Next Article in Journal
Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment Using Calcium Silicate-Based Versus Resin-Based Sealers—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersion in Block-Copolymer Aqueous Solutions: Nanoarchitectonics for Self-Assembly and Aggregation

by
Valeria Conti Nibali
1,
Giovanna D’Angelo
1,
Antonella Arena
2,
Carmine Ciofi
2,
Graziella Scandurra
2 and
Caterina Branca
1,*
1
Department of Mathematical and Computer Science, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d’Alcontres, 98166 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Engineering, University of Messina, Contrada di Dio, I-98166, 98166 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(2), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020039
Submission received: 17 March 2022 / Revised: 4 April 2022 / Accepted: 7 April 2022 / Published: 9 April 2022

Abstract

:
Achieving homogenous dispersion of nanoparticles inside a polymeric matrix is a great challenge for numerous applications. In the present study, we aim at understanding the role of different factors on the dispersion properties of TiO2 in pluronic F-127 mixtures. The mixtures were prepared with different pH and guest/host ratios and investigated by UV-Vis spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, infrared spectroscopy and electrical conductivity. Depending on the preparation conditions, different amounts of TiO2 were loaded within the copolymer as quantitatively determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy. The different content of nanoparticles has direct implications on the gelation and micellization of pluronic analyzed by dynamic light scattering. The information derived on the self-assembly behavior was interpreted in relation to the infrared and conductivity measurements results. Together, these results shed light on the most favorable conditions for improving the nanoparticle dispersion inside the copolymer matrix and suggest a possible strategy to design functional nanoparticle-polymer systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles exhibit unique properties that make them suitable for multifunctional applications. For most of them, effectively dispersing nanoparticles in solution is often necessary but not always easily achievable, and it requires a correct processing strategy. In some cases, the incorporation of nanoparticles within a polymer host became a winning strategy for homogeneous dispersions whose properties are a unique combination of the guest and the host. Tailoring these properties is a great challenge in designing materials with advanced performances.
Among transition metal oxide-based nanoparticles, titanium dioxide nanoparticles are the most extensively used in many different fields as gas sensors [1,2,3,4,5], solar cells [6], photocatalysts [7,8,9,10], and additives in food and cosmetics [11,12,13]. Moreover, thanks to their high biocompatibility and low toxicity, they have been extensively used in nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology for drug delivery, tissue engineering and others [14,15,16,17,18,19].
Whatever their field of application, the dispersion and stability of TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous or in a more complex medium play a key role in improving the efficiency and performance of the systems. It is widely reported that the dispersion of nanoparticles in aqueous systems generally modifies the physicochemical properties, e.g., agglomeration state and surface charge variation [20]. Therefore characterizing the state of titania nanoparticles is of great significance, as they greatly affect many functionalities such as the photocatalytic activity [21,22], the toxicity [23], the particle electronic structure, surface defect density and the surface sorption sites [24].
Thus far, many studies have been performed to investigate the stability of TiO2 nanofluids with different concentrations and under various pH and ionic strength conditions [20,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The final objective of such research works is to define the best conditions for optimal performance of TiO2-based composites, whatever the field of application. In particular, there is a strong applicative interest in realizing well-ordered porous titania thin films. They have several advantages, such as a huge surface area and higher stability that significantly affect the efficiency of the electronic properties. Among various possible methods, the employment of structure-directing agents, including phosphates, ionic and nonionic surfactants, amines, and block copolymers [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], was very promising.
From these studies, it emerged that the structural and morphological properties of surfactant-based TiO2 systems greatly depend on the method of synthesis, the type and concentration of surfactant used, and the thermal treatment temperature other than the type and pH of copolymer solvent. Regardless of the procedure of synthesis used, as a final step, a high-temperature thermal treatment was performed, which enabled efficient removal of the copolymer template. Only after removal, the physical-chemical properties of the TiO2 films were investigated.
Unlike these studies, in the present work, our object of interest is the copolymer-TiO2 water dispersion as a whole. TiO2 nanoparticles were dispersed in pluronic F127/water suspensions at different copolymer concentrations and pH.
Pluronic F127 is a nonionic triblock copolymer consisting of hydrophilic poly (ethylene oxide) and hydrophobic poly (propylene oxide) blocks (PEO–PPO–PEO) with a PEO/PPO ratio of 2:1. Above a critical micelle concentration, the block copolymers assemble into spherical micelles thanks to the difference in hydrophobicity between PEO and PPO blocks. Reversible gelation can occur only above some concentration and temperature [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].
The choice of pluronic F127 stems from its thermosensitivity and capability to solubilize and stabilize drugs inside the micelle core. This system is thus particularly interesting given the possible applications in many fields. In particular, it is one of the most widely used triblock copolymers in pharmaceutical formulations because of the good water solubility through the high content of EO, the low toxicity in the body and the ability to encapsulate any hydrophobic agents [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. However, it is well known that the addition of co-solvents or solutes to pluronic water solutions can influence its properties, inducing phase changes [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68].
In the present study, we are interested in analyzing how the dispersion or aggregation of titania nanoparticles inside pluronic F127 can influence the structural arrangements and, consequently, the systems’ dynamics. As it is well known, when nanoparticles are dispersed in solution, they undergo phenomena of agglomeration or aggregation, the difference being in the strength of interaction. Agglomerates are weakly bound collections of nanoparticles, whereas aggregates are tightly bound collections difficult to break up by mechanical forces. The classical Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (DLVO) theory predicts the overall force between particles by combining Van der Waals attractive forces and repulsive forces arising from the electrical double layer (EDL) around the particles [69,70]. Other non-DLVO forces can influence nanoparticle dispersion, such as hydration, hydrophobic, steric, electronic, and electrostatic forces [69,70]. Among these, steric effects should be included in the case of nonionic polymer coatings; these are generally repulsive interactions, but if the polymer chains can form bridges between particles, that can cause aggregation. For all these reasons, it is clear that the dispersion properties are strongly dependent on parameters such as pH and ionic strength as they directly affect the zeta potential of the solution and the double layer thickness.
Starting from these considerations, we have chosen to prepare the dispersions at pH values far from the isoelectric point (IEP) of the TiO2 suspension, approximately 6.2 [29]. In such a way, the presence of particle surface charge should enhance the electrostatic repulsion between metallic nanoparticles disfavoring, or suppressing, agglomeration. For the same reason, we decided to prepare the samples at a low ionic strength since, according to previous studies, the high ionic strength of the solution compresses the electrical double layer [20,29]. In preparing the pluronic-nanoparticles dispersions, another important factor to be considered is the copolymer concentration since, depending on temperature, it affects the phase behavior of the copolymer [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. In the present case, the prepared base-pluronic solutions have weight fractions of 14% and 20 wt%; in the temperature range between 20 °C and 30 °C, the lowest concentration is always in a sol state, whereas the highest one move from a sol state to a gel-like state [50,51].
All these aspects were taken into consideration while we conducted our research with the final aim to define the best experimental conditions for optimal dispersion of TiO2 in pluronic F-127 mixtures. The samples, prepared under different experimental conditions, were investigated using UV-Vis spectroscopy, attenuated Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and electrical conductivity. The obtained results give valuable information on the dispersion state of nanoparticles; this knowledge is potentially useful for developing and optimizing copolymer-based nanosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TiO2 nanoparticles dry powder anatase phase (average size 4–8 nm) were purchased from PlasmaChem GmbH (Berlin, Germany). The powder is free of organic stabilizer. Pluronic (F127, 12.600 Da) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK). Hydrogen chloride (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium chloride (NaCl) and deionized water were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All the chemicals are of analytical grade.

2.2. Sample Preparation

TiO2 dry powder was suspended in 10 ml of solution at a 10.0 mg/mL concentration. The solutions had pre-adjusted pH values of 4 and 10 and an ionic strength equal to 0.001 M. The dispersions were magnetically stirred for 24 h and then sonicated for 15 min using a bath sonicator. After that, the suspensions were centrifuged for 30 min and 5 ml of each supernatant was sampled and analyzed by DLS. The size distribution calculated by using a CONTIN algorithm evidenced the presence of a bimodal distribution centered at 36 and 280 nm for the dispersion at pH 10 and 50 and 320 nm for the suspension at pH 4, respectively (data not shown). To remove the large agglomerates, the supernatants were then filtered and analyzed by UV-Vis spectroscopy to determine the effective TiO2 concentration. Absorption measurements were repeated in time for 24 h without observing any significant variation, thereby excluding any change in the dispersion state of TiO2 in this time range.
Stock solutions of Pluronic F-127 at weight fractions of 14 wt% and 20 wt% were prepared, and aliquots of the TiO2 dispersions at the two pH values were then added. Attention was paid to adding the same TiO2 nanoparticle concentration in the final suspension (0.1 wt% corresponding to 1 mg/mL).
Table 1 reports the sample labels as a function of the concentration of pluronic, TiO2 and pH conditions. The dispersions were gently stirred at 4 °C for 24 h and left overnight in the refrigerator until a clear solution was obtained. No sol-gel transition was observed for these systems up to 40 °C, as evidenced by the tube inversion method. The dispersions were stirred again and centrifuged; then, the supernatants were removed and transferred to fresh cuvettes for further analysis. No pH change from the stock TiO2 solutions was observed in the final dispersions. For comparison, two plain pluronic solutions with 14 wt% (PA) and 20 wt% (PB) concentrations were prepared.

2.3. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The UV-Vis measurements were made using a small-volume (100 μL) absorbance cuvette (Hellma 105.201-QS) and a UV-1700 Shimadzu spectrophotometer in the 280–700 nm range. All measurements were carried out at room temperature and replicated three times.
To quantitatively determine the concentration of TiO2 loaded in our samples, a calibration plot was first made by recording the UV-Vis spectra for five TiO2 water solutions of known concentration under the same pH and IS conditions. The intensity of the absorption peak at 330 nm was used to quantify TiO2. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis evidencing a high value of fitting degree (R2 > 0.999) (see the inset of Figure 1).

2.4. DLS Measurements

A laboratory-built goniometer equipped with single-mode fiber optics, two APD detectors, and a multi-τ digital time correlator (LS Instrument AG) ALV single-photon detector was used to perform DLS measurements. A He–Ne laser operating at 632.8 nm in linearly polarized single-frequency mode was used as an excitation source. The instrument is equipped with a thermostated recirculating bath which allows us to maintain the temperature with an accuracy of 0.1 °C. All measurements were performed at an angle of 90° to the incident beam at a temperature of 20 °C and 30 °C. Each sample was loaded in a square low-volume cuvette and thermalized at each temperature for 30 min before measuring. The repeatability of all measurements was verified with more than five measurements. From the DLS experiment, we obtained the normalized intensity auto-correlation function (ICF), g2 (q,t); details on the theoretical background of this technique are reported elsewhere [68,71,72,73]. Decay times are estimated from the ICFs according to a fit model reported in the results and discussion section. The CONTIN algorithm was also applied to obtain the size distribution for the TiO2 solutions.

2.5. FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy

FTIR-ATR spectra covering the range 400–4000 cm−1 were recorded on a Bruker Vertex 80V FTIR spectrometer equipped with a Bruker Platinum ATR accessory with a single reflection diamond crystal. A background scan was recorded prior to the measurement and subtracted from the sample spectra. All spectra are the average of three independent measurements with 128 scans each, at a resolution of 2 cm−1. The ATR correction to each spectrum was applied using the OPUS software (Bruker optics). The spectra were normalized to the same area and compared to each other.

2.6. Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity values were obtained from electrical resistance measurements performed with an HP 4284a LCR meter. The instrument has been calibrated using measurements on liquids of known conductivity, and it has been ascertained that consistent measurements could be obtained in the 5 kHz–200 kHz frequency range. Measurements were performed by transferring, using a pipette, a small volume of the samples in ABS containers with a holding volume of 4.5 × 4.5 × 3 mm3 to limit the waste of material. The electrodes immersed in the samples were two small gold connectors 3.18 mm long and with a diameter of 0.5 mm, at a distance of 2.54 mm from each other. The conductivity values were obtained by comparing the resistance curves obtained for the samples with the calibration ones.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The UV-Vis spectra were first analyzed for the quantitative assessment of TiO2 loaded into the pluronic-based dispersions. Figure 1 shows the results of the absorbance measurements for all the pluronic/TiO2 dispersions investigated and, as a reference, for a pluronic water solution (PA sample). For this latter sample, the absorbance spectrum does not reveal any significant absorption in the entire wavelength region investigated: the peak at λ = 330 nm, observed for all the pluronic/TiO2 samples, can be attributed exclusively to titanium dioxide. The observed changes in the intensity of this absorption peak suggest the presence of a higher loading of TiO2 nanoparticles in the suspensions under acidic conditions rather than in basic and, for the same pH, for the dispersions with the lowest pluronic concentration.
Based on the calibration plot, see the inset of Figure 1, the effective concentration of TiO2 in the pluronic-based dispersions was estimated; the obtained results are reported in the last column of Table 1.

3.2. FTIR-ATR Measurements

The effect of a different loading of TiO2 inside the investigated samples was also examined by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy. Measurements were performed on samples purged under dry nitrogen and left for equilibration for half an hour; nevertheless, as we will see, a certain amount of water is, in any case, retained within the samples. In Figure 2, the FTIR-ATR spectra of the TiO2-pluronic samples are shown and compared with the spectrum of pluronic F127. At a first glance, all the spectra appear very similar suggesting that the overall conformation of the copolymer does not change much. This is quite reasonable considering the very low quantity of TiO2 loaded into the samples. However, a more detailed inspection of the spectra revealed some changes that involve three specific bands (highlighted by numbered circles in the figure): the C–O–C stretching band (1050–1150 cm−1), labeled as 1, the CH3 symmetric deformation band (1370–1385 cm−1), labeled as 2 (both characteristic for pluronic) and the band around 1600 cm−1 (labeled as 3) characteristic for the bending mode of water Ti-OH. A magnified view for bands 1 and 3 are also shown in Figure 2. For all the samples, the C–O–C stretching mode observed for the anhydrous pluronic at 1106 cm−1 widens and shifts to a lower frequency, thereby suggesting the formation of more hydrogen bonds involving TiO2 and the oxygen atoms of the PEO chains. No significant change in peak frequency or bandwidth can be noticed among the pluronic-TiO2 samples for the same peak. On the contrary, clear changes can be seen for the bending mode at 1600 cm−1, whose intensity variation indicates the presence of different content of molecular water adsorbed on the TiO2 surface. This amount decreases following the TiO2 concentration as determined by UV-Vis absorption. It is also interesting to observe that, as noted in previous works [74,75], the intensity of the bending mode is significantly much higher than that of the OH stretching. This observation was attributed to an increased dipole moment due to interactions with the surface [74,75].
The CH3 symmetric band deserves a more detailed description. According to previous studies [67,76,77], this mode was analyzed using a Gaussian deconvolution method to separate the two components associated with anhydrous and hydrated methyl groups. For example, in Figure 2, the FTIR-ATR spectra for the dried PBT-pH10 and Pluronic F127 in the range from 1350 to 1420 cm−1 are shown with the corresponding best curving-fitting results. For clarity, all the other Gaussian components used to fit the spectral profiles in this region were subtracted. As one can see, in the presence of TiO2, the symmetric deformation band broadens, indicating a higher structural disorder as just deduced from the C–O–C stretching mode. Besides this difference in the bandwidth, strong similarities are found among all the samples in the peak frequency for the two components that result centered at 1371 cm−1 (anhydrated component) and 1383 cm−1 (hydrated component). The integrated peak areas of these two vibrational modes were calculated from the fit parameters by normalizing the total area to 1. The percentage areas are reported in the table at the bottom of Figure 3. As reported in literature, the proportion of the anhydrous component increases with the dehydration of the micellar core. Thus it is strictly related to pluronic aggregation and micelle formation. As one can see, this hydrophobic effect weakens as the TiO2 content in the sample increases; in particular, for the PBT-pH10 sample, the micellization process is less disturbed by the presence of the nanoparticles; in the following, we will see that DLS evidence support this result.

3.3. DLS Measurements

Dynamic light scattering was performed to determine the different states of aggregation of titania-copolymer water dispersions. We analyzed the normalized autocorrelation functions (ICF) for all the prepared pluronic-TiO2 samples shown in Figure 4 for two different temperatures, 20 °C and 30 °C. The ICFs for the plane pluronic samples PA and PB are also shown for comparison.
Two main findings are immediately evident from this figure; the first is the presence of a drastic drop in the g2 (0) for the PB pluronic solution at T = 30 °C. This decrease is a clear signature of a reduced mobility due to a transition from a sol to a gel state [50,51,68]. The absence of a similar drop for the other TiO2-pluronic suspensions suggests that the presence of the nanoparticles disturbs the gel formation, in agreement with what was observed by the inversion tube method.
The other characteristic that emerges is the quite complex profile of the normalized ICFs that can be accounted for by including multiple exponential-like terms. More precisely, as observed in previous studies [68], the ICFs for the pluronic aqueous solutions are described as a linear combination of an exponential function with a time scale τ1 and a stretched exponential function with a time scale τ2. For all the TiO2-pluronic samples, an additional long time stretched exponential with a time scale τ3 was required for a satisfactory fit. In the most general case, we used the following fitting function
g ( 2 ) ( q , t ) 1 = σ 1 2 { A 1 e x p [ ( t / τ 1 ) ] + A 2 e x p [ ( t / τ 2 ) ] β 2 + A 3 e x p [ ( t / τ 3 ) ] β 3 }
where σ21 is the initial amplitude of the ICFs, A measures the strength of the mode and β is the stretching exponent. As reported elsewhere [43,68], from the relaxation times.
A correlation length ξ of the network can be estimated through the Stokes-Einstein relation, ξ = k T / 6 π η q 2 τ , where k is the Boltzmann constant, η the solvent viscosity and q2 the scattering vector.
According to the fit results, it was found that regardless of the pluronic concentration, temperature or pH, a fast relaxation occurs for all the samples on the time scale of 2.5·10−5–3.0·10−5 s. This fast decay seems to be a common characteristic of other pluronic-based nanoparticle systems. It has been ascribed to freely diffusing pluronic unimers with a radius of nearly 2 nm [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,68]. What profoundly differentiates the pluronic water systems from the pluronic-TiO2 ones is the population of unimers which is drastically reduced in the presence of TiO2.
Following the fast decay is a slower relaxation that we can observe on a time scale of ~2·10−3–5·10−3 s at a temperature of 20 °C and ~2·10−4–4·10−4 s at 30 °C. For pluronic solutions, this decay originates from the process of micellization, which implies, at low temperatures, an initial formation of large aggregates that, at higher temperatures, change into free micelles [43,68]. In the same time domain, a relaxation was also observed for all the pluronic-TiO2 samples at both temperatures, even if the presence of the TiO2 seems to determine a general slowing down for this dynamics. To better assess the influence of the nanoparticles on the assembly geometry, we analyzed the behavior of the correlation lengths ξ2, reported as histograms in Figure 5 (plots a and b) for two different temperatures.
As cited above, the obtained data reproduce our previous findings for the pluronic solutions. Independently of pluronic concentration, this result confirms the formation of large aggregates at low T that decrease in size upon increasing temperature up to the typical size of micelles, 20–30 nm [68]. The same temperature trend in the size evolution can also be recognized for the pluronic-TiO2 samples but with some differences. It is evident that the presence of TiO2 hinders the formation of the large aggregates observed at the lowest temperature. More precisely, it is possible to state that this effect is more pronounced for those samples with the lowest TiO2 concentration. This is evident from Figure 5, plot c, where the same ξ2 data are reported as a function of the “real” TiO2 concentration, as determined by absorption spectroscopy. This suggests that the lower the TiO2 content, the better the metallic nanoparticles’ capability of being dispersed inside the network of PEO chains, hindering the formation of the large polymeric clusters.
This directly implies the slowest dynamic is occurring in the time range between 10−3 and 3·10−1 s. In fact, in this case, the corresponding correlation lengths ξ3, reported in Figure 6, evidence the presence of large micrometric aggregates that decrease in size with both increasing temperature and decreasing TiO2 content.
The last comment concerns the weight fractions for the intermediate and the slowest dynamics. From the evaluated fit parameters A2 and A3, it emerged that the presence of TiO2 determines a generally strong decrease in the percentage of micelles for all samples except for the PBT-pH10 one. This is the only one for which the percentage of micelles is comparable to the counterpart PB sample, thus confirming the infrared evidence. Moreover, for the same PBT-pH10 sample, the population of the micrometric aggregates, A3, is extremely low.
At this point, it remains to be clarified the nature of the micrometric aggregates. As stated in the introduction, at the pH values of this study, electrostatic repulsive interactions between titania nanoparticles are predominant. Consequently, the agglomeration of the nanoparticles due to a thickness reduction of the double layer should be unlikely. Anyway, electrical conductivity measurements helped us shed some light on this point.

3.4. Electrical Conductivity

Thus far, many measurements of the electrical properties for water-based titania nanofluids or titania-polymer systems have been carried out [78,79,80], but not for dispersions of TiO2 inside a micellar matrix. Here, the interest in conductivity measurements arises from the possibility they offer to draw information on the nature of the micro-aggregates observed by DLS.
The experimental data for the electrical conductivity of pluronic-TiO2 nanofluids are summarized in Figure 7, where we reported the relative electrical conductivity, σr, defined as the ratio between the electrical conductivities of pluronic-TiO2 dispersions, σn, and that of the base fluid, σf, (pluronic solutions under the same conditions) σr = σnf.
As expected, the addition of TiO2 to pluronic solutions increases the electrical conductivity of the systems. In principle, an increase in charge carriers determines an increase in effective electrical conductivity. Anyway, an increase in conducting nanoparticles could induce an increase in inter-particle collisions and consequently an enhancement of the probability of aggregation of the nanoparticles. This could determine a reduction in the effective number of charge carriers with a consequent deterioration of the effective charge transport. Even if the establishment of short conducting paths through aggregate-to-aggregate contact were assumed, the low intrinsic conductivity of TiO2 would exclude the possibility. In conclusion, the behavior of the electrical conductivity observed for our samples suggests that the presence of titania aggregates inside the polymeric matrix is unlikely.

4. Conclusions

The present paper investigated the properties of Pluronic F127 mixtures in the presence of TiO2 nanoparticles experimentally. Thus far, different copolymers have been used as a template for the formation of TiO2 mesostructures. Still, no study has examined the impact of the metallic nanoparticles on the self-assembly and aggregation behavior of the copolymer.
We have first analyzed the influence of pH and copolymer/nanoparticle ratio on the loading capacity of the copolymer. UV-Vis spectroscopy revealed that the maximum loading occurs at the lowest pluronic concentration under acidic conditions. Both FTIR-ATR and DLS analyses suggested that the different content of TiO2 inside the samples affects the micellization and aggregation of pluronic differently. In particular, it was observed that at the lowest TiO2 content, the formation of both nano and micrometric aggregates is less favored. Finally, general considerations on the nature of the electrostatic interactions at the pH values investigated together with the observed behavior of the electrical data allowed us to exclude the presence of single-species agglomerates.
Therefore, we can hypothesize that the presence of the metallic nanoparticles favors the formation of an expanded network of micelles within which TiO2 is more or less homogeneously dispersed depending on its content. The fact that the optimal dispersion is obtained for the sample with the higher pluronic/TiO2 ratio corroborates the idea of TiO2 nanoparticles entrapped in a dense pluronic network. In future works, we plan to study the effects of TiO2 on different copolymers to develop the most appropriate strategy to design functional nanoparticle-copolymer systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.B., V.C.N. and G.D.; Investigation: C.B. and G.S.; Formal analysis: V.C.N., C.B. and G.S.; Writing—original draft preparation: C.B. and V.C.N.; Writing—review and editing: C.B., V.C.N. and G.D.; supervision, C.B., V.C.N., G.D., G.S., C.C. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Choi, H.; Sofranko, A.C.; Dionysiou, D.D. Nanocrystalline TiO2 photocatalytic membranes with a hierarchical mesoporous multilayer structure: Synthesis, characterization, and multifunction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chuangchote, S.; Jitputti, J.; Sagawa, T.; Yoshikawa, S. Photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution of electrospun TiO2 nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 1140–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kay, A.; Grätzel, M. Low cost photovoltaic modules based on dye sensitized nanocrystalline titanium dioxide and carbon powder. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1996, 44, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arango, A.C.; Johnson, L.R.; Bliznyuk, V.N.; Schlesinger, Z.; Carter, S.A.; Hörhold, H.-H. Efficient titanium oxide/conjugated polymer photovoltaics for solar energy conversion. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1689–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mor, G.K.; Shankar, K.; Paulose, M.; Varghese, O.K.; Grimes, C.A. Enhanced photocleavage of water using titania nanotube arrays. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Turchi, C.S.; Ollis, D.F. Photocatalytic degradation of organic water contaminants: Mechanisms involving hydroxyl radical attack. J. Catal. 1990, 122, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hoffmann, M.R.; Martin, S.T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D.W. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pelizzetti, E. Concluding remarks on heterogeneous solar photocatalysis. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1995, 38, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berardinelli, A.; Parisi, F. TiO2 in the food industry and cosmetics. In Metal Oxides, Titanium Dioxide (Tio2) and Its Applications; Parrino, F., Palmisano, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 353–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piccinno, F.; Gottschalk, F.; Seeger, S.; Nowack, B. Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Weir, A.; Westerhoff, P.; Fabricius, L.; Hristovski, K.; von Goetz, N. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 2242–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, Q.; Huang, J.-Y.; Li, H.-Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, A.Z.-J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Sun, H.-T.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Lai, Y.-K. TiO2 nanotube platforms for smart drug delivery: A review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 4819–4834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Park, J.; Cimpean, A.; Tesler, A.B.; Mazare, A. Anodic TiO2 nanotubes: Tailoring Osteoinduction via Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Babitha, S.; Korrapati, P.S. Biodegradable zein-polydopamine polymeric sca_old impregnated with TiO2 nanoparticles for skin tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 12, 055008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stan, M.S.; Nica, I.C.; Dinischiotu, A.; Varzaru, E.; Iordache, O.G.; Dumitrescu, I.; Popa, M.; Chifiriuc, M.C.; Pircalabioru, G.G.; Lazar, V.; et al. Photocatalytic, antimicrobial and biocompatibility features of cotton knitcoated with Fe-N-Doped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Materials 2016, 9, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Seisenbaeva, G.A.; Fromell, K.; Vinogradov, V.V.; Terekhov, A.N.; Pakhomov, A.V.; Nilsson, B.; Ekdahl, K.N.; Vinogradov, V.V.; Kessler, V.G. Dispersion of TiO2 nanoparticles improves burn wound healing and tissue regeneration through specific interaction with blood serum proteins. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hasan, K.M.F.; Horváth, P.G.; Alpár, T. Potential Natural Fiber Polymeric Nanobiocomposites: A Review. Polymers 2020, 12, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, J.; Oberdörster, G.; Biswas, P. Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almquist, C.B.; Biswas, P. Role of Synthesis Method and Particle Size of Nanostructured TiO2 on its Photoactivity. J. Catal. 2002, 212, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sclafani, A.; Herrmann, J.M. Comparison of the Photoelectronic and Photocatalytic Activities of various anatase and rutile forms of titania in pure liquid organic phases and in aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13655–13661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, J.; Oberdörster, G.; Elder, A.; Gelein, R.; Mercer, P.; Biswas, P. Does nanoparticle activity depend upon size and crystal phase? Nanotoxicology 2008, 2, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Waychunas, G.A.; Kim, C.S.; Banfield, J.F. Nanoparticulate Iron Oxide Minerals in soils and sediments: Unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005, 7, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kaasalainen, M.; Aseyev, V.; von Haartman, E.; Şen Karaman, D.; Mäkilä, E.; Tenhu, H.; Rosenholm, J.; Salonen, J. Size, Stability, and Porosity of Mesoporous Nanoparticles Characterized with Light Scattering. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Joo, N.Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.J.; Hong, S.H.; Park, H.M.; Yun, W.S.; Yoon, M.; Song, N.W. Preparation of an aqueous suspension of stabilized TiO2 nanoparticles in primary particle form. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2013, 13, 6153–6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bielan, Z.; Dudziak, S.; Sulowska, A.; Pelczarski, D.; Ryl, J.; Zielińska-Jurek, A. Preparation and Characterization of Defective TiO2. The Effect of the Reaction Environment on Titanium Vacancies Formation. Materials 2020, 13, 2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chakraborty, S. An investigation on the long-term stability of TiO2 nanofluid. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 11, 714–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suttiponparnit, K.; Jiang, J.; Sahu, M.; Suvachittanont, S.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Biswas, P. Role of Surface Area, Primary Particle Size, and Crystal Phase on Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Dispersion Properties. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2011, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhang, X.; Yin, L.; Tang, M.; Pu, Y. Optimized method for preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles dispersion for biological study. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 5213–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nilsson, E.; Furusho, H.; Terasaki, O.; Palmqvist, A.E.C. Synthesis of nanoparticulate anatase and rutile crystallites at low temperatures in the Pluronic F127 microemulsion system. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 26, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Li, Y.Q.; Bastakoti, B.P.; Imura, M.; Hwang, S.M.; Sun, Z.Q.; Kim, J.H.; Dou, S.X.; Yamauchi, Y. Synthesis of mesoporous TiO2/SiO2 hybrid films as an efficient photocatalyst by polymeric micelle assembly. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 6027–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Luo, H.; Wang, C.; Yan, Y. Synthesis of mesostructured titania with controlled crystalline framework. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 3841–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peng, T.; Zhao, D.; Dai, K.; Shi, W.; Hirao, K. Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with mesoporous anatase wall and high photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 4947–4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Smarsly, B.; Grosso, D.; Brezesinski, T.; Pinna, N.; Boissiere, C.; Antonietti, M.; Sanchez, C. Highly crystalline cubic mesoporous TiO2 with 10-nm pore diameter made with a new block copolymer template. Chem. Mater. 2008, 16, 2948–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, D.S.; Han, S.J.; Kwak, S.-Y. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous TiO2 with the surface area, crystallite size, and pore size. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 316, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Agarwala, S.; Ho, G.W. Synthesis and tuning of ordering and crystallinity of mesoporous titanium dioxide film. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 1624–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gajjela, S.R.; Ananthanarayanan, K.; Yap, C.; Gratzel, M.; Balaya, P. Synthesis of mesoporous titanium dioxide by soft template based approach: Characterization and application in dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deng, Y.; Cai, Y.; Sun, Z.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Wei, J.; Li, W.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, D. Multifuntional mesoporous composite microsphere with well-designed nanostructure: A highly integrated catalyst system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8466–8473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samsudin, E.M.; Abd Hamid, S.B.; Juan, J.C.; Basirun, W.J. Influence of triblock copolymer (pluronic F127) on enhancing the physico-chemical properties and photocatalytic response of mesoporous TiO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Suwanchawalit, C.; Wongnawa, S. Triblock copolymer-templated synthesis of porous TiO2 and its photocatalytic activity. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 2895–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Roy, S.; Ghosh, S.P.; Pradhan, D.; Sahu, P.K.; Kar, J.P. Morphological and electrical study of porous TiO2 films with various concentrations of Pluronic F-127 additive. J. Porous Mater. 2021, 28, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Brown, W.; Schillén, K.; Almgren, M.; Hvidt, S.; Bahadur, P. Micelle and gel formation in a poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(propylene oxide)/poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer in water solution: Dynamic and static light scattering and oscillatory shear measurements. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1850–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wanka, G.; Hoffmann, H.; Ulbricht, W. Phase diagrams and aggregation behavior of poly(oxyethy1ene)-poly(oxypropylene)-poly(oxyethylene) triblock copolymers in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 4145–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alexandridis, P.; Hatton, T.A. Poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) block copolymer surfactants in aqueous solutions and at interfaces: Thermodynamics, structure, dynamics, and modeling. Colloids Surf. A 1995, 96, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Prudhomme, R.K.; Wu, G.; Schneider, D.K. Structure and rheology studies of poly(oxyethylene-oxypropylene-oxyethylene) aqueous solution. Langmuir 1996, 12, 4651–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Malmsten, M.; Lindman, B. Self-Assembly in Aqueous Block Copolymer Solutions. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 5440–5445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mortensen, K. Structural studies of aqueous solutions of PEO–PPO–PEO triblock copolymers, their micellar aggregates and mesophases; a small-angle neutron scattering study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1996, 8, A103–A124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Alexandridis, P.; Holzwarth, J.F.; Hatton, T.A. Micellization of Poly(ethylene oxide)-Poly(propylene oxide)-Poly(ethylene oxide) Triblock Copolymers in Aqueous Solutions: Thermodynamics of Copolymer Association. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 2414–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shaikhullina, M.; Khaliullina, A.; Gimatdinov, R.; Butakov, A.; Chernov, V.; Filippov, A. NMR relaxation and self-diffusion in aqueous micellar gels of pluronic F-127. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 306, 112898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chaibundit, C.; Ricardo, N.M.P.S.; Costa, F.M.L.L.; Yeates, S.G.; Booth, C. Micellization and gelation of mixed copolymers P123 and F127 in aqueous solution. Langmuir 2007, 23, 9229–9236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Batrakova, E.V.; Kabanov, A.V. Pluronic block copolymers: Evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers. J. Control. Release 2008, 130, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Kulthe, S.S.; Inamdar, N.N.; Choudhari, Y.M.; Shirolikar, S.M.; Borde, L.C.; Mourya, V.K. Mixed micelle formation with hydrophobic and hydrophilic Pluronic block copolymers: Implications for controlled and targeted drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B 2011, 88, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Choi, W.I.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.-Y.; Kim, J.-C.; Kim, Y.H.; Tae, G. Efficient skin permeation of soluble proteins via flexible and functional nano-carrier. J. Control. Release 2012, 157, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Brunet-Maheu, J.M.; Fernandes, J.C.; De Lacerda, C.A.; Shi, Q.; Benderdour, M.; Lavigne, P. Pluronic F-127 as a Cell Carrier for Bone Tissue Engineering. J. Biomater. Appl. 2009, 24, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Patel, H.S.; Shaikh, S.J.; Ray, D.; Aswal, V.K.; Vaidya, F.; Pathak, C.; Sharma, R.K. Formulation, solubilization, and in vitro characterization of quercetin-incorporated mixed micelles of PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 445–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rahdar, A.; Hasanein, P.; Bilal, M.; Beyzaei, H.; Kyzas, G.Z. Quercetin-loaded F127 nanomicelles: Antioxidant activity and protection against renal injury induced by gentamicin in rats. Life Sci. 2021, 276, 119420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kassa, S.B.; Taslimi, P.; Özel, S.; Gür, B.; Gülçin, I.; Onganer, Y. Effects of some phenolic compounds on the inhibition of α-glycosidase enzyme-immobilized on Pluronic®F127 micelles: An in vitro and in silico study. Colloid Surf. A 2022, 632, 127839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rahdar, A.; Hajinezhad, M.R.; Barani, M.; Sargazi, S.; Zaboli, M.; Ghazy, E.; Baino, F.; Cucchiarini, M.; Bilal, M.; Pandey, S. Pluronic F127/Doxorubicin microemulsions: Preparation, characterization, and toxicity evaluations. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 345, 117028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jiang, J.; Li, C.; Lombardi, J.; Colby, R.H.; Rigas, B.; Rafailovich, M.H.; Sokolov, J.C. The effect of physiologically relevant additives on the rheological properties of concentrated Pluronic copolymer gels. Polymer 2008, 49, 3561–3567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pradines, B.; Djabourov, M.; Vauthier, C.; Loiseau, P.M.; Ponchel, G.; Bouchemal, K. Gelation and micellization behaviors of pluronic®F127 hydrogel containing poly(isobutylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles specifically designed for mucosal application. Colloids Surf. B 2015, 135, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dey, J.; Kumar, S.; Nath, S.; Ganguly, R.; Aswal, V.K.; Ismail, K. Additive induced core and corona specific dehydration and ensuing growth and interaction of Pluronic F127 micelles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 415, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nelson, A.; Cosgrove, T. Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Study of Adsorbed Pluronic Tri-Block Copolymers on Laponite. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9176–9182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang, W.; Gilstrap, K.; Wu, L.; Bahadur, R.; Moss, M.A.; Wang, Q.; Lu, X.; He, X. Synthesis and characterization of thermally responsive pluronic F127-chitosan nanocapsules for controlled release and intracellular delivery of small molecules. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6747–6759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Perry, C.; Hebraud, P.; Gernigon, V.; Brochon, C.; Lapp, A.; Lindner, P.; Schlatter, G. Pluronic and β-cyclodextrin in water: From swollen micelles to self-assembled crystalline platelets. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 3502–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nambam, J.S.; Philip, J. Effects of Interaction of Ionic and Nonionic Surfactants on Self-Assembly of PEO−PPO−PEO Triblock Copolymer in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Branca, C.; Khouzami, K.; Wanderlingh, U.; D’Angelo, G. Effect of intercalated chitosan/clay nanostructures on concentrated pluronic F127 solution: A FTIR-ATR, DSC and rheological study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 517, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Branca, C.; D’Angelo, G. Aggregation behavior of Pluronic F127 solutions in presence of chitosan/clay nanocomposites examined by dynamic light scattering. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 542, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Derjaguin, B.V.; Landau, L.D. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Progr. Surf. Sci. 1941, 14, 733–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shrestha, S.; Wang, B.; Dutta, P. Nanoparticle processing: Understanding and controlling aggregation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 279, 102162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Branca, C.; Wanderlingh, U.; D’Angelo, G.; Crupi, C.; Rifici, S. Study of the dynamical behavior of sodium alginate/myoglobin aqueous solutions: A dynamic light scattering study. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 209, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hassan, P.A.; Rana, S.; Verma, G. Making sense of brownian motion: Colloid characterization by dynamic light scattering. Langmuir 2015, 31, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Berne, B.J.; Pecora, R. Dynamic Light Scattering: With Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  74. Finnie, K.M.; Cassidy, D.J.; Bartlett, J.R.; Woolfrey, J.L. IR Spectroscopy of Surface Water and Hydroxyl Species on Nanocrystalline TiO2 Films. Langmuir 2001, 17, 816–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bedurftig, K.; Volkening, S.; Wang, Y.; Wintterlin, J.; Jacobi, K.; Ertl, G. Vibrational and structural properties of OH adsorbed on Pt(111). J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Su, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.Z. FTIR spectroscopic investigation of effects of temperature and concentration on PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer properties in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6426–6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Su, Y.L.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.Z. Melt, hydration, and micellization of the PEO–PPO–PEO block copolymer studied by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Colloids Interface Sci. 2002, 251, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Islam, M.R.; Shabani, B.; Rosengarten, G. Electrical and Thermal Conductivities of 50/50 Water-ethylene Glycol Based TiO2 Nanofluids to be Used as Coolants in PEM Fuel Cells. Energy Procedia 2017, 110, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chereches, E.I.; Minea, A.A. Electrical Conductivity of New Nanoparticle Enhanced Fluids: An Experimental Study. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sikdar, S.; Basu, S.; Ganguly, S. Investigation of electrical conductivity of titanium dioxide nanofluids. Int. J. Nanopart. 2011, 4, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. UV-Vis absorption spectra for the four pluronic-TiO2 dispersions studied in this work. For comparison, the absorption spectrum of a pluronic-F127 water solution (PA) is also reported. In the inset, the calibration plot for TiO2 is shown.
Figure 1. UV-Vis absorption spectra for the four pluronic-TiO2 dispersions studied in this work. For comparison, the absorption spectrum of a pluronic-F127 water solution (PA) is also reported. In the inset, the calibration plot for TiO2 is shown.
Jfb 13 00039 g001
Figure 2. FTIR-ATR spectra for pluronic-F127 and pluronic-TiO2 dispersions in the dry state in the whole range 700–4000 cm−1(a). In (b,c), two magnified views in the range 980–1200 and 1430–1700 cm−1 are reported, respectively.
Figure 2. FTIR-ATR spectra for pluronic-F127 and pluronic-TiO2 dispersions in the dry state in the whole range 700–4000 cm−1(a). In (b,c), two magnified views in the range 980–1200 and 1430–1700 cm−1 are reported, respectively.
Jfb 13 00039 g002
Figure 3. Representative deconvolution for dry pluronic F127 and PBT-pH10 into two Gaussian components representing the anhydrated (~1371 cm−1) and hydrated (~1383 cm−1) state of methyl groups. The experimental data are reported as squares, the best fit and the Gaussian components as continuous lines. Bottom: Integrated peak areas of the anhydrous and hydrated Gaussian component for all the samples investigated.
Figure 3. Representative deconvolution for dry pluronic F127 and PBT-pH10 into two Gaussian components representing the anhydrated (~1371 cm−1) and hydrated (~1383 cm−1) state of methyl groups. The experimental data are reported as squares, the best fit and the Gaussian components as continuous lines. Bottom: Integrated peak areas of the anhydrous and hydrated Gaussian component for all the samples investigated.
Jfb 13 00039 g003
Figure 4. Normalized intensity autocorrelation functions (ICF) measured at a scattering angle of 90° for pluronic and pluronic-TiO2 solutions at T = 20 °C and T = 30 °C. The lines are the fits obtained with Equation (1).
Figure 4. Normalized intensity autocorrelation functions (ICF) measured at a scattering angle of 90° for pluronic and pluronic-TiO2 solutions at T = 20 °C and T = 30 °C. The lines are the fits obtained with Equation (1).
Jfb 13 00039 g004
Figure 5. Correlation lengths ξ2 for the samples investigated at T = 20 °C (a) and T = 30 °C (b). The same data are reported in (c) as a function of the TiO2 concentration as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Figure 5. Correlation lengths ξ2 for the samples investigated at T = 20 °C (a) and T = 30 °C (b). The same data are reported in (c) as a function of the TiO2 concentration as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Jfb 13 00039 g005
Figure 6. Correlation lengths ξ3 for the samples investigated as a function of temperature. The arrow shows the direction of the increment of TiO2 as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Figure 6. Correlation lengths ξ3 for the samples investigated as a function of temperature. The arrow shows the direction of the increment of TiO2 as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Jfb 13 00039 g006
Figure 7. Relative electrical conductivity of the investigated samples. In the inset, the same data are reported as a function of the TiO2 concentration as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Figure 7. Relative electrical conductivity of the investigated samples. In the inset, the same data are reported as a function of the TiO2 concentration as determined by absorption spectroscopy.
Jfb 13 00039 g007
Table 1. Samples labels with the corresponding initial composition and pH values. In the last column, the amount of TiO2 loaded into the samples as determined by UV-Vis measurements is reported.
Table 1. Samples labels with the corresponding initial composition and pH values. In the last column, the amount of TiO2 loaded into the samples as determined by UV-Vis measurements is reported.
SamplePluronic wt%TiO2 wt%pHTiO2 (Mean Value) mg/mL
PAT-pH4140.140.83 (0.083 wt%)
PAT-pH10140.1100.69 (0.069 wt%)
PBT-pH420 0.140.60 (0.060 wt%)
PBT-pH10200.1100.40 (0.040 wt%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Conti Nibali, V.; D’Angelo, G.; Arena, A.; Ciofi, C.; Scandurra, G.; Branca, C. TiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersion in Block-Copolymer Aqueous Solutions: Nanoarchitectonics for Self-Assembly and Aggregation. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020039

AMA Style

Conti Nibali V, D’Angelo G, Arena A, Ciofi C, Scandurra G, Branca C. TiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersion in Block-Copolymer Aqueous Solutions: Nanoarchitectonics for Self-Assembly and Aggregation. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2022; 13(2):39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Conti Nibali, Valeria, Giovanna D’Angelo, Antonella Arena, Carmine Ciofi, Graziella Scandurra, and Caterina Branca. 2022. "TiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersion in Block-Copolymer Aqueous Solutions: Nanoarchitectonics for Self-Assembly and Aggregation" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 13, no. 2: 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020039

APA Style

Conti Nibali, V., D’Angelo, G., Arena, A., Ciofi, C., Scandurra, G., & Branca, C. (2022). TiO2 Nanoparticles Dispersion in Block-Copolymer Aqueous Solutions: Nanoarchitectonics for Self-Assembly and Aggregation. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 13(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13020039

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop