Next Article in Journal
Investigating the Structural Effect of Achievement Motivation and Achievement on Leadership and Entrepreneurial Spirit of Students in Higher Education
Previous Article in Journal
Why Were Innovators Motivated to Be Entrepreneurs? An Empirical Study of Taiwanese Start-Ups
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Administrative Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/admsci12030098
admsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating the Relationship between Experience, Well-Being, and Loyalty: A Study of Wellness Tourists

by
Ramjit Singh
1,
Parikshat Singh Manhas
2,3,*,
Mudasir Ahmad Mir
1 and
Joana A. Quintela
4,5,6,*
1
Department of Tourism Studies, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal 191201, Jammu & Kashmir, India
2
School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, University of Jammu, Jammu 180006, Jammu & Kashmir, India
3
The Business School, University of Jammu, Jammu 180006, Jammu & Kashmir, India
4
Department of Tourism, Heritage and Culture, Portucalense University, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
5
Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies, REMIT-UPT, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
6
Research Unit in Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, GOVCOPP-UA, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adm. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030098
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Strategic Management)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present research aims to determine the relationship between the construct of autonomy, intrinsic motivation, and tourist experience, as well as loyalty in the context of wellness and spa tourism. The exploratory–descriptive design was adopted in the present research. A research instrument was developed based on previous literature and was tested for a pilot study to check validity and reliability. A purposive sampling technique was used to collect the data from tourists who have gained spa experience. A total of 264 usable responses were received after distributing 400 questionnaires. The data were screened, processed, and analyzed using the SPSS 22.0 and Smart-PLS 2.0. The investigation showed that intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and experience positively impact positive emotions and life satisfaction. Besides, it also supported that positive emotions, experience, and life Satisfaction lead to loyalty. Furthermore, the present study tested the mediating role of experience, positive emotions, and life satisfaction; it was also found that experience mediates the relationship between autonomy, positive emotions, and life satisfaction. Positive emotions and life satisfaction were mediators in the relationship between experience and loyalty. Finally, the findings showed that destination images moderated the relationship between experience, positive emotions, and life satisfaction. The results of this investigation can be helpful for both the research community and marketers interested in investigating the well-being of tourists and destination loyalty.

1. Introduction

Tourism is considered a mentally and physically healthy pursuit. Availing vacations and going on short trips for a change and relaxation are part of human life and detaching from their daily routines (Fritz and Sonnentag 2006). The researchers have expressed awareness of wellness and spa tourism and have discussed that people travel for health and medical purposes (Goodarzi et al. 2016; Page et al. 2017) due to the growing interest in seeking relaxation, happiness, rejuvenation, and well-being (Chen and Petrick 2016; Koskinen and Wilska 2019). According to Kucukusta et al. (2013), wellness tourism consists of mental balance, physical balance, and environmental and social balance. Destination suppliers put all their efforts into satisfying the tourists and providing them with all the necessary products and services to enhance their well-being and discover wellness tourism, intellectual development, growth of mind and body, and spirit enhancement (Rodrigues et al. 2010). Few studies concerning spas, including the health-oriented services and water treatments, springs, hot water, etc., are well connected with health and medical tourism, a renowned type of spa and wellness tourism (Dryglas and Salamaga 2017; Hall 2011; Mueller and Kaufmann 2001; Smith and Puczkó 2014). Previous research has discussed wellness tourism’s benefits (Smith and Kelly 2006; Smith and Puczkó 2008). The basic idea behind health or medical tourism, especially wellness tourism, is to be emotionally full, gain a psychological balance of the body, eliminate stress, and achieve mental peace that ultimately enhances general well-being (Dillette et al. 2021; Garvanova et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2019; Luo et al. 2018; Nicolaides and Grobler 2017).
Since the 1940s, scholars have studied motivation as a key factor in tourist behavior, which has been widely accepted. A few scholars have researched tourism and travel reasons; however, others have looked at the connections between tourism and other concepts, such as destination image (e.g., Li et al. 2010; Huang and Hsu 2009; Lee 2010; Yoon and Uysal 2005). Since satisfaction has been shown to have a positive impact on tourists’ post-purchase behavior, such as recommendations (e.g., Hui et al. 2007; Prebensen et al. 2010) and intention to return (e.g., Alegre and Cladera 2009; Bigné et al. 2005), the motivation–satisfaction relationship has been a broad research interest of many scholars; to understand why people travel, why they choose a specific destination, and how they feel, and as a result, it is essential to look at the motives of tourists (Castaño et al. 2003). In this regard, measurement of tourist motivation is the key to pleasing present visitors, attracting additional visitors, projecting future demand, and designing products to match tourists’ wants (Wolfe and Hsu 2004). From the perspective of psychological theories, however, Bright (2008) points out that tourist motivation is a thorny issue to study. Therefore, theories of tourist motivation should be dynamic and adaptable to different scenarios and the unique conditions of tourists (Pearce 1993).
Emotions are full of feeling states described by scenes of serious sentiments related to a particular referent (for example, an individual, an article, or an occasion) and incite explicit reaction practices (Cohen and Areni 1991). Previous investigations carried out by various researchers such as Lee (2014), and Lee and Kyle (2013) have focused on emotional experiences related to festivals, whereas Yuksel (2007) measured emotional measures with shopping. Other studies such as Han and Jeong (2013); Ladhari (2009) have worked in the context of restaurants, and work on theme parks was conducted by Bigné et al. (2005). Mitas et al. (2012); Nawijn et al. (2013); Hosany and Prayag (2013); Lin et al. (2014); have worked on emotional experiences related to holidays, while research related to heritage sites was carried out by Prayag et al. (2013). Faullant et al. (2011) researched emotional experiences in adventure tourism. More recently, Chang (2017) and Sharma and Nayak (2018) researched emotional experiences in dark and wellness tourism, respectively. According to Gretzel et al. (2006), it has become necessary for DMOs to realize the worth and experiential qualities of the tourism offerings to beat the competition. Otto and Ritchie (1996) defined tourism experiences as the “subjective mental state felt by participants during a service encounter.” Prior studies have explored tourist experiences in various settings such as natural and heritage environments (e.g., Beeho and Prentice 1997) and rural and urban destinations (Zhu et al. 2020). Other research carried out by Wearing and Foley (2017) has evaluated tourists’ experiences in the context of cities and Chhetri et al. (2004) in the context of nature-based destinations. The study of Backman et al. (2022) showed that the restorative environment is an essential aspect of the wellness experience, contributing to positive emotions and life satisfaction and determining an individual’s loyalty and intention to revisit; moreover, the findings of the investigation of Chen et al. (2021) found that both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being significantly affect consumers’ intention to revisit the destination and to spread word of mouth online.
The various authors conducted studies on the experience economy concepts and their relationship with satisfaction and intention to purchase in the tourist and hospitality context, including (Manhas and Ramjit 2013), the survey of memorable tourism experiences (Kim et al. 2012, 2016), and the value of co-creation performance of travel experience (Binkhorst and Den Dekker 2009); it has been seen from these studies that the service providers are using service economy concepts to make their customers’ experiences more memorable by designing and developing the same, especially in the context of spa-wellness tourism for their need for rejuvenation, physical and mental relaxation, overall improvement of health/body, etc. (Hjalager and Konu 2011). The topic of spa wellness tourism, mainly in qualitative studies, has been conducted and has increased the attention of the various authors from one decade in the tourism literature, such as the relationship between travel experience and well-being. Therefore, the present study is an extension of the study of (Huang et al. 2019), who, by combining bottom-up and top-down theories of well-being, filled a research gap supported by Diener (1984). Researchers added autonomy as an interpersonal factor and investigated the relationship between experience and well-being as outcomes, and suggested further (Howell and Hill 2009; Newman et al. 2014) that the study may be conducted by considering the mediation role of various factors, such as satisfaction or demographical factors/interpersonal factors, etc. Therefore, the present study shall fill the gap by studying the interrelationship between travel autonomy and experience of loyalty through the mediation of life satisfaction and well-being that the previous researchers did not consider. The structure of the paper is arranged as follows. First, the literature review is presented and followed by hypothesis development. We then present a conceptual model and discuss the relationships among model elements and research methodology, including sources of the research instrument, data collection, and data analysis. Finally, we present the findings, discuss implications, and suggest future research directions.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Tourist Experience in Tourism and Hospitality Industry

Customer experience in hospitality and tourism perspectives has been discovered by various researchers (Loureiro 2014; Hosany and Witham 2010; Hwang and Lyu 2015; Oh et al. 2007) in the context of golf tournaments, temple stays, hotel experience, visitors’ experience, wine trails, bed and breakfast settings, etc. (Hosany and Witham 2010; Hwang and Lyu 2015; Manhas and Ramjit 2013; Oh et al. 2007; Quadri-Felitti and Fiore 2013). Furthermore, Pine and Gilmore (1999) identified experience in four dimensions: entertainment, education, aesthetics, and escapism. The same has been applied in the tourism and hospitality literature. Based on the experience scale (Manhas and Ramjit 2013; Oh et al. 2007; Pine and Gilmore 1999), the four realms of experiences are considered essential for enhancing total quality services excellence, customer satisfaction, and repeat business. Further, the same scale was used by various scholars in their work concerning cruise, lodging, and golf, and they found that pleasing experiences would lead to encouraging emotions, unforgettable moments, trustworthiness, and word-of-mouth publicity (Hosany and Witham 2010; Hwang and Lyu 2015; Loureiro 2014). With the increase in global travel, tourists now focus on such tourism services or products which may create enjoyment, lifetime memory, a reasonable involvement of tourists, and hence “experience economy”, which has now become a growing consideration for hospitality and tourism researchers (Oh et al. 2007; Pine and Gilmore 1999; Quadri-Felitti and Fiore 2013). Concerning the same experience in an economic context, it has also been revealed that the empirical aspect of hospitality and tourism service can be assumed to be a significant factor in attaining customer loyalty, subjective well-being, and positive emotion (Gilbert and Abdullah 2004; Knobloch et al. 2017; Newman et al. 2014). As per top-down and bottom-up well-being theories’ outcomes (Diener 1984), the results of experience drive customers to hold the well-being perception significant during decision-making regarding hospitality/tourism products and services (Chen et al. 2016; Gilbert and Abdullah 2004; Uysal et al. 2016); it has also been observed that tourists’ travel experience can impact the positive sentiments of life and its overall satisfaction, referring to the well-being of the tourist context. Profoundly worrying about the experiential part of tourists and its assurance of being related to the well-being of tourists, the examination of tourism involvement of tourists leading to sentimental and confirmative components of travel with tourist’s comfort and honesty is significant (Diener 1984).

2.2. Tourism Experience and Well-Being

There is no doubt about the inter-relationship between tourism, travel, hospitality, and health. The tourism literature has recognized the benefits of traveling in earlier forms of tourism for the perceived benefits and well-being. Many travels offer relaxation, health purposes, a few for escapism and entertainment, and an emotional attachment to the destinations that offer spas (Hosany et al. 2015) and wellness services (Marmion and Hindley 2018). The emotional response to tourism products and services was found to be considerably influenced by the experience of tourists (Hosany et al. 2015; Woodruff et al. 1983) and, at the same experience, was found to be linked to the well-being of tourists (Hwang and Lyu 2015; Naidoo and Sharpley 2016). Other researchers have also developed related opinions of tourists’ overall experience, contributing to tourists’ well-being and positive feeling (Gilbert and Abdullah 2002; Morgan et al. 2015; Smith and Diekmann 2017). Therefore, the authors acknowledged the importance of tourism for improving the well-being and quality of tourist life and supported strong relations between the tourism experience and overall quality of life (Chen and Petrick 2016; Gilbert and Abdullah 2004; Uysal et al. 2016).
The bottom-up theory’s idea of encouraging enjoyable life involvements leading to a higher level of subjective welfare was well understood (Diener 1984), which explained the association’s foundation. On the same grounds, the experiential outcomes have revealed that tourists’ well-being is positively influenced by tourists’ overall tourism experience, which generally remains enjoyable and includes travel, lodging, dining, etc. (Chen et al. 2016; Knobloch et al. 2017). The results from Neal et al. (1999) work based on bottom-up theory examination recommended that people attain greater gladness in numerous life fields and improve overall life fulfillment with the help of positive travel experiences. Additionally, Nawijn et al. (2010) and their colleagues did further work to analyze the relationship between the tourist’s emotions and vacation; it has been found that tourists’ happiness remains high during vacation and gradually decreases with its end (Nawijn 2011; Nawijn et al. 2010, 2013). Other studies have also found that a vacation plays a significant role in lessening the work stress of full-time workers and boosting their morale and satisfaction with their lives (Chen et al. 2016).
While looking at the consumption practice of tourists concerning tourism products and services, it has been found to impact the well-being of tourists, and the same association has been well analyzed in many other hospitality and tourism perspectives, such as the studies conducted by Filo and Coghlan (2016) and Meng and Choi (2017). For defining tourists’ well-being and future behavior, the experience of tourists is an essential element (Baloglu et al. 2019; Hwang and Lee 2019). Furthermore, other researchers have also worked to show the significance of the overall experiences of tourists in the tourism sector and have presented the same by explaining the association between tourists’ experiences and concepts of life satisfaction, well-being, positive emotion, and future behavior (Suhartanto et al. 2020; Vada et al. 2019).
The spa sector has achieved speedy growth after experiencing rapid customer interest in tourism products and services, contributing to their well-being and raising several promotion opportunities (Spivack 1998). Researchers have also conducted various research to explain the probable breaks that spas could present to enhance the customer’s minds and bodies (Laing and Frost 2016; McNeil and Ragins 2005). Additionally, scientific proof in the literature supports the value of spa therapy on persons’ mental and physical welfare, such as in Strauss-Blasche et al. (2002) and Blasche et al. (2010). Hence, it is also necessary to analyze the possible benefits of spa therapy experience on the well-being of customers as it booms the principles of modern marketing by emphasizing the worth of life in hospitality and tourism business, but unfortunately, the same association of satisfaction, consumer experience, loyalty, and welfare remain unmapped. Thus, it has been suggested that researchers in the hospitality and tourism sector should make an effort to show the relations between tourist’s experience, gratification, and their welfare, which can be later on used by ground-workers in the industry to upgrade overall tourism service and also can disseminate the same benefits to the public which can eventually enhance the request for the hospitality services at spa resorts (Pyke et al. 2016). Literature has also revealed that the travel experience of a growing population (e.g., persons with disabilities and elderly tourists) can be improved through inclusive tourism to enjoy their tourism experience (Sica et al. 2021) entirely. Likewise, the needs of disabled people can also be enhanced through a participatory approach involving various tourism stakeholders that have subsequently improved the importance of enhancing accessibility to tourism services (Bianchi et al. 2020).

2.3. Spa/Wellness Tourism

Several new studies have pointed out the idea of experiencing increasing fame within spa services/practices from tourism and hospitality perspectives (Dimitrov 2012; Dryglas 2013; Han et al. 2017; Kim et al. 2017); it has been seen that many people used to travel to the Dead Sea to avail therapeutic properties, e.g., Romans traveled to take a bath in a hot spring to seek sound health and spiritual practices. Since ancient times, people have traveled to various tourist spots, such as the Dead Sea, for their therapeutic qualities, while the Romans have visited baths and hot springs for spiritual practices (GWI 2021). Concerning the few studies conducted on wellness tourism, those mainly focused on issues such as motivation to travel for well-being (Hun and Batra 2009; Mak et al. 2009; Medina-Muñoz and Medina-Muñoz 2013; Voigt et al. 2011), market demand analysis (Gabor and Oltean 2019; Heung and Kucukusta 2013; Pan et al. 2019), the features/characteristics of wellness tourists (Gabor and Oltean 2019; Kim et al. 2017) and the impact of wellness tourists on residential communities (Lehto et al. 2006).
The hotel and hospitality sectors have started wellness treatments and therapies through mineral springs and thermal water with the same hands-on concept to satisfy the guest’s fitness retrieval and recovery (Wang et al. 2020). Furthermore, it has been found that spa therapies provide pressure relief, a pampering experience, and easing of the whole body, resulting in body, soul, and mind improvement, hence enhancing a person’s overall health (McNeil and Ragins 2005). For drawing wellness tourists, destinations, spas, and fitness features have been the driving forces by researchers to inspect the spa and health tourism business through the qualitative domain (Erfurt-Cooper and Cooper 2009).
For further examination of the German health and spa resort sector, studies have recommended that multiple benefits gained from spa therapies involve health education, healthy nutrition, mediation, weight-loss programs, and beauty care for improving the community, and psychological and bodily welfare of persons (Azman and Chan 2010). With regard to the growing health consciousness of customers and analysis of adult traveler’s evaluation of service on wellness tourism, it has been seen that spa resorts have thus assimilated various therapy treatments, such as yoga in India, salt therapy in Germany, mud therapy in Israel, and massage in Thailand, etc., to advertise wellness and health; moreover, it has been recommended to survey the connection between wellness and spa from the customer’s view in Pforr and Locher (2012) that the wellness significance related to spa experiences improves people’s bodily and psychological health (Choi et al. 2015). The investigation of spa excellence service impact on favorable emotional intakes declared that spa therapies involving five human senses, including the smell of essential oils, would lead to consumers’ positive emotional involvement in fitness. Furthermore, it has been recommended in a study by Koskinen and Wilska (2019). based on an examination of the spa experience of tourists, spa therapies altogether provide numerous health benefits, such as easing, rebuilding, etc., thereby improving both the well-being and wellness of a person. Based on the existing literature and the rapid increase in the wellness tourism market in the last few years, a research gap exists linking variables such as autonomy, intrinsic motivation, experience, positive emotions, life satisfaction, and loyalty. Present writings recommend that the spa, as a subpart of wellness tourism, provides services and products for guests that aim for health improvement from tension, self-development, and sickness recovery, leading to overall life fulfillment.

2.4. Hypotheses Development

Several studies investigated the relationship between experience and motivation; for instance, a study conducted by Yan et al. (2016) concluded that motivation partially impacts customer tourism experience. Likewise, Kong and Chang (2016) showed an essential connection between motivation and shopping background experience. Another study on hot spring visits revealed a strong link between Australian wellness customers’ motivations and experiences (Clark-Kennedy and Cohen 2017). Thus, the literature shows that motivation has a connection with expertise, and accordingly, the hypothesis can be postulated.
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Intrinsic motivation of tourists is positively related to Experience.
Various studies have examined the relationship between autonomy, experience, positive emotions, and life satisfaction (Howell and Hill 2009; Sirgy 2010; Vada et al. 2019). Additionally, satisfaction with the psychological needs of self-reliance in leisure and recreation participation influences life satisfaction. Similar results were found in the study by Huang et al. (2019). Thus, for the present study, the following hypotheses are formulated.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
Autonomy is positively related to the experience gained by the tourists.
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
There is a significant positive relation between Autonomy and the positive emotions of tourists.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
There is a significant positive association between Autonomy and life satisfaction.
Past investigations have tested the relationship between experience, positive emotions, and loyalty in different contexts (Cetin and Dincer 2014; Chua et al. 2017; Kim et al. 2017; Loureiro 2014). Similar studies, such as Huang et al. (2019) and Moon and Han (2018), have found a strong connection between experience and loyalty. Keeping in view the previous findings, the present investigation postulated a hypothesis as follows:
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
Spa-based experiences positively impact tourists’ loyalty.
Past research has examined the impact of experience on emotions and well-being (McCabe and Johnson 2013; Milman 1998; Nawijn et al. 2010; Yüksel and Yüksel 2007). Likewise, a study by Knobloch et al. (2017) examined the role of experience in enhancing emotions and life satisfaction. Huang et al. (2019) tested the same relationship. Thus, the following hypotheses are formulated for the present study.
Hypothesis 6 (H6).
Spa-based experiences have a positive association with tourists’ emotions.
Hypothesis 7 (H7).
Spa-based experiences have a positive impact on tourists’ life satisfaction.
Past studies show a relationship between positive emotions, life satisfaction, and loyalty (Gilboa and Herstein 2012; Hosany and Prayag 2013; Jamaludin et al. 2016; Yüksel and Yüksel 2007). Furthermore, Han et al. (2017), Huang et al. (2019), and Kim et al. (2017) found a strong connection between positive emotions, life satisfaction, and loyalty; moreover, the study has tested the relationship between satisfaction and loyalty in ecotourism. Besides, Carrascosa-López et al. (2021) have shown a connection between the recommendation’s social and emotional value and positive word of mouth.
Accordingly, for the present investigation, the following hypotheses were postulated:
Hypothesis 8 (H8).
There is a significant positive relation between Positive emotion and tourist loyalty.
Hypothesis 9 (H9).
There is a significant positive association between Life Satisfaction and tourists’ loyalty.
Studies such as (Chi and Qu 2008; Huang et al. 2019; Ramseook-Munhurrun et al. 2015). have tested the mediating role of variables, including experience, life satisfaction, and positive emotions in other contexts. Thus, accordingly, for the present study, the following hypotheses were formulated:
Hypothesis 10 (H10).
Experience mediates the relationship between autonomy and positive emotions.
Hypothesis 11 (H11).
Experience mediates the relationship between autonomy and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 12 (H12).
Positive emotions and life satisfaction mediate the relationship between experience and loyalty.

2.5. Conceptual Framework

The researcher adopted the following conceptual framework after critically reviewing the existing literature. The conceptual framework was developed in line with the study’s aim, leading to an exhaustive review of the existing literature based on top-down and bottom-up theories of well-being (Figure 1).
Based on theoretical background and research backgrounds following hypotheses were formulated for the present study.
Hypothesis 1.
Intrinsic motivation of tourists is positively related to Experience.
Hypothesis 2.
Autonomy is positively related to the experience gained by the tourists.
Hypothesis 3.
There is a significant positive relation between Autonomy and the positive emotions of tourists.
Hypothesis 4.
There is a significant positive association between Autonomy and life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 5.
Spa-based experiences positively impact tourists’ loyalty.
Hypothesis 6.
Spa-based experiences have a positive association with tourists’ emotions.
Hypothesis 7.
Spa-based experiences positively impact tourists’ life satisfaction.
Hypothesis 8.
There is a significant positive relation between Positive emotion and tourist loyalty.
Hypothesis 9.
There is a significant positive association between Life Satisfaction and tourists’ loyalty.
Hypothesis 10.
Experience mediates the relationship between autonomy and positive Emotions.
Hypothesis 11.
Experience mediates the relationship between autonomy and Life Satisfaction.
Hypothesis 12.
Positive emotions and life satisfaction act as mediators in the relationship between experience and loyalty.
Hypothesis 13.
Destination image moderates the relationship between experience and Positive Emotions.
Hypothesis 14.
Destination Image moderates the relationship between experience and life satisfaction.

3. Research Methodology

3.1. Research Design

The present study adopted a quantitative research approach, and a self-administered questionnaire designed from the previous studies was pre-tested before collecting the actual data. The instrument was initially pre-tested by four research scholars, four faculty members, and two industry experts. After pre-testing, the questionnaire was conveniently distributed among 20 local tourists for pilot study purposes. The essence of the pilot study is to test the instrument’s reliability, which is used in the main study. A reliability test was conducted for each construct and found that the alpha value was sufficient above the recommended threshold of 0.70 (Nunnally 1978).

3.2. Instrument/Measures

In the present investigation, various constructs were adopted from previously validated scales and modified for this study.

3.2.1. Autonomy

Autonomy was evaluated by the following four items “when taking the vacation, I experienced a lot of freedom (AUT1); while taking the vacation, I did things because they interested me (AUT2); taking vacation provided me with interesting options and choices (AUT3), and I did not feel pressured to be a certain way when taking a vacation (AUT4)”. The items were taken from the studies, and respondents were asked to rate on the five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree, and 5 = strongly agree.

3.2.2. Intrinsic Motivation

Five relevant statements were taken from 24 items of Voigt et al. (2011) motivation scale to measure this variable for the present study; these consist of “to gain a sense of renewal (IntrMot1); to enjoy an experience with all my senses (IntrMot2); to improve my health (IntrMot3); to improve my appearance (IntrMot4), and to share my experiences with people I am close to (IntrMot5)”. The statements were captured on a five-point Likert scale from 1–5, where 1 = strongly disagree, and 5 = strongly agree.

3.2.3. Experience

The experience construct consisted of five statements from Oh et al. (2007). The items include “I have wonderful memories about my spa visit (EXP1); I remember many positive things about my last spa visit (EXP2); I completely escaped from reality (EXP3); the setting pleasured my senses (EXP4); the experience has made me more knowledgeable (EXP5)”. The items were taken on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

3.2.4. Positive Emotions

The positive emotions consist of “Cheerful (PostEmo1); Relaxing (PostEmo2); Inspired (PostEmo3); Active (PostEmo4); Excited (PostEmo5); and Interested (PostEmo6)”. The items were taken from the studies of Prayag et al. (2017). The statements were measured on a five-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

3.2.5. Life Satisfaction

This variable consists of five statements taken from the studies of Diener (1984); these statements are “in most ways, my life was close to my ideal (LS1); the conditions of my life were excellent (LS2); I was satisfied with my life (LS3); I felt I had the important things I wanted in life (LS4); and if I could have lived my life over, I would change almost nothing (LS5)”. Respondents had to rate these items on a five-point Likert Scale ranging from 1 to 5 where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.

3.2.6. Loyalty

The construct of loyalty in this study is measured in the form of the attitudinal measurement, including “willingness to recommend (LOY1), saying positive things to other people (LOY2), and willingness to return to the travel destination in the future (LOY3).” Past studies (Chi and Qu 2008; Campón-Cerro et al. 2017), have measured this construct by using attitudinal indicators.
To test the uni-dimensionality of the variables taken in the study, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) technique was applied by the researcher. A structural equation model (SEM) and Smart PLs 2.0 were used to test hypotheses.

3.3. Study Settings, Sampling, and Data Collection

Data were collected from tourists who experienced spa and wellness services across the various Jammu and Kashmir, union territory (UT) India, from December 2020 to March 2021. 400 questionnaires were distributed among the respondents using the convenience sampling method. Among the returned questionnaires, only 264 were found to be valid for further analysis.

3.4. Common Method Bias (CMB)

In PLS-SEM, common method bias refers to phenomena induced by the SEM analysis’s measurement approach rather than the model’s network of causes and effects. For instance, the instructions at the beginning of a questionnaire may influence the responses of many respondents in the same general direction, resulting in procedural bias. Another technique bias is the implicit social desirability associated with a particular style of question response, which results in indicators sharing a certain degree of variation. For the present investigation, common method bias was checked through the test of full collinearity (Kock and Lynn 2012). The results of full collinearity indicated that CMB was not present in the model/data as the values for full collinearity were below the suggested value of 0.5.

4. Data Analysis and Results

4.1. Reliability and Demographic Results

Initially, the data were screened for missing values and unengaged responses. After screening, the reliability of the instrument was checked through Cronbach alpha. The results of Cronbach Alpha for each construct were found to be above the recommended threshold of 0.70 (Nunnally 1978). The results of reliability statistics are shown in Table 1.
As shown in the demographic table (Table 2), the sample was almost equally split between males and females, with 52.27% males (n = 138) and 47.73% females (n = 126).
Table 2 shows the demographic profile of the respondents. Table 1 shows that 52.27% were male respondents (n = 138), whereas 47.73% were female respondents (n = 126). The majority of the respondents were in the age group of 18–30 years (n = 97, 36.75%), followed by the age group of 31–43 years (n = 84, 31.82%), and only 7.57% (n = 20) of the respondents were above the age of 55 years. Additionally, the findings showed that most of the respondents who took part in the survey were well-qualified (47.72%, n = 126 were Bachelor’s degree holders, followed by Master’s degree holders (n = 70, 26.51%; and 2.65%, n = 7 were those who have attained higher qualification). The results also showed that the majority of the respondents were employed (n = 183, 69.31%) and 16.28% (n = 43) were unemployed, whereas 2.27% (n = 6) were retired and 12.12% (n = 32) were students. Furthermore, the findings showed that 56.06% (n = 148) were those respondents who had an annual income above 200,000, followed by those who had annual income within the range of 150,000 to 200,000 Rs (31.143%, n = 83), followed by those respondents whose income ranged between 100,000 to 150,000 Rs (n = 17, 6.44%).

4.2. Measurement Model

The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) method verifies the factor structure of a set of observed variables (Hair et al. 2012). The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) process determines whether the hypothesized structure provides an excellent fit to the data. In other words, a relationship between the observed variables and their underlying latent, or unobserved constructs exists(Child 1990). The CFA would also verify that all items are correctly aligned with the correct facets within the general construct being measured. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a comprehensive statistical approach to testing hypotheses about relations among observed and latent variables (Hoyle 1995) and is a methodology for representing, estimating, and testing a theoretical network of (mostly) linear relations between variables (Rigdon 1998). Structural Equation Modeling tests hypothesized patterns of directional and non-directional relationships among a set of observed (measured) and unobserved (latent) variables (MacCallum 2012).
In the measurement model, the item loadings were checked and found above the recommended value of 0.60 (Chin 1998). Composite reliability (CR) and AVE were used to check the convergent validity of the constructs. Both were above the recommended values of 0.07 and 0.50 (Hair et al. 2006), thereby holding the convergent validity. Finally, the discriminant validity was assessed. According to Fornell and Larcker (1981), the discriminant validity is upheld “when the square root of the AVE (diagonal values) of each construct is larger than its corresponding correlation coefficients.” The overall results of CFA are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.

4.3. Hypotheses Testing

After confirmatory factor analysis, the next step is to test the hypotheses. The proposed hypotheses were tested through SEM by using the software of Smart PLS 2.0. The findings of the study showed that intrinsic motivation positively influences experience (β = 0.983, t-value = 138.31; p < 0.05); autonomy positively influences experience (β = 0.037, t-value = 2.60; p < 0.05); autonomy positively influences positive emotions (β = 0.951, t-value = 60.35; p < 0.05); autonomy positively influences life satisfaction (β = 0.439, t-value = 4.61; p < 0.05); experience positively influences loyalty (β = 0.200, t-value = 2.06; p < 0.05); experience positively influences positive emotions (β = 0.066, t-value = 2.16; p < 0.05); experience positively influences life satisfaction (β = 0.304, t-value = 3.01; p < 0.05); positive emotion positively influences tourist loyalty (β = 0.209, t-value = 2.18; p < 0.05); and life satisfaction positively influences tourist loyalty (β = 0.308, t-value = 3.76; p < 0.05). Thus, hypotheses H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, and H9 were supported. The hypotheses results are summarized in Table 5, while the results of structural equation modeling and the path coefficient are shown in Figure 2.

4.4. Mediation Results

The mediating role of experience in the relationship between autonomy and positive emotions and the relationship between autonomy, life satisfaction, and loyalty was tested from the model. Besides this, the mediators of positive emotions and life satisfaction were also tested in the relationship between experience and loyalty. The results of the investigation showed a positive direct impact of Autonomy on Positive emotions (β = 0.439, p < 0.05), while the indirect effects of experience on positive emotions were also to be found significant (β1 = 0.0024, p < 0.05), thereby showing the partial mediation of experience in the relationship of Autonomy and Positive emotions. Furthermore, the results of the investigation showed a significant direct impact of experience on Life Satisfaction (β = 0.304, p < 0.05), and the indirect effect for the same relationship was also found to be significant (β2 = 0.011, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the direct effects of positive emotions on loyalty were also found significant (β = 0.209, p < 0.05), and the direct effects of life satisfaction on loyalty were also found significant (β = 0.306, p < 0.05). While the indirect effects of positive emotions and life satisfaction on loyalty were also significant (β1 = 0.013, p < 0.05; β2 = 0.093, p < 0.05), thereby showing the partial mediation of positive emotions and life satisfaction in the relationship between Experience and Loyalty.

4.5. Moderating Results

The moderating effects of destination Image were also tested. The respondents were asked about the destination image as high and low and were categorized into tourists with high destination image (n1 = 219) and tourists with low destination image (n2 = 45). First, the model was run for experience and positive emotions. The results showed a higher impact for experience and positive emotions (n = 219; β1 = 0.467, p < 0.05; n2 = 45, β2 = 0.210, p < 0.05). Thus, image moderates the relationship between experience and positive emotions. Lastly, the findings of the study showed that image also moderates the relationship between experience and life satisfaction (n = 219; β1 = 0.532, p < 0.05; n2 = 45, β2 = 0.173, p < 0.05).

5. Discussion

Based on the top-down and bottom-up theories of well-being, the present study aimed to evaluate the impact of autonomy and intrinsic motivation on experience, positive emotions, and life satisfaction. Furthermore, the study investigates the impact of experience on positive emotions and life satisfaction. Besides, the present tested the mediating role of positive emotions and life satisfaction in the relationship between experience and loyalty. The findings of the investigation showed that intrinsic motivation leads to experience; this is consistent with the findings of Baloglu et al. (2019). Furthermore, the results showed that experience leads to positive emotions, life satisfaction, and loyalty; these findings are in line with the findings of Huang et al. (2019). Besides this, similar results were found in Vada et al. (2019) studies. The present investigation findings how important it is to offer tourism products and to experience value in spa hotel experiences. The model provides an explanation for the variability of the endogenous variables, which are positive emotions (R2 = 95.62%); life satisfaction (R2 = 38.7%); experience (R2 = 99.4%); and loyalty (R2 = 10.4%); it is worth mentioning that positive emotions and life satisfaction with experience determine loyalty. Scientific literature has largely confirmed the positive relationship between satisfaction and loyalty (Chi and Qu 2008; Ramseook-Munhurrun et al. 2015).
The positive outcomes of the proposed model help offer a practical experience for health and wellness based on the spa experience; this offering will positively affect the quality of life of tourists, and life satisfaction, in general, will lead to the repeat patronage of guests; this, in turn, will have the social benefit to two beneficiaries: tourists and residents. Travelers benefit directly from the contact with a new tourist attraction that provides physical, mental, and rehabilitation. Indirectly, residents can benefit from the network of infrastructures and services and positively affect economic revenue and employment for the tourism industry. Therefore, tourists and the people of the areas where tourism is carried out benefit from tourism activities.

6. Implications

When considering our practical results from a spa and wellness industry’s perspective, it can be quickly concluded that the spa experience is an essential element that generates positive feelings, improves well-being and maintains the desire of a consumer to visit spa destinations, increasing their chances of recommending spa treatments. The managers should develop unique and distinctive services and products that offer tourists pleasant experiences to promote tourism loyalty to hotel wellness (Han et al. 2017; Nunnally 1978).
Spa managers should design spiritual awakening, lifestyle coaching, and practice classes (Baloglu et al. 2019). To improve the aesthetic elements of spa facilities, they should strive for physical environment sensation stimulations (Loureiro et al. 2013; Voigt 2016); improved the aesthetic aspects of the spas, such as stress relieving and physical relaxation workshops (Kucukusta et al. 2013) and incorporate entertainment elements, such as emphasis on cultural events and regional fairs (Loureiro 2014).
As autonomy plays a significant part in influencing the spa wellness experience (Thal and Hudson 2017), thus, to cater to the needs of tourists, spa and wellness managers should provide a wide variety of services and specialized spa programs, such as aromatherapy services, meditation courses, and yoga; this will stimulate tourists’ positive emotions, satisfy their lives, and create an intention to revisit and recommend (Baloglu et al. 2019; McNeil and Ragins 2005). Furthermore, spa and wellness managers should provide more comprehensive options for participating in leisure activities; it activates the psychological mechanism of autonomy, which leads to positive emotions and life satisfaction (Newman et al. 2014). Tourists tend to participate in wellness spa activities, spa managers should thus take care of the psychological need for autonomy in well-being services and product design (Carruthers and Hood 2007; Goulimaris et al. 2014). Wellness spa management must strive to develop customer-oriented wellness products and services to meet a traveler’s need for autonomy by actively gaining meaningful and enjoyable experiences in developing appropriate marketing strategies (Rodríguez et al. 2008; Ábrahám et al. 2012).

7. Conclusions, Limitations, and Directions for Future Study

Based on the existing literature, a research gap exists linking variables such as autonomy, intrinsic motivation, experience, positive emotions, life satisfaction, and loyalty. Thus, the present study tried to bridge this research gap and evaluated the impact of intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and experience of positive emotions and life satisfaction. The results showed that intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and experience positively affect positive emotions and life satisfaction. Besides, the study’s findings showed that positive emotions, experience, and life satisfaction lead to loyalty. Furthermore, the present study tested the mediating role of experience, positive emotions, and life satisfaction. The results showed that experience mediates the relationship between autonomy, positive emotions, and life satisfaction.
Moreover, the findings showed that positive emotions and life satisfaction mediate the relationship between experience and loyalty. The proposed hypotheses were tested through a structural equation model using Smart PLS 2.0. The results of this investigation can be helpful for both the research community and marketers interested in investigating the well-being of tourists and destination loyalty.
There are several limitations associated with the present study. The investigation adopted top-down and bottom-up theories of well-being only. In the future, other theories, such as the place attachment theory, should also be integrated with these theories to develop an extended model of well-being. Besides, the present study was quantitative; a mixed-method approach should be adopted in the future to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon; moreover, future studies should use other moderators, such as demographics, to test the role of moderators in framing the experience and attitudinal loyalty. The link between satisfaction and loyalty is influenced by other factors that were not considered in the present study. Thus, future studies should be carried out considering factors such as facilities at the destination, destination attributes, image of the destination, etc. The study was based on cross-sectional data; future studies should focus on longitudinal studies. Lastly, the investigation has been confined to specific statistical tests such as CFA & PLS-SEM; in future investigations, advanced statistical tools such as PLS-Predict, Blindfolding, Neural Network, and IPMA should be applied to get deeper insights into the model. Future research also is conducted by applying the t-test and chi-square test to determine the significance level of the male and female perceptions of the variables undertaken in the present research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization R.S. and P.S.M.; methodology, R.S. and M.A.M.; software, R.S. and M.A.M.; validation, R.S. and M.A.M.; formal analysis, M.A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S., P.S.M. and J.A.Q.; visualization, R.S.; supervision P.S.M. and J.A.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ábrahám, Júlia, Attila Velenczei, and Attila Szabo. 2012. Perceived Determinants Well-being and enjoyment level of leisure activities. Leisure Science 34: 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alegre, Joaquin, and Magdalena Cladera. 2009. Analyzing the effect of satisfaction and previous visits on tourist intentions to return. European Journal of Marketing 43: 670–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Azman, Inoormaziah, and Jennifer Kim Lian Chan. 2010. Health and Spa Tourism Business: Tourists’ profiles and motivational factors. Health, Wellness and Tourism: Healthy Tourism Healthy Business 9: 24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Backman, Sheila J., Yu-Chih Huang, Chun Chu Chen, Hsiao Yun Lee, and Jen-Son Cheng. 2022. Engaging with restorative environments in wellness tourism. Current Issues in Tourism. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baloglu, Seyhmus, James Busser, and Lisa Cain. 2019. Impact Experience Emotional Well-being and loyalty. Journal of Hospitality Marketing Management 8: 427–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beeho, Alison J., and Richard C. Prentice. 1997. Conceptualizing the Experiences of Heritage Tourists: A Case Study of New Lanark World Heritage Village. Tourism Management 18: 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bianchi, Piervito, Giulio M. Cappelletti, Edgardo C. Sica, and Roberta Sisto. 2020. Stakeholder Involvement to Improve Accessibility in a Protect Natural Area: A Case Study. Paper presented at the Le Scienze Merceologiche Nell’era 4.0, the Atti del XXIX Congresso Nazionale di Scienze Merceologiche, Salerno, Italy, February 13–14; Edited by B. Esposito, O. Malandrino, M. R. Sessa and D. Sica. Milano: Franco Angeli. ISBN 978-88-351-0527-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bigné, Enrique, Luisa Andreu, and Jurgen Gnoth. 2005. The theme park experience analyzes pleasure, arousal, and satisfaction. Tourism Management 26: 833–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Binkhorst, Esther, and Teun Den Dekker. 2009. Agenda for Co-creation tourism experience research. Journal of Hospitality and Marketing Management 18: 311–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Blasche, Gerhard, Valentin Leibetseder, and Wolfgang Marktl. 2010. Association of spa therapy with improved psychological symptoms of occupational burnout: A pilot study. Complementary Medical Research 17: 132–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bright, Alan D. 2008. Motivations, attitudes, and beliefs. In Handbook of Hospitality Marketing Management. Edited by Haemoon Oh and Abraham Pizam. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 239–66. [Google Scholar]
  12. Campón-Cerro, Ana María, José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón, and Helena Alves. 2017. Sustainable improvement of competitiveness in rural tourism destinations: The Quest for Tourist Loyalty in Spain. Journal of Destinations and Marketing Management 6: 252–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carrascosa-López, Conrado, Maurício Carvache-Franco, and Wilmer Carvache-Franco. 2021. Perceived Value and Its Predictive Relationship with Satisfaction and Loyalty in Ecotourism: A Study in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park in Spain. Sustainability 13: 7860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carruthers, Cinthya P., and Colleen D. Hood. 2007. Building a life meaning through Therapeutic Recreation: The Leisure and well-being model, part I. Therapeutic Recreation Journal 41: 276–97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Castaño, José Manuel, Alfredo Moreno, Silvia García, and Antonio Crego. 2003. Aproximación psicosocial a la motivación turística: Variables implicadas en la elección de Madrid como destino. Estudios Turísticos 158: 5–41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cetin, Gurel, and Fusun I. Dincer. 2014. Influence of Customer Experience on loyalty and word-of-mouth in hospitality operations. Anatolia 25: 181–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, Li-Hui. 2017. Tourists’ perception of dark tourism and its impact on their emotional experience and geopolitical knowledge: A comparative study of local and non-local tourist. Journal of Tourism Research & Hospitality 6: 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, Chang, Zhuoqi Teng, Chunyi Lu, Md Alamgir Hossain, and Yuantao Fang. 2021. Rethinking Leisure Tourism: From the Perspective of Tourist Touch Points and Perceived Well-being. SAGE Open 11: 21582440211059180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, Chun-Chu, and James F. Petrick. 2016. The roles of Perceived Travel Benefits, importance, and constraints in predicting travel behavior. Journal of Travel Research 55: 509–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Chun-Chu C., James F. Petrick, and Moji Shahvali. 2016. Tourism experiences as a stress reliever: Examining the effects of tourism recovery experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research 55: 150–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chhetri, Prem, Colin Arrowsmith, and Mervyn Jackson. 2004. Determining Hiking Experiences in Nature-based Tourist Destinations. Tourism Management 25: 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chi, Christina Geng-Qing, and Hailin Qu. 2008. Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: An Integrated Approach. Tourism Management 29: 624–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Child, Dennis. 1990. The Essentials of Factor Analysis. London: Cassell Educational. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chin, Wynne W. 1998. Commentary: Issues and Opinions in Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Q 22: vii–xvi. [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi, Youngjoon, Jihee Kim, Choong-Ki Lee, and Benjamim Hickerson. 2015. The role of functional and wellness values visitors’ evaluation of spa experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 20: 263–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chua, Bee-Lia L., Sanghyeop Lee, Hyeon Cheol Kim, and Heesup Han. 2017. Investigating the key drivers of traveler loyalty in airport lounge settings. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22: 651–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Clark-Kennedy, James, and Marc Cohen. 2017. Indulgence or therapy? Exploring the characteristics, motivations, and experiences of hot springs bathers in Victoria, Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22: 501–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cohen, Joel B., and Charles S. Areni. 1991. Affect and Consumer Behavior. In Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Edited by Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, pp. 188–240. [Google Scholar]
  29. Diener, Ed. 1984. Subjective Well-Being. Psychology Bulletin 95: 542–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dillette, Alana K., Alecia C. Douglas, and Carey Andrzejewski. 2021. Dimensions of holistic wellness as a result of international wellness tourism experiences. Current Issues in Tourism 24: 794–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dimitrov, Preslav. 2012. Long-term forecasting of the spa and wellness subsector of the Bulgarian tourism industry. Tourism Management Studies 7: 140–48. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dryglas, Diana. 2013. Spa and wellness tourism as spatially determined products of health resorts in Poland. Current Issues of Tourism Research 2: 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dryglas, Diana, and Marcin Salamaga. 2017. Applying destination attribute segmentation health tourists: A case study of Polish spa resorts. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 34: 503–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Erfurt-Cooper, Patricia, and Malcom Cooper. 2009. Health and Wellness Tourism: Spas and Hot Springs. Bristol: Channel View Publications. [Google Scholar]
  35. Faullant, Rita, Kurt Matzler, and Todd A. Mooradian. 2011. Personality, basic emotions, and satisfaction: Primary emotions in the mountaineering experience. Tourism Management 32: 1423–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Filo, Kevin, and Alexandra Coghlan. 2016. Exploring the Positive Psychology Domains Well-being activated through charity sports event experiences. Event Management 20: 181–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fritz, Charlotte, and Sabine Sonnentag. 2006. Recovery, Well-Being, and Performance-Related Outcomes: The Role of Workload on Vacation Experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology 91: 936–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Gabor, Manuela Rozalia, and Flavia Dana Oltean. 2019. Babymoon Tourism between emotional well-being service for medical tourism and niche tourism. Development and awareness of Romanian Educated women. Tourism Management 70: 170–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garvanova, Magdalena, Krasimira Staneva, and Ivan Garvanov. 2021. Wellness Tourism Approaches Improving the Quality of Life of Mobile Users. CroDiM 4: 141–48. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gilbert, David, and Junaida Abdullah. 2002. A study of the impact of the expectation of a holiday individual’s sense of well-being. Journal of Vacation Marketing 8: 352–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gilbert, David, and Junaida Abdullah. 2004. Holiday taking and The Sense of Well-being. Annals of Tourism Research 31: 103–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gilboa, Shaked M., and Ram Herstein. 2012. Place status, place loyalty, and wellbeing: An exploratory investigation of Israel residents. Journal of Place Management and Development 5: 141–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Goodarzi, M., N. Haghtalab, and E. Shamshiry. 2016. Wellness tourism in Saren, Iran: Resources, planning, and development. Current in Issues Tourism 19: 1071–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Goulimaris, Dimitris, George Mavridis, Maria Genti, and Stella Rokka. 2014. Relationships between Basic Psychological Needs And psychological well-being in recreational dance activities. Journal of Physical Education and Sport 14: 277–84. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gretzel, Ulrike, Daniel R. Fesenmaier, Sandro Formica, and Joseph T. O’Leary. 2006. Searching for the Future: Challenges Faced by Destination Marketing Organizations. Journal of Travel Research 45: 116–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. GWI. 2021. The Global Wellness Tourism Economy Report. Available online: http://www.globalwellnesssummit.com/images/stories/pdf/wellness_tourism_economy_exec_sum_final_10022013.pdf (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  48. Hair, Joseph F., Marko Sarstedt, Pieper M. Torsten, and Christian M. Ringle. 2012. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Plan 45: 320–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hair, Joseph F., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Hoboken: Pearson-Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hall, Michael C. 2011. Health and Medical Tourism: A kill or cure for global public health? Tourism Review 66: 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Han, Heesup, and Chul Jeong. 2013. Multi-dimensions of patrons’ emotional experiences in upscale restaurants and their role in loyalty formation: Emotion scale improvement. International Journal of Hospitality Management 32: 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, Heesup, Kiattipoom Kiatkawsin, Wansoo Kim, and Sangyeop Lee. 2017. Investigating customer loyalty formation for wellness spa: Individualism Vs. Collectivism. International Journal of Hospitality Management 67: 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heung, Vincent, and Deniz Kucukusta. 2013. Wellness tourism in China: Resources, development and marketing. International Journal of Tourism Research 15: 346–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hjalager, Anne-Mette, and Henna Konu. 2011. Co-branding and co-creation wellness tourism: The role of cosmeceuticals. Journal of Hospitality and Marketing Management 20: 879–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hosany, Sameer, and Girish Prayag. 2013. Patterns of tourists’ emotional responses, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Business Research 66: 730–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hosany, Sameer, and Mark Witham. 2010. Dimensions of Cruisers Experiences, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Travel Research 49: 351–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hosany, Sameer, Girish Prayag, S. Dee Latham, Siripan Cauševic, and Khaled Odeh. 2015. Measuring Tourists Emotional Experiences: Further Validation of The Destination Emotions Scale. Journal of Travel Research 54: 482–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Howell, Ryan T., and Graham Hill. 2009. The mediators of experiential purchases: Determining the impact of psychological needs satisfaction and social comparison. Journal of Positive Psychology 4: 511–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hoyle, Rick H. 1995. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  60. Huang, Songshan, and Cathy H. C. Hsu. 2009. Effects of travel motivation, past experience, perceived constraint, and attitude on revisit intention. Journal of Travel Research 48: 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, Yu-Chih, Chun-Chu Bamboo Chen, and Mingjie Jessie Gao. 2019. Customer Experience, well-being, and loyalty in spa hotel context: Integrating the Top-down bottom-up theories well-being. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 36: 595–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hui, Tak Kee, David Wan, and Alvin Ho. 2007. Tourists’ satisfaction, recommendation and revisiting Singapore. Tourism Management 28: 965–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hun, Kim Byung, and Adarsh Batra. 2009. Healthy-living behaviour status and motivational characteristics of foreign tourists to visit wellness facilities in Bangkok. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual PSU Phuket Research Conference, Songkhla, Thailand, November 18–20; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hwang, Jinsoo, and Jung Hoon Lee. 2019. A strategy for enhancing senior tourists’ well-being perception: Focusing on The Experience Economy. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 36: 314–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hwang, Jinsoo, and Seong Ok Lyu. 2015. The antecedents and consequences of well-being perception: An Application of The Experience Economy to Golf Tour name tourists. Journal of Destination Marketing Management 4: 248–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jamaludin, Nor Lelawati Binti, David Lackland Sam, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal, and Ainul A. Adam. 2016. Personal values, subjective well-being, and destination-loyalty intentions of international students. Springer Plus 5: 720–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kim, Eojina, Langlung Chiang, and Liang Tang. 2017. Investigating Wellness Tourists Motivation, engagement and loyalty: In Search of The Missing link. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 34: 867–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, Hyeon-Cheol, Bee-Lia Chua, Sanghyeop Lee, Huey-Chern Boo, and Heesup Han. 2016. Understanding Airline Travelers Perceptions Well-being: The Role of Cognition, emotion, and sensory experiences in airline lounges. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 33: 1213–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, Jong-Hyeong, J. R. Brent Ritchie, and Bryan P. McCormick. 2012. Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research 51: 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Knobloch, Uli, Kirsten Robertson, and Rob Aitken. 2017. Experience, emotion, and eudaimonia: Consideration of Tourist Experiences and Well-being. Journal of Travel Research 56: 651–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kock, Ned, and Gary Lynn. 2012. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kong, Weng H., and Tung-Zong Chang. 2016. Souvenir Shopping, tourist motivation, and travel experience. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality and Tourism 17: 163–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Koskinen, Veera, and Terhi-Anna Wilska. 2019. Identifying and understanding spa tourists’ wellness attitudes. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 19: 259–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kucukusta, Denniz, Loretta Pang, and Sherry Chui. 2013. Inbound Travelers Selection Criteria for Hotel Spas in Hong Kong. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 30: 557–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ladhari, Riadh. 2009. Service quality, emotional satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: A study in the hotel industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 19: 308–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Laing, Jennifer, and Warwick Frost. 2016. Dark tourism and dark events: A journey to positive resolution and well-being. In Positive Tourism. London: Routledge, pp. 82–99. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee, Jenny Jiyeon, and Gerard T. Kyle. 2013. The measurement of emotions elicited within festival contexts: A psychometric test of a festival consumption emotions (FCE) scale. Tourism Analysis 18: 635–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, Jiyeon. 2014. Visitors’ emotional responses to the festival environment. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 31: 114–31. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lee, Tsung Hung. 2010. A structural model to examine how destination image, attitude, and motivation affect the future behavior of tourists. Leisure Sciences 31: 215–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lehto, Xinran Y., Sally Brown, Yi Chen, and Alastair M. Morrison. 2006. Yoga tourism as a niche within the wellness tourism market. Tourism and Recreation Research 31: 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Mimi, Liping A. Cai, Xinran Y. Lehto, and Joy Z. Huang. 2010. A missing link in understanding revisits intention—The role of motivation and image. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 27: 335–48. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lin, Yeqiang, Deborah Kerstetter, Jeroen Nawijn, and Ondrej Mitas. 2014. Changes in emotions and their interactions with personality in a vacation context. Tourism Management 40: 416–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia. 2014. The role of the rural tourism experience economy places attachment and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management 40: 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia, Marta Almeida, and Paulo Rita. 2013. The effect of atmospheric cues and involvement on pleasure and relaxation: The spa hotel context. International Journal of Hospitality Management 35: 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Luo, Yi, Chiang Lanlung, Eojina Kim, Liang Rebecca Tang, and Sung Mi Song. 2018. Towards quality of life: The effects of the wellness tourism experience. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 35: 410–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. MacCallum, Rebort C. 2012. Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and Related Issues. In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Edited by Rick H. Hoyle. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 16–29. [Google Scholar]
  87. Mak, Athena H., Kevin K. Wong, and Richard C. Chang. 2009. Healthorself-indulgence? The Motivations and Characteristics of Spa-goers. International Journal of Tourism Research 11: 185–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Manhas, Parikshat Singh, and Singh Ramjit. 2013. Customer Experience and Its Relative Influence Satisfaction and Behavioural Intention in Hospitality and Tourism Industry. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Heritage 6: 53–68. [Google Scholar]
  89. Marmion, Maeve, and Ann Hindley. 2018. Tourism and Health: Understanding the Relationship. Good Health and Wellbeing. In Good Health and Well-Being. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Edited by Leal Walter Filho, Tony Wall, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli and Pinar Gokcin Özuyar. Cham: Springer, pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. McCabe, Scott, and Sarah Johnson. 2013. The Happiness Factor Tourism: Subjective Well-being social tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 41: 42–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McNeil, Kimberly R., and Edna J. Ragins. 2005. Staying in the spa marketing game: Trends, challenges, strategies and techniques. Journal of Vacation Marketing 11: 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Medina-Muñoz, Diego Ramón, and Rita Dolores Medina-Muñoz. 2013. Critical Issues in Health and Wellness Tourism: An exploratory study of visitors to wellness centres on Gran Canaria. Current Issues in Tourism 16: 415–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Meng, Bo, and Kyuhwan Choi. 2017. The restaurant servicescape in developing the quality of life: The moderating effect of perceived authenticity. International Journal of Hospitality Management 65: 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Milman, Ady. 1998. The impact of tourism and travel experience senior travelers’ psychological well-being. Journal of Travel Research 37: 166–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mitas, Ondrej, Careen Yarnal, Reginald Adams, and N. Ram. 2012. Taking a “peak” at leisure travelers’ positive emotions. Leisure Sciences 34: 115–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Moon, Heesup, and Hyouguen G. Han. 2018. Destination attributes influencing Chinese travelers’ perceptions of experience quality and intentions for island tourism: A case of Jeju Island. Tourism Management Perspectives 28: 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Morgan, Nigel, Annette Pritchard, and Diane Sedgley. 2015. Social Tourism and Wellbeing In Later Life. Annals of Tourism Research 52: 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Mueller, Hansruedi, and Evelin L. Kaufmann. 2001. Wellness Tourism: Market analysis of a particular health tourism segment and implications for the hotel industry. Journal of Vacation Marketing 7: 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Naidoo, Perunjodi, and Richard Sharpley. 2016. Local perceptions of the relative contributions of enclave tourism and agritourism to community well-being: The case of Mauritius. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management 5: 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Nawijn, Jeroan. 2011. Determinants of Daily Happiness on Vacation. Journal of Travel Research 50: 559–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nawijn, Jeroan, Miquelle A. Marchand, Ruut Veenhoven, and Ad J. Vingerhoets. 2010. Vacationers are happier, but most are not happier after holiday. Applied Research on Quality of Life 5: 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Nawijn, Jeroan, Ondrej Mitas, Yeqiang Lin, and Deborah Kerstetter. 2013. How Do We Feel on Vacation? A closer look at how emotions change over the course of a trip. Journal of Travel Research 52: 265–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Neal, Janet D., Joseph M. Sirgy, and Muzaffer Uysal. 1999. The role of satisfaction with leisure travel/tourism services and experience in satisfaction with leisure life and overall life. Journal of Business Research 44: 153–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Newman, David B., Louis Tay, and Ed Diener. 2014. Leisure and subjective well-being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Actors. Journal of Happiness Studies 15: 555–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Nicolaides, Angelo, and Anton Grobler. 2017. Spirituality, Wellness Tourism, and quality of life. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure 6: 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  107. Oh, Haemoon, Anne Marie Fiore, and Miyoung Jeoung. 2007. Measuring Experience Economy Concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of Tourism Research 46: 119–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Otto, J. E., and B. R. Ritchie. 1996. The Service Experience in Tourism. Tourism Management 17: 165–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Page, Stephen J., Heather Hartwell, Nick Johns, Alan Fyall, Adele Ladkin, and Ann Hemingway. 2017. Case study: Wellness, tourism and small business development UK coastal resort public Engagement in Practice. Tourism Management 60: 466–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pan, Xumei, Zhaoping Yang, Fang Han, Yayan Lu, and Qin Liu. 2019. Evaluating potential areas for mountain wellness tourism: A case study of Ili, Xinjiang Province. Sustainability 11: 5668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Pearce, Philippe L. 1993. Fundamental of tourist motivation. In Tourism Research: Critiques and Challenges. Edited by Douglas G. Pearce and Richard W. Butler. London: Routledge, pp. 113–34. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pforr, Christof, and Cornelia Locher. 2012. The German spa and health resort industry in light of healthcare system reforms. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 29: 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pine, B. James, and Joseph H. Gilmore. 1999. The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business Is a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
  114. Prayag, Girish, Samir Hosany, and Kalhed Odeh. 2013. The role of tourists’ emotional experiences and satisfaction in understanding behavioral intentions. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 2: 118–27. [Google Scholar]
  115. Prayag, Girish, Samir Hosany, Birgit Muskat, and Giacomo DelChiappa. 2017. Understanding the relationships between tourists’ emotional experiences, perceived overall image, satisfaction and intention to recommend. Journal of Travel Research 56: 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Prebensen, Nina, Kare Skallerud, and Joseph S. Chen. 2010. Tourist motivation with sun and sand destinations: Satisfaction and the WOM-effect. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 27: 858–73. [Google Scholar]
  117. Pyke, Sarah, Heather Hartwell, Adam Blake, and Ann Hemingway. 2016. Exploring Well-being as a tourism product resource. Tourism Management 55: 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Quadri-Felitti, Donna L., and Anne Marie Fiore. 2013. Destination loyalty: Effects of Wine Tourists Experiences, memories, and satisfaction intentions. Tourism of Hospitality Research 13: 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ramseook-Munhurrun, Prabha, Vishwadeo N. Seebaluck, and Perunjodi Naidoo. 2015. Examining the Structural Relationships of Destination image, perceived value, tourist satisfaction and loyalty: Case of Mauritius. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science 175: 252–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Rigdon, E. E. 1998. Structural Equation Modeling. In Modern Method for Business Research, Marcoulides. Edited by G. A. Marcoulides. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 251–94. [Google Scholar]
  121. Rodrigues, Áurea, Elisabeth Kastenholz, and Apolónia Rodrigues. 2010. Hiking as a relevant wellness activity-results of nexploratorystudyofhiking tourist in Portugal applied areal tourism project. Journal of Vacation Marketing 16: 331–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rodríguez, Ariel, Pavlína Látková, and Ya-Yen Sun. 2008. The relationship between leisure and life satisfaction: Application of activity and need theory. Social Indicators Research 86: 163–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sharma, Pramod, and Jogendra K. Nayak. 2018. Testing the role of tourists’ emotional experiences in predicting destination image, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: A wellness tourism case. Tourism Management Perspectives 28: 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sica, Edgardo, Roberta Sisto, Piervito Bianchi, and Giulio Cappelletti. 2021. Inclusivity and Responsible Tourism: Designing a Trademark for a National Park Area. Sustainability 13: 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sirgy, M. Joseph. 2010. Toward a quality-of-life theory of leisure travel satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research 49: 246–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Smith, Melamie, and Catherine Kelly. 2006. Wellness tourism. Tourism Recreation Research 31: 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Smith, Melanie, and László Puczkó. 2008. Health and Wellness Tourism. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  128. Smith, Melanie, and László Puczkó. 2014. Health, Tourism, and Hospitality: Spas, Wellness, and Medical Travel. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  129. Smith, Melanie K., and Anya Diekmann. 2017. Tourism and Wellbeing. Annals of Tourism Research 66: 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Spivack, Sheryl Elliot. 1998. Health Spa Development in the US: A burgeoning Component of Sport Tourism. Journal of Vacation Marketing 4: 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Strauss-Blasche, Gerhard W., Cem Ekmekcioglu, and Wolfgang Marktl. 2002. Moderating Effects of Vacation Reactions Work and Domestic stress. Leisure Science 24: 237–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Suhartanto, Dwi, Anthony Brien, Ina Primiana, Nono Wibisono, and Ni Nyoman Triyuni. 2020. Tourist Loyalty in Creative Tourism: The Role of Experience Quality, value, satisfaction, and motivation. Current Issues in Tourism 23: 867–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Thal, Karen Irene, and Simon Hudson. 2017. A conceptual model of wellness destination characteristics that contribute to psychological well-being. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 43: 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Uysal, Muzaffer, M. Josef, Eunju Woo, Eunju, and Hye Lin Kim. 2016. Quality of Life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism. Tourism Management 53: 244–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Vada, Sera, Catherine Prentice, and Aaron Hsiao. 2019. The influence of tourism experience and well-being on place attachment. Journal of Retail and Consumer Service 47: 322–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Voigt, Cornelia. 2016. Employing hedonia and eudaimonia to explore differences between three wellness tourists at the experiential, motivational, and global levels. In Positive Tourism. Edited by Filep Sebastian, Laing Jennifer and Csikszentmihalyi Mihaly. London: Routledge, pp. 119–35. [Google Scholar]
  137. Voigt, Cornelia, Graham Brown, and Gary Howat. 2011. Wellness Tourists: In search of transformation. Tourism Review 66: 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, Ke, Ganghong Xu, and Liyuan Huang. 2020. Wellness tourism and spatial stigma: A Case Study of Bama, China. Tourism Management 78: 104039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wearing, Stephen L., and Carmel Foley. 2017. Understanding the tourist experience of cities. Annals of Tourism Research 65: 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wolfe, Kara, and Cathy H. C. Hsu. 2004. An application of the social psychological model of tourism motivation. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration 5: 29–47. [Google Scholar]
  141. Woodruff, Robert B., Ernest R. Cadotte, and Roger L. Jenkins. 1983. Modeling consumer satisfaction processes using experience-based norms. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yan, Bing Jin, Jie Zhang, Hong Lei Zhang, Shao Jing Lu, and Yong Rui Guo. 2016. Investigating the motivation experience relationship on dark tourism space: A case study of the Beichuan Earthquake relics, China. Tourism Management 53: 108–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yoon, Yooshik, and Muzaffer Uysal. 2005. An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tourism Management 26: 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Yuksel, Attila. 2007. Tourist shopping habitat: Effects on emotions, shopping value, and behaviors. Tourism Management 28: 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yüksel, Attila, and Fisun Yüksel. 2007. Shopping Risk Perceptions: Effects Tourists Emotions, satisfaction and expressed loyalty intentions. Tourism Management 28: 703–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhu, Fang, Qin Su, Yun Tao, and Jinghong Shen. 2020. Environmental Restorative Effects of Destination for Tourists from the Perspective of Tourist-Environment Interaction. Tropical Geography 40: 636–48. [Google Scholar]
Admsci 12 00098 g001 550
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Admsci 12 00098 g001
Admsci 12 00098 g002 550
Figure 2. The estimated SEM path model. Source: Authors’ elaboration.
Figure 2. The estimated SEM path model. Source: Authors’ elaboration.
Admsci 12 00098 g002
Table
Table 1. Results of Reliability Test.
Table 1. Results of Reliability Test.
DimensionNo. of ItemsCronbach Alpha (α) Value
Autonomy040.903
Intrinsic Motivation050.825
Experience050.828
Positive Emotions060.894
Life Satisfaction050.849
Loyalty030.871
Note: Cronbach Alpha (α) for all the constructs is above the threshold level of 70.
Table
Table 2. Demographic Profile of Respondents.
Table 2. Demographic Profile of Respondents.
CharacteristicsNumber (n)Percentage
GenderMale (138)52.27%
Female (126)47.73%
Age18–30 years (97)36.75%
31–43 years (84)31.82%
44–55 years (63)23.86%
56 Above (20) 7.57%
EducationElementary school (11)4.16%
Middle school (19) 7.20%
High school (31)11.75%
Bachelor’s degree (126) 47.72%
Master’s degree (70) 26.51%
Higher (7)2.65%
OccupationEmployee (183)69.31%
Unemployed (43)16.28%
Student (32)12.12%
Retired (6)2.27%
Annual
Income		Less than 50,000 Rs (05)1.89%
50,000 to 100,000 Rs (11) 4.16%
100,000 to 150,000 Rs (17) 6.44%
150,000 to 200,000 Rs (83) 31.43%
Above 200,000 Rs (148)56.06%
Table
Table 3. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Table 3. Results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
DimensionsItemsLoadingsAVECR
Autonomy (AUT) 0.7740.932
When taking the vacation, I experienced a lot of freedom (AUT1)0.821
While taking the vacation, I did things because they interested me (AUT2)0.891
Taking vacation provides me with interesting options and choices(AUT3)0.910
I did not feel pressured to be a certain way when taking a vacation (AUT4)0.895
Intrinsic Motivation (IntrMot) 0.6200.884
To gain a sense of renewal(IntrMot1)0.886
To enjoy an experience with all my senses(IntrMot2)0.890
To improve my health (IntrMot3)0.788
To improve my appearance(IntrMot4)0.878
To share my experiences with people, I am close to(IntrMot5)0.361
Experience (EXP) 0.6210.886
I have beautiful memories of my spa visit (EXP1)0.878
I remember many positive things about my last spa visit (EXP2)0.879
I completely escaped from reality(EXP3)0.785
The setting pleasured my senses(EXP4)0.872
The experience has made me more knowledgeable (EXP5)0.430
Positive Emotions (PostEmo) 0.6540.918
Cheerful (PostEmo1)0.811
Relaxing (PostEmo2)0.862
Inspired (PostEmo3)0.885
Active (PostEmo4)0.874
Excited(PostEmo5)0.713
Interested (PostEmo6)0.686
Life Satisfaction (LS) 0.6180.889
In most ways, my life was close to my ideal (LS1)0.794
The conditions of my life were excellent (LS2)0.789
I was satisfied with my life(LS3)0.850
I felt I had the essential things I wanted in life (LS4)0.818
If I could have lived my life over, I would change almost nothing (LS5)0.667
Loyalty (LOY) 0.7890.918
Willingness to recommended (LOY1)0.827
Saying positive things to other people(LOY2)0.928
Willingness to return to the travel destination in the future”(LOY3)0.906
Table
Table 4. Discriminant Validity Results.
Table 4. Discriminant Validity Results.
AVEAUTEXPINMOTLSLOYPOEMO
AUT0.7740.880
EXP0.3830.3420.788
INMOT0.3520.5660.3790.787
LS0.5550.4720.4470.4110.786
LOY0.2590.2720.2610.3560.1820.888
POEMO0.9760.4300.390.3610.6020.2720.809
Note: The values in the above diagonal matrix are the AVE’s square root. AVE = Average Variance Extracted, AUT = Autonomy, EXP = Experience, INMOT = Intrinsic Motivation, LS = Life Satisfaction, LOY = Loyalty, PEMO = Positive Emotions.
Table
Table 5. Hypothesis testing results.
Table 5. Hypothesis testing results.
Path CoefficientsT Statistics p ValuesInference
Intrinsic motivation → Experience0.983138.310.005Supported
Autonomy → Experience0.0372.600.000Supported
Autonomy → Positive Emotions0.95160.350.011Supported
Autonomy → Life Satisfaction0.4394.610.049Supported
Experience → Loyalty0.2002.060.089Supported
Experience → Positive Emotions0.0662.160.007Supported
Experience → Life Satisfaction0.3043.010.000Supported
Positive Emotions → Loyalty0.2092.180.000Supported
Life Satisfaction → Loyalty0.3083.760.000Supported
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, R.; Manhas, P.S.; Mir, M.A.; Quintela, J.A. Investigating the Relationship between Experience, Well-Being, and Loyalty: A Study of Wellness Tourists. Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030098

AMA Style

Singh R, Manhas PS, Mir MA, Quintela JA. Investigating the Relationship between Experience, Well-Being, and Loyalty: A Study of Wellness Tourists. Administrative Sciences. 2022; 12(3):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Ramjit, Parikshat Singh Manhas, Mudasir Ahmad Mir, and Joana A. Quintela. 2022. "Investigating the Relationship between Experience, Well-Being, and Loyalty: A Study of Wellness Tourists" Administrative Sciences 12, no. 3: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030098

APA Style

Singh, R., Manhas, P. S., Mir, M. A., & Quintela, J. A. (2022). Investigating the Relationship between Experience, Well-Being, and Loyalty: A Study of Wellness Tourists. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop