Next Article in Journal
Highly Regioselective Synthesis of Bisadduct[C70] Additive toward the Enhanced Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Ag–Se/Nylon Nanocomposites Grown by Template-Engaged Reaction: Microstructures, Composition, and Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting the Properties of High-Performance Epoxy Resin by Machine Learning Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of Nano Hydroxyapatite as Adsorbents: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/nano12142354
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Nicotine in Tobacco Products Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Conjugated with (1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulphonic Acid) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode

by
M. Abd-Elsabour
1,
Hesham M. Alsoghier
1,
Abdulrahman G. Alhamzani
2,
Mortaga M. Abou-Krisha
1,2,*,
Tarek A. Yousef
2,3 and
Hytham F. Assaf
1,*
1
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
2
Chemistry Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia
3
Mansoura Laboratory, Department of Toxic and Narcotic Drug, Forensic Medicine, Medicolegal Organization, Ministry of Justice, Mansoura 35511, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(14), 2354; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142354
Submission received: 21 April 2022 / Revised: 18 May 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 9 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials: Selected Papers from CCMR)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A simple electrochemical sensor for nicotine (NIC) detection was performed. The sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was modified by (1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid)(Nq) decorated by graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposite. The synthesized (GO) nanosheets were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), FT-IR, and UV-Visible Spectroscopy. The insertion of Nq with GO nanosheets on the surface of GCE displayed high electrocatalytic activity towards NIC compared to the bare GCE. NIC determination was performed under the optimum conditions using 0.10 M of Na2SO4 as a supporting electrolyte with pH 8.0 at a scan rate of 100 mV/s using both cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). This electrochemical sensor showed an excellent result for NIC detection. The oxidation peak current increased linearly with a 6.5–245 µM of NIC with R2 = 0.9999. The limit of detection was 12.7 nM. The fabricated electrode provided satisfactory stability, reproducibility, and selectivity for NIC oxidation. The reliable GO/Nq/GCE sensor was successfully applied for detecting NIC in the tobacco product and a urine sample.

1. Introduction

Nicotine(S)3-(1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl) pyridine (NIC) is one of the fatal toxicities of purine alkaloids which represents about 2–8% of the tobacco plants (Nicotiana genus such as N. Tabacum, N. Rustica, and N. Glauca) [1,2,3,4,5]. It is an oily, hygroscopic, colorless pale yellow liquid that quickly dissolves in water at room temperature [6]. Additionally, NIC is rapidly absorbed in humans and directly attacks the nervous system. The frequent intake of NIC creates many potentially harmful diseases and effects on human health, such as increased blood pressure and heartbeat, reduced healing rates, and vascular disease [7,8,9]. Moreover, it might lead to lung, nose, kidney, stomach, bladder, and colon cancer [10,11]. However, it can treat Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [12,13].
Hence, great attention has been paid to the determination of NIC, especially in medicine, toxicology, and the tobacco industry. To date, several analytical techniques have been reported for the measurement of NIC, including high-performance liquid chromatography [14], gas chromatography [15], spectrophotometry [16], spectrofluorimetry [17], radioimmunoassay [18], amperometric assay [19], and capillary electrophoresis [4]. Unfortunately, most of these methods possess numerous disadvantages, such as being expensive and time-consuming and requiring several chemical treatment steps and many organic solvents [9,20,21]. Moreover, limited biosensors have been used to analyze NIC due to the high cost of enzymes [22,23].
On the other hand, electrochemical techniques are more convenient for detecting NIC due to their practical advantages, such as low-cost instruments, high sensitivity, good selectivity, simple operation, and rapid measurement time [8,24]. The voltammetric determination of NIC at bare electrodes is hindered by slow electrode kinetics. This is not only the electro-oxidation or reduction reaction of NIC occurring at highly positive or negative redox potentials leading to poorly reproducible results. Chemically modified electrodes are the key to enhance the electrocatalytic ability toward NIC determination due to their higher sensitivity and selectivity than typical electrodes [25].
(1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid) is an organic layer on the surface of the electrode in a rich active group, where there are higher chances of adsorption with the analyte. This leads to enhance the conductivity and increasing the effective surface area of the glassy carbon electrode (GCE).
Additionally, graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets have attracted much attention and are considered an excellent candidate for electrode surface modification, high specific surface area, remarkable electrical conductivity, enhanced electrocatalytic, and high mechanical properties [26,27,28]. The unique conjugation between a film of Nq with GO nanosheets on the surface of the GCE can improve the detecting efficiency, stability, reproducibility, and electrocatalytic properties of electrodes [29,30,31].
Our work aims to benefit from the conjugation between Nq layer with GO nanosheets on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode to determine the NIC for the first time. As far as we know, there are no papers of study of the electrochemical behaviors of nicotine at the GO/Nq/GCE. The mixed modification facilitates enhancing the quality of the glassy carbon electrode. This method was applied to determine Nicotine(S)3-(1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl) pyridine, NIC. In sequence, actual samples of tobacco products were studied in an aqueous media, and satisfying results were obtained with the proposed sensor.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Graphene powder (<20 μm) and 1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulphonic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Aldrich’s stock solution of 6.2 mM NIC (C10H14N2, 98%) was freshly prepared using deionized water and kept in the dark at 4 °C. Before use in the experiments, the stock solution was diluted using sodium sulphate (Na2SO4, 0.10 M) purchased from Sigma Aldrich as a supporting electrolyte. All other chemical reagents were of analytical grade and used as received without any further purification.

2.2. Apparatus

The voltammetric experimental conditions have been described in detail in previous literature [32]. Briefly, EG&G Princeton applied research potentiostat/galvanostat model 263 (USA) linked with a PC using 352 corrosion software [32,33]. A conventional three-electrode cell consisted of a GO/Nq/GCE as the working electrode, a saturated Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and an auxiliary electrode made of a bright platinum wire. A pH meter (Euteoh-India) was employed for the pH measurements. The synthesized GO was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert3 Powder, PA Analytical, Netherlands), Raman spectroscopy, a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, QUANTA FEG250, Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL 2100 HRTEM 200V, Tokyo, Japan), FT-IR and UV-Visible spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, WA, USA). In this study, all measurements were carried out at room temperature.

2.3. Synthesis of GO

Synthesis of GO nanosheets were prepared according to the modified Hummers’ method [34,35,36]. Specifically, in an ice-water bath, 1.0 g of natural graphene powder was mixed with the concentrated H2SO4(30 mL) and NaNO3(3g). Then, 3.0 g of KMnO4 was slowly added to keep the oxidation reaction temperature between 10 and 25 °C (Scheme 1). Subsequently, 100 mL of deionized water and 60 mL of 35% H2O2 were carefully added to reduce residual KMnO4 and MnO2. Afterward, the mixture was stirred for 30 min and then centrifuged. Finally, the product was filtered and dried in the oven at 50 °C overnight. According to the literature, GO nanosheets were synthesized from the resulting graphene oxide by magnetic stirring and heating [37,38]. Briefly, 0.50 g of dried graphene oxide nanocomposite powder was stirred with 50 mL of deionized water at 70 °C using magnetic stirring at 400 r.p.m for 12 h [38,39,40].

2.4. GO/Nq/GCE Fabrication

Before modification, a GCE (1 mm diameter) was sequentially polished with alumina powder (3 µm) to a mirror finish surface and ultrasonically cleaned with water: ethanol for 2 min and rinsed with deionized water. The modification of GCE by a layer of Nq can be obtained by electrodeposition on the cleaned surface of GCE. This was performed by dipping GCE in 0.10 M PBS containing 3.33 mM of Nq monomer and was conditioned by cyclic sweeping from −1.25 to 1.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl for 15 cycles (Section 3.2) [41]. The Nq/GCE was carefully cleaned with deionized water and dried in the air. On the other hand, the Nq/GCE was decorated by prepared GO nanosheets by dissolving the GO nanosheets in deionized water to form a suspended solution subjected to an ultrasonic device for 30 min to form a homogenous suspended solution. Then, 5.0 µL of the homogenous suspended solution (2.0 mg/mL) was cast on the surface of Nq/GCE to form GO/Nq/GCE. Finally, the GO/Nq/GCE was carefully cleaned with deionized water and dried in air. To calculate the activate surface of the different electrodes, the cyclic voltammetry of 5.0 mM of K3Fe(CN)6as the redox at the surface of bare GCE, Nq/GCE, andGO/Nq/GCE at different scan rates (from 50 to 300 mV/s) were recorded. There is a direct correlation between peak current and scan rate. By increasing the scan rate, the peak current increased for each electrode. By deriving the relationship between Ip and the square root of scan rate for different electrodes. Straight lines were obtained. Moreover, by compensation of the slope in the following Randles–Sevcik equation used [41].
Ip = 0.446 nFAC(nFDν/RT)1/2
where R is the universal gas constant (J/mol.K), n is the number of electrons, C is the concentration of the electroactive species (mM), F is the Faraday constant (C/mol), ν is the scan rate (mV/s), T is the temperature in Kelvin, Ip is the peak current, D isthe diffusion coefficient (cm2/s) and A(cm2) is the electroactive surface area of the different types of electrodes. The accurate value of D is 5.6 × 10−6 cm2/s [42].So the values of active surface area(A cm 2) were estimated for bare GCE, Nq/GCE, andGO/Nq/GCE as 0.0126 cm2, 0.033 cm2,and0.0425 cm2, respectively. So GO/Nq/GCE provides superior conductivity to other electrodes according to the active surface area data.

2.5. Sample Preparation

For the cigarette samples analysis, leaves were boiled for 5 min in 50 mL of deionized water. The mixture was later cooled and filtered to remove suspended impurities, followed by centrifugation. Decanting the supernatant centrifuged solution resulted in a clean dark brown colored solution. A human urine sample was provided by a project team member and diluted 100 times with 0.10 M Na2SO4 at pH 8.0.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Synthesized GO

Figure 1A displays the XRD patterns of the GO, which demonstrates that GO was successfully synthesized. Thus, the GO exhibits a broad diffraction peak at 2θ of 11.58° due to the interlayer distance of the GO [34]. The Raman spectrum of the synthesized GO has been shown in Figure 1B to confirm the structural properties of GO. Two peaks were observed at 1345 cm−1 (D band) and 1581 cm−1 a (G band). The D (related to structural defects and amorphous carbon) to G (associated with the stretching of in-plane sp2carbons) intensity ratio (ID/IG) was 1.05. The Raman spectrum of the GO is consistent with previous reports [42,43].
On the other hand, the SEM image of the GO is depicted in Figure 2A to examine its structural morphology. As expected, a typical wrinkled, thin sheet-like morphology is shown for the surface of GO. For further support, the features of morphology and structure of the GO can be observed by high-resolution TEM. Figure 2B clearly shows the single-layer sheets containing flake-like wrinkles and rough surfaces. This microstructure gives the stability of GO nanosheets and prevents the collapse back into graphene structure, which provides a high surface area [44].
Figure 3 shows the UV–Visible absorption spectrum of the aqueous solution of GO nanosheets. The observed characteristic peak (230 nm) and shoulder (301 nm) are assigned to π→π* transition of aromatic C=C matrix of GO and n→π* transition of the oxygen lone pair of electron of the carbonyl group (C=O) in GO, respectively [38,40].
FT-IR spectroscopy is vital for describing functional moieties involved on GO’s surface. Figure 4 shows the site of absorption bands of functional groups in GO. The existence of broad stretching peaks at 3409 cm−1, 2925 cm−1, and 2857 cm−1 are stretching asymmetric and symmetric a hydroxyl (O–H) and C–H groups of GO matrix [38,39,40,45], respectively. Moreover, the C=O stretching peak of the carboxylic (COOH) group at 1724 cm−1, stretching band at 1626 cm−1 of aromatic C=C matrix of GO, and phenolic C–O deformation, stretching, and epoxy C–O–C stretching were recognized at 1387, 1224 and 1050 cm−1, respectively [38,39,40,46,47].

3.2. Electrochemical Behaviorof Nq

Figure 5 depicts the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 3.33 mM of Nq in 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.0) on the surface of GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. The results illustrated the reproducible reaction with both anodic and cathodic peaks, observed at potentials 0.25 and −0.11 V. Additionally, by increasing the number of cycles, the continuous growth of Nq film was obtained. The peak separation potential ΔEp = (Epa − Epc) was calculated to be 0.36 V (was higher than 0.059 V) as expected for a quasi-reversible system [48]. Then, the Nq/GCE behavior in 0.10 M PBS (pH 7.0) was examined under various scan rates ranging from 25 to 500 mV/s, as displayed in Figure 6. As can be observed, both anodic and cathodic peak currents gradually increased with a raised scan rate. Furthermore, the oxidative and reductive peak potentials shifted to more positive and negative values. This behavior indicated a surface-controlled process of the electrode reactions process for the organic film of Nq formation [41,49].

3.3. Voltammetric Determination of NIC

Figure 7 describes the CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) containing a bare GCE (a), the Nq/GCE (b), the GO/Nq/GCE (c), and the GO/GCE (d) at a scan rate of 100 mV/s. The results showed that the bare GCE (Figure 7, curve a) gave a poorly broad oxidation peak near 0.77 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) is ascribed to NIC oxidation. Meanwhile, in the case of Nq/GCE, GO/GCE, and GO/Nq/GCE, the peak potential of NIC oxidation appeared to be 0.85. 084 and 0.83 V, respectively, as exhibited in Figure 7 (curves b and c). The interpretation of the negative shift in the peak potential is due to the presence of both GO nanosheets and Nq films, which acted as electrocatalysts toward NIC oxidation, which accelerated the electron transfer rate. On the other hand, the usage of GO/Nq/GCE led to the enhancement and increase in the oxidation peak current of NIC by four-fold, compared to that which appeared at bar GCE. This is because the unique conjugation between the Nq film and nanosheets of GO increased the electroactive surface area that catalyzed NIC oxidation [26,27,28]. The absence of voltammetric response (peak) in the cathodic scan is attributed to the irreversibility of NIC oxidation as supported by the literature [24,50].

3.4. Effect of pH

The pH of the supporting electrolyte is considered an essential factor for the peak current (Ip). By examining the change of pH values from (2.0 to 9.0), it was observed that there are no current responses of NIC at a pH lower than 6.0. However, by increasing the pH value, the anodic peak of NIC increased until a maximum value was observed at pH 8.0, and then it decreased, as shown in Figure 8. This agrees with previous papers that prove that a neutral or slightly alkaline media were appropriate in the voltammetric determination of NIC [5,24]. On the other hand, the potential shifted towards less positive values by increasing the pH values, demonstrating proton participation in the oxidation process [51]. A plot of the oxidation peak potential vs. pH has three almost linear segments, and one is linear over the pH, ranging from 8.0 to 9.0 (inset Figure 8) and expressed by the following equation:
Ep(V) = 1.34 − 0.06 Ph  (R2 = 0.999)
The calculated slope of 60 mV is very close to the theoretical value (59 mV) of the Nernst equation. Therefore, the oxidation process of NIC on the surface of GO/Nq/GCE involves the same number of protons and electrons [52,53,54]. This segment of the curves (∼pH 8.0–9.0) is close to the pKa1 due to changes in protonation of the acid–base functions in the pyrrolidine moiety. As you know, NIC has pKa1 = 8.02, corresponding to the protonation of pyrrolidine nitrogen, and pKa2 = 3.12 of pyridine nitrogen [55]. The NIC oxidation process is pH-dependent, and subsequent measurements were carried out in a buffer with pH 8.0.

3.5. Effect of Scan Rate

To achieve the optimum conditions, the influence of scan rate on the peak current of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0)on the surface of the GO/Nq/GCE was investigated. The results demonstrated a linear increase in the peak current of NIC with the increase in scan rate from 5.0 to 100 mV/s, as illustrated in Figure 9. It can be observed that the potential peak shifts toward more positive values with increasing scan rate. Of course, this behavior was characteristic of an irreversible reaction [5,24]. To assess the oxidation process of NIC at the GO/Nq/GCE, a plot of the anodic peak current of NIC vs. square root of the scan rate was recorded (inset Figure 9). A straight linear relationship was obtained, indicating the oxidation reaction of NIC under a diffusion-controlled process and can be expressed as:
Ip(µA) = 6.117ʋ0.5 − 2.456  (R2 = 0.9984)
For more support, a linear relationship with a slope of 0.54 was obtained when plotting the log peak current versus log scan rate (inset Figure 9) and can be expressed by:
log Ip = 0.54 logʋ + 0.681  (R2 = 0.996)
The slope of the above relation (α = 0.54) is close to the theoretical value calculated, 0.5, as expected for a diffusion-controlled process [56,57,58].
On the other hand, the relation between Ip versus scan rate was studied, a linear relationship was found with correlation co efficient R2 = 0.996
Ip = 2.0ʋ − 23.3  (R2 = 0.996)
Moreover, Ep and Log scan rate was determined to inform the number of electron that contributed in the oxidation process of NIC on the surface ofGO/Nq/GCE as seen in Figure 10a,b.
According to the following equation, a linear relation was obtained with correlation co-efficient R2 = 99.6.
Ep = 0.00127 + 0.414logʋ (R2 = 0.997)
The number of electrons involved was calculated from the Laviron equation:
ΔE vs. Δlog(v) = 59/nα
where α is (the electron transfer coefficient) and n (refers to number of electrons). The calculated number of electrons were found to be (2.1). That is mean two electron was participated in the oxidation process of NIC. So the expected mechanism (Scheme 2) for the oxidation of NIC at the GO/Nq/GCE in alkaline media which involves substitution of CH3 group by OH at the nitrogen of pyrrolidine ring with formation of methanol by two protons and two electrons transfer [5,59].

3.6. Effect of Concentration and Calibration Curve

The DPV technique is the most appropriate technique used to examine the correlation between the peak current and the standard adding of NIC concentration, characterized by accurate electrochemical determination with a low detection limit and background current [59]. The parameters of DPV were optimized, and the influence of various NIC concentrations at the GO/Nq/GCE in 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH = 8.0) was examined. Figure 11 represents the increase in the peak current of NIC by successive standard additions of NIC concentration over the wide range from 6.5 to 245 µM. An excellent linear dependence of the peak current of NIC on its concentration in the same range is shown in Figure 11. The following regression line equation can represent the obtained calibration curve:
Ip(µA) = 0.016 (µM) + 0.573  (R2 = 0.9999)
The limit of detection (LOD) and quantification of NIC at the GO/Nq/GCE can be determined according to LOD = 3SD/b and LOQ = 10SD/b, respectively, where b is the slope of the calibration curve. SD is the standard deviation of Ip of NIC, estimated from the following equation [60].
SD = 1/(n − 2)Σ(Iexp − Ical)2
where Iexp is the experimental value of Ip, and Ical is the corresponding calculated value at the same concentration. The calculated LOD and LOQ of NIC at the proposed sensor were 12.7 and 42.4 nM, respectively.
Under the optimum conditions, the sensitivity of our modified sensor was tested. The comparison of the LOD and linearity range obtained in this work with previous reports with different modified electrodes was recorded. The comparison results are epitomized in Table 1. The lower LOD and good linearity range were achieved from the presented data, reflecting the efficiency and sensitivity our modified electrode toward lower concentration of NIC.

3.7. Chronoamperometric Measurements

The diffusion coefficient of NIC at the GO/Nq/GCE can be determined using the chronoamperometry method. Chronoamperograms were applied by setting the working electrode potential at 0.6 V with various concentrations of NIC (14–44 µM) in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH = 8.0) as represented in Figure 12. Plotting of I for various NIC concentrations against t−1 is depicted in Figure 12A. Then, the slopes of the resulting straight lines were plotted versus the different concentrations of NIC that were constructed inset Figure 12B. Using the obtained slope and applying the Cottrell equation [69],
I = nFAD1/2Cbπ−1/2t−1/2
where Cb (mol cm−3) is the bulk concentration, and D (cm2 s−1) is the diffusion coefficient, the other symbols have their usual meaning. The D value of NIC at the GO/Nq/GCE was determined to be 4.02 × 10−7 cm2/s is considered a satisfactory result.

3.8. Stability and Reproducibility

The viability of the GO/Nq/GCE could be evaluated by their stability and reproducibility towards the NIC determination. Therefore, Figure 13A shows the CVs of 3.5 mM NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) for 14 days, while the modified electrode was kept at 25 °C. The results indicate no significant change in the peak potential, and the peak current remains at 97.71% of its initial current response. Additionally, Figure 13B shows the reproducibility of the GO/Nq/GCE, taking five repetitive CVs’ measurements via the same optimized protocol. It was concluded that the relative standard deviation of RSD = 0.80% in peak current. The results indicated that the fabricated electrode exhibited good stability and high reproducibility.

3.9. Interference Study

An important parameter for a developed electrode is its selectivity towards the target analyte. The influence of some possible interferences on the determination of 3.5 mM NIC in 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE was examined. The tolerance limit was calculated as less than 5% of the relative error in this study. Figure 14 represents the results investigated from the current changes comparing the peak current of NIC only and the signal of NIC with the interfering substances. It is clear that 1000-fold concentration ratios of Na+, K+, Fe2+, Cl−, NO3−, and SO42−, 100-fold concentration ratios of glucose and L-cysteine, and 5-fold concentration ratios of pyridine, dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid did not interfere with the measurement of NIC. Additionally, there is no significant variation in the current response after adding 50-fold concentration ratios of urea, caffeine, and cotinine, a primary metabolite of NIC. These results prove the excellent selectivity of the developed sensor for the electrochemical determination of NIC in presences of other interferences.

3.10. Real Sample Analysis

Next, the content of NIC in a tobacco product and a urine sample was estimated using the GO/Nq/GCE under optimized DPV. Figure 15 depicts DPVs recorded for different concentrations of NIC standard solution, which was added to actual samples in 0.10 M Na2SO4. At the same time, the final NIC concentrations of 100, 110, 130, and 150 μM and the obtained results are shown in Table 2. As observed, good recoveries were obtained in the range of 99.44–100.33%. Therefore, the proposed sensor is capable of detecting NIC in actual and real samples.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we provide an electrochemical sensor used for the first time for NIC determination. The behavior of NIC was studied under optimum conditions. Using different voltammetric techniques such as Cyclic voltammetry. Differential pulse voltammetry and chronoamperometry. The sensor was built on GCE, modified by a layer film of Nq decorated by GO nanosheets. The GO nanosheets were prepared by the Hummers’ method and characterized by different techniques. The fabricated electrode provided a remarkable electrochemical activity toward the oxidation of NIC compared with either bar GCE and GCE modified by Nq. The unique conjugation between Nq and nanosheets of GO has significantly increased the electroactive surface area of the electrode toward NIC.
Additionally, the GO/Nq/GCE showed high stability, reproducibility, a lower detection limit of 12.7 nM, and a linear response range from 6.5 to 450 μM with R2 = 0.9999. The oxidation process of NIC is described as control diffusion. The reliable GO/Nq/GCE sensor was successfully applied for detecting NIC in the tobacco product and a urine sample.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, H.M.A.; investigation, M.A.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F.A.; H.M.A. and M.A.-E.; Funding acquisition, M.M.A.-K., A.G.A. and T.A.Y.; Investigation, H.F.A.; writing—review and editing, M.M.A.-K., A.G.A. and T.A.Y. authors designed the study, contributed to the revision of the drafts, and agreed on the final version to be submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University for funding this work through Research Group no. RG-21-09-72.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Alshaal, T.; Elhenawy, A.; Amer, M.; Shehata, A.; Paulsen, J.; Kleinwächter, M.; Selmar, D.; Taha, H. Contamination of Plant Foods with Nicotine: An Overview. DBG Reports. 2015. Available online: https://eprints.dbges.de/1088/ (accessed on 10 April 2022).
  2. Rahim, S.; Rauf, A.; Rauf, S.; Shah, M.R.; Malik, M.I. Enhanced electrochemical response of a modified glassy carbon electrode by poly (2-vinlypyridine-b-methyl methacrylate) conjugated gold nanoparticles for detection of nicotine. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 35776–35786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Scharenberg, F.; Stegemann, T.; Çiçek, S.S.; Zidorn, C. Sequestration of pyridine alkaloids anabasine and nicotine from Nicotiana (Solanaceae) by Orobanche ramosa (Orobanchaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2019, 86, 103908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marsh, A.; Clark, B.J.; Altria, K.D. Orthogonal separations of nicotine and nicotine-related alkaloids by various capillary electrophoretic modes. Electrophoresis 2004, 25, 1270–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kowalcze, M.; Jakubowska, M. Voltammetric determination of nicotine in electronic cigarette liquids using a boron-doped diamond electrode (BDDE). Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 103, 107710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hannisdal, A.; Mikkelsen, Ø.; Schrøder, K.H. Analysis of nicotine in antismoking pharmaceutical products by differential pulse polarography and voltammetry. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun. 2007, 72, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, L.; Xiong, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S. Electrochemical behaviors of nicotine and its interaction with DNA. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2129–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, C.-T.; Chen, P.-Y.; Chen, J.-G.; Suryanarayanan, V.; Ho, K.-C. Detection of nicotine based on molecularly imprinted TiO2-modified electrodes. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 633, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dushna, O.; Dubenska, L.; Plotycya, S.; Rydchuk, M.; Blazheyevskiy, M. The Alternative Voltammetric Method for the Determination of Nicotine and Its Metabolite Nicotine N-Oxide. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 16513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Banerjee, J.; Al-Wadei, H.A.N.; Schuller, H.M. Chronic nicotine inhibits the therapeutic effects of gemcitabine on pancreatic cancer in vitro and in mouse xenografts. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yu, C.-C.; Chang, Y.-C. Enhancement of cancer stem-like and epithelial—Mesenchymal transdifferentiation property in oral epithelial cells with long-term nicotine exposure: Reversal by targeting SNAIL. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 266, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suto, M.J.; Zacharias, N. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as drug targets. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2004, 8, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Newhouse, P.A.; Potter, A.; Kelton, M.; Corwin, J. Nicotinic treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Psychiatry 2001, 49, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Page-Sharp, M.; Hale, T.W.; Hackett, L.P.; Kristensen, J.H.; Ilett, K.F. Measurement of nicotine and cotinine in human milk by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet absorbance detection. J. Chromatogr. B 2003, 796, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Man, C.N.; Ismail, S.; Harn, G.L.; Lajis, R.; Awang, R. Determination of hair nicotine by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Figueiredo, E.C.; de Oliveira, D.M.; de Siqueira, M.E.P.B.; Arruda, M.A.Z. On-line molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction for the selective spectrophotometric determination of nicotine in the urine of smokers. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 635, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Xu, H.; Wu, L.; Sun, J.; Wang, L. A new spectrofluorometric method for the determination of nicotine base on the inclusion interaction of methylene blue and cucurbit [7] uril. Microchim. Acta 2009, 164, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Byrd, G.D.; Davis, R.A.; Ogden, M.W. A rapid LC-MS-MS method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in serum and saliva samples from smokers: Validation and comparison with a radioimmunoassay method. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2005, 43, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mitsubayashi, K.; Nakayama, K.; Taniguchi, M.; Saito, H.; Otsuka, K.; Kudo, H. Bioelectronic sniffer for nicotine using enzyme inhibition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 573, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.; Wu, J.-T.; Liu, Y.; Qi, X.-M.; Jin, H.-G.; Yang, C.; Liu, J.; Li, G.-L.; He, Q.-G. Recent advances in black phosphorus-based electrochemical sensors: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1170, 338480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, G.; Qi, X.; Zhang, G.; Wang, S.; Li, K.; Wu, J.; Wan, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q. Low-cost voltammetric sensors for robust determination of toxic Cd(II) and Pb(II) in environment and food based on shuttle-like α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles decorated β-Bi2O3 microspheres. Microchem. J. 2022, 179, 107515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giuliano, C.; Parikh, V.; Ward, J.R.; Chiamulera, C.; Sarter, M. Increases in cholinergic neurotransmission measured by using choline-sensitive microelectrodes: Enhanced detection by hydrolysis of acetylcholine on recording sites? Neurochem. Int. 2008, 52, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhou, N.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Liao, C.; Chen, L. A functional graphene oxide-ionic liquid composites–gold nanoparticle sensing platform for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of Hg2+. Analyst 2013, 138, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mehmeti, E.; Kilic, T.; Laur, C.; Carrara, S. Electrochemical determination of nicotine in smokers’ sweat. Microchem. J. 2020, 158, 105155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lakshmi, D.; Whitcombe, M.J.; Davis, F.; Sharma, P.S.; Prasad, B.B. Electrochemical detection of uric acid in mixed and clinical samples: A review. Electroanalysis 2011, 23, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Fu, L.; Lai, G.; Mahon, P.J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, D.; Jia, B.; Malherbe, F.; Yu, A. Carbon nanotube and graphene oxide directed electrochemical synthesis of silver dendrites. Rsc Adv. 2014, 4, 39645–39650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Y.; Kang, M.; Fang, S.; Wang, M.; He, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z. Electrochemical biosensor based on three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide and polyaniline nanocomposite for selective detection of mercury ions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 214, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, H.-S.; Li, T.-H.; Jia, W.-L.; Xu, H.-Y. Highly selective and sensitive determination of dopamine using a Nafion/carbon nanotubes coated poly (3-methylthiophene) modified electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 22, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, W.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, M.; Jiao, K. Electrochemical behaviors of hydroquinone on a carbon paste electrode with ionic liquid as binder. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008, 29, 915–920. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xue, Z.; Yin, B.; Wang, H.; Li, M.; Rao, H.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Lu, X. An organic indicator functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite-based colorimetric assay for the detection of sarcosine. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 5488–5496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abo-bakr, A.M.; Abd-Elsabour, M.; Abou-Krisha, M.M. An Efficient Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Simultaneous Determination of Vitamin C and Aspirin Based on a PMR/Zn-Al LDH/GCE. Electroanalysis 2021, 33, 2476–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rageh, H.M.; Abou-Krisha, M.M.; Abo-Bakr, A.M.; Abd-Elsabour, M. Electrochemical behavior and the detection limit of ascorbic acid on a Pt modified electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 4105–4115. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Muzyka, R.; Kwoka, M.; Smędowski, Ł.; Díez, N.; Gryglewicz, G. Oxidation of graphene by different modified Hummers methods. New Carbon Mater. 2017, 32, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dreyer, D.R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C.W.; Ruoff, R.S. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, T.-Y.; Zhang, D. Aqueous colloids of graphene oxide nanosheets by exfoliation of graphene oxide without ultrasonication. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011, 34, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Emiru, T.F.; Ayele, D.W. Controlled synthesis, characterization and reduction of graphene oxide: A convenient method for large scale production. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2017, 4, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Singh, R.K.; Kumar, R.; Singh, D.P. Graphene oxide: Strategies for synthesis, reduction and frontier applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 64993–65011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Neelakandan, S.; Noel Jacob, K.; Kanagaraj, P.; Sabarathinam, R.M.; Muthumeenal, A.; Nagendran, A. Effect of sulfonated graphene oxide on the performance enhancement of acid-base composite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 51599–51608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Toghan, A.; Abd-Elsabour, M.; Abo-Bakr, A.M. A novel electrochemical sensor based on EDTA-NQS/GC for simultaneous determination of heavy metals. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2021, 322, 112603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chaiyakun, S.; Witit-Anun, N.; Nuntawong, N.; Chindaudom, P.; Oaew, S.; Kedkeaw, C.; Limsuwan, P. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide nanosheets. Procedia Eng. 2012, 32, 759–764. [Google Scholar]
  43. Manavalan, S.; Govindasamy, M.; Chen, S.-M.; Rajaji, U.; Chen, T.-W.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Hemaid, F.M.A.; Elshikh, M.S.; Farah, M.A. Reduced graphene oxide supported raspberry-like SrWO4 for sensitive detection of catechol in green tea and drinking water samples. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 89, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Kang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A.; Lin, Y. Glucose biosensor based on immobilization of glucose oxidase in platinum nanoparticles/graphene/chitosan nanocomposite film. Talanta 2009, 80, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jing, Y.; Lin, E.; Su, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Yuan, X.; Ping, L.; Fan, Y. Electrodeposition of Au nanoparticles on poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) functionalized reduced graphene oxide sheets for voltammetric determination of nicotine in tobacco products and anti-smoking pharmaceuticals. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 26247–26253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, M.M.; Huang, L.J.; Wang, Y.X.; Tang, J.G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.C.; Liu, G.F.; Zhang, Y.; Kipper, M.J.; Wickramasinghe, S.R. Reduced graphene oxide–gold nanoparticle membrane for water purification. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. You, Z.; Fu, Y.; Xiao, A.; Liu, L.; Huang, S. Magnetic molecularly imprinting polymers and reduced graphene oxide modified electrochemical sensor for the selective and sensitive determination of luteolin in natural extract. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 102990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohammadi, S.Z.; Beitollahi, H.; Dehghan, Z.; Hosseinzadeh, R. Electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, uric acid and folic acid using carbon paste electrode modified with novel synthesized ferrocene derivative and core–shell magnetic nanoparticles in aqueous media. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rageh, H.; Abdel-sabour, M. Pharmaceutical electrochemistry: The electrochemical behaviour of paracetamol at ZnO nanoparticales/1, 2-napthaquinone-4-sulphonic acid glassy carbon modified electrode. Anal Bioanal Electrochem. 2017, 9, 351–364. [Google Scholar]
  50. Suffredini, H.B.; de Santos, M.C.; De Souza, D.; Codognoto, L.; Homem-de-Mello, P.; Honório, K.M.; Da Silva, A.B.F.; Machado, S.A.S.; Avaca, L.A. Electrochemical behavior of nicotine studied by voltammetric techniques at boron-doped diamond electrodes. Anal. Lett. 2005, 38, 1587–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Levent, A.; Yardim, Y.; Senturk, Z. Voltammetric behavior of nicotine at pencil graphene electrode and its enhancement determination in the presence of anionic surfactant. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 55, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khodari, M.; Rabie, E.M.; Assaf, H.F. A new electrochemical sensor based on TiO2 nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode for voltammetric determination of phenol. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 1501–1505. [Google Scholar]
  53. Švorc, Ľ.; Stanković, D.M.; Kalcher, K. Boron-doped diamond electrochemical sensor for sensitive determination of nicotine in tobacco products and anti-smoking pharmaceuticals. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2014, 42, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Assaf, H.F.; Salah, H.; Hashem, N.; Khodari, M.; Toghan, A. Fabrication of an electrochemical sensor based on copper waste wire recycling and its application. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 112962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, S.S.; Smetena, I. Evaluation of capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of nicotine and selected minor alkaloids from tobacco. Chromatographia 1995, 40, 375–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Swain, G.M. Solid electrode materials: Pretreatment and activation. In Handbook of Electrochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 111–153. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nicholson, R.S.; Shain, I. Theory of Stationary Electrode Polarography. Single Scan and Cyclic Methods Applied to Reversible, Irreversible, and Kinetic Systems. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 706–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rabie, E.M.; Assaf, H.F.; Shamroukh, A.A.; Khodari, M. Fabrication of a New Electrochemical Sensor Based on Carbon Paste Electrode Modified by Silica gel/MWCNTs for the Voltammetric Determination of Salicylic Acid in Tomato. Egypt. J. Chem. 2019, 62, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Highton, L.; Kadara, R.O.; Jenkinson, N.; Logan Riehl, B.; Banks, C.E. Metallic free carbon nanotube cluster modified screen printed electrodes for the sensing of nicotine in artificial saliva. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 2387–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miller, J.C.; Miller, J.N. Basic statistical methods for analytical chemistry. Part, I. Statistics of repeated measurements. A review. Analyst 1988, 113, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karthika, A.; Karuppasamy, P.; Selvarajan, S.; Suganthi, A.; Rajarajan, M. Electrochemical sensing of nicotine using CuWO4 decorated reduced graphene oxide immobilized glassy carbon electrode. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 55, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lo, T.W.B.; Aldous, L.; Compton, R.G. The use of nano-carbon as an alternative to multi-walled carbon nanotubes in modified electrodes for adsorptive stripping voltammetry. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 162, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bai, H.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, G. A pH-sensitive graphene oxide composite hydrogel. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2376–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jing, Y.; Yu, B.; Li, P.; Xiong, B.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Xiao, X.; Chen, M.; Chen, L. Synthesis of graphene/DPA composite for determination of nicotine in tobacco products. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Sims, M.J.; Rees, N.V.; Dickinson, E.J.F.; Compton, R.G. Effects of thin-layer diffusion in the electrochemical detection of nicotine on basal plane pyrolytic graphene (BPPG) electrodes modified with layers of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-BPPG). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 144, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Geto, A.; Amare, M.; Tessema, M.; Admassie, S. Voltammetric Determination of Nicotine at Poly (4-Amino-3-Hydroxynaphthalene Sulfonic Acid)-Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electroanalysis 2012, 24, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kassa, H.; Geto, A.; Admassie, S. Voltammetric determination of nicotine in cigarette tobacco at electrochemically activated glassy carbon electrode. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2013, 27, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jing, Y.; Yuan, X.; Yuan, Q.; He, K.; Liu, Y.; Lu, P.; Li, H.; Li, B.; Zhan, H.; Li, G. Determination of nicotine in tobacco products based on mussel-inspired reduced graphene oxide-supported gold nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 02354 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of GO using modified Hummers’ method.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of GO using modified Hummers’ method.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 sch001
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) XRD and (B) Raman spectra of the synthesized GO.
Figure 1. (A) XRD and (B) Raman spectra of the synthesized GO.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g001
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) SEM and (B) TEM images of the synthesized GO nanosheets.
Figure 2. (A) SEM and (B) TEM images of the synthesized GO nanosheets.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g002
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g003 550
Figure 3. UV-Visible spectrum curve of the aqueous solution of GO nanosheets (0.0023g GO in 4.5 mL distilled H2O).
Figure 3. UV-Visible spectrum curve of the aqueous solution of GO nanosheets (0.0023g GO in 4.5 mL distilled H2O).
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g003
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g004 550
Figure 4. FT-IR spectrum curve of GO in KBr disc.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectrum curve of GO in KBr disc.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g004
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g005 550
Figure 5. CVs of 3.33 mM of Nq in 0.10 M of PBS (pH 7.0) at the GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Figure 5. CVs of 3.33 mM of Nq in 0.10 M of PBS (pH 7.0) at the GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g005
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g006 550
Figure 6. CVs of the Nq/GCE in 0.10 M of PBS (pH 7.0) at various scan rates (a to i: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500 mV/s).
Figure 6. CVs of the Nq/GCE in 0.10 M of PBS (pH 7.0) at various scan rates (a to i: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, and 500 mV/s).
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g006
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g007 550
Figure 7. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4(pH 8.0) at (a) a bare GCE, (b) the Nq/GCE, and (d) the GO/GCE (c) the GO/Nq/GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Figure 7. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4(pH 8.0) at (a) a bare GCE, (b) the Nq/GCE, and (d) the GO/GCE (c) the GO/Nq/GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g007
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g008 550
Figure 8. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 of various pH values: (6.0, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s. (inset Figure 8) A relation between pH versus both oxidation peak potential and oxidation peak current of NIC.
Figure 8. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 of various pH values: (6.0, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s. (inset Figure 8) A relation between pH versus both oxidation peak potential and oxidation peak current of NIC.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g008
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g009 550
Figure 9. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with various scan rates (a to g: 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mV/s).
Figure 9. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with various scan rates (a to g: 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mV/s).
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g009
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) The relation between oxidation peak potential of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE versus Log scan rate. (b) The relation between peak current of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE versus scan rate.
Figure 10. (a) The relation between oxidation peak potential of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE versus Log scan rate. (b) The relation between peak current of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE versus scan rate.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g010
Nanomaterials 12 02354 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Probable electrochemical oxidation mechanism of NIC.
Scheme 2. Probable electrochemical oxidation mechanism of NIC.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 sch002
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g011 550
Figure 11. DPVs of 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) containing different concentrations of NIC: (a to l: 6.5, 15, 25, 33.5, 56.5, 80, 100, 128, 138.5, 172.5, 210, and 245 µM) at the GO/Nq/GCE. Inset shows the corresponding calibration curve.
Figure 11. DPVs of 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) containing different concentrations of NIC: (a to l: 6.5, 15, 25, 33.5, 56.5, 80, 100, 128, 138.5, 172.5, 210, and 245 µM) at the GO/Nq/GCE. Inset shows the corresponding calibration curve.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g011
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g012 550
Figure 12. Chronoamperograms were obtained at the GO/Nq/GCE in 0.1 M of Na2SO4(pH 8.0) for different concentrations of NIC (a to d: 14, 22, 33, and 44 µM). Insets: (A) a plot of I vs. t−1/2, the (B) plot of the slope of straight lines vs. NIC concentration.
Figure 12. Chronoamperograms were obtained at the GO/Nq/GCE in 0.1 M of Na2SO4(pH 8.0) for different concentrations of NIC (a to d: 14, 22, 33, and 44 µM). Insets: (A) a plot of I vs. t−1/2, the (B) plot of the slope of straight lines vs. NIC concentration.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g012
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g013 550
Figure 13. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s for 14 days (A) and five repetitive CVs measurements (B).
Figure 13. CVs of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE with a scan rate of 100 mV/s for 14 days (A) and five repetitive CVs measurements (B).
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g013
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g014 550
Figure 14. Measurements of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE in the presence of the tolerance limit of foreign species.
Figure 14. Measurements of 3.5 mM of NIC in 0.10 M Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) at the GO/Nq/GCE in the presence of the tolerance limit of foreign species.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g014
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g015 550
Figure 15. DPVs were recorded at the GO/Nq/GCE upon the addition of known concentrations of NIC (a to d: 100, 110, 130, and 150 µM) in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) with a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Inset shows the corresponding calibration curve.
Figure 15. DPVs were recorded at the GO/Nq/GCE upon the addition of known concentrations of NIC (a to d: 100, 110, 130, and 150 µM) in 0.1 M of Na2SO4 (pH 8.0) with a scan rate of 100 mV/s. Inset shows the corresponding calibration curve.
Nanomaterials 12 02354 g015
Table
Table 1. Comparison between our detection limit with the same techniques using different working electrodes.
Table 1. Comparison between our detection limit with the same techniques using different working electrodes.
TechniqueWorking ElectrodeLOD
(M)		Linear Range (µM)Ref.
DPVSPCE0.6 × 10−61–375[24]
AmpCuWO4/rGO/Nf/GCE3.5 × 10−80.1–0.9[61]
CVMWCNTs/CuNPs6.0 × 10−91–1000[62]
DPVPoly(ARS)-GR/SPCE4.6 × 10−630–1000[63]
DPVRGO/DPA/PGE7.60 × 10−631–1900[64]
CVMWCNT-BPPG1.50 × 10−610–1000[65]
SWVp-AHNSA/GCE0.90 × 10−61–200[66]
SWVEA/GCE0.70 × 10−61–200[67]
SWVCNC/SPCE2.00 × 10−610–1000[59]
AmpPDA-RGO/Au/GCE1.50 × 10−80.05–500[68]
DPVGO/Nq/GCE1.27 × 10−86.5–245This work
Table
Table 2. Detection of NIC in practical samples at the GO/Nq/GCE.
Table 2. Detection of NIC in practical samples at the GO/Nq/GCE.
SampleAdded
(µM)		Founded
(µM)		Recovery
(%)
Cigarette0.021.13–
5070.7399.44
100121.53100.33
Urine5050.07100.14
10099.6399.63
200199.499.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abd-Elsabour, M.; Alsoghier, H.M.; Alhamzani, A.G.; Abou-Krisha, M.M.; Yousef, T.A.; Assaf, H.F. A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Nicotine in Tobacco Products Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Conjugated with (1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulphonic Acid) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142354

AMA Style

Abd-Elsabour M, Alsoghier HM, Alhamzani AG, Abou-Krisha MM, Yousef TA, Assaf HF. A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Nicotine in Tobacco Products Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Conjugated with (1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulphonic Acid) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(14):2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abd-Elsabour, M., Hesham M. Alsoghier, Abdulrahman G. Alhamzani, Mortaga M. Abou-Krisha, Tarek A. Yousef, and Hytham F. Assaf. 2022. "A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Nicotine in Tobacco Products Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Conjugated with (1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulphonic Acid) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode" Nanomaterials 12, no. 14: 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142354

APA Style

Abd-Elsabour, M., Alsoghier, H. M., Alhamzani, A. G., Abou-Krisha, M. M., Yousef, T. A., & Assaf, H. F. (2022). A Novel Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Nicotine in Tobacco Products Based on Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Conjugated with (1,2-Naphthoquinone-4-Sulphonic Acid) Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Nanomaterials, 12(14), 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop