1. Introduction
Herpesviridae consist of a widely distributed group of large DNA viruses that cause diseases in humans and other vertebrates. It is further divided into three sub-families,
Alpha-,
Beta- and
Gammaherpesvirinae, on the basis of their biological properties, proteins and sequences [
1]. Among them, Bovine herpes virus -1 (BoHV-1) is an important pathogen of cattle, which belongs to family
alphaherpesvirdea. The genomes of
herpesviruses encode a subset of genes that are homologous among all members of herpesviruses. One such gene encodes for a deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase). dUTPases belongs to a family of metalloenzymes. The primary function of herpesvirus dUTPases is to catalyze the dephosphorylation of dUTP to dUMP. In addition, they can reduce the dUTP pool and inhibit the incorporation of uracil into newly synthesized DNA by DNA polymerases [
2]. Based on their structure and specificity, dUTPases are generally divided into three subgroups: homotrimeric, monomeric, and homodimeric dUTPases. The homotrimeric UTPases is the largest and have high specificity for dUTP. The monomeric dUTPases, which are evolved from the trimeric dUTPases by gene duplication, were found only in herpesviruses [
3,
4]. The homodimeric dUTPases are different from the monomeric and homotrimeric dUTPases and have wide specificity for dUTP [
5]. This enzyme is mostly not necessary for viral replication in vitro [
6,
7,
8] but proved to be essential in vivo [
9,
10].
PRV
UL50 encodes a 33 kDa dUTPase that is homologous to the dUTPases of other alpha herpesviruses and dispensable for virus replication in infected cells [
11], while HSV-1 dUTPase encodes a 40 kDa protein [
12]. The mutation of the dUTPase in HSV-1 results in a decrease in its dUTPase activity, which prevents the incorporation of uracil into newly replicating viral DNA, and reduced viral replication and virulence [
13]. BoHV-1 also encodes a dUTPase known as
UL50, comprising 325 amino acids (34 kDa), which is homologous to other sequences in alphaherpesviruses. Previous studies investigating the functions of
UL50 (dUTPase) and some other BoHV-1 enzymes, such as ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase, were aimed to improve the understanding of BoHV-1 pathogenesis and explore their potential application as a useful antiviral target by [
14,
15,
16].
In the current study, we report the identification, cloning and molecular characterization analysis of the BoHV-1 UL50 gene and its prokaryotic expression. The UL50 protein was purified and used to immunize rabbits for the preparation of polyclonal antibody. Using the rabbit polyclonal antiserum, we examined the intracellular localization of the UL50 protein and the expression of the UL50 protein in BoHV-1-infected cells using immunofluorescence assay and Western blotting, respectively.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Statement
The animal experiment was conducted in Hubei Province, China, and adhered to the guidelines and regulations set forth by the China Hubei Province Science and Technology Department. The ethical considerations were taken into account and approved by the animal ethics committee of Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan, China. The research followed the Animal Welfare Regulations for the Administration of Experimental Animals (1988) and the Hubei Regulations for the Administration of Experimental Animals (2005).
2.2. Cell Lines
MDBK cells were grown in DMEM growth medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and a 2% penicillin and streptomycin (P/S) solution (Hyclone, Linz, Austria, Europe) at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO
2 incubator [
17,
18].
2.3. Construction of Expression Vector
For the construction of the expression vector, the entire coding sequence of UL50 (GenBank accession: AJ004801.1) were amplified from the DNA extracted from BoHV-1 strain IBRV HB06 (isolated by this lab and stored as no. CCTCC V201024 in the Tissue Culture Collection Center of China at Wuhan University) using primers UL50 (F) = 5′GCGGATCC ATGGCAAACAGCGCGGCGGCCACAA’3 and UL50 (R) = 5′CGAAGCTT TTACAGCCCGGTGGACCCAAAGCCG’3 using KOD-Plus (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The amplified PCR product was purified using the Cycle Pure Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Subsequently, after enzyme digestion using BamHI and HindIII the product was purified from gel using the TIANgel Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) and confirmed by DNA sequencing by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The purified enzyme-digested PCR products were ligated into the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX kg using the GST Gene Fusion System (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). The cloned product was confirmed by DNA sequencing (Shanghai, China) and named pGEX-UL50.
2.4. Expression and Purification of the GST-Tagged UL50 Fusion Protein
To obtain the highest yield of the fusion protein, the expression plasmids were introduced into Escherichia coli Rosetta (E. coli) strain BL21 (DE3) (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The expression of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was controlled by an isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible lac operator sequence. For induction, the UL50 bacterial culture was treated with 0.2 mM IPTG and incubated at 20 °C for 16 h. The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 RPM/10 min), then resuspended in 1× PBS and lysed through sonication. The GST fusion proteins were subsequently eluted from the lysate using Glutathione Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and solubilized in SDS loading buffer (containing 10% SDS, 50% glycerol, 0.05% bromophenol blue, 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8 and 100 mM DTT). Then, the pellet was boiled at 95 °C for 10 min and centrifuged briefly. The purified eluted protein was analyzed via sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 12% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
2.5. Rabbit Immunization and Antisera Development
Subsequently, the purified proteins were used to immunize rabbits, as described previously [
19]. Briefly, the protocol is described below. Three New Zealand white rabbits, specific-pathogen-free (NZW SPF), 6-to-9 months old, were used for the development of antiserum. For immunization, the purified proteins (0.5 mg) were injected intradermally with Freund’s Complete Adjuvant (FCA) (1:1) or Incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant (IFA). Subsequently, at day 14, 28 (0.5 mg) and 42 (0.1 mg) rabbit were each boosted intravenously. At day 60, the blood serum was collected from veins of the rabbits’ ears and stored at −80 °C for further use.
2.6. Western Blot Analysis
To analyze the reactivity and specificity of anti-UL50 antiserum Western blot analysis was performed, as described previously [
20]. Briefly, the wild-type BoHV-1 and recombinant fusion protein were separated on 12% (
w/v) SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Hong Kong, China). The membrane was blocked in 5% skim-milk-containing PBS-T (0.2% Tween-20 in PBS, PH 7.4) and probed with polyclonal rabbit antisera against
UL50 (1:3000 dilutions) or with a β-actin antibody as an internal reference (1:1000; Beyotime, Haimen, China). Membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies using goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 1:5000; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, MI, USA). Blots were detected using chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and images were obtained using film.
2.7. Immunofluorescence and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)
To examine the subcellular distribution of the UL50 protein, an immunofluorescence assay was conducted. MDBK cells were seeded on 25 mm glass coverslips in 6-well tissue culture plates and either left uninfected or infected with vBoHV1 virus at a multiplicity of infection of 3. At 18 and 24 h post-infection (hpi), the cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 and then blocked with a solution of 1% bovine serum albumin (Biosharp, Hefei, China) diluted in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. Subsequently, the coverslips were incubated with UL50 rabbit polyclonal antisera (diluted 1:100). Finally, the cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (diluted 1:1000; Beyotime). After each step, the cells were washed three times with 1× PBS. The cell nucleus was counterstained with DAPI (Beyotime), resulting in a blue coloration. The fluorescence was observed using a 152 Zeiss LSM 880 CLSM (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with a 63× objective.
2.8. Bioinformatics Analysis of the UL50 Protein
The amino acid sequence of BoHV-1 UL50 (GenBank accession: AJ004801.1) was retrieved from NCBI (
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The nucleotide sequences aligned and were characterize using Clustal-X program (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA). A similarity in amino acid sequences was evaluated using the basic local alignment search tool (
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi (accessed on 25 December 2016)). Phosphorylation sites, glycosylation sites, and the andantigenic peptide in the protein were predicted using
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhos/ (accessed on 25 December 2016),
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/ (accessed on 25 December 2016) and
https://omictools.com/protein-sequence-analysis (accessed on), [
21] respectively. The subcellular localization was predicted using Predict NLS program (
http://www.rostlab.org/services/predictNLS/ (accessed on 30 December 2016)) and LOCtree program (
http://www.rostlab.org/cgi/var/nair/loctree/query (accessed on 30 December 2016)), and signal peptides analysis was performed using SignalP version 3.0 (
http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/ (accessed on 30December 2016) [
22,
23,
24]. The 3D model of the UL50 protein was built using the free online source SWISS-MODEL (
https://swissmodel.expasy.org/ (accessed on 20 July 2023).
4. Discussion
The BoHV-1 UL50 gene encodes a dUTPase protein consisting of 323 amino acids. This enzyme is a cellular enzyme and is highly conserved across all herpesviruses. In our study, we focused on the cloning, expression, characterization and localization of the UL50 gene from the BoHV-1 strain. Through the multiple sequence alignment of UL50 (dUTPases) proteins, we observed that BoHV-1 UL50 shares significant similarity with other members of the herpesvirus family. Additionally, the UL50 protein sequence contains several conserved amino acid residues. Notably, it possesses eight conserved glycine residues, three conserved alanine residues, two aspartate residues, two serine residues, two arginine residues, and one valine residue. Previous research has identified five conserved amino acid motifs in dUTPases that are present in all herpesviruses, including BoHV-1. Our comparative analysis of amino acid sequences with other alphaherpesviruses revealed a close relationship between the BoHV-1 UL50 gene product and the corresponding proteins of the pseudorabies virus (PRV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) [
11,
26].
As a crucial initial step in understanding the UL50 protein, we successfully expressed the BoHV-1 UL50 gene in the E. coli strain BL21 (DE3). The recombinant UL50 plasmid was carefully verified through both restriction digestion and DNA sequencing. The sequencing analysis confirmed the absence of any nucleotide errors in the synthetic UL50 gene, ensuring its accuracy. To further characterize the UL50 protein, we generated polyclonal antiserum against UL50 by immunizing rabbits with the recombinant UL50 protein. Western blotting analysis using this antiserum revealed the specific recognition of the recombinant UL50 protein. These results indicated that the recombinant UL50 protein induced a strong immunological response, and the UL50 polyclonal antiserum exhibited a high level of specificity.
Furthermore, we investigated the reactivity of the UL50 polyclonal antiserum with BoHV-1-infected cells. Remarkably, the antiserum specifically reacted with BoHV-1-infected cells, demonstrating its ability to detect the UL50 gene product. The apparent molecular mass of the UL50 protein in bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1) was determined to be approximately 34 kDa, which aligns with the expected size of the UL50 protein. Interestingly, similar observations have been made in other herpesviruses, such as the pseudorabies virus (PRV), in which the UL50 protein was detected at approximately 33 kDa using specific polyclonal antiserum raised against PRV UL50 [
11]. Comparing the sizes of dUTPases across different herpesviruses reveals notable distinctions. For instance, the Epstein–Barr virus dUTPase has a molecular mass of approximately 30 kDa [
27]. On the other hand, the equine herpesvirus 1 dUTPase is larger, measuring about 36 kDa [
28], while the HSV-1 dUTPase is even larger, at approximately 41 kDa [
12]. The dUTPase of varicella-zoster virus exhibits an even greater size, measuring around 44 kDa [
29]. Herpesvirus dUTPases are notably distinct from dUTPases found in HSV-1 and the varicella-zoster virus due to their significantly larger size. Understanding the differences in size and structural characteristics of dUTPases among herpesviruses can provide valuable insights into their roles and functions in viral replication, nucleotide metabolism and pathogenesis.
These findings highlight the successful expression and characterization of the BoHV-1 UL50 gene product. The production of polyclonal antiserum against UL50 allowed for the specific detection of the protein in Western blotting experiments, indicating its immunogenicity and the high specificity of the generated antiserum. Furthermore, the reactivity of the antiserum with BoHV-1-infected cells further confirms the presence and localization of the UL50 protein during viral infection. The consistency of these observations with PRV UL50 reinforces the significance and conservation of UL50 proteins across related herpesviruses [
11]. These results showed that the polyclonal antiserum had a high level of reactivity and specificity.
Furthermore, we used the generated antiserum to investigate the intracellular localization of the BoHV-1 UL50 protein. An indirect immunofluorescence assay combined with confocal microscopy was performed on BoHV-1-infected cells to examine the protein’s localization. Our data indicated that the UL50 protein was predominantly localized in the perinuclear cytoplasmic region and the cytoplasm of infected cells. Notably, we did not observe UL50 localization in the nucleus. Similar findings have been reported for HSV-2, in which UL50 (dUTPase) was found to be localized in the cytoplasm of infected cells [
30]. In contrast, previous studies have reported conflicting results for BoHV-1 UL50 (dUTPase), as it was found to be mainly confined to the cytoplasm but was also detectable in the nucleus. In HSV-1, UL50 (dUTPase) was primarily found in the nucleus [
26]. The UL50 gene of cytomegalovirus encodes the pUL50 protein and also localizes primarily in the nuclear envelope. There, pUL50 plays a critical role in facilitating the nuclear egress of CMV particles, allowing the virus to spread and establish infection [
31]. In pseudorabies virus (PRV), the UL50 gene encodes the pUL50 protein, which is involved in the nuclear egress of viral particles. While the specific localization of pUL50 in PRV has not been extensively studied, it is expected to localize primarily in the nuclear membrane, similar to its localization in related alphaherpesviruses, like HSV-1.
Interestingly, our bioinformatics analysis revealed the absence of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the BoHV-1 UL50 protein. The absence of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the UL50 protein suggests that it does not possess a specific sequence motif responsible for targeting the protein to the nucleus. NLSs are typically present in proteins that need to enter the nucleus for their proper function. Additionally, protein localization prediction suggested that the UL50 protein is predominantly located in the cytoplasm. This prediction aligns with our immunofluorescence subcellular localization results. However, considering that the replication of all herpesviruses occurs in the nucleus, the implications of these diverse observations remain unknown.
While the focus of this study was on BoHV-1 UL50 localization, it is important to note that UL50 proteins in other herpesviruses may exhibit different intracellular distributions. For instance, UL50 (dUTPase) localization has been reported to be primarily in the cytoplasm of HSV-2-infected cells. In contrast, the UL50 protein of BoHV-1 has been observed to be mainly confined to the cytoplasm but also detectable in the nucleus. Furthermore, in HSV-1, UL50 (dUTPase) was found to be predominantly localized in the nucleus [
11].
The localization of the UL50 protein may vary across different viruses within the herpesvirus family. These variations in UL50 localization patterns among different herpesviruses could be attributed to several factors, including differences in viral replication strategies, host cell interactions and the specific functions of UL50 in each virus. The presence or absence of nuclear localization signals (NLS) in the UL50 proteins and interactions with other viral or cellular factors may also play a role in determining their subcellular localization.
Further studies are necessary to explore the underlying mechanisms and functional significance of UL50 localization in different herpesviruses. Comparative analyses across a broader range of herpesviruses will help elucidate the factors influencing UL50 localization and its implications for viral replication and pathogenesis.
Our study provides valuable insights into the intracellular localization of the BoHV-1 UL50 protein. The protein was found to be predominantly localized in the perinuclear cytoplasmic region and cytoplasm of infected cells, similar to findings in HSV-2. The absence of an NLS in the BoHV-1 UL50 protein, along with its cytoplasmic localization prediction, supports our experimental results. However, the underlying reasons for the differential localization patterns observed among different herpesviruses, and the significance of these variations, remain to be elucidated. Further research is needed to unravel the implications of UL50 protein localization and its precise role in BoHV-1 infection. Investigating its interactions with other viral and host proteins, its potential translocation to the nucleus at specific stages and the impact of its localization on viral replication and pathogenesis will contribute to a deeper understanding of BoHV-1 biology.