetic relationships of Mepraia (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) on islands of northern Chile. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dias, J.C.P. Evolution of Chagas Disease Screening Programs and Control Programs Historical Perspective. In Global Heart; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 10, pp. 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rocklöv, J.; Dubrow, R. Author Correction: Climate change: An enduring challenge for vector-borne disease prevention and control. Nat. Immunol. 2020, 21, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Costa, J.; Dornak, L.L.; Almeida, C.E.; Peterson, A.T. Distributional potential of the Triatoma brasiliensis species complex at present and under scenarios of future climate conditions. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dujardin, J.P.; Panzera, P.; Schofield, C.J. Triatominae as a model of morphological plasticity under ecological pressure. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 1999, 94, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 14 00325 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of the occurrence of T. infestans in Argentina, Bolivia, and residual foci in Brazil in the states of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul.
Figure 1. Distribution of the occurrence of T. infestans in Argentina, Bolivia, and residual foci in Brazil in the states of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul.
Insects 14 00325 g001
Insects 14 00325 g002 550
Figure 2. Image of the head of an adult male of T. infestans, with marking of the nine type II anatomical landmarks, which were used as coordinates. 1–3: Eye region; 4: Head size; 5–7 Eye region; 8–9 Clypeus region.
Figure 2. Image of the head of an adult male of T. infestans, with marking of the nine type II anatomical landmarks, which were used as coordinates. 1–3: Eye region; 4: Head size; 5–7 Eye region; 8–9 Clypeus region.
Insects 14 00325 g002
Insects 14 00325 g003 550
Figure 3. Box diagram of the centroid size of T. infestans populations from different localities: TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/Residual foci/BA).
Figure 3. Box diagram of the centroid size of T. infestans populations from different localities: TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/Residual foci/BA).
Insects 14 00325 g003
Insects 14 00325 g004 550
Figure 4. Dendrograms generated after generalized Procrustes analysis among populations from different localities. (A) Dendograma of the distance Mahalanobis (B) Dendograma of the distance Procrustes. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/Residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/Residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Figure 4. Dendrograms generated after generalized Procrustes analysis among populations from different localities. (A) Dendograma of the distance Mahalanobis (B) Dendograma of the distance Procrustes. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/Residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/Residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Insects 14 00325 g004
Insects 14 00325 g005 550
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of T. infestans populations from different localities. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of T. infestans populations from different localities. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Insects 14 00325 g005
Insects 14 00325 g006 550
Figure 6. Canonical variance analysis of T. infestans populations from different localities. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS—Rio Grande do Sul.
Figure 6. Canonical variance analysis of T. infestans populations from different localities. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS—Rio Grande do Sul.
Insects 14 00325 g006
Insects 14 00325 g007 550
Figure 7. Box diagram of the centroid size of T. infestans populations from different regions BA/Bahia/Residual Foci (TI169); RS/Rio Grande do Sul (TI24, TI27, TI28, TI131, TI156 Residual foci); Bolivia/Cochabamba (TI165), Argentina/ARG (Córdoba) (TI25); Argentina/ARG/Santa Fé (TI26).
Figure 7. Box diagram of the centroid size of T. infestans populations from different regions BA/Bahia/Residual Foci (TI169); RS/Rio Grande do Sul (TI24, TI27, TI28, TI131, TI156 Residual foci); Bolivia/Cochabamba (TI165), Argentina/ARG (Córdoba) (TI25); Argentina/ARG/Santa Fé (TI26).
Insects 14 00325 g007
Insects 14 00325 g008 550
Figure 8. Dendrograms generated after generalized Procrustes analysis among populations from different regions. (A) Mahalanobis (B) Procrustes. ARG/Argentina (Córdoba) (TI25); ARG/Argentina (Santa Fé) (TI26); BA/Bahia/Brazil/Residual Foci (TI169); Bolivia/Cochabamba (TI165); RS/Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil (TI24, TI27, TI28, TI131, TI156 residual foci).
Figure 8. Dendrograms generated after generalized Procrustes analysis among populations from different regions. (A) Mahalanobis (B) Procrustes. ARG/Argentina (Córdoba) (TI25); ARG/Argentina (Santa Fé) (TI26); BA/Bahia/Brazil/Residual Foci (TI169); Bolivia/Cochabamba (TI165); RS/Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil (TI24, TI27, TI28, TI131, TI156 residual foci).
Insects 14 00325 g008
Insects 14 00325 g009 550
Figure 9. Principal component analysis (PCA) of T. infestans populations from different regions. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Figure 9. Principal component analysis (PCA) of T. infestans populations from different regions. TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/residual foci/BA). BR-BRAZIL, RS-Rio Grande do Sul.
Insects 14 00325 g009
Insects 14 00325 g010 550
Figure 10. Exploratory analysis based on the shape variation of T. infestans heads from different regions after generalized analysis of Procrustes. Argentina (TI25, TI26) Bolivia (TI165), Bahia/ Brazil/ Residual foci 2010 (TI169); Rio Grande do Sul Brazil (TI24, TI 27, TI28, TI131, TI156).
Figure 10. Exploratory analysis based on the shape variation of T. infestans heads from different regions after generalized analysis of Procrustes. Argentina (TI25, TI26) Bolivia (TI165), Bahia/ Brazil/ Residual foci 2010 (TI169); Rio Grande do Sul Brazil (TI24, TI 27, TI28, TI131, TI156).
Insects 14 00325 g010
Table
Table 1. Origin of T. infestans populations.
Table 1. Origin of T. infestans populations.
SpeciesIDLocalityInitiateGeneration *
T. infestansTI24Guarani das Missões/RS */Brazil2006F22
T. infestansTI25Cordoba/Argentina1996F42
T. infestansTI26Santa Fé/Argentina1994F46
T. infestansTI27Entre Ijuís/RS/Brazil1996F42
T. infestansTI28Santo Cristo/RS/Brazil1996F42
T. infestansTI131Santa Rosa/RS/Brazil2008F18
T. infestansTI156 ***Santa Rosa/RS/Brazil2014F6
T. infestansTI165Cochabamba/Bolivia2015F4
T. infestansTI169 ***Tremedal/BA **/Brazil2010F14
* RS—Rio Grande do Sul; ** BA—Bahia; *** residual foci.
Table
Table 2. Mahalanobis distances between T. infestans populations from different localities.
Table 2. Mahalanobis distances between T. infestans populations from different localities.
SamplesTI25TI26TI169TI165TI131TI156TI24TI27TI28
TI250.00
TI261.36410.00
TI1693.76851.98710.00
TI1653.60172.24251.7350.00
TI1313.20753.73943.8853.34270.00
TI1563.46692.18472.32692.02452.62270.00
TI241.62771.67034.1324.2193.8403.8960.00
TI273.52182.44632.4722.29973.42851.23993.7360.00
TI283.74241.90282.11891.66772.36421.34644.23092.02980.00
TI24 (Guarani das Missões/RS/BR); TI25 (Argentina/Cordoba); TI26 (Argentina/Sta. Fe); TI27 (Entre Ijuís/RS/BR); TI28 (Sto. Cristo/RS/BR); TI131 (Sta. Rosa/RS/BR); TI156 (Sta. Rosa/residual foci/RS/BR); TI165 (Cochabamba/Bolívia); TI169 (Tremedal/Residual foci/BA).
Table
Table 3. Mahalanobis distances between populations of T. infestans from different regions.
Table 3. Mahalanobis distances between populations of T. infestans from different regions.
Regions1234
1. ARG0.0000
2. BOL1.77010.0000
3. BR_BA1.58171.50820.0000
4. BR_RS1.24381.93151.98280.0000
ARG (Argentina); BOL (Bolivia); BR_BA (Brazil/Bahia/residual foci); BR_RS (Brazil/Rio Grande do Sul).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peixoto, S.; Belintani, T.; Rocha, D.; Fontes, F.; Frota, N.; Galvão, C. Characterization of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera, Reduviidae) from Residual Foci in the States of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Using Geometric Morphology. Insects 2023, 14, 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040325

AMA Style

Peixoto S, Belintani T, Rocha D, Fontes F, Frota N, Galvão C. Characterization of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera, Reduviidae) from Residual Foci in the States of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Using Geometric Morphology. Insects. 2023; 14(4):325. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peixoto, Solange, Tiago Belintani, Dayse Rocha, Felipe Fontes, Natália Frota, and Cleber Galvão. 2023. "Characterization of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera, Reduviidae) from Residual Foci in the States of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Using Geometric Morphology" Insects 14, no. 4: 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040325

APA Style

Peixoto, S., Belintani, T., Rocha, D., Fontes, F., Frota, N., & Galvão, C. (2023). Characterization of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera, Reduviidae) from Residual Foci in the States of Bahia and Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Using Geometric Morphology. Insects, 14(4), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop