Next Article in Journal
Effect of Fiber Posts on Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Upper Premolars: Finite Element Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorescent Imprinted Nanoparticles for the Effective Monitoring of Irinotecan in Human Plasma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory

Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(9), 1709; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091709
Submission received: 11 August 2020 / Revised: 26 August 2020 / Accepted: 27 August 2020 / Published: 29 August 2020

Abstract

:
Here, we present the synaptic characteristics of AlN-based conductive bridge random access memory (CBRAM) as a synaptic device for neuromorphic systems. Both non-volatile and volatile memory are observed by simply controlling the strength of the Cu filament inside the AlN film. For non-volatile switching induced by high compliance current (CC), good retention with a strong Cu metallic filament is verified. Low-resistance state (LRS) and high-resistance state (HRS) conduction follow metallic Ohmic and trap-assisted tunneling (TAT), respectively, which are supported by I–V fitting and temperature dependence. The transition from long-term plasticity (LTP) to short-term plasticity (STP) is demonstrated by increasing the pulse interval time for synaptic device application. Also, paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) in the nervous system is mimicked by sending two identical pulses to the CBRAM device to induce STP. Finally, potentiation and depression are achieved by gradually increasing the set and reset voltage in pulse transient mode.

1. Introduction

Neuromorphic systems are attracting attention as replacements for von Neumann architecture in the near future due to their capacity for energy efficient, massively parallel, and error tolerant computing [1,2,3,4]. Two-terminal resistive switching memory possesses many features that are suitable for synaptic devices for neuromorphic systems, such as low-power operation, high scalability, analogue switching for multi-level cells (MLCs), fast switching, high endurance, and long retention [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The various resistive switching behaviors have been observed from a lot of materials such as oxides, nitrides, and chalcogenides [11,12].
A CBRAM device is a type of resistive switching memory that involves diffusion of highly diffusive metal electrodes such as Ag and Cu into a host insulator to form a metallic conducting filament in a manner that depends on applied voltage [13,14,15,16]. Ion movement in a CBRAM generally allows for faster operation speeds and lower voltage levels than are seen in filamentary and non-filamentary bipolar devices [17,18]. In terms of metal selection for the top CBRAM electrode, Cu is superior to Ag in terms of CMOS-friendly processes when using a barrier metals such as TaN [19] and TiN [20]. Metal oxides such as HfO2 and Al2O3 are popular host insulators in CBRAM devices owing to their stable and reliable resistive switching characteristics compared to organic materials. Recently, nitride-based resistive switching compounds, such as AlN, ZrN, HfN, NiN, and SiN, have been reported to have excellent non-volatile properties comparable to metal oxides in terms of operation speed, endurance, and retention [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Especially, AlN is suitable for resistive switching memory owing to its high thermal conductivity and large band gap with good insulating properties [29,30,31,32] and could be improved by additional approaches such as the scaling, bilayer structure, and doping like oxide-based RRAM. Robust resistive switching was reported for the TiN/AlN/TiN device [33] and Pt/AlN:Cu/PT device [34] for non-volatile memory applications. However, there have been few studies on volatile and non-volatile switching for selector and synaptic device applications in the neuromorphic system.
In this work, we fabricated a CBRAM-type AlN-based metal-insulator-metal (MIM) device and investigated the STP and LTP for a neuromorphic system. The coexistence of non-volatile and volatile switching is demonstrated by controlling the CC in DC sweep mode. STP is well-emulated by varying pulse interval time in pulse responses. Also, PPF is well-mimicked by changing the interval time and decay rate for STP. The conduction mechanisms of LRS and HRS are explained by I–V fitting and temperature dependence. Finally, we demonstrated 10 cycles of potentiation and depression with incremental pulse schemes.

2. Materials and Methods

The Cu/AlN/TiN device was fabricated in the following manner. A 100 nm thick TiN layer was prepared on a SiO2/Si wafer using a sputtering system. A 20 nm thick AlN layer was deposited by sputtering. The Al target was sputtered with N2 (12 sccm) and Ar (8 sccm) gases under a sputtering power of 0.5 kW, pulsed DC, and 50 kHz, and a pressure of 3 mTorr. A 100-nm thick Cu top electrode was deposited by e-beam evaporation and patterned by a shadow mask containing circular patterns with a diameter of 100 μm. The electrical properties in the DC sweep and transient modes were measured using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (Keithley 4200-SCS and 4225-PMU ultrafast module, Solon, OH, USA). During the measurements, a bias voltage and pulse were applied to the Cu top electrode while the TiN bottom electrode was grounded. XPS depth analysis was conducted with a Nexsa (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a Microfocus monochromatic X-ray source (Al-Kα (1486.6 eV), a sputter source (Ar+), an ion energy of 2 KV, and a beam size of 100 μm.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the XPS depth profile of the AlN/TiN layers for the elements Al, N, O, Ti, and C. The oxygen content is high and the Al content is low at the beginning of etching because oxygen always exists on a sample exposed to the atmosphere. It is also difficult to completely exclude reactions with a little oxygen during AlN deposition and Al target is easily oxidized. At the beginning of AlN deposition, the oxygen in the chamber reacts first, and the oxygen concentration increases with AlN depth. We also confirm that the gradient of oxygen concentration from the peak shifts left in the Al 2p spectra from 35 s to 70 s because the peak for Al–N–O bonds has a higher binding energy (75.1 eV) than that of Al–N (73.9 eV) (Figure 1b) [35,36]. Also, TiN bottom electrode could be little oxidized before AlN deposition. The intensity of Al 2p is highest at 35 s because atmospheric absorption of O–H increases at 0 s and Ti content relatively increases at 70 s. The intensities of the N 1s and O 1s spectra as a function of binding energy with different etching times are presented in Figure 1c and d. The peak slightly shifts left from 35 s to 70 s in the N 1s spectra because the amount of N–Al–O bonds (398.4 eV) is increased at the interface between the AlN and TiN layers.
Firstly, the volatile switching and non-volatile switching can be distinguished by CC. Figure 2a shows the I–V curves with different CCs from 10 μA to 40 μA. The volatile switching is observed with CC of 10 μA and 20 μA and the non-volatile switching is observed with higher CCs of 30 μA and 40 μA. For volatile switching and nonvolatile switching, the initial current and high LRS current are observed. Figure 2b shows the I–V characteristics of volatile switching in the Cu/AlN/TiN device. In the initial state, the current rises rapidly with a steep slope at the threshold voltage (VTH). Here, a low CC (10 μA) is required to achieve volatile switching with a small Cu conducting filament. After the device turns on, it seems to maintain some current in the back sweep, but when it repeatedly performs with the same voltage sweep, it turns on again from the initial state, indicating volatile switching. Bidirectional volatile switching is suitable for a selector device that can suppress the current in the voltage region less than VTH and provide enough current in the voltage region higher than VTH for the set and reset processes. On the other hand, the non-volatile memory property is observed at a higher CC (1 mA) in the same device. The set and reset processes occur via positive sweep and negative sweep, respectively, which is typical bipolar resistive switching behavior (Figure 2c). The set process changes the device from a high-resistance state (HRS) to a low-resistance state (LRS); the reset process is the opposite of the set process and returns the device to a HRS, indicating typical filamentary-type bipolar switching. The average values of set voltage and reset voltage are 2.602 V and −1.033 V and the relative deviations of set voltage and reset voltage are 0.167 V and 0.137 V (Figure 2d). Moreover, the endurance cycles of 100 are achieved by set and reset process (Figure 2e). Figure 2e shows good retention in the LRS and HRS. The LRS and HRS resistance values read at 0.2 V do not deteriorate significantly and the distinction between the two states is maintained for 10,000 s. The high CC makes a strong conducting filament, and this filament cannot be changed within a certain period of time while maintaining the non-volatile property.
Next, we investigate the conduction mechanism of the Cu/AlN/TiN device. Figure 3a shows ln(I/V) versus V1/2 of the initial current before the forming. The linear fitting indicates that the carrier transport of the pristine device follows bulk-limited Poole-Frenkel emission [37]. AlN film has nitride-related defects that acts as the trap sites of the electron. Therefore, the emission of trapped electron into the conduction band could occur [26]. We created double logarithmic plots of IV curves in the LRS and HRS (Figure 3b). The IV curve in the LRS is well-fitted with slope 1, which follows Ohmic behavior. The resistance in the LRS increases with temperature, indicating that a Cu conducting filament with metallic behavior has formed in the AlN film in Figure 3d. On the other hand, there are three distinctive regimes with different slopes in the HRS, which is explained by the SCLC model [38,39]. Thermally generated carriers are dominant over electrode-injected carriers in the Ohmic conduction regime (IV) at low voltage. The slope increases when the injected carriers become dominant over the thermally generated carriers in a higher voltage regime (IV2). The slope increases in the third regime (IV3) when the traps in AlN are all filled out by carriers due to the further increase in the electric field. Resistance decreases with increasing temperature in the HRS, as shown in Figure 3e. This suggests that the Cu filament does not dominate conduction in the HRS because the Cu filament has ruptured. Figure 3c shows ln(I) versus 1/V for TAT at the voltage region (1.3 V~2.1 V) in the HRS [40,41]. The tunneling emission of the electrons helped by the defects in the dielectric can be accelerated in high electric field. Cu cluster may remain in the HRS because Cu filament is not fully ruptured considering that HRS current is higher than initial current. The electron can move via multiple trap sites that Cu clusters provide (Figure 3g). On the other hand, in the LRS case, there is no barrier seen from TiN bottom electrode since the strong Cu filament are formed in the AlN layer. Therefore, metallic Ohmic conduction would be dominant (Figure 3f).
Next, the transient characteristics given pulse responses are investigated in the Cu/AlN/TiN device for neuromorphic applications. Here we employ the initial current for volatile switching properties to distinguish the non-volatile and volatile switching by pulse width and interval time. When a pulse train with an amplitude of 9 V is applied to the device in the initial state, the current gradually increases because of the property of LTP (Figure 4a). This behavior is similar to the long-term memory of some information in the human brain when a stimulus is biologically applied. Here, the filament size, once it is formed, can be expected to gradually increase without decomposition due to the continuous pulse inputs (Figure 4b–d).
On the other hand, when a pulse train with an amplitude of 8 V is applied at a similar frequency, an increase in current is observed, and the increased current gradually decreases when the pulse frequency is decreased (Figure 5a). Here, the smaller voltage amplitude is a precondition for weakening of the conducting filament compared to the voltage seen in Figure 4a, which can be verified by monitoring at the value of the transient current. Here, the phenomenon of gradual current decrease when the frequency of stimulation decreases can be likened to STM in the human brain. The gradual attenuation of the current indicates a process in which the size of the weakly formed filament spontaneously decomposes when the frequency of input stimulation is reduced (Figure 5b,c).
Next, we mimic PPF, which is a biological synaptic activity related to STP and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity [42]. STM can be used for reservoir computing, such as for temporal data processing with low training costs. PPF is emulated when two identical pulse inputs (amplitude: 8.5 V and width: 100 μA) are applied to the Cu/AlN/TiN device. The current increases temporarily at the end of the first pulse and then decreases at the beginning of the second pulse. As the interval time increases, the rate of current decay increases, which is related to STP (Figure 6a, inset). This suggests that the conducting filament formed by the first pulse input instantaneously shrinks. Figure 6b shows PPF as a function of the time interval between the two pulses. The PPF value is defined as ((I1st − I2nd)/I1st) × 100% where I1st is the current at the midpoint of the first pulse input and I2nd is the current at the midpoint of the second pulse input. Here, the current during the rise and fall of the pulse input is influenced by the displacement current, so the current is sensed at the center of the pulse input to obtain the exact PPF value. PPF exponentially decreases and the decrease is well fitted with the following Equation (1):
C·exp(−t/τ1) + C·exp(−t/τ2) + PPF0
where C is fitting constants, τ1 and τ2 are time constants, and PPF0 is the saturated PPF. Here, PPF0 is not zero with a very long interval, which means that the Cu filament formed under the two pulse inputs does not completely decompose. Therefore, this result is closer to a soft set process rather than pure volatile switching.
Next, we implement LTP and LTD of the Cu/AlN/TiN device using incremental amplitude pulse schemes. After the forming process, the high current region is employed for non-volatile potentiation and depression, which is well matched with DC sweep in Figure 2c. Non-volatile resistive switching in the Cu/AlN/TiN device follows a filamentary model, indicating that it is difficult to obtain MLC with fine adjustments. Therefore, incremental amplitude pulse responses are employed to obtain multiple conductance levels. The set pulse with a width of 1 ms is increased from 0.88 V to 1.64 V and a read voltage of 0.3 V is inserted between the set pulses to extract the conductance seen in Figure 7a. Similarly, the reset pulse with a width of 1 ms is increased from −1.25 V to −1.63 V and a read voltage of 0.3 V is used in Figure 7b. With 20 consecutive set pulses followed by 20 consecutive reset pulses, 10 cycles of potentiation and depression are achieved (Figure 7c, inset). Figure 6c shows the average value and spread of the 10 cycles, where the variations in potentiation and depression are 52.3 μS and 41.6 μS, respectively. Cycle-to-cycle variation as well as the linear weight update method are important to achievement of accurate learning in a neuromorphic system.
Finally, we compare this work with existing literature of nitride based CBRAM in terms of deposition method of the dielectrics, operation voltage and current, endurance cycle, retention, and the applications in Table 1. The most deposition techniques were prepared by DC reactive sputtering or RF sputtering for good resistive switching. Ag electrode tends to smaller operation voltage compared to the Cu electrode due to high diffusivity [21,26,43,44,45]. The selector and synaptic device applications are demonstrated even though the resistive switching performances of Cu/AlN/TiN in this work are not overwhelming compared to the previous works.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we closely investigated resistive switching and the synaptic characteristics of a Cu/AlN/TiN device. Volatile and non-volatile properties are observed by controlling the CC under DC sweep. The Ohmic conduction and TAT are revealed by the fitting process and temperature dependence for non-volatile resistive switching. Moreover, various pulse schemes are used to trace the synaptic dynamics of STM and LTM. The transition from LTP to STP is achieved by reducing the pulse amplitude and interval time. Also, PPF is emulated by varying the pulse interval time for STP and the facilitation effect. Finally, repeated LTP and LTD characteristics are statistically obtained at high current levels.

Author Contributions

H.C. conducted the electrical measurements and wrote the manuscript. S.K. designed the experiment concept and supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) under Grant 2018R1C1B5046454.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Kuzum, D.; Yu, S.; Wong, H.-S.P. Synaptic electronics: Materials, devices and applications. Nanotechnol. 2013, 24, 382001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ielmini, D.; Wong, H.-S.P. In-memory computing with resistive switching devices. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Emelyanov, A.V.; E Nikiruy, K.; Serenko, A.V.; Sitnikov, A.V.; Presnyakov, M.Y.; Rybka, R.B.; Sboev, A.G.; Rylkov, V.V.; Kashkarov, P.K.; Kovalchuk, M.V.; et al. Self-adaptive STDP-based learning of a spiking neuron with nanocomposite memristive weights. Nanotechnology 2019, 31, 045201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mikhaylov, A.; Pimashkin, A.; Pigareva, Y.; Gerasimova, S.; Gryaznov, E.; Shchanikov, S.; Zuev, A.; Talanov, M.; Lavrov, I.; Demin, V.; et al. Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tominov, R.; Vakulov, Z.E.; Avilov, V.I.; Khakhulin, D.; Fedotov, A.A.; Zamburg, E.; Smirnov, V.; Ageev, O. Synthesis and Memristor Effect of a Forming-Free ZnO Nanocrystalline Films. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Y.; Choi, S.; Lu, W.D. Oxide Heterostructure Resistive Memory. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2908–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jo, S.H.; Chang, T.; Ebong, I.; Bhadviya, B.B.; Mazumder, P.; Lu, W.D. Nanoscale Memristor Device as Synapse in Neuromorphic Systems. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1297–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Romero, F.J.; Toral-Lopez, A.; Ohata, A.; Morales, D.P.; Ruiz, F.G.; Godoy, A.; Rodriguez, N.; Toral-Lopez, A. Ruiz Laser-Fabricated Reduced Graphene Oxide Memristors. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Waser, R.; Dittmann, R.; Staikov, G.; Szot, K. Redox-Based Resistive Switching Memories - Nanoionic Mechanisms, Prospects, and Challenges. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2632–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shen, Z.; Zhao, C.; Qi, Y.; Xu, W.; Liu, Y.; Mitrovic, I.Z.; Yang, L.; Zhao, C. Advances of RRAM Devices: Resistive Switching Mechanisms, Materials and Bionic Synaptic Application. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, F.; Gao, S.; Chen, C.; Song, C.; Zeng, F. Recent progress in resistive random access memories: Materials, switching mechanisms, and performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2014, 83, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lanza, M.; Wong, H.-S.P.; Pop, E.; Ielmini, D.; Strukov, D.; Regan, B.C.; Larcher, L.; Villena, M.A.; Yang, J.J.; Goux, L.; et al. Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 5, 1800143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Bricalli, A.; Ambrosi, E.; Laudato, M.; Maestro, M.; Rodriguez, R.; Ielmini, D. Resistive Switching Device Technology Based on Silicon Oxide for Improved ON–OFF Ratio—Part II: Select Devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 65, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, Z.; Joshi, S.; Savel’Ev, S.E.; Jiang, H.; Midya, R.; Lin, P.; Hu, M.; Ge, N.; Strachan, J.P.; Li, Z.; et al. Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shim, J.H.; Hu, Q.; Park, M.R.; Abbas, Y.; Kang, C.J.; Kim, J.; Yoon, T.-S. Resistive switching characteristics of TiO2 thin films with different electrodes. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2015, 67, 936–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Meng, X.; Quenneville, F.; Venne, F.; Mauro, E.D.; Isik, D.; Barbosa, M.; Drolet, M.; Natile, M.M.; Rochefort, D. Electrolyte-Gated WO3 Transistors: Electrochmistry, Structure, and Device Performance. J. Phys. Chem C 2015, 119, 21732–21738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, D.; Aluguri, R.; Chand, U.; Tseng, T.Y. Enhancement of resistive switching properties in nitride based CBRAM device by inserting an Al2O3 thin layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 203102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, R.; Liu, S.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Wu, F.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lv, H.; et al. Improvement of Device Reliability by Introducing a BEOL-Compatible TiN Barrier Layer in CBRAM. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oku, T.; Kawakami, E.; Uekubo, M.; Takahiro, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Murakami, M. Diffusion barrier property of TaN between Si and Cu. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1996, 99, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwon, S.-H.; Kwon, O.-K.; Min, J.-S.; Kang, S.-W. Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Ru–TiN Thin Films for Copper Diffusion Barrier Metals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, G578–G581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, C.; Yang, Y.C.; Zeng, F.; Pan, F. Bipolar resistive switching in Cu/AlN/Pt nonvolatile memory device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 083502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Hwang, S.; Kim, M.-H.; Chang, Y.-F.; Park, B.-G. Analog Synaptic Behavior of a Silicon Nitride Memristor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40420–40427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, H.-D.; An, H.-M.; Kim, T.G. Ultrafast Resistive-Switching Phenomena Observed in NiN-Based ReRAM Cells. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 2302–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, H.-D.; An, H.-M.; Lee, E.B.; Kim, T.G. Stable Bipolar Resistive Switching Characteristics and Resistive Switching Mechanisms Observed in Aluminum Nitride-based ReRAM Devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2011, 58, 3566–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, S.; Jung, S.; Kim, M.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chang, T.-C.; Ryoo, K.-C.; Cho, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, B.-G. Scaling Effect on Silicon Nitride Memristor with Highly Doped Si Substrate. Small 2018, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, C.-C.; Liou, H.-Y.; Chu, S.-Y.; Huang, C.-Y.; Hong, C.-S. Diverse resistive switching behaviors of AlN thin films with different orientations. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 6230–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tikhov, S.V.; Gorshkov, O.N.; Antonov, I.N.; Tetelbaum, D.I.; Mikhaylov, A.N.; Belov, A.I.; Morozov, A.I.; Karakolis, P.; Dimitrakis, P. Behavioral Features of MIS Memristors with a Si3N4 Nanolayer Fabricated on a Conductive Si Substrate. Semiconductor 2018, 52, 1540–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rahmani, M.K.; Kim, M.-H.; Hussain, F.; Abbas, Y.; Ismail, M.; Hong, K.; Mahata, C.; Choi, C.; Park, B.-G.; Kim, S. Memristive and Synaptic Characteristics of Nitride-Based Heterostructures on Si Substrate. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, X.; Iizuka, T.; Jiang, P.; Ohki, Y.; Tanaka, T. Role of Interface on the Thermal Conductivity of Highly Filled Dielectric Epoxy/AlN Composites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13629–13639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Luo, Z.; Lv, B.; Ding, Z. Tunable Electronic Properties of Graphene/g-AlN Heterostructure: The Effect of Vacancy and Strain Engineering. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ali, R.; Renzelli, M.; Khan, M.I.; Sebastiani, M.; Bemporad, E. Effects of Residual Stress Distribution on Interfacial Adhesion of Magnetron Sputtered AlN and AlN/Al Nanostructured Coatings on a (100) Silicon Substrate. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ene, V.L.; Dinescu, D.; Djourelov, N.; Zai, I.; Vasile, B.S.; Serban, A.B.; Leca, V.; Andronescu, E. Defect Structure Determination of GaN Films in GaN/AlN/Si Heterostructures by HR-TEM, XRD, and Slow Positrons Experiments. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhang, Z.; Gao, B.; Fang, Z.; Wang, X.; Tang, Y.; Sohn, J.; Wong, H.-S.P.; Wong, S.S.; Lo, G.-Q. All-Metal-Nitride RRAM Devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 36, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, C.; Gao, S.; Tang, G.; Song, C.; Zeng, F.; Pan, F. Cu-Embedded AlN-Based Non-polar Nonvolatile Resistive Switching Memory. IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett. 2012, 33, 1711–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, H.; Wu, H.; Zhou, J.; Hu, L. Bipolar resistive switching properties of AlN films deposited by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 315, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, C.; Gao, S.; Tang, G.; Fu, H.; Wang, G.; Song, C.; Zeng, F.; Pan, F. Effect of Electrode Materials on AlN-Based Bipolar and Complementary Resistive Switching. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1793–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lim, E.W.; Ismail, R. Conduction mehcanism of Valence Change Resistive Switching Memory: A Survey. Electronics 2015, 4, 586–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Çaldıran, Z.; Şinoforoğlu, M.; Metin, Ö.; Aydoğan, Ş.; Meral, K. Space charge limited current mechanism (SCLC) in the graphene oxide–Fe3O4 nanocomposites/n-Si heterojunctions. J. Alloy. Compd. 2015, 631, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ogawa, T.; Cho, D.-C.; Kaneko, K.; Mori, T.; Mizutani, T. Numerical analysis of the carrier behavior of organic light-emitting diode: Comparing a hopping conduction model with a SCLC model. Thin Solid Films 2003, 438, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Houng, M.-P.; Wang, Y.H.; Chang, W.J. Current transport mechanism in trapped oxides: A generalized trap-assisted tunneling model. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 1488–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fu, Y.; Huang, C.-C.; Wang, J.-C. Nonlinear resistive switching features of rapid-thermal-annealed aluminum nitride dielectrics with modified charge trapping behaviors. Microelectron. Eng. 2019, 216, 111033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santschi, L.A.; Stanton, P.K. A paired-pulse facilitation analysis of long-term synaptic depression at excitatory synapses in rat hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions. Brain Res. 2003, 962, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Prakash, R.; Kaur, D. Bipolar resistive switching behavior in Cu/AlN/Pt structure for ReRAM application. Vacuum 2017, 143, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, P.H.; Li, C.Y.; Min, K.P.; Lin, C.C.; Chu, S.Y. Investigations of the effects and mechanisms of metal interconnection layer of AlN-based complementary resistvie switches. AIP. Adv. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Jeon, Y.-R.; Abbas, Y.; Sokolov, A.S.; Kim, S.; Ku, B.; Choi, C. Study of in Situ Silver Migration in Amorphous Boron Nitride CBRAM Device. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 23329–23336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XPS analysis of AlN/TiN layers: (a) Depth profiles for elements Al, N, O, Ti, and C; (b) Al 2p, (c) N 1s; (d) O 1s spectra.
Figure 1. XPS analysis of AlN/TiN layers: (a) Depth profiles for elements Al, N, O, Ti, and C; (b) Al 2p, (c) N 1s; (d) O 1s spectra.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g001
Figure 2. Volatile and non-volatile switching of Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) Voltage sweep with different CCs from 10 μA to 40 μA to distinguish the volatile and non-volatile switching and the distribution of forming voltage in inset; (b) Volatile I–V and (c) non-volatile I–V characteristics; (d) Set and reset distribution and (e) endurance for non-volatile switching; (f) Retention property of non-volatile switching in the LRS and HRS for 10,000 s.
Figure 2. Volatile and non-volatile switching of Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) Voltage sweep with different CCs from 10 μA to 40 μA to distinguish the volatile and non-volatile switching and the distribution of forming voltage in inset; (b) Volatile I–V and (c) non-volatile I–V characteristics; (d) Set and reset distribution and (e) endurance for non-volatile switching; (f) Retention property of non-volatile switching in the LRS and HRS for 10,000 s.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g002
Figure 3. Conduction mechanism of Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) ln(I/V) versus V1/2 for Poole-Frenkel emission; (b) Log-log fitting of non-volatile IV curves for power law; (c) ln(I) versus 1/V for TAT model; Temperature dependence in the (d) LRS and (e) HRS; (f) Ohmic and (g) TAT model in band diagrams in the LRS and HRS, respectively.
Figure 3. Conduction mechanism of Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) ln(I/V) versus V1/2 for Poole-Frenkel emission; (b) Log-log fitting of non-volatile IV curves for power law; (c) ln(I) versus 1/V for TAT model; Temperature dependence in the (d) LRS and (e) HRS; (f) Ohmic and (g) TAT model in band diagrams in the LRS and HRS, respectively.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g003
Figure 4. Transient characteristics of Cu/AlN/TiN device for (a) LTP; Schematics of Cu filament growing (bd).
Figure 4. Transient characteristics of Cu/AlN/TiN device for (a) LTP; Schematics of Cu filament growing (bd).
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g004
Figure 5. Transient characteristics of Cu/AlN/TiN device for (a) STP; Schematics of Cu filament (b) Weak filament before evolution; (c) growing; (d) Spontaneous decomposition.
Figure 5. Transient characteristics of Cu/AlN/TiN device for (a) STP; Schematics of Cu filament (b) Weak filament before evolution; (c) growing; (d) Spontaneous decomposition.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g005
Figure 6. PPF characteristics of the Cu/AlN/TiN device: (a) Transient characteristics given two identical pulse inputs; (b) PPF and decay rate as a function of interval time.
Figure 6. PPF characteristics of the Cu/AlN/TiN device: (a) Transient characteristics given two identical pulse inputs; (b) PPF and decay rate as a function of interval time.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g006
Figure 7. LTP and LTD characteristics of the Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) Incremental pulse schemes for (a) potentiation and (b) depression; (c) LTP and LTD characteristics in 10 cycles.
Figure 7. LTP and LTD characteristics of the Cu/AlN/TiN device. (a) Incremental pulse schemes for (a) potentiation and (b) depression; (c) LTP and LTD characteristics in 10 cycles.
Nanomaterials 10 01709 g007
Table 1. Comparison of the resistive switching performances among nitride-based CBRAM devices.
Table 1. Comparison of the resistive switching performances among nitride-based CBRAM devices.
Device StructureDielectric Deposition MethodOperation VoltageOperation CurrentEndurance CycleRetentionApplications
Cu/AlN/Pt [21]DC sputteringSet: ~3 V
Reset: ~−2 V
>1 mA~1000106 s at RTNon-volatile memory
Ag/AlN/Pt [26]RF magnetron sputteringSet: ~0.5 V
Reset: ~−0.5 V
>100 μA --Non-volatile memory
Cu/AlN/Pt [43]DC reactive magnetron sputteringSet: ~3 V
Reset: ~−2 V
>10 mA~10,000104 s at RTNon-volatile memory
Pt/AlN/Cu/AlN/Pt [44]RF magnetron sputtering~±3 V<100 μA~5012,000 s at RTNon-volatile memory
Pt/AlN/Ag/AlN/Pt [44]RF magnetron sputtering~±2 V<100 μA~50012,000 s at RTNon-volatile memory
Ag/a-BN/Pt [45]RF magnetron sputteringSet: ~1 V
Reset: ~−1 V
<1 mA~100012,000 s at 85 °CNon-volatile memory
Cu/AlN/TiN [this work]DC pulsed sputteringSet: ~3.5 V
Reset: ~−1.5 V
>1 mA10010,000 s RTNon-volatile memory,
Selector device,
Synaptic device

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, H.; Kim, S. Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091709

AMA Style

Cho H, Kim S. Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(9):1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Hyojong, and Sungjun Kim. 2020. "Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory" Nanomaterials 10, no. 9: 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091709

APA Style

Cho, H., & Kim, S. (2020). Emulation of Biological Synapse Characteristics from Cu/AlN/TiN Conductive Bridge Random Access Memory. Nanomaterials, 10(9), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop