Next Article in Journal
Body Condition Score and Milk Production on Conception Rate of Cows under a Small-Scale Dairy System
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Silver Nanoparticle Administration on Productive Performance, Blood Parameters, Antioxidative Status, and Silver Residues in Growing Rabbits under Hot Climate
Previous Article in Journal
Ease of Handling and Physiological Parameters of Stress, Carcasses, and Pork Quality of Pigs Handled in Different Group Sizes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myxomatosis and Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease: A 30-Year Study of the Occurrence on Commercial Farms in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/ani9100799
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acetate Affects the Process of Lipid Metabolism in Rabbit Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue

by
Lei Liu
,
Chunyan Fu
and
Fuchang Li
*
Key Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology and Disease Control and Prevention of Shandong province, Department of Animal Science, Shandong Agricultural University, Shandong 271018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(10), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100799
Submission received: 24 September 2019 / Revised: 4 October 2019 / Accepted: 7 October 2019 / Published: 14 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disease and Immunology of Rabbits)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lots of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced in the rabbit cecum after dietary fiber fermentation. In addition to supplying energy, SCFAs could regulate lipid metabolism, but the related mechanism is still unknown. In our experiment, we study the effect of acetate (major SCFAs, 70–80%) on rabbit lipid metabolism. The present study found that acetate alters the process of lipid metabolism in rabbit liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, and inferred some signaling pathways related to the process. A mechanism of acetate-regulating lipid metabolism is useful to identify the function in fat metabolism of microbiological products from rabbit and rabbit processes for nutrition metabolism.

Abstract

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (a microbial fermentation production in the rabbit gut) have an important role in many physiological processes, which may be related to the reduced body fat of rabbits. In the present experiment, we study the function of acetate (a major SCFA in the rabbit gut) on fat metabolism. Ninety rabbits (40 days of age) were randomly divided into three groups: a sham control group (injection of saline for four days); a group experiencing subcutaneous injection of acetate for four days (2 g/kg BM per day, one injection each day, acetate); and a pair-fed sham treatment group. The results show that acetate-inhibited lipid accumulation by promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation and inhibiting fatty acid synthesis. Activated G protein-coupled receptor 41/43, adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 signal pathways were likely to participate in the regulation in lipid accumulation of acetate. Acetate reduced hepatic triglyceride content by inhibiting fatty acid synthesis, enhancing fatty acid oxidation and lipid output. Inhibited peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and activated AMPK and ERK1/2 signal pathways were related to the process in liver. Acetate reduced intramuscular triglyceride level via increasing fatty acid uptake and fatty acid oxidation. PPARα was associated with the acetate-reduced intracellular fat content.

1. Introduction

In mammals, adipose is the major tissue of fat deposition. Fatty acids may be synthesized in adipose tissue, released into circulation, and delivered to other tissues. In muscle tissue, fatty acids are an important substrate for oxidation to supply energy. The liver is a center of fatty acid metabolism and lipid circulation via lipoprotein synthesis [1]. Hepatocytes accumulation of lipid droplets is a consequence of alterations in synthesis and oxidation of fatty acids and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion [2].
Lots of factors are involved in the metabolism of fatty acids. Carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1) and fatty acid synthase (FAS) are respectively the rate-limiting enzymes of fatty acid oxidation and synthesis [3]. Hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) hydrolyzes triglyceride (TG) in adipose tissue [4]. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) catalyzes the hydrolysis of triglycerides in skeletal muscle [5]. Fatty acid transport protein (FATP) and fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) could promote cellular fatty acids uptake and transport [6]. Some signaling pathways are also associated with the regulation of fatty acids metabolism. The activation of adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) increases fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle, inhibits fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis in liver and lipogenesis process in adipose tissue [7]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has a high expression level in liver, adipose and skeletal muscle tissues, which is also involved in fatty acid metabolism [8]. PPARγ expression sites are mainly in adipose tissue, macrophage and mammary tissue [8,9]. In adipose tissue, PPARγ, as a transcriptional regulatory factor, could regulate various genes expression related to lipid metabolism (e.g., stearoyl-CoA synthetase and acyl-CoA synthetase) [10]. In addition, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) comprise a family of related serine/threonine protein kinases, such as c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNK), extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and p38 MAPK, which play pivotal roles in many essential cellular processes. Recent studies show that ERK could regulate the adipogenic process [11]. A p38 inhibitor treatment decreases the process of adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 [12]. The inhibition of JNK signal attenuates the high-fat diet-induced obesity [13,14]. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase, is involved in regulating various cells metabolism and development. Rapamycin, a mTOR inhibitor, inhibits strongly the adipogenic process in mouse adipocyte by affecting the clonal expansion of pre-adipocytes [15,16], which suggests that mTOR is necessary for adipogenic program in mammals [17].
Lots of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced in the rabbit cecum after dietary fiber fermentation [18]. In addition to supplying energy, SCFAs have been known to have regulatory effects on insulin and glucagon secretion, gastrointestinal motility, and cell proliferation and differentiation [19,20,21,22]. Previous studies showed that acetate (a major SCFA, 70–80%) was a substrate for lipogenesis and stimulated adipocyte differentiation [23]. However, more studies are needed to clarify the regulatory mechanism of acetate on lipid metabolism. In the present study, we investigate the effect of acetate on the lipid metabolism and related signaling pathways in rabbit skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissues and determine the possible pathways related to the regulation of acetate on lipid metabolism in rabbits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Protocol and Sample Collection

At 40 days of age, 90 Hyla rabbits of similar body weight (1513 ± 10 g) were divided into three groups (30 rabbits per group): a sham treatment group (injection of saline at 8:00 AM, one injection each day, control); a group that experienced subcutaneous injection of acetate for four days at 8:00 AM, (2 g/kg of body weight per day, one injection each day, acetate) [24]; and a pair-fed sham treatment group with feed consumption equivalent to that of the acetate-treated rabbits on the previous day (pair-fed). Rabbits were individually housed in self-made cages (60 × 40 × 40 cm). Temperature was maintained at 20–23 °C. A light regime of 12 (light)/12 (dark) was applied. The diets were formulated according to the recommendation of de Blas and Mateos [25], and the feed was made into 4 mm pellets by using pressure. All rabbits received a starter diet containing 17% crude protein, 18% crude fiber and 10.55 MJ/kg of digestible energy. All rabbits had free access to feed and water during the rearing period. Body weight and feed intake were recorded daily during the period of experiment. All study procedures were approved by the Shandong Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee (SDAUA-2018-059) and were in accordance with the Guidelines for Experimental Animals established by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Beijing, China). Rabbits received the first injection at the age of 40 days and the last injection at the age of 43 days. After the last injection, eight rabbits from each group were fasted for 4 h, and then 5 mL of blood was collected from the heart of each fasted rabbit. Plasma was obtained after centrifugation at 380 g for 10 min at 4 °C and stored at −25 °C. These eight rabbits were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the liver, foreleg muscle, hindleg muscle, longissimus dorsi muscle, scapular fat and perirenal fat were weighed and collected. After being snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, these tissue samples were stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Measurements

Plasma VLDL concentration was determined using the method described by Barter and Lally [26]. Tissues were disrupted and homogenized in isopropanol (1 g samples: 9 mL isopropanol). After centrifuging at a speed of 8000 g for 10 min, the supernatant was isolated. TG concentration in tissues and plasma was measured spectrophotometrically using commercial diagnostic kits (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). The operational process of Western blotting and quantitative real time PCR fully followed the instructions in our previous description [27]. The primers’ sequences are listed in Table 1.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All of the data collected were subjected to one-way ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure as post hoc test. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Data are presented as means ± standard error. For food intake and body weight gain, n = 30; for ratio and yield of tissue or organ, TG and VLDL concentrations, gene and protein expression, n = 8. Means were considered significant at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Acetate on Rabbit Performance

Acetate administration significantly decreased daily feed intake, body weight gain and longissimus dorsi muscle yield compared with the control (Figure 1, p < 0.05). Acetate administration significantly decreased the scapular fat yield, foreleg yield and hindleg yield compared with the control and pair-fed counterparts (p < 0.05) while having no effect on the perirenal fat yield and liver yield (p > 0.05).

3.2. Effect of Acetate on TG and VLDL Concentrations in Tissue or Plasma

The concentrations of triglyceride in plasma, longissimus dorsi muscle and scapular fat and cholesterol in plasma were lower in acetate-treated group than in control and pair-fed groups (Figure 2, p < 0.05), while the changes in concentrations of triglyceride in foreleg and hindleg muscles were not significant (p > 0.05). Compared with the control, acetate decreased the triglyceride levels in liver and perirenal fat (p < 0.05). Acetate treatment significantly increased the plasma VLDL concentration compared with the control and pair-fed groups (p < 0.05).

3.3. Effect of Acetate on Genes Expression Related Lipid Metabolism in Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue

As shown in Figure 3, the FAS and PPARα mRNA levels in liver decreased following the acetate treatment compared with the control and pair-fed rabbits (p < 0.05). In contrast to the negative effect of acetate on FAS and PPARα genes expression, the acetate induced an increase in CPT1 gene expression in liver (p < 0.05). In skeletal muscle, the acetate significantly increased the mRNA levels of FABP, FATP, CPT1 and PPARα compared with the control and pair-fed groups (p < 0.05). Compared with the control, the acetate injection significantly increased the LPL gene expression in skeletal muscle (p < 0.05). In adipose tissue, the acetate treatment significantly decreased the genes expression of FAS and LPL compared with the control and pair-fed rabbits (p < 0.05) but significantly increased the genes expression of CPT1, HSL, PPARγ, G protein-coupled receptor (GPR) 41 and GPR43 (p < 0.05). The acetate treatment had no significant effect on PPARα mRNA levels in adipose tissue (p > 0.05).

3.4. Effect of Acetate on Protein Expression Related Lipid Metabolism in Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue

When compared with the control and pair-fed groups, acetate significantly increased the protein levels of p-AMPK in liver and adipose tissue, p-mTOR in adipose tissue, and p-ERK in liver and adipose tissue (Figure 4, p < 0.05), while significantly decreasing the protein levels of p-ERK in skeletal muscle and p-JNK in liver (p < 0.05). No significant changes were found in the protein levels of p-AMPK in skeletal muscle, p-mTOR in liver and skeletal muscle, p38 MAPK in liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, or p-JNK in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue between the acetate-treated group and the control group (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

We demonstrated the effect of acetate administration on fat metabolism in rabbits for the first time. Our data suggested that: (1) acetate-inhibited lipid accumulation promotes lipolysis and fatty acids oxidation and inhibits fatty acids synthesis; (2) acetate reduced the hepatic TG content by inhibiting fatty acid synthesis while enhancing fatty acid oxidation and lipid output; (3) acetate decreased intramuscular TG concentration via increasing the uptake and oxidation of fatty acids; and (4) AMPK and ERK1/2 signaling in liver, PPARα signaling in skeletal muscle, and GPR41/43, AMPK, mTOR and ERK1/2 signaling in adipose tissue were associated with acetate-regulated fat metabolism.

4.1. Acetate-Inhibited Lipid Accumulation

A previous study revealed that SCFAs mediate various physiological functions involved in homoeostasis [28]. In line with those studies [27], our study showed that acetate decreased the feed intake, body weight gain, and fat and muscle weight, which suggested an altered energy distribution that attenuates lipid deposition after acetate administration. The decrease in the absolute weight of adipose tissue is related to increased HSL gene expression. Studies showed that HSL could possess triacylglycerol lipase activity and appears to be the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesteryl ester and diacylglycerol hydrolysis in adipose tissue. [29]. Meanwhile, we found that acetate decreased the TG concentration of adipocyte, which is related to the alteration of CPT1 and FAS genes expression. Decreased FAS mRNA levels after acetate treatment implies that acetate could inhibit fatty acid synthesis [30], and increased CPT1 mRNA levels after acetate treatment suggest an enhanced mitochondrial uptake of fatty acyl-CoA for β-oxidation [31].

4.2. Acetate Reduced the Hepatic Lipid Content

The liver is a center of fatty acid metabolism and lipid circulation via lipoprotein synthesis in mammals. Fatty acids synthesis in liver is tightly controlled by nutritional conditions [32]. FAS gene expression was significantly decreased in liver after acetate treatment in our study, indicating that the process of hepatic fatty acids synthesis is significantly weakened by acetate. Meanwhile, up-regulated CPT1 mRNA levels in the acetate group indicate an increase in the fatty acid catabolic process. VLDL is the major form of synthetic lipid in liver releasing into blood. In our study, acetate significantly increased the plasma VLDL concentration compared with the control and pair-fed groups, indicating that acetate promotes lipid output from the liver. The results suggest that acetate decreases hepatic TG content by inhibiting the fatty acid anabolic process and increasing fatty acid catabolism and output of triglycerides from liver. This result is in line with the previous studies in rats [33].

4.3. Acetate Decreased the Intramuscular Lipid Content

Fatty acids are an important fuel source for oxidative metabolism in muscles [34]. However, the research on regulation of acetate in lipid metabolism in muscle is scarce. Several physiological steps are involved in lipid uptake, transport and oxidation in muscle. FATP and FABP could promote the uptake and use of long-chain fatty acids [35]. Our study shows that acetate increased the genes expression of FATP and FABP in skeletal muscle, indicating that the process of fatty acids uptake in muscle cells may be increased, which subsequently causes the drastic decrease in plasma TG. In addition, our study shows that acetate increases lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation by up-regulating LPL and CPT1 genes expression. Therefore, skeletal muscle could receive abundant energy supply. We also found that acetate decreased the intramuscular TG content, which implies that the increased speed after acetate treatment in lipid transport and oxidation was greater than the lipid uptake.

4.4. PPAR Signaling Was Associated with the Acetate-Regulated Lipid Metabolism

PPARα, a nuclear receptor, regulates lipid metabolism in liver and skeletal muscle. PPARα gene major expresses in peroxisome and mitochondrion and regulates the fatty acids β-oxidation and uptake, and lipoprotein assembly and transport [35,36]. PPARα deficiency in mice severely impairs fatty acid uptake and β-oxidation [36,37]. In humans and rats, PPARα could stimulate CPT1 gene expression through a peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) [38]. In line with a previous study [39], PPARα gene expression showed a similar tendency to the CPT1 gene in muscle after acetate treatment. Besides, the effect of acetate on PPARα gene expression occurs in a tissue-specific manner. Acetate increased the PPARα gene expression in muscle, decreased the PPARα gene expression in liver, and did not alter the PPARα gene expression in adipose tissue. The results indicate that acetate influences lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle, presumably through the PPARα signaling pathway, but not in adipose tissue. Additionally, we noted the opposite tendency of PPARα with CPT1 gene expression and lipid output in liver after acetate treatment, indicating the complexity of the acetate regulation of PPARα gene expression. The function of the PPARα signaling pathway in acetate regulation of lipid metabolism in liver tissue needs further study.
PPARγ, highly expressed in both white adipose tissue and brown adipose tissue, could cause adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitivity [40]. Our study shows that acetate up-regulated the PPARγ gene expression in adipose tissue, in line with previous research [41,42]. Couvigny et al. [41] found that SCFAs are linked to metabolic reprogramming and immune functions via up-regulating PPARγ gene expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Our results imply that acetate enhances the adipocyte differentiation via up-regulating PPARγ gene expression in adipose tissue [42].

4.5. MAPK Signaling Was Associated with the Acetate-Regulated Lipid Metabolism

MAPKs play key roles in many intracellular processes (e.g., proliferation and differentiation). Recent results showed ERK1/2 could regulate PPARγ gene expression and promote adipogenic differentiation of adipocytes [11,43]. Regulation of acetate in PPARγ transcription and adipocyte differentiation in adipose tissue may be associated with the ERK1/2 signal pathway. Menendez et al. [44] found that FAS gene inhibition could activate the ERK1/2 signal. Therefore, the opposite changes in FAS gene expression and p-ERK1/2 protein in liver and adipose tissue imply that ERK1/2 plays a key role in acetate-inhibited fatty acid synthesis. A recent study in adipocytes shows that HSL is a downstream target of ERK1/2 [45]. In our experiment, lipolysis stimulated by acetate may be via ERK1/2 signal pathway. In rodent skeletal muscle, ERK1/2 inhibition prevents the contraction-induced increase in plasma membrane FATP content and lipid uptake [46]. We could not confirm the function of ERK1/2 in acetate-regulated lipid use in skeletal muscle because acetate decreased the p-ERK1/2 protein in skeletal muscle, which is the opposite performance with the FATP and FABP genes expression.
Previous studies showed the regulatory role of p38 MAPK in lipid metabolism, but the results were inconsistent. Engelman et al. [12] found the positive role for p38 MAPK in adipogenesis, which may be related to the decreases in PPARγ and C/EBPβ gene expression. The inhibition of p38MAPK increases adipogenesis from embryonic to adult stages, which may be associated with the enhancing C/EBPβ transcriptional activity [47]. Meanwhile, the p38 MAPK chemical inhibitor treatment decreases bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced adipocyte formation, which is associated with decreases in PPARγ and C/EBPβ transactivation activities [48]. In our study, p38 MAPK protein was not altered by acetate compared with the control and pair-fed groups in liver, muscle and adipose tissues, which suggests that p38 MAPK may be not the major target in acetate-regulating lipid metabolism.
Obesity is associated with abnormally elevated JNK activity, and the absence of JNK results in substantial protection from obesity-induced insulin resistance [13]. JNK deficiency enhances fatty acid use in cultured myotubes [49]. Our study shows that acetate decreases the p-JNK protein levels in liver, which is in accordance with earlier research [50]. The result suggests that the JNK signal pathway is involved in the regulation of acetate in fatty acid use in liver but not in muscle and tissue.

4.6. GPR41/43 Signaling Pathway Was Associated with the Acetate-Regulated Lipid Metabolism in Adipose Tissue

GPR41 and 43 are highly expressed in adipose tissue of pigs and mice [42,51]. In our study, we found also high expression of GPR41 and 43 in adipose but did not detect the GPR41 and 43 genes in liver and muscle, which is in agreement with the findings of Fu et al. [52]. In 3T3-L1 cells, GPR43 blocking inhibited the PPARγ transcription [53]. Thus, GPR41/43 might play an important role in lipid metabolism in adipose tissue. The effect of acetate in GPR41/43 gene expression is species-specific. Hong et al. [53] found that acetate stimulated adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells via GPR43 but not GPR41. However, GPR41/43 was not involved in acetate-regulated adipogenesis in porcine stromal-vascular fraction cells [42]. However, acetate increased significantly the GPR41 and 43 genes expression in our experiment, which suggests that GPR41 and 43 probably participate in the regulatory process of acetate in lipid metabolism in rabbit adipose tissue.

4.7. AMPK Signaling Pathway Was Associated with the Acetate-Regulated Lipid Metabolism in Adipose Tissue

AMPK, a crucial cellular energy sensor, could stimulate of fatty acid oxidation and restrain intracellular lipid accumulation [54]. AMPK could regulate the fatty acid synthesis process via repressing FAS gene expression, and also promote the β-oxidation process of long-chain fatty acids via activating CPT1 [55,56]. SCFAs may indirectly regulate AMPK activity via oxidation to generate adenosine triphosphate and may also directly alter AMPK activity as a signal substance in some cells such as colonocytes [57]. To investigate the function of AMPK in acetate-regulating lipid metabolism, we measured p-AMPKα (Thr172), which is essential for AMPK activity [58]. We found that the effect of acetate on p-AMPK levels is tissue-specific that p-AMPKα levels increased after acetate administration in liver and adipose tissue but not in muscle tissue, indicating that AMPK signaling may be involved in the acetate-regulated fatty acid metabolism in liver and adipose tissue but not in muscle tissue.

4.8. mTOR Signaling Was Associated with the Acetate-Regulated Lipid Metabolism in Adipose Tissue

Recent research showed that the mTOR pathway plays an important role in the synthesis and secretion of triacylglycerol [59]. Inhibition of mTOR signaling reduced intracellular lipid accumulation in goose and fish hepatocytes and 3T3-L1 adipocytes [15,59,60]. In our study, we found a tissue-specific effect of acetate on mTOR protein expression. In rabbits, adipose tissue is more sensitive in response to acetate than liver and muscle tissues. mTOR controls the adipogenesis process by regulating the PPARγ gene expression [61]. The concurrent increase in mTOR protein and PPARγ gene expression after acetate exposure indicate that the mTOR signal may be related to acetate-caused adipocyte differentiation.

5. Conclusions

Acetate decreased the lipid synthesis and accumulation and increased the fatty acids use of skeletal muscle. AMPK, ERK1/2 signaling in liver, PPARα signaling in skeletal muscle, and GPR41/43, AMPK, mTOR and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in adipose tissue were associated with acetate-reduced intracellular fat content.

Author Contributions

L.L. designed, researched and wrote the paper; C.F. executed the experiment and collected data; F.L. offered financial support and had primary responsibility for final content.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2018QC004, ZR2018MC025), Modern Agro-industry Technology Research system (CARS-43-B-1) and Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (2019GNC106007).

Conflicts of Interest

Lei Liu, Chunyan Fu and Fuchang Li have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Frayn, K.N.; Arner, P.; Yki-Järvinen, H. Fatty acid metabolism in adipose tissue, muscle and liver in health and disease. Essays Biochem. 2006, 42, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, L.; Li, C.; Fu, C. Dietary Niacin supplementation suppressed hepatic lipid accumulation in rabbits. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 9, 1748–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thupari, J.N.; Pinn, M.L.; Kuhajda, F.P. Fatty acid synthase inhibition in human breast cancer cells leads to malonyl-CoA-induced inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and cytotoxicity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 285, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Suzuki, J.; Shen, W.J.; Nelson, B.D.; Patel, S.; Veerkamp, J.H.; Selwood, S.P.; Murphy, G.M., Jr.; Reaven, E.; Kraemer, F.B. Absence of cardiac lipid accumulation in transgenic mice with heart-specific HSL overexpression. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 281, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pollare, T.; Vessby, B.; Lithell, H. Lipoprotein lipase activity in skeletal muscle is related to insulin sensitivity. Arter. Thromb. 1991, 11, 1192–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Urban, T.; Mikolásová, R.; Kuciel, J.; Ernst, M.; Ingr, I. A study of associations of the H-FABP genotypes with fat and meat production of pigs. J. Appl. Genet. 2002, 43, 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lage, R.; Diéguez, C.; Vidal-Puig, A.; López, M. AMPK: A metabolic gauge regulating whole-body energy homeostasis. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chinetti, G.; Fruchart, J.C.; Staels, B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): Nuclear receptors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation. Inflamm. Res. 2000, 49, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Proenca, R.; Maffei, M.; Barone, M.; Leopold, L.; Friedman, J.M. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature 1994, 372, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kersten, S. Mechanisms of nutritional and hormonal regulation of lipogenesis. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Camp, H.S.; Tafuri, S.R. Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 10811–10816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Engelman, J.A.; Lisanti, M.P.; Scherer, P.E. Specific inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase block 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32111–32120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hirosumi, J.; Tuncman, G.; Chang, L.; Görgün, C.Z.; Uysal, K.T.; Maeda, K.; Karin, M.; Hotamisligil, G.S. A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance. Nature 2002, 420, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jaeschke, A.; Czech, M.P.; Davis, R.J. An essential role of the JIP1 scaffold protein for JNK activation in adipose tissue. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1976–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Polak, P.; Cybulski, N.; Feige, J.N.; Auwerx, J.; Rüegg, M.A.; Hall, M.N. Adipose-specific knockout of raptor results in lean mice with enhanced mitochondrial respiration. Cell Metab. 2008, 8, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yeh, W.C.; Bierer, B.E.; McKnight, S.L. Rapamycin inhibits clonal expansion and adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 11086–11090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rosen, E.D.; MacDougald, O.A. Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rabbani, G.H.; Albert, M.J.; Rahman, H.; Chowdhury, A.K. Short-chain fatty acids inhibit fluid and electrolyte loss induced by cholera toxin in proximal colon of rabbit in vivo. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1999, 44, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mineo, H.; Hashizume, Y.; Hanaki, Y.; Murata, K.; Maeda, H.; Onaga, T.; Kato, S.; Yanaihara, N. Chemical specificity of short-chain fatty acids in stimulating insulin and glucagon secretion in sheep. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 1994, 267, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scheppach, W. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut 1994, 35, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sakata, T. Stimulatory effect of short-chain fatty acids on epithelial cell proliferation in the rat intestine: A possible explanation for trophic effects of fermentable fibre, gut microbes and luminal trophic factors. Br. J. Nutr. 1987, 58, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Heerdt, B.G.; Houston, M.A.; Augenlicht, L.H. Potentiation by specific short-chain fatty acids of differentiation and apoptosis in human colonic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 3288–3294. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Den Besten, G.; Bleeker, A.; Gerding, A.; van Eunen, K.; Havinga, R.; van Dijk, T.H.; Oosterveer, M.H.; Jonker, J.W.; Groen, A.K.; Reijngoud, D.J.; et al. Short-chain fatty acids protect against high-fat diet–induced obesity via a PPARγ-dependent switch from lipogenesis to fat oxidation. Diabetes 2015, 64, 2398–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fu, C.; Liu, L.; Li, F. Acetate alters the process of lipid metabolism in rabbits. Animal 2017, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Blas, C.; Mateos, G.G. Feed formulation. In Nutrition of the Rabbit; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 222–232. [Google Scholar]
  26. Barter, P.J.; Lally, J.I. Metabolism of esterified cholesterol in the plasma very low density lipoproteins of the rabbit. Atherosclerosis 1978, 31, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, L.; Liu, H.; Fu, C.; Li, C.; Li, F. Acetate induces anorexia via up-regulating the hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) gene expression in rabbits. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2017, 26, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kimura, I.; Ozawa, K.; Inoue, D.; Imamura, T.; Kimura, K.; Maeda, T.; Terasawa, K.; Kashihara, D.; Hirano, K.; Tani, T.; et al. The gut microbiota suppresses insulin-mediated fat accumulation via the short-chain fatty acid receptor GPR43. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kraemer, F.B.; Shen, W.J. Hormone-sensitive lipase knockouts. Nutr. Metab. 2006, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Milgraum, L.Z.; Witters, L.A.; Pasternack, G.R.; Kuhajda, F.P. Enzymes of the fatty acid synthesis pathway are highly expressed in situ breast carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bonnefont, J.P.; Demaugre, F.; Prip-Buus, C.; Saudubray, J.M.; Brivet, M.; Abadi, N.; Thuilliera, L. Carnitine palmitoyltransferase deficiencies. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1999, 68, 424–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Asai, A.; Miyazawa, T. Dietary curcuminoids prevent high-fat diet-induced lipid accumulation in rat liver and epididymal adipose tissue. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 2932–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hara, H.; Haga, S.; Aoyama, Y.; Kiriyama, S. Short-chain fatty acids suppress cholesterol synthesis in rat liver and intestine. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Coppack, S.W.; Jensen, M.D.; Miles, J.M. In vivo regulation of lipolysis in humans. J. Lipid Res. 1994, 35, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Corcoran, M.P.; Lamon-Fava, S.; Fielding, R.A. Skeletal muscle lipid deposition and insulin resistance. effect of dietary fatty acids and exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 662–677. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kersten, S.; Seydoux, J.; Peters, J.M.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Desvergne, B.; Wahli, W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α mediatesthe adaptive response to fasting. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 1489–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Djouadi, F.; Weinheimer, C.J.; Saffitz, J.E.; Pitchford, C.; Bastin, J.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Kelly, P.D. A gender-related defect in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Napal, L.; Marrero, P.F.; Haro, D. An intronic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-binding sequence mediates fatty acid induction of the human carnitine palmitoyl-transferase 1A. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 354, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hsu, S.C.; Huang, C.J. Reduced fat mass in rats fed a high oleic acid-rich safflower oil diet is associated with changes in expression of hepatic PPARalpha and adipose SREBP-1c-regulated genes. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Evans, R.M.; Barish, G.D.; Wang, Y.X. PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Couvigny, B.; de Wouters, T.; Kaci, G.; Jacouton, E.; Delorme, C.; Doré, J.; Renault, P.; Blottière, H.M.; Guédon, E.; Lapaque, N. Commensal streptococcus salivarius modulates PPARγ transcriptional activity in human intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, G.; Yao, W.; Jiang, H. Short-chain fatty acids enhance adipocyte differentiation in the stromal vascular fraction of porcine adipose tissue. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1887–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sale, E.M.; Atkinson, P.G.; Sale, G.J. Requirement of MAP kinase for differentiation of fibroblasts to adipocytes, for insulin activation of p90 S6 kinase and for insulin or serum stimulation of DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Menendez, J.A.; Mehmi, I.; Atlas, E.; Colomer, R.; Lupu, R. Novel signaling molecules implicated in tumor-associated fatty acid synthase-dependent breast cancer cell proliferation and survival: Role of exogenous dietary fatty acids, p53-p21WAF1/CIP1, ERK1/2 MAPK, p27KIP1, BRCA1, and NF-kappaB. Int. J. Oncol. 2004, 24, 591–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Greenberg, A.S.; Shen, W.J.; Muliro, K.; Patel, S.; Souza, S.C.; Roth, R.A.; Kraeme, B.F. Stimulation of lipolysis and hormone-sensitive lipase via the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 45456–45461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Turcotte, L.P.; Raney, M.A.; Todd, M.K. ERK1/2 inhibition prevents contraction-induced increase in plasma membrane FAT/CD36 content and FA uptake in rodent muscle. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2005, 184, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aouadi, M.; Laurent, K.; Prot, M.; Marchand-Brustel, Y.L.; Binetruy, B.; Bost, F. Inhibition of p38MAPK increases adipogenesis from embryonic to adult stages. Diabetes 2006, 55, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hata, K.; Nishimura, R.; Ikeda, F.; Yamashita, K.; Matsubara, T.; Nokubi, T.; Yoneda, T. Differential roles of Smad1 and p38 kinase in regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activating receptor gamma during bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced adipogenesis. Mol. Boil. Cell 2003, 14, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vijayvargia, R.; Mann, K.; Weiss, H.R.; Pownall, H.J.; Ruan, H. JNK deficiency enhances fatty acid utilization and diverts glucose from oxidation to glycogen storage in cultured myotubes. Obesity 2010, 8, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Woo, J.H.; Lim, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Suh, S.I.; Min, D.S.; Chang, J.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Park, J.W.; Kwon, T.K. Resveratrol inhibits phorbol myristate acetate-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression by inhibiting JNK and PKC delta signal transduction. Oncogene 2004, 23, 1845–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dewulf, E.M.; Cani, P.D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Possemiers, S.; Van Holle, A.; Muccioli, G.G.; Deldicqued, L.; Bindelsa, L.B.; Pachikiana, B.D.; Soheta, F.M.; et al. Inulin-type fructans with prebiotic properties counteract GPR43 overexpression and PPARγ-related adipogenesis in the white adipose tissue of high-fat diet-fed mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2011, 22, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fu, C.Y.; Liu, L.; Gao, Q.; Sui, X.Y.; Li, F.C. Cloning, molecular characterization, and spatial and developmental expression analysis of GPR41 and GPR43 genes in New Zealand rabbits. Animal 2017, 11, 1798–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hong, Y.H.; Nishimura, Y.; Hishikawa, D.; Tsuzuki, H.; Miyahara, H.; Gotoh, C.; Feng, D.D.; Chen, C.; Lee, H.G.; Katoh, K.; et al. Acetate and propionate short chain fatty acids stimulate adipogenesis via GPCR43. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 5092–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ruderman, N.; Prentki, M. AMP kinase and malonyl-CoA: Targets for therapy of the metabolic syndrome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Loftus, T.M.; Jaworsky, D.E.; Frehywot, G.L.; Townsend, C.A.; Ronnett, G.V.; Lane, M.D.; Kuhajda, F.P. Reduced food intake and body weight in mice treated with fatty acid synthase inhibitors. Science 2000, 288, 2379–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Andersson, U.; Filipsson, K.; Abbott, C.R.; Woods, A.; Smith, K.; Bloom, S.R.; Carling, D.; Small, C.J. AMP-activated protein kinase plays a role in the control of food intake. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 279, 12005–12008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hardie, D.G.; Ross, F.A.; Hawley, S.A. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hardie, D.G. AMPK and SNF1: Snuffing out stress. Cell Metab. 2007, 6, 339–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, D.D.; Han, C.C.; Wan, H.F.; He, F.; Xu, H.Y.; Wei, S.H.; Du, X.H.; Xu, F. Effects of inhibiting PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway on lipid metabolism homeostasis in goose primary hepatocytes. Animal 2016, 10, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Skiba-Cassy, S.; Lansard, M.; Panserat, S.; Médale, F. Rainbow trout genetically selected for greater muscle fat content display increased activation of liver TOR signaling and lipogenic gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 297, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Laplante, M.; Sabatini, D.M. An emerging role of mTOR in lipid biosynthesis. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 09 00799 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of acetate administration on production performance (A) and tissue development (B). a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The effect of acetate administration on production performance (A) and tissue development (B). a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Animals 09 00799 g001
Animals 09 00799 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of acetate treatment on TG concentration in tissue (mmol/gprot) (A) and TG (mmol/L) and VLDL concentration (absorbance) in plasma (B). a, b, c: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: TG, triglycerides; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein.).
Figure 2. The effect of acetate treatment on TG concentration in tissue (mmol/gprot) (A) and TG (mmol/L) and VLDL concentration (absorbance) in plasma (B). a, b, c: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: TG, triglycerides; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein.).
Animals 09 00799 g002
Animals 09 00799 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of the acetate treatment on genes expression related to lipid metabolism in liver (A), skeletal muscle (B) and adipose tissue (C). a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: FAS, fatty acid synthase; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; FATP, fatty acid transport protein; FABP, fatty acid-binding protein; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; GPR, G protein-coupled receptor.).
Figure 3. The effect of the acetate treatment on genes expression related to lipid metabolism in liver (A), skeletal muscle (B) and adipose tissue (C). a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: FAS, fatty acid synthase; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; FATP, fatty acid transport protein; FABP, fatty acid-binding protein; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; GPR, G protein-coupled receptor.).
Animals 09 00799 g003
Animals 09 00799 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of acetate treatment on protein expression of AMPK (A), mTOR (B), p38 (C), ERK1/2 (D) and JNK (E) in liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: AMPK, adenosine monophosphate zctivated protein kinase; p38, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin).
Figure 4. The effect of acetate treatment on protein expression of AMPK (A), mTOR (B), p38 (C), ERK1/2 (D) and JNK (E) in liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. a, b: means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). (Abbreviations: AMPK, adenosine monophosphate zctivated protein kinase; p38, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin).
Animals 09 00799 g004
Table
Table 1. Rabbit primers information for gene expression.
Table 1. Rabbit primers information for gene expression.
GeneGenebank Accession NumberPrimers Sequences (5′–3′)Product Size (bp)
GAPDHNM_001082253F: TGCCACCCACTCCTCTACCTTCG163
R: CCGGTGGTTTGAGGGCTCTTACT
β-actinNM_001101683.1F:CGCAGAAACGAGACGAGATT168
R:GCAGAACTTTGGGGACTTTG
GPR41XM_002722237.2F:CCATCTATCTCACCTCCCTGTTC130
R:AACCAGCAGAGCCCACTGAC
GPR43XM_002722218.2F:CGTCCAACTTCCGCTGGTA146
R:CTTGTACTGCACGGGGTAGG
PPARγNM_001082148.1F:GGAGCAGAGCAAAGAAGTCG111
R:CTCACAAAGCCAGGGATGTT
FATPXM_002722970F:GGCCTACCTCTCTGGTGATG111
R:TCAGTGGTGGACACGTTCTC
FABPXM_002716060F:AGCTGGTGGACAGCAAGAAT129
R:TCAGGGTGATGATGTCTCCA
CPT1XM_002724092.2F:ATTCTCACCGCTTTGGGAGG196
R:ACGGGGTTTTCTAGGAGCAC
FASKF201292.1F:ACCACGTCCAAGGAGAGCA112
R:AGTTCTGCACCGAGTTGAGC
HSLXM_008249691.2F: CCAGGCTAAACTCGCATCCA119
R: ATTTGGCTCTCTGGACTGGC
LPLNM_001177330.1F: TTCAACCACAGCAGCAAGAC141
R: TAACAGCCAGTCCACCACAA
PPARαXM_002723354F:AGGCCCTCTTCAGAACCTGT122
R:GTGGCTTTCTGTTCCCAGAG
Abbreviations: FAS, fatty acid synthase; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1; HSL, hormone-sensitive lipase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; FATP, fatty acid transport protein; FABP, fatty acid-binding protein; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPR, G protein-coupled receptor.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Fu, C.; Li, F. Acetate Affects the Process of Lipid Metabolism in Rabbit Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue. Animals 2019, 9, 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100799

AMA Style

Liu L, Fu C, Li F. Acetate Affects the Process of Lipid Metabolism in Rabbit Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue. Animals. 2019; 9(10):799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Lei, Chunyan Fu, and Fuchang Li. 2019. "Acetate Affects the Process of Lipid Metabolism in Rabbit Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue" Animals 9, no. 10: 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100799

APA Style

Liu, L., Fu, C., & Li, F. (2019). Acetate Affects the Process of Lipid Metabolism in Rabbit Liver, Skeletal Muscle and Adipose Tissue. Animals, 9(10), 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop