Next Article in Journal
Reliability Design of Mechanical Systems Such as Compressor Subjected to Repetitive Stresses
Next Article in Special Issue
Arsenate and Arsenite Sorption Using Biogenic Iron Compounds: Treatment of Real Polluted Waters in Batch and Continuous Systems
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Nitrogen Linear Flow on Lubricant Removal and Sintering Densification of Alumix 431D Grade Powder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deposition of Arsenic from Nitric Acid Leaching Solutions of Gold–Arsenic Sulphide Concentrates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/met11081260
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pretreatment to Leaching for a Primary Copper Sulphide Ore in Chloride Media

by
Víctor Quezada
1,2,*,
Antoni Roca
1,
Oscar Benavente
2,
Montserrat Cruells
1,
Evelyn Melo
2 and
María Hernández
2
1
Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales y Química Física, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Minas, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1270709, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2021, 11(8), 1260; https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081260
Submission received: 15 July 2021 / Revised: 5 August 2021 / Accepted: 5 August 2021 / Published: 10 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leaching/Bioleaching and Recovery of Metals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The dissolution of copper sulphide ores continues to be a challenge for the copper industry. Several media and leaching alternatives have been proposed to improve the dissolution of these minerals, especially for the leaching of chalcopyrite. Among the alternatives, pretreatment prior to leaching was proposed as an option that increases the dissolution of copper from sulphide ores. In this study, a mineral sample from a copper mining company was used. The copper grade of the sample was 0.79%, and its main contributor was chalcopyrite (84%). The effect of curing time (as pretreatment) in a chloride media on copper sulphide ore was evaluated at various temperatures: 25, 50, 70 and 90 °C. The pretreated sample and leaching residues were characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and reflected light microscopy. Pretreatment products such as CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and S0 were identified although with difficulty, due to the low presence of chalcopyrite in the initial sample (1.99%). Under the conditions of 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time, a copper extraction of 93.1% was obtained at 90 °C with 50 g/L of Cl− and 0.2 M of H2SO4.

1. Introduction

During the few last decades, hydrometallurgy has played a key role in the development of the copper industry in Chile, supporting the mining industry in being the largest copper producer worldwide [1]. Leaching is a process used to achieve the recovery of copper from oxidized minerals and secondary sulphides [2,3]. There are numerous challenges in maintaining copper production in Chile due to the location of the deposits and their natural conditions, including energy costs, environmental impacts, and water scarcity [4,5,6]. However, Chile’s copper production from hydrometallurgy will suffer a sharp decrease, from 28.8% in 2017 to 11.6%, by 2029 [7] due to the depletion of oxide and secondary sulphides ores, leaving copper extraction from primary sulphides as the almost only alternative [8].
Worldwide, the main source of copper is from sulphide minerals, from which 80% of copper is extracted. The main treatment of oxidized minerals is through hydrometallurgy, and for sulphide minerals, it is through flotation followed by a pyrometallurgical process [9]. Flotation processes have a series of challenges related to the environment, such as the generation of tailings in obtaining copper concentrate, the formation of pollutants such as SO2 and As2O3, high energy consumption, and the complex management of the by-products obtained, among others [10,11].
An alternative for the treatment of copper sulphides is through leaching; however, due to the mineralogical characteristics of these minerals, the corresponding processes are difficult to develop. This is due to the slow dissolution kinetics of these minerals, so it is necessary to find the adequate conditions to obtain an optimal process [12,13,14,15]. The slow dissolution kinetics are due the formation of a passivating layer, which prevents the access of the leaching agent to the mineral surface, inhibiting the reaction [16,17]. The main copper sulphide minerals are bornite (Cu5FeS4), enargite (Cu3AsS4), covellite (CuS), chalcocite (Cu2S), and chalcopyrite (CuFeS2), the latter being the most important and abundant copper sulphide mineral, which is associated with pyrite (FeS2), galena (PbS) and sphalerite (ZnS), among others [18,19].
In the last 5 years, several studies have proposed the use of a pretreatment prior to the leaching process for copper recovery [20,21,22,23]. This pretreatment consists of the agglomeration and curing processes, which lead an increase in the dissolution of copper from sulphide minerals that can be obtained. According to Kodali [24], these stages are the best opportunity to improve the dissolution of copper prior to the construction of the heap. Most of the studies evaluating pretreatment (mainly curing) were developed on chalcopyrite ores.
The benefits of applying the curing process, mainly the resting time or curing time, were evaluated by Hernández et al. [20], Cerda et al. [23], and Velásquez-Yévenes et al. [25]. The study performed by Velásquez-Yévenes [25] evaluated the effect of four curing times: 30, 50, 80, and 100 days for a mineral agglomerated with 5 kg/t H2SO4 and using discard brine (32 g/L Cl−), studying the pretreatment effect on leaching efficiency (copper recovery). The maximum copper dissolution (43%) was achieved for a pretreatment with 100 days of curing and subsequent column leaching at room temperature with intermittent irrigation. The temperature evaluation as part of the pretreatment was investigated by Cerda et al. [23]. The authors demonstrated that a maximum of 93% copper extraction was obtained when the ore (mainly chalcopyrite) was treated with 90 kg Cl−/t ore, 40 days of curing time, and 50 °C in flask leaching.
The study of Hernández et al. [20] evaluated the effect of NaCl and NaNO3 on the pretreatment of a mine ore, in which the main copper mineral was chalcopyrite. The authors obtained an optimum copper extraction of 58.6% with the addition of 23.3 kg of NaNO3/t, 19.8 kg of NaCl/t, and after 30 days of curing time at 45 °C. In addition, the effect of pretreatment was evaluated by leaching efficiency using mini columns. The optimum copper extraction of 63.9% was obtained in a leaching test conducted at 25 °C with the use of 20 g/L of chloride. Furthermore, these authors proposed a pretreatment mechanism for chalcopyrite (See Reaction 1). According to them, the reaction is thermodynamically possible under atmospheric pressure and between 25 and 45 °C.
2CuFeS2 + 10H2SO4 +10NaNO3 + 4NaCl → 2CuCl2 + Fe2(SO4)3 + 10NO2 + 4S + 10H2O + 7Na2SO4,
On the other hand, a recent study published by Quezada et al. [26] proposed a pretreatment reaction on a chalcopyrite mineral in a sulphuric acid–chloride media. In this work, a sample especially rich in copper (28.5% Cu) was used for the characterization of products formed during the curing step prior the leaching step. The authors developed a mineralogical characterization of the agglomerates obtained after 15 days of curing, 15 kg/t H2SO4, and 25 kg/t NaCl using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and reflected light microscopy (RLM). The authors indicated that the pretreatment products were copper sulphate (CuSO4), natrojarosite (NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6), elemental sulphur (S0), and copper hydroxychloride Cu2Cl(OH) (See Reaction 2). The passivation during leaching at temperatures between 30 and 70 °C was attributed to the sulphur layer over the chalcopyrite surface.
3CuFeS2 + 3.5H2SO4 + NaCl + 2.5O2 → CuSO4 + NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 + 6.5S + Cu2Cl(OH),
This research focuses on the effect of acid curing on primary copper sulphide ore (0.79% Cu) in sulphuric acid–chloride media. The products generated in the pretreatment (agglomerates) and leaching residues were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and reflected light microscopy. The effect of the pretreatment on leaching efficiency was evaluated at different temperatures, considering the effect of the presence of elevated amounts of gangue in acid consumption. The obtained results are compared with those obtained over a sample with 28.5% Cu [26]. In general, it is shown that pretreatment increases copper extraction and decreases the leaching time. Furthermore, pretreatment is inexpensive, and leaching presents the higher cost the longer it lasts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Copper Sulphide ore Sample

The sample was obtained from an operating mine in Antofagasta, Chile. This sample was initially crushed by a jaw crusher followed by a secondary and tertiary cone crusher, and it was finally dry milled in a ball mill. The size fraction used was −38 + 25 µm. The mineral particles were reduced in size with a closed crushing and grinding circuit.
The chemical composition of the sample was determined by inductively coupled plasma‒optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) (Optima 8300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Before ICP-OES analysis, the solid sample was digested using 1 g of sample in 20% aqua regia solution and heated reaching the boiling point.
Mineralogical data were obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis using a diffractometer (PANalytical, X’Pert PRO MPD Alpha1, Malvern, UK) operating from 4° to 100° 2θ, 45 kV, 40 mA, and Kα 1.54 Å, with a step size 0.017° and a time per step of 150 s. X-ray diffractograms were interpreted using the software X’pert HighScore Plus v.3.0e (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherland).
Qemscan analysis was performed using a Model Zeiss EVO 50 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with Bruker AXS XFlash 4010 detectors (Brusker, Billerica, MA, USA) and Software iDiscover 5.3.2.501 (FEI Company, Brisbane, Australia). Additionally, a reflected light microscope (Zeiss, Axiovert 100, Milan, Italy) was used. Finally, morphological characterization was conducted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL J-7100F, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 20 kV under high vacuum conditions (Emitech K-950X, Lohmar, Germany) coupled with an energy-dispersive X ray- spectroscopy (EDS) microanalysis system (Oxford Instruments INCA, Oxfordshire, UK). Mineral samples were coated with a thin layer of carbon to improve their conductivity. A carbon source in the form of a rod was mounted in a vacuum system between two high-current electrical terminals. When the carbon source was heated to its evaporation temperature, a fine stream of carbon was deposited onto the specimens before SEM characterization.

2.2. Curing Experiments

A total of two grams of the copper sulphide sample was used in each curing test. The samples were agglomerated on an impermeable plastic surface by manually mixing the ore with the solution. The samples were agglomerated with a solution of 15 kg/t H2SO4 and 25 kg/t NaCl using a solid/liquid ratio of 10/2.2 (mass/volume), namely using 0.22 mL of solution per 1 g of ore. A detailed description of this techniques was included in a previous paper [26]. Sulfuric acid and NaCl concentrations were reported as favorable in a previous study published by the authors on the pretreatment of a chalcopyrite mineral [22]. After agglomeration, the samples were placed on watch glasses, covered with a protective film (thermoplastic), and cured in a dark at room temperature for 15 days. The cured samples were used for the mineralogical characterization and leaching tests. After the curing time, briquettes were formed for the mineralogical characterization using a reflected light microscope, XRD, and SEM-EDS analysis. The briquettes were prepared and polished without contact with water to avoid the dissolution of the soluble phases. Finally, the cured samples were used to evaluate the effect of the pretreatment on the copper sulphide ore dissolution.

2.3. Leaching Test

The pre-treated and untreated samples were leached using a mechanical stirrer in a 200 mL vessel with a four-neck using 100 mL of leaching solution containing 0.2 mol·L−1 of H2SO4 (19.6 g/L) and 50 g/L of Cl ion (Figure 1). Agitation was applied using a RW 20 digital overhead stirrer (IKA, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany) at 300 min−1 and heated by a thermostatically controlled water bath (Lauda, Alpha A24, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) to the required temperature: 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C (±1 °C). When the solution reached the desired temperature, a 2 g of sample of cured or noncured ore was added to the solution, and leaching was conducted for a period of 48 h. During the leaching process, the holes in the vessel lid were not covered. Evaporation losses were compensated by adding deionised water. All experiments were performed by duplicate, and the results presented here are the averages of the obtained data (±1.50% in copper extraction).
Sample solutions (3 mL aliquots) were periodically withdrawn for chemical analysis. The samples were filtered (0.2 μm), and the metal concentrations in the filtrate were determined by inductively coupled plasma‒optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The pH and redox solution potential were regularly measured using a pH-ORP meter (HANNA Instruments, HI-4222, St. Louis, MO, USA). All solution potentials were converted to values against the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The solid residues from the leaching experiments were analysed using XRD analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Initial Sample Characterization

The chemical composition of the sample was 0.79% Cu, 2.52% Fe, 2.49% S, and 9.70% Al. Chemical characterization showed that insoluble residue represented 80% of total mass, which suggests the presence of quartz and silicates as insoluble phases.
Figure 2 (X-ray diffractogram) shows that the most abundant species was quartz. In addition, other species such as muscovite, pyrite, and orthoclase were detected. The only copper mineral detected was chalcopyrite. Table 1 shows the mineralogical composition obtained by Qemscan analysis. The main species were muscovite (54.2%) and quartz (29.7%). Other species such as pyrite (3.73%), orthoclase (3.08), and kaolinite (2.51%), were also detected. Chalcopyrite is the most abundant copper mineral (1.99%), representing 84% of the total copper present in the sample. The second largest contributor of the copper was chalcocite (0.150%), representing 10% of the total copper in the sample. Finally, covellite (0.06%) was identified, representing 5.3% of the total copper in the sample.
The high presence of Muscovite (KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2) coincides with the high presence of aluminum in the sample (9.70%). Furthermore, muscovite and quartz represented 84% of the total sample, which coincides with the insoluble residue of the chemical characterization (80%). These analyses show a high presence of gangue minerals.
According to the images obtained using a reflected optical microscope, chalcopyrite and pyrite were recognized according to the characteristic brightness of each species (Figure 3). SEM-EDS analysis showed the majority of the initial sample was composed of muscovite and quartz. Figure 4a shows an analyzed area of the sample, and Figure 4b shows the enlargement of the lower left area of Figure 4a. Finally, chalcopyrite, pyrite, and muscovite were identified in Figure 4b. Through the semi-quantitative reporting of elements, Figure 4c shows an atomic Cu:Fe:S ratio of 1:1:2, which indicates the presence of chalcopyrite, while Figure 4d shows an atomic Fe:S ratio of 1:2, which denotes the presence of pyrite. Figure 4e shows an atomic K:Al:Si:O of 1:3:3:14, which was associated with muscovite.
The copper species were in minority content, which coincides with the nature of the sample. According to By et al. [27], species such as quartz and biotite are not reactive against the presence of sulphuric acid. Muscovite was also declared to be of low reactivity in acid media [28]. Furthermore, pyrite is an inert sulphide, strong oxidants have to be employed for its efficient dissolution, and no such conditions exist in the proposed treatment [29].

3.2. Characterization of Cured Ore Samples

The pretreatment products that were obtained (agglomerated solids) were characterized to identify the newly formed products.
Figure 5 shows the characterization performed by optical microscope conducted over a sample with a pretreatment using 15 kg/t H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days as curing time. A chalcopyrite particle with green edges was observed, showing the formation of new products. These products were associated with copper sulphate or chloride–copper complexes, as evidenced by Quezada et al. [26]. In Figure 5b, a similar behavior was evidenced but with a greater intensity in the formation of the reaction products around the particle.
The identification of new species by X-ray diffraction analysis is presented in Figure 6. Species such as quartz and muscovite are still the most abundant, compared to the initial sample. Other species such as pyrite and orthoclase were identified as minority species. Chalcopyrite is still present, and other species resulting from the pre-treatment, such as copper sulfate, iron sulfate, or elemental sulphur, were not identified. However, the presence of these species should not be ruled out, according to Hernández et al. [20] and Quezada et al. [26]. Finally, sodium chloride (NaCl) was identified as a product of this pretreatment. This is due to the high presence of NaCl used in the formation of the solution that agglomerates the sample. It is possible to associate the presence of NaCl at angles 31.69° and 45.43° (in 2 theta), the main angles of this species. According to Zhang et al. [30], the presence of this salt is both stable and possible under ambient conditions.
The initial diffractogram was compared to the diffractogram of the sample that had been pretreated. Following Reaction 2 proposed by the authors in a previous work, Quezada et al. [26], the products formed during the pretreatment of a chalcopyrite mineral were CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and elemental sulphur.
Comparing the initial diffractogram versus the pretreatment diffractogram, the principal angles of natrojarosite appeared. Some hints of its presence were observed. Figure 7 shows the variation in the presence of natrojarosite before and after pretreatment. For high presence, dissolved iron is required, which is mainly associated with chalcopyrite and pyrite. If chalcopyrite reacts, iron will be available. It is important to consider that the presence of chalcopyrite in this sample was 1.99% instead of 74% of the sample used in a previous paper [26].
Regarding the CuSO4, it was difficult to confirm its presence due to the low content of chalcopyrite in the initial sample. Figure 8 shows one of its secondary peaks but not the peak corresponding to the main angle. However, the intensity associated with this angle is very low. Finally, the eventual presence of elemental sulphur is shown in Figure 9, which is associated with secondary but not main angles. In the case of Cu2Cl(OH), no main or secondary angles were observed. As such, its presence, at least through X-ray diffraction analysis, was not confirmed.
SEM analysis was used to identify species formed during the pretreatment. As in X-ray diffraction analysis, due to the low presence of chalcopyrite, the identification for species using SEM was limited. The quartz, muscovite, and pyrite species were easy to detect because of their abundance. Furthermore, unreacted chalcopyrite was identified (Figure 10). Figure 10b shows an atomic Cu:Fe:S ratio of 1:1:2, which indicated unreacted chalcopyrite.
As postulated in Reaction 2, the pretreatment of chalcopyrite in chloride media prior to leaching proposed the formation of products such as CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, elemental sulphur, and Cu2Cl(OH), which was also considered in studies developed by Hernández et al. [20] and Cerda et al. [23]. Therefore, according to the conditions used in this study, CuSO4, NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, and elemental sulphur were identified. Species such as Cu2Cl(OH) or similar ones were not identified, probably due to the low presence of chalcopyrite in the initial sample (1.99%). Performing this type of test with a pure mineral as conducted in a pervious paper becomes highly recommended because it reduces noisein the interpretation [26].

3.3. Leaching with and without Pretreatment

To evaluate the effect of the curing time, copper sulphide ore samples with pretreatment (agglomerated and cured with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl for a period of 15 days) and without pretreatment were leached at 25, 50, 70, and 90 °C.

3.3.1. Leaching Test without Pretreatment

Figure 11 shows the results of the leaching tests without pretreatment. It can be observed that as the temperature increased, the leaching efficiency increased. The test conducted at 25 °C shows a very classic behavior of a mineral whose main contribution is chalcopyrite [31] in that it reached 16.7% copper extraction and had clear passivation. Considering that chalcopyrite represents 84% of total copper, it can be inferred that the extracted copper would be associated with other more soluble phases such as chalcocite (10% of total copper) and covellite (5% of total copper). According to Dutrizac [32], it is always important to consider these contributions, no matter how small, as this presences can undermine the extraction of copper, especially at low temperatures. By increasing the temperature to 50 °C, a copper dissolution of 44.3% was reached. When the temperature increased to 70 °C, the final copper extraction was 64.4%, showing no clear passivation after 48 h of leaching. Finally, the test conducted at 90 °C reached a copper extraction rate of 88.6%.

3.3.2. Leaching Test with Pretreatment

For the leaching tests performed with pretreatment, the results are shown in Figure 12. A trend very similar to tests without pretreatment was observed but with a higher percentage of copper dissolution. The test performed at 25 °C (with pretreatment) reached a copper extraction rate of 25.9%. This value is almost 10 points higher, compared to the tests without pretreatment. In Figure 12, the passivation of the mineral was evidenced at 25 °C, and the copper extraction was similar to the curing test (27.4%). When the leaching temperature was 50 °C, the copper extraction reached 48.9%, and at 70 °C, 70.2% of copper dissolution was achieved. Finally, at 90 °C, a 93% of copper extraction rate was achieved. There was greater extraction of copper in all tests with pretreatment, resulting in an average of 5% more copper extracted, except at 25 °C, where difference was almost 10% higher.
For tests with pretreatment, the stability of the copper extraction was reached before the tests without pretreatment. This is because the sulfation that was generated becomes a soluble copper product. It was observed that all tests with pretreatment achieved higher copper extraction. In addition, pretreatment tests show greater reactivity in the first two hours of the process. However, as time and temperature increase, the difference in copper extraction decreases. Furthermore, with the pretreatment at 90 °C, a copper extraction of 90% was achieved in 24 h, while without pretreatment, it took 48 h.
According to Hernández et al. [20], the curing time also solubilizes iron, contributing the ferric ions to in the dissolution of the sulphides. This would occur in all of those tests since dissolving more than 20% of copper guarantees iron dissolution as well. This occurs in all tests leached with pretreatment and within the first hour of leaching. Furthermore, a chloride–acid media promotes the formation of copper–chloride complexes due to the rapid incorporation of Cu2+ into the system by pretreatment samples [33].

3.3.3. Characterization of Leaching Residues

The characterization of leaching residues was performed in all leaching tests using X-ray diffraction analysis. Table 2 presents a summary of the main species identified by using this technique, with quartz, muscovite, and pyrite being the most abundant in the leaching residue. These results are similar to those obtained in a previous work [26], in which a rich sample of chalcopyrite was used (with small amount of gangue). It can be concluded that there was low acid consumption to dissolve the gangue phases in the sample. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Chetty [28], in which species such as quartz and muscovite were considered of low solubility in an acid media.
For the tests at 25 °C, the presence of unreacted chalcopyrite was determined. In tests performed at 50 °C, the presence of Cu2S was confirmed. This Cu2S could be undissolved mineral from the initial sample or a product of the leaching of the chalcopyrite. Since the presence of Cu2S is not evident at 25 °C, it is likely to be the product of chalcopyrite leaching [34]. Regarding the tests performed at 70 °C, the presence of chalcocite is no longer evident. The presence of elemental sulphur in the system was observed for the first time due to the dissolution of copper from chalcopyrite (70.2% Cu in test with pretreatment). This does not rule out that at 25 and 50 °C, the presence of elemental sulphur cannot exist; the presence would be so low that it would be difficult to detect. The presence of elemental sulphur is normal in leaching residues, mainly due to the chalcopyrite dissolution, even for processes such as bioleaching [35,36]. Leaching tests at 90 °C reported a composition identical to the tests at 70 °C. The presence of other species that are responsible for the passivation of chalcopyrite, such as natrojarosite or copper polysulfides, were not identified. Furthermore, in systems with the presence of PbSO4, a lack of sulphuric acid could result in the precipitation of iron as plumbojarosite and could therefore create difficulties in the recovery of valuable metals [37]. According to the behavior of the pH in all of the tests, the formation of natrojarosite is unlikely. However, according to Lu et al. [38], it is possible to find this species at pH 0.9; the above would only be possible in tests at 90 °C.

4. Conclusions

The chemical composition of the mine ore sample is 0.790% Cu, 2.52% Fe, 2.49% S, and 9.70% Al. The mineralogical composition indicates the presence of 54.2% muscovite, 29.7% quartz, 3.73% pyrite, 3.08% orthoclase, 2.51% kaolinite, 1.99% chalcopyrite, and other elements in minor amounts.
The pretreatment with 15 kg/t H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing leads to 27% copper extraction prior to the leaching step. This is mainly produced by the generation of copper sulfate identified by comparing the diffractograms of the initial sample versus the generated samples in the pretreatment.
The curing time benefits the kinetics of copper dissolution from copper sulphide ores. In addition, in synergy with the temperature (50 °C and 90 °C), it was possible to generate a difference of 5% in the extraction of copper compared to a mineral without pretreatment. A 93.1% copper extraction was obtained at 90 °C with a pretreatment using 15 kg/t H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing time.
The leaching test, performed at 25 °C, generated the greatest difference in copper extraction. Extraction values of 16.7% and 25.9% were obtained without and with pretreatment, respectively. Chalcopyrite passivation was quickly achieved as evidenced by the behavior of the copper extraction curve over time (around 4 h of leaching).
For leaching at 70 °C, a copper extraction of 65% in 24 h with pretreatment and in 48 h without pretreatment was obtained. During leaching at 90 °C, a copper extraction of 90% in 24 h with pretreatment and in 48 h without pretreatment was also obtained. Thus, the curing treatment significantly reduced the leaching time needed for copper extraction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.Q., A.R., O.B. and M.C.; methodology, V.Q., A.R. and M.C.; software, V.Q.; validation, A.R., O.B. and M.C.; formal analysis, E.M. and M.H.; investigation, V.Q.; resources, A.R. and M.C.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.Q.; writing—review and editing, A.R., O.B., M.C. and E.M.; visualization, E.M. and M.H.; supervision, A.R.; project administration, A.R.; funding acquisition, A.R. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Universitat de Barcelona and the Universidad Católica del Norte for the opportunity and funding provided to conduct this research. We also appreciate the contribution of the Scientific Equipment Unit-MAINI at the Universidad Católica del Norte for their support in preparing the samples, analysis, and data generation using QEMSCAN. We also thank the Centres Científics I Tecnològics, Universitat de Barcelona, for their support in the application of the characterization techniques.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Solminihac, H.; Gonzales, L.E.; Cerda, R. Copper mining productivity: Lessons from Chile. J. Policy Model. 2018, 40, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Olson, G.J.; Brierley, J.A.; Brierley, C.L. Bioleaching review part B: Progress in bioleaching: Applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benavente, O.; Cecilia Herníndez, M.; Melo, E.; Núñez, D.; Quezada, V.; Zepeda, Y. Copper dissolution from black copper ore under oxidizing and reducing conditions. Metals 2019, 9, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Valenzuela-Elgueta, J.; Cánovas, M.; García, A.; Zárate, R. Electrocoalescence of emulsions in raffinate from the solvent extraction phase under AC electrical fields. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 490–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cánovas, M.; Valenzuela, J.; Romero, L.; González, P. Characterization of electroosmotic drainage: Application to mine tailings and solid residues from leaching. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2960–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beiza, L.; Quezada, V.; Melo, E.; Valenzuela, G. Electrochemical Behaviour of Chalcopyrite in Chloride Solutions. Metals 2019, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cochilco. Proyección de la Producción de Cobre en 2018–2029; Cochilco: Santiago, Chile, 2018.
  8. Velásquez Yévenes, L. The Kinetics of the Dissolution of Chalcopyrite in Chloride Media. Ph.D. Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrera-Mendoza, G.E.; Lapidus, G.T. The effect of chemical additives on the electro-assisted reductive pretreatment of chalcopyrite. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 158, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hiroyoshi, N.; Arai, M.; Miki, H.; Tsunekawa, M.; Hirajima, T. A new reaction model for the catalytic effect of silver ions on chalcopyrite leaching in sulfuric acid solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2002, 63, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Winarko, R.; Dreisinger, D.B.; Miura, A.; Tokoro, C.; Liu, W. Kinetic modelling of chalcopyrite leaching assisted by iodine in ferric sulfate media. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 197, 105481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rodríguez, M.; Ayala, L.; Robles, P.; Sepúlveda, R.; Torres, D.; Carrillo-Pedroza, F.R.; Jeldres, R.I.; Toro, N. Leaching chalcopyrite with an imidazolium-based ionic liquid and bromide. Metals 2020, 10, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Baba, A.A.; Ayinla, I.K.; Adekola, A.F.; Ghosh, K.M.; Ayanda, S.O.; Bale, B.R.; Sheik, R.A.; Pradhan, R.S. A Review on Novel Techniques for Chalcopyrite Ore Processing. Int. J. Min. Eng. Miner. Process. 2012, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bobadilla-Fazzini, R.A.; Pérez, A.; Gautier, V.; Jordan, H.; Parada, P. Primary copper sulfides bioleaching vs. chloride leaching: Advantages and drawbacks. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 168, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choubey, P.K.; Lee, J.C.; Kim, M.S.; Kim, H.S. Conversion of chalcopyrite to copper oxide in hypochlorite solution for selective leaching of copper in dilute sulfuric acid solution. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 178, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dreisinger, D. Copper leaching from primary sulfides: Options for biological and chemical extraction of copper. Hydrometallurgy 2006, 83, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klauber, C. A critical review of the surface chemistry of acidic ferric sulphate dissolution of chalcopyrite with regards to hindered dissolution. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2008, 86, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Agacayak, T.; Aras, A.; Aydogan, S.; Erdemoglu, M. Leaching of chalcopyrite concentrate in hydrogen peroxide solution. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2014, 50, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Qian, L.; Sun, M.; Lv, X.; Zhang, L.; Petersen, J.; Qiu, G. A brief overview on the dissolution mechanisms of sulfide minerals in acidic sulfate environments at low temperatures: Emphasis on electrochemical cyclic voltammetry analysis. Miner. Eng. 2020, 158, 106586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernández, P.C.; Dupont, J.; Herreros, O.O.; Jimenez, Y.P.; Torres, C.M. Accelerating copper leaching from sulfide ores in acid-nitrate-chloride media using agglomeration and curing as pretreatment. Minerals 2019, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Quezada, V.; Velásquez, L.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Melo, E.; Keith, B. Effect of curing time on the dissolution of a secondary copper sulphide ore using alternative water resources. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Cruells, M.; Keith, B.; Melo, E. Effect of pretreatment prior to leaching on a chalcopyrite mineral in acid media using NaCl and KNO3. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 10316–10324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cerda, C.; Taboada, M.; Jamett, N.; Ghorbani, Y.; Hernández, P. Effect of Pretreatment on Leaching Primary Copper Sulfide in Acid-Chloride Media. Minerals 2017, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kodali, P. Pretreatment of Copper ore Prior to Heap Leaching. Master’s Thesis, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Velásquez-Yévenes, L.; Quezada-Reyes, V. Influence of seawater and discard brine on the dissolution of copper ore and copper concentrate. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 180, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Melo, E. The Effects of Sulphuric Acid and Sodium Chloride Agglomeration and Curing on Chalcopyrite Leaching. Metals 2021, 11, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bai, X.; Wen, S.; Liu, J.; Lin, Y. Response surface methodology for optimization of copper leaching from refractory flotation tailings. Minerals 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chetty, D. Acid-Gangue Interactions in Heap Leach Operations: A Review of the Role of Mineralogy for Predicting. Metals 2018, 8, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Antonijević, M.M.; Dimitrijević, M.; Janković, Z. Leaching of pyrite with hydrogen peroxide in sulphuric acid. Hydrometallurgy 1997, 46, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, W.; Oganov, A.R.; Goncharov, A.F.; Zhu, Q.; Boulfelfel, S.E.; Lyakhov, A.O.; Stavrou, E.; Somayazulu, M.; Prakapenka, V.B.; Konôpková, Z. Unexpected stable stoichiometries of sodium chlorides. Science 2013, 342, 1502–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Watling, H.R.; Shiers, D.W.; Li, J.; Chapman, N.M.; Douglas, G.B. Effect of water quality on the leaching of a low-grade copper sulfide ore. Miner. Eng. 2014, 58, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dutrizac, J.E. The dissolution of chalcopyrite in ferric sulfate and ferric chloride media. Metall. Trans. B 1981, 12, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Herreros, O.; Quiroz, R.; Restovic, A.; Viñals, J. Dissolution kinetics of metallic copper with CuSO4-NaCl-HCl. Hydrometallurgy 2005, 77, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arce, E.M.; González, I. A comparative study of electrochemical behavior of chalcopyrite, chalcocite and bornite in sulfuric acid solution. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2002, 67, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, R.; Sun, C.; Kou, J.; Zhao, H.; Wei, D.; Xing, Y. Enhancing the leaching of chalcopyrite using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under the induction of surfactant triton X-100. Minerals 2019, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Peng, T.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Miao, J.; Shen, L.; Yu, R.; Gu, G.; Qiu, G.; Zeng, W. Dissolution and passivation of chalcopyrite during bioleaching by acidithiobacillus ferrivorans at low temperature. Minerals 2019, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cháidez, J.; Parga, J.; Valenzuela, J.; Carrillo, R.; Almaguer, I. Leaching chalcopyrite concentrate with oxygen and sulfuric acid using a low-pressure reactor. Metals 2019, 9, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lu, Z.Y.; Jeffrey, M.I.; Lawson, F. Effect of chloride ions on the dissolution of chalcopyrite in acidic solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2000, 56, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 11 01260 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of the magnetic stirrer leaching system.
Figure 1. Scheme of the magnetic stirrer leaching system.
Metals 11 01260 g001
Metals 11 01260 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction pattern of the initial sample.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction pattern of the initial sample.
Metals 11 01260 g002
Metals 11 01260 g003 550
Figure 3. Reflected optical microscope images of the initial sample (a,b). Chalcopyrite identified in (a) as (1) and pyrite (b) as 2.
Figure 3. Reflected optical microscope images of the initial sample (a,b). Chalcopyrite identified in (a) as (1) and pyrite (b) as 2.
Metals 11 01260 g003
Metals 11 01260 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM image of the initial sample at various magnifications: (a) ×650, (b) ×2000. In (b), 1: chalcopyrite, 2: pyrite, and 3: muscovite. EDS analysis in (c) of chalcopyrite, in (d) of pyrite, and in (e) of muscovite.
Figure 4. SEM image of the initial sample at various magnifications: (a) ×650, (b) ×2000. In (b), 1: chalcopyrite, 2: pyrite, and 3: muscovite. EDS analysis in (c) of chalcopyrite, in (d) of pyrite, and in (e) of muscovite.
Metals 11 01260 g004
Metals 11 01260 g005 550
Figure 5. Reflected optical microscope images of the pretreatment products at a magnification of ×50 (a,b). Chalcopyrite identified in (a,b) as (1).
Figure 5. Reflected optical microscope images of the pretreatment products at a magnification of ×50 (a,b). Chalcopyrite identified in (a,b) as (1).
Metals 11 01260 g005
Metals 11 01260 g006 550
Figure 6. X-ray diffractogram for copper sulphide ore agglomerated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature.
Figure 6. X-ray diffractogram for copper sulphide ore agglomerated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing time at room temperature.
Metals 11 01260 g006
Metals 11 01260 g007 550
Figure 7. NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, a product of the pretreatment of copper sulphide ores with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature as identified by X-ray diffraction. In (a,b), the new presence of NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 was identified as (1), compared to the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Figure 7. NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6, a product of the pretreatment of copper sulphide ores with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature as identified by X-ray diffraction. In (a,b), the new presence of NaFe3(SO4)2(OH)6 was identified as (1), compared to the initial diffractogram of the sample.
Metals 11 01260 g007
Metals 11 01260 g008 550
Figure 8. CuSO4 identification by X-ray diffraction analysis in copper sulphide ore pretreated with 15kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Figure 8. CuSO4 identification by X-ray diffraction analysis in copper sulphide ore pretreated with 15kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Metals 11 01260 g008
Metals 11 01260 g009 550
Figure 9. Elemental sulphur identification by X-ray diffraction analysis in copper sulphide ore pretreated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Figure 9. Elemental sulphur identification by X-ray diffraction analysis in copper sulphide ore pretreated with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t of NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature.
Metals 11 01260 g009
Metals 11 01260 g010 550
Figure 10. SEM image (a) and EDS analysis (b) of Zone 1. Unreacted chalcopyrite (1) in the products of the pretreatment of copper sulphide ore with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a), the image is at a magnification of ×1400.
Figure 10. SEM image (a) and EDS analysis (b) of Zone 1. Unreacted chalcopyrite (1) in the products of the pretreatment of copper sulphide ore with 15 kg/t of H2SO4, 25 kg/t NaCl, and 15 days of curing at room temperature. In (a), the image is at a magnification of ×1400.
Metals 11 01260 g010
Metals 11 01260 g011 550
Figure 11. The dissolution of copper from copper sulphide ores without pretreatment in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− in deionized water at 25 °C (●25), 50 °C (▲50), 70 °C (■70), and 90 °C (♦90).
Figure 11. The dissolution of copper from copper sulphide ores without pretreatment in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− in deionized water at 25 °C (●25), 50 °C (▲50), 70 °C (■70), and 90 °C (♦90).
Metals 11 01260 g011
Metals 11 01260 g012 550
Figure 12. The dissolution of copper from copper sulphide ores with pretreatment in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− in deionized water at 25 °C (○25), 50 °C (Δ50), 70 °C (□70), and 90 °C (◊90).
Figure 12. The dissolution of copper from copper sulphide ores with pretreatment in 0.2 M of H2SO4 and 50 g/L of Cl− in deionized water at 25 °C (○25), 50 °C (Δ50), 70 °C (□70), and 90 °C (◊90).
Metals 11 01260 g012
Table
Table 1. Minerals in the copper sulphide ore sample (mass in %) based on Qemscan analysis.
Table 1. Minerals in the copper sulphide ore sample (mass in %) based on Qemscan analysis.
MineralMass, %
Muscovite54.2
Quartz29.7
Pyrite3.73
Orthoclase3.08
Kaolinite2.51
Chalcopyrite1.99
Smectite1.32
Alunite1.18
Chalcocite0.150
Covellite0.060
Table
Table 2. Summary of the species identified using X-ray diffraction analysis. Tests with pretreatment samples are indicated by (P).
Table 2. Summary of the species identified using X-ray diffraction analysis. Tests with pretreatment samples are indicated by (P).
TestMore Abundant SpeciesLess Abundant Species
25 °C (P)SiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2
25 °CSiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2
50 °C (P)SiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and Cu2S
50 °CSiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and Cu2S
70 °C (P)SiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and S
70 °CSiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and S
90 °C (P)SiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and S
90 °CSiO2, KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2 and FeS2CuFeS2 and S
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quezada, V.; Roca, A.; Benavente, O.; Cruells, M.; Melo, E.; Hernández, M. Pretreatment to Leaching for a Primary Copper Sulphide Ore in Chloride Media. Metals 2021, 11, 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081260

AMA Style

Quezada V, Roca A, Benavente O, Cruells M, Melo E, Hernández M. Pretreatment to Leaching for a Primary Copper Sulphide Ore in Chloride Media. Metals. 2021; 11(8):1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quezada, Víctor, Antoni Roca, Oscar Benavente, Montserrat Cruells, Evelyn Melo, and María Hernández. 2021. "Pretreatment to Leaching for a Primary Copper Sulphide Ore in Chloride Media" Metals 11, no. 8: 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081260

APA Style

Quezada, V., Roca, A., Benavente, O., Cruells, M., Melo, E., & Hernández, M. (2021). Pretreatment to Leaching for a Primary Copper Sulphide Ore in Chloride Media. Metals, 11(8), 1260. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop