Next Article in Journal
Study on the Inhibition Effect of Fly Ash on Alkali–SilicaReaction and Its Influence on Building Energy Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Schedula Anima: Dynamic Visualization of Gantt Charts and Resource Usage Graphs in Project Scheduling
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Multi-Dimensional Incentives on the Performance of Rail Transit PPP Projects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evolutionary Mechanism of Trust for Public–Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation

1
School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2
Heilongjiang Province Water Resources Investment Group Co., Ltd., Harbin 150040, China
3
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
4
School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(3), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391
Submission received: 25 November 2024 / Revised: 31 December 2024 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 26 January 2025

Abstract

Trust plays a pivotal role in sustaining cooperative relationships and serves as the cornerstone of successful cooperation among participants in public–private partnership (PPP) projects. A decline in trust can result in unethical behavior, fractured relationships, and even project failure. Despite its critical importance, there is an insufficiency of research exploring the evolutionary dynamics of trust, particularly from the perspective of public participation. To address this, an evolutionary game model is constructed to analyze the evolution of behavioral strategies and identify their stable state from a dynamic perspective. The model examines the influence of trust levels and public participation on cooperation, revealing that trust asymmetry negatively impacts collaborative outcomes in PPP projects. There is an optimal trust level: trust positively influences cooperation up to a certain peak, beyond which excessive trust becomes detrimental and hinders cooperative outcomes. When trust levels are equal, the selection of behavioral strategies is influenced by the initial willingness of participants. A threshold exists for this initial willingness, above which cooperation is more likely to succeed. Additionally, public participation is found to significantly enhance cooperation. These conclusions advance the theoretical advancements of trust in PPP projects and offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in addressing trust-related challenges, thereby fostering sustainable collaboration.
Keywords: public–private partnership (PPP) projects; trust; public participation; evolutionary game public–private partnership (PPP) projects; trust; public participation; evolutionary game

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, E.; Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Hada, S. Evolutionary Mechanism of Trust for Public–Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation. Buildings 2025, 15, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391

AMA Style

Zhang W, Wang Y, Li E, Zhang C, Li H, Hada S. Evolutionary Mechanism of Trust for Public–Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation. Buildings. 2025; 15(3):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Wenjuan, Yuanming Wang, Enzhong Li, Chengyi Zhang, Huimin Li, and Srishti Hada. 2025. "Evolutionary Mechanism of Trust for Public–Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation" Buildings 15, no. 3: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391

APA Style

Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Li, E., Zhang, C., Li, H., & Hada, S. (2025). Evolutionary Mechanism of Trust for Public–Private Partnership Projects with Public Participation. Buildings, 15(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop