Estimation of Durability of HC-550 Floor Slabs Based on Electrochemical Tests of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement Strings in Concrete
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Significance and Novelty
2. Materials Section
2.1. Typical Plates HC500-19/R120
2.2. Test Items Created According to the Manufacturer’s Formula in the Construction Laboratory of the Silesian University of Technology
2.3. Components Cut Directly from HC-500 Slabs
2.3.1. Preparation of Research Elements for Strength Tests
2.3.2. Preparation of Research Elements for Corrosion Tests Carried out Using the Potential Method
3. Test Methods
3.1. Measurement of the Early Shrinkage from the Moment of Forming
3.2. Research Drying Shrinkage
3.3. Shrinkage Ring Test
3.4. Test of Compressive Strength of Concrete after 1, 2, 7, 28 and 90 Days of Maturation
3.5. Flexural Tensile Strength Test after 1, 2, 7, 28 and 90 Days of Maturation
3.6. Examination of the Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete after 2, 28 and 90 Days of Maturation
3.7. Determination of the Depth of Penetration of Water under Pressure
3.8. Frost Resistance of Concrete
3.9. Test of Resistance to Subzero Temperatures with the Use of Deicing Salts
3.10. Compressive Strength Test of Concrete Taken Directly from HC-500 Plates
3.11. Determination of the Migration and Diffusion Coefficient of Chloride Ions
3.12. Accelerated Ingress of Chloride Ions to Cause Corrosion
3.13. Determining the Surface of Reinforcing Strings with the Use 3D Scanning
3.14. Measurements of Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
3.15. Examination of Concrete Porosity
4. Results
4.1. Result of Determining the Early Shrinkage from the Moment of Forming
4.2. Result of Determining the Drying Shrinkage
4.3. Result of Determining the Shrinkage Ring Test
4.4. Result of Determining the Compressive Strength of Concrete
4.5. Result of Determining the Flexural Tensile Strength Test after 1, 2, 7, 28 and 90 Days of Maturation
4.6. Result of Determining the Modulus of Elasticity
4.7. Result of Determination of the Depth of Penetration of Water under Pressure
4.8. Result Obtained in Tests of Frost Resistance of Concrete
4.9. Result of the Test of Resistance to Subzero Temperatures with the Use of Deicing Salts
4.10. Result of Compressive Strength Test of Concrete Taken Directly from HC-500 Plates
4.11. Result of Determination of the Migration and Diffusion Coefficient of Chloride Ions
4.12. Result of Determining the Surface of Reinforcing Strings with the Use of 3D Scanning
4.13. Result of Accelerated Ingress of Chloride Ions to Cause Corrosion
4.14. Result of Measurements of Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)
4.15. Results of Concrete Porosity Tests Using X-ray-Computed Microtomography
4.16. Calculations of Prestressing Force Losses Taking into Account the Influence of Reinforcement Corrosion
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
- Selecting the amount of shrinkage-reducing admixtures to achieve the greatest possible shrinkage reduction with the least impact on mechanical and durability properties.
- Determination of close correlations between adhesion and Cl- ion concentration at the surface of reinforcement strings.
- Determination of changes in the surface area of strut strands caused by pitting corrosion.
- Detailing the relationships that allow for the correct determination of prestressing losses caused by the loss of adhesion, changes in the elastic modulus of concrete and the formation of corrosion products.
- Performing verification tests of changes in the adhesion of reinforcement in fragments of plates placed in an aggressive environment of varying temperature and humidity subjected to long-term stress.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
HC500-19/R120 | Hollow-core slabs designed for constructing ceilings in skeletal buildings with reinforced concrete |
F1-F16 | Concrete samples drilled directly from the HC-500 floor slabs |
FB1-FB49 | Concrete samples created in laboratory according to the recipe provided by the manufacturer |
Y 1860 | Steel, two relaxation classes |
P1 | Tensile force of lower rods |
P2 | Tensile force of upper rods |
q | Stress increment index |
G | Young’s modulus inner steel ring |
α | Steel ring deformation rate increment |
t | The time in which the test was completed |
V | Volume of the sample drilled directly from the HC-500 floor slabs |
h | Height of the sample drilled directly from the HC-500 floor slabs |
d | Smallest side dimension of the sample drilled directly from the HC-500 floor slabs |
Average compressive strength of concrete at the age of t days | |
Average compressive strength after 28 days | |
Coefficient depending on the age of concrete | |
s | Coefficient depending on the type of cement |
Characteristic compressive strength of concrete in structure | |
fck,is,cube | Compressive strength of concrete determined after time t (converted to strength test of cubic samples 150 × 150 × 150 mm) |
Universal gas constant | |
Absolute temperature | |
Valence of ions | |
Faradays constant | |
Transport number of chloride ions | |
Activity coefficient of chloride ions | |
Concentration of chloride ions | |
Volumetric resistivity | |
Conductivity | |
L | Sample thickness |
V | Electrical potential |
A | Cross-sectional area of a sample |
Icorr | Corrosion current |
Rp | Polarization resistance |
icorr | Corrosion current density |
Constants of anodic and cathodic reactions, respectively | |
CR | Coefficient determining the average loss of the bar cross-section |
R1 | Resistance of the liquid phase |
R2, R2a | Resistance of the double layer at the interface between the liquid and solid phases of concrete |
Y2, α2, Y2a, α2a | Capacitance of the double layer at the interface between the liquid and solid phases of concrete |
Y3, α3 | Capacitance of the steel–concrete transition zone |
Y0, α0 | Capacitance of the double layer at the interface between the pore liquid and the reinforcing steel |
Rt | Charge transfer resistance |
D | Diffusion coefficient determined on the basis of the diffusion test |
DM | Migration coefficient determined on the basis of the migration test |
Value of the concentration at the surface of the string | |
τp | Design stresses on the sidewalls of prestressing strut strands |
fbpt | Design strength |
Partial safety factor for concrete for the examined design state | |
αct | Coefficient taking into account long-term effects on the tensile strength and of unfavorable effects, resulting from the way the load was applied |
ΔPcor. | Component of prestressing force losses |
fbpt (t > tini,cor) | Adhesion stress after the corrosion initiation time |
Compressive strength of concrete after 28 days of maturation | |
ϕ0 | Initial diameter of the strut strand |
α | Coefficient expressing the difference between the even Px and pitting corrosion Ppit |
Vcorr | Average loss of strut strand diameter due to corrosion |
Vcorr,max | Loss of strut strand diameter due to corrosion corresponding to the limit of the maximum value of the corrosion current 15 µA |
tn | Time in which chloride ions will cover the entire group of strut strands |
fbpt (tmax) | Adhesion stresses |
ηp1 | Coefficient assumed according to standard [32] for three-wire and seven-wire strands |
ηp2 | Coefficient assumed according to standard [32] with good adhesion conditions |
fctd (tmax) | The design tensile strength of concrete at a time close to the time of corrosion initiation |
fctm (t) | Mean tensile strength of concrete |
tcor.red | Time after which the reduction in adhesion stresses was initiated |
tn.0 | Time after which the adhesion stresses dropped to zero |
tc | Period of time in which the decrease in compressive force occurred |
Δtcor.red | Total time after which adhesion stresses dropped to zero |
Appendix A
Term Research Day | Reading from Displacement Sensors | Drying Shrinkage mm/m | Average Drying Shrinkage mm/m | Deformation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FB1 | FB2 | FB3 | FB1 | FB2 | FB3 | |||
0 | 4.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0 |
1 | 3.971 | 2.968 | 2.974 | 0.058 | 0.064 | 0.052 | 0.058 | 58 |
4 | 3.928 | 2.925 | 2.924 | 0.144 | 0.15 | 0.152 | 0.149 | 149 |
7 | 3.913 | 2.907 | 2.908 | 0.174 | 0.186 | 0.184 | 0.181 | 181 |
14 | 3.881 | 2.874 | 2.875 | 0.238 | 0.252 | 0.25 | 0.247 | 247 |
27 | 3.857 | 2.849 | 2.852 | 0.286 | 0.302 | 0.296 | 0.295 | 295 |
Term Research Day | Sample Weight g | Density kg/m3 | Compressive Strength MPa | The Average Compressive Strength MPa |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FB4 8597 | 2547 | 42.73 | 41.6 |
FB5 8657 | 2565 | 40.12 | ||
FB6 8448 | 2503 | 41.93 | ||
2 | FB7 8437 | 2500 | 50.57 | 50.5 |
FB8 8440 | 2501 | 51.01 | ||
FB9 8447 | 2503 | 49.84 | ||
7 | FB10 8559 | 2536 | 78.07 | 79.4 |
FB11 8508 | 2521 | 81.12 | ||
FB12 8457 | 2506 | 79.1 | ||
28 | FB13 8607 | 2550 | 95.6 | 94.1 |
FB14 8459 | 2506 | 95.2 | ||
FB15 8480 | 2513 | 91.4 | ||
90 | FB16 8593 | 2546 | 109.4 | 107.6 |
FB17 8581 | 2543 | 107.0 | ||
FB18 8600 | 2548 | 106.2 |
Test Date | Breaking Force (kN) | Flexural Tensile Strength (Mpa) | Average Flexural Tensile Strength (Mpa) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | FB19 7.44 | 2.23 | 2.28 |
FB20 7.74 | 2.32 | ||
2 | FB21 9.82 | 2.94 | 3.28 |
FB22 12.03 | 3.61 | ||
7 | FB23 14.67 | 4.40 | 4.16 |
FB24 13.06 | 3.92 | ||
28 | FB25 19.49 | 5.85 | 5.65 |
FB26 18.17 | 5.45 | ||
90 | FB27 21.81 | 6.54 | 6.38 |
FB28 20.74 | 6.22 |
Term Research Day | Sample Weight g | Density kg/m3 | Compressive Strength MPa | Average Compressive Strength MPa | Young’s Modulus E GPa | Average Young’s Modulus E GPa | Coef. Poisson ν | Average Coef. Poisson ν |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 13,492 | 2545 | 45.1 | 43.6 | 41.5 | 40.6 | 0.18 | 0.16 |
13,424 | 2532 | 43.8 | 40.0 | 0.11 | ||||
13,471 | 2541 | 41.9 | 40.1 | 0.18 | ||||
28 | 13,482 | 2543 | 80.0 | 84.1 | 48.39 | 50.3 | 0.21 | 0.17 |
13,448 | 2537 | 87.5 | 51.62 | 0.13 | ||||
13,413 | 2530 | 84.7 | 50.75 | 0.15 | ||||
90 | 13,330 | 2514 | 92.4 | 96.5 | 51.73 | 51.8 | 0.30 | 0.25 |
13,383 | 2524 | 101.4 | 51.62 | 0.24 | ||||
13,357 | 2520 | 95.8 | 52.10 | 0.21 |
Sample Weight g | Weight of Sample after 100 Cycles of Freezing g | The Relative Weight Loss % | Average Relative Weight Loss % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frozen samples | 8606 | 8593 | 0.15 | 0.13 |
8586 | 8581 | 0.06 | ||
8615 | 8600 | 0.17 | ||
Witness samples | 8499 | 8499 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
8482 | 8483 | −0.01 | ||
8555 | 8556 | −0.01 |
Compressive Strength | Average Compressive Strength MPa | Relative Reduction in Compressive Strength % | |
---|---|---|---|
Frozen samples | 96.9 | 97 | −4.31 |
94.3 | |||
99.2 | |||
Reference samples | 92.7 | 93 | |
91.3 | |||
94.4 |
Samples | h mm | d mm | h/d | V mm3 | F kN | fc N/mm2 | fc,cube(t) N/mm2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | 54.1 | 54.8 | 0.99 | 127,599 | 1.11 | 209.0 | 88.6 | 79.9 | 1.10 | 72.5 |
F2 | 61.2 | 54.8 | 1.12 | 144,345 | 1.06 | 218.4 | 92.6 | 87.5 | 1.10 | 79.4 |
F3 | 58.4 | 54.8 | 1.07 | 137,741 | 1.08 | 230.0 | 97.5 | 90.6 | 1.10 | 82.2 |
F4 | 58.5 | 54.8 | 1.07 | 137,977 | 1.08 | 227.6 | 96.5 | 89.7 | 1.10 | 81.4 |
F5 | 53.6 | 54.8 | 0.98 | 126,420 | 1.11 | 206.5 | 87.5 | 78.7 | 1.10 | 71.4 |
F6 | 58.8 | 54.8 | 1.07 | 138,685 | 1.07 | 226.6 | 96.1 | 89.4 | 1.10 | 81.2 |
Appendix B
Specimen No. | Ecorr mV | ba mV | bc mV | Rp kΩ | RpA kΩ cm2 | icorr μA/cm2 | VR µm/YEAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F7/1 | −451 | 149.9 | 65.6 | 1.03 | 23.42 | 0.85 | 9 |
F7/2 | −414 | 265 | 65 | 0.29 | 6.64 | 3.41 | 38 |
F8/1 | −745 | 215 | 128 | 3.40 | 77.32 | 0.45 | 5 |
F8/2 | −420 | 175 | 248 | 0.04 | 0.82 | 54.42 | 599 |
F10/1 | −505 | 170 | 154 | 2.31 | 52.53 | 0.67 | 7 |
F10/2 | −514 | 177 | 104 | 0.15 | 3.43 | 8.28 | 91 |
Sample | t days | R1 Ω | R2 kΩ | R2a kΩ | Y2 10−9 Fsα−1 | α2 | Y2a 10−9 Fsα−1 | α2a | Y3 10−3 Fsα−1 | α3 | Rt kΩ | Y0 10−6 Fsα−1 | α0 | icorr μA/cm2 | Vr mm/year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F7/1 | 0 | 0.131 | 8.63 | 9.32 | 1.98 | 0.871 | 32.35 | 0.806 | 177 × 10−3 | 0.828 | 1319 | 131 | 0.387 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
F7/2 | 21 | 74.17 | 0.282 | 0.281 | 2.14 | 1.0 | 12 × 106 | 1.0 | 4.11 | 0.359 | 1.012 | 45.35 | 0.503 | 0.98 | 11 |
F8/1 | 0 | 52.47 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 86.47 | 1.0 | 13 × 106 | 0.965 | 917 | 0.089 | 0.183 | 35.32 × 103 | 0.115 | 6.36 | 70 |
F8/2 | 21 | 4.27 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 262 × 106 | 0.601 | 811 × 103 | 0.994 | 89.9 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 3.35 × 106 | 0.382 | 1939 | 21,332 |
F10/1 | 0 | 0.003 | 0.326 | 0.028 | 2.37 | 0.974 | 4.2 × 109 | 0.193 | 12.9 | 0.111 | 0.226 | 42.51 | 0.388 | 2.66 | 29 |
F10/2 | 21 | 0.185 | 0.054 | 0.026 | 51.07 × 103 | 0.979 | 13 × 106 | 0.314 | 42.6 | 0.273 | 0.362 | 446 × 10−6 | 1.197 | 3.47 | 43 |
References
- Li, F.; Yuan, Y.; Li, C.Q. Corrosion propagation of prestressing steel strands in concrete subject to chloride attack. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3878–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgese, M.; Ansari, F.; Domaneschi, M.; Cimellaro, G.P. Post-collapse analysis of Morandi’s Polcevera viaduct in Genoa Italy. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2020, 10, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collop, A.C. Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials. Eng. Struct. 1997, 19, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Wang, G.; Shi, W.; Wang, S. Size Distribution Model and Development Two Curing Methods. Materials 2019, 12, 1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Finozzi, I.; Saetta, A.; Budelmann, H. Structural response of reinforcing bars affected by pitting corrosion: Experimental evaluation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 192, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. A global model for corrosion-induced cracking in prestressed concrete structures. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2015, 62, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.S.; Huang, F.M.; Guo, T.; Song, Y.H. Residual life evaluation of prestressed reinforced concrete highway bridges under coupled corrosion-fatigue actions. Adv. Steel Constr. 2015, 11, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, F.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, X.; Ma, R.; Tian, H. Experimental study on corrosion and mechanical behavior of Main Cable Wires Considering the effect of strain. Materials 2019, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adasooriya, N.D.; Hemmingsen, T.; Pavlou, D. Fatigue strength degradation of metals in corrosive environments. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 276, 012039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, C.; Xu, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, H.; Spencer, B.F. Fatigue life prediction for parallel-wire stay cables considering corrosion effects. Int. J. Fatigue 2018, 114, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Wu, C.; Jiang, X. Experimental study on fatigue performance of corroded high-strength steel wires used in bridges. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 187, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z.H.; Wu, S.Y.; Tang, Z.; Zhao, Y.G.; Li, W. Effect of chloride-induced corrosion on the bond behaviors between steel strands and concrete. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Wu, Y.; Dai, M. Virtual Special Issue Durability of Innovative Construction Materials and Structures Degradation of steel-to-concrete bond due to corrosion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Noguchi, T.; Tomosawa, F. Evaluation of the bond properties between concrete and reinforcement as a function of the degree of reinforcement corrosion. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanish, K. Corrosion Effect on Bond Strenght in Reinforced Concreteffects; National Library of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Cabrera, J.G. Deterioration of Concrete Due to Reinforcement Steel Corrosion. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1996, 9465, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Yi, J.; Liu, Y. Simplified model for corrosion-induced bond degradation between steel strand and concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 29, 4016257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Yuan, Y. Effects of corrosion on bond behavior between steel strand and concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 38, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szweda, Z.; Buliński, Z. Application of inverse methodology to estimation of chloride diffusion coefficient in concrete of prestressed precast slab. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 174, 01008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szweda, Z. Analysis of protective features of concrete in precast prestressed floor slabs (HC type) against chloride penetration. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 163, 05006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szweda, Z. Comparison of Diffusion and Migration Coefficients Determined from Tests on Concrete in Prestressed Floor Slabs HC-500. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 471, 052034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szweda, Z.; Jasinski, R. Static Analysis of Prestressed Floor Slabs HC500 with Changes in Tendon Adhesion to Concrete Induced by Penetration of Chloride Ions. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 471, 052035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN-EN 12504-1, 2001; Testing of Concrete in Structures. Part 1, Wells Core. Cutting, Assessment and Testing of Compressive Strength. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2001.
- Gołaszewski, J.; Ponikiewski, T.; Cygan, G.; Gołaszewska, M. Laser System for Testing Early Shrinkage of Concrete Elements in Conjuction with the Deterioration of the Setting Time; Transactions of the VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series; VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava: Ostrava, Czechia, 2016; Volume 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- ASTM C1581-04; Standard Test Method for Determining Age at Cracking and Induced Tensile Stress Characteristics of Mortar and Concrete under Restrained Shrinkage. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
- PN-EN 12390-3, 2002; Concrete Tests—Part 3, Compressive Strength of Samples for Examination. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2002.
- PN-EN 12390-5, 2019-08; Concrete Tests—Part 5, Flexural Strength of Test Specimens. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2019.
- PN-EN 12390-8, 2019-08; Standard Concrete Tests—Part 8, Penetration Depth of Water under Pressure. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2019.
- PN-88/B-06250, 1988; Ordinary Concrete. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1988.
- PKN-CEN/TS 12390-9, 2007; Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 9, Freeze-Thaw Resistance—Scaling. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1988.
- PN-EN 13791, 2008; Evaluation of Concrete Compressive Strength in Structures and Precast Concrete Products. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2008.
- PN-EN 206+A1, 2016-12; Concrete Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. PKN/KT Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2016.
- PN-EN 1992-1-1, 2008; Eurocode 2—Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1, General Rules and Rules for Buildings. British Standard Institution: London, UK, 2004.
- ASTM C1202; Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000.
- NORDTEST. Concrete, Mortar and Cement-Based Repair Materials: Chloride Migration Coefficient from Non-Steady-State Migration Experiments; NT Build 492; NORDTEST: Espo, Finland, 1999; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- C1556-11a; Standard Test Method for Determining the Apparent Chloride Diffusion Coefficient of Cementitious Mixtures by Bulk Diffusion. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2003; pp. 1–7.
- Szweda, Z.; Zybura, A. Theoretical model and experimental tests on chloride diffusion and migration processes in concrete. Procedia Eng. 2013, 57, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Szweda, Z.; Gołaszewski, J.; Ghosh, P.; Lehner, P.; Konečný, P. Comparison of Standardized Methods for Determining the Diffusion Coefficient of Chloride in Concrete with Thermodynamic Model of Migration. Materials 2023, 16, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ASTM C1760-12; Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Conductivity of Hardened Concrete (Withdrawn 2021). ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
- Szweda, Z.; Jaśniok, T.; Jaśniok, M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of electrochemical chloride extraction from concrete on the basis of testing reinforcement polarization and chloride concentration. Ochr. Przed Korozją 2018, 61, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szweda, Z. Evaluating the Impact of Concrete Design on the Effectiveness of the Electrochemical Chloride Extraction Process. Materials 2023, 16, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaśniok, M. Method of Iterative Determination of the Polarized Area of Steel Reinforcement in Concrete Applied in the EIS Measurements. Materials 2022, 15, 3274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ACI 318M-11; Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2014.
- Otieno, M.B.; Alexander, M.G.; Beushausen, H.D. Corrosion in cracked and uncracked concrete–influence of crack width, concrete quality and crack reopening Mag. Concr. Res. 2010, 62, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afroz, S.; Nguyen, Q.D.; Zhang, Y.; Kim, T.; Caste, A. Cracking of limestone calcined clay blended concrete and mortar under restrained shrinkage. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 386, 131599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Constituent/m3 | FB |
---|---|
Cement, kg | 480 |
Sand, kg | 580 |
Basalt 2–8, kg | 671 |
Basalt 8–16, kg | 633 |
Water, kg | 149 |
w/c | 0.31 |
Plasticizer, % m.c. | 1.29 |
Slump cone after 5 min, mm | 60 |
Slump cone after 60 min, mm | 0 |
Air content, % | 3.2 |
Volume weight , kg/m3 | 2519 |
Concrete | FB1 | FB2 | FB3 | F1 | F2 | F3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depth of penetration (mm) | 12 | 10 | 8 | 32 | 36 | 35 |
Average depth (mm) | 10 | 34 |
Basis of the Study | Diffusion Coefficients D m2/s | Migration Coefficient DM m2/s |
---|---|---|
ASTM C1202-97 [34] Migration 6 h | 0.91 × 10−12 | |
NT BUILD 492 [35] Migration 96 h | 0.61 × 10−12 | |
ASTM C1760 [39] | 2.2 × 10−11 | |
ASTM C 1556-03 [36] Diffusion 840 h | 1.44 × 10−12 | |
Thermodynamic model [37] Migration 24 h, 48 h | (0.72 ÷ 1.45) ×10−12 | - |
Thermodynamic model [37] Diffusion 120 days | 1.22 × 10−12 | - |
Dry | Saturated | Weight on a | Sample Volume | Density | Porosity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrostatic Balance | |||||
Weight | Weight | g | cm3 | g/cm3 | % |
100.7 | 104.6 | 64.2 | 40.4 | 2.493 | 9.65 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Szweda, Z.; Czachura, D. Estimation of Durability of HC-550 Floor Slabs Based on Electrochemical Tests of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement Strings in Concrete. Buildings 2023, 13, 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071855
Szweda Z, Czachura D. Estimation of Durability of HC-550 Floor Slabs Based on Electrochemical Tests of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement Strings in Concrete. Buildings. 2023; 13(7):1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071855
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzweda, Zofia, and Dominik Czachura. 2023. "Estimation of Durability of HC-550 Floor Slabs Based on Electrochemical Tests of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement Strings in Concrete" Buildings 13, no. 7: 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071855
APA StyleSzweda, Z., & Czachura, D. (2023). Estimation of Durability of HC-550 Floor Slabs Based on Electrochemical Tests of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement Strings in Concrete. Buildings, 13(7), 1855. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071855