Next Article in Journal
Nutrients Recovery during Vermicomposting of Cow Dung, Pig Manure, and Biochar for Agricultural Sustainability with Gases Emissions
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Acupuncture Treatment on Functional Brain Networks of Parkinson’s Disease Patients during Treadmill Walking: An fNIRS Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Curcuma longa Rhizome Extract as Synbiotic against Cutibacterium acnes

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(24), 8955; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248955
Submission received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 4 December 2020 / Accepted: 13 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering)

Abstract

:
Acne is a chronic inflammatory skin disease induced by Cutibacterium acnes. Recently, the effects of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics have been researched for the treatment of skin diseases in humans. However, the synbiotic effect of probiotics and prebiotic Curcuma longa rhizome extract (CLE) on C. acnes remains ambiguous. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the synergistic antibacterial activities of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with CLE as a synbiotic against C. acnes. Agar well diffusion assays were performed to determine the inhibitory effects of each combination of one of five Lactobacillus sp. with CLE as synbiotics against C. acnes KCTC 3314. Among them, the comparison between the average diameters of inhibition zones showed that the synbiotic combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus A001F8 and CLE significantly increased the inhibition zone diameters against C. acnes, compared to the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus A001F8 or CLE alone (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the synbiotics of probiotic LAB and CLE showed synergistic antibacterial effects against C. acnes, suggesting therapeutic potential for this synbiotic combination in the development of cosmetics or medicine against C. acnes.

1. Introduction

Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease resulting from sebum production in hair follicles on the face, neck and chest, induced by androgen, altered keratinization, inflammation and bacterial colonization. Among them, Cutibacterium acnes is known as a major cause [1].
Probiotics are live bacteria that have beneficial effects on the host; they have been proposed as an alternative to antibiotics, as the indiscriminate use of the latter can cause multidrug resistance or other side effects [2,3]. The direct antibacterial effects of probiotics against pathogens may be observed by inhibiting the growth of pathogens by the production of antimicrobial peptides and colonization resistance [4]. Therefore, probiotics have potential for use as cosmetic or medicinal ingredients against C. acnes.
Prebiotics are defined as nondigestible food ingredients, such as oligosaccharides, inulin and lactulose, which promote the growth and survival of probiotics; they are found in vegetables and fruit [5,6]. In human skin, prebiotic substances can be selectively applied to modulate microbial systems to achieve beneficial effects [7]. In order to develop natural prebiotics, various medicinal plants have been investigated. Among them, turmeric (Curcuma longa rhizome) is well known for its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities [8]. A previous study reported that Curcuma longa rhizome extract (CLE) reduced the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokines produced by C. acnes [9]. However, few studies have focused on CLE as a prebiotic, and none has reported synergistic effects of combinations of probiotics and CLE as synbiotics on C. acnes.
Therefore, in this study, the synergistic effects of probiotics and prebiotics against C. acnes were investigated. First, the antibacterial effects on C. acnes of five potential probiotic strains were assessed. Then, the extracts of twelve natural medicinal plants that have prebiotic potential were screened for their antibacterial activities against C. acnes using antibacterial assays. It was found that only CLE displayed inhibition zones. Finally, each of the five lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species was applied with CLE to examine synergistic antibacterial effects on C. acnes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Plant Extracts

Eleven methanolic plant extracts (Cornus officinalis, Allium cepa, Cudrania tricuspidata, Spinacia oleracea, Rubus coreanus, Daucus carota var. sativa, Chrysanthemum coronarium var. spatiosum, Brassica oleracea var. capitate, Brassica oleracea var. capitate, Mollugo verticillata and Schisandra chinensis) and one ethanolic medicinal plant extract (Curcuma longa L.) rhizome used in this study were purchased from the Korea Plant Extract Bank, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB; Daejeon, South Korea). All plant extracts were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) to 10% of stock concentration and kept at −20 °C, and then 0.01% of test concentration [10] in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution was used for antibacterial test.

2.2. Bacterial Species and Growth Conditions

The species of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used in this study were Lactobacillus acidophilus A001F8, Lactobacillus rhamnosus A001G8, Lactobacillus paracasei A002C5, Lactobacillus plantarum A003A7 and Lactobacillus casei A003D4, all of which were isolated from fermented dairy food. These species were identified by 16Sr RNA gene sequencing. C. acnes KCTC 3314 was obtained from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC; Daejeon, South Korea). The Lactobacillus species were grown in De Man, Rogosa, Sharpe broth (MRS broth; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA). C. acnes was grown at 37 °C for 72 h in brain heart infusion broth (BHI broth; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) and BHI agar under anaerobic conditions using GasPak pouch (BD GasPak™ EZ, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

2.3. Antibacterial Activity by Agar Well Diffusion Assay

An agar well diffusion assay was performed to determine the antibacterial effects of the plant extracts, LAB with and without CLE against C. acnes, respectively. Vancomycin supplement for microbiology (Sigma; St Louis, MO, USA) was diluted in distilled water (DW) and used as a positive control. Each of the MRS broths was cultured with LAB with 0.01% DMSO as a control, and LAB with 0.01% CLE at 37 °C for 24 h. First, the inocula of C. acnes (150 µL) were spread using sterile cotton swabs on BHI agar plates. Agar wells (8 mm) were punched with sterile pipette tips. Then, 100 µL plant extracts and LAB with and without 0.01% CLE were added to the agar well. All plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions using GasPak (BD GasPak™ EZ, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The tests were performed in three independent experiments, and results are presented as the average values of the diameters of the inhibition zones [11].

2.4. Determination of Growth Curves of Probiotics with and without CLE

Lactobacillus sp. (L. acidophilus A001F8, L. rhamnosus A001G8, L. paracasei A002C5, L. plantarum A003A7 and L. casei A003D4) with and without 0.01% CLE were cultured at 37 °C for 18 h. The absorbance was measured by a UV-spectrophotometer (Optizen POP, Mecasys, Korea) at 600 nm (OD600) every 2 h for 18 h. To ensure accuracy, each sample was ten-fold serially diluted with PBS.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the quantitative variables. Frequencies and graphs are given for qualitative variables. A Student’s t-test was performed using SPSS version 23 statistics software to determine statistically significant differences between the measurements of LAB alone and LAB + CLE. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Screening of Antibacterial Activities of Plant Extracts

An agar well diffusion assay was conducted to assess the antibacterial activities of twelve plant extracts against C. acnes. Antibacterial activities were recorded as the average of the diameters of the inhibition zones. As shown in Table 1, vancomycin (30 µg/well), used as a positive control, showed a 13.6 ± 0.29-mm inhibition zone against C. acnes. With the exception of CLE, none of the plant extracts displayed inhibition zones. CLE showed a 10.8 ± 0.29-mm inhibition zone. These results indicated that CLE has antibacterial activity.

3.2. Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Lactobacillus sp. with and without CLE against C. acnes

As shown in Figure 1, the antibacterial properties against C. acnes of each LAB species alone and with CLE were compared on five sets using agar well diffusion assay. Among them, L. acidophilus A001F8 showed the highest synergetic antibacterial activity, and the average value of the inhibition zone diameters of L. acidophilus A001F8 + CLE (13.8 ± 0.29) was significantly increased compared to L. acidophilus A001F8 alone (12.3 ± 0.57) (p < 0.05). Although for other LAB (L. rhamnosus A001G8, L. paracasei A002C5, L. plantarum A003A7 and L. casei A003D4) there was no statistically significant difference, the average values of the inhibition zones of LAB + CLE were larger than those of LAB alone.

3.3. Effect of CLE on the Growth of Five Lactobacillus sp.

The growth curves of five Lactobacillus sp. (L. acidophilus A001F8, L. rhamnosus A001G8, L. paracasei A002C5, L. plantarum A003A7 and L. casei A003D4) with and without CLE showed no significant differences for each set, implying that CLE did not stimulate growth of Lactobacillus sp. (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

Probiotics have the potential to prevent infections from pathogenic bacteria and promote the colonization of a healthy microbiome, thereby serving as potential alternative dermatological treatments [12]. Moreover, the use of synbiotics, i.e., combinations of probiotics and prebiotics, has been proposed to treat several skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, rosacea and wounds [11,13]. In this study, the synergistic antibacterial effects of probiotic LAB with CLE were evaluated against C. acnes using the same agar well diffusion assay applied in previous experiments [11,14]. First, a total of twelve candidate plant extracts that have prebiotic potential were selected based on a literature review [6,15]. These extracts were then subjected to screening for their antibacterial activities against C. acnes. The CLE was finally selected as the most effective substance in terms of its synergistic effect with probiotics to inhibit the growth of C. acnes.
Five combinations of LAB and CLE displayed more positive synergistic effects against the growth of C. acnes than LAB or CLE alone in the agar well diffusion assay. In this study, there were no significant differences in the growth activities of five Lactobacillus sp. when CLE was added at a relatively low concentration of 0.01%, but a recent study reported that a 2% turmeric extract promoted the growth of L. rhamnosus GG (LGG) and Bifidobacterium animalis BB12 [16]. The use of different strains or concentrations of CLE could be the cause of the disagreement between our results and previous data.
According to previous studies, LAB are capable of inhibiting pathogen growth through the antibiofilm effects of biosurfactants or the antimicrobial effects of substances like bacteriocin [17,18]. Also, the bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus sp. HY 449 was reported to have a bacteriolytic action on the cell wall and membrane of C. acnes [19]. Moreover, prebiotics such as oligosaccharides (OS), inulin and lactulose are known to enhance the secretion and activity of bacteriocin produced by LAB [20,21]. Although the mechanisms of the enhancing action remain obscure, our results presented a novel synergistic anti-C. acnes effect of CLE in combination with probiotic LAB. Future studies are needed to investigate the metabolites produced by the synbiotics. Based on the above findings, cosmetics containing a combination of L. acidophilus A001F8 with CLE could have the potential to alleviate acne. Moreover, the systemic supplementation with these synbiotics could a positive effect on acne, according to a previous study [22].
In conclusion, these results suggest that L. acidophilus A001F8 with prebiotic CLE has a synergistic effect of antibacterial activity against C. acnes, and thus, that prebiotic CLE can be utilized for the development of cosmetics and medicines for the treatment of acne.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K. and H.K. (Heebal Kim); Investigation, J.K., H.K. (Hyaekang Kim); methodology, J.K., S.J., H.K. (Hyaekang Kim); formal analysis, S.J., J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.; writing—review and editing, H.K. (Hyaekang Kim), Y.K., H.K. (Heebal Kim); Supervision, H.K. (Heebal Kim). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gribbon, E.; Cunliffe, W.; Holland, K. Interaction of Propionibacterium acnes with skin lipids in vitro. Microbiology 1993, 139, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Salminen, S.; Ouwehand, A.; Benno, Y.; Lee, Y. Probiotics: How should they be defined? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mottin, V.H.; Suyenaga, E.S. An approach on the potential use of probiotics in the treatment of skin conditions: Acne and atopic dermatitis. Int. J. Dermatol. 2018, 57, 1425–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nair, M.S.; Amalaradjou, M.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Antivirulence Properties of Probiotics in Combating Microbial Pathogenesis. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 98, pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibson, G.R.; Roberfroid, M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 1995, 125, 1401–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Al-Sheraji, S.H.; Ismail, A.; Manap, M.Y.; Mustafa, S.; Yusof, R.M.; Hassan, F.A. Prebiotics as functional foods: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1542–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krutmann, J. Pre-and probiotics for human skin. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2009, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vaughn, A.R.; Branum, A.; Sivamani, R.K. Effects of turmeric (Curcuma longa) on skin health: A systematic review of the clinical evidence. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1243–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jain, A.; Basal, E. Inhibition of Propionibacterium acnes-induced mediators of inflammation by Indian herbs. Phytomedicine 2003, 10, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nam, C.; Kim, S.; Sim, Y.; Chang, I. Anti-acne effects of Oriental herb extracts: A novel screening method to select anti-acne agents. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2003, 16, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Ghazzewi, F.H.; Tester, R. Effect of konjac glucomannan hydrolysates and probiotics on the growth of the skin bacterium Propionibacterium acnes in vitro. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2010, 32, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yu, Y.; Dunaway, S.; Champer, J.; Kim, J.; Alikhan, A. Changing our microbiome: Probiotics in dermatology. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 182, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kearney, S.M.; Gibbons, S.M. Designing synbiotics for improved human health. Microb. Biotechnol. 2018, 11, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Vora, J.; Srivastava, A.; Modi, H. Antibacterial and antioxidant strategies for acne treatment through plant extracts. Inform. Med. Unlocked 2018, 13, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Holscher, H.D. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yazdi, F.G.; Soleimanian-Zad, S.; van den Worm, E.; Folkerts, G. Turmeric Extract: Potential Use as a Prebiotic and Anti-Inflammatory Compound? Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2019, 74, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khalaf, H.; Nakka, S.S.; Sandén, C.; Svärd, A.; Hultenby, K.; Scherbak, N.; Aili, D.; Bengtsson, T. Antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus and bacteriocin PLNC8 αβ on the periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Yan, X.; Gu, S.; Cui, X.; Shi, Y.; Wen, S.; Chen, H.; Ge, J. Antimicrobial, anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from Pediococcus acidilactici and Lactobacillus plantarum against Staphylococcus aureus CMCC26003. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 127, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oh, S.; Kim, S.-H.; Ko, Y.; Sim, J.-H.; Kim, K.S.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.J. Effect of bacteriocin produced by Lactococcus sp. HY 449 on skin-inflammatory bacteria. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pranckutė, R.; Kaunietis, A.; Kuisienė, N.; Čitavičius, D.J. Combining prebiotics with probiotic bacteria can enhance bacterial growth and secretion of bacteriocins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 89, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Y.S.; Srionnual, S.; Onda, T.; Yanagida, F. Effects of prebiotic oligosaccharides and trehalose on growth and production of bacteriocins by lactic acid bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fabbrocini, G.; Bertona, M.; Picazo, O.; Pareja-Galeano, H.; Monfrecola, G.; Emanuele, E. Supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1 normalises skin expression of genes implicated in insulin signalling and improves adult acne. Benef. Microbes 2016, 7, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The synergistic antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus sp. with and without CLE against C. acnes. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test and expressed as the means ± SD of three independent experiments (* p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The synergistic antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus sp. with and without CLE against C. acnes. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test and expressed as the means ± SD of three independent experiments (* p < 0.05).
Applsci 10 08955 g001
Figure 2. The growth curve of L. acidophilus A001F8 (A), L. rhamnosus A001G8 (B), L. paracasei A002C5 (C), L. plantarum A003A7 (D) and L. casei A003D4 (E), with and without CLE. There were no statistically significant differences in growth between LAB and LAB + CLE (Student’s t-test; p > 0.05).
Figure 2. The growth curve of L. acidophilus A001F8 (A), L. rhamnosus A001G8 (B), L. paracasei A002C5 (C), L. plantarum A003A7 (D) and L. casei A003D4 (E), with and without CLE. There were no statistically significant differences in growth between LAB and LAB + CLE (Student’s t-test; p > 0.05).
Applsci 10 08955 g002
Table 1. The inhibitory effects of plant extracts against C. acnes.
Table 1. The inhibitory effects of plant extracts against C. acnes.
Name of PlantExtracted PartInhibition Zone
(mm)
Cutibacterium acnes
Cornus officinalisBerry-
Allium cepaWhole plant-
Curcuma longa L.Rhizome10.8 ± 0.29
Cudrania tricuspidataRoot-
Spinacia oleraceaWhole plant-
Rubus coreanusLeaves, Stem-
Daucus carota var. sativaWhole plant-
Chrysanthemum coronarium var. spatiosumWhole plant-
Brassica oleracea var. capitataWhole plant-
Zingiber officinaleRoot-
Mollugo verticillataWhole plant-
Schisandra chinensisLeaves-
Vancomycin (Positive control) 13.6 ± 2.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Jeon, S.; Jo, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H. Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Curcuma longa Rhizome Extract as Synbiotic against Cutibacterium acnes. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8955. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248955

AMA Style

Kim J, Kim H, Jeon S, Jo J, Kim Y, Kim H. Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Curcuma longa Rhizome Extract as Synbiotic against Cutibacterium acnes. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(24):8955. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248955

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jina, Hyaekang Kim, Soomin Jeon, Jinchul Jo, Younghoon Kim, and Heebal Kim. 2020. "Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Curcuma longa Rhizome Extract as Synbiotic against Cutibacterium acnes" Applied Sciences 10, no. 24: 8955. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248955

APA Style

Kim, J., Kim, H., Jeon, S., Jo, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2020). Synergistic Antibacterial Effects of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Curcuma longa Rhizome Extract as Synbiotic against Cutibacterium acnes. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 8955. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10248955

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop