3. Results and Discussion
Nature has evolved ways to texture a surface to substantially increase its surface area using micro/nano structures. Various micro/nano structures derived from nature are being used for various industrial applications. Multiscale structures are used to increase the surface area for cell growth in the biomedical field and to create a superhydrophobic surface. In tribology, multiscale structures are used to modify surface friction properties. A surface area can be increased by various methods, including grit-blasting or chemical etching. Among these techniques, we used a laser processing method to increase the surface area of the Cu current-collectors. In the laser processing, there is no physical contact on the Cu current-collector surface during fabrication; this method features high reproducibility and low contamination. Moreover, it is a more economical method to produce micro/nano structures than the e-beam evaporation method that is currently used to create 3D patterns on Cu current-collector surfaces.
Figure 1 shows a schematic of the overall manufacturing process using one-step laser irradiation to create a multiscale structure on the Cu current-collector surface. A 30 mm × 30 mm area on the Cu current-collector surface was irradiated by the laser. The operation speed, width of the laser, and laser moving speed were set to 2000 mm/s, 0.01 mm, and 500 mm/min, respectively, to determine the effect of laser intensity on battery performance. Laser irradiation was carried out at three levels: 10, 20, and 30 W. By mimicking the multiscale structure found in nature, we intended to improve the performance of lithium-ion batteries by using a simple one-step fabrication process that can generate a micro/nano structure to alleviate the mechanical structure on the Cu current-collector surface.
Figure 2 shows the surface analysis data of the four Cu current-collectors (one bare Cu current-collector and three Cu current-collectors fabricated by laser).
Figure 2a,e,i,m show 3D images of the Cu current-collectors in the following order: The bare Cu current-collector surface and the Cu current-collector surfaces fabricated with 10, 20, and 30 W lasers. These results qualitatively show that the surface roughness could be increased with increased laser power.
Figure 2b,f,j, and n show the Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) images of the Cu current-collector surfaces, which correspond to
Figure 2a,e,i,m, respectively. The right figure of the 3D images are 500× SEM images, respectively. While in
Figure 2b the surface is smooth with little void space, the void space per unit area created by the micro/nano structure increases gradually in
Figure 2f,j,n.
Figure 2c,g,k,o show the line scan profiles of the Cu current-collectors extracted at three different spots along both the
X- and
Y-axes. The upper and bottom graphs in these Figures are the line scan profiles along the
X- and
Y-axis, respectively. The ripples are denser along the
Y-axis than they are along the
X-axis, along which the laser is moved. This is because of the laser-induced melting and resultant smoothing of the Cu surface. While the surface of the bare Cu current-collector was relatively straight and flat (
Figure 2c), as the laser intensity increased, the ripples became much more noticeable, and the density and extent increased (
Figure 2g,k,o). The ripples represent a hierarchical structure consisting of a micro/nano structure similar to that found in nature. One example of such is the number of micro-sized alveoli in the lungs, which maximize the surface area for gas exchange. Lastly,
Figure 2 d,h,l, and p show the surface roughness averages (R
a) of the regions extracted from
Figure 2c,g,k,o, respectively. A higher R
a value indicates a higher degree of roughness, which translates into a larger surface area. The bar graph and error bar of R
a in these figures represent the average and standard errors along the line-scan profiles shown in red, green, and blue in
Figure 2c,g,k,o, respectively. The R
a values measured in
Figure 2d are 0.137 ± 0.017 μm in full image R
a value, where 0.126 ± 0.011 μm and 0.151 ± 0.02 μm along the X- and Y-axis, respectively. In comparison with the bare Cu current-collector (
Figure 2d), the average RA of a laser-irradiated Cu current-collector surface (
Figure 2h) was increased by 196% and 256% along the X- and Y-axis, respectively. The R
a of the roughest surface (
Figure 2p) was 685% and 789% higher along the X- and Y-axis than those of the bare Cu current-collector (
Figure 2d). Cu in the Cu current-collector evaporates owing to the high heat of the laser ablation and then cools off rapidly in air before being deposited again on the surface of the Cu current-collector. As the surface area is increased due to the fabricated nanostructure, R
a values increase, which clearly demonstrates that the Cu current-collector surface area is increased with the laser power. These results indicate that a higher output is required to generate more void space on the surface, which would accommodate the volume expansion resulting from electrochemical reactions.
Figure 3 shows the simulated mechanical stress applied to the Si layer deposited on the bare Cu current-collector and the laser-irradiated Cu current-collectors. For this simulation, a multiscale model was developed to simulate the roughness of the bare and laser-irradiated Cu current-collectors, depending on the laser power. The COMSOL Multiphysics (ver. 5.3) program was used for the simulation. The simulated area was set at 1 cm × 1 cm (1 cm
2), and the relative roughness per unit area of the bare Cu current-collector, 10 W-Cu current-collector, 20 W-Cu current-collector, and 30 W-Cu current-collector was set at 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The inputs of this simulation are surface area and the output represents the stress when the silicon expands under the input conditions.
Figure 3a–d in Column 1 shows the simulated surface of the four models. The surface areas per unit area of the bare Cu current-collector, 10 W-Cu current-collector, 20 W-Cu current-collector, and 30 W-Cu current-collector are 1.0, 1.0215, 1.0824, and 1.281, respectively. According to these simulation results, the increase of the surface area per unit area with the micro/nano structure on the surface is responsible for the stress relief of Si expansion.
Figure 3a–d in Columns 2, 3, and 4 are the 3D images showing both the volume-expansion of the Si-layer deposited on the 10, 20, and 30 W Cu current-collectors during lithiation and the stress distribution in the Si-layer extracted from three locations along the
X-axis. In the 3D images, red and blue indicate the regions under high and low mechanical stress, respectively. The mechanical stress is expressed in J/cm
3.
Figure 3a in Column 2 shows that the Si layer deposited on the flat Cu current-collector has no void space to accommodate the expanding Si particles. Consequently, the Si particles begin to push each other out, increasing the thickness of the Si-layer. The increasing mechanical stress per unit volume is noted in the red regions of the 3D images. In contrast, the micro/nano structure generated by the laser creates void space in the Cu current-collector surface that is sufficient to allow the expansion of the deposited Si-layer without forming cracks (
Figure 3b–d). The reducing stress is represented in the greater blue and lesser red regions in
Figure 3b–d in sequence. The stress per unit area shown in
Figure 3a–d, which is the average stress in three spots extracted along the
X-axis, is 160 ± 10, 130 ± 10, 90 ± 10, and 50 ± 10 N/cm
2, respectively. These results in sequence quantitatively demonstrate the reduction of the mechanical stress resulting from the volume-expansion of the Si-layer.
Overall, the data presented in
Figure 3 suggest that the laser irradiation directly forms a micro/nano structure on the Cu current-collector surface, and the resulting void space reduces the build-up of mechanical stress. The volume-expansion of the Si-layer increases the distance between the electrodes. This results in the deterioration of electric connections during the electrical chemical reactions, eventually leading to battery performance degradation. The simulation results demonstrate that the multiscale structure formed on the Cu current-collector surface could alleviate the mechanical stress, which is critical to improving battery performance.
Figure 4 shows the charge-discharge curves of the lithium-ion batteries prepared with the bare Cu current-collector and the laser-irradiated Cu current-collectors. Si was used as the electrode material, and charging and discharging were carried out at a current density of 6 A g
−1 in the range of 0.01 to 1.50 V.
Figure 4a shows the charge–discharge curve of the lithium-ion battery made from the bare Cu current-collector. The initial discharge capacity and the capacity after 100 cycles were 949 and 221 mAh g
−1, respectively. The initial coulombic efficiency (CE) was very low (3%), which is a common phenomenon in the activation process of Si electrodes. As the number of cycles increases, the CE continues to increase, and it reaches 90% after 50 cycles.
Figure 4b shows the charge–discharge of the lithium-ion battery prepared with the 10 W-Cu current-collector. The initial discharge capacity and the capacity after 100 cycles were 2013 and 225 mAh g
−1, respectively. The initial CE was about 8%, and it maintained 90% after 50 cycles.
Figure 4c shows the charge-discharge characteristics of the lithium-ion battery prepared with the 20 W-Cu current-collector. The initial discharge capacity and the capacity after 100 cycles were 2799 and 291 mAh g
−1, respectively. The CE after the first cycle was 17%, and it continued to increase up to 95% after 50 cycles. The higher initial discharge capacity in
Figure 4c than in
Figure 4b suggests that the laser irradiation directly creates a micro/nano structure on the Cu current-collector surface, which in turn creates void space in the Si-layer, which is used as the active anode material.
Figure 4d is the charge-discharge graph of the lithium-ion battery prepared with the 30 W-Cu current-collector. The initial discharge capacity and the capacity after 100 cycles were 3763 and 315 mAh g
−1, respectively. The initial CE of 17% continued with cycles and maintained 90% after 30 cycles. Compared to
Figure 4c, the initial discharge capacity increased by 1000 mAh g
−1. Again, the higher initial discharge capacity indicates that the stronger laser power is more efficient to fabricate the multiscale structure on the Cu current-collector surface, more efficiently reducing the mechanical stress caused by the volume-expansion. On the other hand, the CE was reduced by 5%, suggesting the trade-off to be considered when high laser power is desired.
Figure 5 comprehensively summarizes the initial discharge capacity and capacity retention to analyze and compare the results of 100 cycles (
Figure 4a–d). The insets in
Figure 5 show the discharge capacity of
Figure 4a–d for the first 60–100 cycles. The Lithium-ion batteries prepared with the laser-irradiated Cu current-collectors showed superior initial capacity and capacity retention to the lithium-ion battery prepared with the bare Cu current-collector. This performance improvement can be attributed to the increased surface area of the Cu current-collectors by laser irradiation.
The results in
Figure 4 and
Figure 5 show that a higher laser power is desirable to increase the initial capacity by simply generating a denser micro/nano structure; however, the CE was lowered by increasing the laser power, suggesting that these two performance parameters should be balanced, depending on specific applications. The large surface area of the bio-inspired multiscale Cu current-collector may facilitate the contact of the atoms on the Cu current-collector surface and the Si atoms on the anode. As the contact between the atoms increases, the resulting electrostatic attraction strengthens the contact force, which narrows the gap between the Cu current-collector and the Si-layer and facilitates lithiation in lithium-ion batteries [
22,
23]. In nature, the gecko is a representative example of utilizing increased surface area for strong adhesion. The Gecko has soles packed with micro/nano structures to efficiently increase the contact area between atoms, resulting in increased van der Waals force, which allow it to adhere to a surface [
24,
25].
Figure 6 shows the impedance analysis results of the lithium-ion batteries prepared with the 10 W-, 20 W-, and 30 W-Cu current-collector for the first 5 and 100 cycles. AC impedance analysis is a method of modeling an electrochemical reaction between the two electrodes in batteries, and it models the electrochemical reaction as an electric circuit to obtain information on the charge transfer resistance (R
ct).
Figure 6a shows the R
ct of the bare Cu current-collector. The R
ct was 405.73 and 204.85 Ω after 5 and 100 cycles, respectively.
Figure 6b shows the R
ct of the Cu current-collector irradiated by 10 W laser. The R
ct was 455.85 and 258.80 Ω after 5 and 100 cycles, respectively.
Figure 6c shows the R
ct of the Cu current-collector irradiated by 20 W laser. In this case, the R
ct value was 640.21 and 237.16 Ω after 5 and 100 cycles, respectively.
Figure 6d shows the R
ct of the Cu current-collector irradiated by 30 W laser. The R
ct value was 448.76 Ω and 213.30 Ω after 5 and 100 cycles, respectively.
These results show that the resistance in the impedance analysis decreases after 100 cycles, as the average roughness increases with the laser’s power. This is because the increasing surface area, equivalent to the increasing surface roughness, improves the stability of the batteries by suppressing crack formation due to volumetric expansion.