Next Article in Journal
Cystinuria in Dogs and Cats: What Do We Know after Almost 200 Years?
Next Article in Special Issue
Sex Determination in Japanese Quails (Coturnix japonica) Using Geometric Morphometrics of the Skull
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): A Comparison between Clinical and Commensal Bacterial Isolates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773)

by
Darija Lemic
1,
Ivana Pajač Živković
1,*,
Matea Šuliček
1 and
Hugo A. Benítez
2
1
Department for Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Laboratorio de Ecología y Morfometría Evolutiva, Centro de Investigación de Estudios Avanzados del Maule, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(8), 2436; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082436
Submission received: 22 July 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 17 August 2021 / Published: 18 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geometric Morphometrics Applied to Biological Structures)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In the following study, methods of geometric morphometrics were used to identify invasive forms of Harmonia axyridis. The study confirms the efficiency of geometric morphometrics as a tool for identifying minimal shape plasticity in wing shape and patterns of sexual shape dimorphism among invasive forms. Although more detailed studies are needed for further clarity, the study demonstrates that these methods can analyze phenotypic differences among the forms and reveal subtle phenotypic changes that explain genetic alterations within an invasive H. axyridis species.

Abstract

The Asian ladybird (Harmonia axyridis Pallas), native to Asia, is one of the 100 most invasive species in the world and has spread worldwide. This study aimed to characterize color forms of H. axyridis in Croatia and to analyze the variability of wing shape between populations and indicated forms. Geometric morphometric methods were used to analyze a total of 129 left and right wings in males and 126 left and right wings in females of H. axyridis collected from four different sites in Croatia. The results show a significant difference in wing shapes between the studied forms. Each form had its own specific morphotype that likely originated under the influence of genetic changes in the species. This study demonstrates that the use of geometric morphometric analysis is effective in studying the variability in H. axyridis populations. As this study is the first of its kind, for further clarity, it is necessary to conduct additional studies on a larger number of sites and an equal number of individuals of all forms.

1. Introduction

Among the world’s best-known biological control agents, approximately 90% of Ladybird beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) are predators. In addition to native species, 13 alien coccinellids are known to occur in European agroecological systems [1]. Among them, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas, 1773) is considered the most invasive and widespread ladybird beetle in the world [2,3]. H. axyridis is native to eastern and western Asia [4] and was intentionally introduced to North America and Europe in the 20th century as a classic and inundative biological control agent of aphids and scale insects [2,5]. Occurring in at least 26 European countries [6], H. axyridis has spread rapidly since the beginning of the 21st century [7,8]. Although considered a top predator of hemipteran insects [2], H. axyridis is better known for its detrimental effects [9] by threatening native biodiversity through predation and competition with other aphid predators (e.g., coccinellids) and non-target species [3,10]. Long-term surveys in different habitats in England and Switzerland showed that H. axyridis became a dominant coccinellid in some habitats, leading to a sharp decline in native species such as Adalia bipunctata (Linnaeus, 1758) [8,10]. H. axyridis can also change its feeding habits from carnivorous to herbivorous [9], which poses a threat to agricultural production. Koch et al. [11] studied the phytophagous preferences of H. axyridis and found that, although it can directly damage some fruits such as raspberries, in most cases, it feeds on fruits previously damaged by other pests. Indirect damage by H. axyridis has also been observed in grape processing, where the presence of the beetle adversely affects product quality [12]. The species is not only an agricultural pest but also an unpleasant urban pest, as it accumulates in houses or buildings in search of overwintering sites [13]. It also emits an unpleasant odor by reflexively secreting blood that stains household textiles [14] and causes seasonal allergies (e.g., rhinitis, urticaria, asthma) in susceptible individuals [15,16]. H. axyridis, also known as the harlequin or multicolored Asian lady beetle, is characterized by elytral color polymorphism, with more than 200 different morphs described in the literature [17,18,19]. Morphs can generally be divided into two main groups, non-melanic (f. succinea) and melanic (f. conspicua, f. spectabilis and f. axyridis). This phenotypic diversity allows for local adaptation of species, suggesting that melanic forms have contributed to the successful global expansion of H. axyridis [20]. According to Honek et al. [19], non-melanic forms mainly occur in America [3], while polymorphic populations (non-melanic and melanic) occur in Europe. Although the European continent is climatically diverse, the observed differences in non-melanic forms were unrelated to the climatic characteristics of this area [19]. On several continents, the dispersal potential of H. axyridis is extremely high, estimated at 100 to 500 km per year [6]. In order to prevent further spread, it is important to investigate the dispersal routes of the pest so that control measures can be properly applied.
Along with genetic factors, complex abiotic and biotic conditions contribute to the global spread of invasive insects [21] and are important for the study of pest populations and their genetic variability. To study and detect this genetic variability and changes in population structure, genetic studies are conducted using morphometric markers such as geometric morphometrics [22,23]. This tool provides data by measuring the distance between well-defined specific points (markers) placed at the intersections of veins on the wings. Since geometric morphometrics has been frequently and successfully used in the last decade to study various body parts of many insect species, particularly the wings [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], it is an ideal tool for describing the phenotypic plasticity of H. axyridis.
This research aimed to identify forms of Asian lady beetle in Croatia, to analyze its wings using geometric morphometric methods and to determine the presence of sexual dimorphism and variability between populations and indicated forms.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

From the 10th to 20th of October 2019, adult H. axyridis were collected by hand from four different locations in Croatia when insects entered residential areas for hibernation (Figure 1).
Collected adults were stored in 70% ethanol pending further analyses. Species and sex were determined through the examination of the abdominal apex prior to wing dissection [33]. In addition to sex determination, H. axyridis individuals were also divided according to their forms (succinea, axyridis, conspicua and spectabilis) [13,17,34]. The left and right hind wings of each H. axyridis were removed and side-mounted using the fixing agent Euparal (Carl Roth GmbH + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) based on standard methods [35] for subsequent morphometric analysis. In total, 253 H. axyridis (129 males and 126 females) from 3 forms (182 f. succinea, 50 f. spectabilis, 21 f. conspicua) were analyzed via the methods described hereinafter. Because only one individual f. axyridis was collected, this form was not further analyzed.

2.2. Multivariate Analysis of Shape

Geometric morphometric analyses were performed using images of the left and right hind wings of H. axyridis individuals taken by a Leica DFC295 digital camera (3 megapixel) on a trinocular mount of a Leica MZ16a stereo microscope. The images were saved in JPEG format using the Leica Application Suite v3.8.0 (Leica Microsystems Limited, Heerbrugg, Switzerland).
Fifteen landmarks (LMs: anatomical homologous points) were digitized on each image using tpsDig v2.10 software [36] (Figure 2). X-Y coordinates were obtained for all landmarks and shape information was extracted using a Procrustes superimposition method [37,38]. This procedure removes size, position and orientation information to standardize each specimen based on centroid size. Shape variation among sex, forms and populations was analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) with the R package Momocs [39]. To assess the influence of allometry in the data, a multivariate regression of shape as the dependent variable (Procrustes coordinates) on centroid size (independent variable) was calculated. For differences between groups, a mixed classifier between forms (succinea, conspicua and spectabilis) and sex was created, and a canonical analysis of variance (CVA) was performed to find the form features that best discriminate between groups of specimens. All exploratory and analytic procedures were performed in the R environment [40] using MorphoJ v1.05d [41].

3. Results

Shape variation among the different forms of H. axyridis was quantified and visualized using PCA (Figure 3). The first two principal components (major sources of shape variation) account for 40.5% of the cumulative shape variance and the first five components account for 66.1% of the cumulative shape variance (Figure 4).
Almost half of the shape variance of all analyzed individuals can be represented by the first two dimensions of the shape space (PC1: 26.4% and PC2: 14.1%). The multivariate regression of shape on centroid size confirmed the absence of allometry in the data; therefore, correction was not required (1.84%). Figure 3 shows that PC2 delineates the shapes: the upper left section of the shape space corresponds to f. conspicua and the upper right section corresponds to f. spectabilis, with the lower middle section of the shape space mainly occupied by f. succinea. After superimposing an average shape for each shape group, the landmark shifts for each group can be distinguished. Conspicua is the longer, elongated form of the three with a posterior section of the wing, where landmark 15 has a shift to the proximal posterior and enlarges the wing. Also noticeable is the elongation of the anterior section with a shift of landmark 5. The forms succinea and spectabilis have a similar shape, but succinea has a smaller and wider shape where landmark 13 has a shift to the distal posterior in relation to the f. spectabilis; landmarks 4 and 5 shift closer and widen the shape at the anterior section of the wing. We assessed the presence of sexual shape dimorphism and found no evidence in the PCA, concluding that the wing shape is not a sexual trait. After calculating the CVA to graphically discriminate between populations based on H. axyridis forms, we found that three populations had the conspicua form (Figure 5A) and four populations had spectabilis and succinea forms (Figure 5B,C), which were also present in fewer individuals. There was also a striking similarity in shape between populations of the succinea form with a more superimposed graph (Figure 5C).

4. Discussion

In the present study, geometric morphometric methods were used to describe the forms of invasive H. axyridis in Croatia. These beetles use the forms mainly as a strategy to colonize different environments by changing certain sections of their morphology in relation to the colonized population. This study confirms the efficiency of geometric morphometrics as a tool for identifying minimal shape plasticity in wing shape of H. axyridis forms.
The ratio of males to females was 51%:49%, indicating a stable population in which both sexes are equally represented. Because this was the collection of the population entering overwintering, we also expected a higher proportion of females to be carriers of the future population.
The hindwings study represents the first use of geometric morphometric methods on H. axyridis. The following results confirm the efficiency of geometric morphometric methods to detect three different morphotypes (forms) in the Asian ladybird H. axyridis (Pallas 1773). As H. axyridis is an invasive species in Croatia, greater variability was expected between populations collected from geographically distant locations, as is the case with other invasive species (e.g., mosquitoes of the genus Aedes show great variability and exhibit sexual dimorphism [42], the invasive beetle Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte develops great variability in newly invaded areas [25,29] and numerous other invasive insects exhibit this trait) [32,43]. The studied wings of H. axyridis in our results did not show any level of allometry or sexual dimorphism, with the detected differences primarily due to the phenotypic variability in color forms. Nevertheless, the absence of sexual shape dimorphism in wings could be related to non-sexual traits, where sexual pressure is normally associated with the abdominal traits [44,45] or to the sex ration found in the population [46,47,48].
In H. axyridis, this variability was most evident at landmarks #4 and #5 (intersection of the radius posterior veins with the median flexion line) and #13 and #15 (medial bridge vein and anal fold). These landmarks are typically associated with important anatomical features used to distinguish between different wing morphotypes [27,29]. As an invasive species, H. axyridis is a generalist insect that significantly deforms its wings (bending and twisting) during flight while flapping similar to other flying beetles [49].
In general, this study found population variability in the studied area of continental Croatia that results from the development of localized phenotypic plasticity of the population. Phenotypic plasticity is defined as a change in phenotypic expression of a genotype in response to ecological factors [50] and has been shown to have significant evolutionary consequences [50,51]. Many studies suggest that newly invasive species exhibit higher levels of phenotypic plasticity, although empirical tests of this theory are very rare [52,53]. Insect wing plasticity can be caused by many factors; however, deformation can vary greatly from beat to beat [54]. This leads to variance in asymmetry between half-beats that cause wing deformation, important for the functionality of any aerodynamic cycle [55]. Because an invasive insect must adapt its morphology to the locality it invades, shape variability should be a key characteristic of H. axyridis. Given the high prevalence and invasiveness of H. axyridis, as well as its demonstrated ability to adapt to different ecological conditions (phenotypic plasticity), its spread and adaptation to previously uncharted areas and hosts should be expected in times of significant climate change.

5. Conclusions

Over the last decade, researchers have increasingly used the methods of geometric morphometrics to study multiple entomological phenomena and processes. This research contributes to the application of geometric morphometric methods in the study of invasive species by confirming the efficiency of geometric morphometrics as a tool for identifying minimal shape plasticity in wing shape and patterns of sexual shape dimorphism among invasive forms. Each form has its own specific morphotype that likely originated under the influence of genetic changes in the species. Although more detailed studies are needed for further clarity, this study demonstrates that geometric morphometric methods can analyze phenotypic differences in forms and reveal subtle phenotypic changes that explain genetic changes within an invasive H. axyridis species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L.; methodology, D.L. and I.P.Ž.; software, H.A.B.; validation, D.L. and H.A.B.; formal analysis, H.A.B. and M.Š.; investigation, M.Š.; resources, D.L. and I.P.Ž.; data curation, D.L. and H.A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L., H.A.B. and I.P.Ž.; writing—review and editing, D.L., H.A.B. and I.P.Ž.; visualization, H.A.B.; supervision, D.L.; project administration, D.L. and I.P.Ž.; funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roy, H.; Migeon, A. Ladybeetles (Coccinellidae). Chapter 8.4. In Alien Terrestrial Arthropods of Europe; Roques, A., Kenis, M., Lees, D., Lopez-Vaamonde, C., Rabitsch, W., Rasplus, J.Y., Roy, D.B., Eds.; BioRisk: Sofia, Bulagaria, 2010; Volume 4, pp. 293–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Roy, H.E.; Brown, P.; Majerus, M.E.N. Harmonia axyridis: A successful biocontrol agent or an invasive threat? In An Ecological and Societal Approach to Biological Control; Eilenberg, J., Hokkanen, H., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 295–301. [Google Scholar]
  3. Roy, H.E.; Brown, P.M.; Adriaens, T.; Berkvens, N.; Borges, I.; Clusella-Trullas, S.; Comont, R.F.; De Clercq, P.; Eschen, R.; Estoup, A.; et al. The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: Global perspectives on invasion history and ecology. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 997–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lombaert, E.; Guillemaud, T.; Thomas, C.E.; Lawson Handley, L.J.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Pang, H.; Goryacheva, I.; Zakharov, I.A.; Jousselin, E.; et al. Inferring the origin of populations introduced from a genetically structured native range by approximate Bayesian computation: Case study of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 4654–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brown, P.M.J.; Adriaens, T.; Bathon, H.; Cuppen, J.; Goldarazena, A.; Hägg, T.; Kenis, M.; Klausnitzer, B.E.M.; Kovar, I.; Loomans, A.J.M.; et al. Harmonia axyridis in Europe: Spread and distribution of a non-native coccinellid. BioControl 2008, 53, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Brown, P.M.J.; Thomas, C.E.; Lombaert, E.; Jeffries, D.L.; Estoup, A.; Lawson Handlex, L.-J. The global spread of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Distribution, dispersal and routes of invasion. BioControl 2011, 56, 623–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jansen, J.P.; Hautier, L. Ladybird population dynamics in potato: Comparison of native species with an invasive species, Harmonia axyridis. BioControl 2008, 53, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, P.M.J.; Roy, H.E. Native ladybird decline caused by the invasive harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis: Evidence from a long-term field study. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2017, 11, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koch, R.L.; Galvan, T.L. Bad side of a good beetle: The North American experience with Harmonia axyridis. BioControl 2008, 53, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kenis, M.; Nacambo, S.; Van Vlaenderen, J.; Zindel, R.; Eschen, R. Long Term Monitoring in Switzerland Reveals That Adalia bipunctata Strongly Declines in Response to Harmonia axyridis Invasion. Insects 2020, 11, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koch, R.L.; Burkness, E.C.; Wold Burkness, C.J.; Hutchison, W.D. Phytophagous Preferences of the Multicolored Asian Lady Beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for Autumn-Ripening Fruit. J. Econ. Entomol. 2004, 97, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ker, K.W.; Pickering, G.J.; Dris, R. Biology and control of the novel grapevine pest-the multicolored Asian lady beetle Harmonia axyridis. In Crops: Quality, Growth and Biotechnology; Dris, R., Ed.; WFL Publisher: Helsinki, Finland, 2005; pp. 991–997. [Google Scholar]
  13. Harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis. Available online: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/26515 (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  14. Roy, H.E.; Brown, P.M. Ten years of invasion: Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Britain. Ecol. Entomol. 2015, 40, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Goetz, D.W. Harmonia axyridis ladybug invasion and allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008, 29, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goetz, D.W. Seasonal inhalant insect allergy: Harmonia axyridis ladybug. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 9, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, C.C. Mosaic dominance in the inheritance of color patterns in the lady-bird beetle, Harmonia axyridis. Genetics 1946, 31, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gautier, M.; Yamaguchi, J.; Foucaud, J.; Loiseau, A.; Ausset, A.; Facon, B.; Gschloessl, B.; Lagnel, J.; Loire, E.; Parrinello, H.; et al. The Genomic Basis of Color Pattern Polymorphism in the Harlequin Ladybird. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28, 3296–3302.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Honek, A.; Brown, P.M.J.; Martinkova, Z.; Skuhrovec, J.; Brabec, M.; Burgio, G.; Evans, E.W.; Fournier, M.; Grez, A.A.; Kulfan, J.; et al. Factors determining variation in colour morph frequencies in invasive Harmonia axyridis populations. Biol. Invasions 2020, 22, 2049–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Michie, L.J.; Mallard, F.; Majerus, M.E.N.; Jiggins, F.M. Melanic through nature or nurture: Genetic polymorphism and phenotypic plasticity in Harmonia axyridis. J. Evol. Biol. 2010, 23, 1699–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garnas, J.R.; Auger-Rozenberg, M.-A.; Roques, A.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Wingfield, M.J.; Saccaggi, D.L.; Roy, H.E.; Slippers, B. Complex patterns of global spread in invasive insects: Eco-evolutionary and management consequences. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 935–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Camara, M.; Caro-Rian, H.; Ravel, S.; Dujardin, J.P.; Hervouet, J.P.; De Meeus, T.; Kagbadouno, M.S.; Bouyer, J.; Solano, P. Genetic and Morphometric Evidence for Population Isolation of Glossina palpalis gambiensis (Diptera: Glossinidae) on the Loos Islands, Guinea. J. Med. Entomol. 2006, 43, 853–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bouyer, J.; Ravel, S.; Dujardin, J.P.; De Meeus, T.; Via, L.; Thévenon, S.; Guerrini, L.; Sidibé, I.; Solano, P. Population structuring of Glossina palpalis gambiensis (Diptera: Glossinidae) according to landscape fragmentation in the Mouhoun river, Burkina Faso. J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Klingenberg, C.P.; Zaklan, S.D. Morphological Integration between Developmental Compartments in the Drosophila Wing. Evolution 2000, 54, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mikac, K.M.; Douglas, J.; Spencer, J.L. Wing shape and size of the western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) is related to sex and resistance to soybean-maize crop rotation. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 1517–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mikac, K.; Lemić, D.; Bažok, R.; Benitez, H.A. Wing shape changes: A morphological view of the Diabrotica virgifera virgifera European invasion. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 3401–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Benítez, H.A.; Lemic, D.; Bažok, R.; Gallardo-Araya, M.C.; Mikac, M.K. Evolutionary Directional Asymmetry and Shape Variation in Diabrotica v. virgifera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): An example using hind wings. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 111, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Benítez, H.A.; Lemic, D.; Bažok, R.; Bravi, R.; Buketa, M.; Püschel, T. Morphological Integration and Modularity in Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hind wings. Zool. Anz. 2014, 253, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lemic, D.; Benítez, H.; Bažok, R. Intercontinental effect on sexual shape dimorphism and allometric relationships in the beetle pest Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Zool. Anz. Comp. Zool. 2014, 253, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lemic, D.; Benitez, H.A.; Bjeliš, M.; Ordenes-Claveria, R.; Ninčević, P.; Mikac, K.M.; Pajač Živković, I. Agroecological effect and sexual shape dimorphism in medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) an example in Croatian populations. Zool. Anz. 2020, 288, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pajač Živković, I.; Lemic, D.; Mešić, A.; Barić, B.; Ordenes, R.; Benítez, H.A. Effect of fruit host on wing morphology in Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A first view using geometric morphometrics. Entomol. Res. 2018, 48, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pajač Živković, I.; Benítez, H.A.; Barić, B.; Drmić, Z.; Kadoić Balaško, M.; Lemic, D.; Dominguez Davila, J.H.; Mikac, K.M.; Bažok, R. Codling moth wing morphology changes due to insecticide resistance. Insects 2019, 10, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. McCornack, B.P.; Koch, R.L.; Ragsdale, D.W. A simple method for in-field sex determination of the multicolored Asian lady beetle Harmonia axyridis. J. Insect Sci. 2007, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Majerus, M.; Strawson, V.; Roy, H. The potential impacts of the arrival of the harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), in Britain. Ecol. Entomol. 2006, 31, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Upton, M.F.S.; Mantel, B.L. Methods for Collecting, Preserving and Studying Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods; The Australian Entomological Society Miscellaneous Pub: Sydney, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rohlf, F.J. TPSdig, v. 2.17; NY State University at Stony Brook: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Rohlf, F.J.; Slice, D. Extensions of the Procustes methods for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 1990, 39, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dryden, I.L.; Mardia, K.V. Statistical Shape Analysis; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bonhomme, V.; Picq, S.; Claude, J.; Gaucherel, C. Momocs: Outline analysis using R. J. Stat. Softw. 2014, 56, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  41. Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2011, 11, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mondal, R.; Pemola Devi, N.; Jauhari, R.K. Landmark-based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape among certain species Aedes mosquitoes in District Dehradun (Uttarakhand), India. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2015, 52, 122–128. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gidaszewski, N.; Baylac, M.; Klingenberg, C. Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melongaster subgroup. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Benítez, H.A.; Sukhodolskaya, R.A.; Órdenes-Clavería, R.; Avtaeva, T.A.; Kushalieva, S.A.; Saveliev, A.A. Measuring the Inter and Intraspecific Sexual Shape Dimorphism and Body Shape Variation in Generalist Ground Beetles in Russia. Insects 2020, 11, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Benítez, H.A.; Vidal, M.; Briones, R.; Jerez, V. Sexual Dimorphism and Morphological Variation in Populations of Ceroglossus chilensis (Eschscholtz, 1829) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 2010, 12, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  46. Benítez, H.A.; Avaria-Llautureo, J.; Canales-Aguirre, C.B.; Jerez, V.; Parra, L.E.; Hernandez, C.E. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism and its relationship with sex ratio in carabid beetles of Genus Ceroglossus Solier. Curr. Zool. 2013, 59, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Benítez, H.A.; Briones, R.; Jerez, V. Intra and Inter-population morphological variation of shape and size of the Chilean magnificent beetle, Ceroglossus chilensis in the Baker River Basin, Chilean Patagonia. J. Insect Sci. 2011, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Benítez, H.A.; Sanzana, M.-J.; Jerez, V.; Parra, L.E.; Hernandez, C.E.; Canales-Aguirre, C.B. Sexual Shape and Size Dimorphism in Carabid Beetles of the Genus Ceroglossus: Is Geometric Body Size Similar Between Sexes Due to Sex Ratio? Zool. Sci. 2013, 30, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ha, N.S.; Truong, Q.T.; Goo, N.S.; Park, H.C. Biomechanical properties of insect wings: The stress stiffening effects on the asymmetric bending of the Allomyrina dichotoma beetle’s hind wing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Schlichting, C.D. The role of phenotypic plasticity in diversification. In Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches; de Witt, T.J., Scheiner, S.M., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  51. Murren, C.J.; Denning, W.; Pigliucci, M. Relationships between vegetative and life history traits and fitness in a novel field environment: Impacts of herbivores. Evol. Ecol. 2005, 19, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hulme, P.E. Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: Is it all Jack? Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Davidson, A.M.; Jennions, M.; Nicotra, A.B. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A metaanalysis. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Combes, S.A. Materials, Structure, and Dynamics of Insect Wings as Bioinspiration for MAVs. In Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering; Blockley, R., Shyy, W., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wootton, R.J. Functional morphology of insect wings. Ann. Rev. 1992, 37, 113–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling sites of H. axyridis in Croatia.
Figure 1. Sampling sites of H. axyridis in Croatia.
Animals 11 02436 g001
Figure 2. H. axyridis hind wing average shape with landmarks by different forms. Colors represent the three common forms: green, conspicua (co); orange, spectabilis (sp); blue, succinea (su).
Figure 2. H. axyridis hind wing average shape with landmarks by different forms. Colors represent the three common forms: green, conspicua (co); orange, spectabilis (sp); blue, succinea (su).
Animals 11 02436 g002
Figure 3. Scatterplot of the principal component analysis of H. axyridis with the corresponding extreme wing shapes of every axis: x-axis=number of dimensions, y-axis=amount of shape variation. Scale represents first two dimensions. The colors represent the different invasive forms: green, conspicua (co); orange, spectabilis (sp); blue, succinea (su).
Figure 3. Scatterplot of the principal component analysis of H. axyridis with the corresponding extreme wing shapes of every axis: x-axis=number of dimensions, y-axis=amount of shape variation. Scale represents first two dimensions. The colors represent the different invasive forms: green, conspicua (co); orange, spectabilis (sp); blue, succinea (su).
Animals 11 02436 g003
Figure 4. Box plot of variation in the first five PC scores for different invasive forms in H. axyridis. The colors represent the different invasive forms: green, spectabilis (sp); red, conspicua (co); blue, succinea (su).
Figure 4. Box plot of variation in the first five PC scores for different invasive forms in H. axyridis. The colors represent the different invasive forms: green, spectabilis (sp); red, conspicua (co); blue, succinea (su).
Animals 11 02436 g004
Figure 5. Canonical variate analysis of the different populations by form in H. axyridis: (A) conspicua form; (B) spectabilis form; (C) succinea form. The colors represent the different populations: green, Osijek; purple, Sveti Ivan Zelina; black, Garešnica; orange, Ludbreg.
Figure 5. Canonical variate analysis of the different populations by form in H. axyridis: (A) conspicua form; (B) spectabilis form; (C) succinea form. The colors represent the different populations: green, Osijek; purple, Sveti Ivan Zelina; black, Garešnica; orange, Ludbreg.
Animals 11 02436 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lemic, D.; Pajač Živković, I.; Šuliček, M.; Benítez, H.A. Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773). Animals 2021, 11, 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082436

AMA Style

Lemic D, Pajač Živković I, Šuliček M, Benítez HA. Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773). Animals. 2021; 11(8):2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lemic, Darija, Ivana Pajač Živković, Matea Šuliček, and Hugo A. Benítez. 2021. "Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773)" Animals 11, no. 8: 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082436

APA Style

Lemic, D., Pajač Živković, I., Šuliček, M., & Benítez, H. A. (2021). Exploratory Analysis of Color Forms’ Variability in the Invasive Asian Lady Beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas 1773). Animals, 11(8), 2436. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082436

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop