The Impact of Passive Strategies on the Overall Energy Performance of Traditional Houses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Vernacular Architectural Analysis
3.1. Site Analysis
3.2. Characteristics of Courtyards in Najd Houses
3.2.1. Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWR)
- A window is an opening in the wall that allows light, sound and air to enter the room. Typically, the height of the set window is between 0.8 m and 1.6 m above the ground (Figure 7a);
- Passive ventilation openings and two-sided ventilation are examples of natural ventilation systems that provide both cross-ventilation and one-sided ventilation for indoor airflow. This type of opening is typically found in active rooms, such as family seating areas and guest bedrooms (Figure 7b);
- Roof ventilation openings act as chimneys to remove toxic harmful exhaust gases and smoke produced by rooms with fireplaces, such as kitchens (Figure 7c).
3.2.2. Shading Device
Shading through Courtyard Spaces
Shading through the Space in Space Concept
Shading by Natural Elements
3.2.3. Thermal Mass Walls
4. Results
4.1. Vernacular Architectural Analysis
Investigation of the Impact of the Green Area on Vernacular Architecture
4.2. Investigation into the Impact of WWR on Vernacular Architecture
4.3. Investigation into the Impact of Shading Devices on Vernacular Architecture
4.4. Investigation into the Impact of Thermal Mass on Vernacular Architecture
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- General Authority for Statistics Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Electrical Energy Statistics. 2020. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/Electrical%20Energy%20Statistics%202020EN_0.pdf (accessed on 10 March 2022).
- Balabel, A.; Alwetaishi, M. Towards Sustainable Residential Buildings in Saudi Arabia According to the Conceptual Framework of “Mostadam” Rating System and Vision 2030. Sustainability 2021, 13, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alyami, S.H.; Rezgui, Y.; Kwan, A. Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pipes, D. Review of The History of Saudi Arabia. Middle East Quarterly. 1999. Available online: https://www.meforum.org/1274/the-history-of-saudi-arabia (accessed on 10 March 2022).
- Al Oboudi, S.M. NAJD, The heart of Arabia. Arab. Stud. Q. 2015, 37, 282–299. [Google Scholar]
- Mortada, H. Sustainable Desert Traditional Architecture of the Central Region of Saudi Arabia. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 24, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, B.; Sibley, M.; Land, P.; Hakmi, M. Courtyard Housing: Past, Present and Future; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Akbar, J.A. Support for Court-Yard Houses: Riyad, Saudi Arabia. Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Bahobail, M.A. The mud additives and their effect on thermal conductivity of adobe bricks. JES. J. Eng. Sci. 2012, 40, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hakim, B.S. Arabic Islamic Cities Rev: Building and Planning Principles; Routledge: Milton Park, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, L.; Hurt, R.; Correia, D.; Boehm, R. Detailed energy saving performance analyses on thermal mass walls demonstrated in a zero energy house. Energy Build. 2009, 41, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaidroos, A.; Krarti, M. Optimal design of residential building envelope systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Energy Build. 2015, 86, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mileto, C.; Vegas, F.; Soriano Garcia, L.; Cristini, V. Vernacular Architecture: Towards a Sustainable Future; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Troup, L.; Phillips, R.; Eckelman, M.J.; Fannon, D. Effect of window-to-wall ratio on measured energy consumption in US office buildings. Energy Build. 2019, 203, 109434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leea, J.W.; Jungb, H.J.; Parkc, J.Y.; Leed, J.B.; Yoonb, Y. Optimization of building window system in Asian regions by analyzing solar heat gain and daylighting elements. Renew. Energy 2013, 50, 522–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwetaishi, M. Energy performance in residential buildings: Evaluation of the potential of building design and environmental parameter. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soflaei, F.; Shokouhian, M.; Abraveshdar, H.; Alipour, A. The impact of courtyard design variants on shading performance in hot- arid climates of Iran. Energy Build. 2017, 143, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derradji, L.; Imessad, K.; Amara, M.; Errebai, F.B. A study on residential energy requirement and the effect of the glazing on the optimum insulation thickness. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 112, 975–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Tamimi, N.; Fadzil, S.F.S.; Harun, W.M.W. The Effects of Orientation, Ventilation, and Varied WWR on the Thermal Performance of Residential Rooms in the Tropics. J. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 4, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acosta, I.; Campano, M.; Molina, J.F. Window design in architecture: Analysis of energy savings for lighting and visual comfort in residential spaces. Appl. Energy 2016, 168, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ossen, D.R.; Ahmad, M.H.; Madros, N.H. Optimum Overhang Geometry for Building Energy Saving in Tropical Climates. J. Asian Arch. Build. Eng. 2005, 4, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asfour, O.S. Solar and Shading Potential of Different Configurations of Building Integrated Photovoltaics Used as Shading Devices Considering Hot Climatic Conditions. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murphy, M. Landscape Architecture Theory; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Attia, S. The Bioclimatic-zones concept: Landscape design strategy for site planning in hot arid climates shady attia. In Proceedings of the 3rd CIB International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Delft, The Netherlands, 15–19 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Mortada, H. Sustainability of Adobe traditional architecture of Najd, Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference KERPIC 2020, Istanbul, Turkey, 26–27 November 2020; pp. 60–70. [Google Scholar]
- Soflaei, F.; Shokouhian, M.; Shemirani, S.M.M. Investigation of Iranian traditional courtyard as passive cooling strategy (a field study on BS climate). Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2016, 5, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shashua-Bar, L.; Pearlmutter, D.; Erell, E. The cooling efficiency of urban landscape strategies in a hot dry climate. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 92, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bougdah, H. The courtyard house: Can a sustainable future learn from a context relevant past. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 1, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-musaed, A.; Almssad, A.; Harith, S.; Nathir, M.; Ameer, M. Shading effects upon cooling house strategy in Iraq. In Proceedings of the 2nd PALENC Conference and 28th AIVC Conference on Building Low Energy Cooling and Advanced Ventilation Technologies in the 21st Century, Crete, Greece, 27–29 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Leylian, M.R.; Amirkhani, A.; Bemanian, M.R.; Abedi, M. Design principles in the hot and arid climate of iran, the case of kashan. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2010, 2, 278–283. [Google Scholar]
Exterior Wall Thermal Priorities for the Contemporary Houses | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categories | Elements N. | Density (kg/m2) | Specific Heat (J/kgK) | Thickness (mm) | Conductivity (W/mk) | |
Exterior walls | Cement Plaster | 1760 | 840 | 25 | 0.72 | |
Insulated Concrete block | Concrete block | 1400 | 1000 | 100 | 0.51 | |
Expanded polystyrene | 10 | 1400 | 30 | 0.046 | ||
Concrete block | 1400 | 1000 | 70 | 0.51 | ||
Cement plaster | 1760 | 840 | 25 | 0.72 | ||
U-value | 0.82 W/m2k | |||||
Exterior Wall Thermal Priorities for the Traditional Houses | ||||||
Categories | Elements N. | Density (kg/m2) | Specific heat (J/kgK) | Thickness (mm) | Conductivity (W/mk) | |
Exterior walls | Clay plaster | 1790 | 2085 | 60 | 0.406 | |
Mud block | 1253 | 880 | 450 | 0.215 | ||
Clay plaster | 1790 | 2085 | 60 | 0.406 | ||
U-value | 0.391 W/m2k |
WWR Guest Room (NW) | WWR Guest Room (SE) | WWR Dining Room | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
Traditional Base Case (T B.c) | 11.6 | 0.11 | 0.9 | 15.5 | 0.25 | 1.6 | 10.2 | 0.25 | 2.5 |
Contemporary Base Case (C B.c) | 13.2 | 1.5 | 11.4 | 19.8 | 1.5 | 7.6 | 16.5 | 1.5 | 9.1 |
WWR Modification (WWR. M) | 11.6 | 1.1 | 9.5 | 15.5 | 1.5 | 9.5 | 10.2 | 0.9 | 9.1 |
WWR Living Room | WWR Kitchen Room | Bedroom 1 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 13 | 0 | 0 | 14.5 | 0 | 0 | 12.6 | 0.25 | 2.0 |
(C B.c %) | 16.2 | 1.5 | 10.8 | 9.9 | 1.5 | 15.2 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 13 | 1.4 | 10.8% | 14.5 | 2.2 | 15.2% | 12.6 | 1.3 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 2 | Family Room (NW) | Family Room (SE) | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 13.1 | 0.25 | 1.9 | 13.6 | 0.25 | 1.8 | 17.9 | 0.5 | 2.8 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 16.5 | 1.5 | 9.1 | - | - | - |
(WWR. M) | 13.1 | 1.4 | 1.5% | 13.6 | 1.2 | 9.1% | 17.9 | 1.6 | 9.1% |
Bedroom 3 | Bedroom 4 | Bedroom 5 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 11.5 | 0.25 | 2.2 | 27.1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 16.6 | 0 | 0 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 11.5 | 1.2 | 10.5% | 27.1 | 2.8 | 10.5% | 16.6 | 1.7 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 6 | |||||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |||||||
(T B.c) | 14.8 | 0.5 | 3.4 | ||||||
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | ||||||
(WWR. M) | 14.8 | 1.6 | 10.5% |
WWR Guest Room (NW) | WWR Guest Room (SE) | WWR Family Room | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 11.6 | 0.11 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 36 | 1.1 | 3.1 |
(C B.c %) | 13.2 | 1.5 | 11.4 | 19.8 | 1.5 | 7.6 | 16.5 | 1.5 | 9.1 |
(WWR. M) | 11.6 | 1.1 | 9.5% | - | - | - | 36 | 3.3 | 9.1% |
WWR Dining Room | Bedroom 1 | Bedroom 2 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 31.5 | 2.2 | 7.0 | 17 | 0.25 | 1.5 | 13.1 | 0.25 | 1.9 |
(C B.c %) | 16.5 | 1.5 | 9.1 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 31.5 | 2.8 | 9.1% | 17 | 1.8 | 10.5% | 13.1 | 1.4 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 3 | Bedroom 4 | Bedroom 5 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 9.6 | 0.25 | 2.6 | 13.3 | 0.25 | 1.9 | 14.1 | 0.25 | 1.8 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 9.6 | 1.0 | 10.5% | 13.3 | 1.4 | 10.5% | 14.1 | 1.5 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 6 | Bedroom 4 | Bedroom 5 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 9.6 | 0.25 | 2.6 | 13.3 | 0.25 | 1.9 | 14.1 | 0.25 | 1.8 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 9.6 | 1.0 | 10.5% | 13.3 | 1.4 | 10.5% | 14.1 | 1.5 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 7 | Bedroom 8 | Bedroom 9 | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 18.8 | 0 | 0 | 12.2 | 0.35 | 2.9 | 17.8 | 0 | 0 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 18.8 | 2.0 | 10.5% | 12.2 | 1.3 | 10.5% | 17.8 | 1.9 | 10.5% |
Bedroom 10 | Bedroom 11 (North) | Bedroom 11 (South) | |||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |
(T B.c) | 16.7 | 0.64 | 3.8 | 15.9 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 15.9 | 0.25 | 1.6 |
(C B.c %) | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 1.5 | 10.5 |
(WWR. M) | 16.7 | 1.8 | 10.5% | 15.9 | 1.7 | 10.5% | 15.9 | 1.7 | 10.5% |
WWR Kitchen | |||||||||
Wall Area m2 | Window Area m2 | WWR % | |||||||
(T B.c) | 30 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
(C B.c %) | 9.9 | 1.5 | 15.2 | ||||||
(WWR. M) | 30 | 4.6 | 15.2% |
Direction | Traditional House in Riyadh City | Traditional House in Hail City | ||
Projection % of Wall Height | M | Projection % of Wall Height | M | |
North | 73.0% | 2.4 | 48.9% | 1.6 |
South | 56.8% | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0 |
West | 54.1% | 1.8 | 65.8% | 2.2 |
East | 59.5% | 2.0 | 44.7% | 1.5 |
Case 2 Temp | Case 2 Hum | Case 3 Temp | Case 3 Hum | Different % of Temp | Different % of Hum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average | 34.5 | 15.9 | 36.4 | 10.2 | −5.5 | 45.3 |
Max | 43.9 | 38.0 | 44.4 | 25.0 | 9.3 | 133.3 |
Min | 22.2 | 7.0 | 27.3 | 2.0 | −33.3 | −48.6 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Aldersoni, A.; Albaker, A.; Alturki, M.; Said, M.A. The Impact of Passive Strategies on the Overall Energy Performance of Traditional Houses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Buildings 2022, 12, 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111837
Aldersoni A, Albaker A, Alturki M, Said MA. The Impact of Passive Strategies on the Overall Energy Performance of Traditional Houses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Buildings. 2022; 12(11):1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111837
Chicago/Turabian StyleAldersoni, Ali, Abdullah Albaker, Mansoor Alturki, and Mohamed Ahmed Said. 2022. "The Impact of Passive Strategies on the Overall Energy Performance of Traditional Houses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia" Buildings 12, no. 11: 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111837
APA StyleAldersoni, A., Albaker, A., Alturki, M., & Said, M. A. (2022). The Impact of Passive Strategies on the Overall Energy Performance of Traditional Houses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Buildings, 12(11), 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111837