Next Article in Journal
Role of Substrate in Au Nanoparticle Decoration by Electroless Deposition
Previous Article in Journal
From Single-Core Nanoparticles in Ferrofluids to Multi-Core Magnetic Nanocomposites: Assembly Strategies, Structure, and Magnetic Behavior
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/nano10112179
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives

by
Alexandra Elena Stoica
1,2,
Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu
1,
Anca Oana Hermenean
3,
Ecaterina Andronescu
1 and
Bogdan Stefan Vasile
1,2,*
1
Department of Science and Engineering of Oxide Materials and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1–7 Gheorghe Polizu Street, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Research Center for Micro and Nanomaterials, Faculty of Applied Chemistry and Materials Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
3
Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(11), 2179; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112179
Submission received: 3 September 2020 / Revised: 15 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials Applied in Regenerative Healing and Scar Free Healing Current Concepts and Future Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Every year, millions of people develop scars due to skin injuries after trauma, surgery, or skin burns. From the beginning of wound healing development, scar hyperplasia, and prolonged healing time in wound healing have been severe problems. Based on the difference between adult and fetal wound healing processes, many promising therapies have been developed to decrease scar formation in skin wounds. Currently, there is no good or reliable therapy to cure or prevent scar formation. This work briefly reviews the engineering methods of scarless wound healing, focusing on regenerative biomaterials and different cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular components in regenerative wound healing to minimize skin damage cell types, and scar formation.

1. Introduction

Every year, millions of people suffer from scars due to skin injuries after surgery, trauma, or burns, which have a significant physical and psychological impact [1,2]. Pathologic skin fibrosis causes scars that are mangled, reduce normal movement, and impede patient recovery and reintegration into society [3,4]. Scarring is a common consequence of skin injuries and can cause various adverse effects, including physical deformities and mental illness [1,5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, more than 11 million burns are reported to require medical care each year worldwide [1,6].
Overproduction of connective tissue (especially collagen) in the time of wound healing may lead to scar formation (see Figure 1) [7,8]. Skin scar formation covers a variety of clinical phenotypes and could be divided into more subtypes. Bayat et al. [9] classified scars into “normal” fine line scars, a variety of abnormal scars, including widespread scars, atrophic scars, scar contractures, hypertrophic scars and keloid scars. If we discuss hypertrophic and keloid scars, both are produced by excessive deposition of immature collagen all along the remodeling phase [10]. Nonetheless, a hypertrophic scar forms a red raised mass in the initial wound site, which in some measures will shrink over time. Simultaneously, a keloid scar (a more severe form of significant scarring) will extend beyond the initial wound site with broad collagen bundles, which do not degenerate spontaneously [7,11].
In 1971, it was first shown that before the 120th day of pregnancy, the fetal lamb wound had healed without scarring [12]. Comparably, it is demonstrated that the skin damage of the human fetus in early pregnancy can be cured to develop normal skin tissue without scarring [13,14,15]. Engineering methods that mimic the fetal wound healing process can lead to techniques that minimize or erase scar generation after injury [1,16,17,18].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g001 550
Figure 1. Histological image—hematoxylin–eosin stages of the wound healing process (10×, bar: 20 µm) (a) physiological skin, (b) damaged skin, (c) skin undergoing wound healing process and (d) healed skin [19].
Figure 1. Histological image—hematoxylin–eosin stages of the wound healing process (10×, bar: 20 µm) (a) physiological skin, (b) damaged skin, (c) skin undergoing wound healing process and (d) healed skin [19].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g001
Although different treatments and therapies are used to target various wound healing stages to impede scar development, none of these treatments or therapies has been entirely successful [3,20,21]. This review presents an update on engineering strategies for scarless wound healing, focusing on the use of regenerative biomaterials, and treat the scope of various growth factors, cell types, cytokines, and extracellular components in regenerative wound healing. Combining the regenerative matrices based on biomaterials with engineered cells with the smaller intrinsic potential for fibrogenesis represents a promising approach for complete scar-free skin tissue regeneration.

2. Scar Healing Mechanism

The human skin has three layers: epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. The epidermis is the outer layer, a barrier to the external environment, such as protecting the skin from ultraviolet (UV) radiation [22]. It contains layers of cells with regenerative abilities, so that superficial injuries, like scrapes, are apt to regenerate without scarring [23,24]. Beneath the epidermis is the dermis, which is as valuable a layer of the skin as the other two. The dermis contains an elaborate network of connective tissues, enhancing the elasticity and strength of human skin [25,26]. Hypodermis is an extremely viscous and soft layer [27]. Nonetheless, at the time of injury, these connective tissue networks are attacked, leading to injury-related scars. Skin scar formation includes normotrophic, hydrotropic, hypertrophic, contracture, and keloid scars. The overgrowth of collagen fibrous tissue causes these scars. In the process of rehabilitation, collagen fibrous tissue replaces normal skin. [26,28,29]. Hypertrophic scars are raised, unusually pigmented, and provoke itching or abnormal sensations [11,30]. If compared with keloid scars, hypertrophic scars remain within the line of actual damage and relapse over time [31,32]. They contain nodules, including myofibroblasts, which are differentiated fibroblasts representing alpha-smooth muscle actin, collagen fibers, and extracellular matrix (ECM) [28,29].
Even though considerable progress has been made in understanding the elaborate processes and networks that control human wound healing, regenerative medicine has still not been able to develop therapies that can induce the natural wound environment in order to heal without scars [33,34]. The lack of ability to induce perfect skin regeneration is somewhat due to our narrow understanding of scarless healing in the natural environment [35,36,37].
The healing process involves many closely coordinated regenerative reactions, counting hemostasis, the migration of various cell types to the wound, inflammation, angiogenesis, and the formation of extracellular matrix [1,2,38,39]. Skin wound healing in adults is well known and consists of four partially overlapping stages (see Figure 2): hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. The last three stages determine whether the wound is healing naturally or whether the abnormal healing process causes excessive ECM protein production and fibrosis [2,40].
The extracellular matrix (ECM) forms a dynamic landscape of structural proteins and macromolecules that describes tissue structure and actively controls the form, behavior, and function of the cells [26,41,42,43]. In numerous situations, ECM provides cell polarity, barrier role, and defense for stem cell progenitor cells, all of which are vital for maintaining complex organisms [41,44]. Therefore, it is not strange that ECM plays a fundamental role in precisely regulated adult tissue repair and is a key element in determining the repair process’s efficacy and grade [41,45].
Scar formation is a key part of normal mammalian tissue regeneration, but its resolution defect may conduce to excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the tissue and cause pathological scar formation. Additionally, excessive production of ECM components and tissue sclerosis are characteristic of other fibrotic conditions of the skin. Scleroderma affects a limited area of the skin, and systemic sclerosis affects the entire skin and internal organs. Fibrosis also disorders numerous other organs, like the heart, kidney, liver, and lungs, leading to acute dysfunction of these tissues [2,46].
The majority of adult skin injuries, the wound will form a disordered extracellular matrix that becomes a scar. However, the degree of occurrence is variable [47]. However, in some people, the result of wound healing is excessive accumulation of collagen, leading to hypertrophic scars or keloids [48]. Therefore, it can be said that scar formation is the final result of the repair process after tissue injury [49,50]. Thus, excessive scars seem to be determined by the following factors: (a) excessive production of collagen and different ECM components; (b) loss or downregulation of key stop signals; (c) dysfunction in the resolution and downregulation of the degradative enzymes implicated in eliminating the scar tissue [47].
About 4 days after inflammatory cells debride the wound, the damaged dermis begins to repair through granulation tissue formation. Under the stimulation of macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells begin to migrate on the temporary wound matrix and enter the wound site with the support of MMPs [51]. Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are key enzymes implicated in ECM remodeling due to their capacity to degrade different matrix components, growth factors, cytokines and cell surface receptors. Finally, the fibrin clot is transformed into connective tissue rich in blood vessels, which becomes the basis for the granular appearance. This transition requires a balance between matrix degradation and production because insufficient ECM degradation or excessive production can lead to hypertrophic scar formation [52].
The molecular mediators that regulate the wound healing stage are outlined in Figure 3 [3]. The core of wound repair is transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), a cytokine secreted by various cell types involved in healing [53]. TGF-β possesses three isoforms (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3), all of which promote infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibroblasts and determine fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, and also ECM production (see Figure 4). In addition, TGF-β inhibits reepithelialization [52,54].
Another suggestive growth factor in the pathogenesis of hypertrophic scars and other fibrotic diseases is the connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). As a mediator of various effects of TGF-β1 on fibroblasts, CTGF supports the production of ECM, counting type I collagen and fibronectin. After all, CTGF can regulate MMPs and their inhibitors (TIMPs), consequently regulating the stability and integrity of the ECM. So, it appears that CTGF is valuable for granulation tissue and subsequent scar formation [52,55].
In humans, there is one exception to this healing process. In the first trimester of pregnancy, the fetus heals with little or no scar formation [49,50]. Human fetal skin in early pregnancy can regenerate after injury without forming scar tissue. Fetal wound healing involves many factors, including cytokines, soluble growth factors, and insoluble extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and tissue mechanics. Recent studies on adult wound healing (considering the fetal wound healing model) have shown that only a single factor (like transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) or interleukin-10 (IL-10)) cannot achieve efficient scar-free wound healing. Research centered on the fetal regeneration process has shown that scarless wound healing can be achieved by combining various cells and morphogenetic factors within a fetal–mimetic matrix or scaffold [1,56,57,58]. Understanding the differences between fetal and adult skin wound healing may conduct new and efficient scar-free skin regenerative therapies.

3. Current Scar Treatments and Involved Factors

Although many treatments have been used for various scars, none of them has gained satisfactory clinical results. Over time, cryotherapy, steroid infusion, weight therapy, and medication have been used for skin regeneration, but patient satisfaction is low. Therefore, scars are still a challenge in the cosmetic and surgical area [4,28,59].
In order to develop new drugs for the prevention and removal of scars, researchers focused on the results of scarless skin regeneration models, such as human fetuses [60,61,62], American black bear [63], reindeer [28], African spiny mouse [64,65], bottlenose dolphin [66], fish-scale gecko [67], zebrafish [68,69,70], salamander [71,72] and amphibians [73,74,75], which, using endogenous stem cells to prevent scar formation, shows significant regeneration and repair capabilities during wound healing. Therefore, we focus here on the engineering methods of scarless wound healing, focusing on the use of regenerative biomaterials, advanced therapeutic dressings, and different growth factors, cytokines and extracellular components for scar-free wound healing [28].

3.1. Cellular Factors Mediating Scar-Free Healing

Wound healing is a very complex process affected by many factors. In the stage of rehabilitation, a distinct set of specific growth factors and cytokines must interact with their receptors, different growth factors, and extracellular matrix (ECM) components at their target sites [7,76]. The wound healing sequence that leads to tissue scars starts with the local inflammation in the tissue; the actual trauma is not mandatory and can be replaced by other stimuli and cascade motion (see Figure 5) [28,33,49].
Skin damage exposes platelets from blood vessels to subendothelial collagen, conducting to thrombin formation. Platelets activated by thrombin release some growth factors, finally forming a hemostatic plug [7,77]. Growth factors represent endogenous signaling molecules that can control cellular responses necessary for wound healing mechanisms (such as migration, proliferation, and differentiation) [7,78]. Growth factors released from activated platelets include heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha and TGF-beta (TGF-β) [7,28]. These growth factors diffuse into surrounding tissues and chemotactically attract monocytes and neutrophils into the wound [7,79]. Neutrophils are the most frequent inflammatory cells at the early stages of the wound healing process. These cells are vital to the wound-healing response by mobilizing other inflammatory cells, like monocyte monocyte-derived macrophages, phagocytosing the fibrin clot, and removing debris of tissue and also dead cells [49,80]. Neutrophils reach the wound site and eliminate microorganisms within the wound bed through phagocytosis and the delivery of antimicrobial granules. Neutrophils also have the role to release chemokines that bring more leukocytes in order to increase the immune response [81,82].
The proliferation phase is defined by granulation tissue formation and the beginning of angiogenesis [7,83]. Granulation tissue consists of neovasculature, fibroblasts, macrophages in a free collagen matrix, hyaluronic acid (HA), and fibronectin. It finally replenishes the wound area. At this stage, the number of inflammatory cells decreases, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) released from inflammatory cells chemotactically bring fibroblasts into the wound site [7,84,85].
The particular binding of growth factors to their receptors activates intracellular signal transduction pathways, thereby regulating different aspects of subcellular physiology and cell function [7,86]. Growth factors link to their equivalent receptors placed on the cell surface, opening signaling pathways to activate important signaling molecules that may stimulate cytoplasmic proteins or lead transcription of novel proteins [7,87]. The role of some fibrogenic signaling molecules, counting TGF-β (see Figure 6), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-13, TNF-α, IGF-1, KGF, PDGF, EGF, VEGF, CTGF, FGF-1, FGF-2 and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1), have been well documented [28,49,88].
Thus, we can declare that diverse signaling pathways and GFs (see Table 1) are implicated in fibrotic pathologies’ genesis, and they are often intertwined. This makes it more challenging to develop new therapies because a single upstream element that regulates these signaling networks can significantly impact other cellular mechanisms [49,90,91,92].
Therefore, as understanding the function of growth factors in the pathophysiology of chronic wounds improves, growth factors are expected to provide the best wound treatment method. Nonetheless, they have restricted clinical applications due to the short in vivo half-life as a result of their low stability, limited absorption through the skin around wound injury, elimination by exudation before achieving the wound site, and unwanted results due to high local and/or systemic levels after topical administration [7,104].

3.2. Advanced Therapeutic Dressings for Scar-Free Wound Healing

Wound healing is a process common to all vertebrates [105]. Many scar-free techniques, materials, and treatments have been developed over time. For clinical and preclinical treatments a variety of vertebrates, including amphibians [35,106,107], fish [69], reptiles [95], and mammals (counting mice, marsupials, sheep, rats, rabbits, pigs, and frogs) [105,108] have been used [105,109]. Wound healing ranges from non-amniotic vertebrates’ ability to completely regenerate tissues to the formation of skin scars in adult mammals and humans [105].
The latest developments in wound repair and regeneration have promoted the use of different bioresource-based nanocomposite dressings. These dressings may solve the problems related to conventional dressings, which can cause tissue damage and cannot effectively prevent infection [110].
Obtaining a valuable nanocomposite system consists of natural polymers regarding drug incorporation and drug release, representing a green approach working at the fusion of nanotechnology and biomedical science [110,111,112]. Further, various drug delivery systems (DDSs) have been developed to assure better stability and controlled release of growth factors for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds (see Figure 7) [7,113,114].
Therefore, the focus of research has been on the application of naturally derived biopolymers like dextran [110,115] and chitosan [116,117,118] based on their biodegradability, biocompatibility, ease of availability, and chemical transformation that decrease their biological properties in terms of therapeutic outputs [110,119,120]. One such example was published by Zhang et al. [116] in a study aimed to determine if and how the cationic of chitosan can affect the hypertrophic scar-related outcomes through preparing carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels with various genipin concentrations (2.5%, 5%, 10%, and 15%, respectively). Moreover, the authors proved that CMCS-5% sample with additional incorporation of 2% (V/V) Aloe vera gel presented a further improved scar prevention performance. Overall, these findings may have important implications for high-quality wound repair and effective scar suppression in the design of chitosan-based wound dressings.
Functionalized wound dressing has been demonstrated to increase wound healing, angiogenesis, and control newly formed types of collagen. It enhances the structure of already formed collagen to decrease its volume around the injured site [49]. Combined with electrospinning technologies, which utilize electrical forces to produce fibrous scaffolds on the nanometer to micrometer scale with controlled porosity, a type of advanced healing dressing should be obtained [121,122]. These scaffolds may be efficient due to their ability to mimic the natural ECM structure, assuring mechanical strength, supporting cell adhesion and proliferation, avoiding dehydration and supporting coverage, conducing to tissue repair in vivo. Their porous structure can also control the loading and release of drugs at the injury site, thereby increasing their antifibrotic compounds [49]. One such example is seen in a study inspired by fetal scarless wound healing. Dongmei Zhang et al. [123] developed a wearable biomimetic film (WBMF) obtained from hyaluronan (HA), vitamin E (VE), dopamine (DA), and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) intending to mimic the fetal context (FC) and fetal extracellular matrix (ECM) around the wound site for dermal regeneration. The authors proved that the WBMF treatment of the severe full-thickness skin defect of adult mice, mimicking fetal ECM, could promote fibroblast migration, angiogenesis, reepithelization, and granulation tissue formation. More importantly, the WBMF could reduce collagen synthesis, reestablish typical dermal collagen architecture, and recover scarless appearance. Another biomimetic electrospun nano-fibrous antimicrobial dressing material loaded with dual antioxidants has been prepared to solve infections and scar formation [124]. Pandey et al. [124] developed a novel composite nano-fibrous material (PVP-Ce-Cur NF) composed of polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), cerium nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO3)3·6H2O), and curcumin using an electrospinning technique. So, the PVP-Ce-Cur NF dressing was directly applied to the full-thickness circular excision wound of Wistar model rats. It showed complete healing and re-epithelialization within 20 days, without any scars.
Encouraged by the fundamental roles of decorin (a small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan that can build extracellular matrix in collagen-containing tissues [125]), Jeon et al. [126] prepared an anti-scar collagen-targeting glue, which consists of newly designed collagen combined with mussel adhesive protein and specific glycosaminoglycans. In a rat skin resection model, the collagen-targeting glue successfully accelerated the wound’s initial regeneration, which was defined by effective re-epithelialization, new blood vessel formation, and rapid collagen synthesis.
A study represents another example of wound dressing inspired this time by the wound healing characteristics of the oral mucosa [83,127]. In short, there are many biological differences between the oral mucosa and other skin tissues, one of which is the expression of cytokines. The biological performance of oral mucosal epidermis in rapid healing after trauma also proves the high expression of cytokines related to epidermal growth and proliferation [128]. Even if the cytokines responsible for cellular proliferation and migration have different mechanisms, their role in promoting wound healing is beyond doubt. Over time, the oral mucosa has formed a highly antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and moist tissue environment that the skin does not have. This is another huge difference between the two tissues [83,127]. A biomimetic hydrogel was prepared by Kong et al. [83] to realize the rapid and scar-free healing of skin wounds. The bFGF, EGF, lysozyme, and HA were selected as the essential components that are differently expressed between the oral mucosa and the back skin. By embedding exogenous EGF into layered self-assembled microcapsules and embedding bFGF into hydrogels, the differential release effects of bFGF and EGF similar to those of the oral mucosa were tactically controlled. They concluded that the sequential expression of simulated cytokines and the sterile, moist environment of the oral mucosa are useful and necessary for rapid and scarless skin healing.
Zinc is essential for humans and is a cofactor for many transcription factors and enzymes, which play a vital role in growth, metabolism, immune function, and wound regeneration [129,130]. Metal nanoparticles, such as zinc, are generally considered safe in wound healing and burn treatment due to their low toxicity, antibacterial, bactericidal and anti-inflammatory properties [129,131,132]. In this context, zinc sulfide (ZnS) nanoparticles were combined with a transglutaminase cross-linked gelatin gel (Col-Tgel) carrier and delivered in a rodent wound bed model [129]. Therefore, Han et al. [129] investigated zinc sulfide nanoparticles (ZnS-NP) on wound healing in vitro with 2D and 3D models and in vivo with a rat full-thickness wound model. Wounds treated with ZnS nanoparticles promoted skin regeneration by inducing skin appendage formation, dermal papillae, and adipocyte migration. ZnS treated group inhibited wound contraction and scar tissue formation.
Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs, represent a rich source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC)) can be obtained from subcutaneous fat tissue through minimally invasive procedures. ASC has shown great potential in many cell-based therapies. Their ability to repair and regenerate skin wounds is most likely to be mediated through differentiation and paracrine effects [133,134]. Adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) sheets may be obtained easily using stimulation with l-ascorbate 2-phosphate and have important tissue regeneration applications and wound healing [133,135]. Recently, ASCs have been shown to have therapeutic effects on fibrosis and difficult scars. Yu et al. [133] fabricated L-ascorbate 2-phosphate (A2-P) induced ASC sheets that proved physiological cues to enhance skin wound healing and reduce scar formation, thus representing an effective topical wound treatment modality.
The mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) have immunomodulatory characteristics and a high regenerative ability. The MSC were first reported as presenting a similar morphology to fibroblasts. The MSC have been isolated from various tissues, including fatty tissue, bone marrow, synovium, hair follicle, dental pulp, Wharton’s jelly, placenta, umbilical cord, umbilical cord blood and periodontal ligament. In addition, MSC-derived exosomes may be a great alternative to MSC cell therapy as they possess similar biological functions to the originating cells. Moreover, MSC exosomes are more stable and have lower immunogenicity compared to their originating cells [136,137]. Jiang et al. [138] studied the cell regeneration effects and its underlying mechanism of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (hBM-MSC-Ex) on cutaneous wound healing in rats (see Figure 8). Their results proved that hBM-MSC-Ex effectively promote the cutaneous wound healing through inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad signal pathway.
In addition, in 2018, Sun et al. [139] showed that Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) could be a promising candidate for the therapy of cutaneous wounds. They investigated whether a WJ-MSC-derived conditioned medium (MSC-CM) may be used to cure radiation-induced skin wounds in rats. The authors proved that MSC-CM promoted cell proliferation, sebaceous gland cell-like regeneration and angiogenesis, accelerated wound closure and enhanced the quality of wound healing. Currently, some animal models are used to study scar formation (rabbit, rats and mice mostly). However, apart from the ethical issues, there is one big limitation: the physiology of animal model skin and their immune systems are very different from humans to the extent that pivotal factors responsible for differences between normotrophic, hypertrophic and keloid scar formation are hard to identify [140].
The new studies reviewed here shed light on the cellular and molecular mechanisms leading to scarring and regeneration upon skin injury. The current situation is continuously updated through multiple efforts in different fields, including interdisciplinary science, materials science engineering, biomedical engineering, and gene therapy, to name a few.

4. Conclusions

Skin wound repair is a versatile process designed to achieve two main tasks: restore the skin’s barrier function to avoid further blood loss and/or infection, and restore mechanical and also physiological properties.
Growth factors are natural peptides implicated in cell growth, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. The particular binding of different growth factors to their receptors activates intracellular signal transduction pathways that control different features of subcellular physiology and cell function. Many scientific researchers have proved that regulating the release of growth factors from pharmaceutical preparations by using DDS-based strategies may improve the wound healing process and skin regeneration.
Due to the heterogeneity under different fibrotic conditions, individual elements’ regulation seems insufficient in most cases; many current therapies have failed to obtain clinically relevant results. Although many advances have been made in the treatment of skin wounds, including different types of wound dressings, cell-based strategies, growth factors, and vacuum-assisted treatment, none of them can support scarless wound healing in adult skin. Therefore, it is essential to shift the target of new treatment methods from single-target modulation therapy to multi-target modulation therapy to maximize synergy and reduce harmful side effects.
Understanding the primary mechanism of scar formation and regeneration balance is the key to achieving scarless regeneration in a controlled manner in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.E.S., A.M.G., A.O.H., E.A.; validation, A.E.S., A.M.G., B.S.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.E.S.; writing—review and editing, A.E.S., A.M.G. and B.S.V.; supervision, B.S.V., A.M.G., A.O.H., E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Monavarian, M.; Kader, S.; Moeinzadeh, S.; Jabbari, E. Regenerative scar-free skin wound healing. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2019, 25, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Poetschke, J.; Gauglitz, G.G. Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. JDDG J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2016, 14, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El Ayadi, A.; Jay, J.W.; Prasai, A. Current Approaches Targeting the Wound Healing Phases to Attenuate Fibrosis and Scarring. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Behrangi, E.; Goodarzi, A.; Roohaninasab, M.; Sadeghzadeh-Bazargan, A.; Nobari, N.N.; Ghassemi, M. A review of scar treatment related to acne and burn. J. Crit. Rev. 2020, 7, 714–722. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lipman, K.; Wang, M.; Berthiaume, E.; Holloway, J.; Da Lio, A.; Ting, K.; Soo, C.; Zheng, Z. Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2020, 84, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. García, C.; Pino, A.; Jimenez, N.; Truchuelo, M.T.; Jaén, P.; Anitua, E. In vitro characterization and clinical use of platelet-rich plasma-derived Endoret-Gel as an autologous treatment for atrophic scars. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 19, 1607–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, J.W.; Hwang, S.R.; Yoon, I.-S. Advanced Growth Factor Delivery Systems in Wound Management and Skin Regeneration. Molecules 2017, 22, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Harsha, L.; Brundha, M. Role of collagen in wound healing. Drug Invent. Today 2020, 13, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bayat, A.; McGrouther, D.; Ferguson, M. Skin scarring. BMJ 2003, 326, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ghazawi, F.M.; Zargham, R.; Gilardino, M.S.; Sasseville, D.; Jafarian, F. Insights into the pathophysiology of hypertrophic scars and keloids: How do they differ? Adv. Ski. Wound Care 2018, 31, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Limandjaja, G.C.; Niessen, F.B.; Scheper, R.J.; Gibbs, S. Hypertrophic scars and keloids: Overview of the evidence and practical guide for differentiating between these abnormal scars. Exp. Dermatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Burrington, J.D. Wound healing in the fetal lamb. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1971, 6, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liechty, K.W.; Adzick, N.S.; Crombleholme, T.M. Diminished Interleukin 6 (Il-6) Production During Scarless Human Fetal Wound Repair. Cytokine 2000, 12, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lorenz, H.P.; Longaker, M.T.; Perkocha, L.A.; Jennings, R.W.; Harrison, M.R.; Adzick, N.S. Scarless wound repair: A human fetal skin model. Development 1992, 114, 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, M.; Zhao, Y.; Hao, H.; Han, W.; Fu, X. Theoretical and practical aspects of using fetal fibroblasts for skin regeneration. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 36, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barnes, L.A.; Marshall, C.D.; Leavitt, T.; Hu, M.S.; Moore, A.L.; Gonzalez, J.G.; Longaker, M.T.; Gurtner, G.C. Mechanical forces in cutaneous wound healing: Emerging therapies to minimize scar formation. Adv. Wound Care 2018, 7, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Jones, R.E.; Foster, D.S.; Hu, M.S.; Longaker, M.T. Wound healing and fibrosis: Current stem cell therapies. Transfusion 2019, 59, 884–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wang, Y.; Beekman, J.; Hew, J.; Jackson, S.; Issler-Fisher, A.C.; Parungao, R.; Lajevardi, S.S.; Li, Z.; Maitz, P.K. Burn injury: Challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 123, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tottoli, E.M.; Dorati, R.; Genta, I.; Chiesa, E.; Pisani, S.; Conti, B. Skin Wound Healing Process and New Emerging Technologies for Skin Wound Care and Regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Su, L.; Zheng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Hu, D. Emerging progress on the mechanism and technology in wound repair. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 117, 109191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, X.; Dong, J.; Wang, S.; Yan, M.; Yao, M. Advances in the treatment of traumatic scars with laser, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, and ultrasound. Burn. Trauma 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ramos-e-Silva, M.; de-Moura-Castro Jacques, C. Epidermal barrier function and systemic diseases. Clin. Dermatol. 2012, 30, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Akazawa, Y.; Yuki, T.; Yoshida, H.; Sugiyama, Y.; Inoue, S. Activation of TRPV4 strengthens the tight-junction barrier in human epidermal keratinocytes. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2013, 26, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Monteiro-Riviere, N.A. Structure and function of skin. Toxicol. Ski. 2010, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Brown, T.M.; Krishnamurthy, K. Histology, dermis. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rippa, A.L.; Kalabusheva, E.P.; Vorotelyak, E.A. Regeneration of dermis: Scarring and cells involved. Cells 2019, 8, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pailler-Mattei, C.; Bec, S.; Zahouani, H. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Giri, S.; Machens, H.-G.; Bader, A. Therapeutic potential of endogenous stem cells and cellular factors for scar-free skin regeneration. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hoerst, K.; van den Broek, L.; Sachse, C.; Klein, O.; von Fritschen, U.; Gibbs, S.; Hedtrich, S. Regenerative potential of adipocytes in hypertrophic scars is mediated by myofibroblast reprogramming. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 97, 761–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bao, Y.; Xu, S.; Pan, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, X.; Pan, F.; Li, X. Comparative efficacy and safety of common therapies in keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2020, 44, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Liao, Y.; Xia, J.; Wang, Z.; Mo, X.; Feng, J.; He, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Lu, F. Mechanical micronization of lipoaspirates for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yuan, F.L.; Sun, Z.L.; Feng, Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Du, Y.; Yu, S.; Yang, M.L.; Lv, G.Z. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition in the formation of hypertrophic scars and keloids. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 21662–21669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodrigues, M.; Kosaric, N.; Bonham, C.A.; Gurtner, G.C. Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 665–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chouhan, D.; Dey, N.; Bhardwaj, N.; Mandal, B.B. Emerging and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin regeneration: Current status and advances. Biomaterials 2019, 216, 119267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Seifert, A.W.; Monaghan, J.R.; Voss, S.R.; Maden, M. Skin regeneration in adult axolotls: A blueprint for scar-free healing in vertebrates. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Amanzadi, B.; Mirzaei, E.; Hassanzadeh, G.; Mahdaviani, P.; Boroumand, S.; Abdollahi, M.; Hosseinabdolghaffari, A.; Majidi, R.F. Chitosan-based layered nanofibers loaded with herbal extract as wound-dressing materials on wound model studies. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019, 9, 3979–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karppinen, S.-M.; Heljasvaara, R.; Gullberg, D.; Tasanen, K.; Pihlajaniemi, T. Toward understanding scarless skin wound healing and pathological scarring. F1000Research 2019, 8, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bhatt, T.; Kansagar, G.; Pincha, N.; Jamora, C. How does the skin heal wounds? Iwonder 2019, 3, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jourdan, M.; Madfes, D.C.; Lima, E.; Tian, Y.; Seité, S. Skin Care Management For Medical And Aesthetic Procedures To Prevent Scarring. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 12, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Huguier, V.; Giot, J.-P.; Simonneau, M.; Levillain, P.; Charreau, S.; Garcia, M.; Jégou, J.-F.; Bodet, C.; Morel, F.; Lecron, J.-C. Oncostatin M exerts a protective effect against excessive scarring by counteracting the inductive effect of TGFβ1 on fibrosis markers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Godwin, J.; Kuraitis, D.; Rosenthal, N. Extracellular matrix considerations for scar-free repair and regeneration: Insights from regenerative diversity among vertebrates. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 56, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xue, M.; Jackson, C.J. Extracellular matrix reorganization during wound healing and its impact on abnormal scarring. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sidgwick, G.; Bayat, A. Extracellular matrix molecules implicated in hypertrophic and keloid scarring. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2012, 26, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lam, M.T.; Nauta, A.; Meyer, N.P.; Wu, J.C.; Longaker, M.T. Effective delivery of stem cells using an extracellular matrix patch results in increased cell survival and proliferation and reduced scarring in skin wound healing. Tissue Eng. Part A 2013, 19, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Rhett, J.M.; Ghatnekar, G.S.; Palatinus, J.A.; O’Quinn, M.; Yost, M.J.; Gourdie, R.G. Novel therapies for scar reduction and regenerative healing of skin wounds. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Urciuolo, F.; Casale, C.; Imparato, G.; Netti, P.A. Bioengineered skin substitutes: The role of extracellular matrix and vascularization in the healing of deep wounds. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yates, C.C.; Bodnar, R.; Wells, A. Matrix control of scarring. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 1871–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ladin, D.A.; Garner, W.L.; Smith, D.J., Jr. Excessive scarring as a consequence of healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1995, 3, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Coentro, J.Q.; Pugliese, E.; Hanley, G.; Raghunath, M.; Zeugolis, D.I. Current and upcoming therapies to modulate skin scarring and fibrosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zangeneh, M.M.; Joshani, Z.; Zangeneh, A.; Miri, E. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Stachys lavandulifolia flower, and their cytotoxicity, antioxidant, antibacterial and cutaneous wound-healing properties. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niessen, F.B.; Spauwen, P.H.; Schalkwijk, J.; Kon, M. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999, 104, 1435–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van der Veer, W.M.; Bloemen, M.C.T.; Ulrich, M.M.W.; Molema, G.; van Zuijlen, P.P.; Middelkoop, E.; Niessen, F.B. Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns 2009, 35, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beanes, S.R.; Dang, C.; Soo, C.; Ting, K. Skin repair and scar formation: The central role of TGF-[beta]. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2003, 5, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gilbert, R.W.D.; Vickaryous, M.K.; Viloria-Petit, A.M. Signalling by Transforming Growth Factor Beta Isoforms in Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brigstock, D.R. Regulation of angiogenesis and endothelial cell function by connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and cysteine-rich 61 (CYR61). Angiogenesis 2002, 5, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Komai, T.; Inoue, M.; Okamura, T.; Morita, K.; Iwasaki, Y.; Sumitomo, S.; Shoda, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Fujio, K. Transforming growth factor-β and interleukin-10 synergistically regulate humoral immunity via modulating metabolic signals. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moore, A.L.; Marshall, C.D.; Barnes, L.A.; Murphy, M.P.; Ransom, R.C.; Longaker, M.T. Scarless wound healing: Transitioning from fetal research to regenerative healing. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2018, 7, e309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rolfe, K.J.; Grobbelaar, A.O. A Review of Fetal Scarless Healing. ISRN Dermatol. 2012, 2012, 698034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Stantchev, R.I.; Chiu, T.-W.; Ahuja, A.T.; Pickwell-MacPherson, E. In vivo terahertz imaging to evaluate scar treatment strategies: Silicone gel sheeting. Biomed. Opt. Express 2019, 10, 3584–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rong, X.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Shi, L.; Jiang, T. Human fetal skin-derived stem cell secretome enhances radiation-induced skin injury therapeutic effects by promoting angiogenesis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Taghiabadi, E.; Beiki, B.; Aghdami, N.; Bajouri, A. Amniotic Membrane Seeded Fetal Fibroblasts as Skin Substitute for Wound Regeneration. In Skin Stem Cells: Methods and Protocols; Turksen, K., Ed.; Springer New York: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 211–219. [Google Scholar]
  62. Goodarzi, P.; Falahzadeh, K.; Aghayan, H.; Mohamadi Jahani, F.; Payab, M.; Gilany, K.; Rahim, F.; Larijani, B.; Tayanloo Beik, A.; Adibi, H.; et al. GMP-Compliant Human Fetal Skin Fibroblasts for Wound Healing. Arch. Neurosci. 2018, 5, e68497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Iaizzo, P.A.; Laske, T.G.; Harlow, H.J.; McClay, C.B.; Garshelis, D.L. Wound healing during hibernation by black bears (Ursus americanus) in the wild: Elicitation of reduced scar formation. Integr. Zool. 2012, 7, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stewart, D.C.; Serrano, P.N.; Rubiano, A.; Yokosawa, R.; Sandler, J.; Mukhtar, M.; Brant, J.O.; Maden, M.; Simmons, C.S. Unique behavior of dermal cells from regenerative mammal, the African Spiny Mouse, in response to substrate stiffness. J. Biomech. 2018, 81, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pinheiro, G.; Prata, D.F.; Araújo, I.M.; Tiscornia, G. The African spiny mouse (Acomys spp.) as an emerging model for development and regeneration. Lab. Anim. 2018, 52, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Toms, C.N.; Stone, T.; Och-Adams, T. Visual-only assessments of skin lesions on free-ranging common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): Reliability and utility of quantitative tools. Mar. Mammal Sci. 2020, 36, 744–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Drelich, A.J.; Monteiro, S.N.; Brookins, J.; Drelich, J.W. Fish Skin: A Natural Inspiration for Innovation. Adv. Biosyst. 2018, 2, 1800055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martin, P.; Feng, Y. Wound healing in zebrafish. Nature 2009, 459, 921–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Richardson, R.; Slanchev, K.; Kraus, C.; Knyphausen, P.; Eming, S.; Hammerschmidt, M. Adult Zebrafish as a Model System for Cutaneous Wound-Healing Research. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Seo, S.B.; Dananjaya, S.H.S.; Nikapitiya, C.; Park, B.K.; Gooneratne, R.; Kim, T.-Y.; Lee, J.; Kim, C.-H.; De Zoysa, M. Silver nanoparticles enhance wound healing in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 68, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mu, L.; Tang, J.; Liu, H.; Shen, C.; Rong, M.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, R. A potential wound-healing-promoting peptide from salamander skin. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 3919–3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Luo, J.; Meng, Y.; Zheng, L.; Xu, K.; Li, C. Fabrication and characterization of Chinese giant salamander skin composite collagen sponge as a high-strength rapid hemostatic material. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abe, G.; Hayashi, T.; Yoshida, K.; Yoshida, T.; Kudoh, H.; Sakamoto, J.; Konishi, A.; Kamei, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Tamura, K.; et al. Nsights regarding skin regeneration in non-amniote vertebrates: Skin regeneration without scar formation and potential step-up to a higher level of regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 100, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Demori, I.; El Rashed, Z.; Corradino, V.; Catalano, A.; Rovegno, L.; Queirolo, L.; Salvidio, S.; Biggi, E.; Zanotti-Russo, M.; Canesi, L.; et al. Peptides for Skin Protection and Healing in Amphibians. Molecules 2019, 24, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Antonella, F. Adaptive immunity and skin wound healing in amphibian adults. Open Life Sci. 2019, 14, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bacci, S. Facts in wound healing: A review. Med. Res. Arch. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Young, A.; McNaught, C.-E. The physiology of wound healing. Surgery (Oxford) 2011, 29, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Werner, S.; Grose, R. Regulation of Wound Healing by Growth Factors and Cytokines. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 835–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kulebyakin, K.Y.; Nimiritsky, P.P.; Makarevich, P.I. Growth Factors in Regeneration and Regenerative Medicine: “the Cure and the Cause”. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020, 11, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Curaj, A.; Schumacher, D.; Rusu, M.; Staudt, M.; Li, X.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Jankowski, V.; Jankowski, J.; Dumitraşcu, A.R.; Hausenloy, D.J.; et al. Neutrophils Modulate Fibroblast Function and Promote Healing and Scar Formation after Murine Myocardial Infarction †. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Erickson, J.R.; Echeverri, K. Learning from regeneration research organisms: The circuitous road to scar free wound healing. Dev. Biol. 2018, 433, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Larouche, J.; Sheoran, S.; Maruyama, K.; Martino, M.M. Immune Regulation of Skin Wound Healing: Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Targets. Adv. Wound Care 2018, 7, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kong, X.; Fu, J.; Shao, K.; Wang, L.; Lan, X.; Shi, J. Biomimetic hydrogel for rapid and scar-free healing of skin wounds inspired by the healing process of oral mucosa. Acta Biomater. 2019, 100, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pelizzo, G.; Avanzini, M.A.; Mantelli, M.; Croce, S.; Maltese, A.; Vestri, E.; De Silvestri, A.; Percivalle, E.; Calcaterra, V. Granulation tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: A potential application for burn wound healing in pediatric patients. J Stem Cells Regen. Med. 2018, 14, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ellis, S.; Lin, E.J.; Tartar, D. Immunology of Wound Healing. Curr. Dermatol. Rep. 2018, 7, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Nurkesh, A.; Jaguparov, A.; Jimi, S.; Saparov, A. Recent Advances in the Controlled Release of Growth Factors and Cytokines for Improving Cutaneous Wound Healing. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lebonvallet, N.; Laverdet, B.; Misery, L.; Desmoulière, A.; Girard, D. New insights into the roles of myofibroblasts and innervation during skin healing and innovative therapies to improve scar innervation. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Harn, H.I.C.; Ogawa, R.; Hsu, C.-K.; Hughes, M.W.; Tang, M.-J.; Chuong, C.-M. The tension biology of wound healing. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Liarte, S.; Bernabé-García, Á.; Nicolás, F.J. Role of TGF-β in Skin Chronic Wounds: A Keratinocyte Perspective. Cells 2020, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Amini-Nik, S.; Yousuf, Y.; Jeschke, M.G. Scar management in burn injuries using drug delivery and molecular signaling: Current treatments and future directions. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 123, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shirakami, E.; Yamakawa, S.; Hayashida, K. Strategies to prevent hypertrophic scar formation: A review of therapeutic interventions based on molecular evidence. Burn. Trauma 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Del Toro, D.; Dedhia, R.; Tollefson, T.T. Advances in scar management: Prevention and management of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 24, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Miller, M.-C.; Nanchahal, J. Advances in the Modulation of Cutaneous Wound Healing and Scarring. BioDrugs 2005, 19, 363–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Peled, Z.M.; Rhee, S.J.; Hsu, M.; Chang, J.; Krummel, T.M.; Longaker, M.T. The ontogeny of scarless healing II: EGF and PDGF-B gene expression in fetal rat skin and fibroblasts as a function of gestational age. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2001, 47, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Subramaniam, N.; Petrik, J.J.; Vickaryous, M.K. VEGF, FGF-2 and TGFb expression in the normal and regenerating epidermis of geckos: Implications for epidermal homeostasis and wound healing in reptiles. J. Anat. 2018, 232, 768–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Occleston, N.L.; Laverty, H.G.; O’Kane, S.; Ferguson, M.W.J. Prevention and reduction of scarring in the skin by Transforming Growth Factor beta 3 (TGFβ3): From laboratory discovery to clinical pharmaceutical. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2008, 19, 1047–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Otsuka, Y.; Mizuta, H.; Takagi, K.; Iyama, K.-I.; Yoshitake, Y.; Nishikawa, K.; Suzuki, F.; Hiraki, Y. Requirement of fibroblast growth factor signaling for regeneration of epiphyseal morphology in rabbit full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. Dev. Growth Differ. 1997, 39, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yoon, D.; Yoon, D.; Cha, H.-J.; Lee, J.-S.; Chun, W. Enhancement of wound healing efficiency mediated by artificial dermis functionalized with EGF or NRG1. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 13, 045007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Efron, P.A.; Moldawer, L.L. Cytokines and wound healing: The role of cytokine and anticytokine therapy in the repair response. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 2004, 25, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rumalla, V.K.; Borah, G.L. Cytokines, growth factors, and plastic surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001, 108, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Abarca-Buis, R.F.; Martínez-Jiménez, A.; Vera-Gómez, E.; Contreras-Figueroa, M.E.; Garciadiego-Cázares, D.; Paus, R.; Robles-Tenorio, A.; Krötzsch, E. Mechanisms of epithelial thickening due to IL-1 signalling blockade and TNF-α administration differ during wound repair and regeneration. Differentiation 2018, 99, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, F.; Lang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, D.; Wang, R.; Lin, X.; Liu, X.; Shi, P.; Pang, X. Human Novel MicroRNA Seq-915_x4024 in Keratinocytes Contributes to Skin Regeneration by Suppressing Scar Formation. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2019, 14, 410–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Liechty, K.W.; Crombleholme, T.M.; Cass, D.L.; Martin, B.; Adzick, N.S. Diminished Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Production in the Fetal Wound Healing Response. J. Surg. Res. 1998, 77, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Murdock, J.; Sayed, M.S.; Tavakoli, M.; Portaliou, D.M.; Lee, W.W. Safety and efficacy of a growth factor and cytokine-containing topical product in wound healing and incision scar management after upper eyelid blepharoplasty: A prospective split-face study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2016, 10, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Ud-Din, S.; Volk, S.W.; Bayat, A. Regenerative healing, scar-free healing and scar formation across the species: Current concepts and future perspectives. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Godwin, J.W.; Rosenthal, N. Scar-free wound healing and regeneration in amphibians: Immunological influences on regenerative success. Differentiation 2014, 87, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Yokoyama, H.; Kudo, N.; Todate, M.; Shimada, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Tamura, K. Skin regeneration of amphibians: A novel model for skin regeneration as adults. Dev. Growth Differ. 2018, 60, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yannas, I.; Lee, E.; Orgill, D.P.; Skrabut, E.; Murphy, G.F. Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 933–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Gawronska-Kozak, B.; Bukowska, J. Chapter 14-Animal Models of Skin Regeneration. In Animal Models for the Study of Human Disease, 2nd ed.; Conn, P.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Singh, S.; Gupta, A.; Gupta, B. Scar free healing mediated by the release of aloe vera and manuka honey from dextran bionanocomposite wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pilehvar-Soltanahmadi, Y.; Dadashpour, M.; Mohajeri, A.; Fattahi, A.; Sheervalilou, R.; Zarghami, N. An Overview on Application of Natural Substances Incorporated with Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds to Development of Innovative Wound Dressings. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 414–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Üstündağ Okur, N.; Hökenek, N.; Okur, M.E.; Ayla, Ş.; Yoltaş, A.; Siafaka, P.I.; Cevher, E. An alternative approach to wound healing field; new composite films from natural polymers for mupirocin dermal delivery. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 738–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kim, H.S.; Sun, X.; Lee, J.-H.; Kim, H.-W.; Fu, X.; Leong, K.W. Advanced drug delivery systems and artificial skin grafts for skin wound healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 146, 209–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Feldman, D. Polymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering, antimicrobials and drug delivery. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2018, 8, 3153–3160. [Google Scholar]
  115. Singh, S.; Gupta, A.; Sharma, D.; Gupta, B. Dextran based herbal nanobiocomposite membranes for scar free wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhang, N.; Gao, T.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Yao, R.; Wu, F. Modulating cationicity of chitosan hydrogel to prevent hypertrophic scar formation during wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 154, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ali Khan, Z.; Jamil, S.; Akhtar, A.; Mustehsan Bashir, M.; Yar, M. Chitosan based hybrid materials used for wound healing applications—A short review. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2020, 69, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ullah, F.; Javed, F.; Zakaria, M.; Jamila, N.; Khattak, R.; Khan, A.; Akil, H. Determining the molecular-weight and interfacial properties of chitosan built nanohydrogel for controlled drug delivery applications. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019, 9, 4452–4457. [Google Scholar]
  119. Hajialyani, M.; Tewari, D.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Nabavi, S.M.; Farzaei, M.H.; Abdollahi, M. Natural product-based nanomedicines for wound healing purposes: Therapeutic targets and drug delivery systems. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5023–5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Abdelghany, A.; Meikhail, M.; El-Bana, A. Microbial activity and swelling behavior of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate semi-natural terpolymer interface containing amoxicillin for wound dressing applications. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019, 9, 4368–4373. [Google Scholar]
  121. Fahmy, A.; Zaid, H.; Ibrahim, M. Optimizing the electrospun parameters which affect the preparation of nanofibers. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2019, 9, 4463–4473. [Google Scholar]
  122. Naghibzadeh, M.; Firoozi, S.; Nodoushan, F.S.; Adabi, M.; Khoradmehr, A.; Fesahat, F.; Esnaashari, S.S.; Khosravani, M.; Tavakol, S.; Pazoki-Toroudi, H. Application of electrospun gelatin nanofibers in tissue engineering. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2018, 8, 3048–3052. [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang, D.; Cai, G.; Mukherjee, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Mai, B.; Liu, K.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y. Elastic, Persistently Moisture-Retentive, and Wearable Biomimetic Film Inspired by Fetal Scarless Repair for Promoting Skin Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 5542–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pandey, V.K.; Ajmal, G.; Upadhyay, S.N.; Mishra, P.K. Nano-fibrous scaffold with curcumin for anti-scar wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 589, 119858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wei, S.; Huard, J. 72-Tissue Therapy: Implications of Regenerative Medicine for Skeletal Muscle. In Principles of Regenerative Medicine; Atala, A., Lanza, R., Thomson, J.A., Nerem, R.M., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; pp. 1232–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jeon, E.Y.; Choi, B.-H.; Jung, D.; Hwang, B.H.; Cha, H.J. Natural healing-inspired collagen-targeting surgical protein glue for accelerated scarless skin regeneration. Biomaterials 2017, 134, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wong, J.W.; Gallant-Behm, C.; Wiebe, C.; Mak, K.; Hart, D.A.; Larjava, H.; Häkkinen, L. Wound healing in oral mucosa results in reduced scar formation as compared with skin: Evidence from the red Duroc pig model and humans. Wound Repair Regen. 2009, 17, 717–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Garzón, I.; Miyake, J.; González-Andrades, M.; Carmona, R.; Carda, C.; Sánchez-Quevedo, M.d.C.; Campos, A.; Alaminos, M. Wharton’s jelly stem cells: A novel cell source for oral mucosa and skin epithelia regeneration. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2013, 2, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Han, B.; Fang, W.H.; Zhao, S.; Yang, Z.; Hoang, B.X. Zinc sulfide nanoparticles improve skin regeneration. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2020, 29, 102263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Koga, A.Y.; Felix, J.C.; Silvestre, R.G.M.; Lipinski, L.C.; Carletto, B.; Kawahara, F.A.; Pereira, A.V. Evaluation of wound healing effect of alginate film containing Aloe vera gel and cross-linked with zinc chloride. Acta Cir. Bras. 2020, 35, e202000507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Manuja, A.; Raguvaran, R.; Kumar, B.; Kalia, A.; Tripathi, B.N. Accelerated healing of full thickness excised skin wound in rabbits using single application of alginate/acacia based nanocomposites of ZnO nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Sabry, N.M.; Tolba, S.; Abdel-Gawad, F.K.; Bassem, S.M.; Nassar, H.; El-Taweel, G.E.; Ibrahim, M.A. On the molecular modeling analyses of the interaction between nano zinc oxide and bacteria. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2018, 8, 3294–3297. [Google Scholar]
  133. Yu, J.; Wang, M.-Y.; Tai, H.-C.; Cheng, N.-C. Cell sheet composed of adipose-derived stem cells demonstrates enhanced skin wound healing with reduced scar formation. Acta Biomater. 2018, 77, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Qiu, H.; Liu, S.; Wu, K.; Zhao, R.; Cao, L.; Wang, H. Prospective application of exosomes derived from adipose-derived stem cells in skin wound healing: A review. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 19, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dong, Y.; Cui, M.; Qu, J.; Wang, X.; Kwon, S.H.; Barrera, J.; Elvassore, N.; Gurtner, G.C. Conformable hyaluronic acid hydrogel delivers adipose-derived stem cells and promotes regeneration of burn injury. Acta Biomater. 2020, 108, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Casado-Díaz, A.; Quesada-Gómez, J.M.; Dorado, G. Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) in Regenerative Medicine: Applications in Skin Wound Healing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Ha, D.H.; Kim, H.-K.; Lee, J.; Kwon, H.H.; Park, G.-H.; Yang, S.H.; Jung, J.Y.; Choi, H.; Lee, J.H.; Sung, S.; et al. Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell-Derived Exosomes for Immunomodulatory Therapeutics and Skin Regeneration. Cells 2020, 9, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Jiang, T.; Wang, Z.; Sun, J. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes stimulate cutaneous wound healing mediates through TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, X.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Q. The Healing Effects of Conditioned Medium Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Radiation-Induced Skin Wounds in Rats. Cell Transplant. 2018, 28, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Van den Broek, L.J.; Limandjaja, G.C.; Niessen, F.B.; Gibbs, S. Human hypertrophic and keloid scar models: Principles, limitations and future challenges from a tissue engineering perspective. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g002 550
Figure 2. Wound healing process and cells involved in each phase: (A) hemostasis, (B) inflammation, (C) proliferation, (D) remodeling [19].
Figure 2. Wound healing process and cells involved in each phase: (A) hemostasis, (B) inflammation, (C) proliferation, (D) remodeling [19].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g002
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g003 550
Figure 3. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) isoforms and their role in wound healing—schematical representation [54].
Figure 3. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) isoforms and their role in wound healing—schematical representation [54].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g003
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g004 550
Figure 4. Regulators of wound healing and scarring (blue indicates activation, and pink indicates attenuation of fibrosis) [3].
Figure 4. Regulators of wound healing and scarring (blue indicates activation, and pink indicates attenuation of fibrosis) [3].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g004
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g005 550
Figure 5. Cutaneous wounds (A) 3 days and (B) 5 days after injury [7].
Figure 5. Cutaneous wounds (A) 3 days and (B) 5 days after injury [7].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g005
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Various TGF-β signatures; (b) the amount of TGF-β varies in the epidermis through the sequential stages of wound healing [89].
Figure 6. (a) Various TGF-β signatures; (b) the amount of TGF-β varies in the epidermis through the sequential stages of wound healing [89].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g006
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g007 550
Figure 7. Growth factor-loaded drug delivery systems (DDSs) for enhanced wound healing [7].
Figure 7. Growth factor-loaded drug delivery systems (DDSs) for enhanced wound healing [7].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g007
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematically ilustration of hBM-MSC-Ex stimulates cutaneous wound healing by regulating the TGF-β/Smad signal pathway [138].
Figure 8. Schematically ilustration of hBM-MSC-Ex stimulates cutaneous wound healing by regulating the TGF-β/Smad signal pathway [138].
Nanomaterials 10 02179 g008
Table
Table 1. Cytokines and growth factor (GF) of current therapeutic importance in the modulation of wound repair and scarring [93].
Table 1. Cytokines and growth factor (GF) of current therapeutic importance in the modulation of wound repair and scarring [93].
NamePredominant Cellular SourceReferences
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)Platelets and macrophages[1,94]
transforming growth factor β-1 (TGFβ-1), transforming growth factor β-2 (TGFβ-2)Platelets and macrophages[54,95]
transforming growth factor β-3 (TGFβ-3)Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes[54,96]
fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGF-1/aFGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2/bFGF)Macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells[95,97]
keratinocyte growth factor (KGF)fibroblasts and endothelial cells[1]
epidermal growth factor (EGF)Macrophages and Keratinocytes[94,98]
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)Keratinocytes[95]
interferon-gamma (IFNγ)T Cells[99,100]
insulin-like growth factor (IGF)Platelets, Macrophages, Fibroblasts[1]
tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα)Macrophages[1]
interleukin-1β (IL-1β)-[101]
interleukin-6 (IL-6)Macrophages and Fibroblasts[13,101,102]
interleukin-8 (IL-8)Macrophages and Fibroblasts[102,103]
interleukin-4 (IL-4)T Cells[99,100]
interleukin-10 (IL-10)Macrophages and T Cells[99,100]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stoica, A.E.; Grumezescu, A.M.; Hermenean, A.O.; Andronescu, E.; Vasile, B.S. Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112179

AMA Style

Stoica AE, Grumezescu AM, Hermenean AO, Andronescu E, Vasile BS. Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(11):2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stoica, Alexandra Elena, Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu, Anca Oana Hermenean, Ecaterina Andronescu, and Bogdan Stefan Vasile. 2020. "Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives" Nanomaterials 10, no. 11: 2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112179

APA Style

Stoica, A. E., Grumezescu, A. M., Hermenean, A. O., Andronescu, E., & Vasile, B. S. (2020). Scar-Free Healing: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. Nanomaterials, 10(11), 2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop