Next Article in Journal
A Two-Stage Neural Network-Based Cold Start Item Recommender
Next Article in Special Issue
Skin Antiaging Effects of the Fermented Outer Layers of Leaf Skin of Aloe barbadensis Miller Associated with the Enhancement of Mitochondrial Activities of UVb-Irradiated Human Skin Fibroblasts
Previous Article in Journal
SVM Performance for Predicting the Effect of Horizontal Screen Diameters on the Hydraulic Parameters of a Vertical Drop
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glycemic Control Potential of Chemically Characterized Extract from Withania frutescens L. Roots in Severe Diabetes-Induced Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/app11094239
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimycotoxigenic Activity of Beetroot Extracts against Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins on Potato Crop

by
Nesrine H. Youssef
1,
Sameer H. Qari
2,
Said I. Behiry
3,
Eldessoky S. Dessoky
4,
Ehab I. El-Hallous
4,
Moustafa M. Elshaer
5,
Ahmed Kordy
6,
Viviana Maresca
7,8,
Ahmed Abdelkhalek
9,* and
Ahmed A. Heflish
3
1
Microbiology and Mycotoxins Labs, Regional Center for Foods and Feeds, Agricultural Researches Center, Alexandria 12619, Egypt
2
Biology Department, Al-Jumum University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca 25376, Saudi Arabia
3
Agricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Microbiology at Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
6
Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
7
Department of Biology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy
8
Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
9
Plant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, ALCRI, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El Arab City 21934, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(9), 4239; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094239
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 3 May 2021 / Published: 7 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Plant Natural Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Alternaria species, mainly air-borne fungi, affect potato plants, causing black spots symptoms. Morphological identification, pathogenicity assessment, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) molecular identification confirmed that all isolates were Alternaria alternata. The annotated sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MN592771–MN592777. HPLC analysis revealed that the fungal isolates KH3 (133,200 ng/g) and NO3 (212,000 ng/g) produced higher levels of tenuazonic acid (TeA) and alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), respectively. Beet ethanol extract (BEE) and beet methanol extract (BME) at different concentrations were used as antimycotoxins. BME decreased the production of mycotoxins by 66.99–99.79%. The highest TeA reduction rate (99.39%) was reported in the KH3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BME treatment. In comparison, the most effective AME reduction rate (99.79%) was shown in the NO3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BME treatment. In the same way, BEE application resulted in 95.60–99.91% mycotoxin reduction. The highest TeA reduction rate (99.91%) was reported in the KH3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BEE treatment, while the greatest AME reduction rate (99.68%) was shown in the Alam1 isolate with 75 µg/mL BEE treatment. GC-MS analysis showed that the main constituent in BME was the antioxidant compound 1-dodecanamine, n,n-dimethyl with a peak area of 43.75%. In contrast, oxirane, methyl- (23.22%); hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (10.72%); and n-hexadecanoic acid (7.32%) were the main components in BEE found by GC-MS. They are probably antimicrobial molecules and have an effect on the mycotoxin in general. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing the antimycotoxigenic activity of beet extracts against A. alternata mycotoxins-contaminated potato crops in Egypt, aimed to manage and save the environment.

1. Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum, L.) is one of the most important vegetable crops worldwide [1]. In Egypt, the amount of land allocated to potato production represents about 20% of the cultivated area [2]. Phytopathogenic fungi cause significant agricultural problems and reduce crop production, resulting in substantial economic losses for growers [3]. Alternaria is one of the most common plant fungal genera found ubiquitously and comprises species that may be saprophytic, endophytic, or pathogenic [4].
Alternaria species produce more than 70 phytotoxins—which can be designated into several groups of mycotoxins—including alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), altenuene (ALT), altertoxins (ATX-I, -II and -III), and tenuazonic acid (TeA) [3,5]. AOH, AME, TeA, and ATX toxins were reported to cause adverse teratogenic effects in mammals [6]. AOH and AME toxins, extracted from grains infected by Alternaria, were responsible for genotoxicity and throat cancer in China [7].
TeA is a beta-diketone with metal-chelating properties and contains a secondary amine moiety [8]. It exhibited acute oral toxicity in many mammalian species (LD50 37.5 and 225 mg/kg b.w. for chicks and mice, respectively) and inhibited protein synthesis [9]. TeA was reported in infected plants and also in the processed products, including gapes, beer and cereal grains [10,11,12,13]. Furthermore, some evidence has been reported that AME and AOH are genotoxic and cytotoxic in human organs [14].
Currently, Alternaria mycotoxins are detected in different geographic regions worldwide, including Egypt. Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris) is a member of the Amaranthaceae family, Chenopodiaceae sub-family (Angiosperm polygamy group), which contains high levels of betalains, polyphenols, and other phytochemical compounds that are associated with antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [15,16].
Our study aimed to (i) isolate, morphologically identify, and genetically characterize (by ITS) the Alternaria isolates; (ii) examine the pathogenicity of the isolates; (iii) investigate the occurrence of Alternaria toxins naturally contaminating potatoes and their geographic distribution in Egypt; (iv) evaluate the effect of beetroot methanol and ethanol extracts against the produced mycotoxins; and (v) identify the active compounds in beetroot extracts by GC-MS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Isolation, and Morphological Identification of Alternaria Species

Infected potato leaves with brown spots were collected from different governorates in Egypt, as indicated in Table 1. All fungal isolates were obtained by cutting a portion of the infected leaf tissue, putting it on potato dextrose agar (PDA), and incubating for 3–4 days at 28 ± 2 °C until the fungal mycelium appeared [17]. The pure hyphae were then picked and transferred onto a new PDA plate. The examined Alternaria isolates were identified by their morphological traits, including conidial length and width (μm), and the L/W ratio was determined using an ocular and stage micrometer or, later, by molecular methods [18].

2.2. ITS rDNA

DNA was extracted from the Alternaria isolates using the DNA isolation kit (EZ™ Genomic DNA Prep Kit, enzynomics, Korea). The quality and concentration of DNA was assessed by Nanodrop ND1000 spectrophotometer. ITS-specific primers, ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′), were used to amplify the ITS region (500‖600 bp in length) from the selected fungal isolates. The PCR, under standard conditions, were performed in 0.2 mL tubes containing a mixture of 10 µL Master mix (2x TOPsimple™ DyeMIX-nTaq, enzynomics, Korea), 1 µL template DNA (50 ng/µL), an equal amount (1 µL) of the forward and reverse primers (5 pmol/µL), and sterile water up to 20 µL. The PCR cycle consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles (30 s for each denaturation at 95 °C, annealing at 56 °C, and extension at 72 °C), and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products were run in a 1% agarose gel stained with redsafe (iNtRon, Seoul, Korea) and visualized under ultraviolet light. The purified fragments were sequenced directly at Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea [19]. The assembled sequences were compared to those on the GenBank website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 1 March 2021) using the BLASTn tool. An ITS full-length alignment revealed relationships to published Alternaria sequences. The obtained Alternaria sequences were submitted to GenBank to generate accession numbers.

2.3. Mycotoxin Production and Extraction In Vitro

Mycotoxin production was examined for each isolate using a modified Czapek-Dox medium (MCD), according to Brzonkalik et al. [20]. Plugs from fungal isolates were cultured in 100 mL of broth medium and incubated for a week at 28 ± 2 °C. After that, the fungal mats were removed, filtered, and further analyzed. Mycotoxins were extracted from the filtered medium by decreasing the acidity to pH 2 with 6 N hydrochloric acid, then 10 mL of acidified medium were mixed with 20 mL of CH2Cl2 in a separating funnel shaker for 1 min, repeated three times, the CH2Cl2 phase was collected in a flask and let to evaporate in a rotary evaporator at 35 °C. The dried material was dissolved in 1 mL of 1:1 water–methanol before the HPLC analysis [21].

2.4. Pathogenicity Test

The pathogenicity test of the seven isolates was performed on the potato cultivar “Diamond”. Potato tubers were bleached in NaOCl, washed with sterilized water, air-dried, and then cultivated separately in 25 × 25 pots and grown at 28 ± 3 °C and relative humidity of 40–60%. The optimal inoculum concentration was approximately calculated (2 × 106 spores/mL) and sprinkled on the potato leaves. Plants were inspected for infection, and the disease severity was evaluated one week after the inoculation. Areas of black necrotic lesions on the leaves (10–100%) were recorded and compared to the control. The disease severity was assessed as slightly pathogenic (10–30%), moderately pathogenic (30–60%), or highly pathogenic (60–100%).

2.5. Preparation of Beetroot Extracts

The beetroots (Beta vulgaris, L.) from the “Early flat-round” variety were purchased from a local market. The taproots were washed, cut, frozen at −80 °C, freeze-dried, and milled into a fine powder using a laboratory blender. The dried powder (60 g) was extracted with 200 mL of 95% methanol or ethanol for 48 h at 25 °C in the dark. The extracts were filtered, concentrated using DAIHAN—Premium Rotary Evaporator (RVE-05, Singapore) at 45 °C, lyophilized, and kept at −20 °C until use. The beetroot methanol extract (BME) and beetroot ethanol extract (BEE) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 100 mg/mL and kept at −20 °C [22].

2.6. Total Phenolic Content Determination

Total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method using 10 mg of crude extract dissolved in 10 mL of the solvent. A volume of 100 µL was then mixed with 750 µL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (1:9 parts of deionized water) and left standing for 10 min at 25 °C. Then, 750 µL of 10% Na2CO3 was added to the mixture and it was left in a dark place for 60 min. Its absorbance was measured by a spectrophotometer SP-300 (OPTIMA Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 725 nm. Gallic acid was used to make the calibration curve (ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 mg/mL) as a standard reference. TPC was measured as gallic acid equivalents (GAE mg/g of the extract).

2.7. Effect of Beetroot Extracts on TeA and AME Production

To evaluate the TeA and AME production by Alternaria spp. in the presence of BME or BEE, 50 μL of an Alternaria inoculum (103 conidia/mL) was inoculated in 50 mL of MCD medium supplemented with: (1) DMSO (control); (2) 75, 150, and 300 μg/mL BME; and (3) 75, 150, and 300 μg/mL BEE. The inoculated flasks were incubated at 28 °C with agitation at 200 rpm for up to a week. The mycotoxin extraction procedure was performed as mentioned before, in Section 2.3.

2.8. HPLC Analysis

Chromatographic detection and quantification of TeA and AME was performed using an HPLC system (Agilent 1260, Waldbronnm, Germany), quaternary pump, auto sampler, and diode array detector. The column used for separation was a Phenomenex C18 column (100 × 4.6 mm) with 2.6 µm particle size. Mobile phases consisted of 0.02% formic acid–water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B). Samples were injected at a volume of 10 µL and eluted with a binary gradient starting at 40% mobile phase A and reaching 100% B in 12 min with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Presence and quantity of Alternaria mycotoxins were determined at the wavelengths of 256 nm (AME) and 278.7 nm (TeA). Standards of TeA and AME were prepared by serial dilutions of stock solutions with methanol.

2.9. GC-MS Analysis of BME and BEE

The BME and BEE were analyzed for their components using a Trace GC Ultra-ISQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, TX, USA) with a direct capillary column TG–5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm film thickness). Program conditions and sampling were performed as published previously [23]. The constituents were identified based on the Wiley and NIST MS library databases and the comparison between mass spectra literature data and their retention times [24,25].

2.10. Statistics Analysis

The experiments were performed in triplicate in a completely randomized design. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the results were compared by the least significant difference (LSD) according to Duncan’s Multiple Range test using Costat statical package (CoHort Software, CA, USA) [26].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Identification

Seven isolates of Alternaria spp., selected based on their high capability to produce mycotoxins, were collected from different locations in Egypt. The initial morphological identification based on conidial length or width, as mentioned in the literature [18], revealed that the isolates were A. alternata. However, the isolates showed different cultural and morphological characteristics, which could have been due to the environment and the area temperature profile in the temperate regions of Egypt where the isolates were collected from [27,28]. The isolates exhibited significant diversity in phenotypic characteristics and mycotoxin productions (Table 1 and Table 2).

3.2. ITS Sequence Analysis

ITS rDNA sequencing was used as a valuable marker for fungal species identification and classification to confirm the morphological characteristics [29]. The ITS-specific primers amplified one fragment (500–600 bp long) from the DNA of all examined isolates. The purified amplicons were sequenced. The obtained nucleotide sequences were aligned using the BLAST tool at NCBI site and revealed that all the isolates were A. alternata, with homology ranging from 99% to 100%. The annotated sequences were accessioned with numbers MN592771–MN592777 (Table 1).

3.3. Mycotoxin Production Ability

The obtained isolates were tested to investigate their abilities to produce mycotoxins. Most of the tested isolates could produce two mycotoxins, as illustrated in Table 1. Our results were in agreement with the findings of Meena et al. [30], who reported that Alternaria spp. could produce several toxins (TeA, AOH, and AME). Our results showed that Alternaria spp. isolates could produce two mycotoxins: alternariol monomethyl ether (AME) and tenuazonic acid (TeA). The isolates KH3, NO3, and Alam1 showed the highest production of the two mycotoxins [3]. All isolates were kept at 4 °C for further tests.

3.4. Pathogenicity Test

All isolates were tested for their pathogenicity on the “Diamond” potato cultivar. A highly pathogenic isolate was defined as the one that caused severe disease symptoms on the potato leaves. We recorded a variation in the disease incidence in case of all the isolates. They were designated into three categories—(i) highly pathogenic, (ii) moderately pathogenic, and (iii) slightly pathogenic—based on the symptom incidence (Table 2).
Our results (Table 1 and Table 2) showed that the pathogenicity was depended on the plant susceptibility to the fungus isolate and on the type and concentration of the mycotoxin. Our findings also demonstrated that the produced mycotoxins were related to fungal pathogenicity, indicating that these mycotoxins were phytotoxic. These results were in accordance with those of other authors [3,21,22], who reported that AME, TeA, and AOH produced by Alternaria species were considered phytotoxins that played a crucial role in plant pathogenesis.

3.5. Total Phenolic Content of Beetroot

The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined in BME and BEE. Our results showed that the TPC of BME (2.52 mg GAE/g) was approximately 2-fold of the TPC of BEE (1.34 mg GAE/g). Our findings were in accordance with previous studies [15,31,32], which reported that the methanol extract had higher concentration than the beetroot ethanol extract. The TPC of Beta vulgaris roots was 20-fold of the TPC of the other parts.

3.6. Effect of Beetroot Extracts on Alternaria Mycotoxins Production

The KH3, NO3, and Alam1 isolates were used in this experiment according to their observed pathogenicity and their different abilities to produce mycotoxins (Table 1). The results showed that BEE was more effective in reducing the TeA and AME mycotoxins (Figure 1 and Figure 2) than the methanol extract. That might have been due to the presence of the antioxidants betalains, which are more stable in ethanol extracts than in methanol extracts. To our knowledge, no data are available in the literature about the effect of the two extracts on A. alternata mycotoxin production. However, several studies have examined the antifungal activity of different extracts on the Alternaria spp. [33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
The ability of plant extracts to reduce fungal growth did not mean that they could stop or decrease the mycotoxin synthesis. Consequently, if the fungus can still grow in the presence of a plant extract, the toxin biosynthesis may be accelerated. Inhibitory actions on growing fungi are also not always correlated with declines in mycotoxin concentrations [34]. While Alternaria is a common food product contaminant, its toxins are little documented, possibly because a control of its presence in food is unavailable. This issue is particularly important in the context of potato products. In developing countries, fruits with high fungal contamination are frequently used for processed food products, resulting in higher mycotoxin accumulation.
The amount of synthesized mycotoxin varied with the toxin, the extract concentration, and the isolate studied. BEE and BME showed high inhibition of production of these metabolites by A. alternata at most doses. Consequently, these fractions could have promising applications in treatments of foods where the two mycotoxins can simultaneously accumulate. It is worth mentioning that certain extracts increased the synthesis of some of these metabolites in comparison with corresponding control values [40]. Moreover, some of them resulted in an inhibition at a particular concentration but enhanced toxin production at another. BEE at a 150 μg/mL concentration was the most effective in reducing TeA produced by the KH3 isolate.
In comparison, BEE at 300 μg/mL was very promising in reducing TeA produced by Alam1 and NO3. BME decreased the mycotoxin production by 66.99% to 99.79%. The highest TeA reduction rate (99.39%) was observed in the KH3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BME treatment, while the most significant AME reduction rate (99.79%) was shown in the NO3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BME treatment.
In the same way, BEE ranged from 95.60% to 99.91% mycotoxin reduction. The highest TeA reduction rate (99.91%) was reported in the KH3 isolate with 150 µg/mL BME treatment. In comparison, the most surprising AME reduction rate (99.68%) was shown in Alam1 isolate with 75 µg/mL BEE treatment. Our results were in accordance with the findings of Youssef [41]. It is interesting to remark that in different isolates of A. alternata, the TeA and AME productions were affected differently. When the BEE concentration was increased, at least the same reduction—or, in some cases, a lower one—was observed in the mycotoxin accumulation, compared with the control (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
BEE controlled the higher amounts of TeA when the extract concentration was increased in the isolates Alam1 and NO3. Other authors have reported similar behavior regarding aflatoxigenic isolates. The decrease or rise in the amount of aflatoxin produced by several Aspergillus or Alternaria spp. depended on the extract concentration combined with environmental conditions [40,42,43,44]. For this reason, the effect of vegetal extracts on mycotoxin biosynthesis must be evaluated to determine the adequate dose for the development of natural antifungals. Both AME and TeA have been considered as phytotoxins that played a crucial role in plant pathogenesis, according to Meena and Samal [3]. It is vital to avoid suboptimal doses that could reduce the fungal activity but increase the mycotoxin accumulation.
The data showed that BEE and BME had anti-mycotoxigenic properties that were not dependent on the TPC. This was in accordance with the results of others [45], who reported that beetroot was among the tested plants which extracts had the best antifungal properties. However, its TPC and total flavonoid content are lower than those of Hibiscus sabdariffa. The two mycotoxins produced by the three tested isolates did not have the same sensitivity against the tested treatments. The tolerability of each mycotoxin depended on the fungus isolate that produced it. The data were in accordance with those of Youssef [41], who found that citrinin produced by Penicillium citrinum did not have the same sensibility as the same mycotoxin produced by Penicillium verrocosum, and the ochratoxin A was more tolerant than citrinin against chitosan.

3.7. GC-MS Analysis of Beetroot Extracts

The GC-MS analysis of the methanolic beetroot extract led to identification of the 17 compounds presented in Figure 3. The active principles of beetroot (taproot) are various components whose compound names, molecular weights, peak areas (%), molecular formulas, and retention times are presented in Table 3. It was found that the most effective constituents of BME were 1-dodecanamine, n,n-dimethyl (43.75%); hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (synonym: palmitic acid, methyl ester) (3.02%); 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester (2.47%); 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-(2.32%); 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester (1.89%); n-hexadecanoic acid (1.74%); 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (0.90%); and octadecanoic acid, methyl ester (synonym: methyl stearate) (0.53%) (Table 3). In the ethanolic extract (BEE), 25 chemical constituents were identified (Table 4 and Figure 3), and the most abundant of them were oxirane, methyl- (23.22%); 9-octadecenoic acid (z)-(1.03%); ethanol,2-(9-octadecenyloxy)-, (Z)- (1.81%); cyclopentane acetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl ester (2.13%); patchouli alcohol (1.43%); propanal (6.23%); 2H-pyran-3-ol,tetrahydro-2,2,6-trimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl),[3S-[3à, 6à (R*)]]- (5.09%); hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, (10.72%), n-hexadecanoic acid (9-octadecenoic acid (z)-) (7.32%); 11,14-octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester (3.76%); 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester (5.99%); octadecanoic acid, methyl ester (2.99%); 9,12-octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)-(linoleoyl chloride) (5.35%); hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (1.49%); hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester (1.14%); n-methyl-n-benzyltetradecanamine (2.05%); and 9-octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (2.74%).
The composition we determined for the methanolic extract corresponded to 86.63% of the entire GC-MS chromatogram, while in case of BEE, it corresponded to 100% of the GC-MS chromatogram curves. Beetroot extracts were found to contain a variety of constituents that may be the cause of their therapeutic potential. 1-dodecanamine, n,n-dimethyl is an antioxidant which acts as a natural or synthetic food preservative against oxidative deterioration during storage and processing due to its high stability and low volatility. It is essential for animal and plant life since it is involved in complex metabolic and signaling mechanisms [46]. Antioxidants have essential roles in deactivation of mycotoxins and avoiding oxidative stress. Kaur and Kapoor [47] evaluated the antioxidant activities of 36 vegetable extracts, using a model system consisting of β-carotene and linoleic acid, and found that the ethanolic extract of beetroot had a high antioxidant activity (>70%). Gilby and Few [48] reported that 1-dodecanamine, n,n-dimethyl, used as a surfactant, could be more active in bacterial protoplast lysis than quaternary ammonium bromide and dodecyl sulfate. Hueck et al. [49] noticed that dodecanamine had antifungal and antibacterial effects on many gram-negative or positive bacteria. Consequently, we propose that dodecanamine and/or its derivatives may have antimycotoxigenic activity.
The GC-MS analysis of the crude extracts showed some significant compounds that contributed to the taproot antimicrobial activity. These included oleic acid; (Z,Z)-9,12-octadecadienoic acid; n-hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester; (Z,Z)-9,12-octadecadienoic acid; and (E)-9-octadecenoic acid, which are known to have antifungal potential [50,51]. Additionally, benzyl chloride, detected in BME, is used as a precursor of a wide range of quaternary ammonium derivatives, including benzalkonium chloride, which has a practical antimicrobial application [52]. Basaran [53] found that benzalkonium chloride could prevent the growth of Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., and A. alternata in inoculated fruits and prevented them from decaying in vitro. The secondary plant metabolites could absorb mycotoxin molecules to minimize their exposure and health side effects. There is a possibility of using the identified constituents as lead compounds in the development of new valuable drugs. The components of the extracts might have contributed to antimicrobial action of traditional medicines in treating various diseases [54,55,56]. There is an increased demand for using plant extracts and their compounds, which raises concerns about the safety, toxicity, and quality of these products [57,58,59]. Studies have reported mycotoxin contaminations and roles for medicinal properties of plant materials [60,61].
Most of plant extracts constituents have been found to show interesting biological activities: against specific pathogens, antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic [62], and antibacterial [63]. Several activities have been reported for n-hexadecanoic acid, suggesting the rationale for the traditional use of Albizia adianthifolia and Pterocarpus angolensis extracts. Moreover, n-hexadecanoic acid isolated from heartwood and stem bark of A. adianthifolia (n-hexane extract) was reported as anti-inflammatory [64], an antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, a nematicide, a pesticide, anti-androgenic, hemolytic, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor [62], and a potent mosquito larvicide [63]. Oleic acid could have antibacterial activity [65]. A chloroform extract of A. adianthifolia contains 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester and exhibited an anti-cancer activity [66]. Li et al. [67] indicated that volatile compounds, such as tetradecanal, dodecanol, and 2,4-dimethyl-6-tert-butylphenol, individually exhibited a strong antifungal effect against the fungal isolates of Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum, although those compounds were found in low amounts in BEE and BME by GC-MS. Tetradecanoic acid showed larvicidal and repellent activities [68]. 2-Propanone, also called acetone or dimethyl ketone, seemed to be an effective compound in our study. Similarly, many authors previously found, by GC-MS, that the active compounds included alcohols, esters, ketones, and acids and they inhibited phytopathogenic fungi [69]. The fatty acid methyl ester could play a role in the decomposition of mycotoxins, based on the antibacterial and antifungal activity. Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester and octadecanoic acid proved to be antimicrobial molecules [63,70]. Finally, there is a need for further studies on the most abundant components found by the GC-MS analysis to evaluate their antimycotoxigenic activities individually.

4. Conclusions

The mycotoxins TeA and AME, produced by A. alternata isolates, did not have the same sensitivity to BEE or BME. The tolerability of each mycotoxin depended on the producing fungus isolate. BEE at 150 μg/mL could be recommended for inhibiting TeA. BEE and BME mycotoxin reduction percentages were 95.60%–99.91% and 66.99%–99.79%, respectively. The GC-MS spectra of the ethanol and methanol extracts showed different constituents; fatty acid methyl esters were the most abundant compounds, which suggested more effective decomposition of the Alternaria toxins.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.H.Y. and S.I.B.; methodology, N.H.Y.; software, A.A.; validation, A.A., A.A.H. and E.S.D.; formal analysis, A.A.H. and A.K.; resources, N.H.Y.; data curation, S.I.B.; writing—original draft preparation, N.H.Y., M.M.E. and S.I.B.; writing—review and editing, V.M., A.A., S.H.Q. and S.I.B.; visualization, A.A.H.; supervision, S.I.B.; project administration, E.S.D. and E.I.E.-H.; funding acquisition, E.S.D. and E.I.E.-H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The current work was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/85), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data reported here is available from the authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University for funding current work by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/85), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdelkhalek, A.; Al-Askar, A.A.; Behiry, S.I. Bacillus licheniformis strain POT1 mediated polyphenol biosynthetic pathways genes activation and systemic resistance in potato plants against Alfalfa mosaic virus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kabeil, S.S.; Amer, M.A.; Matarand, S.M.; El-Masry, M.H. In planta biological control of potato brown rot disease in Egypt. World J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 4, 803–810. [Google Scholar]
  3. Meena, M.; Samal, S. Alternaria host-specific (HSTs) toxins: An overview of chemical characterization, target sites, regulation and their toxic effects. Toxicol. Rep. 2019, 6, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thomma, B.P.H.J. Alternaria spp.: From general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Logrieco, A.; Moretti, A.; Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: An overview of origin, occurrence and risks. World Mycotoxin J. 2009, 2, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Escrivá, L.; Oueslati, S.; Font, G.; Manyes, L. Alternaria mycotoxins in food and feed: An overview. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 1569748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Xu, W.; Han, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, L. Natural occurrence of Alternaria toxins in the 2015 wheat from Anhui Province, China. Toxins 2016, 8, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Shephard, G. Chromatographic separation techniques for determination of mycotoxins in food and feed. In Determining Mycotoxins and Mycotoxigenic Fungi in Food and Feed; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 71–89. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chu, F.S. Mycotoxins: Toxicology, 2nd ed.; Caballer, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 4096–4108. [Google Scholar]
  10. Siegel, D.; Merkel, S.; Koch, M.; Nehls, I. Quantification of the Alternaria mycotoxin tenuazonic acid in beer. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 902–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scott, P.M.; Zhao, W.; Feng, S.; Lau, B.P.-Y. Alternaria toxins alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether in grain foods in Canada. Mycotoxin Res. 2012, 28, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Asam, S.; Lichtenegger, M.; Liu, Y.; Rychlik, M. Content of the Alternaria mycotoxin tenuazonic acid in food commodities determined by a stable isotope dilution assay. Mycotoxin Res. 2011, 28, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, H.B.; Patriarca, A.; Magan, N. Alternaria in food: Ecophysiology, mycotoxin production and toxicology. Mycobiology 2015, 43, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, G.T.; Qian, Y.Z.; Zhang, P.; Dong, W.H.; Qi, Y.M.; Guo, H.T. Etiological role of Alternaria alternata in human esophageal cancer. Chin. Med. J. 1992, 105, 394. [Google Scholar]
  15. Georgiev, V.G.; Weber, J.; Kneschke, E.-M.; Denev, P.N.; Bley, T.; Pavlov, A.I. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of betalain extracts from intact plants and hairy root cultures of the red beetroot Beta vulgaris cv. Detroit dark red. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2010, 65, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, S.; Brooks, M.S.-L. Use of red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) for Antimicrobial Applications—A critical review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018, 11, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Motlagh, M.R.S.; Kaviani, B. Characterization of new Bipolaris spp.: The causal agent of rice brown spot dis-ease in the north of Iran. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2008, 10, 638–642. [Google Scholar]
  18. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual: Fully Illustrated and with Catalogue Raisonné 1796–2007; CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 9789070351687. [Google Scholar]
  19. Abdelkhalek, A. Expression of tomato pathogenesis related genes in response to Tobacco mosaic virus. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2019, 29, 1596–1602. [Google Scholar]
  20. Brzonkalik, K.; Herrling, T.; Syldatk, C.; Neumann, A. The influence of different nitrogen and carbon sources on mycotoxin production in Alternaria alternata. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 147, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siciliano, I.; Ortu, G.; Gilardi, G.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A. Mycotoxin production in liquid culture and on plants infected with Alternaria spp. isolated from rocket and cabbage. Toxins 2015, 7, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sadhasivam, S.; Shapiro, O.H.; Ziv, C.; Barda, O.; Zakin, V.; Sionov, E. Synergistic inhibition of mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxin production by combination of pomegranate peel extract and azole fungicide. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Okla, M.K.; Alamri, S.A.; Salem, M.Z.; Ali, H.M.; Behiry, S.I.; Nasser, R.A.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Al-Ghtani, S.M.; Soufan, W. Yield, phytochemical constituents, and antibacterial activity of essential oils from the leaves/twigs, branches, branch wood, and branch bark of sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.). Processes 2019, 7, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salem, M.Z.; Behiry, S.I.; El-Hefny, M. Inhibition of Fusarium culmorum, Penicillium chrysogenum and Rhizoctonia solani by n-hexane extracts of three plant species as a wood-treated oil fungicide. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1683–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdelkhalek, A.; Behiry, S.I.; Al-Askar, A.A. Bacillus velezensis PEA1 inhibits Fusarium oxysporum growth and induces systemic resistance to Cucumber Mosaic virus. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Duncan, D.B. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 1955, 11, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nagrale, D.T.; Gaikwad, A.P.; Sharma, L. Morphological and cultural characterization of Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler blight of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii H. Bolus ex JD Hook). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2013, 5, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Goyal, P.; Chahar, M.; Mathur, A.P.; Kumar, A.; Chattopadhyay, C. Morphological and cultural variation in different oilseed Brassica isolates of Alternaria brassicae from different geographical regions of India. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 81, 1052. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fajarningsih, N.D. Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as DNA barcoding to identify fungal species: A review. Squalen Bull. Mar. Fish. Postharvest Biotechnol. 2016, 11, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Meena, M.; Swapnil, P.; Upadhyay, R.S. Isolation, characterization and toxicological potential of Alternaria-mycotoxins (TeA, AOH and AME) in different Alternaria species from various regions of India. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Ertekin, F.B.; Nazli, K.; Guzel, S.Z.B. Antioxidant activity and phenolic acid content of selected vegetable broths. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Babagil, A.; Tasgin, E.; Nadaroglu, H.; Kaymak, H.C. Antioxidant and antiradical activity of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. var. conditiva Alef.) grown using different fertilizers. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 7101605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Derbalah, A.; El-Mahrouk, M.; El-Sayed, A. Efficacy and safety of some plant extracts against tomato early blight disease caused by Alternaria solani. Plant Pathol. J. 2011, 10, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zaker, M.; Mosallanejad, H. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts on Alternaria alternata, the causal agent of Alternaria leaf spot of potato. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 13, 1023–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tegegne, G.; Pretorius, J.; Swart, W. Antifungal properties of Agapanthus africanus L. extracts against plant pathogens. Crop. Prot. 2008, 27, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lindsey, K.L.; Van Staden, J.; Eloff, J.N. Growth inhibition of plant pathogenic fungi by extracts of Allium sativum and Tulbaghia violacea. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2004, 70, 671–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Carvalho, D.D.C.; Alves, E.; Camargos, R.B.; Oliveira, D.F.; Scolforo, J.R.S.; De Carvalho, D.A.; Batista, T.R.S. Plant extracts to control Alternaria alternata in Murcott tangor fruits. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2011, 28, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Lima, C.B.; Rentschler, L.L.A.; Bueno, J.T.; Boaventura, A.C. Plant extracts and essential oils on the control of Alternaria alternata, Alternaria dauci and on the germination and emergence of carrot seeds (Daucus carota L.). Ciênc. Rural 2016, 46, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Al-Huqail, A.A.; Behiry, S.I.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ali, H.M.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Salem, A.Z.M. Antifungal, antibacterial, and antioxidant activities of Acacia saligna (Labill.) HL Wendl. flower extract: HPLC analysis of phenolic and flavonoid compounds. Molecules 2019, 24, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Da Cruz Cabral, L.; Pinto, V.F.; Patriarca, A. Control of infection of tomato fruits by Alternaria and mycotoxin production using plant extracts. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2016, 145, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Youssef, N.H. Role of chitosan and some plant parts wraps as alternative interior edible coat surrounding semi-hard cheese in inhibiting fungal growth and mycotoxins migration. Res. Crop. 2019, 20, 869–879. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bluma, R.; Amaiden, M.R.; Etcheverry, M. Screening of Argentine plant extracts: Impact on growth parameters and aflatoxin B1 accumulation by Aspergillus section Flavi. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bluma, R.V.; Etcheverry, M.G. Application of essential oils in maize grain: Impact on Aspergillus section Flavi growth parameters and aflatoxin accumulation. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garcia, D.; Garcia-Cela, E.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V.; Marín, S. Mould growth and mycotoxin production as affected by Equisetum arvense and Stevia rebaudiana extracts. Food Control 2011, 22, 1378–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abdel-Shafi, S.; Al-Mohammadi, A.-R.; Sitohy, M.; Mosa, B.; Ismaiel, A.; Enan, G.; Osman, A. Antimicrobial activity and chemical constitution of the crude, phenolic-rich extracts of Hibiscus sabdariffa, Brassica oleracea and Beta vulgaris. Molecules 2019, 24, 4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Wilson, D.W.; Nash, P.; Buttar, H.S.; Griffiths, K.; Singh, R.; De Meester, F.; Horiuchi, R.; Takahashi, T. The role of food antioxidants, benefits of functional foods, and influence of feeding habits on the health of the older person: An overview. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kaur, C.; Kapoor, H.C. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some Asian vegetables. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 37, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gilby, A.R.; Few, T.L.A.V. Lysis of protoplasts of Micrococcus lysodeikticus by ionic detergents. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1960, 23, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Hueck, H.J.; Adema, D.M.M.; Wiegmann, J.R. Bacteriostatic, fungistatic, and algistatic activity of fatty nitrogen compounds. Appl. Microbiol. 1966, 14, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Seidel, V.; Taylor, P.W. In vitro activity of extracts and constituents of Pelagonium against rapidly growing mycobacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2004, 23, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ai, H.-W.; Kang, Y.-X.; Cao, Y.; Zheng, C.-J. Antifungal properties and chemical analysis of essential oil from Vitex negundo seeds. Br. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 4, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Prieto-Blanco, M.C.; López-Mahía, P.; Prada-Rodríguez, D. Analysis of residual products in benzyl chloride used for the industrial synthesis of quaternary compounds by liquid chromatography with diode-array detection. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2009, 47, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Basaran, P. Inhibition effect of belzalkonium chloride treatment on growth of common food contaminating fungal species. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Peters, D.; Omeodu, S. Effect of ethanolic leave extract of Phyllantus amarus on carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) induced hepatotoxicity in albino rats. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2016, 19, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Abdelkhalek, A.; Salem, M.Z.; Kordy, A.M.; Salem, A.Z.; Behiry, S.I. Antiviral, antifungal, and insecticidal activities of Eucalyptus bark extract: HPLC analysis of polyphenolic compounds. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 147, 104383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ashmawy, N.A.; Salem, M.Z.M.; El Shanhorey, N.; Al-Huqail, A.; Ali, H.M.; Behiry, S.I. Eco-friendly wood-biofungicidal and antibacterial activities of various Coccoloba uvifera L. leaf extracts: HPLC analysis of phenolic and flavonoid compounds. BioResources 2020, 15, 4165–4187. [Google Scholar]
  57. Abdelkhalek, A.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Hafez, E.; Behiry, S.I.; Qari, S.H. The phytochemical, antifungal, and first report of the antiviral properties of Egyptian Haplophyllum tuberculatum extract. Biology 2020, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ashmawy, N.A.; Behiry, S.I.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Salem, M.Z.M. Bioactivity of selected phenolic acids and hexane extracts from Bougainvilla spectabilis and Citharexylum spinosum on the growth of Pectobacterium carotovorum and Dickeya solani bacteria: An opportunity to save the environment. Processes 2020, 8, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohamed, A.A.; Behiry, S.I.; Ali, H.M.; EL-Hefny, M.; Salem, M.Z.M.; Ashmawy, N.A. Phytochemical compounds of branches from P. halepensis oily liquid extract and S. terebinthifolius essential oil and their potential antifungal activity. Processes 2020, 8, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ałtyn, I.; Twarużek, M. Mycotoxin contamination concerns of herbs and medicinal plants. Toxins 2020, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Thipe, V.C.; Bloebaum, P.; Khoobchandani, M.; Karikachery, A.R.; Katti, K.K.; Katti, K.V. Green nanotechnology: Nanoformulations against toxigenic fungi to limit mycotoxin production. In Nanomycotoxicology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 155–188. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kumar, P.P.; Kumaravel, S.; Lalitha, C. Screening of antioxidant activity, total phenolics and GC-MS study of Vitex negundo. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2010, 4, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  63. Rahuman, A.; Gopalakrishnan, G.; Ghouse, B.; Arumugam, S.; Himalayan, B. Effect of Feronia limonia on mosquito larvae. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aparna, V.; Dileep, K.V.; Mandal, P.K.; Karthe, P.; Sadasivan, C.; Haridas, M. Anti-inflammatory property of n-hexadecanoic acid: Structural evidence and kinetic assessment. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Awa, E.P.; Ibrahim, S.; Ameh, D.A. GC/MS analysis and antimicrobial activity of diethyl ether fraction of methanolic extract from the stem bark of Annona senegalensis Pers. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2012, 3, 4213. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu, F.-R.; Lian, X.-Z.; Guo, H.-Y.; McGuire, P.M.; Li, R.-D.; Wang, R.; Yu, F.-H. Isolation and characterization of methyl esters and derivatives from Euphorbia kansui (Euphorbiaceae) and their inhibitory effects on the human SGC-7901 cells. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 8, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Wang, B.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds from Bacillus velezensis CT32 against Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum. Processes 2020, 8, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sivakumar, R.; Jebanesan, A.; Govindarajan, M.; Rajasekar, P. Larvicidal and repellent activity of tetradecanoic acid against Aedes aegypti (Linn.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011, 4, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Santra, H.K.; Banerjee, D. Natural products as fungicide and their role in crop protection. In Natural Bioactive Products in Sustainable Agriculture; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2020; pp. 131–219. [Google Scholar]
  70. Chandrasekaran, M.; Senthilkumar, A.; Venkatesalu, V. Antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of fatty acid methyl esters from the leaves of Sesuvium portulacastrum L. Eur. Rev. Med Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 15, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Applsci 11 04239 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of beetroot extracts on tenuazonic acid mycotoxin production in three isolates of Alternaria alternata. Data with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. BEE = beetroot ethanol extract, BME = beetroot methanol extract.
Figure 1. Effects of beetroot extracts on tenuazonic acid mycotoxin production in three isolates of Alternaria alternata. Data with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. BEE = beetroot ethanol extract, BME = beetroot methanol extract.
Applsci 11 04239 g001
Applsci 11 04239 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of beetroot extracts on alternariol monomethyl ether mycotoxin production in three isolates of Alternaria alternata. Data with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. BEE = beetroot ethanol extract, BME = beetroot methanol extract.
Figure 2. Effects of beetroot extracts on alternariol monomethyl ether mycotoxin production in three isolates of Alternaria alternata. Data with the same letters are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. BEE = beetroot ethanol extract, BME = beetroot methanol extract.
Applsci 11 04239 g002
Applsci 11 04239 g003 550
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatograms of beetroot methanolic (up) and ethanolic (bottom) extracts.
Figure 3. GC-MS chromatograms of beetroot methanolic (up) and ethanolic (bottom) extracts.
Applsci 11 04239 g003
Table
Table 1. Screening of mycotoxins produced by Alternaria isolates isolated from infected potato plants from different areas.
Table 1. Screening of mycotoxins produced by Alternaria isolates isolated from infected potato plants from different areas.
Collection SitesGeographical DataFungal CodeMycotoxin Detection
Tenuazonic Acid (TeA) ng/gAlternariol Monomethyl Ether (AME) ng/g
Beban, Kom Hamada, El Beheira Governorate30°46′00.4′′ N
30°39′46.8′′ E		KH3133,200 a138,320 c
Demeito, Kom Hamada, El Beheira Governorate30°47′19.5′′ N
30°44′07.0′′ E		KH122,560 b94,340 g
An Nubariyah, Gharb El Noubareya, El Beheira Governorate30°40′13.5′′ N
30°02′53.0′′ E		NO124,000 b114,000 f
Al Natron Valley, El Beheira Governorate30°33′12.0′′ N
30°18′04.9′′ E		W227,768 b118,800 e
Quora Kheriguine, Gharb El Noubareya Quora Kheriguine, El Beheira Governorate30°42′36.7′′ N
29°54′43.2′′ E		NO349,270 ab212,000 a
Al Hamam Desert, Matrouh Governorate30°44′56.2′′ N
29°36′50.6′′ E		Alam138,160 b147,278 b
Al Natron Valley, El Beheira Governorate30°34′40.6′′ N
29°58′43.1′′ E		W343,680 b131,560 d
L.S.D.0.05 40.241168.04136
Data with similar letters are not significant.
Table
Table 2. Morphological characteristics of Alternaria alternata isolates, their pathogenicity and GenBank accession numbers.
Table 2. Morphological characteristics of Alternaria alternata isolates, their pathogenicity and GenBank accession numbers.
IsolateConidial Length (μm)Conidial Width (μm)L/W RatioPathogenicityAccession Number
KH127.325.305.15HighMN592776
KH334.454.687.36ModerateMN592775
NO130.585.345.73ModerateMN592772
NO335.486.105.82HighMN592771
W229.67.204.11LowMN592773
W332.776.894.76HighMN592774
Alam126.754.835.54LowMN592777
Table
Table 3. Compounds identified in the methanolic beetroot extract by GC-MS.
Table 3. Compounds identified in the methanolic beetroot extract by GC-MS.
Retention TimeCompound NameArea (%)Molecular
Formula		Molecular Weight
3.95Benzyl chloride
Applsci 11 04239 i001		7.49C7H7Cl126
10.07Dodecanal (Tetradecanal)
Applsci 11 04239 i002		0.71C12H24O184
11.271-Chloroundecane Applsci 11 04239 i0030.42C11H23Cl190
11.371-Dodecanol
Applsci 11 04239 i004		1.17C12H26O186
11.951-Dodecanamine, n,n-dimethyl
Applsci 11 04239 i005		43.75C14H31N213
14.00Tetradecanal
Applsci 11 04239 i006		0.49C14H28O212
15.221-Hexadecanol
Applsci 11 04239 i007		0.67C16H34O242
15.712-Propanone
Applsci 11 04239 i008		18.50C3H6O58
19.55Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (Palmitic acid, methyl ester)
Applsci 11 04239 i009		3.02C17H34O2270
20.24n-Hexadecanoic acid
Applsci 11 04239 i010		1.93C16H32O2256
22.229,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i011		1.89C19H34O2294
22.329-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i012		2.47C19H36O2296
22.493-(N-Benzyl-N-methylamino)-1,2-propanediol
Applsci 11 04239 i013		10.52C11H17NO2195
22.73Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester (Methyl stearate)
Applsci 11 04239 i014		0.53C19H38O2298
22.999-Octadecenoic acid (z)-
Applsci 11 04239 i015		2.32C18H34O2282
25.542-Methylenebrexane3.22C10H14134
27.039-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i016		0.90C21H40O4356
Table
Table 4. Compounds identified in the ethanolic extract of beetroot in GC-MS.
Table 4. Compounds identified in the ethanolic extract of beetroot in GC-MS.
Retention TimeCompound NameArea
(%)		Molecular
Formula		Molecular Weight
3.96Benzene, (chloromethyl)-
Applsci 11 04239 i017		3.01C7H7Cl126
10.079-Octadecenoic acid (z)-
Applsci 11 04239 i018		1.03C18H34O2282
11.92Oxirane, methyl-
Applsci 11 04239 i019		23.22C3H6O85
12.172,4-Di-tert-butylphenol
Applsci 11 04239 i020		1.17C14H22O206
13.741-Chlorooctadecane
Applsci 11 04239 i021		1.05C18H37Cl288
14.07Ethanol,2-(9-octadecenyloxy)-,(Z)-
Applsci 11 04239 i022		1.81C20H40O2312
14.82Cyclopentaneacetic acid, 3-oxo-2-pentyl-, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i023		2.13C13H22O3226
14.89Patchouli alcohol
Applsci 11 04239 i024		1.43C15H26O222
14.971-(4-isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropyl acetate
Applsci 11 04239 i025		1.09C15H22O2234
15.72Propanal
Applsci 11 04239 i026		6.23C3H6O58
15.969-Octadecenoic acid (z)-
Applsci 11 04239 i027		0.66C18H34O2282
16.492H-Pyran-3-ol, tetrahydro-2,2,6-trimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-cyclohexen-1-yl), [3S-[3à,6à(R*)]]-
Applsci 11 04239 i028		5.09C15H26O2238
19.55Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i029		10.72C17H34O2270
20.15Dibutyl phthalate
Applsci 11 04239 i030		2.82C16H22O4278
20.24n-Hexadecanoic acid (9-OCTADECENOIC ACID (Z)-)
Applsci 11 04239 i031		7.32C16H32O2256
22.2211,14-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i032		3.76C19H34O2294
22.329-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i033		5.99C19H36O2296
22.50Benzylamphetamine
Applsci 11 04239 i034		5.61C16H19N225
22.73Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i035		2.19C19H38O2298
23.009,12-Octadecadienoyl chloride, (Z,Z)-( Linoleoyl chloride)
Applsci 11 04239 i036		5.35C18H31ClO298
24.58Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i037		1.49C19H38O4330
25.21Hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i038		1.14C19H38O4330
25.55N-Methyl-N-benzyltetradecanamine
Applsci 11 04239 i039		2.05C22H39N317
27.039-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester
Applsci 11 04239 i040		2.74C21H40O4356
28.581,2-Benzenedicarboxylicacid
Applsci 11 04239 i041		0.93C24H38O4390
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Youssef, N.H.; Qari, S.H.; Behiry, S.I.; Dessoky, E.S.; El-Hallous, E.I.; Elshaer, M.M.; Kordy, A.; Maresca, V.; Abdelkhalek, A.; Heflish, A.A. Antimycotoxigenic Activity of Beetroot Extracts against Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins on Potato Crop. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094239

AMA Style

Youssef NH, Qari SH, Behiry SI, Dessoky ES, El-Hallous EI, Elshaer MM, Kordy A, Maresca V, Abdelkhalek A, Heflish AA. Antimycotoxigenic Activity of Beetroot Extracts against Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins on Potato Crop. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(9):4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Youssef, Nesrine H., Sameer H. Qari, Said I. Behiry, Eldessoky S. Dessoky, Ehab I. El-Hallous, Moustafa M. Elshaer, Ahmed Kordy, Viviana Maresca, Ahmed Abdelkhalek, and Ahmed A. Heflish. 2021. "Antimycotoxigenic Activity of Beetroot Extracts against Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins on Potato Crop" Applied Sciences 11, no. 9: 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094239

APA Style

Youssef, N. H., Qari, S. H., Behiry, S. I., Dessoky, E. S., El-Hallous, E. I., Elshaer, M. M., Kordy, A., Maresca, V., Abdelkhalek, A., & Heflish, A. A. (2021). Antimycotoxigenic Activity of Beetroot Extracts against Alternaria alternata Mycotoxins on Potato Crop. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop