Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Influence of Crystalline Form on Cyto-Genotoxic and Inflammatory Effects Induced by TiO2 Nanoparticles on Human Bronchial and Alveolar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Modulation of the Magnetic Hyperthermia Response Using Different Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Morphologies
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Interactions of TiO2 Nanoparticles with Earthworm Coelomocytes: Immunotoxicity Assessment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Weyl Semimetal Co2MnGa Thin Films

by
Peter Swekis
1,2,
Aleksandr S. Sukhanov
1,2,
Yi-Cheng Chen
1,3,
Andrei Gloskovskii
4,
Gerhard H. Fecher
1,
Ioannis Panagiotopoulos
5,
Jörg Sichelschmidt
1,
Victor Ukleev
6,
Anton Devishvili
7,8,
Alexei Vorobiev
8,
Dmytro S. Inosov
2,
Sebastian T. B. Goennenwein
2,9,10,
Claudia Felser
1 and
Anastasios Markou
1,*
1
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nöthnitzer Str. 40, 01187 Dresden, Germany
2
Institut für Festkörper- und Materialphysik, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
4
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
5
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
6
Laboratory for Neutron Scattering and Imaging, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland
7
Institut Laue Langevin, 38000 Grenoble, France
8
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden
9
Center for Transport and Devices of Emergent Materials, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
10
Department of Physics, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(1), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010251
Submission received: 21 December 2020 / Revised: 12 January 2021 / Accepted: 14 January 2021 / Published: 19 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis, Development and Characterization of Magnetic Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
Magnetic Weyl semimetals are newly discovered quantum materials with the potential for use in spintronic applications. Of particular interest is the cubic Heusler compound Co2MnGa due to its inherent magnetic and topological properties. This work presents the structural, magnetic and electronic properties of magnetron co-sputtered Co2MnGa thin films, with thicknesses ranging from 10 to 80 nm. Polarized neutron reflectometry confirmed a uniform magnetization through the films. Hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed a high degree of spin polarization and localized (itinerant) character of the Mn d (Co d) valence electrons and accompanying magnetic moments. Further, broadband and field orientation-dependent ferromagnetic resonance measurements indicated a relation between the thickness-dependent structural and magnetic properties. The increase of the tensile strain-induced tetragonal distortion in the thinner films was reflected in an increase of the cubic anisotropy term and a decrease of the perpendicular uniaxial term. The lattice distortion led to a reduction of the Gilbert damping parameter and the thickness-dependent film quality affected the inhomogeneous linewidth broadening. These experimental findings will enrich the understanding of the electronic and magnetic properties of magnetic Weyl semimetal thin films.

1. Introduction

Topological materials have attracted tremendous interest in condensed matter physics due to their unique electronic band states, which give rise to novel linear and nonlinear responses [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Weyl semimetals constitute one class of such topological systems. They are characterized by a lack of inversion symmetry or broken time-reversal symmetry, resulting in two-fold degenerate band-touching points (Weyl nodes) with opposite chirality formed in momentum space [3,5,10,11,12]. The Weyl nodes act as quantized sources and sinks of Berry curvature, which in turn lead to intriguing transport properties, such as the anomalous Hall effect [13,14,15,16,17,18], the anomalous Nernst effect [19,20,21,22], magneto-optical responses [23] and the chiral anomaly [24,25]. Recently, some ferromagnetic compounds were proposed to be time reversal symmetry breaking Weyl semimetals (WSMs). Examples of such materials are Heusler compounds [26,27,28] and kagome crystals [29,30,31].
In particular, the Heusler compound Co2MnGa has received significant attention since the recent experimental verification of Weyl fermion lines and drumhead topological surface states [32]. Co2MnGa crystallizes in the Cu2MnAl-type structure (L21, space group F m 3 ¯ m , #225) with a Curie temperature of TC = 694 K and saturation moment of Ms = 4.05 µB per formula unit [33]. Single crystals and thin films exhibit Berry curvature-driven large anomalous Hall and Nernst effects [16,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Further, Co2MnGa films show negative magnetoresistances [40] and high spin polarization [41,42], which in turn results in low magnetic damping [42,43]. Interestingly, Pechan et al. reported that Co2MnGa films grown on different seed layers achieved tunable strain states, which induced remarkably large two-fold and four-fold in-plane (IP) anisotropies [44].
Despite the promising properties of Co2MnGa, knowledge about the intrinsic magnetic properties of thin films in the chemically ordered L21 structure remains limited. Thus, to fully utilize Co2MnGa in practical applications, e.g., spintronic and magnetic memory devices, it is necessary to understand its electronic and magnetic properties, particularly the dynamic magnetic properties approaching the thin film limit. Key parameters include the Gilbert damping, saturation magnetization and magnetic anisotropies.
In this work, we systematically studied the structural, electronic and magnetic properties of high-quality heteroepitaxial L21-ordered Co2MnGa thin films grown on MgO(001) single crystal substrates, with thicknesses ranging from 10 to 80 nm. We obtained a uniform depth profile of the film magnetization using polarized neutron reflectometry (PNR). Further, we investigated the 2p core levels of Co and Mn by means of magnetic dichroism in hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HAXPES) to infer the itinerant and localized characters of the respective d valence electrons and accompanying magnetic moments. In addition, we related the thickness-dependent structural properties to the magnetic properties, including the inhomogeneous linewidth broadening, Gilbert damping parameter and magnetic anisotropies, as determined by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) experiments. In that context, we found that the films showed cubic anisotropy within the film plane and uniaxial anisotropy perpendicular to the film plane.

2. Materials and Methods

High-quality epitaxial thin films of Co2MnGa were grown in a BESTEC UHV magnetron sputtering system on single crystal MgO(001) substrates and capped with 3 nm Al, which is naturally oxidized and protects the epilayer. The details of the growth are provided in [34]. The stoichiometry of the films was confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), with an experimental uncertainty of less than 5 at. %. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurements were conducted using a PANalytical X’Pert3 MRD diffractometer employing Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The film thicknesses were determined by using XRR measurements (not shown). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were collected in non-contact mode on an MFP-3D Origin+ microscope from Oxford Instruments Asylum Research in replicas of the films without capping layers.
PNR measurements were conducted on the SuperADAM instrument at ILL (Grenoble, France). A fixed neutron wavelength of 5.2 Å with an incident polarization of 99.6% was used for the measurements. The neutron wavelength spread was δλ/λ ≈ 0.5%. The neutron momentum transfer was selected by changing the incident and outgoing angles to satisfy the specular reflection condition. In addition, the incident neutron polarization state was controlled by a radiofrequency spin flipper for each of the consecutive measurements. The data were collected at an applied magnetic field of 50 mT preceded by the application of a 0.7 T field. For the details of the SuperADAM polarized neutron reflectometer, see [45,46].
The HAXPES measurements were performed at beamline P22 of PETRA III (Hamburg, Germany) [47]. The photon energy was set to = 6000 ± 0.1 eV. The magnetic circular dichroism was measured at a fixed magnetization by changing the helicity of the photons using a phase retarder. The degree of circular polarization was about 98–99%. The thin films were magnetized in situ along the direction of the photon beam. The energy in the spectra is given with respect to the Fermi energy εF calibrated to Au, with εF appearing at a kinetic energy Ekin of 6000.50 ± 0.2 eV. This corresponds to an overall energy resolution of about 170 meV (EE ≈ 3.5 × 104). For details of the HAXPES setup and HAXPES-MCDAD experiment, see [48,49].
Magnetization measurements were performed on a Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) vibrating sample magnetometer (MPMS 3, Quantum Design). To infer the magnetic field-dependent magnetization of the films, we subtracted the diamagnetic substrate contribution from the raw data.
Broadband FMR measurements were performed on a coplanar waveguide (CPW) in a vector network analyzer (VNA) setup. The CPW was connected to two ports of the VNA, and the complex scattering parameter S21 was recorded by sweeping the frequency with a constant field applied perpendicular to the film plane. Consecutive measurements were performed in 0.5 mT steps. The resonance field Hres and linewidth ΔH were extracted by fitting the field dependence of the complex transmission at constant frequency S21(H)|f to the complex Polder susceptibility, as discussed by Nembach et al. [50].
FMR measurements as a function of the external magnetic field orientation were performed on a continuous-wave Elexsys E500 spectrometer by Bruker. The measurements were conducted at X-band microwave frequencies (ω = 9.4 GHz) in a cylindrical cavity (TE011 mode). The resonance signal was recorded in the field-derivative dP/dH of the absorbed microwave power (P) using a lock-in technique that modulated the external field at a low frequency (100 kHz). The sample orientation was manipulated by a goniometer, rotating perpendicular to H. The obtained spectra were fitted with a first-derivative Lorentzian line shape to obtain the resonance field Hres.

3. Results

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

Figure 1a shows the symmetric radial ω–2θ XRD patterns of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses. We observe only the 00l reflections of Co2MnGa, which suggest that the films grow heteroepitaxially on the MgO(001) substrates. The inset in Figure 1a portrays the asymmetric 113 superstructure reflections. From those, we determined that all of the films crystallized with L21-type chemical ordering [34]. By combining the symmetric and asymmetric reflections, such as 002 and 220, respectively, from XRD measurements, we estimated the lattice parameters of our films, which are depicted in Figure 1b. The thinner films show strain-induced tetragonal distortion, whereas the thicker films are closer to the cubic bulk value (a = 5.77 Å) [33,34]. The films are under bi-axial tensile strain as expected based on the difference between the lattice parameters of the films and substrate ( 2 aMgO = 5.956 Å).
The misfit strain (averaged through the film thickness) increases from 2.51% at 80 nm to 3.63% at 10 nm. Table 1 summarizes the structural parameters.
Figure 2 illustrates the AFM topographic images for the Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses in an area of 5 × 5 μm2. The films exhibit smooth surfaces, with an average RMS roughness Sq that increases from 2.56 to 5.44 Å with increasing film thickness. Simultaneously, the mean lateral surface diameter of the grains D increases with increasing film thickness. The roughness is expected to be proportional to the grain size. However, according to the results shown in Table 1, the minimum roughness is obtained for the 20 nm sample. This is not totally unexpected, as, in the initial stages (10 nm) of growth of a metallic film on an insulating substrate, island formation normally occurs. Simultaneously, the morphology is defined by kinetic mechanisms. At elevated substrate temperatures (550 °C), accelerated recrystallization and grain growth result from rapid surface diffusion coupled with mobile dislocations and grain boundaries. Further, the improved crystallinity inferred from rocking curve measurements [34] indicates that the overall film quality increases with increasing film thickness. Similar behavior can also be observed in other thin films [51,52]. Table 1 summarizes the values of Sq and D.

3.2. PNR

To determine the magnetic depth profile of an 80-nm-thick Co2MnGa film, we performed PNR measurements. Figure 3a shows the intensity of the specular reflection for two incident neutron polarizations: R+ (spin up, along the applied field) and R (spin down) as a function of the momentum transfer perpendicular to the film surface (Qz). The data exhibit well-defined oscillations that are resolved up to ~0.14 Å−1. Reflectivity measurements for the two neutron polarizations enabled us to separate the contributions from the nuclear (ρn) and magnetic (ρm) scattering length density (SLD) profiles. To extract the SLD profiles, we fitted the experimental data with a model that included the Al capping layer and magnetic Co2MnGa layer on top of the MgO substrate using the GenX software [53]. To achieve the most accurate refinement of the magnetic profile, the nuclear SLD values for the MgO substrate and Co2MnGa layer were fixed to the values calculated based on the lattice constants. Thus, the fitted parameters included the thicknesses of the Co2MnGa and capping layers, roughness of each interface and magnetization of the Co2MnGa layer. The applied model resulted in good agreement with the experimental data, as demonstrated by the fitting curves in Figure 3a.
Figure 3b presents the corresponding SLD profiles. The interface between the substrate and Co2MnGa layer is relatively sharp (the roughness is less than the measurement sensitivity). The Co2MnGa layer has a refined thickness of 80.3 nm and exhibits a roughness of 1.7 nm at the interface with the capping layer. The SLD of the 1.1-nm-thick capping layer is slightly higher than the theoretical SLD of Al (~0.21 × 10−5 Å−2), which indicates the presence of an oxide layer (Al2O3 has a higher SLD) at the film surface. As shown by the good quality of the fit, the model that assumes a uniform magnetization within the Co2MnGa layer well reproduces the experimental data. The magnetization calculated from the magnetic SLD [54] is 827 ± 49 kA/m.

3.3. HAXPES

Figure 4 depicts the polarization-dependent core-level spectra near the Co and Mn 2p excitations for a 40-nm-thick Co2MnGa film. Note that the spectra were taken from remanently magnetized samples; hence, the magnetic moment may be lower than the saturation moment. The dichroism is quantified by an asymmetry defined as:
A = I + I max ( I 0 I b g )
where I + and I are the intensities for opposite helicities, I + I = I C D is the dichroism, I 0 = I + + I is the sum of the intensities and I b g is the background intensity.
Figure 4a shows the polarization-dependent spectra and dichroism in the energy region of the Co 2p states. The Co 2p state exhibits a spin–orbit splitting of ΔSO = 15 eV into the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 sub-states, slightly larger than that of Co2MnSi [49]. The dichroism exhibits a sign change ( +   + ) across the energy range of the 2p excitation, which is typical for Zeeman-type level ordering in the single-electron model [55]. A pronounced satellite is observed at about 4.3 eV below the 2p3/2 state but is not detectable at the 2p1/2 state. Further, the 2p3/2 excitation exhibits a splitting of about 100 meV. The asymmetry (Equation (1)) varies between +23% and –6% across 2p3/2 and between –6% and +5% across 2p1/2. Both the polarization-dependent spectra and dichroism indicate that the lines of the multiplet extend over the entire spectral range. In particular, the dichroism does not vanish between the two main parts of the spin–orbit doublet. Comparison with calculated spectra [49] revealed a jj-type coupling in accordance with multiplet calculations [56]. The Zeeman-type splitting observed at both lines is caused by the exchange interaction. The dichroism at the Co 2p states is close to that observed for exchange-biased CoFe or Co2FeAl films [57].
The polarization-dependent 2p spectra of Mn in Figure 4b exhibit a more complicated structure. Splittings of Δ1/2 ≈ 1 eV and Δ3/2 ≈ 1.3 eV occur at the 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 excitations, respectively. The total intensity I 0 (not shown) does not reveal spin-orbit splitting due to the additional splitting of both lines, 2p1/2 and 2p3/2. The mean splitting between the doublet-type structure amounts to about Δ = 11 eV, similar to that in Co2MnSi [49]. In atoms, multiplet splitting occurs due to the interaction of the nl−1 core hole with the polarized open valence shell. The core hole (here 2p5) in a solid is expected to interact with the polarized d states of the valence band. The localized valence d states, however, are screened by delocalized electrons; therefore, quantification is not easily possible. The multiplet theory can be used to explain the observed splittings in the spectra [49,58,59,60], assuming that the atomic character of the valence electrons is partially retained in the solid. Comparison indicated that the two parts of the multiplet could be assigned to the 5P and 7P states with the dipole allowed transitions { [ 2 p 5 3 d 5 ( 5 , 7 P j ] + ϵ ( s , d ) } ( 6 P 7 / 2 , 5 / 2 , 3 / 2 ) . The dichroic asymmetry across the 2p3/2-type part varies between +47% and −24% and does not vanish between the 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 lines. Thus, the splitting is not of Zeeman type, where no additional states would appear between the main lines of the spin–orbit doublet similar to the Co 2p state. Hence, the core hole created by the emission of a Mn 2p electron interacts strongly with the valence band. The multiplet structure and magnetic dichroism of the Mn 2p states of Co2MnGa are very similar to those of Co2MnSi [49], indicating the similarity of the electronic structures, in particular, half-metallic character with very high spin polarization.

3.4. Static and Dynamic Magnetic Properties

3.4.1. DC Magnetometry

Figure 5 depicts the IP and out-of-plane (OOP) magnetization hysteresis loops at 300 K for the Co2MnGa films of various thicknesses. All films show magnetization hysteresis loops characteristic for soft ferromagnetic materials with high magnetization and small coercivity. Magnetic saturation (Ms) is reached easily along the IP direction, which is the easy magnetic axis, while the hard magnetic axis is normal to the film plane along the OOP direction. Between 80 and 20 nm the Ms is similar, while for the thinner film of 10 nm we observe the highest Ms. This enhanced Ms can be attributed to the strain-induced changes of the electronic structure.

3.4.2. Broadband FMR

We performed broadband FMR measurements of the Co2MnGa films at 300 K with H applied perpendicular to the film plane. This configuration ensured minimization of the two-magnon scattering contribution to the extrinsic broadening of the linewidth [61]. Figure 6a–d presents Hres of the FMR mode as a function of the excitation frequency for the Co2MnGa films. Notably, for the 80-nm-thick film (Figure 6d), Hres of another mode in addition to the uniform FMR mode was extracted at lower fields. Aside from possible film non-uniformities, the origin of this mode could be a perpendicular standing spin wave (PSSW) with a nonzero wave vector q = n p / t   (integer order of mode n, with n = 0 as the uniform mode) pointing perpendicular to the film plane. Here, the absence of additional higher order modes may be related to a very weak excitation, resulting in an intensity below the detection limit and preventing us from attributing this mode to a PSSW with certainty.
To determine the effective magnetization Meff, g-factor and exchange stiffness A, a simplified resonance condition was evaluated. For parallel M and H (applied perpendicular to the film surface), this gives:
ω γ = μ 0   ( H res M eff + 2 A n 2 π 2 M s t 2 )
with the gyromagnetic ratio γ = g μ B . The exchange stiffness was only extracted for the 80-nm-thick film, assuming that the second mode originated from a PSSW. Here, A = 16.8 pJ/m is comparable to the exchange stiffness in other Co-based Heusler compounds (4.8–31.5 pJ/m) [62,63,64]. Table 2 summarizes Meff and g for all of the investigated Co2MnGa films. As the thickness increases, Meff drastically decreases. Further, a noticeable uniaxial magnetic anisotropy perpendicular to the film plane, attributed to the growth-induced lattice strain, can be inferred from the increased size of Meff compared to Ms.
Figure 6e–h presents ΔH as a function of the excitation frequency for the Co2MnGa films. Notably, the data for the 10-nm-thick film show significant scattering, attributed to a less accurate fit of the FMR mode due to the low signal intensity. ΔH characterizes the relaxation of the magnetization due to extrinsic frequency-independent contributions (inhomogeneous linewidth broadening ΔH0) as well as intrinsic contributions linearly proportional to the resonance frequency (Gilbert damping parameter α). These contributions can be determined from the frequency dependence of ΔH as:
μ 0 Δ H = μ 0 Δ H 0 + 2 ω γ
The α values summarized in Table 2 agree well with previously reported values for Co2MnGa films (α ≈ 2 × 10−3) [42,43]. In that context, the low α values in conjunction with the previously inferred high degree of spin polarization agree well with the correlation of those properties established by Liu et al. [65]. Further, α slightly increases with thickness. This thickness dependence likely originates in the lattice distortion affecting the spin polarization [66]. In contrast, ΔH0 decreases with increasing film thickness, which indicates increased inhomogeneities in the thinner films and lower crystalline quality [34].

3.4.3. X-Band FMR

Figure 7 shows the H orientation dependencies of Hres in the (001) plane (IP) and (110) plane (IP to OOP). Note that, for the 80-nm-thick film, we only considered the main mode. In the (001) plane (Figure 7a–d), Hres has a four-fold H orientation dependence, which can be explained by the cubic symmetry of the Heusler structure. Here, the easy axes lie along the [110] and equivalent directions. In the (110) plane (Figure 7e–h), the H orientation dependence of Hres agrees with the magnetization measurements (cf. Figure 5), with the magnetic hard axis along the (001) axis (OOP).
The magnetic anisotropies of the Co2MnGa films can be determined from the dependence of the FMR resonance condition on the direction of the applied magnetic field H with respect to the growth orientation of the crystallographic axes (inset in Figure 7h). For that purpose, the total free energy density (Ftot) was employed. Here, we describe Ftot of the Co2MnGa films using the Zeeman energy, the shape anisotropy, a uniaxial anisotropy term perpendicular to the film plane and a cubic anisotropy term:
F t o t = μ 0 M s H ( sin Θ sin Φ sin θ sin ϕ + cos Θ cos θ + sin Θ cos Φ sin θ cos ϕ ) + μ 0 2 M s 2 sin 2 Θ c o s 2 Φ K u , [ 001 ] ( sin Θ c o s Φ ) 2 + K c 1 4 ( sin 2 ( 2 Θ ) + sin 4 Θ sin 2 ( 2 Φ ) ) .
( Θ , Φ ) and ( θ , ϕ ) correspond to the angles of the magnetization and applied magnetic field defined in relation to the sample, respectively. Ku,[001] and Kc are the perpendicular uniaxial and cubic anisotropy constants, respectively. The resonance condition can, in turn, be derived from Ftot for arbitrary orientations of the external magnetic field with respect to the sample as [67]:
( ω γ ) 2 = 1 M s 2 sin Θ ( 2 F tot Φ 2 2 F tot Θ 2 ( 2 F tot Θ Φ ) 2 )
with the derivatives evaluated for the equilibrium direction of the magnetization. In addition, for the simulation of the resonance condition in the presented coordinate system, ϕ was fixed at 90° for rotation in the film plane, whereas θ was fixed at 90° for rotation out of the film plane.
From the Hres simulation results (Figure 7, solid lines) obtained using Equations (4) and (5), the anisotropy constants at 300 K were derived, using Ms and g (entering via γ = g μ B ) in Table 2. The simulations well reproduced both rotation planes, and Table 3 summarizes the corresponding anisotropy constants.
Based on the previous Meff results (cf. Table 2), the Co2MnGa films indeed show a uniaxial contribution to the effective anisotropy perpendicular to the film plane according to:
M eff = 2 K u , eff μ 0 M s = M s 2 K u , [ 001 ] μ 0 M s
with the effective perpendicular uniaxial anisotropy constant Ku,eff. The uniaxial term (Ku,[001]) originates from the aforementioned tensile strain-induced tetragonal distortion (cf. Table 1), adding to the effects of the shape anisotropy and, in turn, increasing the effective anisotropy. Table 3 demonstrates that this behavior is the most pronounced in the 10-nm-thick film and decreases with increasing thickness, in agreement with the thickness dependence of the tetragonal distortion along the [001] axis. This behavior is also reflected in the cubic anisotropies Kc determined from the IP H orientation dependence of Hres. Specifically, Kc decreases with increasing thickness. For the IP H orientation dependence, the absence of a uniaxial contribution supports the observation by Pechan et al. [44] that the strain is isotropic in the film plane.

4. Summary and Conclusions

In this work, we studied the magnetic and electronic properties of L21-ordered Co2MnGa thin films, particularly as functions of the film-thickness-dependent structural and morphological properties. We observed a uniform magnetization throughout the entire film thickness and determined the itinerant and localized characters of the Co d and Mn d valence electrons and accompanying magnetic moments, respectively. Further, by comparing the Mn 2p spectra of Co2MnGa with those of Co2MnSi [49], a very high degree of spin polarization could be inferred. The combination of high-spin polarization with low Gilbert damping makes the L21-Co2MnGa films very interesting for potential spin–orbit–torque and spin–transfer–torque devices [68]. In terms of thickness dependence, we made three main observations. First, as the film thickness decreases, a tensile strain, related to a lattice mismatch between the film and substrate, leads to tetragonal distortion of the Co2MnGa lattice. Similar tetragonal distortion has been observed in other cubic films, using buffer layer and adding small amounts of a third element [69,70]. This tetragonal distortion likely affects the spin polarization [66] and, in turn, leads to the reduction of the Gilbert damping parameter α (from 2.1 × 10−3 to 1.1 × 10−3) in thinner films. This demonstrates the possibility of further reducing the Gilbert damping parameter via the film thickness or lattice matched film growth. Second, the crystalline quality increases with increasing thickness [34], resulting in decreased inhomogeneous linewidth broadening (from 14.4 to 5.8 mT). This observation emphasizes the importance of controlling the thickness-dependent film quality in the development of potential materials for device-based applications. Third, the increasing tetragonal lattice distortion with decreasing thickness also results in decreasing uniaxial anisotropy (from −59 to −95 kA/m3) perpendicular to the film plane and increasing cubic anisotropy (from 1.9 to 7 kA/m3) in the film plane. These features demonstrate that not only the substrate [44] but also the film thickness enables the tuning of the magnetic anisotropies of Co2MnGa films, in particular at the thin film limit. Lastly, a potential perpendicular standing spin wave mode was observed in the 80-nm-thick film and enabled quantification of the exchange stiffness (A = 16.8 pJ/m). The ability to manipulate the intrinsic magnetic properties with strain-induced epitaxial engineering represents an important springboard for exploiting thin films of Co2MnGa in topological spintronic applications. This work enriches the knowledge on the electronic and magnetic properties of Co2MnGa films, which are promising in the development of magnetic storage and non-volatile memory technology.

Author Contributions

A.M. conceived the project and jointly supervised it with C.F. and S.T.B.G., A.M. and Y.-C.C. grew the films. A.M. carried out the structural characterization. A.M. and I.P. performed the magnetometry measurements and analysis. A.S.S., V.U., A.D., A.V. and D.S.I. performed the PNR measurements and analysis. A.G. and G.H.F. performed the HAXPES measurements and analysis. P.S., J.S. and S.T.B.G. performed the FMR measurements and analysis. P.S. and A.M. wrote the paper with substantial contributions from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support from DFG through SFB 1143 (project-id 247310070), the Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence on Complexity and Topology in Quantum Matter—ct.qmat (EXC 2147, project-id 39085490), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under FET-Proactive Grant agreement No. 824123 (SKYTOP) is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

P.S. acknowledges the assistance of M. Weiler and S. Klingler with the broadband FMR measurements. A.G. and G.H.F. acknowledge DESY (Hamburg, Germany) for the provision of the experimental facilities. A.S., V.U., A.D. and A.V. acknowledge ILL (Grenoble, France) for the provided beam time and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Young, S.M.; Zaheer, S.; Teo, J.C.Y.; Kane, C.L.; Mele, E.J.; Rappe, A.M. Dirac semimetal in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 140405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Franchini, C.; Xu, G.; Weng, H.; Dai, X.; Fang, Z. Dirac semimetal and topological phase transitions in A3Bi (A = Na, K, Rb). Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 195320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Burkov, A.A.; Balents, L. Weyl semimetal in a topological insulator multilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 127205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Burkov, A.A.; Hook, M.D.; Balents, L. Topological nodal semimetals. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 235126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Weng, H.; Fang, C.; Fang, Z.; Bernevig, B.A.; Dai, X. Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 011029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Armitage, N.P.; Mele, E.J.; Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 015001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Noky, J.; Sun, Y. Linear Response in Topological Materials. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wu, L.; Patankar, S.; Morimoto, T.; Nair, N.L.; Thewalt, E.; Little, A.; Analytis, J.G.; Moore, J.E.; Orenstein, J. Giant anisotropic nonlinear optical response in transition metal monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moore, J. Optical properties of Weyl semimetals. Nat. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 206–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, S.Y.; Belopolski, I.; Alidoust, N.; Neupane, M.; Bian, G.; Zhang, C.; Sankar, R.; Chang, G.; Zhujun, Y.; Lee, C.C.; et al. Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 2015, 349, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yan, B.; Felser, C. Topological materials: Weyl semimetals. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2017, 8, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Manna, K.; Sun, Y.; Müchler, L.; Kübler, J.; Felser, C. Heusler, Weyl, and Berry. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Burkov, A.A. Anomalous Hall effect in Weyl metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 187202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nakatsuji, S.; Kiyohara, N.; Higo, T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature 2015, 527, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nayak, A.K.; Fischer, J.E.; Sun, Y.; Yan, B.; Karel, J.; Komarek, A.C.; Shekhar, C.; Kumar, N.; Schnelle, W.; Kübler, J.; et al. Large anomalous Hall effect driven by a nonvanishing Berry curvature in the noncolinear antiferromagnet Mn3Ge. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Manna, K.; Muechler, L.; Kao, T.H.; Stinshoff, R.; Zhang, Y.; Gooth, J.; Kumar, N.; Kreiner, G.; Koepernik, K.; Car, R.; et al. From colossal to zero: Controlling the anomalous Hall effect in magnetic Heusler compounds via Berry curvature design. Phys. Rev. X 2018, 8, 041045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Taylor, J.M.; Markou, A.; Lesne, E.; Sivakumar, P.K.; Luo, C.; Radu, F.; Werner, P.; Felser, C.; Parkin, S.P.P. Anomalous and topological Hall effects in epitaxial thin films of the noncollinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 094404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ernst, B.; Sahoo, R.; Sun, Y.; Nayak, J.; Müchler, L.; Nayak, A.K.; Kumar, N.; Gayles, J.; Markou, A.; Fecher, G.H.; et al. Anomalous Hall effect and the role of Berry curvature in Co2TiSn Heusler films. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 054445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ikhlas, M.; Tomita, T.; Koretsune, T.; Suzuki, M.; Nishio-Hamane, D.; Arita, R.; Otani, Y.; Nakatsuji, S. Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 1085–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Xu, L.; Ding, L.; Wang, J.; Shen, M.; Lu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Behnia, K. Anomalous Nernst and Righi-Leduc effects in Mn3Sn: Berry curvature and entropy flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 056601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reichlová, H.; Janda, T.; Godinho, J.; Markou, A.; Kriegner, D.; Schlitz, R.; Železný, J.; Soban, Z.; Bejarano, M.; Schultheiss, H.; et al. Imaging and writing magnetic domains in the non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hu, J.; Ernst, B.; Tu, S.; Kuveždic, M.; Hamzíc, A.; Tafra, E.; Basletíc, M.; Zhang, Y.; Markou, A.; Felser, C.; et al. Anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in Co2TiSn and Co2Ti0.6V0.4Sn Heusler thin films. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2018, 10, 044037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Higo, T.; Man, H.; Gopman, D.; Wu, L.; Koretsune, T.; van ’t Erve, O.M.J.; Kabanov, Y.P.; Rees, D.; Li, Y.; Suzuki, M.T.; et al. Large magneto-optical Kerr effect and imaging of magnetic octupole domains in an antiferromagnetic metal. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Son, D.T.; Spivak, B.Z. Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 104412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Huang, X.; Zhao, L.; Long, Y.; Wang, P.; Chen, D.; Yang, Z.; Liang, H.; Xue, M.; Weng, H.; Fang, Z.; et al. Observation of the Chiral-Anomaly-Induced Negative Magnetoresistance in 3d Weyl semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 031023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, Z.; Vergniory, M.G.; Kushwaha, S.; Hirschberger, M.; Chulkov, E.V.; Ernst, A.; Ong, N.; Cava, R.J.; Bernevig, B.A. Time-Reversal-Breaking Weyl Fermions in Magnetic Heusler Alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 236401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chang, G.; Xu, S.Y.; Zheng, H.; Singh, B.; Hsu, C.H.; Bian, G.; Alidoust, N.; Belopolski, I.; Sanchez, D.S.; Zhang, S.; et al. Room-temperature magnetic topological Weyl fermion and nodal line semimetal states in half-metallic Heusler Co2TiX (X = Si, Ge, or Sn). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kübler, J.; Felser, C. Weyl points in the ferromagnetic Heusler compound Co2MnAl. Europhys. Lett. 2016, 114, 47005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, E.K.; Sun, Y.; Kumar, N.; Muechler, L.; Sun, A.L.; Jiao, L.; Yang, S.Y.; Liu, D.F.; Liang, A.; Xu, Q.N.; et al. Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagomé-lattice semimetal. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, D.F.; Liang, A.J.; Liu, E.K.; Xu, Q.N.; Li, Y.W.; Chen, C.; Pei, D.; Shi, W.J.; Mo, S.K.; Dudin, P.; et al. Magnetic Weyl semimetal phase in a Kagomé crystal. Science 2019, 365, 1282–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Morali, N.; Batabyal, R.; Nag, P.K.; Liu, E.; Xu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Yan, B.; Felser, C.; Avraham, N.; Beidenkopf, H. Fermi-arc diversity on surface terminations of the magnetic Weyl semimetal Co3Sn2S2. Science 2019, 365, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Belopolski, I.; Manna, K.; Sanchez, D.S.; Chang, G.; Ernst, B.; Yin, J.; Zhang, S.S.; Cochran, T.; Shumiya, N.; Zheng, H.; et al. Discovery of topological Weyl fermion lines and drumhead surface states in a room temperature magnet. Science 2019, 365, 278–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Webster, P.J. Magnetic and chemical order in Heusler alloys containing cobalt and manganese. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1971, 32, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Markou, A.; Kriegner, D.; Gayles, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.C.; Ernst, B.; Lai, Y.H.; Schnelle, W.; Chu, Y.H.; Sun, Y.; et al. Thickness dependence of the anomalous Hall effect in thin films of the topological semimetal Co2MnGa. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 100, 054422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sakai, A.; Mizuta, Y.P.; Nugroho, A.A.; Sihombing, R.; Koretsune, T.; Suzuki, M.T.; Takemori, N.; Ishii, R.; Nishio-Hamane, D.; Arita, R.; et al. Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal. Nat. Phys. 2018, 14, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guin, S.N.; Manna, K.; Noky, J.; Watzman, S.J.; Fu, C.; Kumar, N.; Schnelle, W.; Shekhar, C.; Sun, Y.; Gooth, J.; et al. Anomalous Nernst effect beyond the magnetization scaling relation in the ferromagnetic Heusler compound Co2MnGa. NPG Asia Mater. 2019, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Reichlova, H.; Schlitz, R.; Beckert, S.; Swekis, P.; Markou, A.; Chen, Y.C.; Kriegner, D.; Fabretti, S.; Park, G.H.; Niemann, A.; et al. Large anomalous Nernst effect in thin films of the Weyl semimetal Co2MnGa. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 212405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Park, G.H.; Reichlova, H.; Schlitz, R.; Lammel, M.; Markou, A.; Swekis, P.; Ritzinger, P.; Kriegner, D.; Noky, J.; Gayles, J.; et al. Thickness dependence of the anomalous Nernst effect and the Mott relation of Weyl semimetal Co2MnGa thin films. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 060406(R). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xu, L.; Li, X.; Ding, L.; Chen, T.; Sakai, A.; Fauqué, B.; Nakatsuji, S.; Zhu, Z.; Behnia, K. Anomalous transverse response of Co2MnGa and universality of the room-temperature α i j A / σ i j A   ratio across topological magnets. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 180404(R). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sato, T.; Kokado, S.; Kosaka, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Ogawa, T.; Tsunoda, M. Large negative anisotropic magnetoresistance in Co2MnGa Heusler alloy epitaxial thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 112407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Varaprasad, B.S.D.C.S.; Rajanikanth, A.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Hono, K. Enhanced Spin Polarization of Co2MnGe Heusler Alloy by Substitution of Ga for Ge. Appl. Phys. Express 2010, 3, 023002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guillemard, C.; Petit-Watelot, S.; Pasquier, L.; Pierre, D.; Ghanbaja, J.J.-C.; Rojas-Sánchez, A.B.; Rault, J.; Fèvre, P.L.; Bertran, F.; Andrieu, S. Ultralow Magnetic Damping in Co2Mn-based Heusler compounds: Promising Materials for Spintronics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 064009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Guillemard, C.; Petit-Watelot, S.; Rojas-Sánchez, J.C.; Hohlfeld, J.; Ghanbaja, J.; Bataille, A.; Fèvre, P.L.; Bertran, F.; Andrieu, S. Polycrystalline Co2Mn-based Heusler thin films with high spin polarization and low magnetic damping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 115, 172401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pechan, M.J.; Yu, C.; Carr, D.; Palmstrøm, C.J. Remarkable strain-induced magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial Co2MnGa (0 0 1) films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 286, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Devishvili, A.; Zhernenkov, K.; Dennison, A.J.C.; Toperverg, B.P.; Wolff, M.; Hjörvarsson, B.; Zabel, H. SuperADAM: Upgraded polarized neutron reflectometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013, 84, 025112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vorobiev, A.; Devishvilli, A.; Palsson, G.; Rundlöf, H.; Johansson, N.; Olsson, A.; Dennison, A.; Wollf, M.; Giroud, B.; Aguettaz, O.; et al. Recent upgrade of the polarized neutron reflectometer Super ADAM. Neutron News 2015, 26, 25–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schlueter, C.; Gloskovskii, A.; Ederer, K.; Schostak, I.; Piec, S.; Sarkar, I.; Matveyev, Y.; Lömker, P.; Sing, M.; Claessen, R.; et al. The new dedicated HAXPES beamline P22 at PETRAIII. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2054, 040010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gloskovskii, A.; Stryganyuk, G.; Fecher, G.H.; Felser, C.; Thiess, S.; Schulz-Ritter, H.; Drube, W.; Berner, G.; Sing, M.; Claessen, R.; et al. Magnetometry of buried layers—Linear magnetic dichroism and spin detection in angular resolved hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2012, 185, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fecher, G.H.; Ebke, D.; Ouardi, S.; Agrestini, S.; Kuo, C.Y.; Jollmann, N.; Hu, Z.; Gloskovskii, A.; Yakhou, F.; Brookes, N.B.; et al. State of Co and Mn in half-metallic ferromagnet Co2MnSi explored by magnetic circular dichroism in hard X-ray photoelectron emission and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopies. Spin 2014, 4, 1440017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nembach, H.T.; Silva, T.; Shaw, J.M.; Schneider, M.L.; Carey, M.J.; Maat, S.; Childress, J.R. Perpendicular ferromagnetic resonance measurements of damping and Landé g-factor in sputtered (Co2Mn)1-xGex thin films. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 054424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lita, A.E.; Sanchez, J.E., Jr. Characterization of Surface Structure in Sputtered Al Films: Correlation to Microstructure Evolution. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cougon, F.G.; Depla, D. The Seebeck coefficient of sputter deposited metallic thin films: The role of process conditions. Coatings 2019, 9, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Björck, M.; Andersson, G. GenX: An extensible X-ray reflectivity refinement program utilizing differential evolution. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 1174–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, Y. Modern Techniques for Characterizing Magnetic Materials; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  55. Menchero, J.G. One-electron theory of core-level photoemission from ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martins, M.; Godehusen, K.; Richter, T.; Wernet, P.; Zimmermann, P. Open shells and multi-electron interactions: Core level photoionization of the 3d metal atoms. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2006, 29, R79–R125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kozina, X.; Fecher, G.H.; Stryganyuk, G.; Ouardi, S.; Balke, B.; Felser, C.; Ikenaga, E.; Sugiyama, T.; Kawamura, N.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Magnetic dichroism in angle-resolved hard X-ray photoemission from buried layers. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 054449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Van der Laan, G. M2,3 absorption spectroscopy of 3d transition-metal compounds. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1991, 3, 7443–7454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Groot, F.; Kotani, A. Core Level Spectroscopy of Solids; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bagus, P.S.; Broer, R.; de Jong, W.A.; Nieuwpoort, W.C. Atomic Many-Body Effects for the p-Shell Photoelectron Spectra of Transition Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 2259–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Zakeri, K.; Lindner, J.; Barsukov, I.; Meckenstock, R.; Farle, M.; von Hörsten, U.; Wende, H.; Keune, W.; Rocker, J.; Kalarickal, S.S.; et al. Spin dynamics in ferromagnets: Gilbert damping and two-magnon scattering. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 104416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Kubota, T.; Hamrle, J.; Sakuraba, Y.; Gaier, O.; Oogane, M.; Sakuma, A.; Hillebrands, B.; Takanashi, K.; Ando, Y. Structure, exchange stiffness, and magnetic anisotropy of Co2MnAlxSi1-x Heusler compounds. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 113907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Trudel, S.; Gaier, O.; Hamrle, J.; Hillebrands, B. Magnetic anisotropy, exchange and damping in cobalt-based full-Heusler compounds: An experimental review. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2010, 43, 193001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Demiray, A.S.; Kubota, T.; Iihama, S.; Mizukami, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Naganuma, H.; Oogane, M.; Ando, Y. Static and dynamic magnetic properties of cubic Mn-Co-Ga Heusler films. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 17D133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, C.; Mewes, C.K.A.; Chshiev, M.; Mewes, T.; Butler, W.H. Origin of low Gilbert damping in half metals. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 95, 022509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Block, T.; Carey, M.J.; Gurney, B.A.; Jepsen, O. Band-structure calculations of the half-metallic ferromagnetism and structural stability of full- and half-Heusler phases. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 205114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vonsovskii, S.V. Ferromagnetic Resonance, 1st ed.; Pergamon: Moscow, Russia, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hellman, F.; Hoffmann, A.; Tserkovnyak, Y.; Beach, G.S.; Fullerton, E.E.; Leighton, C.; MacDonald, A.H.; Ralph, D.C.; Arena, D.A.; Dürr, H.A.; et al. Interface-induced phenomena in magnetism. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 025006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Giannopoulos, G.; Reichel, L.; Markou, A.; Wallisch, W.; Stöger-Pollach, M.; Panagiotopoulos, I.; Psycharis, V.; Fähler, S.; Fidler, J.; Niarchos, D. Structural and magnetic properties of strongly carbon doped Fe-Co thin films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 393, 479–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Giannopoulos, G.; Salikhov, R.; Zingsem, B.; Markou, A.; Panagiotopoulos, I.; Psycharis, V.; Farle, M.; Niarchos, D. Large magnetic anisotropy in strained Fe/Co multilayers on AuCu and the effect of carbon doping. APL Mater. 2015, 3, 041103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses. The inset shows the asymmetric 113 reflections. (b) Lattice parameters of Co2MnGa films as a function of thickness.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses. The inset shows the asymmetric 113 reflections. (b) Lattice parameters of Co2MnGa films as a function of thickness.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g001
Figure 2. (ad) AFM topographic images of the Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses.
Figure 2. (ad) AFM topographic images of the Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g002
Figure 3. (a) PNR measurements of an 80-nm-thick Co2MnGa film. The solid lines are the fitted curves. (b) Nuclear and magnetic SLD profiles obtained from fitting the PNR data. The right axis shows the magnetization corresponding to the magnetic SLD profile.
Figure 3. (a) PNR measurements of an 80-nm-thick Co2MnGa film. The solid lines are the fitted curves. (b) Nuclear and magnetic SLD profiles obtained from fitting the PNR data. The right axis shows the magnetization corresponding to the magnetic SLD profile.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g003
Figure 4. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mn 2p HAXPES spectra of Co2MnGa film on MgO(001). Shown are spectra taken with σ+ and σ polarization of the photons. The insets show the difference spectra, that is the dichroism.
Figure 4. (a) Co 2p and (b) Mn 2p HAXPES spectra of Co2MnGa film on MgO(001). Shown are spectra taken with σ+ and σ polarization of the photons. The insets show the difference spectra, that is the dichroism.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g004
Figure 5. Magnetization hysteresis loops with H applied along the: (a) IP and (b) OOP film directions at 300 K for Co2MnGa films of various thicknesses.
Figure 5. Magnetization hysteresis loops with H applied along the: (a) IP and (b) OOP film directions at 300 K for Co2MnGa films of various thicknesses.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g005
Figure 6. (ad) Resonance fields µ0Hres with H applied perpendicular to the film plane for the Co2MnGa films with various thicknesses; and (eh) linewidths of the respective FMR modes, including linear fits for the damping parameters.
Figure 6. (ad) Resonance fields µ0Hres with H applied perpendicular to the film plane for the Co2MnGa films with various thicknesses; and (eh) linewidths of the respective FMR modes, including linear fits for the damping parameters.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g006
Figure 7. Resonance fields Hres and simulated resonance conditions (solid lines, see main text) at 300 K and 9.4 GHz of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses: (ad) H rotated in the (001) plane, i.e., IP rotation; and (eh) H rotated in the (110) plane, i.e., IP to OOP rotation. The dashed lines indicate the crystallographic directions of the film at the respective angles. Inset in (h): Cartesian and polar coordinate system, where the crystallographic directions refer to the Co2MnGa film and the angles to the direction of H.
Figure 7. Resonance fields Hres and simulated resonance conditions (solid lines, see main text) at 300 K and 9.4 GHz of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses: (ad) H rotated in the (001) plane, i.e., IP rotation; and (eh) H rotated in the (110) plane, i.e., IP to OOP rotation. The dashed lines indicate the crystallographic directions of the film at the respective angles. Inset in (h): Cartesian and polar coordinate system, where the crystallographic directions refer to the Co2MnGa film and the angles to the direction of H.
Nanomaterials 11 00251 g007
Table 1. Structural parameters of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses t. Lattice parameters perpendicular to the film plane c and in the plane a with an error of ±0.001 Å. Misfit strain f, root-mean-square (RMS) roughness Sq and mean lateral surface diameter D of the grains.
Table 1. Structural parameters of Co2MnGa films with different thicknesses t. Lattice parameters perpendicular to the film plane c and in the plane a with an error of ±0.001 Å. Misfit strain f, root-mean-square (RMS) roughness Sq and mean lateral surface diameter D of the grains.
t (nm)c (Å)a (Å)f (%) Sq (Å)D (nm)
105.7275.8103.623.0845 (±8)
205.7405.8042.832.5656 (±6)
405.7435.7922.613.1978 (±4)
805.7515.7812.515.4493 (±5)
Table 2. Magnetic parameters of the Co2MnGa films extracted from linear fits to the resonance fields and linewidths (Figure 6), including saturation magnetizations from the hysteresis curves (cf. Figure 5).
Table 2. Magnetic parameters of the Co2MnGa films extracted from linear fits to the resonance fields and linewidths (Figure 6), including saturation magnetizations from the hysteresis curves (cf. Figure 5).
t (nm)Ms (kA/m)Meff (kA/m)gα (×10−3)µ0ΔH (mT)
108579411.971.1 ± 0.814.4 ± 1.6
207449081.960.8 ± 0.214.4 ± 0.5
407528841.971.4 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.2
807608951.952.1 ± 0.25.8 ± 0.4
Table 3. Anisotropy constants of the Co2MnGa films determined from simulations of the magnetic field orientation-dependent resonance fields (Figure 7).
Table 3. Anisotropy constants of the Co2MnGa films determined from simulations of the magnetic field orientation-dependent resonance fields (Figure 7).
t (nm)Ku,eff (kJ/m3)Ku,[001] (kJ/m3)Kc (kJ/m3)
10556−957.0
20415−673.4
40430−753.7
80421−591.9
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Swekis, P.; Sukhanov, A.S.; Chen, Y.-C.; Gloskovskii, A.; Fecher, G.H.; Panagiotopoulos, I.; Sichelschmidt, J.; Ukleev, V.; Devishvili, A.; Vorobiev, A.; et al. Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Weyl Semimetal Co2MnGa Thin Films. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010251

AMA Style

Swekis P, Sukhanov AS, Chen Y-C, Gloskovskii A, Fecher GH, Panagiotopoulos I, Sichelschmidt J, Ukleev V, Devishvili A, Vorobiev A, et al. Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Weyl Semimetal Co2MnGa Thin Films. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(1):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010251

Chicago/Turabian Style

Swekis, Peter, Aleksandr S. Sukhanov, Yi-Cheng Chen, Andrei Gloskovskii, Gerhard H. Fecher, Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, Jörg Sichelschmidt, Victor Ukleev, Anton Devishvili, Alexei Vorobiev, and et al. 2021. "Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Weyl Semimetal Co2MnGa Thin Films" Nanomaterials 11, no. 1: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010251

APA Style

Swekis, P., Sukhanov, A. S., Chen, Y. -C., Gloskovskii, A., Fecher, G. H., Panagiotopoulos, I., Sichelschmidt, J., Ukleev, V., Devishvili, A., Vorobiev, A., Inosov, D. S., Goennenwein, S. T. B., Felser, C., & Markou, A. (2021). Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Weyl Semimetal Co2MnGa Thin Films. Nanomaterials, 11(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010251

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop