Next Article in Journal
Non-Invasive Wildlife Disease Surveillance Using Real Time PCR Assays: The Case of the Endangered Galemys pyrenaicus Populations from the Central System Mountains (Extremadura, Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Drivers of Palatability for Cats and Dogs—What It Means for Pet Food Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Placental HSD17B1 Expression and Its Regulation in Various Mammalian Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

LPS Administration during Fertilization Affects Epigenetic Inheritance during Embryonic Development

Graduate School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences and Agriculture, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(7), 1135; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071135
Submission received: 13 December 2022 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The long-term effect of exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxins during fertilization in mammals has not been clarified. In this study, we examined the influence of LPS on early embryonic development and fetal development in mice. The uteruses of mice were examined for the expression of genes related to the inflammatory response. The expression of Il-1β and Il-6 increased following the administration of 200 and 1000 µg/kg LPS. Exposure to LPS during in vitro fertilization (IVF) significantly decreased the embryonic developmental rate. A concentration of 100 µg/kg LPS significantly increased the placental weight and fetal crown–rump length (CRL), whereas a concentration of 200 µg/kg LPS significantly decreased the placenta weight and fetal weight in vivo at 18.5 days post-coitus (dpc). In summary, this study demonstrated that LPS exposure during fertilization causes abnormal embryonic phenotypes and fetal development in mice. Maternal endotoxins may affect epigenetic inheritance in embryonic development from the early to late stages of pregnancy.

Abstract

Intrauterine inflammation can cause infertility by disrupting reproductive function. The pathogenesis underlying this process may primarily involve endotoxins from lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are produced by Gram-negative bacteria. However, the long-term effects of endotoxins in mammalian pregnancy following LPS exposure during fertilization have not been clarified. In this study, we performed experiments to analyze the influence of LPS on early embryonic development and fetal development in mice. Mice uteruses were examined for the expression of genes related to the inflammatory response. The expression of Il-1β and Il-6 increased following the administration of 200 and 1000 µg/kg LPS. Exposure to LPS using in vitro fertilization (IVF) significantly decreased the embryonic developmental rate. A concentration of 100 µg/kg LPS significantly increased the placental weight and fetal crown –rump length (CRL), whereas a concentration of 200 µg/kg LPS significantly decreased the placenta weight and fetal weight in vivo. These findings indicate that maternal LPS during fertilization affects fetal development until the late stage of pregnancy. Thus, maternal endotoxins may affect epigenetic inheritance during embryonic development from the early to late stages of pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy is a complex process in which the maternal immune system has to tolerate the allogenic fetus to achieve a successful natal outcome [1]. Recently, several studies have focused on the relationship between disruption of the immune system balance in pregnancy by endotoxins and infertility and chronic intrauterine infections [2,3]. Endotoxins are a silent consequence of bacterial infections and are associated with various negative impacts on reproductive function in humans and livestock animals [4,5,6]. Generally, bacterial infections of the genital tract are linked to inflammatory disease in the uterus and ovaries [7]. Among bacteria that induce pathogenic infections, Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, secrete lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxins. LPS consists of a lipid and carbohydrate chain and is one of the elements constituting the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. The carbohydrate chain consists of a hydrophilic core saccharide and an O-antigenic structure [8,9]. LPS is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on the cell surface, which forms a co-receptor with CD14 and MD2. The binding of LPS to TLR4 activates the nuclear signaling pathway for the transcription factor complex nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), which in turn produces pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [8]. The production of LPS by bacteria during infection has been reported to trigger the expression of several genes, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, which are involved in inflammatory responses induced by TLR signaling pathways [10,11,12].
Studies have reported that LPS has harmful effects on the female genital tract [13] and intrauterine germ cells, namely the sperms and oocytes. In dairy cows, LPS decreased the mRNA expression of StAR and CYP17, gonadotropin receptors associated with steroid hormone cascades, and levels (concentration) of the steroid androgen and progesterone [14,15,16]. LPS levels were also correlated with the concentrations of PGE2 and E2 or P4 in ovarian follicles and uteruses with inflammatory uterine diseases [17,18,19,20]. In mice, LPS increased the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines Il-6, Ptgs2, and Tnf-α in cumulus cells [21]. Furthermore, late-stage LPS administration at 15 days post-coitus (dpc) increased the rate of abnormal fetal development [22]. In pigs, LPS decreased male reproductive performance by affecting sperm motility and sperm viability [23]. These studies suggest that endotoxemia might cause harmful immune responses during embryonic development in mammals.
However, whether maternal LPS exposure during fertilization directly affects the oocytes or acts via the uterus during pregnancy has not been clarified in mammals. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of LPS exposure at fertilization on early embryo and fetal development. We analyzed the effect of LPS on early embryonic development using a culture system of mice embryos and used fertilized mice as a mammalian model to evaluate the impact of LPS on pregnancy and fetal development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. LPS Treatment

LPS (Escherichia coli LPS, serotype O111:B4) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Animal Ethics and Care

The experimental procedures complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (approval number 18-121, 22-173). The animals had free access to food and water throughout the experiment and were housed in a control room with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle at a controlled temperature (23 ± 2 °C) and humidity (50 ± 5%).

2.3. Maternal Effect of LPS Administration in the Uterus

Female ICR mice (10–12 weeks old) were used to examine the effects of LPS administration on the uterus. Mice received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of LPS at concentrations of 0, 10, 100, 200, or 1000 μg/kg. Then, 6 h after LPS administration the mice were sacrificed and blood samples were collected from the heart to measure the LPS concentration. Thereafter, the uterus was removed and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Total RNA extracted from the uterus was used for gene expression analysis by immunoreaction. To analyze the immune response, the uterine color after LPS injection was measured using a CM-700d spectrophotometer (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The color indicators included the following: L*: lightness, a*: redness, and b*: yellowness. Furthermore, to assess the morphology of the uterus, samples were fixed in 10% formalin (066-06821, Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan), dehydrated using an ethyl alcohol series, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Images were obtained using a ZEISS Axio Zoom microscope.V16 for Biology (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and the software ZEN 3.1 pro (Carl Zeiss AG).

2.4. Measuring LPS Concentration in Blood Samples

LPS concentrations in the blood were measured using PYROSTAR Neo (294-36731, Fujifilm Wako) and Control Standard Endotoxin (293-16541, Fujifilm Wako).

2.5. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

IVF was performed as previously described [24]. Young female ICR mice (3–6 weeks old) and adult male ICR mice (14–20 weeks old) were used for fertilization. Female mice received an i.p. injection of 7.5 IU eCG (serotropin, Asuka Animal Health Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to stimulate follicular growth, followed by an injection of 7.5 IU hCG (gonadotropin 3000, Asuka Animal Health Inc.) 49 h later to stimulate superovulation. At 15–16 h after hCG injection, the mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation and the cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from the mouse oviductal ampulla. Cumulus cells were removed using 0.3 mg/mL hyaluronidase in a droplet of 150 μL Toyoda-Yokoyama-Hosi (TYH) medium (DR01031, LSI Medience Inc., Tokyo, Japan) [25], which was covered with Paraffin Liquid (26114-75, Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The denuded oocytes were washed three times with droplets of 80 μL TYH medium. After washing, the denuded oocytes were inseminated in a droplet of 150 μL TYH medium with LPS concentrations of 0, 1, or 10 μg/mL as the fertilization medium. A pre-experiment was performed to finalize the LPS concentrations for IVF and final concentrations of 1 and 10 μg/mL in the fertilization medium were chosen. Sperms were recovered from the cauda epididymis and incubated to capacitation in a droplet of 150 μL TYH medium under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation, the sperms were introduced into the fertilization medium with the denuded oocytes and incubated to achieve fertilization under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 6 h. At 6 h after insemination, oocytes that exhibited two distinct pronuclei were considered to be fertilized. The fertilized eggs were washed four times with modified Whitten’s (mW) medium and transferred to droplets of 80 μL mW culture medium (DR01032-K, LSI Medience Inc.) [26,27] without LPS. The fertilization rate was calculated based on the number of collected oocytes and fertilized eggs. The embryonic development rate of the fertilized eggs was measured by observing the 2-cell, 4-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages. In total, 23 mice were used as oocytes donors for IVF. The IVF experiment was repeated six times.

2.6. LPS Administration In Vivo Using Mice

Female and male ICR mice (11–19 weeks old) were used to examine the effect of LPS exposure at fertilization on late embryonic development. Briefly, 25 female mice were mated with male mice overnight and the vaginal plug was examined the following morning (control group, n = 7; 10 µg/kg LPS group, n = 6; 100 µg/kg LPS group, n = 6; and 200 µg/kg LPS group, n = 6). The presence of a vaginal plug was classified as 0.5 dpc for the pregnant mouse. On the same day, mice received an i.p. of 0, 10, 100, or 200 μg/kg LPS. The pregnant mice were sacrificed at 18.5 dpc and the litter size, fetal resorption rate, placenta weight, fetal weight, and crown–rump length (CRL) were recorded. Furthermore, fetal tissue without internal organs was collected and used for gene expression analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis markers.

2.7. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA from tissue samples collected from the LPS administration experiments was extracted using TRIzol reagent (15596018, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The total RNA concentration was measured using a Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total RNA (1 µg) was treated with DNase and converted to cDNA with random primers (48190011, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and SuperScript Ⅱ (18064022, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a GeneAtlas thermal cycler 482 (4990902, ASTEC, Fukuoka, Japan).
Real-time PCR was performed using the SsoAdvancedTM Universal SYBR®︎ Green Supermix (1725271, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and LightCycler®︎ 96 system (05815916001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each PCR reaction was performed at 95 °C for 30 s (denaturation), 95 °C for 10 s, and 35 cycles at 60 °C for 60 s (amplification). The primer sequences used are listed in Table 1. We used β-actin (ACTB) as the internal control, and the relative expression level of genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method.

2.8. Formatting of Mathematical Components

The equation for color value is as follows:
ΔE*ab = (ΔL*2 + Δa*2 + Δb*2)/2
ΔL* = (each LPS group L*) − (control group L*)
Δa* = (each LPS group a*) − (control group a*)
Δb* = (each LPS group b*) − (control group b*)

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the free software R version 4.2.2 (https://www.r-project.org/, access on 20 March 2023). Statistical analyses of LPS concentration, gene expression, and fetal development were conducted using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test. A comparison of the mean fertilization and embryo developmental rate were performed using chi-squared tests. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). p < 0.05 was considered significant. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the following factors: LPS concentration, fetal parameters (placental weight, fetal weight, and CRL), and gene expression (six genes).

3. Results

3.1. Maternal Effect of LPS Administration

To examine the effect of LPS in uteruses, mice were administered 0, 10, 100, 200, or 1000 µg/kg LPS by i.p. injection. The high concentration of 1000 μg/kg LPS was administered to identify whether LPS clearly induced an acute inflammation. The administration of 100, 200, and 1000 µg/kg LPS significantly increased the concentration of LPS in plasma compared with the control group (Figure 1A, p < 0.01). To assess the inflammatory reaction, uterus color was measured by spectrophotometry. The value of L* (lightness) and a* (redness) displayed an inflammatory-like appearance in an LPS dose-dependent manner (Figure 1B,C). The expression of genes related to inflammatory responses was examined in the uteruses. Compared with the control group, the expression of Tnf-α did not significantly change following LPS administration, whereas that of Il-1β and Il-6 demonstrated an increasing trend following the administration of 200 µg/kg LPS (p < 0.1) and significantly increased with 1000 µg/kg LPS (Figure 2, p < 0.001).

3.2. Effect of LPS on Early Embryonic Development In Vitro

To investigate the effect of LPS exposure at fertilization on early development, we administered 0, 1, or 10 μg/mL LPS to denuded oocytes for fertilization. We calculated the development rate at the 2-cell, 4-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages (Table 2). The fertilization rate of the 1 and 10 μg/mL LPS groups were 78.8% and 76.9%, respectively, and significant differences were not observed compared with the control group. The development rate of the 1 μg/mL LPS group showed no differences compared with the control group at all development stages. However, the development rate of the 10 μg/mL LPS group displayed a decreasing trend in the 2-cell stage (95.0%, p < 0.1) compared with the control group (99.4%) and a significant decrease after the 4-cell stage (4-cell 83.0%, morula 71.0%, and blastocyst 62.0%, p < 0.05) compared with the control group (4-cell 93.6%, morula 84.9%, and blastocyst 82.0%).

3.3. Effect of LPS on Late Embryonic Development In Vivo

To examine the effect of LPS exposure at fertilization on embryonic development, we injected 0, 10, 100, or 200 µg/kg LPS into pregnant mice at 0.5 dpc. The pregnant mice were sacrificed at 18.5 dpc, and the effects of LPS exposure on litter size, fetal resorption rate, placental weight, fetal weight, and CRL before birth were examined (Figure 3A). The litter size and resorption rate were not affected at any concentration of LPS at 0.5 dpc (Figure 3B). However, 100 µg/kg LPS significantly increased the placental weight (0.118 ± 0.002 g) and CRL (2.487 ± 0.015 cm) compared with the control group (placental weight: 0.111 ± 0.002 g, fetal weight: 1.488 ± 0.016 g, CRL: 2.410 ± 0.014 cm) at 18.5 dpc (Figure 3C,E, p < 0.05). We also found that 200 µg/kg LPS significantly decreased the placental weight (0.104 ± 0.001 mg) and fetal weight (1.431 ± 0.011 g) compared with the control group (Figure 3C,D, p < 0.05). This indicated that the administration of LPS at 0.5 dpc affected late embryonic development. To reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects, gene expression of the fetal tissue was analyzed after LPS administration. The expression of Ki67, which is related to the cell cycle, showed a decreasing tendency at 200 µg/kg LPS compared with the control group (Figure 4, p < 0.1), whereas the expression of p53 and caspase4, which are related to apoptosis, were not affected by LPS.

3.4. Principal Component Analysis

To comprehensively assess the effect of LPS administration at 0.5 dpc, we performed PCA using LPS concentration, fetal parameters, and gene expression in either the maternal uterus or fetal tissue. The three principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues >1.0 covered 90.79% of the cumulative proportion (PC1: 55.86%, PC2: 21.25%, and PC3: 7.06%). The PC1 factors mainly included the LPS concentration and Il-1β, Il-6, Ki67, p53, and caspase4 expression (based on the largest loading values); PC2 included placental weight and CRL; and PC3 included fetal weight and Tnf-α expression (Table 3). Plotting PC1×PC3 showed a clear separation between 100 and 200 µg/kg LPS concentrations and the control group for fetal weight (Figure 5A). The plot of PC2 × PC3 showed separation between each LPS-administered group for placental weight, fetal weight, and CRL but not for LPS concentration (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

This study investigated the effects of LPS administration at fertilization on early embryonic and fetal development in pregnancy. LPS administration in mice increased gene expression of Il-1β and Il-6 and induced inflammation in the uterus. Inflammatory uterus diseases, for example metritis and endometritis, are known to cause implantation failure and abnormal fetal development [28,29]. Therefore, embryonic development might be affected by inflammation of the reproductive tract during fertilization and implantation induced by LPS endotoxemia. Furthermore, previous IVF studies have reported that embryos from the 1-cell stage expressed TLR4, which is associated with pro-inflammatory cytokines [21,30]. Following LPS administration, these cells showed increased expression of the cytokine-related genes Il-6 and Tnf-α, and these cytokines decreased embryonic development among mammals [21,31,32]. However, in this study we used denuded oocytes to analyze the direct effect of LPS on IVF. Our results showed that oocytes without a cumulus exhibited decreased embryonic development rates following LPS administration in vitro, which suggests that LPS directly affects embryonic development.
Other studies have demonstrated that overexpression of the inflammatory cytokines Il-1β and Il-6 induced cell proliferation in primary culture cells [33,34]. Furthermore, a previous study reported that LPS administration decreased the cell number of blastocysts, although the development rate of embryos did not change [35]. In this study, fetal development increased (particularly the placental weight and CRL) with 100 µg/kg LPS, whereas the placental and fetal weight decreased with 200 µg/kg LPS. Furthermore, 200 µg/kg LPS induced a decreasing trend in the gene expression of Ki67 in the fetal tissue. In Figure 5A, the PCA results on the factors affected by LPS concentrations were clearly divided into three groups. In Figure 5B, the groups were affected by the fetal phenotype, such as the placental weight, fetal body weight, and CRL, without the LPS factor. As a result, LPS exposure at fertilization altered embryonic development and the immune response in uteruses, resulting in the phenomenon of abnormal fetal development. The difference in the effects with each LPS concentration was consistent with previous studies using animal models and cultured cells [36,37,38,39]. Previous reports have indicated that Ki67 is related to the initiation of the cell cycle [40,41]. The results presented here suggest that high concentrations of LPS affect the cell cycle and induce abnormal embryo development.
There are many studies on the impact of LPS on pregnancy, however, these were mainly performed in the late stages of pregnancy in mammals [22,37,39,42]. In contrast, in this study LPS was administered at fertilization (0.5 dpc), which is the early stage of embryogenesis. We did not observe changes in litter size and fetal resorption until 18.5 dpc, but placental and fetal weight and CRL were affected. This result suggested that LPS exposure at fertilization impacts fetal development until late-stage pregnancy. Therefore, we speculate that LPS might cause more critical damage related to fetal mortality at the late stages, when placentas have formed, than during the early stages of pregnancy. Inflammation of the placenta in humans has been reported to increase abnormal fetal phenotypes, for example diminished fetal growth, fetal death, and preterm birth [13]. However, we did not evaluate the expression of genes related to cytokines and the survival of placental tissue.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the present study demonstrated that LPS exposure at fertilization leads to the incidence of abnormal phenotypes during embryonic and fetal development in mice. The maternal endotoxin effect might impact the epigenetic inheritance of embryonic development from the early to late stages of pregnancy. This finding in the mouse model links the maternal environment before pregnancy to fetal development, and the effects are likely associated with infertility and developmental disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K., T.S. and Y.M.; methodology, S.K. and Y.M.; formal analysis, S.K., E.Y., K.T, and Y.M.; investigation, S.K., E.Y., K.T. and Y.M.; resources, H.W. and M.S.; data curation, S.K., M.K. and Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K. and Y.M.; writing—review and editing, S.K., E.Y., H.W., M.K., M.S. and Y.M.; supervision, Y.M.; funding acquisition, T.S. and Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Akiyama Life Science Foundation 2018 (102-045).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine (approval number 18-121, 22-173).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff from the animal facility in Obihiro University for providing daily maintenance and care for the animals. We also thank Tetsuka for providing the material. We would also like to thank Editage (www.editage.com, accessed on 20 March 2023) for English language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ander, S.E.; Diamond, M.S.; Coyne, C.B. Immune Responses at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Sci. Immunol. 2019, 4, eaat6114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Witkin, S.S.; Linhares, I.M.; Bongiovanni, A.M.; Herway, C.; Skupski, D. Unique Alterations in Infection-Induced Immune Activation during Pregnancy. BJOG 2011, 118, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Giakoumelou, S.; Wheelhouse, N.; Cuschieri, K.; Entrican, G.; Howie, S.E.M.; Horne, A.W. The Role of Infection in Miscarriage. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016, 22, 116–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bidne, K.L.; Dickson, M.J.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H.; Keating, A.F. Disruption of Female Reproductive Function by Endotoxins. Reproduction 2020, 155, R169–R181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sheldon, I.; Price, S.; Cronin, J.; Gilbert, R.; Gadsby, J. Mechanisms of Infertility Associated with Clinical and Subclinical Endometritis in High Producing Dairy Cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mierzejewski, K.; Kurzyńska, A.; Kunicka, Z.; Klepacka, A.; Golubska, M.; Bogacka, I. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Ligands Regulate the Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Porcine Endometrium during LPS-Induced Inflammation. Theriogenology 2022, 187, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldon, I.M.; Cronin, J.; Goetze, L.; Donofrio, G.; Schuberth, H.J. Defining Postpartum Uterine Disease and the Mechanisms of Infection and Immunity in the Female Reproductive Tract in Cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Deb, K.; Chaturvedi, M.M.; Jaiswal, Y.K. Comprehending the Role of LPS in Gram-Negative Bacterial Vaginosis: Ogling into the Causes of Unfulfilled Child-Wish. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2004, 270, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bertani, B.; Ruiz, N. Function and Biogenesis of Lipopolysaccharides. EcoSal Plus 2018, 8, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Araya, A.V.; Pavez, V.; Perez, C.; Gonzalez, F.; Colombo, A.; Aguirre, A.; Schiattino, I.; Aguillón, J.C. Ex Vivo Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Induced TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6 and PGE 2 Secretion in Whole Blood from Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with or without Aggressive Periodontitis. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2003, 14, 128–133. [Google Scholar]
  11. Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Toll-like Receptors in Innate Immunity. Int. Immunol. 2005, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. TLR Signaling. Semin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, C.J.; Romero, R.; Chaemsaithong, P.; Kim, J.S. Chronic Inflammation of the Placenta: Definition, Classification, Pathogenesis, and Clinical Significance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S53–S69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Suzuki, C.; Yoshioka, K.; Iwamura, S.; Hirose, H. Endotoxin Induces Delayed Ovulation Following Endocrine Aberration during the Proestrous Phase in Holstein Heifers. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2001, 20, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lavon, Y.; Leitner, G.; Moallem, U.; Klipper, E.; Voet, H.; Jacoby, S.; Glick, G.; Meidan, R.; Wolfenson, D. Immediate and Carryover Effects of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Toxin-Induced Mastitis on Follicular Function in Dairy Cows. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 942–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fumie, M.; Maya, H.; Akio, M.; Takashi, S. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Inhibits Steroid Production in Theca Cells of Bovine Follicles In Vitro: Distinct Effect of LPS on Theca Cell Function in Pre-and Post-Selection Follicles. J. Reprod. Dev. 2014, 60, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mateus, L.; Lopes da Costa, L.; Diniz, P.; Ziecik, A.J. Relationship between Endotoxin and Prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGFM) Concentrations and Ovarian Function in Dairy Cows with Puerperal Endometritis. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2003, 76, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herath, S.; Williams, E.J.; Lilly, S.T.; Gilbert, R.O.; Dobson, H.; Bryant, C.E.; Sheldon, I.M. Ovarian Follicular Cells Have Innate Immune Capabilities That Modulate Their Endocrine Function. Reproduction 2007, 134, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Magata, F.; Horiuchi, M.; Echizenya, R.; Miura, R.; Chiba, S.; Matsui, M.; Miyamoto, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shimizu, T. Lipopolysaccharide in Ovarian Follicular Fluid Influences the Steroid Production in Large Follicles of Dairy Cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 144, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Heidari, M.; Kafi, M.; Mirzaei, A.; Asaadi, A.; Mokhtari, A. Effects of Follicular Fluid of Preovulatory Follicles of Repeat Breeder Dairy Cows with Subclinical Endometritis on Oocyte Developmental Competence. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 205, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shimada, M.; Hernandez-Gonzalez, I.; Gonzalez-Robanya, I.; Richards, J.A.S. Induced Expression of Pattern Recognition Receptors in Cumulus Oocyte Complexes: Novel Evidence for Innate Immune-like Functions during Ovulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2006, 20, 3228–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xu, D.X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, L.; Ning, H.; Chen, Y.H.; Zhang, C. Effects of Low-Dose Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Pretreatment on LPS-Induced Intra-Uterine Fetal Death and Preterm Labor. Toxicology 2007, 234, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okazaki, T.; Mihara, T.; Fujita, Y.; Yoshida, S.; Teshima, H.; Shimada, M. Polymyxin B Neutralizes Bacteria-Released Endotoxin and Improves the Quality of Boar Sperm during Liquid Storage and Cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kawase, Y.; Tachibe, T.; Kamada, N.; Jishage, K.; Watanabe, H.; Suzuki, H. Male Advantage Observed for in Vitro Fertilization Mouse Embryos Exhibiting Early Cleavage. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2021, 20, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Toyoda, Y.; Yokoyama, M. The Early History of the TYH Medium for in Vitro Fertilization of Mouse Ova. J. Mamm. Ova. Res. 2016, 33, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Whitten, W.K.; Biggers, J.D. Complete Development in Vitro of the Pre-Implantation Stages of the Mouse in a Simple Chemically Defined Medium. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1968, 17, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wu, H.T.; Chou, C.K.; Lin, C.S.; Huang, M.C. Effects of Glucose Concentration on in Vitro Fertilization in BALB/c Mice. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2003, 38, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kitaya, K.; Matsubayashi, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Nishiyama, R.; Takaya, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Yasuo, T.; Yamada, H. Chronic Endometritis: Potential Cause of Infertility and Obstetric and Neonatal Complications. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Murtinger, M.; Wirleitner, B.; Spitzer, D.; Bralo, H.; Miglar, S.; Schuff, M. Diagnosing Chronic Endometritis: When Simplification Fails to Clarify. Hum. Reprod. Open 2022, 2022, hoac023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rose, J.A.; Rabenold, J.J.; Parast, M.M.; Milstone, D.S.; Abrahams, V.M.; Riley, J.K. Peptidoglycan Induces Necrosis and Regulates Cytokine Production in Murine Trophoblast Stem Cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 66, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lauren, R.J.; Char, E.F.; Scott, W. Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibits In Vitro Bovine Embryo Development through a Prostaglandin Mediated Mechanism. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Li, M.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Yao, Y. Interleukin-6 Regulates Expression of Fos and Jun Genes to Affect the Development of Mouse Preimplantation Embryos. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2018, 44, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Baptista, F.I.; Aveleira, C.A.; Castilho, Á.F.; Ambrósio, A.F. Elevated Glucose and Interleukin-1 β Differentially Affect Retinal Microglial Cell Proliferation. Mediators Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 4316316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Brandt, A.M.; Kania, J.M.; Reinholt, B.M.; Johnson, S.E. Human IL6 Stimulates Bovine Satellite Cell Proliferation through a Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3)-Dependent Mechanism. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2018, 62, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wiliams, C.L.; Teeling, J.L.; Perry, H.V.; Fleming, T.P. Mouse Maternal Systemic Inflammation at the Zygote Stage Causes Blunted Cytokine Responsiveness in Lipopolysaccharide-Challenged Adult Offspring. BMC Biol 2011, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wenbio, T.; Tryo, L.O.; Liu, S.-H.; Bazer, F.W. Intrauterine Infusion of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Prior to Mating Has No Adverse Effect on Fertility, Fetal Survival and Fetal Development. J. Reprod. Immuol. 1999, 42, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Garnier, Y.; Kadyrov, M.; Gantert, M.; Einig, A.; Rath, W.; Huppertz, B. Proliferative Responses in the Placenta after Endotoxin Exposure in Preterm Fetal Sheep. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 138, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lv, J.; Zeng, J.; Zhao, W.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cai, S.; Hu, G.; Chen, Y. Cdc42 Regulates LPS-Induced Proliferation of Primary Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells via ERK Pathway. Microvasc. Res. 2017, 109, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, J.; Miao, H.; Li, X.; Hu, Y.; Sun, H.; Hou, Y. Curcumin Inhibits Placental Inflammation to Ameliorate LPS-Induced Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice via Upregulation of Phosphorylated Akt. Inflamm. Res. 2017, 66, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, X.; Kaufman, P.D. Ki-67: More than a Proliferation Marker. Chromosoma 2018, 127, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sobecki, M.; Mrouj, K.; Colinge, J.; Gerbe, F.; Jay, P.; Krasinska, L.; Dulic, V.; Fisher, D. Cell-Cycle Regulation Accounts for Variability in Ki-67 Expression Levels. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 2722–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bao, J.; Zou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Garfield, R.E.; Liu, H. Nicotine Protects Fetus against LPS-Induced Fetal Growth Restriction through Ameliorating Placental Inflammation and Vascular Development in Late Pregnancy in Rats. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20190386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Effect of LPS on the immune response in the uterus. (A) Concentration of LPS in the plasma (n = 3). The values are shown as mean ±SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (B) Histological examination of uteruses after administration of LPS. (C) Measurement of uterus color using spectrophotometry. L*: lightness, a*: redness, b*: yellowness.
Figure 1. Effect of LPS on the immune response in the uterus. (A) Concentration of LPS in the plasma (n = 3). The values are shown as mean ±SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (B) Histological examination of uteruses after administration of LPS. (C) Measurement of uterus color using spectrophotometry. L*: lightness, a*: redness, b*: yellowness.
Animals 13 01135 g001
Figure 2. Gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in the uterus after administration of LPS. Mice were administered 0, 10, 100, 200, and 1000 µg/kg LPS and uteruses were collected after 6 h. The values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). † p < 0.1, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in the uterus after administration of LPS. Mice were administered 0, 10, 100, 200, and 1000 µg/kg LPS and uteruses were collected after 6 h. The values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). † p < 0.1, *** p < 0.001.
Animals 13 01135 g002
Figure 3. Effect of LPS for fetal development. Mice were administered 0, 10, 100, or 200 µg/kg LPS at 0.5 dpc (control n = 7, each LPS group n = 6). The fetal parameters were measured at 18.5 dpc. (A) Appearance of the litters in each group. (B) Litter size and fetal resorption rate. (C) Placental weight. (D) Fetal weight. (E) Crown–rump length. The values are shown as mean ± SEM (control n = 97, 10 µg/kg LPS n = 74, 100 µg/kg LPS n = 67, 200 µg/kg LPS n = 95) and * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of LPS for fetal development. Mice were administered 0, 10, 100, or 200 µg/kg LPS at 0.5 dpc (control n = 7, each LPS group n = 6). The fetal parameters were measured at 18.5 dpc. (A) Appearance of the litters in each group. (B) Litter size and fetal resorption rate. (C) Placental weight. (D) Fetal weight. (E) Crown–rump length. The values are shown as mean ± SEM (control n = 97, 10 µg/kg LPS n = 74, 100 µg/kg LPS n = 67, 200 µg/kg LPS n = 95) and * p < 0.05.
Animals 13 01135 g003
Figure 4. Gene expression of cell cycle and apoptosis markers in fetal tissue. The fetal tissues were collected at 18.5 dpc (n = 3) from litters of pregnant mice that had been administered 0, 100, and 200 µg/kg LPS. The values are shown as the mean ± SEM. † p < 0.1.
Figure 4. Gene expression of cell cycle and apoptosis markers in fetal tissue. The fetal tissues were collected at 18.5 dpc (n = 3) from litters of pregnant mice that had been administered 0, 100, and 200 µg/kg LPS. The values are shown as the mean ± SEM. † p < 0.1.
Animals 13 01135 g004
Figure 5. PCA performed using LPS concentration, fetal parameters, and gene expression. (A) Plot of PCA using PC1 and PC3. (B) Plot of PCA using PC2 and PC3. ○: control, △: 100 µg/kg LPS, ◇: 200 µg/kg LPS.
Figure 5. PCA performed using LPS concentration, fetal parameters, and gene expression. (A) Plot of PCA using PC1 and PC3. (B) Plot of PCA using PC2 and PC3. ○: control, △: 100 µg/kg LPS, ◇: 200 µg/kg LPS.
Animals 13 01135 g005
Table 1. Primer pairs used in the gene expression analysis.
Table 1. Primer pairs used in the gene expression analysis.
GenePrimerSize
(bp)
Annealing
Temperature (°C)
Accession No.
Tnf-αF
R
AAAGATGGGGGGCTTCCAGA
GATGAGAGGGAGGCCATTTGG
15760NM_013693.3
Il-1βF
R
GCCACCTTTTGACAGTGATGAG
AAGGTCCACGGGAAAGACAC
21960NM_008361.4
Il-6F
R
GGATACCACTCCCAACAGACC
GGTACTCCAGAAGACCAGAGGAA
25160NM_001314054.1
Ki67F
R
GAGGCTGAGACATGGAGACATA
TATCTGCAGAAAGGCCCTTGG
24560NM_001081117.2
p53F
R
TGGAGGAGTCACAGTCGGATAT
ACACTCGGAGGGCTTCACTT
18060NM_011640.3
caspase4F
R
TAGACTCATTTCCTGCTTCCGG
AGGTTGCCCGATCAATGGTG
12860NM_007609.3
ACTBF
R
CGTGCGTGACATCAAAGAGAA
TGGATGCCACAGGATTCCAT
20160NM_007393.5
Table 2. Fertilization and development rate in IVF.
Table 2. Fertilization and development rate in IVF.
LPS
Concentration
(µg/mL)
No. of
Denuded
Oocyte
Development Stages
Oocytes
Fertilized
2-Cell4-CellMorulaBlastocyst
Control213172
80.8%
171
99.4%
161
93.6%
146
84.9%
141
82.0%
1132104
78.8%
104
100%
97
93.3%
83
79.8%
75
72.1%
10130100
76.9%
95
95.0% †
83
83.0% *
71
71.0% *
62
62.0% **
LPS was administered at 0, 1, and 10 µg/mL. † p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Proportion and variables of the three principal components (90.79%).
Table 3. Proportion and variables of the three principal components (90.79%).
PC1PC2PC3
Eigenvalue5.5862.1251.368
Proportion (%)55.8621.257.06
Cumulative (%)55.8677.1190.79
Variables
LPS concentration0.4100.0810.175
Placental weight−0.037−0.452−0.047
Fetal weight−0.084−0.4900.493
CRL0.043−0.5670.303
Tnf-α−0.049−0.396−0.669
Il−1β0.422−0.040−0.330
Il−60.4050.1020.204
Ki67−0.418−0.050−0.117
p530.386−0.176−0.265
caspase40.3930.1610.239
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.; Yoneda, E.; Tomita, K.; Kayano, M.; Watanabe, H.; Sasaki, M.; Shimizu, T.; Muranishi, Y. LPS Administration during Fertilization Affects Epigenetic Inheritance during Embryonic Development. Animals 2023, 13, 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071135

AMA Style

Kim S, Yoneda E, Tomita K, Kayano M, Watanabe H, Sasaki M, Shimizu T, Muranishi Y. LPS Administration during Fertilization Affects Epigenetic Inheritance during Embryonic Development. Animals. 2023; 13(7):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Sangwoo, Erina Yoneda, Kisaki Tomita, Mitsunori Kayano, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Motoki Sasaki, Takashi Shimizu, and Yuki Muranishi. 2023. "LPS Administration during Fertilization Affects Epigenetic Inheritance during Embryonic Development" Animals 13, no. 7: 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071135

APA Style

Kim, S., Yoneda, E., Tomita, K., Kayano, M., Watanabe, H., Sasaki, M., Shimizu, T., & Muranishi, Y. (2023). LPS Administration during Fertilization Affects Epigenetic Inheritance during Embryonic Development. Animals, 13(7), 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop