Microbial Pigments: Major Groups and Industrial Applications
, Athayde Neves Junior, Maria Cristina Pinheiro Pereira Reis-Mansur and Alane Beatriz Vermelho *
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThis review describes the structure of microbial pigments, the advantages of their use, and their applications in different fields, which will help further research on microbial pigments. The logic of the manuscript is confusing, the data collection is not rigorous enough, and the current content of the manuscript is insufficient to support the title.
Only some of the bugs are listed below, and the authors are kindly requested to reread the whole manuscript carefully and check it in detail.
Major comments
Phenol compounds from specific fungal species are also a well-known class of pigments, please refer to and cite the following literature:
A: Styrylpyrone-class compounds from medicinal fungi Phellinus and Inonotus spp. and their medicinal importance. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 349 J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 349-359.
B: Diverse Metabolites and Pharmacological Effects from the Basidiomycetes Inonotus hispidus, Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 1097
The gene clusters for the biosynthetic processes shown in Figures 6, 8, 9, and 11 should also be shown;
Minor errors
The doi numbers of the references are unnecessary
Figure 1. - Major types of synthetic and natural pigments.
Line 344 [102,103.104].
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageIt is OK.
Author Response
this review describes the structure of microbial pigments, the advantages of their use, and their applications in different fields, which will help further research on microbial pigments. The logic of the manuscript is confusing, the data collection is not rigorous enough, and the current content of the manuscript is insufficient to support the title.
Only some of the bugs are listed below, and the authors are kindly requested to reread the whole manuscript carefully and check it in detail.
Major comments
1.Phenol compounds from specific fungal species are also a well-known class of pigments, please refer to and cite the following literature:
A: Styrylpyrone-class compounds from medicinal fungi Phellinus and Inonotus spp. and their medicinal importance. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 349 J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 349-359.
B: Diverse Metabolites and Pharmacological Effects from the Basidiomycetes Inonotus hispidus, Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 1097
As suggested by the reviewers, the references were added.
2.The gene clusters for the biosynthetic processes shown in Figures 6, 8, 9, and 11 should also be shown.
Figure 6- In this figure, there are only known chlorophyll structures, not biosynthesis pathways.
Figure 8 - prodigiosin is a Prodiginines, and the clusters were added in the revised text, in lines 381-384
Figure 9 melanin a nao figure 17 was based on the reference Solano et al. 2014, and the clusters were added in the revised text, in lines 543-547;
Solano, F. Melanins: Skin Pigments and Much More—Types, Structural Models, Biological Functions, and Formation Routes. 939 New J. Sci. 2014, 2014, 1–28, doi:10.1155/2014/498276.
figure 11, now figure 14, is a biosynthesis of azaphilone
the clusters were added in the revised text, in lines 489-492
was based on two references about the pathwayLiu, L.; Zhao, J.; Huang, Y.; Xin, Q.; Wang, Z. Diversifying of Chemical Structure of Native Monascus Pigments. Front. Microbiol. 957 2018, 9, 1-13.doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.03143.
Chen, W.; Chen, R.; Liu, Q.; He, Y.; He, K.; Ding, X.; Kang, L.; Guo, X.; Xie, N.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Orange, Red, Yellow: Biosynthesis 960 of Azaphilone Pigments in Monascus Fungi. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4917–4925 .doi:10.1039/C7SC00475C.
Minor errors
- The doi numbers of the references are unnecessary.
- The doi of references was removed.
4.Figure 1. - Major types of synthetic and natural pigments.
The error of the figure was not pointed out, and for the authors, the figure is correct.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsI have read the manuscript, it is correct, but it does not contain anything new or revealing. This topic has been discussed in many review articles published in last years, including:
Microbial pigments: learning from the Himalayan perspective to industrial applications. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jimb/kuac017
Microbial Pigments: Natural Colorants and their Industrial Applications. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1005.071
Natural Pigments of Microbial Origin. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.590439
Biopigments of Microbial Origin and Their Application in the Cosmetic Industry. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics10020047
Microbial pigments as an alternative to synthetic dyes and food additives: a brief review of recent studies. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02641-4
Microbial Pigments in the Food Industry—Challenges and the Way Forward. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00007
Research progress, challenges, and perspectives in microbial pigment production for industrial applications - A review. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110989
Multifaceted Applications of Microbial Pigments: Current Knowledge, Challenges and Future Directions for Public Health Implications. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7070186
and many others. What is new in the article prepared by the authors? The review article should clearly indicate its innovation and future perspectives of the topic.
Author Response
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThis review meticulously examines a wide array of pigments derived from microorganisms, emphasizing their applicability in biotechnological realms. A critical synthesis of existing work, encompassing analyses of over 180 literary sources, has been conducted to consolidate findings pertaining to pigment properties. While certain segments of the review, such as Section 6, are commendably executed, there are areas identified for potential enhancement and further clarification.
Introduction (Section 2-5 Revision Suggestion):
The introduction, currently extensive, could be made more concise and focused, ensuring it offers a clear and logical opening to the subject matter.
Scalability and Technological Viability:
Clarification and in-depth discussion are required concerning the scalability of technologies involved in pigment production from microorganisms. Critical analysis should assess whether the current technological advancements align with contemporary market demands and expectations.
Influential Factors in Pigment Formation:
A comprehensive exploration of factors influencing pigment formation, such as light and temperature, is imperative. The review should offer a detailed examination of how these variables may impact pigment characteristics and yield
Future Prospects and Enhancement Areas:
A focused discussion on future trajectories and possible enhancement areas in the exploitation of microbial pigments is essential. This includes potential strategies for optimizing pigment production and utilization in various biotechnological applications.
Potential Applications in Animal Husbandry:
The review should also contemplate and elaborate on the prospective utilization of microbial pigments in animal husbandry, exploring the feasibility and benefits of such applications.
A coherent conclusion that encapsulates the key findings, insights, and recommendations gleaned from the review is necessary to provide readers with a synthesized understanding of the field’s current state and future directions.
Author Response
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
This review meticulously examines a wide array of pigments derived from microorganisms, emphasizing their applicability in biotechnological realms. A critical synthesis of existing work, encompassing analyses of over 180 literary sources, has been conducted to consolidate findings pertaining to pigment properties. While certain segments of the review, such as Section 6, are commendably executed, there are areas identified for potential enhancement and further clarification.
Introduction (Section 2-5 Revision Suggestion):
The introduction, currently extensive, could be made more concise and focused, ensuring it offers a clear and logical opening to the subject matter.
As suggested by the reviewer, the introduction was modified and reduced but still contains relevant information.
Scalability and Technological Viability
Clarification and in-depth discussion are required concerning the scalability of technologies involved in pigment production from microorganisms. Critical analysis should assess whether the current technological advancements align with contemporary market demands and expectations.
New text containing all the requested information was added to the review, and new sections were created.
Influential Factors in Pigment Formation: A comprehensive exploration of factors influencing pigment formation, such as light and temperature, is imperative. The review should offer a detailed examination of how these variables may impact pigment characteristics and yield.
The review was augmented to 46 pages ( from 26) to include all the reviewers' suggestions. We did not create a new section for this specific theme. However, in item 8,3- pigment extraction, we added information about these factors.
Future Prospects and Enhancement Areas: A focused discussion on future trajectories and possible enhancement areas in the exploitation of microbial pigments is essential. This includes potential strategies for optimizing pigment production and utilization in various biotechnological applications.
New sections were added to answer these questions as requested by the reviewer.
Potential Applications in Animal Husbandry:The review should also contemplate and elaborate on the prospective utilization of microbial pigments in animal husbandry, exploring the feasibility and benefits of such applications.
More information was added about this in pigment in the food industry.
A coherent conclusion that encapsulates the key findings, insights, and recommendations gleaned from the review is necessary to provide readers with a synthesized understanding of the field’s current state and future directions.
The conclusion was modified in order to attend to the reviewer.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe careful revision of the manuscript by the author has significantly improved its quality. As a review, the current version is more comprehensive. However, the redundant DOI numbers have not been removed, but this does not prevent the manuscript from being considered for publication.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageIt is OK.
Author Response
The careful revision of the manuscript by the author has significantly improved its quality. As areview, the current version is more comprehensive. However, the redundant DOI numbers have ot been removed, but this does not prevent the manuscript from being considered forpublication.
Thank you for the comments that improved the review. The DOi number was removed in this last revision.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe authors did not clearly respond to the reviewer's comments, they only provided me with general information. I still don't see anything new in this literature review.
Author Response
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDespite the fact that the authors did not respond to all of the reviewer’s comments, in my opinion the corrections made are satisfactory. I have no serious comments. The review has become more interesting and, in my opinion, will find its readers.
Author Response
no issues were raised by this reviewer
