Next Article in Journal
An Overview of Minimally Invasive Surgery Robots from the Perspective of Human–Computer Interaction Design
Next Article in Special Issue
Spontaneous and Controlled Fermentation Tests in Industrial Table Olives Production
Previous Article in Journal
LightR: A Fault-Tolerant Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks-on-Chip Topology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Antidiabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Carissa carandas Linn Extract: In Vitro and In Vivo Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Air- and Freeze-Drying Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica Fructification

by
Gabriela C. González
1,†,
Maximiliano Rugolo
1,†,
Tiane C. Finimundy
2,3,
Elizabeth Ohaco
4,
Maria B. Pildain
1,* and
Carolina Barroetaveña
1,*
1
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico (CIEFAP), Ruta Nacional 259 Km 16,24, Esquel 9200, Argentina
2
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
3
Laboratório Associado para a Sustentabilidade e Tecnologia em Regiões de Montanha (SusTEC), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
4
Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Nacional del Comahue (UNCo), Villa Regina 8336, Argentina
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(15), 8873; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158873
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 30 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023

Abstract

:
Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica are wild edible fungi from Patagonia, which produce mushrooms that have been consumed since ancient times by those in local communities. Both species possess high protein and low fat contents and other bioactive compounds with remarkable antioxidant activity. Drying is a widely and commonly practiced preservation technique that is cost-effective. However, the process of drying can have an impact on the levels of bioactive compounds. In this study, the effects of drying methods on the total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant activity in the fructification of F. antarctica and R. patagonica were estimated. The analysis was conducted using fructifications that were fresh-frozen, dried at 50, 60, and 70 °C, and freeze-dried. The TPC was significantly higher for the fructifications that were fresh-frozen and dried at 60 °C in R. patagonica (with values of 14.78 and 13.67 mg GAE/mg of extract, respectively). Also, the fresh-freezing, freeze-drying. and 60 °C methods exhibited the highest inhibition of free radicals. In addition, R. patagonica had a notably higher concentration of phenols and showed higher antioxidant capacity than F. antarctica. The greatest losses concerning phenols occur in F. antarctica in the three evaluated air-drying temperatures (36.57, 29.76, 39.47% in 50, 60 and 70 °C respectively, compared with fresh-frozen). TPC and antioxidant activity were higher in fresh-frozen and freeze-dried samples. A drying temperature of 60 °C is advisable for both species, considering drying time and bioactivity. Overall, the fructifications from different processing methods exhibited unique functional properties. This information can be utilized to optimize the postharvest preservation and maximize the potential applications of these mushrooms.

1. Introduction

The Patagonian Andean forests are home to a wide variety of wild fungi species that hold great potential as edible food, offering both high nutritional value and medicinal properties [1]. Certain species within these forests have been identified by Mapuche communities as having a long history of traditional use, remarkable sensory qualities, and promising economic viability [2]. In particular, the ancestral consumption records of the species Fistulina antarctica (n.v. lengua de vaca) and Ramaria patagonica (n.v. changle) are widespread. Recently, the nutritional composition of these and other wild edible mushrooms (WEM) from Argentina and Chile has been investigated, with a particular focus on their fatty and organic acids, soluble sugars, phenolic compounds, and ergosterol contents, in addition to antioxidant and antimicrobial potential [3,4,5]. Fistulina antarctica showed low amounts of fat (0.83 ± 0.01 g/100 g dw), sugars (28.68 ± 0.58 g/100 g dw), proteins (3.71 ± 0.07 g/100 g dw), and phenolic compounds (9.85 ± 0.09 µg/100 g dw), compared with R. patagonica, which showed low amounts of fat (2.51 ± 0.10 g/100 g dw) and sugars (9.41 ± 0.35 g/100 g dw) and high amounts of proteins (19.68 ± 0.64 g/100 g dw) and phenolic compounds (134.39 ± 2.10 µg/100 g dw) [3,5].
Phenolic compounds are a significant category of bioactive substances that possess antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties. These compounds have the potential to enhance natural defense mechanisms in humans [6,7]. The antioxidant properties of these bioactive molecules are crucial in preventing the damage caused by free radicals; numerous studies have reported that this activity is related to their phenolic content [8,9]. Between the Patagonian species, R. patagonica presented the highest content of phenolic compounds of 50.82 mg GAE/g extract [3], with relatively high amounts of protocatechuic acid [5] and the most effective results in all antioxidant activity assays in comparison with other WEMs [3,5]. Instead, Fistulina antarctica showed the lowest antioxidant activity in terms of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances’ (TBARSs’) inhibition, ꞵ-carotene bleaching inhibition assay [3], oxidative hemolysis inhibition (OxHLIA), and TBARS inhibition assay [5]; Fistulina antarctica also had a low phenols contents of 7.82 mg GAE/g [3] and 1.30 mg GAE/g extract [5].
Mushrooms are known for their perishability and relatively short shelf-life because they lack a protective cuticle, have a high respiratory rate, and contain a significant amount of water [10,11]. These factors make them susceptible to various deteriorative processes, including mechanical damage, microbial contamination, weight loss, and enzymatic browning [10]. Consequently, mushrooms suffer a rapid decline in quality shortly after harvest, so postharvest conditions as well as culinary treatments significantly affect their quality [12,13,14]. Agaricus bisporus and Pleurotus ostreatus are mushrooms that typically last for one to three days at room temperature and five to seven days when refrigerated [10]. The maximum shelf-life in conventional refrigerator conditions (at 4 °C) was in 4 days for F. antarctica and 8 days for R. patagonica [15]. This creates a problem for the distribution and marketing of fresh mushrooms. In addition, as edible wild mushrooms from Patagonia have strict fruiting seasonality (April and May for these species), to enable their consumption during the rest of the year, they must be preserved through drying.
Dehydration has become an efficient, widely used mushroom preservation process to extend their shelf life [16,17,18], as reducing the water content minimizes microbial spoilage and deterioration while preserving texture and flavor [15,19,20]. Dehydration constitutes the postharvest method commonly used for extending the shelf life of WEMs in Patagonia [2]. However, the changes that foods can undergo with this method make it necessary to search for other preservation techniques that maintain the quality and bioactive compounds and extend the shelf life of fresh mushrooms [15,16].
Hot-air drying (HD) and freeze drying (FD) are two of the most used methods for drying mushrooms [21,22,23]. HD involves exposing the mushrooms to circulating hot air, which causes moisture evaporation and subsequent drying. This method is relatively simple and cost-effective; nevertheless, HD can lead to losses in bioactivity and potentially affects the texture and color of mushrooms [7,13,14,20,23]. On the other hand, FD is a more advanced and specialized method. It involves freezing the mushrooms and then subjecting them to a vacuum environment, where the frozen water undergoes sublimation (directly changing from solid to a gas). FD is known for its ability to retain the original color, texture, and nutritional properties of mushrooms. FD is suitable for heat-sensitive compounds (such as phenols, tocopherols, carotenoids, and ascorbic acid, which have antioxidant properties) and results in high-quality dried mushrooms; however, the FD is a more expensive and time-consuming process, requiring specialized equipment and expertise [22,24,25].
The selection of an ideal drying method for mushrooms is driven by the objectives of minimizing drying time and energy consumption, thereby reducing the cost, while ensuring the desired quality of the final product [17]. However, the choice between methods depends on various factors including available resources and cost considerations.
Thus, to select the most appropriate drying process and to analyze the cost/benefit relationship in the technological re-adaptation of traditional practices, it is necessary to analyze the bioactivity losses linked to dehydration methods and to different dehydration temperatures. By using suitable techniques, it is possible to maintain the integrity of these bioactive compounds and secondary metabolites, thereby increasing the shelf life of mushrooms [10].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of air-drying temperature and freeze drying on the total phenolic content (TPC) as well as antioxidant activity of F. antarctica and R. patagonica. Additionally, these research efforts are associated with initiatives to establish mycotourism and mycogastronomy as regional development alternatives. To achieve this, it is necessary to have solid information on different postharvest conservation techniques and storage methods that allow the sale of quality products with bioactive properties that are as similar as possible to those of fresh products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Processing

Wild F. antarctica and R. patagonica samples (Figure 1) were collected from Los Alerces National Park (LANP) in April–May 2023. The fresh fruiting bodies of both species were initially cleaned and sliced into small pieces (about 2–3 mm) on the day of harvesting to determine fresh moisture content, and the rest was divided into portions of 250 g for the air-drying treatments. Samples were immediately used fresh for air-drying temperature treatments and frozen at −80 °C until freeze-dried. Experiments were performed in the area of the Phytopathology and Applied Microbiology of Forest Research Center (CIEFAP).

2.2. Moisture Content

Fresh initial moisture content was measured via the oven method [26]. In brief, a known amount of fresh sample was placed in Petri dishes in a drying oven (Dalvo instruments, Model UBF575, Santa Fe, Argentina) at 102 °C, dried to constant weight, taken out, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed using a precision balance (Explorer Ohaus, Parsippany, NJ, USA; 0.0001 g). Moisture content was established using the following formula:
X(db) = g H2O/g DS
where X(db) is the moisture content on a dry basis, and DS is dry solid. Three replicates were conducted for each treatment.

2.3. Drying Process

For the air-drying experiment, different drying temperatures (50 °C, 60 °C, or 70 °C) were applied using a commercial oven (Numak DHG-9203A), keeping the flush speed constant at 0.8 m/s and the relative air humidity at 7%). The weight losses of the partially dehydrated samples were obtained through discontinuous weighing using a digital analytical balance (Explorer Ohaus, USA; ±0.0001 g). Following Valiente et al. [26], samples were dried until equilibrium. The final dry weight was determined in a forced-air oven at 102 °C, until constant weight was reached, using the aforementioned balance. The relative moisture content was calculated as Xr (X/X0), where X is the moisture content at time t, and X0 is the initial moisture content, depending on the drying time (t).
For the freeze-drying experiment, fresh fructifications were packaged in plastic centrifuge tubes (50 mL), frozen at −80 ± 1 °C for 24 h, removed, and placed immediately in a freeze-dryer (BiOBASE, BK-FD10 Series) for 72 h. The temperature of the condenser was fixed at −64 °C, and the vacuum was kept at 20 Pa. Three replicates were conducted for each treatment.

2.4. Preparation of Extracts of Bioactive Compounds

The dry or freeze-dried samples (2 g equivalent to 20 g of fresh-frozen) were ground and extracted using 50 mL of a solution of ethanol/water (80:20 v/v) for 2 h at room temperature in a shaker (IKA-MAG, Type RCT, Staufen, Germany). The extracts were concentrated in a rotating evaporator, lyophilized, and stored before use. Then, samples were redissolved in methanol at a 5 mg/mL concentration for bioactive analysis. All analyses were carried out in triplicate.

2.5. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The concentration of TPC was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method [27]. Folin-Ciocalteau reagents (50 μL) were added to 500 μL of the extract and mixed. The protocol of Valiente et al. was followed [26]. Absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a Multiskan Sky High spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A standard of gallic acid (mg/L) was used. The results are expressed as milligrams of equivalent gallic acid per 100 grams of fresh or dried mushrooms on a dry weight basis (mg GAE/100 g).

2.6. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity

2.6.1. ABTS Radical Scavenging Activity

The ABTS radical scavenging was determined using the method reported by Gąsecka et al. [28] with some changes. Briefly, 200 μL of ABTS-adjusted solution was added to 20 μL of each extract. The absorbance was measured at 734 nm after 10 min of incubation. Controls contained 50 μL of distilled water. The ABTS radical scavenging activity (RSA) was estimated using the formula:
ABTS RSA (%) = [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100
where A1 is the absorbance value of samples; A0 is the absorbance value of the ABTS solution without samples.

2.6.2. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Radical Scavenging Activity

The DPPH radical scavenging capacity was evaluated according to a modified version of the method reported by Blois [29]. Briefly, 270 μL of 0.06 mM methyl alcohol DPPH solution was added to 30 μL of ethanolic extract mushroom species in a 96-well plate. The mixture was shaken vigorously and allowed to stand at room temperature for 60 min. The absorbance was measured at 515 nm after 60 min of incubation at room temperature.
The DPPH radical scavenging effect was calculated as follows:
DPPH RSA (%) = (A0 − A1)/A0 × 100%,
where A1 is the absorbance value of the solution samples, and A0 is the absorbance value of the DPPH solution without samples.

2.6.3. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay (FRAP)

Reducing power was determined according to Kozaski et al. [30]. The absorbance of 200 µL of the mix solution was measured at 700 nm. The blank was the solution with all reagents without mushroom extract. A higher absorbance indicates a greater reducing power. A calibration curve between 0 and 30 mg/mL of ascorbic acid (AA) was used to express the results as AA equivalents in 100 mL.

2.6.4. Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation (LIP)

The conjugated diene method, with some modifications, was used for antioxidant activity determination [31]. The absorbance was recorded at 234 nm at 0, 24, and 48 h of incubation time. The samples were incubated at 37 °C and 150 rpm, without light. A blank without-mushroom extract was used. The proportional antioxidant activity was calculated as follows:
[(ΔA0 − ΔA1)/ΔA0] × 100
where ΔA0 is the difference in the absorbance between 0 and 24 h of incubation of the control reaction, and ΔA1 is the difference in the absorbance in the presence of the sample. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. A value of 100% indicated a stronger inhibitory ability.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Three different samples of each of the two mushrooms were tested. Measurements were conducted in triplicate, and the resulting data from the experiments were collected and analyzed using the Statistical Package RStudio (version 1.1.485—© 2009–2022 RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). The results presented in tables and figures are shown as the mean value of three replicates and its corresponding standard deviation. Differences between mean values were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey’s test with a significance level of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95% (p < 0.05).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Moisture Contents and Air-Drying Behavior

The fresh moisture contents of F. antarctica and R. patagonica were 90.65 ± 3.7% and 91.5 ± 1%, respectively. The moisture content of the tested species as a function of drying time (Xr = X/X0, fixing a relative moisture of Xr = 0.01) for different temperatures is presented in Figure 2. Significantly less dehydration time was required at 70 °C for both species (Table 1). Between mushrooms, a remarkable difference in drying time was detected, as Fistulina antarctica required almost twice the drying time compared with R. patagonica (Table 1). The coralloid shape of R. patagonica, with a cylindrical axis of 0.5 cm diameter, on average, can explain the difference found with F. antarctica.
The moisture of the fresh fructifications was similar to those reported for other edible mushrooms, for example, a moisture content for Fistulina hepatica of 87.51% [32], for Flammulina velutipes of 90.7% [33], for Lactarius deliciosus of 90.0% [12], for Lentinula edodes of 88.4% [34], for Lepista nuda of 93.8% [35], for Pleurotus ostreatus of 91.5% [36], for Ramaria aurea of 88.5% [33], and for R. botrytis of 89.8% [35]. Beyond the morphology of the fruitings, the water contents of the edible mushrooms were very similar.
The shorter drying time (3.62 h and 1.62 h at 70 °C for F. antarctica and R. patagonica, respectively) is an advantage in comparison with other edible mushrooms that are used for global consumption and production. Since there are no previous reports of drying of species of the genus Fistulina and Ramaria, our results are compared to those for other edible mushrooms. In the case of Hericium erinaceus, the drying times at 40 °C and 70 °C were 12 and 7 h, respectively [7]. In the case of Agaricus bisporus, the drying times were 8.6 and 2.6 h at 50 °C and 75 °C, respectively [37]; for Lentinula edodes, this time was 7.5 h at 60 °C [22] and drying time was 8, 7, and 6 h at 50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C, respectively, for Pleurotus ostreatus [38].

3.2. Effect on Total Phenolic Content

The TPCs were higher in the R. patagonica than in the F. antarctica samples and varied significantly between the mushrooms in the fresh-frozen, freeze-dried, and dehydrated treatments, although with different patterns. Fresh freeing and a 60 °C dehydration temperature produced significantly higher TPC values for R. patagonica (14.78 ± 0.09 and 13.67 ± 0.43 mg GAE/mg extract, respectively), followed by the other treatments, although with no significant differences between them. Instead, for F. antarctica, freeze-dried samples presented the significantly highest value (8.66 ± 0.16 mg GAE/mg extract) followed by fresh-frozen samples (7.93 mg GAE/mg extract) and then by the samples in the three different dehydration temperature treatments (Table 2).
High amounts of TPC have been previously reported for R. patagonica [3,5] and other Ramaria species such as R. flava, R. subaurantiaca [4], and R. botrytis [5]. The major phenolic compounds in F. antarctica were gallic acid (3.14 ± 0.05 µg/100 g dw) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (6.71 ± 0.25 µg/100 g dw); for R. patagonica, they were gallic acid (4.56 ± 0.06 µg/100 g dw), p-hydroxybenzoic acid (126.42 ± 2.16 µg/100 g dw), and p-coumaric acid (3.41 ± 0.01 µg/100 g dw) [3,5]. The greatest losses concerning phenols occurred in F. antarctica for the three evaluated air-drying temperatures (Table 3), with the highest loss occurring at 70 °C (39.47% loss with respect fresh-frozen TPC values); in R. patagonica, the highest lost occurred at 50 °C with respect to the values of the fresh-frozen samples (lower by 35.45%).

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

The inhibition of free radicals by F. antarctica extracts showed a decreasing trend in the following order: freeze-dried samples (with the best percent inhibition activity in the ABTS and ILP assays, at 82.35 ± 0.11% and 82.35 ± 0.11% at 48 h, respectively), fresh-frozen samples (with the best percent inhibition activity in DPPH and FRAP assays, at 68.94 ± 1.99% and 43.01 ± 0.21%, respectively), and samples that were heat-dried. In the ILP assay, no activity was detected for any of the dried F. antarctica samples. In R. patagonica, the samples produced by the fresh-freezing, freeze-drying, and 60 °C methods showed the best inhibition of free radicals (in all assays: 99.03 ± 0.87% for ABTS, 99.31 ± 4.23% for DPPH RSA, 98.08 ± 0.70% for FRAP, and 99.03 ± 0.87% for ILP for fresh-frozen samples; 90.01 ± 1.16% for ABTS, 82.43 ± 0.44% for DPPH RSA, 96.54 ± 2.06% for FRAP, and 99.55 ± 1.20% for ILP for freeze-dried samples; and 91.59 ± 1.83% for ABTS, 82.58 ± 0.66% for DPPH RSA, 97.60 ± 2.28% for FRAP, and 85.52 ± 1.20% for ILP for the 60 °C air-dried samples) in comparison with the other hot-air-dry methods (Table 2).
The antioxidant activity of the methanolic extract of the two analyzed mushroom species were evaluated using different antioxidant activity assays because no single method can provide a complete overall evaluation [39]. Higher levels of phenolic compounds in mushrooms tend to be correlated with stronger antioxidant activity (Table 2), as reported in a previous study [12]. This relationship suggests that the phenolic compounds present in mushrooms contribute significantly to their antioxidant properties. In general, the fresh-frozen and freeze-dried mushrooms had the highest phenol contents and best antioxidant properties; in some cases, the mushrooms air-dried at 60 °C showed no significant differences from these. In agreement with a previous report [7], drying typically results in a decrease in total phenol content and antioxidant activity in extracts from F. antarctica fruiting bodies, with the highest level of reduction for compounds generally observed at 70 °C. Natural antioxidants, such as phenolic compounds, are highly susceptible to degradation when exposed to elevated temperatures. When p-hydroxybenzoic acid, the main compound in F. antarctica and R. patagonica, undergoes decarboxylation, it loses its bioactive properties such as its antioxidant activity. Thus, the decarboxylation of p-hydroxybenzoic acid can have a direct effect on its antioxidant properties [40]. In concordance with Radzki et al. [41], who studied wild edible mushrooms from Poland, our assays showed that hot-air drying can have either a positive or a negative impact on phenolic content and antioxidant activity, depending on the antioxidant assay used or the mushroom species. But, it is noted that the occurrence of negative effects is more common with hot-air drying than with the FD method. In the latter, drying is performed at low temperatures, minimizing thermal damage to heat-sensitive nutrients, therefore making it more effective in maintaining bioactive/antioxidant activities [42].
Among the temperatures used for dehydration, we found that, for P. ostreatus, 60 °C was the best temperature to preserve the contents of phenols and antioxidants as well as color of the samples, while a temperature of 70 °C negatively affected the TPC [26]. Additionally, an increase in antioxidant activity with drying at 60 °C was observed for B. edulis [43]. In other organoleptic evaluation studies, a hot-air-drying temperature of 65 °C was found to produce a mushroom soup and rehydrated slices of desirable quality that were also acceptable to consumers [44]. Others demonstrated that the total free amino acid content in samples treated with hot-air drying at 60 °C was the highest compared with that of the other dried and freeze-dried samples [23]. The inhibition of DPPH radicals decreased from 69 to 24% for F. antarctica and from 99 to 81% for R. patagonica after drying (70 °C in comparison with fresh-frozen samples). Regarding the scavenging effects, our results agree with those for H. erinaceus, L. scabrum [7], P. colossus [45], G. frondosa [46], P. ostreatus, and A. bisporus [47], which demonstrated a severe decrease in the ability to scavenge DPPH radicals after drying in comparison with fresh mushrooms.
Ramaria patagonica extracts (concentration 5 mg/mL) displayed remarkable scavenging effects on ABTS and DPPH radicals and FRAP and ILP in the range of 81.25–99.31%. The high antioxidant activity of Ramaria patagonica agrees with the findings of previous research [3,5], which showed that this edible mushroom is one of the best among more than twenty edible Patagonian species according to the results of DPPH scavenging assay, β-carotene bleaching inhibition, inhibition of lipid peroxidation (TBARS), and oxidative hemolysis inhibition assay (OxHLIA). Other Ramaria species, such as R. aurea and R. botrytis, proved to have high antioxidant activity [33,35]. On the other hand, F. antarctica presented comparatively lower antioxidant activity, in agreement with other findings [3,5], probably due to the low content of total phenolics in the fruiting bodies extracts. Another study [48] reports that Fistulina hepatica (beefsteak fungus) extracts exhibited high pro-oxidant activity due to the amounts of ascorbic acids, despite the good capacity to act as a scavenger of DPPH radicals.

4. Conclusions

This study emphasizes the value of postharvest methods regarding their effectiveness in preserving food, TPC, and antioxidant qualities, enabling the choice of the most suitable technology to enable the conservation and use of wild native Patagonian mushrooms out of season. Ramaria patagonica showed high antioxidant activity. The contents of total phenols and bioactivity were much better when preserved via fresh-freezing or freeze-drying methods in comparison with drying methods for both species. In this sense, the air-drying temperature did not affect the tested parameters, so other factors such as energy consumption can be taken into account when choosing the drying time. For this reason, the best option for these mushrooms would be drying at 60 °C. This study emphasizes the advantage of using familiar technology, with low-cost dehydration ovens, which are adaptable to rural areas for family or community use.
Mushroom consumers and traders attach a great deal of importance to bioactive compound contents; knowledge about correct postharvest processing will be the first step in making food protocols to help inform future public-health decisions. In this sense, if the decision is to increase the bioactive/antioxidant activities of functional foods, higher investment will be needed in increasing lyophilization capability, which maintains antioxidant values and phenolic concentrations in food like fresh F. antarctica and R. patagonica. The quick freeze-drying process that almost fully preserves the phenol and antioxidant contents, along with texture (compared with −20 °C freezers that completely alter mushroom texture) also requires special equipment (blast chillers and individual quick-freezing (IQF) equipment) and a suitable, reliable, and more expensive logistics for distribution.
The information generated in this study on the postharvest practices of edible wild mushrooms, through the application of different treatments aimed at extending their shelf life, significantly contributes to their commercialization. Using a suitable method facilitates and extends distribution timelines and enhances mushroom shelf life at sales locations. This study specifically addressed drying methods that are suitable for implementation in environments with limited resources and provides useful guidance to preserve these nontimber forest products after harvest and to enhance local products or family businesses in Patagonia, promoting multiple and sustainable applications of native forests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.C.G., M.R., M.B.P. and C.B.; methodology: G.C.G., M.R., M.B.P., C.B. and E.O., experimental work: G.C.G. and M.R., modeling and data analysis: G.C.G. and M.R.; writing—original draft preparation: G.C.G. and M.R.; writing—review and editing: G.C.G., M.R., M.B.P., T.C.F. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica FONCyT Argentina (grant PICT-2021-I-A-01261) and CONICET (grant PIP 11220110100388).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to P. Masera for assistance with the analyses and B. Sede Lucena for assistance with the laboratory tasks.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barroetaveña, C.; Toledo, C.V. Diversity and Ecology of Edible Mushrooms from Patagonia Native Forests, Argentina, in Mushrooms, Humans and Nature in a Changing World: Perspectives from Ecological, Agricultural and Social Sciences; Perez-Moreno, J., Guerin Laguette, A., Flores Arzú, R., Yu, F.Q., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 297–318.
  2. Molares, S.; Toledo, C.V.; Stecher, G.; Barroetaveña, C. Traditional mycological knowledge and processes of change in Mapuche communities from Patagonia, Argentina: A study on wild edible fungi in Nothofagaceae forests. Mycologia 2020, 112, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Toledo, C.V.; Barroetaveña, C.; Fernandes, Â.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical and antioxidant properties of wild edible mushrooms from native Nothofagus spp. forest, Argentina. Molecules 2016, 21, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jacinto-Azevedo, B.; Valderrama, N.; Henríquez, K.; Aranda, M.; Aqueveque, P. Nutritional value and biological properties of Chilean wild and commercial edible mushrooms. Food Chem. 2021, 356, 129651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rugolo, M.; Spréa, R.M.; Dias, M.I.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Añibarro-Ortega, M.; Barroetaveña, C.; Caleja, C.; Barros, L. Nutritional Composition and Bioactive Properties of Wild Edible Mushrooms from Native Nothofagus Patagonian Forests. Foods 2022, 11, 3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Souilem, F.; Fernandes, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barreira, J.C.; Barros, L.; Skhiri, F.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C. Wild mushrooms and their mycelia as sources of bioactive compounds: Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic properties. Food Chem. 2017, 230, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gąsecka, M.; Siwulski, M.; Magdziak, Z.; Budzyńska, S.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Niedzielski, P.; Mleczek, M. The effect of drying temperature on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Leccinum scabrum (Bull.) Gray and Hericium erinaceus (Bull.) Pers. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 57, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Barros, L.; Cruz, T.; Baptista, P.; Estevinho, L.M.; Ferreira, I.C. Wild and commercial mushrooms as source of nutrients and nutraceuticals. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2742–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, K.; Mehra, R.; Guiné, R.P.F.; Lima, M.J.; Kumar, N.; Kaushik, R.; Ahmed, N.; Yadav, A.N.; Kumar, H. Edible Mushrooms: A Comprehensive Review on Bioactive Compounds with Health Benefits and Processing Aspects. Foods 2021, 10, 2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castellanos-Reyes, K.; Villalobos-Carvajal, R.; Beldarrain-Iznaga, T. Fresh Mushroom Preservation Techniques. Foods 2021, 10, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dawadi, E.; Magar, P.B.; Bhandari, S.; Subedi, S.; Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, J. Nutritional and post-harvest quality preservation of mushrooms: A review. Heliyon 2022, 8, 12093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barros, L.; Baptista, P.; Correia, D.M.; Morais, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Effects of Conservation Treatment and Cooking on the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Portuguese Wild Edible Mushrooms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4781–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fernandes, Â.; Barros, L.; Barreira, J.C.; Antonio, A.L.; Oliveira, M.B.P.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C. Effects of different processing technologies on chemical and antioxidant parameters of Macrolepiota procera wild mushroom. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, K.; Pu, Y.-Y.; Sun, D.-W. Recent advances in quality preservation of postharvest mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus): A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barroetaveña, C.; López, S.; Pildain, M.B. Cocinar Con Hongos Silvestres, Descripción Nutricional, Propiedades, Modos de Consumo y Preservación de Los Hongos Silvestres de Patagonia; Centro forestal CIEFAP: Esquel, Argentina, 2020; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pei, F.; Yang, W.-J.; Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Mariga, A.M.; Zhao, L.-Y.; Fang, Y.; Ma, N.; An, X.-X.; Hu, Q.-H. Comparison of Freeze-Drying with Three Different Combinations of Drying Methods and Their Influence on Colour, Texture, Microstructure and Nutrient Retention of Button Mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) Slices. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2014, 7, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yadav, D.; Negi, P.S. Bioactive components of mushrooms: Processing effects and health benefits. Food Res. Int. 2021, 148, 110599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Giri, S.; Prasad, S. Drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics of microwave-vacuum and convective hot-air dried mushrooms. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pendre, N.K.; Nema, P.K.; Sharma, H.P.; Rathore, S.S.; Kushwah, S.S. Effect of drying temperature and slice size on quality of dried okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 49, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xu, L.; Fang, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, H.; Mu, H.; Gao, H. Effects of high-temperature pre-drying on the quality of air-dried shiitake mushrooms (Lentinula edodes). Food Chem. 2019, 285, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kotwaliwale, N.; Bakane, P.; Verma, A. Changes in textural and optical properties of oyster mushroom during hot air drying. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 1207–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S. Comparison of Three New Drying Methods for Drying Characteristics and Quality of Shiitake Mushroom (Lentinus edodes). Dry. Technol. 2014, 32, 1791–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, Y.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, M. Comparative analysis of taste compounds in shiitake mushrooms processed by hot-air drying and freeze drying. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1100–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, L.-L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L.-P.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Sun, D.-F. Influence of combination drying methods on composition, texture, aroma and microstructure of apple slices. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, L.-L.; Zhang, M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Lim, R.-X. Comparison of four drying methods for re-structured mixed potato with apple chips. J. Food Eng. 2011, 103, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valiente, L.; Ohaco, E.; Michelis, A. Antioxidant capacity of frozen Pleurotus ostreatus during convective drying. Micol. Apl. Int. 2016, 28, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  27. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gąsecka, M.; Mleczek, M.; Siwulski, M.; Niedzielski, P.; Kozak, L. The effect of selenium on phenolics and flavonoids in selected edible white rot fungi. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blois, M.S. Antioxidant Determinations by the Use of a Stable Free Radical. Nature 1958, 181, 1199–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kozarski, M.; Klaus, A.; Niksic, M.; Jakovljevic, D.; Helsper, J.P.; Van Griensven, L.J. Antioxidative and immunomodulating activities of polysaccharide extracts of the medicinal mushrooms Agaricus bisporus, Agaricus brasiliensis, Ganoderma lucidum and Phellinus linteus. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 1667–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lingnert, H.; Vallentin, K.; Eriksson, C.E. Measurement of Antioxidative Effect in Model System. J. Food Process. Preserv. 1979, 3, 87–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Heleno, S.A.; Barros, L.; Sousa, M.J.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C. Study and characterization of selected nutrients in wild mushrooms from Portugal by gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography. Microchem. J. 2009, 93, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pereira, E.; Barros, L.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C. Towards chemical and nutritional inventory of Portuguese wild edible mushrooms in different habitats. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, J.; Zeng, H.; Zheng, B. Effects of different drying methods on the product quality and volatile compounds of whole shiitake mushrooms. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barros, L.; Venturini, B.A.; Baptista, P.; Estevinho, L.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical Composition and Biological Properties of Portuguese Wild Mushrooms: A Comprehensive Study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3856–3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ouzouni, P.K.; Petridis, D.; Koller, W.-D.; Riganakos, K.A. Nutritional value and metal content of wild edible fungi collected from west Macedonia and Epirus, Greece. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. İzli, N.; Yıldız, G.; Ünal, H.; Işık, E.; Uylaşer, V. Effect of different drying methods on drying characteristics, colour total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Goldenberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bhattacharya, M.; Srivastav, P.P.; Mishra, H.N. Thin-layer modeling of convective and microwave-convective drying of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2013–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castada, H.Z.; Sun, Z.; Barringer, S.A.; Huang, X. Thermal degradation of p-Hydroxybenzoic acid in Macadamia Nut oil, olive oil, and corn oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2020, 93, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Radzki, W.; Slawinska, A.; Jablonska-Rys, E.; Gustaw, W. Antioxidant Capacity and Polyphenolic Content of Dried Wild Edible Mushrooms from Poland. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2014, 16, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Garcia-Amezquita, L.; Welti-Chanes, J.; Vergara-Balderas, F.; Bermudez-Aguirre, D. Freeze-Drying: The Basic Process in Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Caballero, B., Finglas, P., Toldra, F., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaworska, G.; Pogoń, K.; Bernaś, E.; Skrzypczak, A. Effect of Different Drying Methods and 24-Month Storage on Water Activity, Rehydration Capacity, and Antioxidants in Boletus edulis Mushrooms. Dry. Technol. 2014, 32, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lidhoo, C.K.; Agrawal, Y.C. Optimizing temperature in mushrooms drying. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2008, 32, 881–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liaotrakoon, W.; Liaotrakoon, V. Influence of drying process on total phenolics, antioxidative activity and selected physical properties of edible bolete (Phlebopus colossus (R. Heim) Singer) and changes during storage. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 38, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Sim, K.Y.; Liew, J.Y.; Ding, X.Y.; Choong, W.S.; Intan, S. Effect of vacuum and oven drying on the radical scavenging activity and nutritional contents of submerged fermented Maitake (Grifola frondosa) mycelia. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 37, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Reid, T.; Merjury, M.; Takafira, M. Effect of cooking and preservation on nutritional and phytochemical composition of the mushroom Amanita zambian. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ribeiro, B.; Valentão, P.; Baptista, P.; Seabra, R.M.; Andrade, P.B. Phenolic compounds, organic acids profiles and antioxidative properties of beefsteak fungus (Fistulina hepatica). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 1805–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Samples of the wild edible mushrooms studied: (A) Fistulina antarctica; (B) Ramaria patagonica.
Figure 1. Samples of the wild edible mushrooms studied: (A) Fistulina antarctica; (B) Ramaria patagonica.
Applsci 13 08873 g001
Figure 2. Drying curves at the tested temperatures for Fistulina antarctica (A) and Ramaria patagonica (B).
Figure 2. Drying curves at the tested temperatures for Fistulina antarctica (A) and Ramaria patagonica (B).
Applsci 13 08873 g002
Table 1. Drying times at different air-drying temperatures. Different letters indicate significant differences between temperatures for each species (p < 0.05).
Table 1. Drying times at different air-drying temperatures. Different letters indicate significant differences between temperatures for each species (p < 0.05).
50 °C60 °C70 °C
F. antarctica9.75 ± 1.06 b7.37 ± 0.53 b3.62 ± 0.17 a
R. patagonica3.87 ± 0.18 b2.37 ± 0.70 b1.62 ± 0.77 a
Table 2. Antioxidant activity in fresh frozen, dried, and freeze-dried simples. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). nd = not detected.
Table 2. Antioxidant activity in fresh frozen, dried, and freeze-dried simples. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). nd = not detected.
TPC (mg GAE/mg Extract)ABTS (% of Inhibition)DPPH RSA (%)FRAP (mg AAE/100 mL)ILP (%)
t 24t 48
F. antarctica
Fresh-frozen7.93 ± 0.64 c79.75 ± 0.58 bc68.94 ± 1.99 c43.01 ± 0.21 ab39.02 ± 1.30 a27.71 ± 0.80 a
50 °C5.03 ± 0.20 a 63.00 ± 3.77 a47.21 ± 4.75 b24.77 ± 6.28 abndnd
60 °C5.57 ± 0.10 b70.73 ± 7.90 ab48.39 ± 0.44 b32.86 ± 2.50 abndnd
70° C4.80 ± 0.11 a57.05 ± 1.74 a24.31 ± 0.55 a24.58 ± 1.99 andnd
Freeze-dried8.66 ± 0.16 d82.35 ± 0.11 c43.41 ± 7.64 b38.88 ± 1.20 a 37.36 ± 0.90 a22.62 ± 0.58 c
R. patagonica
Fresh-frozen14.78 ± 0.09 b99.03 ± 0.87 b99.31 ± 4.23 b98.08 ± 0.70 d97.72 ± 0.90 c99.03 ± 0.87 b
50 °C9.54 ± 0.43 a90.77 ± 1.06 a81.25 ± 1.66 a72.90 ± 6.64 a86.57 ± 0.80 cd81.82 ± 0.20 b
60 °C13.67 ± 0.43 b91.59 ± 1.83 a82.58 ± 0.66 a97.60 ± 2.28 b93.09 ± 1.30 bc85.52 ± 1.20 a
70 °C11.11 ± 0.34 a92.83 ± 0.29 a81.57 ± 0.55 a89.02 ± 8.90 ab82.79 ± 0.90 a83.51 ± 2.10 a
Freeze-dried10.52 ± 0.53 a90.01 ± 1.16 a82.43 ± 0.44 a96.54 ± 2.06 b92.51 ± 0.80 b99.55 ± 1.20 c
Table 3. Percentage of loss of TPC and antioxidant activity for the different drying methods. nd = not detected. nrd = not reduction detected.
Table 3. Percentage of loss of TPC and antioxidant activity for the different drying methods. nd = not detected. nrd = not reduction detected.
MushroomDrying MethodsReduction in TPC (%) (Compared to Fresh Frozen)Reduction in Antioxidant Activity (%) (Compared to Fresh Frozen)
ABTSDPPHFRAPILP
t 24t48
F. antarctica50 °C36.5721.0031.5243.33ndnd
60 °C29.7611.3129.8023.59ndnd
70 °C39.4728.4664.7342.85ndnd
Freeze-driednrdnrd37.039.604.2519.34
R. patagonica50 °C35.458.3418.1825.6711.4117.38
60 °C7.517.5116.840.494.7313.64
70 °C24.836.2617.869.2315.2815.67
Freeze-dried28.829.1116.991.575.33nrd
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, G.C.; Rugolo, M.; Finimundy, T.C.; Ohaco, E.; Pildain, M.B.; Barroetaveña, C. Impact of Air- and Freeze-Drying Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica Fructification. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8873. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158873

AMA Style

González GC, Rugolo M, Finimundy TC, Ohaco E, Pildain MB, Barroetaveña C. Impact of Air- and Freeze-Drying Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica Fructification. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(15):8873. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158873

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Gabriela C., Maximiliano Rugolo, Tiane C. Finimundy, Elizabeth Ohaco, Maria B. Pildain, and Carolina Barroetaveña. 2023. "Impact of Air- and Freeze-Drying Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica Fructification" Applied Sciences 13, no. 15: 8873. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158873

APA Style

González, G. C., Rugolo, M., Finimundy, T. C., Ohaco, E., Pildain, M. B., & Barroetaveña, C. (2023). Impact of Air- and Freeze-Drying Methods on Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Fistulina antarctica and Ramaria patagonica Fructification. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8873. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop