Next Article in Journal
Wild Boars Carry Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Escherichia coli
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Streptococcus spp. in Bovine Mastitis
Previous Article in Journal
Changes of the Proteome and Acetylome during Transition into the Stationary Phase in the Organohalide-Respiring Dehalococcoides mccartyi Strain CBDB1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Streptococcal Infections in Marine Mammals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms9020366
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Streptococcus suis Induces Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue

by
Muriel Dresen
1,†,
Josephine Schenk
1,†,
Yenehiwot Berhanu Weldearegay
1,
Désirée Vötsch
1,
Wolfgang Baumgärtner
2,
Peter Valentin-Weigand
1,* and
Andreas Nerlich
1,3,*
1
Institute for Microbiology, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany
2
Institute for Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany
3
Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020366
Submission received: 23 January 2021 / Revised: 6 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology and Pathogenicity of Animal-Adapted Streptococci)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Streptococcus suis is a common pathogen colonising the respiratory tract of pigs. It can cause meningitis, sepsis and pneumonia leading to economic losses in the pig industry worldwide. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and its metabolites play an important regulatory role in different biological processes like inflammation modulation and immune activation. In this report we analysed the induction of COX-2 and the production of its metabolite prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in a porcine precision-cut lung slice (PCLS) model. Using Western blot analysis, we found a time-dependent induction of COX-2 in the infected tissue resulting in increased PGE2 levels. Immunohistological analysis revealed a strong COX-2 expression in the proximity of the bronchioles between the ciliated epithelial cells and the adjacent alveolar tissue. The morphology, location and vimentin staining suggested that these cells are subepithelial bronchial fibroblasts. Furthermore, we showed that COX-2 expression as well as PGE2 production was detected following infection with two prevalent S. suis serotypes and that the pore-forming toxin suilysin played an important role in this process. Therefore, this study provides new insights in the response of porcine lung cells to S. suis infections and serves as a basis for further studies to define the role of COX-2 and its metabolites in the inflammatory response in porcine lung tissue during infections with S. suis.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus suis is an important coloniser of the upper respiratory tract of pigs. It can cause a variety of disease manifestations ranging from pneumonia, septicaemia, meningitis to arthritis leading to great economic losses in the pig industry (reviewed in [1,2]). S. suis is also considered as a zoonotic agent that can cause meningitis and septicaemia [3,4]. The bacterium shows a high diversity of more than 700 sequence types and can be classified into different serotypes based on its capsule polysaccharide [5]. Although serotype 2 strains are considered the most common ones, causing infections in pigs and humans [1], infections with serotype 9 strains are becoming increasingly important in several countries, particularly in Western Europe [1,6]. Pathogenesis of S. suis infections is not completely understood, but a strong inflammatory response is a hallmark of S. suis infections. Some virulence and virulence-associated factors have been identified and characterised including the capsule, muraminidase-released protein, the extracellular factor and the pore-forming toxin suilysin (SLY) (reviewed in [7]). SLY belongs to the group of cholesterol-dependent toxins that are produced by numerous Gram-positive bacteria. Oligomerisation of the toxin subunits in cholesterol-rich membranes of host cells leads to the formation of large pores and consecutive cellular homeostatic changes culminating in immune activation and cell death [8].
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a small molecular derivative of arachidonic acid produced by a variety of cell types, participates in different biological processes like inflammation modulation and immune activation [9]. In the lung, PGE2 is considered to play an important regulatory role in the control of inflammatory responses and tissue repair processes [10]. Generation of PGE2 starts with the liberation of arachidonic acid from cell membranes followed by conversion into prostaglandin H2 by the rate-limiting enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX), which can be further converted into PGE2 by PGE2 synthases [11,12]. Of the two isoforms, COX-1 is considered to be constitutively expressed and has homeostatic functions, whereas COX-2 is the inducible isoform involved in pathophysiological processes [11]. Released PGE2 can signal via four different receptors and elicit different immunomodulatory effects [13].
Induction of COX-2 and production of PGE2 were demonstrated in tissue biopsies from S. pyogenes-infected patients as well as in the tissue of experimentally infected mice [14] and were also found in human lung tissue infected with S. pneumoniae [15]. Furthermore, induction of COX-2/PGE2 was observed in swine infections with bacterial lung pathogens like Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [16,17]. Notably, to the best of our knowledge, COX-2 induction has not yet been reported for respiratory tract infections by S. suis. Thus, this study aimed at investigating whether COX-2, the rate-limiting enzyme of PGE2 production, is induced by S. suis in porcine lung tissue and at identifying bacterial factors that might contribute to induction.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Precision-cut lung slice (PCLS) culture media were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). If not stated otherwise, all other reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). The experimental COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 and recombinant porcine interleukin 1β (IL1β) were purchased from Bio-Techne (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Fluorescently labelled phalloidin (Phalloidin-iFluor 647) was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). The following primary antibodies were used: monoclonal rabbit antibody against COX-2 (Clone SP21, Cat# SAB5500087-100UL, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-acetylated α-Tubulin antibody (Cat# sc-23950, RRID:AB_628409, St. Cruz (Dallas, TX, USA)), mouse monoclonal anti-vimentin antibody (Cat# GA630, RRID:AB_2827759, Agilent (St. Clara, CA, USA)) and rabbit monoclonal antibody against glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (D16H11, RRID:AB_11129865, Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA)). Generation of the polyclonal antiserum against SLY was described previously [18]. Secondary goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) (H + L) Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated antibody (Cat# A-11029; RRID: AB_2534088), goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated antibody (Cat# A-11008; RRID: AB_143165) and goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor® 568 (Cat# A-11011; RRID: AB_143157) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG, horseradish peroxidase-linked (#7074, RRID:AB_2099233) was obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).

2.2. Bacterial Strains and Recombinant Suilysin (SLY) Protein

The virulent, SLY-positive S. suis serotype 2 strain 10 (S10) was kindly provided by H. Smith (Lelystad, the Netherlands) [19]. Its isogenic SLY-deficient mutant (S10∆sly) was constructed by the insertion of an erythromycin cassette in the sly gene [18]. Complementation of S10∆sly (S10∆sly-C) was undertaken by allelic exchange and was described in a previous publication [20]. S. suis serotype 9 strain 8067 was isolated from a piglet and previously described [21]. All strains were grown on Columbia agar supplemented with 7% (v/v) sheep blood (Oxoid™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) overnight at 37 °C under aerobic conditions. For infection experiments, cryo-conserved bacterial stocks were prepared from liquid cultures in Todd-Hewitt Broth (THB; Bacto™, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at the late-exponential growth phase (optical density at 600 nm = 1.1) as previously described [22]. Recombinant suilysin (rSLY) was expressed, purified and characterised as previously described [18].

2.3. Generation of Precision-Cut Lung Slice (PCLS) and Infection with Streptococcus suis (S. suis)

Precision-cut lung slices were prepared as previously described [22] from lungs of freshly slaughtered pigs (obtained from a local abattoir, Leine-Fleisch GmbH, Laatzen, Germany). In brief, the cranial, middle and intermediated lobes were carefully removed and the bronchi were filled with 37 °C low-melting agarose (GERBU, Heidelberg, Germany) in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After solidifying on ice, cylindrical portions of lung tissue were punched out with a tissue coring tool so that the bronchus/bronchiole was in the middle. The approximately 300-µm thick slices were cut by a Krumdieck tissue slicer (model MD 4000-01; TSE Systems, Chesterfield, MO, USA). PCLS were collected in RPMI-1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) containing antibiotics and antimycotics (1 µg/mL clotrimazole, 10 µg/mL enrofloxacin (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), 50 µg/mL kanamycin, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin/mL, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B). For removing the agarose, PCLS were bubbled with a normoxic gas mixture for two hours at 37 °C as previously described [23]. Then, the slices were transferred to 24-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) and incubated for one day in RPMI-1640 medium with antibiotics and antimycotics at 37 °C and 5% CO2. On the following day, viability of the slices was analysed by observing the ciliary activity using a DMi1 light microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). PCLS with ciliary activity of at least 80–90% were selected and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Afterwards, the slices were incubated in RPMI-1640 medium containing no antibiotics and antimycotics for another day.
After washing the slices twice with PBS, they were inoculated with approximately 107 CFU/well of S. suis S10, S10Δsly, S10Δsly-C and S8067 in 500 µL RPMI-1640, respectively. Slices were incubated for up to 24 h (h) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. In the experiments shown in Figure 1C,D, slices were left uninfected or infected for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in the presence of 10 µM of the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 or the vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Supernatant and slices were collected at indicated time points for PGE2-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blot analysis and immunofluorescence staining. Slices were washed twice with PBS before collecting the samples. All experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times.

2.4. Isolatation of Primary Brochial Fibroblasts and Infection with S. suis

For isolating primary porcine bronchial fibroblasts, the bronchial tissue was carefully dissected, any parenchymal connective tissue was removed and the bronchus was cut into 5 mm thick rings. The pieces were placed in a 10 cm diameter cell culture dish in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% glutamine and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B) and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After two weeks in culture, fibroblasts had grown out from the explanted tissue. The tissue pieces were removed and the cells were cultured for approximately two–three weeks until confluent cell islands were observed. Then, the cultures were passaged with a split ratio of 1:2 into 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks. Experiments were performed with cells between passages three and six showing typical fibroblast morphology and positive staining for vimentin by immunofluorescence microscopy. For infection with S. suis, fibroblasts were trypsinised, counted and 1.0 × 105 cells per well were seeded on glass coverslips placed in a 24-well plate in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% FCS and 1% glutamine. After incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 over night, cells were infected for 8 h with S. suis using a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of one or five or left uninfected. As positive control, cells were stimulated with 40 ng/mL recombinant porcine IL1β for 8 h.

2.5. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western Blotting

For protein analysis by Western blotting, whole tissue lysates were prepared in cell extraction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail P8340, 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride and Halt phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using an MP Biomedicals™ FastPrep-24™ 5G Instrument (St. Ana, CA, USA). Crude lysates were cleared by centrifugation and protein amounts were quantified by MicroBC Assay Protein Quantitation Kit (Interchim, Montluçon, France). Equal protein amounts (15 μg) were separated on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels which were then blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The latter were blocked in 5% (w/v) skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature, washed and incubated overnight with the respective primary antibodies at 4 °C. After washing, the blots were incubated for 1 h with secondary antibodies against rabbit IgG and washed. All washing steps were performed in tris-buffered saline (TBS)/0.05% (v/v) Tween® 20 (3 × 5 min). Blots were developed using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a ChemoCam Imager 3.2 (Intas, Göttingen, Germany). Densitometry was performed using LabImage 1D version 4.1 (Kapelan Bio-Imaging, Leipzig, Germany).

2.6. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

PGE2 levels in the supernatants were determined using the PGE2 ELISA kit (Enzo Life Science, Farmingdale, NY, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.

2.7. Immunofluorescence Staining of Histological Sections and Primary Fibroblasts

PCLS were fixed with 4% (v/v) formalin, embedded in paraffin blocks and sections of 3–4 µm were prepared. Sections were deparaffinised in Roti®Histol (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), rehydrated in a descending series of ethanol (100%, 95%, and 70%) and cooked in sodium-citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6.0, 10 min) for antigen retrieval. To block unspecific binding sides, the samples were incubated in 1% (v/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% (v/v) goat serum, 0.3% (v/v) Triton-X-100 and 0.05% (v/v) Tween® 20 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted in 1% (v/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Tween® 20 in PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. For visualing cilia, a monoclonal mouse antibody against acetylated α-tubulin (1:500), followed by an Alexa Fluor® 488 goat-anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (1:500), were used. COX-2 was stained using an anti-COX-2 antibody (1:100) and a goat-anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 568 (1:500). Vimentin was visualised with a mouse monoclonal antibody diluted 1:100 in combination with an Alexa Fluor® 488 goat-anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (1:500). Cell nuclei were visualised by 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 0.5 µg/mL in PBS, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). Stained sections were mounted with ProLong® Gold Antifade Reagent (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) and stored at 4 °C until examination.
Fibroblasts were fixed with 3% (v/v) formaldehyde in PBS (methanol-free, Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 20 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were washed three times with PBS, permeabilised with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 5 min and blocked in PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA, 5% (v/v) goat serum and 0.05% (v/v) Tween® for 30 min at room temperature. All antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 1% (v/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Tween® 20 and cells were washed for 5 min with PBS between staining steps. COX-2 was stained using an anti-COX-2 antibody (1:100, 1 h) and a secondary goat-anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 488 antibody (1:500, 45 min) at ambient temperature. The actin cytoskeleton was stained with Phalloidin-iFluor 647 (1:500 in PBS) for 20 min at room temperature. Visualisation of nuclei and mounting was done as described above for PCLS.

2.8. Microscopy and Image Analysis

Confocal microscopy of PCLS was performed using a TCS SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with a 40 × 1.25-NA oil HCX Plan Apochromat objective and 63 × 1.40−0.60-NA oil HCX Plan Apochromat objective (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Overlapping image stacks with a z-distance of 1.0 µm per plane were acquired using a 1-Airy-unit pinhole diameter in sequential imaging mode to avoid bleed through. Maximum intensity projections were generated and the resulting images were stitched together using the pairwise stitching plugin [24] in Fiji-ImageJ version 1.53c [25]. Widefield microscopy of fibroblasts was performed with a Nikon Eclipse Ti-S microscope equipped with a 20 × 0.5-NA CFI Plan Fluor objective and a Nikon DS-QiMC-U2 camera controlled by NIS-Elements BR version 4.51.01 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). For display purposes, images were identically adjusted for contrast and brightness using Fiji-ImageJ version 1.53c.
COX-2 expression in fibroblasts was quantified using CellProfiler software version 4.0.7 (https://cellprofiler.org/, access date 23 January 2021) as previously described with modifications [26]. First, individual cells were identified by segmenting nuclei based on the DAPI signal. Next, the identified primary objects were propagated to obtain a mask for the cytoplasm. Subsequently, the intensity in the COX-2 channel was measured using these cytoplasm masks with the built-in measurement modules in CellProfiler. Measurements were exported and final data analysis was undertaken with Python 3.8 (Python Software Foundation, https://www.python.org/ (accessed on 30 September 2020)).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Values are expressed as means ± SD from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with Python 3.8 (Python Software Foundation, https://www.python.org/ (accessed on 30 September 2020)) and the Pingouin (0.3.8) package [27]. Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test was used for comparison of three or more groups.

3. Results

3.1. S. suis Induced Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in Porcine Lung Tissue

Studies using different streptococcal pathogens indicated an upregulation of COX-2 in streptococcal infections [14,15]. Since virtually no study has systematically analysed the biology of COX-2 in the porcine lung following S. suis infection, we used an ex vivo model of porcine precision-cut lung slices infected with S. suis to explore COX-2 induction and PGE2 synthesis.
To investigate whether COX-2 was expressed in S. suis-infected PCLS, slices were infected for the indicated time and COX-2 induction was analysed by Western blotting. In uninfected control slices, no induction of COX-2 expression was detectable during the course of the experiment. In contrast, in slices infected with S. suis S10 increasing amounts of COX-2 were detected over time, which started to rise at 4 h and continuously increased until the end of the experiment (Figure 1A). Densitometric analysis revealed a robust and significant induction after 24 h (Figure 1B).
Next, we determined PGE2 levels in S. suis infected PCLS after 24 h to test whether the increased expression of COX-2 translated into elevated COX-2 activity. The selective experimental inhibitor NS-398, that inhibits COX-2 activity and, thereby, production of prostaglandins by COX-2, was included to determine the amount of PGE2 produced by COX-2. As shown in Figure 1C, PGE2 was significantly increased in the supernatants of infected tissue compared with uninfected PCLS. This increase of PGE2 was completely blocked by treatment of PCLS with 10 µM NS-398, indicating that the synthesis of PGE2 in response to S. suis infection was mainly mediated by COX-2 (Figure 1C). Western blot analysis revealed an increase of COX-2 protein induction in the presence of the inhibitor compared to PCLS infected in the presence of solely DMSO (Figure 1D).
Taken together, the data indicate that COX-2 is strongly upregulated in porcine PCLS upon infection with S. suis resulting in the production of PGE2.

3.2. Localisation of COX-2 Induction in S. suis-Infected PCLS

In an ex vivo S. pneumoniae human lung infection model, alveolar type II cells, the vascular endothelium, and alveolar macrophages were identified as primary COX-2 producing cells [15]. To analyse which cells express COX-2 in our porcine PCLS model after infection with S. suis, we localised the COX-2 protein by immunohistochemistry.
COX-2 staining was more abundant and intense in infected lung tissue than in uninfected control tissue (Figure 2). Close examination of the histological sections demonstrated that COX-2 was mainly expressed in cells located in a region between the ciliated cells of the bronchioles and the corresponding proximal alveolar tissue, representing the connective tissue surrounding the bronchioles (Figure 2, S10, closed arrowheads). We only found a low expression of COX-2 in a few cells in the adjacent alveolar tissue (Figure 2, S10, open arrowheads) as well as in the more distant alveolar tissue (Figure 3A, S10, closed arrowheads). Furthermore, examination of COX-2 induction in blood vessels did not show any induction in endothelial cells lining the lumen of the vessels, but we observed induction in some cells located in the basement membrane (Figure 3B, closed arrowheads). Finally, staining for vimentin, a widely used marker for fibroblasts, showed a strong signal in elongated/spindle-shaped cells positive for COX-2 in the bronchiolar region (Figure 4, S10, closed arrowheads).
To test whether COX-2 can be directly induced in fibroblasts by S. suis, we isolated primary porcine bronchial fibroblasts and infected them with S. suis S10 using two different multiplicities of infection. Stimulation with recombinant IL1β was used as positive control. As shown in Figure S1, we could not detect COX-2 induction by S. suis in isolated fibroblasts infected in vitro, while stimulation with IL1β resulted in a robust induction of COX-2 expression.
Taken together, vimentin staining and cell morphology/localisation suggest that after infection of PCLS with S. suis, COX-2 is most likely primarily produced in fibroblasts in the bronchiolar area. Lack of COX-2 induction in infected isolated fibroblasts hints towards indirect induction.

3.3. COX-2 is Induced by Two Prevalent S. suis Serotypes in Porcine PCLS

To analyse whether COX-2 induction is specific for the serotype 2 strain S10, we next infected PCLS with the serotype 9 strain S. suis S8067 and compared COX-2 induction with that of S. suis S10. As shown in Figure 5A, Western blot analysis of infected PCLS after 24 h demonstrated a strong COX-2 induction in tissue infected with S8067 at a similar level as induced by S10, while no COX-2 induction was detectable in uninfected tissue. Densitometric analysis revealed a significant induction after infection with both strains when compared to control tissue, but no significant difference between the two strains (Figure 5B).
In line with increased COX-2 protein expression in PCLS infected with both strains, we also detected a significantly, 13.5-fold increased PGE2 level in tissue infected with S10 (Figure 5C). In tissue infected with S8076 we detected a 5.5-fold increased PGE2 level which is lower compared to infection with S10, but significantly increased compared to unstimulated PCLS (Figure 5C).
Immunohistochemical analysis of COX-2 induction in PCLS infected for 24 h revealed a similar localisation primarily in the bronchiolar region for both strains. Virtually no COX-2 induction was detectable in uninfected tissue (Figure 5D).
These results demonstrate that induction of COX-2 and PGE2 production in the PCLS model is not specific for S. suis S10, even though the level of produced PGE2 seems to vary between the two tested strains.

3.4. S. suis-Induced Expression of COX-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue is Modulated by SLY

Finally, we analysed the role of the pore-forming toxin SLY in the induction of COX-2 as a role for pore-forming toxins in this process has been demonstrated for S. pyogenes [28].
For this, PCLS were infected for 24 h with S. suis S10, its isogenic suilysin deletion mutant S10Δsly or left uninfected. COX-2 induction was analysed by Western blotting of whole tissue lysates (WTL). As shown in Figure 6A, infection with the wild-type strain S10 induced COX-2 expression as demonstrated before. In contrast, tissue infected with S10Δsly showed a reduced COX-2 protein level compared to tissue infected with the wild-type strain (Figure 6A, WTL). Densitometric analysis revealed a significant induction after infection with the S10 wild-type strain when compared to control tissue. Although we also observed a significant induction in case of S10Δsly when compared to control tissue, there was significant difference in COX-2 induction between wild type and mutant by densitometry (Figure 6B). Furthermore, we proved production of SLY by the wild-type strain S10 and absence of SLY production by S10Δsly by Western blotting of tissue culture supernatants (Figure 6A, SN). Reduced induction of COX-2 by S10Δsly was restored by infection with a complemented suilysin mutant strain (Figure S2).
In accordance with reduced COX-2 protein expression, we observed a significantly reduced level of PGE2 in S10Δsly infected PCLS compared to tissue infected with the wild-type strain S10 (Figure 6C).
Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis of COX-2 induction in PCLS revealed a reduced number of COX-2 positive cells with a strongly reduced COX-2 signal in the tissue infected with S10Δsly (Figure 6D).
Finally, we tested whether suilysin alone is sufficient to induce COX-2 expression by stimulation of PCLS with increasing amounts of recombinant suilysin (rSLY) for 24 h and subsequent analysis of COX-2 induction by Western blotting. As shown in Figure 7A, stimulation with rSLY resulted in a dose-dependent increase of COX-2 expression. Densitometric analysis revealed a significant COX-2 induction in tissues stimulated with 1000 ng/mL rSLY (Figure 7B).
Taken together, these data indicate that the pore-forming toxin of S. suis plays an important role in induction of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in PCLS.

4. Discussion

COX-2 generates metabolites that are important regulators of inflammation [9]. Studies using different streptococcal pathogens [14,15] indicated a prominent immunomodulatory role of COX-2 in streptococcal infections of murine and human skin as well as human lung tissue. Since virtually no study has systematically analysed the biology of COX-2 in the porcine lung following S. suis infection, we used an ex vivo model of porcine precision-cut lung slices infected with S. suis to explore COX-2 induction and PGE2 synthesis.
PCLS represent a model system with the typical lung architecture containing all relevant cell types maintained in their differentiation state and preserving important functions like ciliary activity of the bronchiolar epithelial cells [22]. This model also includes resident immune cells like dendritic cells and alveolar macrophages [29]. Therefore, this model is suitable to investigate the inflammatory response of the resident cells induced by interactions of the bacteria within the bronchial and alveolar compartment. However, not all aspects of immunity like recruitment of immune cells and resolution of the inflammatory response can be studied because the tissue is disconnected from the blood stream. Nevertheless, we observed a reproducible induction of COX-2 expression and production of PGE2 after infection with S. suis in this model that is comparable to results obtained with S. pneumoniae in a human lung ex vivo infection model [15] and might contribute to chemo- and cytokine regulation in the lung [9]. Interestingly and in contrast to the human lung ex vivo infection model, we observed an increase in COX-2 protein in the presence of the COX-2 inhibitor NS-398. This inhibitor mitigates the COX-2-mediated production of prostaglandins but does not inhibit the induction of COX-2. In one study using mouse lung fibroblast, PGE2 was shown to regulate COX-2 expression in a positive feedback loop [30], whereas other studies demonstrated a repressive effect of PGE2 in different cell/tissue systems [31,32]. The increase of COX-2 at the protein level in the presence of the inhibitor which almost completely reduces production of PGE2 in our model, also suggests a negative feedback loop.
We detected a strong COX-2 expression in the proximity of the bronchioles between the ciliated epithelial cells and the adjacent alveolar tissue. Morphology, location as well as the strong vimentin signal suggest that these cells are subepithelial bronchial fibroblasts. However, in future studies, staining with other fibroblast markers is required to further prove that these cells are indeed fibroblasts. We tested an antibody that is specific for human fibroblasts (TE-7 antibody) [33], but did not observe a specific staining in porcine lung tissue and isolated primary porcine fibroblasts, suggesting that the epitope recognised by the antibody is not present in porcine fibroblasts (data not shown). Lung fibroblasts play a key role in maintaining normal lung homeostasis and act as immune sentinels responding to inhaled toxic substances and cytokines like IL-1β [34]. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated that fibroblast activity integrates innate immune signals to regulate the adaptive immune environment of the lung after infection with influenza A virus [35]. This study showed, that in virus-infected mouse lungs, three different classes of fibroblast can be distinguished: resting, ECM-synthesizing and inflammatory fibroblasts. Although COX-2 expression in the different classes of fibroblasts was not analysed in this study, it is tempting to speculate that the presence of functionally distinct fibroblasts may be the reason why we only detected COX-2 expression in a subset of vimentin-positive cells. However, to proof that these fibroblast subgroups are also present in our model system and that COX-2 induction correlates with these subgroups, single cell transcriptomic analysis needs to be performed in future studies.
Induction of COX-2 in fibroblasts is in contrast to studies on COX-2 induction in lungs of pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae where induction was predominantly found in ciliated epithelial cells [16]. This might be explained by the direct interaction of M. hyopneumoniae with the ciliated bronchial cells and a lack of cytolytic toxins that primarily results in the activation of signalling pathways, subsequently leading to COX-2 induction in these cells [36]. Using a human lung ex vivo infection model, Szymanski et al. demonstrated that S. pneumoniae induces upregulation of COX-2 mainly in alveolar type II cells, but also in alveolar macrophages and endothelial cells [15]. We also detected COX-2-positive cells in the alveolar compartment, but the observed level of the COX-2 signal, as well as the number of positive cells, was much lower compared to the bronchiolar region. The reason for this difference could be the lack of bronchial structures in this human lung model system leading to an induction of COX-2 primarily in the alveolar tissue [15].
At the protein level, both strains induced strong expression of COX-2 while the PGE2 levels were lower in case of infection with the serotype 9 strain 8067. The final step of PGE2 generation initiated by COX-2 depends on the membrane-bound enzyme PGE2 synthase (mPGES) which can be induced by pro-inflammatory factors [12,37]. Although COX-2 and mPGES are thought to be functionally linked, the kinetics of COX-2 and mPGES induction are different in various cell types, suggesting different regulatory mechanisms controlling the expression of both enzymes [38,39,40]. While COX-2 expression can be directly induced by pore-forming toxins via, e.g., calcium signalling [28], induction of mPGES might be delayed due to lower induction of pro-inflammatory mediators required for its upregulation in case of infection with the serotype 9 strain 8067 and, therefore, leading to lower PGE2 levels. Interestingly, a recent study showed lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in dendritic cells infected in vitro with a serotype 9 strain compared to infection with a serotype 2 strain [41]. However, due to the fact, that only two different strains were tested in the present study, more strains need to be analysed in follow-up studies to determine definitively whether there are strain-specific differences in COX-2 induction or PGE2 production.
COX-2 induction has been demonstrated for several different bacterial toxins, e.g., LPS [42], C. difficile toxin A [43] as well as the S. pyogenes cytolysins SLS and SLO [28]. SLY also belongs to the family of pore-forming toxins and exerts cytotoxic effects on various cell types such as epithelial cells, endothelial cells, phagocytes [18,44,45], but also on more complex tissue models like air–liquid interface cultures and PCLS [20,22]. In contrast to S. pyogenes expressing SLS and SLO, infection with a SLY-expressing S. suis strain does not induce COX-2 expression in isolated primary bronchial fibroblasts. However, in the study by Blaschke et al. [28] macrophages were used that, as professional phagocytic cells, might have the capacity to directly upregulate COX-2 after infection. Interestingly, we did not observe COX-2 expression in isolated fibroblasts after infection with S. suis, but after stimulation with recombinant IL1β. S. suis has been shown to induce IL1β in a SLY-dependent manner [46]. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate, that COX-2 induction is facilitated indirectly in the PCLS model via inflammatory mediators like IL1β and/or other cytokines produced by epithelial cells or resident immune cells in response to S. suis infection. Nevertheless, in this study, we provide evidence that SLY is involved in the induction of COX-2 and the synthesis of PGE2 in porcine lung tissue infected with S. suis, thus extending the list of functional activities of this toxin. In future, the regulatory mechanisms underlying the induction of COX-2 by S. suis should be further investigated.

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrated that S. suis induces COX-2 expression and PGE2 production in porcine PCLS. COX-2 induction is most likely primarily induced in fibroblasts located in the bronchiolar region. Furthermore, COX-2 is induced by two different S. suis strains representing prevalent serotypes and the cytolysin SLY is a critical factor involved in the induction of COX-2 and the synthesis of PGE2 in the porcine PCLS model. Further studies are needed to verify the obtained results in animal models and to analyse the role of COX-2 and PGE2 in the inflammatory response in the porcine lung during infections with S. suis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/2/366/s1, Figure S1: COX-2 induction in primary porcine bronchial fibroblasts. Figure S2: Restoration of COX-2 expression in PCLS infected with the complemented suilysin mutant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N. and P.V.-W.; investigation, M.D., J.S., Y.B.W., D.V. and A.N.; formal analysis, M.D., J.S. and A.N.; resources, W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D. and A.N.; writing—review and editing, all authors; funding acquisition, W.B. and P.V.-W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding to P.V.-W. from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 727966 and from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany (Va 239/7-2). In part R2N Project funded by the Federal State of Lower Saxony, Germany (W.B.). This publication was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany, and the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation within the funding programme Open Access Publishing.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hilde E. Smith (Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands) for providing S. suis strains 10 and 8067 as well as Nina Janze for excellent technical assistance. Part of this work was contributed by M.D. in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree from the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Goyette-Desjardins, G.; Auger, J.P.; Xu, J.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2014, 3, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vötsch, D.; Willenborg, M.; Weldearegay, Y.B.; Valentin-Weigand, P. Streptococcus suis—The "Two Faces" of a Pathobiont in the Porcine Respiratory Tract. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, J.; Wang, C.; Feng, Y.; Yang, W.; Song, H.; Chen, Z.; Yu, H.; Pan, X.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome caused by Streptococcus suis serotype 2. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Gottschalk, M.; Xu, J.; Calzas, C.; Segura, M. Streptococcus suis: A new emerging or an old neglected zoonotic pathogen? Future Microbiol. 2010, 5, 371–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Okura, M.; Osaki, M.; Nomoto, R.; Arai, S.; Osawa, R.; Sekizaki, T.; Takamatsu, D. Current Taxonomical Situation of Streptococcus suis. Pathogens 2016, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schultsz, C.; Jansen, E.; Keijzers, W.; Rothkamp, A.; Duim, B.; Wagenaar, J.A.; van der Ende, A. Differences in the population structure of invasive Streptococcus suis strains isolated from pigs and from humans in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Fittipaldi, N.; Segura, M.; Grenier, D.; Gottschalk, M. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of the infection caused by the swine pathogen and zoonotic agent Streptococcus suis. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Heuck, A.P.; Moe, P.C.; Johnson, B.B. The cholesterol-dependent cytolysin family of gram-positive bacterial toxins. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 2010, 51, 551–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalinski, P. Regulation of immune responses by prostaglandin E2. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Park, G.Y.; Christman, J.W. Involvement of cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandins in the molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory lung diseases. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2006, 290, L797–L805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Simmons, D.L.; Botting, R.M.; Hla, T. Cyclooxygenase isozymes: The biology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004, 56, 387–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Murakami, M.; Naraba, H.; Tanioka, T.; Semmyo, N.; Nakatani, Y.; Kojima, F.; Ikeda, T.; Fueki, M.; Ueno, A.; Oh, S.; et al. Regulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis by inducible membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase that acts in concert with cyclooxygenase-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 32783–32792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Martínez-Colón, G.J.; Moore, B.B. Prostaglandin E(2) as a Regulator of Immunity to Pathogens. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 185, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Goldmann, O.; Hertzen, E.; Hecht, A.; Schmidt, H.; Lehne, S.; Norrby-Teglund, A.; Medina, E. Inducible cyclooxygenase released prostaglandin E2 modulates the severity of infection caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 2372–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Szymanski, K.V.; Toennies, M.; Becher, A.; Fatykhova, D.; N’Guessan, P.D.; Gutbier, B.; Klauschen, F.; Neuschaefer-Rube, F.; Schneider, P.; Rueckert, J.; et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae-induced regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 in human lung tissue. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 40, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Andrada, M.; Quesada-Canales, O.; Suárez-Bonnet, A.; Paz-Sánchez, Y.; Espinosa de Los Monteros, A.; Rodríguez, F. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in pigs infected experimentally with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. J. Comp. Pathol. 2014, 151, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cho, W.S.; Chae, C. Expression of nitric oxide synthase 2 and cyclooxygenase-2 in swine experimentally infected with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Vet. Pathol. 2004, 41, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Benga, L.; Fulde, M.; Neis, C.; Goethe, R.; Valentin-Weigand, P. Polysaccharide capsule and suilysin contribute to extracellular survival of Streptococcus suis co-cultivated with primary porcine phagocytes. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 132, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Smith, H.E.; Damman, M.; van der Velde, J.; Wagenaar, F.; Wisselink, H.J.; Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N.; Smits, M.A. Identification and characterization of the cps locus of Streptococcus suis serotype 2: The capsule protects against phagocytosis and is an important virulence factor. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 1750–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meng, F.; Wu, N.H.; Seitz, M.; Herrler, G.; Valentin-Weigand, P. Efficient suilysin-mediated invasion and apoptosis in porcine respiratory epithelial cells after streptococcal infection under air-liquid interface conditions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wisselink, H.J.; Smith, H.E.; Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N.; Peperkamp, K.; Vecht, U. Distribution of capsular types and production of muramidase-released protein (MRP) and extracellular factor (EF) of Streptococcus suis strains isolated from diseased pigs in seven European countries. Vet. Microbiol. 2000, 74, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meng, F.; Wu, N.H.; Nerlich, A.; Herrler, G.; Valentin-Weigand, P.; Seitz, M. Dynamic Virus-Bacterium Interactions in a Porcine Precision-Cut Lung Slice Coinfection Model: Swine Influenza Virus Paves the Way for Streptococcus suis Infection in a Two-Step Process. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 2806–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Paddenberg, R.; Mermer, P.; Goldenberg, A.; Kummer, W. Videomorphometric analysis of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction of intra-pulmonary arteries using murine precision cut lung slices. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, e50970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Preibisch, S.; Saalfeld, S.; Tomancak, P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1463–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nerlich, A.; von Wunsch Teruel, I.; Mieth, M.; Hönzke, K.; Rückert, J.C.; Mitchell, T.J.; Suttorp, N.; Hippenstiel, S.; Hocke, A.C. Reversion of pneumolysin induced executioner caspase activation redirects cells to survival. J. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vallat, R. Pingouin: Statistics in Python. J. Open Source Softw. 2018, 3, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blaschke, U.; Beineke, A.; Klemens, J.; Medina, E.; Goldmann, O. Induction of Cyclooxygenase 2 by Streptococcus pyogenes Is Mediated by Cytolysins. J. Innate Immun. 2017, 9, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lyons-Cohen, M.R.; Thomas, S.Y.; Cook, D.N.; Nakano, H. Precision-cut Mouse Lung Slices to Visualize Live Pulmonary Dendritic Cells. J. Vis. Exp. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Vichai, V.; Suyarnsesthakorn, C.; Pittayakhajonwut, D.; Sriklung, K.; Kirtikara, K. Positive feedback regulation of COX-2 expression by prostaglandin metabolites. Inflamm. Res. 2005, 54, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferguson, S.; Hébert, R.L.; Laneuville, O. NS-398 upregulates constitutive cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the M-1 cortical collecting duct cell line. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999, 10, 2261–2271. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pang, L.; Nie, M.; Corbett, L.; Knox, A.J. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human airway smooth muscle cells: Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 1043–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Goodpaster, T.; Legesse-Miller, A.; Hameed, M.R.; Aisner, S.C.; Randolph-Habecker, J.; Coller, H.A. An immunohistochemical method for identifying fibroblasts in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008, 56, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lacy, S.H.; Woeller, C.F.; Thatcher, T.H.; Maddipati, K.R.; Honn, K.V.; Sime, P.J.; Phipps, R.P. Human lung fibroblasts produce proresolving peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ ligands in a cyclooxygenase-2-dependent manner. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2016, 311, L855–Ll867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Boyd, D.F.; Allen, E.K.; Randolph, A.G.; Guo, X.J.; Weng, Y.; Sanders, C.J.; Bajracharya, R.; Lee, N.K.; Guy, C.S.; Vogel, P.; et al. Exuberant fibroblast activity compromises lung function via ADAMTS4. Nature 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Q.; Young, T.F.; Ross, R.F. Glycolipid receptors for attachment of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to porcine respiratory ciliated cells. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 4367–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jakobsson, P.J.; Thorén, S.; Morgenstern, R.; Samuelsson, B. Identification of human prostaglandin E synthase: A microsomal, glutathione-dependent, inducible enzyme, constituting a potential novel drug target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7220–7225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kojima, F.; Naraba, H.; Miyamoto, S.; Beppu, M.; Aoki, H.; Kawai, S. Membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase-1 is upregulated by proinflammatory cytokines in chondrocytes from patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2004, 6, R355–R365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wright, K.L.; Weaver, S.A.; Patel, K.; Coopman, K.; Feeney, M.; Kolios, G.; Robertson, D.A.; Ward, S.G. Differential regulation of prostaglandin E biosynthesis by interferon-gamma in colonic epithelial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 141, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, I.Y.; Cho, W.; Kim, J.; Park, C.S.; Choe, J. Human follicular dendritic cells interact with T cells via expression and regulation of cyclooxygenases and prostaglandin E and I synthases. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Auger, J.P.; Payen, S.; Roy, D.; Dumesnil, A.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Interactions of Streptococcus suis serotype 9 with host cells and role of the capsular polysaccharide: Comparison with serotypes 2 and 14. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lee, S.H.; Soyoola, E.; Chanmugam, P.; Hart, S.; Sun, W.; Zhong, H.; Liou, S.; Simmons, D.; Hwang, D. Selective expression of mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase in macrophages stimulated with lipopolysaccharide. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 25934–25938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, H.; Rhee, S.H.; Kokkotou, E.; Na, X.; Savidge, T.; Moyer, M.P.; Pothoulakis, C.; LaMont, J.T. Clostridium difficile toxin A regulates inducible cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 synthesis in colonocytes via reactive oxygen species and activation of p38 MAPK. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 21237–21245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lalonde, M.; Segura, M.; Lacouture, S.; Gottschalk, M. Interactions between Streptococcus suis serotype 2 and different epithelial cell lines. Microbiology 2000, 146 Pt 8, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Charland, N.; Nizet, V.; Rubens, C.E.; Kim, K.S.; Lacouture, S.; Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus suis serotype 2 interactions with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lavagna, A.; Auger, J.P.; Dumesnil, A.; Roy, D.; Girardin, S.E.; Gisch, N.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Interleukin-1 signaling induced by Streptococcus suis serotype 2 is strain-dependent and contributes to bacterial clearance and inflammation during systemic disease in a mouse model of infection. Vet. Res. 2019, 50, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 09 00366 g001 550
Figure 1. S. suis induced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in porcine lung tissue. (A) Precision-cut lung slice (PCLS) were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 and COX-2 protein expression was analysed 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after infection by Western blotting. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as loading control. One representative of four independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of the Western blot experiments described in (A). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PCLS were infected for 24 h with S. suis S10 in the presence of vehicle (DMSO) or the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (10 µM). Cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) alone served as control. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production was determined in the supernatant by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (D) Western blot analysis of COX-2 induction in PCLS treated and infected as described in (C). GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown.
Figure 1. S. suis induced expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in porcine lung tissue. (A) Precision-cut lung slice (PCLS) were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 and COX-2 protein expression was analysed 0, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after infection by Western blotting. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) served as loading control. One representative of four independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of the Western blot experiments described in (A). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PCLS were infected for 24 h with S. suis S10 in the presence of vehicle (DMSO) or the selective COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 (10 µM). Cells treated with vehicle (DMSO) alone served as control. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production was determined in the supernatant by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (D) Western blot analysis of COX-2 induction in PCLS treated and infected as described in (C). GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g001
Microorganisms 09 00366 g002 550
Figure 2. Localisation of COX-2 induction in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and acetylated tubulin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, grey). Stained tissue was analysed by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Open arrowheads indicate COX-2 expressing cells in the proximal alveolar tissue and closed arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells in the bronchiolar region. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Figure 2. Localisation of COX-2 induction in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and acetylated tubulin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, grey). Stained tissue was analysed by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Open arrowheads indicate COX-2 expressing cells in the proximal alveolar tissue and closed arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells in the bronchiolar region. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g002
Microorganisms 09 00366 g003 550
Figure 3. COX-2 induction in distal alveolar tissue and blood vessels in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation, the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and acetylated tubulin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (grey). Stained tissue was analysed for COX-2 induction in (A) distal alveolar tissue and (B) blood vessels by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expression in the distal alveolar tissue ((A), S10) and in cells located in the basement membrane of the vessel ((B), S10). One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Bv, blood vessel.
Figure 3. COX-2 induction in distal alveolar tissue and blood vessels in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation, the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and acetylated tubulin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (grey). Stained tissue was analysed for COX-2 induction in (A) distal alveolar tissue and (B) blood vessels by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expression in the distal alveolar tissue ((A), S10) and in cells located in the basement membrane of the vessel ((B), S10). One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Bv, blood vessel.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g003
Microorganisms 09 00366 g004 550
Figure 4. Co-staining of COX-2 and vimentin in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation, the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and vimentin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (grey). Stained tissue was analysed by confocal microscopy. The boxed region is shown enlarged in the lower panel. The area containing smooth muscle cells (Sm), which are negative for vimentin, is labelled. Closed arrowheads indicate exemplary elongated/spindle shaped cells in the bronchiolar region that show strong vimentin staining and are positive for COX-2. One representative of two independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles; Sm, smooth muscle cells.
Figure 4. Co-staining of COX-2 and vimentin in S. suis infected PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 (S10) for 24 h. After fixation, the tissue was stained for COX-2 (red) and vimentin (cyan). Nuclei were visualised with DAPI (grey). Stained tissue was analysed by confocal microscopy. The boxed region is shown enlarged in the lower panel. The area containing smooth muscle cells (Sm), which are negative for vimentin, is labelled. Closed arrowheads indicate exemplary elongated/spindle shaped cells in the bronchiolar region that show strong vimentin staining and are positive for COX-2. One representative of two independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles; Sm, smooth muscle cells.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g004
Microorganisms 09 00366 g005 550
Figure 5. COX-2 is induced by two prevalent S. suis serotypes in porcine PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 and S8067, respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after infection by Western blotting. GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PGE2 production after 24 h of stimulation was determined in the supernatant by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games-Howell post hoc test). (D) Visualisation of COX-2 (red), acetylated tubulin (cyan) and nuclei (grey) in uninfected (ctrl) and infected (S10, S8067) tissue by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Figure 5. COX-2 is induced by two prevalent S. suis serotypes in porcine PCLS. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 and S8067, respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after infection by Western blotting. GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PGE2 production after 24 h of stimulation was determined in the supernatant by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games-Howell post hoc test). (D) Visualisation of COX-2 (red), acetylated tubulin (cyan) and nuclei (grey) in uninfected (ctrl) and infected (S10, S8067) tissue by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g005
Microorganisms 09 00366 g006 550
Figure 6. S. suis-induced expression of COX-2 in porcine lung tissue is suilysin (SLY)-dependent. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 wild type and an S10Δsly mutant, respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after infection by Western blotting of whole tissue lysates (WTC). GAPDH served as loading control. Expression of SLY was analysed by Western blotting of tissue culture supernatants (SN). One representative of four independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of COX-2 induction in the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PGE2 production after 24 h of stimulation was determined in the supernatant by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (D) Visualisation of COX-2 (red), acetylated tubulin (cyan) and nuclei (grey) in uninfected (ctrl) and infected (S10, S10Δsly) tissue by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Figure 6. S. suis-induced expression of COX-2 in porcine lung tissue is suilysin (SLY)-dependent. PCLS were left uninfected (ctrl) or infected with S. suis S10 wild type and an S10Δsly mutant, respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after infection by Western blotting of whole tissue lysates (WTC). GAPDH served as loading control. Expression of SLY was analysed by Western blotting of tissue culture supernatants (SN). One representative of four independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of COX-2 induction in the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (C) PGE2 production after 24 h of stimulation was determined in the supernatant by ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test). (D) Visualisation of COX-2 (red), acetylated tubulin (cyan) and nuclei (grey) in uninfected (ctrl) and infected (S10, S10Δsly) tissue by confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are shown enlarged in the right panel. Arrowheads indicate exemplary COX-2 expressing cells. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. Av, alveolar tissue; Br, bronchioles.
Microorganisms 09 00366 g006
Microorganisms 09 00366 g007 550
Figure 7. SLY is sufficient for COX-2 induction in porcine lung tissue. PCLS were left unstimulated or stimulated with 1000, 500 and 125 ng/mL recombinant suilysin (rSLY), respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after stimulation by Western blotting. GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of COX-2 induction in the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test).
Figure 7. SLY is sufficient for COX-2 induction in porcine lung tissue. PCLS were left unstimulated or stimulated with 1000, 500 and 125 ng/mL recombinant suilysin (rSLY), respectively. (A) COX-2 protein expression was analysed 24 h after stimulation by Western blotting. GAPDH served as loading control. One representative of three independent experiments is shown. (B) Densitometric analysis of COX-2 induction in the Western blot experiments shown in (A). Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Exact p values are indicated (Welch ANOVA followed by Games–Howell post hoc test).
Microorganisms 09 00366 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dresen, M.; Schenk, J.; Berhanu Weldearegay, Y.; Vötsch, D.; Baumgärtner, W.; Valentin-Weigand, P.; Nerlich, A. Streptococcus suis Induces Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020366

AMA Style

Dresen M, Schenk J, Berhanu Weldearegay Y, Vötsch D, Baumgärtner W, Valentin-Weigand P, Nerlich A. Streptococcus suis Induces Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(2):366. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dresen, Muriel, Josephine Schenk, Yenehiwot Berhanu Weldearegay, Désirée Vötsch, Wolfgang Baumgärtner, Peter Valentin-Weigand, and Andreas Nerlich. 2021. "Streptococcus suis Induces Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue" Microorganisms 9, no. 2: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020366

APA Style

Dresen, M., Schenk, J., Berhanu Weldearegay, Y., Vötsch, D., Baumgärtner, W., Valentin-Weigand, P., & Nerlich, A. (2021). Streptococcus suis Induces Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Porcine Lung Tissue. Microorganisms, 9(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop