Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Well-Defined Pinholes in TiO2 Electron Selective Layers Used in Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Liquid-Plasma Hydrogenated Synthesis of Gray Titania with Engineered Surface Defects and Superior Photocatalytic Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Plasticised Regenerated Silk/Gold Nanorods Hybrids as Sealant and Bio-Piezoelectric Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Robust and Selective System for Water Pollutants Removal: How to Transform a Traditional Photocatalyst into a Highly Robust and Selective System for Water Pollutants Removal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/nano10010180
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration

by
Shaobin Sun
1,2,†,
Hong Yao
1,*,†,
Xinyang Li
1,
Shihai Deng
1,3,
Shenlong Zhao
1,4 and
Wen Zhang
1,2,5
1
Beijing International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Water Pollution Control Techniques for Antibiotics and Resistance Genes, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aqueous Typical Pollutants Control and Water Quality Safeguard, Department of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2
John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore
4
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
5
School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally to this article.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(1), 180; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010180
Submission received: 6 December 2019 / Revised: 11 January 2020 / Accepted: 15 January 2020 / Published: 20 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites for Photocatalytic Removal of Organic Pollutants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pharmaceutical residuals are increasingly detected in natural waters, which made great threat to the health of the public. This study evaluated the utility of the photo-Fenton ceramic membrane filtration toward the removal and degradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) as a model recalcitrant micropollutant. The photo-Fenton catalyst Goethite (α-FeOOH) was coated on planar ceramic membranes as we reported previously. The removal of SMX in both simulated and real toilet wastewater were assessed by filtering the feed solutions with/without H2O2 and UV irradiation. The SMX degradation rate reached 87% and 92% respectively in the presence of UV/H2O2 for the original toilet wastewater (0.8 ± 0.05 ppb) and toilet wastewater with a spiked SMX concentration of 100 ppb. The mineralization and degradation by-products were both assessed under different degradation conditions to achieve deeper insight into the degradation mechanisms during this photo-Fenton reactive membrane filtration. Results showed that a negligible removal rate (e.g., 3%) of SMX was obtained when only filtering the feed solution through uncoated or catalyst-coated membranes. However, the removal rates of SMX were significantly increased to 67% (no H2O2) and 90% (with H2O2) under UV irradiation, respectively, confirming that photo-Fenton reactions played the key role in the degradation/mineralization process. The highest apparent quantum yield (AQY) reached up to approximately 27% when the H2O2 was 10 mmol·L−1 and UV254 intensity was 100 μW·cm−2. This study lays the groundwork for reactive membrane filtration to tackle the issues from micropollution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pharmaceutical residuals are increasingly detected in natural waters and effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) [1]. This raises public health concerns even though most of the detected pharmaceuticals in the environment are at low sub-therapeutic concentrations (e.g., 110~610 ng∙L−1) [2,3]. Pharmaceutical residuals may be released from various sources such as disposed medicines [4], urine [5], contaminaed soil [6], and industrial wastewater [7]. Among these sources, human urine releases pharmaceuticals with concentrations at 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than other municipal wastewater streams that enter WWTPs [8]. Pharmaceuticals such as sulfamethoxazole (SMX) are commonly prescribed to treat infectious and respiration diseases. Sulfonamide antibiotics are discharged in feces and urine, either as parent compound or metabolites [9].
Different treatment processes have been investigated for removing pharmaceuticals from urine. These processes range from membrane filtration [10], anion exchange resin [11,12], electrodialysis [12], and struvite precipitation [13]. Most of the treatment processes results in separation, concentration, and fixation of water pollutants in other forms such as solid waste. Additional chemical destruction of the sulfonamides and other pharmaceuticals are often necessary for avoiding secondary pollution [14]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) such as UV/O3, UV/H2O2, photocatalysis, ozonation, electrochemical oxidation, Fenton, and Fenton-like processes are commonly used to mineralize diverse recalcitrant organic pollutants including pharmaceutical pollutants [15,16,17]. Moreover, combination of AOPs and membrane filtration has gained a great deal of attention recently as AOPs show synergistic roles in membrane filtration by enhancing pollutant degradation [18,19], improving filtration performance [20], and mitigating membrane fouling [21,22,23]. For example, our previous work [24,25] and a few others [26,27], heterogeneous photo-Fenton reaction was coupled with ceramic membrane filtration and increased the removal efficiency of 55 ± 5% and surface foulants (e.g., BSA and humic acid). Yang Guo developed a novel catalytic ceramic membrane with a coating layer of CuMn2O4 particles that increased ozonation and filtration performances. The modified membrane increased the additional removal rate of benzophenone-3 from 28% to 34% and reduced the toxicity of degradation intermediates with a drop of EC50 by 12.77% [28]. This improvement was ascribed to the surface-catalytic reactions between ozone and CuMn2O4 particles that enhanced the ozone self-decompose to generate. Other reactive membrane systems (e.g., microwave-enhanced membrane filtration [29], photocatalytic ceramic membrane [24,25,30,31,32], and electrochemical ceramic membrane [33,34,35,36]) were recently tested for their removal capabilities of various micropollutants including 1,4-dioxane, dyes, and drugs.
This study evaluated the utility of the photo-Fenton ceramic membrane filtration toward the removal and degradation of SMX as a model recalcitrant micropollutant. Goethite (α-FeOOH) was coated on planar ceramic membranes as the photo-Fenton catalyst as we reported previously [37]. The removals of SMX were assessed not only in simulated feed water but also the real toilet wastewater, which were filtered through the coated membrane with/without H2O2 and UV irradiation. The TOC removal and degradation by-products were both assessed under different degradation conditions to achieve deeper insight into the degradation mechanisms during this photo-Fenton reactive membrane filtration.

2. Material and Method

2.1. Functionalization of Ceramic Membrane

Synthesis of α-FeOOH catalysts and surface coating on the flat-sheet ceramic membrane (47M014, Sterlitech Ceramic Membrane, Kent, WA, USA) were conducted following the reported methods [24]. Briefly, α-FeOOH catalysts were synthesized in a precipitation method, where 0.5 mol·L−1 Fe(NO3)3 was titrated with a 2.5 mol·L−1 NaOH solution until the reaction solution reached a pH of 12. Then, the suspension was oven dried at 60 °C for 12 h and cooled at room temperature. The precipitate washed repeatedly with DI water and vacuum dried at 60 °C for 2 h. The synthesized catalyst particles with a length of approximately 400–500 nm and the width of about 25–50 nm were immobilized onto planar membranes using Bis-(3-[triethoxysilyl]-propyl)-tetrasulfide (22.3%, w/w, in water) as a silane binder. The coating density, approximately 2 µg-catalyst g−1-membrane, was consistently used in most of the experiment below. Moreover, the coating density was varied by depositing different amounts of catalyst on membranes to examine the impact of coating structures on permeate flux. The catalyst surface coverage and thickness were examined by SEM.

2.2. Batch Degradation Experiments under Different Conditions

To examine the contributions of membrane adsorption, UV photolysis and photo-Fenton reaction toward the removal of SMX, a series of bath experiments were carried out with/without UV254 irradiation, H2O2, and the presence of α-FeOOH catalyst on the membrane. Briefly, 30 mL of the SMX solution with the initial concentration of 12 mg·L−1 was prepared. Then, the ceramic membrane (47 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in thickness) with or without the coating of α-FeOOH was placed on the bottom of the 90-mm petri dish as shown in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information (SI). The distance between the UV lamp and the surface of the liquid was 2.5 cm to obtain approximately the exposure intensity of 400 ± 1 µW∙cm−2. The petri dish was mildly agitated on a rotational shaker to thoroughly mix up the solution. The dose of H2O2 was consistently 10 mM for all the experiments unless indicated. 0.5 mL samples were taken at different times (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min) and filtered before the analytical measurement of the SMX concentrations by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, WATERS e2695, USA) as detailed in the Supporting Information.

2.3. Filtration Experiments

2.3.1. Operation of Continuous Filtration Experiments

The removal and degradation of SMX were also assessed in a dead-end mode filtration through the catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. The membrane filtration module was made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) that is highly resistant to chemical oxidation or UV irradiation. The available membrane surface area was approximately 17.34 cm2 with an overhead space of 1.9 ml (0.2 cm in depth) and a quartz window allowing the UV light illumination (Figure S2). A UVL 214-Watt lamp (Analytikjena Company, Beverly, MA, USA) provides a monochromatic UV254 irradiation of 401 μW·cm−2 on the surface of the α-FeOOH-coated membrane. More detailed illustration of the photocatalytic membrane filtration was reported previously [24,25].

2.3.2. Degradation of SMX Spiked in Toilet Wastewater via Photocatalytic Membrane Filtration

Real toilet water was taken from railway stations in China and filtrated by mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes with a nominal pore size 0.45 µm. The background SMX concentration was determined to be 0.8 ± 0.05 ppb. To accurately assess the removal of SMX in the real toilet water, SMX was spiked to reach a final concentration of 100 ppb in the tested water by adding 0.1 mL of the SMX stock solution (1 mg·L−1) to 1 L of the real toilet water that was pre-filtrated with 0.45-μm glass fiber membrane filters. The pH of the real toilet water varied slightly (5.7–7.3), which was adjusted to 7 with phosphate buffer or NaOH. Other major real toilet water quality parameters are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Analysis of Photocatalytic Degradation Mechanisms

To examine the photocatalytic degradation pathways for SMX, influent and effluent samples from the photo-Fenton reactions were analyzed for degradation byproducts using liquid chromatography−electrospray ionization mass spectrometry equipped with an electrospray ionization source (ESI) or LC−ESI−MS (Agilent1290-6430, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The following experiments were carried out at least with triplicate independent sampling or testing: (1) DI water permeation test; (2) degradation assessment of SMX in batch mode; (3) the concentration measurement of SMX and TOC. SEM images in Figure 1 are typical results selected from at least five sample locations, while the presented results in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 are usually presented with average values with standard deviation as error bars. For the filtration studies, permeate samples were taken at multiple sampling times to obtain representative results, which were shown as average (Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, three repetitions of filtration tests were conducted to confirm the observations. t-testing was used to examine the significance of data variations we observed in Figure 5 in different filtration conditions using at a significant level of 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Catalyst Coating Density and Impacts of Membrane Permeability

Figure 1 shows the SEM images of the coated membranes from the top and cross-sectional views. As the catalyst coating density increased from 0.5 to 6 µg·g−1, the surface coverage apparently increased, and the resulting pores seemed to decrease as compared between Figure 1a,c. The cross-sectional images show that the coating thickness varied from 5 to 8 µm accordingly. Figure S3 shows the water permeability under various TMPs for ceramic membranes before and after catalyst coating. The permeate flux (L m−2 h−1, LMH) was calculated by the Darcy’s equation under different TMPs as detailed in Section S3. The water permeability for the pristine ceramic membranes with a nominal pore diameter of 0.14 μm are determined to be more than 44.0 LMH∙psi−1. For coated membranes, the water permeability reduced to 10, 13, and 20 LMH∙psi−1 under heavy coating, medium coating and low coating. The inherent membrane resistance (Rm) for the pristine ceramic membranes was 0.8 × 1010 m−1. With the catalyst coating, the values of Rm increased to 3.45 × 1010 m−1, 2.74 × 1010 m−1, and 1.98 × 1010 m−1 under heavy coating, medium coating, and low coating conditions.

3.2. Assessment of Pollutant Degradation in Batch Experiments

Figure 2 compares the degradation rates of SMX on catalyst-coated membranes under different conditions. The removal rate of SMX was negligible when the SMX solution was only exposed to catalyst-coated membrane, implying that the surface adsorption of SMX on coated membrane was minor. Similarly, the SMX degradation was also negligible if only H2O2 was present in the solution. When the membrane was present with addition of H2O2, the SMX removal slightly increased to a stable level of over 5% after 10 min. By contrast, the SMX removal was significantly improved under UV irradiation, which alone led to a progressive SMX degradation as shown by the purple triangle data. With the combination with UV/H2O2 or the coated membrane/UV/H2O2, the SMX removal efficiencies were substantially increased. UV irradiation alone appeared to cause SMX degradation or photolysis, especially in the presence of the catalyst-coated membranes, on which UV photocatalytic reactions may occur. The results in Figure 2a were fitted using a first-order degradation kinetics [38]. The corresponding rate constants (k) and the squared correlation coefficients (R2) are summarized in Table 2. The highest reaction rate constant was obtained when using the coated membrane under UV/H2O2, confirming that photo-Fenton reaction on the membrane was the primary factor for the enhanced degradation of SMX [24,25].
Figure 2b shows the TOC changes in the SMX solution under different reaction conditions. No mineralization of SMX was obtained when the solution was exposed to the catalyst-coated membrane or H2O2 only. By contrast, a TOC removal rate of 90% at 60 min when UV/H2O2 were both applied to the catalyst-coated membrane. However, the mineralization of SMX was reduced to 49% and 42% at 20 min if the solution was only exposed to UV/H2O2 or to the catalyst-coated membrane under UV irradiation only.

3.3. Pollutant Removal and Degradation in Continuous Filtration

3.3.1. Removal of SMX under Different Membrane Filtration Conditions

Figure 3 shows that approximately 2% of SMX was removed by the uncoated membrane with less than 1% of TOC reduction, which indicates that the contributions from the size exclusion or membrane surface adsorption for SMX are negligible. Meanwhile, filtration through the catalyst-coated membrane slightly increased the removal rate of SMX to about 11%. By contrast, when the catalyst-coated membrane was only exposed to H2O2, 20% of SMX and 13% of TOC were was removed, indicating that the degradation of SMX was slightly enhanced but the mineralization was still minor. In the presence of catalyst on the membrane and UV irradiation, both the removal rates of SMX and TOC were significantly increased to 40% and 22% respectively, which agrees with the results from the batch experiments. Furthermore, when applying UV irradiation and H2O2 onto the catalyst-coated membrane, the removal of SMX reached the highest level (almost 58%), confirming that the degradation/mineralization was primarily attributed to the photo-Fenton reactions.

3.3.2. Assessment of SMX Removal in Toilet Wastewater

Figure 4 compares the degradation rates of SMX in toilet wastewater with/without spiked SMX on catalyst-coated membranes under different filtration conditions. Clearly, the degradation rates of SMX in the real toilet water well align with in the spiked toilet water, though the SMX removal rates were higher in the spiked toilet water than in the real toilet water. The removal rate of SMX was negligible when the SMX solution was filtrated only by adding H2O2 to the feed solution. By contrast, the SMX removal was significantly improved under UV irradiation, which alone led to a progressive SMX degradation to 50% and 60% in raw and spiked toilet wastewater respectively. With the combination with UV/H2O2, the SMX removal efficiencies were substantially increased to 87% and 92% for the raw and spiked toilet wastewater respectively.
Apparently, the background constituents in the raw toilet wastewater such as dissolved organic matters with a TOC of 1712 ± 18 mg·L−1, suspended solids (983 ± 9 mg·L−1) and ammonia nitrogen (1218 ± 16 mg·L−1) did not negatively affect the photodegradation of SMX on the ceramic membrane surface, although these species may potential sequester and consume photogenerated radicals. This is probably because the operating photo-Fenton reaction exhibited a greater electron scavenging or transferring rates than the level imposed from the filtering wastewater. The rate (e−∙s−1) of electrons (JP) transferred from valence band to the conduction band on photocatalyst can be calculated by
JP = η × UV intensity × surface area/band gap
where η is the apparent quantum yield (e.g., 5–15%), the UV intensity was 400 µW∙cm−2, the effective UV-exposure area was about 12.56 cm2 and the band gap of FeOOH catalyst was 2.5 eV (1 eV = 1.6 × 10−19 J). The total electron loading rate (Je) from the influent is a function of the flow rate (Q) and concentrations of equivalent electrons
J e = Q ⋅ ∑ i n i C i
where i refers to the electron donor species (SMX, TOC, and NH4+-N); n is the number of the total electrons from electron donor species (e− mole−1); (e.g., for SMX, n = 42 e−∙mole−1, for TOC, n was taken as 8 e− mole−1; and for NH4+-N, n = 8 e− mole−1 if completely oxidized to nitrate); Ci is the concentration of electron donor species (mg·L−1 or mol·L−1); and Q is the feed flow rate (3.5 µL∙s−1). Applying our filtration and experimental conditions, we determined that Je (5.89 × 10−6 e−∙s−1) was much smaller than JP (1.26 ± 0.63 × 1015 e−·s−1, assuming η = 15%), which explains why the background pollutants did not significantly affect the removal rates of SMX. This result also agrees with the previous studies showing that TOC and ammonia could be efficiently oxidized by photo-Fenton reactions [39,40].

3.4. Analysis of Photocatalytic Degradation Mechanisms

The surface sites (≡FeIII(OH)) on α-FeOOH catalyst are considered to catalyze the generation of hydroxyl radicals and peroxide anions via photo-Fenton reactions [24]. As reported previously [41], ·OH stoichiometricaly reacts with p-Chlorobenzoic acid (pCBA) in a mole ratio of 1:1, and degradation of ·H through side reactions with other potential contaminants in our reaction system can be ignored. Our results show that UV or H2O2 alone did not decrease the pCBA concentration significantly, which similarly occurred to coated membrane with or without the addition of H2O2. When exposed to UV alone or the catalyst-coated membrane, the pCBA concentration started to decline much faster. Furthermore, when UV/H2O2 was applied with or with the catalyst-coated membrane, the pCBA concentration declined sharply, indicative of the generation of OH via photocatalysis or photo-Fenton reactions. The detailed measurement of pCBA has been reported elsewhere [24].
To gain a better understanding of mineralization mechanisms, the oxidation byproducts of SMX were identified by LC−ESI−MS. Figure 5 shows the chromatograms of the treated permeate samples at different reaction times (0, 5, 30, and 60 min). Four main oxidation intermediates and SMX are identified based on their characteristic peaks at different m/z values. Figure 6 illustrates the hypothetical degradation or transformation pathways (A, B, and C) of SMX in the photo-Fenton oxidation reaction. In pathway A, the SMX forms monohydroxylated sulfamethoxazole by direct attack of HO· on the aromatic moiety of SMX and/or hydrolysis of unstable radical cation SMX·+ formed by interaction with SO4− [42]. Subsequently, the sulfonamide bond is cleaved by reactive oxygen species to produce monohydroxylated sulfanilic acid and 3-amino-5-methyl-isoxazole [43,44]. In pathway B, cleavage of the S–N bond, which leads to the hydrolyzation of SMX into C6H8NO2S and C5H7N2O, respectively. In pathway C, the H were replaced by the O forming the 5-(4-methoxy phenyl)-1 and 4-oxadiazoles-2-mercaptan [45].

4. Conclusions

This study evaluated the photo-Fenton ceramic membrane filtration toward the removal and degradation of SMX as a model recalcitrant micropollutant. The removal of SMX in feed water as well as the raw toilet wastewater in the presence of H2O2 and UV irradiation was over 80%. The background constituents such as TOC or ammonia in raw toilet wastewater did not appear to affect the photodegradation of SMX. The TOC removal and degradation by-products analysis revealed three possible SMX degradation pathways with four main oxidation intermediates. The research findings laid groundwork toward the application of photo-Fenton reactive membranes for such as wastewater treatment and water reuse.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/1/180/s1, Figure S1: Schematics of the batch experiment of Photo-Fenton degradation. Figure S2: Schematic of the filtration unit with the Photo-Fenton ceramic membrane. Figure S3: The pure water fluxes of the pristine and the catalyst-coated ceramic membranes. Figure S4: (a) The degradation kinetics of SMX and (b) The apparent quantum yield (QY) under different UV254 irradiation intensities. Initial SMX concentration: 20 mg·L−1; H2O2 concentration was 10 mmol·L−1; and the catalyst on the ceramic membrane was 2 µg·g−1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and H.Y.; Methodology, W.Z.; Software, X.L.; Validation, X.L., S.D., and S.Z.; Formal analysis, S.S.; Investigation, S.S.; Resources, S.S.; Data curation, S.S.; Writing—Original draft preparation, S.S.; Writing—Review and editing, W.Z.; Visualization, S.S.; Supervision, S.Z.; Project administration, H.Y.; Funding acquisition, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910004016) and “the China’s National Science Foundation (Award Number: 51578043 and 51778306.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Acosta-Rangel, A.; Sánchez-Polo, M.; Polo, A.M.S.; Rivera-Utrilla, J.; Berber-Mendoza, M.S. Sulfonamides degradation assisted by UV, UV/H2O2 and UV/K2S2O8: Efficiency, mechanism and byproducts cytotoxicity. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 225, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, J.; Farid, M.U.; Lee, E.-J.; Yan, D.Y.-S.; Jeong, S.; Kyoungjin An, A. Fouling behavior of negatively charged PVDF membrane in membrane distillation for removal of antibiotics from wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 551, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Clarizia, L.; Russo, D.; Di Somma, I.; Marotta, R.; Andreozzi, R. Homogeneous photo-Fenton processes at near neutral pH: A review. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 209, 358–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.-F.; He, M.; Wu, T.-F.; Hao, A.-P.; Zhang, S.-B.; Chen, Y.-D.; Zhou, S.-B.; Zhen, L.-Y.; Wang, R.; Yuan, Z.-L.; et al. Sulfadiazine oxidation by permanganate: Kinetics, mechanistic investigation and toxicity evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 349, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, T.; Dong, F.; Luo, F.; Li, C. Degradation of sulfonamides and formation of trihalomethanes by chlorination after pre-oxidation with Fe(VI). J. Environ. Sci. 2018, 73, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Akhtar, J.; Amin, N.A.S.; Shahzad, K. A review on removal of pharmaceuticals from water by adsorption. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 12842–12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yadav, M.S.P.; Neghi, N.; Kumar, M.; Varghese, G.K. Photocatalytic-oxidation and photo-persulfate-oxidation of sulfadiazine in a laboratory-scale reactor: Analysis of catalyst support, oxidant dosage, removal-rate and degradation pathway. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, P.; Li, Y.; Meng, T.; Zhang, R.; Song, M.; Ren, J. Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics and human metabolite by biochar and biochar/H2O2 in synthetic urine. Water Res. 2018, 147, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, C.-C.; Huang, C.-L.; Cheng, T.-C.; Lai, H.-T. Inhibitory effect of salinity on the photocatalytic degradation of three sulfonamide antibiotics. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 102, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pronk, W.; Palmquist, H.; Biebow, M.; Boller, M. Nanofiltration for the separation of pharmaceuticals from nutrients in source-separated urine. Water Res. 2006, 40, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Landry, K.A.; Boyer, T.H. Fixed Bed Modeling of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Removal by Ion-Exchange in Synthetic Urine: Mass Removal or Toxicity Reduction? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10072–10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pronk, W.; Zuleeg, S.; Lienert, J.; Escher, B.; Koller, M.; Berner, A.; Koch, G.; Boller, M. Pilot experiments with electrodialysis and ozonation for the production of a fertiliser from urine. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 56, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kemacheevakul, P.; Chuangchote, S.; Otani, S.; Matsuda, T.; Shimizu, Y. Phosphorus recovery: Minimization of amount of pharmaceuticals and improvement of purity in struvite recovered from hydrolysed urine. Environ. Technol. 2014, 35, 3011–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abellán, M.N.; Bayarri, B.; Giménez, J.; Costa, J. Photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole in aqueous suspension of TiO2. Appl. Catal. B 2007, 74, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tao, Y.; Cai, J.; Huai, X.; Liu, B. A novel antibiotic wastewater degradation technique combining cavitating jets impingement with multiple synergetic methods. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 44, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, S.; Li, D.; Yang, X.; Cai, Q.; Peng, S.; Peng, X.; Yao, H.; Xie, B. Novel characteristics on micro-electrolysis mediated Fe(0)-oxidizing autotrophic denitrification with aeration: Efficiency, iron-compounds transformation, N2O and NO 2 − accumulation, and microbial characteristics. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 123409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chong, M.N.; Sharma, A.K.; Burn, S.; Saint, C.P. Feasibility study on the application of advanced oxidation technologies for decentralised wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 35 (Suppl. C), 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karnik, B.S.; Davies, S.H.; Baumann, M.J.; Masten, S.J. Fabrication of Catalytic Membranes for the Treatment of Drinking Water Using Combined Ozonation and Ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7656–7661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schlichter, B.; Mavrov, V.; Chmiel, H. Study of a hybrid process combining ozonation and microfiltration/ultrafiltration for drinking water production from surface water. Desalination 2004, 168, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.-F.; Xu, Z.-L.; Yang, H.; Yu, L.-Y.; Liu, M. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 4725–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, Y.; Xu, B.; Qi, F. A novel ceramic membrane coated with MnO2–Co3O4 nanoparticles catalytic ozonation for benzophenone-3 degradation in aqueous solution: Fabrication, characterization and performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 287, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. You, S.-H.; Tseng, D.-H.; Hsu, W.-C. Effect and mechanism of ultrafiltration membrane fouling removal by ozonation. Desalination 2007, 202, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.; Davies, S.H.R.; Baumann, M.J.; Tarabara, V.V.; Masten, S.J. Effect of ozone dosage and hydrodynamic conditions on the permeate flux in a hybrid ozonation–ceramic ultrafiltration system treating natural waters. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 311, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, S.; Yao, H.; Fu, W.; Hua, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, W. Reactive Photo-Fenton ceramic membranes: Synthesis, characterization and antifouling performance. Water Res. 2018, 144, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, S.; Yao, H.; Fu, W.; Xue, S.; Zhang, W. Enhanced degradation of antibiotics by photo-fenton reactive membrane filtration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 386, 121955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Angelis, L.; de Cortalezzi, M.M.F. Improved membrane flux recovery by Fenton-type reactions. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 500, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, L.; Ruan, S.; Xu, X.; Zou, R.; Hu, J. One-dimensional nanomaterial-assembled macroscopic membranes for water treatment. Nano Today 2017, 17, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, Y.; Song, Z.; Xu, B.; Li, Y.; Qi, F.; Croue, J.-P.; Yuan, D. A novel catalytic ceramic membrane fabricated with CuMn2O4 particles for emerging UV absorbers degradation from aqueous and membrane fouling elimination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 1229–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, W.; Zhang, W. Microwave-enhanced membrane filtration for water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 568, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, X.; Shen, Z.-P.; Shi, L.; Cheng, R.; Yuan, D.-H. Photocatalytic Membrane Reactors (PMRs) in Water Treatment: Configurations and Influencing Factors. Catalysts 2017, 7, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yatmaz, H.C.; Dizge, N.; Kurt, M.S. Combination of photocatalytic and membrane distillation hybrid processes for reactive dyes treatment. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 2743–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alias, S.S.; Harun, Z.; Latif, I.S.A. Characterization and performance of porous photocatalytic ceramic membranes coated with TiO2 via different dip-coating routes. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 53, 11534–11552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, J.; Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Xu, S.; Wu, Z. Development of an Electrochemical Ceramic Membrane Filtration System for Efficient Contaminant Removal from Waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 4117–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Heddrich, M.P.; Gupta, S.; Santhanam, S. Electrochemical Ceramic Membrane Reactors in Future Energy and Chemical Process Engineering. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2019, 91, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, W.; Wang, X.; Zheng, J.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z. Antifouling performance and mechanisms in an electrochemical ceramic membrane reactor for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 570–571, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ganiyu, S.O.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Cretin, M.; Esposito, G.; Oturan, M.A. Coupling of membrane filtration and advanced oxidation processes for removal of pharmaceutical residues: A critical review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 156, 891–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, G.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, T.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, P. Effects of organic acids and initial solution pH on photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A (BPA) in a photo-Fenton-like process using goethite (α-FeOOH). Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2016, 15, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, B.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, L.; Guo, Y.; Yan, S. Enhanced heterogeneous Fenton degradation of Methylene Blue by nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) assembled on magnetic Fe3O4/reduced graphene oxide. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 5, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, M.-H.; Dong, H.; Zhao, L.; Wang, D.-X.; Meng, D. A review on Fenton process for organic wastewater treatment based on optimization perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 670, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dantas, T.L.P.; José, H.J.; Moreira, R. Fenton and Photo-Fenton oxidation of tannery wastewater. Acta Sci. Technol. 2003, 25, 91–95. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Niu, J.; Chen, Y. Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5164–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ji, Y.; Fan, Y.; Liu, K.; Kong, D.; Lu, J. Thermo activated persulfate oxidation of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole and structurally related compounds. Water Res. 2015, 87, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Oh, G.-H.; Kim, J.-E.; Park, Y.-J. Development of stabilized tenofovir disoproxil tablet: Degradation profile, stabilization, and bioequivalence in beagle dogs. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2018, 44, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, Z.-T.; Oh, W.-D.; Liu, Y.; Yang, E.-H.; Lim, T.-T. Controllable mullite bismuth ferrite micro/nanostructures with multifarious catalytic activities for switchable/hybrid catalytic degradation processes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 509, 502–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moradi, M.; Moussavi, G. Investigation of chemical-less UVC/VUV process for advanced oxidation of sulfamethoxazole in aqueous solutions: Evaluation of operational variables and degradation mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 190, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of α-FeOOH coated ceramic membranes. (a–c) Top views for ceramic membranes with low coating, medium coating and heavy coating. (d–f) Cross-sectional views for ceramic membranes with low coating, medium coating, and heavy coating corresponding to coating densities of 0.5, 2 and 6 µg-catalyst·g-membrane−1.
Figure 1. SEM images of α-FeOOH coated ceramic membranes. (a–c) Top views for ceramic membranes with low coating, medium coating and heavy coating. (d–f) Cross-sectional views for ceramic membranes with low coating, medium coating, and heavy coating corresponding to coating densities of 0.5, 2 and 6 µg-catalyst·g-membrane−1.
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The ratio of the remaining concentration (C) of SMX over the initial concentration (C0) under different degradation processes on catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. (b) The TOC removal in the batch photo-Fenton reactions with or without the presence of the catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. Initial SMX concentration: 20 mg·L−1 corresponding to an initial TOC concentration of 5.8 mg·L−1, UV wavelength was 254 nm and intensity was 401 µw·cm−2; H2O2 concentration was 10 mmol·L−1, and the catalyst on the ceramic membrane was 2 μg·g−1. The doses of UV irradiation and H2O2 on SMX photodegradation were optimized with details discussed in Section S4.
Figure 2. (a) The ratio of the remaining concentration (C) of SMX over the initial concentration (C0) under different degradation processes on catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. (b) The TOC removal in the batch photo-Fenton reactions with or without the presence of the catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. Initial SMX concentration: 20 mg·L−1 corresponding to an initial TOC concentration of 5.8 mg·L−1, UV wavelength was 254 nm and intensity was 401 µw·cm−2; H2O2 concentration was 10 mmol·L−1, and the catalyst on the ceramic membrane was 2 μg·g−1. The doses of UV irradiation and H2O2 on SMX photodegradation were optimized with details discussed in Section S4.
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g003 550
Figure 3. The removal of SMX under different filtration conditions: SMX concentration: 20 mg·L−1; Influent flux: 10 LMH; UV intensity: 401 μW·cm−2; H2O2 dosage: 10 mmol·L−1 at 5 ± 0.2 μL∙s−1 and CM denotes for coated membrane.
Figure 3. The removal of SMX under different filtration conditions: SMX concentration: 20 mg·L−1; Influent flux: 10 LMH; UV intensity: 401 μW·cm−2; H2O2 dosage: 10 mmol·L−1 at 5 ± 0.2 μL∙s−1 and CM denotes for coated membrane.
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g004 550
Figure 4. The SMX removal in initial and spiked toilet water under different degradation processes on catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. The background SMX concentration: 0.8 ± 0.05 ppb, spiked SMX concentration: 100 ppb. The UV254 intensity was 401 µW·cm−2; H2O2 concentration was 10 mmol·L−1; and the catalyst on the ceramic membrane was 2 µg·g−1. “Fil.” stands for filtration with a permeate flux of 10 LMH.
Figure 4. The SMX removal in initial and spiked toilet water under different degradation processes on catalyst-coated ceramic membrane. The background SMX concentration: 0.8 ± 0.05 ppb, spiked SMX concentration: 100 ppb. The UV254 intensity was 401 µW·cm−2; H2O2 concentration was 10 mmol·L−1; and the catalyst on the ceramic membrane was 2 µg·g−1. “Fil.” stands for filtration with a permeate flux of 10 LMH.
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g005 550
Figure 5. The RRLC-MS analysis of SMX and its degradation byproducts in the liquid samples that underwent different reaction times (0, 5, 30, and 60 min).
Figure 5. The RRLC-MS analysis of SMX and its degradation byproducts in the liquid samples that underwent different reaction times (0, 5, 30, and 60 min).
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g006 550
Figure 6. Reaction pathways of SMX and the major intermediates observed in this study.
Figure 6. Reaction pathways of SMX and the major intermediates observed in this study.
Nanomaterials 10 00180 g006
Table
Table 1. Major water quality parameters of the toilet wastewater before/after prefiltration.
Table 1. Major water quality parameters of the toilet wastewater before/after prefiltration.
ParameterspHTOC (mg·L−1)SS (mg·L−1)NH4+-N (mg·L−1)TP (mg·L−1)
Raw6.94 ± 0.011712 ± 18983 ± 91218 ± 1666 ± 3
Pre-filtered6.94 ± 0.011524 ± 21N.A.1168 ± 1362 ± 2
TOC: total organic carbon; SS: Suspended solid; NH4+-N: ammonia nitrogen; TP: total phosphors.
Table
Table 2. First-order degradation kinetics rate constants of SMX under different experimental conditions in Figure 2a with the uncoated and coated ceramic membranes.
Table 2. First-order degradation kinetics rate constants of SMX under different experimental conditions in Figure 2a with the uncoated and coated ceramic membranes.
Membrane TypeReaction TypeFirst-Order Kinetic Rate Constant (min−1)R2
No membraneUV only0.01260.9654
H2O2 only0.00050.9346
UV + H2O20.04110.9436
Uncoated membraneNo UV or H2O20.00010.9855
UV only0.02130.9781
H2O2 only0.00050.9345
UV + H2O20.09280.9776
Coated membraneNo UV or H2O20.00010.9674
UV only0.14350.9532
H2O2 only0.00050.9762
UV + H2O21.00310.9683

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, S.; Yao, H.; Li, X.; Deng, S.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, W. Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010180

AMA Style

Sun S, Yao H, Li X, Deng S, Zhao S, Zhang W. Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(1):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010180

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Shaobin, Hong Yao, Xinyang Li, Shihai Deng, Shenlong Zhao, and Wen Zhang. 2020. "Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration" Nanomaterials 10, no. 1: 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010180

APA Style

Sun, S., Yao, H., Li, X., Deng, S., Zhao, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in Toilet Wastewater by Photo-Fenton Reactive Membrane Filtration. Nanomaterials, 10(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010180

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop