Next Article in Journal
Review of Petroleum and Hydrogeology Equations for Characterizing the Pressure Front Diffusion during Pumping Tests
Next Article in Special Issue
Collection, Standardization and Attribution of Robust Disaster Event Information—A Demonstrator of a National Event-Based Loss and Damage Database in Austria
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Modelling Challenges in Rock Engineering with Special Consideration of Open Pit to Underground Mine Interaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Geosciences
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/geosciences12050200
geosciences-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Chronological Database about Natural and Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Italy

by
Carmela Vennari
1,* and
Mario Parise
2
1
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica, 87036 Rende, Italy
2
Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, University Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2022, 12(5), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050200
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 13 April 2022 / Accepted: 30 April 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development and Use of Databases to Analyze Geo-Hydrological Hazards)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sinkholes are a widespread geological hazard, typical of karst lands, where they generally originate as collapse features related to presence of underground voids. Nevertheless, other types of sinkholes can be formed through solution, suffusion and sagging processes. Sinkholes can also be originated in relation to artificial cavities, excavated by man in past times. In Italy, sinkholes interest large sectors of the country, given the very long history of Italy with an intense utilization of the underground. They cause serious damage to infrastructures, economic activities, and human health every year. We present a catalogue on natural and anthropogenic sinkholes in Italy, as the first step toward evaluation of the sinkhole hazard. After introducing sinkholes, which is definitely a highly underrated type of disaster in Italy, we point out their occurrence in the country. We illustrate the methodology used to build the database, with particular focus on accuracy and reliability of the data. Collecting information from different types of sources, a catalogue of some 1190 sinkhole events is built. Database structure and data analysis are then illustrated. Eventually, we draw some conclusions on the likely uses of our work by providing recommendations for environmental management on this very delicate issue.

1. Introduction

1.1. Sinkholes, an Often Underrated Geohazard

Between 1980 and 2019, climate-related extremes caused economic losses totaling an estimated EUR 446 billion in the European member countries [1]. In Italy, EUR 72.534 million in losses and 20.735 fatalities were registered. Italy is a geologically fragile territory where a great variety of geohazards are present, but most of the attention is generally focused on landslides and floods, the most commonly occurring geological events [2,3,4]. Nevertheless, these extremely high numbers could increase even further if considering other natural hazards that are typically underrated since they are limited to certain natural settings, or to particular conditions and/or situations. Among these, sinkholes definitely have to be included: they are well-defined depressions in the landscape and can be ascribed within the most diagnostic features of karst [5,6,7,8,9]. When compared to other geo-hazards, sinkholes are typically underrated and go unreported for a number of reasons, including the decisions of landowners to keep these occurrences hidden in the fear that the economic value of their lands and properties will be decreased. Produced by a variety of processes, sinkholes are difficult to predict, and the issue of identifying possible precursory evidence of the phenomena is still open in the scientific community [10,11,12,13]. In this regard, an important issue is the assessment of the degradation of rock masses surrounding the caves and analysis of the weathering conditions, eventually leading, through a decrease in the physical properties of the rocks [14,15,16,17,18,19], toward instability, collapse and sinkhole development [20,21,22,23]. In addition, several recent papers have been dedicated to the spatial analysis of sinkholes and GIS-based multi-criteria predictions [24,25,26,27].
The importance of the sinkhole hazard in Italy is further increased due to the fact that, besides the regions with a presence of soluble rocks, the long historical and cultural vicissitudes of the country led to the development of thousands of man-made cavities. All these underground voids, often extending well below the urban areas, represent a real danger to society and are worth being examined in detail.
Taking into account all of the above, we present in this contribution the result of years of data collection and analysis about sinkholes in Italy as a first step in the production of susceptibility and hazard maps. We describe a chronological catalogue of natural and anthropogenic sinkholes in Italy, maintained by the Earth and Environmental Sciences Department at the University Aldo Moro of Bari and by CNR-IRPI. After illustrating the scopes of the database and its main structure, including the sources used for its data population, we move to discuss the preliminary results about the documented sinkholes in Italy, their distribution over the territory and the quality of the data. Eventually, we present some considerations about the utility of such a catalogue in land planning management and its possible contribution toward mitigation of the sinkhole risk.

1.2. Sinkholes, Not Only a Karst Feature

Sinkholes are defined as closed depressions with internal drainage [6]. Known as one of the main diagnostic landforms of karst, they can originate from different types of processes [28,29,30,31] and can be related to natural or anthropogenic cavities [32,33,34]. Their formation often occurs through a rapid, catastrophic collapse, in most of the cases without any precursory sign [10], which strongly increases the potential risk. Instability occurring in karst caves may move upward, through progressive failures from both the vault and the walls [35,36,37], until reaching the ground surface in the form of a sinkhole.
Besides their diffusion in karst settings, sinkholes may also occur in inhabited areas or in sectors characterized by the presence of rocks different from carbonates and evaporites. In these cases, their formation is related to the presence of underground cavities realized by man, for a variety of purposes and in different historical ages [38,39]. They represent the peculiarity of certain contexts, and very often the instability of the subterranean voids might have severe repercussions on the topsoil. For these reasons, exploration and surveying of the caves is necessarily the first step to carry out toward knowledge of the underground [40,41,42,43] and is mandatory to the census and cataloguing of the cavities and to later studies as well.
All types of artificial caves may potentially originate subsidence and/or sinkhole problems; however, certain categories, such as underground quarries and mines, are more prone to ground instability than others [44,45,46,47], threatening the above built structures with very high possibility of sinkhole formation [48,49,50,51,52,53,54] and sometimes even predisposing the slope above them to landslides [55]. Further, abandoned hydraulic works such as wells and underground aqueducts or qanats are at the origin of potential sinkholes [56,57,58]. Recent developments and expansions of urban settlements and activities over areas occupied by underground cavities resulted worldwide in an increasing number of events in the last decades [59,60].
Sinkholes are therefore not limited to karst but might potentially affect any urban area where an extensive network of underground cavities is present. This makes the analysis of sinkholes and of their effects at the surface even more important.

1.3. The Need of a Good Knowledge of Past Events

In order to manage the hidden and very dangerous hazard related to sinkholes, knowledge about past events is mandatory. Given the difficulties in accessing the underground (especially in the case of abandoned cavities, the memories of which got lost), documentation about sinkholes is of primary importance and is necessary for a correct approach toward risk mitigation [61,62,63].
Knowledge about sinkholes should start from the location of the underground cavities and their present conditions. In addition, the origin of the caves (natural vs. anthropogenic) must be ascertained. With reference to natural caves, knowledge of their presence depends on the nature of the terrain and on the techniques used to investigate the subsoil. As regards artificial cavities, many Italian cities are affected by anthropogenic sinkholes, and particularly in the last 20 years, a massive increase in their number was recorded [64,65,66]. Sinkhole occurrence in built-up areas or in rural hamlets is certainly one of the hazards mostly affecting the urbanized areas. They concentrate where urbanization has been more massive and where practices of excavation of the subsoil for different purposes have developed over the centuries. These phenomena pose serious problems for land protection and planning and have recently been repeatedly brought to the attention of public opinion through a number of catastrophic events.
In Southern Italy, many rock settlements, going back to the so-called rupestrian civilization [67], are present within the gravine [68], that is, ravines or deep incisions of Apulia and Basilicata, where hundreds of cavities of variable size have been excavated along the valleysides. They are a peculiarity of these territories but may often represent a serious hazard due to instabilities within the subterranean cavities and the likely repercussions at the surface. In such situations, one of the most difficult issues is the multi-level arrangement of the cavities, which determines a sort of chain, with each cavity depending on the stability conditions of the nearby ones [34].

2. Sinkholes

Natural vs. Anthropogenic Sinkholes

The origin of the sinkholes has to be related to various typologies of processes, as reported in the international literature [29,30,31,69,70,71,72]: they can be generated either by collapse of subsurface voids or of overburden deposits, or even by subsurface erosion, sagging or suffusion (Figure 1). Gutierrez and co-workers [31] describe the main classification of sinkholes. The effect at the surface may vary from mild depressions, slightly lower than the surrounding terrain [73,74], to abrupt features with steep walls and high depth (even > tens of meters). In areas particularly affected by sinkholes, these may originate as individual features, and with time become coalescent, giving origin to more complex landforms, or to wide marshland, especially near the coastlines [75,76].
In addition to karst sinkholes of natural origin, in the last decades, anthropogenic sinkholes—related to presence of cavities excavated by man in the subsoil in the past—have become increasingly important (Figure 2). Artificial cavities are extremely widespread in Italy, especially in some regions where the historical and cultural events, combined with the geological and morphological characters of the territory, greatly favored the development of cave-dwelling civilizations.
The analysis, cataloguing and management of data related to the different typologies of artificial cavities therefore represent elements of primary importance for their safeguard. In order to standardize the collection of data about artificial cavities, a codification has been established which groups all known types according to the scope of their first realization. This classification, produced by the National Commission on Artificial Cavities of the Italian Speleological Society [38] and illustrated by a typological tree (Figure 3), was later adopted at international level by the International Union of Speleology (UIS) [39].
In this classification, each category is indicated by a capital letter: A—hydraulic works; B—civilian dwellings; C—religious works; D—military/war works; E—mines; F —transit works. Eventually, letter G covers all works not included in the previous categories. Each category is then subdivided into classes (indicated by a progressive number following the capital letter) in order to define more precisely the purpose/use for which the cavity was made.

3. Materials and Methods: The Chronological Catalogue of Sinkholes

3.1. Idea of the Database

The first mandatory step in the process of evaluating susceptibility, hazard and risk is the collection of information about the phenomena dealt with. Knowledge of when and where a certain type of geohazard occurred, as well as the intensity and frequency of past events, are crucial elements to start the analysis and eventually contribute to risk mitigation.
We collected information about sinkhole occurrence in Italy, covering both sinkholes of natural and anthropogenic origin. Even if the frequency of sinkholes over the Italian territory is not as high as for landslides or floods, there are many regions significantly prone to this danger. In some regions, this is related to the widespread presence at the outcrop, or in the first meters of depth, of soluble rocks (carbonates and subordinately evaporites) [65,75,77,78,79,80,81,82]; in many others, the high propensity to sinkholes is linked to the complex history of Italy, where a high number of underground cavities have been built for different uses during the long history of the country [83,84,85,86,87]. Nevertheless, sinkholes are generally poorly taken into account in Italy when dealing with geohazards, despite that many cities and villages periodically suffer from sinkhole damage. The main goal in building and populating a chronological catalogue of these phenomena is thus to establish the basis on which to work for a first evaluation of the sinkhole hazard in Italy. To this purpose, knowing the temporal and spatial occurrence of the sinkholes to include in the catalogue is mandatory.

3.2. Definitions

The quality of data plays an important role in business analysis and decision making. A necessary task for data quality management is to evaluate the accuracy of the data [88]. The data quality problem has been studied in different areas such as statistics, management science and computer science. Dirty data with uncertainty, duplication or inconsistency may lead to wrong evaluations and ineffective results. The consequence in managing dirty data may be severe; hence, it is extremely important to evaluate data quality before these are being used [88]. In building the chronological catalogue of sinkholes in Italy, great attention was given to this aspect and particularly to the temporal and spatial occurrence of the events. To evaluate the level of knowledge of these parameters, we adopted the concepts of accuracy, certainty and reliability.
Accuracy in safety concepts, based on reliable data, provides legal and economic confidence [89]. In forecasting, it is the degree of fit (matching) between the predictions and the actual data [90]. In mathematics, it is a measure of the precision of a numerical quantity, usually given to n* significant figures (where the proportional accuracy is the important aspect) or n* decimal places (where absolute accuracy is more important; [91]). In the fields of science, engineering, industry and statistics, the accuracy of a measurement system is the degree of closeness of measurements of a quantity to that quantity’s true value [92].
We considered accuracy for the time of sinkhole occurrence. In our case, the true value is represented by the exact and complete knowledge of the time of occurrence of an event, which should ideally include: hour, day, month and year. Hence, when all these data are available, the accuracy is high, whereas it decreases when the data move away from the complete knowledge (Table 1). Temporal accuracy represents the extent of the time interval to which the event occurrence can be [93]; thus, the level of accuracy may also change after the initial entry in the database.
As concerns certainty, from a linguistic standpoint, it is the state of being completely sure about something [94]. In business science, certainty is the theoretical condition in which decision making is without risk, because the decision maker has all information about the exact outcome of the decision before he/she takes the action [90]. In statistics, uncertainty is the estimated amount or percentage by which an estimated or calculated value may differ from the true value.
In our sinkhole database, certainty is linked to the location of the event and shows a high value when the details given by the source (or obtained through direct surveys) allow us to be sure about the site affected by the sinkhole. This happens when geographic coordinates are available, when exact data about the sinkhole site are provided, or when specific studies and field surveys have been performed. Nevertheless, the certainty is always related to the trustworthiness of the information source (see later on).
Reliability is defined as the overall consistency of a measure: a measure is said to have high reliability if it produces similar results under consistent conditions [95]. For this purpose, the reports used should be as clear and detailed as possible, but this is often a problem when the event under study is not the main focus of the report or article. In our specific case, the presence of an underground cavity at the origin of the sinkhole, for instance, should be documented without any reasonable doubt.
The robustness of the used source is the base to reach a high level of reliability [96,97]; thus, if the presence of an underground cavity is reported, either of natural or anthropogenic origin, it must be unambiguous. Reliability for our database is a latent rule that helps to make sure that records are the most accurate information available.
Databases on geohazards should consist of verified information, to build a robust and reliable amount of data to use for statistical and probabilistic analysis [98,99]. Building a large but inconsistent database, full of inaccurate and unreliable data, will result in incorrect conclusions, due to wrong inputs and propagation of the error. Further, these could be used in land planning decisions, potentially leading to further problems rather than acting toward mitigation of the risk.

3.3. Structure of the Database

The database of the catalogue contains information about sinkholes, derived from accurate scrutiny and analysis of a variety of information sources. Data are stored in a .xls file that contains all the information listed above. In addition, we used ©Google Earth (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA) and ©Qgis version 3.24 (Gispo Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) software to record the geographical location of phenomena and perform statistical analysis. Different types of documents have been consulted, which allowed for collecting detailed and variegated information about sinkholes, including the origin of the phenomenon, the size and other morphometric parameters, and the effects on the anthropogenic environment, including the damage produced, triggering factors, etc. The main types of information are described in this section.

3.3.1. Time of Occurrence

Each sinkhole in the catalogue is identified by an ID, an identification code that includes information about the region where the event is located, followed by a progressive number. As mentioned previously, the main constraints for including an event in the database are represented by the availability of information at the time of occurrence of the sinkhole and its location. Information about the time occurrence is divided into five columns, with four fields being numeric (hour, day, month, year) and one alphabetic. If information about sinkhole occurrence is reported as a time period, without a precise date, the data are recorded only in an alphabetic way (for example: “in the time span from 1 to 5 of March” or “during Spring”); this also applies in all those cases where the date is not explicit. As regards time information, a very important field is represented by the temporal accuracy, as previously defined (Table 1).

3.3.2. Origin of the Cavity

The nature of the underground cavity is key information to collect for every sinkhole. Sinkholes can be produced in relation to natural caves or anthropogenic cavities, and depending upon the origin of the underground void, there will be a significant difference in terms of approach to the problem, as well as for prevention and susceptibility analysis, and eventually for the choice of the engineering works necessary to stabilize the site. As concerns the sinkhole origin, we defined three distinct categories: natural, anthropogenic and unknown origin, with this latter being applied when no clear information about the nature of the underground cavity responsible for the sinkhole is available.

3.3.3. Location

Information about the spatial occurrence of sinkholes is recorded in the catalogue through many fields, which cover, with increasing details: region, province, municipality, street and locality. Each sinkhole is located using Google Earth, reporting in the catalogue the relative coordinates. As for the level of certainty in location, three classes were considered (Table 2).
The Italian Territory is divided, for civil protection issues, into 134 Alert Zone by the National Department for Civil Protection; these represent homogeneous areas for the weather−hydrological response of the territory to geo-hydrological phenomena [100]. This information is included in the catalogue as well, since it might be useful for coordinating emergency actions in case of necessity.

3.3.4. Sinkhole Typology

Regarding natural sinkholes, the mechanism of formation of the event is recorded in the catalogue, following the classification of [31]. As for artificial cavities, it is very important to define the typology in accordance with the aforementioned typological tree (Figure 3). Further, other data include morphometry (size, diameter, depth) and state of activity of the phenomenon (first-time sinkhole or re-activation; Figure 4). Moreover, if the sinkhole is included in the national cadastre of caves (managed by the Italian Speleological Society), we also added the number of the cadastre, pulling it out from [101] if the cave is a natural karst cave or from [102] if it is of anthropogenic origin.

3.3.5. Triggering Factors

Sinkholes may be triggered by different factors, including, but not limited to, the following ones: rainfall, earthquake, human actions, rupture of underground utilities, collapse of cavity and infiltration. These factors operate individually or in some cases simultaneously. A field evaluating the list and the reliability of information about triggering factor(s) is included in the catalogue, even though in many cases there is a high uncertainty about these factors.

3.3.6. Damage

Many events in the database caused damage to private buildings or to communication routes. To include all these data that are necessary for evaluating the vulnerability and thus the risk, damage information was included according to the EU Floods Directive specification (Directive 2007/2/EC) by considering 5 categories and 11 types of consequences of damage (Table 3).
Particular attention was given to the consequence of human health by considering the following categories: evacuees, homeless, injured and deaths. In particular, we distinguished among certain and estimated numbers, since in many cases the number of casualties is not expressed as a single value but simply as the number of families affected by the event.

3.3.7. Sources

Sinkhole phenomena have been dealt with in the international scientific literature for many years in terms of classification processes, occurrences and analyses of specific case studies. Daily newspapers and other types of magazines, together with the widespread use of videos and their diffusion through the web, often report news regarding sinkholes, especially for those that have caused damage to society. For this reason, recently, sinkholes have been increasingly considered by the population due to a growing emphasis on this type of geohazard. This has also been true for Italy since the 1990s as a consequence of several events in Tuscany (Camaiore in 1995 and Grosseto in 1999 [103,104,105]), in addition to recurrent episodes in towns such as Rome and Naples [83,106,107].
To collect documentation about sinkhole occurrences in Italy, we considered different types of sources with the aim of putting together the highest number of well-documented events and cross-checking the related information, whenever possible, in order to increase the levels of certainty and reliability: scientific literature, bachelor’s theses, newspaper clips (at national, regional and local levels), historical books and technical reports. To all these sources, direct investigation and field surveys were also added.
The most used information source was scientific literature, from which about 60% of the documented events were derived, while the remaining 40% mostly came from chronicle sources and technical reports.
The scientific literature has examined both sinkholes that have caused damage to people and infrastructures, and sinkholes unknown to the population. Due to the specific details typically included in scientific research, in most cases comprising direct investigation, information about the triggering factors and the dimensions of the sinkholes are generally provided, together with data concerning the nature of the underground cavity. The temporal accuracy of sinkholes reported in the scientific literature is middle-high on average. It has to be noted that many ancient (historical) sinkholes have been studied, or at least mentioned, in this type of source.
Newspaper clips represent a very important source of information on geohazards, especially when considering local daily newspapers or magazines [108,109,110]. As proved by several previous studies about natural hazards [96,111,112,113], this category of source often provides data that otherwise would be lost. The main problem, however, is finding and scrutinizing the huge number of local newspapers, especially for countries with a very long history such as Italy. Nevertheless, newspaper clips supply many details in terms of the temporal occurrence when compared with other documentation sources and are generally more reliable at this regard. Most of the events with high temporal accuracy derive, as a matter of fact, from chronicles. As a drawback, newspapers often report only sinkholes that caused damage; further, in many cases, the chronicles do not highlight the nature of the underground cavity at the origin of a sinkhole, leaving some degrees of uncertainty about this aspect.
In addition to traditional daily newspapers, press and mass media, in the last decades, a huge source of information is represented by the internet and social networks [114,115]. Much information about geohazards can be drawn, almost in real time, from such sources, but we must be extremely careful when assessing the reliability of the extracted information, which definitely needs a detailed cross-check among as many sources as possible.
In Italy, some databases on sinkholes are already available, and these were also included in our sources of information. Vennari and co-workers [116] published a geospatial database containing data on geo-hydrological processes (Landslides, Floods, Sinkholes) and related damage that occurred between 2008 and 2019 in the Apulia Region (Southern Italy). The Institute for the Protection and Environmental Research (ISPRA) collects sinkhole events occurring over the Italian territory in an online database [117]. Further, the University of Rome Tre built “IWSD”, the Italian Web Sinkholes Database [118]. There are also some regional databases of natural sinkholes, such as in the Campania region, created by the Regional Soil Defense Department [119]. All these databases, however, present several drawbacks. First, they are not focused on the time occurrence of the events. Then, they include many events where the link with an underground void (either natural or anthropogenic) is not proved. As a consequence, many entries deal with holes in the streets due to leakages from pipelines (that is, urban management problems, not karst or underground cavities). Many events are described without a chronological reference, since the goal of these databases is a collection of events and their spatial distribution, but not the definition of the sinkhole hazard (which necessarily requires information about temporal occurrence). Notwithstanding the above limitations and drawbacks, all mentioned databases were carefully scrutinized to identify events that fulfilled the requirements for inclusion in our chronological catalogue and to cross-check data from different sources.
Accurate scrutiny, aimed at evaluating and ascertaining the certainty and the reliability of the information, was carried out in order to be sure to reach a consistent database and not to analyze other types of phenomena as sinkholes. In this way, we aimed at building a robust and reliable catalogue to be used for statistical and probabilistic analyses.
For instance, it is interesting to report in this regard the case which occurred in the historic center of Florence on May 25, 2016, when the failure of the riverbank at Lungarno Torrigiani, between Ponte Vecchio and Ponte alle Grazie, resulted in dozens of parked cars buried and in the evacuation of a historical building. The event was initially considered as a sinkhole but actually cannot be ascribed to this type of geohazard. A few days later, The Guardian published an article in which the title—“When is a sinkhole not a sinkhole?”—clearly remarks the possibility of wrongful attribution of the phenomena [120]. This example effectively highlights the problems existing in scrutinizing mass media and managing data from this type of source [121].

4. Results

About 1190 sinkholes that occurred over the Italian territory are included in the catalogue at the time we are writing (February 2022). As mandatory entries, for all these events, temporal and spatial information are available. With respect to temporal distribution, the oldest documented sinkhole took place in 276 B.C. in Campania. Looking at the temporal distribution (gray bars in Figure 5), it can be noted that few documented events occurred before year 1000 and that until 1800, the number of documented sinkholes is relatively low. A data increase occurs between 1800 and 1900, with many events in Campania, Latium, Apulia and Sicily documented by specific studies.
From 1900 to 2021, the temporal distribution in the histogram is subdivided into decades, and a progressive increase in the number of events in the catalogue must be highlighted. This is due not only to growing interest from the scientific community, but above all to the availability of further information sources (chronicles and technical reports). This is also confirmed by the most represented decades in the database, covering the time spans of 2001–2010 (222 sinkholes) and 2011–2021 (395 sinkholes). The boom of the internet and the wider distribution of news allowed for more basic information about sinkholes to be found more easily. Furthermore, the possibility to compare different information sources allowed for reaching a greater accuracy in the temporal documentation of the events, or at least finding some information on their time occurrence. The final bar in the histogram covers the last decade (2011–2021), where it can be noted that the sinkholes in Italy slightly increased compared to the previous decade. This is due also to specific case study performed for the anthropogenic sinkholes in the city of Naples [87].
Figure 5 also reports the distribution, over the years investigated, of the temporal accuracy, following the classification reported in Table 1. Temporal accuracy has improved considerably in recent years, with a progressive increase for sinkholes with high accuracy (H) since 1980. These data are certainly related to the wide use of the web, which allows for immediately reporting on sinkhole occurrences. In addition, online blogs and newspapers usually report information about the time of the events, especially for those that caused damage. Sinkholes with High temporal accuracy represent 8.2% of the database.
Sinkholes characterized by Medium-High accuracy (MH in Figure 5) represent the majority in the catalogue, about 69%. This is a very important aspect that strongly makes our catalogue significantly different from the other sinkhole databases in Italy. The database contains especially events with Medium-High and High temporal accuracy (76.8%). The data mainly derive from scientific papers and regard events that occurred mostly after 2000. Sinkholes characterized by Medium-High temporal accuracy (MH in Figure 5) have increased since 1960, except for a peak corresponding to the 19th century. An increase in correspondence of the last decade (2010–2021) is shown for the High accuracy class (H). Sinkholes with Medium accuracy (M in Figure 5) are about 8.4% of the documented data. Despite the high availability of information sources, they are still present in the last decades, which points to the difficulty in obtaining the day of occurrence for some phenomena (even though few).
Sinkholes with Low or Medium-Low temporal accuracy are very few if compared to the total amount of documented events, namely only 6% and 8.8%. They particularly concentrate between 1970 and 1990 and are typically of medium-low certainty also for location. Considering that these sinkholes did not generally affect the urbanized areas, they could have destroyed property values. Many property owners typically do not report occurrences of sinkholes, being afraid to have a loss in the value of their lands [122], so information about time of occurrence in rural areas may be very poor. Once again, Campania, Apulia and Latium are the regions where sinkholes with High to Medium-High accuracy are mostly located, due to their high propensity to both natural and anthropogenic sinkholes and the availability of specific studies [9,107,123,124,125,126,127].
Regarding the certainty in localizing a phenomenon, for most of the sinkholes (79%), we know with certainty the precise location (Figure 6A) with specific geographic coordinates or detailed information about the site provided by the source. This information is of remarkable importance for the future use of the catalogue and in particular for carrying out hazard and risk analyses. Many of the sinkholes with high certainty in location occurred in Southern Italy and are linked primarily to anthropogenic cavities. In Figure 3, it is possible to note that almost all Italian regions show the presence of documented sinkholes, their distribution being naturally related to the presence of soluble rocks, or to alluvial deposits covering soluble rocks, or to the history of the site as concerns the presence of anthropogenic cavities. Each Italian region is present in the catalogue, with the exception of Valle d’Aosta (Northwestern Italy); this does not mean that sinkholes did not occur in that region, but simply that we did not have news about their occurrence, or that information were not sufficient to include the event in the catalogue. Therefore, Figure 6 is not a snapshot of the sinkhole distribution in Italy, but rather a spatial distribution of the documented sinkholes in our catalogue.
When documentation about a sinkhole is included in technical reports, it is also typically presented in scientific papers, but this is not always the rule as concerns news provided by chronicles. The most detailed information about certainty in location is typically supplied by the scientific literature, often providing precise geographical coordinates.
Each sinkhole is classified considering the origin of the underground cavity causing its occurrence. Figure 6B shows their distribution over the Italian territory. Most of the sinkholes in the catalogue are of anthropogenic origin (58%), indicating a direct connection to artificial cavities. About 100 out of these are in the town of Palermo, Sicily, deriving from [128], while about 160 have been extracted from the works of [83,87] in the town of Naples, one of the most well-known sites for sinkhole problems. About 90 anthropogenic sinkholes of the Apulia region have been extracted not only from scientific papers, but also from technical reports. The certainty in location of anthropogenic sinkholes is high for more than 79% of events.
The typology of artificial caves at the origin of sinkholes is known for 25% of the events: they mainly belong to categories E (mines—4%), A (hydraulic underground works—22%) and B (hypogean civilian dwellings—10%). Underground mines and quarries are definitely the most worrying typologies of man-made cavities, possibly evolving in time to instability and sinkhole problems [129]. To these categories, also the collapses related to salt mines, with a number of events worldwide [130,131], have to be included. In Italy, the 1984 event at Belvedere di Spinello, in Calabria, must be recalled, which caused environmental degradation of many hectares of land [132,133].
Natural sinkholes represent 18% of the data recorded. They are due to the presence of soluble rocks, or alluvial overburden above a soluble bedrock, and are widespread in Central and Southern Italy, particularly in Latium, Campania and Apulia. In the sinkhole classification [31,71], they mostly belong to the categories of collapse or cover-collapse sinkholes, with subordinate suffusion sinkholes. If the information source only provides information about the presence of an underground void, without indicating its nature, the sinkhole is classified as of “unknown origin” (24% of the data).
The primary triggering cause for sinkholes is represented by rainfall, followed by seismic shocks and then by damage in underground facilities. This is most likely due to the fact that scientific papers mainly analyze rainfall events, which are able to trigger simultaneously different types of phenomena, while lesser is the information about earthquakes.
In the long time period considered, sinkholes did great harm, but it is not easy to have a complete figure of the damage resulting from them. In most cases, the information is qualitative, especially for the oldest events, or for those that caused damage to private properties. Based upon the documented events, private buildings and roads appear to be the most damaged classes by sinkholes, especially of anthropogenic origin. The central and southern parts of Italy are the most hit as they have the highest occurrences of sinkholes.
In order to classify damage, we used flood directive specifications (Table 3). Figure 7 reports a percentage of damage in each category: sinkholes mainly caused damage to the category of “economic activity” (83.6%), and in greater detail, negative consequences to infrastructures and properties were registered.
Concerning damage to human health, especially for the oldest events, the information sources provide generic information, such as “some victims” or “several victims”. This is certainly an issue which needs to be better examined since it is crucial for assessing the effects on the built-up environment. Further, the resulting data might be used for delineating different scenarios for further sinkholes, as well as in the case of re-activations of those already existing. To our knowledge, all casualties occurred in Southern Italy, with the highest number of injured, homeless and evacuees in Campania. Overall, sinkholes caused 146 casualties, 94 injured, 5701 homeless and 1808 evacuated.
The categories of sources used to collect information for the chronological catalogue of Italian sinkholes can be classified in three many categories: (i) scientific papers, (ii) chronicles, (iii) institutional reports or databases.
Source analysis reveals that more than 60% of data derive from scientific papers, about 17% from chronicles and about 14% from institutional reports and databases (Figure 8). Approximately 5% of data recorded in the database derive from multiple sources and in particular, the majority from merging information contained in scientific papers and institutional reports or databases (3.4%).

5. Use of the Database and Future Perspectives

Management of geological hazards is highly difficult, especially when multiple hazards may occur in response to specific triggers, such as intense rainstorms, in complex environmental settings [134,135,136]. Knowledge of the most susceptible sites, as well as data about the occurrence of past events, always represent precious information aimed at providing land managers with the minimum amount of data on which to build their decisions and the consequent actions [137,138,139,140]. These data should necessarily include information about the geological conditions at the site, the likely effects of potential sinkholes on society (in terms of damage to infrastructures and other man-made works), integrated by detailed topographic surveys of the underground spaces and their interaction with the built-up environment. In this regard, availability of catalogues built on sound data with good reliability is a fundamental step in the process of gaining a correct knowledge about geohazards, which is in turn necessary to move toward actions aimed at mitigating the risks. The possibility, through multi-temporal analysis of aerial photographs or maps and orthophotos, to evaluate the evolution in time of the sinkholes [76,141,142] has also to be pointed out, especially because in the last decades, the wide use of remote sensing, including LIDAR and UAV, has made possible a significant increase in the availability and quality of data [143,144,145,146,147]. This type of approach may lead to understanding the way sinkholes evolve over time and provide precious information for land planning and management [148,149,150,151,152]. Further, a good knowledge of the history at the sites is fundamental in order to correctly plan and design engineering works, which typically in karst areas have to face a variety of problems due to dissolution of the soluble rocks and difficulties in ascertaining the groundwater flow [8,153,154,155,156].
Sinkholes, despite being underrated when compared to other types of geo-hazards in Italy and in many other countries, represent the main hazard in several geological settings (including, but not limited to, karst), and their analysis is worth being carried out in the attempt to mitigate related risks (Figure 9).
To this aim, the catalogue we presented here offers a scientifically sound basis for developing susceptibility and hazard analyses, at least for those portions of the Italian territory where there is a sufficient number of documented sinkholes with data derived from both surface and subsurface surveys [34].
Further, other specific research such as, for instance, analysis of the relationships between ground shaking related to earthquakes and sinkhole development (Figure 10) might be more deeply investigated [123,124,125,157,158,159,160,161] in the light of the collected entries in the catalogue. This is an issue which is raising increasing interest also in other countries in the aftermath of recent earthquakes such as the sequence in Croatia [162,163].
A crucial issue to point out regards the potential importance of caves, especially those of cultural and historical value, and their valorization: in many Italian towns, artificial caves in good stability conditions might be used and exploited for tourism or for cultural events. They represent, as a matter of fact, sites of high value whose history should be transferred to the young generations, as has already been done in many cases and in several other countries [164,165,166,167,168,169]. In other words, karst caves and artificial cavities are worth being studied, but they should not be seen only as a hazard; when in good condition, once stability has been carefully evaluated [48,170,171,172], they may represent a social and economic value for local communities and offer good opportunity of work and development.

Author Contributions

C.V.: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Validation, Statistical analysis, Writing—Review & Editing; M.P.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Validation, Writing—Review & Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for their criticism, which contributed to improvements of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Environment Agency (EEA). Economic Losses from Climate-Related Extremes in Europe. 2021. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/economic-losses-from-climate-related (accessed on 12 January 2022).
  2. Guzzetti, F. Landslide fatalities and the evaluation of landslide risk in Italy. Eng. Geol. 2000, 58, 89–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guzzetti, F.; Salvati, P.; Stark, C.P. Evaluation of risk to the population posed by natural hazard in Italy. In Landslide Risk Management; Hungr, O., Fell, R., Couture, R., Eberhardt, E., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2005; pp. 381–389. [Google Scholar]
  4. Salvati, P.; Bianchi, C.; Rossi, M.; Guzzetti, F. Societal landslide and flood risk in Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 10, 465–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. White, W.B. Geomorphology and Hydrology of Karst Terrains; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ford, D.; Williams, P. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-470-84996-5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Palmer, A.N. Cave Geology; Cave Books: Dayton, OH, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-939748-66-2. [Google Scholar]
  8. Parise, M.; Ravbar, N.; Živanovic, V.; Mikszewski, A.; Kresic, N.; Mádl-Szőnyi, J.; Kukuric, N. Hazards in Karst and Managing Water Resources Quality. In Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering; Stevanovic, Z., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 601–687. [Google Scholar]
  9. Parise, M.; Pisano, L.; Vennari, C. Sinkhole clusters after heavy rainstorms. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2018, 80, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Szwedzicki, T. Geotechnical precursors to large-scale ground collapse in mines. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2001, 38, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castellanza, R.; Gerolymatou, E.; Nova, R. An Attempt to Predict the Failure Time of Abandoned Mine Pillars. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2007, 41, 377–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parise, M.; Lollino, P. A preliminary analysis of failure mechanisms in karst and man-made underground caves in Southern Italy. Geomorphology 2011, 134, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ma, D.; Zhang, K. Mechanism of collapse sinkholes induced by solu-tion mining of salt formations and measures for prediction and prevention. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2019, 78, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dobereiner, L.; De Freitas, M.H. Geotechnical properties of weak sandstones. Géotechnique 1986, 36, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andriani, G.F.; Walsh, N. Physical properties and textural parameters of calcarenitic rocks: Qualitative and quantita-tive evaluations. Eng. Geol. 2002, 67, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hoke, G.D.; Turcotte, D.L. The weathering of stones due to dissolution. Environ. Earth Sci. 2004, 46, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, M.L.; Jeng, F.S.; Tsai, L.S.; Huang, T.H. Wetting weakening of tertiary sandstones—Microscopic mechanism. Environ. Earth Sci. 2005, 48, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ghabezloo, S.; Pouya, A. Numerical modeling of the_effect of weathering on the progressive failure of underground limestone mines. In Eurock 2006—Multyphysics Coupling and Long Term Behavior in Rock Mechanics; Van Cotthem, A., Charlier, R., Thimus, J.F., Tshibangu, J.P., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2006; pp. 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  19. Castellanza, R.; Lollino, P.; Ciantia, M. A methodological approach to assess the hazard of underground cavities subjected to environmental weathering. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 82, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, K.S. Subsidence hazards due to evaporite dissolution in the United States. Environ. Earth Sci. 2005, 48, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Waltham, T.; Park, H.; Suh, J.; Yu, M.; Kwon, H.; Bang, K. Collapses of old mines in Korea. Eng. Geol. 2011, 118, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Poppe, S.; Holohan, E.P.; Pauwels, E.; Cnudde, V.; Kervyn, M. Sinkholes, pit craters, and small calderas: Analog mod-els of depletion-induced collapse analyzed by computed X-ray microtomography. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2014, 127, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bérest, P. Cases, causes and classifications of craters above salt caverns. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2017, 100, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taheri, K.; Gutiérrez, F.; Mohseni, H.; Raeisi, E.; Taheri, M. Sinkhole susceptibility mapping using the analytical hier-archy process (AHP) and magnitude–frequency relationships: A case study in Hamadan province, Iran. Geomorphology 2015, 234, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Taheri, K.; Shahabi, H.; Chapi, K.; Shirzadi, A.; Gutiérrez, F.; Khosravi, K. Sinkhole susceptibility mapping: A com-parison between Bayes-based machine learning algorithms. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 730–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rosdi, M.A.H.M.; Othman, A.N.; Zubir, M.A.M.; Latif, Z.A.; Yusoff, Z.M. Sinkhole Susceptibility Hazard Zones Using GIS and Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP): A Case Study of Kuala Lumpur and Ampang Jaya. ISPRS-Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, XLII-4/W5, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Al-Halbouni, D.; Holohan, E.P.; Taheri, A.; Schöpfer, M.P.J.; Emam, S.; Dahm, T. Geomechanical modelling of sinkhole development using distinct elements: Model verification for a single void space and application to the Dead Sea area. Solid Earth 2018, 9, 1341–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Beck, B. Soil Piping and Sinkhole Failures. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 2nd ed.; Culver, D.C., White, W.B., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 521–526. [Google Scholar]
  29. Waltham, T.; Bell, F.G.; Culshaw, M.G. Sinkholes and Subsidence; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2005; p. 382. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gutiérrez, F.; Guerrero, J.; Lucha, P. A genetic classification of sinkholes illustrated from evaporite paleokarst expo-sures in Spain. Environ. Geol. 2008, 53, 993–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gutiérrez, F.; Parise, M.; De Waele, J.; Jourde, H. A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2014, 138, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Klimchouk, A.; Andrejchuk, V. Karst breakdown mechanisms from observations in the gypsum caves of the Western Ukraine: Implications for subsidence hazard assessment. Int. J. Speleol. 2002, 31, 55–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Waltham, T.; Lu, Z. Natural and Anthropogenic Rock Collapse over Open Caves. In Natural and Anthropogenic Hazards in Karst Areas: Recognition, Analysis, and Mitigation; Parise, M., Gunn, J., Eds.; Geological Society of London: London, UK, 2007; pp. 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  34. Parise, M. A procedure for evaluating the susceptibility to natural and anthropogenic sinkholes. Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 2015, 9, 272–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Palmer, A.N. Origin and Morphometry of Limestone Caves. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1991, 103, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andrejchuk, V.; Klimchouk, A. Mechanisms of karst breakdown formation in the Gypsum Karst of the Fore-Ural Re-gions, Russia (from observations in the Kungurskaja Cave). Int. J. Speleol. 2002, 31, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Worthington, S.R.H. Evolution of caves in response to base-level lowering. Cave Karst Sci. 2005, 32, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  38. Galeazzi, C. The Typological Tree of Artificial Cavities: A Contribution by the Commission of the Italian Speleological Society; EGERIA Underground Research Centre: Rome, Italy, 2013; pp. 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Parise, M.; Galeazzi, C.; Bixio, R.; Dixon, M. Classification of Artificial Cavities: A First Contribution by the UIS Com-mission. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Speleology, Brno, Czech Republic, 21–28 July 2013; pp. 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  40. Day, A. Cave Surveying; British Cave Research Association: Buxton, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Häuselmann, P. Symbols for Karst Surfaces: The UIS list. Z. Fur Geomorphol. 2006, 147, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  42. Häuselmann, P. (Ed.) UIS Mapping Grades, version 2; Survey and Mapping Working Group, UIS Informatics Commission, 2010. Available online: http://www.uisic.uis-speleo.org/UISmappingGrades.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  43. Martimucci, V.; Parise, M. Cave surveys, the representation of underground karst landforms, and their possible use and misuse. In Proceedings of the 20th International Karstological School ‘Karst Forms and Processes’, Postojna, Slovenia, 18–21 June 2012; pp. 69–70. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fraldi, M.; Guarracino, F. Limit analysis of collapse mechanisms in cavities and tunnels according to the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2009, 46, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferrero, A.M.; Segalini, A.; Giani, G.P. Stability analysis of historic underground quarries. Comput. Geotech. 2010, 37, 476–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Formicola, W.; Gueguen, E.; Martimucci, V.; Parise, M.; Ragone, G. Caves Below Quarries and Quarries above Caves: Problems, Hazard and Research. A Case Study from Southern Italy; Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 2010; Volume 42. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sunwoo, C.; Song, W.-K.; Ryu, D.-W. A Case Study of Subsidence over an Abandoned Underground Limestone Mine. Geosystem Eng. 2010, 13, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hutchinson, D.J.; Phillips, C.; Cascante, G. Risk Considerations for Crown Pillar Stability Assessment for Mine Clo-sure Planning. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2002, 20, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Waltham, A.; Swift, G. Bearing capacity of rock over mined cavities in Nottingham. Eng. Geol. 2004, 75, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Parise, M. The Impacts of Quarrying in the Apulian Karst. In Advances in Research in Karst Media; Carrasco, F., La Moreaux, J.W., Duran Valsero, J.J., An-dreo, B., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 441–447. [Google Scholar]
  51. Parise, M. Hazards in Karst. In Sustainability of the Karst Environment. Dinaric Karst and Other Karst Regions, Proceedings of the International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference, Plitvice Lakes, Croatia, 23–26 September 2009; Bonacci, O., Ed.; IHP-UNESCO: Paris, France, 2010; pp. 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lollino, P.; Martimucci, V.; Parise, M. Geological survey and numerical modeling of the potential failure mechanisms of underground caves. Geosystem Eng. 2013, 16, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vattano, M.; Parise, M.; Lollino, P.; Bonamini, M.; Maggio, D.; Madonia, G. Examples of Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Sicily and Comparison with Similar Phenomena in Southern Italy. In Proceedings of the Full Proceedings of the Thirteenth Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst, Carlsbad, New Mexico, 6–10 May 2013; Land, L., Doctor, D.H., Stephenson, J.B., Eds.; University of South Florida: Tampa, FL, USA, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  54. Fazio, N.; Perrotti, M.; Lollino, P.; Parise, M.; Vattano, M.; Madonia, G.; Di Maggio, C. A three-dimensional back-analysis of the collapse of an underground cavity in soft rocks. Eng. Geol. 2017, 228, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Shi, W.; Ren, J.; Liang, F.; Lu, J.; Li, H.; Yu, X. Forensic analysis and numerical simulation of a cata-strophic landslide of dissolved and fractured rock slope subject to underground mining. Landslides 2022, 19, 1045–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abbasnejad, A.; Abbasnejad, B.; Derakhshani, R.; Hemmati Sarapardeh, A. Qanat hazard in Iranian urban areas: Explanation and remedies. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Parise, M. Qanat is not a hazard. Rebuttal to ‘‘Qanat hazard in Iranian urban areas: Explanation and remedies’’ by Ab-basnejad A, Abbasnejad B, Derakhshani R, Hemmati Sarapardeh A (Environ Earth Sci 2016; 75: 1306). Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Valipour, M.; Abdelkader, T.A.; Antoniou, G.P.; Sala, R.; Parise, M.; Salgot, M.; Sanaan Bensi, N.; Angelakis, A.N. Sustainability of underground hydro-technologies: From ancient to modern times and toward the future. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brinkmann, R.; Parise, M.; Dye, D. Sinkhole distribution in a rapidly developing urban environment: Hillsborough County, Tampa Bay area, Florida. Eng. Geol. 2008, 99, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hermosilla, R.G. The Guatemala City sinkhole collapses. Carbonates Evaporites 2011, 27, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Upchurch, S.B.; Littlefield, J.R. Evaluation of data for Sinkhole-development risk models. Environ. Earth Sci. 1988, 12, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Benson, R.C.; Yuhr, L.; Kaufmann, R.D. Assessing the risk of karst subsidence and collapse. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Spec. Publ. 2003, 122, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  63. Brinkmann, R. Florida Sinkholes; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  64. Nisio, S.; Caramanna, G.; Ciotoli, G. Sinkholes in Italy: First results on the inventory and analysis. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spéc. Publ. 2007, 279, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Parise, M.; Vennari, C. A chronological catalogue of sinkholes in Italy: The first step toward a real evaluation of the sinkhole hazard. In Proceedings of the 13th Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst, Carlsbad, New Mexico, 6–10 May 2013; Land, L., Doctor, D.H., Stephenson, B., Eds.; National Cave and Karst Research Institute: Carlsbad, NM, USA, 2013; pp. 383–392. [Google Scholar]
  66. Parise, M.; Vennari, C. Distribution and features of natural and anthropogenic sinkholes in Apulia. In EuroKarst 2016, Neuchatel: Advances in the Hydrogeology of Karst and Carbonate Reservoirs; Renard, P., Bertrand, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 27–34. ISBN 978-3-319-45464-1. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fonseca, C. Rupestrian civilization in Apulia. In Apulia between Bisantium and the West; 1980; pp. 36–116. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  68. Parise, M.; Federico, A.; Delle Rose, M.; Sammarco, M. Karst terminology in Apulia (southern Italy). Acta Carsologica 2003, 32, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tharp, T.M. Mechanics of upward propagation of cover-collapse sinkholes. Eng. Geol. 1999, 52, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Waltham, T. The engineering classification of karst with respect to the role and influence of caves. Int. J. Speleol. 2002, 31, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Parise, M. Sinkholes. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 3rd ed.; White, W.B., Culver, D.C., Pipan, T., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 934–942. [Google Scholar]
  72. Parise, M. Sinkholes, Subsidence and Related Mass Movements. In Treatise on Geomorphology; Shroder, J.J.F., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; Volume 5, pp. 200–220. ISBN 9780128182345. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sauro, U. Dolines and Sinkholes: Aspects of Evolution and Problems of Classification. Acta Carsol. 2003, 32, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Williams, P. Dolines. In Encyclopedia of Caves and Karst Science; Gunn, J., Ed.; Fitzroy Dearborn: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 304–310. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rose, M.D.; Parise, M. Karst subsidence in South-Central Apulia, Southern Italy. Int. J. Speleol. 2002, 31, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Margiotta, S.; Marini, G.; Fay, S.; D’Onghia, F.; Liso, I.; Parise, M.; Pinna, M. Hydro-Stratigraphic Conditions and Human Activity Leading to Development of a Sinkhole Cluster in a Mediterranean Water Ecosystem. Hydrology 2021, 8, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rose, M.D.; Federico, A.; Parise, M. Sinkhole genesis and evolution in Apulia, and their interrelations with the anthropogenic environment. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2004, 4, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Fidelibus, M.D.; Gutiérrez, F.; Spilotro, G. Human-induced hydrogeological changes and sinkholes in the coastal gypsum karst of Lesina Marina area (Foggia Province, Italy). Eng. Geol. 2011, 118, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zini, L.; Calligaris, C.; Forte, E.; Petronio, L.; Zavagno, E.; Boccali, C.; Cucchi, F. A multidisciplinary approach in sinkhole analysis: The Quinis village case study (NE Italy). Eng. Geol. 2015, 197, 132–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Intrieri, E.; Gigli, G.; Nocentini, M.; Lombardi, L.; Mugnai, F.; Fidolini, F.; Casagli, N. Sinkhole monitoring and early warning: An experimental and successful GB-InSAR application. Geomorphology 2015, 241, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Iovine, G.; Vennari, C.; Gariano, S.L.; Caloiero, T.; Lanza, G.; Nicolino, N.; Suriano, S.; Ferraro, G.; Parise, M. The “Pi-ano dell’Acqua” sinkholes (San Basile, Northern Calabria, Italy). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2016, 75, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Margiotta, S.; Negri, S.; Parise, M.; Quarta, T.A.M. Karst geosites at risk of collapse: The sinkholes at Nociglia (Apulia, SE Italy). Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 75, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Guarino, P.M.; Nisio, S. Anthropogenic sinkholes in the territory of the city of Naples (Southern Italy). Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2012, 49, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Parise, M. A present risk from past activities: Sinkhole occurrence above underground quarries. Carbonates Evaporites 2012, 27, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Guarino, P.M.; Santo, A.; Forte, G.; De Falco, M.; Niceforo, D.M.A. Analysis of a database for anthro- pogenic sinkhole triggering and zonation in the Naples hinterland (Southern Italy). Nat. Hazards 2018, 91, 173–192. [Google Scholar]
  86. Scotto di Santolo, A.; Forte, G.; Santo, A. Analysis of sinkhole triggering mechanisms in the hinter-land of Naples (southern Italy). Eng. Geol. 2018, 237, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tufano, R.; Guerriero, L.; Corona, M.A.; Bausilio, G.; Di Martire, D.; Nisio, S.; Calcaterra, D. Anthropogenic sinkholes of the city of Naples, Italy: An update. Nat. Hazards 2022, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, J. Relative Accuracy Evaluation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M.; Stoffel, M.; Rudolf-Miklau, F. Summary and Outlook. In Dating Torrential Processes on Fans and Cones; Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M., Stoffel, M., Rudolf-Miklau, F., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 419–423. [Google Scholar]
  90. Gibson, K. BusinessDictionary.com. Ref. Rev. 2009, 23, 25–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Clapham, C.; Nicholson, J. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chapra, S.C.; Canale, R.P. Numerical Methods for Engineers, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hill Higher Education: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-07-340106-5. [Google Scholar]
  93. Aleotti, P.; Chowdhury, R. Landslide hazard assessment: Summary review and new perspectives. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 1999, 58, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cambridge University. Cambridge Dictionary; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  95. Carlson, N.R.; Buskist, W.; Heth, D.C.; Schmaltz, R. Psychology: The Science of Behaviour. Fourth Canadian Edition with MyPsychLab, 4th ed.; Pearson Education Canada: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2009; ISBN 978-0205702862. [Google Scholar]
  96. The Use of Historical Data in Natural Hazard Assessments. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research; Glade, T.; Albini, P.; Frances, F. (Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
  97. Vennari, C.; Salvati, P.; Bianchi, C.; Casarano, D.; Parise, M.; Basso, A.; Marchesini, I. AReGeoDatHa: Apulian Regional GeoDatabase for geo-hydrological Hazards. J. Environ. Manag. 2022. under review. [Google Scholar]
  98. Nursey-Bray, M.J.; Vince, J.; Scott, M.; Haward, M.; O’Toole, K.; Smith, T.; Harvey, N.; Clarke, B. Science into policy? Discourse, coastal management and knowledge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 38, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Guzzetti, F. Forecasting natural hazards, performance of scientists, ethics, and the need for transparency. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2016, 98, 1043–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. POLARIS-POpoLAtion at RISk by Landslides and Floods in Italy. (In Italian). Available online: http://polaris.irpi.cnr.it/elenco-zone-allerta/ (accessed on 12 January 2022).
  101. Portal of the National Register of Italian Caves. (In Italian). Available online: https://speleo.it/catastogrotte/ (accessed on 2 December 2021).
  102. Nationale Register of Artificial Cavities. (In Italian). Available online: http://catastoartificiali.speleo.it/applications/1.0/ (accessed on 2 December 2021).
  103. Billi, A.; Valle, A.; Brilli, M.; Faccenna, C.; Funiciello, R. Fracture-controlled fluid circulation and dissolutional weathering in sinkhole-prone carbonate rocks from central Italy. J. Struct. Geol. 2007, 29, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Buchignani, V.; D’Amato Avanzi, G.; Giannecchini, R.; Puccinelli, A. Evaporite karst and sinkholes: A synthesis on the case of Camaiore (Italy). Environ. Geol. 2008, 53, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tassi, F.; Bicocchi, G.; Cabassi, J.; Capecchiacci, F.; Vaselli, O.; Capezzuoli, E.; Brogi, A. Hydrogeochemical processes controlling water and dissolved gas chemistry at the Accesa sinkhole (southern Tuscany, central Italy). J. Limnol. 2014, 73, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Del Prete, S.; Galeazzi, C.; Germani, C.; Martimucci, V.; Parise, M. Geohydrological problems related to underground artificial cavities. In Proceedings of the Convegni Lincei “Frane e dissesto idrogeologico: Consuntivo”; Accademia dei Lincei, Rome, Italy, 22 March 2010; Volume 262, pp. 223–232. (In Italian). [Google Scholar]
  107. Germani, C.; Galeazzi, C.; Galeazzi, S.; Casciotti, L.; Vennari, C.; Parise, M. Sinkhole problems at Rome and in the surrounding territories. In Proceedings of the World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium WMESS 2015, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–11 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
  108. Adams, W.C. Whose Lives Count?: TV Coverage of Natural Disasters. J. Commun. 1986, 36, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Van Belle, D.A. New York times and network TV news coverage of foreign disasters: The significance of the insignificant variables. J. Mass Commun. Q. 2000, 77, 50–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Eisensee, T.; Strömberg, D. News droughts, news floods, and US disaster relief. Q. J. Econ. 2007, 122, 693–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Calcaterra, D.; Parise, M. The contribution of historical information in the assessment of the landslide hazard. In The Use of Historical Data in Natural Hazard Assessments. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research; Glade, T., Albini, P., Frances, F., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 201–217. [Google Scholar]
  112. Calcaterra, D.; Parise, M.; Palma, B. Combining historical and geological data for the assessment of the landslide hazard: A case study from Campania, Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 3, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Vennari, C.; Parise, M.; Santangelo, N.; Santo, A. A database on flash flood events in Campania, southern Italy, with an evaluation of their spatial and temporal distribution. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 16, 2485–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Avvenuti, M.; Del Vigna, F.; Cresci, S.; Marchetti, A.; Tesconi, M. Pulling information from social media in the after-math of unpredictable disasters. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Disaster Management (ICT-DM), Piscataway, NJ, USA; 2015; pp. 258–264. [Google Scholar]
  115. Hicks, S.P. Geoscience analysis on Twitter. Nat. Geosci. 2019, 12, 585–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vennari, C.; Salvati, P.; Bianchi, C.; Casarano, D.; Parise, M.; Basso, A.; Marchesini, I. Database of geo-hydrological hazards in Apulia (Italy) (1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sinkholes Project-ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. Available online: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/progetti/cartella-progetti-in-corso/suolo-e-territorio-1/il-progetto-sinkhole (accessed on 4 February 2022).
  118. Italian Web Sinkholes Database. Available online: http://host.uniroma3.it/laboratori/idrogeologia/iwsd.php (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  119. Sinkhole Project WebGIS. Soil Protection, Campania Region. (In Italian). Available online: http://webgis.difesa.suolo.regione.campania.it:8080/sinkhole/map.phtml (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  120. Davis, N. When is a sinkhole not a sinkhole? The Guardian, 28 May 2016; 32. [Google Scholar]
  121. Pasquarè, F.; Pozzetti, M. Geological hazards, disasters and the media: The Italian case study. Quat. Int. 2007, 173–174, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Brinkmann, R.; Parise, M. The timing of sinkhole formation in Tampa and Orlando, Florida. Florida Geogr. 2010, 41, 22–38. [Google Scholar]
  123. Del Prete, S.; Di Crescenzo, G.; Santangelo, N.; Santo, A. Collapse sinkholes in Campania (southern Italy): Predis-posing factors, genetic hypothesis and susceptibility. Geomorphology 2010, 54, 259–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Del Prete, S.; Iovine, G.; Parise, M.; Santo, A. Origin and distribution of different types of sinkholes in the plain areas of Southern Italy. Geodin. Acta 2010, 23, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Santo, A.; Ascione, A.; Del Prete, S.; Di Crescenzo, G.; Santangelo, N. Collapse sinkholes in the carbonate massifs of Central and Southern Apennines. Acta Carsologica 2012, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Santo, A.; Santangelo, N.; De Falco, M.; Forte, G.; Valente, E. Cover collapse sinkhole over a deep buried carbonate bedrock: The case study of Fossa San Vito (Sarno-Southern Italy). Geomorphology 2019, 345, 106838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Martinotti, M.E.; Pisano, L.; Marchesini, I.; Rossi, M.; Peruccacci, S.; Brunetti, M.T.; Melillo, M.; Amoruso, G.; Loiacono, P.; Vennari, C.; et al. Landslides, floods and sinkholes in a karst environment: The 1–6 September 2014 Gargano event, southern Italy. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 17, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Sottile, R. Geological Problems Related to Sinkholes in Urban Areas. The Example of the City of Palermo. Bachelor Thesis, Palermo University, Palermo, Italy, 2010. (In Italian). [Google Scholar]
  129. Barla, G.; Jarre, P. Subsidence over an Abandoned Dissolving Salt Mine. In Rock Mechanics as a Multidisciplinary Science; Roegiers, J.-C., Ed.; Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 393–398. [Google Scholar]
  130. Bérest, P.; Bergues, J.; Brouard, B. Review of static and dynamic compressibility issues relating to deep underground salt caverns. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1999, 36, 1031–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bérest, P.; Brouard, B.; Feuga, B.; Karimi-Jafari, M. The 1873 collapse of the Saint-Maximilien panel at the Varangeville salt mine. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2008, 45, 1025–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gisotti, G. Environmental problems about the salt mine at Belvedere Spinello (Catanzaro). A new case of subsidence in Italy. Memorie Descrittive della Carta Geologica d’Italia 1992, 42, 283–306. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  133. Roda, C.; Martelli, G. The 25 april 1984 collapse chimney in the territory of Belvedere di Spinello (Crotone). Giorn. Geol. Appl. 2006, 3, 237–248. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  134. Mayer, R.; Plank, C.; Bohner, A.; Kollarits, S.; Corsini, A.; Ronchetti, F.; Siegel, H.; Noessing, L.; Mair, V.; Sulzenbacher, U.; et al. MONITOR: Hazard monitoring for risk assessment and risk communication. Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 2008, 2, 195–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ho, K.K.S.; Ko, F.W.Y. Application of quantified risk analysis in landslide risk management practice: Hong Kong experience. Georisk 2009, 3, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sousa, R.L.; Karam, K.; Einstein, H.H. Exploration analysis for landslide risk management. Georisk Assess. Manag. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 2014, 8, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sidle, R.C.; Benson, W.H.; Carriger, J.F.; Kamai, T. Broader perspective on ecosystem sustainability: Consequences for decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9201–9208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Stein, J.L.; Stein, S. Gray swans: Comparison of natural and financial hazard assessment and mitigation. Nat. Hazards 2012, 72, 1279–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Qin, L.; Feng, S.; Zhu, H. Research on the technological architectural design of geological hazard monitoring and rescue-after-disaster system based on cloud computing and Internet of things. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2018, 9, 684–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Shao, L. Geological disaster prevention and control and resource protection in mineral resource exploitation region. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2019, 14, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Festa, V.; Fiore, A.; Parise, M.; Siniscalchi, A. Sinkhole evolution in the Apulian Karst of Southern Italy: A case study, with some considerations on Sinkhole Hazards. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2012, 74, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zumpano, V.; Pisano, L.; Parise, M. An integrated framework to identify and analyze karst sinkholes. Geomorphology 2019, 332, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Filin, S.; Baruch, A. Detection of Sinkhole Hazards using Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2010, 76, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhu, J.; Taylor, T.P.; Currens, J.C.; Crawford, M.M. Improved karst sinkhole mapping in Kentucky using LiDAR tech-niques: A pilot study in Floyds fork watershed. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2014, 76, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Bauer, C. Analysis of dolines using multiple methods applied to airborne laser scanning data. Geomorphology 2015, 250, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wu, Q.; Deng, C.; Chen, Z. Automated delineation of karst sinkholes from LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. Geomorphology 2016, 266, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hofierka, J.; Gallay, M.; Bandura, P.; Šašak, J. Identification of karst sinkholes in a forested karst landscape using air-borne laser scanning data and water flow analysis. Geomorphology 2018, 308, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kemmerly, P.R. Sinkhole Hazards and Risk Assessment in a Planning Context. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 1993, 59, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Florea, L. Using state-wide GIS data to identify the coincidence between sinkholes and geologic structure. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2005, 67, 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  150. Gao, Y.; Alexander, E.C., Jr.; Barnes, R.J. Karst database implementation in Minnesota: Analysis of sinkhole distribution. Environ. Geol. 2005, 47, 1083–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hyland, S.E.; Kennedy, L.M.; Younos, T.; Parson, S. Analysis of Sinkhole Susceptibility and Karst Distribution in the Northern Shenandoah Valley, Virginia: Implications for Low Impact Development (LID) Site Suitability Models. Available online: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/49477/VWRRC_sr200631.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  152. Brinkmann, R.; Parise, M. Karst Environments: Problems, Management, Human Impacts, and Sustainability. An introduction to the Special Issue. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2012, 74, 135–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Milanovic, P.T. Geological Engineering in Karst; Zebra: Belgrade, Serbia, 2000; p. 347. ISBN 867489125X. [Google Scholar]
  154. Milanovic, P. The environmental impacts of human activities and engineering constructions in karst regions. Episodes 2002, 25, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zhou, W.; Beck, B.F.; Beynen, P.E. Engineering Issues on Karst. In Karst Management; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 9–45. [Google Scholar]
  156. Parise, M.; Closson, D.; Gutierrez, F.; Stevanovic, Z. Anticipating and managing engineering problems in the com-plex karst environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 7823–7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Nicoletti, P.G.; Parise, M. Seven landslide dams of old seismic origin in southeastern Sicily (Italy). Geomorphology 2002, 46, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Porfido, S.; Esposito, E.; Vittori, E.; Tranfaglia, G.; Michetti, A.; Blumetti, M.; Ferreli, L.; Guerrieri, L.; Serva, L. Areal Distribution of Ground Effects Induced by Strong Earthquakes in the Southern Apennines (Italy). Surv. Geophys. 2002, 23, 529–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Closson, D.; Karaki, N.A.; Milisavljevic, N.; Hallot, F.; Acheroy, M. Salt-dissolution-induced subsidence in the Dead Sea area detected by applying interferometric techniques to ALOS Palsar Synthetic Aperture Radar images. Geodin. Acta 2010, 23, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Kawashima, K.; Ömer, A.; Aoki, T.; Kishimoto, I.; Konagai, K.; Matsui, T.; Sakuta, J.; Takahashi, N.; Teodori, S.-P.; Yashima, A. Reconnaissance Investigation on the Damage of the 2009 L’Aquila, Central Italy Earthquake. J. Earthq. Eng. 2010, 14, 817–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Parise, M.; Perrone, A.; Violante, C.; Stewart, J.P.; Simonelli, A.; Guzzetti, F. Activity of the Italian National Research Council in the aftermath of the 6 April 2009 Abruzzo earthquake: The Sinizzo Lake case study. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop “Sinkholes in the Natural and Anthropogenic Environment”, Rome, Italy, 3–4 December 2009; pp. 623–641. [Google Scholar]
  162. Tomac, I.; Kovačević Zelić, B.; Perić, D.; Domitrović, D.; Štambuk Cvitanović, N.; Vučenović, H.; Parlov, J.; Stipčević, J.; Matešić, D.; Matoš, B.; et al. Geotechnical Reconnaissance of an Extensive Cover-Collapse Sinkhole Phenomena of 2020–2021 Petrinja Earthquake Sequence (Central Croatia). Earthq. Spectra. 2021, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tomac, I.; Vlahović, I.; Parlov, J.; Matoš, B.; Matešić, D.; Kosović, I.; Pavičić, I.; Frangen, T.; Terzić, J.; Pavelić, D.; et al. Geotechnical Reconnaissance and Engineering Effects of the December 29, 2020, M6.4 Petrinja, Croatia Earthquake, and Associated Seismic Sequence; Technical report of Geotechnical Extreme Event Reconnaissance (GEER) Association: Petrinja, Croatia, 2021; pp. 49–96. Available online: http://www.geerassociation.org/index.php/component/geer_reports/?view=geerreports&layout=build&id=99 (accessed on 13 March 2022).
  164. Laureano, P. Gardens of Stone; Bollati Boringhieri: Turin, Italy, 1993. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  165. Lapenna, V.; Leucci, G.; Parise, M.; Porfyriou, H.; Genovese, L.; Varriale, R. A project to promote the importance of the natural and cultural heritage of the underground environment in southern Italy. In Proceedings of the International Congress in Artificial Cavities “Hypogea 2017”, Cappadocia, Turkey, 6–10 March 2017; pp. 128–136, ISBN 978-605-9680-37-0. [Google Scholar]
  166. AlRayyan, K.; Hamarneh, C.; Sukkar, H.; Ghaith, A.; Abu-Jaber, N. From Abandoned Mines to a Labyrinth of Knowledge: A Conceptual Design for a Geoheritage Park Museum in Jordan. Geoheritage 2017, 11, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Polimeni, B.; Bixio, R.; Galeazzi, C.; Germani, C.; Parise, M.; Saj, S.; Sammarco, M. Creating a Map of the Underground Heritage in the Mediterranean Area: A Visual Representation for a Comprehensive Research. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 26, pp. 115–129. [Google Scholar]
  168. Genovese, L. Underground Built Heritage as Valuable Resource for Sustainable Growth. In Damage Assessment and Conservation of Underground Spaces as Valuable Resources for Human Activities in Italy and Japan; Varriale, R., Oguchi, C.T., Parise, M., Eds.; Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Rome, Italy, 2020; pp. 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  169. Varriale, R.; Parise, M.; Genovese, L.; Leo, M.; Valese, S. Underground Built Heritage in Naples: From Knowledge to Monitoring and Enhancement. In Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 2001–2035. [Google Scholar]
  170. Hatzor, Y.; Talesnick, M.; Tsesarsky, M. Continuous and discontinuous stability analysis of the bell-shaped caverns at Bet Guvrin, Israel. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2002, 39, 867–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Oguchi, C.T.; Sakane, K.; Tamura, Y. Non-destructive Field Measurement for Investigation of Weathered Parts–Case Study at the Taya Cave, Central Japan. In Damage Assessment and Conservation of Underground Spaces as Valuable Resources for Human Activities in Italy and Japan; Varriale, R., Oguchi, C.T., Parise, M., Eds.; Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Rome, Italy, 2020; pp. 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  172. Parise, M. Instability Issues in Underground Cultural Heritage Sites. In Damage Assessment and Conservation of Underground Spaces as Valuable Resources for Human Activities in Italy and Japan; Varriale, R., Oguchi, C.T., Parise, M., Eds.; Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche: Rome, Italy, 2020; pp. 93–106. [Google Scholar]
Geosciences 12 00200 g001 550
Figure 1. Examples of natural sinkholes from Apulia and Calabria. The sinkholes involve carbonates (a,d,e,h), evaporites (b,f,g) and alluvial deposits (c) and belong to the categories of collapse (a,d,h), cover-collapse (f,g) and suffusion sinkholes (b,c,e).
Figure 1. Examples of natural sinkholes from Apulia and Calabria. The sinkholes involve carbonates (a,d,e,h), evaporites (b,f,g) and alluvial deposits (c) and belong to the categories of collapse (a,d,h), cover-collapse (f,g) and suffusion sinkholes (b,c,e).
Geosciences 12 00200 g001
Geosciences 12 00200 g002 550
Figure 2. Sinkholes related to artificial cavities. All examples refer to underground calcarenite quarries, a rock material frequently used for building construction: (a) Cutrofiano, Apulia; (b) Barletta, Apulia; (c,d) Altamura, Apulia; (e) Marsala, Sicily.
Figure 2. Sinkholes related to artificial cavities. All examples refer to underground calcarenite quarries, a rock material frequently used for building construction: (a) Cutrofiano, Apulia; (b) Barletta, Apulia; (c,d) Altamura, Apulia; (e) Marsala, Sicily.
Geosciences 12 00200 g002
Geosciences 12 00200 g003 550
Figure 3. Classification of artificial cavities (after [39]).
Figure 3. Classification of artificial cavities (after [39]).
Geosciences 12 00200 g003
Geosciences 12 00200 g004 550
Figure 4. Left: karst collapse sinkhole at Barbarano, Apulia; the sinkhole is 35 mt deep and more than 40 mt wide. Right: detachment of the southern rim of the sinkhole as a reactivation in February 2011.
Figure 4. Left: karst collapse sinkhole at Barbarano, Apulia; the sinkhole is 35 mt deep and more than 40 mt wide. Right: detachment of the southern rim of the sinkhole as a reactivation in February 2011.
Geosciences 12 00200 g004
Geosciences 12 00200 g005 550
Figure 5. Temporal distribution of sinkhole occurrences (gray bars) and temporal accuracy classes trend over the years investigated (colored lines: H—High; MH—Middle-High; M—Middle; ML—Middle-Low; L—Low; see Table 1 for details).
Figure 5. Temporal distribution of sinkhole occurrences (gray bars) and temporal accuracy classes trend over the years investigated (colored lines: H—High; MH—Middle-High; M—Middle; ML—Middle-Low; L—Low; see Table 1 for details).
Geosciences 12 00200 g005
Geosciences 12 00200 g006 550
Figure 6. Distribution of the sinkholes documented in the catalogue in the Italian regions; (A) following the certainty in location classes (H—high; M—Medium; L—Low; see Table 2 for details), (B) following the origin of underground cavity.
Figure 6. Distribution of the sinkholes documented in the catalogue in the Italian regions; (A) following the certainty in location classes (H—high; M—Medium; L—Low; see Table 2 for details), (B) following the origin of underground cavity.
Geosciences 12 00200 g006
Geosciences 12 00200 g007 550
Figure 7. Damage caused by recorded sinkholes, according to the EU Floods Directive specifications.
Figure 7. Damage caused by recorded sinkholes, according to the EU Floods Directive specifications.
Geosciences 12 00200 g007
Geosciences 12 00200 g008 550
Figure 8. Percentage of sources used in data record.
Figure 8. Percentage of sources used in data record.
Geosciences 12 00200 g008
Geosciences 12 00200 g009 550
Figure 9. Sinkhole occurrence in urbanized areas can pose serious risks to society, threatening buildings and infrastructures.
Figure 9. Sinkhole occurrence in urbanized areas can pose serious risks to society, threatening buildings and infrastructures.
Geosciences 12 00200 g009
Geosciences 12 00200 g010 550
Figure 10. Open cracks and shore disruption at Sinizzo Lake (Abruzzo, Italy) after the L’Aquila earthquake on 6 April 2009 (Mw 6.3).
Figure 10. Open cracks and shore disruption at Sinizzo Lake (Abruzzo, Italy) after the L’Aquila earthquake on 6 April 2009 (Mw 6.3).
Geosciences 12 00200 g010
Table
Table 1. Temporal accuracy ranges.
Table 1. Temporal accuracy ranges.
Temporal AccuracyAvailable InformationExamples
HighHour-day-month-year8:10 am, 20 February 2020
Middle-highDay-month-year20 February 2020
MiddleMonth (or season)-yearFebruary 2020, or Winter 2020
Middle-lowYear2020
LowRange of yearsBetween 2019 and 2020, or after 2020
Table
Table 2. Geographical certainty range.
Table 2. Geographical certainty range.
Geographical CertaintyAvailable Information
HighThe locality has an accuracy of less than 100 m
MiddleThe locality is known but not attributable to a precise point or it is generically located along a street
LowLocality is expressed in general terms
Table
Table 3. Damage classification (from Flood Directive 2007/2/EC).
Table 3. Damage classification (from Flood Directive 2007/2/EC).
Category CodeCategory DescriptionType of ConsequencesEU-CODE
1Human HealthSocialB10
1Human HealthHuman healthB11
1Human HealthCommunityB12
1Human HealthOtherB13
2EnvironmentEnvironmentB20
2EnvironmentWater body statusB21
2EnvironmentProtected areasB22
2EnvironmentPollution sourcesB23
2EnvironmentOtherB24
3Cultural HeritageCultural heritageB30
3Cultural HeritageCultural assettsB31
3Cultural HeritageLandscapeB32
3Cultural HeritageOtherB33
4Economic ActivityEconomicB40
4Economic ActivityPropertyB41
4Economic ActivityInfrastructureB42
4Economic ActivityRural land useB43
4Economic ActivityEconomic activityB44
4Economic ActivityOtherB45
5OtherOther
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vennari, C.; Parise, M. A Chronological Database about Natural and Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Italy. Geosciences 2022, 12, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050200

AMA Style

Vennari C, Parise M. A Chronological Database about Natural and Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Italy. Geosciences. 2022; 12(5):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vennari, Carmela, and Mario Parise. 2022. "A Chronological Database about Natural and Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Italy" Geosciences 12, no. 5: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050200

APA Style

Vennari, C., & Parise, M. (2022). A Chronological Database about Natural and Anthropogenic Sinkholes in Italy. Geosciences, 12(5), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop