Next Article in Journal
Editorial for Special Issue “Unleashing the Hidden Potential of Anaerobic Fungi”
Next Article in Special Issue
Gonococcal Genetic Island in the Global Neisseria gonorrhoeae Population: A Model of Genetic Diversity and Association with Resistance to Antimicrobials
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of a New Pseudomonas Putida Strain Ch2, a Degrader of Toxic Anthropogenic Compounds Epsilon-Caprolactam and Glyphosate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasmid Composition, Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Genes Profiles of Ciprofloxacin- and Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Foodborne Salmonella enterica Isolates from Russia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Resistome Analysis of Nosocomial Multidrug-Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Pathogens from the Balkans

1
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 8, Dragan Tzankov Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 2, Zdrave Str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
BioInfoTech Laboratory, Sofia Tech Park, 111, Tsarigradsko Shosse Blvd., 1784 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(3), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030651
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023

Abstract

:
Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB), such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, are among the major opportunistic pathogens involved in the global antibiotic resistance epidemic. They are designated as urgent/serious threats by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and are part of the World Health Organization’s list of critical priority pathogens. Also, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is increasingly recognized as an emerging cause for healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units, life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients, and severe pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis and COVID-19 individuals. The last annual report of the ECDC showed drastic differences in the proportions of NFGNB with resistance towards key antibiotics in different European Union/European Economic Area countries. The data for the Balkans are of particular concern, indicating more than 80% and 30% of invasive Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively, to be carbapenem-resistant. Moreover, multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant S. maltophilia from the region have been recently reported. The current situation in the Balkans includes a migrant crisis and reshaping of the Schengen Area border. This results in collision of diverse human populations subjected to different protocols for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control. The present review article summarizes the findings of whole-genome sequencing-based resistome analyses of nosocomial multidrug-resistant NFGNBs in the Balkan countries.

1. Introduction

Non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) are a heterogeneous group of aerobic, non-spore-forming bacteria that do not utilize carbohydrates via fermentation as an energy source [1]. Some species, such as Pesudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, have already been recognized as important nosocomial pathogens with significant contributions to mortality in hospitals worldwide [2]. Moreover, the first two species mentioned are part of the ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) pathogens that represent a global therapeutic problem worldwide [3]. They frequently “escape” from the most commonly used antimicrobial treatment via the acquisition and/or development of multiple resistance mechanisms [4]. Due to the potential resistance to a high number of antibiotics, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are designated as urgent/serious threats by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and are included in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) list of critical priority pathogens [5,6,7,8]. Particularly problematic are carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) and A. baumannii (CRAB), most of which are simultaneously multidrug-resistant (MDR, non-susceptible to at least one agent in more than three antimicrobial categories) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR, non-susceptible to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories) [4,9]. Treating the infections caused by them represents a serious challenge for clinicians, and often novel generation antibiotics, such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and cefiderocol, should be applied [10,11,12]. In other occasions, the treatment requires even the reconsideration of old antimicrobial drugs, such as polymyxins, which were considered too toxic for clinical use before [13]. One of the two commercially available polymyxins, colistin, is now considered as a last-line therapy for infections caused by XDR NFGNB from the ESKAPE group [14].
The most common and severe NFGNB is P. aeruginosa, which is frequently found to be involved in a wide variety of nosocomial infections, particularly infecting patients with predisposing factors, such as burn victims, immunocompromised hosts, or those with metabolic disorders [15,16,17]. It is also recognized as a predominant cause of pulmonary disease and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis [18].
Furthermore, recent reports highlighted that up to 50% of neutropenic patients diagnosed with an infection due to MDR P. aeruginosa isolates also received inappropriate antibiotic empirical therapy, and this was associated with higher mortality rates [19]. In total, from all estimated 541,000 deaths (95% uncertainty intervals: 370,000–763,000) associated with bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the WHO European region in 2019, 43,801 were caused by P. aeruginosa and 29,000 of the causative agents were CRPA [20].
Despite that A. baumannii is not considered as a highly virulent pathogen, it is found to be responsible for many cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and meningitis in critically ill patients [21]. It is also considered as a serious burden for many hospital settings globally mainly due to its immense ability to acquire and/or upregulate AMR genetic determinants [22]. It is worth noting that a retrospective study of US military personal wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan highlighted A. baumanniii as the most commonly isolated pathogen from open tibial fractures [23]. Moreover, the percentage of MDR isolates recovered from patients in a military medical center in the US was 2.5 times higher among war casualties deployed overseas (52%) than among local patients (20%) [24]. This statistic is of a particular concern in the light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine with an estimated number of up to 200,000 military casualties on all sides. In the WHO European region, A. baumannii was one of the seven pathogens responsible for 27,206 deaths associated with AMR in 2019 and 18,100 of these isolates were CRAB [20].
S. maltophilia is increasingly recognized as an emerging cause for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients, and severe pulmonary infections in individuals with cystic fibrosis [25,26]. It ranks third among NFGNB (after P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species) as a cause of HAIs [27,28]. Moreover, a recent study focused on respiratory co-infections in COVID-19 patients in an ICU in China, which determined S. maltophilia to be the most frequently isolated pathogen in the severe patients group and in the critical patients group [29]. These findings emphasize the importance of this pathogen for the Balkan countries since four of them are on the list for highest number of COVID-19 deaths worldwide per one million population [30]. S. maltophilia possesses an intrinsic resistance towards β-lactams, including carbapenems, due to the production of two β-lactamases (L1 metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and L2 inducible cephalosporinase) [31]; therefore, the use of this class of antibiotic is not considered as a treatment option [32,33]. The last resort antibiotic colistin is also not suitable despite the demonstrated in vitro activity because half of the isolates are actually resistant to this antibiotic [34]. In addition, a recent study described a colistin-degrading protease in an environmental S. maltophilia isolate [35]. Co-cultivation experiments demonstrated that this enzyme can inactivate colistin and thereby protect an otherwise susceptible P. aeruginosa strain. Similar enzyme protection may seriously affect the treatment options for patients co-infected with S. maltophilia and other NFGNBs.
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and outbreak investigations are mandatory to restrain NFGNB-caused infections in hospital wards, especially ICUs. Analysis of the AMR in the WHO European region in 2019 showed drastic differences in the proportions of NFGNB with resistance towards key antibiotics in different European Union/European Economic Area countries [20]. The number of resistant isolates trend to increase following the axes “west–east” and “north–south” highlighting the Balkans as a high priority region. There is no universal agreement on the components of the easternmost of Europe’s southern peninsulas [36].

2. Antimicrobial Resistance in NFGNBs in the Balkan States

In this review article we summarize the whole-genome sequencing-based resistome analyses of isolates from the Balkan countries (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and Turkey) found in the literature. The entire Balkan region is characterized by a high degree of ethnic diversity and fragmentation. Despite that, it is surrounded by seas, and the peninsula is not cut off from neighboring regions to the east, west, or south. This creates a lot of crossroads for traffic passing to and from Anatolia, the Italian peninsula, and the eastern Mediterranean region. Moreover, the Balkan countries are very diverse in aspects, such as European Union (EU) membership (Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, and Romania) or Schengen Area membership (Croatia and Greece), all of which affects the AMR monitoring on different levels. The current situation in the Balkans includes a migrant crisis and reshaping of the Schengen Area border. This results in the collision of diverse human populations subjected to different protocols for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control. All these circumstances together contribute to the wide spread of MDR pathogens, including MDR-NFGNBs, on the Balkans.
According to the 2020 annual report of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the prevalence of invasive CRPA isolates on the Balkans exceeded 30% with the highest values reported in Montenegro (72.7%) and Serbia (65.9%) and the lowest in Croatia (30.3%), Greece (35.7%), and Turkey (36.2%) [37]. The corresponding frequency values for invasive carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. isolates were the highest in Montenegro (100%) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (97.9%), and the lowest were in Bulgaria (82.9%) and Kosovo (84.7%). These numbers highlight the Balkan countries as a reservoir for CRPA and CRAB isolates in Europe [37]. The geographic distribution of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa is shown in Figure 1.
On the other hand, the prevalence of MDR (combined resistance to carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides) Acinetobacter spp. exceeded 70%, with the highest values reported in Serbia (95.9%) and Croatia (95.1%) and the lowest in Kosovo (71.2%) and Bulgaria (72.9%). The incidence of MDR (combined resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial groups, including piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides) P. aeruginosa varied widely, from 11.6% (Croatia) to 61.4% (Serbia) [37]. The report lacks data for Albania. The data are presented in Figure 2.
Monitoring these trends requires the adaptation of new technologies, such as whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as a tool to precisely determine the AMR mechanisms. It provides a vast amount of information and the highest possible resolution for pathogen subtyping. Moreover, the generated sequencing data by AMR surveillance programs, such as the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) implemented by WHO, may guide the development of rapid and sensitive diagnostic tools addressing the global antibiotic resistance epidemic [38].
The next section presents a brief introduction into the used sequencing technologies with their strengths and weaknesses for resistome analysis of clinical NFGNB isolates.

3. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Bacterial Pathogens

WGS has been globally adopted as a tool of choice for resistome studies in the field of clinical microbiology [39]. The first sequenced genome of a self-replicating, free-living bacterium was that of Haemophilus influenzae Rd and its analysis identified several genetic determinants involved in antibiotic resistance [40]. Many other bacterial genomes have been sequenced in the next several years including the genomes of the NFGNB, such as P. aerugiosa PAO1, S. maltophilia K279a, and A. baumannii AYE [41,42,43]. Even in the early days of its development, WGS proved to be a valuable technique capable of providing various genomic features. It revealed not only the numerous genes involved in bacterial regulation, catabolism, transport, efflux, and chemotaxis, but also provided some insights into the adaptive mechanisms and intrinsic drug resistance of some important pathogens. The major barrier to its widespread adoption is hidden in the significant cost of the analysis due to the dye-primer or dye-terminator Sanger sequencing approaches used [44,45]. The development of new sequencing technologies, united under the collective term “next generation sequencing” (NGS), has revolutionized the study of bacterial genomes due to their substantially reduced cost and significantly improved time-efficiency [46]. The genome of A. baumannii ATCC 17978 is among the first ones obtained by the NGS approach called high-density pyrosequencing [47]. It generated 22 scaffolds, which ranged in length from 6199 base pairs (bp) to 1,257,593 bp with an average of 179,384 bp. All gaps were subsequently filled by the employment of PCR-based strategies. They added 30,304 bp in total, indicating that the pyrosequencing effectively determined 99.24% of the total chromosome sequence.
The further development of these methods has allowed the use of WGS not only for scientific research purposes, but also in many clinical applications, such as isolate identification, AMR profiling, and outbreak investigation. A good example of such implementation is the foodborne disease surveillance program provided by the global PulseNet laboratory network. The participating laboratories have preferred WGS over pulse-field gel electrophoresis as the primary monitoring tool due to demonstrated superior sensitivity, specificity, and more timely resolution of outbreaks [48]. Sequencing and analyzing the bacterial genomes are becoming increasingly widespread on a global scale and have transformed many of the current protocols in bacterial genetics [49]. The Balkans are not an exception from this trend and a significant number of local reports utilizing NGS for identification, resistome, and virulome analysis, as well as monitoring the emergence and spread of nosocomial pathogens, exist in the literature [50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. Having in mind the clinical significance of the multidrug-resistant NFGNB, such as A. baumannii, P. aerugiosa, and S. maltophilia isolates, it will be important to summarize the findings of WGS-based resistome analyses and the molecular epidemiology of infections caused by these pathogens in the Balkan countries. In order to better understand these data, one should first focus on the sequencing technologies used that have made it possible to generate large amounts of sequence data rapidly and at a substantially lower cost.
All studies that sequenced genomes of clinical isolates from Balkan countries used some of the existing high throughput DNA sequencing methodologies [57,58]. Second generation methods based on sequencing by synthesis (SBS) are the most preferred choice mainly due to their highest cost-efficiency per analysis among all the existing NGS technologies. These approaches produce millions to billions of short reads with intrinsically higher error rates compared to Sanger sequencing [59]. The genome assembly from these reads can either be performed de novo or by mapping them to a reference strain [60]. The lower accuracy of the SBS dictates that each sequenced bacterial genome has to be generated as a set of consensus sequences that are composed by many overlapping sequencing reads. The low length of the individual sequencing reads affects the assembly level of the de novo sequenced genomes leading to the production of draft versions composed by tens to hundreds of unplaced pieces called contigs [61]. The linear order of such segments cannot be determined by the DNA assemblers, but it may be estimated afterwards via comparison with single complete reference genome using stand-alone software tools like Mauve [62] or by multiple reference-based scaffolders that utilize a set of refence genomes [63,64,65,66]. It is worth noting that this type of in silico contig re-arrangement assumes similarity between the architectures of the sequenced and the reference genomes and, therefore, it may not accurately reveal some isolate-specific genomic rearrangements. In general, it has a limited impact on analyses focused on the resistome composition despite the fact that an antibiotic resistance determinant may be missed when analyzing a de novo assembled genome if it was split across multiple contigs during the assembly procedure [60]. Furthermore, AMR-related mutations affecting only one or two copies of multicopy genes can be omitted when the assemblers collapse these sequences into a single copy. Such cases have been described for genetic variants in the 23S rRNA responsible for macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin (MLS) resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other microorganisms [67,68,69]. Another shortcoming of the de novo assembled genomes from short sequencing reads affects our ability to properly localize the identified AMR genetic determinants. In such draft sequences, the contig breaks are usually caused by the presence of repeated sequences, such as insertion sequence (IS) elements, transposons, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) arrays, rRNA genes, etc. As already mentioned, genome assemblers trend to collapse these regions into a single copy creating contig borders in the corresponding locations. This leads to inability to pinpoint the exact location of many of the identified AMR resistance genes and cassettes that are flanked by ISs and/or are part of structures, such as integrons and transposons. Some of the most troublesome resistance mechanisms in NFGNBs include production of Verona integron-encoded [70,71] and Imipenemase (IMP)-type [72,73] MBLs in P. aeruginosa and the acquisition of sul genes that are part of 3′ conservative ends of class 1 integrons in S. maltophilia [74,75], so this limitation is not insignificant.
On the other hand, the reference-based genome assemblies do not have problems with fragmentation/contig ordering, but they require that a high-quality reference genome is available and the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms becomes less accurate when the isolate and the reference are not highly similar. This may affect the proper detection of chromosomal mutations with significant contribution to the AMR in NFGNB, such as the ones found in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA and parC [76,77,78] or those related to polymyxin resistance in various genes [79,80,81].
Two different types of SBS-based NGS methodologies have mainly been used for sequencing the genomes of NFGNB clinical isolates from the Balkans. These are the Illumina technology that was first developed by Solexa and Lynx Therapeutics [82] and the DNA nanoball approach [83] commercialized by the BGI Group. Comparative analyses demonstrate that platforms based on both approaches produce data with comparable magnitudes of error and can be used interchangeably for genome sequencing [84].
A limited number of studies of NFGNB genomes from the Balkans also utilize long sequencing reads generated by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platform. The methodology for DNA sequencing by passing long DNA molecules through small diameter pores and measuring the currents as each nucleotide passes can be considered as a “fourth generation” technology [57]. It is characterized by the production of very long reads (from hundreds of kilobases up to megabases) that can span the repetitive regions in bacterial genomes but have considerably higher error rates compared to the ones generated by SBS methods. These long reads can be used for the generation of high-quality complete circularized bacterial genomes (including the plasmids as separate sequences). The major limitations of the ONT platforms are still the higher cost per genome and the sequence errors that set a challenge for accurate genomic analyses. The most efficient approach to overcome the limitations of both technologies is to use a hybrid assembly strategy that utilizes ONT and SBS sequencing reads together [85].
Knowing the general strengths and the weaknesses of the described second and fourth generation sequencing methodologies, we can now proceed with describing how WGS was applied to study the resistomes of clinical NFGNB isolates from the Balkans.

4. P. aeruginosa

4.1. Mechanisms of Carbapenem Resistance in P. aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa has a genome with an average size of 6.7 Mbp, a median number of 6016 coding sequences, and a GC content of 66.1% [86]. Recent analysis of the species pangenome indicated more than 16,000 non-redundant genes and only approximately 15% of them are included in the core genome. This genome variability at the strain level corrupts the efforts to develop a vaccine that can establish complete protection against P. aeruginosa infections [87]. Moreover, it also highlights the importance of WGS for proper characterization of isolates and the molecular epidemiological investigation of outbreaks. As mentioned, CRPA isolates represent one of the major hazards in hospital settings impelling a great challenge to the treatment of infected patients. P. aeruginosa can develop a carbapenem resistance utilizing various mechanisms. Some of them are driven by acquisition of chromosomal mutations. For example, early reports pointed out genetic variations leading to loss of the outer membrane protein OprD resulting in altered permeability as the predominant cause for a reduced susceptibility to imipenem [88,89]. Later studies revealed that a regulatory gene for oprD also contributes to carbapenem resistance [90]. The overexpression of three-component efflux systems, such as MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM, by mutations at the regulatory regions extrudes a wide variety of antimicrobial agents, including meropenem (but not imipenem) [91,92]. Mutational derepression of the chromosomally-encoded cephalosporinase AmpC in combination with an exchange to alanine at position 105 lead to reduced susceptibility against oxyiminocephalosporins and imipenem [93]. If CRPA isolates possess combinations of chromosomal mutations that lead to OprD loss, MexAB-OprM overexpression, and AmpC derepression, their synergistic impact can confer high-level resistance to carbapenems with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) up to and even higher than 128 mg/L [94].
Despite that the acquisition of chromosomal mutations is the predominant way for P. aeruginosa to develop a carbapenem resistance, another mechanism that deserves special attention is the production of carbapenem-hydrolysing enzymes (carbapenemases). They can easily spread between isolates via horizontal gene transfer through integrons, transposons, and plasmids accelerating the dissemination of CRPA isolates [86]. Three molecular classes of carbapenemases, named A, B, and D, have been identified in P. aeruginosa so far [71,95].
The class A β-lactamases utilize Ser residue at the active site and an additional Glu residue is involved in the catalytic process [96,97]. Their activity is partially inhibited by clavulanic acid. GES-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), belonging to class A, have been increasingly reported among Gram-negative pathogens, including P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. Some GES-type enzyme variants, including GES-2, 4, 5, 6, and 14, have shown carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity [98,99,100,101,102,103]. GES-5 was reported in a clinical P. aeruginosa isolate obtained from a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Turkey a few years ago [104]. Later, the same enzyme, together with GES-1, was also described in clinical CRPA isolates from Bulgaria [105]. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) is another member of class A β-lactamases that has been identified in Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. In 2007, the first clinical isolate of KPC-producing P. aeruginosa was identified in a Colombian hospital [106] and has continuously spread throughout other countries, including the USA, China, Brazil, and Germany [107,108,109,110].
The class B comprises MBLs and is the most prevalent among clinical isolates on a global scale. MBLs can hydrolase all β-lactams except for monobactams, such as aztreonam. Their activity can be inhibited by the presence of a chelator-like ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) because they utilize divalent cations as a cofactor. Clinically relevant small molecule inhibitors that can block the MBL action have not been found yet [111]. Several types of MBLs have been recovered from clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. The first IMP-type MBL was recovered from an imipenem-resistant strain P. aeruginosa GN17203 in Japan in 1991 [112]. Today, more than 70 IMP variants are known and this MBL is the second most common carbapenemase produced by P. aeruginosa [86]. The VIM-1 enzyme was first isolated from a CRPA strain in Verona, Italy [70]. Another subtype named VIM-2 was next obtained from a blood culture of a 39-year-old woman treated with imipenem in Marseilles, France in 1996 [113]. Both these MBLS were originally found in P. aeruginosa as parts of gene cassettes in the variable regions of class 1 integrons, and VIM-producing clinical isolates have been detected all over the world. Numerous reports for their identification on the Balkans exist [114,115,116,117,118,119] highlighting them as a serious threat to the public health in this region. The first member of the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-type carbapenemases was recovered from a Swedish patient who had recently travelled to India prior to hospitalization [120]. Moreover, the majority of the European NDM-1-producing Enterobacterales clinical isolates in the next few years were isolated from patients who had recent travel and hospitalization in India, Pakistan or the Balkan countries [121]. The NDM-1 variant was detected for a first time in P. aeruginosa on the Balkans in Serbia [122]. CRPA isolates expressing MBLs different from the globally distributed VIM-, IMP-, and NDM-variants do exist, but they have limited significance for the Balkan region since the local screening efforts have not yet detected them [123].
The Class D carbapenemases are serine β-lactamases with a key carboxylated Lys residue that is responsible for the hydrolysis [124]. They are also named oxacillinases (OXAs) in reference to their ability to hydrolyze oxacillin much faster than benzylpenicillin. Twelve groups of these enzymes exist, and three of them (OXA-40-like, OXA-48-like, and OXA-198-like) rarely have been identified in P. aeruginosa [86]. They have not been described in CRPA isolates on the Balkans so far. It should be mentioned that Turkey, together with North African and Middle East countries, are among the most important reservoirs for plasmid-borne OXA-48-like variants in Enterobacterales, so a realistic possibility for horizontal gene transfer exists [125].
The global surveillance initiatives have identified ten P. aeruginosa high-risk clones in terms of prevalence, global spread, and association with MDR/XDR profiles—ST235, ST111, ST233, ST244, ST357, ST308, ST175, ST277, ST654, and ST298 [126]. Two of them, ST235 and ST111, are the carbapenemase producers that raise the biggest concerns since they are associated not only with class B but also with class A and D carbapenemases [86]. Strains that belong to both clones have been identified in many of the Balkan countries. Most of the WGS-subjected clinical CRPA isolates in the region cover members of these two clones.
The studies to date, including WGS-based resistome analyses of problematic P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from the Balkan countries, are presented in the next few subsections. Summary data from them are shown in Table 1.

4.2. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Albania

In their study, Tafaj et al. report the genome sequences of two NDM-1-producing P. aeruginosa strains of ST235 that were isolated from the surgical wound of two inpatients in Tirana [127]. The WGS procedure was carried out at the San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) using Illumina NextSeq 500 (2 × 150 bp) sequencing. It generated two draft genomes, each composed by more than 500 contigs. Both of them were found to harbor blaNDM-1 genes in combination with a total of 58 other AMR genetic determinants, including genes conferring resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines, through different mechanisms, such as antibiotic efflux (n = 37), antibiotic efflux and antibiotic target alteration (n = 3), antibiotic inactivation (n = 11), antibiotic target alteration (n = 6), and antibiotic target replacement (n = 1) [127]. All of them were identified using the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) v.5.1.0 from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) [133]. A significant limitation of this study remains the absence of antibiotic susceptibility testing results meaning that the performed resistome analysis is only computational. It remains unclear if all these in silico predictions result in AMR phenotypes.

4.3. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Bulgaria

In the first report from Bulgaria, Kostyanev et al. described the WGS of five CRPA strains that were obtained from clinical samples of different patients in two hospitals in Sofia [105]. A combination of short-read Illumina MiSeq (2 × 250 bp) sequencing and long-read ONT MinION sequencing was used. The five isolates were found to be clonally related, all belonging to ST654 and all possessing blaNDM-1MBL genes. This combination of sequencing technologies allowed the hybrid assembly of one chromosome-level genome (GCF_021378395.1). This is the first complete P. aeruginosa genome described in a study from the Balkans. Its analysis revealed a novel class 1 integron In1884 with the 5′CS–blaGES-5/aadB–3′CS gene cassette array [105].
The second report analyzed a single XDR P. aeruginosa isolate obtained in September 2019 from a urine sample of a 60-year-old male [128]. Authors used the Illumina HiSeq (2 × 150 bp) platform. The assembled draft genome was 7.16 Mb in size, comprising 78 contigs larger than 1000 bp (largest contig—644,223 bp) with an N50 value of 231,855 bp. WGS-based MLST analysis classified the isolate into the globally recognized high-risk sequence type ST111 [134]. The assembled genome was shown to contain a blaVIM-2 gene as part of the resistance gene cassette embedded into the variable region of its In59-like integron [128].

4.4. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Greece

A recent large-scale study in Greece screened a total of 120 non-repetitive clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, which had meropenem MICs greater than 2 mg/L, for the presence of VIM-genes [129]. Sixty-one CRPAs were found to contain genetic determinants for VIM MBLs and the isolates of ST111 were dominant among them (n = 34), followed by those belonging to ST235 (n = 15). Next, a PCR-based methodology was used to amplify and sequence the blaVIM genes within their corresponding integrons. Six isolates, representative of different integron structures and sequence types (STs), were subjected to WGS using Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 bp). Each of the resulting genomes was shown to harbor either a blaVIM-2 or blaVIM-4 variant. Additionally, the genomes of nine P. aeruginosa isolates, being positive in the EDTA–meropenem test but negative in PCR screening, were also sequenced. No known MBL genes were found in them suggesting that the phenotypic detection of MBLs using double-disk synergy test with imipenem-EDTA may be unreliable on some occasions [135].

4.5. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Romania

In order to estimate the effects of the high consumption of antimicrobials in Romania on the AMR profile of NFGNBs, Gheorghe-Barbu et al. sequenced the genomes of 34 MDR A. baumannii and 20 MDR P. aeruginosa strains [130]. These isolates were recovered in the 2018–2019 period from hospital settings, hospital collecting sewage tanks, and the receiving wastewater treatment plants located in seven different geographic locations, and the sequencing was performed by Illumina MiSeq (2 × 300 bp). In the context of the present review article, the detection of dissemination of blaIMP-13 resistance determinants among isolates from a Bucharest hospital and its effluent is very alarming. A major limitation of this study is the way of presenting the results from the resistome analyses. It is focused entirely on summarization of all data into a single table and suffers by the insufficient description of the individual isolates and their AMR determinants [130]. Despite that, it successfully demonstrates how WGS could provide important information about AMR determinants’ transmission from the hospital environment to wastewater.

4.6. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Serbia

A recent study investigated the molecular characteristics of MBL-producing CRPA isolates in Serbia, as well as the underlying resistance mechanisms and the genetic context of the MBL genes detected [131]. Their distribution suggested clonal dissemination and possible recombination. High-risk clones ST235 and ST654 were identified for the first time in Serbia in combination with blaNDM-1 determinants that confer resistance to carbapenems and all other β-lactams, except for aztreonam. Kabic et al. also performed detailed phylogenomic analysis by calling and comparing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the core gene alignment of 165 P. aeruginosa genomes, of which four were sequenced by the authors. It should be mentioned that this is the second study form the Balkans that utilizes ONT long reads (MinION) in combination with the short reads generated by an Illumina platform (Illumina HiSeq, 2 × 150 bp) [131]. This results in the generation of the second complete genome of a CRPA isolate again carrying the blaNDM-1 gene similar to the report from Bulgaria [127]. The absence of essential clinical information regarding the isolates that were subject to WGS can be considered as the biggest limitation of this study.

4.7. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates in Turkey

Çekin et al. identified two carbapenemase-producing isolates from a Turkish hospital by both Carba NP [136] and Carbapenem Inactivation Method [137] tests and sequenced their genomes using Illumina MiSeq (2 × 150 bp) [132]. In addition to the identified blaVIM-5 and blaIMP-7, the genomes of the two CRPA strains also harbor plasmid-borne resistance determinants, such as crpP (ciprofloxacin resistance protein, plasmid encoded) and crpP-2 [138]. The crpP gene was also found in the VIM-2 producing isolate previously described in Bulgaria [128].

4.8. WGS of Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates from the Balkans in International Projects

A number of large-scale international projects that use WGS to analyze clinical P. aeruginosa isolates exist, and some of them include isolates from Balkan countries [139,140,141,142].
In summary, the main goal of all WGS-based resistome analyses carried out in the Balkan countries in recent years has been to explore the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, especially MBL genes and their genetic context. A variety of MBL genes have been identified, including blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaIMP alleles. All investigated P. aeruginosa isolates from Albania, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Turkey, as well as most isolates from Greece and Romania, have been classified into globally recognized epidemic high-risk sequence types (STs: 111, 235, 308, 357, and 654) [126]—Table 1.

5. A. baumannii

5.1. Mechanisms of Carbapenem Resistance in A. baumannii

Analysis of all complete A. baumannii genomes available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) reveals that the size of species chromosome varies in the range of 3.63–4.57 Mbp with a GC content of 38.76–39.7%. Recent pan-genome analysis of 79 A. baumannii genomes identified 1344 core, 4644 accessory, and 1695 unique protein-coding genes [143]. Unique genomic content was presented mainly by genetic determinants that contribute to carbon catabolism, virulence, and antibiotic resistance. The extent of AMR and its environmental flexibility are the two key aspects responsible for the ubiquitous dissemination of A. baumannii in hospitals worldwide [144].
Carbapenems have generally been considered as the preferred antibiotics to treat A. baumannii infections due to their efficiency and favorable safety [145]. Due to this, CRAB isolates are considered as a major threat in hospital settings and represent a critical challenge to the treatment of infected patients. It is worth noting that the carbapenem resistance is widely spread among invasive Acinetobacter spp. isolates on the Balkans.
A. baumannii utilizes numerous AMR mechanisms, including β-lactamases/carbapenemases, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, overexpression of efflux pumps, permeability defects due to outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) loss, and modifications of target sites [22,145,146,147].
The carbapenemase-mediated resistance in A. baumannii needs special attention since the species was shown to possess natural competence to incorporate exogenous DNA [148,149]. The considerable amount of foreign DNA in its genome suggests frequent horizontal gene transfers in this pathogen. Moreover, albumin, the main protein of the blood plasma, enhances the natural competence of A. baumannii, which leads to even higher possibilities for carbapenemase gene acquisition in invasive isolates [150]. All three molecular classes of carbapenemases (A, B, and D) have been found in clinical CRAB isolates. Class A β-lactamases detected in A. baumannii are represented by GES-11 found in France [151] and KPC-2, 3, 4 and 10 initially detected in Puerto Rico [152] and Brazil [153]. The different KPC variants are usually found in MDR-CRAB isolates, which cause difficult to treat infections with high mortality rates. KPC carbapenemases were also frequently found in CRAB isolates obtained from burn victims [154]. A variety of class B MBLs have been detected in CRAB strains so far, including IMP-1 [155], IMP-2 [156], IMP-4 [157], IMP-5 [158], IMP-6 [159], IMP-8 [160], IMP-11 [161], IMP-19 [161], IMP-24 [160], IMP-55 [162], NDM-1 [163], GIM-like [164], NDM-2 [165], NDM-3 [166], SIM-1 [167], VIM-1 [168], VIM-2 [169], VIM-3 [160], VIM-4 [170], and VIM-11 [160]. Although MBLs are not the predominant type of carbapenemases found in A. baumannii, they present a serious threat for infected patients due to their broad substrate range, potent activity, and resistance to all available inhibitors [144]. The most important class of carbapenemases in clinical CRAB isolates are the OXA-type Class D β-lactamases [22]. So far, more than 400 OXA-enzymes have been identified among various bacteria [146] and many of them possess carbapenem hydrolyzing activity [171]. The corresponding blaoxa genes can be located either on the chromosome, on a plasmid, or sometimes may be found in integrons. Carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D beta-lactamases (CHDLs) are the major cause for carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii and the acquisition of their corresponding genes is often mediated by flanking IS elements [172]. Four OXA-type CHDLs groups, such as OXA-23, OXA-40/24, OXA-51, and OXA-58, are the predominant carbapenemases in CRAB isolates [144]. OXA-23 was the first one found in A. baumannii isolate obtained from the blood culture of a Scottish patient in 1985 [173]. Currently, it is disseminated worldwide, including on the Balkans [174]. The OXA-40/OXA-24 group includes the enzymes OXA-25, OXA-26, OXA-40, and OXA-72 that differ only in few amino acids [175]. From them, OXA-72 has been identified as a cause for an A. baumannii outbreak in Croatia [176]. OXA-51-group carbapenemases are intrinsic chromosomal enzymes found in the genome of the species that are expressed at a low level [177]. The acquisition of a strong promoter by insertion of the ISAba1 element upstream of the 5′ end of the OXA-51-group gene leads to elevation in the enzymatic activity [178]. OXA-58 is encoded by the blaOXA-58 gene, which was found to be plasmid borne. A number of outbreaks caused by this variant have been reported in many countries, including Greece [179] and Turkey [180]. Again, OXA-58 can mediate high-level carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii either by an upstream insertion of the IS1008 element [181] or by the presence of the ISAba825-ISAba3-like hybrid promoter [182]. The other three OXA-type CHDL groups found in CRAB, OXA-149, OXA-182, and OXA-235 are rare [183,184,185] and have so far not been identified in A. baumannii isolates from Balkan countries.
Multidrug efflux systems can also play a role in the carbapenem resistance of CRAB isolates. In a recent study, high expression of the RND-type pump AdeABC was associated with meropenem resistance [186]. AbeM, an H+-coupled Multidrug and Toxic compound Extrusion (MATE) family pump, was reported to confer an imipenem resistance in A. baumannii [187].
Permeability defects caused by mutations also contribute to the carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii. The loss of the 29 kDa outer membrane porin CarO leads to both imipenem and meropenem resistance [188]. Other studies have also highlighted 22–33-kDa OMP [189], 33–36-kDa OMP [190], 37-kDa OMP [191], 44-kDa OMP [191], and 47-kDa OMP [191] as being involved in the carbapenem resistance.
The alteration of target sites in rare cases can lead to imipenem resistance in the absence of other known resistance mechanisms. This phenomenon was observed in A. baumannii isolates that demonstrate overexpression of certain penicillin-binding proteins with a low affinity for imipenem [192].

5.2. Mechanisms of Colistin Resistance in A. baumannii

The high rate of carbapenem resistance among the clinical A. baumannii isolates on the Balkans forces the clinicians to look for alternative antibiotics to treat the infected patients. Unfortunately, very frequently the CRAB isolates turn to be also MDR or XDR, which severely limits the available treatment options. In such cases, the polymyxin antibiotic colistin frequently is being applied as a “last resort” antibiotic despite its strong neuro- and nephrotoxicity. However, since 2015, its efficiency has been largely compromised by the emergence and rapid dissemination of mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes among Gram-negative bacteria worldwide. Until now, ten MCR-family genes and their variants have been described [193,194]. Despite that mcr genes have already been found on the Balkans [195,196,197,198], none of them were obtained from A. baumannii isolates. Recent studies from Croatia detected colistin resistant A. baumannii isolates, but the resistance mechanism was mediated by chromosomal mutations [199,200]. Nevertheless, these findings are very troublesome especially in the light that some of the strains were also carbapenem-resistant [200].
The chromosomally mediated colistin resistance can occur in A. bumannii by several mechanisms [201,202]. The first relies on the complete loss of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) production by mutational inactivation of a lipid A biosynthesis gene (lpxA, lpxC, or lpxD) or via insertional inactivation of lpxACD genes due to the ISAba11 element [203]. Another way is based on the occurrence of point mutations in pmrA and pmrB genes of the PmrAB two-component system [203]. Such sequence variations in pmrB were found in multiple A. baumanii isolates from the Balkans. In addition, a mutation in the pmrC homologue eptA and a point mutation in ISAba1 upstream of eptA recently were associated with colistin resistance and increased eptA expression [204].
The studies to date, including WGS-based resistome analyses of problematic A. baumannii clinical isolates from the Balkan countries, are presented in the next few subsections. Summary data from them are shown in Table 2.

5.3. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Albania

In their study, Abdelbary et al. presented the genome sequences of two clinical CRAB isolates obtained from Albanian and Togolese patients [205]. The draft genome sequence of the Albanian isolate was assembled using reads from Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 150 bp). It was composed by 128 contigs that comprised 3,933,485 bp with an N50 contig size of 125,943 bp and a GC content of 38.8%. No antibiotic susceptibility testing results were given, so the resistome analysis was performed entirely in silico.

5.4. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Croatia

Seven colistin-resistant Enterobacterales and three colistin-resistant CRAB isolates were subjected to WGS in a recent study [200]. It also utilized different NGS technology in the face of the Ion Torrent PGM platform (400 bp). D’Onofrio et al. identified missense mutations in the pmrB gene that can be a plausible explanation for the observed colistin resistance. It is worth noting that one of these variants (A138T) was present in all three genomes investigated. In addition, the authors provided complete clinical details about all isolates. The most important conclusion from this work is that colistin-resistant and CRAB isolates have already emerged on the Balkans and the clinicians in local hospitals should be prepared to apply novel combined strategies in the treatment of severe infections caused by colistin-resistant CRAB isolates [212].

5.5. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Greece

The first report from Greece described the complete genome of the A. baumannii isolate A388 recovered in 2002 [206]. It represented a distinct antibiotic-resistant lineage of the global clone 1 (GC1) producing OXA-58 carbapenemase. Authors used long reads generated by the MinION platform (ONT) to generate the 4.332-Mbp genome sequence. Curiously, the short reads used for the hybrid assembly were generated long ago in a previous study, using the llumina HiSeq platform (SRA accession number ERX087515). Taking this into consideration, the work of Hamidian et.al. demonstrates that the portable sequencing device MinION can be used to complete previously sequenced genomes.
The second Greek study concentrated on genome analysis (Illumina NovaSeq, 2 × 150 bp) of 40 colistin-resistant CRAB isolates. Two genomes of colistin-susceptible A. baumannii were also sequenced for comparison [207]. It is worth noting that the isolates, analyzed by Palmieri et al. were isolated before the colistin-resistant CRAB strains from Croatia. Authors identified a previously described mutation in pmrB (A226V) in all resistant isolates. It was associated with low-level colistin resistance before [79,213]. Some genomes harbored additional mutations in pmrB (E140V or L178F) or pmrA (K172I or D10N), first described by the authors. They resulted in higher colistin MICs for the corresponding isolates. In addition, the A138T mutation (found also by D’Onofrio et al.) was observed in all genomes sequenced suggesting that it has no role in the colistin resistance phenotype as previously reported [214]. Finally, all isolates were found to harbor mutations in the QRDR regions of gyrA and parC that confer quinolone resistance.

5.6. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Romania

Gheorghe et al. presented their report on the resistome and virulome of seven XDR/CRAB strains isolated from hospitalized and ambulatory patients in Bucharest, Romania [208]. The analysis revealed AMR genetic determinants that are present in all strains as well as some resistance genes that are isolate-specific. The entire study is well designed, and the authors provide very detailed clinical information for all isolates tested. All data from the assembly of the genomes (performed using paired-end reads by Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms) and the corresponding resistomes are given.

5.7. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Serbia

The first report from Serbia presented the draft genome sequence (Illumina MiSeq 2 × 75 bp) of a clinical CRAB isolate [209]. Authors did not provide any further details. The isolate was found to harbor the blaOXA-72 carbapenemase gene for a first time in Serbia. Its draft genome sequence consisted of a 3.91 Mbp, with an average GC content of 38.8%.
The second report described the WGS (Illumina MiSeq) of 30 colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates and analyzed the global genomic epidemiology of these infectious agents [210]. Phylogenomic analysis showed that colistin resistance arose independently in several clonal lineages. Mutations in the PmrB and subsequent overexpression of the phosphoethanolamine transferase PmrC were found to be the major mechanism of colistin resistance among the tested isolates. Also, one of the colistin-resistant isolates was found also to possess the blaNDM-1 gene. The presence of MBL in an isolate that is not susceptible to colistin is alarming since such combined resistance mechanisms will create extreme difficulties to the local clinicians on the Balkans.

5.8. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates in Turkey

In their study, Gülbüz and Sariyer analyzed a MDR A. baumannii strain via WGS (Illumina NovaSeq) [211]. In addition to the standard resistome and virulome analyses, authors also performed homology modelling, molecular docking, and dynamics simulations in order to obtain complete structural information about the G225S mutation found in the blaADC-73 β-lactamase of the isolate.

5.9. WGS of Clinical A. baumannii Isolates from the Balkans in International Projects

Large scale WGS of CRAB isolates was performed within the EURECA study [215]. In total, 228 CRAB strains from 10 countries were collected from blood cultures and their corresponding genome assemblies were obtained via Illumina sequencing. The majority of the isolates originated from patients hospitalized in Balkan countries, predominantly Serbia (n = 105), Greece (n = 41), and Kosovo (n = 32).
In summary, the main goal of the WGS-based resistome analyses regarding problematic nosocomial A. baumannii isolates from the Balkans has been to explore the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, as well as colistin resistance. A variety of CHDL genes and ISs have been identified, while genes for MBLs are rarely found. Also, pandrug-resistant A. baumannii isolates have already emerged in Croatia.

6. S. maltophilia

6.1. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in S. maltophilia

The clinical S. maltophilia K279a isolate, obtained from a blood sample of an elderly male patient undergoing chemotherapy, was shown to possess a genome with a total size of 4,851,126 bp and a GC content of 66.7% [42]. Its analysis indicated the presence of nine RND-type efflux pump genetic determinants identified on a sequence homology basis. Gene disruption experiments demonstrated their involvement in the intrinsic drug resistance of the isolate by decreasing the MICs of aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines but none dramatically [42]. It is known than the MDR phenotype in Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens is frequently mediated by the over-expression of such RND-type efflux pumps [216,217]. With the development of the NGS technologies that lead to wider adoption of WGS in the bacterial genomics, more S. maltophilia genomes become available [218]. Their analyses revealed that the species possesses a variety of AMR genetic determinants, including β-lactamases and aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, in addition to the efflux pumps [31]. Importantly, these genes were found in most of the analyzed isolates, showing the same synteny and high levels of sequence homology. This observation suggests that such AMR genetic determinants have not been transmitted recently in S. maltophilia but are rather old and were acquired before the antibiotic therapy was introduced. Moreover, some of these genes have important functions in S. maltophilia physiology, such as the genes encoding the SmeDEF efflux pump. Its activity is essential for the colonization of plants roots [219] and at the same time it is involved in resistance to quinolones, tetracyclines, macrolides, chloramphenicol, and novobiocin [220]. The ambivalent nature of the AMR determinants to a large extent explains the intrinsic low susceptibility of S. maltophilia to most of the antibiotics allowing this opportunistic pathogen to infect patients receiving antimicrobial therapy. Actually, previous antibiotic treatment can be considered even as a risk factor for such infection [221,222]. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that S. maltophilia is the most common pathogen detected in the severe group and in the critical group of COVID-19 patients in the ICU at the Beijing Ditan Hospital in Beijing, China [29].
S. maltophilia has an intrinsic resistance against β-lactam antibiotics (including carbapenems). Genome analyses revealed that it possesses two chromosomally encoded β -lactamases named L1 and L2. The L1 enzyme was classified as a Zn2+-dependent class B3 MBL [223], while L2 is a serine active-site class A cephalosporinase [224] susceptible to clavulanic acid. When a β-lactam antibiotic is present, the expression of both enzymes gets stimulated via AmpR-dependent upregulation [225]. In addition, ampD(I) [226] and the ampN-ampG operon [227] also are essential for the β-lactamase inducibility.
Besides β-lactamase genes, the chromosome of S. maltophilia harbours genes for several intrinsic aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, including aac(6′)-Iz (encodes aminoglycoside acetyltransferase that confers resistance to amikacin, tobramycin, sisomicin, and netilmicin) [228], aph(3′)-IIc (encodes aminoglycoside phosphotransferase that contributes to resistance to kanamycin, neomycin, paromycin, and butirosin) [229], and aac(6′)-Iak (encodes aminoglycoside acetyltransferase that decreases the susceptibility to arbekacin, kanamycin, neomycin, sisomicin, and tobramycin) [230].
The major contributors to the intrinsically high antibiotic resistance of S. maltophilia are the various types of efflux pumps, which can be found encoded in its genome. They include: two ATP-binding cassette (ABC) multidrug efflux pumps—SmrA (contributes to fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and doxorubicin resistance) [231] and MacABCsm (contributes to aminoglycosides, macrolides, and polymyxins resistance) [232]; one major facilitator superfamily (MFS) efflux pump EmrCABsm (participating in the export of nalidixic acid, erythromycin, carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone, and tetrachlorosalicylanilide) [233]; and the fusaric acid tripartite efflux pump FusA (involved in the efflux of fusaric acid) [234]. Furthermore, eight types of RND efflux pumps (SmeABC, SmeDEF, SmeGH, SmeIJK, SmeMN, SmeOP, SmeVWX, and SmeYZ) were also found in the genome of S. maltophilia, and studies have identified a role in the antibiotic resistance for seven of them (all except SmeMN) [218]. Some RND pumps have a basal expression level under regular growth conditions that is sufficient to alter the susceptibility to antimicrobials of the bacterium. SmeDEF is the best studied system of this type. Its mutational inactivation leads to increased susceptibility toward several antimicrobials, including quinolones, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, macrolides, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (SXT) [220,235,236]. The expression levels of other pumps are increased upon induction by different signals.
Another chromosomal gene that is related to the AMR in S. maltophilia is Smqnr [237]. It encodes for a pentapeptide repeat protein that protects the DNA topoisomerases from the action of fluoroquinolones. A large number of Smqnr alleles exist in clinical isolates, each of them presenting subtle differences in its contribution to the quinolone resistance [238].
The extreme variety of intrinsic chromosomally encoded AMR genetic determinants in S. maltophilia complicates all attempts for resistome analysis. In principle, the WGS can provide detailed information about sequence variations in the regulatory regions and the coding sequences of all these genes, but the interpretation of the results is difficult and with a low level of confidence. The identified missense mutations are often strain-specific and/or found in unique combinations, which decreases the possibilities to predict their functional outcome. Moreover, the number of sequenced S. maltophilia genomes is significantly lower compared to these of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, and this reduces the predictive power of WGS in the species. Additional techniques, such as real-time PCR, transcriptome sequencing, and genetic manipulations, can help to overcome these issues, but most researchers choose not to apply them due to time- or cost-related limitations.
In addition to the intrinsic resistance mechanisms and the acquired antimicrobial resistance via mutations leading to overexpression of pumps, S. maltophilia can obtain AMR genetic determinants through horizontal gene transfer of various genetic structures. SXT is traditionally recommended as the first option against S. maltophilia infection; however, increasing resistance to this antimicrobial agent has complicated the treatment [239]. Resistance determinants, such as sul (encoding dihydropteroate synthases) and dfrA (encoding dihydrofolate reductases) genes, class 1–3 integrons, and mobile genetic elements, contribute to SXT resistance [240,241]. Studies have demonstrated that sul1 (and to a lesser extent sul2 and sul3, which are part of the class 2 and class 3 integrons, respectively) are the leading causes for SXT resistance [75,242]. Moreover, it has been reported that the dfrA genes, located in the gene cassettes of the class 1 integrons, lead to a high-level resistance to SXT [240]. Having this in mind, it is clear that the first goal of a resistome analysis in clinical S. maltophilia isolates is always to check for the presence of these genes.

6.2. WGS of Clinical S. maltophilia Isolates in Bulgaria

The only studies that have sequenced genomes of clinical S. maltophilia isolates on the Balkans were performed by Strateva et al. in Bulgaria. In the first of their reports, authors analyzed the resistome of an XDR S. maltophilia isolate (SM130 resistant to SXT, levofloxacin, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, and colistin) that was obtained in 2015 from a tracheobronchial aspirate of a 44-year-old inpatient with clinical symptoms of ventilator-associated pneumonia [243]. The WGS was carried out on an Illumina HiSeq system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using 2 × 150-bp paired-end sequencing (BGI Group, Hong Kong, China) to generate a genome assembly at the contig level. The isolate was found to harbor a class 1 integron (with sul1 gene located at its 3′ conservative end) containing resistance gene cassette embedded into the variable region of the integron. It had a length of approximately 3.2 kb and contained the following genes: blaOXA-74 (encoding an OXA-10 family class D β-lactamase OXA-74), aac(6′)-Ib-cr (fluoroquinolone-acetylating aminoglycoside acetyltransferase) and cmlA7 (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase). Further searching by the authors found the same cassette solely in the variable region of a class 1 integron in a P. aeruginosa isolate (EU161636.1) from Budapest (Hungary) [244].
Recently, Strateva et al. sequenced eight additional contig-level genomes of nosocomial S. maltophilia isolates using the DNA nanoball technology commercialized by BGI Genomics [245]. One of them (SM148) was found to harbor an empty 2.6-kb sized class 1 integron with sul1 gene corresponding to SXT resistance of the isolate studied. The structure of a typical class 1 integron, as well as that of those recently found in nosocomial isolates from Bulgaria, is presented in Figure 3.
The most important aspect of these Bulgarian investigations was imbedded in the presented data about the strong biofilm forming ability of all isolates. Bacterial biofilms are associated with a variety of infections caused by NFGNB, from those related to medical devices, such as catheters or prosthetic joints, to chronic tissue infections, such as pulmonary diseases of CF patients [246,247]. It is worth noting that bacteria inside a biofilm are much more resistant to antimicrobial agents than planktonic forms. Understanding the interplay between phenotypic and genetic resistance mechanisms acting on biofilms is essential for a complete resistome analysis of biofilm-producing clinical NFGNB isolates.

7. Conclusions

The present review shows that XDR and even pandrug-resistant NFGNB strains have already emerged in the Balkan states in recent years. Severe infections caused by these problematic pathogens pose a growing clinical threat to public health; therefore, the development of new antimicrobial strategies should be the future mainstay of infection control stewardship practices in hospitals. Using WGS for AMR monitoring is a superior approach compared to other molecular techniques since it provides a deeper understanding of the genetic resistance mechanisms, as well as pathogen evolution and population dynamics. The resistome analysis can be especially efficient to detect chromosomal mutations, such as those involved in the colistin resistance among NFGNBs.

Author Contributions

S.P.: Design of the review content, critical overview of the literature, and writing of the paper (original draft preparation). T.S.: Design of the review content and supervision, coordinating the research project and raising funding, and writing (review and editing). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

T.S. and S.P. would like to thank the Council of Medical Science of the Medical University of Sofia for the financial support to conduct the WGS of the Bulgarian S. maltophilia isolates described in this review article (Project no. 7240/15.11.2021; Contract no. D-134/14.06.2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rezaei, N. Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wisplinghoff, H. Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp. and Miscellaneous Gram-Negative Bacilli; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 1579–1599.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Oliveira, D.M.P.; Forde, B.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Harris, P.N.A.; Schembri, M.A.; Beatson, S.A.; Paterson, D.L.; Walker, M.J. Antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 33, e00181-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (accessed on 19 January 2023).
  6. Asokan, G.V.; Ramadhan, T.; Ahmed, E.; Sanad, H. WHO Global Priority Pathogens List: A Bibliometric Analysis of Medline-PubMed for Knowledge Mobilization to Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Bahrain. Oman Med. J. 2019, 34, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  8. Kadri, S.S. Key Takeaways from the U.S. CDC’s 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Threats Report for Frontline Providers. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 48, 939–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chumbita, M.; Monzo-Gallo, P.; Lopera-Mármol, C.; Aiello, T.F.; Puerta-Alcalde, P.; Garcia-Vidal, C. New treatments for multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli Infections. Rev. Española Quimioter. 2022, 35, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Soriano, M.C.; Montufar, J.; Blandino-Ortiz, A. Cefiderocol. Rev. Española Quimioter. 2022, 35 (Suppl. S1), 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Syed, Y.Y. Cefiderocol: A Review in Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections. Drugs 2021, 81, 1559–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. El-Sayed Ahmed, M.A.E.G.; Zhong, L.L.; Shen, C.; Yang, Y.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.B. Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: An extended review(2000–2019). Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 868–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Paterson, D.L.; Harris, P.N.A. Colistin resistance: A major breach in our last line of defence. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hasannejad-Bibalan, M.; Jafari, A.; Sabati, H.; Goswami, R.; Jafaryparvar, Z.; Sedaghat, F.; Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie, H. Risk of type III secretion systems in burn patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns 2021, 47, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mitov, I.; Strateva, T.; Markova, B. Prevalence of Virulence Genes Among Bulgarian Nosocomial and Cystic Fibrosis Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yakout, M.A.; Abdelwahab, I.A. Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Production during the Covid-19 Pandemic. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 16, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhagirath, A.Y.; Li, Y.; Somayajula, D.; Dadashi, M.; Badr, S.; Duan, K. Cystic fibrosis lung environment and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. BMC Pulm. Med. 2016, 16, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Martinez-Nadal, G.; Puerta-Alcalde, P.; Gudiol, C.; Cardozo, C.; Albasanz-Puig, A.; Marco, F.; Laporte-Amargós, J.; Moreno-García, E.; Domingo-Doménech, E.; Chumbita, M.; et al. Inappropriate Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in High-risk Neutropenic Patients With Bacteremia in the Era of Multidrug Resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mestrovic, T.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Swetschinski, L.R.; Ikuta, K.S.; Gray, A.P.; Davis Weaver, N.; Han, C.; Wool, E.E.; Gershberg Hayoon, A.; Hay, S.I.; et al. The burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in the WHO European region in 2019: A cross-country systematic analysis. Lancet Public Health 2022, 7, e897–e913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peleg, A.Y.; Seifert, H.; Paterson, D.L. Acinetobacter baumannii: Emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 21, 538–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Moubareck, C.A.; Halat, D.H. Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: A Review of Microbiological, Virulence, and Resistance Traits in a Threatening Nosocomial Pathogen. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Johnson, E.N.; Burns, T.C.; Hayda, R.A.; Hospenthal, D.R.; Murray, C.K. Infectious complications of open type III tibial fractures among combat casualties. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Keen, E.F.; Murray, C.K.; Robinson, B.J.; Hospenthal, D.R.; Aldous, W.K. Changes in the incidences of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant organisms isolated in a military medical center. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2010, 31, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Looney, W.J.; Narita, M.; Mühlemann, K. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Trifonova, A.; Strateva, T. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia—A low-grade pathogen with numerous virulence factors. Infect. Dis. 2019, 51, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chawla, K.; Vishwanath, S.; Munim, F.C. Nonfermenting Gram-negative Bacilli other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter Spp. Causing Respiratory Tract Infections in a Tertiary Care Center. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2013, 5, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Abbott, I.J.; Slavin, M.A.; Turnidge, J.D.; Thursky, K.A.; Worth, L.J. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Emerging disease patterns and challenges for treatment. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2014, 9, 471–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yang, S.; Hua, M.; Liu, X.; Du, C.; Pu, L.; Xiang, P.; Wang, L.; Liu, J. Bacterial and fungal co-infections among COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit. Microbes Infect. 2021, 23, 104806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. COVID-19 Deaths per Capita by Country|Statista. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deaths-worldwide-per-million-inhabitants/ (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  31. Sánchez, M.B. Antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Meletis, G. Carbapenem resistance: Overview of the problem and future perspectives. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chang, Y.T.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Hsueh, P.R. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rodríguez, C.H.; Nastro, M.; Calvo, J.L.; Fariña, M.E.; Dabos, L.; Famiglietti, A. In vitro activity of colistin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2014, 2, 316–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, D.H.; Cha, J.H.; Kim, D.W.; Lee, K.; Kim, Y.S.; Oh, H.Y.; Cho, Y.H.; Cha, C.J. Colistin-degrading proteases confer collective resistance to microbial communities during polymicrobial infections. Microbiome 2022, 10, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Britannica. Balkans|Definition, Map, Countries, & Facts|Britannica. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/place/Balkans (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  37. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2020. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net); ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  38. GLASS Whole-Genome Sequencing for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240011007 (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  39. Beg, A.Z.; Khan, A.U. Exploring bacterial resistome and resistance dessemination: An approach of whole genome sequencing. Future Med. Chem. 2019, 11, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fleischmann, R.D.; Adams, M.D.; White, O.; Clayton, R.A.; Kirkness, E.F.; Kerlavage, A.R.; Bult, C.J.; Tomb, J.F.; Dougherty, B.A.; Merrick, J.M.; et al. Whole-Genome Random Sequencing and Assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 1995, 269, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Stover, C.K.; Pham, X.Q.; Erwin, A.L.; Mizoguchi, S.D.; Warrener, P.; Hickey, M.J.; Brinkman, F.S.L.; Hufnagle, W.O.; Kowallk, D.J.; Lagrou, M.; et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 2000, 406, 959–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Crossman, L.C.; Gould, V.C.; Dow, J.M.; Vernikos, G.S.; Okazaki, A.; Sebaihia, M.; Saunders, D.; Arrowsmith, C.; Carver, T.; Peters, N.; et al. The complete genome, comparative and functional analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals an organism heavily shielded by drug resistance determinants. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fournier, P.E.; Vallenet, D.; Barbe, V.; Audic, S.; Ogata, H.; Poirel, L.; Richet, H.; Robert, C.; Mangenot, S.; Abergel, C.; et al. Comparative Genomics of Multidrug Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Sanger, F.; Nicklen, S.; Coulson, A.R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1977, 74, 5463–5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Rosenblum, B.B.; Lee, L.G.; Spurgeon, S.L.; Khan, S.H.; Menchen, S.M.; Heiner, C.R.; Chen, S.M. New dye-labeled terminators for improved DNA sequencing patterns. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4500–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Behjati, S.; Tarpey, P.S. What is next generation sequencing? Arch. Dis. Child.-Educ. Pract. 2013, 98, 236–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Smith, M.G.; Gianoulis, T.A.; Pukatzki, S.; Mekalanos, J.J.; Ornston, L.N.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. New insights into Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis revealed by high-density pyrosequencing and transposon mutagenesis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nadon, C.; van Walle, I.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Campos, J.; Chinen, I.; Concepcion-Acevedo, J.; Gilpin, B.; Smith, A.M.; Kam, K.M.; Perez, E.; et al. PulseNet International: Vision for the implementation of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for global food-borne disease surveillance. Eurosurveillance 2017, 22, 30544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Didelot, X.; Bowden, R.; Wilson, D.J.; Peto, T.E.A.; Crook, D.W. Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Palmieri, M.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Pelegrin, A.C.; Mirande, C.; Brkic, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Goossens, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; van Belkum, A. Genomic Epidemiology of Carbapenem- and Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Serbia: Predominance of ST101 Strains Carrying a Novel OXA-48 Plasmid. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Strateva, T.; Peykov, S.; Sirakov, I.; Savov, E.; Dimov, S.; Mitov, I. First detection and characterisation of a VanA-type Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolate from Bulgaria. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 18, 260–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Peykov, S.; Stratev, A.; Kirov, B.; Gergova, R.; Strateva, T. First detection of a colistin-resistant Klebsiella aerogenes isolate from a critically ill patient with septic shock in Bulgaria. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2022, 69, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Surleac, M.; Barbu, I.C.; Paraschiv, S.; Popa, L.I.; Gheorghe, I.; Marutescu, L.; Popa, M.; Sarbu, I.; Talapan, D.; Nita, M.; et al. Whole genome sequencing snapshot of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from hospitals and receiving wastewater treatment plants in Southern Romania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Turumtay, H.; Allam, M.; Sandalli, A.; Turumtay, E.A.; Genç, H.; Sandalli, C. Characteristics in the whole-genome sequence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST147 from Turkey. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2022, 69, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meletis, G.; Chatzopoulou, F.; Chatzidimitriou, D.; Tsingerlioti, F.; Botziori, C.; Tzimagiorgis, G.; Skoura, L. Whole Genome Sequencing of NDM-1-Producing ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated in a Private Laboratory in Greece. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karampatakis, T.; Papadopoulos, P.; Tsergouli, K.; Angelidis, A.S.; Sergelidis, D.; Papa, A. Genetic characterization of two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spa type t127 strains isolated from workers in the dairy production chain in Greece. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2021, 68, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Slatko, B.E.; Gardner, A.F.; Ausubel, F.M. Overview of Next Generation Sequencing Technologies. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2018, 122, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mardis, E.R. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2008, 9, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fuller, C.W.; Middendorf, L.R.; Benner, S.A.; Church, G.M.; Harris, T.; Huang, X.; Jovanovich, S.B.; Nelson, J.R.; Schloss, J.A.; Schwartz, D.C.; et al. The challenges of sequencing by synthesis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Su, M.; Satola, S.W.; Read, T.D. Genome-Based Prediction of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01405-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Help for Assembly. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/help/ (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  62. Darling, A.C.E.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple Alignment of Conserved Genomic Sequence With Rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kolmogorov, M.; Raney, B.; Paten, B.; Pham, S. Ragout-a reference-assisted assembly tool for bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, i302–i309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kolmogorov, M.; Armstrong, J.; Raney, B.J.; Streeter, I.; Dunn, M.; Yang, F.; Odom, D.; Flicek, P.; Keane, T.M.; Thybert, D.; et al. Chromosome assembly of large and complex genomes using multiple references. Genome Res. 2018, 28, 1720–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, S.C.; Ju, Y.R.; Lu, C.L. Multi-CSAR: A web server for scaffolding contigs using multiple reference genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W500–W509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bosi, E.; Donati, B.; Galardini, M.; Brunetti, S.; Sagot, M.F.; Lió, P.; Crescenzi, P.; Fani, R.; Fondi, M. MeDuSa: A multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 2443–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Eyre, D.W.; Silva, D.; de Cole, K.; Peters, J.; Cole, M.J.; Grad, Y.H.; Demczuk, W.; Martin, I.; Mulvey, M.R.; Crook, D.W.; et al. WGS to predict antibiotic MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1937–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sinclair, A.; Arnold, C.; Woodford, N. Rapid detection and estimation by pyrosequencing of 23S rRNA genes with a single nucleotide polymorphism conferring linezolid resistance in Enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3620–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ellington, M.J.; Ekelund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Canton, R.; Doumith, M.; Giske, C.; Grundman, H.; Hasman, H.; Holden, M.T.G.; Hopkins, K.L.; et al. The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: Report from the EUCAST Subcommittee. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Lauretti, L.; Riccio, M.L.; Mazzariol, A.; Cornaglia, G.; Amicosante, G.; Fontana, R.; Rossolini, G.M. Cloning and Characterization of blaVIM, a New Integron-Borne Metallo-β-Lactamase Gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Strateva, T.; Yordanov, D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa—A phenomenon of bacterial resistance. J. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 58, 1133–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Hirakata, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nakano, M.; Izumikawa, K.; Mine, M.; Aoki, S.; Kondoh, A.; Matsuda, J.; Hirayama, M.; Yanagihara, K.; et al. Clinical and Bacteriological Characteristics of IMP-Type Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Ito, H.; Arakawa, Y.; Ohsuka, S.; Wacharotayankun, R.; Kato, N.; Ohta, M. Plasmid-mediated dissemination of the metallo-beta-lactamase gene blaIMP among clinically isolated strains of Serratia marcescens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gillings, M.R. Integrons: Past, Present, and Future. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Hu, L.F.; Chen, G.S.; Kong, Q.X.; Gao, L.P.; Chen, X.; Ye, Y.; Li, J. Bin Increase in the Prevalence of Resistance Determinants to Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole in Clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates in China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Liu, Y.H.; Kuo, S.C.; Lee, Y.T.; Chang, I.C.Y.; Yang, S.P.; Chen, T.L.; Fung, C.P. Amino acid substitutions of quinolone resistance determining regions in GyrA and ParC associated with quinolone resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2012, 45, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Zaki, M.E.S.; ElKheir, N.A.; Mofreh, M. Molecular Study of Quinolone Resistance Determining Regions of gyrA Gene and parC Genes in Clinical Isolates of Acintobacter baumannii Resistant to Fluoroquinolone. Open Microbiol. J. 2018, 12, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, Y.T.; Lee, M.F.; Peng, C.F. Mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions associated with ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Southern Taiwan. Biomark. Genom. Med. 2014, 6, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Arroyo, L.A.; Herrera, C.M.; Fernandez, L.; Hankins, J.V.; Trent, M.S.; Hancock, R.E.W. The pmrCAB Operon Mediates Polymyxin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and Clinical Isolates through Phosphoethanolamine Modification of Lipid A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fernández, L.; Álvarez-Ortega, C.; Wiegand, I.; Olivares, J.; Kocíncová, D.; Lam, J.S.; Martínez, J.L.; Hancock, R.E.W. Characterization of the Polymyxin B Resistome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Gutu, A.D.; Sgambati, N.; Strasbourger, P.; Brannon, M.K.; Jacobs, M.A.; Haugen, E.; Kaul, R.K.; Johansen, H.K.; Høiby, N.; Moskowitz, S.M. Polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phoQ mutants is dependent on additional two-component regulatory systems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2204–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Buermans, H.P.J.; den Dunnen, J.T. Next generation sequencing technology: Advances and applications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2014, 1842, 1932–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Drmanac, R.; Sparks, A.B.; Callow, M.J.; Halpern, A.L.; Burns, N.L.; Kermani, B.G.; Carnevali, P.; Nazarenko, I.; Nilsen, G.B.; Yeung, G.; et al. Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 2010, 327, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Korostin, D.; Kulemin, N.; Naumov, V.; Belova, V.; Kwon, D.; Gorbachev, A. Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Chen, Z.; Erickson, D.L.; Meng, J. Benchmarking hybrid assembly approaches for genomic analyses of bacterial pathogens using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yoon, E.J.; Jeong, S.H. Mobile Carbapenemase Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 614058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mosquera-Rendón, J.; Rada-Bravo, A.M.; Cárdenas-Brito, S.; Corredor, M.; Restrepo-Pineda, E.; Benítez-Páez, A. Pangenome-wide and molecular evolution analyses of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa species. BMC Genomics 2016, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Drusano, G.L.; Standiford, H.C. Emergence of resistance to carbapenem antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1989, 24 (Suppl. A), 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Köhler, T.; Michea-Hamzehpour, M.; Epp, S.F.; Pechere, J.C. Carbapenem activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Respective contributions of OprD and efflux systems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Farra, A.; Islam, S.; Strålfors, A.; Sörberg, M.; Wretlind, B. Role of outer membrane protein OprD and penicillin-binding proteins in resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and meropenem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 31, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Livermore, D.M. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Our worst nightmare? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Masuda, N.; Sakagawa, E.; Ohya, S.; Gotoh, N.; Tsujimoto, H.; Nishino, T. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3322–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Extended-spectrum cephalosporinases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 1766–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Chalhoub, H.; Sáenz, Y.; Rodriguez-Villalobos, H.; Denis, O.; Kahl, B.C.; Tulkens, P.M.; Van Bambeke, F. High-level resistance to meropenem in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the absence of carbapenemases: Role of active efflux and porin alterations. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2016, 48, 740–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Matagne, A.; Dubus, A.; Galleni, M.; Frère, J.M. The beta-lactamase cycle: A tale of selective pressure and bacterial ingenuity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1999, 16, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Frase, H.; Shi, Q.; Testero, S.A.; Mobashery, S.; Vakulenko, S.B. Mechanistic basis for the emergence of catalytic competence against carbapenem antibiotics by the GES family of beta-lactamases. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 29509–29513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Vourli, S.; Giakkoupi, P.; Miriagou, V.; Tzelepi, E.; Vatopoulos, A.C.; Tzouvelekis, L.S. Novel GES/IBC extended-spectrum beta-lactamase variants with carbapenemase activity in clinical enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 234, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bonnin, R.A.; Nordmann, P.; Potron, A.; Lecuyer, H.; Zahar, J.R.; Poirel, L. Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing GES-Type Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Bogaerts, P.; Naas, T.; El Garch, F.; Cuzon, G.; Deplano, A.; Delaire, T.; Huang, T.D.; Lissoir, B.; Nordmann, P.; Glupczynski, Y. GES Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates in Belgium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4872–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Bae, I.K.; Lee, Y.N.; Jeong, S.H.; Hong, S.G.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.J.; Youn, H. Genetic and biochemical characterization of GES-5, an extended-spectrum class A beta-lactamase from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 58, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wachino, J.I.; Doi, Y.; Yamane, K.; Shibata, N.; Yagi, T.; Kubota, T.; Arakawa, Y. Molecular characterization of a cephamycin-hydrolyzing and inhibitor-resistant class A beta-lactamase, GES-4, possessing a single G170S substitution in the omega-loop. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 2905–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Hishinuma, T.; Tada, T.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Yamamoto, N.; Shimojima, M.; Kirikae, T. Spread of GES-5 carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates in Japan due to clonal expansion of ST235. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Malkoçoǧlu, G.; Aktaş, E.; Bayraktar, B.; Otlu, B.; Bulut, M.E. VIM-1, VIM-2, and GES-5 Carbapenemases among Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates at a Tertiary Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kostyanev, T.; Nguyen, M.N.; Markovska, R.; Stankova, P.; Xavier, B.B.; Lammens, C.; Marteva-Proevska, Y.; Velinov, T.; Cantón, R.; Goossens, H.; et al. Emergence of ST654 Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-harbouring blaNDM-1 and blaGES-5 in novel class I integron In1884 from Bulgaria. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 22, 672–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Villegas, M.V.; Lolans, K.; Correa, A.; Kattan, J.N.; Lopez, J.A.; Quinn, J.P. First identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates producing a KPC-type carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 1553–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. De Araújo Jácome, P.R.L.; Rodrigues Alves, Ĺ.; Borges Cabral, A.; Lopes, A.C.S.; Vieira Maciel, M.A. First report of KPC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Ge, C.; Wei, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Shen, P.; Yu, Y.; Li, L. Identification of KPC-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1184–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P.; Lagrutta, E.; Cleary, T.; Munoz-Price, L.S. Emergence of KPC-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Hagemann, J.B.; Pfennigwerth, N.; Gatermann, S.G.; von Baum, H.; Essig, A. KPC-2 carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa reaching Germany. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1812–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Palzkill, T. Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1277, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Watanabe, M.; Iyobe, S.; Inoue, M.; Mitsuhashi, S. Transferable imipenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1991, 35, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Poirel, L.; Naas, T.; Nicolas, D.; Collet, L.; Bellais, S.; Cavallo, J.D.; Nordmann, P. Characterization of VIM-2, a Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing Metallo-β-Lactamase and Its Plasmid- and Integron-Borne Gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolate in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Liakopoulos, A.; Mavroidi, A.; Katsifas, E.A.; Theodosiou, A.; Karagouni, A.D.; Miriagou, V.; Petinaki, E. Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa from central Greece: Molecular epidemiology and genetic analysis of class I integrons. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Bahar, G.; Mazzariol, A.; Koncan, R.; Mert, A.; Fontana, R.; Rossolini, G.M.; Cornaglia, G. Detection of VIM-5 metallo-beta-lactamase in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate from Turkey. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54, 282–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Schneider, I.; Keuleyan, E.; Rasshofer, R.; Markovska, R.; Queenan, A.M.; Bauernfeind, A. VIM-15 and VIM-16, two new VIM-2-like metallo-beta-lactamases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Bulgaria and Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2977–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Bośnjak, Z.; Bedenić, B.; Mazzariol, A.; Jarža-Davila, N.; Šuto, S.; Kalenić, S. VIM-2 beta-lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Zagreb, Croatia. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 42, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Dortet, L.; Flonta, M.; Boudehen, Y.M.; Creton, E.; Bernabeu, S.; Vogel, A.; Naas, T. Dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Romania. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 7100–7103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Kazmierczak, K.M.; Rabine, S.; Hackel, M.; McLaughlin, R.E.; Biedenbach, D.J.; Bouchillon, S.K.; Sahm, D.F.; Bradford, P.A. Multiyear, Multinational Survey of the Incidence and Global Distribution of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 60, 1067–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Yong, D.; Toleman, M.A.; Giske, C.G.; Cho, H.S.; Sundman, K.; Lee, K.; Walsh, T.R. Characterization of a new metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla(NDM-1), and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 5046–5054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Struelens, M.J.; Monnet, D.L.; Magiorakos, A.P.; O’Connor, F.S.; Giesecke, J.; Grisold, A.; Zarfel, G.; Jans, B.; Velinov, T.; Kantardjiev, T.; et al. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase 1-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Emergence and response in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15, 19716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Jovcic, B.; Lepsanovic, Z.; Suljagic, V.; Rackov, G.; Begovic, J.; Topisirovic, L.; Kojic, M. Emergence of NDM-1 Metallo-β-Lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from Serbia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Cayci, Y.T.; Biyik, İ.; Birinci, A. VIM, NDM, IMP, GES, SPM, GIM, SIM Metallobetalactamases in Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Turkish University Hospital. J. Arch. Mil. Med. 2022, 10, 118712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Golemi, D.; Maveyraud, L.; Vakulenko, S.; Samama, J.P.; Mobashery, S. Critical involvement of a carbamylated lysine in catalytic function of class D beta-lactamases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 14280–14285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Poirel, L.; Potron, A.; Nordmann, P. OXA-48-like carbapenemases: The phantom menace. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. del Barrio-Tofiño, E.; López-Causapé, C.; Oliver, A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tafaj, S.; Gona, F.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Kapisyzi, P.; Caushi, F.; Rossen, J.W.; Cirillo, D.M. Whole-Genome Sequences of Two NDM-1-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated in a Clinical Setting in Albania in 2018. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020, 9, e01291-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Strateva, T.; Setchanova, L.; Peykov, S. Characterization of a Bulgarian VIM-2 metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate belonging to the high-risk sequence type 111. Infect. Dis. 2021, 53, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Verra, A.; Galani, V.; Xitsas, S.; Bitar, I.; Hrabak, J.; Petinaki, E. Unravelling the Features of Success of VIM-Producing ST111 and ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Greek Hospital. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Gheorghe-Barbu, I.; Barbu, I.C.; Popa, L.I.; Pîrcălăbioru, G.G.; Popa, M.; Măruțescu, L.; Niță-Lazar, M.; Banciu, A.; Stoica, C.; Gheorghe, Ș.; et al. Temporo-spatial variations in resistance determinants and clonality of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from Romanian hospitals and wastewaters. Antimicrob. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2022, 11, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Kabic, J.; Fortunato, G.; Vaz-Moreira, I.; Kekic, D.; Jovicevic, M.; Pesovic, J.; Ranin, L.; Opavski, N.; Manaia, C.M.; Gajic, I. Dissemination of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Serbian Hospital Settings: Expansion of ST235 and ST654 Clones. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Çekin, Z.K.; Dabos, L.; Malkoçoğlu, G.; Fortineau, N.; Bayraktar, B.; Iorga, B.I.; Naas, T.; Aktaş, E. Carbapenemase -producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Turkey: First report of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones with VIM-5- and IMP-7-type carbapenemases in a tertiary hospital. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 99, 115174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Jia, B.; Raphenya, A.R.; Alcock, B.; Waglechner, N.; Guo, P.; Tsang, K.K.; Lago, B.A.; Dave, B.M.; Pereira, S.; Sharma, A.N.; et al. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D566–D573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Molina-Mora, J.A.; Campos-Sánchez, R.; Rodríguez, C.; Shi, L.; García, F. High quality 3C de novo assembly and annotation of a multidrug resistant ST-111 Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome: Benchmark of hybrid and non-hybrid assemblers. Sci. Reports 2020, 10, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Lee, K.; Lim, Y.S.; Yong, D.; Yum, J.H.; Chong, Y. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 4623–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L.; Dortet, L. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1503–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Van Der Zwaluw, K.; De Haan, A.; Pluister, G.N.; Bootsma, H.J.; De Neeling, A.J.; Schouls, L.M. The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Chávez-Jacobo, V.M.; Hernández-Ramírez, K.C.; Romo-Rodríguez, P.; Pérez-Gallardo, R.V.; Campos-García, J.; Félix Gutiérrez-Corona, J.; García-Merinos, J.P.; Meza-Carmen, V.; Silva-Sánchez, J.; Ramírez-Díaz, M.I. CrpP Is a Novel Ciprofloxacin-Modifying Enzyme Encoded by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pUM505 Plasmid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02629-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Khaledi, A.; Weimann, A.; Schniederjans, M.; Asgari, E.; Kuo, T.; Oliver, A.; Cabot, G.; Kola, A.; Gastmeier, P.; Hogardt, M.; et al. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa with machine learning-enabled molecular diagnostics. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12, e10264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Treepong, P.; Kos, V.N.; Guyeux, C.; Blanc, D.S.; Bertrand, X.; Valot, B.; Hocquet, D. Global emergence of the widespread Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 clone. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Jaillard, M.; van Belkum, A.; Cady, K.C.; Creely, D.; Shortridge, D.; Blanc, B.; Barbu, E.M.; Dunne, W.M.; Zambardi, G.; Enright, M.; et al. Correlation between phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility and the resistome in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2017, 50, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Kos, V.N.; Déraspe, M.; McLaughlin, R.E.; Whiteaker, J.D.; Roy, P.H.; Alm, R.A.; Corbeil, J.; Gardner, H. The resistome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in relationship to phenotypic susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Yakkala, H.; Samantarrai, D.; Gribskov, M.; Siddavattam, D. Comparative genome analysis reveals niche-specific genome expansion in Acinetobacter baumannii strains. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Lin, M.-F.; Lan, C.-Y. Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside. World J. Clin. Cases WJCC 2014, 2, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Doi, Y.; Murray, G.L.; Peleg, A.Y. Acinetobacter baumannii: Evolution of antimicrobial resistance-treatment options. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 36, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Lee, C.R.; Lee, J.H.; Park, M.; Park, K.S.; Bae, I.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Cha, C.J.; Jeong, B.C.; Lee, S.H. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms, and Prospective Treatment Options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: Mechanisms and epidemiology. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006, 12, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Traglia, G.M.; Chua, K.; Centron, D.; Tolmasky, M.E.; Ramírez, M.S. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis of the Naturally Competent Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolate A118. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 2235–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Ramirez, M.S.; Don, M.; Merkier, A.K.; Bistué, A.J.S.; Zorreguieta, A.; Centrón, D.; Tolmasky, M.E. Naturally competent Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolate as a convenient model for genetic studies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1488–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Traglia, G.M.; Quinn, B.; Schramm, S.T.J.; Soler-Bistue, A.; Ramirez, M.S. Serum Albumin and Ca2+ Are Natural Competence Inducers in the Human Pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 4920–4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Moubareck, C.; Brémont, S.; Conroy, M.C.; Courvalin, P.; Lambert, T. GES-11, a novel integron-associated GES variant in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3579–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Robledo, I.E.; Aquino, E.E.; Santé, M.I.; Santana, J.L.; Otero, D.M.; León, C.F.; Vázquez, G.J. Detection of KPC in Acinetobacter spp. in Puerto Rico. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Ribeiro, P.C.S.; Monteiro, A.S.; Marques, S.G.; Monteiro, S.G.; Monteiro-Neto, V.; Coqueiro, M.M.M.; Marques, A.C.G.; de Jesus Gomes Turri, R.; Santos, S.G.; Bomfim, M.R.Q. Phenotypic and molecular detection of the blaKPC gene in clinical isolates from inpatients at hospitals in São Luis, MA, Brazil. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Lima, W.G.; Silva Alves, G.C.; Sanches, C.; Antunes Fernandes, S.O.; de Paiva, M.C. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in patients with burn injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns 2019, 45, 1495–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Tognim, M.C.B.; Gales, A.C.; Penteado, A.P.; Silbert, S.; Sader, H.S. Dissemination of IMP-1 metallo- beta -lactamase-producing Acinetobacter species in a Brazilian teaching hospital. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2006, 27, 742–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Riccio, M.L.; Franceschini, N.; Boschi, L.; Caravelli, B.; Cornaglia, G.; Fontana, R.; Amicosante, G.; Rossolini, G.M. Characterization of the metallo-beta-lactamase determinant of Acinetobacter baumannii AC-54/97 reveals the existence of bla(IMP) allelic variants carried by gene cassettes of different phylogeny. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Chu, Y.W.; Afzal-Shah, M.; Houang, E.T.S.; Palepou, M.F.I.; Lyon, D.J.; Woodford, N.; Livermore, D.M. IMP-4, a novel metallo-beta-lactamase from nosocomial Acinetobacter spp. collected in Hong Kong between 1994 and 1998. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 710–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Silva, G.J.; Correia, M.; Vital, C.; Ribeiro, G.; Sousa, J.C.; Leitão, R.; Peixe, L.; Duarte, A. Molecular characterization of bla(IMP-5), a new integron-borne metallo-beta-lactamase gene from an Acinetobacter baumannii nosocomial isolate in Portugal. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 215, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Gales, A.C.; Tognim, M.C.B.; Reis, A.O.; Jones, R.N.; Sader, H.S. Emergence of an IMP-like metallo-enzyme in an Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strain from a Brazilian teaching hospital. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2003, 45, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Lee, M.F.; Peng, C.F.; Hsu, H.J.; Chen, Y.H. Molecular characterisation of the metallo-beta-lactamase genes in imipenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from a university hospital in southern Taiwan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 32, 475–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Yamamoto, M.; Nagao, M.; Matsumura, Y.; Matsushima, A.; Ito, Y.; Takakura, S.; Ichiyama, S. Interspecies dissemination of a novel class 1 integron carrying blaIMP-19 among Acinetobacter species in Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2480–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Shakibaie, M.R.; Azizi, O.; Shahcheraghi, F. Insight into stereochemistry of a new IMP allelic variant (IMP-55) metallo-β-lactamase identified in a clinical strain of Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 51, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Chen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, Y. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in China. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1255–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Girija, S.A.S.; Priyadharsini, J.V.; Arumugam, P. Prevalence of VIM- and GIM-producing Acinetobacter baumannii from patients with severe urinary tract infection. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2018, 65, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Espinal, P.; Fugazza, G.; López, Y.; Kasma, M.; Lerman, Y.; Malhotra-Kumar, S.; Goossens, H.; Carmeli, Y.; Vila, J. Dissemination of an NDM-2-producing Acinetobacter baumannii clone in an Israeli rehabilitation center. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5396–5398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Kumar, M. Identification of a Novel NDM Variant, blaNDM-3, from a Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016, 37, 747–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Lee, K.; Yum, J.H.; Yong, D.; Lee, H.M.; Kim, H.D.; Docquier, J.D.; Rossolini, G.M.; Chong, Y. Novel acquired metallo-beta-lactamase gene, bla(SIM-1), in a class 1 integron from Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from Korea. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4485–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Tsakris, A.; Ikonomidis, A.; Pournaras, S.; Tzouvelekis, L.S.; Sofianou, D.; Legakis, N.J.; Maniatis, A.N. VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 981–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Yum, J.H.; Yi, K.; Lee, H.; Yong, D.; Lee, K.; Kim, J.M.; Rossolini, G.M.; Chong, Y. Molecular characterization of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomospecies 3 from Korea: Identification of two new integrons carrying the bla(VIM-2) gene cassettes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 837–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Tsakris, A.; Ikonomidis, A.; Poulou, A.; Spanakis, N.; Vrizas, D.; Diomidous, M.; Pournaras, S.; Markou, F. Clusters of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones producing different carbapenemases in an intensive care unit. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Walther-Rasmussen, J.; Høiby, N. OXA-type carbapenemases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Zarrilli, R.; Giannouli, M.; Tomasone, F.; Triassi, M.; Tsakris, A. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: The molecular epidemic features of an emerging problem in health care facilities. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2009, 3, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Mugnier, P.D.; Poirel, L.; Naas, T.; Nordmann, P. Worldwide dissemination of the blaOXA-23 Carbapenemase gene of Acinetobacter baumannii. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Bonnin, R.A.; Poirel, L.; Licker, M.; Nordmann, P. Genetic diversity of carbapenem-hydrolysing β-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii from Romanian hospitals. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1524–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Poirel, L.; Naas, T.; Nordmann, P. Diversity, epidemiology, and genetics of class D beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Goic-Barisic, I.; Towner, K.J.; Kovacic, A.; Sisko-Kraljevic, K.; Tonkic, M.; Novak, A.; Punda-Polic, V. Outbreak in Croatia caused by a new carbapenem-resistant clone of Acinetobacter baumannii producing OXA-72 carbapenemase. J. Hosp. Infect. 2011, 77, 368–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Héritier, C.; Poirel, L.; Fournier, P.E.; Claverie, J.M.; Raoult, D.; Nordmann, P. Characterization of the naturally occurring oxacillinase of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4174–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Chen, T.L.; Lee, Y.T.; Kuo, S.C.; Hsueh, P.R.; Chang, F.Y.; Siu, L.K.; Ko, W.C.; Fung, C.P. Emergence and Distribution of Plasmids Bearing the blaOXA-51-like gene with an upstream ISAba1 in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Taiwan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4575–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Pournaras, S.; Markogiannakis, A.; Ikonomidis, A.; Kondyli, L.; Bethimouti, K.; Maniatis, A.N.; Legakis, N.J.; Tsakris, A. Outbreak of multiple clones of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates expressing OXA-58 carbapenemase in an intensive care unit. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Vahaboglu, H.; Budak, F.; Kasap, M.; Gacar, G.; Torol, S.; Karadenizli, A.; Kolayli, F.; Eroglu, C. High prevalence of OXA-51-type class D β-lactamases among ceftazidime-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp.: Co-existence with OXA-58 in multiple centres. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Chen, T.L.; Wu, R.C.C.; Shaio, M.F.; Fung, C.P.; Cho, W.L. Acquisition of a plasmid-borne blaOXA-58 gene with an upstream IS1008 insertion conferring a high level of carbapenem resistance to Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2573–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Ravasi, P.; Limansky, A.S.; Rodriguez, R.E.; Viale, A.M.; Mussi, M.A. ISAba825, a functional insertion sequence modulating genomic plasticity and bla(OXA-58) expression in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 917–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Higgins, P.G.; Pérez-Llarena, F.J.; Zander, E.; Fernández, A.; Bou, G.; Seifert, H. OXA-235, a novel class D β-lactamase involved in resistance to carbapenems in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2121–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Kim, C.K.; Lee, Y.; Lee, H.; Woo, G.J.; Song, W.; Kim, M.N.; Lee, W.G.; Jeong, S.H.; Lee, K.; Chong, Y. Prevalence and diversity of carbapenemases among imipenem-nonsusceptible Acinetobacter isolates in Korea: Emergence of a novel OXA-182. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 68, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Higgins, P.G.; Poirel, L.; Lehmann, M.; Nordmann, P.; Seifert, H. OXA-143, a novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 5035–5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Dou, Q.; Zou, M.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Liu, W. AdeABC efflux pump and resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii against carbapenem. J. Cent. South Univ. Med. Sci. 2017, 42, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Su, X.Z.; Chen, J.; Mizushima, T.; Kuroda, T.; Tsuchiya, T. AbeM, an H+-coupled Acinetobacter baumannii multidrug efflux pump belonging to the MATE family of transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4362–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Benmahmod, A.B.; Said, H.S.; Ibrahim, R.H. Prevalence and Mechanisms of Carbapenem Resistance Among Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates in Egypt. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Bou, G.; Cervero, G.; Dominguez, M.A.; Quereda, C.; Martinez-Beltran, J. Characterization of a nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain with a carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzyme: High-level carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii is not due solely to the presence of beta-lactamases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 3299–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Tomás, M.D.M.; Beceiro, A.; Pérez, A.; Velasco, D.; Moure, R.; Villanueva, R.; Martínez-Beltrán, J.; Bou, G. Cloning and functional analysis of the gene encoding the 33- to 36-kilodalton outer membrane protein associated with carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 5172–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Quale, J.; Bratu, S.; Landman, D.; Heddurshetti, R. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii endemic in New York City. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Gehrlein, M.; Leying, H.; Cullmann, W.; Wendt, S.; Opferkuch, W. Imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumanii is due to altered penicillin-binding proteins. Chemotherapy 1991, 37, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hussein, N.H.; AL-Kadmy, I.M.S.; Taha, B.M.; Hussein, J.D. Mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes from 1 to 10: A comprehensive review. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 2897–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ling, Z.; Yin, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3087–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Maciuca, I.E.; Cummins, M.L.; Cozma, A.P.; Rimbu, C.M.; Guguianu, E.; Panzaru, C.; Licker, M.; Szekely, E.; Flonta, M.; Djordjevic, S.P.; et al. Genetic Features of mcr-1 Mediated Colistin Resistance in CMY-2-Producing Escherichia coli from Romanian Poultry. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Mišić, D.; Kiskaroly, F.; Szostak, M.P.; Cabal, A.; Ruppitsch, W.; Bernreiter-Hofer, T.; Milovanovic, V.; Feßler, A.T.; Allerberger, F.; Spergser, J.; et al. The First Report of mcr-1-Carrying Escherichia coli Originating from Animals in Serbia. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Kurekci, C.; Aydin, M.; Nalbantoglu, O.U.; Gundogdu, A. First report of Escherichia coli carrying the mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Turkey. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Protonotariou, E.; Meletis, G.; Malousi, A.; Kotzamanidis, C.; Tychala, A.; Mantzana, P.; Theodoridou, K.; Ioannidou, M.; Hatzipantelis, E.; Tsakris, A.; et al. First detection of mcr-1-producing Escherichia coli in Greece. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 31, 252–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Jovcic, B.; Novovic, K.; Dekic, S.; Hrenovic, J. Colistin Resistance in Environmental Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb. Drug Resist. 2021, 27, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. D’Onofrio, V.; Conzemius, R.; Varda-Brkić, D.; Bogdan, M.; Grisold, A.; Gyssens, I.C.; Bedenić, B.; Barišić, I. Epidemiology of colistin-resistant, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter baumannii in Croatia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 81, 104263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Hamel, M.; Rolain, J.M.; Baron, S.A. The History of Colistin Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria: Progress and Challenges. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Jieling, Z. Mechanism of Colistin Resistance to Acinetobacter baumannii and its Progress: A Review Article. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2020, 29, 22183–22188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Cai, Y.; Chai, D.; Wang, R.; Liang, B.; Bai, N. Colistin resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii: Clinical reports, mechanisms and antimicrobial strategies. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Gerson, S.; Betts, J.W.; Lucaßen, K.; Nodari, C.S.; Wille, J.; Josten, M.; Göttig, S.; Nowak, J.; Stefanik, D.; Roca, I.; et al. Investigation of Novel pmrB and eptA Mutations in Isogenic Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates Associated with Colistin Resistance and Increased Virulence In Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01586-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Abdelbary, M.M.H.; Prod’hom, G.; Greub, G.; Senn, L.; Blanc, D.S. Draft Genome Sequences of Two Carbapenemase-Producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Strains Isolated from Albanian and Togolese Patients. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e00115-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Hamidian, M.; Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Holt, K.E.; Hall, R.M. Complete Genome Sequence of A388, an Antibiotic-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Global Clone 1 Isolate from Greece. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e00971-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  207. Palmieri, M.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Pelegrin, A.C.; Perrot, N.; Mirande, C.; Blanc, B.; Legakis, N.; Goossens, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; van Belkum, A. Abundance of Colistin-Resistant, OXA-23- and ArmA-Producing Acinetobacter baumannii Belonging to International Clone 2 in Greece. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Gheorghe, I.; Barbu, I.C.; Surleac, M.; Sârbu, I.; Popa, L.I.; Paraschiv, S.; Feng, Y.; Lazăr, V.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Oţelea, D.; et al. Subtypes, resistance and virulence platforms in extended-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Romanian isolates. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Dortet, L.; Bonnin, R.A.; Girlich, D.; Imanci, D.; Bernabeu, S.; Fortineau, N.; Naas, T. Whole-Genome Sequence of a European Clone II and OXA-72-Producing Acinetobacter baumannii Strain from Serbia. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, 1390–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Kabic, J.; Novovic, K.; Kekic, D.; Trudic, A.; Opavski, N.; Dimkic, I.; Jovcic, B.; Gajic, I. Comparative genomics and molecular epidemiology of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2023, 21, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Gülbüz, M.; Saral Sariyer, A. Combined in silico approach and whole genome sequencing: Acinetobacter baumannii ST218 isolate harboring ADC-73 β-lactamase which has a similar C-loop with ADC-56 and ADC-68 β-lactamase. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2022, 114, 108195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Vidaillac, C.; Benichou, L.; Duval, R.E. In vitro synergy of colistin combinations against colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4856–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Mavroidi, A.; Likousi, S.; Palla, E.; Katsiari, M.; Roussou, Z.; Maguina, A.; Platsouka, E.D. Molecular identification of tigecycline- and colistinresistant carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii from a Greek hospital from 2011 to 2013. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Oikonomou, O.; Sarrou, S.; Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Georgiadou, S.; Mantzarlis, K.; Zakynthinos, E.; Dalekos, G.N.; Petinaki, E. Rapid dissemination of colistin and carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Central Greece: Mechanisms of resistance, molecular identification and epidemiological data. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Kostyanev, T.; Xavier, B.B.; García-Castillo, M.; Lammens, C.; Bravo-Ferrer Acosta, J.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Cantón, R.; Glupczynski, Y.; Goossens, H. Phenotypic and molecular characterizations of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected within the EURECA study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2021, 57, 106345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Carrara, J.B.A.; Barroso, C.D.N.; Tuon, F.F.; Faoro, H.; Lorusso, A.B.; Carrara, J.A.; Deuttner, C.; Barroso, N.; Tuon, F.F.; Faoro, H. Role of Efflux Pumps on Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Poole, K. Efflux pumps as antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Ann. Med. 2007, 39, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Gil-Gil, T.; Martínez, J.L.; Blanco, P. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A review of current knowledge. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2020, 18, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. García-León, G.; Hernández, A.; Hernando-Amado, S.; Alavi, P.; Berg, G.; Martínez, J.L. A Function of SmeDEF, the Major Quinolone Resistance Determinant of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Is the Colonization of Plant Roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Alonso, A.; Martinez, J.L. Cloning and Characterization of SmeDEF, a Novel Multidrug Efflux Pump from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Ibn Saied, W.; Merceron, S.; Schwebel, C.; Le Monnier, A.; Oziel, J.; Garrouste-Orgeas, M.; Marcotte, G.; Ruckly, S.; Souweine, B.; Darmon, M.; et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Risk factors and outcome. J. Infect. 2020, 80, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Wang, C.H.; Lin, J.C.; Chang, F.Y.; Yu, C.M.; Lin, W.S.; Yeh, K.M. Risk factors for hospital acquisition of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in adults: A matched case-control study. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2017, 50, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Crowder, M.W.; Walsh, T.R.; Banovic, L.; Pettit, M.; Spencer, J. Overexpression, purification, and characterization of the cloned metallo-beta-lactamase L1 from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Walsh, T.R.; MacGowan, A.P.; Bennett, P.M. Sequence analysis and enzyme kinetics of the L2 serine beta-lactamase from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1460–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Lin, C.W.; Huang, Y.W.; Hu, R.M.; Chiang, K.H.; Yang, T.C. The role of AmpR in regulation of L1 and L2 beta-lactamases in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Yang, T.C.; Huang, Y.W.; Hu, R.M.; Huang, S.C.; Lin, Y.T. AmpDI is involved in expression of the chromosomal L1 and L2 beta-lactamases of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2902–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Huang, Y.W.; Lin, C.W.; Hu, R.M.; Lin, Y.T.; Chung, T.C.; Yang, T.C. AmpN-AmpG operon is essential for expression of L1 and L2 beta-lactamases in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 2583–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Li, X.Z.; Zhang, L.; McKay, G.A.; Poole, K. Role of the acetyltransferase AAC(6′)-Iz modifying enzyme in aminoglycoside resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 803–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Okazaki, A.; Avison, M.B. Aph(3′)-IIc, an aminoglycoside resistance determinant from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 359–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Tada, T.; Miyoshi-Akiyama, T.; Dahal, R.K.; Mishra, S.K.; Shimada, K.; Ohara, H.; Kirikae, T.; Pokhrelc, B.M. Identification of a novel 6′-N-aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, AAC(6′)-Iak, from a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 6324–6327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Al-Hamad, A.; Upton, M.; Burnie, J. Molecular cloning and characterization of SmrA, a novel ABC multidrug efflux pump from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  232. Lin, Y.T.; Huang, Y.W.; Liou, R.S.; Chang, Y.C.; Yang, T.C. MacABCsm, an ABC-type tripartite efflux pump of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia involved in drug resistance, oxidative and envelope stress tolerances and biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 3221–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Huang, Y.W.; Hu, R.M.; Chu, F.Y.; Lin, H.R.; Yang, T.C. Characterization of a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) tripartite efflux pump EmrCABsm from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2498–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  234. Hu, R.M.; Liao, S.T.; Huang, C.C.; Huang, Y.W.; Yang, T.C. An Inducible Fusaric Acid Tripartite Efflux Pump Contributes to the Fusaric Acid Resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Sánchez, M.B.; Martínez, J.L. Overexpression of the Efflux Pumps SmeVWX and SmeDEF Is a Major Cause of Resistance to Co-trimoxazole in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00301-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Wu, C.J.; Lu, H.F.; Lin, Y.T.; Zhang, M.S.; Li, L.H.; Yang, T.C. Substantial Contribution of SmeDEF, SmeVWX, SmQnr, and Heat Shock Response to Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  237. Shimizu, K.; Kikuchi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Takahashi, N.; Ohtsuka, M.; Ono, Y.; Hiramatsu, K. Smqnr, a New Chromosome-Carried Quinolone Resistance Gene in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Gordon, N.C.; Wareham, D.W. Novel variants of the Smqnr family of quinolone resistance genes in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Adegoke, A.A.; Stenström, T.A.; Okoh, A.I. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as an emerging ubiquitous pathogen: Looking beyond contemporary antibiotic therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Hu, L.F.; Chang, X.; Ye, Y.; Wang, Z.X.; Shao, Y.B.; Shi, W.; Li, X.; Li, J. Bin Stenotrophomonas maltophilia resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole mediated by acquisition of sul and dfrA genes in a plasmid-mediated class 1 integron. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 37, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Barbolla, R.; Catalano, M.; Orman, B.E.; Famiglietti, A.; Vay, C.; Smayevsky, J.; Centrón, D.; Piñeiro, S.A. Class 1 Integrons Increase Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole MICs against Epidemiologically Unrelated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  242. Toleman, M.A.; Bennett, P.M.; Bennett, D.M.C.; Jones, R.N.; Walsh, T.R. Global emergence of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia mediated by acquisition of sul genes. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Strateva, T.; Trifonova, A.; Savov, E.; Mitov, I.; Peykov, S. Characterization of an extensively drug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolate with strong biofilm formation ability from Bulgaria. Infect. Dis. 2020, 52, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Libisch, B.; Poirel, L.; Lepsanovic, Z.; Mirovic, V.; Balogh, B.; Pászti, J.; Hunyadi, Z.; Dobák, A.; Füzi, M.; Nordmann, P. Identification of PER-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates of the international clonal complex CC11 from Hungary and Serbia. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 54, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  245. Strateva, T.; Trifonova, A.; Sirakov, I.; Borisova, D.; Stancheva, M.; Keuleyan, E.; Setchanova, L.; Peykov, S. Analysis of biofilm formation in nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates collected in Bulgaria: An 11-year study (2011–2022). Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2023, 70, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Ciofu, O.; Rojo-Molinero, E.; Macià, M.D.; Oliver, A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. APMIS 2017, 125, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Sharma, D.; Misba, L.; Khan, A.U. Antibiotics versus biofilm: An emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of invasive carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa on the Balkans according to the 2020 annual report of the ECDC [37]. CR, carbapenem-resistant; CRPA, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa; EU, European Union; SA, Schengen Area.
Figure 1. Geographic distribution of invasive carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa on the Balkans according to the 2020 annual report of the ECDC [37]. CR, carbapenem-resistant; CRPA, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa; EU, European Union; SA, Schengen Area.
Microorganisms 11 00651 g001
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of invasive multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa on the Balkans according to the 2020 annual report of the ECDC [37]. MDR, multidrug-resistant; EU, European Union; SA, Schengen Area.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of invasive multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa on the Balkans according to the 2020 annual report of the ECDC [37]. MDR, multidrug-resistant; EU, European Union; SA, Schengen Area.
Microorganisms 11 00651 g002
Figure 3. Linear map of a typical class 1 integron. IRi marks an inverted repeat that flanks the intI1 gene encoding class 1 integrase. The dotted rectangle represents a cassette array with a variable composition. The conserved sequence in the 3′ end of the integron includes qacEΔ1 (quaternary ammonium compound efflux SMR transporter), sul1 (dihydropteroate synthase type-1), and orf5 (unknown function). Below are the two gene cassettes found in isolates SM130 and SM148. The SM130 gene cassette contains the following genes: blaOXA-74 (OXA-10 family class D b-lactamase OXA-74), aac(6′)-Ib-cr (fluoroquinolone-acetylating aminoglycoside acetyltransferase), and cmlA7 (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase). OXA, oxacillinase; SMR, small multidrug resistance.
Figure 3. Linear map of a typical class 1 integron. IRi marks an inverted repeat that flanks the intI1 gene encoding class 1 integrase. The dotted rectangle represents a cassette array with a variable composition. The conserved sequence in the 3′ end of the integron includes qacEΔ1 (quaternary ammonium compound efflux SMR transporter), sul1 (dihydropteroate synthase type-1), and orf5 (unknown function). Below are the two gene cassettes found in isolates SM130 and SM148. The SM130 gene cassette contains the following genes: blaOXA-74 (OXA-10 family class D b-lactamase OXA-74), aac(6′)-Ib-cr (fluoroquinolone-acetylating aminoglycoside acetyltransferase), and cmlA7 (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase). OXA, oxacillinase; SMR, small multidrug resistance.
Microorganisms 11 00651 g003
Table 1. Whole-genome sequencing-based resistome studies of carbapenem-resistant, MDR, and XDR P. aeruginosa isolates from the Balkans.
Table 1. Whole-genome sequencing-based resistome studies of carbapenem-resistant, MDR, and XDR P. aeruginosa isolates from the Balkans.
CountryIsolates AnalyzedYear β-Lactam ResistanceAminoglycoside ResistanceFluoroquinolone ResistanceOther AMR DeterminantsSource
Albania2 isolates, CRPA, ST2352018blaOXA-488, blaNDM-1, blaPDC-2aac(6′)-Il, ant(2)-Ia, aph(3′)-IIbcpxR, pmpM, gyrA mutationsbcr1, catB7, emrE, fosA, sul1[127]
Bulgaria5 isolates, XDR, ST6542017–2018blaNDM-1, blaGES-1, blaGES-5strA, strB, aph(3′)-Via, aadB sul1, sul3, tetA, tetR[105]
1 isolate, XDR, ST1112019blaVIM-2, blaPAO, blaOXA-395aac(6′)-29a, aph(30)-IIb, ant(3)-IacrpP, gyrA and parC mutationscatB7, cmlB1, fosA, sul1[128]
Greece15 isolates, CRPA, ST111 (x2), ST235 (x6), ST162 (x5), ST395 (x2)2018blaVIM-2, blaVIM-4, blaPAO, blaOXA-35, blaOXA-50, blaOXA-395, blaOXA-488, blaOXA-494, blaPER-1aph(3′)-IIb, ant(2″)-Ia, aadA6, aph(3′)-Via, aacA4, aadA2, aacA29, strA, strB catB7, sul1[129]
Romania10 isolates, ST357, ST395, ST6212018blaIMP-13aph(3′)-IIb, ant(2″)-I bcr1, catB7, fosA, sul1[130]
Serbia4 isolates, CRPA, ST235 (x3), ST654 (x1)2018–2021blaNDM-1aac(6′)Ii, aph(3′)-IIb, aph(6′)Ib, aph(6′)Id, aphA6, aadA6 sul1[131]
Turkey2 isolates, MDR, ST308 (x1), ST357 (x1)2015–2016blaVIM-5, blaIMP-7, blaPAO, blaOXA-2, blaOXA-50, blaOXA-488aac(6′)-1Ib-cr, aph(3′)-IIb, aac(6′)-Ib3, aph(3)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, aac(6′)-II, aadA1crpP, crpP-2catB7, fosA, sul1[132]
AMR, antimicrobial resistance; ST, sequence type; NDM, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase; VIM, Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase; IMP, Imipenemase-type metallo-β-lactamase; CRPA, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa; XDR, extensively drug-resistant. Note: The sequence types given in red belong to the worldwide top 10 P. aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones [126].
Table 2. Whole-genome sequencing-based resistome studies of MDR, XDR, PDR, and colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates from the Balkans.
Table 2. Whole-genome sequencing-based resistome studies of MDR, XDR, PDR, and colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates from the Balkans.
CountryIsolates AnalyzedYearβ-Lactam ResistanceAminoglycoside ResistanceColistin ResistanceOther AMR DeterminantsSource
Albania1 isolate, CRAB, ST2/ST4362015ampC, blaOXA-23, blaMBL, blaOXA-51, blaTEM-1armA, aph(3′)-Ia, aphA6, strA, and strB sul2, tetB[205]
Croatia3 isolates, PDR2018blaOXA-23, blaADC-25, blaOXA-66aac(3)-Ia, aph(3′)-Via, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Via, aph(6)-Id, armA, aadA1pmrB mutations: S14L, A138T, S183F, T269PcatA1, sul1, tet(B)[200]
Greece1 isolate, CRAB, ST1/ST4392002blaOXA-58aphA6, aacA4, aacC1, aphA1 sul1, tetA[206]
42 isolates, (40 x ColR-CRAB, 2 x CRAB)2015–2017blaADC, blaOXA–51, * blaOXA–23 Several chromosomal mutations in genes potentially involved in colistin resistanceQRDR mutations: GyrA S83L and ParC S80L[207]
Romania7 isolates, XDR, ST3636/- (x1), ST492/- (x2), ST1/- (x1), ST636/- (x1), ST2/- (x2)2017blaOXA-24, blaOXA-23, * blaOXA-23, blaOXA-51,* blaOXA-51, blaOXA-72, blaADC-11, blaADC-25, blaADC-30, blaADC-74, blaTEM-12, blaTEM-84,
blaPER-1
aac(3)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, ant(3″)-IIa, aph(3″)-Ib, aadA1, aph(3′)-Ia, aadA2, armA, aph(3′)-VIa, aph(3′)VIb, armA catA1, dfrA12, msr(E), mph(E), sul1, sul2, tet(A), tet(B), tetR
QRDR mutations: GyrA S83L and ParC S84L, S467G
[208]
21 isolates, no antimicrobial susceptibility and ST affiliation data2018–2019blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaTEM, blaVIM, blaVEBaph(6)-Id, aph(3′)-Via, ant(2″)-Ia, ant(3″)-IIa, armA, aadA1 msr(E), mph(E), sul1, sul2, tet(B)[130]
Serbia1 isolate, CRAB blaOXA-72 [209]
30 isolates, ColR-CRAB2018–2021blaNDM-1, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, blaADC-30, blaADC-73, blaADC-74, blaADC-217aadA2, aph(3′)-VI, aac(3)-Ia, aadA, aph(3″)-Ib, aph(3′)-Ia, armA, ant(3″)-IIc, aph(3′)-Via, aph(6)-IdVarious mutationscatI, dfrA1, dfrA12, msr(E), mph(E), sul1, sul2, tet(B), tetR
QRDR mutations: GyrA S84L, V104I, D105E and ParC S81L
[210]
Turkey1 isolate, MDR, ST218 blaADC-73 [211]
AMR, antimicrobial resistance; CRAB, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii; MDR, multidrug-resistant; XDR, extensively drug-resistant; PDR, pandrug-resistant; ColR, colistin-resistant; ST, sequence type determined using Pasteur Institute typing scheme/Oxford MLST scheme (left/right); MBL, metallo-β-lactamase; QRDR, Quinolone Resistance-Determining Region. Note: * indicates the ISAba1 insertion upstream of the gene encoding respective carbapenemase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peykov, S.; Strateva, T. Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Resistome Analysis of Nosocomial Multidrug-Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Pathogens from the Balkans. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030651

AMA Style

Peykov S, Strateva T. Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Resistome Analysis of Nosocomial Multidrug-Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Pathogens from the Balkans. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030651

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peykov, Slavil, and Tanya Strateva. 2023. "Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Resistome Analysis of Nosocomial Multidrug-Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Pathogens from the Balkans" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030651

APA Style

Peykov, S., & Strateva, T. (2023). Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Resistome Analysis of Nosocomial Multidrug-Resistant Non-Fermenting Gram-Negative Pathogens from the Balkans. Microorganisms, 11(3), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11030651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop