Next Article in Journal
Research on Cutting Angle Design Optimization of Rubber Cutter Based on Discrete Element Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Livelihood Resilience of Rural Residents under the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Ethnic Areas of Western Sichuan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Optimizing the Performance of Green Forage Maize Harvester Header Using a Combined Response Surface Methodology–Artificial Neural Network Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Organic Pork Help Achieve Sustainable Development Goals in Thailand?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review

by
Eduard Alexandru Dumitru
1,
Rozi Liliana Berevoianu
1,
Valentina Constanta Tudor
2,
Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu
2,
Dalila Stoica
1,
Andreea Giucă
1,
Diana Ilie
1 and
Cristina Maria Sterie
1,*
1
Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 010961 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculty of Management and Rural Development, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 010961 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 1891; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 27 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Rural Development and Agri-Food Systems)

Abstract

:
Agriculture is a fundamental aspect of our society, providing food and resources for a growing population. However, climate change is putting this sector at risk through rising temperatures, changing rainfall patterns and an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. Our study highlights the need to address climate change in a differentiated way, taking into account the specificities of each agricultural sector, and therefore aims not only to organise and summarise current research but also to fill an important gap in the existing literature by focusing on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops. The topic was researched using the Web of Science and Scopus databases, where 219 publications were thoroughly reviewed and only those that fully addressed the impact of climate change on vegetable crops were selected. Of the 219 publications reviewed, only 53 focused exclusively on the effects of climate change on vegetable crops, indicating the need for more specialised research in this area, especially given the complex challenges that climate change poses not only in terms of yield but also non-trivial quality and food safety, and can be considered a future research prospect.

1. Introduction

Climate change is a pressing issue of the 21st century with several implications for both human life and the environment. Agriculture is one of the areas most affected by climate change, and it is a crucial sector for the global economy and food security. Vegetable crops, which play a crucial role in the global food system, can be deeply affected by climate fluctuations [1].
Increasing temperatures are likely to decrease the quantity of desirable crops, whilst fostering the growth of weeds and pests [2]. Alterations in rainfall cycles will increase the probability of short-term crop losses and long-term yield damage [3].
Furthermore, climate change may affect migration patterns, as people may move as a way of adapting to weather-related risks, particularly those affecting agriculture [4]. Subsistence or smallholder farmers in developing countries are among the groups most affected by climate change [5]. The vulnerability of these regions to climate change arises due to their predominantly tropical location, coupled with multiple socio-economic, demographic and political constraints that hinder their capacity to adapt to these changes [6].
Climate change has recently transformed the weed flora of agricultural ecosystems in Europe to a great extent. Thermophilic weeds, late-emerging weeds and certain opportunistic weeds have become more prevalent in certain cropping systems, for example [7]. The composition of weed species is influenced by environmental factors such as temperature and precipitation [8].
Most farmers in Europe are experiencing the impacts of climate change, and these impacts are expected to worsen in the coming decades. The resulting impacts will intensify regional disparities and exacerbate existing climate vulnerabilities. Although limitations on water usage for irrigation and the use of agrochemicals are still in their early stages, they are viewed as more positive from a production standpoint and less positive from an environmental standpoint [9].
Furthermore, climate change is expected to result in physical and economic repercussions in Europe. Specifically, these will fall into four categories of market impacts, namely agriculture, river flooding, coastal areas and tourism, as well as one non-market impact, human health. It appears that climate change will affect the southern regions of Europe, the British Isles and North Central Europe the most [10]. In contrast, Northern Europe is the only region that has net economic benefits, mainly due to the positive effects on agriculture [11].
Vegetable crops are crucial for human nutrition as they provide essential nutrients and are a fundamental constituent of the daily diet [12,13]. Nonetheless, these crops are exceedingly sensitive to climate change, particularly to increasing temperatures, which can directly impact their yield [14]. To address the challenges of climate change, it is crucial to develop vegetable varieties that are heat-resistant [12,15].
Climate change is significantly impacting the global vegetable sector, and Europe is not an exception. A study by Reidsma et al. (2015) [16] emphasized the need for integrated assessments and analysis of farming systems, considering adaptation at different levels, as a basis for assessing the impacts of climate change on agriculture. Despite crop modelling indicating positive impacts of climate change on major crop yields in 2050 [17], a semi-quantitative and participatory approach evaluating the effects of extreme events demonstrates the presence of several climate risks [6]. Several adaptation measures are available to mitigate potential negative impacts on crops. Moreover, farmers at the farm level can modify their cropping patterns and adjust their inputs and outputs [18].
In their 2016 study, Harrison et al. [19] pointed out that climate change impact assessments that focus only on isolated sectors such as agriculture, forestry and water management, without considering how they interact, tend to give a distorted picture of the real effects. This is especially significant for the vegetable sector as it is closely connected to other sectors through changes in demand, land matching and the competition for resources.
As climate change continues to evolve, it is of utmost importance to understand how it could affect various types of vegetable crops. For instance, some vegetables may exhibit higher resilience to specific climatic conditions than others. Differences of this nature could have considerable implications for climate change adaptation strategies [20]. Furthermore, alterations in precipitation and temperature can impact the lifecycle of pests and illnesses, which may have an additional impact on the yield and the quality of vegetable crops [21].
Moreover, certain studies imply that implementing heat-resistant strains of Trichoderma could serve as a sustainable solution to tackle climate change in vegetable farming [22]. This emphasises the significance of investigating climate change adaptation in agriculture and the urge to create new strategies to safeguard vegetable crops (Figure 1).
Vegetable crops such as tomatoes, potatoes, onions and cabbage play a vital role in providing food and supporting local economies. Thus, understanding their sensitivity to climatic variations is crucial in devising strategies to safeguard and adapt them against future environmental challenges [27]. High temperatures and drought can cause heat stress in plants, which has a direct impact on their health and growth [28].
The aim of this study is not only to organise and summarise current research but also to fill an important gap in the existing literature by focusing on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops. It places particular emphasis on identifying effective methods of disease and pest control, strategies for soil conservation and water management and discovering technologies and innovations for sustainable horticulture. Our study highlights the need to address climate change in a differentiated way, taking into account the specificities of each agricultural sector. This is crucial because climate change affects agricultural sectors differently, whether cereals, vegetables or fruit, and each requires specific adaptation and mitigation strategies, thus contributing to a more nuanced understanding of how the vegetable sector will be affected.

2. Materials and Methods

To conduct the study, we carried out a systematic review of papers exploring the impact of climate change on vegetable crops. This review aimed to identify how researchers have approached this topic. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting checklist [29,30].
To achieve the study’s aim, a comprehensive search was conducted on 219 scientific articles in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, out of a total of 107,799 scientific publications on the general topic of “climate change impacts” from 1990 to 2023. The search focused on the effects of climate change on vegetable crops and imposed no restrictions on date or language. Despite a large body of research examining the impacts of climate change on agriculture as a whole, there is a notable gap in the scientific literature when it comes to the impacts on vegetable crops. Many of the existing studies tend to generalise the effects of climate change on the agricultural sector, without looking at the specifics of particular crop types. This generalisation can be problematic because vegetable crops may be more sensitive to changes in temperature, precipitation and other climatic factors than other crops [31]. This increased sensitivity not only raises questions about the long-term viability of these crops but also has serious implications for food security and public health. It is therefore imperative to have a more detailed and focused understanding of how climate change specifically affects vegetable crops in order to formulate effective adaptation and mitigation strategies. Consequently, the title, abstract, keywords, journal name, and year of publication were exported in a spreadsheet [30].
The subsequent action was to assign the spreadsheet to two assessors, whose task was to analyse the downloaded titles and abstracts independently, check their eligibility concerning the subject under review and reject those that did not meet the criteria [29]. A total of 89 records not specifically related to the impact of climate change on vegetable crops have been removed and we only retained articles that exclusively deal with vegetable-related issues for the literature review (Figure 2).
The papers were reviewed completely and independently in the same manner. Note that any disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus. If the reviewers could not reach a consensus, a third independent reviewer would have been consulted to review the articles in question.

3. Results

Analysing the number of empirical research publications on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops, a substantial increase can be observed since 2015 (Figure 2). This upward trend likely reflects a growing awareness of the effects of climate change on agriculture, as well as the recognition of the importance of this topic in policies at European and global levels. The increase in the number of publications in this field indicates an increased focus of research efforts on the impacts of climate change on vegetable crops, peaking in 2022 (Figure 3).
In terms of the geographical context of empirical research on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops, it can be seen that most of the research comes from highly industrialised countries with rapidly growing populations, such as the USA, India, China, England and Germany. This suggests that climate change and food security are major issues in these countries, likely due to the combined pressures of industrialisation, population growth and the need to ensure food security. In addition, these countries have the resources and capacity to conduct extensive research on this topic (Figure 4).
The distribution of empirical research publications in the field of climate change on vegetable crops shows that this field is interdisciplinary, involving several scientific disciplines. The majority of studies (31.1%) are in the field of environmental sciences, which underlines the importance of understanding the ecological context in which climate change takes place. At the same time, a significant proportion of the studies (15.1%) are in the field of agronomy, indicating a focus on the impact of climate change on agricultural practices and technologies. In addition, 11.9% of the studies are in plant sciences, suggesting a focus on the effects of climate change on plant physiology and biology (Figure 5).
Using VosViewer version 1.6.19 software, maps were generated with the keywords used in the research, mentioned at least 5 times, and grouped into clusters. It shows the words related to our topic, grouped into clusters based on semantic similarities between words, the size of the nodes representing the frequency of keywords and the length and thickness of the lines between words showing the degree of association between them [32].
The first cluster (red) named, “yield”, includes tomato, nitrogen, vegetable, carbon dioxide, growth, drought, maize, plants, quality, heat stress, salinity, high-temperature, drought stress, elevated co2 and air co2 enrichment. The keywords contained in this cluster present two research directions, namely, the increased interest in plants and vegetables and the effects of climate and stress on them.
Cluster two (green), called “agriculture”, includes consumption, productivity, management, use efficiency, diversity, farmers, impact, land use, climate, stress and food security. These words indicate researchers’ concerns about the effects of climate change on agriculture in general, consumption and food security.
Cluster three (blue), called “irrigation”, includes food, wheat, greenhouse gas emission, model, system, performance, sustainability, environmental impact and life cycle assessment. Thus, it can be said that irrigation is a complex topic covering efficiency, environmental and life cycle issues.
Cluster four (yellow), called “climate change”, includes temperature, adaptation, variability, rice, trends, precipitation, soil and responses, and cluster five, (purple) called “impacts”, includes crops, global warming, systems, water and vulnerability (Figure 6). It should be noted that the keywords appearing in Figure 6 that are not related to vegetable production are determined by the studies analysed that take a broader approach to the agricultural sector as a whole, which were subsequently eliminated in the aggregation process.
The following are the keywords that researchers used in 2016–2020: Wheat, soil, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, elevated co2, responses and photosynthesis. In 2018 and 2019, researchers focused on adaptation, climate change, yield, temperature, food security, plants, productivity, agriculture, management, use efficiency, vulnerability, impact, irrigation, performance, sustainability, life cycle assessment, crop, vegetable and salinity. Later, in 2020, researchers were concerned about topics such as stress, climate change, crop yield, precipitation, land use, farmers, heat stress, tomato, food, model and system (Figure 6). It is worth noting that since 2020, keywords such as ‘stress’, ‘farmers’, ‘heat stress’ and ‘food’ have become more prevalent, which may be due to the COVID-19 pandemic putting additional stress on agricultural systems, farmers and food security (food), which has increased researchers’ attention on these issues (Figure 7).
Out of a total of 219 publications analysed, 89 were excluded because, although they dealt with the effects of climate change, they did not focus specifically on the topic of “vegetables”. This resulted in 130 articles meeting the established criteria. Of these 130 articles, 77 included vegetables in their discussion of climate change but did not focus exclusively on this topic. In this category, the majority of articles (53) were of the “Article” type, followed by “Review” (11), “Proceedings Paper” (8), “Article; Book Chapter” (4) and “Article; Data Paper” (1) (Table 1).
In contrast, 53 articles dealt exclusively with the effects of climate change on vegetable crops. In this category, the majority of articles were of the “Article” type (27), followed by “Review” (14), “Proceedings Paper” (9), “Article; Book Chapter” (2) and “Article; Proceedings Paper” (1). In terms of the distribution over time, a significant increase in the number of publications can be observed over the period of 2018–2023, both for articles that include vegetables in their discussion of climate change and those that focus exclusively on this topic (Table 1).
The next step was to collect and analyse publications that exclusively address the effects of climate change on vegetable crops (n = 53) and to rank them in descending order of citations, being ranked in descending order of citations, while also being considered a ranking criterion according to their importance, highlighting objectives, methods and results in the simplest possible way (Table 2).
Based on the synthesis shown in Table 1, taking into account the results identified, four topics were determined according to how the effects of climate change on productivity are addressed (Figure 8).

3.1. Impact of Climate Change on Productivity

Recent studies indicate that climate change is significantly impacting vegetable productivity. The effect of climate change on vegetable microbiological safety was highlighted by Jung, Jang and Matthews (2014) [33], who reported that it increases the ability of pathogens to persist in soil, water and crops, thus posing risks to human health. Meanwhile, Shrestha and Nepal (2016) [40] found evidence of climate change negatively impacting farming communities in Makwanpur district, Nepal, putting their food security at risk. Heat stress and droughts are expected to render many areas that currently have optimal climates unsuitable for open-field tomato cultivation in the future [42]. Based on historical climate data, they estimated the temperature and precipitation response of vegetables, with positive results for fruiting vegetables but decreased yield stability of vegetables (root vegetables) [45].
Jasper, Wagstaff and Bell (2020) [2] reported that glucosinolate biosynthesis and the formation of hydrolysis products after harvest are significantly affected by growth temperatures. Specifically, a high growth temperature (40 °C) was found to significantly reduce the germination, growth, regeneration and survival of arugula plants. Bisbis, Gruda and Blanke (2019) [47] determined that global warming will have consequences for physiological processes, such as vernalization and winter chilling, of vegetables, which are highly temperature-dependent, indicating the impact of climate change on horticultural crops.

3.2. Pest and Disease Control Methods and Techniques

Various methods and techniques can be used to control diseases and pests in vegetable production, particularly given the challenges posed by climate change. In a study by Tasca, Nessi and Rigamonti (2017) [34], the environmental impacts of two endive supply chains, one organic and the other integrated, were compared. The results showed that neither cultivation technique displayed a clearly superior environmental profile. This emphasises the necessity of enhancing organic farming techniques, particularly with respect to fertilisation practices.
Arbuscular mycorrhizae can be used as a method of disease and pest control by improving plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, as proposed by Malhi and colleagues in 2021 [38]. Litskas and colleagues (2019) [36] simulated the impact of climate change on tomato production and related pests, indicating that in several parts of the world, future environmental conditions might become unsuitable for tomato cultivation.
The effectiveness, specificity, longevity and public acceptance of biological control against soil-borne pathogens like Fusarium oxysporum and Pythium species, which have significant negative impacts on tomato yield and growth, have caused an increase in attention to this method. Additionally, Temmen et al.’s (2022) [66] study evaluated the feasibility of ocean drift as a means of introducing South American sweet potato seed pods to the Pacific Islands, revealing the potential of this method for colonizing new regions.
Grafting, a technique discovered and implemented in the early 20th century, has been mainly used in high-value crops such as solanaceous and cucurbitaceous to mitigate soil diseases and extend early or late yields through rootstock-mediated vigour. According to Perez-Alfocea (2021) [48], the potential for the use of grafting in vegetables worldwide is still vast. However, further development will depend on its ability to address major societal challenges, including ensuring food production for the growing population, combatting malnutrition, conserving natural resources and mitigating and adapting to climate change.

3.3. Soil Conservation and Water Resource Management

Effective soil conservation and water resource management play a crucial role in sustaining agricultural productivity, particularly in the face of climate change. Al-liaume et al. (2014) [35] analysed the impact of varied soil, crop residue and organic matter management techniques on runoff, soil erosion, water dynamics and productivity in a system of tomato–oat rotation on raised beds. Their findings showed that practices like reduced tillage, the use of mulched cover crops and chicken manure incorporation significantly lowered soil erosion and runoff by over 50% compared to the three traditional tillage systems. Nevertheless, conventional tillage with chicken manure integration produced the highest yield, exceeding the reduced tillage by over 50%.
Furthermore, the implementation of contemporary technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT) can enhance the management of water resources in greenhouse horticulture. According to Carrasquilla-Batista et al. (2016) [78], IoT resources were investigated to enhance the precision of drainage measurements in greenhouse horticulture. The researchers integrated IoT capabilities into a greenhouse, thereby providing a platform for timely decision-making by researchers concerning irrigation, moisture and nutrient requirements.

3.4. Technologies and Innovations for Sustainable Horticulture

The role of technologies and innovations is paramount in promoting sustainable horticulture amidst climate change. Malhotra (2017) [17] highlights the necessity of a climate-adapted intervention in horticulture, which incorporates location-specific and intensive knowledge to enhance production under challenging conditions.
Using a crop simulation model, Cammarano et al. (2020) [41] evaluated the effect of climate change on water and nitrogen use efficiency in processing tomato crops cultivated in Italy. Their findings suggest that as a result of projected increases in air temperature and precipitation fluctuations, the phenology of tomatoes was reduced by 1.5 to 3 days, ultimately causing an overall 15% decline in tomato yield. In a related study, Min et al. (2016) [43] estimated the global warming potential in an intensive vegetable cropping system that was influenced by crop rotation and the nitrogen rate. Their research indicated that global warming potential can be reduced while maintaining agricultural economic benefits by optimising vegetable crop rotation through the inclusion of legumes and adjusting nitrogen application rates.
Nevertheless, contemporary technologies such as deep learning and the Internet of Things (IoT) can be employed to enhance sustainable horticulture. Tarek et al. (2022) [44] assessed several pre-trained deep learning models to detect tomato diseases and noted that both MobileNetV3 Small and Large models achieved over 98% accuracy. Furthermore, Ahmad et al. (2019) [46] investigated the impact of supplementary potassium on the antioxidant defence system and physiological processes that could affect cabbage cultivation in saline conditions.
Perez-Alfocea (2015) [50] concludes that agrarian productivity should increase by 60% to sustain the estimated 9.6 billion population in 2050. This target can only be accomplished via socio-environmental sustainability of natural resources. The text suggests that the primary objective of vegetable grafting investigation should be to ascertain a firm comprehension of the physiological and genetic foundation of rootstock–graft interactions and the agronomic performance of the rootstock-mediated traits.
Regarding the geographical context of the research, most studies originate from highly industrialised countries with rapidly growing populations, comprising the USA, India, China, England and Germany. This indicates that climate change and food security are major concerns in these nations, likely due to the combined pressures of industrialisation, population growth and the imperative for ensuring food security.
In a changing world, where climate change is having a significant impact on vegetable productivity, there are complex challenges. These challenges not only affect yield but also have significant impacts on nutritional quality and food safety. The degree of impact varies depending on the geographical context, type of vegetable and growing conditions.
Disease and pest control become essential in this landscape to maintain productivity in the face of climate change. Organic farming, biological control, grafting and the use of arbuscular mycorrhizae are emerging as promising techniques that can improve the resilience of vegetable crops to climate change.
Simultaneously, soil conservation and efficient water resource management are proving to be crucial components of climate change adaptation. Through low-tillage techniques, the use of mulch and the incorporation of organic matter, farmers can help reduce soil erosion and improve water retention.
The Internet of Things (IoT) and other emerging technologies have the potential to play a crucial role in managing resources efficiently and increasing productivity. Integrating these technologies into vegetable production systems could enable researchers and farmers to make faster and better-informed decisions about irrigation, moisture and nutrient requirements.

4. Conclusions

The geographical distribution of these studies shows a significant bias towards highly industrialised countries such as the US, India, China, the UK and Germany. While this could be attributed to higher levels of scientific activity and funding in these countries, it also highlights a critical research gap in less industrialised or developing countries, where the impacts of climate change could be even more severe due to fewer resources for adaptation.
The interdisciplinary nature of the existing literature, ranging from environmental sciences to agronomy, suggests a comprehensive approach to understanding the ecological and practical aspects of climate change impacts. However, the focus remains largely on crop yield, with less attention paid to other critical factors such as nutritional quality, food safety and pest and disease control.
Of the 219 publications reviewed, only 53 focused exclusively on the effects of climate change on vegetable crops. Furthermore, despite the low number of related studies (53), many of these have not received adequate attention in terms of citations (see Table 2). This points to the need for more specialised research in this area, especially given the complex challenges that climate change poses not only to yield but also to nutritional quality and food safety.

Future Research Perspectives

  • Geographical bias: Most studies are from developed countries, which limits the applicability and global relevance of the results. It is essential to extend research to developing countries and regions with different climates. This would provide a more nuanced understanding of how climate change affects vegetable crops in different geographical and socio-economic contexts.
  • Crop diversity: Focusing on a limited number of crops, such as tomatoes, limits the general applicability of the results. Future research should include a wider variety of vegetables to better understand species-specific adaptations and develop more comprehensive adaptation strategies.
  • Nutritional quality: Few studies address the impact of climate change on the nutritional quality of vegetables. A detailed investigation of how climate change may affect the nutritional composition of vegetables, including vitamins, minerals and antioxidants, is needed.
  • Technological integration: While emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things are promising, their practical applicability remains underexplored. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of integrating emerging technologies into vegetable production systems, particularly in resource-constrained contexts.
  • Funding and scientific activity: The large volume of research in developed countries may lead to bias in the perception of where climate change impacts are most severe or most studied. Future research should take account of this bias and seek to provide a more balanced global perspective, including exploring alternative sources of funding and international collaborations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.D., R.L.B. and V.C.T.; methodology, E.A.D. and C.M.S.; software, D.S. and D.I.; validation, A.G. and C.M.S.; formal analysis, R.L.B. and E.A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.D. and F.-R.T.; writing—review and editing, D.S. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Romania), under contract ADER 22.1.3/21.07.2023—“The economic efficiency in small and medium-sized farms of production technologies in an ecological system for the main horticultural and vegetable crops in Romania in order to reduce the effects of climate change”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Porter, J.R.; Challinor, A.J.; Henriksen, C.B.; Howden, S.M.; Martre, P.; Smith, P. Invited Review: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food—A Case of Shifting Cultivation and History. Global Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2518–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jasper, J.; Wagstaff, C.; Bell, L. Growth Temperature Influences Postharvest Glucosinolate Concentrations and Hydrolysis Product Formation in First and Second Cuts of Rocket Salad. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 163, 111157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Raza, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, S.; Zou, X.; Zhang, X.; Lv, Y.; Xu, J. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants 2019, 8, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Falco, C.; Donzelli, F.; Olper, A. Climate Change, Agriculture and Migration: A Survey. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chel, A.; Kaushik, G. Renewable Energy for Sustainable Agriculture. Agronomy Sust. Developm. 2011, 31, 91–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Georgopoulou, E.; Mirasgedis, S.; Sarafidis, Y.; Vitaliotou, M.; Lalas, D.P.; Theloudis, I.; Giannoulaki, K.-D.; Dimopoulos, D.; Zavras, V. Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Options for the Greek Agriculture in 2021–2050: A Monetary Assessment. Clim. Risk Manag. 2017, 16, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korres, N.E.; Norsworthy, J.K.; Tehranchian, P.; Gitsopoulos, T.K.; Loka, D.A.; Oosterhuis, D.M.; Gealy, D.R.; Moss, S.R.; Burgos, N.R.; Miller, M.R.; et al. Cultivars to Face Climate Change Effects on Crops and Weeds: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parajuli, R.; Gustafson, D.; Asseng, S.; Stöckle, C.O.; Kruse, J.; Zhao, C.; Intrapapong, P.; Matlock, M.D.; Thoma, G. Protocol for Life Cycle Assessment Modeling of US Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains- Cases of Processed Potato and Tomato Products. Data Brief 2021, 34, 106639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iglesias, A.; Garrote, L.; Quiroga, S.; Moneo, M. A Regional Comparison of the Effects of Climate Change on Agricultural Crops in Europe. Clim. Chang. 2012, 112, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nemecek, T.; Weiler, K.; Plassmann, K.; Schnetzer, J.; Gaillard, G.; Jefferies, D.; García–Suárez, T.; King, H.; Milà I Canals, L. Estimation of the Variability in Global Warming Potential of Worldwide Crop Production Using a Modular Extrapolation Approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 31, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ciscar, J.-C.; Iglesias, A.; Feyen, L.; Szabó, L.; Van Regemorter, D.; Amelung, B.; Nicholls, R.; Watkiss, P.; Christensen, O.B.; Dankers, R.; et al. Physical and Economic Consequences of Climate Change in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 2678–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Saeed, F.; Chaudhry, U.K.; Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Bakhsh, A.; Bohra, A.; Ali, S.; Chitikineni, A.; Saeed, Y.; Visser, R.G.F.; et al. Developing Future Heat-Resilient Vegetable Crops. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2023, 23, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dumitru, E.A.; Sterie, C.M.; Rodino, S.; Butu, M. Consumer Preferences in the Purchase of Agri-Food Products: Implications for the Development of Family Farms. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Payen, S.; Basset-Mens, C.; Perret, S. LCA of Local and Imported Tomato: An Energy and Water Trade-Off. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lobell, D.B.; Bänziger, M.; Magorokosho, C.; Vivek, B. Nonlinear Heat Effects on African Maize as Evidenced by Historical Yield Trials. Nature Clim. Chang. 2011, 1, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reidsma, P.; Wolf, J.; Kanellopoulos, A.; Schaap, B.F.; Mandryk, M.; Verhagen, J.; Van Ittersum, M.K. Climate Change Impact and Adaptation Research Requires Farming Systems Analysis and Integrated Assessment: A Case Study in the Netherlands. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 29, 286–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Malhotra, S.K. Horticultural Crops and Climate Change: A Review. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 87, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramlall, I. Gauging the Impact of Climate Change on Food Crops Production in Mauritius: An Econometric Approach. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2014, 6, 332–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harrison, P.A.; Dunford, R.W.; Holman, I.P.; Rounsevell, M.D.A. Climate Change Impact Modelling Needs to Include Cross-Sectoral Interactions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 6, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smith, P.; Olesen, J.E. Synergies between the Mitigation of, and Adaptation to, Climate Change in Agriculture. J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 148, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garrett, K.A.; Dendy, S.P.; Frank, E.E.; Rouse, M.N.; Travers, S.E. Climate Change Effects on Plant Disease: Genomes to Ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 489–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Singh, A.K.; Mishra, P.; Kashyap, S.P.; Karkute, S.G.; Singh, P.M.; Rai, N.; Bahadur, A.; Behera, T.K. Molecular Insights into Mechanisms Underlying Thermo-Tolerance in Tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1040532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, C.; Liu, X.; He, X. A Global Meta-Analysis of Crop Yield and Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Nitrogen Fertilizer Application. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 831, 154982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dou, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, X.; Lei, L.; Wang, L.; Shi, W.; Zhang, D.; Wei, W.; Zhu, G.; Huang, J.; et al. Optimization of Planting Structure Underthe Background of Water-Saving Irrigationin Shiyang River Basin, China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2022, 31, 5009–5026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wimalasiri, E.M.; Jahanshiri, E.; Perego, A.; Azam-Ali, S.N. A Novel Crop Shortlisting Method for Sustainable Agricultural Diversification across Italy. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tripathi, A.; Tripathi, D.K.; Chauhan, D.K.; Kumar, N.; Singh, G.S. Paradigms of Climate Change Impacts on Some Major Food Sources of the World: A Review on Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 216, 356–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scheelbeek, P.F.D.; Moss, C.; Kastner, T.; Alae-Carew, C.; Jarmul, S.; Green, R.; Taylor, A.; Haines, A.; Dangour, A.D. United Kingdom’s Fruit and Vegetable Supply Is Increasingly Dependent on Imports from Climate-Vulnerable Producing Countries. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Mu, J.; Musumba, M.; McCarl, B.; Gu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Cao, Z.; Li, Q. The Role of Climate Factors in Shaping China’s Crop Mix: An Empirical Exploration. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sundling, C.; Jakobsson, M. How Do Urban Walking Environments Impact Pedestrians’ Experience and Psychological Health? A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, H.; Lau, T.C. Evidence-Based Green Human Resource Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mavromatis, T.; Georgoulias, A.K.; Akritidis, D.; Melas, D.; Zanis, P. Spatiotemporal Evolution of Seasonal Crop-Specific Climatic Indices under Climate Change in Greece Based on EURO-CORDEX RCM Simulations. Sustainability 2022, 14, 17048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ellegaard, O. The Application of Bibliometric Analysis: Disciplinary and User Aspects. Scientometrics 2018, 116, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jung, Y.; Jang, H.; Matthews, K.R. Effect of the Food Production Chain from Farm Practices to Vegetable Processing on Outbreak Incidence. Microb. Biotechnol. 2014, 7, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tasca, A.L.; Nessi, S.; Rigamonti, L. Environmental Sustainability of Agri-Food Supply Chains: An LCA Comparison between Two Alternative Forms of Production and Distribution of Endive in Northern Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 725–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alliaume, F.; Rossing, W.A.H.; Tittonell, P.; Jorge, G.; Dogliotti, S. Reduced Tillage and Cover Crops Improve Water Capture and Reduce Erosion of Fine Textured Soils in Raised Bed Tomato Systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 183, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Wan, S.; Wang, F.; Dou, W.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Ma, R.; Qi, L. A Long Short-term Memory-based Model for Greenhouse Climate Prediction. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2022, 37, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pérez Neira, D.; Soler Montiel, M.; Delgado Cabeza, M.; Reigada, A. Energy Use and Carbon Footprint of the Tomato Production in Heated Multi-Tunnel Greenhouses in Almeria within an Exporting Agri-Food System Context. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628–629, 1627–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Malhi, G.S.; Kaur, M.; Kaushik, P.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Alsahli, A.A.; Ahmad, P. Arbuscular Mycorrhiza in Combating Abiotic Stresses in Vegetables: An Eco-Friendly Approach. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 1465–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Azam, A.; Khan, I.; Mahmood, A.; Hameed, A. Yield, Chemical Composition and Nutritional Quality Responses of Carrot, Radish and Turnip to Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Responses of Carrot, Radish and Turnip to Carbon Dioxide. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 3237–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shrestha, R.P.; Nepal, N. An Assessment by Subsistence Farmers of the Risks to Food Security Attributable to Climate Change in Makwanpur, Nepal. Food Sec. 2016, 8, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cammarano, D.; Ronga, D.; Di Mola, I.; Mori, M.; Parisi, M. Impact of Climate Change on Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Processing Tomato Cultivated in Italy. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 241, 106336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Silva, R.S.; Kumar, L.; Shabani, F.; Picanço, M.C. Assessing the Impact of Global Warming on Worldwide Open Field Tomato Cultivation through CSIRO-Mk3·0 Global Climate Model. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 155, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Min, J.; Lu, K.; Sun, H.; Xia, L.; Zhang, H.; Shi, W. Global Warming Potential in an Intensive Vegetable Cropping System as Affected by Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Rate: Air. Clean Soil Air Water 2016, 44, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tarek, H.; Aly, H.; Eisa, S.; Abul-Soud, M. Optimized Deep Learning Algorithms for Tomato Leaf Disease Detection with Hardware Deployment. Electronics 2022, 11, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Potopová, V.; Zahradníček, P.; Štěpánek, P.; Türkott, L.; Farda, A.; Soukup, J. The Impacts of Key Adverse Weather Events on the Field-Grown Vegetable Yield Variability in the Czech Republic from 1961 to 2014: The impacts of key adverse weather events on the crop vegetables. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 1648–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ahmad, W.; Ayyub, C.M.; Shehzad, M.A.; Ziaf, K.; Ijaz, M.; Sher, A.; Abbas, T.; Shafi, J. Supplemental Potassium Mediates Antioxidant Metabolism, Physiological Processes, and Osmoregulation to Confer Salt Stress Tolerance in Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea L.). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2019, 60, 853–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bisbis, M.; Gruda, N.; Blanke, M. Securing Horticulture in a Changing Climate—A Mini Review. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Litskas, V.D.; Migeon, A.; Navajas, M.; Tixier, M.-S.; Stavrinides, M.C. Impacts of Climate Change on Tomato, a Notorious Pest and Its Natural Enemy: Small Scale Agriculture at Higher Risk. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 084041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schmidt, N.; Zinkernagel, J. Model and Growth Stage Based Variability of the Irrigation Demand of Onion Crops with Predicted Climate Change. Water 2017, 9, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pérez-Alfocea, F. Why should we investigate vegetable grafting? Acta Hortic. 2015, 1086, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hoshikawa, K.; Pham, D.; Ezura, H.; Schafleitner, R.; Nakashima, K. Genetic and Molecular Mechanisms Conferring Heat Stress Tolerance in Tomato Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 786688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Stoilova, T.; Van Zonneveld, M.; Roothaert, R.; Schreinemachers, P. Connecting Genebanks to Farmers in East Africa through the Distribution of Vegetable Seed Kits. Plant Genet. Resour. 2019, 17, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Koundinya, A.V.V.; Kumar, P.P.; Ashadevi, R.K.; Hegde, V.; Kumar, P.A. Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change in Vegetable Cultivation: A Review. J. Water Clim. Chang. 2018, 9, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cecílio Filho, A.B.; Nascimento, C.S.; Pereira, B.D.J.; Nascimento, C.S. Nitrogen Fertilisation Impacts Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Carbon Footprint, and Agronomic Responses of Beet Intercropped with Arugula. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Kiniry, J.R.; Ku, K.-M. A Hybrid Decision Tool for Optimizing Broccoli Production in a Changing Climate. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2021, 62, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdelkader, M.; Zargar, M.; Murtazova, K.M.-S.; Nakhaev, M.R. Life Cycle Assessment of the Cultivation Processes for the Main Vegetable Crops in Southern Egypt. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kazandjiev, V. Climate Change: Fundamentals, Agroclimatic Conditions in Bulgaria, and Resilience Agriculture through Adaptation. In Implications of Climate Change and Disasters on Military Activities; NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security; Nikolov, O., Veeravalli, S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 119–135. ISBN 978-94-024-1070-9. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lohr, V.I. Climate Change Literacy in Postsecondary Horticultural Education in the United States. HortTechnol. Hortte 2014, 24, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Singh, D.; Bisen, M.; Shukla, R.; Prabha, R.; Maurya, S.; Reddy, Y.; Singh, P.; Rai, N.; Chaubey, T.; Chaturvedi, K.; et al. Metabolomics-Driven Mining of Metabolite Resources: Applications and Prospects for Improving Vegetable Crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ma, M.; Taylor, P.W.J.; Chen, D.; Vaghefi, N.; He, J.-Z. Major Soilborne Pathogens of Field Processing Tomatoes and Management Strategies. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yonekura, T.; Kihira, A.; Shimada, T.; Miwa, M.; Aruzate, A.; Izuta, T.; Ogaw, K. Impacts of O3 and CO2 Enrichment on Growth of Komatsuna (Brassica Campestris) and Radish (Raphanus Sativus). Phyton-Ann. Rei Bot. 2005, 45, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hansen, L.; Sorgho, R.; Mank, I.; Nayna Schwerdtle, P.; Agure, E.; Bärnighausen, T.; Danquah, I. Home Gardening in sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review on Practices and Nutrition Outcomes in Rural Burkina Faso and Kenya. Food Energy Secur. 2022, 11, e388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jaenicke, H.; Virchow, D. The Contribution of Horticulture to Sustainable Development. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1205, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Le Quillec, S.; Brajeul, E.; Lesourd, D.; Loda, D.; Herraux, R. Using temperature integration over 24 hours in soilless tomato cultivation in greenhouse: Application in the west of france. Acta Hortic. 2011, 893, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, K.; Rajametov, S.N.; Jeong, H.-B.; Cho, M.-C.; Lee, O.-J.; Kim, S.-G.; Yang, E.-Y.; Chae, W.-B. Comprehensive Understanding of Selecting Traits for Heat Tolerance during Vegetative and Reproductive Growth Stages in Tomato. Agronomy 2022, 12, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Temmen, J.; Montenegro, A.; Juras, S.; Field, J.S.; DeGrand, J. Floating the Sweet Potato to Polynesia: Considering the Feasibility of Oceanic Drift for the Prehistoric Introduction of the Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas) to Pacific Islands. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2022, 295, 107709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Saqib, M.; Anjum, M.A. Mitigation of climate change effect in sweet pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.) through adjustment of planting time. Pak. J. Agri. Sci 2021, 58, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lounsbury, N.P.; Lounsbury, B.B.; Warren, N.D.; Smith, R.G. Tarping Cover Crops Facilitates Organic No-till Cabbage Production and Suppresses Weeds. HortScience 2022, 57, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pérez-Alfocea, F. Grafting to Address Grand Challenges. Acta Hortic. 2021, 1302, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bhusal, K.; Udas, E.; Bhatta, L.D. Ecosystem-Based Adaptation for Increased Agricultural Productivity by Smallholder Farmers in Nepal. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0269586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kumar, P.; Kar, A.; Singh, D.R.; Perumal, A.; Shivamurthy, S.G.C.; Reddy, K.V.; Badal, P.S.; Lala Kamble, A.; Kamalvanshi, V.; Jha, G.K.; et al. Protected Cultivation of Horticultural Crops in Uttarakhand: An Economic Analysis. Agronomy 2021, 11, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kalanda Joshua, M.D.; Ngongondo, C.; Chipungu, F.; Malidadi, C.; Liwenga, E.; Majule, A.; Stathers, T.; Kosgei, J.R.; Lamboll, R. Strengthening Horticultural Innovation Systems for Adaptation to Effects of Urbanisation and Climate Variability in Peri-Urban Areas. In Climate Variability and Change in Africa; Sustainable Development Goals Series; Matondo, J.I., Alemaw, B.F., Sandwidi, W.J.P., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 137–156. ISBN 978-3-030-31542-9. [Google Scholar]
  73. Van Loon, J.; Heuts, R.F.; Schrevens, E.; Vansteenkiste, J.; Diels, J. Decision support in horticultural production—Impact on accuracy from a fully monitored to a minimal data framework. Acta Hortic. 2012, 957, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Choudhary, M.L.; Patel, V.B.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Mahdl, S.S. (Eds.) Climate Change: Impact On Productivity And Quality Of Temperate Fruits And Its Mitigation Strategies. In Climate Dynamics in Horticultural Science; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 53–74. ISBN 978-0-429-17385-1. [Google Scholar]
  75. Klostermann, H.R.; Zinkernagel, J.; Kahlen, K. Geisenheim FACE for Vegetable Crops—Methodological Framework. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 29, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yang, Q.; Zeng, X.; Kuang, W.; Liu, D. Heavy Metal Enrichment and Edible Safety of Two Vegetables in Rare Earth Tailings. Acad. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 4, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tang, R.; Supit, I.; Hutjes, R.; Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, F.; Chen, X. Modelling Growth of Chili Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.) with the WOFOST Model. Agric. Syst. 2023, 209, 103688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Flores-Saavedra, M.; Plazas, M.; Vilanova, S.; Prohens, J.; Gramazio, P. Induction of Water Stress in Major Solanum Crops: A Review on Methodologies and Their Application for Identifying Drought Tolerant Materials. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 318, 112105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Carrasquilla-Batista, A.; Chacon-Rodriguez, A.; Solorzano-Quintana, M. Using IoT Resources to Enhance the Accuracy of Overdrain Measurements in Greenhouse Horticulture. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 36th Central American and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXVI), San Jose, Costa Rica, 9–11 November 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  80. Siomos, A.S.; Koularmanis, K.; Tsouvaltzis, P. The Impacts of the Emerging Climate Change on Broccoli (Brassica Oleracea L. Var. Italica Plenck.) Crop. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Manea, V.; Balas, C.; Toma, D.-M.; Burnichi, F.; Jitea, D.; Mirea, E.; Toader, A.-C.; Staicu, B.-G.; Dorogan, A. Vegetable Culture vs. Climate Change. Innovative Solutions.Part 1. Research on the Chemical Analysis of Buzau White Onion Bulbscultivated Using Diatomite and Trichoderma. Ind. Textila 2022, 73, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of climate change. Source: Own processing after: [23,24,25,26].
Figure 1. Effects of climate change. Source: Own processing after: [23,24,25,26].
Agriculture 13 01891 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the current study [29].
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the current study [29].
Agriculture 13 01891 g002
Figure 3. Number of empirical research publications on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops by year.
Figure 3. Number of empirical research publications on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops by year.
Agriculture 13 01891 g003
Figure 4. Geographical context of empirical research on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops.
Figure 4. Geographical context of empirical research on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops.
Agriculture 13 01891 g004
Figure 5. Share of empirical research publications on climate change on vegetable crops.
Figure 5. Share of empirical research publications on climate change on vegetable crops.
Agriculture 13 01891 g005
Figure 6. Link between “Climate change impact on vegetable crops” and other related terms. Source: Own processing based on WoS results using VOSviewer.
Figure 6. Link between “Climate change impact on vegetable crops” and other related terms. Source: Own processing based on WoS results using VOSviewer.
Agriculture 13 01891 g006
Figure 7. Relationship between “Climate change impact on vegetable crops” and other related terms by year. Source: Own processing based on WoS results using VOSviewer.
Figure 7. Relationship between “Climate change impact on vegetable crops” and other related terms by year. Source: Own processing based on WoS results using VOSviewer.
Agriculture 13 01891 g007
Figure 8. Topics covered in the synthesis of articles based exclusively on the impact of climate change on crop production.
Figure 8. Topics covered in the synthesis of articles based exclusively on the impact of climate change on crop production.
Agriculture 13 01891 g008
Table 1. Distribution of types of research papers on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops.
Table 1. Distribution of types of research papers on the impact of climate change on vegetable crops.
ApproachDocument Type1998–20022003–20072008–20122013–20172018–2023Total
Including vegetablesArticle1-5103753
Article; Book Chapter--13-4
Article; Data Paper----11
Proceedings Paper1--438
Review1-13611
Total307204777
Exclusive vegetablesArticle---91827
Article; Book Chapter---112
Article; Proceedings Paper-1---1
Proceedings Paper--2529
Review---21214
Total012173353
ExcluseArticle-11202951
Article; Book Chapter---123
Article; Proceedings Paper---1-1
Editorial Material; Book Chapter1----1
Proceedings Paper-127111
Review--321621
Review; Book Chapter---1-1
Total126324889
Total general431569128219
Table 2. Summary of evidence and findings ranked in descending order of citations.
Table 2. Summary of evidence and findings ranked in descending order of citations.
AuthorsYear of PublicationCitationsObjectivesMethodsResults
Jung, Y.J.; et al. [33]2014114Microbiological risk assessment of vegetablesAnalysis of disease outbreaks and laboratory studiesPotential increase in risks due to climate change
Tasca, A.L.; et al. [34]201783Comparing the environmental impact of two supply chainsComparing organic and integrated productionThe need to improve organic farming techniques
Alliaume, F.; et al. [35]201471Impact of different soil management practicesField study with four soil management practicesSignificant reduction of run-off and soil erosion
Liu, Y.W.; et al. [36]202262Climate prediction in greenhousesModel LSTMRobust, more efficient model
Neira, D.P.; et al. [37]201838Energy use and carbon footprint analysisLife cycle analysisIncreasing productivity but also energy demand and carbon footprint
Malhotra, S.K. [17]201733Climate change impact assessmentAnalysis of physiological responsesThe need to adapt horticulture
Malhi, G.S.; et al. [38]202133Climate change impact investigationArbuscular mycorrhizal association examinationMycorrhiza improves plant stress tolerance
Azam, A.; et al. [39]201332Impact of atmospheric CO2 on yield and nutritional qualityYield assessment under increased CO2 conditionsEvaluation of yield and chemical characteristics under increased CO2
Shrestha, R.P. and Nepal, N. [40]201625Impact of climate change on food securityClimate data analysis, interviews, group discussionsClimate change affects food security
Cammarano, D.; et al. [41]202024Agricultural crop simulation model evaluationUse of field data, selection of climate projections, use of DSSAT modelModel successfully simulated tomato response to nitrogen fertilization
Silva, R.S.; et al. [42]201723Assessing the impact of climate change on tomato cultivationUse CLIMatic indEX climate model, A2 emissions scenario, CSIRO-Mk30 climate modelCurrent favourable areas will become unsuitable for tomato growing
Min, J.; et al. [43]201617Estimation of global warming potential in vegetable growing systemComparative field experimentChanging crop rotation reduced N2O emissions and increased economic benefit
Tarek, H.; et al. [44]202216Identification of tomato diseasesEvaluation of pre-trained models98.99–99.81% accuracy
Potopova, V.; et al. [45]201716Temperature and precipitation response estimationStatistical analysis of historical dataPositive effects of warming
Ahmad, W.; et al. [46]201913Understanding stress tolerance in cabbageNaCl stress testingGrowth and regulation of mechanisms under saline conditions
Jasper, J.; et al. [2]202013Impact of temperatures on arugulaGrowing at different temperaturesArugula survival decreases at 40 °C
Bisbis, M.B.; et al. [47]201912Climate impact assessment on cropsLiterature reviewNegative impact of climate change
Litskas, V.D.; et al. [48]201910Climate impact on tomatoesModelling irrigation conditionsPotential for red spider mite outbreaks increases
Schmidt, N. and Zinkernagel, J. [49]20179Impact of climate on onion irrigationSimulation of various scenariosIncreasing water demand
Perez-Alfocea, F. [50]20159Increasing agricultural productivityStudy of plant interactionsContributing to sustainable agriculture
Saeed, F.; et al. [12]20238Heat-resistant vegetablesOmics technologies and genomic editingVegetables more resistant to high temperatures
Hoshikawa, K.; et al. [51]20217Climate impact on food securityLiterary reviewReducing production and genetic diversity
Stoilova, T.; et al. [52]20197The role of seed kits in supporting agricultureDistribution and monitoring of seed kitsIncreasing vegetable diversity
Koundinya, A.V.V.; et al. [53]20186Climate change adaptation strategiesAnalysis of genomics and phenomicsMultiple adaptation strategies identified
Cecilio, A.B.; et al. [54]20226Effect of nitrogen on growth and greenhouse gas emissionsEvaluation of nitrogen efficiencyHigher winter beet productivity
Kim, S.; et al. [55]20215Impact of climate on broccoli productionPlant-oriented cropping patternClose yield linked to nitrogen application
Abdelkader, M.; et al. [56]20224Energy footprint and greenhouse gas emissions in vegetable productionAnalysis of energy consumption and GHG emissionsPotato production has the lowest environmental impact
Kazandjiev, V. [57]20173Maximising yield by controlling the plant growth environmentProtected cultivation techniquesSuccessful growing of fruit and vegetables under controlled conditions
Lohr, V.I. [58]20143Assessing awareness of climate change in horticultureSurvey on the inclusion of climate change in coursesMost programmes do not offer specific courses on climate change
Singh, D.P.; et al. [59]20223Exploring metabilome to improve vegetable crop performanceMetabilomic analysis technologiesIdentification of metabolic biomarkers for improved molecular crop improvement
Ma, M.X.; et al. [60]20232Examining the impact of soilborne pathogens on the processing tomato cropLiterature reviewIdentification of various management methods for disease control
Yonekura, T.; et al. [61] 20052Investigating the effects of O3 and CO2 on the growth of komatsuna and radish crop plantsExposure of plants to different levels of O3 and CO2O3 reduced leaf area and biomass, while CO2 significantly increased biomass
Singh, A.K.; et al. [22]20222Understanding the molecular mechanisms of heat resistance in tomatoesScientific literature reviewIdentifying the importance of generative tissue research and genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in heat resistance
Hansen, L.S.; et al. [62]20222Analysis of gardening in sub-Saharan AfricaLiterature reviewVariation in home gardens
Jaenicke, H. and Virchow, D. [63]20182Analysis of the role of horticulture in sustainable developmentEvaluation of the SDGsHorticulture contributes to several SDGs
Le Quillec, S.; et al. [64]20112Evaluating the effectiveness of a temperature strategyStudies from 2006–2008Energy consumption reduced by 5–15%
Lee, K.; et al. [65]20222Impact of heat stress on tomatoesReview of studiesNegative impact on yield
Temmen, J.; et al. [66]20221Evaluation of ocean drift of sweet potatoLaboratory and numerical experimentsFeasible, but seed viability decreases
Saqib, M. and Anjum, M.A. [67]20211Impact of planting date on sweet pepperEvaluation of transplantsBetter performance in early plantings
Lounsbury, N.P.; et al. [68]20221The efficiency of prelayers in cabbage productionCover crop + use of tarpaulinsHeavier cousin in no-till system
Perez-Alfocea, F. [69]20211The potential of grafting in vegetable productionIdentification of problems that can be solved by graftingPropose tolerable root to parasitic broomrapes
Bhusal, K.; et al. [70]20221Adapting to climate change in NepalParticipatory field assessment30.5% and 31.1% increase in bitter harvest
Kumar, P.; et al. [71]20211Economic analysis of protected cultivation in UttarakhandSurvey and focus group discussions with 96 farmersProtected cultivation is a highly profitable activity
Joshua, M.D.K.; et al. [72]20200Sustainable technologies to improve vegetable production in peri-urban contextParticipatory Action Research (PAR) approachSignificant improvements in vegetable production
Van Loon, J.; et al. [73] 20120Influence of daily weather variations on the use of decision support systemsDevelopment of a cauliflower growth modelProposed framework for using a cauliflower growth model with minimum data
Choudhary et al. [74]20150Climate stress resistance of vegetablesIdentification of resistant germplasmHolistic approach needed
Klostermann, H.R.; et al. [75]20150CO2 impact on vegetable productivityExperiments in the FACE facilityResults not yet available
Yang, Q.H.; et al. [76]20160Assessment of heavy metal pollutionPlasma mass spectrometryHeavy metal content determined
Tang, R.L.; et al. [77]20230Adaptation of the WOFOST model for chilli peppersUse of field data from 2021Good growth simulation
Flores-Saavedra, M.; et al. [78]20230Review of water stress induction methodsAnalysis of stress induction techniquesWater stress affects crop performance
Carrasquilla-Batista, A.; et al. [79]20160Introducing IoT in greenhousesIntegration of an IoT platformImproved drainage measurements
Siomos, A.S.; et al. [80]20220Highlighting climate impacts on broccoliAnalysis of temperature requirementsThe significant impact of climate change
Manea, V.; et al. [81]20220Identification of organic fertiliser alternativesChemical analysis of onion bulbsEffectiveness of organic diatomite and Trichoderma
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dumitru, E.A.; Berevoianu, R.L.; Tudor, V.C.; Teodorescu, F.-R.; Stoica, D.; Giucă, A.; Ilie, D.; Sterie, C.M. Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891

AMA Style

Dumitru EA, Berevoianu RL, Tudor VC, Teodorescu F-R, Stoica D, Giucă A, Ilie D, Sterie CM. Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review. Agriculture. 2023; 13(10):1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dumitru, Eduard Alexandru, Rozi Liliana Berevoianu, Valentina Constanta Tudor, Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu, Dalila Stoica, Andreea Giucă, Diana Ilie, and Cristina Maria Sterie. 2023. "Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review" Agriculture 13, no. 10: 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891

APA Style

Dumitru, E. A., Berevoianu, R. L., Tudor, V. C., Teodorescu, F. -R., Stoica, D., Giucă, A., Ilie, D., & Sterie, C. M. (2023). Climate Change Impacts on Vegetable Crops: A Systematic Review. Agriculture, 13(10), 1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop