Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Performance and Failure Mode of Web-Connected Replaceable Energy Dissipation Link
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Experimental Program
2.1. Specimen Design and Material Properties
2.2. Material Properties
2.3. Test Setup and Instrumentation
2.4. Test Point Layout and Data Collection
2.5. Loading Protocol
3. Experimental Results and Discussion
3.1. Failure Mode and Damage Processes
3.2. Stress Analysis
3.3. Hysteretic Performance
- (1)
- The hysteretic curve shape roughly displays spindle shape, and it can be observed from the figure the hysteretic curve has three sections, including elastic section, yield section, and reinforcement section. A certain displacement of rigid body has occurred during the test due to the loading equipment, resulting in a certain pinching of hysteresis curve.
- (2)
- The mechanical properties of energy dissipation links are consistent under the action of tensile and compressive loads. The hysteretic curves are symmetrical in tension and pressure, and the hysteretic curves take the shape of central symmetry.
- (3)
- When the load is initially applied, the curve is a straight line under the action of tension and pressure. When the displacement and load increase, the link starts to enter the yield from the elastic stage. The stiffness of the specimen decreases and the link produces plastic deformation. The area of hysteresis loop gradually increases with the increase of load, and the energy dissipation capacity of the link is gradually developed. The energy dissipation is stable at this stage. When the displacement reaches the limit value, the bearing capacity of the energy-dissipated link begins to decrease and the area of hysteresis loop reaches its maximum.
3.4. Energy Dissipation Behavior
- (1)
- The energy dissipation coefficient of each test specimen is relatively large, with the minimum energy dissipation coefficient being 1.59 of rsl-6 and the maximum being 1.96 of rsl-1, which indicated that the abdominal board-type replaceable energy dissipation link is able to dissipate the energy well in earthquake and it has good seismic performance.
- (2)
- By comparing rsl-4, rsl-7 with rsl-8, it can be seen that when the link length, stiffening rib spacing, and yield type are the same, and the energy dissipation coefficient of the link with a large section size is relatively low.
- (3)
- By comparing rsl-1, rsl-4 with rsl-6, the energy dissipation coefficient decreases when the length of the energy dissipation link increases, and it can be seen that the energy dissipation capacity of shear link is better than that of bending link.
- (4)
- By comparing rsl-4 to rsl-5 in shear yield, when the stiffened ribs spacing between rsl-4 and rsl-5 decreases by 52.47%, the energy dissipation coefficient decreases by 0.74%. By comparison of rsl-5 and rsl-6 in the bending yield, rsl-5 decreases by 52.47% as compared with rsl-6 stiffening rib spacing, but the energy dissipation coefficient decreases by 2.45%. The energy dissipation coefficient of stiffening ribs decreases when the space between them is reduced.
- (5)
- By comparing the energy dissipation coefficients of rsl-1, rsl-4, rsl-5, rsl-7, and rsl-8, the energy dissipation coefficients of the link decrease with the increase of ζ, and the smaller the cross section of the link is, the higher the energy dissipation coefficient of the link.
3.5. Skeleton Curves
- (1)
- As can be seen from the shape of the skeleton curve, the skeleton curve of all the specimens keeps roughly the same trend. It can be seen that the elastic section, yield section, and strengthening section are easy to observe. With the continuous increase of displacement, the stiffness of specimens shows a gradual downward trend.
- (2)
- By comparison of rsl-4, rsl-7, and rsl-8, it can be seen that, when the link length, stiffening rib spacing and yield type are the same, the skeleton curve of the link with relatively large section size has high bearing capacity and high stiffness. It can be seen that the skeleton curve of web connection type link is greatly affected by the size of the section, and the bearing capacity of the link with a larger size of the section is stronger.
- (3)
- By comparing rsl-1 with rsl-6, and rsl-4 with rsl-6, respectively, it can be seen that the skeleton curve has the same trend. The load peak of rsl-1 and rsl-6 differs by 15kN, and the skeleton curve of rsl-4 and rsl-6 are consistent. Therefore, when the cross-section size, number of stiffening ribs, and yield type of the replaceable link are the same, the link length has relatively little impact on the bearing capacity.
- (4)
- By comparing rsl-5 with rsl-6, and rsl-4 with rsl-5, respectively, it can be seen that the number of stiffening ribs of rsl-5 increases compared with rsl-6, but the skeleton curve has no change in trend and bearing capacity, and the curve is consistent. Therefore, it can be concluded that the stiffening spacing of the link has little influence on the skeleton curve when the cross-section size, length, and yield type of the link are the same.
- (5)
- As the size and length of the section of the link have impact on the changes of Mp and Vp of the link, it is necessary to compare the difference ζ between 1.16 and 1.57 as a variable on the basis of the same number of stiffening ribs of the link. By comparing the skeleton curves of rsl-1, rsl-8, rsl-7, with rsl-4, the larger the section size is, the higher the bearing capacity of the skeleton curve. Therefore, the difference of ζ does not determine the bearing capacity and deformation of the skeleton curve.
3.6. Stiffness Degradation
3.7. Plastic Rotation Angle (Link Rotation Capacity)
- (1)
- By comparing RSL-4, RSL-7, with RSL-8, the bearing capacity and stiffness of the link with relatively larger section size are stronger when the length of the link, the spacing of the stiffeners and the yield type are the same.
- (2)
- By comparing RSL-1, RSL-3, RSL-4, with RSL-7, the link length and the stiffening distance has little effect on the bearing capacity, when the section size and yield type of the replaceable energy dissipation links are the same.
- (3)
- The minimum rotation angle of all specimens in the test was 0.16 rad, which indicated that the replaceable link has good rotational capacity.
- (4)
- By comparing RSL-2, RSL-3, RSL-4, with RSL-5, on the condition that the section size, length, and yield type of energy dissipating links are the same, the stiffening spacing of energy-dissipating links has little influence on the bearing capacity.
4. Finite Element Analysis
4.1. Verification of Finite Element Models
4.2. Finite Element Type and Mesh Size
4.3. Loading and Boundary Conditions
4.4. The Result Analysis of Test and Finite Element
4.5. Stress Distribution
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Balut, N.; Gioncu, V. Suggestion for an improved ‘dog-bone’ solution. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Naples, Italy, 9–12 June 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Stratan, A.; Dubina, D.; Dinu, F. Control of global performance of seismic resistant EBF with removable link. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, Naples, Italy, 9–12 June 2003; pp. 175–180. [Google Scholar]
- Dubina, D.; Stratan, A.; Dinu, F. Design implementation of re-centring dual eccentrically braced frames with removable links. Soil. Dyn. Earth. Eng. 2018, 112, 174–184. [Google Scholar]
- Zona, A.; Degée, H.; Leoni, G.; Dall’Asta, A. Ductile design of innovative steel and concrete hybrid coupled walls. Constr. Steel. Res. 2016, 117, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alper, K.; Milot, M. Influence of repairable bolted dissipative beam splices (structural fuses) on reducing the seismic vulnerability of steel-concrete composite frames. Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2019, 117, 281–298. [Google Scholar]
- Morelli, F.; Manfredi, M.; Salvatore, W. An enhanced component based model for steel connection in a hybrid coupled shear wall structure: Development, calibration and experimental validation. Comput. Struct. 2016, 176, 50–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alireza, F.; Farhad, K.; Pouya, P. Experimental study of a replaceable steel coupling beam with an end-plate connection. J. Constr. Steel. Res. 2016, 122, 138–150. [Google Scholar]
- Clifton, C.; Bruneau, M.; MacRae, G.; Leon, R.; Fussell, A. Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011. Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 2011, 44, 297–318. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
- Chinese National Standard. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings; GB 50011-2010; China Ministry of Construction: Beijing, China, 2016.
- Gardiner, G.; Clifton, C.; MacRae, G.A. Performance, damage assessment and repair of a multistory eccentrically braced frame building following the Christchurch earthquake series, steel innovations conference 2013. In Proceedings of the Steel Innovations Conference 2013, Christchurch, New Zealand, 21–22 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Mansour, N. Eccentrically Braced Frames with Replaceable Shear Links. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ramsay, J.J.; Fussell, A.; Wilkinson, R.G. Design of replaceable-link eccentric braced frames in post-earthquake Christchurch. In Proceedings of the Steel Innovations Conference 2013, Christchurch, New Zealand, 21–22 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Mansour, N.; Christopoulos, C.; Tremblay, R. Experimental validation of replaceable shear links for eccentrically braced steel frames. J. Struct. Eng. 2011, 137, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabau, G.A.; Poljansek, M.; Taucer, F.; Pegon, P.; Molina, F.J.; Tirelli, D.; Viaccoz, B.; Stratan, A.; Ioan Chesoan, A.; Dubina, D. Seismic engineering research infrastructures for European synergies: Full-scale experimental validation of a dual eccentrically braced frame with removable links (DUAREM). In Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Report EUR 27030; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ioan, A.; Stratan, A.; Dubina, D.; Poljansek, M.; Molina, F.J.; Taucer, F.; Pegon, P.; Sabau, G. Experimental validation of re-centring capability of eccentrically braced frames with removable links. Eng. Struct. 2016, 113, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohsaki, M.; Nakajima, T. Optimization of link member of eccentrically braced frames for maximum energy dissipation. J. Cons. Steel. Res. 2012, 75, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ji, X.D.; Wang, Y.D.; Ma, Q.F.; Okazaki, T. Cyclic behavior of very short steel shear links. J. Struct. Eng. 2016, 142, 04015114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uang, C.M.; Seible, F.; McDaniel, C.; Chou, C.C. Performance evaluation of shear links and orthotropic bridge deck panels for the new san francisco–oakland bay bridge. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2010, 34, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemzadeh, A.; Topkaya, C. A review of research on steel eccentrically braced frames. J. Constr. Steel. Res. 2017, 128, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lian, M.; Su, M.Z. Seismic performance of high-strength steel fabricated eccentrically braced frame with vertical shear link. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2017, 137, 262–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDaniel1, C.C.; Uang, C.M. Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge. J. Struct. Eng. 2012, 129, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjelmstad, K.D.; Popov, E.P. Cyclic behavior and design of link beams. J. Struct. Eng. 1983, 109, 2387–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, O.; Popov, E.P. Shear links in eccentrically braced frames. J. Struct. Eng. 1984, 110, 2275–2295. [Google Scholar]
- Manheim, D.N.; Popov, E.P. Plastic shear hinges in steel frames. J. Struct. Eng. 1983, 109, 2404–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasai, K.; Popov, E.P. General behavior of WF steel shear link beams. J. Struct. Eng. 1986, 112, 362–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engelhardt, M.D.; Popov, E.P. Experimental performance of long links in eccentrically braced frames. J. Struct. Eng. 1992, 118, 3067–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Institute of Steel Construction. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings; AISC 341-10; American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- American Institute of Steel Construction. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings; AISC 360-10; American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- American Institute of Steel Construction. Steel Construction Manual, 13th ed.; AISC 325-05; American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Kuşyılmaz, A.; Topkaya, C. Evaluation of seismic response factors for eccentrically braced frames using FEMA P695 methodology. Earthq. Spect. 2016, 32, 303–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Institute of Steel Construction. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings; AISC 341-02; American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Chinese National Standard. Design of Steel Structures; GB 50017-2017; China Ministry of Construction: Beijing, China, 2017.
- Stratan, A.; Dubina, D. Bolted links for eccentrically braced steel frames. In Proceedings of the 5th AISC/ECCS International Workshop: Connections in Steel Structures V. Behaviour, Strength and Design, Delft, The Netherlands, 3–5 June 2004; pp. 223–332. [Google Scholar]
- Okazaki, T.; Arce, G.; Engelhardt, M.D. Experimental study of local buckling, overstrength, and fracture of links in eccentrically braced frames. J. Struct. Eng. 2005, 131, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubina, D.; Stratan, A.; Dinu, F. Dual high-strength steel eccentrically braced frames with removable links. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2008, 37, 1703–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubina, D.; Stratan, A.; Dinu, F. Re-centring capacity of dual-steel frames. Steel. Constr. 2011, 4, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, T.; Engelhardt, M.D. Cyclic loading behavior of EBF links constructed of ASTM A992 steel. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2007, 63, 751–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravanan, M.; Goswami, R.; Palani, G.S. Replaceable fuses in earthquake resistant steel structures: A review. Int. J. Steel Struct. 2018, 18, 868–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephens, M.T.; Dusicka, P.; Lewis, G. End web stiffeners for connecting ductile replaceable links. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2018, 150, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhraddini, A.; Saffari, H.; Fadaee, M.J. A hybrid force/displacement seismic design method for steel eccentrically braced frames. Asian J. Civil Eng. 2018, 19, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyla, G.; Christopoulos, C. Development of replaceable cast steel links for eccentrically braced frames. J. Struct. Eng. 2016, 142, 04016079. [Google Scholar]
- Bozkurt, M.B.; Topkaya, C. Replaceable links with direct brace attachments for eccentrically braced frames. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2017, 46, 2121–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.Z.; Feng, D.Z.; Yang, W.W. Damage analyses of replaceable links in eccentrically braced frame (EBF) subject to cyclic loading. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.W.; Yan, R.H. Experimental study on hysteretic behavior of the overlapped K-Joints with concrete filled in chord. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.Z.; Bu, F.C. Overall stability analysis of improved buckling restrained braces. Open Civil Eng. J. 2016, 10, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazemi, M.T.; Erfani, S. Mixed shear-flexural (VM) hinge element and its applications. Sci. Iran. Trans. Civil Eng. 2007, 14, 193–204. [Google Scholar]
- Koboevic, S.; Rozon, J.; Tremblay, R. Seismic performance of low-to-moderate height eccentrically braced steel frames designed for north american seismic conditions. J. Struct. Eng. 2012, 138, 1465–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, P.P.; Lombardo, A. Influence of the link overstrength factor on the seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2007, 63, 1529–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabol, T.A.; Nishi, D.E. Application of performance-based design to an eccentrically braced frame structure. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 2011, 20, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirmoz, A.; Ahadi, P.; Farajkhah, V. Finite element analysis of extended stiffened end plate link to column connections. Steel Constr. 2016, 9, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pirmoz, A.; Marefat, M.S. Reliability assessment of compression columns in seismic EBFs. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2015, 104, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malakoutian, M.; Berman, J.W.; Dusicka, P. Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 2013, 42, 795–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenna, F.; Fenves, G.; Filippou, F.C.; Mazzoni, S. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees); Computer Software; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Farzampour, A.; Mansouri, I.; Dehghani, H. Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance of multi-story buildings with butterfly-shaped structural dampers. Buildings 2019, 9, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzampour, A.; Eatherton, M. Parametric Computational study on butterfly-shaped hysteretic dampers. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farzampour, A. Evaluating Shear Links for Use in Seismic Structural Fuses. Doctoral Thesis, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Farzampour, A.; Eatherton, M. Yielding and lateral torsional buckling limit states for butterfly-shaped shear links. Struct. Eng. 2019, 180, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.S.; Gu, Q. Research on Seismic Collapse Margin Ratio of EBSF System. J. Sichuan Univ. 2016, 4, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, Q.; Feng, Q.; Song, G. Water presence detection in a concrete crack using smart aggregates. International. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 6, 149–161. [Google Scholar]
- Siu, S.; Ji, Q.; Wu, W.; Song, G.; Ding, Z. Stress wave communication in concrete: I. Characterization of a smart aggregate based concrete channel. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 125030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, H.C.; Moslehy, Y.; Sanders, D.; Song, G.; Mo, Y.L. Multi-functional smart aggregate-based structural health monitoring of circular reinforced concrete columns subjected to seismic excitations. Smart Mater. Struct. 2010, 19, 065026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Kong, Q.; Ho, S.C.M.; Mo, Y.L.; Song, G. Feasibility study of using smart aggregates as embedded acoustic emission sensors for health monitoring of concrete structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 115031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Kong, Q.; Shi, Z.; Song, G. Electromechanical properties of smart aggregate: Theoretical modeling and experimental validation. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 095008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Song, G. Dynamic cooperative identification based on synergetics for pipe structural health monitoring with piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2013, 22, 045003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, G.; Kong, Q.; Zhou, H.; Gu, H. Multiple cracks detection in pipeline using damage index matrix based on piezoceramic transducer-enabled stress wave propagation. Sensors 2017, 17, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Hao, J.; Fan, S. Health Monitoring of Bolted Spherical Joint Connection Based on Active Sensing Technique Using Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Divsholi, B.S.; Soh, C.K. A reusable PZT transducer for monitoring initial hydration and structural health of concrete. Sensors 2010, 10, 5193–5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, Q.; Robert, R.; Silva, P.; Mo, Y. Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezo ceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Serial Number | Section | Length e/mm | ρ | Number of Stiffening Ribs | Stiffener Spacing | Yield Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSL-1 | [160 × 63 × 6 × 8 | 212 | 1.16 | 2 | 10@92 | shear |
RSL-2 | [160 × 63 × 6 × 8 | 322 | 1.76 | 3 | 10@96 | flexural |
RSL-3 | [160 × 63 × 6 × 8 | 322 | 1.76 | 2 | 10@202 | flexural |
RSL-4 | [200 × 73 × 8 × 10 | 322 | 1.57 | 3 | 10@96 | shear |
RSL-5 | [200 × 73 × 8 × 10 | 322 | 1.57 | 3 | 10@202 | shear |
RSL-6 | [200 × 73 × 8 × 10 | 412 | 2.01 | 4 | 10@91 | flexural |
RSL-7 | [220 × 77 × 8 × 10 | 322 | 1.47 | 3 | 10@96 | shear |
RSL-8 | [250 × 80 × 8 × 12 | 322 | 1.21 | 3 | 10@96 | shear |
Thickness (mm) | Measured Value (mm) | Yield Strength fy/MPa | Ultimate Strength fu/MPa | MOE E/MPa | Elongation δ/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 5.53 | 285 | 425 | 212,570 | 30.66 |
8 | 7.49 | 290 | 430 | 209,870 | 24.96 |
10 | 9.60 | 270 | 420 | 197,100 | 28.20 |
14 | 13.54 | 283 | 423 | 199,561 | 30.06 |
specimen | RSL-1s | RSL-2s | RSL-3s | RSL-4s |
plastic corner | 0.230 | 0.170 | 0.140 | 0.080 |
specimen | RSL-5s | RSL-6s | RSL-7s | RSL-8s |
plastic corner | 0.100 | 0.150 | 0.060 | 0.050 |
Position | No. | Normal Stress (Mpa) | No. | Normal Stress (Mpa) |
Flange | 1 | 26.05 | 9 | −0.29 |
2 | 140.16 | 10 | −94.31 | |
3 | 101.98 | 11 | −78.56 | |
4 | 69.07 | 12 | −92.90 | |
5 | −109.66 | 13 | 108.65 | |
6 | −161.77 | 14 | 137.93 | |
7 | −85.43 | 15 | 111.48 | |
8 | −11.12 | 16 | 17.77 | |
Stiffening rib | 17 | −27.67 | 18 | −28.13 |
19 | −36.96 | 20 | −35.75 | |
Position | No. | Normal stress (Mpa) | Normal stress (Mpa) | Shear stress (Mpa) |
Web | 1 | 144.11 | −180.75 | 162.43 |
2 | 133.66 | −118.65 | 126.16 | |
3 | 182.82 | 75.11 | 53.85 | |
4 | 154.04 | −109.90 | 131.97 | |
5 | 93.14 | −91.12 | 92.13 | |
6 | 72.49 | −147.20 | 169.79 | |
7 | −19.99 | −12.12 | - |
Position | No. | Normal Stress (Mpa) | No. | Normal Stress (Mpa) |
Flange | 1 | 29.69 | 9 | −16.16 |
2 | 407.15 | 10 | −107.64 | |
3 | ≥425 | 11 | −57.15 | |
4 | ≥425 | 12 | ≤−425 | |
5 | ≤-425 | 13 | ≥425 | |
6 | ≤-425 | 14 | ≥425 | |
7 | −164.60 | 15 | 352.22 | |
8 | 58.57 | 16 | 61.59 | |
Stiffening rib | 17 | ≤−425 | 19 | ≤−425 |
18 | ≤−425 | 20 | ≤−425 | |
Position | No. | Normal Stress (Mpa) | Normal Stress (Mpa) | Shear Stress (Mpa) |
Web | 1 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 |
2 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 | |
Web | 3 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 |
4 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 | |
5 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 | |
6 | ≥425 | ≥425 | ≥245 | |
7 | ≥425 | −184.79 | - |
Number | RSL-1 | RSL-2 | RSL-3 | RSL-4 | RSL-5 | RSL-6 | RSL-7 | RSL-8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E | 1.96 | 1.63 | 1.59 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 1.65 | 1.66 | 1.62 |
Number | RSL-1 | RSL-2 | RSL-3 | RSL-4 | RSL-5 | RSL-6 | RSL-7 | RSL-8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDM | 65.46% | 60.06% | 62.04% | 61.83% | 64.31% | 58.72% | 60.01% | 57.12% |
Number | RSL-1 | RSL-2 | RSL-3 | RSL-4 | RSL-5 | RSL-6 | RSL-7 | RSL-8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Displacement | 81.35 | 71.5 | 74.5 | 63.25 | 82.6 | 73.55 | 77.72 | 52.75 |
Angle | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.16 |
Bearing capacity | 468.33 | 461.00 | 453.33 | 529.33 | 545.33 | 511.00 | 449.33 | 550.67 |
Number | Test/kN | Finite Element /kN | Difference Value |
---|---|---|---|
RSL-1 | 468.33 | 463.66 | 1.00% |
RSL-2 | 467.66 | 461.77 | 1.26% |
RSL-3 | 453.33 | 448.81 | 1.00% |
RSL-4 | 609.33 | 664.40 | 8.29% |
RSL-5 | 604.00 | 670.48 | 9.91% |
RSL-6 | 529.33 | 561.59 | 5.75% |
RSL-7 | 624.33 | 682.43 | 8.81% |
RSL-8 | 550.67 | 791.71 | 30.44% |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yin, Z.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Feng, D. Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Performance and Failure Mode of Web-Connected Replaceable Energy Dissipation Link. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153200
Yin Z, Huang Z, Zhang H, Feng D. Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Performance and Failure Mode of Web-Connected Replaceable Energy Dissipation Link. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(15):3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153200
Chicago/Turabian StyleYin, Zhanzhong, Zhaosheng Huang, Hui Zhang, and Dazhe Feng. 2019. "Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Performance and Failure Mode of Web-Connected Replaceable Energy Dissipation Link" Applied Sciences 9, no. 15: 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153200
APA StyleYin, Z., Huang, Z., Zhang, H., & Feng, D. (2019). Experimental Study on Energy Dissipation Performance and Failure Mode of Web-Connected Replaceable Energy Dissipation Link. Applied Sciences, 9(15), 3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153200