Next Article in Journal
Effect of Annealing Temperature on Spatial Atomic Layer Deposited Titanium Oxide and Its Application in Perovskite Solar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Coating Effect on the 1H—NMR Relaxation Properties of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
An Analytical Multiple-Temperature Model for Flash Laser Irradiation on Single-Layer Graphene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Room Temperature Magnetic Memory Effect in Cluster-Glassy Fe-Doped NiO Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Magnetosomes in Magnetic Hyperthermia

by
Nikolai A. Usov
1,2,3,* and
Elizaveta M. Gubanova
3
1
National University of Science and Technology «MISiS», 119049 Moscow, Russia
2
Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation, Russian Academy of Sciences, IZMIRAN, Troitsk, 108480 Moscow, Russia
3
National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”, 115409 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(7), 1320; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071320
Submission received: 26 May 2020 / Revised: 1 July 2020 / Accepted: 2 July 2020 / Published: 5 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications and Properties of Magnetic Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
Nanoparticles, specifically magnetosomes, synthesized in nature by magnetotactic bacteria, are very promising to be usedin magnetic hyperthermia in cancer treatment. In this work, using the solution of the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation, we calculate the specific absorption rate (SAR) in an alternating (AC) magnetic field of assemblies of magnetosome chains depending on the particle size D, the distance between particles in a chain a, and the angle of the applied magnetic field with respect to the chain axis. The dependence of SAR on the a/D ratio is shown to have a bell-shaped form with a pronounced maximum. For a dilute oriented chain assembly with optimally chosen a/D ratio, a strong magneto-dipole interaction between the chain particles leads to an almost rectangular hysteresis loop, and to large SAR values in the order of 400–450 W/g at moderate frequencies f = 300 kHz and small magnetic field amplitudes H0 = 50–100 Oe. The maximum SAR value only weakly depends on the diameter of the nanoparticles and the length of the chain. However, a significant decrease in SAR occurs in a dense chain assembly due to the strong magneto-dipole interaction of nanoparticles of different chains.

1. Introduction

Magnetic hyperthermia [1,2,3] is currently considered as a very promising method of cancer treatment. Laboratory tests [4,5,6,7] and clinical studies [8,9,10] show that local, dosed heating of tumors leads to a delay in their growth and even complete decay and disappearance. For this, it is necessary in several sessions to maintain the temperature of the tumor at the level of 43–45 °C for 30 min [1,2,3]. In magnetic hyperthermia local heating of biological tissues is achieved by introducing magnetic nanoparticles into a tumor and applying to them a low frequency alternating (AC) magnetic field [1,2,3,11,12]. The fundamental advantage of magnetic hyperthermia lies in the possibility of local heating of tumors located deep in a human body, since the low-frequency magnetic field is relatively poorly shielded by the biological medium, in contrast to high-frequency and laser heating methods [13,14], which are suitable for the treatment of tumors localized near body surface.
However, for the successful implementation of the magnetic hyperthermia in practice it is necessary to use assemblies of magnetic nanoparticles with a sufficiently high specific absorption rate (SAR) in AC magnetic field of moderate frequency, f < 1 MHz, and amplitude H0 of the order of 100–200 Oe. It was proved [15] that the effect of an AC magnetic field on living organisms is relatively safe under the condition H0f ≤ 5 × 108 A(ms)−1, though recently safety limit was increased [16] up to H0f ≤ 5 × 109 A(ms)−1. In addition, only mildly toxic and biodegradable nanoparticles can be used in magnetic hyperthermia to reduce the risk of possible side effects. Based on these requirements, magnetic nanoparticles of iron oxides are considered to be the most suitable for application in magnetic hyperthermia [1,2,3,11,12,16,17,18,19].
Unfortunately, the popular chemical methods for the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles of iron oxides [1,20,21,22] in most cases give assemblies with a wide distribution of nanoparticles in size and shape. Moreover, the obtained nanoparticles turn out to be polycrystalline, which leads to a low saturation magnetization of particles in comparison with the corresponding single-crystal three-dimensional samples [23]. For such assemblies it is hardly possible to obtain sufficiently high SARs under the above restrictions on the frequency and amplitude of AC magnetic field [24,25]. Furthermore, the subsequent uncontrolled agglomeration of nanoparticles in the biological medium leads to a further decrease of the assembly SAR [26,27].
The results of numerical simulations [28,29,30], confirmed by a number of experimental data [25,31,32,33,34,35,36] show that in order to achieve sufficiently high SARs at moderate amplitudes and frequencies of AC magnetic field, one has to use single-crystal magnetic nanoparticles with high saturation magnetization. It is necessary also to ensure a narrow particle size distribution near the optimally chosen nanoparticle diameter. Due to difficulties with chemical synthesis, lately, much attention has been paid to experimental and theoretical studies of assemblies of magnetosomes, which are synthesized in nature by magnetotactic bacteria [5,25,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Magnetosomes grow inside bacteria under optimal physiological conditions. Therefore, they have a perfect crystalline structure, a quasi-spherical shape, and a fairly narrow particle size distribution. Most magnetotactic bacteria synthesize nanoparticles that are close in chemical composition to high-purity maghemite, γ-Fe2O3 [42] or magnetite, Fe3O4 [45].
It was shown in the pioneer work of Hergt, et al. [37] that the SAR in the oriented assembly of magnetosomes reaches a very high value of 960 W/g at a frequency f = 410 kHz and magnetic field amplitude H0 = 126 Oe. High SAR values in magnetosome assemblies were also obtained in a number of subsequent experimental studies [5,25,39,45]. It is known [37,38,43] that various types of magnetotactic bacteria synthesize nanoparticles with different characteristic sizes, from 20 to 50 nm. In the bacteria the nanoparticles are arranged in the form of long chains consisting of 6–30 particles of approximately the same diameter. Existing experimental techniques make it possible to isolate magnetosomes from bacteria both in the form of single particles and in the form of chains with different numbers of nanoparticles in the chain [25,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
The behavior of the assembly of magnetosome chains in an AC magnetic field is of great interest from a theoretical point of view. It was already emphasized earlier [46,47,48] that the orientation of individual nanoparticles and their chains along the applied AC magnetic field is important to obtain appreciable SARs for magnetosome assembly. In this paper, based on the solution of the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation [49,50,51,52], the low-frequency hysteresis loops of assemblies of magnetosome chains extracted from magnetotactic bacteria are calculated. This theoretical approach makes it possible to take into account the complicated magnetic anisotropy of particles, the influence of thermal fluctuations of magnetic moments, and strong magnetic dipole interaction between chain particles. In this work the dependence of the assembly SAR on the particle diameter, on the length of the chains, and the distance between particles in the chain is studied in detail. We also investigate the dependence of SAR on the orientation of applied magnetic field with respect to the chain axis, as well as on the average density of the chain assembly. It is shown that with an optimal choice of magnetosome chain geometry, sufficiently high SAR values, of the order of 400–450 W/g, can be obtained at a frequency f = 300 kHz and at small and moderate field amplitudes, H0 = 50−100 Oe. However, it is found that the SAR of the chain assembly decreases significantly with an increase in its average density. It seems that the results obtained will be useful for the optimal choice of the geometric parameters of magnetosome chains to further increase their heating ability for successful application in magnetic hyperthermia.

2. Model and Methods

Calculations of SAR of magnetosome chains were performed in this work by numerical simulation using stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation [49,50,51,52]. The latter governs the dynamics of the unit magnetization vector α i of i-th single-domain nanoparticle of the magnetosome chain
α i t = γ 1 α i × ( H e f , i + H t h , i ) κ γ 1 α i × ( α i × ( H e f , i + H t h , i ) ) ,   i = 1 , 2 , , N p .
where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio, κ is phenomenological damping parameter, γ1 = γ/(1 + κ2), H e f , i is the effective magnetic field, H t h , i is the thermal field, and Np is the number of nanoparticles in the chain. The effective magnetic field acting on a separate nanoparticle can be calculated as a derivative of the total chain energy
H e f , i = W M s V α i .
The total magnetic energy of the chain W = Wa + WZ + Wm is a sum of the magnetic anisotropy energy Wa, Zeeman energy WZ of the particles in applied magnetic field, and the energy of mutual magneto-dipole interaction of the particles Wm. Since magnetosomes released from bacteria are coated with thin non-magnetic shells, there is no direct contact between the magnetic cores of the nanoparticles. Therefore, the exchange interaction of neighboring nanoparticles in the chain can be neglected.
The magneto-crystalline anisotropy energy of magetosomes with a perfect crystalline structure is that of cubic type [52,53]
W a = K c V i = 1 N p ( ( α i e 1 i ) 2 ( α i e 2 i ) 2 + ( α i e 1 i ) 2 ( α i e 3 i ) 2 + ( α i e 2 i ) 2 ( α i e 3 i ) 2 )
where ( e 1 i , e 2 i , e 3 i ) is a set of orthogonal unit vectors that determine an orientation of i-th nanoparticle of the chain. It is assumed that the easy anisotropy axes of various nanoparticles in the chain are randomly oriented with respect to each other.
The Zeeman energy of the chain in applied AC magnetic field H 0 sin ( ω t ) is given by
W Z = M s V i = 1 N p ( α i H 0 sin ( ω t ) )
For nearly spherical uniformly magnetized nanoparticles the magnetostatic energy of the chain can be represented as the energy of the point interacting dipoles located at the particle centers r i within the chain. Then, the energy of magneto-dipole interaction is
W m = M s 2 V 2 2 i j α i α j 3 ( α i n i j ) ( α j n i j ) | r i r j | 3
where n i j is the unit vector along the line connecting the centers of i-th and j-th particles, respectively.
The thermal fields H t h , i acting on various nanoparticles of the chain are statistically independent, with the following statistical properties [49] of their components
H t h , i ( α ) ( t ) = 0 ;   H t h , i ( α ) ( t ) H t h , i ( β ) ( t 1 ) = 2 k B T κ γ M s V i δ α β δ ( t t 1 ) ,   α , β = ( x , y , z )
where kB is the Boltzmann constant, δαβ is the Kroneker symbol, and δ(t) is the delta function. The numerical simulation procedure is described in details in [54,55].
The SAR value of an assembly of magnetic nanoparticles in an AC magnetic field with a frequency f is determined by the integral [28]
S A R = f M s ρ m d H
where ρ is the density of magnetic material and m is the reduced magnetic moment of the assembly.

3. Results

In this work the calculations of SAR of magnetosome chain assemblies are performed in the frequency range f = 250–350 kHz, at small and moderate amplitudes of an AC magnetic field, H0 = 50–150 Oe, since the use of AC magnetic fields of small amplitude is preferable in a medical clinic.

