Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity, Virulence, and Antibiotic Resistance Determinants of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates in Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
An Overview of Aspergillus Species Associated with Plant Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Current Status of the Diagnosis of Brugia spp. Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant and Antifungal Properties of Cinnamon, Cloves, Melia azedarach L. and Ocimum gratissimum L. Extracts against Fusarium oxysporum Isolated from Infected Vegetables in Mauritius
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Filamentous Fungi Associated with Disease Symptoms in Non-Native Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany—A Gateway for Alien Fungal Pathogens?

Department of Forest Protection, Northwest German Forest Research Institute (NW-FVA), Grätzelstraße 2, D37079 Goettingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(9), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090715
Submission received: 19 June 2024 / Revised: 31 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Filamentous Fungal Pathogens: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Filamentous fungi associated with disease symptoms in non-native giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany were investigated in ten cases of disease in Northwest Germany. During the study period from 2018 to 2023, a total of 81 species of Dikaria were isolated from woody tissue and needles of giant sequoia and morphotyped. Morphotypes were assigned to species designations based on ITS-sequence comparison and, in part, multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. Nine species were recognised as new reports for Germany or on giant sequoia: Amycosphaerella africana, Botryosphaeria parva, Coniochaeta acaciae, C. velutina, Muriformistrickeria rubi, Pestalotiopsis australis, P. monochaeta, Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis, and Rhizosphaera minteri. The threat posed to giant sequoia and other forest trees in Germany by certain, especially newly reported, fungal species is being discussed. The detection of a considerable number of new fungal records in the trees studied suggests that giant sequoia cultivation may be a gateway for alien fungal species in Germany.

1. Introduction

In the face of ongoing climate change, many European tree species are experiencing a loss of vitality and dieback, especially since the repeated drought and heat years from 2018 onwards. Prolonged periods of unusually high temperatures, high solar radiation, and precipitation deficits have led, for example, to the outbreak of complex disease and the vitality loss of beech in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) [1,2] in Germany. Native latent pathogens of beech, such as Neonectria coccinea (Pers.) Rossman & Samuels or Biscogniauxia nummularia (Bull.) Kuntze, have played a major role in the course of damage as key organisms. In detailed investigations of the fungal pathogens involved, Diplodia corticola A.J.L. Phillips, A. Alves & J. Luque was detected for the first time in Germany and worldwide on European beech [1,2]. So far, it has not been possible to clarify whether this species is native or whether it has been converted in the course of climate change and globalisation. Diplodia corticola is a latent plant pathogen that has frequently been isolated from physiologically impaired oak trees [3] and grapevine cankers [4].
Additionally, non-native tree species such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco) have come under drought stress under the environmental conditions since 2018, showing a loss of vitality and signs of death often associated with fungal pathogens [5]. In Germany, the main mortality factors of Douglas fir are fungi that have spread from native tree species to Douglas fir, such as Armillaria ostoyae (Romagn.) Herink, Diplodia sapinea (Fr.) Fuckel, Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref., and Sirococcus conigenus (Pers.) P.F. Cannon & Minter. Additionally, Douglas-fir-specific alien fungal species, such as Nothophaeocryptopus gaeumannii (T. Rohde) Videira, C. Nakash., U. Braun & Crous lead to a loss of vitality in the affected trees [5]. Besides climate change and globalisation, alien pathogens are among the most important triggers of emerging fungal diseases in forest trees [6].
Alien invasive organisms can have substantial negative impacts on forest ecosystems, their biodiversity, their species, and their communities [7,8,9]. Invasions by alien pests and pathogens can cause enormous damage to forests, leading to the near extinction of some tree species [9,10], as occurred, for example, with the introduction of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral, Queloz & Hosoya to Europe [11]. Invasions by non-native species are the fourth most important pressure directly driving global biodiversity loss [12]. Over the last 200 years, Europe has experienced an unprecedented increase in the number of forest pathogen introductions. This is largely due to human-assisted international transport and the trade of plants and plant materials [13,14,15]. As with plants, emerging infectious diseases of trees are closely linked to biological invasions and are often caused by the arrival of previously unrecognised pathogens or newly evolved species [16,17,18]. In this context, fungal and fungus-like infections have always played a major role [13,19]. The inventory of invasive forest pathogens (IFPs) in Europe, compiled by Santini et al. (2012) [13], has recorded 123 taxa (70% Ascomycota, Basidiomycota 21%, and 9% Oomycota), of which 42% are considered alien. For 28% of the IFPs, a European origin could be determined, but for 26% of species the actual origin was unclear. In almost 25% of all disease cases, IFPs lead to the death of the host tree. Commonly caused symptoms are tree dieback (37%) and growth reduction in the host tree (40%), or the death of the host tree (25%).
The giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) J.Buchholz) in the family of Cupressaceae originates from California (Sierra Nevada). It grows primarily in the temperate biome and has been introduced to Austria, France, and Great Britain [20]. According to the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BFN), there is an unstable neophytic occurrence in Germany. The giant sequoia was introduced to Europe in the mid-19th century and has since proved to be a largely hardy park tree [21]. As a light-demanding tree species, giant sequoia does not tolerate overshadowing or lateral pressure by other trees, which affects its ability to mix with other tree species [22]. When young, giant sequoia is sensitive to frost. In a growing trial in Germany, trees in some areas suffered from Armillaria [23].
Shoot dieback and Botryosphaeria canker on giant sequoia caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea (Moug.) Ces. & De Not. occur in both Europe [24,25,26] and North America [27]. The diseases are more pronounced in regions where giant sequoia is non-native [28]. Botryosphaeria dothidea (anamorph: Fusicoccum aesculi Corda) is the type species of the genus Botryosphaeria (Botryosphaeriaceae, Botryosphaeriales), but Slippers et al. 2004 [29] have shown that many fungi described under B. dothidea belong to other species. In the last 20 years, it has become apparent that B. dothidea is one of the most widespread and important endophytes, and this pathogen was found on a wide range agricultural and forestry plants [30]. Botryosphaeria dothidea is a host-stress-associated pathogen, and the stress is usually triggered by abiotic factors such as a lack of water or heat. Disease symptoms are cankers on twigs, branches and stems; the dieback of tips and branches; fruit rot; and blue stain [30]. Population analyses from Slovenia and Italy on European hop hornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) suggest that B. dothidea may be a native pathogen to Europe [31]. Additional Botryosphaeriaceae have been detected as pathogens on S. giganteum, such as Botryosphaeria parva (Pennycook & Samuels) Crous, Slippers & A.J.L. Phillips (anamorph: Neofusicoccum parvum (Pennycook & Samuels) Crous, Slippers & A.J.L. Phillips) in Switzerland [28] and Neofusicoccum yunnanense G.Q. Li & S.F. Chen in Croatia [32].
Fungi of the genus Pestalotiopsis, in particular Pestalotiopsis funerea (Desm.) Steyaert (Pestalotiopsidaceae), have also been implicated in disease outbreaks. The latter species is considered to be a weak secondary pathogen [25], to be widespread, and to cause leaf and stem blight, occasionally canker or girdling, and dieback and root rot, mainly on Coniferae, including giant sequoia [33,34].
The introduction of new tree species is also an important driver of new tree diseases. As non-native species can bring their pathogens with them from their country of origin, these alien species pose a potential threat to native tree species in Germany. Therefore, ten cases of disease in giant sequoia in Northwest Germany were analysed in detail with regard to their triggering and damaging factors in line with Manion (1981) [35] and Sinclair & Lyon (2005) [36]. The main objectives were as follows:
  • To isolate and identify the filamentous Dikaria D. S. Hibbett, T. Y. James & Vilgalys species associated with the disease symptoms;
  • To determine whether alien invasive fungal species were involved in the studied cases of disease;
  • To discuss the risk to native tree species from alien fungal pathogens on giant sequoia in Germany.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cases of Disease in Giant Sequoia in Northwest Germany

This study analysed only samples of giant sequoia, which were sent to the mycology laboratory of the Northwest German Forest Research Institute (NW-FVA) for a causal analysis of forest damage. Damages to giant sequoia trees in forest stands located in the federal states of Hesse and Lower Saxony were reported and investigated between 2018 and 2023. The samples of ten cases of disease observed in Northwest Germany (Table 1 and Table S1, Figure 1) were analysed for associated fungi, particularly in transition zones from living to diseased or necrotic tissues, to identify the potential causal agent. However, in most cases, only twig samples (disease cases 1–6, 8, 10) were sent, and therefore no stem or branch tissue could be analysed. Detailed information on the diseased forest stands and sites as well as precipitation data are provided in the Supplementary Material (Table S1). All of the studied sites had soils that were at least weakly mesotrophic or well supplied with nutrients, except for the forest sites of the disease cases 5 and 6. The soils in the latter were only weakly supplied with nutrients. The soils were mostly moderately fresh to fresh, in some cases, moderately dry in the summer, and weakly alternatingly moist to waterlogged or stock fresh.
Figure 1. Cases of disease; the small map at the bottom right shows Germany with its federal states with locations of giant sequoia stands with cases of disease and neighbouring countries, the North Sea and Baltic Sea are highlighted in blue, the supporting federal states of the NW-FVA are highlighted in darker gray, the area marked in red is zoomed out in the large map and displays the locations of the ten analysed forest stands (1–10, Table 1) in Lower Saxony and Hesse. © GeoBasis-DE/BKG 2014 and © EuroGeographics.
Figure 1. Cases of disease; the small map at the bottom right shows Germany with its federal states with locations of giant sequoia stands with cases of disease and neighbouring countries, the North Sea and Baltic Sea are highlighted in blue, the supporting federal states of the NW-FVA are highlighted in darker gray, the area marked in red is zoomed out in the large map and displays the locations of the ten analysed forest stands (1–10, Table 1) in Lower Saxony and Hesse. © GeoBasis-DE/BKG 2014 and © EuroGeographics.
Pathogens 13 00715 g001
Table 1. Forest stand and site information for the disease cases of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Northwest Germany reported and analysed in the years 2018–2023.
Table 1. Forest stand and site information for the disease cases of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Northwest Germany reported and analysed in the years 2018–2023.
Disease CaseForest SiteSequoiadendron
giganteum
NoYear of Reportm aslBed RockAverage Annual Precipitation Sum (mm) 1Deviation in 2018 from the Annual Average Precipitation 1Average Precipitation Sum of the Vegetation Period (mm) 1Precipitation Deficit in the Vegetation Period 2018 (%) 1Tree Age (y)Observed
Symptoms (Figure 2)
1201810Sand726−22.438839.7Approx. 27Dieback of the crown,
shoot dieback,
dead, brown leaves
2201820Sand671−29.735560.212
3201820Sand612+6.43279.318
4201823Sand671−29.735560.225
5201810Sand671−29.735560.228
6201813Sand726−22.438839.721
72021172Loess loam, which is anthropogenically modified in the urban area820−25.540659.1Approx. 60Wood discolouration at the stem base along a tension crack
82021212Loam, which is anthropogenically modified in the urban area606−28.735658.4Approx. 12Dieback of the crown (brown needles, shoots and branches) since 2020
92022357Buntsandstein705−24.737051.1Approx. 33Dieback of the crown (brown needles, shoots and branches), wood discolouration and rot at the stem base and in branches
102023300Volcanic rocks of the Miocene865−21.342045.7Approx. 90Dieback of the crown (brown needles, shoots and branches) since 2019
m asl: m above sea level. 1 According to data from adjacent DWD weather stations; for average data, the climate reference period 1961–1990 was used (Table S1).
Figure 2. Various disease symptoms in giant sequoia. (a) Browning of shoots associated with Amycosphaerella africana and Pestalotiopsis australis in disease case 5; (b) browning of shoots associated with Pestalotiopsis australis and Rhizosphaera minteri in disease case 1; (c) browning of shoots where Botryosphaeria dothidea and Neofusicoccum parvum were isolated from disease case 10; (df) close-up of dying twigs from disease case 10; (g) wood discoloration; Botryosphaeria dothidea and Pezicula neosporulosa were isolated in disease case 9; (h) diseased needles of disease case 1; (i) close-up of wood discoloration associated with Ophiostoma quercus disease case 7; (j) stem disc from disease case 9; Pezicula neospurolosa, Cantharellales sp., and Pezicula sp. (melanigena or radicicola) were isolated.
Figure 2. Various disease symptoms in giant sequoia. (a) Browning of shoots associated with Amycosphaerella africana and Pestalotiopsis australis in disease case 5; (b) browning of shoots associated with Pestalotiopsis australis and Rhizosphaera minteri in disease case 1; (c) browning of shoots where Botryosphaeria dothidea and Neofusicoccum parvum were isolated from disease case 10; (df) close-up of dying twigs from disease case 10; (g) wood discoloration; Botryosphaeria dothidea and Pezicula neosporulosa were isolated in disease case 9; (h) diseased needles of disease case 1; (i) close-up of wood discoloration associated with Ophiostoma quercus disease case 7; (j) stem disc from disease case 9; Pezicula neospurolosa, Cantharellales sp., and Pezicula sp. (melanigena or radicicola) were isolated.
Pathogens 13 00715 g002

2.2. Isolation of Fungi

Associated fungi of the giant sequoia samples were isolated from surfaces of sterilised woody chips obtained from the basal stem discs and stems according the method of Peters et al. (2023) [37]. Parts of the plant with visible degeneration were examined (browning, necrotisation; see Figure 2). Dieback pathogens were isolated according the method of Bußkamp et al. (2020) [38], with the difference that the shoots were not defoliated. Therefore, affected shoots were washed and surface-disinfested by treatment for 1 min in 70% EtOH, 5 min in 3% NaOCl, and 1 min in 70% EtOH. Affected needles were washed and surface-disinfested with treatment for 1 min in 70% EtOH, 1 min in a 3% NaOCl, and 1 min in 70% EtOH. Thereafter, twigs were cut into 5–6 segments with a size of 5 mm length, and needles were cut into three segments and then plated on malt yeast peptone agar (MYP). Emerging mycelia were subcultured separately on MYP medium. Isolated strains were first assigned to mycelial morphotypes (MT), which were further characterised based on micromorphological characteristics and DNA sequence analysis. Representative strains were stored in the fungal culture collection of the Northwest German Forest Research Institute (NW-FVA).

2.3. Detection of Heterobasidion annosum and Armillaria at the Stem Collar

The detection of Heterobasidion annosum was performed using the incubation method of Langer and Bressem (2017) [39] and the microscopic evaluation of fungal conidiophores produced on infected woody tissue. A Stemi 508 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with an Axiocam ERc 5S and an Axiolab 5 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with an Axiocam 208 color were used.

2.4. Identification of Isolated Fungi

At least one representative strain from each MT was chosen for molecular analysis. The genomic DNA of the isolates was extracted using the method of Damm et al. (2008) [40]. The 5.8S nuclear ribosomal gene with the two flanking internal transcribed spacers ITS-1 and ITS-2 (ITS region) was amplified for all strains. Additionally, for a selection of strains, the 28S nrRNA gene (LSU), a partial sequence of the translation elongation factor 1α (EF-1α), a partial DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit gene (RPB2), and a partial beta-tubulin gene (TUB) were amplified using the primer pairs and PCR conditions listed in Table 2. The PCR mixture consisted of 1 µL of DNA and 19 µL mastermix that contained 2.5 µL 10× PCR reaction buffer (with 20 mM MgCl2, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 1 µL of each primer (10 mmol), 2.5 µL MgCl2 (25 mmol), 0.1 µL RotiR-Pol Taq HY Taq polymerase (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), and 2.5 µL of 2 mmol dNTPs (Biozym Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany). Each reaction was topped up to a volume of 20 µL by adding sterile water. A StepOnePlus ™ PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to carry out the DNA amplifications. A 1% agarose gel was used to visualise the PCR products. The products were sent to Eurofins Scientific Laboratory (Ebersberg, Germany) for sequencing. All resulting sequences were visually checked and edited as follows using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (v. 7.2.5; Hall (1999) [41]). Consensus sequences were generated, improper sequence beginnings and ends were trimmed, and erroneous nucleotide allocations were corrected. Sequences were submitted to GenBank (Table 3, Supplementary Table S1).
Blastn searches using ITS sequences were carried out on the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank (accessed on 1 May 2024), Altschul et al. (1997) [42]) in order to determine the taxonomic classification of isolates. The results were critically interpreted with emphasis on well-curated culture collections, such as the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Collection (CBS). For confirmation, the findings were rechecked against the literature and previously identified cultures from the institute’s collection. Extended analyses for taxon determination on a species level were conducted for isolates belonging to Amycosphaerella, Coniochaeta, Phacidiopycnis, and Pestalotiopsis (Figure 3, Supplementary Figure S1). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on concatenated sequence datasets, including appropriate reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. All analyses were performed using RAxML v. 8.2.11 [43,44], as implemented in Geneious R11 [45], using the GTRGAMMA model with the rapid bootstrapping and search for best scoring ML tree algorithm including 1000 bootstrap replicates [46,47].
Table 2. Primer pairs and PCR conditions used for molecular analyses of strains.
Table 2. Primer pairs and PCR conditions used for molecular analyses of strains.
DNA-Region 1Primer Pairs 1PCR ConditionsPrimer Reference
ITSITS-1F + ITS4See Bien et al. (2020) [48]Gardes & Bruns (1993) [49], White et al. (1990) [50]
LSULROR + LR5See Paulin & Harrington (2000) [51]Rehner & Samuels (1994), Vilgalys & Hester (1990) [46,47]
RPB2RPB2-5F2 + RPB2-7cRSee Braun et al. (2018) for species of Amycosphaerella [52]; see Tanney & Seifert (2018) for species of Phacidiopycnis [53]Liu et al. (1999) [54]
EF-1αEF1-983F + EF1-2218RSee Arnold et al. (2021) for species of Coniochaeta [55]Rehner & Buckley (2005) [56]
TUBT1 + Bt-2bSee Liu et al. (2019) for species of Pestalotiopsis [54]Glass & Donaldson (1995), O’Donnell & Cigelnik (1997) [57,58]
1 ITS: internal transcribed spacers and intervening 5.8S nrDNA; LSU: large subunit (28S) of the nrRNA gene operon; RPB2: partial DNA-directed RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit gene; EF-1α: partial translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene; TUB: partial beta-tubulin gene.
Table 3. List of selected isolated fungi suggested to be noteworthy agents in the disease cases, alien to Germany, or new records for giant sequoia.
Table 3. List of selected isolated fungi suggested to be noteworthy agents in the disease cases, alien to Germany, or new records for giant sequoia.
SpeciesOrderNW-FVA ID Accession No Disease CaseShootNeedleStem/Branch
Amycosphaerella africana 1,2Mycosphaerellales4336PP9133851–611-
Botryosphaeria dothideaBotryophaeriales9830PP9134045, 9, 10111
Botryosphaeria parva (anamorph: Neofusicoccum parvum2Botryophaeriales11986PP913460101--
Botrytis cinereaHelotiales7912PP9134151–6, 811-
Coniochaeta acaciae 1,2Coniochaetales9903PP91341891--
Coniochaeta velutina 1Coniochaetales4360PP91341911--
Coprinellus micaceusAgaricales9842PP9134219111
Diaporthe eres ADiaporthales7949
11993
PP913426
PP913425
8, 1011-
Diaporthe eres BDiaporthales9864
7953
11989
PP913428, PP913427, PP9134318–1011-
Diaporthe nobilisDiaporthales4447
4460
11994
PP913434
PP913433
PP913435
2, 3, 6, 1011-
Diaporthe rudisDiaporthales4359
9869
PP913436
PP913437
1, 911-
Muriformistrickeria rubi 1,2Pleosporales12037PP913455101--
Nothophoma cf. quercinaPleosporales7950PP9134648-1-
Ophiostoma quercusMicroascales6920PP9134657--1
Pestalotiopsis australis 1,2Amphisphaeriales4349
4341
4462
4497
4466
PP913472
PP913473
PP913474
PP913483
PP913475
1, 3, 511-
Pestalotiopsis monochaeta 1,2Amphisphaeriales9837
9836
9832
11997
PP913476
PP913477
PP913478
PP913479
9, 10111
Pestalotiopsis cf. verruculosaAmphisphaeriales7952PP9134808-1-
Pestalotiopsis cf. hollandicaAmphisphaeriales12038PP913481101--
Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis 1,2Rhytismatales9901PP91350091
Phacidium lacerumRhytismatales4362
4449
4468
PP913501
PP913503
PP913502
1, 5, 61--
Phacidium sp.Rhytismatales4488PP91350531-1
Pseudocercospora sp.Mycosphaerellales4456
4454
PP913506
PP913507
21--
Rhizosphaera minteri 1,2Venturiales4358PP91350811
1 New report for giant sequoia. 2 New report for Germany.

3. Results

3.1. Cases of Disease in Giant Sequoia in Northwest Germany

All the stands analysed suffered to varying degrees from precipitation deficits during the study period. With the exception of stand 3, all sites showed a deficit compared to the climate reference period 1961–1990 for the average annual precipitation sum in the period 2018 to 2023 (Table 1 and Table S1). In 2018, all affected forest sites experienced a significant precipitation deficit (9.3–60.2%) during the vegetation period from May to October. Some locations also had a lack of rainfall in the following years (Table S1). The observed disease symptoms on giant sequoia were dieback of the crown, shoot dieback, death, brown needles, and wood and rot discolouration at the stem (Figure 2).

3.2. Associated Fungi

In the studied woody tissues (Figure 2) of the stems, no Heterobasidion annosum nor Armillaria species were found. In total, 81 Dikaria species (Table S1) were detected, of which 97.6% were Ascomycota and 2.4% Basidiomycota (Cantharellales sp. and Coprinellus micaceus (Bull.) Vilgalys, Hopple & Jacq. Johnson). The majority of the isolated species were assigned to the common endophytic fungal species that occur in conifers, according Bußkamp et al. (2020) and Langer et al. (2021) [38,59]. Isolated fungi that were new for Germany or giant sequoia or that were suggested to be noteworthy causative agents in the disease cases are listed in Table 3.
Fungal pathogens previously reported on giant sequoia in Germany, such as B. dothidea (Botryosphaeriaceae, Figure 3) and Botrytis cinerea Pers. (Sclerotiniaceae), were detected in the diseased tissues of cases 5, 9, 10 and 1–5, 8, respectively. Botryosphaeria dothidea was also retrieved from asymptomatic needle tissue (Table S1). The isolated Diaporthe strains could be assigned, based on phylogenetic analysis, to the following species groups: Diaporthe eres Nitschke, Diaporthe nobilis Sacc. & Speg., and Diaporthe rudis (Fr.) Nitschke. Strains belonging to D. eres showed considerable differences in their ITS sequences and were, for the purpose of this study, subdivided into D. eres A and B.
Various strains of Pestalotiopsis (Pestalotiopsidaceae) were detected in the disease cases of 1–3, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10. Based on the multigene phylogeny conducted, the strains isolated from giant sequoia can be distinguished into four taxa (Figure 3). Several strains showed concordance with the reference strains of Pestalotiopsis australis Maharachch., K.D. Hyde & Crous (Figure 4 and Figure 5e,f), including the ex-type strain. Despite the lack of bootstrap support of the clade, the isolated strains are presumed to belong to this species, due to considerable genetic differences to the closest related species Pestalotiopsis scoparia Maharachch., K.D. Hyde & Crous. A further four strains clustered in a well-supported clade with the ex-type strain of Pestalotiopsis monochaeta Maharachch., K.D. Hyde & Crous. One strain (NW-FVA 12038) clustered with several strains, including ex-type strains of Pestalotiopsis hollandica Maharachch., K.D. Hyde & Crous and Pestalotiopsis brassicae (Guba) Maharachch., K.D. Hyde & Crous. As P. brassicae has so far only been described from New Zealand [60], an assignment of the strain isolated here to P. hollandica seems appropriate. Due to the unclear genetic delimitation, the strain is referred to as P. cf. hollandica. One strain isolated here (NW-FVA 7952) groups with several strains tentatively assigned to Pestalotiopsis verruculosa Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde and the ex-type strain of this species. Due to missing support for the combined clade and phylogenetic similarity to other strains, including the ex-type strains of P. brassicae and P. hollandica, the strain is referred to as P. cf. verruculosa.

3.3. New Records for Giant Sequoia or Germany

Seven isolated species are new reports for Germany and giant sequoia (Table 3): Amycosphaerella africana (Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Quaedvl. & Crous (Mycosphaerellaceae, Figure 4 and Figure 5a,b), Coniochaeta acaciae Samarak., Gafforov & K.D. Hyde (Coniochaetaceae, Figure 4 and Figure 5c,d), Muriformistrickeria rubi Q. Tian, Wanas., Camporesi & K.D. Hyde (Melanommataceae), P. australis (Figure 4 and Figure 5e,f), P. monochaeta, Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis C.L. Xiao & J.D. Rogers (Phacidiaceae), and Rhizosphaera minteri Joanne E. Taylor & Koukol (Venturiaceae). Amycosphaerella africana was associated with shoot and needle dieback in disease cases 1–6 in the north of Lower Saxony, but was also isolated from green shoots (disease case 4). Coniochaeta acaciae was only isolated with disease case 9 (located in the south of lower Saxony). From a symptomatic dead shoot of disease case 10 (located in Vogelsberg, Central Germany) we obtained a single isolate of M. rubi. Pestalotiopsis australis and P. monochaeta were isolated from several disease cases (1, 3, 5, and 9, 10, respectively). Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis was identified as a single isolate retrieved from giant sequoia shoots in disease case 9. Rhizosphaera minteri was isolated from eight out of ten sampled symptomatic or dead shoots in disease case 1.
Neofusicoccum parvum (disease case 10) was reported for the first time in Germany. The isolation of Coniochaeta velutina (Fuckel) Cooke from a dead symptomatic shoot of a giant sequoia (disease case 1) represents the first evidence of this fungal species on this host species. Additionally, a Pseudocercospora species (Mycosphaerellaceae) was isolated from shoots of disease case 2, showing a very high level of similarity in the ITS region with Pseudocercospora lindericola (W. Yamam.) Goh & W.H. Hsieh, Pseudocercospora natalensis Crous & T.A. Cout., and Pseudocercospora rhododendri Crous & Yuan Yuan Chen.

4. Discussion

4.1. Triggering Factors for Disease Outbreak

All studied diseased giant sequoia trees suffered from precipitation deficits during the study period and extreme summer drought and heat events characterised by climate anomalies [61,62]. This was, in the authors’ opinion, the main triggering factor for the observed outbreak of fungal diseases in giant sequoia. This is in accordance with the opinions of Choat et al. (2012) [63] and McDowell and Allen (2015) [64], who posit that drought and heat are key inciting factors in severe reductions in tree vigour in forests. Moreover, this is consistent with observations of the occurrence of other fungal forest tree diseases from 2018 to 2023 [1,5,65,66,67] and the assessment of the impact of the exceptional weather conditions between 2018 and 2022 on the health of our forest stands [65,66]. Severe droughts have caused widespread tree mortality in many forest biomes [66]. Tree mortality is a complex process that can be linked to multiple interacting abiotic and biotic factors [68]. Primarily, tree mortality is often physiologically based. This is evidenced by the failure of the plant hydraulic system, leading to extensive crown death and tree mortality during drought [66]. Drought has a significant secondary effect of weakening trees, making them more susceptible to secondary invaders and opportunistic pests, such as canker and root- and wood-rotting fungi, facilitating the transition of endophytes to pathogenic fungi [1,2,5].

4.2. Associated Fungi

As expected, numerous endophytes and latent pathogens previously reported from Germany were isolated from the analysed asymptomatic and symptomatic tissues of Sequoiadendron giganteum, for example B. dothidea, B. cinerea, Diaporthe spp., Phacidium lacerum Fr., and Pestalotiopsis spp. [25,69]. Branch or shoot damage to giant sequoia trees in Germany caused by or associated with B. dothidea, Diaporthe spp., P. funerea, or B. cinerea has already been observed [25].
Botryosphaeria dothidea was associated with most of the examined symptomatic tissues in this study, but was also present in asymptomatic needle tissue (disease case 9). The latter supports Smith et al.’s (1996) [70] findings that this species is a latent pathogen that also occurs endophytically in its host plants. As mentioned above, B. dothidea has already been described as a common causal agent of shoot dieback and Botryosphaeria canker on giant sequoia in Germany [25]. Additionally, N. parvum was found, which has been described as a cause of canker on giant sequoia in Switzerland [28]. According to the species list of the German red list on higher fungi, this is the first report of this species in Germany [69]. The latter Botryophaeriaceae species is considered to be an aggressive vascular pathogen and can cause severe dieback symptoms and death in its host plants [71,72,73]. In Switzerland, both B. dothidea and B. parva were found on diseased giant sequoia trees. Pathogenicity tests fulfilling the Henle–Koch postulates showed that B. parva was the main cause of the damage [28]. Both species are regarded as cosmopolitan fungi, and are associated with a variety of plant hosts, either as endophytes or as pathogens [74,75,76]. The authors hypothesise that B. parvum has previously been confused with B. dothidea, or that B. parva is a new pathogen on giant sequoia [29].
A Pseudocercospora species with a very high level of similarity in the ITS region with non-native P. lindericola, P. natalensis, and P. rhododendri (=Chuppomyces handelii (Bubák) U. Braun, C. Nakash., Videira & Crous) was isolated from a symptomatic shoot. The cosmopolitan genus Pseudocercospora comprises plant pathogenic fungi, has a wide range of host plants, and is generally associated with blights, as well as leaf and fruit spots [77]. Pseudocercospora lichenum (Keissl.) D. Hawksw. is the only species of this genus that is listed in the standard species list of fungi for Germany [69]. In contrast, P. lindericola was found on Lauraceae in Taiwan and China [78]. Pseudocercospora natalensis was originally described from Eucalyptus nitens (H.Deane & Maiden) Maid in South Africa [79] and C. handelii from Rhododendron ponticum L. in Turkey, but they have also been detected in the Netherlands [80].

4.3. New Records for Giant Sequoia or Germany

Amycosphaerella africana was frequently isolated from symptomatic needles and shoots of S. giganteum in this study. The species was originally described as Mycosphaerella africana Crous & M.J. Wingf. in 1996, after being isolated from leafspots of Eucalyptus viminalis Labill. in South Africa [81]. At least five synonyms are known since the species has been described multiple times under various names due to confusion concerning modes of ascospore germination [82]. According to Index Fungorum, current synonyms other than the basionym are Mycosphaerella aurantia A. Maxwell, M. buckinghamiae Crous & Summerell, M. ellipsoidea Crous & M.J. Wingf., and Teratosphaeria africana (Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous & U. Braun, all representing teleomorphic states. Additionally, Uwebraunia ellipsoidea Crous & M.J. Wingf. has been described as an anamorphic state for M. ellipsoidea (Crous & Wingfield 1996). Amycosphaerella africana has been primarily connected to leaf spot diseases of several Eucalyptus species [80], namely Eucalyptus deanei Maiden, E. globulus Labill., E. grandis W.Hill, E. radiata A.Cunn. ex DC., E. smithii F.Muell. ex R.T.Baker, and E. viminalis. Additionally, A. africana has been found to be connected to leaf spot disease in Buckinghamia sp. [83], and citrus greasy spot disease in four Citrus spp. [84]. It was found in leaves of Fraxinus ornus L. (endophytic occurrence) [85], Metrosideros excelsa Sol. ex Gaertn., and Dracaena draco (L.) L. [80]. The species appears to be widespread, with reports from Africa, Australia, South America, and New Zealand [81,86,87,88]. In Europe, it has been found in Italy, Portugal, and Spain [80,84,85,86,89]. This study presents the first report of A. africana from Germany, but more interestingly the first report of this species from a gymnosperm host. In addition, the location of this new find is considerably further north than all previous finds in warmer climates. The transmission and spread of mycosphaerella-like fungi, which cause leaf spot diseases, is thought to be linked to the increasing transportation of infected plant material between plantations in different countries or continents [90]. Temperature and moisture play a significant role in the establishment of pathogens in new environments [91]. Hence, the long periods of high temperatures in recent years could explain a new occurrence of A. africana in Germany.
The endophytic occurrence of A. africana in F. ornus in Northern Italy, a report from the monocotyledon plant D. draco in New Zealand, and the evidence presented here in S. giganteum in Northwest Germany suggest a much higher hidden distribution in possibly a large number of different host species. However, the question remains as to whether the fungal species was introduced to Germany in conjunction with the host, or whether the fungus jumped onto trees that were already present in Germany. The latter seems more likely in view of the fact that the natural ranges of the host and the fungus (as far as is known) do not appear to overlap. Considering the ability of the fungus to infect angiosperm and gymnosperm host species alike, further transmission within forest trees seems possible. As in other mycosphaerella-like fungi, transmission probably occurs through the wind dispersal of ascospores or the splash dispersal of conidia directly between host leaves [92,93,94]. In the case of leaf spot disease in E. globulus, Aguín et al. (2013) [89] suggest that A. africana acts as a primary pathogen, albeit with low incidence and aggressiveness, highlighting the possibility that the pathogen has been overlooked in forestry for a long time. Against this background, however, the pathogen does not appear to pose a major threat to German forests.
Coniochaeta acaciae was isolated once from an asymptomatic needle of giant sequoia in this study. This species was described in 2018 as a saprobic fungus from a dead trunk and branches of Acacia sp. in Uzbekistan [95]. Species of Coniochaeta have been isolated from a wide variety of substrates: saprobic, pathogenic, endophytic, lichen-associated, and even extremophilic lifestyles are known [96,97,98,99,100,101]. Apart from Acacia sp., C. acaciae has been reported from asymptomatic leaf petioles of Fraxinus excelsior L. in Poland [102], from dead twigs and branches of Betula pendula Roth in Ukraine [103], in connection to the lichen Flavopunctelia flaventior (Stirt.) Hale in Yunnan, China [104], and from Anemone rivularis Buch.-Ham. ex DC. in China [105]. According to an entry in Genbank, the species was further found in seeds of Quercus ithaburensis subsp. macrolepis (Kotschy) Hedge & Yalt. in Iraq (GenBank Acc. OQ185454). Based on the multigene (LSU-ITS-EF1α) phylogeny of Coniochaeta species in this study (Supplementary Material Figure S1) and that of Si et al. (2021) [104], the closest relatives of C. acacia are saprobic Coniochaeta baysunika Wanas., Gafforov, E.B.G. Jones & K.D. Hyde from Rosa sp. in Uzbekistan [106], endophytic C. euphorbiae S. Nasr, S. Bien & Damm, and endophytic C. iranica S. Nasr, S. Bien & Damm from Euphorbia polycaulis Boiss. & Hohen. in Iran [107]. In this study, C. acaciae is reported for the first time from Germany and for the host S. giganteum. In the original description of the species, Samarakon et al. (2018) [108] describe perithecia with exceptionally short setae. Here, we report rather long setae, predominantly between 60 and 90 µm, sometimes up to 120 µm in length, from perithecia produced in culture after approximately 8 weeks, which unfortunately remained sterile (see Figure 5c,d). One further species of Coniochaeta was found in this study, namely C. velutina. This species is distributed worldwide and has already been reported in Germany [37,109,110,111,112]. To the authors’ knowledge, however, this is the first report on the host S. giganteum.
Here, we report Muriformistrickeria rubi Q. Tian, Wanas., Camporesi & K.D. Hyde for the first time from the new host S. giganteum, as well as from Germany. The two known members of the genus Muriformistrickeria are so far known as being hosted by the Rosaceae family. Muriformistrickeria rubi was described on a dead branch of Rubus sp. in Italy and has since been detected on spines of Rosa sp. in Sweden [106,113]. Its sister species, Muriformistrickeria rosae Wanas., Camporesi, E.B.G. Jones & K.D. Hyde, was also isolated in Italy from dead spines of Rosa canina L. [106]. No statement can be made about the pathogenic potential of these fungi due to the low number of findings and the lack of information concerning their ecological roles.
Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis was found to be associated with the shoot dieback of S. giganteum in this study. This anamorphic species was described in 2005 as a post-harvest pathogen of apples (Rosaceae) in Washington, USA [114]. It is the causal agent for the disease named “speck rot” or “rubbery rot” on apple fruit and persimmon fruit of Diospyros kaki Thunb. [115,116,117]. Additionally, the fungus has also been isolated in connection with canker disease and twig dieback on crabapple and pear trees in commercial orchards [114] and with a leaf blight disease on Arbutus menziesii Pursh [118]. In the fruit industry, this fungal infection possesses the capability to induce significant post-harvest damage [114,116] and has been reported from the Northwest USA, Northern Italy, Northern Germany, Chile, and Norway [114,115,117,119,120]. This study presents the first report of P. washingtonensis from giant sequoia and at the same time the first report from a gymnosperm host and a forest environment in Europe. Since the pathogen has been widely reported in the Northwestern United States and is thus distributed within the natural range of Sequoiadendron, an introduction into Germany together with the host seems probable, in contrast to A. africana, as discussed above. Weber (2011) [117] does not rule out a recent migration of the fungus to Europe, but considers a longer, hidden spread of the pathogen in fruit orchards to be more likely. In the past, infections in German fruit orchards or post-harvest might have remained unnoticed or ignored due to marginal damages [117]. Additionally, the recognition of this specific fruit rot disease is hindered due to simple confusion with diseases causing similar symptoms, such as infection with B. cinerea, Sphaeropsis, Phytophthora, or Monilia [116,117]. In the case of P. washingtonensis, the fungus does not seem to benefit from rising temperatures. Xiao et al. (2005) [114] describe the fungus as a low-temperature species that grows between −3 °C and +25 °C and finds its optimum growth between 15 and 20 °C. Above 30 °C, the fungus reversibly stops growing; according to the study, temperatures of +35 °C over a period of 10 days led to the death of cultures. The observations by Elliott et al. (2014) [118] led to the assumption that foliar blight on A. menziesii is triggered when the leaves are subjected to cold stress. Increased disease severity in the spring of 2011 in the Northwestern USA was linked to extreme cold in the preceding months of November and February. Although cold extremes in Germany cannot be ruled out, long periods of heat and drought, such as those that have increasingly occurred in the study area in recent years, would probably prevent a dangerous establishment of the pathogen. Accordingly, an increase in abnormalities associated with this fungus in German forests is not to be expected. However, a long-hidden distribution of P. washingtonensis in German forests seems possible in view of the fact that a closely related fungal species is known in the wood and needles of conifer hosts in Northern Europe. Multilocus phylogeny shows a close relationship to Allantophomopsiella pseudotsugae (M. Wilson) Crous (Supplementary Material Figure S1), which has been isolated from Abies, Larix, Pinus, Picea, Pseudotsuga, and S. giganteum, also in Germany [25,121,122]. It can be assumed that a risk from P. washingtonensis exists for trees belonging to the Rosaceae family, based on the occurrences described above. However, according to Amiri (2020) [123], P. washingtonensis is considered as a weak canker- and twig-dieback-causing pathogen on trees.
Anyway, we did not isolate A. pseudotsugae. On the contrary, we found two other Phacidiaceae, namely P. lacerum (=Dothidea pinastri Fr., =Ceuthospora pinastri (Fr.) Höhn. fide Crous et al. (2014) [121]) and Phacidium sp. Phacidium lacerum is a fungus that has been found throughout Europe, including Germany, and was first described from Pinus sylvestris L. needles [121]. Therefore, this species which has a wide host range within pine species [124,125], is considered by the authors of this study to be native to Germany. An additional Phacidium species, Phacidium pseudophacidioides Crous, is native to Europe and occurs in the Netherlands, sampled from Ilex aquifolium L. and in Switzerland, sampled from Chamaespartium sagittale (L.) P.E.Gibbs [121]. It is therefore likely that the latter species could be native to Germany but has not yet been found or has been assigned to P. lacerum.
Only two of the isolated Pestalotiopsis species, P. australis and P. monochaeta, could be clearly identified down to species level. Pestalotiopsis funerea, which can occur as a concomitant pathogen on various tree species [126,127,128,129] and is said to occur on giant sequoia in Germany [25], has not been identified. However, the inability to recognise P. funerea might be explained through the lack of reliable sequence data of this species [130,131]. The sequence data of two strains designated as P. funerea retrieved from GenBank were included in the phylogeny presented here (Figure 3), and are clearly distinct. The results of this study are the first published evidence for P. australis in Germany and on giant sequoia. Pestalotiopsis australis was originally described from Telopea sp. in Australia [60]. However, the species has recently been detected in Europe (Portugal) from diseased shoots of Pinus pinea L. and from diseased blueberries [131,132]. Infection experiments have shown that P. australis can cause lesions on blueberries, but not on P. pinea. Infection trials, as conducted by Heanzi et al. (2021) and Kovac et al. (2021) [28,32] on young giant sequoia trees, could be used to observe the influence of Pestalotiopsis species on the damage progress. Morphological studies on cultural characteristics and conidial morphology (e.g., Ref. [60]) will clarify the exact species affiliations, especially in the cases of P. hollandica and P. monochaeta. Judith-Hertz (2016) [108] suggested the synonymisation of P. hollandica and P. monochaeta based on genetic data. However, considerable morphological differences have been described for the two supposed species, such as the number of setulae (apical appendages) on the conidia (P. hollandica with 1–4 apical appendages, P. monochaeta with 1 apical appendage) and slight differences in culture morphology [60]. In the phylogeny presented here, the two ex-type strains can clearly be distinguished through the comparison of TUB (5 nk difference) and EF-1α (2 nk difference) sequences. Pestalotiopsis hollandica was first isolated from Sciadopitys verticillata (Thunb.) Siebold & Zucc. (Sciadopityaceae) in the Netherlands in 1933 [60]. This species has also been associated with P. pinea (Pinaceae), which showed shoot blight disease mainly caused by Pestalotiopsis pini A.C. Silva, E. Diogo & H. Bragança in Portugal [131]. Additionally, it has been identified in Cupressus sempervirens L. (Cupressaceae) in Spain [133] and in Quercus robur L. (Fagaceae) in the Netherlands [134]. The findings in different regions of Europe since 1933 suggest that P. hollandica could be native to Germany. Pestalotiopsis monochaeta was first described from Quercus robur L. and Taxus baccata L. in the Netherlands [60]. No other finds of this species have been published to date. There is some evidence that the species occurs in Germany (reported as Pestalotiopsis (cf.) monochaeta) [135].
Rhizosphaera minteri has recently been described from needles of Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. and Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière in Scotland and Wales [136]. The isolates of this species in this study, from several browning shoots of one tree, represent the first report of the species on Sequoiadendron and outside Great Britain. Taylor et al. (2023) [136] emphasise that the species could only be found on dead needles, and it can therefore be assumed that it is a true needle-cast pathogen. Furthermore, the authors assume that the species has its natural range in North America and has migrated to Europe together with spruce hosts. The find shown here reveals another possible host with which the migration from North America could have taken place. As shown by Taylor et al. (2023) [136], R. minteri is closely related to Rhizosphaera kalkhoffii Bubák based on ITS phylogeny. The latter has already been associated with a host from the Sequoioideae group, as it has been found on Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl. in New Zealand [137,138]. The actual distribution and danger of R. minteri as a pathogen on gymnosperm hosts must be further investigated, as confusion with the morphologically similar Rhizosphaera pini (Corda) Maubl. is likely [136].

5. Conclusions

The first main objective of this study was fulfilled by isolating 81 Dikaria species from diseased tissues of giant sequoia. The second main objective was also partially achieved, as several fungal species associated with the diseased studied trees were isolated from giant sequoias for the first time or were new to Germany. It is still unclear whether these pathogens are truly invasive or non-native in Germany and whether they caused the observed damage. Additionally, the location of the first spatial contact between giant sequoia trees and these pathogens remains unknown. Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis could have been brought by the giant sequoia from its native range, as this fungus was first described in North America [114]. The third main objective was also realised, in which the authors assessed and discussed the risk to native tree species from the fungal species isolated that were assigned as alien pathogens in Germany. None of the pathogens was found to be a lethal causal agent on the giant sequoia trees studied in the absence of co-occurring other fungal pathogens and inciting abiotic factors. Although some of the fungal species reported for the first time in this study were detected in more than one disease case (A. africana, P. australis, P. monochaeta), the majority were restricted to a single case or only to a low number of tissue samples. This indicates a rather rare occurrence of the pathogens in relation to giant sequoia. However, the invasive behaviour of newly migrated species can be delayed by lag phases that can last for decades [139]. In conclusion, the cultivation of non-native giant sequoia can pose a potential risk to other native tree species in Germany, as the potentially alien fungi found could infect the latter and lead to novel diseases. It is therefore advisable to carry out pathogenicity tests with giant sequoia and native main tree species with A. africana, C. acaciae, M. rubi, Pestalotiopsis spp., P. washingtonensis, and Phacidium sp. in order to determine Koch’s postulates, in line with Bhunjun et al. (2021) [140].
We have not been able to prove conclusively whether the cultivation of non-native tree species in Germany is a gateway for alien species. It is not clear whether the newly discovered fungi originate from imported giant sequoia or whether the trees tested were infected here in Germany. It is also possible that the fungi found for the first time in Germany were previously undetected. However, the example of giant sequoia has shown that many fungal species unknown in Germany, including tree pathogens, have been discovered for the first time, and the risk should not be underestimated.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens13090715/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenetic analyses; Table S1: CasesofDisease_Isolates_Weather.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.J.L.; methodology, G.J.L., J.B. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, G.J.L., S.B. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, G.J.L., S.B. and J.B.; visualization, S.B. and J.B.; funding acquisition, G.J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project is funded by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) and the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) through the Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR) as part of the Forest Climate Fund (FKZ: 2220WK92D4).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data of all sequences generated in this study (Table 3 and Table S1) are deposited in the NCBI GenBank database.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the technical support provided by the staff of the NW-FVA during the project; to Peter Gawehn and Jonas Niemöller for field sampling; to Annette Ihlemann, Martina Hille, Brigitte Jünemann and Tim Baroth for conscientious laboratory work; and to Etta Starick for preparing the figures. We would like to thank the two reviewers for their recommendations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Langer, G.J.; Bußkamp, J. Fungi Associated with Woody Tissues of European Beech and Their Impact on Tree Health. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 702467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Langer, G.J.; Bußkamp, J. Vitality Loss of Beech: A Serious Threat to Fagus sylvatica in Germany in the Context of Global Warming. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2023, 130, 1101–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Panzavolta, T.; Panichi, A.; Bracalini, M.; Croci, F.; Ginetti, B.; Ragazzi, A.; Tiberi, R.; Moricca, S. Dispersal and Propagule Pressure of Botryosphaeriaceae Species in a Declining Oak Stand Is Affected by Insect Vectors. Forests 2017, 8, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Urbez-Torres, J.R.; Castro-Medina, F.; Mohali, S.R.; Gubler, W.D. Botryosphaeriaceae Species Associated with Cankers and Dieback Symptoms of Acacia mangium and Pinus caribaea Var. Hondurensis in Venezuela. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 2455–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Langer, G.; Hartung, T.; Bußkamp, J. Pilzliche und komplexe Schäden an Douglasie. AFZ-DerWald 2023, 78, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghelardini, L.; Pepori, A.L.; Luchi, N.; Capretti, P.; Santini, A. Drivers of Emerging Fungal Diseases of Forest Trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 381, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cameron, E.K.; Vilà, M.; Cabeza, M. Global Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Terrestrial Invertebrate Invaders on Species, Communities and Ecosystems. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vilà, M.; Espinar, J.L.; Hejda, M.; Hulme, P.; Jarošík, V.; Maron, J.; Pergl, J.; Schaffner, U.; Sun, Y.; Pyšek, P. Ecological Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants: A Meta-Analysis of Their Effects on Species, Communities and Ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hultberg, T.; Sandström, J.; Felton, A.; Öhman, K.; Rönnberg, J.; Witzell, J.; Cleary, M. Ash Dieback Risks an Extinction Cascade. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 244, 108516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lovett, G.; Weiss, M.; Liebhold, A.; Holmes, T.; Leung, B.; Lambert, K.; Orwig, D.; Campbell, F.; Rosenthal, J.; Mccullough, D.; et al. Nonnative Forest Insects and Pathogens in the United States: Impacts and Policy Options. Ecol. Appl. 2016, 26, 1437–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langer, G.J.; Fuchs, S.; Osewold, J.; Peters, S.; Schrewe, F.; Ridley, M.; Kätzel, R.; Bubner, B.; Grüner, J. FraxForFuture—Research on European Ash Dieback in Germany. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2022, 129, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maxwell, S.L.; Fuller, R.A.; Brooks, T.M.; Watson, J.E.M. Biodiversity: The Ravages of Guns, Nets and Bulldozers. Nature 2016, 536, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Santini, A.; Ghelardini, L.; De Pace, C.; Desprez-Loustau, M.; Capretti, P.; Chandelier, A.; Cech, T.; Chira, D.; Diamandis, S.; Gaitniekis, T.; et al. Biogeographical Patterns and Determinants of Invasion by Forest Pathogens in Europe. New Phytol. 2012, 197, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hulme, P. Trade, Transport and Trouble: Managing Invasive Species Pathways in an Era of Globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brasier, C.M. The Biosecurity Threat to the UK and Global Environment from International Trade in Plants. Plant Pathol. 2008, 57, 792–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bandyopadhyay, R.; Frederiksen, R.A. Contemporary Global Movement of Emerging Plant Diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 894, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health. Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States; Lederberg, J., Shope, R.E., Oaks, S.C., Eds.; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 1992; ISBN 978-0-309-04741-8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Daszak, P.; Cunningham, A.; Hyatt, A. Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife-- Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science 2000, 287, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anderson, P.K.; Cunningham, A.A.; Patel, N.G.; Morales, F.J.; Epstein, P.R.; Daszak, P. Emerging Infectious Diseases of Plants: Pathogen Pollution, Climate Change and Agrotechnology Drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Plants of the World Online Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) J. Buchholz. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:234727-2 (accessed on 2 February 2024).
  21. Schütt, P.; Schuck, H.J.; Aas, G.; Lang, U.M. Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse; M. & H. Schaper: Hannover, Germany, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neumann, H. Bisherige Erfahrungen in Nordrhein-Westfalen Mit Dem Anbau Und Der Anzucht Des Riesenmammutbaums—Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchh. Mitteilungen Der Dtsch. Dendrol. Ges. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  23. Melchior, G.H.; Herrmann, S. Ergebnisse aus einem Versuch mit vier Herkünften des Mammutbaumes (Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchholz). In Anbau Fremdländischer Baumarten Im Lichte Der Gegenwärtigen Wald. [Verhandlungen Einer Vortragstagung Der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Für Forstgenet. Und Forstpflanzenzüchtung]; Landwirtschaftsverlag: Münster, Germany, 1989; pp. 211–221. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cech, T.L.; Tomiczek, C. Botryosphaeria-Krebs (Botryosphaeria dothidea) des Mammutbaumes nimmt in Ostösterreich zu. Forstsch. Aktuell 2013, 57/58, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kehr, R. Triebschäden an Mammutbaum (Sequoiadendron giganteum) durch Botryosphaeria dothidea auch in Deutschland nachgewiesen. Nachrichtenblatt Des Dtsch. Pflanzenschutzdienstes 2004, 56, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morelet, M.; Andréoli, C.; Chandelier, P.; Ménard, J.-E. Botryosphaeria Dothidea, Agent de Chancre Sur Sequoiadendron giganteum. Rev. For. Française 1993, 45, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scharpf, R.P. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers U.S; United States Government Printing Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; Volume 521, ISBN 978-0-16-041765-8. [Google Scholar]
  28. Haenzi, M.; Cochard, B.; Chablais, R.; Crovadore, J.; Lefort, F. Neofusicoccum parvum, A New Agent of Sequoia Canker and Dieback Identified in Geneva, Switzerland. Forests 2021, 12, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Slippers, B.; Crous, P.W.; Denman, S.; Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, B.D.; Wingfield, M.J. Combined Multiple Gene Genealogies and Phenotypic Characters Differentiate Several Species Previously Identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycologia 2004, 96, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marsberg, A.; Kemler, M.; Jami, F.; Nagel, J.; Postma, A.; Naidoo, S.; Wingfield, M.J.; Crous, P.W.; Spatafora, J.; Hesse, C.N.; et al. Botryosphaeria dothidea: A Latent Pathogen of Global Importance to Woody Plant Health. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Piškur, B.; Pavlic, D.; Slippers, B.; Ogris, N.; Maresi, G.; Wingfield, M.J.; Jurc, D. Diversity and Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae on Declining Ostrya carpinifolia in Slovenia and Italy Following Extreme Weather Conditions. Eur. J. For. Res. 2011, 130, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kovač, M.; Diminić, D.; Orlović, S.; Zlatković, M. Botryosphaeria dothidea and Neofusicoccum yunnanense Causing Canker and Die-Back of Sequoiadendron giganteum in Croatia. Forests 2021, 12, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. CABI International. Pestalotiopsis Funerea, Set. No 52, Published 1976; CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria; CABI International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guba, E.F. Monograph of Monochaetia and Pestalotia; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
  35. Manion, P.D. Tree Disease Concepts; Prentice-Hall: Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sinclair, W.A.; Lyon, H.H. Diseases of Trees and Shrubs, 2nd ed.; Cornel University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  37. Peters, S.; Fuchs, S.; Bien, S.; Bußkamp, J.; Langer, G.J.; Langer, E.J. Fungi Associated with Stem Collar Necroses of Fraxinus excelsior Affected by Ash Dieback. Mycol. Progress. 2023, 22, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bußkamp, J.; Langer, G.J.; Langer, E.J. Sphaeropsis sapinea and Fungal Endophyte Diversity in Twigs of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris) in Germany. Mycol. Prog. 2020, 19, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Langer, G.J.; Bressem, U. Phlebiopsis gigantea als Antagonist des Wurzelschwamms. AFZ/Der Wald. 2017, 72, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  40. Damm, U.; Mostert, L.; Crous, P.W.; Fourie, P.H. Novel Phaeoacremonium Species Associated with Necrotic Wood of Prunus Trees. Pers. Int. Mycol. J. 2008, 20, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. In Nucleic Acids Symposium Series; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; Volume 41, pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  42. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Analyses with Thousands of Taxa and Mixed Models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A Tool for Phylogenetic Analysis and Post-Analysis of Large Phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rehner, S.A.; Samuels, G.J. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Gliocladium Analysed from Nuclear Large Subunit Ribosomal DNA Sequences. Mycol. Res. 1994, 98, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid Genetic Identification and Mapping of Enzymatically Amplified Ribosomal DNA from Several Cryptococcus Species. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 4238–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bien, S.; Kraus, C.; Damm, U. Novel Collophorina-like Genera and Species from Prunus Trees and Vineyards in Germany. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 2020, 45, 46–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS Primers with Enhanced Specificity for Basidiomycetes-application to the Identification of Mycorrhizae and Rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.J.W.T.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. A Guide Methods Appl. 1990, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  51. Paulin, A.E.; Harrington, T.C. Phylogenetic Placement of Anamorphic Species of Chalara among Ceratocystis Species and Other Ascomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 2000, 45, 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  52. Braun, U.; Nakashima, C.; Crous, P.W.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Moreno-Rico, O.; Rooney-Latham, S.; Blomquist, C.L.; Haas, J.; Marmolejo, J. Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Genus Tubakia s. Lat. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2018, 1, 41–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tanney, J.B.; Seifert, K.A. Phacidiaceae Endophytes of Picea Rubens in Eastern Canada. Botany 2018, 96, 555–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic Relationships among Ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA Polymerse II Subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arnold, A.E.; Harrington, A.H.; Huang, Y.-L.; U’Ren, J.M.; Massimo, N.C.; Knight-Connoni, V.; Inderbitzin, P. Coniochaeta elegans Sp. Nov., Coniochaeta montana Sp. Nov. and Coniochaeta nivea Sp. Nov., Three New Species of Endophytes with Distinctive Morphology and Functional Traits. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 005003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rehner, S.A.; Buckley, E. A Beauveria Phylogeny Inferred from Nuclear ITS and EF1-α Sequences: Evidence for Cryptic Diversification and Links to Cordyceps Teleomorphs. Mycologia 2005, 97, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Glass, N.L.; Donaldson, G.C. Development of Primer Sets Designed for Use with the PCR to Amplify Conserved Genes from Filamentous Ascomycetes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 1323–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. O’Donnell, K.; Cigelnik, E. Two Divergent Intragenomic RDNA ITS2 Types within a Monophyletic Lineage of the Fungus Fusarium Are Nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 1997, 7, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Langer, G.J.; Bußkamp, J.; Blumenstein, K.; Terhonen, E. Fungi Inhabiting Woody Tree Tissues—Stems, Branches, and Twigs. In Forest Microbiome; Forest Microbiology; Elsevier: London, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; Cambridge, UK; Oxford, UK, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 175–205. ISBN 978-0-12-822542-4. [Google Scholar]
  60. Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Xu, J.; Crous, P.W. Pestalotiopsis Revisited. Stud. Mycol. 2014, 79, 121–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bastos, A.; Fu, Z.; Ciais, P.; Friedlingstein, P.; Sitch, S.; Pongratz, J.; Weber, U.; Reichstein, M.; Anthoni, P.; Arneth, A.; et al. Impacts of Extreme Summers on European Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of 2003, 2010 and 2018. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 375, 20190507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gharun, M.; Shekhar, A.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Buchmann, N. Effect of the 2022 Summer Drought across Forest Types in Europe. EGUsphere 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Choat, B.; Jansen, S.; Brodribb, T.J.; Cochard, H.; Delzon, S.; Bhaskar, R.; Bucci, S.J.; Feild, T.S.; Gleason, S.M.; Hacke, U.G.; et al. Global Convergence in the Vulnerability of Forests to Drought. Nature 2012, 491, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McDowell, N.G.; Allen, C.D. Darcy’s Law Predicts Widespread Forest Mortality under Climate Warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Buras, A.; Rammig, A.; Zang, C.S. Quantifying Impacts of the 2018 Drought on European Ecosystems in Comparison to 2003. Biogeosciences 2020, 17, 1655–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Choat, B.; Brodribb, T.J.; Brodersen, C.R.; Duursma, R.A.; López, R.; Medlyn, B.E. Triggers of Tree Mortality under Drought. Nature 2018, 558, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rohner, B.; Kumar, S.; Liechti, K.; Gessler, A.; Ferretti, M. Tree Vitality Indicators Revealed a Rapid Response of Beech Forests to the 2018 Drought. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 120, 106903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rebollo, P.; Moreno-Fernández, D.; Cruz-Alonso, V.; Gazol, A.; Rodríguez-Rey, M.; Astigarraga, J.; Zavala, M.A.; Gómez-Aparicio, L.; Andivia, E.; Miguel-Romero, S.; et al. Recent Increase in Tree Damage and Mortality and Their Spatial Dependence on Drought Intensity in Mediterranean Forests. Landsc. Ecol. 2024, 39, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dämmrich, F.; Lotz-Winter, H.; Schmidt, M.; Pätzold, W.; Otto, P.; Schmitt, J.A.; Scholler, M.; Schurig, B.; Winterhoff, W.; Gminder, A.; et al. Rote Liste der Großpilze und Vorläufige Gesamtartenliste der Ständer—Und Schlauchpilze (Basidiomycota und Ascomycota) Deutschlands mit Ausnahme der Flechten und der Phytoparasitischen Kleinpilze; Matzke-Hajek, G., Hofbauer, N., Ludwig, G., Eds.; Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands, Band 8: Pilze (Teil 1)—Großpilze; Landwirtschaftsverlag: Münster, Germany, 2016; Volume 70, p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  70. Smith, H.; Wingfield, M.J.; Petrini, O. Botryosphaeria dothidea Endophytic in Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus nitens in South Africa. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 89, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Blanco-Ulate, B.; Rolshausen, P.; Cantu, D. Draft Genome Sequence of Neofusicoccum parvum Isolate UCR-NP2, a Fungal Vascular Pathogen Associated with Grapevine Cankers. Genome Announc. 2013, 1, e00339-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nazar Pour, F.; Pedrosa, B.; Oliveira, M.; Fidalgo, C.; Devreese, B.; Driessche, G.V.; Félix, C.; Rosa, N.; Alves, A.; Duarte, A.S.; et al. Unveiling the Secretome of the Fungal Plant Pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum Induced by In Vitro Host Mimicry. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Phillips, A.J.L.; Alves, A.; Abdollahzadeh, J.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The Botryosphaeriaceae: Genera and Species Known from Culture. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 76, 51–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Golzar, H.; Burgess, T. Neofusicoccum parvum, a Causal Agent Associated with Cankers and Decline of Norfolk Island Pine in Australia. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2011, 40, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Park, S.; Kim, S.-H.; Back, C.-G.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kang, I.; Jung, H.-Y. First Report of Botryosphaeria parva Causing Stem Blight on Rubus crataegifolius in Korea. Res. Plant Dis. 2016, 22, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J. Botryosphaeriaceae as Endophytes and Latent Pathogens of Woody Plants: Diversity, Ecology and Impact. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2007, 21, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Crous, P.W.; Braun, U.; Hunter, G.C.; Wingfield, M.J.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Shin, H.-D.; Nakashima, C.; Groenewald, J.Z. Phylogenetic Lineages in Pseudocercospora. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 75, 37–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Liu, Z.; Braun, U.; Crous, P.; Si, J.; Zhang, Y. Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Cercosporoid Fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) from China 1. Phytotaxa 2016, 278, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Crous, P.W. Mysocphaerella spp. & Their Anamorphs Associated with Leaf Spot Diseases of Eucalyptus; Amer Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1998; ISBN 978-0-89054-190-6. [Google Scholar]
  80. Videira, S.I.R.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Nakashima, C.; Braun, U.; Barreto, R.W.; de Wit, P.J.G.M.; Crous, P.W. Mycosphaerellaceae: Chaos or Clarity? Stud. Mycol. 2017, 87, 257–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J. Species of Mycosphaerella and Their Anamorphs Associated with Leaf Blotch Disease of Eucalyptus in South Africa. Mycologia 1996, 88, 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Carnegie, A.J.; Burgess, T.I.; Summerell, B.A.; Edwards, J.; Taylor, P.W.J.; Groenewald, J.Z. Foliar Pathogens of Eucalypts. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 94, 125–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Crous, P.W.; Summerell, B.A.; Taylor, J.E.; Bullock, S. Fungi Occurring on Proteaceae in Australia: Selected Foliicolous Species. Austral. Plant Pathol. 2000, 29, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aguilera-Cogley, V.A.; Berbegal, M.; Català, S.; Brentu, F.C.; Armengol, J.; Vicent, A. Characterization of Mycosphaerellaceae Species Associated with Citrus Greasy Spot in Panama and Spain. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ibrahim, M.; Sieber, T.N.; Schlegel, M. Communities of Fungal Endophytes in Leaves of Fraxinus ornus Are Highly Diverse. Fungal Ecol. 2017, 29, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Crous, P.W.; Wingfield, M.J. New Species of Mycosphaerella Occurring on Eucalyptus Leaves in Indonesia and Africa. Can. J. Bot. 1997, 75, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Crous, P.W.; Schumacher, R.K.; Akulov, A.; Thangavel, R.; Hernández-Restrepo, M.; Carnegie, A.J.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Wingfield, M.J.; Summerell, B.A.; Quaedvlieg, W.; et al. New and Interesting Fungi. 2. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2019, 3, 57–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Pérez, C.A.; Wingfield, M.J.; Altier, N.A.; Blanchette, R.A. Mycosphaerellaceae and Teratosphaeriaceae Associated with Eucalyptus Leaf Diseases and Stem Cankers in Uruguay. For. Pathol. 2009, 39, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Aguín, O.; Sainz, M.J.; Ares, A.; Otero, L.; Pedro Mansilla, J. Incidence, Severity and Causal Fungal Species of Mycosphaerella and Teratosphaeria Diseases in Eucalyptus Stands in Galicia (NW Spain). For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 302, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hunter, G.C.; Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Burgess, T.I.; Wingfield, M.J. Mycosphaerella and Teratosphaeria Diseases of Eucalyptus; Easily Confused and with Serious Consequences. Fungal Divers. 2011, 50, 145–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hunter, G.C.; Crous, P.W.; Carnegie, A.J.; Wingfield, M.J. Teratosphaeria nubilosa, a Serious Leaf Disease Pathogen of Eucalyptus spp. in Native and Introduced Areas. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cheah, L.-H.; Hartill, W.F.T. Ascospore Release in Mycosphaerella cryptica (Cooke) Hansford. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1987, 17, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hunter, G.C. Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Population Biology of Mycosphaerella Species Occurring on Eucalyptus; University of Pretoria: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  94. Mondal, S.N.; Gottwald, T.R.; Timmer, L.W. Environmental Factors Affecting the Release and Dispersal of Ascospores of Mycosphaerella citri. Phytopathology 2003, 93, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Samarakoon, M.C.; Gafforov, Y.; Liu, N.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Bhat, J.D.; Liu, J.-K.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. Combined Multi-Gene Backbone Tree for the Genus Coniochaeta with Two New Species from Uzbekistan. Phytotaxa 2018, 336, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Damm, U.; Fourie, P.H.; Crous, P.W. Coniochaeta (Lecythophora), Collophora Gen. Nov. and Phaeomoniella Species Associated with Wood Necroses of Prunus Trees. Pers. Int. Mycol. J. 2010, 24, 60–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Harrington, A.H.; del Olmo-Ruiz, M.; U’Ren, J.M.; Garcia, K.; Pignatta, D.; Wespe, N.; Arnold, A.E. Coniochaeta endophytica Sp. Nov., a Foliar Endophyte Associated with Healthy Photosynthetic Tissue of Platycladus orientalis (Cupressaceae). Plant Fungal Syst. 2019, 64, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Perdomo, H.; García, D.; Gené, J.; Cano, J.; Sutton, D.A.; Summerbell, R.; Guarro, J. Phialemoniopsis, a New Genus of Sordariomycetes, and New Species of Phialemonium and Lecythophora. Mycologia 2013, 105, 398–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Troy, G.C.; Panciera, D.L.; Pickett, J.P.; Sutton, D.A.; Gene, J.; Cano, J.F.; Guarro, J.; Thompson, E.H.; Wickes, B.L. Mixed Infection Caused by Lecythophora canina Sp. Nov. and Plectosphaerella cucumerina in a German Shepherd Dog. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Vázquez-Campos, X.; Kinsela, A.S.; Waite, T.D.; Collins, R.N.; Neilan, B.A. Fodinomyces uranophilus Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov. and Coniochaeta fodinicola Sp. Nov., Two Uranium Mine-Inhabiting Ascomycota Fungi from Northern Australia. Mycologia 2014, 106, 1073–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Weber, E. The Lecythophora-Coniochaeta Complex: I. Morphological Studies on Lecythophora Species Isolated from Picea abies. Nova Hedwig. 2002, 74, 159–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bilański, P.; Kowalski, T. Fungal Endophytes in Fraxinus Excelsior Petioles and Their in Vitro Antagonistic Potential against the Ash Dieback Pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 257, 126961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chethana, K.W.T.; Niranjan, M.; Dong, W.; Samarakoon, M.C.; Bao, D.F.; Calabon, M.S.; Chaiwan, N.; Chuankid, B.; Dayarathne, M.C.; De Silva, N.I.; et al. AJOM New Records and Collections of Fungi: 101–150. Asian J. Mycol. 2021, 4, 113–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Si, H.-L.; Su, Y.-M.; Zheng, X.-X.; Ding, M.-Y.; Bose, T.; Chang, R.-L. Phylogenetic and Morphological Analyses of Coniochaeta Isolates Recovered from Inner Mongolia and Yunnan Revealed Three New Endolichenic Fungal Species. MycoKeys 2021, 83, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Meng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, G.; Liu, Y.; Du, G.; Feng, H. Can Nitrogen Supersede Host Identity in Shaping the Community Composition of Foliar Endophytic Fungi in an Alpine Meadow Ecosystem? Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 895533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wanasinghe, D.N.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Lee, H.B.; Gareth Jones, E.B.; Tibpromma, S.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Jayasiri, S.C.; et al. Fungal Diversity Notes 709–839: Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Contributions to Fungal Taxa with an Emphasis on Fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Divers. 2018, 89, 1–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nasr, S.; Bien, S.; Soudi, M.R.; Alimadadi, N.; Shahzadeh Fazeli, S.A.; Damm, U. Novel Collophorina and Coniochaeta Species from Euphorbia polycaulis, an Endemic Plant in Iran. Mycol. Progress. 2018, 17, 755–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Judith-Hertz, C. Systematics and Species Delimitation in Pestalotia and Pestalotiopsis s.l. (Amphisphaeriales, Ascomycota); Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Fachbereich Biowissenschaften: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  109. Bußkamp, J.; Bien, S.; Neumann, L.; Blumenstein, K.; Terhonen, E.; Langer, G.J. Endophytic Community in Juvenile Acer Pseudoplatanus and Pathogenicity of Cryptostroma corticale and Other Associated Fungi under Controlled Conditions. J. Plant Pathol. 2024, 106, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jacobs, V.G.; Halleen, F.; Mostert, L. Fungi Associated with Dieback of Apple Trees to Be Excavated and the Assessment of Diplodia seriata Fruiting Structures on Chipped Apple Wood Used for Mulch. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 324, 112613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kim, M.-J.; Shin, H.-K.; Choi, Y.-S.; Kim, G.-C.; Kim, G.-H. An Aeromycological Study of Various Wooden Cultural Heritages in Korea. J. Cult. Herit. 2016, 17, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xie, J.; Strobel, G.A.; Feng, T.; Ren, H.; Mends, M.T.; Zhou, Z.; Geary, B. An Endophytic Coniochaeta velutina Producing Broad Spectrum Antimycotics. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tian, Q.; Liu, J.K.; Hyde, K.D.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Boonmee, S.; Jayasiri, S.C.; Luo, Z.L.; Taylor, J.E.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Bhat, D.J.; et al. Phylogenetic Relationships and Morphological Reappraisal of Melanommataceae (Pleosporales). Fungal Divers. 2015, 74, 267–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Xiao, C.L.; Rogers, J.D.; Kim, Y.K.; Liu, Q. Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis—A New Species Associated with Pome Fruits from Washington State. Mycologia 2005, 97, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Garibaldi, A.; Bertetti, D.; Amatulli, M.T.; Gullino, M.L. First Report of Postharvest Fruit Rot in Persimmon Caused by Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis in Italy. Plant Dis. 2010, 94, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kim, Y.K.; Xiao, C.L. A Postharvest Fruit Rot in Apple Caused by Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 1376–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Weber, R.W.S. Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis, Cause of a New Storage Rot of Apples in Northern Europe: Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis on Stored Apples in Europe. J. Phytopathol. 2011, 159, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Elliott, M.; Chastagner, G.A.; Coats, K.P.; Sikdar, P.; Xiao, C.L. First Report of a New Leaf Blight Caused by Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis on Pacific Madrone in Western Washington and Oregon. Plant Dis. 2014, 98, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Børve, J.; Talgø, V.; Brurberg, M.B.; Stensvand, A. Fruit Rot Caused by Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis on Apple in Norway. In Proceedings of the IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4 September 2023; Volume 164, pp. 101–102. [Google Scholar]
  120. Díaz, G.A.; Latorre, B.A.; Ferrada, E.; Lolas, M. Identification and Characterization of Diplodia mutila, D. seriata, Phacidiopycnis washingtonensis and Phacidium lacerum Obtained from Apple (Malus x Domestica) Fruit Rot in Maule Region, Chile. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 153, 1259–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Crous, P.W.; Quaedvlieg, W.; Hansen, K.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Groenewald, J.Z. Phacidium and Ceuthospora (Phacidiaceae) Are Congeneric: Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Implications. IMA Fungus 2014, 5, 173–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hahn, G.G. A New Species of Phacidiella Causing the So-Called Phomopsis Disease of Conifers. Mycologia 1957, 49, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Amiri, A. Phacidiopycnis Rots 2020. WSU Tree Fruit Comprehensive Tree Fruit Site. Washington State University. Available online: https://treefruit.wsu.edu/crop-protection/disease-management/phacidiopycnis-rot/ (accessed on 5 February 2024).
  124. Kowalski, T.; Bilański, P. Fungi Detected in the Previous Year’s Leaf Petioles of Fraxinus excelsior and Their Antagonistic Potential against Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Forests 2021, 12, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ozturk, I.K.; Amiri, A. Pathogenicity and Control of Phacidium lacerum, an Emerging Pome Fruit Pathogen in Washington State. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 3124–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bajo, J.; Santamaría, O.; Diez, J.J. Cultural Characteristics and Pathogenicity of Pestalotiopsis funerea on Cupressus arizonica. For. Pathol. 2008, 38, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gonthier, P.; Nicolotti, G. First Report of Pestalotiopsis funerea on Cupressocyparis leylandii in Italy. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Madar, Z.; Solel, Z.; Kimchi, M. Pestalotiopsis Canker of Cypress in Israel. Phytoparasitica 1991, 19, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sousa, M.F.; Tavares, R.M.; Gerós, H.; Neto, T.L. First Report of Hakea sericea Leaf Infection Caused by Pestalotiopsis Funerea in Portugal. Plant Pathol. 2004, 53, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liu, F.; Bonthond, G.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Cai, L.; Crous, P.W. Sporocadaceae, a Family of Coelomycetous Fungi with Appendage-Bearing Conidia. Stud. Mycol. 2019, 92, 287–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Silva, A.; Diogo, E.; Henriques, J.; Ramos, A.; Sandoval-Denis, M.; Crous, P.W.; Bragança, H. Pestalotiopsis pini Sp. Nov., an Emerging Pathogen on Stone Pine (Pinus pinea L.). Forests 2020, 11, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Santos, J.; Hilário, S.; Pinto, G.; Alves, A. Diversity and Pathogenicity of Pestalotioid Fungi Associated with Blueberry Plants in Portugal, with Description of Three Novel Species of Neopestalotiopsis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 162, 539–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Crous, P.W.; Schumacher, R.K.; Wingfield, M.J.; Akulov, A.; Denman, S.; Roux, J.; Braun, U.; Burgess, T.I.; Carnegie, A.J.; Váczy, K.Z.; et al. New and Interesting Fungi. 1. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2018, 1, 169–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Solarte, F.; Muñoz, C.; Maharachchikumbura, S.; Alvarez, E. Diversity of Neopestalotiopsis and Pestalotiopsis spp., Causal Agents of Guava Scab in Colombia. Plant Dis. 2017, 102, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Marqua, J.; Fischer, C. Die Pilzflora des Ehinger Raumes. Available online: http://www.pilzflora-ehingen.de/pilzflora/arthtml/pmonochaeta.php (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  136. Taylor, J.E.; Koukol, O. Towards Resolving Nothophaeocryptopus and Rhizosphaera Inhabitants of Spruce Needles. For. Pathol. 2023, 53, e12807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gadgil, P.D. Fungi on Trees and Shrubs in New Zealand; Fungal Diversity Research Series; Fungal Diversity Press: Hong Kong, China, 2005; ISBN 978-962-86765-9-0. [Google Scholar]
  138. Pennycook, S.R.; Young, J.M.; Fletcher, M.J.; Fry, P.A. Plant Diseases Recorded in New Zealand; Plant Diseases Division, DSIR: Auckland, New Zealand, 1989; ISBN 978-0-477-02547-8. [Google Scholar]
  139. Mack, R.N.; Simberloff, D.; Mark Lonsdale, W.; Evans, H.; Clout, M.; Bazzaz, F.A. Biotic Invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global Consequences, and Control. Ecol. Appl. 2000, 10, 689–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bhunjun, C.S.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Promputtha, I.; Hyde, K.D. Importance of Molecular Data to Identify Fungal Plant Pathogens and Guidelines for Pathogenicity Testing Based on Koch’s Postulates. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 3. Phylogeny obtained by maximum likelihood analysis of the combined LSU-ITS-TUB-EF1α sequence alignment of species from Pestalotiopsis. ML bootstrap support values above 70% are shown at the nodes. Pestalotiopsis furcata strain MFLUCC12-0054 is used as the outgroup. Strains analysed in this study are emphasised in bold. Branches that are crossed by diagonal lines are shortened by 50%.
Figure 3. Phylogeny obtained by maximum likelihood analysis of the combined LSU-ITS-TUB-EF1α sequence alignment of species from Pestalotiopsis. ML bootstrap support values above 70% are shown at the nodes. Pestalotiopsis furcata strain MFLUCC12-0054 is used as the outgroup. Strains analysed in this study are emphasised in bold. Branches that are crossed by diagonal lines are shortened by 50%.
Pathogens 13 00715 g003
Figure 4. Colony surfaces of isolated fungal species on MEA (left) and PDA (right) medium after 4 weeks. (a,b) Amycosphaerella africana strain NW-FVA 4336; (c,d) Botryosphaeria dothidea strain NW-FVA 9830; (e,f) Coniochaeta acaciae strain NW-FVA 9903; (g,h) Ophiostoma quercus strain NW-FVA 6920; (i,j) Pestalotiopsis australis strain NW-FVA 4349.
Figure 4. Colony surfaces of isolated fungal species on MEA (left) and PDA (right) medium after 4 weeks. (a,b) Amycosphaerella africana strain NW-FVA 4336; (c,d) Botryosphaeria dothidea strain NW-FVA 9830; (e,f) Coniochaeta acaciae strain NW-FVA 9903; (g,h) Ophiostoma quercus strain NW-FVA 6920; (i,j) Pestalotiopsis australis strain NW-FVA 4349.
Pathogens 13 00715 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic illustrations of selected fungal species. (a,b) Conidiomata of Amycosphaerella africana strain NW-FVA 4336; (c,d) conidiomata of Coniochaeta acaciae strain NW-FVA 9903; (e) conidiomata and (f) conidia of Pestalotiopsis australis strain NW-FVA 4349. Scale bars: (a,c) = 200 μm; (b,d) = 50 μm; (e) = 128 μm; (f) = 20 μm.
Figure 5. Microscopic illustrations of selected fungal species. (a,b) Conidiomata of Amycosphaerella africana strain NW-FVA 4336; (c,d) conidiomata of Coniochaeta acaciae strain NW-FVA 9903; (e) conidiomata and (f) conidia of Pestalotiopsis australis strain NW-FVA 4349. Scale bars: (a,c) = 200 μm; (b,d) = 50 μm; (e) = 128 μm; (f) = 20 μm.
Pathogens 13 00715 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Langer, G.J.; Bien, S.; Bußkamp, J. Filamentous Fungi Associated with Disease Symptoms in Non-Native Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany—A Gateway for Alien Fungal Pathogens? Pathogens 2024, 13, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090715

AMA Style

Langer GJ, Bien S, Bußkamp J. Filamentous Fungi Associated with Disease Symptoms in Non-Native Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany—A Gateway for Alien Fungal Pathogens? Pathogens. 2024; 13(9):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Langer, Gitta Jutta, Steffen Bien, and Johanna Bußkamp. 2024. "Filamentous Fungi Associated with Disease Symptoms in Non-Native Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany—A Gateway for Alien Fungal Pathogens?" Pathogens 13, no. 9: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090715

APA Style

Langer, G. J., Bien, S., & Bußkamp, J. (2024). Filamentous Fungi Associated with Disease Symptoms in Non-Native Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in Germany—A Gateway for Alien Fungal Pathogens? Pathogens, 13(9), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop