Next Article in Journal
Seroprevalence of Leptospira in Racehorses and Broodmares in New Zealand
Next Article in Special Issue
Welfare Aspects of Raising Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates
Previous Article in Journal
Paratuberculosis in Captive Scimitar-Horned Oryxes (Oryx dammah)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carcass Characteristics and Primal Pork Cuts of Gilts, Boars, Immunocastrates and Barrows Using AutoFOM III Data of a Commercial Abattoir
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Strategies to Meet Nutritional Requirements and Reduce Boar Taint in Meat from Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates

1
Agroscope, Institute for Livestock Sciences, La Tioleyre 4, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
2
IFIP-Institut du Porc, La Motte au Vicomte, 35650 Le Rheu, France
3
Pig Research Centre, Danish Agriculture & Food Council, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark
4
Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
5
Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 C996 Co. Cork, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(11), 1950; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111950
Submission received: 24 September 2020 / Revised: 14 October 2020 / Accepted: 17 October 2020 / Published: 23 October 2020

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Raising entire male pigs and immunocastrates poses various challenges on how the nutrient requirements of these growth-efficient animals can be met. Applying the appropriate nutritional strategy will markedly affect the production efficiency and the carcass and pork quality, but will also control the incidence of boar-tainted carcasses.

Abstract

This paper reviews the current knowledge on the nutritional requirements of entire male and immunocastrated pigs to obtain an efficient growth, low boar taint level, and good carcass and meat quality. We present the reasons for offering entire males ad libitum access to the diets in order to optimize their protein deposition potential. Boar taint is one of the major issues in the production of entire males; therefore, the impact of various skatole- and indole-reducing feed ingredients is discussed regarding their efficiency and the possible mechanism affecting skatole and indole production in the hindgut. Entire males have lean carcasses, so their intramuscular fat content can be lower than that of surgical castrates or females and the adipose tissue can be highly unsaturated. The possible nutritional strategies to counteract these effects are summarized. We conclude that immunocastrates can be fed similarly to entire males until the second vaccination. However, due to the metabolic changes occurring shortly after the second vaccination, the requirements for essential amino acids are markedly lower in immunocastrates than in entire males.

1. Introduction

Increasing concerns regarding animal welfare have now placed the surgical castration of male pigs at an early age without pain relief under great scrutiny in major European pig-producing countries [1]. Various solutions, such as castration under anesthesia and analgesia, raising entire male pigs, or immunization against gonadotrophin (also referred to as immunological castration or immunocastration), are available and make sense from a point of view of production efficiency. However, some pig-meat importing countries will not accept meat from entire males or from immunocastrates, which poses a problem for countries with large export markets. Compared to surgically castrated pigs, entire male pigs are more nutrient efficient as their empty bodies and carcasses contain more protein and less fat [2,3,4]. However, the carcasses of entire males have greater portions of fore-end and lower portions of ham, their muscles contain less protein, and the meat is less tender [5]. Because of this, and despite the advantages with respect to production efficiency, it is still common practice to castrate male pigs. The principal reason for this is to reduce the possible risk of the offensive odor and flavor known as boar taint that is primarily caused by an increase in the concentration of the compounds androstenone, skatole, and indole in the meat. Boar taint develops to various degrees in sexually mature as well as immature entire males and greatly influences the consumer’s acceptability of pork [6].
An already proven alternative to early surgical castration of male pigs is immunization against gonadotrophin-releasing factor, or immunocastration, and this greatly reduces the incidence of boar taint in male pigs [7]. Immunocastration suppresses testicular development and function, so these formerly male pigs become immunological castrates, thereby progressively reaching a productivity level similar to that of surgical castrates while lacking the expression of the offensive odor and flavor. A further advantage of immunological castration is that these male pigs are allowed to grow as entire males for most of the growing–finishing period, thereby benefiting from the naturally greater feed efficiency and improved carcass composition of entire males [8,9,10] during this time, as the immunization is normally conducted in the late finishing stage.
From a nutritional point of view, raising male pigs without surgical castration poses three major challenges. The first challenge is to adapt the composition of the diet to cover the nutritional needs for an efficient protein deposition without excessive feed cost and environmental impact due to nutrient spillage. The second is to select the dietary ingredients that reduce skatole and indole production so that bacterial degradation of tryptophan in the large intestine is minimized, thereby lowering skatole and indole production and their expression in the tissue. The third is to optimize the diet composition for immunocastrates following the second vaccination to take into account the change in metabolic demands of pigs, which, at this time, switch from being those of entire males to demands more akin to those of castrates. The objective of this short review is to share current knowledge gathered during the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action entitled “Innovative Approaches for Pork Production with Entire Males” (IPEMA) on the main challenges with respect to the nutrition of entire males and immunocastrates.

2. Assessment of Energy Requirements

The factorial approach to determine nutritional requirements identifies three energy sinks that determine the differences in energy requirements between females, surgical castrates, and entire males (and immunocastrates): first are the requirements for maintenance, second are the requirements for muscle (or protein) growth, and third are the requirements for fat (or lipid) deposition. Furthermore, a portion of ingested dietary energy is not available for maintenance and growth but is instead used for physical activity. In entire males, this can be quite substantial due to the relative increase in social interactions among penmates, such as fighting, biting, and mounting. As described in the literature, protein deposition increases linearly with energy intake up to a maximum value (called a plateau [Figure 1]) and this depends on the amino acids available or the growth potential of the animal [11,12]. Above this value, protein deposition does not increase further, but lipid deposition does increase, as does the resulting lipid-to-protein ratio in the marginal body weight gain. Therefore, the energy intake at which protein deposition reaches the plateau (also known as the protein deposition potential), when not limited by amino acid supplies, is considered the optimal energy allowance for a pig and corresponds to the optimum average daily gain and optimum feed conversion ratio. Above this level, the extra energy intake is associated with a poor marginal increase in average daily gain but a high marginal decrease in feed efficiency due to the high marginal increase in fat deposition. However, after decades of genetic selection for lean tissue growth, no plateau is observed in the modern entire male genotype [2]. Therefore, as long as the amino acid requirements of the pig are met, protein deposition is an energy-dependent process during the growing-finishing period. Therefore, to exploit the full potential of protein deposition, entire males should have ad libitum access to their diet [13].
The current literature shows no difference in the lean meat content in the carcasses of modern types of male pigs associated with a different level of nutrient intake under different feeding conditions, i.e., when male pigs are provided with ad libitum access to dry feed vs. restricted access to dry feed in France [14] or to wet feed in Denmark [15]. The corollary of this conclusion is that any factor that affects spontaneous feed intake affects both protein and lipid deposition, and consequently muscle gain and growth rate, rather than mainly fat deposition as in the case of surgical castrates or the fat type of pigs. In immunocastrates, the increase in energy intake observed after the second immunization is associated with an increased lipid proportion in body weight gain [16,17,18] that corresponds to a situation where energy supply is no longer limiting for protein deposition.

3. Energy Concentration

Due to the limited appetite of entire males, which is caused by both androgens and estrogens [19] and the less time spent at the feeder [20], a decrease in energy intake utilized for growth limits the overall protein deposition during the growing-finishing period. This means that any decrease in energy intake is associated with a reduction in both protein and lipid gains. On the contrary, when the average daily weight gain is far below the expected growth potential of the pig, even when provided with ad libitum access to feed, increasing the dietary energy concentration is seen as a solution to overcome the limitation of the low ingestion capacity in the pig [21]. This strategy is efficient in female and castrated pigs [22], but the effects of increasing dietary energy density are more complex to analyze in entire males. Feeding entire males with 7% extra energy and 14% extra protein resulted in a 6% increase in daily weight gain, a 5% increase in feed utilization, and 4.6 days shorter time to reach the slaughter weight.
When formulating diets for entire males, the productivity and the production of skatole in the intestine should be considered. Increased energy digestibility in the diet means less indigestible energy available for the microbes in the large intestine to produce boar taint components [23], while also orientating the selection of a microbiota more prone to use the indigestible tryptophan as an energy fuel instead of microbial protein. A net energy (NE) concentration in the diet between 9.5 and 10.0 MJ/kg allows flexibility to formulate diets for entire males. However, when the NE level of the diet is above 10.0 MJ/kg, it is more difficult to design diets with a minimum level of indigestible compounds, like soluble or fermentable fibers, in an effort to lessen the production of skatole in the hind gut.

4. Feeding Level

In some European countries, finisher pigs are restrictively fed in order to improve carcass leanness and feed efficiency. This is due to the great appetite of surgical castrates approaching slaughter weight and their propensity to deposit excess dietary energy as adipose tissue. Feed restriction is an efficient strategy to improve feed efficiency when the decrease in energy supply limits lipid deposition rate without negatively affecting protein deposition.
With liquid feeding, the use of long troughs allows the practice of restricting feed allowance as would be required for surgical castrates (or, in some instances, females) at heavy target slaughter weights. Practicing ad libitum liquid feeding where pigs are fed from long troughs is much more difficult to implement, due to increased feed wastage. However, newer ad libitum, sensor-controlled short-trough liquid feeding systems allow more frequent feeding and ad libitum feeding of entire males works well with these systems. Competition among pigs occurs only during the delivery of the meals with liquid feeding; however, negative social interactions can occur when pigs are fed below their appetites [20,24,25]. Due to the adverse impact of restriction on behavior and to improve weight gain for some breeds, ad libitum feeding is recommended for entire males in the growing-finishing phase. Nevertheless, ad libitum sensor-controlled liquid feeding can also create a scramble for pigs to feed, even when there is existing feed in the trough, and this is thought be triggered by the noise from the feeding valve opening at the time of feed-out.

5. Amino Acid Requirements

There is general agreement that, in relation to the composition of the body weight gain, the requirement for essential amino acids per unit of energy is greater in entire males than in surgical castrates and female pigs. Quiniou et al. [26] estimated that the standardized ileal digestible (SID) lysine requirement is 0.1 g/MJ NE greater (grower period: 0.94 vs. 0.81 g/MJ NE; finisher period: 0.81 vs. 0.71 g/MJ NE) for entire males than for surgical castrates throughout the growing-finishing phase (Figure 2). Aymerich et al. [27] found a 17% greater SID lysine requirement for entire males (0.91 vs. 0.75 g SID/MJ NE) than for female pigs, especially in the finisher period. Interestingly, Moore et al. [28] hypothesized that entire males might use the available amino acid more efficiently for growth compared to female pigs. The body weights were 50 and 100 kg when female pigs and entire males were offered the same diet (0.5 g standardized ileal digestible lysine/MJ digestible energy) that supported near maximum growth rate. Both sexes had similar lysine intake but entire males grew 13.2% faster and were 10.4% more feed efficient than females (Figure 3). Maribo et al. [29] showed that entire males could effectively benefit from 17–25% more amino acids (lysine, methionine, threonine, and tryptophan) than recommended by the Danish standards for better growth and feed utilization.
Increasing environmental concerns in recent years have led to improvements in the feed efficiency as well as in the practice of formulating pig diets with reduced protein and essential amino acid content to reduce nitrogen losses and ammonia emissions. This practice is feasible in surgical castrates and female pigs, but not in entire males, as shown in a recent study by Ruiz-Ascacibar et al. [2]. The authors compared the protein and fat deposition rates of surgical castrates and entire males and showed that entire males had a significantly lower protein deposition rate when offered an amino acid- and protein-restricted diet (20% lower than the standard) (Figure 4). The authors concluded that, unlike with surgical castrates, reducing the essential amino acid supply for entire males below the current recommended levels (which are higher than those of females and surgical castrates) has negative consequences for pig growth. Furthermore, this negative effect will worsen if the essential amino acid profile of the diet is unbalanced. However, when the undersupply of essential amino acids is limited to a short period of restriction (for instance, during the grower period), entire males with high lean-tissue growth potential can express compensatory protein deposition during the re-alimentation period (finisher period), and, consequentially, achieve whole body protein deposition targets [30].

6. The Special Requirements of Immunocastrates

As previously mentioned, prior to the second vaccination (booster) against gonadotrophin-releasing factor, which is usually administered four to six weeks prior to slaughter, entire males and immunocastrates are similar in terms of growth performance and composition of body weight (BW) gain. Therefore, to maximize growth and obtain maximal protein deposition rates, the same recommendations for nutrient requirements can be used for both. Within two weeks after the booster injection, the testosterone levels drop in response to the lack of luteinizing hormone [7,31]. Subsequently, the metabolism of immunocastrates progressively switches toward that of surgical castrates, resulting in increased appetite [13,32], reduced growth, and poorer feed utilization (personal communication, Maribo 2020). While more fat is retained in immunocastrates after the second immunization, particularly due to their increased feed intake, a reduced protein-to-lipid ratio also becomes apparent in the BW gain. For this reason, the immunocastrates require a lower essential amino acid-to-energy ratio in their diet. The lysine requirement of immunocastrates decreases by up to 30% compared to that of entire males at approximately 14 d after the second vaccination (Figure 5; [13,16,33]). With immunocastrates, when switching to a final finisher diet after the booster is not feasible, a possible alternative would be to restrict feed intake, thereby improving feed efficiency. This would then reduce the SID lysine and protein intake (as well as energy intake) and as a positive side effect nitrogen emission. However, quantitative feed restriction after the second immunization is associated with impaired growth, although feed efficiency and carcass leanness are not improved [34]. Feed restriction also results in a greater number of skin lesions in pigs, which are indicative of greater negative social interactions among penmates. After the second immunization, the duration of individual meals (min/meal) and feeding rate (g/min) both increase [35], all at a time when access to feed at a trough is restricted, thereby explaining the greater animal-to-animal interactions.

7. Dietary Control of Boar Taint

Dietary composition is one of the major factors regulating intestinal skatole and indole synthesis. Several mechanisms control involving dietary components can affect skatole and indole levels. First, diet can reduce the availability of the skatole and indole precursor L-tryptophan in the colon by changing the rate of apoptosis. Second, diet can alter the composition of gut microbiota and the availability of Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp., which have been reported to produce skatole [23]. Some dietary components can increase energy availability and shift microbial activity from proteolytic to saccharolytic. Diet also affects intestinal transit time and the rate of absorption of skatole and indole. Details of these factors are described by Wesoly and Weiler [23]. Moreover, bioactive compounds in feed can affect the skatole and indole levels in fat by induction or inhibition of their metabolism via cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes [36].
A substantial effort has been made to reduce skatole levels by dietary means. Different feeding regimes and dietary compositions have been tested for their effects on skatole and indole levels in back fat, blood, intestinal digesta, and feces, and the results from these studies are well reviewed [23,37]. In the present article, we summarize and discuss the research results published since 2010. We paid particular attention to additives that both reduce the levels of boar taint compounds and promote animal health.

7.1. Chicory Root and Inulin

Accumulating evidence, albeit not always consistent due to differences in experimental design, supports the skatole-reducing effects of dietary supplementation with chicory root. Inclusion of purified inulin in the diet produced similar results to chicory root, suggesting that inulin, a fermentable fiber also found in large amounts in the Jerusalem artichoke, is the main chicory component responsible for the skatole reduction (Table 1). Feeding chicory at 15% for 14 days before slaughter successfully reduced skatole [38]. However, chicory is very expensive, so a shorter period was tested under Danish conditions to make it more economically suitable. Continuous feeding 15% chicory in the diet for 3–4 days before slaughter was sufficient to reduce skatole by 50–60% [38,39].
Indole levels are usually not affected by the presence of either chicory root or inulin in the diet (Table 1). Aluwé et al. [42] suggested that the addition of chicory or oligosaccharides can decrease the bacterial conversion of tryptophan to skatole while increasing its conversion to indole. Although speculative, the absence of effects on indole might be regarded as a positive finding, given that indole makes only a minor contribution to boar taint and positively affected intestinal health in other species [50,51]. One point to be emphasized is that, to the best of our knowledge, the role of indole in pig health has not been studied.
Inulin, a high-molecular weight polymer of fructose, is fermented by endogenous microbiota, with a resulting increase in the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate [52]. Butyrate, in particular, is beneficial because of its anti-inflammatory properties [53,54]. Lepczyński et al. [55] demonstrated that dietary supplements containing dried chicory root and inulin altered the expression of several hepatic proteins associated with energy metabolism and induced the expression of proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress. Moreover, a study using an in vitro model of the pig’s gastrointestinal tract reported an upregulation of genes related to intestinal barrier integrity following treatment with inulin [56].
The exact mechanism of the skatole-reducing effect of chicory root is not fully understood, and several explanations have been offered. One is that the addition of chicory or other sources of fermentable dietary fibers promotes an increased butyrate concentration in the colon, which in turn reduces cell apoptosis and, therefore, the availability of tryptophan for skatole synthesis [57]. Another explanation is that the compounds in chicory root modulate the microbial composition and decrease the abundance of skatole-producing bacteria. Nonetheless, neither of these two hypothesis has been confirmed [41,58]. Li et al. [41] and Øverland et al. [58] explained the reduction in skatole after feeding chicory as a response to increased microbial activity and an associated increased incorporation of amino acids into bacterial biomass, resulting in an inhibition of skatole synthesis from tryptophan. Moreover, Rasmussen et al. [59] suggested that the skatole-reducing effect of chicory might be due, at least in part, to increased activities of the skatole-metabolizing enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP2A19.

7.2. Hydrolysable Tannins

Another promising feed additive with potential to reduce the levels of skatole and indole in the adipose tissue is hydrolysable tannins, which are secondary metabolites found in many plants [45,46]. Tannins inhibit proliferation and apoptosis in the cecum; this inhibition then reduces intestinal skatole production due to the lower availability of cell debris and tryptophan [60]. Indeed, intestinal skatole production was lower in pigs supplemented with tannin [45]. The effects on skatole and indole levels in back fat, however, were not consistent, ranging from reduction to induction depending on the dose of tannins used (Table 1). Thus, the future use of hydrolysable tannin supplementation to reduce boar taint will first require determination of the optimal dose. Interestingly, Bee et al. [46] observed a numerical reduction in another boar taint compound, androstenone, in pigs fed hydrolysable tannins. A later study confirmed these results, as the androstenone levels in the adipose were also numerically lower in entire males fed the tannin supplemented diet [47]. However, the pigs in the latter study had low levels of androstenone overall. More studies are needed to confirm the effect of hydrolysable tannins on androstenone and to elucidate the underlying mechanism.
Generally, tannins are viewed as antinutrients, as they form complexes with proteins and minerals, as well as with digestive enzymes, and they interfere with nutrient digestibility. However, tannins seem to be relatively tolerable to pigs compared to other animals, and pigs can consume tannin-rich feedstuffs without negative health consequences [61]. Moreover, recent findings indicate that tannins also display antibacterial effects and can potentially serve as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics for farm animals [62]. Other observations indicate that tannin-rich wood extracts can improve feed efficiency in weaned piglets and reduce intestinal bacterial proteolytic reactions [63]. For example, addition of a 2% chestnut-tannin extract reduced the incidence and diarrhea severity of weaned pigs [64,65].

7.3. Raw Potato Starch

Previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of raw potato starch in feed consistently reduced skatole levels (reviewed by Zamaratskaia and Squires [37], Wesoly and Weiler [23]). In these studies, raw potato starch was provided to the pigs as a top dressing, which is not practical in commercial pig production. However, formulation of 20% raw potato starch into a pelleted diet did not reduce skatole levels in the distal intestine or in the adipose tissue of entire males [58].
When present, the skatole-lowering effect of potato starch is thought to be due to its high concentration of resistant starch. The effect of dietary resistant starch alters the intestinal microbial composition, increases the production of short-chain fatty acids, reduces damage to colonocytes, modulates lipid metabolism, and improves colonic mucosal integrity [48,66]. However, practical solutions for incorporating raw potato starch into the pig’s diet are required.

7.4. Other Ingredients

A recent study demonstrated that feeding a diet with blue sweet lupin seeds altered microbial activity in the large intestine of pigs [67]. In that study, a high level of lupin seeds in the diet (300 g/kg) tended to decrease the indole concentration in the distal colon below that seen with a low inclusion level (150 g/kg). Skatole concentrations were not measured. Inclusion of either chicory root or sweet lupin in the diet increased colonic abundance of Bifidobacterium thermoacidophilum and Megasphaera elsdenii [68].
Holinger et al. [69] attempted to reduce skatole and indole concentrations by feeding grass silage to Swiss Large White pigs. These authors hypothesized that the presence of fermentable energy (fiber-rich diet) would promote the use of tryptophan for microbial protein synthesis instead of its conversion to indole compounds in the hindgut. However, neither skatole nor indole levels were reduced in this study.
Several attempts have been made to reduce skatole and indole production by adding sugar beet pulp to the pig’s diet (reviewed by Wesoly and Weiler [23]). Lately, only a few experiments have been performed to investigate the effect of Jerusalem artichoke on boar taint. Vhile et al. [44] reported a tendency toward decreased skatole levels in the hindgut and adipose tissue, whereas indole levels were not affected. The reduction in skatole levels was explained by a decrease in Clostridium perfringens and an increase in short-chain fatty acid production in the intestine, which reduced the pH in the digesta. Pieper et al. [49] suggested that sugar beet pulp reduced skatole synthesis in the proximal large intestine. The addition of a mixture of lignin and cellulose into the diet also reduced skatole levels [49]. In contrast to inulin, cellulose has low solubility and is not readily used as a substrate by intestinal microbiota. The mechanism behind this reduction warrants further investigation.
Pieper et al. [49] also observed reduced skatole formation in the distal colon after feeding a lignin- and cellulose-containing diet. The authors suggested that the effect was due to combining soluble and insoluble fiber sources to provide fermentable carbohydrates to the intestinal microbiota along the entire gut. In that study, skatole formation in both the proximal and distal large intestine was reduced. Another and much cheaper way to reduce skatole is by feeding pure cereal grains for 3–4 days before slaughter, as it reduces skatole by 50% [70].

8. Carcass and Meat Quality Are Not Related to Boar Taint

An undisputed finding is that, when reared under identical conditions, the carcasses of entire males have a lower dressing percentage, greater lean meat content, and a more extensive longissimus thoracis muscle cross-sectional area when compared to surgical castrates [8,71]. Furthermore, Aaslyng et al. [5] showed that the conformation of carcasses of entire males differs from that of surgical castrates, as the entire males have larger fore-ends and smaller hams and their meat has a lower protein content. The lower carcass fat content is associated with a lower intramuscular fat content [8]. Depending on the average intramuscular fat content of the genetic line used, the decrease observed in entire males compared to surgical castrates or female pigs might impact the sensory traits of pork, like its texture and taste [72]. The lower fat deposition usually results in a greater degree of unsaturation of the adipose tissue [73]. From the human nutrition point of view, a greater amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids can be considered beneficial [74]. However, from a meat-processing perspective, soft tissue with an elevated level of mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids is less suitable [75,76,77]. The question arises as to how these “defects” could be avoided by nutritional strategies.
The fatty acid composition of pork can be easily manipulated by selecting appropriate feed ingredients. This is because, in pigs, the amount of ingested polyunsaturated fatty acid is closely related to the amount deposited in both the subcutaneous and intramuscular lipids [73,78,79]. In countries where the adipose composition is a quality trait, feeding recommendations need to be developed based on the fat composition of the diet [80]. However, the currently available recommendations were developed for surgical castrates and female pigs and, depending on the amount of deposited adipose tissue, they might not be valid. A valid strategy to increase the amount of deposited intramuscular fat without altering carcass leanness is to reduce the protein/lysine-to-energy ratio of the diet [81] below the requirement for some period prior to slaughter. However, one has to be aware that applying this feeding strategy would also reduce pig growth in that period prior to slaughter. To our knowledge, these strategies have not yet been tested in entire males but only in pigs with a potential for intramuscular fat deposition [82]. Thus, whether this feeding strategy would be successful with entire males of modern lean breeds remains to be established. With regard to the carcass and meat quality of immunocastrates, these appear to be similar to those of surgical castrates [10], which implies that no specific dietary regimen targeting meat quality traits is necessary with immunocastrates.

9. Practical Considerations with Feeding Entire Males or Immunocastrates

Ireland and the UK have been producing entire males since the 1970s because entire males grow faster and are more feed efficient than their surgical castrate counterparts. For instance, Hanrahan [83] reported an 8% improvement in carcass feed efficiency and a 6% increase in carcass average daily gain when entire males were compared with surgical castrates. Likewise, Lawlor et al. [84] found an 8.4% improvement in the feed conversion ratio in entire males compared with surgical castrates, although no increase was found in average daily gain. Traditionally, producers in these countries have been able to benefit from the reduced production costs associated with producing entire males since the carcass weight was low relative to that in other European pig producing countries and so the risk of boar taint was also lower. However, because it is very cost beneficial for farmers to produce heavier pigs, and because processors benefit from savings in per unit processing cost, as well as larger joints (preferred by some sectors of the processing and catering industries) with heavier carcasses, the slaughter weight has increased substantially in recent years. In 2000, the average slaughter weight in Ireland was 90.1 kg live weight (68.1 kg carcass weight) and by 2019 it had increased to 118.4 kg live weight (90.3 kg carcass weight) [85]. This 28 kg increase in slaughter weight may seem large; however, the age of pigs at slaughter has decreased by 1.4 d since 2000. The average daily gain from weaning to sale during this same time increased from 585 to 795 g/d due to genetic advances and improved nutrition and housing, as well as sanitary conditions. Therefore, the risk of boar taint from entire males is no higher now than it was 20 years ago. The following paragraphs describe some practical considerations, both positive and negative, relating to nutrition when producing entire males.
Producing entire males also has some environmental benefits compared with surgical castrates. As previously pointed out, entire males fed the same diet as surgical castrates are more feed efficient, which means reduced manure production and ultimately lower nutrient losses from entire males. Lawlor et al. [86] found that N excretion per kg carcass was 11.7% less for entire males than for surgical castrates, principally due to increased N retention in entire males.
Entire males are much more aggressive than females and surgical castrates. The highest levels of aggression and sexual mounting are found in single-sex groups of entire males, with intermediate levels in mixed sex groups and the lowest levels in groups of females [87]. Therefore, entire male pigs appear to have better welfare when reared in mixed-sex groups, while females are better in single-sex groups, where they are not stressed by mounting and fighting caused by the males. Therefore, making recommendations on the optimal group gender composition is difficult. In the majority of cases in commercial pig production, entire males and females are not grouped separately and the same diet is fed to both sexes. In many cases, only one diet is fed to both genders between 30 kg and up to 120 kg live weight. Where farms do group entire males and females separately, they generally still feed the same diet to both groups.
For this reason, the only advantage in separating the sexes on these farms is that male pens can be emptied earlier, as the male pigs reach their target slaughter weight earlier than the females. However, the differential in growth and feed efficiency between entire males and females means that female pigs can be fed diets that are lower in energy by ~4% and lower in SID amino acids by ~7%. If implemented, this has potential to reduce feed cost by ~2.4 cents/kg dead weight or €2.02/gilt pig [88]. Penning entire males and females separately also allows entire males to be brought to a higher sale weight compared to females at a given slaughter age. Alternatively, if entire males and females are produced to the same target slaughter weight, it allows entire male pens to be emptied earlier [88]. Another advantage of penning entire males and females separately is that it eliminates the possibility of females being pregnant at slaughter, which may be a problem where pigs are slaughtered at particularly heavy weights and hence are older and more mature at slaughter.
Allen et al. [89] recommended that Irish pig producers house mixed-sex groups on fully slatted floors and feed them reduced crude protein diets in liquid form to help reduce the incidence of boar taint in the entire males. To reduce skatole development, a frequent recommendation is to withhold feed from entire males for 26 h prior to slaughter. In practice, this poses a welfare problem, as modern pigs have large appetites and hunger could cause escalation of mounting and aggression. Further investigation is required regarding the implications of feed withdrawal on welfare and skatole levels in entire male pigs and females in case of mixed-sex groups.

10. Conclusions

This review describes the various ways that can be used to tackle the different issues of rearing entire male pigs and immunocastrates through nutrition. The goal of these strategies is to optimize and fully exploit the growth potential and efficiency of these nutrient-efficient animals. At the same time, with the same diet, producers should be able to reach low levels of boar taint, sufficient intramuscular fat content, and a fat tissue suitable for meat processing or ripening. Do we have the solutions for all of this? We have the main puzzle pieces, but they need further exploitation. The reason for this is that the available results are not always consistent due to various factors, such as the breeds, genetic lines, rearing conditions, and feeding regimes. In the future, a more holistic approach is needed that considers the impact of the whole diet, with overall benefits on pig performance, health, pork quality, and profitability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision: G.B.; Writing original draft: G.B., N.Q., H.M., G.Z. and P.G.L.; Review and editing: G.B., N.Q., H.M., G.Z. and P.G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This review was prepared within the framework of the Cost Action CA 15215 IPEMA. In sweet memory and honour of the project coordinator of IPEMA Ulrike Weiler.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bee, G.; Chevillon, P.; Bonneau, M. Entire male pig production in Europe. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 1347–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ruiz-Ascacibar, I.; Stoll, P.; Kreuzer, M.; Bee, G. Dietary crude protein and amino acid restriction has a different impact on the dynamic of protein, amino acid and fat deposition in entire male, castrated and female pigs. Animal 2019, 13, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ruiz-Ascacibar, I.; Stoll, P.; Kreuzer, M.; Boillat, V.; Spring, P.; Bee, G. Impact of amino acid and CP restriction from 20 to 140 kg BW on performance and dynamics in empty body protein and lipid deposition of entire male, castrated and female pigs. Animal 2017, 11, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dunshea, F.; King, R.; Campbell, R.; Sainz, R.; Kim, Y. Interrelationships between sex and ractopamine on protein and lipid deposition in rapidly growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 2919–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aaslyng, M.D.; Støier, S.; Lund, B.W.; Nielsen, D.B. Slaughtering of entire male pigs seen from the slaughterhouse perspective. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 333, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bonneau, M.; Walstra, P.; Claudi-Magnussen, C.; Kempster, A.J.; Tornberg, E.; Fischer, K.; Diestre, A.; Siret, F.; Chevillon, P.; Claus, R.; et al. An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: IV. Simulation studies on consumer dissatisfaction with entire male pork and the effect of sorting carcasses on the slaughter line, main conclusions and recommendations. Meat Sci. 2000, 54, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dunshea, F.R.; Colantoni, C.; Howard, K.; McCauley, I.; Jackson, P.; Long, K.A.; Lopaticki, S.; Nugent, E.A.; Simons, J.A.; Walker, J.; et al. Vaccination of boars with a GnRH vaccine (Improvac) eliminates boar taint and increases growth performance. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 2524–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pauly, C.; Luginbuhl, W.; Ampuero, S.; Bee, G. Expected effects on carcass and pork quality when surgical castration is omitted-results of a meta-analysis study. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 858–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pauly, C.; Spring, P.; O’Doherty, J.V.; Ampuero Kragten, S.; Bee, G. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of group-penned surgically castrated, immunocastrated (Improvac(R)) and entire male pigs and individually penned entire male pigs. Animal 2009, 3, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Batorek, N.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Bonneau, M.; Van Milgen, J. Meta-analysis of the effect of immunocastration on production performance, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds in pigs. Animal 2012, 6, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bikker, P.; Karabinas, V.; Verstegen, M.W.; Campbell, R.G. Protein and lipid accretion in body components of growing gilts (20 to 45 kg) as affected by energy intake. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73, 2355–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van Milgen, J.; Quiniou, N.; Noblet, J. Modelling the relation between energy intake and protein and lipid deposition in growing pigs. Anim. Sci. 2000, 71, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dunshea, F.R.; Allison, J.R.; Bertram, M.; Boler, D.D.; Brossard, L.; Campbell, R.; Crane, J.P.; Hennessy, D.P.; Huber, L.; de Lange, C.; et al. The effect of immunization against GnRF on nutrient requirements of male pigs: A review. Animal 2013, 7, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Quiniou, N.; Courboulay, V.; Goues, T.; Le Roux, A.; Chevillon, P. Incidence des conditions d’élevage sur les performances de croissance, les caractéristiques de carcasse et le risque d’odeur des porcs mâles entiers. J. Rech. Porc. 2013, 45, 57–62. [Google Scholar]
  15. Maribo, H.; Christiansen, M. Economy in Production of Entire Males; Meddelelse nr. 984; Videncenter for Svineproduktion: Foulum, Denmark, 2013; Available online: https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2013/984 (accessed on 20 September 2020).
  16. Huber, L.; Squires, E.J.; de Lange, C.F.M. Dynamics of nitrogen retention in entire male pigs immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 4817–4825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Needham, T.; Hoffman, L.C.; Gous, R.M. Growth responses of entire and immunocastrated male pigs to dietary protein with and without ractopamine hydrochloride. Animal 2017, 11, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Poulsen Nautrup, B.; Van Vlaenderen, I.; Aldaz, A.; Mah, C.K. The effect of immunization against gonadotropin-releasing factor on growth performance, carcass characteristics and boar taint relevant to pig producers and the pork packing industry: A meta-analysis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 119, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Squires, E.; Young, L.; Hacker, R.; Adeola, O. The role of growth hormones, ß-adrenergic agents and intact males in pork production: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 73, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cronin, G.; Dunshea, F.; Butler, K.; McCauley, I.; Barnett, J.; Hemsworth, P. The effects of immuno-and surgical-castration on the behaviour and consequently growth of group-housed, male finisher pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 81, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Black, J.; Campbell, R.; Williams, I.; James, K.; Davies, G. Simulation of energy and amino acid utilisation in the pig. Res. Dev. Agric. 1986, 3, 121–145. [Google Scholar]
  22. Quiniou, N.; Noblet, J. Effect of the dietary net energy concentration on feed intake and performance of growing-finishing pigs housed individually. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 4362–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wesoly, R.; Weiler, U. Nutritional influences on skatole formation and skatole metabolism in the pig. Animals 2012, 2, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Holinger, M.; Früh, B.; Hillmann, E. Group composition for fattening entire male pigs under enriched housing conditions-Influences on behaviour, injuries and boar taint compounds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015, 165, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Holinger, M.; Hillmann, E.; Fruh, B. Prevalence of injuries and the resulting requirements in housing conditions of entire male pigs. Tieraerztl. Umsch. 2014, 69, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  26. Quiniou, N.; Courboulay, V.; Salaün, Y.; Chevillon, P. Conséquences de la non castration des porcs males sur les performances de croissance et le comportement: Comparaison avec les mâles castrés et les femelles. J. Rech. Porc. 2010, 42, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  27. Aymerich, P.; Soldevila, C.; Bonet, J.; Farré, M.; Gasa, J.; Coma, J.; Solà-Oriol, D. Interrelationships between sex and dietary lysine on growth performance and carcass composition of finishing boars and gilts. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2020, 4, txaa129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moore, K.L.; Mullan, B.P.; Campbell, R.G.; Kim, J.C. The response of entire male and female pigs from 20 to 100-kg liveweight to dietary available lysine. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013, 53, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maribo, H.; Møller, H.; Thoning, H. Male Pigs Grow Faster Increasing the Protein and Energy Level in the Diet; Meddelelse nr. 1061; Videncenter for Svineproduktion: Foulum, Denmark, 2015; Available online: https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2015/1061 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  30. Martinez-Ramirez, H.R.; Jeaurond, E.A.; de Lange, C.F.M. Dynamics of body protein deposition and changes in body composition after sudden changes in amino acid intake: II. Entire male pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 2168–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Brunius, C.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Andersson, K.; Chen, G.; Norrby, M.; Madej, A.; Lundström, K. Early immunocastration of male pigs with Improvac®—Effect on boar taint, hormones and reproductive organs. Vaccine 2011, 29, 9514–9520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lealiifano, A.; Pluske, J.R.; Nicholls, R.; Dunshea, F.; Campbell, R.G.; Hennessy, D.; Miller, D.; Hansen, C.F.; Mullan, B. Reducing the length of time between slaughter and the secondary gonadotropin-releasing factor immunization improves growth performance and clears boar taint compounds in male finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 2782–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Moore, K.L.; Mullan, B.P.; Kim, J.C.; Dunshea, F.R. Standardized ileal digestible lysine requirements of male pigs immunized against gonadotrophin releasing factor. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 1982–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Quiniou, N.; Monziols, M.; Colin, F.; Goues, T.; Courboulay, V. Effect of feed restriction on the performance and behaviour of pigs immunologically castrated with Improvac(R). Animal 2012, 6, 1420–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Weiler, U.; Götz, M.; Schmidt, A.; Otto, M.; Müller, S. Influence of sex and immunocastration on feed intake behavior, skatole and indole concentrations in adipose tissue of pigs. Animal 2013, 7, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rasmussen, M.K.; Zamaratskaia, G. Regulation of porcine hepatic cytochrome p450—Implication for boar taint. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2014, 11, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zamaratskaia, G.; Squires, E.J. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal 2009, 3, 1508–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Maribo, H.; Claudi-Magnussen, C.; Jensen, B.B. Effect of 15% Dried Chicory Root in Feed for Male Pigs; Meddelelse nr. 876; Videncenter for Svineproduktion: Foulum, Denmark, 2010; p. 14. Available online: https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2010/876 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  39. Maribo, H.; Jensen, B.B.; Thoning, H. Fibres Reduces Skatol in Male Pigs; Meddelelse nr. 1055; Videncenter for Svineproduktion: Foulum, Denmark, 2015; p. 13. Available online: https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2015/1055 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  40. Kjos, N.P.; Øverland, M.; Fauske, A.K.; Sørum, H. Feeding chicory inulin to entire male pigs during the last period before slaughter reduces skatole in digesta and backfat. Livest. Sci. 2010, 134, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X.; Jensen, B.B.; Canibe, N. The mode of action of chicory roots on skatole production in entire male pigs is neither via reducing the population of skatole-producing bacteria nor via increased butyrate production in the hindgut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e02327-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Aluwé, M.; Heyrman, E.; Theis, S.; Sieland, C.; Thurman, K.; Millet, S. Chicory fructans in pig diet reduce skatole in back fat of entire male pigs. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 115, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Salmon, L.; Edwards, S. The effects of dietary fructo-oligosaccharide addition on boar taint compounds and performance in heavy slaughter weight boars and gilts. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 207, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Vhile, S.G.; Kjos, N.P.; Sørum, H.; Øverland, M. Feeding Jerusalem artichoke reduced skatole level and changed intestinal microbiota in the gut of entire male pigs. Animal 2012, 6, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Čandek-Potokar, M.; Škrlep, M.; Batorek Lukač, N.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Prevolnik Povše, M.; Velikonja Bolta, Š.; Kubale, V.; Bee, G. Hydrolysable tannin fed to entire male pigs affects intestinal production, tissue deposition and hepatic clearance of skatole. Vet. J. 2015, 204, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bee, G.; Silacci, P.; Ampuero-Kragten, S.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Wealleans, A.; Litten-Brown, J.; Salminen, J.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Hydrolysable tannin-based diet rich in gallotannins has a minimal impact on pig performance but significantly reduces salivary and bulbourethral gland size. Animal 2016, 11, 1617–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Tretola, M.; Maghin, F.; Silacci, P.; Ampuero, S.; Bee, G. Effect of supplementing hydrolysable tannins to a grower–finisher diet containing divergent PUFA levels on growth performance, boar taint levels in back fat and intestinal microbiota of entire males. Animals 2019, 9, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zhou, L.; Fang, L.; Sun, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhu, W. Effects of a diet high in resistant starch on fermentation end-products of protein and mucin secretion in the colons of pigs. Starch-Stärke 2017, 69, 1600032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pieper, R.; Boudry, C.; Bindelle, J.; Vahjen, W.; Zentek, J. Interaction between dietary protein content and the source of carbohydrates along the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 68, 263–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gao, J.; Xu, K.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Bai, M.; Peng, C.; Li, T.; Yin, Y. Impact of the gut microbiota on intestinal immunity mediated by tryptophan metabolism. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Whitfield-Cargile, C.M.; Cohen, N.D.; Chapkin, R.S.; Weeks, B.R.; Davidson, L.A.; Goldsby, J.S.; Hunt, C.L.; Steinmeyer, S.H.; Menon, R.; Suchodolski, J.S. The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 246–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.-J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Bedford, A.; Gong, J. Implications of butyrate and its derivatives for gut health and animal production. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. In Advances in Immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 121, pp. 91–119. [Google Scholar]
  55. Lepczyński, A.; Herosimczyk, A.; Ożgo, M.; Marynowska, M.; Pawlikowska, M.; Barszcz, M.; Taciak, M.; Skomiał, J. Dietary chicory root and chicory inulin trigger changes in energetic metabolism, stress prevention and cytoskeletal proteins in the liver of growing pigs—A proteomic study. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 101, e225–e236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Uerlings, J.; Schroyen, M.; Willems, E.; Tanghe, S.; Bruggeman, G.; Bindelle, J.; Everaert, N. Differential effects of inulin or its fermentation metabolites on gut barrier and immune function of porcine intestinal epithelial cells. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 67, 103855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Claus, R.; Lösel, D.; Lacorn, M.; Mentschel, J.; Schenkel, H. Effects of butyrate on apoptosis in the pig colon and its consequences for skatole formation and tissue accumulation. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Øverland, M.; Kjos, N.K.; Fauske, A.K.; Teige, J.; Sørum, H. Easily fermentable carbohydrates reduce skatole formation in the distal intestine of entire male pigs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 140, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rasmussen, M.K.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Ekstrand, B. In vivo effect of dried chicory root (Cichorium intybus L.) on xenobiotica metabolising cytochrome P450 enzymes in porcine liver. Toxicol. Lett. 2011, 200, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bilić-Šobot, D.; Kubale, V.; Škrlep, M.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Prevolnik Povše, M.; Fazarinc, G.; Škorjanc, D. Effect of hydrolysable tannins on intestinal morphology, proliferation and apoptosis in entire male pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 70, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seoni, E.; Battacone, G.; Ampuero Kragten, S.; Dohme-Meier, F.; Bee, G. Impact of increasing levels of condensed tannins from sainfoin in the grower-finisher diets of entire male pigs on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality. Animal 2020, in press. [Google Scholar]
  62. Girard, M.; Bee, G. Invited review: Tannins as a potential alternative to antibiotics to prevent coliform diarrhea in weaned pigs. Animal 2020, 14, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Biagia, G.; Cipollini, I.; Paulicks, B.R.; Roth, F.X. Effect of tannins on growth performance and intestinal ecosystem in weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2010, 64, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Girard, M.; Hu, D.; Pradervand, N.; Neuenschwander, S.; Bee, G. Chestnut extract but not sodium salicylate decreases the severity of diarrhea and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4 shedding in artificially infected piglets. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0214267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Girard, M.; Thanner, S.; Pradervand, N.; Hu, D.; Ollagnier, C.; Bee, G. Hydrolysable chestnut tannins for reduction of postweaning diarrhea: Efficacy on an experimental ETEC F4 model. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nofrarías, M.; Martínez-Puig, D.; Pujols, J.; Majó, N.; Pérez, J.F. Long-term intake of resistant starch improves colonic mucosal integrity and reduces gut apoptosis and blood immune cells. Nutrition 2007, 23, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tuśnio, A.; Barszcz, M.; Święch, E.; Skomiał, J.; Taciak, M. Large intestine morphology and microflora activity in piglets fed diets with two levels of raw or micronized blue sweet lupin seeds. Livest. Sci. 2020, 240, 104137. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mølbak, L.; Thomsen, L.; Jensen, T.K.; Bach Knudsen, K.; Boye, M. Increased amount of Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum and Megasphaera elsdenii in the colonic microbiota of pigs fed a swine dysentery preventive diet containing chicory roots and sweet lupine. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 1853–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Holinger, M.; Früh, B.; Stoll, P.; Pedan, V.; Kreuzer, M.; Bérard, J.; Hillmann, E. Long-term effects of castration, chronic intermittent social stress, provision of grass silage and their interactions on performance and meat and adipose tissue properties in growing-finishing pigs. Meat Sci. 2018, 145, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Møller, S.; Maribo, H. 4 Days Feeding with Pure Grain before Slaughter Reduces Skatol in Male Pigs; Meddelelse nr. 989; Videncenter for Svineproduktion: Foulum, Denmark, 2013; p. 8. Available online: https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2013/989 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  71. Lundstörm, K.; Matthews, K.R.; Haugen, J.E. Pig meat quality from entire males. Animal 2009, 3, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fernandez, X.; Monin, G.; Talmant, A.; Mourot, J.; Lebret, B. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat—2. Consumer acceptability of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Sci. 1999, 53, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wood, J.D.; Enser, M.; Fisher, A.V.; Nute, G.R.; Sheard, P.R.; Richardson, R.I.; Hughes, S.I.; Whittington, F.M. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 343–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Simopoulos, A. Human requirement for N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Scheeder, M.R.L.; Gläser, K.R.; Eichenberger, B.; Wenk, C. Influence of different fats in pig feed on fatty acid composition of phospholipids and physical meat quality characteristics. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2000, 102, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Scheeder, M.R.L.; Gläser, K.R.; Schwörer, D.; Wenk, C. Oxidative stability and texture properties of fermented sausage produced from pork differing in fatty acid composition. In Proceedings of the 44th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain, 30 August–4 September 1998; pp. 866–867. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hadorn, R.; Eberhard, P.; Guggisberg, D.; Piccinali, P.; Schlichtherle-Cerny, H. Effect of fat score on the quality of various meat products. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bee, G.; Wenk, C. Einfluss der Fettsäuren im Futter auf die Fettsäuren im Gesamtkörper beim Schwein. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr 1991, 66, 122. [Google Scholar]
  79. Bee, G.; Gebert, S.; Messikommer, R.; Wenk, C. Effect of energy supply and dietary fat sources on the fatty acid profile of the adipose tissue in growing-finishing pig. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 1999, 8, 137. [Google Scholar]
  80. Stoll, P. Fütterungsempfehlung Fettqualität beim Schwein. In Proceedings of the ETH-Schriftenreihe zur Tierernährung, Zurich, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 200–202. Available online: https://www.google.ch/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj9p7zmg8rsAhVLC-wKHfzMB1AQFjABegQIBRAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.agroscope.admin.ch%2Fagroscope%2Fde%2Fhome%2Fueber-uns%2Fmitarbeitende%2F_jcr_content%2Fpar%2Fexternalcontent.external.exturl.pdf%2FaHR0cHM6Ly9pcmEuYWdyb3Njb3BlLmNoL2l0LUNIL0VpbnplbH%2FB1Ymxpa2F0aW9uL0Rvd25sb2FkP2VpbnplbHB1Ymxpa2F0aW9u%2FSWQ9MzY3MjM%3D.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3CNZ0LJlw1dYELgwn4cA_1&cshid=1603432835310540 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  81. Lebret, B.; Juin, H.; Noblet, J.; Bonneau, M. The effects of two methods of increasing age at slaughter on carcass and muscle traits and meat sensory quality in pigs. Anim. Sci. 2001, 72, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lebret, B. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal 2008, 2, 1548–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Hanrahan, T. Relative Performance of Boars, Gilts and Castrates; 1979; 1980. p. 67. Available online: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19810159046 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  84. Lawlor, P.G.; Lynch, P.B.; Mullane, J.; Kerry, J.P.; Hogan, S.; Allen, P. Enhancement of Pigmeat Quality by Altering Pre-Slaughter Management; 4939; Teagasc: Carlow, Ireland, 2005; p. 61. Available online: https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/bitstream/handle/11019/999/eopr-4939.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  85. Teagasc. National Herd Performance Report 2019; Teagasc Pig Development Department, Teagasc: Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland, 2020; p. 18. Available online: https://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2020/national-pig-herd-performance-report-2019.php (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  86. Lawlor, P.G.; Lynch, P.B.; Mullane, J.; Kerry, J.P.; Hogan, S.A.; Allen, P. Enhancement of Pigmeat Quality by Altering Pre-Slaughter Management. End of Project Report 4939; Teagasc Pig Development Department, Teagasc: Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland, 2005; p. 66. Available online: https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/handle/11019/999 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
  87. Boyle, L.; Björklund, L. Effects of fattening boars in mixed or single sex groups and split marketing on pig welfare. Anim. Welf. 2007, 16, 259–262. [Google Scholar]
  88. Lawlor, P.G. Management of Male and Female Finisher Pigs. Teagasc Pig Advisory Newsletter. March 2020, pp. 10–11. Available online: https://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/animals/pigs/Teagasc-Pig-Newsletter----March-2020.pdf (accessed on 19 October 2020).
  89. Allen, P.; Joseph, R.; Lynch, B. Reducing the Incidence of Boar Taint in Irish Pigs; 4404; Teagasc: Ballsbridge, Dublin, Ireland, 2001; p. 14. Available online: https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/bitstream/handle/11019/118/Report%2033.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 21 September 2020).
Figure 1. Model of the response of an individual animal to a changing energy supply. PD: protein deposition; LD: lipid deposition; PDmax: upper limit to protein deposition; F: level of energy intake (as a multiple of the maintenance energy requirement) to reach PDmax; X: fraction of metabolizable energy (ME) intake above maintenance designated toward PD (after Van Milgen et al. [12]).
Figure 1. Model of the response of an individual animal to a changing energy supply. PD: protein deposition; LD: lipid deposition; PDmax: upper limit to protein deposition; F: level of energy intake (as a multiple of the maintenance energy requirement) to reach PDmax; X: fraction of metabolizable energy (ME) intake above maintenance designated toward PD (after Van Milgen et al. [12]).
Animals 10 01950 g001
Figure 2. Estimation of digestible lysine requirements in pigs according to body weight and sex (after Quiniou et al. [26]).
Figure 2. Estimation of digestible lysine requirements in pigs according to body weight and sex (after Quiniou et al. [26]).
Animals 10 01950 g002
Figure 3. Average daily gain and feed conversion ratio of entire male (EM) and female pigs fed the same amount of lysine (0.5 g standard ileal digestible lysine/g digestible energy) (after Moore et al. [28]).
Figure 3. Average daily gain and feed conversion ratio of entire male (EM) and female pigs fed the same amount of lysine (0.5 g standard ileal digestible lysine/g digestible energy) (after Moore et al. [28]).
Animals 10 01950 g003
Figure 4. Dynamics of changes in relative deposition rates (g/kg empty body weight (BW) gain) of protein (a) and fat (b) with increasing empty BW of entire male pigs fed a standard or a low-protein, amino acid-limiting diet. The standard was formulated to meet nutrient requirements according to the standard Swiss feeding recommendations for grower-finisher pigs in the respective growth periods; the low protein diet was formulated to contain (expressed as percentage of the standard diet) 80% dietary crude protein, lysine, methionine + cystine, threonine and tryptophan (after Ruiz-Ascacibar et al. [2]).
Figure 4. Dynamics of changes in relative deposition rates (g/kg empty body weight (BW) gain) of protein (a) and fat (b) with increasing empty BW of entire male pigs fed a standard or a low-protein, amino acid-limiting diet. The standard was formulated to meet nutrient requirements according to the standard Swiss feeding recommendations for grower-finisher pigs in the respective growth periods; the low protein diet was formulated to contain (expressed as percentage of the standard diet) 80% dietary crude protein, lysine, methionine + cystine, threonine and tryptophan (after Ruiz-Ascacibar et al. [2]).
Animals 10 01950 g004
Figure 5. Suggested dietary standardized ileal-digestible lysine requirements in a three-phase feeding program adapted to meet requirements for female pigs, castrates, entire males (EM), and immunocastrates (IC). The standardized ileal-digestible lysine requirement levels are expressed relative to those for gilts (bases). The proposed schedule is to feed the diet of the third phase one week after the second immunization (after Dunshea et al. [13]).
Figure 5. Suggested dietary standardized ileal-digestible lysine requirements in a three-phase feeding program adapted to meet requirements for female pigs, castrates, entire males (EM), and immunocastrates (IC). The standardized ileal-digestible lysine requirement levels are expressed relative to those for gilts (bases). The proposed schedule is to feed the diet of the third phase one week after the second immunization (after Dunshea et al. [13]).
Animals 10 01950 g005
Table 1. Summary of some studies investigating the effects of dietary carbohydrates on skatole and indole levels in pigs.
Table 1. Summary of some studies investigating the effects of dietary carbohydrates on skatole and indole levels in pigs.
IngredientAmountDuration of Each Experimental DietBreed and GenderSite of MeasurementEffect on SkatoleEffect on IndoleReference
Chicory inulin9%From 67 kg body weight until slaughter at 101 kg((Landrace × Yorkshire) × Landrace)) entire male pigsBack fatDecreasedNoKjos et al. [40]
Chicory root25%7 days(Duroc × (Danish Landrace × Yorkshire)) entire male pigsPlasmaTendency to be lowerNoLi et al. [41]
Oligofructose5%21 daysDanbred × Piétrain entire male pigsBack fatDecreasedNoAluwé et al. [42]
Inulin5%21 daysDanbred × Piétrain entire male pigsBack fatDecreasedNoAluwé et al. [42]
Short chain fructooligosaccharides0.2%from 60 kg body weight until slaughter at 130 kg (no information on exact duration)White × Landrace cross entire male and female pigsBack fatDecreasedNoSalmon and Edwards [43]
Jerusalem artichoke4.1, 8.1 and 12.2%1 week((Norwegian Landrace × Yorkshire) × (Norwegian Landrace × Duroc)) entire male pigsBack fatTendency to be lowerNoVhile et al. [44]
Hydrolysable tannin-rich chestnut wood extract2% and 3%From 123 to 190 days of ageLandrace × Large White entire male pigsBack fatDecreased compared to 1% supplementationNot determinedČandek-Potokar et al. [45]
Hydrolysable tannin-rich chestnut wood extract1.5% and 3%From 105 to 165 days of ageSwiss Large White entire male pigsBack fatDecreased compared to 1.5% but not 0% supplementationDecreasedBee et al. [46], Tretola et al. [47]
Raw potato starch28%From 120 to 170 days of ageDuroc × Landrace × Large White growing barrowsColonDecreasedDecreasedZhou et al. [48]
Mixture of lignin and cellulose8%3 weeksDuroc × Piétrain of both gendersProximal and distal colonDecreasedNoPieper et al. [49]
Sugar beet pulp12%3 weeksDuroc × Piétrain of both gendersProximal and distal colonNoTendency to be lowerPieper et al. [49]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bee, G.; Quiniou, N.; Maribo, H.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Lawlor, P.G. Strategies to Meet Nutritional Requirements and Reduce Boar Taint in Meat from Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates. Animals 2020, 10, 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111950

AMA Style

Bee G, Quiniou N, Maribo H, Zamaratskaia G, Lawlor PG. Strategies to Meet Nutritional Requirements and Reduce Boar Taint in Meat from Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates. Animals. 2020; 10(11):1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111950

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bee, Giuseppe, Nathalie Quiniou, Hanne Maribo, Galia Zamaratskaia, and Peadar G. Lawlor. 2020. "Strategies to Meet Nutritional Requirements and Reduce Boar Taint in Meat from Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates" Animals 10, no. 11: 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111950

APA Style

Bee, G., Quiniou, N., Maribo, H., Zamaratskaia, G., & Lawlor, P. G. (2020). Strategies to Meet Nutritional Requirements and Reduce Boar Taint in Meat from Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates. Animals, 10(11), 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10111950

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop