Next Article in Journal
Electroglottographic Analysis of the Voice in Young Male Role of Kunqu Opera
Next Article in Special Issue
A Combined Vermifiltration-Hydroponic System for Swine Wastewater Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Control of Linear Astigmatism Aberration in a Perturbed Axially Symmetric Optical System and Tolerancing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biosorption of Heavy Metals by the Bacterial Exopolysaccharide FucoPol
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/app11093932
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Removal of Organic UV Filters Using Enzymes in Spent Mushroom Composts from Fungicultures

by
Chu-Wen Yang
,
Ping-Hsun Tu
,
Wen-Yi Tso
and
Bea-Ven Chang
*
Department of Microbiology, Soochow University, Taipei 11102, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 3932; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093932
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 24 April 2021 / Published: 26 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Technologies for Pollutants Removal from Water and Wastewater)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Organic UV filters in sunscreen products are released to aquatic ecosystems through human recreational activities and urban wastewater treatment plant effluents. The biodegradation of three organic UV filters, 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS), homosalate (HMS) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), which cannot be effectively removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants, was investigated in this study. Spent mushroom compost (SMC), a waste product of the mushroom industry, which contains white-rot fungus extracellular enzymes, was tested for its ability to remove the three organic UV filters. The results of batch experiments revealed that the SMC enzyme extract of Pleurotus djamor exhibited the highest ability for EHS and HMS removal. The results of bioreactor experiments indicated that direct application of SMCs may be a feasible solution to remove EHS and HMS from urban wastewater. The application of SMCs for the removal of organic UV filters can be developed into a green and sustainable technology.

1. Introduction

Organic UV filters are major components of sunscreen products. They can absorb solar UV radiation to protect humans from acute (sunburn, photoaging) and chronic (skin cancer) damage [1]. Organic UV filters are released into aquatic ecosystems through human recreational activities and urban wastewater effluents [2]. For instance, two organic UV filters (homosalate (HMS) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC)) were identified in the Nanjing Qinhuai River system (an urban river system) [3]. EHMC and 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (EHS) were identified in samples from eleven sites among three rivers, five sewage treatment plants and four wastewater treatment plants located in different parts of South Korea [4]. A study by da Silva et al. (2015) indicated that EHMC and EHS were present in samples from six water treatment plants in cities in Southeast Brazil [5]. A study by Kameda et al. (2011) indicated that EHMC and HMS were present in surface waters and sediments in Japanese rivers and lakes. [6]. EHMC and HMS were also identified in samples from estuaries in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia [7] and Chesapeake Bay, USA [8]. These results indicated that three organic UV filters (EHS, HMS and EHMC) widely occur in urban wastewater, freshwater rivers and lakes and cannot be effectively removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants.
In the past, studies of organic UV filters mainly focused on the distributions of organic UV filters in the environment and sewage, as well as the bioaccumulation and toxicity of organic UV filters to users (humans) and organisms in environments [9,10,11]. An increasing number of experimental studies indicated that several organic UV filters (such as benzophenone-3, 3-benzylidene camphor, 3-(4-methyl-benzylidene) camphor, 2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxy cinnamate, homosalate (HMS), 2-ethylhexyl 4-dimethylaminobenzoate and 4-aminobenzoic acid) might have endocrine disruptive effects [9]. Many in vivo and in vitro studies of organic UV filters have revealed a wide variety of adverse effects on the exposed organisms, such as coral bleaching, which has received considerable attention [10,11]. Laboratory studies show that UV filters alter the development of the brain and liver in zebrafish. High levels of UV filters led to decreased egg production and significantly fewer hatchings in Japanese rice fish [10]. Moreover, potential endocrine, neurologic, neoplastic and developmental toxicities of organic UV filters may be detrimental to a vast array of aquatic and marine organisms [11,12,13]. Some organic UV filters are proven to accumulate in various kinds of aquatic organisms and, as a consequence, have adverse effects on organisms in the food web including humans. The removal of organic UV filters in the environment has become an important issue. However, little is known about the biodegradation and biotransformation of organic UV filters.
Biodegradation and biotransformation are techniques that exploit the ability of microorganisms to break down or transform pollutants [14]. Mycoremediation, employing extracellular enzymes of white-rot fungi for the removal of organic pollutants, is a cost-effective, eco-friendly and efficacious method [15,16,17,18]. The identification, study and implementation of laccase-mediated processes to eliminate pollutants from contaminated environments is an intensive research area of mycoremediation [19,20]. Laccases belong to the enzyme family of multicopper oxidases, which are classified as benzenediol oxygen reductases (EC 1.10.3.2) and are also known as urushiol oxidases and p-diphenol oxidases [21]. They are versatile enzymes with low substrate specificity and high capability to oxidize a large number of phenolic and nonphenolic molecules [22]. Adsorption is another strategy of mycoremediation. For example, the removal of heavy metal pollutants can be achieved by adsorption [23,24].
Spent mushroom compost (SMC), a waste product of the mushroom industry, contains white-rot fungus extracellular enzymes that can be used to degrade many organic pollutants such as acetaminophen, sulfonamides and tetrabromobisphenol-A [25,26,27]. SMC is mainly composed of 95% natural wood chips and other ingredients such as rice bran, corn flour and wheat flour. Therefore, in addition to the use of extracellular enzymes to decompose organic pollutants, SMCs can also be used to remove organic pollutants by adsorption [25]. The application of SMCs for organic UV filter removal is a mycoremediation-based green and sustainable technology.
The aim of this study is to test the removal efficiency of three organic UV filters (EHS, HMS and EHMC) using SMCs of four different mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii, Pleurotus djamor, Pleurotus ostreatus and Auricularia polytricha). The effects of enzyme extracts of the four SMCs were investigated by batch experiments. Bioreactor experiments were conducted to simulate the efficiency of UV filter removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water and wastewater (wastewater treatment plant effluent) by direct use of SMCs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Chemicals, solvents and the three UV filters, EHMC, HMS, EHS (analytical grade, 99.0% purity) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck/Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The chemical structure formulas of the three target compounds are shown in Figure 1B.

2.2. Wastewater Sampling and Spent Mushroom Compost

Wastewater (effluent after secondary treatment) was sampled from the Dihus domestic sewage treatment plant, Taipei City, Taiwan. SMCs of four mushrooms (P. eryngii, P. djamor, P. ostreatus and A. polytricha) were obtained from a mushroom cultivation farm in Nantou, Taiwan (Figure 1A).

2.3. Analysis of Remaining UV Filters in Experimental Samples

For batch experiments, a 1 mL sample (reaction mixture) was filtered by a 0.22 μm filter and applied to HPLC analysis. For bioreactor experiments, 0.5 g of SMC was mixed with 0.5 mL of methanol. The mixture was vortexed 10 s and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The liquid phase was collected and filtered by a 0.22 μm filter and applied to HPLC analysis. UV filters were analyzed using an Agilent 1260 HPLC equipped with a 4.6 × 250 mm column (Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18, Agilent) and monitored by a photodiode array detector at 311 nm (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The solvents delivered by the analytical pump were acetonitrile (A) and water (containing 0.1% formic acid) (B). Samples were eluted at 1 mL/min with a gradient starting from 70/30 (A/B) for 13 min and then from 80/20 (A/B) for 13–30 min. The recovery percentages for EHMC, HMS and EHS were 95.3, 95.6 and 94.3, respectively. The detection limits for EHMC, HMS and EHS were 0.01, 0.01 and 0.01 mg/L, respectively. The remaining percentages of organic UV filters were calculated using the formula: [%] = (residue UV filter concentration/initial UV filter concentration) × 100.

2.4. Batch Experiments

The SMC enzyme extracts were prepared as described previously [22]. Briefly, SMCs containing mushroom mycelium were broken into fragments. A 120 g amount of SMC fragments and 400 mL of sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) were mixed in a 1000 mL flask and incubated in a 130 rpm shaker at 25 °C for 3 h. The mixtures were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered by a 0.22 μm filter and referred to as SMC enzyme extract.
Batch experiments were performed using 125 mL flask bottles containing 50 mL of SMC extract and 2 mg/L UV filters. Reaction mixtures were incubated in a shaker (120 rpm) at 25 °C in the dark. Samples were taken periodically to analyze the residual UV filter concentrations. A single UV filter was used in each test at a time. Each experiment was performed in triplicates.
Laccase activity was measured in reaction mixtures of 0.5 mL of enzyme, 0.25 mL of 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 3.0) and 0.25 mL of 5 mM ABTS. After reaction under 25 °C for 5 min, enzyme activities were measured by a spectrophotometer using 420 nm. Laccase activity was computed by the following formula: laccase activity (units/L) = (ΔAbs/Δt ε l) × (total assay volume/enzyme sample volume), where Δt is the incubation time (min), ΔAbs is the change in absorbance, ε is the extinction coefficient of the substrates (ε420 = 36 mM−1 cm−1 for ABTS) and l is the cuvette diameter (1 cm).

2.5. GC-MS Analysis of Intermediates of Biodegradation and Biotransformation

Biodegradation and biotransformation intermediates of organic UV filters by the SMC enzyme extracts were evaporated to near dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen and analyzed by a 6890 N gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer. A ZB-5 fused-silica capillary column (5% phenyl–95% dimethylpolysiloxane, 15 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film thickness, Zebron ZB-5 Capillary GC) was used. The carrier gas in the constant flow mode (He, purity 99.9995%) at 1.1 mL/min was used. The split/splitless injection port in split mode at 280 °C was used. The chromatographic oven was programmed as follows: 50 °C, hold for 1 min, increase of 10 °C/min up to 200 °C, increase of 200 °C/min up to 290 °C and hold for 8 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron impact (EI) positive mode (70 eV). The MS transfer line temperature was 280 °C, the MS ion source temperature was 230 °C, and the MS quadrupole temperature was 150 °C.

2.6. Adsorption Experiments

A 125 mL flask containing 10 g of SMC, 50 mL of sterile water and each UV filter at different concentrations (2, 10, 20, 50, 100 mg/L) were used to conduct adsorption experiments. The samples were incubated on a shaker (120 rpm) at 25 °C in the dark for 24 h. The suspensions were centrifuged (5870× g, 30 min), and the supernatants were filtered by 0.22 μm filters. The residual organic UV filter was determined by HPLC. Each experiment was performed in triplicates. The adsorption isotherm of organic UV filter was fit with linear regression, i.e., S = Kd C, where Kd is the adsorption constant, S is the concentration of UV filter in the solid phase and C is the concentration of UV filter in the aqueous phase.

2.7. Bioreactor Experiments

The settings of the bioreactor experiments are shown in Figure 2. Plastic filter funnels with a volume of 500 mL were used as reactors. The reactors were treated with RO water that was circulated through the reactor for 24 h. After the steady state was reached, the reactors with flow rates of either 500 mL/2 h or 500 mL/30 min were continuously fed either RO water or wastewater containing 20 mg/L UV filter flowed through 200 g of SMCs. The bioreactor was maintained at room temperature (25 °C) by air conditioners. The remaining (%) UV filters in the solid phase of SMCs were measured periodically.

3. Results

3.1. Performances of UV Filter Removal Using Enzyme Extracts of SMCs

As shown in Figure 3, the order of the UV filter removal rates of enzyme extracts from the four SMCs was P. djamor > P. ostreatus > P. eryngii > A. polytricha. P. djamor exhibited the highest efficiency of UV filter removal. The order of the UV filter removal efficiency was EHMC > EHS > HMS. The enzymes of A. polytricha were ineffective in EHS and HMS degradation. In contrast, EHMC can be removed by all of the four SMC enzyme extracts very fast. These results indicate that the enzyme associated with EHS and HMS removal is absent or at a very low level in the SMC enzyme extracts of A. polytricha. In contrast, the enzymes involved in the EHMC removal were present in all SMCs.
The laccase activities and pH values of the SMC enzyme extracts at the start and end of the batch experiments are shown in Figure 4. The laccase activities in the enzyme extracts from A. polytricha were much lower than those of the other three fungi (Figure 4A). The pH values of all SMC enzyme extracts increased after the batch experiments (Figure 4B).

3.2. The Intermediate Products of Removal of EHMC, EHS and HMS

To further understand the removal of EHMC, EHS and HMS by SMC enzyme extracts, intermediates in batch experiments of P. djamor were analyzed. As shown in Figure 5A, HMS was converted to m-hemipic anhydride, 3,4-dimethoxy benzenemethanol and 3,4-dimethoxy-benzaldehyde and finally was converted to benzoic acid. EHS was converted to 3,4-dimethoxy-benzaldehyde. 3,4-Dimethoxy-benzaldehyde was finally converted to benzoic acid (Figure 5B). EHMC was converted to its isomer (2-propenoic acid, 3-[4-methoxyphenyl]-, 2-ethylhexyl ester) (Figure 5C).

3.3. Determination of UV Filter Adsorption by SMCs

It is time-consuming and difficult to produce large amounts of enzyme extracts of SMCs for wastewater treatment. Therefore, the direct application of SMCs for UV filter removal was tested. As shown in Figure 6, the ranges of the adsorption coefficients of EHS and HMS were 30.9 to 10.1. The range of the adsorption coefficients of EHMC was 18.3 to 11.3. These results suggested that SMCs exhibit higher adsorption ability for EHS and HMS than EHMC.

3.4. Comparison of UV Filter Removal in RO Water and Effluent Using SMCs

To simulate the removal of UV filters by SMCs, bioreactor experiments were conducted. The remaining (%) UV filters in SMCs were determined and are shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8. A slow flow rate (500 mL/2 h) led to more UV filter adsorption on SMCs. The absorbed UV filters were removed gradually by enzymes in the SMCs (Figure 7 and Figure 8). The pH values of all SMCs increased after the bioreactor experiments (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The SMC of A. polytricha exhibited very low laccase activity (Figure 10E,F) and cannot be used to remove EHS and HMS (Figure 8E–H). Although wastewater contains many impurities that may have some inhibitory effects on laccases (Figure 9A,B,E,F and Figure 10A,B,E,F), the degradation efficiency of UV filters in wastewater was comparable with the degradation efficiency of UV filters in RO water (Figure 7 and Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Only a few intermediates were identified by GC/MS analysis. This may be due to the problem of sample collection, sample preparation and experimental technology. There are unknown reactions in the GC/MS results due to unidentified intermediates. Although the results shown in Figure 5 are incompletely hypothesized degradation pathways. However, these results indicate that EHS and HMS were degraded and EHMC was transformed by SMCs. More experiments need to be conducted to understand the detailed reaction mechanism of EHS and HMS biodegradation.
EHS and HMS were degraded into benzoic acid (Figure 5A,B) by the extracellular enzymes in the SMCs. He et al. (2020) indicated that benzoic acid can be degraded by the extracellular enzymes (lignin peroxidase and laccase) of the white-rot fungus Hypocrea lixii AH [28]. Zhao et al. (2020) indicated that 3-phenoxybenzoic acid can be degraded by Aspergillus oryzae M-4 [29]. A study by Xie et al. (2015) indicated that benzoic acid can be degraded by the endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambari [30]. Therefore, more investigations should be performed to ensure that the benzoic acid produced from EHS and HMS in this study can be further degraded by extracellular enzymes from P. djamor, P. ostreatus or P. eryngii.
The results in Figure 5 further support the proposal that the enzymes involved in the transformation of EHMC were different from the enzymes involved in the removal of EHS and HMS. The degradation of EHS and HMS may be associated with laccases because EHS and HMS were not degraded by enzyme extracts and SMCs of A. polytricha, which exhibit very low laccase activities (Figure 3D, Figure 4A, Figure 9E–H and Figure 10E,F) and evidenced by the study of Thakur et al. (2017) [31]. In contrast, EHMC was converted to an isomer (2-propenoic acid, 3-[4-methoxyphenyl]-, 2-ethylhexyl ester, Figure 5C). The isomerization of EHMC may have nothing to do with laccase because the reaction occurred in both enzyme extracts and SMCs of A. polytricha (Figure 3D, Figure 4A, Figure 9E–H and Figure 10E,F).
There are at least three factors that affect the adsorption of UV filters on SMCs. First, as shown in Figure 1, the chemical structures of EHS and HMS are similar and are different from that of EHMC. Therefore, EHS and HMS exhibit similar adsorption abilities for all four SMCs and exhibit different adsorption abilities from EHMC. Second, the differences in adsorption abilities of the four SMCs to one UV filter may be due to different compositions of SMCs for different fungi (Figure 6). Third, the rates of water or wastewater (containing UV filters) used to flow through the SMCs may cause differences; a slow flow rate (500 mL/2 h) led to more UV filter adsorption on SMCs (Figure 7 and Figure 9). These three factors should be considered in the real application of SMCs for wastewater treatments.
The direct application of SMCs for UV filter treatment is better than the use of enzyme extracts of SMCs and has three advantages. First, there are living fungal mycelia in SMCs that can continuously secrete extracellular enzymes to degrade the organic UV filters adsorbed onto the SMCs. Second, some of the extracellular enzymes were flushed out with wastewater (containing UV filters). Organic UV filters can be continuously degraded by these enzymes in the effluents. Third, the preparation of enzyme extracts of SMCs requires a large amount of water. In contrast, there is no extra requirement for water with the direct application of SMCs, which saves considerable time and costs.

5. Conclusions

In this study, SMCs, waste products of mushroom cultivation, were used as a low-cost material for the removal of emerging pollutants. This design not only employs the concept of mycoremediation but also turns SMCs into a useful resource. The P. djamor SMC exhibited the greatest effectiveness for EHS and HMS removal. Batch experiments suggested that laccases are associated with EHS and HMS degradation because EHS and HMS were not degraded by the SMC enzyme extracts of A. polytricha (with very low laccase activity). Another enzyme associated with EHMC biotransformation is present in all SMC enzyme extracts of the four mushrooms. Bioreactor experiments suggested that SMC could be used directly for UV filter removal from wastewater effluent. Although wastewater contains impurities that may inhibit laccase activities, the EHS and HMS removal in wastewater was comparable with the degradation efficiency of EHS and HMS in RO water. The mechanisms of SMCs for EHS and HMS removal include adsorption, biodegradation and biotransformation. The results of this study provide a feasible solution for the removal of two UV filters (EHS and HMS) from wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.-V.C.; formal analysis, P.-H.T. and W.-Y.T.; methodology, P.-H.T. and W.-Y.T.; project administration, B.-V.C.; visualization, C.-W.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-W.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.-W.Y. and B.-V.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant Nos. MOST 109-2311-B-031-001– and MOST 109-2313-B-031-001–).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sabzevari, N.; Qiblawi, S.; Norton, S.A.; Fivenson, D. Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: Part 1: Changing regulations and choices for optimal sun protection. Int. J. Womens Dermatol. 2021, 7, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huang, Y.; Law, J.C.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Leung, K.S. Fate of UV filter Ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate in rat model and human urine: Metabolism, exposure and demographic associations. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, H.; Lu, G.; Yan, Z.; Liu, J.; Dong, H.; Bao, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y. Residues, bioaccumulation, and trophic transfer of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in highly urbanized rivers affected by water diversion. J. Hazard Mater. 2020, 391, 122245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ekpeghere, K.I.; Kim, U.J.; O, S.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Oh, J.E. Distribution and seasonal occurrence of UV filters in rivers and wastewater treatment plants in Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 542, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. da Silva, C.P.; Emídio, E.S.; de Marchi, M.R. The occurrence of UV filters in natural and drinking water in São Paulo State (Brazil). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 22, 19706–19715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kameda, Y.; Kimura, K.; Miyazaki, M. Occurrence and profiles of organic sun-blocking agents in surface waters and sediments in Japanese rivers and lakes. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 1570–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Allinson, M.; Kameda, Y.; Kimura, K.; Allinson, G. Occurrence and assessment of the risk of ultraviolet filters and light stabilizers in Victorian estuaries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 12022–12033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, K.; Hain, E.; Timm, A.; Tarnowski, M.; Blaney, L. Occurrence of antibiotics, estrogenic hormones, and UV-filters in water, sediment, and oyster tissue from the Chesapeake Bay. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 3101–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krause, M.; Klit, A.; Blomberg Jensen, M.; Søeborg, T.; Frederiksen, H.; Schlumpf, M.; Lichtensteiger, W.; Skakkebaek, N.E.; Drzewiecki, K.T. Sunscreens: Are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int. J. Androl. 2012, 35, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Downs, C.A.; Kramarsky-Winter, E.; Segal, R.; Fauth, J.; Knutson, S.; Bronstein, O.; Ciner, F.R.; Jeger, R.; Lichtenfeld, Y.; Woodley, C.M.; et al. Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its environmental contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 70, 265–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fivenson, D.; Sabzevari, N.; Qiblawi, S.; Blitz, J.; Norton, B.B.; Norton, S.A. Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: Part 2-Increasing awareness of UV filters and their potential toxicities to us and our environment. Int. J. Womens Dermatol. 2020, 7, 45–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gago-Ferrero, P.; Díaz-Cruz, M.S.; Barceló, D. An overview of UV-absorbing compounds (organic UV filters) in aquatic biota. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 2597–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, Y.; Law, J.C.; Lam, T.K.; Leung, K.S. Risks of organic UV filters: A review of environmental and human health concern studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Asgher, M.; Bhatti, H.N.; Ashraf, M.; Legge, R.L. Recent developments in biodegradation of industrial pollutants by white rot fungi and their enzyme system. Biodegradation 2008, 19, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Treu, R.; Falandysz, J. Mycoremediation of hydrocarbons with basidiomycetes-a review. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2017, 52, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zahmatkesh, M.; Spanjers, H.; van Lier, J.B. Fungal treatment of humic-rich industrial wastewater: Application of white rot fungi in remediation of food-processing wastewater. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 2752–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pozdnyakova, N.N. Involvement of the ligninolytic system of white-rot and litter-decomposing fungi in the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2012, 2012, 243217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akhtar, N.; Mannan, M.A. Mycoremediation: Expunging environmental pollutants. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arregui, L.; Ayala, M.; Gómez-Gil, X.; Gutiérrez-Soto, G.; Hernández-Luna, C.E.; Herrera de Los Santos, M.; Levin, L.; Rojo-Domínguez, A.; Romero-Martínez, D.; Saparrat, M.C.N.; et al. Laccases: Structure, function, and potential application in water bioremediation. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Theerachat, M.; Guieysse, D.; Morel, S.; Remaud-Siméon, M.; Chulalaksananukul, W. Laccases from marine organisms and their applications in the biodegradation of toxic and environmental pollutants: A review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 187, 583–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Riva, S. Laccases: Blue enzymes for green chemistry. Trends. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Upadhyay, P.; Shrivastava, R.; Agrawal, P.K. Bioprospecting and biotechnological applications of fungal laccase. 3 Biotech 2016, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kumar, R.; Sharma, P.; Umar, A.; Kumar, R.; Singh, N.; Joshi, P.K.; A. Alharthi, F.; Ali Alghamdi, A.; Al-Zaqri, N. In vitro bioadsorption of Cd2+ ions: Adsorption isotherms, mechanism, and an insight to mycoremediation. Processes 2020, 8, 1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kapahi, M.; Sachdeva, S. Mycoremediation potential of Pleurotus species for heavy metals: A review. Bioresour. Bioprocess 2017, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chang, B.V.; Fan, S.N.; Tsai, Y.C.; Chung, Y.L.; Tu, P.X.; Yang, C.W. Removal of emerging contaminants using spent mushroom compost. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, C.W.; Tsai, L.L.; Chang, B.V. Fungi extracellular enzyme-containing microcapsules enhance degradation of sulfonamide antibiotics in mangrove sediments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 10069–10079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, C.W.; Chen, W.Z.; Chang, B.V. Biodegradation of tetrabromobisphenol-A in sludge with spent mushroom compost. Int. Biodeter. Biodeg. 2017, 119, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, H.; Zhang, Q.; Tang, L.F.; Shi, K.Y.; Hong, F.F.; Tao, X.X.; Ali, M.I.; Urynowicz, M.; Huang, Z. Biodegradation of concentrated benzoic acid using white-rot fungus Hypocrea lixii AH. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2020, 37, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, J.; Jia, D.; Chi, Y.; Yao, K. Co-metabolic enzymes and pathways of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid degradation by Aspergillus oryzae M-4. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, X.G.; Dai, C.C. Biodegradation of a model allelochemical cinnamic acid by a novel endophytic fungus Phomopsis liquidambari. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Thakur, N.; Tripathi, A.; Sagar, S.; Kumar, P.; Devi, N.; Sharma, I.; Sharma, J. Estimation of extracellular ligninolytic enzymes from wild Auriculeria polytricha, Helvella sp. and Morchella sp. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 5, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Applsci 11 03932 g001 550
Figure 1. Spent mushroom composts (SMCs) of four mushrooms (A). Chemical structure formulas of the three organic UV filters used in this study (B).
Figure 1. Spent mushroom composts (SMCs) of four mushrooms (A). Chemical structure formulas of the three organic UV filters used in this study (B).
Applsci 11 03932 g001
Applsci 11 03932 g002 550
Figure 2. Experimental settings of bioreactor experiments. (A) A 500 mL volume of RO water/wastewater with a 20 ppm UV filter was fed to the bioreactors using a peristaltic pump as a flow rate controller. (B) Two flow rates: 500 mL/2 h and 500 mL/30 min were used in this study. The remaining (%) of each UV filter in SMCs was determined after 500 mL of RO water/wastewater flow through SMCs. SMC: spent mushroom compost.
Figure 2. Experimental settings of bioreactor experiments. (A) A 500 mL volume of RO water/wastewater with a 20 ppm UV filter was fed to the bioreactors using a peristaltic pump as a flow rate controller. (B) Two flow rates: 500 mL/2 h and 500 mL/30 min were used in this study. The remaining (%) of each UV filter in SMCs was determined after 500 mL of RO water/wastewater flow through SMCs. SMC: spent mushroom compost.
Applsci 11 03932 g002
Applsci 11 03932 g003 550
Figure 3. Removal of three UV filters (2 ppm) by enzyme extracts of the spent mushroom compost of four mushrooms ((A) P. eryngii, (B) P. djamor, (C) P. ostreatus and (D) A. polytricha). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Figure 3. Removal of three UV filters (2 ppm) by enzyme extracts of the spent mushroom compost of four mushrooms ((A) P. eryngii, (B) P. djamor, (C) P. ostreatus and (D) A. polytricha). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Applsci 11 03932 g003
Applsci 11 03932 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Laccase activity and (B) pH values of the enzyme extracts before and after batch experiments. Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. s: start of experiments, e: end of experiments. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Figure 4. (A) Laccase activity and (B) pH values of the enzyme extracts before and after batch experiments. Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. s: start of experiments, e: end of experiments. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Applsci 11 03932 g004
Applsci 11 03932 g005 550
Figure 5. Intermediates of the biodegradation and biotransformation of homosalate (A), 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (B) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (C) by enzyme extracts from the spent mushroom compost of Pleurotus djamor. Question marks indicate unidentified intermediates.
Figure 5. Intermediates of the biodegradation and biotransformation of homosalate (A), 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (B) and ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (C) by enzyme extracts from the spent mushroom compost of Pleurotus djamor. Question marks indicate unidentified intermediates.
Applsci 11 03932 g005
Applsci 11 03932 g006 550
Figure 6. Linear adsorption isotherm of the spent mushroom compost of four mushrooms ((A) P. eryngii, (B) P. djamor, (C) P. ostreatus and (D) A. polytricha). The label of the y-axis, S, is the concentration of the substrates (EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate) in the solid phase. The label of the x-axis, C, is the concentration of the substrates (EHMC, EHS and HMS) in the aqueous phase.
Figure 6. Linear adsorption isotherm of the spent mushroom compost of four mushrooms ((A) P. eryngii, (B) P. djamor, (C) P. ostreatus and (D) A. polytricha). The label of the y-axis, S, is the concentration of the substrates (EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate) in the solid phase. The label of the x-axis, C, is the concentration of the substrates (EHMC, EHS and HMS) in the aqueous phase.
Applsci 11 03932 g006
Applsci 11 03932 g007 550
Figure 7. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter (20 ppm) removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water (A,B,E,F) and wastewater (C,D,G,H) using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii (A–D) and Pleurotus djamor (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Figure 7. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter (20 ppm) removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water (A,B,E,F) and wastewater (C,D,G,H) using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii (A–D) and Pleurotus djamor (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Applsci 11 03932 g007
Applsci 11 03932 g008 550
Figure 8. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter (20 ppm) removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration (A,B,E,F) and wastewater (C,D,G,H) using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus (A–D) and Auricularia polytricha (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Figure 8. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter (20 ppm) removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration (A,B,E,F) and wastewater (C,D,G,H) using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus (A–D) and Auricularia polytricha (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate.
Applsci 11 03932 g008
Applsci 11 03932 g009 550
Figure 9. Laccase activity and pH values of the enzyme extracts before (day 0) and after (day 8) the bioreactor experiments. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water and wastewater using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii (A–D) and Pleurotus djamor (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Figure 9. Laccase activity and pH values of the enzyme extracts before (day 0) and after (day 8) the bioreactor experiments. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water and wastewater using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus eryngii (A–D) and Pleurotus djamor (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Applsci 11 03932 g009
Applsci 11 03932 g010 550
Figure 10. Laccase activity and pH values of the enzyme extracts before (Day 0) and after (Day 8) the bioreactor experiments. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water and wastewater using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus (A–D) and Auricularia polytricha (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Figure 10. Laccase activity and pH values of the enzyme extracts before (Day 0) and after (Day 8) the bioreactor experiments. Bioreactor experiments simulating UV filter removal in reverse osmosis (RO) filtration water and wastewater using the spent mushroom compost of two mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus (A–D) and Auricularia polytricha (E–H)). Data from triplicate experiments are presented as the mean ± SE. EHMC: ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate, EHS: 2-ethylhexyl salicylate, HMS: homosalate. Red stars indicate the p values of t tests < 0.05.
Applsci 11 03932 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, C.-W.; Tu, P.-H.; Tso, W.-Y.; Chang, B.-V. Removal of Organic UV Filters Using Enzymes in Spent Mushroom Composts from Fungicultures. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093932

AMA Style

Yang C-W, Tu P-H, Tso W-Y, Chang B-V. Removal of Organic UV Filters Using Enzymes in Spent Mushroom Composts from Fungicultures. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(9):3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Chu-Wen, Ping-Hsun Tu, Wen-Yi Tso, and Bea-Ven Chang. 2021. "Removal of Organic UV Filters Using Enzymes in Spent Mushroom Composts from Fungicultures" Applied Sciences 11, no. 9: 3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093932

APA Style

Yang, C. -W., Tu, P. -H., Tso, W. -Y., & Chang, B. -V. (2021). Removal of Organic UV Filters Using Enzymes in Spent Mushroom Composts from Fungicultures. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 3932. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop