Next Article in Journal
Is Palm Kernel Cake a Suitable Alternative Feed Ingredient for Poultry?
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Sugar Cane Molasses Addition on the Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Tastes of Alfalfa Silage
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) and Spirulina (Spirulina platensis) Dietary Supplementation on Laying Hens Productivity and Oxidative Status
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transfer of Mycotoxins from Lactation Feed to Colostrum of Sows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs

Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan 625014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
Animals 2021, 11(2), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020336
Submission received: 19 December 2020 / Revised: 19 January 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feed Safety and Quality Control)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is one of the most toxic mycotoxins compounds produced by Aspergillus, a common fungi contaminant in food and animal feed. Although there are many studies on AFB1, most of them are focused on the acute toxic effects of high-dose AFB1 ingestion. The symptoms of acute AFB1 mycotoxicosis are rarely observed in actual animal production. However, long-term exposure to low levels of AFB1 is common in swine production and may contribute to chronic diseases. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of chronic exposure to low levels of dietary AFB1 on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility and intestinal health in pigs. We found that chronic exposure to low levels of dietary AFB1 suppressed growth performance, reduced apparent total tract digestibility and damaged intestinal barrier integrity in pigs, which could be associated with the decreased intestinal antioxidant capacity and the increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production. These results could provide new insights for future studies on the prevention and treatment of AFB1 poisoning.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of chronic exposure to low levels of dietary aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility and intestinal health in pigs. In a 102-day experiment, fourteen barrows (Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire, initial BW = 38.21 ± 0.45 kg) were randomly divided into control (CON, basal diet) and AFB1 groups (the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1). Results revealed that the AFB1 exposure decreased the final BW, ADFI and ADG in pigs (p < 0.10). AFB1 exposure also decreased the apparent total tract digestibility of dry mater and gross energy at 50 to 75 kg and 105 to 135 kg stages, and decreased the apparent total tract digestibility of ether extract at 75 to 105 kg stage (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, AFB1 exposure increased serum diamine oxidase activity and reduced the mRNA abundance of sodium-glucose cotransporter 1, solute carrier family 7 member 1 and zonula occluden-1 in the jejunal mucosa (p < 0.05). Furthermore, AFB1 exposure decreased superoxide dismutase activity (p < 0.05) and increased 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine content (p < 0.10) in jejunal mucosa. AFB1 exposure also increased tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β and transforming growth factor-β mRNA abundance in jejunal mucosa and upregulated Escherichia coli population in colon (p < 0.05). The data indicated that chronic exposure to low levels of dietary AFB1 suppressed growth performance, reduced the apparent total tract digestibility and damaged intestinal barrier integrity in pigs, which could be associated with the decreased intestinal antioxidant capacity and the increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

1. Introduction

The occurrence of mycotoxins in foodstuffs for humans and animals has been constituted as a threat to international public health [1]. Aflatoxins are secondary metabolites produced primarily by Aspergillus [2]. Among aflatoxins identified, aflatoxin B1 is the most toxic contaminant in foods and feedstuffs, and is classified as a Class I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [3]. Aflatoxin B1 needs to convert to AFB1-8,9-exo-epoxide (AFBO) to exert toxic effects [4]. Aflatoxin B1 has been characterized as hepatotoxic, teratogenic, carcinogenic, and immunosuppressive [5]. Aflatoxin B1 contaminated feeds can cause animal poisoning, whose manifestation includes growth retardation, liver and kidney damage, oxidative stress, immune inhibition, and increased susceptibility to diseases [6,7,8]. In addition, AFB1 remains in human food through animal-derived products (such as animal tissues, milk, and eggs), which may pose a threat to human health [9]. Therefore, AFB1 has raised concerns globally in animal production and human public health.
The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is not only an important organ for nutrient digestion and absorption, it also plays a key role in defending against pathogen infection [10]. Aflatoxin B1 is rapidly absorbed into the blood from the GIT, followed by an extensive transformation into metabolites in the liver [11]. The GIT is the first organ by which AFB1 comes into the bodies of humans and animals; thus, this toxin should exert greater toxic impacts on the intestinal tract compared with other organs [7]. Nevertheless, the effects of AFB1 on the intestinal tract are often neglected and inconclusive. Therefore, it is important and necessary to study the effects of AFB1 on the intestinal health of pigs.
Although much research is available about AFB1 in pigs, most of these reports are focused on acute toxicity following the consumption of high doses of AFB1, which is characterized by body weight reduction, liver and kidney injuries, and immunosuppression [12,13,14,15]. Actually, dietary AFB1 levels could be very low due to taking good care of dietary ingredients. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has reported that the maximum tolerance level of pigs to aflatoxins is 200 μg/kg [16]. The United States has limited the AFB1 concentration in pig diets to 300 μg/kg, while in China, the maximum AFB1 in pig diets is 20 μg/kg [8]. Furthermore, according to the global survey of mycotoxins in feedstuffs [17,18], the dose of aflatoxins is divided into three categories: realistic doses (representative of field conditions, <300 μg/kg); occasional doses (unfavorable weather conditions, 300~2000 μg/kg); and unrealistic doses (unlikely to occur in nature, >2000 μg/kg) [19]. Therefore, the symptoms of acute AFB1 mycotoxicosis are rarely observed in actual animal production. However, long-term exposure to low levels of AFB1 is common and may contribute to chronic diseases.
Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine the effects of chronic exposure to low levels of dietary AFB1 on growth performance, apparent total tract digestibility and intestinal health in pigs, thereby providing a scientific basis for guidance on the production of healthy pigs.

2. Materials and Methods

All procedures involved in the study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (Approval number: CD-SYXK-2017-015).

2.1. Aflatoxin B1 Production and Diet Preparation

Aflatoxin was produced by Aspergillus flavus (ATCC28539; purchased from the China Center of Industrial Culture Collection) via fermentation on sterile, polished rice. The mold strain was cultured on sterile potato dextrose agar and incubated at 28 °C for 5–8 days to obtain a uniform fungus spore suspension. Following this, 10 mL of the fungus spore suspension containing 106 spores/mL was transplanted to 80 g sterile rice in Erlenmeyer flasks, and incubated at 28 °C. After 5 days, the rice was immersed in chloroform to kill the fungi, and then ground into fine powder. The concentration of AFB1 in rice powder samples was detected by ELISA kits (Suwei Microbiology Research Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China). Finally, the dried AFB1-contaminated rice powder (equal to 180 mg/kg of AFB1) was added to the basal diet to obtain the desired level of AFB1 diet (approximately 280 μg/kg of AFB1).
The contents of mycotoxins (AFB1, zearalenone (ZEA), deoxynivalenol (DON), T2 and ochratoxin (OTA)) in basal diet and AFB1 diet were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC: Shimadzu LC-10 AT, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) method [18,20]. The minimum detection concentrations are 0.10 μg/kg for AFB1, 1.00 μg/kg for ZEA, 10.00 μg/kg for DON, 25.00 μg/kg for T2, and 0.21 μg/kg for OTA, respectively. Concentrations of various mycotoxins in basal diet and AFB1 diet are presented in Table 1. Finally, the contents of AFB1 in basal diet and AFB1 diet were 0.40 µg/kg and 286.60 µg/kg, respectively. Only AFB1 exceeded the regulatory guidance concentration of Chinese National Standard (GB 13078-2001), while other mycotoxins did not exceed the regulatory limits of Chinese National Standard (GB 13078.2-2006, GB 13078.3-2007, and GB 21693–2008).

2.2. Experimental Design and Animal Management

Fourteen barrows (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire, initial BW = 38.21 ± 0.45 kg) were randomly divided into the control (CON, basal diet) and AFB1 groups (the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1), with 7 pigs per group. All pigs were housed in individual metabolism cages (0.7 m × 1.5 m) and were given ad libitum access to water and feed. The experiment lasted 102 days and consisted of 4 stages: 38 to 50 kg, 50 to 75 kg, 75 to 100 kg and 100 to 135 kg. The basal diet (Table 2) was formulated to meet the National Research Council nutrient requirements (NRC) [21]. The pigs were weighed individually on day 1 and 103, and feed intake was recorded daily. These values were used to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and the ratio of feed to gain (F/G).

2.3. Sample Collection

The apparent total tract digestibility was determined during the last 4 days of each stage (average body weight of pigs at each stage = 74.36 ± 0.93, 102.50 ± 1.58, 128.71 ± 2.36 kg, respectively). During the period of digestibility determination, fecal samples from pigs in each group were collected and weighted daily. After weighing, 10 mL of 10% H2SO4 solution was added to each 100 g of fecal sample, and subsequently stored in plastic bags at −20 °C. At the end of the 4 day period, all fecal samples from each pig were thawed at room temperature and mixed thoroughly, and then dried at 65 °C for 48 h, after which they were ground to pass through a 1 mm screen and stored at −20 °C for chemical analyses. All experimental diets were sampled and stored at −20 °C until chemical analysis for crude protein, dry mater, crude fat, and gross energy. Blood samples were collected from pigs via the anterior vein on day 103 following an overnight fast. After centrifugation (3500× g for 10 min at 4 °C), serum samples were harvested and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Subsequently, all pigs were euthanized by electric shock, and the jejunal tissue was immediately collected. Mucosal samples from the middle jejunum were scraped and rapidly stored at −80 °C until analysis. In addition, an approximately 3 g digesta sample from the colon was stored at −80 °C for microbial DNA analysis.

2.4. Chemical Analysis

The apparent total tract digestibility of crude protein, dry mater, ether extract and gross energy was determined by the method of acid insoluble ash (AIA) [22]. The crude protein (method 990.03), dry mater (method 930.15) and ether extract (method 945.16) were measured according to the methods described by AOAC (1995) [23]. Gross energy was determined using an automatic adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL, USA). The apparent total tract digestibility was calculated using the following formula: apparent total tract digestibility (%) = {1 − [(A1 × F2)/(A2 × F1)]} × 100, in which A1 = the AIA content of the diet, A2 = the AIA content of feces, F1 = the nutrient content of the diet and F2 = the nutrient content of feces.

2.5. Diamine Oxidase Activity in Serum

The activity of diamine oxidase (DAO) in serum was measured by using Diamine Oxidase Assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Bioengineering, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All determinations were done in triplicate, and absorbance was measured using a multi-mode microplate reader (SpectraMax M2, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

2.6. Antioxidant Parameters in Jejunal Mucosa

The mucosal sample of jejunum was homogenized in ice-cold physiologic saline (w/v = 1:9). After centrifugation (3500× g for 10 min at 4 °C), the mucosal supernatant was collected to determine antioxidant parameters. The jejunal mucosal antioxidant parameters including total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were measured by the commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Bioengineering, Nanjing, China) combined with a UV–VIS Spectrophotometer (UV1100, MAPADA, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total protein concentration of supernatants was determined by using a protein assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Bioengineering, Nanjing, China).

2.7. 8-OHdG and PCO Concentrations in Jejunal Mucosa

The concentrations of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and protein carbonylation (PCO) in jejunal mucosa were determined using commercially available pig ELISA kits (Chenglin Institute of Bioengineering, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.8. Total RNA Isolation and Gene Expression Analysis

Approximately 40 mg of jejunal mucosa were used for total RNA extraction using TRizol Reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Reverse transcription was performed according to the instructions of the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Real-time PCR was conducted in a QuanStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA), using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The primer sequences were listed in Table 3 and purchased form TaKaRa (Dalian, China). The real-time PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The relative mRNA levels of target genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method with β-actin as the housekeeping gene [24].

2.9. Bacterial DNA Isolation and Microbial Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Bacterial DNA in colonic digesta was extracted by using the Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, CA, USA). All primers and probes were listed in Table 4 and designed following the previous report [25]. Microbial real-time quantitative PCR was performed in a QuanStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). Briefly, the total bacteria was detected using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), and the Bacillus, Lactobacillus, E. coli and Bifidobacterium were detected using PrimerScriptTM PCR kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) following the previous methods [26]. Furthermore, for the quantification of bacteria, specific standard curves were generated by constructing standard plasmids as presented by Chen et al. (2013) [26].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Each pig was considered as an experimental unit. Bacterial copies were transformed (log10) before statistical analysis. All data were expressed as means ± standard errors (SE) and were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student’s t-test was used in order to compare the means. p < 0.05 was considered as significant, 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10 was considered as a tendency.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

Pigs fed the AFB1 diet trended to decrease their final BW, ADFI and ADG across the whole experiment compared with the CON group (Table 5, p < 0.10). However, no significant difference in F/G was observed between AFB1 group and CON group (p > 0.05).

3.2. Apparent Total Tract Digestibility

Compared with CON group, pigs fed the AFB1 diet significantly decreased the apparent total tract digestibility of dry mater and gross energy at the 50 to 75 kg and 105 to 135 kg stages, and decreased the apparent total tract digestibility of ether extract at 75 to 105 kg stage (Table 6, p < 0.05). However, no significant difference in the apparent total tract digestibility of crude protein was observed (p > 0.05).

3.3. Relative mRNA Expressions of Nutrient Transporters in Jejunal Mucosa

Pigs fed the AFB1 diet had significantly decreased mRNA expression of SGLT1 and SLC7A1 in jejunal mucosa compared with those fed the CON diet (Table 7, p < 0.05).

3.4. Serum DAO Activity and Relative mRNA Expressions of Barrier Junction Related Genes in Jejunal Mucosa

The serum DAO activity in the AFB1 group was greater than that in CON group (Table 8, p < 0.05). Meanwhile, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed significantly decreased mRNA abundance of ZO-1 in the jejunal mucosa compared with CON group (p < 0.05).

3.5. Antioxidant Capacity

Compared with the CON group, pigs fed AFB1 diet showed significantly decreased activity of SOD (Table 9, p < 0.05), and tended to show increased content of 8-OHdG in the jejunal mucosa (p < 0.10). However, no significant effects of dietary AFB1 on the activity of T-AOC and the content of MDA and PCO in jejunal mucosal were observed (p > 0.05).

3.6. Relative mRNA Expressions of Inflammatory Related Genes in Jejunal Mucosa

Compared with the CON group, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed a significantly increased mRNA abundance of TNF-α and IL-1β (Table 10, p < 0.05), and tended to show an increase in the mRNA abundance of TGF-β in the jejunal mucosa (p = 0.05). However, no significant effect of dietary AFB1 on the mRNA abundance of IL-8 in the jejunal mucosal was observed (p > 0.05).

3.7. Bacteria Populations

Pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed a significantly increased Escherichia coli population incolonic digesta compared with the CON group (Table 11, p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed on the populations of total bacteria, Lactobacillus, Bacillus and Bifidobacterium in colonic digesta between the AFB1 group and the CON group (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is one of the most common mycotoxins found in feedstuffs such as corn, barley, and wheat [27]. Ingestion of AFB1 by animals causes many health issues including decreased feed intake and body weight, liver damage, immune suppression and even death, which eventually leads to significant economic losses [28,29]. Pigs are easily exposed to AFB1 due to the composition of their feed [30]. Previous studies have shown that piglets fed a diet contaminated with 200 μg/kg of aflatoxins decreased growth rate and feed intake [31]. Marin et al. (2002) reported a decrease in the growth rate of piglets fed a diet contaminated with 280 μg/kg of AFB1 [8]. Similarly, the data of this study revealed that the ingestion of a diet containing 280 μg/kg AFB1 trended to decrease the final BW, ADFI and ADG of pigs. The adverse effect of AFB1 on growth performance partially results from undereating and from decreased nutrient digestibility [32,33]. In this study, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed significantly decreased apparent total tract digestibility of dry mater, gross energy and ether extract. However, other studies have reported that the AFB1 diet failed to affect growth performance of pigs [34,35,36]. The difference between the experimental results may be partly due to the different physiological stages (age, sex, or body weight) of pigs, the source of the contamination (purified AFB1 or naturally contaminated feedstuff), and the dietary concentration of AFB1.
Furthermore, Na+-dependent glucose transporter1 (SGLT1) and solute carrier family 7 member 1 (SLC7A1) in the small intestine epithelium are closely related to nutrient absorption. SGLT1 is an important glucose transporter, mainly responsible for transporting luminal glucose across the intestinal epithelium [37]. SLC7A1 is an important luminal amino acid transporter located in the intestinal mucosa [38]. In the present study, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed significantly decreased mRNA levels of SGLT1 and SLC7A1 in the jejunal mucosa, so nutrient absorption of these pigs could be poorer than that of pigs fed the basal diet. This result is consistent with the reduction of growth performance and nutrient digestibility in the AFB1 group. This may be related to changes in the integrity of the intestinal barrier.
The integrity of the intestinal barrier plays a key role in the digestion and absorption of nutrients and the inhibition of pathogen invasion. Recent studies have revealed that AFB1 could cause remarkable disturbances in intestinal barrier function [39,40], which was supported by a study that observed the biotransformation of AFB1 to the toxic AFB1-exo-8,9-epoxide (AFBO) also occurred in the intestinal tract [41]. Diamine oxidase (DAO) is an intracellular enzyme located in the intestinal epithelium, which is released into the blood when the intestinal barrier is destroyed [42]. Therefore, serum DAO activity can be used as an index to evaluate intestinal permeability [43]. In the present study, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed significantly increased serum DAO activity, indicating that AFB1 supplementation damages intestinal barrier integrity. Furthermore, the tight junction proteins (ZO-1, occluding and claudin-1) play an important role in regulating and maintaining intestinal permeability [44]. In the current experiment, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed significantly decreased mRNA abundance of ZO-1 in jejunal mucosa, further indicating that AFB1 could damage the intestinal barrier’s integrity.
Oxidative stress has been associated with intestinal barrier disruption [45]. It has been reported that AFB1 can initiate the production of free radicals [46], indicating the involvement of AFB1 in an oxidative stress pathway. SOD is a crucial antioxidant enzyme for scavenging free radicals [47]. Cao et al. reported that broilers fed an AFB1 contaminated diet showed significantly reduced SOD activity in the liver [48]. Similarly, our current research found that AFB1 supplementation significantly decreased the activity of SOD in the jejunal mucosa, indicating that AFB1 could decrease intestinal antioxidant ability. In addition, intestinal oxidative damage was evaluated by measuring the concentrations of PCO, 8-OHdG and MDA, indicating the degree of protein, DNA and lipid peroxidation, respectively [49]. In the present study, pigs fed the AFB1 diet tended to show increased content of 8-OHdG in the jejunal mucosa. The results indicated that AFB1 may damage intestinal barrier partially through the reduction of intestinal antioxidant ability.
Cytokines exert momentous influences on the immune and inflammatory responses and participate in the regulation of intestinal barrier integrity [50]. Previous studies have reported that pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) increase intestinal permeability by inducing the disruption of tight junctions [51]. In this study, consistent with the decreased ZO-1 mRNA levels in the jejunal mucosa of the AFB1 group, increased levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA abundance were observed, indicating that AFB1 may damage intestinal barrier integrity partially by stimulating pro-inflammatory cytokine production. However, up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β mRNA abundance was also observed in the AFB1 group. The reason may be that pigs fed the AFB1 diet acquired intestinal injury; in order to maintain intestinal health, the animals’ bodies increased the expression of TGF-β through immune mechanisms to alleviate excessive intestinal injury.
The flora in the gastrointestinal tract play an important role in the maturation of the immune system and the development of normal intestinal morphology [52]. Some degree of internal and external stimulation or interference of the body may trigger a change in the numbers or the components of intestinal microflora, cause physiochemical reactions, and lead to diseases [53]. Previous studies have reported that AFB1 exposure can cause gut dysbiosis and disrupt the balance of gut microbiota by increasing the growth of non-beneficial and pathogenic bacteria [54]. Oswald et al. (2003) reported that mycotoxin fumonisin B1 increased intestinal colonization of pathogenic Escherichia coli in pigs [55]. In this study, pigs fed the AFB1 diet showed a significantly increased Escherichia coli population in colonic digesta. Previous studies indicated that pathogenic Escherichia coli infection may damage the intestinal barrier and cause inflammatory responses in children and pigs [56]. Thus, AFB1-induced increase of the intestinal Escherichia coli population may also be an important reason that it inhibits growth and damages intestinal barrier integrity in pigs.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, chronic exposure to low levels of dietary aflatoxin B1 suppressed growth performance, reduced the apparent total tract digestibility and damaged intestinal barrier integrity in pigs, which could be associated with the decreased intestinal antioxidant capacity and the increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

Author Contributions

B.Y., D.C., J.H. and G.T. conceived this research and designed experiments; P.Z., J.Y., X.M., Z.H., J.L. and Y.L. participated in the design and interpretation of the data; J.P. and Q.Y. performed experiments and analysis; J.P. and Q.Y. wrote the paper; B.Y. and H.Y. participated in the revisions of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (2014BAD13B01) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province (2015NZ0095).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University (Approval number: CD-SYXK-2017-015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Méndez-Albores, A.; Del Río-García, J.C.; Moreno-Martínez, E. Decontamination of aflatoxin duckling feed with aqueous citric acid treatment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 135, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hernandez-Mendoza, A.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Garcia, H.S. Effect of oral supplementation of Lactobacillus reuteri in reduction of intestinal absorption of aflatoxin B1 in rats. J. Basic Microb. 2011, 51, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. IARC. Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Chemical Agents and Related Occupations: Iarc Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2012; Volume 100, pp. 9–562. [Google Scholar]
  4. Eaton, D.L.; Gallagher, E.P. Mechanisms of Aflatoxin Carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1994, 34, 135–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, T.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, L.; Jia, R.; Zhang, J.; Ji, C.; Wang, X. Protective Effects of Sporoderm-Broken Spores of Ganderma lucidum on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Low Level of Aflatoxin B₁. Toxins 2016, 8, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Magnoli, A.P.; Monge, M.P.; Miazzo, R.D.; Cavaglieri, L.R.; Magnoli, C.E.; Merkis, C.I.; Cristofolini, A.L.; Dalcero, A.M.; Chiacchiera, S.M. Effect of low levels of aflatoxin B1 on performance, biochemical parameters, and aflatoxin B1 in broiler liver tissues in the presence of monensin and sodium bentonite. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yunus, A.W.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bohm, J. Aflatoxin B1 in Affecting Broiler’s Performance, Immunity, and Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review of History and Contemporary Issues. Toxins 2011, 3, 566–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Marin, D.E.; Taranu, I.; Bunaciu, R.P.; Pascale, F.; Oswald, I.P. Changes in performance, blood parameters, humoral and cellular immune responses in weanling piglets exposed to low doses of aflatoxin. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 1250–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bintvihok, A.; Thiengnin, S.; Doi, K.; Kumagai, S. Residues of Aflatoxins in the Liver, Muscle and Eggs of Domestic Fowls. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2002, 64, 1037–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Yuan, Q.; Su, J.; Yang, L.; Ning, L.; Lei, H. Fumonisin B1 damages the barrier functions of porcine intestinal epithelial cells in vitro. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2019, 33, e22397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rawal, S., Jr.; Coulombe, R.A. Metabolism of aflatoxin B1 in Turkey liver microsomes: The relative roles of cytochromes P450 1A5 and 3A37. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2011, 254, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meissonnier, G.M.; Pinton, P.; Laffitte, J.L.; Cossalter, A.-M.; Gong, Y.Y.; Wild, C.P.; Bertin, G.; Galtier, P.; Oswald, I.P. Immunotoxicity of aflatoxin B1: Impairment of the cell-mediated response to vaccine antigen and modulation of cytokine expression. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2008, 231, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lindemann, M.D.; Blodgett, D.J.; Kornegay, E.T.; Schurig, G.G. Potential ameliorators of aflatoxicosis in weanling/growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Harvey, R.B.; Huff, W.E.; Kubena, L.F.; Corrier, D.E.; Phillips, T.D. Progression of aflatoxicosis in growing barrows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 49, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schell, T.C.; Lindemann, M.D.; Kornegay, E.T.; Blodgett, D.J. Effects of feeding aflatoxin-contaminated diets with and without clay to weanling and growing pigs on performance, liver function, and mineral metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71, 1209–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. FAO. Worldwide Regulations for Mycotoxins 1995; A Compendium Fao Food & Nutrition Paper; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodrigues, I.; Naehrer, K. A three-year survey on the worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in feedstuffs and feed. Toxins 2012, 4, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Binder, E.M.; Tan, L.M.; Chin, L.J.; Handl, J.; Richard, J. Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2007, 137, 265–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grenier, B.; Applegate, T.J. Modulation of Intestinal Functions Following Mycotoxin Ingestion: Meta-Analysis of Published Experiments in Animals. Toxins 2013, 5, 396–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fan, Y.; Zhao, L.; Ma, Q.; Li, X.; Shi, H.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, J.; Ji, C. Effects of Bacillus subtilis ANSB060 on growth performance, meat quality and aflatoxin residues in broilers fed moldy peanut meal naturally contaminated with aflatoxins. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 748–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 7th Revised ed.; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Furuya, S.; Yamamoto, A.; Itoh, M.; Aoki, Y. Use of acid-insoluble ash added with celite as a marker for determining digestibility in pigs. Nihon Yoton Gakkaishi 2001, 38, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed.; AOAC International: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  24. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2 −ΔΔ C T Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qi, H.; Xiang, Z.; Han, G.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Chen, D. Effects of different dietary protein sources on cecal microflora in rats. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 3704–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, H.; Mao, X.; He, J.; Yu, B.; Chen, D. Dietary fibre affects intestinal mucosal barrier function and regulates intestinal bacteria in weaning piglets. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2013, 110, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Chaytor, A.C.; Hansen, J.A.; Van Heugten, E.; See, M.T.; Kim, S.W. Occurrence and Decontamination of Mycotoxins in Swine Feed. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 24, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chaytor, A.C.; See, M.T.; Hansen, J.A.; de Souza, A.L.P.; Middleton, T.F.; Kim, S.W. Effects of chronic exposure of diets with reduced concentrations of aflatoxin and deoxynivalenol on growth and immune status of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weaver, A.; See, M.; Hansen, J.; Kim, Y.; De Souza, A.; Middleton, T.; Kim, S. The Use of Feed Additives to Reduce the Effects of Aflatoxin and Deoxynivalenol on Pig Growth, Organ Health and Immune Status during Chronic Exposure. Toxins 2013, 5, 1261–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Meissonnier, G.M.; Laffitte, J.; Loiseau, N.; Benoit, E.; Raymond, I.; Pinton, P.; Cossalter, A.-M.; Bertin, G.; Oswald, I.P.; Galtier, P. Selective impairment of drug-metabolizing enzymes in pig liver during subchronic dietary exposure to aflatoxin B1. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 2145–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thieu, N.Q.; Ogle, B.; Pettersson, H. Efficacy of bentonite clay in ameliorating aflatoxicosis in piglets fed aflatoxin contaminated diets. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2008, 40, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Oguz, H.; Kurtoglu, V.; Coskun, B. Preventive efficacy of clinoptilolite in broilers during chronic aflatoxin (50 and 100 ppb) exposure. Res. Vet. Sci. 2000, 69, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, X.Y.; Huang, Q.C.; Li, W.F.; Jiang, J.F. Changes in Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activities and Nutrient Digestibility of Cherry Valley Ducks in Response to Aflatoxin B1 Levels. Livest. Sci. 2013, 119, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fu, J.C.; Chen, Q.; Du, J.; Shi, B.-M.; Shan, A.-S. Effectiveness of maifanite in reducing the detrimental effects of aflatoxin B1 on hematology, aflatoxin B1 residues, and antioxidant enzymes activities of weanling piglets. Livest. Sci. 2013, 157, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duthie, I.F.; Lancaster, M.C.; Taylor, J.; Lomax, E.B.; Clarkson, H.M. Toxic ground-nut meal in feeds for pigs. 2. The effect of consuming toxic groundnut meal during part of the growing period or during the finishing period. Vet. Rec. 1968, 82, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hintz, H.F.; Booth, A.N.; Cucullu, A.F.; Gardner, H.K.; Heitman, H. Aflatoxin Toxicity in Swine. Exp. Biol. Med. 1967, 124, 266–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Breves, G.; Kock, J.; Schroder, B. Transport of nutrients and electrolytes across the intestinal wall in pigs. Livest. Sci. 2007, 109, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, J.; Ren, W.; Duan, J.; Wu, L.; Chen, S.; Li, T.; Yin, Y.; Wu, G. Dietary arginine supplementation enhances intestinal expression of SLC7A7 and SLC7A1 and ameliorates growth depression in mycotoxin-challenged pigs. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, G.D.; He, J.; Ao, X.; Chen, D. Effects of maize naturally contaminated with aflatoxin B1 on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and digestive physiology in ducks. Poult. Sci. 2016, 96, 1948–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.; Murdoch, R.; Zhang, Q.; Shafer, D.J.; Applegate, T.J. Effects of dietary protein concentration on performance and nutrient digestibility in Pekin ducks during aflatoxicosis. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sergent, T.; Ribonnet, L.; Kolosova, A.; Garsou, S.; Schaut, A.; Saeger, S.D.; Peteghem, C.V.; Larondelle, Y.; Pussemier, L.; Schneider, Y.-J. Molecular and cellular effects of food contaminants and secondary plant components and their plausible interactions at the intestinal level. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 813–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, J.; Vaughan, W.; Forst, C.; Jacobs, D.; Weekly, J.; Rikkers, L. The effect of the route of nutrient delivery on gut structure and diamine oxidase levels. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 1987, 11, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, J.; Bing, Y.; Daiwen, C.; Zhiqing, H.; Xiangbing, M.; Ping, Z.; Jie, Y.; Junqiu, L.; Jun, H. Chlorogenic acid improves intestinal barrier functions by suppressing mucosa inflammation and improving antioxidant capacity in weaned pigs. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 2018, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pu, J.; Chen, D.; Tian, G.; He, J.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Yu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Luo, J. Protective Effects of Benzoic Acid, Bacillus Coagulans, and Oregano Oil on Intestinal Injury Caused by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Weaned Piglets. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Circu, M.L.; Aw, T.Y. Intestinal redox biology and oxidative stress. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 23, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kodama, M.; Inoue, F.; Akao, M. Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Formation of Free Radicals From Aflatoxin B 1. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1990, 10, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wan, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, D.; Yu, B.; Huang, Z.; Mao, X.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; He, J. Alginate oligosaccharide enhances intestinal integrity of weaned pigs through altering intestinal inflammatory responses and antioxidant status. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 13482–13492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cao, J.; Wang, W. Effects of astaxanthin and esterified glucomannan on hematological and serum parameters, and liver pathological changes in broilers fed aflatoxin-B1-contaminated feed. Anim. Sci. J. 2014, 85, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pu, J.; Tian, G.; Li, B.; Chen, D.; Yu, B. Trace Mineral Overload Induced Hepatic Oxidative Damage and Apoptosis in Pigs with Long-Term High-Level Dietary Mineral Exposure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1841–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pedersen, J.; Lacasse, E.C.; Seidelin, J.B.; Coskun, M.; Nielsen, O.H. Inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) regulate intestinal immunity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) inflammation. Trends Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 652–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alsadi, R.; Boivin, M.; Ma, T.Y. Mechanism of cytokine modulation of epithelial tight junction barrier. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 2765–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. De Vrese, M.; Marteau, P. Probiotics and Prebiotics: Effects on Diarrhea. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 205–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Croswell, A.; Amir, E.; Teggatz, P.; Barman, M.; Salzman, N.H. Prolonged Impact of Antibiotics on Intestinal Microbial Ecology and Susceptibility to Enteric Salmonella Infection. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2741–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Liew, W.; Mohdredzwan, S. Mycotoxin: Its Impact on Gut Health and Microbiota. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Oswald, I.P.; Desautels, C.; Laffitte, J.; Fournout, S.; Peres, S.Y.; Odin, M.; Bars, P.L.; Bars, J.L.; Fairbrother, J.M. Mycotoxin fumonisin B1 increases intestinal colonization by pathogenic Escherichia coli in pigs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5870–5874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Mclamb, B.L.; Gibson, A.J.; Overman, E.L.; Chad, S.; Moeser, A.J.; Colette, K.L. Early Weaning Stress in Pigs Impairs Innate Mucosal Immune Responses to Enterotoxigenic E. coli Challenge and Exacerbates Intestinal Injury and Clinical Disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. The concentration of mycotoxin in diets.
Table 1. The concentration of mycotoxin in diets.
MycotoxinsCON 1AFB1 1Limit 2
AFB1 (ug/kg)0.40286.6020.0
ZEA (ug/kg)ND 349.9500
DON (ug/kg)101.10406.401000
T2 (ug/kg)ND 3ND 31000
OTA (ug/kg)ND 3ND 3100
AFB1, aflatoxin B1; ZEA, zearalenone; DON, deoxynivalenol; T2, T2 toxins; OTA, ochratoxin. 1 CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1. 2 Chinese National Standard (GB) 13078-2001, GB 13078.2-2006, GB 13078.3-2007, and GB 21693-2008 of China (Beijing, China) 3 ND: Not detected.
Table 2. Diet and chemical compositions of basal diets (%, as-fed basis).
Table 2. Diet and chemical compositions of basal diets (%, as-fed basis).
Items38 to 50 kg50 to 75 kg75 to 100 kg100 to 135 kg
Ingredients
Maize72.1178.6878.6484.41
Soybean meal, dehulled18.1416.7617.4212.04
Fish meal3.00
Sucrose2.00
Choline chloride0.100.150.150.15
NaCl0.300.400.400.40
Soybean oil1.400.910.800.60
Limestone0.580.740.560.58
CaHPO40.930.940.930.71
L-Lysine-HCl0.380.390.220.21
DL-Methionine0.080.06
L-Threonine0.110.110.040.05
L-Tryptophan0.030.03 0.01
Rice0.300.300.300.30
Rice bran0.310.300.310.31
Vitamin premix 10.030.030.030.03
Mineral premix 20.200.200.200.20
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00
Nutrient compositions
Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg13.9213.7513.7513.82
Crude protein16.4714.5013.6012.60
Calcium0.660.590.520.46
Total phosphorus0.580.500.500.44
Available phosphorus0.320.250.250.21
SID 3 Lysine1.100.960.840.70
SID 3 Methionine0.370.300.250.22
1 Supplied per kilogram of diets: 12,000 IU vitamin A; 3000 IU vitamin D3; 11.23 IU vitamin E; 0.6 mg vitamin B1; 4.8 mg vitamin B2; 1.8 mg vitamin B6; 9 ug vitamin B12; 1.5 mg vitamin K3; 10.5 mg niacin; 0.15 mg folic acid; 7.5 mg pantothenic. 2 Supplied per kilogram of diets: 4.0 mg Cu (CuSO4·5H2O); 60 mg Fe (FeSO4·H2O); 2.0 mg Mn (MnSO4·H2O); 60 mg Zn (ZnSO4·H2O); 0.2 mg Se (Na2SeO3); 0.14 mg I (KI). 3 Standardized ileal digestible.
Table 3. Primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.
Table 3. Primer sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.
GeneSequence (5′–3′)Product Size (bp)Accession No.
SGLT1F: GCAACAGCAAAGAGGAGCGTAT95NM_001164021.1
R: GCCACAAAACAGGTCATAGGTC
SLC7A1F: CTTTCTACCCGCGGTCTCC150NM_001012613.1
R: TGCTGAGCGAATCTGCTGTA
ZO-1F: CAGCCCCCGTACATGGAGA114XM_005659811
R: GCGCAGACGGTGTTCATAGTT
OccludinF: CTACTCGTCCAACGGGAAAG158NM_001163647.2
R: ACGCCTCCAAGTTACCACTG
TNF-αF: ACCACGCTCTTCTGCCT121NM_214022.1
R: GGCTTATCTGAGGTTTG
IL-8F: AGTGGACCCCACTGTGAAAA102X61151.1
R: TACAACCTTCTTCTGCACCCA
TGF-βF: AGGACCTGGGCTGGAAGTG119NM_214015.1
R: GGGCCCCAGGCAGAAAT
IL-1βF: TCTGCCCTGTACCCCAACTG112NM_214055.1
R: CCAGGAAGACGGGCTTTTG
β-actinF: CCACGCCCTTTCTCACTTGT114DQ178122
R: CACCCACAGCACCTTATGCT
SGLT1, sodium-glucose cotransporter 1; SLC7A1, solute carrier family 7 member 1; ZO-1, zonula occluden-1; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-8, interleukin-8; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; IL-1β, interleukin-1β.
Table 4. Primer and probe sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.
Table 4. Primer and probe sequences used for quantitative RT-PCR.
ItemsSequence (5′–3′)Anneal Temperature (°C)Product Size (bp)
Total bacteriaF: ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG
R: ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG
60.0200
LactobacillusF: GAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTC
R: CAACAGTTACTCTGACACCCGTTCTTC
P: AAGAAGGGTTTCGGCTCGTAAAACTCTGTT
57.5126
BifidobacteriumF: CGCGTCCGGTGTGAAAG
R: CTTCCCGATATCTACACATTCCA
P: ATTCCACCGTTACACCGGAA
59.5121
BacillusF: GCAACGAGCGCAACCCTTGA
R: TCATCCCCACCTTCCTCCGGT
P: CGGTTTGTCACCGGCAGTCACCT
60.092
Escherichia coliF: CATGCCGCGTGTATGAAGAA
R: CGGGTAACGTCAATGAGCAAA
P: AGGTATTAACTTTACTCCCTTCCTC
58.896
Table 5. Effects of AFB1 on growth performance of pigs.
Table 5. Effects of AFB1 on growth performance of pigs.
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
Initial BW (kg)38.22 ± 0.7038.19 ± 0.650.98
Final BW (kg)132.80 ± 2.10124.60 ± 3.430.07
ADFI (g/d)2544.08 ± 41.642332.18 ± 96.260.07
ADG (g/d)927.25 ± 15.69847.16 ± 33.520.06
F/G2.75 ± 0.042.75 ± 0.050.91
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). BW, body weight; ADFI, average daily feed intake; ADG, average daily gain; F/G, the ratio of feed intake to gain. CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 6. Effects of AFB1 on the apparent total tract digestibility of pigs (%).
Table 6. Effects of AFB1 on the apparent total tract digestibility of pigs (%).
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
50 to 75 kg
Dry mater87.74 ± 0.7786.17 ± 0.440.04
Gross energy87.34 ± 0.7685.66 ± 0.450.03
Crude protein85.22 ± 1.1884.62 ± 0.770.61
Ether extract75.99 ± 2.1973.63 ± 1.220.25
75 to 105 kg
Dry mater89.59 ± 0.1989.82 ± 0.580.76
Gross energy89.08 ± 0.2289.1 ± 0.570.98
Crude protein87.24 ± 0.4487.63 ± 1.10.80
Ether extract81.88 ± 0.4378.06 ± 0.740.04
105 to 135 kg
Dry mater88.25 ± 0.3686.39 ± 0.600.03
Gross energy87.76 ± 0.3485.54 ± 0.580.01
Crude protein84.80 ± 1.1883.12 ± 0.790.27
Ether extract73.88 ± 1.7871.99 ± 1.470.43
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 7. Effects of AFB1 on the relative mRNA expressions of nutrient transporters in jejunal mucosa of pigs.
Table 7. Effects of AFB1 on the relative mRNA expressions of nutrient transporters in jejunal mucosa of pigs.
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
SGLT11.00 ± 0.190.36 ± 0.120.02
SLC7A11.00 ± 0.030.86 ± 0.040.04
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). SGLT1, sodium-glucose cotransporter 1; SLC7A1, solute carrier family 7 member 1. CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 8. Effects of AFB1 on serum DAO activity and the relative mRNA expressions of barrier junction-related genes in jejunal mucosa.
Table 8. Effects of AFB1 on serum DAO activity and the relative mRNA expressions of barrier junction-related genes in jejunal mucosa.
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
Serum
DAO (U/L)13.79 ± 1.9723.75 ± 1.65p < 0.01
Jejunal mucosa
ZO-11.00 ± 0.050.67 ± 0.03p < 0.01
Occludin1.00 ± 0.121.06 ± 0.080.68
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). DAO, diamine oxidase; ZO-1, zonula occluden-1. CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 9. Effects of AFB1 on jejunal mucosal antioxidant indicators of pigs.
Table 9. Effects of AFB1 on jejunal mucosal antioxidant indicators of pigs.
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
T-AOC (U/mgprot)1.44 ± 0.101.20 ± 0.160.24
SOD (U/mgprot)275.34 ± 21.06189.34 ± 18.620.02
MDA (nmol/mgprot)0.18 ± 0.020.18 ± 0.030.95
8-OHdG (pg/mL)11.22 ± 0.9615.03 ± 1.630.08
PCO (pg/mL)26.80 ± 2.2831.47 ± 3.670.31
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; PCO, protein carbonylation. CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 10. Effects of AFB1 on the relative mRNA expressions of inflammatory related genes in jejunal mucosa of pigs.
Table 10. Effects of AFB1 on the relative mRNA expressions of inflammatory related genes in jejunal mucosa of pigs.
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
TNF-α1.00 ± 0.081.44 ± 0.140.03
IL-1β1.00 ± 0.061.34 ± 0.100.02
IL-81.00 ± 0.111.42 ± 0.280.21
TGF-β1.00 ± 0.081.56 ± 0.210.05
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; IL-8, interleukin-8; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β. CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Table 11. Effects of AFB1 on bacteria populations in colonic digesta of pigs (log10(copies/g)).
Table 11. Effects of AFB1 on bacteria populations in colonic digesta of pigs (log10(copies/g)).
ItemsCONAFB1p-Value
Total bacteria13.46 ± 0.0913.54 ± 0.020.45
Lactobacillus7.74 ± 0.247.82 ± 0.230.82
Bacillus9.84 ± 0.179.93 ± 0.050.63
Escherichia coli6.72 ± 0.377.72 ± 0.130.03
Bifidobacterium5.43 ± 0.135.62 ± 0.350.63
Results are expressed as means ± standard errors (n = 7). CON, basal diet; AFB1, the basal diet supplemented with 280 μg/kg AFB1.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pu, J.; Yuan, Q.; Yan, H.; Tian, G.; Chen, D.; He, J.; Zheng, P.; Yu, J.; Mao, X.; Huang, Z.; et al. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs. Animals 2021, 11, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020336

AMA Style

Pu J, Yuan Q, Yan H, Tian G, Chen D, He J, Zheng P, Yu J, Mao X, Huang Z, et al. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs. Animals. 2021; 11(2):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pu, Junning, Qinghui Yuan, Hui Yan, Gang Tian, Daiwen Chen, Jun He, Ping Zheng, Jie Yu, Xiangbing Mao, Zhiqing Huang, and et al. 2021. "Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs" Animals 11, no. 2: 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020336

APA Style

Pu, J., Yuan, Q., Yan, H., Tian, G., Chen, D., He, J., Zheng, P., Yu, J., Mao, X., Huang, Z., Luo, J., Luo, Y., & Yu, B. (2021). Effects of Chronic Exposure to Low Levels of Dietary Aflatoxin B1 on Growth Performance, Apparent Total Tract Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Pigs. Animals, 11(2), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop