A Study on the Trends for Expression in Korean Contemporary Architectural Facade Design: Focusing on Large Buildings in the City Center

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this study, the author examined and analyzed different types of facades as representative case studies of facade expression in South Korea. He identified several modern architectural trends for new ways of building facades in modern architecture in a particular region. The author divides facades untraditionally into structural, decorative, media and green. It presents some case studies in South Korea, which are presented in figures and tables. This is a relatively brief contribution with a small amount of used literature. The introduction and conclusion of this paper are very brief. The conclusion is relatively unconventional and ranges in general. The author suggests research here and claims that this new research will contribute to the architectural expression and development of new facades that reflect a new era. The author describes the same five points in an abstract and then returns to it in the conclusion, where he states the efforts of the architects. 1- efforts to improve function, 2-attempts to create a decorative expression 3-creation of complementary relations with the city by proving regionality 4- increase the performance of facades by referring to organic forms 5- helps to spread publicity, for example to strengthen and combine the relationship between the city, the building and the person.

The article is quite interesting, I recommend slightly widening the perspective on the issue and publish after the necessary changes. I recommend focusing on more recently published works in journals and thus expanding the range of literary sources. 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

Point 1: This is a relatively brief contribution with a small amount of used literature

Response 1: More recently published international works in journals were studied to expand range of literary sources. [Added reference]

[2]	S. Francesca, "Adaptive facade and phase change materials (PCMS) A sustainable approach for building materials," From Mega to Nano, The Complexity of a Multiscalar Project, pp. 44-69, 2020.
[3]	G. Katia , "Media-surface design for urban regeneration: the role of colour and light for public space usability," Journal of the International Colour Association, vol. 17, pp. 38-49, 2017.
[4]	R. Romano, L. Aelenei and D. Aelenei, "What is an adaptive façade? analysis of recent terms and definitions from an international perspective," Journal of Facade Design & Engineering, vol. 6(3), pp. 65-76, 2018.
[5]	F. H. M. F. S. S. A. A. B. A. R. and M. , "Green “Breathing facades” for occupants’ improved quality of life,", Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 234, p. 173–184, 2016.
[6]	S. M. Hosseinia, M. Mohammadia, A. Rosemannb, T. Schröderc and J. Lichtenbergc, "A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort,", Building and Environment, vol. 153, p. 186–204, 2019.
[7]	T. S. Wajiha and A. Quratulain, “Adaptive biomimetic facades: Enhancing energy efficiency of highly glazed buildings,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 8(3), pp. 319-331, 2019.
[25]	M. Cha, "A Study on application examples of media façade by technology case and content type," Journal of Digital Art Engineering & Multimedia, vol. 5(2) , pp. 175-184, 2018.
[26]	E. V. Moghaddam and R. Ibrahim, "People's evaluation towards media façade as new urban landmarks at night," International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 10(1), pp. 257-273, 2016.

 

Point 2: The introduction and conclusion of this paper are very brief. The conclusion is relatively unconventional and ranges in general.

Response 2: The introduction and conclusion were updated with reflecting recent international research.

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper reviews the architectural facade designs in South Korea. The author categorized the facades into structural facades, decorative facades, media facades, and green facades, and discussed the features for the different categories. The review topic is interesting, and the content is easy to follow. However, the review is lack of depth. The statements are generic and superficial. The research problem is not clearly defined. I do not know what is the new knowledge and information that people can learn from this review. 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

Point 1:  The review is lack of depth.

Response 1: More recently published international works in journals were studied to expand range of literary sources. [Added reference]

[2]	S. Francesca, "Adaptive facade and phase change materials (PCMS) A sustainable approach for building materials," From Mega to Nano, The Complexity of a Multiscalar Project, pp. 44-69, 2020.
[3]	G. Katia , "Media-surface design for urban regeneration: the role of colour and light for public space usability," Journal of the International Colour Association, vol. 17, pp. 38-49, 2017.
[4]	R. Romano, L. Aelenei and D. Aelenei, "What is an adaptive façade? analysis of recent terms and definitions from an international perspective," Journal of Facade Design & Engineering, vol. 6(3), pp. 65-76, 2018.
[5]	F. H. M. F. S. S. A. A. B. A. R. and M. , "Green “Breathing facades” for occupants’ improved quality of life,", Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 234, p. 173–184, 2016.
[6]	S. M. Hosseinia, M. Mohammadia, A. Rosemannb, T. Schröderc and J. Lichtenbergc, "A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort,", Building and Environment, vol. 153, p. 186–204, 2019.
[7]	T. S. Wajiha and A. Quratulain, “Adaptive biomimetic facades: Enhancing energy efficiency of highly glazed buildings,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 8(3), pp. 319-331, 2019.
[25]	M. Cha, "A Study on application examples of media façade by technology case and content type," Journal of Digital Art Engineering & Multimedia, vol. 5(2) , pp. 175-184, 2018.
[26]	E. V. Moghaddam and R. Ibrahim, "People's evaluation towards media façade as new urban landmarks at night," International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 10(1), pp. 257-273, 2016.

 

Point 2: The statements are generic and superficial. The research problem is not clearly defined

Response 2: The introduction and conclusion were updated with reflecting recent international research.

Reviewer 3 Report

The study is interesting in its conceptual idea though. It has been worded in a very confusing way. Especially in the methodological description. What makes the reader very difficult to interpret and follow. It must be rewritten more clearly and precisely. It is necessary to carry out a more rigorous bibliographic review in the introductory part. The Methodology must be better and more clearly explained. The objectives of the work are not clear and the conclusions do not contribute novelty. A rewrite of all work should be done more clearly and coherent with the objectives.

 

Abstract: Review the Abstract. It must be more concrete and precise. Defining objectives well Methodology results and conclusions in a brief and summarized way.

 

Introduction: The introduction requires a Bibliographic review that will justify more clearly the need to carry out the study

 

Methodology: The objectives of the work must be defined more clearly. They appear very diffuse.

It would be very interesting to relate the facades with the energy efficiency associated with thermal bridges. It is not only interesting to justify its architectural functionality but also its energy efficiency and environmental sustainability.

It would be interesting to analyze the architectural evolution of ventilated facades in Korea from an aesthetic and functional point of view.

Where would you place the concept of chromaticity in the treatment of facades or the use of sustainable materials of natural origin?

The treatment of facades by flood lighting using LED technology is very interesting. From an aesthetic and energy efficiency point of view. It would be good to historically place these concepts and their aesthetic, functional, chromatic, and energetic impact.

It would be interesting to relate the facades with the materials and their LCA (Life Cycle Analysis). Not only in the use of materials of natural origin but also in their impact on manufacturing processes, transport, use and disposal, recycling, and recovery.

 

4. Study Case

The Methodology of the study should be better explained. What criteria were chosen for the selection? Why these case studies? Has an existing Methodology been followed or has it been proposed as a novelty? These are questions that need a qualification and justification, if possible referenced to similar studies carried out.

Table 1 has to be better explained to the reader. It is confusing and not clear enough

The evaluation in Excellent ●, Good ◐, Poor ○) must be explained and justified as well as the criteria of this evaluation

 

 

 

 

Sub-conclusions:

This section could be tabulated to be able to analyze it in more detail. Information is not ordered or classified. It is not usual in scientific articles to define Subconclusions. It would be better to expand the Discussion section in this case

The study is interesting in its conceptual idea though. It has been worded in a very confusing way. Especially in the methodological description. What makes the reader very difficult to interpret and follow. It must be rewritten more clearly and precisely

 

Conclusions: The Conclusion provides little scientific novelty or relevant contribution. It should be rewritten and clearly related to the objectives and results of the study. Also providing future research lines for the researcher in the subject under study.

 

References: References are scarce and from 11 to 18 are more referenced according to the template format of the magazine and publisher

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 3 Comments

 

Point 1: Abstract: Review the Abstract. It must be more concrete and precise. Defining objectives well Methodology results and conclusions in a brief and summarized way.

Response 1: Abstract was updated in more brief and summarized way.

 

Point 2: Introduction: The introduction requires a Bibliographic review that will justify more clearly the need to carry out the study

Response 2:  More recently published international works in journals were studied to expand range of literary sources. [Added reference].

[2]	S. Francesca, "Adaptive facade and phase change materials (PCMS) A sustainable approach for building materials," From Mega to Nano, The Complexity of a Multiscalar Project, pp. 44-69, 2020.
[3]	G. Katia , "Media-surface design for urban regeneration: the role of colour and light for public space usability," Journal of the International Colour Association, vol. 17, pp. 38-49, 2017.
[4]	R. Romano, L. Aelenei and D. Aelenei, "What is an adaptive façade? analysis of recent terms and definitions from an international perspective," Journal of Facade Design & Engineering, vol. 6(3), pp. 65-76, 2018.
[5]	F. H. M. F. S. S. A. A. B. A. R. and M. , "Green “Breathing facades” for occupants’ improved quality of life,", Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 234, p. 173–184, 2016.
[6]	S. M. Hosseinia, M. Mohammadia, A. Rosemannb, T. Schröderc and J. Lichtenbergc, "A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort,", Building and Environment, vol. 153, p. 186–204, 2019.
[7]	T. S. Wajiha and A. Quratulain, “Adaptive biomimetic facades: Enhancing energy efficiency of highly glazed buildings,” Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 8(3), pp. 319-331, 2019.
[25]	M. Cha, "A Study on application examples of media façade by technology case and content type," Journal of Digital Art Engineering & Multimedia, vol. 5(2) , pp. 175-184, 2018.
[26]	E. V. Moghaddam and R. Ibrahim, "People's evaluation towards media façade as new urban landmarks at night," International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 10(1), pp. 257-273, 2016.

 

Point 3: Methodology: The objectives of the work must be defined more clearly. They appear very diffuse.

Point 4: The Methodology of the study should be better explained

Response 3,4:  Methodology was updated with objectives of the work and similar case of international studies were carried out.

 

Point 5:  Sub-conclusions: This section could be tabulated to be able to analyze it in more detail. Information is not ordered or classified. It is not usual in scientific articles to define Subconclusions. It would be better to expand the Discussion section in this case

The study is interesting in its conceptual idea though. It has been worded in a very confusing way. Especially in the methodological description. What makes the reader very difficult to interpret and follow. It must be rewritten more clearly and precisely

Response 5: Sub-conclusions section is deleted and added in the Discussion section to expand the Discussion

 

Point 6:  Conclusions: The Conclusion provides little scientific novelty or relevant contribution. It should be rewritten and clearly related to the objectives and results of the study. Also providing future research lines for the researcher in the subject under study.

Response 6:  Conclusion was updated for relevant contribution and future research lines for the researcher was added.  

 

Point 7:  References: References are scarce and from 11 to 18 are more referenced according to the template format of the magazine and publisher

Response 7:  Recently published international works in journals were studied and referenced. Reference was updated according to the template format of the magazine and publisher

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors proceeded to edit the manuscript and performed all necessary actions so that the final submission is acceptable. 

Reviewer 2 Report

I do not have other comments. 

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors satisfactorily answered the questions for improvement.