3.1. Dilute Chain Assembly

Let us consider first the properties of dilute oriented assemblies of magnetosome chains neglecting the magnetic dipole interaction between various chains. It is of considerable interest to study the dependence of the SAR of such an assembly on the nanoparticle diameter D, on the number of particles in the chain Np, and on the orientation of the external magnetic field with respect to the chain axis. For completeness, the chains with different average distances a between the centers of the nanoparticles are considered. Note that all geometric parameters mentioned can be adopted properly during the experimental design of a chain from individual magnetosomes of approximately the same diameter [5,7,40,41,42]. In particular, the distance a between the centers of successive nanoparticles in a chain is determined by the thickness of non-magnetic shells on their surfaces. The latter protect the nanoparticles from the aggressive action of the medium. It is worth noting that, since the cubic magnetic anisotropy constant of magnetite is negative, Kc = −1 × 105 erg/cm3, the quasi-spherical magnetite nanoparticles have eight equivalent directions of easy anisotropy axes [53]. In the calculations performed it is assumed that the easy anisotropy axes of individual magnetosomes are randomly oriented, since it is hardly possible to make multiple easy anisotropy axes of various magnetosomes parallel when a chain is created. Saturation magnetization of the magnetosomes is assumed to be Ms = 450 emu/cm3 [25,45]. It is also supposed that the magnetosome chain cannot rotate as a whole, being distributed in a medium with a sufficiently high viscosity or being tightly bound to surrounding tissue.
Figure 1a shows the results of SAR calculation for dilute oriented assemblies of magnetosome chains with particles of various diameters, D = 20–50 nm. The number of particles in the chains is fixed at Np = 30, AC magnetic field frequency f = 300 kHz, field amplitude H0 = 50 Oe. The AC magnetic field is applied parallel to the chain axis, the easy anisotropy axes of various particles in the chain are randomly oriented. The calculation results are averaged over a sufficiently large number of independent chain realizations, Nexp = 40–60. The temperature of the system is T = 300 K.
As Figure 1a shows, in all cases considered there is a significant dependence of SAR on the reduced distance a/D between the centers of the particles of the chain. The assembly SAR reaches a maximum value at the ratios a/D = 1.5, 1.85, 2.2, and 3.6 for particles with diameters D = 20, 30, 40, and 50 nm, respectively.
The SAR decreases sharply after reaching the maximum. It is interesting to note that the SAR at the maximum only weakly depends on the particle diameter. Indeed, according to Figure 1a for particles with diameters D = 20, 30, 40, and 50 nm, the maximum SAR values are given by 440, 444, 454, and 409 W/g, respectively.
Figure 1b shows the evolution of the low frequency hysteresis loops of a dilute chain assembly with nanoparticle diameter D = 30 nm as a function of the reduced distance a/D between the nanoparticle centers. It is known [28,29] that the SAR of an assembly of magnetic nanoparticles is proportional to the area of the low frequency hysteresis loop. In Figure 1b, it can be seen that in accordance with Figure 1a the maximum area of the hysteresis loop for particles with diameter D = 30 nm corresponds to the reduced distance a/D = 1.85.
It is interesting to note that the position of the SAR maximum is practically independent on the frequency. For example, according to Figure 2a for the case of particles with diameter D = 30 nm the SAR maximum corresponds to the ratio a/D ≈ 1.8 in the frequency range f = 250–350 kHz. At the same time, as Figure 2b shows, the position of the maximum and the SAR value at the maximum substantially depend on the amplitude of the AC magnetic field. Therefore, the choice of the optimal a/D ratio for a magnetosome chain should be consistent with the given value of H0. With increasing H0 the maximum of the assembly SAR grows, and the position of the maximum falls at a shorter distance between the particles of the chain. Indeed, in Figure 2b the maximum values of SAR = 440.1, 854.6, and 1281.0 W/g are observed at a/D = 1.5, 1.35, and 1.2 for the magnetic field amplitudes H0 = 50, 100, and 150 Oe, respectively. In general, as Figure 1 and Figure 2 show, for a dilute oriented assembly of magnetosome chains with an optimal choice of the a/D ratio one can obtain rather high SAR values, of the order of 400–450 W/g already in an AC magnetic field with a relatively small amplitude H0 = 50 Oe.
The significant dependence of the assembly SAR on the a/D ratio, and on the amplitude of the AC magnetic field H0, shown in Figure 1a and Figure 2b, is explained by the influence of a strong interacting field Hd acting between closely located particles of the chain. Figure 3a shows the instantaneous distribution of interacting fields for an individual chain consisting of Np = 30 nanoparticles of diameter D = 20 nm at a time when the AC magnetic field is close to zero. The z axis is assumed to be parallel to the axis of the chain, the amplitude and frequency of the AC magnetic field are H0 = 50 Oe, and f = 300 kHz, respectively. As Figure 3a shows, in the central part of the chain, due to the summation of the magnetic fields of individual nanoparticles, the longitudinal component of the interacting field reaches sufficiently large values, Hdz = 250 Oe, significantly exceeding the amplitude of the AC magnetic field, H0 = 50 Oe.
On the contrary, the transverse field components turn out to be relatively small |Hdx|, |Hdy| < 50 Oe. Obviously, the irregular distribution of the interacting field on individual particles, shown in Figure 3a is associated with a random orientation of the easy anisotropy axes of individual nanoparticles.
As Figure 3a shows the interacting field is greatly reduced at the chain ends. Therefore, the magnetization switching field Hsf of the chain is determined by the conditions near its ends. Calculations show that for Hsf < H0 the chain magnetization reverses as a whole in a process similar to the giant Barkhausen jump in iron-rich amorphous ferromagnetic microwires [56]. The switching field Hsf of the chain increases with decreasing average distance between the particles in the chain, since the intensity of the magnetic dipole interaction increases if neighboring nanoparticles are located closer to each other. When the distance between the particle centers decreases, the switching field of the chain can reach values exceeding the amplitude of AC magnetic field, Hsf > H0. Under this condition, the magnetization reversal of the chain is impossible. As Figure 1b shows, when the reduced distance between the particle centers decreases from a/D = 1.85 to a/D = 1.7, the area of the assembly hysteresis loop reduces sharply. This leads to a sharp drop in the SAR of the corresponding assembly in Figure 1a. However, the drop in the hysteresis loop area in Figure 1b does not occur immediately to zero, due to fluctuations in the switching fields Hsf of individual chains of the assembly. As a result, even at a/D = 1.7 some of the assembly chains are still able to reverse their magnetizations in applied magnetic field. This, however, leads to a sharp narrowing of the vertical size of the low frequency hysteresis loop of the whole assembly. With a further decrease of the a/D ratio, the fraction of chains capable of magnetization reversal at given magnetic field amplitude H0 tends to zero. As a result, the ability of the assembly to absorb the energy of an AC magnetic field disappears.
Similar considerations explain the behavior of the assembly SAR as a function of the AC magnetic field amplitude. As Figure 2b shows, with an increase in H0 the magnetization reversal of the chain is possible at smaller reduced distances a/D. This leads to a shift in the positions of the SAR maximum to smaller reduced distances and to increase in the maximum SAR values.
It is important to note the characteristic change of the shape of the low frequency hysteresis loop of a dilute magnetosome assembly as a function of a/D ratio. As Figure 1b shows, the hysteresis loop is nearly rectangular and has maximal area for optimal ratio (a/D)0. For ratios smaller than optimal, a/D < (a/D)0, the vertical size of the hysteresis loop is considerably decreased, M/Ms < 1. On the other hand, for ratios larger than optimal, a/D > (a/D)0, the width of the assembly hysteresis loop is reduced, 2Hmax < 2H0.
For an infinite periodic chain of single-domain nanoparticles with uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, the switching field for magnetization reversal was analytically determined by Aharoni [57]. However, in the present case an analytical consideration is hardly possible due to the randomness in the orientation of the easy anisotropy axes of individual nanoparticles and the influence of thermal fluctuations of the particle magnetic moments at a finite temperature.
It is interesting to note that the effect of sharp variation of the SAR of a dilute assembly of magnetosome chains as a function of the a/D ratio only slightly depends on the number of particles in the chains, provided that it exceeds the value of the order of Np = 4–6. For example, Figure 3b shows the dependences of SAR on the number of particles, Np = 2–30, in the chain assemblies with particles of various diameters, D = 20–40 nm. The calculations presented in Figure 3b are performed at optimal ratios a/D = 1.5, 1.85, and 2.2 for particles with diameters D = 20, 30, and 40 nm, respectively. These optimal a/D values were determined previously at frequency f = 300 kHz and amplitude H0 = 50 Oe. According to Figure 3b, regardless of the nanoparticle diameter, a sharp increase in SAR as a function of the number of particles in the chains occurs in the range Np ≤ 4–5. However, with a further increase in the chain length, the SAR values of the assemblies change slowly.
Let us consider now the dependence of the SAR of a dilute oriented chain assembly on the angle θ of AC magnetic field with respect to the chain axis. The calculations presented in Figure 4 are carried out at frequency f = 300 kHz and magnetic field amplitude H0 = 50 Oe, the number of particles in the chains being Np = 30. The reduced distances between the centers of neighboring nanoparticles in the chains are chosen optimal, so that a/D = 1.5, 1.85, and 2.2 for particles with diameters D = 20, 30, and 40 nm, respectively.
As Figure 4a shows, the maximum SAR value is achieved when the AC magnetic field is parallel to the chain axis, θ = 0. It is remarkable, however, that in a rather wide range of angles, θ ≤ 30–40°, the SAR of the assembly varies slightly. Only for angles θ > 50° the assembly SAR drops sharply, so that for magnetic field directed perpendicular to the chain axis the assembly SAR is close to zero. Figure 4b shows the evolution of the low frequency hysteresis loops for an assembly of nanoparticles with a diameter of D = 30 nm and ratio a/D = 1.85 for various values of the angle θ. In accordance with Figure 4a, the hysteresis loop of the maximum area corresponds to the angle θ = 0, and for angles θ ≥ 60° the hysteresis loop area is tends to zero.
The fact that the angular dependence of assembly SAR turns out to be rather slow in the range of angles θ ≤ 30–40° means that the results presented in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 are approximately true for dilute partially oriented assemblies of magnetosome chains. Our calculations also show that a small variation in particle diameters within the same chain, random variations in the distances between the centers of particles in the chain, and small random deviations of the particle positions from the straight line do not significantly affect the low frequency hysteresis loops averaged over a representative assembly of magnetosome chains.

3.2. Interaction of Magnetosome Chains

In this section the results obtained above are generalized to the case of dilute assembly of clusters of magnetosome chains of various densities. Inside the cluster due to the close arrangement of the chains the magnetic dipole interaction of nanoparticles of various chains should be taken into account. Figure 5a shows the results of calculating the low frequency hysteresis loops of an assembly of oriented cylindrical clusters with an overall diameter Dcl = 280 nm, and a height Lcl = 480 nm. The axis of the chains is parallel to the axis of the cylinder, but the positions of the chains in the cluster are distributed randomly, as shown schematically in Figure 5b. The AC magnetic field is applied along the chain axis. In the calculations performed it is assumed that the centers of the nanoparticles in the chains are located at an optimal distance, a = 2.2D, for nanoparticles with diameter D = 40 nm. This allows one to compare the numerical results with the data shown in Figure 1a for a dilute assembly of individual chains with the same nanoparticle diameter. The frequency and amplitude of the AC magnetic field are f = 300 kHz and H0 = 50 Oe, respectively.
In the illustrative calculations performed, the number of particles in the chains is fixed at Np = 6, but the number of chains Nch in a cluster of given diameter Dcl = 280 nm varied from 4 to 10. In this manner we can change the total number of nanoparticles in the cluster, NpNch, as well as the cluster filling density, η = NpNchV/Vcl, where V = πD3/6 is the volume of the nanoparticle, V c l = π D c l 2 L c l / 4 being the volume of the cylindrical cluster. SAR calculations of dilute assemblies of clusters with different numbers of chains Nch are averaged over a sufficiently large number of independent realizations of random clusters, Nexp = 40–60.
As Figure 5a shows, due to an increase in the intensity of the magnetic dipole interaction inside the clusters, the area of the assembly hysteresis loop rapidly decreases with an increase in the cluster filling density. The cluster filling density increases as η = 0.027, 0.041, 0.054, and 0.068 for the clusters of the given size with the number of chains within the cluster Nch = 4, 6, 8, and 10, respectively. It is found that with increase in the cluster filling density, the SAR of the assembly of clusters rapidly decreases as follows: SAR = 270.9, 145.5, 98.2, and 62.5 W/g. It should be noted that for a dilute assembly of non-interacting chains (see Figure 1a) with the same chain geometry, frequency and amplitude of the AC magnetic field, the SAR of the assembly at maximum reaches the value 454 W/g for the particles with optimal ratio a/D = 2.2. Thus, a significant drop in the SAR assembly due to the magnetic dipole interaction of individual chains must be taken into account when analyzing experimental data.

4. Discussion

As emphasized above, the properties of magnetosome assemblies are currently being actively studied for application in biomedicine [7,25,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. In particular, SARs of magnetosome assemblies are measured [25,37,41,42,45] in an AC magnetic field under various conditions. In addition, assemblies of magnetosome chains are used in laboratory experiments [7,38,40,42] for the successful treatment of glioblastoma in mice using magnetic hyperthermia.
Low-frequency hysteresis loops of dilute assemblies of isolated magnetosomes with an average diameter D = 45 ± 6 nm were measured [25] at selected frequencies of 75 kHz, 149 kHz, 302 kHz and 532 kHz, in the range of magnetic fields up to 570 Oe. The measurements were carried out for magnetosome assemblies distributed in water, and in agarose gel with an increased viscosity. It was shown that in both cases the SAR of the assemblies almost linearly depend on the AC field frequency. For the assembly of magnetosomes dispersed in water, a very high value of SAR = 880 W/g was obtained at a frequency f = 200 kHz and magnetic field amplitude H0 = 310 Oe. In agarose gel the SAR of the assembly at the same frequency and magnetic field amplitude turns out to be somewhat lower, SAR = 635 W/g, since in a medium with increased viscosity, the Brownian contribution to SAR is significantly reduced. These data are in agreement with the high SAR values obtained previously for magnetosome assemblies by Hergt et al. [37].
Recently very large SARs were obtained by the same authors [45] for assemblies of “whole” magnetotactic bacteria distributed in water. The importance of the orientation of the chains of magnetosomes located inside the bacteria in the direction of the AC magnetic fieldis emphasized again. Since the chains of magnetosomes are located inside bacteria with sizes 2–5 × 0.5 μm, they turn out to be efficiently separated by organic material. This reduces the intensity of the magnetic dipole interaction of nanoparticles belonging to different chains. It is shown [45] that the heating efficiency of oriented assembly of magnetotactic bacteria is appreciably higher than the one obtained [25] for the assembly of isolated magnetosomes. Actually, the SAR values of the assembly of magnetotactic bacteria measured by means of AC magnetometry reaches the huge value of 2400 W/g at frequency f = 300 kHz and magnetic field amplitude H0 = 380 Oe. Nevertheless, it seems hardly possible to uniformly distribute and correctly orient within the tumor large bacteria of 2–5 μm in length. This can probably be done much easier using short chains of magnetosomes having 4–6 nanoparticles in length. For example, the optimal length of a chain consisting of five nanoparticles with diameter D = 20 nm is given by only 140 nm. In addition, when working with chains created from individual magnetosomes, it becomes possible to optimize the geometry of the chains, that is, to ensure the optimal a/D ratio, matching it with the applied value of H0.
In this regard, a technique for working with magnetosomes developed by Alphandery with co-workers [7,38,40,41,42] seems to be promising. They removed most of the organic materials, including endotoxins, from magnetosomes extracted from magnetotactic bacteria. The nanoparticles are then stabilized with different bio-degradable and biocompatible coating agents of various thickness, such as poly-L-lysine, oleic acid, citric acid, or carboxy-methyl-dextran [40]. Then, individual magnetosomes coated with these shells are assembled into chains with a small number of particles, Np = 4–6, and introduced into the tumor for magnetic hyperthermia. A typical concentration of magnetic nanoparticles introduced into a tumor is given by 25 μg in iron of nanoparticles per mm3 of tumor [7,41,42]. Taking into account the density of magnetosomes around 5 g/cm3, and assuming nearly uniform distribution of the magnetosome chains within the tumor, one obtains the average density of the assembly η = 0.005. Such chain assembly can be considered quite diluted, so that the results obtained in Section 3.1 above can be applied for the theoretical estimation of the assembly SAR.
However, Le Fèvre et al. [42] obtained rather small SAR values for the assembly of the magnetosome chains studied, only 40 W/gFe at frequency f = 198 kHz. As a result, in order to obtain the required tumor temperature of 43–46 °C, it was necessary to use rather large amplitudes of the AC magnetic field, H0 = 110–310 Oe. Similarly, only relatively small values of SAR = 89–196 W/gFe were obtained in [40] at frequency f = 198 kHz at sufficiently large magnetic field amplitudes, H0 = 340–470 Oe. This may indicate that the geometric structure of the magnetosome chains, in particular, the a/D ratio, was not optimal in these experiments. Indeed, the individual magnetosomes used to construct the magnetosome chains [42] were covered by rather thin poly-L-lysine shells with a thickness of t = 4–17 nm. Therefore, for a significant fraction of the magnetosome chains with an average particle diameter D = 40.5 ± 8.5 nm, the ratio a/D = 1 + 2t/D ≈ 1.2–1.6 may turn out to be far from the optimal value for the amplitudes of the AC magnetic field used. Similarly, magnetosomes with an average diameter D = 40–50 nm were covered with shells of various chemical compositions [41], but of sufficiently small thickness, t = 2–6 nm.
Another reason for the small SAR values observed in experiments [41,42] may be associated with the formation of dense clusters of magnetosome chains inside the tumor. As shown in Section 3.2, in a dense cluster of magnetosome chains, a significant decrease in SAR value occurs due to the strong magneto-dipole interaction of nanoparticles of different chains. Finally, as shown in Section 3.1, the unfavorable orientation of the chains with respect to the direction of applied magnetic field can also cause a significant drop in the assembly SAR value. In this regard, it would be interesting to check the possible effect of a strong magnetic field of a Neodymium permanent magnet on the orientation of short magnetosome chains (Np = 4–6) within a tumor. A constant magnetic field can be temporarily applied during the procedure of introducing magnetosome chains into a tumor to provide correct chain orientation.

5. Conclusions

It is now widely accepted [1,2,3] that, for use in magnetic hyperthermia, it is extremely important to ensure a high quality of magnetic nanoparticles. For dilute assemblies of single-domain magnetic nanoparticles with perfect crystalline structure, sufficiently high saturation magnetization and narrow particle size distribution, sufficiently high SAR can be obtained [25,31,32,33,34,35] at moderate frequencies and amplitudes of an AC magnetic field satisfying the criteria of Brezovich [15] or Hergt et al. [16]. These experimental results are in satisfactory agreement with the earlier theoretical estimates [28,29]. However, in many experimental studies, it was found [26,27,58,59] that when an assembly of magnetic nanoparticles is introduced into a tumor, uncontrolled agglomeration of nanoparticles occurs with the formation of dense clusters of nanoparticles of various geometric structures. As a result, the SAR value of the assembly significantly decreases [26,27,60] due to the influence of a strong magnetic dipole interaction between the nanoparticles of the cluster. Recent theoretical calculations show [54,55] that with an increase in the average density of a nanoparticle assembly in the range η = 0.01–0.35, the maximum SAR value of the assembly of nanoparticles with different types of magnetic anisotropy decreases by about 5–6 times, compared with the SAR of dilute assembly of the same nanoparticles. Thus, the strong magneto-dipole interaction between the nanoparticles, generally speaking, negatively affects the ability of the assembly to absorb the energy of AC magnetic field [1,26,27,54,55].
An important exception to this rule is a dilute oriented assembly of magnetosome chains in an AC magnetic field applied parallel to the chain axis [45,46,47,48]. In this case the intense magnetic dipole interaction between the nanoparticles of the chain plays a positive role. Due to the influence of mutual magneto-dipole interaction within the chain, the magnetic moments of magnetically soft iron oxide nanoparticles are oriented approximately along the chain axis. In addition, the magnetization reversal of the chain in a magnetic field parallel to its axis occurs in a process similar to the giant Barkhausenjump [56]. As a result, the shape of the low-frequency hysteresis loop becomes nearly rectangular, which leads to a significant increase in the SAR value of a dilute assembly of chains in comparison with the corresponding assembly of isolated magnetosomes [45].
In this paper, this effect is studied in detail using numerical modeling by solving the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz equation for assemblies of magnetosome chains of various geometries. In addition to the results of previous studies [46,47,48], attention is paid to the correct selection of the geometric parameters of the chain, namely, the reduced distance a/D between the centers of the particles of the chain, consistent with the used value of the magnetic field amplitude H0. It is shown that assemblies of magnetosome chains of different lengths have comparable SAR values, provided that the number of particles in the chain exceeds Np = 4–5. However, the SAR of an oriented chain assembly significantly decreases for large angles θ > 50° of the magnetic field direction with respect to chain axis. In addition, the SAR value of the oriented assembly of magnetosome chains also decreases rapidly with an increasing average density of the assembly due to increase in the intensity of a magneto-dipole interaction between the nanoparticles belonging to various chains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A.U.; software, N.A.U. and E.M.G.; numerical simulation, E.M.G.; writing-original draft preparation, N.A.U. and E.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of Increase Competitiveness Program of NUST «MISIS», contract № K2-2019-012.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Périgo, E.A.; Hemery, G.; Sandre, O.; Ortega, D.; Garaio, E.; Plazaola, F.; Teran, F.J. Fundamentals and Advances in Magnetic Hyperthermia. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2015, 2, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Blanco-Andujar, C.; Teran, F.J.; Ortega, D. Current Outlook and Perspectives on Nanoparticle-Mediated Magnetic Hyperthermia. In Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications; Mahmoudi, M., Laurent, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 197–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahmoudi, K.; Bouras, A.; Bozec, D.; Ivkov, R.; Hadjipanayis, C. Magnetic hyperthermia therapy for the treatment of glioblastoma: A review of the therapy’s history, efficacy and application in humans. Int. J. Hyperth. 2018, 34, 1316–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ito, A.; Tanaka, K.; Kondo, K.; Shinkai, M.; Honda, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Saida, T.; Kobayashi, T. Tumor regression by combined immunotherapy and hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles in an experimental subcutaneous murine melanoma. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Alphandéry, E.; Faure, S.; Seksek, O.; Guyot, F.; Chebbi, I. Chains of magnetosomes extracted from AMB 1 magnetotactic bacteria for application in alternative magnetic field cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 6279–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kobayashi, T. Cancer hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6, 1342–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alphandéry, E.; Idbaih, A.; Adam, C.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Schmitt, C.; Guyot, F.; Chebbi, I. Development of non-pyrogenic magnetosome minerals coated with poly-l-lysine leading to full disappearance of intracranial U87-Luc glioblastoma in 100% of treated mice using magnetic hyperthermia. Biomaterials 2017, 141, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Johannsen, M.; Gneveckow, U.; Eckelt, L.; Feussner, A.; Waldofner, N.; Scholz, R.; Deger, S.; Wust, P.; Loening, S.A.; Jordan, A. Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: Presentation of a new interstitial technique. Int. J. Hyperth. 2005, 21, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. van Landeghem, F.K.; Maier-Hauff, K.; Jordan, A.; Hoffmann, K.T.; Gneveckow, U.; Scholz, R.; Thiesen, B.; Brück, W.; von Deimling, A. Post-mortem studies in glioblastoma patients treated with thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matsumine, A.; Takegami, K.; Asanuma, K.; Matsubara, T.; Nakamura, T.; Uchida, A.; Sudo, A. A novel hyperthermia treatment for bone metastases using magnetic materials. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 16, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pankhurst, Q.A.; Thanh, N.T.K.; Jones, S.K.; Dobson, J. Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 224001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Dutz, S.; Hergt, R. Magnetic nanoparticle heating and heat transfer on a microscale: Basic principles, realities and physical limitations of hyperthermia for tumour therapy. Int. J. Hyperth. 2013, 29, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. El-Sayed, I.H.; Huang, X.; El-Sayed, M.A. Selective laser photo-thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 2006, 239, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Espinosa, A.; Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Abou-Hassan, A.; Sangnier, A.P.; Curcio, A.; Silva, A.K.A.; Di Corato, R.; Neveu, S.; Pellegrino, T.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; et al. Magnetic (hyper)thermia or photo-thermia? Progressive comparison of iron oxide and gold nanoparticles heating in water, in cells, and in vivo. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brezovich, I.A. Low frequency hyperthermia: Capacitive and ferromagnetic thermoseed methods. Med. Phys. Monogr. 1988, 16, 82–111. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hergt, R.; Dutz, S.; Müller, R.; Zeisberger, M. Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia: Nanoparticle Magnetism and Materials Development for Cancer Therapy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, S2919–S2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reddy, L.H.; Arias, J.L.; Nicolas, J.; Couvreur, P. Magnetic Nanoparticles: Design and Characterization, Toxicity and Biocompatibility, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5818–5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silva, A.K.A.; Espinosa, A.; Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Wilhelm, C.; Gazeau, F. Medical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles. In Iron Oxides: From Nature to Applications; Faivre, D., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2016; pp. 425–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J.; Lartigue, L.; Javed, Y.; Luciani, N.; Pellegrino, T.; Wilhelm, C.; Alloyeau, D.; Gazeau, F. Biotransformations of magnetic nanoparticles in the body. Nano Today 2016, 11, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, S.; Zeng, H. Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8204–8205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Daou, T.J.; Pourroy, G.; Bégin-Colin, S.; Grenèche, J.M.; Ulhaq-Bouillet, C.; Legaré, P.; Bernhardt, P.; Leuvrey, C.; Rogez, G. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Monodisperse Magnetite Nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 4399–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hui, C.; Shen, C.; Yang, T.; Bao, L.; Tian, J.; Ding, H.; Li, C.; Gao, H.-J. Large-Scale Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Soluble in Water Synthesized by a Facile Method. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11336–11339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bautin, V.A.; Seferyan, A.G.; Nesmeyanov, M.S.; Usov, N.A. Properties of polycrystalline nanoparticles with uniaxial and cubic types of magnetic anisotropy of individual grains. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 460, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kallumadil, M.; Tada, M.; Nakagawa, T.; Abe, M.; Southern, P.; Pankhurst, Q.A. Suitability of commercial colloids for magnetic hyperthermia. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2009, 321, 1509–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muela, A.; Munoz, D.; Martin-Rodriguez, R.; Orue, I.; Garaio, E.; Abad Diaz de Cerio, A.; Alonso, J.; Garcia, J.A.; Fdez-Gubieda, M.L. Optimal Parameters for Hyperthermia Treatment Using Biomineralized Magnetite Nanoparticles: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 24437–24448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Etheridge, M.L.; Hurley, K.R.; Zhang, J.; Jeon, S.; Ring, H.L.; Hogan, C.; Haynes, C.L.; Garwood, M.; Bischof, J.C. Accounting for biological aggregation in heating and imaging of magnetic nanoparticles. Technology 2014, 2, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sanz, B.; Calatayud, M.P.; Biasi, E.D.; Lima, E., Jr.; Mansilla, M.V.; Zysler, R.D.; Ibarra, M.R.; Goya, G.F. In silico before in vivo: How to predict the heating efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles within the intracellular space. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Usov, N.A. Low frequency hysteresis loops of superparamagnetic nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 123909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carrey, J.; Mehdaoui, B.; Respaud, M. Simple models for dynamic hysteresis loop calculations of magnetic single-domain nanoparticles: Application to magnetic hyperthermia optimization. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 83921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jonasson, C.; Schaller, V.; Zeng, L.; Olsson, E.; Frandsen, C.; Castro, A.; Nilsson, L.; Bogart, L.K.; Southern, P.; Pankhurst, Q.A.; et al. Modelling the effect of different core sizes and magnetic interactions inside magnetic nanoparticles on hyperthermia performance. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 477, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mehdaoui, B.; Meffre, A.; Carrey, J.; Lachaize, S.; Lacroix, L.-M.; Gougeon, M.; Chaudret, B.; Respaud, M. Optimal Size of Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia: A Combined Theoretical and Experimental Study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 4573–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Guardia, P.; Di Corato, R.; Lartigue, L.; Wilhelm, C.; Espinosa, A.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.; Gazeau, F.; Manna, L.; Pellegrino, T. Water-soluble iron oxide nanocubes with high values of specific absorption rate for cancer cell hyperthermia treatment. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3080–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Di Corato, R.; Espinosa, A.; Lartigue, L.; Tharaud, M.; Chat, S.; Pellegrino, T.; Ménager, C.; Gazeau, F.; Wilhelm, C. Magnetic hyperthermia efficiency in the cellular environment for different nanoparticle designs. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6400–6411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Unni, M.; Uhl, A.M.; Savliwala, S.; Savitzky, B.H.; Dhavalikar, R.; Garraud, N.; Arnold, D.P.; Kourkoutis, L.F.; Andrew, J.S.; Rinaldi, C. Thermal decomposition synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles with diminished magnetic dead layer by controlled addition of oxygen. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2284–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nemati, Z.; Alonso, J.; Rodrigo, I.; Das, R.; Garaio, E.; Garcia, J.A.; Orue, I.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H. Improving the heating efficiency of iron oxide nanoparticles by tuning their shape and size. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 2367–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Navarro, E.; Luengo, Y.; Veintemillas, S.; Morales, M.P.; Palomares, F.J.; Urdiroz, U.; Cebollada, F.; González, J.M. Slow magnetic relaxation in well crystallized, monodispersed, octahedral and spherical magnetite nanoparticles. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 125143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hergt, R.; Hiergeist, R.; Zeisberger, M.; Schuïer, D.; Heyen, U.; Hilger, I.; Kaiser, W.A. Magnetic properties of bacterial magnetosomes as potential diagnostic and therapeutic tools. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 293, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alphandéry, E.; Chebbi, I.; Guyot, F.; Durand-Dubief, M. Use of bacterial magnetosomes in the magnetic hyperthermia treatment of tumours: A review. Int. J. Hyperth. 2013, 29, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Timko, M.; Molcan, M.; Hashim, A.; Skumiel, A.; Müller, M.; Gojzewski, H.; Jozefczak, A.; Kovac, J.; Rajnak, M.; Makowski, M.; et al. Hyperthermic effect in suspension of magnetosomes prepared by various methods. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2013, 49, 250–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alphandéry, E. Application of magnetosomes synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria in medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2014, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mandawala, C.; Chebbi, I.; Durand-Dubief, M.; Le Fèvre, R.; Hamdous, Y.; Guyot, F.; Alphandery, E. Biocompatible and stable magnetosome minerals coated with poly-l-lysine, citric acid, and carboxy-methyl-dextran for application in the magnetic hyperthermia treatment of tumors. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 7644–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Le Fèvre, R.; Durand-Dubief, M.; Chebbi, I.; Mandawala, C.; Lagroix, F.; Valet, J.-P.; Idbaih, A.; Adam, C.; Delattre, J.-Y.; Schmitt, C.; et al. Enhanced antitumor efficacy of biocompatible magnetosomes for the magnetic hyperthermia treatment of glioblastoma. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4618–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marcano, L.; Muñoz, D.; Martin-Rodriguez, R.; Orue, I.; Alonso, J.; Garcia-Prieto, A.; Serrano, A.; Valencia, S.; Abrudan, R.; FernándezBarquin, L.; et al. Magnetic Study of Co-Doped Magnetosome Chains. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 7541–7550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Orue, I.; Marcano, L.; Bender, P.; García-Prieto, A.; Valencia, S.; Mawass, M.A.; Gil-Cartón, D.; Alba Venero, D.; Honecker, D.; Garcıa-Arribas, A.; et al. Configuration of the magnetosome chain: A natural magnetic nanoarchitecture. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 7407–7419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gandia, D.; Gandarias, L.; Rodrigo, I.; Robles-Garcia, J.; Das, R.; Garaio, E.; Garcia, J.A.; Phan, M.-H.; Srikanth, H.; Orue, I.; et al. Unlocking the Potential of Magnetotactic Bacteria as Magnetic Hyperthermia Agents. Small 2019, 15, 1902626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Martinez-Boubeta, C.; Simeonidis, K.; Makridis, A.; Angelakeris, M.; Iglesias, O.; Guardia, P.; Cabot, A.; Yedra, L.; Estrade, S.; Peiro, F.; et al. Learning from nature to improve the heat generation of iron–oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Serantes, D.; Simeonidis, K.; Angelakeris, M.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Marciello, M.; Morales, M.P.; Baldomir, D.; Martinez-Boubeta, C. Multiplying Magnetic Hyperthermia Response by Nanoparticle Assembling. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 5927–5934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Simeonidis, K.; Morales, M.P.; Marciello, M.; Angelakeris, M.; de la Presa, P.; Lazaro-Carrillo, A.; Tabero, A.; Villanueva, A.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Serantes, D. In-situ particles reorientation during magnetic hyperthermia application: Shape matters twice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Brown, W.F., Jr. Thermal fluctuations of a single-domain particle. Phys. Rev. 1963, 130, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Garcia-Palacios, J.L.; Lazaro, F.J. Langevin-dynamics study of the dynamical properties of small magnetic particles. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 14937–14958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Scholz, W.; Schrefl, T.; Fidler, J. Micromagnetic simulation of thermally activated switching in fine particles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 233, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Coffey, W.T.; Kalmykov, Y.P.; Waldron, J.T. The Langevin Equation: With Applications to Stochastic Problems in Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering, 2nd ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2004; p. 704. ISBN 978-981-238-462-1. [Google Scholar]
  53. Usov, N.A.; Peschany, S.E. Theoretical hysteresis loops of single-domain particles with cubic anisotropy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1997, 174, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Usov, N.A.; Serebryakova, O.N.; Tarasov, V.P. Interaction effects in assembly of magnetic nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Usov, N.A.; Nesmeyanov, M.S.; Gubanova, E.M.; Epshtein, N.B. Heating ability of magnetic nanoparticles with cubic and combined anisotropy. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gudoshnikov, S.A.; Grebenshchikov, Y.B.; Ljubimov, B.Y.; Palvanov, P.S.; Usov, N.A.; Ipatov, M.; Zhukov, A.; Gonzalez, J. Ground state magnetization distribution and characteristic width of head to head domain wall in Fe-rich amorphous microwire. Phys. Stat. Sol. 2009, 206, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aharoni, A. Nucleation of magnetization reversal in ESD magnets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1969, 5, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Branquinho, L.C.; Carriao, M.S.; Costa, A.S.; Zufelato, N.; Sousa, M.H.; Miotto, R.; Ivkov, R.; Bakuzis, A.F. Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: Implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Conde-Leboran, I.; Baldomir, D.; Martinez-Boubeta, C.; Chubykalo-Fesenko, O.; Morales, M.P.; Salas, G.; Cabrera, D.; Camarero, J.; Teran, F.J.; Serantes, D. A single picture explains diversity of hyperthermia response of magnetic nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 15698–15706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gudoshnikov, S.A.; Liubimov, B.Y.; Popova, A.V.; Usov, N.A. The influence of a demagnetizing field on hysteresis losses in a dense assembly of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2012, 324, 3690–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Dependence of assembly SAR on the reduced distance a/D between the particle centers for chains with various particle diameters. (b) Evolution of the shape of the low-frequency hysteresis loop for chains of particles with diameter D = 30 nm for various reduced distances: (1) a/D = 1.7, (2) a/D = 1.85, (3) a/D = 2.4, (4) a/D = 3.0.
Figure 1. (a) Dependence of assembly SAR on the reduced distance a/D between the particle centers for chains with various particle diameters. (b) Evolution of the shape of the low-frequency hysteresis loop for chains of particles with diameter D = 30 nm for various reduced distances: (1) a/D = 1.7, (2) a/D = 1.85, (3) a/D = 2.4, (4) a/D = 3.0.
Nanomaterials 10 01320 g001
Figure 2. (a) Frequency dependence of SAR for assembly of magnetosome chains with particle diameter D = 30 nm in an AC magnetic field with an amplitude H0 = 50 Oe. (b) Dependence of SAR on the distance a between the particle centers for particles with diameter D = 20 nm for various amplitudes of AC magnetic field: (1) H0 = 50 Oe, (2) H0 = 100 Oe, (3) H0 = 150 Oe.
Figure 2. (a) Frequency dependence of SAR for assembly of magnetosome chains with particle diameter D = 30 nm in an AC magnetic field with an amplitude H0 = 50 Oe. (b) Dependence of SAR on the distance a between the particle centers for particles with diameter D = 20 nm for various amplitudes of AC magnetic field: (1) H0 = 50 Oe, (2) H0 = 100 Oe, (3) H0 = 150 Oe.
Nanomaterials 10 01320 g002
Figure 3. (a) Distribution of the components of the interaction field depending on the position of the nanoparticle in the chain. (b) Dependence of the SAR of a dilute chain assembly on the number of particles Np in the chainswith particles of different diameters, D = 20–40 nm, assuming the optimal ratios a/D for various chains.
Figure 3. (a) Distribution of the components of the interaction field depending on the position of the nanoparticle in the chain. (b) Dependence of the SAR of a dilute chain assembly on the number of particles Np in the chainswith particles of different diameters, D = 20–40 nm, assuming the optimal ratios a/D for various chains.
Nanomaterials 10 01320 g003
Figure 4. (a) Dependence of the assembly SAR on the angle of AC magnetic field with respect to the chain axis for assemblies of particles of different diameters. (b) The evolution of low frequency hysteresis loops for assembly of particles with diameter D = 30 nm for different directions of applied magnetic field with respect to the common chain axis: (1) θ = 0, (2) θ = 30°, (3) θ = 40°, (4) θ = 60°.
Figure 4. (a) Dependence of the assembly SAR on the angle of AC magnetic field with respect to the chain axis for assemblies of particles of different diameters. (b) The evolution of low frequency hysteresis loops for assembly of particles with diameter D = 30 nm for different directions of applied magnetic field with respect to the common chain axis: (1) θ = 0, (2) θ = 30°, (3) θ = 40°, (4) θ = 60°.
Nanomaterials 10 01320 g004
Figure 5. (a) Low-frequency hysteresis loops of dilute assemblies of cylindrical clusters of interacting chains of nanoparticles depending on the number of chains located inside the cluster: (1) Nch = 4, (2) Nch = 6, (3) Nch = 8, (4) Nch = 10. (b) The model of random oriented cluster of magnetosome chains used in the calculations.
Figure 5. (a) Low-frequency hysteresis loops of dilute assemblies of cylindrical clusters of interacting chains of nanoparticles depending on the number of chains located inside the cluster: (1) Nch = 4, (2) Nch = 6, (3) Nch = 8, (4) Nch = 10. (b) The model of random oriented cluster of magnetosome chains used in the calculations.
Nanomaterials 10 01320 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Usov, N.A.; Gubanova, E.M. Application of Magnetosomes in Magnetic Hyperthermia. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071320

AMA Style

Usov NA, Gubanova EM. Application of Magnetosomes in Magnetic Hyperthermia. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(7):1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071320

Chicago/Turabian Style

Usov, Nikolai A., and Elizaveta M. Gubanova. 2020. "Application of Magnetosomes in Magnetic Hyperthermia" Nanomaterials 10, no. 7: 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071320

APA Style

Usov, N. A., & Gubanova, E. M. (2020). Application of Magnetosomes in Magnetic Hyperthermia. Nanomaterials, 10(7), 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071320

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop