Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile of Selected Organic and Conventional Honeys from Poland
Next Article in Special Issue
Inactivation of Carbonyl-Detoxifying Enzymes by H2O2 Is a Trigger to Increase Carbonyl Load for Initiating Programmed Cell Death in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Anthocyanins from Hibiscus syriacus L. Inhibit Oxidative Stress-Mediated Apoptosis by Activating the Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Ageing Process Affects the Antioxidant Defences and the Poly (ADPribosyl)ation Activity in Cistus Incanus L. Leaves
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/antiox9010043
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression

by
Mohamed A. El-Esawi
1,*,
Amr Elkelish
2,
Mona Soliman
3,
Hosam O. Elansary
4,5,
Abbu Zaid
6 and
Shabir H. Wani
7
1
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
2
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
3
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
4
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Floriculture, Ornamental Horticulture, and Garden Design Department, Faculty of Agriculture (El-Shatby), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
6
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
7
Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani Anantnag 192101, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2020, 9(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010043
Submission received: 7 December 2019 / Revised: 23 December 2019 / Accepted: 31 December 2019 / Published: 4 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress in Plant)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The heavy metal contamination in plant-soil environment has increased manifold recently. In order to reduce the harmful effects of metal stress in plants, the application of beneficial soil microbes is gaining much attention. In the present research, the role of Serratia marcescens BM1 in enhancing cadmium (Cd) stress tolerance and phytoremediation potential of soybean plants, was investigated. Exposure of soybean plants to two Cd doses (150 and 300 µM) significantly reduced plant growth, biomass, gas exchange attributes, nutrients uptake, antioxidant capacity, and the contents of chlorophyll, total phenolics, flavonoids, soluble sugars, and proteins. Additionally, Cd induced the stress levels of Cd, proline, glycine betaine, hydrogen peroxide, malondialdehyde, antioxidant enzymes (i.e., catalase, CAT; ascorbate peroxidase, APX; superoxide dismutase, SOD; peroxidise, POD), and the expression of stress-related genes (i.e., APX, CAT, Fe-SOD, POD, CHI, CHS, PHD2, VSO, NR, and P5CS) in soybean leaves. On the other hand, inoculation of Cd-stressed soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 significantly enhanced the plant growth, biomass, gas exchange attributes, nutrients uptake, antioxidant capacity, and the contents of chlorophyll, total phenolics, flavonoids, soluble sugars, and proteins. Moreover, Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation reduced the levels of cadmium and oxidative stress markers, but significantly induced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and the levels of osmolytes and stress-related genes expression in Cd-stressed plants. The application of 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens triggered the highest expression levels of stress-related genes. Overall, this study suggests that inoculation of soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 promotes phytoremediation potential and Cd stress tolerance by modulating the photosynthetic attributes, osmolytes biosynthesis, antioxidants machinery, and the expression of stress-related genes.

1. Introduction

Over the last few decades, there has been a growing incidence of heavy metal (HM) circulation in plant-soil continuum owing to various natural and anthropogenic activities [1]. HMs, including cadmium (Cd), pose a serious danger to the growth of crop plants, as well as human and animal health [2,3]. Cadmium is a toxic HM with strong mobility in the soil-plant interface and biological toxicity [4]. Cadmium retards vital physio-biochemical activities in plants, which include photosynthesis, biosynthesis of chlorophyll and accessory pigments, and the uptake and assimilation of essential mineral nutrients by triggering the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including singlet oxygen (1O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide radical (O2•−), and the hydroxyl radical (OH•) [5,6]. ROS accumulation causes high toxicity in plant cells [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Cadmium evokes peroxidation of membrane lipids and modulates the expression of genes of antioxidant defense systems in plants [17]. The presence of Cd inside plants thus causes stress by inducing ionic, osmotic, and oxidative stress [17,18]. Various studies also support the active involvement of antioxidant proteins in combating Cd-induced stress. Gene expression analysis further revealed the active participation of antioxidants genes (Mn/SOD, FeSOD, POD, CAT, APX, and GR) under Cd-induced stress [19,20].
During the course of evolution, plants have evolved intricate strategies to cope with the Cd-induced oxidative stress by activating various signalling networks, which include optimum nutrient homeostasis, enhanced accumulation of osmolytes, ROS detoxification by enhanced activities of antioxidants, and the production of thiol-related compounds [21,22,23,24]. Plant stress physiologists are engaged in devising potential sustainable strategies that can unravel mechanisms behind Cd-stress tolerance; however, the field is still emerging. Out of the various strategies that have been adopted to reverse HM-induced stress impacts in plants, the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) interaction is an emerging and effective sustainable way. Various recent studies in the discipline of ecological engineering and management have strongly advocated the use of PGPRs to alleviate HM-induced oxidative stress in plants, like energy crops [25], Solanum nigrum [26], Spartina maritime [27], and Lycopersicon esculentum [20,28,29]. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are known to induce tolerance against metal stress via modulating various intrinsic or underlying mechanisms [30]. These mechanisms primarily involve exclusion, extrusion, biotransformation, methylation/demethylation, and accommodation (complex formation) of metals [20,31,32,33,34]. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria also induce the formation of different phytohormones, such as cytokinins, auxins, and gibberellins [35,36]. In addition, the synergistic interaction between microorganisms and plant roots under various abiotic pressures positively regulates the plant performance and edaphic factors [32,37,38]. Serratia species are potent PGPRs that are known to induce HM stress tolerance in crop plants [39]. Studies, undertaken so far, have established the role of Serratia marcescens in inducing HM stress tolerance in plant species. Cristani et al. [39] studied the possible action of Serratia marcescens in lead, Cd, and chromium metal biosorption. Khan et al. [40] analyzed the genome of Serratia marcescens RSC-14 and found that this species is an efficient PGPR that can alleviate Cd stress in host plants. By employing proteomic approach, Queiroz et al. [41] indicated that Serratia marcescens LG1 can be successfully used for adaptation and tolerance against manganese (Mn). However, the potential of the isolate Serratia marcescens BM1 in conferring tolerance against Cd stress in soybean (Glycine max L.) has not been studied yet.
Soybean is an economically important food crop worldwide and experiences various environmental stresses, including salinity and HMs, which limit the plant growth and productivity [42,43,44]. Therefore, enhancing the stress tolerance, productivity and phytoremediation potential of this crop is of utmost importance. Considering the importance of investigating these issues, the present research intends to elucidate the various underlying mechanisms that Serratia marcescens BM1 triggers in response to Cd stress in soybean plants. Growth traits of soybean plants have been investigated. Additionally, various physiological, biochemical and molecular approaches have been assayed.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Investigation of Cadmium Tolerance of Serratia marcescens BM1 Strain

Serratia marcescens BM1 strain used in the present study was isolated from the maize rhizospheric soils of the Egyptian Suez Canal area and proved its capability for indole acetic acid production and inorganic phosphate solubilization [45,46]. In the present research, Cd tolerance of Serratia marcescens BM1 strain was investigated in nutrient broth media, containing 0, 150, 300, and 450 µM CdCl2 (i.e., CdCl2 was used to provide Cd stress). Bacterial growth was estimated by measuring the optical density (OD = 600 nm) following 36, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation at 29 °C. This experiment was conducted in four replications.

2.2. Inoculation and Growth of Soybean Plants

Following culturing of Serratia marcescens BM1 in nutrient broth media for 4 days at 29 °C, bacterial cells were centrifuged for 4 min at 2000× g and then collected. Resultant pellets were re-suspended in sterilized water, and bacterial culture was then set to 108 colony-forming units (CFU) mL−1 and used to inoculate soybean plants. Soybean cultivar Giza 35 seeds were obtained from Legumes Institute of Kafrelsheikh in Egypt, and were then sterilized using sodium hypochlorite (8%, v/v) for 7 min, washed with sterilized water several times, and left to grow on a wet filter paper for 6 days at 24 °C. The 6-day old plants were then inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 suspension for 25 min and transferred into hydroponic plastic pots, containing Hoagland plant nutrient solution. Control plants were kept in fresh nutrient broth for 25 min. Experimental treatments were performed as follows: (i) control plants without CdCl2 and bacterial inoculation (T1); (ii) plants inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 alone (T2); (iii) plants treated with 150 µM CdCl2 alone (T3); (iv) plants treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1 (T4); (v) plants treated with 300 µM CdCl2 alone (T5); and, (vi) plants treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1 (T6). Soybean plants were irrigated with a Hoagland nutrient solution supplemented with 0, 150, and 300 µM CdCl2 three times a week. The pots were left in a completely randomized block design in growth chambers of a temperature of 27/19 °C (day/night) and a humidity of 76%. After 7 weeks, plants were collected for the subsequent experimental analyses.

2.3. Morphological Parameters of Plant Root and Shoot

Root and shoot lengths were determined using a measuring tape. Separated roots and shoots were washed with deionized water and weighed to measure their fresh weight. Separated roots and shoots were then oven-dried at 72 °C for 50 h to estimate their dry weights.

2.4. Measurement of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Cadmium Uptake

Oven-dried leaf samples were ground into a fine powder and then digested in H2SO4 at 190 °C for 5 h. H2O2 was then added to the samples and left for 60 min. Digested samples were filtered and then diluted with sterile distilled H2O. Nitrogen concentration was calculated following Kjeldahl methodology as mentioned by Bremner [47]. Phosphorus concentration was calculated according to the protocol of Murphy and Riley [48]. To determine Cd content, dried leaf samples were grinded to fine powder and then digested in a mixture of HNO3: HClO4 (3:1, v/v) at 120 °C. Cadmium was then quantified using an atomic absorption spectrometer (AA6300C, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.5. Measurements of Chlorophyll Content, Leaf Relative Water Content, and Gas-Exchange Attributes

Total leaf chlorophyll content was determined by homogenizing 0.2 g fresh leaf samples in 50 mL of 80% acetone, followed by centrifugation at 14,000× g for 7 min and the absorbance was then spectrophotometrically recorded at 662 and 645 nm as reported by Lichtenthaler [49]. Net photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E), and stomatal conductance (gs) were measured on expanded leaves of similar developmental stages with a portable gas-exchange system (LI-6400, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) between 9:30 and 10:30 am, according to the methodology of Holá et al. [50]. Leaf relative water content (RWC) was determined as previously explained by El-Esawi and Alayafi [12].

2.6. Measurement of Total Soluble Sugars, Soluble Protein, Proline and Glycine Betaine Levels

Leaves were ground into a fine powder and homogenized in 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0), followed by centrifugation at at 14,000× g for 14 min. Using the protocol of Dey [51], total soluble sugar content was determined by recording the absorbance at 485 nm. The Bradford method [52] was used to estimate the total protein content.
The protocol of Bates et al. [53] was used to estimate proline content. Leaf samples were digested in 5% (w/v) sulfosalicylic acid, and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 7.0 min. Supernatant was diluted with sterile distilled water and then mixed with 2% ninhydrin, followed by heating up at 96 °C for 30 min, then cooling. Toluene was then added to the mixture, and the absorbance of the upper aqueous phase formed was recorded at 520 nm. Following the protocol of Grieve and Grattan [54], glycine betaine content was estimated by extracting dry leafy samples in hot distilled water at 72 °C. To the extract formed, 2 N HCl and potassium tri-iodide solution were added, mixed and cooled on ice for 2 h. Cold 1,2-dichloromethane and distilled water were then added to the mixture where two layers were formed. Organic layer absorbance was recorded at 365 nm.

2.7. Determination of Total Flavonoids and Phenols Contents

The protocol of Zhishen et al. [55] was used to estimate the total flavonoid content by homogenizing oven-dried leaf powder (1.0 g) in distilled water (100 mL), followed by filtration and mixing with a solution composed of distilled H2O, AlCl3, and NaNO2. Few drops of NaOH was then added to the mixed solution, which was then diluted with distilled water. The mixture absorbance was recorded at 510 nm. Catechin calibration curve was used.
Total phenolic content was measured by extracting leaf samples (2.0 g) in methanol solution (10 mL, 80%), followed by agitation at 72 °C for 18 min. Methanolic extract (2.0 mL) was diluted in 10 mL distilled H2O comprising 1 N Folin–Ciocalteau reagent (500 μL), and then incubated at 30 °C. The mixture absorbance was recorded at 725 nm [56] using gallic acid as a standard.

2.8. Estimation of Hydrogen Peroxide and Malondialdehyde Levels

Following the protocol of Velikova et al. [57], hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content was measured by extracting leaf samples in 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), followed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min. Potassium phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH 7.0) and potassium iodide (1 M) were added and well-mixed with the supernatant. The mixture absorbance was then read at 390 nm and H2O2 content was estimated following H2O2 standard curve. Using the methodology of Heath and Packer [58], malondialdehyde (MDA) level was determined by homogenizing leaf samples in 0.1% TCA followed by centrifugation at 14,000× g for 6 min. Thiobarbituric acid (0.5%) and 20% TCA were added to the supernatant. The mixture was then heated up at 96°C for 25 min, followed by cooling and centrifugation at 9,000× g for 12 min. The supernatant absorbance was recorded at 532 and 660 nm.

2.9. Determination of Leaf Antioxidant Capacity

Leaf antioxidant capacities were estimated by β-carotene-linoleic acid and 2,2′-diphenypicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays [59,60]. Leaf samples (2.0 g) were extracted in methanol solution (10 mL, 80%), and then agitated at 72°C for 18 min. For DPPH assay, 50 μL of methanolic extract (1 mg mL−1) was added to 5 mL of methanolic DPPH solution (0.004%), and then mixed and left in darkness for 25 min. The mixture absorbance was read at 517 nm. For β-carotene-linoleic acid assay, 50 μL of methanolic extract was transferred to β-carotene mixture, and then mixed and incubated for 46 h. The absorbance was read at 470 nm. The results were expressed as IC50 in mg mL−1.

2.10. Estimation of Antioxidant Enzymes

Leaf samples were extracted in Tris-HCl (100 mM, pH 7.5) and then mixed with Dithiothreitol (5 mM), PVP-40 (1.5%), MgCl2 (10 mM), EDTA (1 mM), magnesium acetate (5 mM), phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (1 mM), and aproptinin (1 μg mL−1). The mixture was filtered and then centrifuged at 14,000× g for 8 min. The supernatants were utilized for estimating antioxidant enzymes activities. The protocol of Nakano and Asada [61] was used to estimate ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity by extracting leaf samples in 2 mM AsA, followed by recording the absorbance at 265 nm. Moreover, the methodology of Aebi [62] was used to estimate catalase (CAT) activity, and the absorbance was read at 240 nm. Following the nitroblue tetrazolium photo-reduction method [63], superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured, and the absorbance was read at 540 nm. Using the methodology of Putter and Becker [64], peroxidase (POD) activity was determined by recording the oxidized guaiacol production rate at 436 nm. Enzymes activities were expressed in enzyme unit per milligramme protein (EU mg−l protein).

2.11. Expression Analysis of Stress-Related Genes

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay was applied to investigate the expression levels of 10 stress-related genes, including APX, CAT, Fe-SOD, POD, CHI (encoding chalcone isomerase in flavonoids biosynthesis pathways; [65]), CHS (encoding chalcone synthase in flavonoids biosynthesis pathways), PHD2 (plant-homeo-domain gene of DNA binding ability and stress tolerance induction; [66]), VSP (encoding vegetative storage defense protein; [67]), NR (encoding nitrate reductase; [67]) and P5CS (encoding pyrroline-5 carboxylate synthetase; [67]). Total RNA was extracted from leaf tissue samples using RNeasy Plant Mini kits (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). Contaminating DNA was then removed and first-strand cDNAs were prepared using Reverse Transcription kits (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). RT-qPCR analysis was conducted as reported in the protocol of QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Manchester, UK). Reaction volume and PCR amplification conditions were adjusted as mentioned by El-Esawi et al. [43]. Gene-specific primers of Sirhindi et al. [68], Vaishnav et al. [67], El-Esawi et al. [69], and Kim et al. [70] (Table S1) were used for genes amplification. A housekeeping gene, actin, was used. The method of Livak and Schmittgen [71] was utilized to estimate relative expression levels.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data are means ± standard errors (SEs) (n = 4). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test were carried out using SPSS version 16 (Chicago, IL, USA). Values at p ≤ 0.05 differ significantly.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cadmium Tolerance of Serratia marcescens BM1

Serratia marcescens BM1 strain grew in nutrient broth medium having 0, 150 and 300 µM CdCl2 at different incubation time intervals with OD = 0.49–0.61, OD = 0.29–0.49 and OD = 0.22–0.35, respectively (Figure 1). However, the bacterium could not grow in the medium containing 450 µM CdCl2 at all the incubation time intervals (OD = 0). These findings reveal that BM1 was able to grow and tolerate Cd stress up to 300 µM CdCl2, indicating that this bacterium could be exploited in the phytoremediation and Cd stress tolerance studies.

3.2. Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Growth and Biomass of Soybean Plants Under Cadmium Stress

Soybean plants exhibited a significant decrease in growth and biomass traits under Cd stress at both doses (150 and 300 µM) with respect to control plants (Table 1). Cadmium stress at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) treatments decreased root length by 27.56%, and 47.43% and shoot length by 30.95%, and 50.79%, respectively, with respect to the control plants. Inoculating Cd-stressed soybean with Serratia marcescens BM1 enhanced the length of root by 14.20% at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and 17.10% at T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments, as compared to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 1). A similar trend also follows in case of shoot length, by which a significant increase of 18.40% at T4 and 27.40% at T6 was noticed with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 1).
Root and shoot fresh weights showed a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease under Cd stress at T3 and T5 treatments compared to T1 unstressed plants (Table 1). Cadmium stress at T3 and T5 decreases the root fresh weight by 28.46% and 55.47% and shoot fresh weight by 32.24%, and 57.92%, respectively, with respect to unstressed T1 plants. On the other hand, Serratia marcescens BM1 application to Cd-stressed soybean plants enhanced the root fresh weight by 20.41% at T4 and 26.23% at T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5 treatments, respectively. A similar trend was also noticed in shoot fresh weight, in which a significant increase of 13.71% at T4 and 19.48% at T6, was observed with respect to T3, and T5 treatments, respectively (Table 1).
In case of dry weights of root and shoot, Cd induces a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease at both T3 and T5 treatments (Table 1). Cadmium induced significant (p ≤ 0.05) reductions of 33.33% and 60.00% in root dry weight at T3, and T5 treatments, respectively, with respect to control plants. Cadmium stress also decreased the shoot dry weight by 43.24%, and 59.45% at T3, and T5 treatments, respectively, with respect to control plants. On the other hand, Serratia marcescens BM1 application to Cd-stressed plants showed a significant increase in root and shoot dry weight. An increase of 20.00% and 16.66% in root dry weight and 38.10% and 26.66% in shoot dry weight was noticed at T4 and T6 treatments in comparison to plants treated only with Cd at T3, and T5, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, the root dry weight/shoot dry weight ratio was also higher for plants inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 in the presence or absence of cadmium. Therefore, Serratia marcescens BM1 effect was most profound on root development with a recorded increment in the root/shoot ratio in response to cadmium stress. This could be attributed to the modulation of antioxidant machinery and nutrients uptake in plant cells.
The aforementioned growth effects are consequences of the plant growth-promoting traits of Serratia marcescens BM1 strain, which promoted soybean growth and biomass under Cd stress conditions. Similar reports revealed the potential of Serratia spp. in enhancing plant growth and biomass under control and stress conditions. Serratia marcescens strain SRM significantly improved plant growth and biomass of wheat plants grown in cold temperature [72]. Serratia marcescens AL2-16 also improved the growth and biomass of the medicinal plant, Achyranthes aspera L. [73]. Furthermore, Serratia liquefaciens KM4 improved maize growth and biomass under normal and saline conditions [74]. Serratia marcescens CDP-13 promoted plant growth and alleviated salinity stress in wheat [75]. Moreover, Khan et al. [76] revealed that Cd stress significantly reduced plant growth and biomass of Solanum nigrum L. plants, whereas Serratia sp. RSC-14 inoculation alleviated Cd stress-induced toxic effects by significantly promoting plant growth and biomass.

3.3. Serratia marcescens BM1 Modulates the Contents of Cadmium, Nitrogen and Phosphorous in Cadmium-Stressed Soybean Plants

Cadmium stress at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) treatments significantly induced the accumulation of Cd over the control plants (Table 2). On the other hand, application of Serratia marcescens BM1 to Cd-stressed soybean plants significantly reduced Cd uptake by 21.05% at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and 17.86% at T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 2).
Under both doses of Cd stress at T3 and T5 treatments, soybean plants exhibited a decrease in N and P contents (Table 2). Cadmium stress at T3 and T5 decreased the N level by 18.18%, and 34.09%, respectively, with respect to unstressed T1 plants. Serratia marcescens BM1 application significantly enhanced N content at both Cd treatments. An increase of 12.50% and 12.07% was noticed in N content at T4 and T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 2). Low and high doses of Cd stress also significantly decreased P content at T3 and T5 treatments with respect to unstressed T1 plants. Phosphorous contents showed a significant decline of 27.50% and 45.00% at T3, and T5, respectively, in relation to control plants. Application of Serratia marcescens BM1 to Cd-stressed soybean plants induced phosphorus content by 24.14% and 36.36% at T4 and T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 2). These results indicate that Serratia marcescens BM1 was able to alleviate Cd stress-induced oxidative damage by enhancing nutrients uptake in soybean plants. Our results are in agreement with the findings of previous reports which indicated the potential of other Serratia strains in mitigating abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage through enhancing nutrients uptake in plants. For example, Serratia marcescens strain SRM significantly induced nutrients uptake of wheat plants grown under cold conditions [72]. Serratia marcescens TRS-1 also enhanced leaf and root phosphate content of tea plants [77]. Furthermore, Serratia nematodiphila LRE07 improved plant growth, biomass and nutrient uptake of Solanum nigrum L. plants under Cd stress conditions [78]. Serratia liquefaciens KM4 also significantly induced nutrient uptake of maize plants grown under normal and saline stress conditions [74].

3.4. Serratia marcescens BM1 Induces Leaf Gas Exchange Attributes, Leaf Relative Water Content and Biosynthesis of Chlorophyll, Sugars, Proteins, Osmolytes, Flavonoids, and Phenolics Under Cadmium Stress

Serratia marcescens BM1 application improved Pn, E and gs under stress-free and Cd-stressed conditions (Table 2). Soybean exposure to 150 µM CdCl2 (T3) and 300 µM CdCl2 (T5) doses significantly decreased Pn, E and gs values with respect to unstressed T1 plants. Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation nullified the Cd-induced repressions in gas-exchange characteristics and enhanced Pn, E and gs at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments as compared to Cd stressed plants at T3, and T5, respectively (Table 2).
Cadmium stress decreased the chlorophyll content by 21.28% and 30.19% at T3, and T5 treatments, respectively, with respect to unstressed T1 plants (Table 3). Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation significantly (p ≤ 0.05) induced the biosynthesis of chlorophyll by 5.66% at T4 and 5.67% at T6 treatments as compared to Cd stressed plants at T3, and T5, respectively. Furthermore, Cd stress significantly reduced the leaf relative water content (RWC) with respect to unstressed T1 plants (Table 3). On the other hand, Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation significantly induced RWC in Cd-stressed plants as compared to untreated Cd stressed plants.
Low and high doses of Cd stress at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) treatments in soybean plants showed a decrease in total soluble sugars and protein contents (Table 3). Both low and high dose of Cd at T3 and T5 caused significant (p ≤ 0.05) decreases of 9.95%, and 19.91%, respectively, in sugars levels with respect to T1 control plants. A similar trend also follows in these treatments in case of total protein content, whereas a decrease of 20.72% and 39.93% at T3, and T5 was noticed with respect to control plants. On the other hand, Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation significantly enhanced sugars and protein contents at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively. In case of sugars, a significant increase of 5.53% and 9.84% was noticed at T4 and T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively. Significant increases of 19.32% and 17.91% were also recorded in protein content at T4 and T6 with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 3).
Serratia marcescens BM1 enhanced the biosynthesis of osmolytes, including proline and glycine betaine in control and Cd-stressed soybean plants (Table 3). Cadmium stress at T3 and T5 caused a marked increase in proline content by 2.69, and 3.98 fold, respectively, over control plants. A similar trend was also noticed in glycine betaine, whereas an increase of 1.76 and 2.56 fold at T3 and T5, respectively, was recorded over control plants. Inoculation of plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 at both Cd stress conditions had an additive effect on proline and glycine betaine biosynthesis and maximum values of these parameters were recorded at T6 treatments.
Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation improved the levels of flavonoids and phenolics under control and Cd stress conditions (Table 4). Cadmium stress lowered flavonoid content by 29.95% at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and by 59.77% at T5 (300 µM CdCl2) with respect to unstressed T1 plants. However, inoculating Cd-stressed soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 induced flavonoids content by 10.69% and 41.37% at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments, with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 4). The phenolic content also exhibited a significant decrease of 23.59% and 41.01% at T3, and T5 treatments, respectively, with respect to T1 control plants. Serratia marcescens BM1 application exhibited higher phenolic content of 9.55% and 24.76% at T4 and T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 4).
The results of the above parameters demonstrate that Serratia marcescens BM1 also mitigated the negative impacts of Cd stress by modulating leaf gas exchange characteristics, photosynthesis, and osmolytes. These results are in agreement with the findings of previous studies which revealed the key roles of Serratia isolates in alleviating abiotic stress effects in plants by regulating photosynthesis, leaf gas exchange parameters, and osmolytes biosynthesis. For example, Serratia nematodiphila LRE07 enhanced photosynthetic pigments biosynthesis of Solanum nigrum L. plants under Cd stress conditions [78]. Khan et al. [76] revealed that Serratia sp. RSC-14 inoculation mitigated the negative impacts of Cd stress by significantly improving chlorophyll biosynthesis. Moreover, Serratia liquefaciens KM4 significantly induced leaf gas exchange attributes, photosynthesis process, and osmolytes biosynthesis of maize plants grown under saline stress conditions [74].

3.5. Serratia marcescens BM1 Inoculation Reduces the Contents of H2O2 and MDA Under Cadmium Stress

Cadmium stress at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) treatments significantly increased the production of H2O2 over the control plants. On the other hand, the application of Serratia marcescens BM1 to Cd-stressed soybean plants significantly reduced H2O2 level by 15.27% at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and 29.41% at T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively. MDA production exhibited significant increases at T3 and T5 treatments with respect to T1 unstressed plants. A significant decrease of 17.64% and 22.95% in MDA content was noticed in plants inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 at T4 and T6 treatments with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 4), indicating that Serratia marcescens BM1 regulates membrane functions through scavenging ROS accumulation. These results are in agreement with the findings of the previous reports, which indicated the potential of Serratia isolates in mitigating the Cd stress impacts by reducing the oxidative stress markers, such as MDA, electrolyte leakage, and hydrogen peroxide. Khan et al. [76] revealed that Serratia sp. RSC-14 relived the toxic effects of Cd stress by reducing MDA and electrolytes production. Furthermore, Serratia liquefaciens KM4 significantly alleviated the salt stress-induced oxidative damage by reducing MDA and H2O2 contents [74].

3.6. Serratia marcescens BM1 Inoculation Modulates Antioxidant Capacity and Antioxidative Enzyme Activities Under Cadmium Stress

Cd stress decreased the DPPH values by 13.20% and 28.30% at T3 (150 µM CdCl2), and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) treatments, respectively, with respect to control plants (Table 4). Nevertheless, Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation further caused a decrease in DPPH values by 8.69% and 7.89% at T4 (150 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) and T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments with respect to respective T3, and T5 treatments, respectively. β-carotene-linoleic acid of soybean plants also follows a same decreasing trend when grown under Cd stress conditions at T3 and T5 treatments. Inoculating soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 further caused a significant decrease in β-carotene-linoleic acid values by 6.81% and by 8.10% at T4 and T6 with respect to T3, and T5, respectively (Table 4).
To scavenge ROS accumulation and mitigate cellular toxicity, plants activate their defence strategies, including their non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant systems, such as ascorbate, SOD, CAT, APX, and POD. In the present study, the activities of antioxidant enzymes in soybean plants, such as CAT, APX, POD, and SOD were elevated in response to Cd stress at T3 (150 µM CdCl2) and T5 (300 µM CdCl2) with respect to T1 control plants (Figure 2). Furthermore, the highest significant increase in CAT, APX, POD, and SOD activities was recorded when soybean Cd-stressed plants were inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 at T6 (300 µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments (Figure 2). These findings are consistent with the results of the previous reports which showed the key roles of Serratia strains in alleviating the abiotic stress-induced oxidative damage through regulating the key antioxidant enzymes. For example, Serratia nematodiphila LRE07 alleviated the negative impacts of Cd stress in Solanum nigrum L. plants by further inducing the activities of anti-oxidative enzymes [78]. Serratia liquefaciens KM4 also significantly alleviated the salt stress-induced oxidative damage by upregulating various antioxidative enzymes, such as CAT, APX, POD, and SOD [74].

3.7. Serratia marcescens BM1 Induces the Expression Levels of Stress-Related Genes Under Cadmium Stress

The application of Cd stress in both doses on soybean plants exhibited a dynamic increase in the expression levels of antioxidant genes (APX, CAT, Fe-SOD and POD; Figure 3) and stress-induced genes (CHI, CHS, PHD2, VSP, and P5CS; Figure 4). The results also revealed that the expression levels of these 10 genes were further increased upon inoculating soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1, whereas, the expression levels reached to the maximum extent at T6 (300µM CdCl2 + Serratia marcescens BM1) treatments in case of APX, CAT, Fe-SOD, POD, PHD2, VSP, and P5CS genes. The expression profiling of CHI, CHS, and NR genes were induced to a maximum extent in non-stressed soybean plants, inoculated with Serratia marcescens BM1 (Figure 4). These results indicate the key role of Serratia marcescens BM1 in eliminating toxic free radicals and conferring Cd stress tolerance through upregulating the abiotic stress-related genes. Similar reports indicated the potential of Serratia and other PGPBs in improving abiotic stress tolerance by inducing abiotic stress-related genes [74,79].
Overall, cadmium stress-induced oxidative effects have negative impacts on gas exchange attributes and photosynthetic activity, thereby, limiting plant growth and biomass. However, the present study revealed a key role of Serratia marcescens BM1 in improving phytoremediation and Cd stress tolerance in soybean plants by modulating the leaf gas exchange attributes, antioxidant machinery, osmolytes, and expression of genes associated with antioxidant defence systems and stress response.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, Cd stress reduced the growth, biomass, photosynthetic attributes, mineral nutrients uptake, and contents of flavonoids, phenolics, soluble sugars, and proteins of soybean plants. Cadmium also increased the contents of cadmium, hydrogen peroxide, and malondialdehyde. Conversely, Serratia marcescens BM1 inoculation mitigated the deleterious impacts of cadmium stress by significantly inducing the plant growth, biomass, gas exchange attributes, nutrients uptake, antioxidant capacity, and the contents of chlorophyll, total phenolics, flavonoids, soluble sugars, and proteins in Cd-stressed soybean plants. Serratia marcescens BM1 also triggered the activities of antioxidant enzymes and the expression of stress-related genes. Considering these results, it could be concluded that Serratia marcescens BM1 might promote Cd stress tolerance through the modulation of photosynthesis, leaf gas exchange traits, antioxidant machinery, osmolyte biosynthesis, and the expression of stress-related genes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/9/1/43/s1, Table S1: Gene-specific primers sequences used in the present study.

Author Contributions

M.A.E.-E. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. A.E., M.S. and H.O.E. participated in experiments, data analysis and writing the manuscript. A.Z. and S.H.W. participated in writing the manuscript. All the authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors appreciate King Saud University’s funding through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/118). This work has also been supported by Tanta University in Egypt.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to King Saud University’s funding through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2019/118). The authors also acknowledge the supporting facilities of Tanta University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wani, W.; Masoodi, K.Z.; Zaid, A.; Wani, S.H.; Shah, F.; Meena, V.S.; Wani, S.A.; Mosa, K.A. Engineering plants for heavy metal stress tolerance. Rend. Lincei 2018, 29, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abou-Kassem, D.E.; Mahrose, K.M.; Alagawany, M. The role of vitamin E or clay in growing Japanese quail fed diets polluted by cadmium at various levels. Animal 2016, 10, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Zaid, A.; Arif, M.S.; Yasmeen, T.; Hussain, A.; Shahid, M.R.; Bukhari, S.A.H.; Hussain, S.; Abbasi, G.H. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Induced Heavy Metal Stress Tolerance and Underlying Mechanisms in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1423–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Maqbool, A. A critical review on the effects of zinc at toxic levels of cadmium in plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 6279–6289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Per, T.S.; Khan, N.A.; Masood, A.; Fatma, M. Methyl jasmonate alleviates cadmium-induced photosynthetic damages through increased S-assimilation and glutathione production in mustard. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zaid, A.; Mohammad, F. Methyl Jasmonate and Nitrogen Interact to Alleviate Cadmium Stress in Mentha arvensis by Regulating Physio-Biochemical Damages and ROS Detoxification. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 1331–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elkelish, A.A.; Alhaithloul, H.A.S.; Qari, S.H.; Soliman, M.H.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Pretreatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates waterlogging-induced growth alterations in tomato seedlings by modulating physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 171, 103946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. El-Esawi, M.; Arthaut, L.; Jourdan, N.; d’Harlingue, A.; Martino, C.; Ahmad, M. Blue-light induced biosynthesis of ROS contributes to the signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis cryptochrome. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Consentino, L.; Lambert, S.; Martino, C.; Jourdan, N.; Bouchet, P.-E.; Witczak, J.; Castello, P.; El-Esawi, M.; Corbineau, F.; d’Harlingue, A.; et al. Blue-light dependent reactive oxygen species formation by Arabidopsis cryptochrome may define a novel evolutionarily conserved signalling mechanism. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1450–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Esawi, M.A.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Alsahli, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Alayafi, A.A.; Witczak, J.; Ahmad, M. Genetic variation and alleviation of salinity stress in barley. Molecules 2018, 23, 2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. El-Esawi, M.A.; Alayafi, A.A. Overexpression of rice Rab7 gene improves drought and heat tolerance and increases grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genes 2019, 10, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. El-Esawi, M.A.; Alayafi, A.A. Overexpression of StDREB2 Transcription Factor Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Genes 2019, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Soliman, M.; Alhaithloul, H.A.; Hakeem, K.R.; Alharbi, B.M.; El-Esawi, M.; Elkelish, A. Exogenous Nitric Oxide Mitigates Nickel-Induced Oxidative Damage in Eggplant by Upregulating Antioxidants, Osmolyte Metabolism, and Glyoxalase Systems. Plants 2019, 8, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. El-Esawi, M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Ahmad, M. Overexpression of AtWRKY30 Transcription Factor Enhances Heat and Drought Stress Tolerance in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes 2019, 10, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Elansary, H.O.; Ali, H.M.; Elshikh, M.; Witczak, J.; Ahmad, M. Genetic transformation and hairy root induction enhance the antioxidant potential of Lactuca serriola L. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 5604746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahanger, M.A.; Qin, C.; Begum, N.; Maodong, Q.; Dong, X.X.; El-Esawi, M.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Zhang, L. Nitrogen availability prevents oxidative effects of salinity on wheat growth and photosynthesis by up-regulating the antioxidants and osmolytes metabolism, and secondary metabolite accumulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.Z.; Hao, L. Salicylic acid-altering Arabidopsis plant response to cadmium exposure: Underlying mechanisms affecting antioxidation and photosynthesis-related processes. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Ali, Q.; Shakoor, M.B.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Farid, M.; Asma, M. Effect of zinc-lysine on growth, yield and cadmium uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2017, 187, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Luo, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Fu, J. Antioxidant responses and gene expression in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) under cadmium stress. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khanna, K.; Jamwal, V.L.; Kohli, S.K.; Gandhi, S.G.; Ohri, P.; Bhardwaj, R.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Hashem, A.; Ahmad, P. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria induced Cd tolerance in Lycopersicon esculentum through altered antioxidative defense expression. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mnasri, M.; Ghabriche, R.; Fourati, E.; Zaier, H.; Sabally, K.; Barrington, S.; Ghnaya, T. Cd and Ni transport and accumulation in the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum: Implication of organic acids in these processes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Silva, A.J.; Nascimento, C.W.A.; Gouveia-Neto, A.S. Assessment of cadmium phytotoxicity alleviation by silicon using chlorophyll a fluorescence. Photosynthetica 2016, 55, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sakouhi, L.; Rahoui, S.; Gharsallah, C.; Munemasa, S.; El Ferjani, E.; Murata, Y.; Chaoui, A. Effects of calcium and EGTA on thiol homeostasis and defense-related enzymes in Cd-exposed chickpea roots. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; ur Rehman, M.Z.; Rinklebe, J.; Tsang, D.C.; Bashir, A.; Maqbool, A.; Tack, F.M.G.; Ok, Y.S. Cadmium phytoremediation potential of Brassica crop species: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631, 1175–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, Y.; Rajkumar, M.; Vicente, J.A.F.; Freitas, H. Inoculation of Ni-resistant plant growth promoting bacterium Psychrobacter sp. strain SRS8 for the improvement of nickel phytoextraction by energy crops. Int. J. Phytoremed. 2010, 13, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shi, P.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, T. Growth and Cadmium Accumulation of Solanum nigrum L. Seedling were Enhanced by Heavy Metal-Tolerant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mesa-Marín, J.; Del-Saz, N.F.; Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D.; Redondo-Gómez, S.; Pajuelo, E.; Ribas-Carbó, M.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. PGPR Reduce Root Respiration and Oxidative Stress Enhancing Spartina maritima Root Growth and Heavy Metal Rhizoaccumulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Madhaiyan, M.; Poonguzhali, S.; Sa, T. Metal tolerating methylotrophic bacteria reduces nickel and cadmium toxicity and promotes plant growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Chemosphere 2007, 69, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, T.; Lv, X.; Jia, H.; Hua, L.; Xu, H.; Zhou, R.; Zhao, J.; Ren, X.; Guo, J. Effects of salicylic acid, Fe (II) and plant growth-promoting bacteria on Cd accumulation and toxicity alleviation of Cd tolerant and sensitive tomato genotypes. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sessitsch, A.; Kuffner, M.; Kidd, P.; Vangronsveld, J.; Wenzel, W.W.; Fallmann, K.; Puschenreiter, M. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 60, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kao, P.H.; Huang, C.C.; Hseu, Z.Y. Response of microbial activities to heavy metals in a neutral loamy soil treated with biosolid. Chemosphere 2006, 64, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brunetti, G.; Farrag, K.; Soler-Rovira, P.; Ferrara, M.; Nigro, F.; Senesi, N. The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 2012, 170, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Malekzadeh, E.; Alikhani, H.A.; Savaghebi-Firoozabadi, G.R.; Zarei, M. Bioremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil through cultivation of maize inoculated with plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. Bioremed. J. 2012, 16, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Radhakrishnan, R.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Bacillus: A biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gupta, C.; Dubey, R.; Maheshwari, D. Plant growth enhancement and suppression of Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot of peanut by fluorescent Pseudomonas. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2002, 35, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
  36. Arkhipova, T.N.; Veselov, S.U.; Melentiev, A.I.; Martynenko, E.V.; Kudoyarova, G.R. Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant Soil 2005, 272, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gururani, M.A.; Upadhyaya, C.P.; Baskar, V.; Venkatesh, J.; Nookaraju, A.; Park, S.W. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chandra, P.; Tripathi, P.; Chandra, A. Isolation and molecular characterization of plant growth-promoting Bacillus spp. and their impact on sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) growth and tolerance towards drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cristani, M.; Naccari, C.; Nostro, A.; Pizzimenti, A.; Trombetta, D.; Pizzimenti, F. Possible use of Serratia marcescens in toxic metal biosorption (removal). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, A.R.; Park, G.S.; Asaf, S.; Hong, S.J.; Jung, B.K.; Shin, J.H. Complete genome analysis of Serratia marcescens RSC-14: A plant growth-promoting bacterium that alleviates cadmium stress in host plants. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Queiroz, P.S.; Ruas, F.A.D.; Barboza, N.R.; de Castro Borges, W.; Guerra-Sá, R. Alterations in the proteomic composition of Serratia marcescens in response to manganese (II). BMC Biotechnol. 2018, 18, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Jabborova, D.; Räsänen, L.A.; Liao, H. Coordination between Bradyrhizobium and Pseudomonas alleviates salt stress in soybean through altering root system architecture. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. El-Esawi, M.A.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alamri, S.A.; Ali, H.M.; Alayafi, A.A. Bacillus firmus (SW5) augments salt tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.) by modulating root system architecture, antioxidant defense systems and stress-responsive genes expression. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 132, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Elkelish, A.A.; Alnusaire, T.S.; Soliman, M.H. Calcium availability regulates antioxidant system, physio-biochemical activities and alleviates salinity stress mediated oxidative damage in soybean seedlings. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019, 92, 258–266. [Google Scholar]
  45. Abd El-Azeem, S.A.M. Studies on Plant Growth Promoting Rhizosphere Microorganisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  46. Abd El-Azeem, S.A.M.; Mehana, T.A.; Shabayek, A.A. Some plant-growth-promoting traits of rhizobacteria isolated from Suez Canal region, Egypt. Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. Proc. 2007, 8, 1517–1525. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bremner, J.M. Total Nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (Methods of Soil); American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; pp. 1149–1178. [Google Scholar]
  48. Murphy, J.; Riley, J. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chem. Acta 1962, 27, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzym. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar]
  50. Holá, D.; Benešová, M.; Honnerová, J.; Hnilička, F.; Rothová, O.; Kočová, M.; Hniličková, H. The evaluation of photosynthetic parameters in maize inbred lines subjected to water deficiency: Can these parameters be used for the prediction of performance of hybrid progeny? Photosynthetica 2010, 48, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dey, P.M. Oligosaccharides. In Methods in Plant Biochemistry, Carbohydrates; Dey, P.M., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1990; Volume 2, pp. 189–218. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bates, L.; Waldren, P.P.; Teare, J.D. Rapid determination of free proline of water stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Grieve, C.; Grattan, S. Rapid assay for determination of water-soluble quaternary ammonium compounds. Plant Soil 1983, 70, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zieslin, N.; Ben-Zaken, R. Peroxidase activity and presence of phenolic substances in peduncles of rose flowers. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1993, 31, 333–339. [Google Scholar]
  57. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ueno, H.; Yamakura, S.; Arastoo, R.S.; Oshima, T.; Kokubo, K. Systematic evaluation and mechanistic investigation of antioxidant activity of fullerenols using β carotene bleaching assay. Nanomaterials 2014, 7, 802596. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pyrzynska, K.; Pękal, A. Application of free radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) to estimate the antioxidant capacity of food samples. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 4288–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  62. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzym. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kono, Y. Generation of superoxide radical during autoxidation of hydroxylamine and an assay for superoxide dismutase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1978, 186, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Putter, J.; Becker, R. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; p. 685. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhou, Y.; Huang, J.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Zhu, L.M.; Wang, X.F.; Guo, N.; Zhao, J.M.; Xing, H. Overexpression of Chalcone Isomerase (CHI) Increases Resistance Against Phytophthora sojae in Soybean. J. Plant Biol. 2018, 61, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wei, W.; Huang, J.; Hao, Y.J.; Zou, H.F.; Wang, H.W.; Zhao, J.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhang, W.K.; Ma, B.; Zhang, J.S.; et al. Soybean GmPHD-type transcription regulators improve stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Vaishnav, A.; Kumari, S.; Jain, S.; Varma, A.; Tuteja, N.; Choudhary, D.K. PGPR-mediated expression of salt tolerance gene in soybean through volatiles under sodium nitroprusside. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 1274–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sirhindi, G.; Mir, M.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P.; Gucel, S. Jasmonic Acid Modulates the Physio-Biochemical Attributes, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, and Gene Expression in Glycine max under Nickel Toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El-Esawi, M.A.; Elansary, H.O.; El-Shanhorey, N.A.; Abdel-Hamid, A.M.E.; Ali, H.M.; Elshikh, M.S. Salicylic Acid-Regulated Antioxidant Mechanisms and Gene Expression Enhance Rosemary Performance under Saline Conditions. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, M.J.; Kim, H.J.; Pak, J.H.; Cho, H.S.; Choi, H.K.; Jung, H.W.; Lee, D.H.; Chung, Y.-S. Overexpression of AtSZF2 from Arabidopsis showed enhanced tolerance to salt stress in soybean. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Selvakumar, G.; Mohan, M.; Kundu, S.; Gupta, A.D.; Joshi, P.; Nazim, S.; Gupta, H.S. Cold tolerance and plant growth promotion potential of Serratia marcescens strain SRM (MTCC 8708) isolated from flowers of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Devi, K.A.; Pandey, P.; Sharma, G.D. Plant Growth-Promoting Endophyte Serratia marcescens AL2-16 Enhances the Growth of Achyranthes aspera L., a Medicinal Plant. HAYATI J. Biosci. 2016, 23, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. El-Esawi, M.A.; Alaraidh, I.A.; Alsahli, A.A.; Alzahrani, S.M.; Ali, H.M.; Alayafi, A.A.; Ahmad, M. Serratia liquefaciens KM4 Improves Salt Stress Tolerance in Maize by Regulating Redox Potential, Ion Homeostasis, Leaf Gas Exchange and Stress-Related Gene Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Singh, R.P.; Jha, P.N. The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Khan, A.R.; Ullah, I.; Khan, A.L.; Park, G.S.; Waqas, M.; Hong, S.J.; Jung, B.K.; Kwak, Y.; Lee, I.J.; Shin, J.H. Improvement in phytoremediation potential of Solanum nigrum under cadmium contamination through endophytic-assisted Serratia sp. RSC-14 inoculation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 14032–14042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Chakraborty, U.; Chakraborty, B.N.; Chakraborty, A.P. Influence of Serratia marcescens TRS-1 on growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis against Fomes lamaoensis. J. Plant Interact. 2010, 5, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wan, Y.; Luo, S.; Chen, J.; Xiao, X.; Chen, L.; Zeng, G.; Liu, C.; He, Y. Effect of endophyte-infection on growth parameters and Cd-induced phytotoxicity of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Chemosphere 2012, 89, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. El-Esawi, M.A.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Ali, H.M.; Alayafi, A.A. Azospirillum lipoferum FK1 confers improved salt tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by modulating osmolytes, antioxidant machinery and stress-related genes expression. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 159, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 09 00043 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth curve of Serratia marcescens BM1 in nutrient broth media supplemented with 0, 150, 300, and 450 µM CdCl2 after 0, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation at 29 °C.
Figure 1. Growth curve of Serratia marcescens BM1 in nutrient broth media supplemented with 0, 150, 300, and 450 µM CdCl2 after 0, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation at 29 °C.
Antioxidants 09 00043 g001
Antioxidants 09 00043 g002 550
Figure 2. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) activities in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Figure 2. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) activities in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Antioxidants 09 00043 g002
Antioxidants 09 00043 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression levels of APX, CAT, Fe-SOD, and POD genes in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Figure 3. Expression levels of APX, CAT, Fe-SOD, and POD genes in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Antioxidants 09 00043 g003
Antioxidants 09 00043 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression levels of CHI, CHS, PHD2, VSP, NR and P5CS genes in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Figure 4. Expression levels of CHI, CHS, PHD2, VSP, NR and P5CS genes in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress. Data are means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) above the chart columns indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). T1, control with no Cd and BM1 treatment; T2, plant treated with Serratia marcescens BM1; T3, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2; T4, plant treated with 150 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1; T5, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2; T6, plant treated with 300 µM CdCl2 and Serratia marcescens BM1.
Antioxidants 09 00043 g004
Table
Table 1. Growth and biomass of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
Table 1. Growth and biomass of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
CdCl2 (µM)BM1Root Length (cm)Root Fresh Weight (g Plant−1)Root Dry Weight (g Plant−1)Shoot Length (cm)Shoot Fresh Weight (g Plant−1)Shoot Dry Weight (g Plant−1)Root DW/Shoot DW
0−BM1 (T1)15.6 ± 1.11b1.37 ± 0.07b0.15 ± 0.03b25.2 ± 1.4b1.83 ± 0.15b0.37 ± 0.14b0.41 ± 0.05b
+BM1 (T2)17.3 ± 1.25a1.51 ± 0.08a0.18 ± 0.06a26.9 ± 1.6a1.98 ± 0.12a0.42 ± 0.12a0.43 ± 0.04a
150−BM1 (T3)11.3 ± 1.11d0.98 ± 0.06d0.10 ± 0.05d17.4± 1.3d1.24 ± 0.11d0.25 ± 0.15d0.40 ± 0.05b
+BM1 (T4)12.9 ± 1.21c1.18 ± 0.09c0.12 ± 0.04c20.6 ± 1.5c1.41 ± 0.12c0.29 ± 0.11c0.42 ± 0.03a
300−BM1 (T5)8.2 ± 1.07f0.61 ± 0.08f0.06 ± 0.05f12.4 ± 1.6f0.77 ± 0.15f0.16 ± 0.13f0.37 ± 0.05d
+BM1 (T6)9.6 ± 1.10e0.77 ± 0.06e0.07 ± 0.04e15.8 ± 1.8e0.92 ± 0.12e0.18 ± 0.11e0.39 ± 0.03c
Values represent the means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) next to numbers in the same column indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). DW denotes dry weight.
Table
Table 2. Minerals uptake, photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
Table 2. Minerals uptake, photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
CdCl2 (µM)BM1Cd Content (mg g−1 DW)N Content (mg g−1 DW)P Content (mg g−1 DW)Pn (μmol m2 s−1)E (mmol m2 s−1)gs (mol m2 s−1)
0 −BM1 (T1)0.01 ± 0.01e0.88 ± 0.12b0.40 ± 0.08b17.03 ±1.24b1.84 ± 0.07b0.11 ± 0.03b
+BM1 (T2)0.01 ± 0.01e0.93 ± 0.11a0.44 ± 0.11a18.92 ±1.15a2.03 ± 0.05a0.13 ± 0.02a
150 −BM1 (T3)0.19 ± 0.09c0.72 ± 0.09d0.29 ± 0.09d11.12 ±1.21d1.49 ± 0.04d0.06 ± 0.03d
+BM1 (T4)0.15 ± 0.05d0.81 ± 0.07c0.36 ± 0.10c13.25 ±1.23c1.58 ± 0.07c0.08 ± 0.02c
300 −BM1 (T5)0.2 8± 0.11a0.58 ± 0.08f0.22 ± 0.11e8.91 ± 1.05f1.33 ± 0.07f0.03 ± 0.01f
+BM1 (T6)0.23 ± 0.10b0.65 ± 0.07e0.30 ± 0.12d10.33 ±1.07e1.42 ± 0.08e0.05 ± 0.03e
Values represent the means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) next to numbers in the same column indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).
Table
Table 3. chlorophyll content, leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugars, protein, proline and glycine betaine (GB) contents in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
Table 3. chlorophyll content, leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugars, protein, proline and glycine betaine (GB) contents in leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
CdCl2 (µM)BM1Chlorophyll (mg g−1 FW)RWC (%)Sugars (µg g−1 FW)Proteins
(mg g−1 FW)		Proline
(µg g−1 FW)		GB (µmol g−1 FW)
0 −BM1 (T1)2.02 ± 0.08b91 ± 0.53b2.41 ± 0.14b1.11 ± 0.14b20.5 ± 0.29f2.36 ± 0.04f
+BM1 (T2)2.14 ± 0.07a93 ± 0.48a2.63 ± 0.16a1.23 ± 0.13a35.1 ± 0.24e3.22 ± 0.07e
150 −BM1 (T3)1.59 ± 0.09d55 ± 0.51d2.17 ± 0.14d0.88 ± 0.10d55.2 ± 0.41d4.17 ± 0.06d
+BM1 (T4)1.68 ± 0.08c68 ± 0.46c2.29 ± 0.15c1.05 ± 0.14c77.3 ± 0.40c5.13 ± 0.05c
300 −BM1 (T5)1.41 ± 0.09f42 ± 0.61e1.93 ± 0.17e0.67 ± 0.11f81.7 ± 0.52b6.06 ± 0.07b
+BM1 (T6)1.49 ± 0.07e54 ± 0.45d2.12 ± 0.13d0.79 ± 0.14e97.4 ± 0.55a7.88 ± 0.06a
Values represent the means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) next to numbers in the same column indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). FW denotes the fresh weight of soybean plants.
Table
Table 4. The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, lipid peroxidation (MDA) level, total flavonoid content (mg catechin/g extract), total phenolic content (mg gallic acid/g extract) and antioxidant activity (DPPH and β-carotene-linoleic acid) of leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
Table 4. The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, lipid peroxidation (MDA) level, total flavonoid content (mg catechin/g extract), total phenolic content (mg gallic acid/g extract) and antioxidant activity (DPPH and β-carotene-linoleic acid) of leaves of un-inoculated and inoculated soybean plants with Serratia marcescens BM1 under Cd stress.
CdCl2 (µM)BM1Total FlavonoidsTotal PhenolicsH2O2 (µmol g−1 FW)MDA (µmol g−1 FW)DPPH (IC50, μg mL−1)β-Carotene Linoleic Acid (IC50, μg mL−1)
0 −BM1 (T1)7.21 ± 0.28b17.8 ± 0.24b0.27 ± 0.05d20 ± 1.71e0.53 ± 0.03a0.51 ± 0.05a
+BM1 (T2)9.11 ± 0.30a19.1 ± 0.23a0.18 ± 0.06e16 ± 1.66f0.48 ± 0.05b0.47 ± 0.04b
150 −BM1 (T3)5.05 ± 0.22d13.6 ± 0.22d0.72 ± 0.04b51 ± 2.27b0.46 ± 0.04c0.44 ± 0.05c
+BM1 (T4)5.59 ± 0.27c14.9 ± 0.24c0.61 ± 0.07c42 ± 2.24d0.42 ± 0.03d0.41 ± 0.06d
300 −BM1 (T5)2.9 ± 0.23f10.5 ± 0.31e0.85 ± 0.04a61 ± 2.43a0.38 ± 0.05e0.37 ± 0.05e
+BM1 (T6)4.1 ± 0.26e13.1 ± 0.29d0.60 ± 0.05c47 ± 2.11c0.35 ± 0.04f0.34 ± 0.05f
Values represent the means ± SE (n = 4). Different letters (a–f) next to numbers in the same column indicate significant differences between treatments (p ≤ 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A.; Soliman, M.; Elansary, H.O.; Zaid, A.; Wani, S.H. Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010043

AMA Style

El-Esawi MA, Elkelish A, Soliman M, Elansary HO, Zaid A, Wani SH. Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010043

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Esawi, Mohamed A., Amr Elkelish, Mona Soliman, Hosam O. Elansary, Abbu Zaid, and Shabir H. Wani. 2020. "Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression" Antioxidants 9, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010043

APA Style

El-Esawi, M. A., Elkelish, A., Soliman, M., Elansary, H. O., Zaid, A., & Wani, S. H. (2020). Serratia marcescens BM1 Enhances Cadmium Stress Tolerance and Phytoremediation Potential of Soybean Through Modulation of Osmolytes, Leaf Gas Exchange, Antioxidant Machinery, and Stress-Responsive Genes Expression. Antioxidants, 9(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop