Next Article in Journal
Are Sex Differences in Collegiate and High School Sports-Related Concussion Reflected in the Guidelines? A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Olfactory Epithelium Stimulation Using Rhythmic Nasal Air-Puffs Improves the Cognitive Performance of Individuals with Acute Sleep Deprivation
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Serum Markers of Perioperative Brain Injury and Inflammation Associated with Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alteration of Excitation/Inhibition Imbalance in the Hippocampus and Amygdala of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Patients Treated with Acute Vagus Nerve Stimulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/brainsci13091309
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Function and Emotional Regulation in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

by
Pei Dai
1,
Zhao-Xia Wang
2,3,
Hui-Xian Yu
2,3,
Chang-Bin Liu
2,3,
Si-Hao Liu
2,3 and
Hao Zhang
1,*
1
School of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China
2
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tian tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
3
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(9), 1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091309
Submission received: 12 August 2023 / Revised: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 8 September 2023 / Published: 11 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurological Changes after Brain Stimulation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objectives: Cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a common cause of vascular dementia and is often accompanied by mental disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on the cognitive function and Hamilton depression (HAMD) scores in patients with CSVD. Methods: A total of 30 CSVD patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to either the sham or cTBS group. The patients in both groups received routine cognitive function training. All the patients were under treatment for 14 sessions, with one session per day (each cTBS conditioning session consisted of three-pulse bursts at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz, 80% MT, and 600 pulses). Before and after the treatment, the patients in both groups were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT), Trail Marking Test (TMT), Digital Span Test (DST), and HAMD test. The time to complete the SCWT and TMT were recorded. The scores of the MoCA, DST and HAMD test were recorded. Results: The HAMD scores in the cTBS group decreased significantly compared to the control (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the MoCA (including the MoCA subitems) or DST scores or in the SCWT or TMT completion times between the two groups (p > 0.05). For the HAMD scores and the MoCA subitem visuospatial/executive scores, the SCWT-B and SCWT-C completion times in the two groups both improved significantly before and after treatment (p < 0.05). For the MoCA scores, the DST-backward scores and the TMT-B completion times in the cTBS group improved significantly before and after treatment (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the SCWT-A, TMT-A completion times and MoCA subitems naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In this study, cTBS over the right DLPFC decreased the HAMD scores significantly in patients with CSVD but had no significant improvement or impairment effects on cognitive function. cTBS over the right DLPFC could be used to treat CSVD patients with depression symptoms.

1. Introduction

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) causes 25% of strokes, and the prevalence increases with age [1]. The brain imaging biomarkers of CSVD include recent small subcortical infarcts, white matter hyperintensities, lacunes, cerebral microbleeds, enlarged perivascular spaces, and cerebral atrophy [2]. CSVD is considered to be the most common cause of vessel cognitive impairment (VCI) [3], and cognitive functions such as attention, processing speed, and executive function are often involved [4]. Depression is also frequently seen in patients with CSVD. Traditional treatment methods, such as drugs to improve cognitive function and mood disorders, have some shortcomings clinically.
Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown in many studies over the years to modulate cognitive function, both in animal experimentation and in patients [5,6], and to improve depression [7,8]. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a special mode of rTMS that includes continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Similar to the excitatory effect of high-frequency stimulation (>5 Hz) and the inhibitory effect of low-frequency stimulation (1 ≤ Hz) in rTMS [9], iTBS induces a long-term excitatory effect on neural function (long-term potentiation, LTP), while cTBS can rapidly induce inhibitory effects on neural function (long-term depression, LTD) [10]. In recent years, TBS has been increasingly used to improve cognitive impairment in post-stroke patients [11,12] as well as mood disorders (e.g., depression) [13]. TBS has been found to have the same cortical modulatory effect as rTMS but with fewer pulses and a higher efficiency, requiring only 20 s to 3 min to be fully effective [14,15]. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is a crucial area for processing various behavioral tasks. However, the effects of the cTBS protocol delivered unilaterally to the right DLPFC appear to be controversial in their ability to improve cognitive function or depression [16,17,18]. Previous studies have focused more on the role of the left DLPFC since the left cerebral hemisphere is dominant in language, logical thinking, analysis, synthesis, and positive emotions [19,20]. Although the right DLPFC has also been shown to be involved in cognitive processing and negative emotions, it still seems to be ignored. In some studies, cTBS over the right DLPFC even seemed to reduce both inhibitory and cognitive control [18,21], or only exhibit a modest antidepressant effect [1].
In recent years, with the deepening of research, rapid progress has been made in the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and evaluation systems of CSVD.
However, the study on the dysfunction caused by CSVD is insufficient. Cognitive impairment in CSVD has specific manifestations and is often accompanied by depressive symptoms. Few studies exist on the treatment of cognitive impairment and mental disorders with TBS in CSVD. In the context of the controversial effects of cTBS over the DLPFC, our study aimed to investigate the effects of cTBS over the right DLPFC on cognitive function and depression in patients with CSVD and to provide direction for clinical intervention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

A total of 30 patients aged between 40 and 80 years with CSVD who were admitted to Beijing Tiantan Hospital rehabilitation department between January 2021 and April 2023 were recruited. All the patients who were enrolled provided signed and informed consent.
Inclusion criteria: ① according to the definition published by Pantoni et al. [22] in 2010, the imaging manifestations of CSVD included lacunae, new subcortical infarcts, leukoencephalopathy, an enlarged perivascular space, cerebral micro-hemorrhage, and cerebral atrophy [2]; ② a CSVD diagnosis in accordance with the criteria of the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction related to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (2019) [23]; ③ an education level of Grade 6 or above; ④ 40–80 years old; and ⑤ signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria: ① a history of a large artery atherosclerosis stroke; ② unable to cooperate with the cognitive assessment due to language, hearing, or visual impairment; ③ other diseases affecting cognitive function (such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, etc.); and ④ unable to perform a head MRI due to a pacemaker, stent placement, or claustrophobia.
In our study, all the 30 CSVD patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Using the random number table method, patients were divided into two groups (n = 15 cases in each group). In the cTBS group, there were 11 men and four women who were aged (68.93 ± 5.09) years old and educated for (9.87 ± 2.56) years. In the sham cTBS group, there were 11 men and four women who were aged (64.93 ± 6.70) years old and educated for (9.80 ± 3.45) years. All the patients received routine cognitive function training.

2.2. Depression and Cognitive Function Assessment

2.2.1. Primary Outcomes

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

The MoCA included visuospatial, execution, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation components. One point was added if the patient had less than 12 years of education. A score of less than 26 indicated a cognitive impairment. A higher total score indicated a better cognitive function [24].

Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD)

Each participant was evaluated by a professionally trained psychiatrist using the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD). The scores were categorized as no depression (0–7), mild depression (8–16), moderate depression (17–23), and severe depression (≥24) [25].

2.2.2. Secondary Outcomes

The Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT)

The SCWT was used to measure the perceptual conversion ability, selective attention, and inhibitory control ability. It used three cards. Card A included 50 color words (yellow, red, blue, and green), and the subjects were asked to read out the words representing the colors as quickly and accurately as possible. Card B consisted of dots in four colors (yellow, red, blue, and green), and the subjects were asked to read out the colors as quickly and accurately as possible. Card C covered four color words, which were printed in four different colors (yellow, red, blue, and green), and the subjects were asked to read out the colors as quickly and accurately as possible. In our study, the time to complete the SCWT was recorded for all the patients. Performing the task faster was associated with a better inhibitory control of executive functioning [26].

The Trail Marking Test (TMT)

The TMT was divided into two parts: A and B. Part A required the subjects to connect numbers 1–25 in sequence, reflecting the function of the right cerebral hemisphere, including rapid visual search, visuospatial sorting, and perceptual motor speed ability. Part B asked the subjects to connect 25 numbers and letters alternately in sequence, reflecting the function of the left cerebral hemisphere, including overall visuospatial scanning, perceptual motion speed, and set-shifting ability [27]. The TMT completion time was recorded for all the patients. A shorter time to completion indicated a better execution function set-shifting ability.

The Digital Span Test (DST)

The DST contained digit forward and digit backward tests. It mainly assessed memory refresh, attention, and working memory. The evaluator read a list of numbers aloud and then asked the subject to recall the numbers either in order or in reverse order. One point was scored for each string of numbers answered correctly. The evaluator terminated the test after two consecutive failed strings, and then calculated the score. A higher score suggested better memory refresh, attention, and working memory [28].

2.3. Study Design and TMS Procedure

A randomized, double-blind study was designed. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups, including the cTBS group and the sham cTBS group. All the patients were blinded to the treatment. The evaluators were also unaware of the patients’ grouping.
The TMS procedures were used to apply cTBS over the right DLPFC. cTBS was performed using a figure-eight-shaped coil (each loop had a diameter of 3.5 cm) connected to a Yiruide CCY-IA magnetic stimulation device (Wuhan Yiruide Medical Equipment New Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) that was cooled in liquid nitrogen. Each cTBS conditioning session consisted of three-pulse bursts at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz. Thus, 600 pulses were applied at intervals of 0.02 s for a total of 40 s for each patient at an 80% threshold of the maximum output intensity.
Prior to the application of cTBS, the resting motor threshold (RMT) determination was performed. An electromyographic electrode was used to record the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the muscular abdomen of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The RMT was determined as the minimum intensity required to evoke five out of 10 MEPs greater than 50 mV at rest. The cTBS group and sham groups received real cTBS or sham stimulation, respectively. In the cTBS intervention group, the center of the figure-eight-shaped coil was tangent to the intersection of the DLPFC of the skull. In the sham intervention group, the coil was held perpendicular to the skull, and the brain was not affected by the magnetic field. The parameters of the cTBS and sham groups were the same, and the stimulation protocol was performed once a day for a total of two weeks.

3. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 9.4.1 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis and graphing. The baseline characteristics were compared between the two groups of patients. Fisher’s exact test (for percentages) was performed to evaluate the between-group sex difference. The continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± the standard deviation. The unpaired t-test was performed to evaluate between the groups. The non-normally distributed data were expressed as the median (M) and interquartile range (IQR). The Mann–Whitney U test was performed to evaluate the between-group differences and the Wilcoxon test was performed to evaluate the differences before and after treatment in both groups. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

This study of 30 patients with CSVD included 22 males and eight females. All the patients had a history of hypertension.
There were no significant differences in age, gender, or educational level (p > 0.05, Table 1).

4.1. The Effects of cTBS on the HAMD Scores

The HAMD scores in both groups improved significantly after treatment compared to before (p < 0.05, Figure 1). Moreover, the scores in the cTBS group decreased significantly compared to the sham cTBS group (p < 0.05, Figure 1).

4.2. The Effects of cTBS on Cognitive Function

The SCWT-B and SCWT-C completion times in both groups decreased significantly before and after treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 2A,B), and the MoCA subitem visuospatial/executive scores improved significantly before and after treatment in both groups (p < 0.05, Figure 2C).
For the MoCA scores, the DST-backward scores improved significantly (p < 0.05, Figure 3A,C) and the TMT-B completion times decreased significantly (p < 0.05, Figure 3B) in the cTBS group before and after treatment.
There was no significant difference in the MoCA subitems naming, attention scores, or the SCWT-A and TMT-A completion times either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups (p > 0.05, Figure 4A–D).
There was no significant difference in the MoCA subitems language, abstraction, delayed recall, or orientation scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups (p > 0.05, Figure 5A–D).

5. Discussion

In this study, cTBS over the right DLPFC decreased the HAMD scores significantly in patients with CSVD but had no significant improvement or inhibitory effects on cognitive function. As the results showed, the HAMD scores in the cTBS group decreased significantly compared to the control group, and there was no significant difference in the MoCA or DST scores or in the SCWT or TMT completion times between the two groups. For the HAMD scores and the MoCA subitem visuospatial/executive scores, the SCWT-B and SCWT-C completion times in the two groups both improved significantly before and after treatment. For the MoCA scores, the DST-backward scores and the TMT-B completion times in the cTBS group improved significantly before and after treatment. There was no significant difference in SCWT-A, the TMT-A completion times, or the MoCA subitems naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, or orientation scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups.
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a crucial role in numerous cognitive processes, including attention [29], working memory [30], decision-making [31], inhibitory control [21,32], and depressive symptoms [33]. Non-invasive neuromodulation tools (such as TMS) over the DLPFC could significantly improve cognitive function and depression. As a protocol for TMS, TBS has been shown to have similar or even better effects than TMS for improving depression and cognition [15,34]. TBS is similar to the endogenous theta rhythms of the brain and is thought to modify cortical activity more effectively through the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity [10]. However, the choice between iTBS or cTBS, as well as between the right or left DLPFC, is still controversial. More studies have focused on the effects of iTBS over the left DLPFC or right-sided cTBS combined with left-sided iTBS. These previous studies attempted to investigate the cTBS protocol delivered unilaterally to the right DLFPC, but results of improvement, inhibition, or no obvious effect were all observed. Since executive function and attention are often impaired in CSVD patients and are usually accompanied by depression, this study mainly investigated the effect of cTBS over the right DLPFC on cognitive function and the HAMD scores.
Our study showed that the HAMD scores decreased significantly in the cTBS group compared to the sham group. CSVD could lead to depressive symptoms via damage to frontal-subcortical circuits, and a pathological condition was hypothesized to predispose individuals to depression [35]. Songran Yang et al. [35] found that the lesions located in the left thalamus, left putamen, right insular cortex, and right superior longitudinal fascicle were associated with post-stroke depression (PSD). These regions were closely related to the DLPFC. During the treatment of depression using TMS, the left DLPFC function was abnormally weakened, and the right DLPFC function was abnormally enhanced in the patients with depression. Therefore, treatment is usually performed using a stimulus program that excites the left cortex and suppresses the right. Based on the above mechanisms and according to a meta-analysis by Berlim et al. [36], a Level B of evidence (probable antidepressant efficacy) could be proposed for a sequential bilateral left-sided iTBS in addition to a right-sided cTBS protocol applied to the DLPFC in the context of patients with unipolar major depression. On the other hand, unilateral cTBS over the right DLPFC was ineffective for depression score reduction [13]. Our results showed significant effects of cTBS over the right DLPFC in reducing depression scores. We speculated that the previous studies mostly focused on major depression that did not have many vascular risk factors. However, the mechanism of “vascular depression”, a hypothesis proposed by Alexopoulos in 1997 [37], including CSVD-related depression, is not completely the same as major depression. Since CSVD is more common among the elderly, its relevance to depression becomes greater with age. It was postulated that cerebrovascular damage might contribute to depression in advanced age via the involvement of the brain regions involved in mood regulation, notably by damaging the subcortical regions [38]. A recent population-based study revealed that a large white matter hyperintensities (WMH) volume due to CSVD is associated with chronic depression above the age of 60 years [39]. The stimulus protocol of our study may be more effective and suitable for CSVD patients, which can be verified by further expanding the sample size in the future.
According to our results, there was no significant difference between the sham group and the cTBS group in cognition after therapy. The effects of cTBS over the right DLPFC on cognition varied among the different studies. In a systematic review [40], cTBS over the right DLPFC impaired attention, inhibitory control, planning, and goal-directed behavior in decision-making but improved decision-making by reducing impulsivity. Another study found that cTBS over the right DLPFC increased the sensitivity to reinforcers, leading to an avoidance of risky choices and a promotion of advantageous choices [31]. Other studies found that cTBS over the right DLPFC did not improve working memory [30]. Animal experiments showed that the mechanism of cTBS for improving cognitive function might be related to improving the function of the glymphatic system and regulating the polarization of aquaporin-4 [41,42]. In our study, the cognitive function assessment involved the use of the MoCA, SCWT, TMT, and DST. For the MoCA and DST-backward scores, the completion time of TMT-B only in cTBS group improved significantly before and after treatment, suggesting that cTBS over the right DLPFC may improve cognitive function to some extent. However, we did not find any significant difference between the sham and cTBS groups among these assessments. Based on these results, performing cTBS over the right DLPFC did not improve or impair cognitive functions, such as inhibitory control, attention, set-shifting ability, or working memory. These results could have been related to the small sample size, the short session of stimulation, and the lack of regular follow-up evaluations. In addition, the assessment of the MoCA and DST primarily addressed focused attention, which is only one aspect of attention. The other aspects of attention, including selective attention, alternating attention, divided attention, and sustained attention, were not assessed. Some studies found that both an active and passive neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex [43,44] seemed to be effective on sustained attention. The above evidence might help us explain the absence of certain significant effects of prefrontal cTBS on attention and choose other, more suitable assessment scales for attention.
As mentioned above, there were some limitations in our study. First, the sample size was relatively small. It was difficult to collect patients with CSVD strictly according to the inclusion criteria. The small sample size would affect the generality of the findings. Second, the stimulation protocol was performed once a day for a total of 2 weeks in our study. Maybe the time of stimulation was not enough. Insufficient stimulation may have resulted in unsustainable effects. Third, CSVD is a disease of the whole brain, and we assumed that a circular coil could be more suitable for these patients, which was the direction of our future study. Forth, in this paper, we only completed neuropsychological evaluations, but we also completed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after treatment for some cases, which could be better analyzed in combination with the neuropsychological evaluation results to some certain extent. However, the number of these cases was much smaller, and we will continue to collect these data in the future. Fifth, we did not have data from regular follow-ups, and thus couldn’t evaluate any possible changes over the course of the disease. Therefore, in our study, the choice of coil, the imaging data, an enlarged sample size, a prolonged treatment session, and a regular follow-up may be necessary in the future to achieve better effects.
In conclusion, our study showed that cTBS over the right DLPFC decreased the HAMD scores significantly in patients with CSVD but had no significant improvement or impairment effects on cognitive function. Additionally, cTBS over the right DLPFC could be used to treat CSVD patients with depression symptoms. In the future, we hope to enlarge the sample size, improve regular follow-ups, and increase the treatment sessions if necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.D.; methodology, P.D., Z.-X.W. and H.-X.Y.; formal analysis, P.D. and Z.-X.W.; data curation, C.-B.L. and S.-H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.D.; writing—review and editing, H.Z.; supervision, H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University. All the participants provided signed and informed consent. The ethics review number is KY 2021-039-01.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the “Clinical Trial Management Public Platform”(Number: ChiCTR2100055080). The data is also available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank their colleagues for their mentorship, help and guidance in the experimental design.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

CSVD Cerebral small vessel disease
VCI Vessel cognitive impairment
rTMS Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation
TBS Theta burst stimulation
cTBS Continuous theta burst stimulation
iTBS Intermittent theta burst stimulation
LTP Long-term potentiation
LTD Long-term depression
DLPFC Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment
SCWT Stroop Color-Word Test
TMT Trail Marking Test
DST Digital Span Test
HAMD Hamilton depression scale
RMT Resting motor threshold
MEPs Motor evoked potentials
M Median
IQR Interquartile range
PSD Post-stroke depression
WMH White matter hyperintensities

References

  1. Cannistraro, R.J.; Badi, M.; Eidelman, B.H.; Dickson, D.W.; Middlebrooks, E.H.; Meschia, J.F. CNS small vessel disease: A clinical review. Neurology 2019, 92, 1146–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wardlaw, J.M.; Smith, E.E.; Biessels, G.J.; Cordonnier, C.; Fazekas, F.; Frayne, R.; Lindley, R.I.; T O’Brien, J.; Barkhof, F.; Benavente, O.R.; et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 822–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shi, Y.; Wardlaw, J.M. Update on cerebral small vessel disease: A dynamic whole-brain disease. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2016, 1, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sachdev, P.; Kalaria, R.; O’Brien, J.; Skoog, I.; Alladi, S.; Black, S.E.; Blacker, D.; Blazer, D.; Chen, C.; Chui, H.; et al. Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: A VASCOG statement. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2014, 28, 206–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hong, J.; Chen, J.; Li, C.; An, D.; Tang, Z.; Wen, H. High-Frequency rTMS Improves Cognitive Function by Regulating Synaptic Plasticity in Cerebral Ischemic Rats. Neurochem. Res. 2021, 46, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cha, B.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.M.; Choi, J.W.; Choi, J.; Kim, K.; Cha, J.; Kim, M. Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Prospective Pilot Study. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 813597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dardenne, A.; Baeken, C.; Crunelle, C.L.; Bervoets, C.; Matthys, F.; Herremans, S.C. Accelerated HF-rTMS in the elderly depressed: A feasibility study. Brain Stimul. 2018, 11, 247–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fitzgerald, P.B.; Gill, S.; Breakspear, M.; Kulkarni, J.; Chen, L.; Pridmore, S.; Purushothaman, S.; Galletly, C.; Clarke, P.; Ng, F.; et al. Revisiting the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression, again. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2022, 56, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lefaucheur, J.P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 160, 559–580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Huang, Y.-Z.; Edwards, M.J.; Rounis, E.; Bhatia, K.P.; Rothwell, J.C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsai, P.-Y.; Lin, W.-S.; Tsai, K.-T.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Lin, P.-H. High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020, 45, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, W.; Wen, Q.; Xie, Y.; Hu, A.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y. Improvement of poststroke cognitive impairment by intermittent theta bursts: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav. 2022, 12, e2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holczer, A.; Németh, V.L.; Vékony, T.; Kocsis, K.; Király, A.; Kincses, Z.T.; Vécsei, L.; Klivényi, P.; Must, A. The Effects of Bilateral Theta-burst Stimulation on Executive Functions and Affective Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder. Neuroscience 2021, 461, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lowe, C.J.; Manocchio, F.; Safati, A.B.; Hall, P.A. The effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS) targeting the prefrontal cortex on executive functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2018, 111, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, X.; Wang, L.; Geng, Z.; Wei, L.; Yan, Y.; Xie, C.; Chen, X.; Ji, G.-J.; Tian, Y.; Wang, K. Improved Cognitive Promotion through Accelerated Magnetic Stimulation. eNeuro 2021, 8, ENEURO.0392-20.2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chistyakov, A.V.; Kreinin, B.; Marmor, S.; Kaplan, B.; Khatib, A.; Darawsheh, N.; Koren, D.; Zaaroor, M.; Klein, E. Preliminary assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of continuous theta-burst magnetic stimulation (cTBS) in major depression: A double-blind sham-controlled study. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 170, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Langenbach, B.P.; Baumgartner, T.; Cazzoli, D.; Müri, R.M.; Knoch, D. Inhibition of the right dlPFC by theta burst stimulation does not alter sustainable decision-making. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Maier, M.J.; Rosenbaum, D.; Haeussinger, F.B.; Brüne, M.; Enzi, B.; Plewnia, C.; Fallgatter, A.J.; Ehlis, A.-C. Forgiveness and cognitive control—Provoking revenge via theta-burst-stimulation of the DLPFC. NeuroImage 2018, 183, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schicktanz, N.; Fastenrath, M.; Milnik, A.; Spalek, K.; Auschra, B.; Nyffeler, T.; Papassotiropoulos, A.; de Quervain, D.J.-F.; Schwegler, K. Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Decreases Medium Load Working Memory Performance in Healthy Humans. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ware, A.; Lum, J.A.; Kirkovski, M. Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates language-related inhibitory processes in bilinguals: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Struct. Funct. 2021, 226, 1453–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McNeill, A.; Monk, R.L.; Qureshi, A.W.; Makris, S.; Heim, D. Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs inhibitory control and increases alcohol consumption. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 18, 1198–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pantoni, L. Cerebral small vessel disease: From pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Geriatric Neurology Group; Chinese Geriatric Medicine Branch; The Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Cognitive Dysfunction of Small Cerebral Vascular Disease Chinese Expert Group. Diagnosis and treatment of cognitive dysfunction associated with cerebrovascular disease in China. Chin. J. Geriatr. 2019, 38, 345–353. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nasreddine, Z.S.; Phillips, N.A.; Bédirian, V.; Charbonneau, S.; Whitehead, V.; Collin, I.; Cummings, J.L.; Chertkow, H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ma, S.; Yang, J.; Yang, B.; Kang, L.; Wang, P.; Zhang, N.; Wang, W.; Zong, X.; Wang, Y.; Bai, H.; et al. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 vs. the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in Assessing Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 747139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scarpina, F.; Tagini, S. The Stroop Color-Word Test. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Muir, R.T.; Lam, B.; Honjo, K.; Harry, R.D.; McNeely, A.A.; Gao, F.Q.; Ramirez, J.; Scott, C.J.; Ganda, A.; Zhao, J.; et al. Trail Making Test elucidates neural substrates of specific poststroke executive dysfunctions. Stroke 2015, 46, 2755–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tamez, E.; Myerson, J.; Morris, L.; White, D.A.; Baum, C.; Connor, L.T. Assessing executive abilities following acute stroke with the trail making test and digit span. Behav. Neurol. 2011, 24, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stonsaovapak, C.; Hemrungroj, S.; Terachinda, P.; Piravej, K. Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on the Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020, 101, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vékony, T.; Németh, V.L.; Holczer, A.; Kocsis, K.; Kincses, Z.T.; Vécsei, L.; Must, A. Continuous theta-burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inhibits improvement on a working memory task. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Obeso, I.; Herrero, M.-T.; Ligneul, R.; Rothwell, J.C.; Jahanshahi, M. A Causal Role for the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Avoidance of Risky Choices and Making Advantageous Selections. Neuroscience 2021, 458, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, K.; Yu, F. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves response inhibition. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2021, 162, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taylor, J.E.; Yamada, T.; Kawashima, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yoshihara, Y.; Miyata, J.; Murai, T.; Kawato, M.; Motegi, T. Depressive symptoms reduce when dorsolateral prefrontal cortex-precuneus connectivity normalizes after functional connectivity neurofeedback. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Blumberger, D.M.; Vila-Rodriguez, F.; Thorpe, K.E.; Feffer, K.; Noda, Y.; Giacobbe, P.; Knyahnytska, Y.; Kennedy, S.H.; Lam, R.W.; Daskalakis, Z.J.; et al. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): A randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1683–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, S.; Hua, P.; Shang, X.; Cui, Z.; Zhong, S.; Gong, G.; Humphreys, G.W. A significant risk factor for poststroke depression: The depression-related subnetwork. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015, 40, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Berlim, M.T.; McGirr, A.; dos Santos, N.R.; Tremblay, S.; Martins, R. Efficacy of theta burst stimulation (TBS) for major depression: An exploratory meta-analysis of randomized and sham-controlled trials. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 90, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alexopoulos, G.S.; Meyers, B.S.; Young, R.C.; Campbell, S.; Silbersweig, D.; Charlson, M. “Vascular depression” hypothesis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1997, 54, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taylor, W.D.; Schultz, S.K.; Panaite, V.; Steffens, D.C. Perspectives on the management of vascular depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 2018, 175, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Geraets, A.F.; Köhler, S.; Jansen, J.F.; Eussen, S.J.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Schaper, N.C.; Wesselius, A.; Verhey, F.R.; Schram, M.T. The association of markers of cerebral small vessel disease and brain atrophy with incidence and course of depressive symptoms–the maastricht study. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 292, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ngetich, R.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Jin, Z.; Li, L. Assessing the Effects of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Human Cognition: A Systematic Review. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, D.-X.; He, X.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C.; Liang, F.-Y.; He, X.-F.; Dai, G.-Y.; Pei, Z.; Lan, Y.; et al. Continuous theta burst stimulation facilitates the clearance efficiency of the glymphatic pathway in a mouse model of sleep deprivation. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 653, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wu, C.; Lin, T.; Ding, Q.; Zhang, N.; Ou, Z.T.; Cai, G.Y.; Chen, H.Y.; Xu, J.Y.; Li, G.; Pei, Z.; et al. Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Promotes Paravascular CSF Interstitial Fluid Exchange through Regulation of Aquaporin-4 Polarization in APP/PS1 Mice. Mediat. Inflamm. 2022, 2022, 2140524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Knight, H.C.; Smith, D.T.; Ellison, A. The role of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in attentional bias. Neuropsychologia 2020, 148, 107631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pamplona, G.S.; Heldner, J.; Langner, R.; Koush, Y.; Michels, L.; Ionta, S.; Scharnowski, F.; Salmon, C.E. Network-based fMRI-neurofeedback training of sustained attention. Neuroimage 2020, 221, 117194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 13 01309 g001
Figure 1. The HAMD scores between the two groups. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. HAMD, Hamilton depression; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Figure 1. The HAMD scores between the two groups. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. HAMD, Hamilton depression; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Brainsci 13 01309 g001
Brainsci 13 01309 g002
Figure 2. For the MoCA subitem visuospatial/executive scores, the SCWT-B and SCWT-C completion times in the two groups both improved significantly before and after treatment. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Figure 2. For the MoCA subitem visuospatial/executive scores, the SCWT-B and SCWT-C completion times in the two groups both improved significantly before and after treatment. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Brainsci 13 01309 g002
Brainsci 13 01309 g003
Figure 3. For the MoCA scores, the DST-backward scores and the TMT-B completion times in the cTBS group improved significantly before and after treatment. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; TMT, Trail Marking Test; DST, Digital Span Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Figure 3. For the MoCA scores, the DST-backward scores and the TMT-B completion times in the cTBS group improved significantly before and after treatment. ∗ p < 0.05 indicated a statistical significance. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; TMT, Trail Marking Test; DST, Digital Span Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Brainsci 13 01309 g003
Brainsci 13 01309 g004
Figure 4. There was no significant difference in SCWT-A, the TMT-A completion times, and the MoCA subitems naming or attention scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; TMT, Trail Marking Test; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Figure 4. There was no significant difference in SCWT-A, the TMT-A completion times, and the MoCA subitems naming or attention scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; TMT, Trail Marking Test; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Brainsci 13 01309 g004
Brainsci 13 01309 g005
Figure 5. There was no significant difference in the MoCA subitems language, abstraction, delayed recall, or orientation scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Figure 5. There was no significant difference in the MoCA subitems language, abstraction, delayed recall, or orientation scores either before or after treatment in the two groups or between the two groups. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation.
Brainsci 13 01309 g005
Table 1. Patient comparisons.
Table 1. Patient comparisons.
GroupAgeSex (n)Educational Level
(Years)MaleFemale(Years)
cTBS68.93 ± 5.091149.87 ± 2.56
Sham cTBS64.93 ± 6.701149.80 ± 3.45
cTBS, continuous theta burst stimulation. p > 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dai, P.; Wang, Z.-X.; Yu, H.-X.; Liu, C.-B.; Liu, S.-H.; Zhang, H. The Effect of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Function and Emotional Regulation in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091309

AMA Style

Dai P, Wang Z-X, Yu H-X, Liu C-B, Liu S-H, Zhang H. The Effect of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Function and Emotional Regulation in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Brain Sciences. 2023; 13(9):1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dai, Pei, Zhao-Xia Wang, Hui-Xian Yu, Chang-Bin Liu, Si-Hao Liu, and Hao Zhang. 2023. "The Effect of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Function and Emotional Regulation in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease" Brain Sciences 13, no. 9: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091309

APA Style

Dai, P., Wang, Z. -X., Yu, H. -X., Liu, C. -B., Liu, S. -H., & Zhang, H. (2023). The Effect of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Cognitive Function and Emotional Regulation in Patients with Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Brain Sciences, 13(9), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13091309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop