Accumulation of Minerals in Faba Bean Seeds and Straw in Relation to Sowing Density
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Site and Soil Properties
2.2. Weather Conditions in Years of the Experiment
2.3. Chemical Analysis
2.4. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Cultivar and Different Sowing Density on Yield of Seeds and Straw
3.2. Effect of Cultivar and Different Sowing Density on Macroelements Accumulation in Seed and Straw
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abou-Khater, L.; Maalouf, F.; Jighly, A.; Rubiales, D.; Kumar, S. Adaptability and Stability of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Accessions under Diverse Environments and Herbicide Treatments. Plants 2022, 11, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2021. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 10 September 2021).
- Flores, F.; Nadal, S.; Solis, I.; Winkler, J.; Sass, O.; Stoddard, F.L.; Link, W.; Raffiot, B.; Muel, F.; Rubiales, D. Faba bean adaptation to autumn sowing under European climates. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). Food Data Central (Nutrient Database). 2021. Available online: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/ (accessed on 26 January 2021).
- Valente, I.M.; Maia, M.R.G.; Malushi, N.; Oliveira, H.M.; Papa, L.; Rodrigues, J.A.; Fonseca, A.J.M.; Cabrita, A.R.J. Profiling of phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of European varieties and cultivars of Vicia faba L. pods. Phytochemistry 2018, 152, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haciseferogullari, H.; Gezer, I.; Bahtiyarca, Y.; Mengeş, H.O. Determination of some chemical and physical properties of sakis faba bean (Vicia faba L. var. major). J. Food Eng. 2003, 60, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.S.; Mortuza, M. Chemical composition of Kalimatar, a locally grown strain of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2006, 9, 1817–1822. [Google Scholar]
- Duc, G.; Marget, P.; Esnault, R.J.; Guen, L.; Bastianelli, D. Genetic variability for feeding value of faba bean seeds (Vicia faba L.): Comparative chemical composition of isogenics involving zero-tannin and zero-vicine genes. J. Agric. Sci. 1999, 133, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Multari, S.; Stewart, D.; Russell, W.R. Potential of Fava Bean as Future Protein Supply to Partially Replace Meat Intake in the Human Diet. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etemadi, F.; Hashemi, M.; Autio, W.R.; Mangan, F.X.; Zandvakili, O. Yield and accumulation trend of biomass and L-DOPA in different parts of eight faba bean cultivars. Crop. Sci. 2018, 58, 2020–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohseni, M.S.M.; Golshani, B. Simultaneous determination of levodopa and carbidopa from fava bean, green peas and green beans by high performance liquid gas chromatography. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013, 7, 1004–1007. [Google Scholar]
- Adamu, G.O.L.; Ezeokoli, O.T.; Dawodu, A.O.; Adebayo-Oyetoro, A.O.; Ofodile, L.N. Macronutrients and micronutrients profile of some underutilized beans in southwestern Nigeria. Inter. J. Biochem. Res. Rev. 2015, 7, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gepts, P.; Aragão, F.J.; Barros, E.D.; Blair, M.W.; Brondani, R.; Broughton, W.; Galasso, I.; Hernández, G.; Kami, J.; Lariguet, P.; et al. Genomics of Phaseolus beans, a major source of dietary protein and micronutrients in the tropics. In Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models; Moore, P.H., Ming, R., Eds.; Genomics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 1, pp. 113–143. [Google Scholar]
- Rahate, K.A.; Madhumita, M.; Prabhakar, P.K. Nutritional composition, anti-nutritional factors, pre-treatments-cum-processing impact and food formulation potential of faba bean (Vicia faba L.): A comprehensive review. LWT 2020, 138, 14. [Google Scholar]
- Nosworthy, M.G.; Medina, G.; Franczyk, A.J.; Neufeld, J.; Appah, P.; Utioh, A.; Frohlich, P.; House, J.D. Effect of processing on the in vitro and in vivo protein quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris and Vicia faba). Nutrients 2018, 10, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarwar Gilani, G.; Wu, X.C.; Cockell, K.A. Impact of antinutritional factors in food proteins on the digestibility of protein and the bioavailability of amino acids and on protein quality. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Khattab, R.Y.; Arntfield, S.D.; Nyachoti, C.M. Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments, Part 1: Protein quality evaluation. LWT 2009, 42, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Nidhi; Prasad, N.; Sinha, S.K. Nutritional and antinutritional attributes of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) germplasms growing in Bihar, India. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2015, 21, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Khazaei, H.; Vandenberg, A. Seed Mineral Composition and Protein Content of Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.) with Contrasting Tannin Contents. Agrnomy 2020, 10, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jasińska, Z.; Kotecki, A.; Kozak, M. Plonowanie oraz wartość resztek pożniwnych grochu i bobiku. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Rol. We Wrocławiu. Rol. 1996, L28, 183–193. [Google Scholar]
- Jasińska, Z.; Kotecki, A.; Kozak, M. Masa i skład chemiczny resztek pożniwnych wybranych odmian grochu i bobiku. Zesz. Probl. Postępów Nauk. Rol. 1997, 446, 239–246. [Google Scholar]
- Uribelarrea, M.; Moose, S.P.; Below, F.E. Divergent selection for grain protein affects nitrogen use in maize hybrids. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciampitti, I.A.; Vyn, T.J. Grain nitrogen source changes over time in maize: A review. Crop. Sci. 2012, 53, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- May, A.; Filho, A.B.C.; de Queiros Porto, D.R.; Vargas, P.F.; Barbosa, J.C. Acúmulo de macronutrientes por duas cultivares de cebola produzidas em sistema de semeadura direta. Bragantia 2013, 67, 507–51225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McPhee, K.E.; Muehlbauer, F.J. Improving the nutritional value of cool season food legumes. J. Crop. Prod. 2002, 5, 191–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthews, P.; Armstrong, E.; Lisle, C.; Menz, I.; Shephard, P.; Armstrong, B.C. The effect of faba bean plant population on yield, seed quality and plant architecture under irrigation in southern NSW. Australian Society of Agronomy. In Proceedings of the Global Issues, Paddock Action—Proceedings of the 14th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 21–25 September 2008. [Google Scholar]
- ISTA—International Rules For Seed Testing. Seed Science and Technology; ISTA: Wallisellen, Switzerland, 1985; Volume 13, pp. 361–513. [Google Scholar]
- IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; p. 106. [Google Scholar]
- IUNG-PIB. Available online: http://www.iung.pulawy.pl/ (accessed on 13 September 2020).
- Łukasiewicz, S. Propozycja modyfikacji metody wykreślania okresu wilgotnego, ‘humidowego’ w diagramie klimatycznym Gaussena-Waltera (Proposal for modification of the method of plotting the humid period in the Gaussen-Walter climate diagram). Bad. Fizjogr. Pol. Zach. Ser. A Geogr. Fiz. 2006, 57, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
- Polish Standard Committee. Polish Norm PN-R-04013: The Estimation of Dry Matter in Fruits and Vegetables; Polish Standard Committee: Warszawa, Poland, 1988; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Statistica. Data Analysis Software System, Version 12; Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Plies-Balzer, E.; Kong, T.; Schubert, S.; Mengel, K. Effect of water stress on plant growth, nitrogenase activity and nitrogen economy of four different cultivars of Vicia faba L. Eur. J. Agron. 1995, 4, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghamd, S. Chemical Composition of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Genotypes under Various Water Regimes. Pak. J. Nutr. 2009, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Muktadir, M.A.; Adhikari, K.N.; Merchant, A.; Belachew, K.Y.; Vandenberg, A.; Stoddard, F.L.; Khazaei, H. Physiological and biochemical basis of faba bean breeding for drought adaptation-a review. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olle, M.; Tamm, S. The effect of sowing rate and variety on the nutrient content of faba beans. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2021, 71, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neugschwandtner, R.; Ziegler, K.; Kriegner, S.; Wagentristl, H.; Kaul, H.P. Nitrogen yield and nitrogen fixation of winter faba beans. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2015, 65, 7, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ercoli, L.; Lulli, L.; Mariotti, M.; Masoni, A.; Arduini, I. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barłóg, P.; Grzebisz, W.; Łukowiak, R. Faba bean yield and growth dynamics in response to soil potassium availability and sulfur application. Field Crop. Res. 2018, 219, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barłóg, P.; Łukowiak, R. Potassium and elemental sulfur as factors determining nitrogen management indices of soil and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turpin, J.E.; Herridge, D.F.; Robertson, M.J. Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and fababean (Vicia faba). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2002, 53, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allito, B.B.; Ewusi-Mensah, N.; Logah, V. Legume-rhizobium strain specificity enhances nutrition and nitrogen fixation in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, R.D.R.; Will, G.D.; Dawes, L.A.; Gardner, E.A.; Lyons, D.J. Phosphorus as a limiting factor on sustainable greywater irrigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 456–457, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Olle, M. Suitable Sowing Rate for Peas and Beans—A Review. JOJ Hortic. Arboric. 2018, 1, 55555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, I. Magnesium in crop production, food quality and human health. Plant Soil. 2013, 368, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brouwer, W. Die Ackerbohne (Faba bean L.). In Handbuch des Speziellen Pflanzenbaues; Paul Parey: Berlin & Hamburg, Germany, 1976; Volume 2, pp. 717–807. [Google Scholar]
Years | pH in 1 M KCl | P | K | Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 5.9 | 62 | 116 | 87 |
2014 | 5.9 | 108 | 140 | 90 |
2015 | 5.9 | 77 | 176 | 78 |
Specification | Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | ||
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 3.57 a ± 0.22 | 2.51 a ± 1.18 | 4.07 a ± 0.36 | 3.40 a ± 0.95 |
Granit | 3.07 b ± 0.25 | 2.57 a ± 1.22 | 4.01 a ± 0.38 | 3.20 a ± 0.96 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 3.02 b ± 0.31 | 1.91 a ± 0.69 | 3.71 b ± 0.32 | 2.88 b ± 0.89 |
60 | 3.46 a ± 0.23 | 2.30 a ± 1.32 | 4.00 b ± 0.10 | 3.25 b ± 1.04 | |
75 | 3.49 a ± 0.29 | 3.41 a ± 0.97 | 4.42 a ± 0.17 | 3.77 a ± 0.73 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 3.30 b ± 0.12 | 1.86 a ± 0.72 | 3.78 b ± 0.40 | 2.98 ab ± 0.96 |
60 | 3.67 a ± 0.06 | 2.45 a ± 1.64 | 4.05 ab ± 0.05 | 3.39 ab ± 1.12 | |
75 | 3.74 a ± 0.11 | 3.39 a ± 0.58 | 4.39 a ± 0.22 | 3.84 a ± 0.54 | |
Granit | 45 | 2.74 c ± 0.08 | 1.95 a ± 0.77 | 3.64 b ± 0.25 | 2.78 b ± 0.84 |
60 | 3.25 b ± 0.02 | 2.16 a ± 1.16 | 3.94 ab ± 0.10 | 3.11 ab ± 0.98 | |
75 | 3.23 b ± 0.09 | 3.42 a ± 1.36 | 4.45 a ± 0.13 | 3.70 a ± 0.91 | |
Average | 3.32 ± 0.35 | 2.54 ± 1.18 | 4.04 ± 0.36 | 3.30 ± 0.96 |
Specification | Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | ||
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 1.91 a ± 0.21 | 2.24 a ± 0.99 | 3.09 a ± 0.38 | 2.41 a ± 0.79 |
Granit | 1.87 a ± 0.20 | 2.19 a ± 1.06 | 3.04 a ± 0.42 | 2.37 a ± 0.82 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 1.70 b ± 0.10 | 1.65 a ± 0.67 | 2.74 b ± 0.47 | 2.03 b ± 0.69 |
60 | 1.95 a ± 0.13 | 2.10 a ± 1.02 | 3.10 ab ± 0.15 | 2.39 ab ± 0.78 | |
75 | 2.02 a ± 0.20 | 2.91 a ± 0.92 | 3.37 a ± 0.17 | 2.76 a ± 0.78 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 1.74 ab ± 0.13 | 1.71 a ± 0.72 | 2.90 ab ± 0.66 | 2.11 ab ± 0.78 |
60 | 2.04 ab ± 0.11 | 2.12 a ± 1.25 | 3.13 ab ± 0.06 | 2.43 ab ± 0.83 | |
75 | 1.95 abc ± 0.24 | 2.89 a ± 0.73 | 3.25 ab ± 0.13 | 2.70 ab ± 0.70 | |
Granit | 45 | 1.67 a ± 0.05 | 1.59 a ± 0.71 | 2.56 b ± 0.12 | 1.94 b ± 0.60 |
60 | 1.87 abc ± 0.09 | 2.09 a ± 0.96 | 3.07 ab ± 0.21 | 2.34 ab ± 0.75 | |
75 | 2.08 a ± 0.16 | 2.92 a ± 1.21 | 3.49 a ± 0.08 | 2.83 a ± 0.88 | |
Average | 1.89 ± 0.20 | 2.22 ± 1.00 | 3.07 ± 0.39 | 2.39 ± 0.80 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 151 a ± 9.5 | 115 a ± 52.6 | 136 a ± 12.2 | 134 a ± 34.3 |
Granit | 127 b ± 11.5 | 105 a ± 52.8 | 130 b ± 11.8 | 120 b ± 33.1 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 126 b ± 15.3 | 82 b ± 29.7 | 122 c ± 10.9 | 110 b ± 28.1 |
60 | 145 a ± 12.2 | 100 ab ± 59.6 | 132 b ± 5.5 | 126 b ± 39.0 | |
75 | 146 a ± 12.3 | 148 a ± 41.6 | 145 a ± 6.0 | 146 a ± 24.2 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 140 b ± 5.5 | 84 a ± 32.3 | 126 cd ± 13.3 | 116 bc ± 30.9 |
60 | 157 a ± 2.5 | 112 a ± 75.6 | 136 abc ± 2.1 | 135 abc ± 43.8 | |
75 | 157 a ± 4.8 | 148 a ± 25.2 | 147 a ± 7.5 | 151 a ± 14.8 | |
Granit | 45 | 112 c ± 3.3 | 80 a ± 31.7 | 118 d ± 7.9 | 103 c ± 24.7 |
60 | 134 b ± 1.2 | 87 a ± 46.2 | 127 bcd ± 3.4 | 116 bc ± 32.6 | |
75 | 136 b ± 3.9 | 147 a ± 58.5 | 143 ab ± 4.1 | 142 ab ± 31.1 | |
Average | 139 ± 16.0 | 110 ± 51.8 | 133 ± 12.3 | 127 ± 34.1 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 15.2 a ± 1.61 | 24.0 a ± 10.7 | 14.7 a ± 1.8 | 18.0 a ± 7.52 |
Granit | 13.7 b ± 1.38 | 25.4 a ± 12.1 | 15.8 a ± 2.1 | 18.3 a ± 8.64 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 13.4 b ± 0.88 | 18.3 b ± 7.4 | 13.9 b ± 2.1 | 15.2 b ± 4.84 |
60 | 14.4 ab ± 1.74 | 23.4 ab ± 11.4 | 15.1 ab ± 0.7 | 17.6 ab ± 7.62 | |
75 | 15.6 a ± 1.53 | 32.4 a ± 10.6 | 16.8 a ± 1.8 | 21.6 a ± 9.83 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 13.8 ab ± 1.08 | 17.7 a ± 7.5 | 13.7 b ± 3. | 15.1 a ± 4.71 |
60 | 15.9 a ± 0.86 | 23.3 a ± 13.6 | 15.3 ab ± 0.3 | 18.2 a ± 8.08 | |
75 | 15.8 a ± 1.97 | 31.0 a ± 7.8 | 15.2 b ± 0.6 | 20.7 a ± 8.69 | |
Granit | 45 | 13.0 b ± 0.38 | 18.9 a ± 8.5 | 14.0 b ± 0.6 | 15.3 a ± 5.19 |
60 | 12.9 b ± 0.66 | 23.5 a ± 10.8 | 14.9 b ± 1.0 | 17.1 a ± 7.45 | |
75 | 15.3 ab ± 1.20 | 33.8 a ± 14.0 | 18.4 a ± 0.4 | 22.5 a ± 11.17 | |
Average | 14.5 ± 1.64 | 24.7 ± 11.2 | 15.3 ± 1.99 | 18.1 ± 8.05 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 17.3 a ± 2.10 | 11.9 a ± 5.50 | 11.8 a ± 1.05 | 13.7 a ± 4.26 |
Granit | 16.0 b ± 1.53 | 11.6 a ± 5.51 | 11.6 a ± 0.88 | 13.0 a ± 3.86 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 14.9 c ± 0.93 | 8.9 b ± 3.22 | 10.9 b ± 0.91 | 11.5 b ± 3.18 |
60 | 17.0 b ± 0.9 | 10.8 ab ± 6.22 | 11.5 b ± 0.27 | 13.1 b ± 4.47 | |
75 | 18.1 a ± 2.14 | 15.6 a ± 4.39 | 12.7 a ± 0.49 | 15.4 a ± 3.4 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 15.6 c ± 0.59 | 8.6 a ± 3.31 | 11.0 b ± 1.18 | 11.7 b ± 2.09 |
60 | 16.4 c ± 0.26 | 11.5 a ± 7.71 | 11.6 abc ± 0.12 | 13.2 ab ± 1.53 | |
75 | 20.1 a ± 0.61 | 15.6 a ± 2.64 | 12.8 a ± 0.62 | 16.2 a ± 5.50 | |
Granit | 45 | 14.1 d ± 0.41 | 9.2 a ± 3.62 | 10.8 b ± 0.72 | 11.4 b ± 5.51 |
60 | 17.6 b ± 0.12 | 10.1 a ± 5.43 | 11.3 ab ± 0.29 | 13.0 ab ± 1.05 | |
75 | 16.2 c ± 0.43 | 15.5 a ± 6.15 | 12.6 ab ± 0.38 | 14.7 ab ± 0.89 | |
Average | 16.7 ± 1.93 | 11.8 ± 5.39 | 11.7 ± 0.96 | 13.4 ± 4.05 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 2.35 a ± 0.31 | 3.12 a ± 1.42 | 1.24 a ± 0.16 | 2.24 a ± 1.13 |
Granit | 2.31 a ± 0.13 | 3.07 a ± 1.43 | 1.25 a ± 0.20 | 2.21 a ± 1.11 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 2.15 b ± 0.15 | 2.32 b ± 0.94 | 1.15 b ± 0.19 | 1.87 b ± 0.75 |
60 | 2.47 a ± 0.21 | 2.89 ab ± 1.42 | 1.17 b ± 0.05 | 2.18 ab ± 1.09 | |
75 | 2.36 ab ± 0.23 | 4.07 a ± 1.29 | 1.42 a ± 0.11 | 2.62 a ± 1.33 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 2.07 b ± 0.16 | 2.25 a ± 0.95 | 1.20 b ± 0.28 | 1.84 a ± 0.31 |
60 | 2.63 a ± 0.14 | 2.98 a ± 1.74 | 1.33 b ± 0.02 | 2.27 a ± 0.13 | |
75 | 2.36 ab ± 0.29 | 4.13 a ± 1.04 | 1.09 ab ± 0.06 | 2.60 a ± 1.42 | |
Granit | 45 | 2.24 b ± 0.07 | 2.39 a ± 1.07 | 1.15 b ± 0.05 | 1.90 a ± 1.43 |
60 | 2.32 ab ± 0.12 | 2.80 a ± 1.28 | 1.51 b ± 0.08 | 2.09 a ± 0.16 | |
75 | 2.37 ab ± 0.18 | 4.02 a ± 1.67 | 1.20 a ± 0.04 | 2.64 a ± 0.20 | |
Average | 2.33 ± 0.23 | 3.10 ± 1.40 | 1.25 ± 0.18 | 2.22 ± 1.11 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 35.4 a ± 2.4 | 23.9 a ± 11.0 | 36.7 a ± 3.2 | 32.0 a ± 8.8 |
Granit | 31.2 b ± 2.3 | 23.5 a ± 11.2 | 36.3 a ± 3.2 | 30.3 a ± 8.5 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 30.5 c ± 2.8 | 18.2 b ± 6.7 | 33.4 c ± 2.9 | 27.4 b ± 8.0 |
60 | 33.8 b ± 1.5 | 21.4 ab ± 12.3 | 36.5 b ± 0.7 | 30.6 b ± 9.6 | |
75 | 35.5 a ± 2.9 | 31.6 a ± 8.9 | 39.6 a ± 1.5 | 35.6 a ± 6.2 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 33.0 c ± 1.2 | 17.3 a ± 6.7 | 34.2 b ± 3.7 | 28.2 bc ± 9.0 |
60 | 35.2 b ± 0.5 | 22.8 a ± 15.3 | 36.3 ab ± 0.5 | 31.4 abc ± 10.2 | |
75 | 38.1 a ± 1.2 | 31.6 a ± 5.3 | 39.7 a ± 2.0 | 36.5 a ± 4.8 | |
Granit | 45 | 28.1 d ± 0.9 | 19.0 a ± 7.5 | 32.7 b ± 2.2 | 26.6 c ± 7.2 |
60 | 32.5 c ± 0.2 | 20.1 a ± 10.8 | 36.7 ab ± 1.0 | 29.7 abc ± 9.3 | |
75 | 32.9 c ± 0.9 | 31.6 a ± 12.5 | 39.5 a ± 1.2 | 34.6 ab ± 7.5 | |
Average | 33.3 ± 3.2 | 23.7 ± 10.9 | 36.5 ± 3.2 | 31.2 ± 8.0 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 29.6 a ± 3.6 | 32.7 a ± 14.2 | 59.5 a ± 7.6 | 40.6 a ± 16.5 |
Granit | 28.3 a ± 3.4 | 29.0 a ± 14.5 | 60.0 a ± 7.5 | 39.1 a ± 17.7 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 25.4 b ± 1.5 | 22.9 b ± 9.8 | 53.4 b ± 8.6 | 33.9 b ± 15.9 |
60 | 29.9 a ± 2.3 | 28.6 ab ± 14.0 | 60.1 ab ± 2.8 | 39.5 b ± 16.9 | |
75 | 31.5 a ± 3.0 | 41.1 a ± 12.9 | 65.7 a ± 3.1 | 46.1 a ± 16.5 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 26.0 b ± 2.0 | 26.0 a ± 11.0 | 55.3 ab ± 12.6 | 35.7 bc ± 16.9 |
60 | 31.6 a ± 1.7 | 29.5 a ± 17.2 | 59.7 ab ± 1.1 | 40.2 abc ± 17.0 | |
75 | 31.2 a ± 3.9 | 42.8 a ± 10.7 | 63.5 ab ± 2.6 | 45.8 ab ± 15.3 | |
Granit | 45 | 24.8 b ± 0.7 | 19.8 a ± 8.9 | 51.5 b ± 2.4 | 32.0 c ± 15.3 |
60 | 28.2 ab ± 1.4 | 27.8 a ± 12.8 | 60.6 ab ± 4.2 | 38.9 abc ± 17.5 | |
75 | 31.9 a ± 2.5 | 39.5 a ± 16.4 | 67.9 a ± 1.6 | 46.4 a ± 18.4 | |
Average | 29.0 ± 3.5 | 30.9 ± 14.2 | 59.8 ± 7.4 | 39.8 ± 17.0 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 3.95 a ± 0.37 | 1.75 a ± 0.80 | 4.69 a ± 0.58 | 3.46 a ± 1.40 |
Granit | 2.95 b ± 0.27 | 1.67 a ± 0.73 | 4.83 a ± 0.48 | 3.15 b ± 1.41 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 3.09 c ± 0.41 | 1.39 a ± 0.52 | 4.15 c ± 0.37 | 2.88 b ± 1.23 |
60 | 3.75 b ± 0.47 | 1.52 a ± 0.88 | 4.90 b ± 0.09 | 3.39 a ± 1.53 | |
75 | 3.52 a ± 0.73 | 2.21 a ± 0.61 | 5.23 a ± 0.21 | 3.65 a ± 1.38 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 3.47 b ± 0.13 | 1.29 a ± 0.50 | 4.01 a ± 0.43 | 2.92 cd ± 1.28 |
60 | 4.19 a ± 0.07 | 1.62 a ± 1.08 | 4.90 a ± 0.06 | 3.57 ab ± 1.58 | |
75 | 4.20 a ± 0.12 | 2.33 a ± 0.39 | 5.16 b ± 0.26 | 3.90 a ± 1.25 | |
Granit | 45 | 2.72 c ± 0.08 | 1.50 a ± 0.59 | 4.28 b ± 0.29 | 2.83 d ± 1.24 |
60 | 3.31 b ± 0.02 | 1.43 a ± 0.77 | 4.90 b ± 0.13 | 3.21 cd ± 1.54 | |
75 | 2.84 c ± 0.08 | 2.09 a ± 0.82 | 5.30 b ± 0.15 | 3.41 abc ± 1.50 | |
Average | 3.45 ± 0.60 | 1.71 ± 0.75 | 4.76 ± 0.52 | 3.31 ± 1.40 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 12.7 a ± 1.37 | 9.1 a ± 3.99 | 30.2 b ± 3.74 | 17.3 a ± 9.86 |
Granit | 11.1 b ± 1.04 | 8.5 a ± 4.18 | 33.0 a ± 4.24 | 17.5 a ± 11.64 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 11.5 a ± 0.63 | 6.4 b ± 2.63 | 28.3 b ± 4.37 | 15.4 c ± 9.96 |
60 | 11.7 a ± 1.98 | 8.6 ab ± 4.23 | 32.0 ab ± 2.58 | 17.4 b ± 11.03 | |
75 | 12.4 a ± 1.40 | 11.5 a ± 3.63 | 34.4 a ± 3.04 | 19.4 a ± 11.18 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 11.5 ab ± 0.90 | 6.9 a ± 2.91 | 28.6 b ± 6.52 | 15.7 bc ± 10.47 |
60 | 13.5 a ± 0.74 | 9.0 a ± 5.23 | 30.1 b ± 0.55 | 17.5 abc ± 9.90 | |
75 | 13.0 a ± 1.64 | 11.5 a ± 2.68 | 31.8 ab ± 1.32 | 18.8 ab ± 9.81 | |
Granit | 45 | 11.5 ab ± 0.31 | 5.9 a ± 2.66 | 27.9 b ± 1.28 | 15.1 bc ± 9.88 |
60 | 9.9 b ± 0.48 | 8.2 a ± 3.75 | 34.0 ab ± 2.31 | 17.4 abc ± 12.50 | |
75 | 11.8 ab ± 0.95 | 11.4 a ± 4.74 | 37.1 a ± 0.92 | 20.1 a ± 12.81 | |
Average | 11.9 ± 1.44 | 8.8 ± 4.01 | 31.6 ± 4.17 | 17.4 ± 10.71 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 3.52 a ± 0.17 | 2.60 a ± 1.19 | 5.35 a ± 0.43 | 3.82 a ± 1.36 |
Granit | 2.86 b ± 0.20 | 2.38 a ± 1.08 | 5.09 b ± 0.42 | 3.44 b ± 1.37 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 2.96 b ± 0.40 | 1.97 a ± 0.72 | 4.83 b ± 0.46 | 3.25 b ± 1.32 |
60 | 3.27 a ± 0.36 | 2.26 a ± 1.34 | 5.23 a ± 0.14 | 3.59 b ± 1.48 | |
75 | 3.33 a ± 0.32 | 3.23 a ± 0.90 | 5.60 a ± 0.24 | 4.05 a ± 1.24 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 3.33 b ± 0.12 | 1.90 a ± 0.73 | 5.03 bc ± 0.54 | 3.42 b ± 1.42 |
60 | 3.61 a ± 0.06 | 2.51 a ± 1.68 | 5.32 ab ± 0.07 | 3.82 ab ± 1.49 | |
75 | 3.62 a ± 0.11 | 3.39 a ± 0.58 | 5.70 a ± 0.28 | 4.23 a ± 1.14 | |
Granit | 45 | 2.60 d ± 0.08 | 2.05 a ± 0.81 | 4.63 c ± 0.31 | 3.09 b ± 1.25 |
60 | 2.94 c ± 0.02 | 2.01 a ± 1.08 | 5.14 abc ± 0.14 | 3.36 b ± 1.49 | |
75 | 3.04 c ± 0.08 | 3.07 a ± 1.21 | 5.50 ab ± 0.16 | 3.87 ab ± 1.36 | |
Average | 3.19 ± 0.38 | 2.49 ± 1.12 | 5.22 ± 0.44 | 3.63 ± 1.37 |
Specification | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2013–2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for factors | |||||
Cultivars | Bobas | 2.58 a ± 0.29 | 5.33 a ± 2.26 | 4.66 a ± 0.58 | 4.19a ± 1.77 |
Granit | 2.04 b ± 0.20 | 4.84 a ± 2.10 | 4.56 a ± 0.68 | 3.82 b ± 1.78 | |
Sowing density | 45 | 2.16 b ± 0.23 | 4.09 a ± 1.67 | 4.07 b ± 0.75 | 3.44 b ± 1.37 |
60 | 2.36 ab ± 0.52 | 4.92 a ± 2.41 | 4.67 a ± 0.22 | 3.98 ab ± 1.80 | |
75 | 2.41 a ± 0.29 | 6.24 a ± 1.98 | 5.09 a ± 0.26 | 4.58 a ± 1.98 | |
Average for interaction | |||||
Bobas | 45 | 2.35 bc ± 0.18 | 4.30 a ± 1.82 | 4.39 ab ± 1.00 | 3.68 a ± 1.47 |
60 | 2.83 a ± 0.16 | 5.00 a ± 2.93 | 4.69 ab ± 0.09 | 4.17 a ± 1.83 | |
75 | 2.56 ab ± 0.32 | 6.68 a ± 1.68 | 4.89 a ± 0.20 | 4.71 a ± 1.98 | |
Granit | 45 | 1.98 cd ± 0.06 | 3.89 a ± 1.75 | 3.76 b ± 0.17 | 3.21 a ± 1.29 |
60 | 1.89 d ± 0.09 | 4.83 a ± 2.22 | 4.65 ab ± 0.32 | 3.79 a ± 1.83 | |
75 | 2.26 bcd ± 0.18 | 5.81 a ± 2.41 | 5.28 a ± 0.13 | 4.45 a ± 2.06 | |
Average | 2.31 ± 0.37 | 5.09 ± 2.15 | 4.61 ± 0.62 | 4.01 ± 1.78 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Serafin-Andrzejewska, M.; Jama-Rodzeńska, A.; Helios, W.; Kotecki, A.; Kozak, M.; Białkowska, M.; Bárta, J.; Bártová, V. Accumulation of Minerals in Faba Bean Seeds and Straw in Relation to Sowing Density. Agriculture 2023, 13, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010147
Serafin-Andrzejewska M, Jama-Rodzeńska A, Helios W, Kotecki A, Kozak M, Białkowska M, Bárta J, Bártová V. Accumulation of Minerals in Faba Bean Seeds and Straw in Relation to Sowing Density. Agriculture. 2023; 13(1):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010147
Chicago/Turabian StyleSerafin-Andrzejewska, Magdalena, Anna Jama-Rodzeńska, Waldemar Helios, Andrzej Kotecki, Marcin Kozak, Monika Białkowska, Jan Bárta, and Veronika Bártová. 2023. "Accumulation of Minerals in Faba Bean Seeds and Straw in Relation to Sowing Density" Agriculture 13, no. 1: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010147
APA StyleSerafin-Andrzejewska, M., Jama-Rodzeńska, A., Helios, W., Kotecki, A., Kozak, M., Białkowska, M., Bárta, J., & Bártová, V. (2023). Accumulation of Minerals in Faba Bean Seeds and Straw in Relation to Sowing Density. Agriculture, 13(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13010147