Next Article in Journal
Effect of Basketweave Microstructure on Very High Cycle Fatigue Behavior of TC21 Titanium Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Porous Phosphate Coatings Enriched with Calcium, Magnesium, Zinc and Copper Created on CP Titanium Grade 2 by Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
Microstructure, Wear Behavior and Corrosion Resistance of WC-FeCrAl and WC-WB-Co Coatings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 8
Issue 6
10.3390/met8060400
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multilayer-Forming Behavior of Cr Nitrides and Carbides for Thermoreactive Deposition

by
Kyeongmo Park
1,
Jun-Ho Kim
2,*,
Sunkwang Kim
2 and
Namhyun Kang
1,*
1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
2
Dongnam regional division, Korea Institute of Industry Technology, Yangsan 50635, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2018, 8(6), 400; https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060400
Submission received: 4 May 2018 / Revised: 21 May 2018 / Accepted: 28 May 2018 / Published: 30 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Treatment Technology of Metals and Alloys)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effect of a nitride layer on the forming behavior of CrN and (Cr, Fe)7C3 multilayers for thermoreactive deposition (TRD) was investigated. Plasma nitriding followed by TRD (PN-TRD) produced a larger coating thickness than the case of direct TRD with no plasma nitriding. For PN-TRD, an Fe2-3N layer of 10 μm in thickness was produced on AISI 52100 steels using plasma nitriding, followed by TRD using a mixed powder composed of 30 wt % Cr, 2 wt % NH4Cl, and 68 wt % Al2O3. During TRD at 800 °C, a CrN layer of 2 μm in thickness was formed along with a thin layer of mixed carbide (Cr7C3) and nitride (CrN) on top. As the deposition temperature was increased to 950 °C, a new layer of Cr7C3 was formed underneath the outermost layer composed of mixed Cr7C3 and CrN. At 950 °C, a Cr-rich zone indicated a thickness of ~7 μm. As the deposition time increased to 3 h at 950 °C, a new layer of (Cr, Fe)7C3 was produced at the interface between the CrN formed at 800 °C and the base metal. This layer formed because of the abundant resources of Cr and C provided from the TRD powder and base metal, respectively. The multilayer and interface were concretely filled without the formation of voids as the TRD time increased to 6 h at 950 °C. The TRD process on a pre-nitrided layer was successfully applied to produce multilayers of CrN and Cr7C3.

1. Introduction

The materials request continuously higher performance and improved properties [1]. Specifically, many studies have been conducted to improve the wear resistance of materials. Coating technology can improve wear resistance. Deposition techniques, such as physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD), are widely used in academic research. Furthermore, thermoreactive deposition (TRD) and plasma nitriding (PN) are more widely used for mass production to increase wear resistance [2,3,4,5]. In addition, studies on surface treatment using multicoating techniques [6,7,8,9,10] and multilayer formation have been conducted to improve bonding strength and wear resistance [11,12].
In PN, nitrogen is diffused into the base material to form a nitrided layer with high hardness; this improves fatigue, corrosion, and wear resistance, and gives excellent thermal stability with less deformation of the base metal. In particular, PN has a shorter processing time, can be done at lower cost, and offers pollution-free operation. Using PN, one can control the phase of nitride compared to normal nitriding [13,14]. In previous studies [6,15], normal nitriding was successfully used to increase the nitrogen content of the substrate surface for multicoating treatment.
Multilayers formed by PVD and CVD have been reported to have superior adhesion and high wear resistance compared to single layer structures [11,12]. That was because a crack starting from the coating surface was deflected at the interface between the layers. However, PVD has the disadvantages of high cost and low adhesion compared to other coating technologies, such as CVD and TRD. CVD also has many process variables and a complicated device configuration. By contrast, TRD has the advantages of excellent bonding strength, simple equipment, and capability of mass production. TRD coating is performed in a heat treatment furnace at 800–1250 °C using carbonitride-forming powders, such as vanadium, niobium, tantalum, chromium, molybdenum, and tungsten. There are several process techniques incorporating salt baths, fluidized beds, and pack cementation [16]. In the surface treatment based on TRD, factors affecting the growth of the coating layer include temperature, time, powder composition, and base metal. The longer the time, the thicker the coating layer becomes, and the higher the temperature, the more the growth is promoted. The composition of the powder depends on the ratio of the mixed powders and the catalyst used [16,17,18,19,20,21]. To form a carbide, it is necessary for the base metal to contain at least 0.3 wt % C [18,22], and the carbide thickness becomes thicker as the C content increases [20,23]. Therefore, a multilayer having high hardness formed using TRD is more likely to be applied to the material that requires wear resistance, than that by PVD and CVD.
In this study, we applied PN to increase the nitrogen content of the base material and a Cr-carbonitride multilayer with high hardness, corrosion, and wear resistance was formed on high-carbon steel through TRD coating [24,25]. In the TRD process, the integrity of the coating layer and the diffusion behavior of the coating powder components were investigated with respect to temperature and time, and the formation behavior of multilayers was studied.

2. Experimental Details

The base material used for the TRD was a high-carbon steel (AISI 52100 steel), with a square pillar of 5 × 5 × 10 mm. The composition of the base material is given in Table 1. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the multicoating treatment. PN (PN40/60, Rübig, Wels, Austria) was conducted at 520 °C for 10 h. During TRD coating, a heating rate of 5 °C/min was maintained, and specimens were air cooled when they reached 650 °C, 800 °C, and 950 °C. It took 126, 156, and 186 min from the room temperature to reach 650, 800, and 950 °C, respectively. Also, for the study of the TRD layer over time at 950 °C, specimens were kept for 3 and 6 h, followed by air cooling.
All specimens were cleaned with ethanol prior to PN, and then placed in the same place in the furnace for nitriding. The chamber was pumped down to 3 × 10−1 mbar before hydrogen was loaded, and the specimen was cleaned by hydrogen sputtering for 1 h at a pressure of 5 mbar. PN was conducted at 5 mbar using a 90% N2–9% H2–1% CH4 mixed gas. After nitriding, the specimens were cooled in the furnace. TRD coating powders were composed of 30 wt % Cr, 2 wt % NH4Cl, and 68 wt % Al2O3, and a 99.9% high-purity powder of Cr was used in the study [19]. TRD coating was performed by using pack cementation. The mixed powder was placed in a cylindrical alumina crucible having a diameter of 36 mm and a height of 45 mm, and the specimen was placed at the center in the longitudinal direction of the crucible.
The cross section of the coating layer was analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, MIRA3 LMH, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) and the chemical composition by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, APOLLO XP, AMETEK, Berwyn, PA, USA). The surface of the coating layer was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using a Cu target. Inorganic crystal structure data (ICSD) of the planar distance was used to match the planar distance measured in XRD [26]. Mapping of Fe, Cr, C, and N elements was done by field emission electron probe microanalysis (FE-EPMA, JXA-8530F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) to analyze the formation behavior of the coating layer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure and Crystal Structure of the Coating Layer

3.1.1. Plasma-Nitrided Layer

Plasma nitriding was preliminarily performed to produce carbonitride by supplying nitrogen with high carbon content of the base material. Figure 2a shows an SEM cross-sectional image of the PN specimen. The nitride was formed to a thickness of ~10 μm, and the typical defect of pores was observed in the outermost surface of the coating layer. Figure 2b shows the XRD pattern measured on the surface of the PN layer. Fe2-3N (ICSD Ref. code: 98-009-3184) was produced on the surface, and it is known to be destabilized and form N2 at temperatures >450 °C. The pores resulting from N2 formation are unavoidable on the outermost surface of the coating layer [27]. Furthermore, an Fe3C (ICSD Ref. code: 98-016-7667) peak was observed because of the CH4 gas in the gas mixture used for plasma nitriding.

3.1.2. Thermoreactive Deposited Layer

To obtain a Cr-carbonitride multilayer, a pre-nitrided layer was first formed on the base metal using PN, followed by TRD coating using Cr powder. To investigate the effect of PN before TRD on the forming behavior, TRD-coated specimens (hereinafter, direct-TRD) without a PN layer and TRD-coated PN specimens (hereinafter, PN-TRD) were analyzed. Figure 3a,c compares the cross sections of direct-TRD and PN-TRD specimens, respectively, for 6 h at 950 °C. Direct-TRD produced a coating layer with a thickness of ~10 μm, and a single coating layer was formed. The XRD pattern in Figure 3b shows that the coating layer consisted of Cr7C3 (ICSD Ref. code: 98-008-7129) and a small amount of CrN (ICSD Ref. code: 98-062-6334). The latter contribution can be explained as follows: because the concentration of N2 in the gas atmosphere increased as a result of the decomposition of the NH4Cl in the mixed powder used in the TRD coating, CrN formed at the outermost surface [19].
Figure 3c shows a cross-sectional SEM image of the PN-TRD specimen. The thickness of the coating layer was ~10 μm, and multilayers of dark gray and bright gray were formed. Table 2 gives the EDS analysis measured at points A, B, and C in the multilayer, as indicated in Figure 3c. Carbon contents at points A and C were mostly the same, being ~30 at %. The summation of Fe and Cr contents was ~70 at %. The Cr content at point A was higher than that of point C, and the Fe content was higher at point C than at point A. This is because the Cr diffused into the coating layer from the powder and Fe is supplied from the base material during the TRD reaction. Point B (dark gray) contained a small amount of Fe and C, and most of the material was composed of Cr and N. At point A, there was also a discontinuous microstructure of dark-gray color, which was identified as a CrN layer. The EDS analysis in SEM was reliable for proving the existence of chromium carbides and nitrides, because the base metal was AISI 52100 steel, having C of 0.95 wt %, and TRD after nitriding was conducted in the study. From the XRD results in Figure 3d, higher CrN peaks were found in the PN-TRD specimens. In addition, no phase related to Fe carbide was observed on the XRD pattern, but it was found that Fe formed a mixed carbide together with Cr through EDS. Compared to the standard Cr7C3 peak of the XRD database, all peaks of (Fe, Cr)7C3 are known to have some shifts [21]. As a result of comparing the contents of Fe, Cr, C, and N and XRD patterns through EDS, A and C layers were identified as (Fe, Cr)7C3, and the B layer was identified as CrN. Therefore, it was found that the composite coating layer formed through PN-TRD had a multilayer structure of CrN and (Fe, Cr)7C3.

3.2. Formation Behavior of the Coating Layer with Respect to Temperature

Figure 4 compares the coating behavior of direct-TRD specimens at temperatures of 650 °C, 800 °C, and 950 °C. The direct-TRD specimen showed no change in its surface, even when the process temperature reached 650 °C. When the process temperature was increased to 800 °C, a coating layer gradually formed on the surface portion, and, at 950 °C, a coating layer with a thickness of ~4 μm was formed. Figure 4d lists the chemical composition measured at point A indicated in Figure 4c. Nitrogen was not observed, and it was judged that (Cr, Fe)7C3 was formed because the total content of Fe and Cr was ~66.1 at %, and the content of C was ~33.9 at % C.
Figure 5 shows the behavior of coating layer formation of PN-TRD specimens at 650 °C, 800 °C, and 950 °C. The PN-TRD specimen was in the middle of the decomposition of Fe2-3N when it reached 650 °C. Approaching 800 °C, a coating layer of ~3 μm in thickness was formed. When the temperature reached 950 °C, a composite layer of ~7 μm in thickness was formed, and the layer was divided into A (bright gray) and B (dark gray) layers, as indicated in Figure 5c. The composition of A and B layers is given in Figure 5d. The content of Fe and Cr in the A layer is ~69.2 at %, and the content of C is ~30.8 at %. Therefore, it is considered to be (Cr, Fe)7C3. The B layer was CrN, with Cr and N content of ~91.3 at %.
The PN-TRD specimen formed a coating layer of 3 μm at 800 °C, which thickened to 7 μm at 950 °C. The multilayer thickness of the PN-TRD specimen was 3 μm thicker than the 4 μm thickness of the direct-TRD specimen at 950 °C. The PN-TRD specimen decomposed Fe2-3N nitride to provide a high nitrogen concentration on the surface, and reacted with the Cr powder before the diffusion of N, thereby producing a CrN layer rapidly at 800 °C. As the TRD progressed to 950 °C, both C and Cr diffused from the base material and TRD powder, respectively, reacting to form (Cr, Fe)7C3 on the CrN coating layer. In addition, compared to the direct-TRD process, the PN-TRD process exhibited porosity, as indicated with red arrows in Figure 5a–c, and a high coating speed. This can probably be attributed to the pores formed by the decomposition of the nitride serving as a diffusion path for Cr, thereby accelerating the formation of the coating layer [27,28,29]. Given the thickness of the composite layer, the optimum temperature of the TRD process is determined to be 950 °C.

3.3. Formation Behavior of Coating Layers with Respect to the TRD Time at 950 °C

Figure 6 compares the formation stages of the direct-TRD and PN-TRD coating layers at the optimum TRD temperature (950 °C) with respect to the retention time (0–6 h). The direct-TRD specimen had a layer thickness of 4 μm at 0 h and 9 μm at 3 h. After 6 h at 950 °C, the thickness of the coating layer increased from 9 μm to 10 μm. Although the growth rate of the coating layer decreased, the interface between the coating layer and the base material became uniform.
The PN-TRD coating layer exhibited thicknesses of ~7 μm at 0 h, ~9 μm at 3 h, and ~10 μm at 6 h. The PN-TRD coating produced the following multilayers: a CrN layer with a dark gray color and a Cr7C3 layer with a bright gray color. The CrN layer retained the same thickness of ~2 μm as time increased to 6 h. These results indicate that the N resource is entirely consumed to form CrN, as the temperature increased to 950 °C. However, when the specimen was maintained at 950 °C for 3 h, a (Cr, Fe)7C3 layer was formed under the CrN layer, and the number of pores decreased (as indicated by the red arrows in Figure 6e). As the process time increased to 6 h, (Cr, Fe)7C3 was further grown under the CrN layer, and the porosity continued to decrease. Comparing direct-TRD (Figure 6c) and PN-TRD (Figure 6f) images at 6 h, one sees that the boundary between the direct-TRD layer and the base material was uniform but that the PN-TRD coating layer had an irregular boundary. Under the CrN layer (Figure 6e), the Cr7C3 layer with porosity indicated a larger thickness than that with no porosity. Therefore, it can be seen that the porosities assist the diffusion of Cr derived from the TRD coating powder.

3.4. Diffusion of Fe, Cr, C, and N During the Formation of Coating Layers

Figure 7 compares the extent to which the diffusion of Fe, Cr, C, and N elements contributes to the formation of the PN-TRD composite layer with respect to the TRD temperature and time. The color scale bar is represented in Figure 7a. The blue- and red-color area represent, respectively, the lowest and highest content of alloying elements. For 650 °C, N was widely spread under the surface, and the decomposition of the nitride was incomplete (Figure 7a).
At 800 °C, both Cr and N distributions were concentrated on the surface, and the distribution thickness of N decreased compared to that at 650 °C (Figure 7b). Comparing the distribution of N and Fe, one sees that there is a deficiency of Fe in the region where N is abundant. Therefore, it is considered that the Fe2-3N nitride completely decomposed and reacted with Cr to form CrN. C was diffused to the outermost surface on the CrN layer, and a Cr7C3 layer was partly produced on the CrN layer. Furthermore, a carbon-rich layer (indicated by the white arrow) was present under the CrN coating layer. The nitrogen supplied from the decomposition of Fe2-3N and the carbon supplied from the base material diffused to the surface and reacted with the carbonitride-forming element, Cr, to form a composite layer of carbide and nitride. When low-carbon steels were coated with Cr powder, a decarburized layer was formed under the Cr carbide layer [30]. However, the high-carbon steels used in this study showed a C-rich zone without a decarburized zone, and C diffused to the surface, thereby producing a small amount of Cr carbides in the outermost layer.
As the TRD temperature increased to 950 °C, Cr was present on the surface at a thickness of ~7 μm, as shown in Figure 7c. In addition, N exists intensively at the interface between the base material and the coating layer, thereby producing a CrN layer with a thickness of 2–3 μm. A C-rich zone existed above the CrN layer with a thickness of 1–2 μm, and, on the outermost surface, abundant N and C were observed with a thickness of 2–3 μm. That is, the Cr-rich layer having a thickness of 7 μm was composed of a composite layer of (CrN + Cr7C3)–Cr7C3–CrN. From the cross-sectional SEM image (Figure 6d), it can be seen that this is consistent with the composite layer having a thickness of ~7 μm. The C-rich zone under the CrN layer, which was found in Figure 7b, diffused above the CrN layer as the TRD process temperature increased to 950 °C, and reacted with incoming Cr to form Cr7C3 on the CrN layer. Approaching 950 °C, the N distribution region was divided into two distinct layers. The N distribution in the outermost layer was probably formed by the formation of CrN resulting from the increased concentration of N2 in the gas atmosphere from the decomposition of NH4Cl in the TRD coating mixed powder. This was also observed in direct-TRD specimens, as can be seen from the XRD results in Figure 3a.
Figure 7d shows the component behavior of a PN-TRD specimen maintained at 950 °C for 3 h. Compared with the results of the specimen at 950 °C for 0 h, the diffusion of N was insignificant, and the distribution thickness of C and Cr increased to 9–12 μm. N was concentrated in the interface between the base material and the coating layer, as was the case for the CrN layer, indicated in Figure 7c, and the thickness of the CrN layer remained the same, with no variation, even when the TRD process lasted for 3 h at 950 °C. Furthermore, a layer containing Cr was observed in the outermost layer composed of a composite layer of CrN + Cr7C3. The whole composite layer enriched with Cr consisted of (CrN + Cr7C3)–Cr7C3–CrN, as in the case of the 950 °C 0 h specimen. However, unlike the 0 h specimen, the 950 °C 3 h specimen produced a new layer enriched with Cr, C, and Fe under the CrN layer formed at the interface between the base material and the coating layer. This layer is estimated to be (Cr, Fe)7C3. This phenomenon became more evident in the 950 °C 6 h specimen, as indicated in Figure 7e. In the (Cr, Fe)7C3 layer, the concentration of Cr decreased and that of Fe increased as the base material was approached.
Figure 8 summarizes the behavior of composite layer formation with temperature and time in the PN-TRD process. When the PN-TRD specimen was held at 950 °C for 6 h, a CrN coating layer was formed on the interface between the base material and the coating layer, and a Cr7C3 layer and a mixed (Cr7C3 + CrN) layer were formed closer to the surface. Below the CrN layer at the interface, (Cr, Fe)7C3 was produced. The total thickness of the composite layer was 10–12 μm. The composite layer was in the order of (CrN + Cr7C3)–Cr7C3–CrN–(Cr, Fe)7C3 from the outermost layer.

4. Conclusions

In this study, an Fe2-3N layer was formed by plasma nitriding on AISI 52100 steel, followed by TRD coating using Cr powder to form a composite coating layer. The influence of Fe, Cr, C, and N diffusion on the formation of the composite layer was studied as a function of the TRD temperature and time.
(1)
In the direct-TRD process, a coating layer of ~4 μm thickness was formed at 950 °C. Mostly, a Cr7C3 layer was formed and a small amount of CrN phase formed.
(2)
The PN-TRD process showed a faster coating layer formation rate than the direct-TRD process, and a coating layer of ~7 μm thickness was formed at 950 °C. When the TRD temperature was increased to 800 °C, the rich N supplied from the decomposition of Fe2-3N and the Cr supplied from the TRD powder reacted to produce the CrN layer with a thickness of 2 μm. The outermost surface layer consisted of a mixed (Cr7C3 + CrN) layer. Furthermore, a C-rich zone was formed under the CrN layer.
(3)
When the TRD temperature was increased to 950 °C, a 2 μm-thick Cr7C3 layer was formed between the (Cr7C3 + CrN) layer, and the CrN layer formed at the interface between the base material and the coating layer. The whole composite layer consisted of (Cr7C3 + CrN)–Cr7C3–CrN and had a thickness of ~7 μm.
(4)
For the 950 °C 6 h specimen, the coating layer had the same elemental distribution as that of the 3 h specimen and the thickness of 10–12 μm. However, the multilayer and interface were concretely filled without the formation of voids as the TRD time increased to 6 h at 950 °C. The TRD process on the pre-nitrided layer was successfully applied to produce a multilayer of (CrN + Cr7C3)–Cr7C3–CrN–(Cr, Fe)7C3 from the outermost layer.

Author Contributions

K.P., J.K. and N.K. conceived and designed the experiments; K.P. and S.K. performed the experiments; K.P., J.K. and N.K. analyzed and discussed the data; K.P. and N.K. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Future Material Discovery Project of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea (NRF-2016M3D1A1023534) and a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) through GCRC-SOP (Grant no. 2011-0030013).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oil and Colour Chemists’ Association, Raw Materials and Their Usage. In Surface Coatings; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 1, ISBN 9789401045346.
  2. Warcholinski, B.; Gilewicz, A. Tribological properties of CrNx coatings. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2009, 37, 498–504. [Google Scholar]
  3. Maury, F.; Douard, A.; Delclos, S.; Samelor, D.; Tendero, C. Multilayer chromium based coatings grown by atmospheric pressure direct liquid. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2009, 204, 983–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aghaie-Khafri, M.; Fazlalipour, F. Vanadium carbide coatings on die steel deposited by the thermo-reactive diffusion technique. J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 2008, 69, 2465–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Binder, C.; Bendo, T.; Hammes, G.; Klein, A.N.; de Mello, J.D.B. Effect of Nature of Nitride Phases on Sliding Wear of Plasma Nitrided Sintered Iron. Wear 2015, 332–333, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hakami, F.; Sohi, M.H.; Ghani, J.R.; Ebrahimi, M. Chromizing of plasma nitrided AISI 1045 steel. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 6783–6786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hakami, F.; Sohi, M.H.; Ghani, J.R. Duplex surface treatment of AISI 1045 steel via plasma nitriding of chromized layer. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 6792–6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Taktak, S.; Ulker, S.; Gunes, I. High temperature wear and friction properties of duplex surface treated bearing steels. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 3367–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, C.Y.; Chen, F.S. Characterization on multi-layer fabricated by TRD and plasma nitriding. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 90, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cao, H.L.; Luo, C.P.; Liu, J.W.; Zou, G.F. Phase transformations in low-temperature chromized 0.45wt% C plain carbon steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 7970–7977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gilewicz, A.; Warcholinski, B. Tribological properties of CrCN/CrN multilayer coatings. Tribol. Int. 2014, 80, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Warcholinski, B.; Gilewicz, A. The properties of multilayer CrCN/CrN coatings dependent on their architecture Plasma Process. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hirsch, T.; Clarke, T.G.R.; da Silva Rocha, A. An in-situ study of plasma nitriding. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Clarke, T.G.R.; da Silva Rocha, A.; Reguly, A.; Hirsch, T. In situ XRD measurements during plasma nitriding of a medium carbon steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005, 194, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, K.; Kang, N.; Bae, J.; Lee, C.W. Microstructural behavior of nitriding compound layer for Nb-carbonitride coating grown by thermo-reactive diffusion process. Met. Mater. Int. 2016, 22, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arai, T. Thermo-Reactive Deposition/Diffusion Process ASM Handbook: Heat Treating; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1991; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ozdemira, O.; Sen, S.; Sen, U. Formation of chromium nitride layers on AISI 1010 steel by nitro-chromizing treatment. Vacuum 2007, 81, 567–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aghaie-Khafri, M.; Fazlalipour, F.; Phys, J. Kinetics of V(N,C) coating produced by a duplex surface treatment. Chem. Solids 2008, 69, 2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, C.Y.; Chen, F.S. Thermoreactive deposition coating of chromium carbide by contact free method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 91, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, F.S.; Lee, P.Y.; Yeh, M.C. Thermal reactive deposition coating of chromium carbide on die steel in a fluidized bed furnace. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1998, 53, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, X.J.; Xiang, Z.D. Formation of chromium nitride coatings on carbon steels by pack cementation process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 309, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. King, P.C.; Reynoldson, R.W.; Brownrigg, A.; Long, J.M. Cr(N,C) diffusion coating formation on pre-nitrocarburised H13 tool steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 179, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, J.W.; Duh, J.G. Evaluation of microstructures and mechanical properties of chromized steels with different carbon contents. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2004, 177–178, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taktak, S.; Gunes, I.; Ulker, S.; Yalcin, Y. Effect of N2+H2 gas mixtures in plasma nitriding on tribological properties of duplex surface treated steels. Mater Charact. 2008, 59, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ghahfarokhi, H.H.; Saatchi, A.; Monirvaghefi, S.M. Corrosion investigation of chromium nitride and chromium carbide coatings for PEM fuel cell bipolar plates in simulated cathode condition. Fuel Cells 2016, 16, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cullity, B.D.; Stock, S.R. Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 3rd ed.; Prentice-Hall: New York, NY, USA, 2001; ISBN 9780201610918. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dossett, J.; Totten, G.E. Fundamentals of nitriding and nitrocarburizing. In ASM Handbook: Steel Heat Treating Fundamentals and Processes; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2013; p. 619. ISBN 9781627080118. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cao, H.L.; Luo, C.P.; Liu, J.W.; Wu, C.L.; Zou, G.F. Formation of a nanostructured CrN layer on nitrided tool steel by low temperature chromizing. Scr. Mater. 2008, 58, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. King, P.C.; Reynoldson, R.W.; Brownrigg, A.; Long, J.L. Fluidized bed CrN coating formation on prenitrocarburized plain carbon steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2004, 13, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baggio-Scheid, V.H.; de Vasconcelos, G.; Oliveira, M.A.S.; Ferreira, B.C. Duplex surface treatment of chromium pack diffusion and plasma nitriding of mild steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 163–164, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 08 00400 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of multicoating treatment, plasma nitriding followed by thermoreactive deposition (PN-TRD).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of multicoating treatment, plasma nitriding followed by thermoreactive deposition (PN-TRD).
Metals 08 00400 g001
Metals 08 00400 g002 550
Figure 2. Microstructure of plasma-nitrided specimen: (a) cross-sectional view using SEM; and (b) surface measured using XRD pattern.
Figure 2. Microstructure of plasma-nitrided specimen: (a) cross-sectional view using SEM; and (b) surface measured using XRD pattern.
Metals 08 00400 g002
Metals 08 00400 g003 550
Figure 3. Cross-sectional microstructure of direct-TRD specimen (a,b) and PN-TRD (c,d); (a) cross-sectional SEM image; (b) XRD pattern of the direct-TRD coated at 950 °C; (c) cross-sectional SEM image; and (d) XRD pattern of the PN-TRD coated at 950 °C for 6 h.
Figure 3. Cross-sectional microstructure of direct-TRD specimen (a,b) and PN-TRD (c,d); (a) cross-sectional SEM image; (b) XRD pattern of the direct-TRD coated at 950 °C; (c) cross-sectional SEM image; and (d) XRD pattern of the PN-TRD coated at 950 °C for 6 h.
Metals 08 00400 g003
Metals 08 00400 g004 550
Figure 4. Formation behavior of direct-TRD layer with respect to temperature: (a) 650 °C; (b) 800 °C; (c) 950 °C; and (d) chemical composition at point A indicated in Figure 4c.
Figure 4. Formation behavior of direct-TRD layer with respect to temperature: (a) 650 °C; (b) 800 °C; (c) 950 °C; and (d) chemical composition at point A indicated in Figure 4c.
Metals 08 00400 g004
Metals 08 00400 g005 550
Figure 5. Formation behavior of PN-TRD layer with respect to temperature: (a) 650 °C; (b) 800 °C; (c) 950 °C; and (d) chemical composition at points A and B indicated in (c).
Figure 5. Formation behavior of PN-TRD layer with respect to temperature: (a) 650 °C; (b) 800 °C; (c) 950 °C; and (d) chemical composition at points A and B indicated in (c).
Metals 08 00400 g005
Metals 08 00400 g006 550
Figure 6. Formation behavior of direct-TRD and PN-TRD layers at 950 °C with respect to time: (a–c) direct-TRD for 0, 3, and 6 h, respectively; (d–f) PN-TRD for 0, 3, and 6 h, respectively.
Figure 6. Formation behavior of direct-TRD and PN-TRD layers at 950 °C with respect to time: (a–c) direct-TRD for 0, 3, and 6 h, respectively; (d–f) PN-TRD for 0, 3, and 6 h, respectively.
Metals 08 00400 g006
Metals 08 00400 g007 550
Figure 7. Diffusion mapping of Fe, Cr, C, and N during coating layer formation with TRD temperature and time using EPMA.
Figure 7. Diffusion mapping of Fe, Cr, C, and N during coating layer formation with TRD temperature and time using EPMA.
Metals 08 00400 g007
Metals 08 00400 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematics of multilayer formation for PN-TRD specimens as a function of TRD temperature and time: (a) 650 °C for 0 h; (b) 800 °C for 0 h; (c) 950 °C for 0 h; and (d) 950 °C for 6 h.
Figure 8. Schematics of multilayer formation for PN-TRD specimens as a function of TRD temperature and time: (a) 650 °C for 0 h; (b) 800 °C for 0 h; (c) 950 °C for 0 h; and (d) 950 °C for 6 h.
Metals 08 00400 g008
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of AISI 52100 steel.
Table 1. Chemical composition of AISI 52100 steel.
ElementCCrMnSiPSCuNiMoFe
wt %0.951.390.40.310.080.050.120.080.03Balanced
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition at points A, B, and C indicated in Figure 3c.
Table 2. Chemical composition at points A, B, and C indicated in Figure 3c.
PositionFe (at %)Cr (at %)C (at %)N (at %)
A26.842.730.5-
B0.655.45.638.4
C39.729.331.0-

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, K.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.; Kang, N. Multilayer-Forming Behavior of Cr Nitrides and Carbides for Thermoreactive Deposition. Metals 2018, 8, 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060400

AMA Style

Park K, Kim J-H, Kim S, Kang N. Multilayer-Forming Behavior of Cr Nitrides and Carbides for Thermoreactive Deposition. Metals. 2018; 8(6):400. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060400

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Kyeongmo, Jun-Ho Kim, Sunkwang Kim, and Namhyun Kang. 2018. "Multilayer-Forming Behavior of Cr Nitrides and Carbides for Thermoreactive Deposition" Metals 8, no. 6: 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060400

APA Style

Park, K., Kim, J. -H., Kim, S., & Kang, N. (2018). Multilayer-Forming Behavior of Cr Nitrides and Carbides for Thermoreactive Deposition. Metals, 8(6), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8060400

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop