Next Article in Journal
West Nile Virus: An Update on Pathobiology, Epidemiology, Diagnostics, Control and “One Health” Implications
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Mycoplasma bovis Diversity and Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Calf Feedlots Undergoing a Respiratory Disease Outbreak
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of Leptin and Leptin Receptor Expression in Mice Acutely Infected with Neospora caninum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycoplasma bovis in Spanish Cattle Herds: Two Groups of Multiresistant Isolates Predominate, with One Remaining Susceptible to Fluoroquinolones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance-Associated Genes through Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates with Different Antimicrobial Resistances

Animal Health Lab, University of Guelph, 419 Gordon St., Guelph, ON N1H 6R8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(7), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070588
Submission received: 30 June 2020 / Revised: 15 July 2020 / Accepted: 16 July 2020 / Published: 19 July 2020

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Mycoplasma bovis has been previously associated with topoisomerase and ribosomal gene mutations rather than specific resistance-conferring genes. Using whole genome sequencing (WGS) to identify potential new AMR mechanisms for M. bovis, it was found that a 2019 clinical isolate with high MIC (2019-043682) for fluoroquinolones, macrolides, lincosamides, pleuromutilins and tetracyclines had a new core genome multilocus sequencing (cgMLST) type (ST10-like) and 91% sequence similarity to the published genome of M. bovis PG45. Closely related to PG45, a 1982 isolate (1982-M6152) shared the same cgMLST type (ST17), 97.2% sequence similarity and low MIC results. Known and potential AMR- associated genetic events were identified through multiple sequence alignment of the three genomes. Isolate 2019-043682 had 507 genes with non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) and 67 genes disrupted. Isolate 1982-M6152 had 81 NSMs and 20 disruptions. Using functional roles and known mechanisms of antimicrobials, a 55 gene subset was assessed for AMR potential. Seventeen were previously identified from other bacteria as sites of AMR mutation, 38 shared similar functions to them, and 11 contained gene-disrupting mutations. This study indicated that M. bovis may obtain high AMR characteristics by mutating or disrupting other functional genes, in addition to topoisomerases and ribosomal genes.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma bovis is a member of the Mollicutes; membrane-bound bacteria which lack a cell wall, precluding the use of many common antimicrobial agents such as the β-lactams [1]. In cattle, M. bovis is a causative agent of pneumonia, arthritis, otitis media, and reproductive disease and is a contributor to the bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex, also known as ‘shipping fever’, which is a major source of morbidity, mortality and financial loss in calf and feedlot operations. Additionally, M. bovis is capable of persisting for the life of a colonized animal, which may remain asymptomatic while acting as a source of infection for herdmates or offspring [1,2].
Of note, many of the antibiotics to which M. bovis shows resistance are not licensed for usage in treating M. bovis infections [3] but may be used in the treatment of other bovine bacterial pathogens. Given the asymptomatic nature of many M. bovis infections, and the high rates of colonization when animals are co-mingled (potentially over 90%) [4,5], conditions are favourable for the development of multi-drug resistant strains. With global rates of antimicrobial resistance increasing, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance, particularly for multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains, is critical for determining effective treatment [6], or potentially to design treatment protocols that use evolutionary approaches to counter or reverse antimicrobial resistance [7].
Unlike other members of the BRD complex such as Mannheimia haemolytica, Histophilus somni or Pasteurella multocida, M. bovis is not known to possess defined antimicrobial resistance genes [8] but appears to have the molecular mechanisms of its resistance rooted in point mutations within several ribosomal and topoisomerase genes. Previous studies have used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) paired with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing to establish that mutations within gyrA and parC are linked to increased resistance to fluoroquinolones, that increased resistance to spectinomycin and the tetracyclines is linked to rrs1-rrs2 (16S rRNA gene) mutations, and that rrl1-rrl2 (23S rRNA gene) mutations are linked to increased resistance to florfenicol, lincosamides, macrolides and pleuromutilins [9], with rrl3 (23S rRNA gene) also implicated in macrolide resistance [10].
In a large-scale MIC study of M. bovis strains isolated between 1978 to 2009, fluctuations in antimicrobial susceptibility over time were observed [3] with the MIC50 values, and thus resistance, increasing for several tetracycline and macrolide-class antimicrobial drugs over the span of the study. Additionally, associations between MIC50 values were observed for different antimicrobials; although sequencing these isolates fell beyond the scope of the study, the association between lincosamides, pleuromutilins and florfenicol in terms of rrl1-rrl2 mutations was mirrored by a similar observed association in MIC50 values with these historical samples.
A high MIC M. bovis was isolated from lung tissues of a two-week old male Holstein calf submitted to the Animal Health Lab in July of 2019 for post-mortem examination. In the interest of determining possible genetic factors for this high level of resistance, whole-genome sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform was conducted, in tandem with WGS of a historical isolate of M. bovis (1982-M6152) previously categorized as low MIC for most antimicrobials [3]. The MICs and sequence data for both isolates were compared to M. bovis strain PG45, a reference strain with a fully sequenced and circularized genome, in order to identify any gaps in sequencing coverage, to determine if any new genes were present in the isolates as opposed to a reference strain, and to better elucidate which mutations in the high MIC isolate were potentially significant for AMR by ruling out any shared mutations with the low MIC isolate.

2. Results

2.1. MIC Testing

Cultures of two isolates of M. bovis (1982-M6152 and 2019-043682) and M. bovis strain PG45 (used as a reference strain) were tested in triplicate for minimum inhibitory concentration of 16 antimicrobials (Table 1), with the results of MIC testing identical within each triplicate. Relative to M. bovis PG45, isolate 1982-M6152 shows a two-fold increase in MIC for oxytetracycline but is otherwise identical in response to other antimicrobial compounds. Isolate 2019-043682 shows increased MICs for multiple fluoroquinolones, macrolides and tetracyclines, as well as a lincosamide, a pleuromutilin and two inhibitors of protein synthesis (gentamicin and florfenicol). For aminoglycosides the results are mixed, with increased MIC observed for spectinomycin, but no change in MIC for neomycin. All three strains have high MICs for sulfonamides, although they retain a low MIC for combination trimethoprim/sulfa.

2.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing

Raw sequencing yield for the two sequenced isolates was 167.8 Mb for 1982-M6152 (GenBank accession: CP058969), and 54.02 Mb for 2019-043682 (GenBank accession: CP058968). Given the sequencing yields and the documented genome size of 1.003 Mb for M. bovis PG45 (GenBank accession NC_014760.1), raw sequencing coverage (where C = yield/genome size) was 167× for 1982-M6152 and 54× for 2019-043682, which is sufficient for analysis of mutations and SNPs. Assembled using SPAdes 3.9.0 [11] in Illumina’s BaseSpace hub (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) genome sizes were 978,895 bp for 1982-M6152 and 941,076 bp for 2019-043682. Also within BaseSpace, core genome multilocus squence typing (cgMLST) was conducted for both isolates sequenced, using Bacterial Analysis Pipeline v1.0.4 [12]. Isolate 2019-043682 had an undescribed cgMLST type (ST10-like) while isolate 1982-M6152 had the same cgMLST type (ST17) as PG45.
Assembly and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of both isolates with M. bovis PG45 in Geneious 11(Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) (Figure 1) revealed that 2019-043682 had 91% sequence similarity to PG45. 1982-M6152 had 97.2% sequence similarity to PG4.
Annotation of the MSA in MegAlign using feature data for PG45 identified 878 features (MegAlign’s term: CDS, in more general usage) in strain PG45, with divergences by isolate summarized in Table 2. Features were reported as Identical by MegAlign if they were 100% identical to PG45, with 100% coverage. Features were reported as Not_Mapped by MegAlign if their % identity score fell below 95%. Unmapped features have been further categorized by the researchers as excised, truncated or highly variable based on their % coverage score (Table 2). Isolate 1982-M6152 had 696 features identical to PG45, 105 with substitutions, 37 with insertions or deletions and 39 reported as Not_Mapped. Of these 39, 24 were excised, 11 truncated and 4 present but highly variable. Isolate 2019-043682 had 183 identical features, 471 with substitutions, 50 with insertions or deletions, and 173 reported as Not_Mapped. Of these, 81 were excised, 48 were truncated, and 44 were present but highly variable. Although several features were excised in the isolates relative to PG45, no unique features were identified in either isolate that were absent from PG45.
To determine which mutations could potentially alter gene function, further analysis of the two isolates using DNAStar’s ArrayStar software revealed 3285 individual nonsynonymous mutations relative to M. bovis PG45 in total between the two isolates, across 513 genes and pseudogenes. Isolate 1982-M6152 contained 81 genes with non-synonymous mutations, 20 of which were disrupted. Isolate 2019-043682 contained 507 genes with non-synonymous mutations, with 67 genes disrupted. 17 genes with non-synonymous mutations were common to both isolate 1982-M6152 and isolate 2019-043682, with 14 of the mutations identical between the 2 isolates. Four genes with disrupting mutations were common to both isolates, with an insertion mutation in gene MBOVPG45_RS03940 (insertion TTGT, PG45 genome reference position 918372) identical between isolates. A subset of 55 genes (Table 3) containing NSMs was selected for further consideration based on the functional role of the genes and known mechanisms of antimicrobials, through consultation of the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and literature review [13]. Additionally, 22 genes were identified as ABC transporter system genes (Table 4) although the lack of available characterization has led to them being grouped separately for discussion. A full list of nonsynonymous mutations, their sequence and their positions is available as supplementary data (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2), as well as an expanded version of Table 3 (Supplementary Table S3) containing gene descriptions.

3. Discussion

The recent isolate 2019-043682 had significantly elevated MICs for multiple fluoroquinolones, macrolides and tetracyclines, as well as a lincosamide, a pleuromutilin, spectinomycin, and two inhibitors of protein synthesis (gentamicin and florfenicol), indicating multi-drug resistant M. bovis can emerge in the field.
Of the M. bovis genes previously linked by Sulyok et al. with AMR for various classes of antimicrobial, two sites linked with fluoroquinolone resistance (gyrA and gyrB) display multiple non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) for the high-MIC isolate 2019-043682 and no NSMs for the low-MIC isolate 1982-M6152. ParC, likewise associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, shows 18 unique NSMs in the isolate 2019-043682, and a single NSM in 1982-M6152, which is shared with the 2019-043682, therefore the shared single NSM is unlikely to be contributory to the elevated MICs. Although genes rrs1-rrs2 and rrl1-rrl2 were associated with AMR for tetracyclines, spectinomycin, macrolides, lincosamides and pleuromutilins, there are no NSMs for them in the isolate 2019-043682 despite the elevated MIC values, suggesting additional genetic events may be associated with AMR for these antimicrobials.
For antimicrobials where an observed increase in MIC was not matched with a previously identified M. bovis resistance-associated mutation, genes identified as AMR-associated in other species, as well as genes within the same functional groups are likely candidates for AMR association. Beyond the genes previously associated with AMR in M. bovis, an additional 510 features contain non-synonymous mutations. Assigning these genes to functional groups allowed us to exclude pseudogenes and genes coding for uncharacterized and hypothetical proteins. Also excluded were genes whose NSMs were identical between isolates 2019-043682 (high MIC) and 1982-M6152 (low MIC). Of the 149 genes remaining, we focused on a subset of 55 genes with nonsynonymous mutations within functional roles known to be involved in antimicrobial resistance [13]: protein synthesis and topoisomerases. Additionally, 22 genes with NSMs were identified as ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter system genes. These genes, although lacking full characterization, are nonetheless included in the discussion as targets for future analysis, due to the role of efflux pumps, particularly ABC transporters, in AMR.

3.1. Protein Synthesis

Interference with protein synthesis is a primary method of action for the antimicrobials, with different antimicrobials interfering at different stages of synthesis, and at different locations within the ribosome complex.

3.1.1. Methyltransferases

RNA methyltransferases methylate specific bases within ribosomal RNA, altering the physical structure of binding sites and other active sites within the ribosomal subunits [16,29,30]. Mutations within the 16S RNA methyltransferase family are known to confer aminoglycoside resistance within other bacterial species [16], and five genes (rsmA, rsmD, rsmH, rsmI and MBOVPG45_RS02280, a 16S uracil methyltransferase) within isolate 2019-043682 contain NSMs not found in isolate 1982-M6152. The 23S methyltransferase rlmA has been associated with AMR for tylosin [29], and while rlmA is wildtype in isolate 2019-043682, the related 23S methyltransferases rlmB, rlmD and rlmH contain 5, 11 and 1 unique NSMs respectively. RlmB has also been identified as a potential site for AMR mutations based on an analysis of its structure [15], although no mutational studies have been conducted. For tRNA methyltransferases, trmD is implicated in multi-drug resistance [31]: it is wildtype in isolate 2019-043682, but two related tRNA methyltransferases (trmB and MBOVPG45_RS00465, a cytidine methyltransferase) contain NSMs, with trmB containing a gene disruption.

3.1.2. Ribosomal Proteins

Mutations in rpsC and rpsJ, components of the 30S ribosomal subunit, are known to confer tetracycline resistance [18,20]. RpsC contains a single NSM in isolate 2019-043682 that is unique from the two NSMs observed in isolate 1982-M6152, but rpsJ is wildtype in isolate 2019-043682 and contains a single NSM in isolate 1982-M6152 that is therefore unlikely to influence MIC values. RpsB and rpsE contain 3 and 2 NSMs in the 2019 isolate, with a single, separate NSM present for rpsE in the 1982 isolate: mutations in these genes have been linked with aminoglycoside resistance [17,19], Additionally, five other 30S ribosomal proteins (rpsD, rpsG, rpsP, rpsS, and rbfA) contain NSMs in isolate 2019-043682.
Of the 50S ribosomal proteins with observed NSMs, rplD and rplV have been previously associated with macrolide resistance in Clostridium perfringens and two Campylobacter species [22,23] with rplD containing ten separate NSMs in the isolate 2019-043682. The 50S subunit gene rplC, where mutation has been previously associated with pleuromutilin resistance [32], contains a single NSM in the 2019 isolate, unique from the two NSMs found in the 1982 isolate. 50S ribosomal proteins mutations have also been linked with resistance to lincosamides, macrolides and phenicols [32]: an additional five genes (rplB, rpmE, MBOVPG45_RS00445, MBOVPG45_RS03525 and MBOVPG45_RS01360) coding for 50S ribosomal proteins contain NSMs in isolate 2019-043682 while remaining wildtype in isolate 1982-M6152. Among these, rpmE has been linked with multi-drug resistance [24].

3.1.3. Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

While none of the antimicrobials used in MIC testing in this study target them, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, also known as tRNA-ligases, are enzymes which attach individual amino acids to their corresponding tRNAs and are a target of interest for antimicrobial development [33]. Isolate 2019-043682 contains 22 tRNA-ligase genes with NSMs, of which ileS (a known target for pseudomonic acid) [27] is disrupted, as is alaS (a novobiocin target) [25], in addition to a glutamate-tRNA ligase (MBOVPG45_RSO1150) and a methionine-tRNA ligase (MBOVPG45_RS03150). AsnS and pheS have been linked with multi-drug resistance [26] and contain one and two unique NSMs in isolate 2019-043682, respectively. Three of these genes (alaS, ileS and MBOVPG45_RS02170, a threonine-tRNA ligase) contain different NSMs in isolate 1982-M6152, illustrating that the presence of an NSM on its own is not sufficient for AMR, and deeper investigation into changes in protein structure and function are required. LysS, containing 3 NSMs in isolate 2019-043682, has been identified as a gene contributing to methicillin resistance in MRSA [31]: as a β-lactam, methicillin is not used in the treatment of mycoplasma infections, but co-infection with M. bovis containing a potential AMR-associated mutation raises the possibility of horizontal gene transfer to a normally susceptible species.

3.2. Topoisomerases

In addition to gyrA, gyrB and parC discussed by Sulyok et al. (2017), parE mutations are also involved in fluoroquinolone resistance [14] and the isolate 2019-043682 contains four NSMs within the parE gene. While topA, a type I DNA topoisomerase, has not been linked with AMR previously, the gene, which is wildtype in isolate 1982-M6152, contains a single nucleotide “A” insertion at nt 1762 of the topA gene in isolate 2019-043682, which results in a topA (612–614 VK *) to topA (612–613 S *) mutation, likely a gene disrupting mutation. As bacterial topoisomerase I is a target of interest for antimicrobial development [34,35,36], screening for mutations affecting topA may be of future value to researchers and clinicians.

3.3. Bacterial Efflux Pumps: ABC Transporters

Bacterial efflux pumps are a class of membrane transport proteins whose role is the removal of toxic substances or metabolites from within the bacterial cell: It is estimated that 5–10% of all bacterial genes are involved in transport, with efflux pumps specifically comprising a large proportion of these transporters [37]. Of the two classes of efflux pump, primary and secondary, the primary transporters use ATP hydrolysis as an energy source, and are also known as ATP binding cassette transporters, or ABC transporters [38]. They are more commonly implicated in resistance to a single drug or category of drugs, although instances of multi-drug resistant ABC transporters have been described 200 [16,38].
As summarized in Table 4, 22 ABC transporter genes contain NSMs in isolate 2019-043682, one of which (MBOVPG45_RS03705) contains a gene-disrupting mutation. Three (MBOVPG45_RS01775, MBOVPG45_RS02905 and MBOVPG45_RS04315) also contain NSMs in isolate 1982-M6152. Although none are previously identified as SDR- or MDR- involved in M. bovis, the wide range of antimicrobials affected by efflux pumps suggests that this may be an area of interest for future research. While 8 non-ABC membrane transport proteins with NSMs were identified in isolate 2019-043682 (Supplementary Table S2), none has been characterized sufficiently to determine their potential as secondary efflux pumps and have thus been excluded from discussion.

3.4. Future Directions

Within the 55 genes selected for additional study based on functional role and the 22 ABC transporter genes, the 40 genes identified by their organism (eg., MBOVPG45_RS00380) rather than a common name limit the utility of a literature review or database search for assessing AMR potential. Although beyond the scope of the current study, a BLAST search for each gene to identify homology with other organisms could permit more detailed characterization of these genes and thus allow for a more thorough search of existing research into AMR. This would be of particular value for the ABC transporters, as all 22 identified as potential AMR associations due to their mutations are given M. bovis-specific identifiers. MBOVPG45_RS04315, with 89 separate NSMs in the high-MIC isolate, is a particularly strong candidate for a homology search.
As an initial foray by the research group into whole genome sequencing, the sequencing of a pair of high and low MIC isolates and the use of a fully-characterized reference strain (PG45) as a scaffold for assembly and annotation allowed us to determine which genes and which NSMs were non-contributory to the high MIC observed in the 2019 isolate, and allowed us to determine that no additional genes were present relative to the reference strain. Sequencing additional high-MIC strains of M. bovis as they arise in the future will allow us to develop further evidence in support of AMR association for the subset of genes identified and may uncover additional candidate genes for AMR association. Likewise, selecting historical strains for WGS that are high or low MIC for specific antimicrobials may allow for further refinement or expansion of the list of AMR-association candidates.

4. Materials and Methods

As a non-interventionary study, prior approval from the University of Guelph Research Ethics Board was not required for this research.

4.1. Culture & Isolation of Mycoplasmas

The body of a two-week old male Holstein calf was submitted to the Animal Health Lab in July of 2019 for post-mortem examination. Histologically, no lesions indicative of mycoplasma pneumonia were observed within the lungs. Culture and isolation of M. bovis AHL# 2019-043682 from the calf lung tissue was conducted as follows: The lung tissue submitted was perforated repeatedly using a sterile dry swab to collect sample material for broth (pig serum, horse serum and ureaplasma broths) and agar plate (pig serum agar, yeastolate agar, ureaplasma agar) culture [39]. Mycoplasma agar plates were incubated at 37 °C with 5–7% CO2 and 80–100% relative humidity. Ureaplasma agar plates ware incubated at 37 °C anaerobically. All broth cultures were incubated aerobically at 37 °C. Plates were read at 48–72 h intervals using a transilluminated stereomicroscope. Broth tubes were visually inspected for growth and pH change at 18–24 h intervals, and were subcultured twice, at 48–72 h growth and at 48–72 h following the first subculture. Agar plates were subcultured if suspicious growth was observed during reading. Following isolation, species identity as M bovis was confirmed using goat anti-rabbit/fluorescein isothiocyanate (GAR/FITC)-labelled antiserum fluorescent antibody staining [39]. Blocks of agar containing pure isolate were cut and stored at −80 °C for long term storage. Isolated 1982-M6152, an isolate of M. bovis from 1982 stored at −80 °C and identified in a previous study [3] as low MIC for most antimicrobials, was propagated and tested by WGS and MIC retesting.

4.2. MIC Testing

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was conducted on M. bovis isolates 2019-043682, 1982-M6152 and strain PG45 in triplicates for each isolate using previously described procedures [3], and using M. bovis isolate 227, an internal laboratory reference strain, as a control. Briefly: each isolate was first inoculated into 4 mL Mycoplasma MIC broth and incubated 48–72 h at 37 °C aerobically, before being frozen at −80 °C.
Following this incubation period, a colour-changing unit (CCU) and colony forming unit (CFU) count were setup to determine the number of CCU’s in the frozen aliquots. A 10-fold serial dilution was prepared for each isolate using Mycoplasma MIC broth, with 200 µL total volume in each of 12 wells. 10µL of the first 6 dilutions were plated onto Hayflick’s agar, and both the serial dilutions and agar plates were incubated for 48–72 h at 37 °C with 5–7% CO2 and 80–100% relative humidity. Both serial dilutions (lowest serial dilution showing a blue-red colour change) and agar plates (colonies counted using a stereomicroscope) were read after 48–72 h, and the CCU and CFU counts of the isolates were calculated accordingly.
A frozen aliquot was thawed and diluted in tubes of Mycoplasma MIC broth in successively larger volumes so that at least 25 mL of a 103–105 CCU/mL dilution was achieved. MIC testing was setup by inoculating 200 µL of this dilution into every well of a Sensititre BOPO6F microtitre plate. The Sensititre plate was incubated at 37 °C with 5–7% CO2 and 80–100% relative humidity for 24–72 h, until the positive control wells showed a blue-red colour change. At this point the Sensititre plate was read, and any wells showing a blue-red colour change were noted. The MIC for each antibiotic was calculated as the lowest concentration of drug that suppressed growth. After the Sensititre plate had been inoculated, the CCU and CFU counts of the inoculum were determined as previously described.

4.3. Nucleic Acid Extraction

For the isolates 1982-M6152, 2019-043682 and M. bovis PG45, 100 µL of a broth culture was extracted on the Applied Biosystems MagMAX 96 automated nucleic acid extraction platform (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the Low Cell Content protocol for the MagMAX Pathogen DNA/RNA kit (Applied Biosystems). Samples were eluted in a final volume of 90 µL, using the elution buffer provided with the kit, then held at −20 °C until prepared for WGS.

4.4. Whole Genome Sequencing & Bioinformatics

A 2 × 251 paired end sequencing reaction was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using a Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and associated protocols for whole genome sequencing (Illumina Custom Protocol Selector, Illumina Inc.) Quality filtering and assembly of FASTQ files was done on instrument and then uploaded to Illumina’s BaseSpace storage and computing cloud. On BaseSpace, genome assembly was conducted using SPAdes Genome Assembler v3.9.0 [11], and MLST assignment of two isolates using the Bacterial Analysis Pipeline v1.0.4 [12].
The assembled FASTQ files were then downloaded from BaseSpace, the adapter for the Nextera XT Kit (CTGTCTCTTATACACATCT) trimmed, then the genomes were assembled using bioinformatics software DNAstar (V17) (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) using NGS-Based Reference-guide (small genomes, contigs) of Hybrid reference-guide/de novo genome assembly function against and annotated with features from reference genome M. bovis PG45 (GenBank Accession: NC_014760.1). Multiple genome alignment was performed using Mauve Genome of Geneious v11 (Auckland, New Zealand) with automatically calculated seed weight and automatically calculated minimum LCB score. SNPs were analyzed with MegAlign, DNASTAR’s ArrayStar v14 (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA), and Geneious v11 to identify deleted and truncated genes, SNPs and non-synonymous mutations relative to M. bovis PG45. Gene features were then tabulated in a spreadsheet (Supplementary Table S2) and further annotated by searching NCBI’s Gene database to identify their functional roles where possible. Named genes with functional roles in protein synthesis and topoisomerase structure that contained NSMs or disruptions in the 2019 isolate were selected for additional study, using the CARD database [13] and literature review (Google Scholar, keywords used: “antimicrobial resistance”, “antibiotic resistance”, AMR, and the gene name or functional group, I.e. “rplD” “antimicrobial resistance”) to identify mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, and M. bovis gene homologues with AMR association in other organisms.

5. Conclusions

This study identified 55 genetic events of nonsynonymous mutations and gene disruptions linked to M. bovis AMR. Future studies are warranted to further analyze these candidate genes, identifying the effects of the altered amino acids on protein structure and their link to AMR. Additionally, mutated genes identified in this study but currently uncharacterized may be assigned to functional groups in future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/7/588/s1, Table S1: ArrayStar Output of Nonsynonymous Mutations, Table S2: Summary of NSMs, Table S3: AMR-Associated Gene Candidates. WGS sequence data for 1982-M6152 (Accession: CP058969) and 2019-043682 (Accession: CP058968) are available through GenBank.

Author Contributions

Contributor roles for this publication are defined as follows: Conceptualization, H.Y.C; methodology, H.Y.C., J.E. and L.L.; software, H.Y.C.; validation, H.Y.C., L.L., J.E.; formal analysis, H.Y.C. and L.L.; investigation, J.E. and L.L.; resources, H.Y.C.; data curation, H.Y.C. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, H.Y.C. and J.E.; visualization, L.L., H.Y.C.; supervision, H.Y.C.; project administration, H.Y.C.; funding acquisition, H.Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Ontario Animal Health Network, funded by the University of Guelph-OMAFRA Partnership Agreement and the Animal Health Laboratory (AHL), University of Guelph, Canada.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the technical support and advice on Illumina BaseSpace software provided by Aparna Krishnamurthy and Durda Slavic, Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, Canada.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Caswell, J.L.; Bateman, K.G.; Cai, H.Y.; Castillo-Alcala, F. Mycoplasma bovis in Respiratory Disease of Feedlot Cattle. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2010, 26, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Griffin, D.; Chengappa, M.M.; Kuszak, J.; McVey, D.S. Bacterial Pathogens of the Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2010, 26, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cai, H.Y.; McDowall, R.; Parker, L.; Kaufman, E.I.; Caswell, J.L. Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Mycoplasma bovis over time. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 83, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, W.J.; McCormack, R.; Egan, J.; Brice, N.; Ball, H.J.; Markey, B. Isolation of Mycoplasma bovis from bovine clinical samples in the Republic of Ireland. Vet. Rec. 2001, 148, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rosenbusch, R.F.; Kinyon, J.M.; Apley, M.; Funk, N.D.; Smith, S.; Hoffman, L.J. In Vitro Antimicrobial Inhibition Profiles of Mycoplasma Bovis Isolates Recovered from Various Regions of the United States from 2002 to 2003. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2005, 17, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Lysnyansky, I.; Ayling, R.D. Mycoplasma bovis: Mechanisms of Resistance and Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baym, M.; Stone, L.K.; Kishony, R. Multidrug evolutionary strategies to reverse antibiotic resistance. Science 2016, 351, aad3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Owen, J.R.; Noyes, N.; Young, A.E.; Prince, D.J.; Blanchard, P.C.; Lehenbauer, T.W.; Aly, S.S.; Davis, J.H.; O’Rourke, S.M.; Abdo, Z.; et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Concordance Between Antimicrobial Susceptibility Genotypes and Phenotypes of Bacterial Isolates Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 3059–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Sulyok, K.M.; Kreizinger, Z.; Wehmann, E.; Lysnyansky, I.; Bányai, K.; Marton, S.; Jerzsele, Á.; Rónai, Z.; Turcsányi, I.; Makrai, L.; et al. Mutations Associated with Decreased Susceptibility to Seven Antimicrobial Families in Field and Laboratory-Derived Mycoplasma bovis Strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Sato, T.; Higuchi, H.; Yokota, S.; Tamura, Y. Mycoplasma bovis isolates from dairy calves in Japan have less susceptibility than a reference strain to all approved macrolides associated with a point mutation (G748A) combined with multiple species-specific nucleotide alterations in 23S rRNA. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 61, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Nurk, S.; Bankevich, A.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.; Korobeynikov, A.; Lapidus, A.; Prjibelsky, A.; Pyshkin, A.; Sirotkin, A.; Sirotkin, Y.; et al. Assembling Genomes and Mini-metagenomes from Highly Chimeric Reads. In Proc Research Comp Molecular Bio; Deng, M., Jiang, R., Sun, F., Zhang, X., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/ Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 158–170. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thomsen, M.C.F.; Ahrenfeldt, J.; Cisneros, J.L.B.; Jurtz, V.; Larsen, M.V.; Hasman, H.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Lund, O. A Bacterial Analysis Platform: An Integrated System for Analysing Bacterial Whole Genome Sequencing Data for Clinical Diagnostics and Surveillance. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.-L.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D517–D525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Perichon, B.; Tankovic, J.; Courvalin, P. Characterization of a mutation in the parE gene that confers fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1166–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Michel, G.; Sauvé, V.; Larocque, R.; Li, Y.; Matte, A.; Cygler, M. The Structure of the RlmB 23S rRNA Methyltransferase Reveals a New Methyltransferase Fold with a Unique Knot. Structure 2002, 10, 1303–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fyfe, C.; Grossman, T.H.; Kerstein, K.; Sutcliffe, J. Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics in Public Health Pathogens. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Feng, Y.; Jonker, M.J.; Moustakas, I.; Brul, S.; Ter Kuile, B.H. Dynamics of Mutations during Development of Resistance by Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Five Antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4229–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Grossman, T.H. Tetracycline Antibiotics and Resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, Z.; Kong, L.C.; Jia, B.Y.; Liu, S.M.; Jiang, X.Y.; Ma, H.X. Aminoglycoside susceptibility of Pasteurella multocida isolates from bovine respiratory infections in China and mutations in ribosomal protein S5 associated with high-level induced spectinomycin resistance. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 79, 1678–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hu, M.; Nandi, S.; Davies, C.; Nicholas, R.A. High-Level Chromosomally Mediated Tetracycline Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae Results from a Point Mutation in the rpsJ Gene Encoding Ribosomal Protein S10 in Combination with the mtrR and penB Resistance Determinants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4327–4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Long, K.S.; Hansen, L.H.; Jakobsen, L.; Vester, B. Interaction of Pleuromutilin Derivatives with the Ribosomal Peptidyl Transferase Center. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1458–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hölzel, C.S.; Harms, K.S.; Schwaiger, K.; Bauer, J. Resistance to Linezolid in a Porcine Clostridium perfringens Strain Carrying a Mutation in the rplD Gene Encoding the Ribosomal Protein L4. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1351–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cagliero, C.; Mouline, C.; Cloeckaert, A.; Payot, S. Synergy between Efflux Pump CmeABC and Modifications in Ribosomal Proteins L4 and L22 in Conferring Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 3893–3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, A.; Tran, L.; Becket, E.; Lee, K.; Chinn, L.; Park, E.; Tran, K.; Miller, J.H. Antibiotic Sensitivity Profiles Determined with an Escherichia coli Gene Knockout Collection: Generating an Antibiotic Bar Code. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Milija, J.; Lilic, M.; Janjusevic, R.; Jovanovic, G.; Savic, D.J. tRNA Synthetase Mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 Are Resistant to the Gyrase Inhibitor Novobiocin. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 2979–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Magalhães, S.; Aroso, M.; Roxo, I.; Ferreira, S.; Cerveira, F.; Ramalheira, E.; Ferreira, R.; Vitorino, R. Proteomic profile of susceptible and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae using label-free and immunoproteomic strategies. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yanagisawa, T.; Lee, J.T.; Wu, H.C.; Kawakami, M. Relationship of protein structure of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase with pseudomonic acid resistance of Escherichia coli. A proposed mod of action of pseudomonic acid as an inhibitor of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 24304–24309. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dordel, J.; Kim, C.; Chung, M.; Pardos de la Gándara, M.; Holden, M.T.J.; Parkhill, J.; de Lencastre, H.; Bentley, S.D.; Tomasz, A. Novel Determinants of Antibiotic Resistance: Identification of Mutated Loci in Highly Methicillin-Resistant Subpopulations of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, M.; Douthwaite, S. Resistance to the macrolide antibiotic tylosin is conferred by single methylations at 23S rRNA nucleotides G748 and A2058 acting in synergy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 14658–14663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Doi, Y.; Arakawa, Y. 16S Ribosomal RNA Methylation: Emerging Resistance Mechanism against Aminoglycosides. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Masuda, I.; Matsubara, R.; Christian, T.; Rojas, E.R.; Yadavalli, S.S.; Zhang, L.; Goulian, M.; Foster, L.J.; Huang, K.C.; Hou, Y.-M. tRNA Methylation Is a Global Determinant of Bacterial Multi-drug Resistance. Cell Syst. 2019, 8, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Giguère, S. Lincosamides, Pleuromutilins, and Streptogramins. In Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 199–210. ISBN 978-1-118-67501-4. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hurdle, J.G.; O’Neill, A.J.; Chopra, I. Prospects for Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitors as New Antimicrobial Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4821–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tse-Dinh, Y.-C. Bacterial topoisomerase I as a target for discovery of antibacterial compounds. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bansal, S.; Tawar, U.; Singh, M.; Nikravesh, A.; Good, L.; Tandon, V. Old class but new dimethoxy analogue of benzimidazole: A bacterial topoisomerase I inhibitor. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2010, 35, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nagaraja, V.; Godbole, A.A.; Henderson, S.R.; Maxwell, A. DNA topoisomerase I and DNA gyrase as targets for TB therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Webber, M.A.; Piddock, L.J.V. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marquez, B. Bacterial efflux systems and efflux pumps inhibitors. Biochimie 2005, 87, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ruhnke, H.L.; Rosendal, S. Useful Protocols for Diagnosis of Animal Mycoplasmas. In Mycoplasmosis in Animals: Laboratory Diagnosis; Whitford, H.W., Rosenbusch, R.F., Lauerman, L.H., Eds.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1994; pp. 141–166. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graphical output of multiple sequence alignment (Mauve, Geneious 11) for M. bovis isolates 2019-43682, 1982-M6152 and M. bvis strain PG45 with GenBank accessions displaying depth of sequencing and areas with large deletions.
Figure 1. Graphical output of multiple sequence alignment (Mauve, Geneious 11) for M. bovis isolates 2019-43682, 1982-M6152 and M. bvis strain PG45 with GenBank accessions displaying depth of sequencing and areas with large deletions.
Pathogens 09 00588 g001
Table 1. Average results of MIC testing for two isolates of Mycoplasma bovis, compared to reference strain PG45, by µg of antimicrobial compound required to inhibit growth. Isolates and the reference strain were tested in triplicate with identical results within each triplicate for all antimicrobials tested.
Table 1. Average results of MIC testing for two isolates of Mycoplasma bovis, compared to reference strain PG45, by µg of antimicrobial compound required to inhibit growth. Isolates and the reference strain were tested in triplicate with identical results within each triplicate for all antimicrobials tested.
AntimicrobialPG452019-0436821982-M6152
Neomycin>32>32>32
Spectinomycin<816<8
Trimethoprim/Sulfa>2/38>2/38>2/38
Danofloxacin0.5>10.5
Enrofloxacin0.520.5
Clindamycin<0.25>16<0.25
Tilmicosin<4>64<4
Tulathromycin8>648
Tylosin Tartrate1>321
Tiamulin181
Gentamicin8168
Florfenicol4>84
Sulphadimethoxine>256>256>256
Chlortetracycline<0.5>8<0.5
Oxytetracycline<0.5>81
Ceftiofur>8>8>8
Table 2. Summary of variation of isolates from M. bovis PG45, by feature count (CDS), generated using MegAlign. v17 for multiple sequence alignment.
Table 2. Summary of variation of isolates from M. bovis PG45, by feature count (CDS), generated using MegAlign. v17 for multiple sequence alignment.
Genetic Events1982-M61522019-043682
Variation typesIdentical696183
Deletion818
Deleted_end_3prime33
Deleted_end_5prime13
Indel34
Insertion2222
Not_Mapped39173
Substitution105471
TOTAL877877
Unmapped featuresExcised (<5% coverage)2481
Truncated (5–95% coverage)1148
Highly variable (>95% coverage)444
TOTAL39173
Table 3. Count of non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) relative to M. bovis PG45, by gene and by isolate, for a subset of NSM-containing genes identified as potentially associated with antimicrobial resistance.
Table 3. Count of non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) relative to M. bovis PG45, by gene and by isolate, for a subset of NSM-containing genes identified as potentially associated with antimicrobial resistance.
Functional Role:Gene:1982-M61522019-043682Associated AMR:Reference:
TopoisomerasesgyrA08fluoroquinolones[9]
gyrB06fluoroquinolones[9]
parC1 *19 *fluoroquinolones[9]
parE04fluoroquinolones[14]
topA01 ^
Protein Synthesis:
Methyltransferases:MBOVPG45_RS0046502
MBOVPG45_RS0047007
MBOVPG45_RS0228004
rlmB05Predicted AMR[15]
rlmD011
rlmH01
rsmA06aminoglycosides[16]
rsmD01aminoglycosides[16]
rsmH05aminoglycosides[16]
rsmI05aminoglycosides[16]
trmB04 ^
30S Ribosomal ProteinsrpsB03aminoglycosides[17]
rpsC21tetracyclines[18]
rpsD02
rpsE12aminoglycosides[19]
rpsH01
rpsJ10tetracyclines[20]
rpsP02
rpsS01
rbfA01
50S Ribosomal ProteinsMBOVPG45_RS0044501
rplB01
rplC01pleuromutilins[21]
rplD010linezolid[22]
MBOVPG45_RS0352502
rplV01macrolides[23]
MBOVPG45_RS0136001
rpmE01MDR[24]
tRNA ligasesalaS18 ^novobiocin[25]
MBOVPG45_RS0164005
asnS01multi-drug resistance[26]
MBOVPG45_RS0020509
MBOVPG45_RS0115006 ^
MBOVPG45_RS0273002
MBOVPG45_RS0264001
ileS15 ^pseudomonic acid[27]
MBOVPG45_RS0314501
MBOVPG45_RS02255016
lysS03methicillin[28]
MBOVPG45_RS03150010
pheS02MDR[26]
MBOVPG45_RS00380018
serS01
tRNA ligasesMBOVPG45_RS0217018 ^
trpS01
MBOVPG45_RS0421009 ^
MBOVPG45_RS0074007 ^
tilS08
thiI04
mnmA05
* Identical NSM; ^ Contains a gene-disrupting NSM.
Table 4. Count of non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) relative to M. bovis PG45, by gene and by isolate, for ABC transporter system genes potentially linked to the bacterial efflux pump mechanism of AMR. ^Gene contains a disrupting mutation.
Table 4. Count of non-synonymous mutations (NSMs) relative to M. bovis PG45, by gene and by isolate, for ABC transporter system genes potentially linked to the bacterial efflux pump mechanism of AMR. ^Gene contains a disrupting mutation.
Gene:1982-M61522019-043682Description:
MBOVPG45_RS0009001ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS0018002ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0055502ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0057004ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein
MBOVPG45_RS0060001ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein
MBOVPG45_RS0148502energy-coupling factor transporter transmembrane protein EcfT
MBOVPG45_RS0154001sugar ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0154504ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein
MBOVPG45_RS0172001ABC transporter permease subunit
MBOVPG45_RS0177001ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS0177517ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0200505ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS0271001ABC transporter permease subunit
MBOVPG45_RS0271502ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein
MBOVPG45_RS0290511ABC transporter permease subunit
MBOVPG45_RS0342501ATP-binding cassette domain-containing protein
MBOVPG45_RS0346504ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS0347006ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS0370506 ^carbohydrate ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0371001sugar ABC transporter permease
MBOVPG45_RS0431005ABC transporter ATP-binding protein
MBOVPG45_RS04315189ABC transporter permease
^ Contains a gene-disrupting NSM.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ledger, L.; Eidt, J.; Cai, H.Y. Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance-Associated Genes through Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates with Different Antimicrobial Resistances. Pathogens 2020, 9, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070588

AMA Style

Ledger L, Eidt J, Cai HY. Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance-Associated Genes through Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates with Different Antimicrobial Resistances. Pathogens. 2020; 9(7):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ledger, Lisa, Jason Eidt, and Hugh Y. Cai. 2020. "Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance-Associated Genes through Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates with Different Antimicrobial Resistances" Pathogens 9, no. 7: 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070588

APA Style

Ledger, L., Eidt, J., & Cai, H. Y. (2020). Identification of Antimicrobial Resistance-Associated Genes through Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycoplasma bovis Isolates with Different Antimicrobial Resistances. Pathogens, 9(7), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop