Next Article in Journal
Biology and Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2: Understandings for Therapeutic Developments against COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Coffee Pulp, a By-Product of Coffee Production, Modulates Gut Microbiota and Improves Metabolic Syndrome in High-Carbohydrate, High-Fat Diet-Fed Rats
Previous Article in Journal
First Characterisation of the Phoma Species Complex on Maize Leaves in Central Europe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Fungi and Archaea of the Gut Microbiota with Crohn’s Disease in Pediatric Patients—Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens10091217
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Cranberry Concentrate Decreases Adhesion and Invasion of Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82 In Vitro

by
Derek Zhang
1,
Lynn Verstrepen
2,
Jelle De Medts
2,
Cindy Duysburgh
2,
Pieter Van den Abbeele
3,
Massimo Marzorati
2,4 and
Christina Khoo
1,*
1
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., Lakeville-Middleboro, MA 02349, USA
2
ProDigest BV, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
3
Cryptobiotix SA, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
4
Center of Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(9), 1217; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091217
Submission received: 28 July 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 12 September 2021 / Published: 18 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Current Status of Research on Gut Metabolites and Microbiota)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
While many beneficial host–microbiota interactions have been described, imbalanced microbiota in the gut is speculated to contribute to the progression and recurrence of chronic inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s disease (CD). This in vitro study evaluated the impact of a cranberry concentrate Type M (CTM) on adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82, a pathobiont associated with CD. Different stages of pathogenic infection were investigated: (i) colonization of the mucus layer, and (ii) adhesion to and (iii) invasion of the epithelial cells. Following 48 h of fecal batch incubation, 0.5 and 1 mM of CTM significantly altered AIEC LF82 levels in a simulated mucus layer, resulting in a decrease of 50.5% in the untreated blank, down to 43.0% and 11.4%, respectively. At 1 mM of CTM, the significant decrease in the levels of AIEC LF82 coincided with a stimulation of the metabolic activity of the background microbiota. The increased levels of health-associated acetate (+7.9 mM) and propionate levels (+3.5 mM) suggested selective utilization of CTM by host microorganisms. Furthermore, 1 mM of both fermented and unfermented CTM decreased the adhesion and invasion of human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells by AIEC LF82. Altogether, this exploratory in vitro study demonstrates the prebiotic potential of CTM and supports its antipathogenic effects through direct and/or indirect modulation of the gut microbiome.

1. Introduction

The human gut is inhabited by a vast number of bacteria that have a substantial impact on human health [1]. Although the majority of gut microbes are commensal or mutualistic, pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella, Shigella, Helicobacter, Vibrio, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Clostridia, and Listeria can negatively affect human health via infectious diseases [2]. In contrast to pathogens that can often cause infectious disease in healthy hosts, pathobionts are defined as resident microbes that are innocuous to the host under normal conditions, yet associated with chronic inflammation [3]. Previous studies have shown correlations between the gut microbiome and chronic inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s disease (CD) [4,5,6,7]. In view of CD, adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) is a pathobiont of particular interest given its high prevalence in the inflamed ileal and colonic mucosa of CD patients [8]. It plays an important role in the induction and/or maintenance of intestinal inflammation, as reviewed by Chervy et al. [9]. Treatments should not only be developed to tackle the increasing incidence of CD (around 300 per 100,000 inhabitants in Europe/North America [10]), but also its social and economic burden (annual cost estimated to be around EUR 30 billion for Europe/North America in 2013 [11]).
Not everyone who ingests an infectious dose of a given pathogen will develop diseases [12]. In order to cause an infection, pathogens need to overcome several hurdles. First, pathogens need to be resistant to the actions of salivary enzymes and the acidic gastric environment [13]. Next, high concentrations of bile salts in the duodenum are toxic to certain bacterial groups [14,15]. Furthermore, the presence of a healthy, balanced host microbiota competes with pathogens for nutrients and space, and can produce metabolites that inhibit the growth and activities of pathogens [16]. If a pathogen surpasses these hurdles, it still needs to infect the host’s intestinal epithelial cells (IECs). This typically includes three steps: (i) adhesion to and penetration of the mucus layer that covers the surface of IECs, (ii) adhesion to IECs, and (iii) invasion of IECs [17]. AIEC is an interesting test strain for proof-of-concept studies, since it utilizes specialized strategies targeting each of these three steps. AIEC can penetrate the mucus layer by promoting mucin degradation with proteases [18]. Adhesion to IECs occurs via interactions between long polar fimbriae type 1 pili of AIEC and the carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 6 (CEACAM6) of the host [19,20]. AIEC utilizes bacterial effector delivery to invade host cells via outer membrane vesicles [21]. Different in vitro models have been applied to investigate AIEC colonization of the mucus layer [22] and its interaction with IECs [23]. Thus, these studies often focus on a single step of the infection process. However, it is important to investigate all three stages in order to obtain better insight into the antipathogenic effects.
The American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) is known to exert antipathogenic effects. In the course of urinary tract infections, uropathogenic E. coli adheres to uroepithelial cells via P-fimbriae [24]. Proanthocyanidins (PACs) (mostly A-type linkages) in cranberry products are capable of lowering this P-fimbriae-mediated adhesion [25,26]. Some lines of evidence also show that cranberries modulate microbiota in the gut [27]. In the study performed by Cai et al., dietary cranberry significantly suppressed colonic pro-inflammatory cytokines and decreased the abundance of potentially harmful bacteria, such as Sutterella and Bilophila, in dextran sodium sulfate treated mice. When dosed using an in vitro gut model, cranberries suppressed Enterobacteriaceae (to which E. coli belongs) and increased Bacteroidaceae [28]. Cranberry and its active ingredients, i.e., polyphenols such as anthocyanins, anthocyanidins, PACs, phenolics, and flavonols [29], are interesting candidates with which to develop strategies to combat pathogen-mediated infections.
This study aimed to investigate the antipathogenic effects of a cranberry concentrate Type M (CTM) against AIEC LF82 using an integrated in vitro approach to assess (i) adhesion to a simulated mucus layer in the presence of a simulated background microbiota, (ii) adhesion to human-derived epithelial cells (caco2-cells), and (iii) invasion of these epithelial cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Bornem, Belgium) unless otherwise stated. The CTM was supplied by Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc. (Lakeville-Middleboro, MA, USA). The composition of CTM was characterized (Table 1) and CTM was tested at concentrations of 0.5–1 mM proanthocyanidin (PAC). Gu et al. quantified that cranberry juice contains 231 mg PAC/L or around 60 mg per serving [30]. Similar as how Deprez et al. estimated that an intake of 45 mg PAC would result in a minimum concentration of 0.3 mM in the intestine [31], intake of 1–2 servings of cranberry juice would thus result in a concentration in the range of 0.5–1 mM which was thus selected as concentration range for the current project.

2.2. Single Strain and Growth Conditions

The ampicillin/erythromycin-resistant AIEC LF82, isolated from a chronic ileal lesion of a CD patient [32], was used as the AIEC reference strain. AIEC was grown in a nutrient broth at 37 °C under aerobic conditions upon inoculating 1% from a frozen stock stored at −80 °C with 20% (v/v) of glycerol.
Two media were used during fecal batch incubations. In Test 1, the background medium consisted of 5.2 g/L of K2HPO4, 16.3 g/L of KH2PO4, 2.0 g/L of NaHCO3 (Chem-lab NV, Zedelgem, Belgium), 2.0 g/L of Yeast Extract (Oxoid, Aalst, Belgium), 2.0 g/L of pepton (Oxoid, Aalst, Belgium), 1.0 g/L of mucin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.5 g/L of L-cystein, and 2.0 mL/L of Tween80. In Test 2, the concentrated background medium consisted of 7.6 g/L of K2HPO4, 23.9 g/L of KH2PO4, 2.9 g/L of NaHCO3 (Chem-lab NV, Zedelgem, Belgium), 2.9 g/L of Yeast Extract (Oxoid, Aalst, Belgium), 2.9 g/L of pepton (Oxoid, Aalst, Belgium), 1.5 g/L of mucin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 0.7 g/L of L-cystein, and 2.9 mL/L of Tween80.

2.3. Test 1: Fecal Batch Incubation

During Test 1, the impact of a single dose of CTM on AIEC LF82 levels, both in the luminal content and adherence to mucin-covered microcosms, was investigated in the presence of a background microbiota derived from a human adult donor (Figure 1A). Briefly, 49 mL of background medium was added to sterile 100 mL Duran bottles already containing 4 mucin-covered microcosms (AnoxKaldnes K1carrier, AnoxKaldnes AB, Lund, Sweden), prepared according to Van den Abbeele et al. [33]. The reactors also contained 0 mM of CTM (blank), 0.5 mM of CTM, or 1 mM of CTM. Prior to the start of the incubation, 1 mL of overnight-grown AIEC LF82 culture and 20 µL of freshly prepared 7.5% fecal slurry were administered. The fecal slurry was prepared as described by Moens et al. [34]. The dilution of the fecal sample resulted in a microbial dysbiosis, rendering the microbial community vulnerable to AIEC invasion [22]. All reactors were incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 48 h under continuous agitation (90 rpm), and were run in n = 3. Samples were collected at 0, 24, and 48 h for determination of pH, gas production, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), branched-chain fatty acids (bCFA), and luminal AIEC levels (via qPCR), while mucosal levels of AIEC were determined only at 48 h, since formation of a biofilm requires several days rather than several hours [35].
The AIEC numbers were determined by plating on a selective agar given the presence of a complex background microbiota, i.e., MacConkey (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) containing 50 mg/L of ampicillin and 20 mg/L of erythromycin, allowing the selective enumeration of AIEC LF82 within a complex microbiota [36]. Samples were serially diluted in saline solution (8.5 g/L of NaCl), after which plates were inoculated and incubated aerobically at 37 °C.

2.4. Test 2: Adhesion/Invasion and Invasion Assay

2.4.1. Adhesion/Invasion and Invasion Assay

For the adhesion/invasion and invasion assay (Figure 2A), Caco-2 cells (HTB-37; American Type Culture Collection) were seeded at 5 × 105 cells in 24-well plates coated with 0.1% gelatin. Cells were grown for 14 days in a complete medium (Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM HEPES, and 1X antibiotic-antimycotic), with 3 medium changes per week. Three days before the experiment, the medium was changed to an antibiotic-antimycotic free complete medium.
The AIEC was cultured for 7 h at 37 °C in nutrient broth, and kept overnight at 4 °C. On the day of the experiment, the cells were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 1% heat-inactivated FBS in the presence or absence of the test products. Bacteria were added to the cells, and after 3 h of incubation, cells were either (i) washed and lysed with 1% triton X-100 (=sum of adhered and invaded AIEC cells) or (ii) further incubated for 1 h in the presence of 250 mg/L of gentamycin, which kills all adhered AIEC cells without disturbing those that invaded the Caco-2 cells (as gentamycin does not permeate within Caco-2 cells). Finally, gentamycin-treated Caco-2 cells were washed and lysed to determine the number of invaded AIEC cells.
In each case, cell lysates and medium controls were plated on nutrient broth agar (non-selective agar, since AIEC was only bacteria present). After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, colonies were counted, and the colony forming units (CFU/mL) were determined.

2.4.2. Preparation of CTM-Containing Samples

The adhesion/invasion of AIEC upon CTM treatment was investigated for (i) the test product as such (at 0.5 mM and 1 mM), (ii) upon simulated digestion of CTM along the upper gastro-intestinal tract (GIT), and (iii) upon subsequent fermentation along the colon (Figure 2B). The CTM was dosed at a concentration of 3.5 mM in the small intestine, so that upon subsequent dilutions, a dose of 1 mM in the colon was reached.
In a fed state, the upper GIT simulation was performed as described by Marzorati et al. [37]. Briefly, the CTM was added to a SHIME nutritional medium, mimicking the stomach. After stomach incubation, pancreatic enzymes and bile salts were added to simulate the small intestinal phase. Incubations were performed at 37 °C under continuous shaking (90 rpm). Prior to being tested on the cells, the small intestinal samples containing 3.5 mM of CTM were diluted to reach a final concentration of 1 mM of CTM.
In addition to the adhesion/invasion assay testing, part of the small intestinal matrix was further incubated in a fecal batch incubation to mimic the colonic fermentation of CTM. The protocol of the fecal batch incubation was similar to the one described above for Test 1, but included slight modifications. Sterile reactors were filled with 43 mL of concentrated background medium (rather than 49 mL of non-concentrated background medium); 20 mL of upper GIT suspension and 7 mL of 7.5% fecal slurry were then added (rather than the 20 µL that was specifically applied to create dysbiosis and AIEC invasion in Test 1). Incubations were performed within a period of 48 h, at 37 °C, under shaking (90 rpm) and anaerobic conditions. In order to account for biological variability, all tests were performed in n = 3. Colonic samples collected after 48 h were filtered through a 0.22 µm filter to remove bacteria.

2.5. Microbial Metabolic Activity

The acidification during fecal batch incubations is a measure for the overall microbial activity, and was measured using a SenseLine F410 pH electrode (ProSense, Oosterhout, The Netherlands). Furthermore, SCFA (sum of acetate, propionate, and butyrate), bCFA (sum of isobutyrate, isovalerate, and isocaproate), and the sum thereof (total SCFA) were quantified by gas chromatography (GC) coupled with flame ionization detection (FID) as described by De Weirdt et al. [38].

2.6. Toxicity Test of Triton X-100 toward AIEC LF82

Prior to the adhesion/invasion assay, the viability of AIEC was evaluated following exposure to the lysis buffer containing triton X-100. Triton X-100 is known to affect the viability of some bacterial species [39]. Therefore, AIEC was cultured for 7 h at 37 °C in nutrient broth and kept overnight at 4 °C. The day of the viability test, AIEC cells were incubated for 30 min in the presence of 1% triton X-100 in PBS. AIEC levels were determined via plating on McConkey agar at the start and at the end of the incubation.

2.7. Toxicity Test of CTM, Upper GIT Suspension, and Colonic Suspension toward Caco-2 Cells

Prior to the adhesion/invasion assay, the viability of Caco-2 cells was tested after incubation with upper GIT and colonic suspension. Briefly, Caco-2 cells were again seeded at 5 × 105 cells in 24-well plates coated with 0.1% gelatin. Cells were grown for 14 days in a complete medium (DMEM supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 10 mM of HEPES, and 1× antibiotic-antimycotic), with 3 medium changes per week. On the day of the toxicity test, cells were incubated with CTM (at 1 mM, 0.5 mM, or 0.25 mM), upper GIT suspension, or colonic suspension. The latter two were diluted in a ratio of 1:5 in a complete medium. After 4 h of incubation at 37 °C, a cell viability assay was performed to assess the toxicity of the compounds, considering the WST-1 assay from Roche Diagnostics GmbH (Germany) that was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.8. Statistics

To evaluate statistical differences between blank and CTM treatment for each of the endpoints, one-way ANOVA analysis with post hoc Dunnett tests were performed. For metabolic markers, where comparisons were performed on multiple time points, a two-way ANOVA was performed. Significant differences are indicated by (*) = p < 0.05 and (**) = p < 0.01. Statistical analysis and figure preparation were conducted in GraphPad Prism v9.1.1 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. CTM Stimulated Activity of Background Microbiota and Lowered Colonization of Mucin-Coated Microcosms by AIEC (Test 1)

At the start of the incubation, 7.43 ± 0.20 log CFU/mL of AIEC LF82 was added to the reactors. AIEC LF82 colonized the reactors up to abundances of around 9 log CFU/mL, with no differences being observed between the blank and CTM treatment in the luminal content (Figure 3A). In contrast, AIEC levels decreased in the simulated mucus layer by 50.5% in the blank to 43.0% and 11.4% when CTM was dosed at 0.5 and 1 mM, respectively (Figure 3B). The decrease was statistically significant following 1 mM of CTM treatment (p = 0.032).
The lower colonization of the mucus layer by AIEC coincided with an overall more pronounced acidification following incubation with 1 mM of CTM. At 24 h, the pH was lower in the group receiving the dosing of 1 mM (p = 0.026), with the effect being even more pronounced at 48 h (p = 0.001). This stronger acidification was in part due to the acids present in the test products with an initial pH of 6.65 ± 0.01, 6.57 ± 0.02, and 6.53 ± 0.00 for the blank, and 0.5 and 1 mM of CTM, respectively. This acidification effect could also be the consequence of enhanced microbial metabolism stimulated upon CTM administration (Figure 4), as demonstrated by the increased production of SCFA upon dosing 1 mM of CTM. At 24 h, 1 mM of CTM significantly increased acetate (+7.4 mM; p = 0.005), propionate (+4.6 mM; p = 0.0004), and total SCFA levels (+12.4 mM; p = 0.001). At 48 h, similar effects were observed, with increases in acetate (+7.9 mM; p = 0.003), propionate (+3.5 mM; p = 0.004), and thus total SCFA levels (+11.0 mM; p = 0.003). At 48 h, 1 mM of CTM also decreased bCFA levels (−1.05 mM; p = 0.043).

3.2. CTM Lowered Adhesion/Invasion and Invasion of Epithelial Cells (Test 2)

Prior to the adhesion/invasion assay, it was confirmed that AIEC viability was not affected by the lysis procedure that was used to release invaded AIEC cells from the human epithelial Caco-2 cells (Figure 5A).
The toxicity effect of CTM in the upper GIT and colonic matrix on Caco-2 cells was evaluated. In the absence of product and matrix toxicity, one would know that an observed effect is caused by AIEC, but not by the product or matrix. A WST-1 test confirmed that cell viability was not affected by the matrices or by any of the concentrations of CTM tested (Figure 5B–D), so CTM could be tested in the in vitro model under investigation.
As in Test 1, the most pronounced effects were observed at the highest test dose of CTM (Figure 6A). While the sum of adhered/invaded AIEC LF82 cells tended to decrease upon dosing 1 mM of CTM (p = 0.089), the invaded AIEC LF82 fraction decreased significantly to 32.0% (p = 0.043) versus the blank. The 0.5 mM dose did not significantly affect the sum of adhered/invaded cells. However, it significantly decreased the invaded AIEC fraction to 29.1% versus the blank (p = 0.035).
Therefore, only the highest dose (1 mM) was tested upon upper GIT (Figure 6B) and colonic incubation (Figure 6C). While upper GIT digestion of CTM seemed to attenuate the effects of CTM on adhesion/invasion, upon colonic fermentation, the effects of CTM were more pronounced. The dose of 1 mM of CTM decreased the sum of adhered/invaded AIEC cells to 40.4% (p = 0.009), and the invaded fraction was decreased to 26.6% (p = 0.003).

4. Discussion

Using a combination of in vitro models ranging from fecal batch incubations to Caco-2 cell adhesion/invasion assays, this in vitro study demonstrated the prebiotic potential of the polyphenol-rich, cranberry-derived product CTM, provided it was dosed in a sufficient amount (1 mM). While prebiotics for dietary applications have often been involved in the use of indigestible carbohydrates such as inulin [40], a recent international scientific consensus suggested including polyphenol-rich products as prebiotics, which are currently defined as a substrate that is selectively utilized by host microorganisms, thus conferring a health benefit [41].
The key health benefit of the CTM was its antipathogenic effect, as demonstrated during the current study using AIEC LF82 as a model organism. Not only did CTM lower the adhesion of AIEC LF82 to mucins, but it also lowered adhesion of AIEC LF82 to human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells and subsequent invasion by acting on three different levels involved in pathogenic infections [17]. While none of the effects achieved a complete eradication of the pathogen, CTM could exert a potent antipathogenic effect. The effect of cranberry-derived products on E. coli is in line with the already reported antimicrobial properties of phenolic compounds extracted from cranberry [28,42,43]. Although anti-adhesive effects have been described previously, such effects were observed in the context of cranberry-derived PACs decreasing P-fimbriae-mediated adhesion of uropathogenic E. coli along the urinary tract [25,26]. In contrast to uropathogenic E. coli, AIEC LF82 adheres to the cells via type 1 pilli [19], suggesting that the underlying mode of action of the anti-adhesive effect might be different in the gut versus the urinary tract. A potential mechanism worth investigating is the indirect antipathogenic effect via modulation of the background microbiota. Previous studies demonstrated that probiotic strains, such as Bifidobacterium, have an anti-adhesion and anti-virulence effect on AIEC in in vitro [44] or inflammatory bowel disease [45]. Further investigation into the stimulation of such beneficial bacteria could complement the direct impact of the CTM on AIEC invasion.
In addition to conferring a health benefit, a second key criterion of the definition of prebiotics is the selective utilization of CTM by the gut microbiota. Such selective utilization is supported by the current study, given the observed selective modulation of metabolic activity with the supplementation of 1 mM of CTM. More specifically, the increase in the acetate and propionate levels following CTM supplementation suggests the selective utilization of CTM by microorganisms that are able to produce these metabolites. An important observation was that CTM decreased the initial pH of the incubation. This provides a potential mode of action by which CTM could impact the gut microbiota. A lower pH favors colonization of acid-resistant Bifidobacterium species [46]. Even if CTM is not easily fermented, it might already result in a different outcome of the fermentation by promoting the growth of Bifidobacterium species, resulting in an enhanced acetate level [47]. In addition to Bifidobacterium species, other microbial species involved in CTM utilization could be Bacteroidaceae members. These bacteria were recently found to be selected upon cranberry concentrate administration to an in vitro gut model, at the expense of Enterobacteriaceae (to which E. coli belongs) [28]. Bacteroidaceae are abundant acetate and propionate producers [48]. Another contributing species could be Akkermansia muciniphila, another potent acetate and propionate producer [49,50] recently found to be enriched in rodents that were fed a polyphenol-rich cranberry extract, coinciding with protection from diet-induced obesity, insulin resistance, and intestinal inflammation [51]. Independent of the underlying SCFA producing microbes in the current study, both acetate and propionate have been associated with well-documented health benefits. As reviewed by Rivière et al. [52], acetate and propionate both exert anti-inflammatory effects, while propionate specifically promotes satiety, lowers blood cholesterol, decreases liver lipogenesis, and improves insulin sensitivity. Acetate could also serve as an energy source for muscle and brain tissue. Finally, the decrease in bCFA levels upon dosing CTM at 1 mM further suggests a beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota by CTM. bCFA are associated with proteolytic fermentation [53] and the formation of other metabolites with detrimental health effects [54,55]. Altogether, the findings at the metabolic level suggest that CTM could confer health benefits upon its selective utilization by host microorganisms.
Finally, a critical remark on the adhesion/invasion assay needs to be made. If a test product increases or decreases the number of AIEC cells in the medium used to culture the epithelial cells, it will affect the number of cells that can subsequently adhere to or invade the Caco-2 cells. The impact of growth-related effects was minimized in our adhesion and invasion assays with an incubation time as short as 3 h. An additional weakness of the assay is the relatively large variability in the adhesion/invasion and invasion assays. It might warrant more replicates to obtain a statistically robust analysis.

5. Conclusions

Overall, the cranberry-derived test product under investigation has prebiotic potential due to the selective stimulation of specific health-related metabolites, and the potent antipathogenic effects against AIEC LF82. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms and broaden the understanding of the background microbiota during the fermentation of CTM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.K., D.Z. and M.M.; methodology, L.V., J.D.M. and C.D.; formal analysis, L.V., J.D.M. and C.D.; investigation, L.V., J.D.M., C.D. and P.V.d.A.; resources, D.Z. and C.K.; writing—original draft preparation, P.V.d.A.; writing—review and editing, D.Z., C.K. and M.M.; supervision, D.Z., C.K. and P.V.d.A.; project administration, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The studies described in this manuscript were performed at the request of and were funded by Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University Hospital Ghent (reference number B670201836585). The investigations were carried out following the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study participant gave informed consent.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the subject involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Elizabeth Johnson (Ocean Spray) Aurélien Baudot (Cryptobiotix) for proof-reading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

D.Z. and C.K. are employees of Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. D.Z. and C.K. participated in the design of the study, the interpretation of the data, and the revision of the manuscript; D.Z and C.K. did not participate in the collection or analyses of data.

References

  1. Marchesi, J.R.; Adams, D.H.; Fava, F.; Hermes, G.D.A.; Hirschfield, G.M.; Hold, G.; Quraishi, M.N.; Kinross, J.; Smidt, H.; Tuohy, K.M.; et al. The Gut Microbiota and Host Health: A New Clinical Frontier. Gut 2016, 65, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jandhyala, S.M.; Talukdar, R.; Subramanyam, C.; Vuyyuru, H.; Sasikala, M.; Nageshwar Reddy, D. Role of the Normal Gut Microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chow, J.; Tang, H.; Mazmanian, S.K. Pathobionts of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Inflammatory Disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011, 23, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Frank, D.N.; St. Amand, A.L.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-Phylogenetic Characterization of Microbial Community Imbalances in Human Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Walker, A.W.; Sanderson, J.D.; Churcher, C.; Parkes, G.C.; Hudspith, B.N.; Rayment, N.; Brostoff, J.; Parkhill, J.; Dougan, G.; Petrovska, L. High-Throughput Clone Library Analysis of the Mucosa-Associated Microbiota Reveals Dysbiosis and Differences between Inflamed and Non-Inflamed Regions of the Intestine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sokol, H., Dr.; Seksik, P.; Rigottier-Gois, L.; Lay, C.; Lepage, P.; Podglajen, I.; Marteau, P.; Doré, J. Specificities of the Fecal Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2006, 12, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sokol, H.; Brot, L.; Stefanescu, C.; Auzolle, C.; Barnich, N.; Buisson, A.; Fumery, M.; Pariente, B.; Bourhis, L.L.; Treton, X.; et al. Prominence of Ileal Mucosa-Associated Microbiota to Predict Postoperative Endoscopic Recurrence in Crohn’s Disease. Gut 2020, 69, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nadalian, B.; Yadegar, A.; Houri, H.; Olfatifar, M.; Shahrokh, S.; Aghdaei, H.A.; Suzuki, H.; Zali, M.R. Prevalence of the Pathobiont Adherent-Invasive Escherichia Coli and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 36, 852–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chervy, M.; Barnich, N.; Denizot, J. Adherent-Invasive, E. Coli: Update on the Lifestyle of a Troublemaker in Crohn’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; et al. Worldwide Incidence and Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2017, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Floyd, D.N.; Langham, S.; Séverac, H.C.; Levesque, B.G. The Economic and Quality-of-Life Burden of Crohn’s Disease in Europe and the United States, 2000 to 2013: A Systematic Review. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2015, 60, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vonaesch, P.; Anderson, M.; Sansonetti, P.J. Pathogens, Microbiome and the Host: Emergence of the Ecological Koch’s Postulates. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Eusebi, L.H.; Rabitti, S.; Artesiani, M.L.; Gelli, D.; Montagnani, M.; Zagari, R.M.; Bazzoli, F. Proton Pump Inhibitors: Risks of Long-Term Use. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 32, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Clements, W.D.; Parks, R.; Erwin, P.; Halliday, M.I.; Barr, J.; Rowlands, B.J. Role of the Gut in the Pathophysiology of Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction. Gut 1996, 39, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V.; Bartolí, R.; Planas, R.; Hofmann, A.F.; Viñado, B.; Hagey, L.R.; Hernández, J.M.; Mañé, J.; Alvarez, M.A.; Ausina, V.; et al. Oral Bile Acids Reduce Bacterial Overgrowth, Bacterial Translocation, and Endotoxemia in Cirrhotic Rats. Hepatology 2003, 37, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fukuda, S.; Toh, H.; Hase, K.; Oshima, K.; Nakanishi, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Tobe, T.; Clarke, J.M.; Topping, D.L.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Bifidobacteria Can Protect from Enteropathogenic Infection through Production of Acetate. Nature 2011, 469, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ribet, D.; Cossart, P. How Bacterial Pathogens Colonize Their Hosts and Invade Deeper Tissues. Microbes Infect. 2015, 17, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gibold, L.; Garenaux, E.; Dalmasso, G.; Gallucci, C.; Cia, D.; Mottet-Auselo, B.; Faïs, T.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Nguyen, H.T.T.; Barnich, N.; et al. The Vat-AIEC Protease Promotes Crossing of the Intestinal Mucus Layer by Crohn’s Disease-Associated Escherichia Coli. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Keita, Å.V.; Alkaissi, L.Y.; Holm, E.B.; Heil, S.D.S.; Chassaing, B.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; McKay, D.M.; Söderholm, J.D. Enhanced E. Coli LF82 Translocation through the Follicle-Associated Epithelium in Crohn’s Disease Is Dependent on Long Polar Fimbriae and CEACAM6 Expression, and Increases Paracellular Permeability. J. Crohn. Colitis 2020, 14, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Barnich, N.; Carvalho, F.A.; Glasser, A.-L.; Darcha, C.; Jantscheff, P.; Allez, M.; Peeters, H.; Bommelaer, G.; Desreumaux, P.; Colombel, J.-F.; et al. CEACAM6 Acts as a Receptor for Adherent-Invasive E. Coli, Supporting Ileal Mucosa Colonization in Crohn Disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Rolhion, N.; Hofman, P.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A. The Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response Chaperone Gp96, a Host Receptor for Crohn Disease-Associated Adherent-Invasive Escherichia Coli. Gut Microbes 2011, 2, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van den Abbeele, P.; Marzorati, M.; Derde, M.; De Weirdt, R.; Joan, V.; Possemiers, S.; Van de Wiele, T. Arabinoxylans, Inulin and Lactobacillus Reuteri 1063 Repress the Adherent-Invasive Escherichia Coli from Mucus in a Mucosa-Comprising Gut Model. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2016, 2, 16016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barrila, J.; Crabbé, A.; Yang, J.; Franco, K.; Nydam, S.D.; Forsyth, R.J.; Davis, R.R.; Gangaraju, S.; Ott, C.M.; Coyne, C.B.; et al. Modeling Host-Pathogen Interactions in the Context of the Microenvironment: Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Comes of Age. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00282–e00318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lane, M.C.; Mobley, H.L.T. Role of P-Fimbrial-Mediated Adherence in Pyelonephritis and Persistence of Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli (UPEC) in the Mammalian Kidney. Kidney Int. 2007, 72, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Howell, A.B.; Botto, H.; Combescure, C.; Blanc-Potard, A.-B.; Gausa, L.; Matsumoto, T.; Tenke, P.; Sotto, A.; Lavigne, J.-P. Dosage Effect on Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli Anti-Adhesion Activity in Urine Following Consumption of Cranberry Powder Standardized for Proanthocyanidin Content: A Multicentric Randomized Double Blind Study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Tao, Y.; Pinzón-Arango, P.A.; Howell, A.B.; Camesano, T.A. Oral Consumption of Cranberry Juice Cocktail Inhibits Molecular-Scale Adhesion of Clinical Uropathogenic Escherichia Coli. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Cai, X.; Han, Y.; Gu, M.; Song, M.; Wu, X.; Li, Z.; Li, F.; Goulette, T.; Xiao, H. Dietary Cranberry Suppressed Colonic Inflammation and Alleviated Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Treated Mice. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6331–6341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’Connor, K.; Morrissette, M.; Strandwitz, P.; Ghiglieri, M.; Caboni, M.; Liu, H.; Khoo, C.; D’Onofrio, A.; Lewis, K. Cranberry Extracts Promote Growth of Bacteroidaceae and Decrease Abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in a Human Gut Simulator Model. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0224836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Anhê, F.F.; Varin, T.V.; Le Barz, M.; Desjardins, Y.; Levy, E.; Roy, D.; Marette, A. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Obesity-Linked Metabolic Diseases and Prebiotic Potential of Polyphenol-Rich Extracts. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2015, 4, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gu, L.; Kelm, M.A.; Hammerstone, J.F.; Beecher, G.; Holden, J.; Haytowitz, D.; Gebhardt, S.; Prior, R.L. Concentrations of Proanthocyanidins in Common Foods and Estimations of Normal Consumption. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deprez, S.; Mila, I.; Huneau, J.-F.; Tome, D.; Scalbert, A. Transport of Proanthocyanidin Dimer, Trimer, and Polymer Across Monolayers of Human Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cells. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2001, 3, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Neut, C.; Barnich, N.; Lederman, E.; Di Martino, P.; Desreumaux, P.; Gambiez, L.; Joly, B.; Cortot, A.; Colombel, J.F. Presence of Adherent Escherichia Coli Strains in Ileal Mucosa of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 1998, 115, 1405–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Van den Abbeele, P.; Belzer, C.; Goossens, M.; Kleerebezem, M.; De Vos, W.M.; Thas, O.; De Weirdt, R.; Kerckhof, F.-M.; Van de Wiele, T. Butyrate-Producing Clostridium Cluster XIVa Species Specifically Colonize Mucins in an in Vitro Gut Model. ISME J. 2013, 7, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Moens, F.; Duysburgh, C.; van den Abbeele, P.; Morera, M.; Marzorati, M. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Boulardii Exert Synergistic Antipathogenic Activity in Vitro against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli. Benef. Microbes 2019, 10, 923–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Stoodley, P.; Sauer, K.; Davies, D.G.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilm as Complex Differentiated Communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2002, 56, 187–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bretin, A.; Lucas, C.; Larabi, A.; Dalmasso, G.; Billard, E.; Barnich, N.; Bonnet, R.; Nguyen, H.T.T. AIEC Infection Triggers Modification of Gut Microbiota Composition in Genetically Predisposed Mice, Contributing to Intestinal Inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marzorati, M.; Possemiers, S.; Verhelst, A.; Cadé, D.; Madit, N.; Van de Wiele, T. A Novel Hypromellose Capsule, with Acid Resistance Properties, Permits the Targeted Delivery of Acid-Sensitive Products to the Intestine. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 60, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Weirdt, R.; Possemiers, S.; Vermeulen, G.; Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T.C.W.; Boschker, H.T.S.; Verstraete, W.; Van de Wiele, T. Human Faecal Microbiota Display Variable Patterns of Glycerol Metabolism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 74, 601–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Tsilia, V.; Van den Abbeele, P.; Van de Wiele, T. Improved in Vitro Assay for Determining the Mucin Adherence of Bacteria Sensitive to Triton X-100 Treatment. Folia Microbiol. 2015, 60, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Le Bastard, Q.; Chapelet, G.; Javaudin, F.; Lepelletier, D.; Batard, E.; Montassier, E. The Effects of Inulin on Gut Microbial Composition: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Human Studies. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020, 39, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert Consensus Document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on the Definition and Scope of Prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Caillet, S.; Côté, J.; Sylvain, J.-F.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial Effects of Fractions from Cranberry Products on the Growth of Seven Pathogenic Bacteria. Food Control 2012, 23, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Côté, J.; Caillet, S.; Doyon, G.; Dussault, D.; Sylvain, J.-F.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial Effect of Cranberry Juice and Extracts. Food Control 2011, 22, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Boudeau, J.; Glasser, A.-L.; Julien, S.; Colombel, J.-F.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A. Inhibitory Effect of Probiotic Escherichia Coli Strain Nissle 1917 on Adhesion to and Invasion of Intestinal Epithelial Cells by Adherent-Invasive E. Coli Strains Isolated from Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 18, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Leccese, G.; Bibi, A.; Mazza, S.; Facciotti, F.; Caprioli, F.; Landini, P.; Paroni, M. Probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Strains Counteract Adherent-Invasive Escherichia Coli (AIEC) Virulence and Hamper IL-23/Th17 Axis in Ulcerative Colitis, but Not in Crohn’s Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chung, C.-S.; Chang, P.-F.; Liao, C.-H.; Lee, T.-H.; Chen, Y.; Lee, Y.-C.; Wu, M.-S.; Wang, H.-P.; Ni, Y.-H. Differences of Microbiota in Small Bowel and Faeces between Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients and Healthy Subjects. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 51, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Vuyst, L.; Moens, F.; Selak, M.; Rivière, A.; Leroy, F. Summer Meeting 2013: Growth and Physiology of Bifidobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 116, 477–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Formation of Propionate and Butyrate by the Human Colonic Microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Naito, Y.; Uchiyama, K.; Takagi, T. A Next-Generation Beneficial Microbe: Akkermansia Muciniphila. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2018, 63, 33–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Derrien, M.; Vaughan, E.E.; Plugge, C.M.; de Vos, W.M. Akkermansia Muciniphila Gen. Nov., Sp. Nov., a Human Intestinal Mucin-Degrading Bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1469–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Anhê, F.F.; Roy, D.; Pilon, G.; Dudonné, S.; Matamoros, S.; Varin, T.V.; Garofalo, C.; Moine, Q.; Desjardins, Y.; Levy, E.; et al. A Polyphenol-Rich Cranberry Extract Protects from Diet-Induced Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Intestinal Inflammation in Association with Increased Akkermansia Spp. Population in the Gut Microbiota of Mice. Gut 2015, 64, 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Rivière, A.; Selak, M.; Lantin, D.; Leroy, F.; De Vuyst, L. Bifidobacteria and Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria: Importance and Strategies for Their Stimulation in the Human Gut. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Davila, A.-M.; Blachier, F.; Gotteland, M.; Andriamihaja, M.; Benetti, P.-H.; Sanz, Y.; Tomé, D. Intestinal Luminal Nitrogen Metabolism: Role of the Gut Microbiota and Consequences for the Host. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 68, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nowak, A.; Libudzisz, Z. Influence of Phenol, p-Cresol and Indole on Growth and Survival of Intestinal Lactic Acid Bacteria. Anaerobe 2006, 12, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kikugawa, K.; Kato, T. Formation of a Mutagenic Diazoquinone by Interaction of Phenol with Nitrite. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 1988, 26, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 10 01217 g001 550
Figure 1. Reactor design (A), and timeline and analysis (B) of Test 1. The effect of cranberry concentrate Type M (tested at 0.5 mM and 1 mM) was evaluated for the adhesion of AIEC LF82 to mucin-adhered microcosms (n = 3).
Figure 1. Reactor design (A), and timeline and analysis (B) of Test 1. The effect of cranberry concentrate Type M (tested at 0.5 mM and 1 mM) was evaluated for the adhesion of AIEC LF82 to mucin-adhered microcosms (n = 3).
Pathogens 10 01217 g001
Pathogens 10 01217 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Schematic overview of in vitro procedure to test the impact of cranberry concentrate Type M on adhesion/invasion and invasion of AIEC LF82 to human-derived epithelial cells (Test 2). (B) Cranberry concentrate Type M was tested as such upon upper GIT incubation and upon simulated colonic incubation (n = 3).
Figure 2. (A) Schematic overview of in vitro procedure to test the impact of cranberry concentrate Type M on adhesion/invasion and invasion of AIEC LF82 to human-derived epithelial cells (Test 2). (B) Cranberry concentrate Type M was tested as such upon upper GIT incubation and upon simulated colonic incubation (n = 3).
Pathogens 10 01217 g002
Pathogens 10 01217 g003 550
Figure 3. Average (±SEM) AIEC LF82 levels in the lumen (A) (log CFU/mL) and mucus (B); proportion (%) of the abundance in mucus (CFU/g) versus the abundance in lumen (CFU/mL) during 48 h fecal batch incubations upon treatment with 0 (blank), 0.5, or 1 mM of cranberry concentrate Type M (test 1). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a one-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 3. Average (±SEM) AIEC LF82 levels in the lumen (A) (log CFU/mL) and mucus (B); proportion (%) of the abundance in mucus (CFU/g) versus the abundance in lumen (CFU/mL) during 48 h fecal batch incubations upon treatment with 0 (blank), 0.5, or 1 mM of cranberry concentrate Type M (test 1). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a one-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Pathogens 10 01217 g003
Pathogens 10 01217 g004 550
Figure 4. Average (±SEM) acidity (A), together with levels of acetate (B), propionate (C), butyrate (D), bCFA (E), and total SCFA (F) during 48 h fecal batch incubations upon treatment with 0 (blank), 0.5, or 1 mM of cranberry concentrate Type M (test 1). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a two-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.01) (n = 3).
Figure 4. Average (±SEM) acidity (A), together with levels of acetate (B), propionate (C), butyrate (D), bCFA (E), and total SCFA (F) during 48 h fecal batch incubations upon treatment with 0 (blank), 0.5, or 1 mM of cranberry concentrate Type M (test 1). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a two-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.01) (n = 3).
Pathogens 10 01217 g004
Pathogens 10 01217 g005 550
Figure 5. Viability of AIEC LF82 (log CFU/mL) at the end of the lysis procedure with triton X-100 (used to lyse the human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells during the invasion assay) (n = 1) (A). Cell viability (as measured via a WST-1 absorbance test) of human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells following 4 h incubation with CTM (n = 1) (B), upon undergoing a simulated upper GIT (n = 3) (C), and colonic incubation (n = 3) (D), each time versus an untreated blank.
Figure 5. Viability of AIEC LF82 (log CFU/mL) at the end of the lysis procedure with triton X-100 (used to lyse the human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells during the invasion assay) (n = 1) (A). Cell viability (as measured via a WST-1 absorbance test) of human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells following 4 h incubation with CTM (n = 1) (B), upon undergoing a simulated upper GIT (n = 3) (C), and colonic incubation (n = 3) (D), each time versus an untreated blank.
Pathogens 10 01217 g005
Pathogens 10 01217 g006 550
Figure 6. Average (±SEM) AIEC LF82 adhesion/invasion and invasion (expressed as proportion of the viable cells as determined via plating (CFU) in the treatment versus the blank) of human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells (Test 2). Effects were assessed for the cranberry concentrate Type M (A), upon upper GIT incubation (B), and upon simulated colonic incubation (C). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a one-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.01) (n = 3).
Figure 6. Average (±SEM) AIEC LF82 adhesion/invasion and invasion (expressed as proportion of the viable cells as determined via plating (CFU) in the treatment versus the blank) of human-derived epithelial Caco-2 cells (Test 2). Effects were assessed for the cranberry concentrate Type M (A), upon upper GIT incubation (B), and upon simulated colonic incubation (C). Statistical differences versus the blank were calculated using a one-way ANOVA analysis with a post hoc Dunnett test and are indicated with * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.01) (n = 3).
Pathogens 10 01217 g006
Table
Table 1. Composition of the cranberry concentrate Type M (CTM). PAC: proanthocyanidin; BL-DMAC: Brunswick Labs 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde method, with procyanidin A2 dimer as standard; OSC DMAC: Ocean Spray Cranberries 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde method, with proprietary PAC extract from cranberries as standard.
Table 1. Composition of the cranberry concentrate Type M (CTM). PAC: proanthocyanidin; BL-DMAC: Brunswick Labs 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde method, with procyanidin A2 dimer as standard; OSC DMAC: Ocean Spray Cranberries 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde method, with proprietary PAC extract from cranberries as standard.
ComponentsCranberry Concentrate Type M (CTM)
total anthocyanins (mg/kg)570
organic acids (%)19.4
sugars (%)23.4
flavonols (mg/kg)940
phenolic acids (mg/kg)1245
PAC--BL DMAC (dwb; mg/kg)11,250
PAC--OSC DMAC (dwb; mg/kg)32,975
total phenolics (mg/g)—measured by Folin–Ciocalteu method15.6
Brix50.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, D.; Verstrepen, L.; De Medts, J.; Duysburgh, C.; Van den Abbeele, P.; Marzorati, M.; Khoo, C. A Cranberry Concentrate Decreases Adhesion and Invasion of Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82 In Vitro. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091217

AMA Style

Zhang D, Verstrepen L, De Medts J, Duysburgh C, Van den Abbeele P, Marzorati M, Khoo C. A Cranberry Concentrate Decreases Adhesion and Invasion of Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82 In Vitro. Pathogens. 2021; 10(9):1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091217

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Derek, Lynn Verstrepen, Jelle De Medts, Cindy Duysburgh, Pieter Van den Abbeele, Massimo Marzorati, and Christina Khoo. 2021. "A Cranberry Concentrate Decreases Adhesion and Invasion of Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82 In Vitro" Pathogens 10, no. 9: 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091217

APA Style

Zhang, D., Verstrepen, L., De Medts, J., Duysburgh, C., Van den Abbeele, P., Marzorati, M., & Khoo, C. (2021). A Cranberry Concentrate Decreases Adhesion and Invasion of Escherichia coli (AIEC) LF82 In Vitro. Pathogens, 10(9), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10091217

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop