Next Article in Journal
Effect of Fast Loading on the Seismic Performance of SRUHSC Frame Structures
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Studies on Seismic Performance of UHPSFRC-Filled Square Steel Tubular Columns
Previous Article in Journal
Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Critical Stress Determination of Local and Distortional Buckling of Lipped Angle Columns under Axial Compression
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation for the Seismic Performance of an Innovative Connection between a Flat CFST Column and an H Beam

Buildings 2022, 12(6), 735; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060735
by En-Feng Deng 1, Yu-Han Wang 1, Zhe Liu 2,3,*, Yong-Ji Song 1, Zhen Wang 2 and Dian-Bin Cao 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Buildings 2022, 12(6), 735; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060735
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 20 May 2022 / Accepted: 25 May 2022 / Published: 29 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Performance Steel–Concrete Composite Structures)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

well organized and written article

Author Response

 Response 1: Thank you for your positive comment.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

I have read this paper and found that:

  1. Overall content and presentation of this paper is good.
  2. The title is not reflected the content, must include the word of numerical simulation / finite element analysis.
  3. Must consider the existing connection as comparison purposes and why this connection is proposed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is interesting and presents the results of laboratory tests and FEM analysis of the connection of beams and columns. From the substantive point of view, the article is correct and requires only minor additions:

  • measurements of forces, displacements and strains should be described in more detail − the declared accuracy of these measurements is missing,
  • what were the values of friction coefficients steel-steel and steel-concrete based on?
  • the summary should note that the conclusions are based on three individual studies and cannot be treated as universal.

Editorial notes:

  • Lines 80-95 are repeated as lines 99-114. Similarly, lines 178-183 and 186-191.
  • Line 243: is "mental", it should be "metal". The same is in rows 246 and 271.
  • Line 313: there is a reference to Table 3, it should be Table 4.
  • Authors inconsistently use a space between the numerical value and the unit (you should either use a space everywhere or remove it).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop