The
Awakening of Faith, one of the most seminal treatises in East Asian Buddhism, is well-known for its synthesis of the two Mahāyāna concepts of
tathāgatagarbha and
ālayavijñāna. Unlike early Yogācāra texts, such as the
Yogācārabhūmi, in which
ālayavijñāna is described
[...] Read more.
The
Awakening of Faith, one of the most seminal treatises in East Asian Buddhism, is well-known for its synthesis of the two Mahāyāna concepts of
tathāgatagarbha and
ālayavijñāna. Unlike early Yogācāra texts, such as the
Yogācārabhūmi, in which
ālayavijñāna is described as a defiled consciousness, the
Awakening of Faith explains it as a “synthetic” consciousness, in which
tathāgatagarbha and the defiled mind are unified in a neither-identical-nor-different condition. East Asian Buddhist exegetes noted the innovative explanation of the
Awakening of Faith and compiled the commentaries, among which Huayan master Fazang’s (643–712) commentary had a profound effect on the process of the establishment of the treatise as one of the most representative
tathāgatagarbha texts in East Asia. However, as scholarly perceptions that the commentators’ interpretations do not always represent the
Awakening of Faith’s tenets themselves have grown, the propriety of relying on Fazang’s commentary for understanding the treatise has also been questioned. What attracts our attention in this regard is that the Silla scholar-monk Wŏnhyo’s (617–686) commentaries, which are known to have significantly influenced Fazang’s, present very different views. This article demonstrates that two distinct interpretations existed in Wŏnhyo’s days for
tathāgatagarbha and
ālayavijñāna of the
Awakening of Faith, by comparing Wŏnhyo and Fazang’s commentaries, and further considers the possibility that the
Awakening of Faith’s doctrine of
ālayavijñāna is not doctrinally incompatible with that of early Yogācāra on the basis of Wŏnhyo’s view on
ālayavijñāna.
Full article