Research on Influencing Factors and Driving Path of BIM Application in Construction Projects Based on the SD Model in China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background
1.2. Literature Review
1.3. Research Method
2. Identification of Influencing Factors
2.1. Economic Factors
2.1.1. BIM Personnel Costs
2.1.2. BIM Application Costs
2.1.3. BIM Cost Management in Enterprises
2.1.4. Economic Benefits Provided by BIM Technology
2.2. Technical Factors
2.2.1. The Difficulty Level of BIM Software Operation
2.2.2. Model Transmission Efficiency at Each Stage
2.2.3. BIM Technology Maturity
2.3. Organizational Factors
2.3.1. Degree of Collaboration among Various Stakeholders in the Project
2.3.2. Degree of Collaboration among Various Departments within an Enterprise
2.3.3. Clarity of BIM Requirements
2.4. Political and Legal Factors
2.4.1. The Level of Government Support for BIM
2.4.2. Degree of BIM Application Standards and Specifications
2.4.3. Clarity of Legal Liability Boundaries for BIM Application
2.5. Subjectively Cognitive Factors
2.5.1. The Acceptance of BIM Technology by All Stakeholders in the Project
2.5.2. Enterprises’ Understanding of BIM Technology
2.5.3. BIM Technology Application Experience
3. Dynamics Model Construction
3.1. Drawing a Causal Relationship Diagram
3.2. Determine Model Variables
3.3. Flow Chart Drawing
3.4. Determine the Variable Equation
3.4.1. BIM Economic Application Level Equation
3.4.2. BIM Technology Application Level Equation
3.4.3. BIM Organizational Application Level Equation
3.4.4. BIM Policy and Legal Application Level Equation
3.4.5. BIM Subjective Cognitive Application Level Equation
3.4.6. BIM Technology Application Level Equation
4. Model Analysis
4.1. Parameter Determination
4.1.1. Data Sources
4.1.2. Determining Function Relationships Based on Function Fitting
4.1.3. MIV Algorithm Determining Function
4.2. Model Verification
4.3. Analysis of System Dynamics Model Simulation Results
4.3.1. Analysis of the BIM Technology Application Performance Subsystem
4.3.2. Simulation Analysis of the BIM Application Level System
4.3.3. Single-Factor Simulation Analysis
5. Demonstration of BIM Technology Application Cases
5.1. Case Background
5.2. Application of BIM
5.2.1. Application of the BIM5D Management Platform in the Early Stages of Construction
5.2.2. Application of the BIM5D Management Platform in the Construction Process
5.2.3. Application of the BIM5D Management Platform in the Operation and Maintenance Phase
5.2.4. Application Effectiveness of the BIM5D Management Platform
5.2.5. Shortcomings in the Application of the BIM5D Management Platform
5.3. Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing BIM Application
5.4. Suggestions and Measures for Improving the Application of BIM Technology
5.4.1. Optimize the BIM Training Mechanism and Strengthen Talent Cultivation
5.4.2. Strengthening the Enterprise Management Level
5.4.3. The Government Strengthens the Importance of BIM and Improves the BIM Application Environment
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fargnoli, M.; Lombardi, M. Building information modelling (BIM) to enhance occupational safety in construction activities: Research trends emerging from one decade of studies. Buildings 2020, 10, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández Rodríguez, J.F. Implementation of BIM Virtual Models in Industry for the Graphical Coordination of Engineering and Architecture Projects. Buildings 2023, 13, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancini, M.; Wang, X.; Skitmore, M.; Issa, R. Editorial for IJPM special issue on advances in building information modeling (BIM) for construction projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 656–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eleftheriadis, S.; Mumovic, D.; Greening, P. Life cycle energy efficiency in building structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM capabilities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 811–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Tookey, J.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Naismith, N.; Azhar, S.; Efimova, O.; Raahemifar, K. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 75, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, L.; Lu, W.; Chen, K.; Chau, K.W.; Niu, Y. Benefit sharing for BIM implementation: Tackling the moral hazard dilemma in inter-firm cooperation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pezeshki, Z.; Ivari, S.A.S. Applications of BIM: A Brief Review and Future Outline. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2018, 25, 273–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oesterreich, T.; Teuteberg, F. Looking at the big picture of IS investment appraisal through the lens of systems theory A System Dynamics approach for understanding the economic impact of BIM. Comput. Ind. 2018, 99, 262–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, H.; Yang, Y. BIM adoption under government subsidy: Technology diffusion perspective. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04019089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belay, S.; Goedert, J.; Woldesenbet, A.; Rokooei, S.; Matos, J.; Sousa, H. Key BIM adoption drivers to improve performance of infrastructure projects in the Ethiopian construction sector: A Structural equation modeling approach. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, H.; Chang, R.; Dong, N.; Zuo, J.; Webber, R.J. Interaction mechanism of BIM application barriers in prefabricated construction and driving strategies from stakeholders’ perspectives. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2023, 14, 101821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.K.; Song, J.; Yu, J.H. Comparative Analysis of BIM Performance between Korea and China using IPA. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2021, 37, 317–326. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, Z.; Zuo, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, J.Y. Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: A China study. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2015, 22, 732–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oraee, M.; Hosseini, M.R.; Edwards, D.J.; Li, H.; Papadonikolaki, E.; Cao, D. Collaboration barriers in BIM-based construction networks: A conceptual model. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2019, 37, 839–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Jin, R.; Xu, Y.; Lin, F.; Dong, Y.; Pan, Z. The analysis of barriers to BIM implementation for industrialized building construction: A China study. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2021, 27, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, D.; Wang, G.; Li, H.; Skitmore, M.; Huang, T.; Zhang, W. Practices and effectiveness of building information modelling in construction projects in China. Autom. Constr. 2015, 49, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, T.; Chen, K.; Xue, F.; Lu, W. Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in China’s prefabricated construction: An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 219, 949–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ashmori, Y.Y.; Othman, I.; Rahmawati, Y.; Amran, Y.M.; Sabah, S.A.; Rafindadi, A.D.U.; Mikić, M. BIM benefits and its influence on the BIM implementation in Malaysia. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020, 11, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, L.; Teo, E.A.L. Critical success factors for enhancing the building information modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2017, 23, 1029–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellado, F.; Lou, E.C.W. Building information modelling, lean and sustainability: An integration framework to promote performance improvements in the construction industry. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alreshidi, E.; Mourshed, M.; Rezgui, Y. Factors for effective BIM governance. J. Build. Eng. 2017, 10, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, K.; Witt, E.; Lill, I. The BIM-based building permit process: Factors affecting adoption. Buildings 2022, 12, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Liang, Z. Barriers to Building Information Modeling from an Individual Perspective in the Chinese Construction Industry: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Buildings 2023, 13, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almarri, K.; Aljarman, M.; Boussabaine, H. Emerging contractual and legal risks from the application of building information modelling. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2019, 26, 2307–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aljarman, M. Emerging Risk from the Application of Building Information Modelling through the Life Cycle of Projects. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, L.; Teo, E.A.L.; Chang, R. Reducing critical hindrances to building information modeling implementation: The case of the Singapore construction industry. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olawumi, T.O.; Chan, D.W.M. Building information modelling and project information management framework for construction projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2019, 25, 53–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Rao, Z.; Cai, L. Comprehensive Evaluation of BIM Calculation Quantity in Domestic Construction Engineering Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, 2021, 3292376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phang, T.C.H.; Chen, C.; Tiong, R.L.K. New model for identifying critical success factors influencing BIM adoption from precast concrete manufacturers’ view. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04020014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, S.; Lee, G. Process, productivity, and economic analyses of BIM–based multi-trade prefabrication—A case study. Autom. Constr. 2018, 89, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Q.; Hu, X.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, G. Understanding architectural designers’ continuous use intention regarding BIM technology: A China case. Buildings 2021, 11, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adekunle, S.A.; Ejohwomu, O.; Aigbavboa, C.O. Building information modelling diffusion research in developing countries: A user meta-model approach. Buildings 2021, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, R.; Hancock, C.M.; Tang, L.; Wanatowski, D. BIM investment, returns, and risks in China’s AEC industries. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2017, 143, 04017089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyis, S. Pros and cons of using building information modeling in the AEC industry. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2019, 145, 04019046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oesterreich, T.D.; Teuteberg, F. Behind the scenes: Understanding the socio-technical barriers to BIM adoption through the theoretical lens of information systems research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 146, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbasnejad, B.; Nepal, M.P.; Ahankoob, A.; Nasirian, A.; Drogemuller, R. Building Information Modelling (BIM) adoption and implementation enablers in AEC firms: A systematic literature review. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2021, 17, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Factor Categories | Influence Factor | References |
---|---|---|
Economic factors | BIM personnel costs | [8,11,12,20] |
BIM application costs | [12,15,18,21] | |
BIM cost management in enterprises | [9,10,20,22] | |
Economic benefits provided by BIM technology | [1,23,24,25] | |
Technical factors | The difficulty level of BIM software operation | [21,22,26,27] |
Model transmission efficiency at each stage | [4,10,23,27] | |
BIM technology maturity | [12,20,23,25] | |
Organizational factors | Degree of collaboration among various stakeholders in the project | [5,20,22,28] |
Degree of collaboration among various departments within an enterprise | [10,15,18,29] | |
Clarity of BIM requirements | [14,17,29,30] | |
Political and legal factors | The level of government support for BIM | [9,10,13,26] |
Degree of BIM application standards and specifications | [9,23,31,32] | |
Clarity of legal liability boundaries for BIM application | [5,10,11,25] | |
Subjectively cognitive Factors | The acceptance of BIM technology by all stakeholders in the project | [3,9,31,33] |
Degree of BIM application standards and specifications | [15,17,34,35] | |
BIM technology application experience | [11,27,32,36] |
System | Primary Factors | Secondary Factors |
---|---|---|
Application level in BIM | Application level of economy in BIM | BIM personnel costs |
BIM application costs | ||
BIM cost management in enterprises | ||
Economic benefits provided by BIM technology | ||
Application level of technology in BIM | The difficulty level of BIM software operation | |
Model transmission efficiency at each stage | ||
BIM technology maturity | ||
Application level of organization in BIM | Degree of collaboration among various stakeholders in the project | |
Degree of collaboration among various departments within an enterprise | ||
Clarity of BIM requirements | ||
Application level of policy and law in BIM | The level of government support for BIM | |
Degree of BIM application standards and specifications | ||
Clarity of legal liability boundaries for BIM application | ||
Application level of subjective cognition in BIM | The acceptance of BIM technology by all stakeholders in the project | |
Degree of BIM application standards and specifications | ||
BIM technology application experience |
Variable (in Dimensionless Units) | |
---|---|
State variables (SVi) | i = 1–5, 1 represents the application level of economy in BIM, 2 represents the application level of technology in BIM, 3 represents the application level of the organization in BIM, 4 represents the application level of policy and law in BIM, and 5 represents the application level of subjective cognition in BIM. |
Decision variables (DVi) | i = 1–5, 1 represents the changes in the economic aspects of BIM, 2 represents the changes in the technical aspects of BIM, 3 represents the changes in the organizational aspects of BIM, 4 represents the changes in the political and legal aspects of BIM, and 5 represents the changes in the subjectively cognitive aspects of BIM. |
Auxiliary variable (AVi) | i = 1–14, 1 represents BIM application costs, 2 represents BIM personnel costs, 3 represents BIM cost management in enterprises, 4 represents the economic benefits provided by BIM technology, 5 represents the difficulty level of BIM software operation, 6 represents model transmission efficiency at each stage, 7 represents BIM technology maturity, 8 represents the degree of collaboration among various stakeholders in the project, 9 represents the degree of collaboration among various departments within an enterprise, 10 represents the clarity of BIM requirements, 11 represents the degree of BIM application standards and specifications, 12 represents the clarity of legal liability boundaries for BIM applications, 13 represents the acceptance of BIM technology by all stakeholders in the project, and 14 represents an enterprise’s understanding of BIM technology. |
Exogenous variable (EVi) | i = 1–2, 1 represents the level of government support for BIM, and 2 represents BIM technology application experience. |
Model Description | Parameter Estimation Value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equation | R2 | F | Degree of Freedom 1 | Degree of Freedom 2 | Significance | Constant | b1 |
linear | 0. 946 | 52. 395 | 1 | 3 | 0. 005 | 0. 085 | 0. 954 |
Influence Factor | BIM Technology Application Level | Application Level Change Rate | Ranking | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Current | Current 1 | |||
BIM technology maturity | 4.757 | 5.545 | 16.57% | 1 |
The difficulty level of BIM software operation | 4.757 | 5.378 | 13.05% | 2 |
Degree of collaboration among various departments within an enterprise | 4.757 | 5.240 | 10.15% | 3 |
An enterprise’s understanding of BIM technology | 4.757 | 5.106 | 7.34% | 4 |
BIM personnel costs | 4.757 | 5.086 | 6.92% | 5 |
The acceptance of BIM technology by all stakeholders in the project | 4.757 | 5.047 | 6.1% | 6 |
The economic benefits provided by BIM technology | 4.757 | 5.034 | 5.82% | 7 |
Clarity of BIM requirements | 4.757 | 5.007 | 5.26% | 8 |
Shortcomings in BIM Application | Empirical Analysis of BIM Influencing Factors |
---|---|
Intelligence level in data collection | BIM technology maturity |
Incomplete software | The difficulty level of BIM software operation |
Insufficient understanding of collaborative work among project stakeholders | Degree of collaboration among various stakeholders in the project; The acceptance of BIM technology by all stakeholders in the project |
Insufficient data accumulation on BIM management platform | BIM technology application experience |
The application in the operation and maintenance phase is very lacking | BIM technology application experience |
Lack of comprehensive BIM usage standards | An enterprise’s understanding of BIM technology; Clarity of BIM requirements |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Deng, J.; Li, X.; Rao, J. Research on Influencing Factors and Driving Path of BIM Application in Construction Projects Based on the SD Model in China. Buildings 2023, 13, 2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112794
Deng J, Li X, Rao J. Research on Influencing Factors and Driving Path of BIM Application in Construction Projects Based on the SD Model in China. Buildings. 2023; 13(11):2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112794
Chicago/Turabian StyleDeng, Jianxun, Xiaoxin Li, and Jintong Rao. 2023. "Research on Influencing Factors and Driving Path of BIM Application in Construction Projects Based on the SD Model in China" Buildings 13, no. 11: 2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112794
APA StyleDeng, J., Li, X., & Rao, J. (2023). Research on Influencing Factors and Driving Path of BIM Application in Construction Projects Based on the SD Model in China. Buildings, 13(11), 2794. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112794