Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Innovations in Wastewater Treatment
2.1. Membrane Bioreactors (MBR)
2.2. Electrochemical Treatment
2.3. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs)
- Pretreatment: This involves the removal of large particles and sediments from wastewater [17];
- Reagent production: Radicals used in advanced oxidation processes are produced, varying according to the specific technology [21]. This includes the following steps:
- Fenton reaction (using Fe2+ and H2O2);
- Ozonation (using O3);
- Photocatalytic oxidation (using UV light and catalyst).
- Reaction zone: The radicals produced react with the organic pollutants in the wastewater, oxidizing and breaking them down. At this stage, strong oxidants, such as hydroxyl radicals (OH), are crucial [22];
- Pollutant removal: Organic pollutants are transformed into harmless compounds, such as CO2 and H2O, through oxidation [23];
- Final treatment: By-products and residual chemicals formed after the reaction are removed. This may include additional filtration or other treatment methods. Disinfection processes using chlorine, ozone, or UV may also be applied [24];
- Treated water: In the final stage, purified and safe water is obtained, which can be reused for various purposes, such as agricultural irrigation or industrial use [8].
2.4. Biological Treatment
2.4.1. Flow Chart of Biological Treatment and Traditional Treatment Systems
- Activated sludge process: Microorganisms consume organic matter in wastewater as oxygen is introduced from the air. The presence of oxygen allows bacteria to convert organic pollutants into carbon dioxide and water [31];
- Activated sludge systems: Microorganisms are continuously mixed with water in aeration tanks, where they consume organic matter in the wastewater, improving water quality [41]. This system is particularly effective for wastewater with a high organic load;
- Biofilm reactors: In these systems, microorganisms grow on a fixed surface and wastewater flows over this surface. Organic substances are decomposed by the microorganisms on the biofilm, purifying the water [42];
- Lagoons: Lagoons are natural biological treatment methods in which wastewater is processed by microorganisms in large pools [43];
- Anaerobic digestion: This biological treatment method occurs in an oxygen-free environment. Microorganisms in closed tanks biologically transform organic matter, producing biogas in the process [44]. This method is especially beneficial for energy recovery.
2.4.2. Advanced Biological Treatment Systems
2.5. Production of Biofuels from Wastewater
- Biochemical conversion stage: Two key technologies are employed, as follows:
- Microbial fuel cells (MFC): Organic matter is biologically degraded by microorganisms, releasing electrons. These electrons are harnessed to generate electricity in the fuel cell [50].
- Biogas collection and purification: The biogas (methane and carbon dioxide) produced in the biochemical conversion stage is purified to increase the methane concentration and separate unwanted gases, like CO2 [51];
- Energy production and use: The purified biogas is used for electricity and heat production. It can also be converted into transportation fuel in the form of compressed or liquefied methane (CNG/LNG) [52];
3. Strategies for Wastewater Reuse
- Use of treated wastewater in agriculture: Many countries utilize treated wastewater for agricultural irrigation, conserving water and protecting water resources [56];
- Wastewater recycling for industrial use: Reusing treated wastewater, especially as cooling or process water, is a common practice in industries [57]. This strategy reduces the demand for clean water resources;
- Greywater recycling: The repurposing of greywater (from showers, sinks, and washing machines) for indoor use, such as toilet flushing or landscape irrigation, is encouraged, particularly in water-scarce regions [58];
- Constructed wetlands and natural treatment systems: Artificial wetlands and natural treatment systems serve as low-cost, environmentally friendly methods for cleaning wastewater naturally and reintroducing it into water resources [60];
- Obtaining drinking water: In water-scarce regions, particularly in developed countries, advanced treatment technologies convert wastewater into drinking water [61]. This offers a sustainable solution in areas where water resources are limited;
- Urban water cycles: In large cities, local water cycles are established, such as using treated wastewater to irrigate parks and green areas [63];
- Conversion of sewage water into drinking water: Advanced purification technologies are used to transform sewage water into safe drinking water. This method is applied in cities with limited water resources, contributing to sustainable water management and helping to conserve water [61,66]. Singapore’s NEWater project serves as a successful example, employing advanced treatment technologies following conventional treatment methods [67].
4. Wastewater Reuse Studies
- Wastewater treatment efficiency: This efficiency measures the difference between the incoming wastewater and the outgoing clean water, determining the amount of water recovered. The basic Formula (1) is as follows [90]:
- 2.
- Sludge reduction and dryness calculation: The drying process aims to reduce the amount of sludge generated during wastewater treatment. In Antalya OIZ, a 50% reduction in sludge volume and a 92% dryness rate have been achieved [88]. If 1% of sludge is produced from 20,000 m3 of treated wastewater, the daily sludge amount is calculated as follows (Formula (2)):
- 3.
- Wastewater treatment efficiency result and remaining sludge amount after treatment: A = 10,000 m3/day, B = 20,000 m3/day. Wastewater treatment efficiency is calculated by the following Formula (5):
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fırat, B.; Sericik, S.; Çakmak, Y.; Uğuzlu, S.; Demir, Ö. An overview of wastewater reuse. Düzce Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 2024, 12, 612–630. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Asan, C. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Applications in Reuse of Grey Water. Master’s Thesis, May Nineteen University, Samsun, Turkey, 2013. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Escobar, I.C. An overview of the global water situation. Sustain. Sci. Eng. 2010, 2, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
- Adalı, S.; Yalılı, M.K. Use of treated wastewater in agricultural irrigation: The case of İznik. Int. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 1, 12–23. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Yılmaz, C. Reuse of Treated Wastewater in Meat and Dairy Facilities. Master’s Thesis, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey, 2019. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Demir, Ö.; Yıldız, M.; Sercan, Ü.; Arzum, C.Ş. Recovery and reuse of wastewater. Harran Univ. J. Eng. 2017, 2, 1–14. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Yıldız, S.; Namal, O.Ö.; Çekim, M. Historical developments in wastewater treatment technologies. Selcuk Univ. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2013, 1, 55–67. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Büyükkamacı, N. The Active Ingredient of Water Management: Reuse. In Proceedings of the İzmir Urban Problems Symposium, Izmir, Turkey, 8–10 January 2009; pp. 363–377. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Muslu, Y. Treatment of Wastewater. Istanbul Technical University: Istambul, Turkey, 1996. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Nas, B. Reuse of Treated Wastewater: Industrial Sectors Application Guidelines; Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of the Republic of Turkey: Ankara, Turkey, 2018. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Kitiş, M.; Yiğit, M.Ö.; Köseoğlu, H.; Harman, İ.B. Treatment and Recovery of Urban and Industrial Wastewater by Membrane Processes. In Proceedings of the Current Situation in Our Country, Water Consumption, Treatment, Reuse Symposium, Bursa, Turkey, 3–5 September 2008; pp. 269–276. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Membrane Systems. Available online: https://www.ceyka.com.tr/tr/membran.html (accessed on 5 September 2024). (In Turkish).
- Orkun, M. Investigation of Solid Waste Leachate by Electrochemical Methods. Master’s Thesis, May Nineteen University, Samsun, Turkey, 2007. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Özyonar, F. Electroflotation process in water and wastewater treatment. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 2020, 9, 730–745. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Köksal, Z. Investigation of Treatment of Pistachio Processing Wastewater by Electrochemical Treatment Methods in Continuous System. Master’s Thesis, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey, 2015. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Budak, T.; Erdoğan, D. Wastewater Treatment by Electrochemical Methods. In Proceedings of the III. Physical Chemistry Days, Balıkesir, Turkey, 12–15 July 2012. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Paździor, K.; Bilińska, L.; Ledakowicz, S. A review of the existing and emerging technologies in the combination of AOPs and biological processes in industrial textile wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 376, 120597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Öztürk, M.; Polat, A.; Topçu, U.S.; Aslan, Ş. Treatment of Solid Waste Leachate by Advanced Oxidation Methods. Cumhuriyet University, Sivas Vocational School, Organic Farming Program. Academic Platform. 2015; pp. 2096–2104. Available online: https://www.isites.info/PastConferences/ISITES2015/ISITES2015/papers/A18-ISITES2015ID335.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2024). (In Turkish).
- Glaze, W.H.; Kang, J.W.; Chapin, D.H. The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and UV-radiation. Ozone Sci. Eng. 1987, 9, 335–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yalılı, M.K.; Kestioğlu, K. Investigation of the applicability of advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of industrial wastewater. J. Uludag Univ. Fac. Eng. Archit. 2008, 13, 67–80. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Pueyo, N.; Miguel, N.; Ovelleiro, J.; Ormad, M. Limitations of the removal of cyanide from coking wastewater by ozonation and by the hydrogen peroxide-ozone process. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 74, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karaarslan, M. Natural Organic Matter Removal from Water by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Master’s Thesis, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey, 2012. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Tran, L.H.; Drogui, P.; Mercier, G. Jean-François Blais, Electrochemical degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in creosote solution using reuthenium oxide on titanium expanded mesh anode. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 164, 1118–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dilek, S. Comparison of Existing and New Technological Methods for Disposal and Reuse of Wastewater Treatment Plant Wastes. Specialization Thesis, Iller Bank Joint Stock Company, Ankara, Turkey, 2015. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Sinan, R.K. Estimation of Pre-Treatment and Biological Treatment Output Parameters in Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants with ANN. Master’s Thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, 2010. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Paraskeva, P.; Diamadopoulos, E. Review technologies for olive mill wastewater (OMW) treatment: A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 1475–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turan, G.; Şahinkaya, S.; Işık, M. Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants and Operational Problems. Master’s Thesis, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Turkey, 2014. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Peavy, H.S.; Rowe, D.R.; Tchobanoglous, G. Environmental Engineering; McGraw Hill Inc.: Singapore, 1985; p. 719. [Google Scholar]
- Köker, B.; Cebeci, M.; Yılmaz, Z.; Selçuk, S.F. Effects of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and treatment methods. Natl. J. Environ. Sci. Res. 2022, 5, 84–91. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Biological Treatment. Available online: https://web.deu.edu.tr/atiksu/ana58/bolum05.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2024). (In Turkish).
- Toprak, H. Operation of the Activated Sludge Process; Ninth of September University Faculty of Engineering: Izmir, Turkey, 2000; p. 257. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Yılmaz, M. Elimination of Odor Emissions from The Food Fermentation Industry Using A Biofilter System. Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, 2016. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Uyar, Ö. Control of Ammonia Emissions with Biofilters. Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, 2007. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Dalgalı, H.; Oğuz, M. Comparison of biological wastewater treatment technologies and cost analysis-The case of Kayseri Province. Harran Univ. J. Eng. 2022, 7, 152–160. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Tezcan, E. Adapazarı Karaman Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Removal. Master’s Thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey, 2007. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Metcalf, L.; Eddy, H.P.; Tchobanoglous, G. Processing and Treatment of Sludge. In Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1449–1559. [Google Scholar]
- Ebrahimi, G.M. Investigation of Separate Anaerobic Digestion Potential of Primary and Secondary Sewage Sludge at Upper Mesophylic Temperature and Stabilized Sludge Quality. Master’s Thesis, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey, 2019. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- What is a Wastewater Treatment Plant? Available online: https://mavi-cevre.com/blog/atik-su-aritma-tesisi-nedir-nasil-isletilir (accessed on 21 May 2023). (In Turkish).
- Yaşar, A.; Doğan, E.C. Risks posed by micropollutants in the use of treated urban wastewater in irrigation. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 2020, 9, 760–769. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Asano, T.; Burton, F.L.; Leverenz, H.L.; Tsuchihasti, R.; Tchobanoglous, G. Water Reuse: Issues, Technologies, and Application; Metcalf & Eddy/AECOM. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2007; p. 1503. [Google Scholar]
- Haliki, A.; Özdemir, G.; Uzel, A. A research on the isolation and control strategies of filamentous microorganisms that cause problems in activated sludge systems. Ege J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2004, 21, 275–277. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Bakar, S.N.H.A.; Hasan, H.A.; Mohammad, A.W.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Haan, T.Y.; Ngteni, R.; Yusof, K.M.M. A review of moving-bed biofilm reactor technology for palm oil mill effluent treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 171, 1532–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yinanç, A.; Adiloğlu, S. Use of natural plants in treatment, models and pilot study example: Kozan district. J. Tekirdag Fac. Agric. 2017, 14, 114–124. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Filibeli, A. Processing of Sewage Sludge, No: 225; Ninth of September University Publications: Izmir, Turkey, 1998. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Kanat, A.İ. Electrical Energy Production from Biogas in Wastewater Treatment Plants and Applicability Analysis. Specialization Thesis, Iller Bank Joint Stock Company, Ankara, Turkey, 2017. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Kiliç, F.Ç. Biogas, its importance, general situation and place in Turkey. Renew. Energy World 2007, 8, 94–106. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Baburşah, S. Recovery and Reuse of Textile Industry Wastewater. Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, 2004. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Gülen, J.; Çeşmeli, Ç. General information about biogas and the use of its by-products. Erzincan Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 2012, 5, 65–84. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Öğüt, H. The Role of Biofuels in Ensuring Energy Security: What is Biofuel? In Proceedings of the Chamber of Electrical Engineers, Central Anatolia Energy Forum, Nevşehir, Turkey, 29 June 2007; Available online: https://www.emo.org.tr/ekler/5a01195b62ec393_ek.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2024). (In Turkish).
- Demir, Ö.; Gümüş, E. Sludge treatment and electricity generation with microbial fuel cells. Sinop Univ. J. Sci. 2016, 1, 81–89. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Patterson, T.; Esteves, S.; Dınsdale, R.; Guwy, A. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 1806–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyacı, Y.S. Technologies for Biogas Purification and Use As Vehicle Fuel. Ph.D. Thesis, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey, 2024. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.; Kim, H.-T.; Choi, B.C. Optimization of CO2 absorption process with MEA solution. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2004, 153, 429–434. [Google Scholar]
- Clesceri, L.S.; Greenberg, A.E.; Eaton, A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Molden, D. Water for Food Water for Life. In A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture; International Water Management Institute Earthscan: Oxford, UK, 2007; p. 645. [Google Scholar]
- Kırtorun, E.; Karaer, F. Water management and sustainability of water. J. Sustain. Eng. Pract. Technol. Dev. 2018, 1, 151–159. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Katip, A. Evaluation of reuse areas of treated wastewater. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Univ. J. Eng. Sci. 2018, 7, 541–557. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Santos, C.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Cheng, C.Y.; Leite, D. Development of an experimental system for greywater reuse. Desalination 2012, 285, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, S.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Y.; Jiao, W. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in China: Opportunities and challenges. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 39, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güneş, A.; Kumar, R.; Pek, T.; Yüksel, M.; Karabay, N. Effects of Salvinia Natans and Lemna Minor plant species used in wastewater rehabilitation in artificial wetlands on water quality. Turk. J. Hyg. Exp. Biol. 2017, 74, 79–86. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Kurtkulak, H. Recycling of Urban Wastewater and Reuse of Green Areas for Irrigation. Master’s Thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey, 2014. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Pintilie, L.; Torres, C.M.; Teodosiu, C.; Castells, F. Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: An LCA case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, M.; Van Passel, S.; Camposeo, S.; Pedrero, F.; Dogot, T.; Lebailly, P.; Vivaldi, G.A. Modelling environmental impacts of treated municipal wastewater reuse for tree crops ırrigation in the Mediterranean coastal region. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saltuk, B.; Atılgan, A.; Ulusoy, A.; Ertop, H. Rainwater Harvesting. In Biosystems Engineering V; Academician Bookstore: Ankara, Turkey, 2023; Chapter 5; pp. 185–206. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Üstün, G.E.; Can, T.; Küçük, G. Rainwater harvesting in buildings. J. Uludag Univ. Fac. Eng. 2020, 25, 1593–1610. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Başa, Ş.; Kurt, S. Smart water management applications in water and sewerage administrations: The case of Tekirdağ. Süleyman Demirel Univ. J. Fac. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2017, 22, 1519–1532. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Taşdemir, R.Ş.; Koyuncu, İ. Alternative water supply with membrane technologies: Desalination and wastewater recovery. J. Sustain. Environ. 2021, 1, 18–30. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Bruggen, B.V.D. The Global Water Recycling Situation. In Sustainability Science and Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 41–62. [Google Scholar]
- Maryam, B.; Büyükgüngör, H. Wastewater reclamation and reuse trends in Turkey: Opportunities and challenges. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 30, 100501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oron, G.; Gillerman, L.; Buriakovsky, N.; Bick, A.; Gargir, M.; Dolan, Y.; Yossi, M.; Ludmilla, K.; Josef, H. Membrane technology for advanced wastewater reclamation for sustainable agriculture production. Desalination 2008, 218, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koyuncu, İ. Membrane Technologies and Applications in Water/Wastewater Treatment and Recovery; Turkish Environmental Protection Foundation: Yıldızlar Ofset, Turkey, 2018. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Public Utilities Board (PUB). Singapore Water Reclamation Study: Reports on Expert Panel Review and Findings, NEWater Expert Panel, 2002; p. 25. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/99865970/Singapore-Water-Reclaimation-Study-Expert-Panel-Review-and-Study (accessed on 2 November 2024).
- İlhan, F. Membrane Processes in the World of the Future and Their Use in Water/Wastewater Treatment; Ekin Publishing House, Scientific and Professional Studies in the World of the Future, Natural Sciences and Agriculture: Bursa, Turkey, 2020; pp. 37–55. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Pedrero, F.; Kalavrouziotis, I.; Alarcon, J.J. Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture—Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97, 1233–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nas, B.; Yılmaz, C. Benefits and risks in the use of treated domestic/urban wastewater as a new water source. Clim. Chang. Environ. 2019, 4, 42–46. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Courault, D.; Albert, I.; Perelle, S.; Fraisse, A.; Renault, P.; Salemkour, A.; Amato, P. Assessment and risk modeling of airborne enteric viruses emitted from wastewater reused for irrigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 592, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, I.S.; Lee, E.W.; Oh, S.; Kim, Y. Comparison of SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) between RO and NF processes for the reclamation of secondary effluent. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helvacı, E. Investigation of the Applicability of Membrane Bioreactors in the Treatment of Domestic Wastewater to Turkey. Specialization Thesis, Iller Bank Joint Stock Company, Ankara, Turkey, 2017. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Uzal, N. Recovery and Reuse of Indigo Dyeing Wastewater Using Membrane Technology. Ph.D. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Bressan, M.; Liberatore, L.; D’alessandro, N.; Tonucci, L.; Belli, C.; Ranali, G. Improved combined chemical and biological treatments of olive oil mill wastewaters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1228–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoufi, S.; Feki, F.; Sayadi, S. Detoxification of olive mill wastewater by electrocoagulation and sedimentation processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khoufi, S.; Alouni, F.; Sayadi, S. Treatment of olive oil mill wastewater by combined process electro-fenton reaction and anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2006, 40, 2007–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortuno, A.; Hernandez, M.; Civera, S. Golf course irrigation and self-sufficiency water in Southern Spain. Land Use Policy 2015, 44, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sallanko, J.; Haanpaa, K.M. Practical melting forecasting of artificial snow made from treated wastewater. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2010, 24, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millamena, O.M. Ozone treatment of slaughterhouse and laboratory wastewaters. Aquac. Eng. 1992, 11, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coşkun, U. Evaluation of Wastewater (National Water) Gained by Recycling System in Ready-Mixed Concrete Plants in Concrete Production. Master’s Thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey, 2007. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- In Antalya OIZ Wastewater Treatment Plant, Sludge is Reached 92 Percent Dryness with ARBIDRY. Available online: https://www.suvecevre.com/yayin/610/antalya-osb-atiksu-aritma-tesisi-nde-camur-arbidry-ile-yuzde-92-kuruluga-ulastiriliyor_17950.html (accessed on 24 March 2016). (In Turkish).
- Antalya OIZ, Green OIZ Implements Clean Antalya Project. Available online: https://www.antalyasonhaber.com/antalya-osb-yesil-osb-temiz-antalya-projesini-hayata-geciriyor-328948h.htm (accessed on 19 July 2024). (In Turkish).
- Antalya OIZ “Water Efficiency Management System Certificate”. Available online: https://www.haberturk.com/antalya-haberleri/34993209-antalya-osb-su-verimliligi-yonetim-sistemi-belgesi-aldi (accessed on 29 June 2024). (In Turkish).
- Metcalf, L.; Eddy, H.P.; Tchobanoglous, G.; Stensel, H.D.; Tsuchihashi, R.; Burton, F.L. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Iorhemen, O.T.; Hamza, R.A.; Tay, J.H. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology for Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation: Membrane Fouling. Membranes 2016, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, C.R.; Srivastava, A.K. Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment: A review. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Technology | Application Area | Cost Effectiveness | Energy Saving | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Membrane bioreactors (MBR) | Urban and industrial | High recovery rates (90%+), long-term efficiency | Moderate energy consumption (0.3–0.5 kWh/m3) | High water quality (BDO < 5 mg/L), small space requirement, automatic process control | Membrane clogging, high initial costs, frequent maintenance required |
Electrochemical treatment | Industrial | Low operating costs (20–30% savings) | High energy consumption (1–4 kWh/m3) | Effective removal of major pollutants (heavy metals, organic matter) | Energy costs, high equipment costs in some applications, electrode wear |
Biological treatment | Urban | Low investment costs (200–300 USD/m3) | Low energy consumption (0.05–0.1 kWh/m3) | Natural processes, environmentally friendly, low chemical use | Long process time (12–24 h), poor water quality (space requirement in some cases) |
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) | Industrial | High effectiveness rates (over 90%) | Moderate energy consumption (1–3 kWh/m3) | Removal of pollutants that are difficult to decompose, short process times | High initial costs, energy costs, need for pH control |
Circular economy approaches | Urban and industrial | Long-term cost savings (10–20% annually) | Low energy consumption (0.1–0.5 kWh/m3) | Resource recovery (water, energy, food), waste reduction, environmental sustainability | Difficulty of implementation, need for system integration, initial investment |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ulusoy, A.; Atılgan, A.; Rolbiecki, R.; Jagosz, B.; Rolbiecki, S. Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122111
Ulusoy A, Atılgan A, Rolbiecki R, Jagosz B, Rolbiecki S. Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management. Agriculture. 2024; 14(12):2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122111
Chicago/Turabian StyleUlusoy, Ayşe, Atılgan Atılgan, Roman Rolbiecki, Barbara Jagosz, and Stanisław Rolbiecki. 2024. "Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management" Agriculture 14, no. 12: 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122111
APA StyleUlusoy, A., Atılgan, A., Rolbiecki, R., Jagosz, B., & Rolbiecki, S. (2024). Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management. Agriculture, 14(12), 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122111